540003_Inspection_20231030

Division of Water Resources
Faci tty Nuii ber - �.'s.. uO Division of Soil adter ter Conservation w
O Other Agency fi .
type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
2eason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Q 30- Arrival Time: 110, 30 Departure Time: County: h_k" p Cr
Farm Name: 'YM-f jYiS L 1 I Owner Email:
Owner Name: �Ci►'►YlS (QC_ Phone:
Mailing Address: �(� �p�� l I K, II Vc
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �L,,� )� Title:
Onsite Representative: 9,�e N �l Q�i �� 14�s
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
.fI
Se
`Design, Current
CapaclV Pop., -
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
`l
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
rf�
her +'
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: PN
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design
Current
Wet Poultry
�.. Capa
POP.
-;
Layer
Non -La er
Design
Current
e.
Dry Poultry
Capacity
Pon.
Layers
—.Non-Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Region: ` C(Ro
Design &rrenir-
Cattlb, 14pacitj,'; . rop,.-r, .
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [Dio ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No
[:]Yes [:]No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L40'
❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
[::]Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: 10"2
Waste Collection & Treatment
ZN,o
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
0 Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
(Structure
Identifier: 3 7
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
E�/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environm7N�o
hreat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? 'If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure
to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 9 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 51121'2020 Continued

lFacility Number. - Date of Ins tion: Q— f
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [' J ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ElYes u No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [,—J/<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes. []_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the [:]Yes ur o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
E2,110 ❑ NA
❑ NE
plain any YE9answers,and/o ,,sny additional ;recommendatlo or another, inmen
Comments (refe to qu oa #);tyvla][Atuatioh"�9'(Ltse
1#�t dry qes d�iHtV 1061: additiolbiees -nece fi'irv). �I " a }%W '�i
0 - t-1 ^'�_z
aos Q Kaa ----)
(,-y) , 3 �5 ' 0 cs-� )-,-Ul JIL 3 71 ' 0,�
LJ-z
-L)
uFZ_3,q►
22
(13-(0 i WA - 3)1 J
?d . - 1
i,s
I ,1
Cab 2n V aj-s, I, r��A.
c.CC)P�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
-94�-oa3�
Date: 10 ' 0 _ 2S
511212020