20090266 Ver 10_2023 PCN supporting docs_20231031

PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO.
STREET ADDRESS
AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
PLAN NO. PARCEL ID 4679517312
1721 Water Way Road, Greenville, NC 27834
Please print:
Property Owner: Greenville Utilities Commission
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Ms. Keven Arrance
(Contractor / Agent)
, of Hazen and Sawyer
(Name of Consulting Firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
3355 NC-43, Greenville, NC 27834
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Date:
Authorized Signature
Date: �//3/Z Z

Arrance, Keven
From: Arrance, Keven
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 9:29 PM
To: 401 [e-mail]
Subject: 401 Pre -filing Meeting Request
Please fill out the following information:
Project Name: Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement
County: Pitt
Applicant Name: Greenville Utilities Commission, attn: J. Scott Farmer, P.E.
Applicant Email: [e-mail]

10/26/23, 11:55 AM
IPaC
IPaC: Explore Location resources
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources)
under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below.
The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by
activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires
gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities)
information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined
project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Pitt County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
[phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, INC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, INC 27606-1487
Foy`
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5U HVM62B E RPD LT6ZGJ N WQ W WY/resources 1 /10

10/26/23, 11:55AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for
species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that
area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by
reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not
guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary information whether any species which is listed
or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed
by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an
official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website and request an official species list by d 'ng
the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so). 40(
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species? and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of thI.S. Fish and ildlife Service (USFWS) and the
fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries)
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for
species under their jurisdiction. k L:n %opf
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows species that are candidates, or proposed,
for listing. See the listing status page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals C)\
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myot septentrionalis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https-//eco.s.fws.gov/ecp/�Species/776
STATUS
Endangered
Proposed Endangered
Threatened
Marine mammal
STATUS
SAT
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5U HVM62B E RPD LT6ZGJ N WQ W WY/resources 2/10

10/26/23, 11:55 AM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location overlaps the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ec ss.fws.gov/ecp/species/Sl64
Tar River Spinymussel Parvaspina steinstansana
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http5://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Critical habitats
STATUS
Threatened
STATUS
Threatened
Endangered
114
STATUS tililAxo\
C to 'N Ilk
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered species themselves.
This location overlaps the critical habitat for the following species:
NAME � TYPE
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Final
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772#crithab
e 11( %wo,
Bald & Golden Eagles
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act' and the Migratory Bird Treaty Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or golden eagles, or their habitats3, should
follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Managment httpsLwww.fws.gQv//program/eagle-man agement
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds httpsL//www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC http2-//w ww.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-
and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
There are bald and/or golden eagles in your project area.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your
list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5U HVM62B E RPD LT6ZGJ N WQ W WY/resources 3/10

10/26/23, 11:55AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the
Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or
activities.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information
can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (m)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of
the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the
corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided
by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of
presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20
for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative
probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall
between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over b
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which -the blhtd ee across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars
shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid
cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, si y over your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having <�aWlk, Jere no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the
Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
44111114
SPECI
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC Vulnerable
JAN FEB MAR APR
1111111111111111 loll RTTT 11.11
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1111 11+1 Tr11T TTTT ITTT TTTI 1111 1111
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified location?
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKIN data is based on a growing collection of survey,,
banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply).
To see a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs of bald and golden eagles in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of LISFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other species that may warrant special attention in your project
location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),. The AKIN data is based on a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)
which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your
project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5UHVM62BERPDLT6ZGJNWQWWY/resources 4/10

10/26/23, 11:55 AM
What if I have eagles on my list?
IPaC: Explore Location resources
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Please contact
your local Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office if you have questions.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should
follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gQv//program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-
and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or
warrant special attention in your project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is
generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be
found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area,
visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic
Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly
interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your
list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA
https.//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bald Eagle Haliae6tus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention because of the
Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or
activities.
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
http5://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
httpi//ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Mar 1 to Jul 15
Breeds Apr 26 to jul 20
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Breeds elsewhere
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5U HVM62B E RPD LT6ZGJ N WQ W WY/resources 5/10

10/26/23, 11:55AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA
Short -billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 tojul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
Probability of Presence Summary %
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present i o r project area. This information
can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (m)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during a particular week of
the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the presence score if the
corresponding survey effort is also high. J00%
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
f
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the week where the species was detected divided
by the total number of survey events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence is calculated. This is the probability of
presence divided by the maximum probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20
for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative
probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical conversion so that all possible values fall
between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars
shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid
cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the
Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5U HVM62B E RPD LT6ZGJ N WQW WY/resources 6/10

