Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
NC0089079_Rescission_20231102
NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart Governor Secretary July 6, 2015 Mr. John R. Townson Environmental Management Director PSC Box 20005 Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0005 Laserfiche Subject: Rescission of NPDES Permit NCO089061 Borrow Pits 2 & 3 Rescission of NPDES Permit NCO089079 Borrow Pit 10 Onslow County Dear Mr. Townson: The Division has reviewed your permit rescission requests received on June 30, 2015. The Division has no objection to your request. Therefore, NPDES permits NCO089061 and NCO089079 are rescinded, effective immediately. If in the future your organization wishes to discharge wastewater to the State's surface waters, it must first apply for and receive a new NPDES permit. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Charles H. Weaver at (919) 807-6391 or via e-mail [charles.weaver@ncdenr.gov]. S, cp rely, /1, Jay immerman, Director �rDivision of Water Resources cc: Central Files Wilmington Regional Office / Jim Gregson NPDES Unit Teresa Revis / Budget 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Phone: 919 807-6300 / FAX 919 807-6489 / Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 501/o Recycled/101/6 Post Consumer Paper I Weaver, Charles From: Bowden, Kevin Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 2:48 PM To: Weaver, Charles; Chernikov, Sergei Subject: permit rescission requests for NC0089061 and NC0089079 - Borrow Pits - Camp Lejeune Attachments: BORROW_PITS_2_3_10_RESCISSION_PKG.pdf Charles and Sergei, Not sure who is supposed to receive this, but Page 2 of the attachment contains the rescission request for both permits, along with additional information. For some reason, the request was addressed to Nathaniel. WIRO concurs with permit rescission. Thanks. kevin Kevin Bowden Division of Water Resources 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (phone) 919.807.6397, (fax) 919.807.6494, (e-mail) E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation. 1 Official Document Inventory Jan 12015 to present - Lbrrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Permit Resc... Page 1 of 1 21391 Correspondence Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Permit Rescission NCO089061 NCO089079 5/29/2015 Outgoing Final MCBCL/EMD 5090,20.1 Water Quality NCO089079 NCO089061 Borrow Pit Bldg 12/Rm 236 Bookcase iv 6 /1S EQ Lowder Cant Woodall Townson Ce?Rd Lejeune Working Files - 5090_20.1 Water Quality - Borrow—Pits-2-3-10 Official Document Inventory Jan 1 2015 to Present ► Official Document Inventory Jan 1 2015 to present: Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Permit Rescission NCO089061 NCO089079 ID# Document Type Document Title Date Received/Created Date Signed Mail Status Document Status Author Program Keywords Building/Room # Storage Route Mailing Instructions Comments Working File Link Director Comments Permament Yes Attachments Enclosure _i_NCO089061_Cover _Page.pdf Enclosure_2_NC0089079_Cover_Page.pdf Enclosure_3_NPDES_Insp_Rpt_NC0089061.pdf Enclosure _4_N PDES_Insp_Rpt_NC0089079. pdf Created at 5/29/2015 9:40 AM by Acosta CIV Lauren D Last modified at 5/29/2015 9:40 AM by Acosta CIV Lauren D L Tags & Notes Close https://em.,Lrsme.nii llsites/lc/hdIListslOfficial%2ODocument%20Itiventoly%2OJan%201 %2... 5/29/2015 a UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS EAST -MARINE CORPS BASE PSC BOX 20005 • �� CAMP LfiJEUNE NC 28542-0005 5090.20 BEMD JUN 0 3 2015 Mr, Nathaniel Thornburg North Carolina Department of Environment And Natural Resources Division of Water Resources Water Quality Permitting Section-NPDES Non -Discharge Permitting Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Dear Mr. Thornburg: Marine Corps Installations East -Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ) was issued two National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) individual permits associated with wet mining/dewatering for borrow pits 2 and 3, permit number NC0089061, and borrow pit 10, permit number NCO089079 on 23 June 2011 and 27 April 2011 respectively. Enclosures (1) and (2) contain the cover page for each permit. MCIEAST-MCB CAMLEJ requests permit rescissions for both of the aforementioned NPDES permits. All site work within each of these borrow pits is complete, Ms. Joanne Steenhuis, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR) Wilmington Regional Office (WRO), conducted an inspection of borrow pits 2, 3, and 10 on 27 May 2015. All borrow pits were considered to be in compliance. Copies of these inspection reports are included as Enclosures (3) and (4). If you have any questions or need any clarification on the information provided, contact Lauren Acosta, Environmental Quality Branch, Environmental Management Division, G-F, at (910)451-9518. Enclosure(s): 1. Permit N00089061 2. Permit NCO089079 3. NPDES Compliance Pits 2 & 3 4. NPDES Compliance Pit 10 Sincerely, OI, R . TOWNSON Director, Environmental Management By direction of the Commanding General Cover Page Cover Page Inspection Report for Borrow Inspection Report for Borrow �iffl CDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Governor May 28, 2015 Mr. Neal Paul, Deputy Public Works Officer Public Works Division MCB, Camp Lejeune 1005 Michael Road Camp Lejeune, NC 28542 Subject: NPDES Compliance Inspection Report Borrow Pits 2 & 3 Brewster Boulevard, MCB Camp Lejeune NPDES Individual Permit No. NCO089061 Dear Mr. Paul; Donald R. van der Vaart Secretary A site inspection was conducted for Borrow Pits 2 & 3 located off Brewster Boulevard in Camp Lejeune. 1 conducted the inspection on May 27, 2015 and met with Mike Taylor from EMD. The Division of Water Resources (Division) appreciates the assistance and information provided by Mike Taylor and information provided by Carl Owen during the inspection procedure. Borrow pits 2 & 3 are covered under an NPDES Individual Permit NC 0089061 for discharges of wastewater associated with wet mining/dewatering. it is my understanding that during the mining of pit 3, there was no discharge to Northeast Creek. It is also my understanding that the pit Is now reclaimed (although you still will have to officially close it out with the Division of Energy, Mining and Land Resources). Pit 2 was never excavated and it is my understanding that the MCB Camp Lejeune will not be using this site for borrow. I have enclosed a copy of the Inspection details. At this time, you are considered to be in compliance and the Wilmington Regional Office recommends and supports Camp Lejeune requesting a rescission of the NPDES Permit NCO089061. if you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please do not hesitate to contact me at 910.796.7306. 1 will be glad to assist you. I have also enclosed a copy of the Inspection report. Sincerely Joanne Steenhuis Senior Envlronmental Specialist Water Quality Regional Operations Section Wilmington Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDENR Enclosure: inspection report 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Phone: 910-796.7215\ Internet: www.ncdenr,Kov An Equat Oppodunity 1 AfkmaM Action Employer -►lade In W by recy W paper Enclosure (3) United Stales Envvonmentel Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington' D.C. 20W OMB No. 2040.0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPOES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fao Type 1 IN 1 2 16 1 3 1 N00089061 Ill 12 16105/28 17 18 I r f 191 S I 201 I 211 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l I_ ] �g I I i I l l l I f I I I l Ig6 Inspection Work Days Fadtily Self-Monlloring Evaluation Rating at QA ---•— -•--•—Reserved• »-- ••- 67 70 I, I 71 u 72 Il—I N j LJ 73 j 74 75 1 80 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also Include Entry TlmalDalo Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 09:10AM 15/05/28 11/08101 MCB Camp Le)eune Borrow Pits 2 and 3 Brewster Blvd Exil Time/Date permit Expiration Dale Camp Leleune NC 28642 09:35AM 16/05/28 1e/07/31 Name(s) of Onsits Roprosentativa(splies(s)/Phone and Fax Numbers) Other Facility Data 11l Name, Address of Responsible OIIIdaUTille/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Neat Paul,1005 Michael Rd Camp Le)eune NC 285472621/Deputy Public Works No Officer1910.451.2212/ Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) ® Permit M Facility Site Review Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of speclor(e) Agency/Ofike/Phone and Fax Numbers Dale Joanne H Steenhule C /" ' - 1M RO MY 1 Signature of Management Reviewer Agency/OfficafPhone and Fax Numbers Dale James Gregson V� WIRO WQ/// O S EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 94) Prev4s editions are obsolete. Page# Enclosure (3) a Pen"IL N0008t+081 Owner • Faclllty: MCB Camp lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3 Inspeotion Otto: 05/28/2015 Inspection Typo: CompSanee EVOJOOn Perm] Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires In 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ ❑ M ❑ application? Is the facility as described In the permit? N ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ❑ C] 0 ❑ Is the Inspector granted access to all areas for Inspection? ❑ ❑ Cl Comment: The sites are borrow pits and site 2 was gartlallY cleared, byl the pit was not excavated. Page# 3 Enclosure (3) NCD`ER North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Governor May 28, 2015 Mr. Neal Paul, Deputy Public Works Officer Public Works Division MCB Camp Lejeune 1005 Michael Road Camp Lejeune, NC 28542 Subject: NPDES, Compliance inspection Report Borrow Pit 10 Bougainville Dr, MCB Camp Lejeune NPDES Individual Permit No. NCO089079 Dear Mr. Paul; Donald R. van der Vaart Secretary A site inspection was conducted for Borrow Pit 10 located off Bougainville Drive in Camp Lejeune. I conducted the inspection on May 27, 2015 and met on site with Mike Taylor from EMD and Carl Owen from ROICC. The Division of Water Resources (Division) appreciates the assistance and information provided by both Mike Taylor and Carl Owen during the Inspection procedure. The borrow pit is covered under an NPDES Individual Permit NC 0089079 for discharges of wastewater associated with wet mining/dewatering. It Is my understanding that during the mining of the pit, there was no discharge to Northeast Creek. It Is also my understanding that the pit Is now reclaimed (although you still will have to officially close it out with the Division of Energy, Mining and Land Resources). I have enclosed a copy of the Inspection details. At this time, you are considered to be In compliance and the Wilmington Regional Office recommends and supports Camp Lejeune requesting a rescission of the NPDES Permit NC0089079. If you have any questions concerning this correspondence, please do not hesitate to contact me at 910.796.7306. 