820276_Routine Inspection_20231020

� OTM5
4fi� 'e50�1i�
i, ;
t lF �.. fin � �.at
1 i, l it {ilk
d tkii' C i li:y ei� �I 1�)#i$}iz,. �ii`"� £i t I�'•„ tst iip.yiii{ iF
Type of Visit: Otompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: d d Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: r ic-U
Farm Name: �/ Gkr� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: � Title:
Onsite Representative: Pelaw /�
Certified Operator: ze_e_ (iJ
d
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: /,0 11313
Certification Number:
Longitude:
f
( i
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
jl�
Non La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish;
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean_ig
Dry
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
I
r
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts,.
Non -Layer
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Dili.; ill
TurkeyPouetsloll,
Other
f CI
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
16No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notifyDWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
,❑/-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
&No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: F2 - -L%;Date of Inspection: f6 8-FJ %3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes _®-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: ( Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 't6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes J, TNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes [D-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes E].No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes E246
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[:]Yes �Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [D.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window -� ❑ ��Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): L?2` �'k Ian �i c�i�%f�( els
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. .
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes-e-'KIo
[—]Yes ji'No
[—]Yes Q-No
[—]Yes I No
[—]Yes E31No
❑ Yes AE -No
❑ Yes 4E�No
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (ffNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E�No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Z No
Page 2 of 3
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
1_3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ®Aro
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes E3'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes _ED,1�0
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes �E7�No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
�
❑ Yes Kol
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes [2 T o
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes _E5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes —❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [3-f4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
/iJ/�rJ/a-3
Page 3 of 3 511212020

FACILITY#: - 7' ARM NAME: d!, LAGOON
PERMIT pre)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (420)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (mf)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE _. NITROGEN LEVEL
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
- P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Note if4orle )
CU/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
SOIL REPORT (xzH
IRR2 (R21)
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (nza)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION /lr'y9 /a-2
FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL hrrl
-INITIAL AFTER 1* RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
% / SLUDGE W azsl
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE �/ a''� /�.Z
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
F r O:�P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
1113 0: P: q , cl % RATIO OF SLUDGE �/ 2
OTHER FORMS Inzz AND pzlj
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st -Ends September30*
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1-t- Ends March 31�
Corn: Opens February 15t - Ends June 30*
Cotton: Opens March 15t - Ends August 1�
Rye: Opens September 1 rt - Ends March 31-t
Oats: Opens September 1�- Ends April 15s
Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30u
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15t
Fescue: Opens August 1st -Ends July 31�t
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15w - Ends August 31 st