10/26/23, 11:55AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel I +A11 111' III ++1+ ++}� ,+++ +1+1
BCC -BCR
Bald Eagle Non -BCC Vulnerable I i1 1111 1_ ■_ "1 "11 �$+1 h I I I 1++1 6111 +11/ 1 1 1.1 g111 IIN
_ ■NEL
Brown -headed Nuthatch BCC -BCR 111+
--
Cerulean warbler ++++ ++++ }} I � I I � � � � I I I I I ++}+ ++++ +1}+ I I I I
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Chimney Swift ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Lesser Yellowlegs ++++ ++++ }} I I I I I 1*++ ++++ ++++ ++I1 1+++ ++}+ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Pectoral Sandpiper ++++ ++++ ++++ + I }+ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++1 1+$+ ++}+ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prairie Warbler ++++ ++++ +++I 1 1 I I ++++ I I I +1+++}+ ++}+ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Prothonotary Warbler TI +++ ++++ +++, 1111 ++}+ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON) ■■
Red-headed Woodpecker +++� ++++ }++ IN TF I I ++ +++I IN$+ ++}+ +1 + ++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Rusty Blackbird BCC -BCR +++l +*++ }++0 ++0+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++}+ + ++++ ++++
Short -billed Dowitcher I +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++I }+ + ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON) T
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL G SEP OCT NOV DEC
Wood Thrush ++++ ++++ }+++ ++}0 mill "11 ++01+ IN}+ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation ofthese
measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any
active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project
area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the
type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC). and other species that may warrant special attention in your project
location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),. The AKN data is based on a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s)
which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
re$Girements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your
project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived
from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence
graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the
RAIL Tool and look at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory
bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe
specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5U HVM62B E RPD LT6ZGJ N WQW WY/resources 7/10

10/26/23, 11:55 AM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the
Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for
non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this
list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize
migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of bird species within your project area off the
Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in
your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may
not include this information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or
Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is
generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap
your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the
existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence
score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence
of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in
knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ 'Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the
bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
be 1 0'?4*111-
10�0 \
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5UHVM62BERPDLT6ZGJ N WQ W WY/resources 8/10

10/26/23, 11:55 AM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Marine mammals
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also protected under the Endangered Species Acti and
the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
[responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears, manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries2 [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins,
and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this list; for additional information on those
species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take (to harass, hunt, capture, kill, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture or kill) of marine
mammals and further coordination may be necessary for project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office
shown.
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973.
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade
in plants and animals does not threaten their survival in the wild.
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are potentially affected by activities in this
location:
NAME
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
Facilities
WA Vkt##
rqov
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by
the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other
State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update our NWI data set. We recommend you
verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1/2C
RIVERINE
R2UBH
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5UHVM62BERPDLT6ZGJNWQWWY/resources 9/10

10/26/23, 11:55AM IPaC: Explore Location resources
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI
data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information on the location, type and size of these
resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or
classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and
the amount of ground truth verification work conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping
problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or
classifications between the information depicted on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect
wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal
waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go
undetected by aerial imagery. f
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory.
There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to
establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or
adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies con rning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary
jurisdictions that may affect such activities.0'?4*A- co
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/XZ5U HVM62B E RPD LT6ZGJ N WQ W WY/resources 10/10

� �
o
� {
.
■
z
.
$
2
a
,
e
\�
g
w
, f / -
|
J
■ e
/� � �
e
«
§
E
°°ll&uns f
�Qub� ��
q a
lb -if �
+ �
+
�
,
�r
r9
y
c
_
I
y pay y� a « �
%
■
~~�
4-�%w
f
E
;
-
�(
Rf
�\
/}
�
%k
*
«f
cf
cq
I3
CO
)
)
t
f%
/
ZLU
�(
�
LU
/
0
00
/
3g
)(
\
)
2
±
\
\
IA)
77k
\
/
j
®
{
/
\
)
m
❑
g
§
�
@
e
/
}
�
/
q
/
{
\
k
\
!
/
/
3
$
$
\
j
]
o
/
\
)
�
§
ƒ
o
7
q
q
\
=
I
o 7
S
?
0
2 $
�
k
■
�
2
2
¥