1 will be glad to assist you. I have also enclosed a copy of the inspection report. Sin ely oanne Steenhuls Senior Environmental Specialist Water Quality Regional Operations Section Wilmington Regional Office Division of Water Resources, NCDENR Enclosure: inspection report 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Phone: 910.796.7215\ Internet: www.ncdenr.aov M Equal OpporD ty 1 AtnrmaM Action Employer - Made h port by m*W paper Enclosure (4) N Scardina, Maureen Subject: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting -----Original Message ----- From: Hunkele, Dean Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:01 AM To: Weaver, Charles; Scardina, Maureen Cc: steven.whited(@usmc.mil Subject: FW: NC0O89079 & NC0O89061 Borrow Pits Reporting Please see their request -- contact them with any questions or concerns. Thanks Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist Wilmington Regional Office -----Original Message ----- From: Whited CIV Steven J rmailto:steven.whitedousmc.mill Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:14 AM To: Hunkele, Dean Subject: FW: NCO089079 & NC0O89061 Borrow Pits Reporting Dean, Good morning. I hope you had a good Christmas. Please see the information below regarding the subject borrow pits at MCB, Camp Lejeune. We would like to suspend reporting until we get a better idea on when the dewatering/discharge operation will begin at these pits. Please advise. v/r Steven -----Original Message ----- From: Sleeper, Lonny A LTJG NAVFAC, OICC MCI East fmailto:lonny.sleeper(@navy.mill Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 9:40 AM To: Whited CIV Steven J Cc: Raper CIV Patricia H; Bulfer CIV Orathai; Sylvester CIV Emily M; Blair, Joseph; Wright, Hubert D CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT, IPTNC; Hartman, Thomas M CIV NAVFAC, OICC MCI East Subject: NC0089O79 & NC0O89061 Borrow Pits Reporting Steve, The Borrow Areas for the New Base Entry Road being utilized (Borrow Area 3 and 10) are currently not dewatering and managing the water by pumping to cells within the existing pits. Also, Pit 2 is not open at the present time. When I spoke with Mr. Dean Hunkele a couple of weeks ago he recommended that a request for the monitoring to be suspended until a date when operations will begin be submitted to them. As of today the contractor has developed a plan which is not requiring any dewatering and with no definite date when the reporting for the dewatering will need to be initiated. Can an official request be made to suspend reporting until 30 days after the request for authorization to construct is requested? For Borrow Area 2 we need to wait until P-1382B is awarded to discuss with that contractor on how they plan to operate that area. 1 ��a NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor Mr. Lonny Sleeper MCB Camp Lejeune OICC MCI East 1005 Michael Rd Camp Lejeune, N.C. 28547-2521 Dear Mr. Sleeper: Division of Water Quality Charles Wakild, P.E. Director January 4, 2012 Dee Freeman Secretary Subject: Waiver of Monthly Reporting Requirement NPDES Permits NC0089061 & NC0089079 Borrow Pits 2 & 3 / Borrow Pit 10 Onslow County The Division has reviewed your request to suspend submission of monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs). After considering the recommendations of the staff in the Wilmington Regional Office, I have agreed to waive the requirement to submit monthly DMRs for the subject facilities, effective January 1, 2012. The DMRs up through (and including) December 2011 should be submitted as usual. Be advised that if and when any wastewater discharge occurs, the discharge must be monitored as per the terms of the NPDES permits and other applicable rules or statutes. Please keep the Wilmington Regional Office apprised of any pertinent developments that arise regarding either facility, especially if the discharge is re -activated. While requirements for operator visitation, monitoring and reporting are being waived, you are still required to pay the Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee that is associated with this and all NPDES permits. If you have any questions, or if you wish to request rescission of either permit, contact Charles H. Weaver at 919 807-6391. 1 Sincerely, Coleen H. Sullins cc: Central Files Wilmington Regional Office / Dean Hunkele NPDES Files 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCarolina Phone: 919 807-6300 /FAX 919 807-6495 I Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% ;UUM11b, Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper q S. 4 • Weaver, Charles From: Hunkele, Dean Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:01 AM To: Weaver, Charles; Scardina, Maureen Cc: steven.whited@usmc.mil Subject: FW: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting Please see their request -- contact them with any questions or concerns. Thanks Dean Hunkele, Senior Environmental Specialist Wilmington Regional Office Division of Water Quality, Surface Water Protection Section http://www.ncwaterguality.org/ Direct Phone: (910) 796-7387 Main Phone: (910) 796-7215 Fax: (910) 350-2004 Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext Wilmington, NC 28405-3845 To report a SSO, WWTP Bypass, or Spill after hours, holidays, or weekends call The NC Division of Emergency Management @ 1-800-858-0368 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. -----Original Message ----- From: Whited CIV Steven J [mailto:steven.whited@usmc.mil] Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:14 AM To: Hunkele, Dean Subject: FW: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting Dean, Good morning. I hope you had a good Christmas. Please see the information below regarding the subject borrow pits at MCB, Camp Lejeune. We would like to suspend reporting until we get a better idea on when the dewatering/discharge operation will begin at these pits. Please advise. v/r Steven -----Original Message ----- From: Sleeper, Lonny A LTJG NAVFAC, OICC MCI East [mailto:lonny.sleeper@navy.mil] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 9:40 AM To: Whited CIV Steven J Cc: Raper CIV Patricia H; Bulfer CIV Orathai; Sylvester CIV Emily M; Blair, Joseph; Wright, Hubert D CIV NAVFAC MIDLANT, IPTNC; Hartman, Thomas M CIV NAVFAC, OICC MCI East 1 16 Subject: NC0089079 & NC0089061 Borrow Pits Reporting Steve, The Borrow Areas for the New Base Entry Road being utilized (Borrow Area 3 and 10) are currently not dewatering and managing the water by pumping to cells within the existing pits. Also, Pit 2 is not open at the present time. When I spoke with Mr. Dean Hunkele a couple of weeks ago he recommended that a request for the monitoring to be suspended until a date when operations will begin be submitted to them. As of today the contractor has developed a plan which is not requiring any dewatering and with no definite date when the reporting for the dewatering will need to be initiated. Can an official request be made to suspend reporting until 30 days after the request for authorization to construct is requested? For Borrow Area 2 we need to wait until P-1382B is awarded to discuss with that contractor on how they plan to operate that area. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. V/r, Lonny Sleeper LT, CEC, USN Project Engineer OICC MCI East Camp Lejeune, NC ------------------------- (0) 910.451.2581 ext 5272 (C) 910.376.0074 (F) 910.451.5899 (DSN) 751.2581 ext 5272 A ft NR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor Mr. Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer Public Works Division MCB Camp Lejeune 1005 Michael Road Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542 Dear Mr. Baker: Division of Water Quality Coleen H. Sullins Director June 23, 2011 Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO089061 Borrow Pits 2 and 3 Onslow County Facility Class I Dee Freeman Secretary Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for a new permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended). This Final Permit includes the following major changes from the Draft Permit: • The daily maximum TSS limit has been increased to 15 mg/L. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Ralegh, North Carolina 27604 One Phone: 919-807.6300 \ FAX: 919-807-64921 Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarohna Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Naturally An Equal Opportunity 1 Aifirmafive Action Employer Please note that this permit is not transferable exce�t after notice to the Division. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Sergei Chemikov at telephone number (919) 807-6393. Sincerely, i oleen H. Sullins C- '/ cc: NPDES Files Central Files Wilmington Regional Office / Surface Water Protection Louise Slate (e-mail-LOSLATE@mactec.com) 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 one Phone: 919-807-63001 FAX: 919-807-64921 Customer Service:1-877.623-6748 NorthCarolina Internet) www.nnity k Affirmative rg Action An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer Permit No. NCO089061 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, MCB Camp Lejeune is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at Borrow Pits 2 and 3 Brewster Boulevard MCB Camp Lejeune Onslow County to receiving waters designated as Northeast Creek in the White Oak River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective August 1, 2011. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2016. Signed this day June 23, 2011. een H. Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit No. NCO089061 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3 is hereby authorized to: 1. Upon receiving an Authorization to Construct from the Division of Water Quality, construct a 0.72 MGD groundwater treatment plant consisting of a settling basin and pumps, located at MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3, Brewster Boulevard, MCB Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, and 2. After submitting an Engineer's Certification, operate 0.72 MGD treatment plant located at MCB Camp Lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3, Brewster Boulevard, MCB Camp Lejeune, Onslow County, and 3. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Northeast Creek, which is classified as SC NSW HQW waters in the White Oak River Basin. Ilk L� .. '.. ULLWJ Vi:, 7 AOn 16 N.4 lz Arl, '04 16 ow RW 1 117 ` Permit NC008W61 A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [002] During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: PARAMETER LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [PCS Code] Monthly I Daily Measurement Sample Sample Average Maximum Frequency e Location Flow 0.72 MGD Weekly Instantaneous Effluent 50050 Ethylbenzene (pg/L) Quarterly Grab Effluent 34371 pH > 6.8 and < 8.5 standard units Weekly Grab Effluent 00400 Total Suspended Solids 10.0 mg/L 15.0 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent C0530 Temperature ( OC) Weekly Grab Effluent 00010 There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [003] During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 003. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: PARAMETER LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [PCS Code] Monthly Daily Measurement Sample Sample Average Maximum __Lrequency Type Location Flow 0.216 MGD Weekly Instantaneous Effluent 50050 pH > 6.8 and < 8.5 standard units Weekly Grab Effluent 00400 Total Suspended Solids 10 mg/L 15 mg/L Weekly Grab Effluent C0530 Temperature ( °C) Weekly Grab Effluent 00010 There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. ONSLOW COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA I AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of County and State of said publisher, duly commissioned, qualified and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared , who being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that he (she) is Jimmy Williams, Editor (Owner, partner or other officer or employee authorized to make this affidavit) of THE CARTERET PUBLISHING CO., INC., Carteret County, N.C., engaged in the publication of a news- paper known as Tideland News, published, issued, and entered as second class mail in the Town of Swansboro, in said County and State; that he (she) is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in Tideland News on the following dates: 5/4/11 and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statues of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statues of North Carolina. This the 2nd day of June , 2011. Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 2nd My commission expires August 24, 2014 fn Signature of person making affidavit day of June , 2011. Notary Public LEGAL NOTICES Public Notice North Carolina Environmental Management Commission/ NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit The North Carolina En- vironmental Management Commission proposes to issue a NPDES wastewa- ter discharge permit to the Person(s) listed below. Written comments re- garding the proposed .per- mit will be accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. The Di- rector of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) may hold a public hearing should there be a signifi- cant degree of public inter- est. Please mail comments and/or information re- quests to DWQ at the above address. Interested persons may visit the DWQ at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC to re- view information on file. Additional information on NPDES permits and this notice may be found on our website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/webiw q/swP/ps/npdes/calendar or by calling (919)807-6304. MCB Camp Lejeune re- quested a new permit NCO089079 for Borrow Pit 10 in Onslow County; this facility discharge is treated groundwater to Northeast Creek, White Oak River Basin. MCB Camp Lejeune re- quested a new permit NC0089061 for Borrow Pits 2 and 3 in Onslow County; this facility dis- charge is treated ground- water to Northeast Creek, White Oak River Basin. My4 MACTEC engineering and constructing a better tomorrow May 27, 2011 Sergei Chernikov, PhD NCDENR — Complex Permitting Unit 512 N. Salisbury Street, 9`s floor Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Subject: Letter Report of Natural Resources Support Services MCB Camp Lejeune — Borrow Pits Dear Dr. Chernikov: There are some concerns regarding language included in the draft NPDES wastewater discharge permits for Borrow Pits 2 and 3 and Borrow Pit 10. The 10 mg/L TSS effluent limit seems overly restrictive in light of two facts. First, this is a short term discharge and second, the water being discharged is groundwater from a surface aquifer where no contamination has been detected. Construction time for the Base Entry Road is at a maximum 36 months total and 7 months of this have already elapsed. Dewatering activities will only take place until borrow pit capacity is reached, which reduces the discharge time further. Furthermore, the groundwater from each of these borrow pits has been tested and it is shown that this is clear, uncontaminated groundwater being discharged as part of an on -site construction project. Wells will be installed so as to draw groundwater from beneath the borrow pits and have the existing soil media act as a filter. It will also be run through a sediment filter bag to provide treatment and disperse flow prior to it being discharged to surface water. In light of this, we recommend that the effluent limit be raised slightly so that the discharge can be achievable while maintaining acceptable discharge limits that reflect the short term nature of the operation and the initial overall quality of the groundwater. Respectfully, MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Louise O. Slate Senior Engineer PA6470\(Wamp Lejeune\Borrow Pits\NPDES Individual PermitWomment Letter to DENR 5-27-11 Richard P. Leone Principal Scientist MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 3301 Atlantic Avenue • Raleigh, NC 27604 • Phone: 919.876.0416 • Fax: 919.831.8136 www.mactec.com Chernikov, Sergei From: Willis, Linda Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 1:51 PM To: Chernikov, Sergei Subject: RE: draft permits for your review I don't have any comments concerning these permits. I would rather see a daily flow tracked since for other individual mining permits we would need to see that, especially where we have 7Q10 issues (which we won't have that issue here since they are going to discharge to the main stem of Northeast Creek. Thanks Linda From: Chernikov, Sergei Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 8:53 AM To: Willis, Linda Cc: Pugh, James L.; LOSLATE@mactect.com Subject: draft permits for your review Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. Environmental Engineer II Complex Permitting Unit Phone: 919-807-6393, fax 919-807-6495 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Express mail: 512 North Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27606 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Note to File MCB Camp Lejeune, Borrow Pits 2 and 3 Permit NC0089061 The proposed permit is for dewatering a borrow pits to construct the Base Entry point and road at MCB Camp Lejeune. Projected flow is based on the conservative assumption of the dewatering the entire pit. Operationally, the pits will be excavated in cells, which will decrease the discharge because some of the water will be stored in other cells. The plan is to remove the suitable fill from borrow pit 3 and when that pit is exhausted to move to borrow pit 2. The discharge will be to the Northeast Creek, which is classified SC NSW HQW. Therefore, the TSS limit of 10 mg/L will be applied. The groundwater analysis at Borrow Pit 2 indicated the presence of ethylbenzene at 0.8 µg/L , which is far less than EPA criteria of 130 µg/L. However, the quarterly monitoring will be added to insure the protection of the receiving stream. The permits are needed for limited time period until construction projects are completed. UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS BASE PSC BOX 20004 CAMP LEJEUNE NC 28542-0004 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5020.20 BEMD APR 8 8 2011 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Attention: Mr. Sergei Chernikov Complex Permitting Unit Point Source Branch Surface Water Protection Section - NPDES Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Dear Mr. Chernikov: Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp Lejeune (CamLej) received a Letter of Approval (ONSLO-2010-104) dated September 16, 2010 for revised erosion and sedimentation control plans that include on -site borrow areas (Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10) for constructing the Base Entry Road. On September 27, 2010, Linda Willis from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (DWQ) sent an email to a consultant for MCB CamLej stating that discharge from the borrow pits without an NPDES permit would constitute a violation of GS 143-215.1(a)l. Since that time, MCB CamLej explored options for addressing water in the borrow pits and is pursuing minor individual wastewater discharge permits for Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10. The purpose of this letter is to address issues related to dewatering borrow pits necessary to construct the new Base entry road to MCB CamLej. There are two wastewater discharge permits being requested from NCDENR: (1) One discharge permit for borrow pits 2 and 3 (2) One discharge permit for borrow pit 10 In evaluating options for dewatering these borrow pits to facilitate excavation, one consideration was to connect the wastewater streams to the wastewater collection system and treat it at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). However, it is strongly recommended that the WWTP not accept this additional discharge because adding large volumes of freshwater to the wastewater stream is damaging to the balance of microbes at the plant. { j 5020.20 BEMD Groundwater from these borrow pits was sampled on March 16, 2011. The enclosure forwards the results from this sampling event. Ethyl benzene was the only constituent that was detected and was well below the established limit for groundwater. Due to the reasons stated above, MCB CamLej will continue with the original design plans and discharge to stormwater. If you have any questions or need any clarification on the information provided, please contact Mr. Steven Whited, Environmental Quality Branch, Environmental Management Division, Installations and Environment Department, at (910) 451-9518. Sincerely, +R. OHN R. TOWNSON Director, Environmental Management By direction of the Commanding Officer Enclosure: 1. March 16, 2011 Sampling Event Performed by SGS North America Inc. 2 Laboratory Report of Analysis To: Kim Charles -Smith MACTEC 5710 Oleander Drive Suite 110 Wilmington, NC 28403 Report Number: 31100471 Client Project: Camp Lejeune Dear Kim Charles -Smith, Enclosed are the results of the analytical services performed under the referenced project for the received samples and associated QC as applicable. The samples are certified to meet the requirements of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference Standards. Copies of this report and supporting data will be retained in our files for a period of five years in the event they are required for future reference. All results are intended to be used in their entirety and SGS is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Any samples submitted to our laboratory will be retained for a maximum of thirty (30) days from the date of this report unless other arrangements are requested. If there are any questions about the report or services performed during this project, please call Barbara A. Hager at (910) 350-1903. We will be happy to answer any questions or concerns which you may have. Thank you for using SGS North America Inc. for your analytical services. We look forward to working with you again on any additional analytical needs. Sincerely, SGS North America Inc. 