EXISTING
CONCRETE
RETAINING
WALL "I _
LIMITS OF -
RIP -RAP TO BE
REMOVED AND REPLACED IN
KIND [TYP) ,r+
SEE DRAWING'J
010-CA2 FOR
HEADER SYSTEM
__-DETAIly9 .,
~ FLOW TRAJNING VANE ITYP S7I
(SEE DETAI ,
AND DI GO-C-0Q F
I
CONFIGURATION)
1p
APPROXIM
RIP -RAP ISI
EIOOO-C-03)
15
-20
O+DO
KEY NOTES:
NO.
DESCRIPTION
10
3D' X 30" 45-DEGREE SEND, RJ X RJ
_ _
O
39' X 30" 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
fi
O3
30' X 30' 45-DEGREE SEND, RJ X RJ
- FIELD L K CRA9l�T
TEST PLUG-
30" X 30" 45-DEGREE BEND, PJ X RJ
t 7
30' X 30' 45-DEGREE SEND, RJ X RJ
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION {TYP)
30' X 30' 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
t
.)J
�
L'J
30" X 30" 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
I,'.•.`
I�
30' X 30' 45-DEGREE KENO, RJ X RJ
19
10
9O
30" X 30' 22.5-DEGREE SEND, PE X RJ
�
d,
10
30' X 30' 22.5-DEGREE BEND, PE X RJ
30" PIPES
2u.o• C_C.
11
30" X 30' 22.5-DEGREE SEND, RJ X RJ
30" X 30" 45-DEGREE BEND, RJ X RJ
INTAKE SCREEN WI FLANGED
- _
CONNECTION
INTAKE SCREEN WI FLANGED
-
CONNECTION
INTAKE SCREEN WI FLANGED
-
CONNECTION
_
98
INTAKE SCREEN WI FLANGED
'•._�
SEE DETAIL
CONNECTION
f SMOD-003 FOR
PROPOSED
77
Y"AIR BUBBLE LINES LOCATED a 30' BFV's OPERATOR.
INTAKE SECTION
BOTH OPERATORS TO SOUTH SIDE OF VALVE _
• APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF
RIP -TRAP (SEE DETAIL
18
30" MJ BUTTERFLY VALVE
- DMOD-W)
`-
19
30" MJ BUTTERFLY VALVE
TOP OF BANK
EXI5TING GRADE MP)
PROPOSED GRADE 12:1y
1
STA. 4-46.76
I E REE
INTAKE SCREENS
STA. 4+-5504
(SEE SHEET
INTAKE SCREEN
42' HEADER SYSTEM
000-C-03 FOR
STA 4t57,21
(SEE DRAWING 01O C-02)
WATER
ACIF
INTAKE SECTION)
INTAKE SCREEN
ABLE)
CO(VAF
$TA, 411
7 $
INTAKE
3
4
B 5
9
'
INTAKE -
'= II AKEPIPE#2.STA.
(�TA
30' INTAKE
PIPE (TYP. OF 2)
3+01.720-
t1A
=NIJ45°
BEND
11
d
34,02.75
STA
14.00STA.
APPROXIMATE
0
45, BEND
45' BEND [
O1M1
12
STA. 9
45°
.07
BEND
-BOTTOM --13.
45' BEND
45' BEND
45' BEND (
)
I -
-
INTAKE PIPE ALI
- -
$7A.d+15.
STA.
d5' BEND
9
4s` KENO
P)
P}
0I-50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50
PROFILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE! 1' = 30'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1' • 5'
5410 TOnfty Road
Palisades II, Suite 320
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
(919)2.33-917$
NC License No, F-0785
LINE IS 21NCHES
EXTERNAL REFERENCE FILES
A7 Futl SIRE
[IF NDT Y-9GLE ACCORDNBLYI
DESIGNED: C SANDT
ts�ttluc•oor.-ocauc
T34Qg1Aprpgl.tlwp _ ___
DRAWN; M MENDEZ
CHECKED: RTEEM
CHECKED: R CARRIER
APPROVED:
3+00 3+60 4+D0 4+50
`'INICAIITI
�qH LARD
YESSF
D32259
T Na
� HOln�,.t�'
C
REVISIONS
DESCRIPDON
10
NORTHING
690MO26
BKM5.06
690M 70
690213.77
6e0074.35
690072.81
690005.00
6B9981.32
689994.17
866976.08
689985.7
689970.56
889981.68
EASTING
24749W-73
2474994.01
2474969.52
247496323
2475096.59
2475091 AS
2475064.41
2476066.99
2476071.00
2475W 55
2475084.35
2475073.76
2475030.38
68OD55-N
2475023.88
5S9938.97
2475034AS
6SM33.68
2475028.39
669978.69 2475083.75
889996.76 2475074 4
5 APPROVE©
North Carolina ETlvircri ental
markwment Commission
DM21101n Of Water Resources
Dow 09113 19
e
PllTlml1# 09-D266 VF
319
:REEN
;KEEN =-7,V MSL
-10
LIVER
' MSL
-15
ik'=-1fi.75' MSL
-20
5+00
GENERAL NOTES:
ELEVATION (MSL)
1. ALL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO EXISTING PUMP STATION STRUCTURE
AND EXISTING PUMP STATION INTERIOR IS BASED ON RECORD DRAWINGS
BY OLSEN ASSOCIATES, INC., DATED JULY, 1980.
CL = -7.00'
2. PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE THESE GENERAL NOTES, SEE
CL = -7,W
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL RECUI REMENTS. SPECIFIC NOTES AND
DETAILS ON DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER GENERAL NOTES AND
CL = -7.00'
TYPICAL DETAILS.
CL - -7.OD'
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ADEQUATE PRECAUTIONS TO ENSURE THE
SAFETY OF WORKERS AND VISITORS TO THE SITE, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO ACCE 5S RESTRICTIONS, PROPER PERSONAL PROTECTIVE
CL = -7.DIY
EQUIPMENT, SAFETY MEETINGS AND TRAINING, WARNING SIGNS AND
BARRIERS, SHORING, AND BRACING. COMPLY WITH ALL FEDERAL, STATE.
CL - -7.0T
AND LOCAL SAFETY CODES AND STANDARDS.
CL • -7.00'
4. ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SWILL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF
GREENVILLE MANUAL OF STANDARD DE5IONS AND DETAILS (MSpDI,
CL - -7,00'
5. THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE DEPICTED
CL = •7,00
ACCURATELY AND THAT UTILITIES IN ADDITION TO THOSE SHOWN WILL NOT
BE ENCOUNTERED. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING
CL = -7.DO
LOCATION OF BURIED UTILITIES BEFORE CONDUCTING ANY EXCAVATION
WORK_ CONTRACTOR MUS7 NOTIFY NC-ONE•CALL (1-BM-532-4W OR S11)
CL=-15.75
AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF EXCAVATION OR TRENCHING
TO HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED.
CL = 4E_75
S. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF EXISTING PIPE
MATERIALS, PIPE LOCATION, PIPE SITE AND DEPTH. CONTRACTOR SMALL
CL =-7.00'
PREPARE FOR AND PERFORM DISCOVERY DIGS AHEAD OF CONSTRUCTION
CONNECTIONS OF SUCH VERIFICATIONS. TIME AND SCHEDiII E FOR
CONSTRUCTION SHALL ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR SUCH DISCOVERY
CL = .7.W
WORK A MINIMUM OF TEN 110) WORKING DAYS BEFORE CONNECTION IS
SCHEDULED TO BE CONSTRUCTED. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED
IMMEDIATELY OF ANY REQUIRED CHANGES
CL = -7,00'
7. DESIGN AND LAYOUTS OF UTILITIES SHOWN ON DRAWINGS ARE SCHEMATIC
ONLY. POINTS OF CONNECTION SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS,
BUT INTERM EDI ATE ROUTING SHALL BE DETERMINED ON THE MOST
CL = -7.O0'
SUITABLE LOCATION TO ALLOW NEW UTI LI7I ES TO AVOID, PASS OVER, OR
PASS UNDER EXISTING UTILITIES AS VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE
CONTRACTOR
a- REQUIRED UTILITY RELOCATIONS ARE NOT NECESSARILY IDENTI FLED. ANY
RELOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY
THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RE51FONSIBLE FOR
RELOCATING EXISTING UTILITIES THAT INTERFERE WITH THE INSTALLATION
OF NEW UTILITIES, AND TO OTHERWISE DEFINE A ROUTING FOR ALL NEW
UTILr11ES QVER UNDER, OR AROUND THE REMAINING EXISTING UTILITIES.
THE CONTRACTOR $HALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED
WITH THE RELOCATION OF E]USTING UTILITIES
9. BURIED POWER LINES EXIST WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OR LESS
THAN TEN FEET OUTSIDE THE IJMITS.
10. CONTROL DATUM:
TBM Nt
N - 690464.66, E • 2474992.51 - SOLT ON TOP FLANGE OF FIRE HYDRANT
ELEVATION - 2S.25' (M$L)
T8M R2
N=e90%9.93, E�,475047.36 - NW CORNER OF CONCRETE PAD
ELEVATION = 29.9W {MSL}
11. ALL COORDINATES FOR PROPOSED SrTE ARE AT GRADE LEVEL AND
OUTSIDE FACE OF STRUCTURE, PIPE CENTERLINE, OR TOP OF CONCRETE
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
12. FOR SITE REMOVAL ITEMS SEE DRAWING OTO-C-Oi.
13. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS FROM THE
STATE AND CORPS FOR ANY WETLAN6IRIVER DISTURBANCE PRIOR TO ANY
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
14. SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 01014 FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE.
15. EXISTING PUMPING STATION SHALL REMAIN IN SERVICE AT ALL TIMES
DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPECT AND MATCH PROVIBIO74S FOR RAPIDLY
FLUCTUATING GROUND WATER AND SURFACE WATER. DEWA7ERING OF
THE CONS7RUCTI ON SITE IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RE5PONSI6ILFiY AND
SHALL CONFIRM TOICOMPLY WITH ALL REGULATORY PROVISIONS.
17. RESTORE SITE TO EXISTING GRADES AT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION.
18. TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY FOR RECORD DRAWINGS COMPLETED BY CH
ENGINEERING, INC. ON 071DN1010 AND I VOV41 D, SUPPUMENTED WITH
SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY BROWN AND CALDWELL ON 090512010.
m
11]
TY
r7
RECORD DRAWINGS
THIS RECORD DRAWING WA8 PREPARED USING "FORMATION REPORTED TO BROWN AND ru nw=T
AND CONTAINS ONLY THE STANDARD AND CUSTOMARY LEVEL OF OETA _ THE INFORMATION WAS NOT
INDEPENDENTLY FIELD VERIFIED. THERE IS NO ONGOING PROGRAM TO UPDATE THE DRAWINGS TO , N
REFLECT CHANGES SUBSEQUENT TO THE DATE INDICATED. THEREFORE, TM DRAWING IS NOT
CERTIFIED DOCUMENT AS TO THE ORIGINAL DOCu1&N7 BUT ONLY A9 TO THE RECORD DRAWING
CHMOE9.
THIS DOCUMENT ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND SEIu-ED BY ROBERT A TEEM, N.CPJE. O37289, DATED JUNE2
Mo. mmwhan beIm
THE REAL OF ROBERT A. TEEM. N.C.P,E. G9 M COVFIIB ONLY RECORD DRAWING CHANGES MWDE TO Call Y dig
THESE DRAWINGS DURING CONSTRUCTION.NT DOCLIMEED THROUGH PART THE OBSERVATION BY THE 'r�
ENGINEER AND FORMALLY RECORDED BY THE MNTRACTOR.
GREENVILLE UTILITIES COMMISSION FILENAME
RAW WATER PUMPING STATION IMPROVEMENTS 134891-0IDL-03
Greenville 8C PROJECT NUMBER
734891
CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER
L Utilities PLAN AND PROFILE MAWINGNUMaER
GREENVILLE UTILITIES CQ9MISSION PROPOSED INTAKE PIPING 01 O_C_d3
POST OFFICE SOX 1847
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 27935 SHEET NUMBER