'JDN: HCIV Digitally signed by Barbara A. Hager CN = Barbara A. Hager, C = US, O = SGS Wilmington, NC, OU = Project Manager Date: 2011.03.24 16:02:51-04'00' Barbara A. Hager Project Manager barbara.hager@sgs.com i i Print Date: 0312412011 Date N.C. Certification # 481 SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www_us.sgs.com Member of SGS Group UWm G Laboratory Qualifiers Report Definitions DL Method, Instrument, or Estimated Detection Limit per Analytical Method CL Control Limits for the recovery result of a parameter LOQ Reporting Limit DF Dilution Factor RPD Relative Percent Difference LCS(D) Laboratory Control Spike (Duplicate) MS(D) Matrix Spike (Duplicate) MB Method Blank Qualifier Definitions " Recovery or RPD outside of control limits B Analyte was detected in the Lab Method Blank at a level above the LOQ U Undetected (Reported as ND or < LOD) V Recovery is below quality control limit. The data has been validated based on a favorable signal-to-noise and detection limit A Amount detected is less than the Lower Method Calibration Limit J Amount detected is between the Method Detection Limit and the Lower Calibration Limit O The recovery of this analyte in the OPR is above the Method QC Limits and the reported concentration in the sample may be biased high E Amount detected is greater than the Upper Calibration Limit S The amount of analyte present has saturated the detector. This situation results in an underestimation of the affected analyte(s) Q Indicates the presence of a quantitative interference. This situation may result in an underestimation of the affected analyte(s) I Indicates the presence of a qualitative interference that could cause a false positive or an overestimation of the affected analyte(s) DPE Indicates the presence of a peak in the polychlorinated diphenylether channel that could cause a false positive or an overestimation of the affected analyte(s) TIC Tentatively Identified Compound EMC Estimated Maximum possible Concentration due to ion ratio failure NO Not Detected K Result is estimated due to ion ratio failure in High Resolution PCB Analysis P RPD > 40% between results of dual columns D Spike or surrogate was diluted out in order to achieve a parameter result within instrument calibration range M1 Mis-identified peak M2 Software did not integrate peak M3 Incorrect baseline construction (i.e. not all of peak included; two peaks integrated as one) M4 Pattern integration required (i.e. DRO, GRO, PCB, Toxaphene and Technical Chlordane) M5 Other - Explained in case narrative Note Results pages that include a value for "Solids (%)" have been adjusted for moisture content. Print Date: 0312412011 i N.C. Certification # 481 SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 t 910.3_50.1_903 f 910.350.1557_www.us.sgs.com Member of SGS Group SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 t 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com Member of SGS Group SGS Results of BP-2 Client Sample ID: BP-2 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-A Matrix: Water k Lab Project ID: 31100471 " Results by EPA 624 i Parameter Result QuaI 2L LOQ/CL nit DF 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane ND U 0.123 1.00 ug/L 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND U 0.156 1.00 ug/L 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND U 0.126 1.00 ug/L 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ND U 0.165 1.00 ug/L 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ND U 0.212 1.00 ug/L 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.0697 1.00 ug/L 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND U 0.167 1.00 ug/L 1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND U 0.163 1.00 ug/L 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.140 1.00 ug/L 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.107 1.00 ug/L 1 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND U 1.82 25.0 ug/L 1 Benzene ND U 0.113 1.00 ug/L 1 Bromodichloromethane ND U 0.110 1.00 ug/L 1 Bromoform ND U 0.0974 1.00 ug/L 1 Bromomethane ND U 0.237 1.00 ug/L 1 Carbon tetrachloride ND U 0.101 1.00 ug/L 1 Chlorobenzene ND U 0.116 1.00 ug/L 1 Chloroethane ND U 0.311 1.00 ug/L 1 Chloroform ND U 0.139 1.00 ug/L 1 Chloromethane ND U 0.448 1.00 ug/L 1 Dibromochloromethane ND U 0.134 1.00 ug/L 1 cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0767 1.00 ug/L 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0862 1.00 ug/L 1 Ethyl Benzene 0.800 J 0.0877 1.00 ug/L 1 Methylene chloride ND U 0.152 5.00 ug/L 1 Tetrachloroethene ND U 0.155 1.00 ug/L 1 Toluene ND U 0.133 1.00 ug/L 1 Trichloroethene ND U 0.125 1.00 ug/L 1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND U 0.137 1.00 ug/L 1 Vinyl chloride ND U 0.124 1.00 ug/L 1 m,p-Xylene ND U 0.182 2.00 ug/L 1 o-Xylene ND U 0.0874 1.00 ug/L 1 tert-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE) ND U 0.144 1.00 ug/L 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND U 0.223 1.00 ug/L 1 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 63.5-140 % 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 84.7-115 % 1 Toluene d8 100 81.8-117 % 1 s t Print Dale: 03/24/2011 N.C. Certification # 481 SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 29405 t 910.350.1903 If 910.350.1557 www.us.sas.com Member of SGS Group Results of BP-2 Client Sample ID: BP-2 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-A Lab Project ID: 31100471 l Results by EPA 624 Parameter Result Qual Batch Information-- �.nalyli+::,1 i3cti.h: VMS1098 Analytical Method: EPA 624 Instrument: MSD3 Analyst: BWS Analytical Date/Time: 03/21/2011 15:12 Kq Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35 Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Matrix: Water LO /CL Units DF Prep Batch: VXX1204 Prep Method: EPA 624 Prep Datefrime: 03/21/2011 16:58 Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 40 mL Prep Extract Vol: 40 mL N.C. Certification # 481 SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 it 10.350.1903 f 9101 0.1557 www,us.sgs.com Member of SGS Group SGS Results of BP-2 Client Sample ID: BP-2 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-D Lab Project ID: 31100471 Results by EPA 625 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35 Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Matrix: Water Parameter Result Qual DL LO /CL Units DF Phenol ND U 3.22 6.81 ug/L 1 Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ND U 3.01 6.81 ug/L 1 #I# 2-Chlorophenol ND U 2.97 6.81 ug/L 1 t Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ND U 2.78 6.81 ug/L 1 n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND U 3.04 6.81 ug/L 1 Hexachloroethane ND U 1.91 6.81 ug/L 1 Nitrobenzene ND U 2.98 6.81 ug/L 1 Isophorone ND U 2.85 6.81 ug/L 1 2-Nitrophenol ND U 2.68 6.81 ug/L 1 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND U 3.01 6.81 ug/L 1 Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ND U 2.89 6.81 ug/L 1 2,4-Dichlorophenol ND U 2.81 6.81 ug/L 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND U 2.36 6.81 ug/L 1 Naphthalene ND U 2.64 6.81 ug/L 1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND U 2.07 6.81 ug/L 1 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND U 2.70 6.81 ug/L 1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND U 1.07 13.6 ug/L 1 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND U 2.77 6.81 ug/L 1 2-Chloronaphthalene ND U 2.72 6.81 ug/L 1 Dimethyl phthalate ND U 2.92 6.81 ug/L 1 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND U 2.56 6.81 ug/L 1 Acenaphthene ND U 2.81 6.81 ug/L 1 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND U 0.910 34.1 ug/L 1 4-Nitrophenol ND U 1.73 34.1 ug/L 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND U 2.51 6.81 ug/L 1 Fluorene ND U 3.32 6.81 ug/L 1 Diethyl phthalate ND U 2.86 6.81 ug/L 1 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND U 3.35 6.81 ug/L 1 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND U 0.673 34.1 ug/L 1 Diphenylamine ND U 2.75 6.81 ug/L 1 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND U 2.78 6.81 ug/L 1 Hexachlorobenzene ND U 2.63 6.81 ug/L 1 Pentachlorophenol ND U 2.11 34.1 ug/L 1 Phenanthrene ND U 2.71 6.81 ug/L 1 Anthracene ND U 2.63 6.81 ug/L 1 Di-n-butyl phthalate ND U 2.60 6.81 ug/L 1 Fluoranthene ND U 2.75 6.81 ug/L 1 Pyrene ND U 2.74 6.81 ug/L 1 Butyl benzyl phthalate ND U 2.57 6.81 ug/L 1 Benzo(a)anthracene ND U 2.67 6.81 ug/L 1 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND U 2.38 13.6 ug/L 1 Chrysene ND U 3.00 6.81 ug/L 1 Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND U 2.66 6.81 ug/L 1 Print Date 03/24/2011 N C. Certification -J # 481 SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 t 910,350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.5gs.com Member of SGS Group I - SGS Results of BP-2 Client Sample ID: BP-2 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471001-D Lab Project ID: 31100471 Results by EPA 625 Parameter Result Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND Benzo(a)pyrene ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND Acenaphthylene ND Di-n-octyl phthalate ND Surrogates 2-Fluorophenol 80.8 Phenol-d6 85.4 Nitrobenzene-d5 90.2 2-Fluorobiphenyl 75.3 2,4, 6-Tribromophenol 80.6 Terphenyl-d 14 55.8 Batch Information Analytical Batch: XMS1042 Analytical Method: EPA 625 j Instrument: MSD10 Analyst: CMP Analytical Date/Time: 03122/2011 01:11 Qua[ U U U U U U U U Collection Date: 03/16/2011 14:35 Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Matrix: Water DL LO /CL Units DF 2.67 6.81 ug/L 1 3.15 6.81 ug/L 1 2.53 6.81 ug/L 1 2.75 6.81 ug/L 1 2.75 6.81 ug/L 1 2.93 6.81 ug/L 1 2.72 6.81 ug/L 1 1.99 6.81 ug/L 1 33.1-118 % 1 49.0-120 % 1 46.0-118 % 1 50.0-107 % 1 29.3-152 % 1 22.1-142 % 1 SGS North America Inc. 15500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 Prep Batch: XXX1134 Prep Method: EPA 625 Prep Date/Time: 03/19/2011 15:30 Prep Initial Wt./Vol.: 734 Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL SGS Results of BP-3 Client Sample ID: BP-3 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-B Lab Project ID: 31100471 Results by EPA 624 Parameter 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether Benzene Bromod ich lorometha ne Bromoform Bromomethane Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane Dibromochloromethane cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Ethyl Benzene Methylene chloride Tetrachloroethene Toluene Trichloroethene Trichlorofl uoromethane Vinyl chloride m,p-Xylene o-Xylene tert-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE) trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 4-Bromofluorobenzene Toluene d8 i Print Dale: 03124,12011 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40 Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Matrix: Water Result Qual DL LOQ/CL VLk DF ND U 0.123 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.156 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.126 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.165 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.212 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.0697 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.167 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.163 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.140 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.107 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 1.82 25.0 ug/L 1 ND U 0.113 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.110 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.0974 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.237 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.101 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.116 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.311 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.139 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.448 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.134 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.0767 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.0862 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.0877 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.152 5.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.155 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.133 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.125 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.137 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.124 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.182 2.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.0874 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.144 1.00 ug/L 1 ND U 0.223 1.00 ug/L 1 100 63.5-140 % 1 100 84.7-115 % 1 100 81.8-117 % 1 SGS North America Inc 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 it 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www.us.sgs.com i N.C. Certification # 481 Member of SGS Group Results of BP-3 Client Sample ID: BP-3 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-B Lab Project ID: 31100471 Results by EPA 624 Parameter Result Batch Information - --- - — -- - W- Analytical Batch VMS1098 Analytical Method: EPA 624 Instrument: MSD3 i Analyst: BWS Analytical DatelTime: 03/21/2011 14:48 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40 Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Matrix: Water u I DL LOOlCL Units Prep Batch: VXX1204 Prep Method: EPA 624 Prep DatelTime: 03/21/2011 16:58 Prep Initial Wt./Vol.: 40 mL Prep Extract Vol: 40 mL PIF Print Date: 0312412011 N.C. Certification # 481 SGS North America Inc. 15500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 Group SGS Results of BP-3 Client Sample ID: BP-3 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-D Lab Project ID: 31100471 Results by EPA 625 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40 Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Matrix: Water Parameter Result Qual DL L CL Units DF Phenol ND U 2.39 5.07 ug/L 1 Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether ND U 2.24 5.07 ug/L 1 2-Chlorophenol ND U 2.21 5.07 ug/L 1 Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether ND U 2.07 5.07 ug/L 1 n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND U 2.26 5.07 ug/L 1 Hexachloroethane ND U 1.42 5.07 ug/L 1 Nitrobenzene ND U 2.22 5.07 ug/L 1 Isophorone ND U 2.12 5.07 ug/L 1 2-Nitrophenol ND U 2.00 5.07 ug/L 1 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND U 2.24 5.07 ug/L 1 Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ND U 2.15 5.07 ug/L 1 2,4-Dichlorophenol ND U 2.09 5.07 ug/L 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND U 1.75 5.07 ug/L 1 Naphthalene ND U 1.97 5.07 ug/L 1 Hexachlorobutadiene ND U 1.54 5.07 ug/L 1 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND U 2.01 5.07 ug/L 1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND U 0.799 10.1 ug/L 1 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND U 2.06 5.07 ug/L 1 2-Chloronaphthalene ND U 2.03 5.07 ug/L 1 Dimethyl phthalate ND U 2.17 5.07 ug/L 1 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND U 1.91 5.07 ug/L 1 Acenaphthene ND U 2.09 5.07 ug/L 1 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND U 0.677 25.4 ug/L 1 4-Nitrophenol ND U 1.29 25.4 ug/L 1 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND U 1.87 5.07 ug/L 1 Fluorene ND U 2.47 5.07 ug/L 1 Diethyl phthalate ND U 2.13 5.07 ug/L 1 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND U 2.49 5.07 ug/L 1 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ND U 0.501 25.4 ug/L 1 Diphenylamine ND U 2.05 5.07 ug/L 1 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND U 2.07 5.07 ug/L 1 Hexachlorobenzene ND U 1.96 5.07 ug/L 1 Pentachlorophenol ND U 1.57 25.4 ug/L 1 Phenanthrene ND U 2.02 5.07 ug/L 1 Anthracene ND U 1.96 5.07 ug/L 1 Di-n-butyl phthalate ND U 1.94 5.07 ug/L 1 Fluoranthene ND U 2.05 5.07 ug/L 1 Pyrene ND U 2.04 5.07 ug/L 1 Butyl benzyl phthalate ND U 1.92 5.07 ug/L 1 Benzo(a)anthracene ND U 1.99 5.07 ug/L 1 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND U 1.77 10.1 ug/L 1 Chrysene ND U 2.23 5.07 ug/L 1 Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND U 1.98 5.07 ug/L {{ 1 Print Date: 03/24/2011 N.C. Certification # 481 SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 t 910.350.1903 If 910.350.1557 www.us.sas.com Member of SGS Group SGS Results of BP-3 Client Sample ID: BP-3 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471002-D Lab Project ID: 31100471 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 12:40 Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Matrix: Water - Results by EPA 625 Parameter Result Qual DL L / L Units Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND U 1.99 5.07 ug/L Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND U 2.34 5.07 ug/L Benzo(a)pyrene ND U 1.89 5.07 ug/L Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND U 2.05 5.07 ug/L Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND U 2.05 5.07 ug/L Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND U 2.18 5.07 ug/L Acenaphthylene ND U 2.03 5.07 ug/L Di-n-octyl phthalate ND U 1.48 5.07 ug/L Surrogates 2-Fluorophenol 69.3 33.1-118 % Phenol-d6 74.1 49.0-120 % Nitrobenzene-d5 82.0 46.0-118 % 2-Fluorobiphenyl 73.3 50.0-107 % 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 69.5 29.3-152 % Terphenyl-d14 91.1 22.1-142 % Batch Information Analytical Batch: XMS1042 Prep Batch: XXX1134 Analytical Method: EPA 625 Prep Method: EPA 625 Instrument: MSD10 Prep Date/Time: 03/19/2011 15:30 Analyst: CMP Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 986 mL Analytical Date/Time: 03/22/2011 01:34 Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL Print Date: 03/2412011 SGS North America Inc. Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 DF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N.C. Member of SGS Grow SGS Results of BP-10 Client Sample ID: BP-10 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 16:15 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-A Matrix: Water Lab Project ID: 31100471 -Results by EPA 624 Parameter Result Qual DL LOQ/CL Uaiii DF 1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane ND U 0.123 1.00 ug/L 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND U 0.156 1.00 ug/L 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND U 0.126 1.00 ug/L 1 1,1-Dichloroethane ND U 0.165 1.00 ug/L 1 1,1-Dichloroethene ND U 0.212 1.00 ug/L 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.0697 1.00 ug/L 1 1,2-Dichloroethane ND U 0.167 1.00 ug/L 1 1,2-Dichloropropane ND U 0.163 1.00 ug/L 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.140 1.00 ug/L 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND U 0.107 1.00 ug/L 1 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND U 1.82 25.0 ug/L 1 Benzene ND U 0.113 1.00 ug/L 1 Bromodichloromethane ND U 0.110 1.00 ug/L 1 Bromoform ND U 0.0974 1.00 ug/L 1 Bromomethane ND U 0.237 1.00 ug/L 1 Carbon tetrachloride ND U 0.101 1.00 ug/L 1 Chlorobenzene ND U 0.116 1.00 ug/L 1 Chloroethane ND U 0.311 1.00 ug/L 1 Chloroform ND U 0.139 1.00 ug/L 1 Chloromethane ND U 0.448 1.00 ug/L 1 Dibromochloromethane ND U 0.134 1.00 ug/L 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0767 1.00 ug/L 1 trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene ND U 0.0862 1.00 ug/L 1 Ethyl Benzene ND U 0.0877 1.00 ug/L 1 Methylene chloride ND U 0.152 5.00 ug/L 1 Tetrachloroethene ND U 0.155 1.00 ug/L 1 Toluene ND U 0.133 1.00 ug/L 1 Trichloroethene ND U 0.125 1.00 ug/L 1 Trichlorofluoromethane ND U 0.137 1.00 ug/L 1 Vinyl chloride ND U 0.124 1.00 ug/L 1 m,p-Xylene ND U 0.182 2.00 ug/L 1 o-Xylene ND U 0.0874 1.00 ug/L 1 tert-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE) ND U 0.144 1.00 ug/L 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND U 0.223 1.00 ug/L 1 Surrogates 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 63.5-140 % 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 84.7-115 % 1 Toluene d8 100 81.8-117 % 1 Print Date, 03/24/2011 N.C. Certification # 481 SGS North America Inc. 15500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 t 910.350.1903f910.350.1557 www.us_sgs.com Member of SGS Group Results of BP-10 Client Sample ID: BP-10 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-A Lab Project ID: 31100471 Results by EPA 624 Parameter Result Qual Batch Information ---- ------ -- - a u VMS1098 Analytical Method: EPA 624 ¢ Instrument: MSD3 j Analyst: BWS Analytical Date/Time: 03/21/2011 14:23 SGS North America Inc. 5500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 910.350.1903 f 910.350.1557 www_us sys.com. Member of SGS Group W n W W-p m 0 D-u T 2 A 0 A A p MN A N D N O N N= A= z -+ N (p N N F z= 7 W N T T CD C 'G C 0 S m m Cp (") Cp C A Z A n T (� A m 0 m m N A A z O .- CD z ^' 0 S CD N 'z N `C CD O 0 7 j O x S S S O j 3 S O X S X U A N -0 O X S CD or N 0 0 d O m 0 0 m CD CD S 0 S N N N 7 S m CD S O S '< (D O ° V v 0 v° .. S .� .� `G 0 M. p D� MO. S S m S O 0 O �_ O �_ ° N CD m m o 0� 3° s ° �° 5° o or 0 o W o 0? O° Er m o °- °�° � CD Q S 'O CD (D m 0 0 N 0 m C 0 CD O C S S° 3 C m O O(D CD O 0 0 m ,C CD d .S. E N 0 `G m 3 `G 01 CD 0 m m N S -0 O ID Di O N S S N -° O 0 ° S 0 CD O 9 V m � 0 � N N S° .