z GREENVILLE UTILITIES COMMISSION
DETAIL K'
GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
`�
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
"'ECTio' o=
SECTION iiTLE
2--SHEET NUS -I
-i PICAL SECTION KEY
GRAPHIC SCALE GUIDE FOR
HALF -SCALE DRAWINGS
2E
RAW WATER PUMP STATION
AND INTAKE STRUCTURE
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET NO.
DESCRIPTION
COVER SHEET
�
r. N RAFN R
OVERALL SITE PLAN
ICI I _ONTf�RACT _SP-1
C-1
GRADING PLAN AND STAKING PLAN
C-2
OPERATING LEVEL AND PIPING
GALLERY PLAN VIEWS
C-3
PLAN VIEW -WET WELLS
C - 4
SECTION THRU INTAKE STRUCTURE
C-5
SECTION THRU WET WELLS
C - 6
MISC. DETAILS
C - 7
MISC. DETAILS -STRUCTURAL REINF'G.
C-8
INTAKE SCREEN MOUNTING-MISC. DETAILS
A-1
PLAN. ELEVATIONS, WALL SECTIONS , DETAILS
A-2
DETAILS
_ . _...
RPW WATER PLf+P STATION l
AhD NTN(E STRUCTURE \
5 �%r
(L1 ELECTRICAL CONTRACT
E-1
SITE PLAN, MECH EQUIP 8 GROUND GRID PLAN,
& SYMBOL SCHEDULE
E-2
OPERATING LEVEL & PIPING GALLERY
ELECTRICAL PLANS
E-3
MOTOR CONTROL CENTER MCC -'A', PANEL
SCHEDULE & POWER RISER DIAGRAM
OLSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS • SURVEYORS
RALEIGH , NORTH CAROLINA
r.
VICINii YM_A_
SCALE' 1-2DDD'' vi
CONTRACT NO. 830.20
J U LY,'19BO
COVER SHEET