� _°. m 7 O CD 7 O S j N d CD O N(D `< (D m m m j (D U m N 0 m `OG ° CD yCD CD K = 'G m 0 N 0 m0 7 3 N OG_ 3 CD CD C1 0 m m 3 7 fR CD CD 0 S m 0 S 0 CD m� CD j m CD CD z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z;a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I0 c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C m N N N N N N N -+ N N N O N N N -� --+ O N N N N O N N N N N N N N -+ N N N N N 0 O N O O CO O CO O O O O Cn cn O 0 W m w fJ O w O Cn O O -+ j W O— N A W N W? Ir W W N A V W O W V N O A O W A N C A O W O NO M W N O A O Cn V O M N N V O CA (n Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn N Cn Cn Cn N m Cn W Cn N N N 0 °1 Cn m Cn Cn Cn Cn (n Cn (n to Cn m Cn Cn (n Cn Cn Cn A O O O O O CD O O A 0 0 0 r N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n I� r c c c c c c c c c C C c c c C c c c c C C c c c c c c c c c c c c C c c c c c c c C c ° 0 C C r= r= r r= r- r- r- r= rl r- r- r. r. r= r= r- r- r- r- r- r- r= r- r= r- r= r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r= r- r � N z' 0 T W 0 0 Doi O 3 .P (A (D N n = CD CA rS CS CD CD cn c cr 3 w o m�_m`c�iv W D 0 — J 0 W " � v O N A CA J v A V O � r 0 O • we b' • yCD O X L CD CD o C1 7 v v W O O CW w V CA N N O O c _SGS--, Results of BP-10 Client Sample ID: BP-10 Client Project ID: Camp Lejeune Lab Sample ID: 31100471003-D Lab Project ID: 31100471 i Results by EPA 625 Parameter Result Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND Benzo(a)pyrene ND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND Acenaphthylene ND Di-n-octyl phthalate ND Surrogates 2-Fluorophenol 68.1 Phenol-d6 73.5 Nitrobenzene-d5 77.6 2-Fluorobiphenyl 70.8 2,4, 6-Tdbromophenol 60.5 Terphenyl-d 14 70.8 Batch Information -- w Analytical Batch: XMS1045 Analytical Method: EPA 625 Instrument: MSD6 Analyst: CMP Analytical Date/Time: 03122/2011 15:26 Collection Date: 03/16/2011 16:15 Received Date: 03/17/2011 15:25 Matrix: Water ual DL LOQ/CL Units DF U 2.04 5.20 ug/L 1 U 2.40 5.20 ug/L 1 U 1.94 5.20 ug/L 1 U 2.10 5.20 ug/L 1 U 2.10 5.20 ug/L 1 U 2.24 5.20 ug/L 1 U 2.08 5.20 ug/L 1 U 1.52 5.20 ug/L 1 33.1-118 % 1 49.0-120 % 1 46.0-118 % 1 50.0-107 % 1 29.3-152 % 1 22.1-142 % 1 SGS North America Inc. 15500 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 Prep Batch: XXX1134 Prep Method: EPA 625 Prep Date/Time: 03/19/2011 15:30 Prep Initial Wt.Nol.: 961 mL Prep Extract Vol: 5 mL Member of SGS Group SG$- CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD SGS North America Inc. v� I� Locations Nationwide Alaska Maryland New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio www.us.sgs.com 101117 CLIENT: M� C%�� r I'u SGS Reference: YW 1 PAGE OF _ CONTACT: / a �c1 SE Sv+J� PHONE N0:(qj �) $ 3 1 - g�C jo c— PROJECT / SITE/PWSID#: CJdjLlf� L� ev ram.- No C SAr7PLE TYPE Preservafives urea REPORTS TO: Analysis Required / ^ _ _ _ �] 1 9 �7 Lets 0 S C..x n .3 1 O(✓ FAX N0. (�I l) O N T A 1 c= COMP GRAB 3 INVOICE TO: QUOTE #: NN� P.O. NUMBER N21 EE R S VI LAB NO. SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION DATE TIME MATRIX � REMARKS s a (-2ya G 3 a - l U Ib� �► l(�l S U� S 3 5 4 is d (1 Date Time Received By: Shipping Carrier: Samples Received Cold? (Circl YE NO Shipping Ticket No: Temperature C: ✓i C. (2) Date Time Received Special Deliverable Requirements: Chain of Custody Seal: (Circle) r(4) INTACT BROKEN ABSENT 3) Date Time Received By: Special Instructions: 4) Date Time Received By: Requested Turnaround Time: ❑ RUSH ❑ STD Date Needed -j 2vv vv. rotier unve anchorage, AK 99518 Tel: (907) 562-2343 Fax: (907) 561-5301 O 5500 Business Drive Wilmington, NC 28405 Tel: (910) 350-1903 Fax: (910) 350-1557 White - Retained by Lab Pmk - Retained by 0 ent SGS North America Inc. Sample Receipt Checklist (SRC) Client: Pr Work Order No.: 3 (�� T �j 1. Shipped Notes: gHand Delivered 2. COC Present on Receipt No COC _ _Additional Transmittal Forms 3. Custody Tape on Container �C No Custody Tape 4. Samples Intact Samples Broken / Leaking 5. _ZChilled on Receipt Actual Temp.(s) in °C: 5_ %° C' _Ambient on Receipt _ Walk-in on Ice; Coming down to temp. Received Outside of Temperature Specifications 6. Sufficient Sample Submitted `Insufficient Sample Submitted 7. _ Chlorine absent < 2 _HNO3 HCL < 2 Additional Preservatives verified (see notes) 8. Received Within Holding Time _ Not Received Within Holding Time 9. No Discrepancies Noted Discrepancies Noted 10. No Headspace present in VOC vials Headspace present in VOC vials >6mm Comments: Inspected and Logged in by: «� MI_11.5 Chernikov, Sergei From: Slate, Louise [LOSLATE@mactec.com] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 3:15 PM To: Chernikov, Sergei Subject: Figure for borrow pits 2 and 3 Attachments: figure 1_BP2_3.pdf Sergei, Today is the first day back in the office since Monday. Here are the figures you requested. I will send the figure for borrow pit 10 in a separate email. Please let me know if you need anything else. Louise Borrow Pit 2 Lat 34 43' 32" N Long 77 22' 58" W Borrow Pit 3 Lat 34 43' 23" N Long 77 22' 11" W Louise O. Slate, PE, LEED AP I Senior Engineer I Environmental Department MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 3301 Atlantic Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina Office 919.876.0416 Direct 919.831.8006 1 Fax 919.831.8136 Email loslate(a)mactec.com I Web www.mactec.com Date: March 29, 2011 To: Sergei Chernikov From: Linda Willis, Env. Eng., DWQ, SWPS Through: Rick Shiver, Wilmington Regional Supervisor, DWQ, SWPS Subject: NPDES Permit Applications NCO089079 MCB Camp lejeune Borrow Pit 10 And NCO089061 MCB Camp lejeune Borrow Pits 2 and 3 NPDES Permit Applications were received by the Division of Water Quality for three borrow pits for coverage under individual NPDES wastewater permits. Camp Lejeune proposes a discharge of 410,000 gallons per day of pit wastewater to the Northeast Creek from borrow pit #10 and up to 720,000 gallons per day from borrow pits #2 and #3 collectively. The classification of Northeast Creek in the vicinity of the discharge is class SC, NSW, HQW. The application for Pits 2 and 3 indicate a TSS daily discharge of 100 to 1000 Ibs/day. The TSS will be restricted at 10 mg/L per day to meet HQW water quality limitations. This would result in less than 60 Ibs/day TSS. The discharge needs to occur in the main stem of Northeast Creek since the input of freshwater to the small tidal creeks would change the nature of the receiving streams adversely, potentially preventing their function as a PNA. Salinity in the creek (as well as the mainstem of Northeast Creek) ranges from 0.47 parts per thousand to 24 ppt depending upon the tide. The following considerations are offered: 1. The receiving waters are classified HQW (along with SC) since this area of the Cape Fear River is a Primary Nursery Area. TSS should be limited to 10 mg/L daily maximum as well as monthly average. Temperature and pH should be required for monitoring. 2. A means to sample the discharge from the settling basin needs to be provided since the outfall to the Northeast Creek may be difficult to access for sampling purposes. A diffuser should be used at the end of the pipe. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. DWQ CO Files DWQ WiRO NPDES MAR 31 2011 p�ENR-W — - QUA NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. Mail the complete application to: N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 NPDES Permit Number INCOO Q Please print or type. 1. Contact Information: Owner Name Facility Name Mailing Address City State / Zip Code Telephone Number Fax Number e-mail Address Commanding Officer, US Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune MCB Camp Lejeune Public Works Division PSC Box 20005 Camp Lejeune NC, 28542 910-451-2213 910-451-2927 Carl.h.baker a usmc.mil 2. Location of facility producing discharge: Check here if same as above ❑ Street Address or State Road City State / Zip Code County Brewster Boulevard MCB Camp Lejeune NC 28542 Onslow 3. Operator Information: Name of the firm, consultant or other entity that operates the facility. (Note that this is not referring to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC) Name Carl Baker, Public Works Division, MCB Camp Lejeune Mailing Address 1005 Michael Road City Camp Lejeune State / Zip Code NC, 28542 Telephone Number 910-451-2213 Fax Number 910-451-2927 4. Ownership Status: Page 1 of 5 C-MI 10108 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. Federal ® State ❑ Private ❑ Public ❑ S. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code(s): 1442 6. Number of employees: N/A 7. Describe the treatment system List all installed waste treatment components with capacities, describe the processes that generate wastewaters. If the space provided is not sufficient attach a separate sheet of paper with the system description. As part of dewatering borrow pits 2 and 3, groundwater will be pumped to a stilling basin and discharged into Northeast Creek. If necessary, pumped groundwater will be run through a silt bag to reduce TSS before being otherwise treated and discharged. 8. Is facility covered under federal effluent limitation guidelines? No ❑ Yes If yes, specify the category? 40 CFR 436 C 9. Principal product(s) produced: mineral soil for roadway fill Principal raw material(s) consumed: no materials consumed in pit Briefly describe the manufacturing process(es): The borrow pits will be excavated to a depth of 20 feet below ground surface. Pits may be excavated in a series of cells to manage groundwater. Groundwater discharge will be pumped from cell to cell or from the cells to a stilling basin equipped with a skimmer and discharged to Northeast Creek. Suitable soils excavated from the borrow pits will be used to construct the road bed for the Base Entry Point and Road. Unsuitable soils will be spoiled within the borrow pit area and permanently stabilized according to the approved plans. Side slopes of the borrow pits will be 3:1 down to the groundwater table and then will be 2:1 to the bottom of the pit. Page 2 of 5 C-MI 10/08 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. 10. Amount of principal product produced or raw material consumed Listspecific amounts consumed and/or units of roduction over the last three ears Product Produced or Raw Material Consumed AVERAGE Product Produced or Raw Material Consumed PEAK per Day 1,000 CY per pit 1,500 CY per pit per Month 20,000 CY per pit 25,000 CY per pit per Year 168,000 CY pit 2; 132,000 CY pit 3 168,000 CY pit 2; 132,000 CY pit 3 11. Frequency of discharge: Continuous ® Intermittent ❑ If intermittent: Days per week discharge occurs: Duration: 12. Types of wastewater discharged to surface waters only Discharge Flow GALLONS PER DAY Sanitary - monthly average none Utility water, etc. - monthly average none Process water - monthly average none Stormwater - monthly average none Other - monthly average Explain: Groundwater from borrow pit Monthly Average total discharge (all types) 720,000 gpd or less -> 21,600,000 gal/month 13. Number of separate discharge points: 1 Outfall Identification number(s) 2 and 3 14. Name of receiving stream(s) (Provide a map showing the exact location of each outfall, including latitude and longitude): Northeast Creek Page 3 of 5 C-MI 10/08 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. 15. Effluent Data [for new or proposed discharges] Provide data for the parameters listed. Temperature and pH shall be grab samples, for all other parameters 24-hour composite sampling shall be used. If more than one analysis is reported, report daily maximum and monthly average. If only one analysis is reported, report as daily maximum. NOTE: Permittees requesting renewal should complete the table ONLY for the parameters nvrrontlit snnnitnrnd Svmmnrl2o the »rzst 3 years of effluent datat- Parameter Daily Maximum Monthly Average Units of Measurement Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) Total Organic Carbon Total Suspended Solids 10 10 mg/1 Ammonia as N Temperature (Summer) Temperature (Winter) pH 6-9 6-9 Fecal Coliform (If sanitary waste is present) Total Residual Chlorine (if chlorine is used) 16. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications (check all that apply and provide permit numbers or check none if not applicabler Permit Type Permit Number Type Number Hazardous Waste (RCRA) none NESHAPS (CAA) none UIC (SDWA) none Ocean Dumping (MPRSA) none NPDES *NCG010000 Dredge or fill (Section 404 or 2010-00436 PSD (CAA) none Other Non -attainment program none *ONSLO-2010-104 ESCP - Stormwater Discharge for Construction Activities 17. List any chemicals that may be discharged (Please list and explain source and potential amounts.) No chemicals are anticipated to be discharged. Page 4 of 5 C-MI 10/08 NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION - SHORT FORM C - Minor Industrial Minor industrial, manufacturing and commercial facilities. 18. Is this facility located on Indian country? (check one) Yes ❑ No 19. Applicant Certification I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. Printed name of Signer of Applicant ViA_TY Vk g UC 000_6 0 H- (Gc- Title Date North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6 (b)(2) provides that: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required to be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.) Page 5 of 5 C-MI 10108 Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Dee Freeman, Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Coleen H. Sullins, Director Division of Water Quality April 8, 2011 Mr. Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer Public Works Division MCB Camp Lejeune 1005 Michael Road Camp Lejeune, North Carolina 28542 Subject: Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA) Permit NCO089079 Permit NCO089061 Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10 Onslow County Dear Mr. Baker: The Division of Water Quality (Division) has reviewed your Engineering Alternative Analysis (EAA) for the Borrow Pits 2, 3, and 10. The Division concurs with the conclusions and recommendations of the EAA. The EAA you have submitted is sufficient to meet the Alternative Analysis requirements for a new discharge. The Division will now proceed to the permitting of the discharge. The entire permitting process may take between 60 and 120 days. If the draft permits causes significant protests from local citizens, governmental organizations, and/or environmental groups a public hearing may be scheduled and issuance of the final permit may be further delayed. In some cases the Division may modify or deny the request for a new permit based on the public hearing results. If you have any questions about the NPDES permit process, contact me at the following e-mail address - ser ei.chernikov@ncdenr.gov, or telephone number 919-807-6393. cc: NPDES File Wilmington Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Louise Slater (e-mail copy) MACTEC Engineering and Consulting 3301 Atlantic Ave., Raleigh, NC 27604 Mailing Address Phone (919) 807-6300 1617 Mail Service Center - Fax (919) 807-6492 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Sincerely,7 , Sergei Chemikov, Ph.D. Environmental Engineer II Complex NPDES Permitting Unit Location 1�1QrethCarolina 512 N. Salisbury St. aturallJ Raleigh, NC 27604 Internet: www.ncwateroualitv.ore Customer Service 1-877-623-6748 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Engineering Alternatives Analysis 1. Determination that proposed discharge is allowed Several potential restrictions exist to wastewater discharge to surface waters. These are: • Zero flow stream restrictions • Receiving stream classification restrictions • Basinwide Water Quality Plans • Impaired waters and TMDLs • Presence of endangered species Borrow pits 2 and 3 for construction of the new Base Entry Point and Road at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp Lejeune are proposed to discharge to Northeast Creek in the White Oak River Basin, Onslow County. The drainage area of Northeast Creek at the discharge points is approximately 50 square miles. Northeast Creek is a tidally affected stream up to the highway 24 road crossing, approximately 1.5 miles upstream of the discharge points. There are no zero flow stream restrictions on Northeast Creek. Northeast Creek (19-16-(3.5)) is classified as an SC, HQW, NSW. It is also classified as a primary nursery area (PNA). According to 15A NCAC 02B .0224 (1) (b) (ii), new or expanded wastewater discharges in High Quality Waters have limitations on discharges of total suspended solids (TSS) of 10 mg/I for trout waters and PNAs and 20 mg/I for all other High Quality Waters. Based on this Rule, effluent is limited to 10 mg/I for TSS. Basinwide Water Quality Plans for the White Oak River Basin indicate that Northeast Creek is part of the New River watershed, which is contained entirely within Onslow County. It drains portions of Hoffman State Forest, the City of Jacksonville, the Village of White Oak, and MCB Camp Lejeune. The discharge points for dewatering borrow pits 2 and 3 are located on Northeast Creek between ambient monitoring stations PA 10 and PA 11. This is near the transition from impaired to non impaired water quality status for aquatic life. The stream reach upstream of PA 10 at Highway 24 is rated impaired to its headwaters. According to the state 303(d) list, Northeast Creek 19-16-(3.5)a is listed as impaired for aquatic life in non -shellfish harvesting waters due to low pH and chlorophyll a and supporting for recreation. Northeast Creek 19-16-(3.5)b is supporting for aquatic life. There is no TMDL developed for Northeast Creek. According to the 404/401 permit developed for the Base Entry Road, there are few Threatened/ Endangered (T/E) species in Northeast Creek. These are the manatee, American alligator, and short nosed sturgeon. Of these manatee sightings are rare. Short nosed sturgeon sightings are historic, meaning they haven't been seen in over 50 years in this location. The manatee and short nosed MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits\NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Alternatives Analysis 1 sturgeon are subject to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The alligator is listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance. It is not subject to section 7 of the ESA. 2. Projections for population and flow The discharge request is not due to wastewater generated by domestic populations. This is limited to wastewater discharge to dewater a borrow pit to construct the Base Entry Point and Road at MCB Camp Lejeune. Therefore population projections are irrelevant to this discharge. Flow projections have been conservatively developed. It was assumed that the entire borrow pit would be dewatered from one well located in the center of each pit in order to excavate in the dry. Operationally, the pits will be excavated in cells, which discharge less water because some water may be stored in other cells. More water will be pumped from borrow pit 2 because it is slightly larger than borrow pit 3 and the ground water table is closer to the ground surface. Based on these conservative calculations, a maximum of 720,000 GPD will be pumped from borrow pit 2 and a maximum of 216,000 GPD will be pumped from borrow pit 3. It is highly unlikely that groundwater will be pumped from the pits simultaneously. The plan is to remove suitable fill from borrow pit 3 and when that pit is exhausted to move to borrow pit 2; therefore, both pits will not be operating simultaneously. 3. Evaluate technically feasible alternatives. Borrow pits 2 and 3 are intended to be used for two years during the construction of the Base Entry Road at MCB Camp Lejeune. These are not intended to be permanent discharges. Once borrow pits have been excavated to their design depth, they are intended to be graded so there is a 3:1 slope or flatter down to the water line and a 2:1 slope or platter below the water line. They will then be permanently stabilized in place. No additional pumping from these pits is anticipated. Alternatives to be considered include connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system, land application, wastewater reuse, direct discharge, and a combination of alternatives. It is not considered feasible to connect fresh groundwater from a borrow pit to an existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Adding too much freshwater would impair the media (i.e. kill the bugs) used in digesting domestic wastewater. Furthermore, a new sewer line would need to be constructed to tie the borrow pits to the existing sanitary sewer lines. The cost to direct this water from the borrow pits to the WWTP on base is not supported by the short term nature of the dewatering operations, nor does this quantity of freshwater into the system support the ability of the WWTP to treat domestic wastewater. Land application is not feasible. MCB Camp Lejeune currently does not have a permit to land -apply, nor is there suitable land nearby where it could be applied because large spray areas are required. The land surrounding the borrow pits is used for military operations. It is a shorter distance and less cost to discharge to Northeast Creek than to an area that may be suitable to land -apply. MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits\NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Alternatives Analysis 2 In general, wastewater reuse is not feasible because there is insufficient demand for the quantity of water that will be removed from the borrow pits in the dewatering process. With that being said, some of the water from the borrow pits could be used to control dust or moisten the soil as part of the road bed construction process. Using water from the borrow pits for this operation conserves potable water for domestic use on Base. Direct discharge is the most feasible option. Dewatering is intended to keep the construction site cleaner and operations running smoother by excavating fill material in the dry rather than in the wet. The pollutant of greatest concern is total suspended sediment (TSS). To limit TSS, discharge will be pumped from cells within the borrow pit to a stilling basin and from there to the bank of Northeast Creek. Before the water is discharged into Northeast Creek, it will be run through a sediment filter bag which will serve as another level of treatment and as a means of dispersing the flow and slowing it down before it enters the creek. If necessary PAM can be added to the stilling basin to encourage settling of sediment and produce cleaner discharge. 