Y�Y Y•3
CCP-METION SFIMECE �..vT
IIFY aDEPPARLM NANlFS Cf PN. RStllRAND OITINItt 0 HAY. WATey eL. L4.GTI amauc 04V.
ll NOA Ll.4p'Ct) FlUtbllED lveoe
DL\'El➢MM In DWLITY SEMON, DUE MDWION EFGIM, � -
6eCKFILL SEE
') CIFAR BUII➢IED AND MIX WOS. coHveCTED e5% N 7", ES,L R.o. n' htPPE 4S
3) [PIEME EXUVAi1QI AND RIIIDIKa OPcR4T1US. Bptl61LL PAFA CONC. EWCAS'T N uca¢o Frx+R¢ 2(n'D
70 FUVL GRM PS XM. _
4) RAID FOIDN OF A= RND NC PAW NG WA AS MN, AND 21-o'I Z'•R" r
•f¢EI.IC
Fa¢TH tSeCICF+LL � � ;u. H SmEEs 1r Be
GMVE UNDIAIELY " (DAP MON a:GRADING. 44 pA - F PecrEo m x % es 0— vi¢iICAL
5) SEED M WDI DE DIMRO AFFA AS SPECIFIED, OR ON WISE I ' ' 'rrA.loA¢o \ / 4s FEShIEnt
R PROVIDE SURRCIE T RM M M RSNWIH 9MION NIININ A.6M -
7NIR(Y OD) )OIIIIG DAYS AFER CRPIF(IQI OF ACTIVE OJEF q' d rd 2'. SII' yL 4quere
STRICTIOR. 2e4 DAL! Ei. A b�N (i�1x A
�K w"L .41M a Dl.v 2 DECANT DETAIL Ci PIPE TRENCH DETAIL
5•0 OLLS H'
y RA WIH45. erc'! wO Gt SrsLE: VV-1-w C-1 N.T.S.
a
ELE�u.Ld = -
s
I pl hLE PIArJ
&A4 e4" DCITpn pF 5�4 ee¢S
�SIH ELro-p)
ELEVATICH \\ END NEW
A
HEADWALL DETAIL
-1 SCALe: a/e'=1'-d
Y4 �F[ I/B Fl. htoF-T /D I F'L hLovE -� I/4A/G(
4 AhPHAL1 hU¢FACE CC V. ,E
8! COMPAciEO�LR¢JhIIED
�sfpWE EAhE hE (�dEc)
ROADWAY WITHOUT GUTTER 1
c-t,j NSS
0.2
___ _ _ _ _ -_ _ - t Epl_I GI.P. RdW W6TEQ oSCNwe.r LINE(CLA4461)
So-.1f.. p✓E FI UHE (CLAK ab)
)
I
g0'PLP RAID WATE2 INTAKE LINE (CLASS%
12'D.IP SAND FLUSHING LMIEIEMErdE9C4(a"642)
_ - — DI D.LR � � pWRH � UNE A (MN ip)
- -- - RETAIWEICA WALL, SEE DETbL WTAKE SCIEEEN,SEE DETML t C7E'D.IP. OECeHT LIHe(m%w)
NOIST eEN•1 END FQeME aSEE .8 DETAIL A2 t3
A"'r T1I M) IV41'A T.
N t'/2" c4 LR C6LRIE2 RPE) 5E! DET.�_
12 TOP ItE'PELU-56MFLE LINE 10 IJeIER "e
FILR2 ft.YR. TOP OF DAMM
A ROVER may/ —
I) TAR ROVER
1 _ _
2d
10'6RAVEL ACCESS VCe
,P PR85ETTUMCI
IMPMHDMEHT(H.LC.)
eW WATEZ
H015T ( PUMFNNA STe
T¢OLLEY MID'INTAKE
STPUCTLIze
__N'`GRADING & PIPING PLAN — - — — - a STAKING AND LOCATION PLAN
— --
22
In�W
Q
a En
u z a ¢o
W IL u
C =
�Wo
f aY z
7 Qf j
w25
W F w
J Q W
J3o�
aQ
t, a
O
Z
Q
Z
Q
J Z
aQ
c� _j
Z0
p Z
<a
U

1 21/21 A, p-
r
IkKAI(8 /19W6l
a`gmbW-lw..\
neV. - sA 1
�' (4lururEecaeeus)
- F-AO'
4' lAPPFa%. RNER EErt`roN) i
A 612V.-LS
IsE F 24'
I (Z �O) ELBoIJ e
ELWP Fly.- TYr.
=EYfENESpa�eC N9E To EL. LF �LO?115 1
I .J011JT •io'
(FIp 6iRI.E.)-LEYt)Til
Ih 0�llYEO. "--
I VER IP/EL SENSo¢�SEEe
B
D.I.r.
"i
II
�4Ec¢o�uGlYy
I it
4tY/a2
;j
�i
I.)E%[40.V�AR
Kwe%sp .4
II
II
II
I�
/TE
66 E241I'�'D'AlI�' LL
5cR
SJ,,f pRLE 'L5 4=16d I
s.) Eaw. vv.TIE s. ECy�
('SFJL
I.M-W
AT .w .0
GdKIK di E%TENSYxI T rSYCE
LIpTERTffE. SIM. Ta <e,
!s
ELEVATION SE(
1 INTAKE SCREEN SUPPORT DETAIL END
C-8 SCALE:1/2 = 1'-0' SEE
RIVER LEVEL TRN.$
w uarERveooP:
nrusiva ' -
T/q• vlvE s voar
SAND EDUCTOR BOOSTER PUMP
C-8 trel G P- Rm RIVET( LEVEL 6E11 rt
<)8'AIR & VACUUM VALVE
C-8 N.T.S.
-sN avn 6 -D 3'
Ewcioa Eo7'TFiI uN
.PUMP W/2 .pP .
-dHWoR PEE F )
anD
5EE C
(IYPK
G�aSERETE �
s RIVER LEVEL SENSOR MOUNTING
C 8 N.T.S.
aAil
a
qtn¢ SLEEVE .
5EE DETdL
1 RIVER LEVEL TRANSMITTER
V NT. S
— FLOW
WMa xodYal A44ENBW(4•900)
.W'x44FIIYI4!
W' O.Lr..
I'YI �• BOLT U/
S-IIW. TIE%)dlfb(Lbf RPad W.
411SY4D ee).T(Illffa)
5E! RET11L
IS' TPE
WrtY5;(4.MWO
0oTE'' R FspRlwcs�Tlo¢J.
z SUPPORT BEAM DETAIL
C-8 SCALE:1'=1'-O'
A STRUCTRAL STEEL LOCATION PLAN
C-8 SCALE: 1/4'-T-0'
Z
w LA
J
N F-
w
W 0
Y L5
H In
Z f
i

1419
WTP Property - �--• 1F� _
\ ((\ J •J• '• �� 1
l + - \ +' _ - -♦/ - •r.. ✓ Watt! ` J ^�... : y:r� o IV �` �' • i
' // `\\\ ♦ .4. - r _ _ L IQ� / Fration ! ! �•. 1 /'� �` /LGM
J •♦-
1 �. 1/' � y �\ /v yr. - r. _ � - j� , ` JJ I �\., ,.. _ � - •1
,� Q Proposed Project Footprint/%/�E /� ••�'�/-�-
GREE IL O •' , • r� i .?;• ?::•_.r,,
--��►'=iO�' - -AIRPORT
`_♦•/' '•�r<•f/� `
ly
KERN) E
��. + - ..- + ¢�-.� ,� ! Alvan• , !
+ •vim • >\-- , r►} ; ! '� R' �++' _ s . i /� � ; //` t . j ::J• - '.t •
l !, T � �J' � ��l ✓ 9^ - � - a � �-fl�, r _ +-- .•. -ram J �
- o
Cop_yrighb:Or20fi0 National Geographic Society, rcu'bed
Reha i ! ♦ J - / p
N 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 \ Project Location Map
W z Feet , Hazen Greenville Utilities Commission
1 inch = 2,000 feet Greenville — Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement and Dredging
S utilities Pitt County, North Carolina

r
•7
p�
�11
d
100-Year Floodplain
(Landward Limit) r
V� =fie
Al
Floodway
Landward s-, ",.4 WTP Property �.
Limit)
Proposed Construction Laydown Area
Delineated Wetlands k ,,
Proposed Project Footprint
Pitt -Greenville
Airport Property
+P
J
N 0 350 700 1,400 \ Project Vicinity Map
W z Feet , Hazen Greenville Utilities Commission
1 inch = 700 feet Greenville — Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement and Dredging
Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina

30 NOTES:
25 25-
1. SITE INFORMATION WITHIN PROJECT SURVEY
MATCHLINE SEE OVERALL SITE PLA 1 LIMITS FROM SITE SURVEY PREPARED BY STEWART
DATED MARCH 18, 2020. SEE GENERAL NOTES ON
-- -- -- -- -- 500 YEAR FLOOD ZONE /I C0I FOR ADDITIONAL STEWART SURVEY
(ZONE X, SHADED) �S INFORMATION. SITE INFORMATION OUTSIDE OF
NCGS MONUMENT PROJECT SURVEY LIMITS FROM SITE SURVEY
q -- -- -- -- --OL RIVER ROAD 2 'ELKS" /� 50 PREPARED BY SPRUILL AND ASSOCIATES, INC
wm�_ _ N 26 DATED FEBRUARY 13, 2018.
0 27 O 0 0 0 _ <tOv 2. JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE US WERE
1 a +oov8 k— �''6+ I DELINEATED IN THE FIELD BY HAZEN AND SAWYER
oave
.,00ya oovR +00yR o �.-.+oova 0 �I HA 7 OCTOHELD G R UNIT
AND 20 MARCH R A USING
II x HANDHELD GPS UNIT WITH SUBMETER ACCURACY.
1 25 NCGS STEEL ROD
I ` �Q- 3. PROJECT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE IS 0.98 ACRES.
100YR oo "WATERWAY" an o�
I I CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT AREA USED FOR
LAYDOWN AND SPOILS TO ENSURE TOTAL
DISTURBED AREA REMAINS UNDER ONE ACRE
1 /—+oova $ "I THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF ACTIVITIES.
II
24 /
i 1 1 /\
I 0 PLANT ENTRANCE 2l I c I
II K o 0 1 0 100-VR FLOODPLAIN, TYP I
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD 'o� 1'
/ 0 0 AREA (ZONE AE) J o SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD 26
AREA (ZONE AE)
24 .5 i? I PRE -SEDIMENTATION
IMPOUNDMENT
I 255' X 100' CONTRACTOR
a4 x I I LAYDOWN AND SPOILS AREA,
i 30 30 SEE NOTE 3
I\ I o
I 30 _ I I FEMA FLOODWAY
BOUNDARY i I
� GROUND O m
N N
GROUND STORAGETANK 0
STO 1 TALOVING I L00 LOD L0D
CONTRACTOR II
LAYDOWN AREA I I I
O 1 �' GRAVEL I h
`� N ENTRANCE/EXIT 1'
1 0 ozsnol
GROUND
STORAGE TANK II g i � I
29
SILT FENCE N
x
I
e 1 L--------- -- J BACKFLOW TRAINING 0227000 I N
2 fl
AINTENAN BUILDING
$ —7 N N
BUILDING , I
CONTROL NAIL II 50
CLEARWELL PUMP I — MAINTENA EAN" e , �+ N:690506.
E2474919.33' 35
EL: 24.88' 17' II 4p I
: II I
STATION (UNDER ELECTRICAL UILDI ` II 28
CONSTRUCTION) � `� D II g0
x � CONTROL NAIL � 26
-----
O by 1y N: 690282.00' 25 .Ly
--
BULK CHEMICAL E: 2474938.42' 24,
FILTERS BLDG (UNDER II y — = 21 I i I STORAGE FACILITY 1 EL10'74' " 1 // 36" RW (FUTURE)
CONSTRUCTIONS) II �23 I G7
_ e i / 1 —/ 11 ��"+%',•y I �,s STORAGE BUILDING
BULK I �w SEDIMENTATION I AL
STORAGEFCIL is�
� PROJECT SURVEY LIMITS,
STORAGE FACILITY 2
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION)
BASINS I 25 / SEE NOTE 1
L— �
FLOOD PROTECTION WALL vr
RAW WATER PUMP STATION
30' pD ''4 WETLANDS, TYP
II _ 30" RW (EXISTING)
II w EXISTING INTAKE;
II SCREEN (TYP. OF 4) S _ q " TOP OF BANK
22 35 LIMITS F DIST ABRU NCE, TYP ,2 a "`\ • •�:\ REGULATORY FLOODWAY
37 I SEE NOTE 3 CUU VVV TAR-PAMLICO RIPARIAN
BUFFER (ZONE 2)
25
TAR-PAMLICO RIPARIAN
BUFFER
(ZONE 1)
O
30 LIMITS OF DREDGING 2
25 25
FLOOD PROTECTION BERM 5 0`•
E PLAN 2 DOWNSTREAM
EXISTING INTAKE _
OV RALL SITE SCREENS (TYP. OF4) OVERLLl SITE PLAN 2 10o so a loo
1" = 100' 1"= 100' SCALE: 1" = 100'
PROJECT DATE: AUGUST ZO22
ENGINEER: D.BRILEY GREENVILLE UTILITIES COMMISSION
DESIGNED BY: D.TURNER CONFORMED DRAWING Z
�I GREENVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA INTAKE SCREEN REPLACEMENT HAZEN NO.: 31218-010
DRAWN C. MCNICOL THIS DOCUMENT ORIGINALLY ISSUED FOR 1CONTRACT NO.: 01
CONSTRUCTION AND SEALED BY _ CIVIL
CHECKED BY: D. BRILEY L. MICHAEL SANTOWASSO, SEAL NUMBER DRAWING
3 CONFORMED SET 09/2022 DJT 18560. THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE HAZEN AND SAWYER OVERALL SITE PLAN NUMBER:
CONSIDERED A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT.
2 ADDENDUM 1 09/2022 DJr 4011 WESTCHASE BOULEVARD, SUITE 500 INTAKE SCREENS REPLACEMENT
IF THIS BAR DOES NOT 0 1/2" 1"
_1 CONSTRUCTION 08/2022 DJT MEASURE 1"THEN DRAWING RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607 C1 O
REV ISSUED FOR DATE BY IS NOT TO FULL SCALE LICENSE NO.: C-0381

r "Floodway
I qndward i
Screens Cluster
JAW
tj
all
4.
_ Y

Existing Intake Flow Vanes
Permanent Impact OW-3
Maintenance Dredging
80 feet wide, 200 feet long
0.38 acre of Tar River
u;',
:�?��' -!
0 50 100 200
Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
Permanent Impact OW-1
Maintenance Dredging
60 feet wide, 200 feet long
0.28 acre of Tar River
Permanent Impact OW-2
Maintenance Dredging
15 feet wide, 200 feet long
0.05 acre of Tar River
Hazen
Greenville —
Utilities
AIV
OExisting Intake Flow Vanes
Delineated
Wetland
Proposed Impacts Map
Greenville Utilities Commission
Raw Water Intake Screen Replacement and Dredging
Pitt County, North Carolina