4. Evaluate economic feasibility of alternatives If discharge were to be pumped to the WWTP serving MCB Camp Lejeune, an 8-inch force main would be required to carry 500 gpm from the borrow pits to the sanitary sewer trunk line. This connector provides a full flow velocity in the pipe of 3.2 ft/sec and a friction loss of 0.465 feet/100 feet. This system would require additional design cost and a wastewater extension permit in addition to the construction cost. Typical construction cost for an 8-inch ductile iron force main would average approximately $42 per linear foot (source R.S. Means estimating guide 22nd annual edition — 2007). In addition to cost, this process could add months to the schedule, potentially causing construction delays. Adding this much freshwater to the WWTP could also be detrimental to treatment of domestic wastewater. Land application of wastewater from the borrow pits is not feasible for several reasons. First, a geologic study is required to ensure soils are suitable for infiltration and that there is enough separation between the soil surface and seasonal high water table. A permit to land apply wastewater is required and a spray irrigation system would have to be designed. The permit and design process is estimated to cost $50,000. In order to dewater 500 gpm seven days a week, two or three big spray irrigation guns are needed at a cost of $40,000 per gun. Assuming 1 inch of wastewater can be applied per week, 186 acres are needed for this volume of water. Even if soil infiltration capacity is such that it can handle more than 1 inch per week, a very large area is required for the spray field. Large tracts of land are not readily available near the borrow pits so significant cost and effort would be needed to pipe the water from the borrow pit to the spray field and these areas would not be available for military tactical operations for a period of time, which is detrimental to the mission of MCB Camp Lejeune. The most economically feasible option is discharging into Northeast Creek. Costs related to this option include the cost of pumping and maintaining the pump and associated intake and discharge lines, the MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits\NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Ahernatives Analysis 3 stilling basin, and maintenance of the sediment filter bag at the end of the pipe serving as both a filter and a level spreader. A potential cost is for polyacrylamide (PAM) application in the stilling basin to encourage more settling of TSS. Of these three options, discharging water from the borrow pits into Northeast Creek has the lowest capital cost by far and lower recurring costs. MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. MCB Camp Lejeune Base Entry Road NPDES Individual Wastewater Discharge Permit Application P:\6470\09\Camp Lejeune\Borrow Pits\NPDES Individual Permit\Engineering Alternatives Analysis 4 BOO -ate Pit Z 1`1 C B 'C..Et w,p L. f eu,..L� Predicting Radius of Influence Under Pumping Conditions From Cooper & Jacob 1946 (See Driscoll pg 219) s = [264Q/T] x log [0.3Tt/r2S] Where: s = drawdown in ft at distance r from pumping well Q = pumping rate in gpm T = transmissivity in gpd/ft t = time since pumping started in days r = distance in ft from pumping well S = storage coefficient (0.001 for confined, 0.2 for unconfined) Proposed Well: Q = 500 gpm T = 5000 gpd/ft S = 0.2 t (days) => 1 10 100 365 r (ft) s (ft) s (ft) s (ft) s (ft) 1 102.30 128.70 155.10 169.95 10 49.50 75.90 102.30 117.15 20 33.61 60.01 86.41 101.25 30 24.31 50.71 77.11 91.95 40 17.71 44.11 70.51 85.36 50 12.60 39.00 65.40 80.24 60 8.42 34.82 61.22 76.06 70 4.88 31.28 57.68 72.52 80 1.82 28.22 54.62 69.46 90 -0.88 25.52 51.92 66.76 100 -3.30 23.10 49.50 64.35 200 -19.19 7.21 33.61 48.45 300 -28.49 -2.09 24.31 39.15 400 -35.09 -8.69 17.71 32.56 500 -40.20 -13.80 12.60 27.44 600 -44.38 -17.98 8.42 23.26 700 -47.92 -21.52 4.88 19.72 800 -50.98 -24.58 1.82 16.66 900 -53.68 -27.28 -0.88 13.96 1000 -56.10 -29.70 -3.30 11.55 2000 -71.99 -45.59 -19.19 -4.35 2250 -74.69 -48.29 -21.89 -7.05 2500 -77.11 -50.71 -24.31 -9.47 2750 -79.30 -52.90 -26.50 -11.65 3000 -81.29 -54.89 -28.49 -13.65 3250 -83.13 -56.73 -30.33 -15.48 3500 -84.83 -58.43 -32.03 -17.18 3750 -86.41 -60.01 -33.61 -18.76 4000 -87.89 -61.49 -35.09 -20.24 4250 -89.28 -62.88 -36.48 -21.63 4500 -90.59 -64.19 -37.79 -22.94 4750 -91.83 -65.43 -39.03 -24.18 5000 -93.00 -66.60 -40.20 -25.36 5250 -94.12 -67.72 -41.32 -26.48 based on Driscoll correlation with density from split -spoon k= 106.5 gpd/ft^2 sampling T=k*b b= 46.75 ft based on NCDENR hydro framework database T= 4978.875 gpd/ft T= 4979 gpd/ft Driscoll If center of pit well Need 16 ft of drawdown minimum Further distance from pit is NE corner near C, approx. 820 ft Therefore: A = 1600 ft B=820ft C = 4020 ft (2xA+B) Based on above, no discernible drawdown in image well Note: negative drawdown values indicate no measureable drawdown is expected at these locations Reference: Driscoll, Fletcher G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells, 2nd edition. Johnson Division, St. Paul, MN, 1089 p. C Borrau) Predicting Radius of Influence Under Pumping Conditions From Cooper & Jacob 1946 (See Driscoll pg 219) s = [264Q/T] x log [0.3Tt/r2S] Where: s = drawdown in ft at distance r from pumping well Q = pumping rate in gpm T = transmissivity in gpd/ft t = time since pumping started in days r = distance in ft from pumping well S = storage coefficient (0.001 for confined, 0.2 for unconfined) Proposed Well: Q = 150 gpm T = 3621 gpd/ft S = 0.2 t(days) => 1 10 100 365 r (ft) s (ft) s (ft) s (ft) s (ft) 1 40.85 51.78 62.72 68.87 10 18.97 29.91 40.85 47.00 20 12.39 23.33 34.26 40.41 30 8.54 19.47 30.41 36.56 40 5.80 16.74 27.68 33.83 50 3.69 14.62 25.56 31.71 60 1.95 12.89 23.83 29.98 70 0.49 11.43 22.36 28.51 80 -0.78 10.16 21.09 27.24 90 -1.90 9.04 19.97 26.12 100 -2.90 8.04 18.97 25.12 200 -9.48 1.45 12.39 18.54 300 -13.33 -2.40 8.54 14.69 400 -16.07 -5.13 5.80 11.95 500 -18.19 -7.25 3.69 9.83 600 -19.92 -8.98 1.95 8.10 700 -21.38 -10.45 0.49 6.64 800 -22.65 -11.72 -0.78 5.37 900 -23.77 -12.83 -1.90 4.25 1000 -24.77 -13.84 -2.90 3.25 2000 -31.36 -20.42 -9.48 -3.33 2250 -32.47 -21.54 -10.60 -4.45 2500 -33.48 -22.54 -11.60 -5.45 2750 -34.38 -23.44 -12.51 -6.36 3000 -35.21 -24.27 -13.33 -7.19 3250 -35.97 -25.03 -14.10 -7.95 3500 -36.67 -25.74 -14.80 -8.65 3750 -37.33 -26.39 -15.45 -9.31 4000 -37.94 -27.00 -16.07 -9.92 4250 -38.52 -27.58 -16.64 -10.49 4500 -39.06 -28.12 -17.19 -11.04 4750 -39.57 -28.64 -17.70 -11.55 5000 -40.06 -29.12 -18.19 -12.04 5250 -40.52 -29.59 -18.65 -12.50 Borrow Area 3 based on Driscoll correlation with density from split- k= 106.5 gpd/ft^2 spoon sampling T=k"b b= 34 ft based on NCDENR hydro framework database T= 3621 gpd/ft T= 3621 gpd/ft Driscoll If center of pit well Need 5 ft of drawdown minimum Further distance from pit is S corner near D', approx. 760 ft Therefore: A = 600 ft B = 760 ft C = 1960 ft (2xA+B) With pumping at 150 gpm Drawdown at B= 5.37 Drawdown at C= no discernible So theoretical drawdown (B-C) = 5.37 Note: negative drawdown values indicate no measureable drawdown is expected at these locations Reference: Driscoll, Fletcher G., 1986. Groundwater and Wells, 2nd edition. Johnson Division, St. Paul, MN, 1089 p. RU (, Legend a TARAWA BOULEVARD ` 9 n. a C Outfall Location 1 U '7 D Roads rl o Borrow Pit Boundary .� Outfa1110 >- m Q Camp Lejeune Boundary j I ST. MARYS'DR In E m W SETH � I't'I4 41rn qM � sA_ C� • `G9�o Source: USDA: Natural Resources Conservation Service NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND - MIDATLANTIC FY10 MCON PROJECT 1382 BASE ENTRY ROAD BP-2 & BP-3 OUTFALLS TO NORTHEAST CREEK 10 1,000 2,000 Feet CAMP LEJEUNE - JACKSONVILLE, ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA FIGURE 1 January 2011 ' 3 4 5 I �g LEGEND N 1 1 W y I i5 1 PERMIT BOUNDARY I (16.74 AC) Z w o so no r�) IIIII N TEMP HAUL ROAD (O21 AC)CID Q 1 1 10 7 t; PERMIT BOUNDARY IKAI` RC I 03:59 03 P �,I 20-2011 If ss/ 029447 NOTES: � yiF� t' - 25' UN -EXCAVATED BUFFER j II _ \ F4 , s INE ? C !. WATER HANDLED BY THE STILLING BASIN AND SKIMMER IS PRIMARILY In (TYP.)�'� PUMPED GROUNDWATER (NOT STORMWATER)TO FACILITATE EXCAVATION BELOW WATER TABLE._, STILLING POND I � :� DTI 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MANAGE WATER WITHIN THE PIT ITSELF TO THE W/SKIMMER m DISCHARGE I \ EXTENT POSSIBLE USING TEMPORARY DNERS/ONS.IF WATER MUST BE 15'X45' (APPROXI \\ou PUMPED FROM PIT TO SPECIAL STILLING BASIN, CONTRACTOR SHALL < SEE DETAIL PROTECT THE PUMP INLET (WET WELL OR SIMILAR) TO MINIMIZE m RIP RAP STILLING BASIN 0 FALL — \ e l� I \ MACTEC I RK&K JV ENTRAINED SEDIMENT. % \. 3. SKIMMER ORIFICE TO BE SIZED BY CONTRACTOR USING NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MANUAL DESIGN GUIDELINES TEMP STREAM C SS/NG LVERT-36' D/A EO USING PUMP RATE AS DETERMINED /N THE FIELD. UN ENT) % �_ is \ i 1 11 \\� 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCHARGING WATER IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE NC GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT CRITERIA I ;�� ,NC NBE EXCAVATION AREA LORE ' _ I tl^ 5. SITE /S LOCATED /N ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROL/NA suw 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB THE AREA WITHIN THE PERMIT j BOUNDARY LIMITS 1N ACCORDANCE WITH THE BASE ENTRY ROAD (P/382) TURE SPECIFICATIONS. / /�. LOOP C �I ` ti;\� _ E a 7. GROUNDWATER OR PRE-TREATED GROUND AND STORMWATER WITHIN THE PIT WHICH MEETS THE WATER QUALITY CRITERIA CAN BE DISCHARGED VIA A TEMPORARY STILLING BASIN OR SPECIAL STILLING BASIN /N 1 I f�... j -•-jj ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS. THE INTENT IS TO KEEP THE CLEAN AND SEDIMENT LADEN WATER STREAMS FROM M/XING,AND REDUCING THE p� STABILIZED ENTRANCE ('-- C LOAD ON THE STILLING BASINS. AI— I ; / L 1 1 + CO .T r) d 8. POND ELEVATION WILL FLUCTUATE WITH CHANGING GROUND WATER ZQ 1 _ CL ~ LEVELS AND STORMWATER EVENTS.LLJ 9. LYNCHBURG FINE SANDY LOAM. TEMP CULV RT - Cii I 8 ~ (18' EQUN NT) I� nll i ii ~ii nl i i Z z d II ;2: MEJ x F1 li �! i n ii ii 1 i u m W ' 11 IZ1 1 11 11 1 N // I a h • IT ,.• Lu Qc AS NOTED H� It 1 I 1 li ll l/It it it It it II .la.x0. /. 11 1 1 1 11 I/ ll 1 / ON.NG ND. 12559342A � 2 in EXCAVATION THA FLOW FROM ST w BASIN A-2 TO THE EXIS ING NCE TOWARDS THE END 0 E I (P1382) CONSTRUCTION. ` COORDINATE; P/T- WI EXCAVATION AS NEEDED. STABILIZED L ENTRANCE i I PERMIT BOU 4. 25'UN-EX AVATED 8UF R (TYPJ P CULVERT 4N EQUIVALENT)) 04, EXCAVATION - AOEA_N STILLING POND--/ WISKIMMER DISCHARGE 15'X45'(APPROX) SEE DETAILS RIP RAP STILLING BASIN OUTFALL 50'UN-DISTURBED BUF FROM WETLANDS (( EXCAVATION AREA 44 f WATER HANDLED B)` T STILLI BA AND SKIMMER IS RIMARI A PED GROU A '- ORMWATER) TO.:ACIL/`FATE TION BE R TAB CONTRACTOR ANAGE WATER WITHIN THE PIT SELF To T T T , OSSIBLE USING TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS.IF ATE 1-4 T BE PUMPED FROM PIT TO SPECIAL STILLING BASACONT HALL PROI ECT TH SI, E- PUMP INLET (WET WELL OR SIMILAR) TO MINIMIZE ENTRAINED SEDIMENT.. 3. SKIMMER ORIFICE TO BE SIZED BY CONTRACTOR USING NORTH. CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MANUAL DESIGN GUIDEAINES PUMP RATE AS DETERMINED IN THE FIELD 4. CONTR OR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCHARGING WATER IN COMPLIANCE WITH T NC GENERAL STORYWATER PERMIT CRITERIA : 5. CONTRACTOR SHOULD CONFIRM THAT UTILITIES WITHIN THE FOOT PRINT AVE BEEN RELOCATED OR ABANDONED PER PHASE I(PI382) 6. fTE IS LOCATED IN ONSLON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLI CO TOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB TH A WITHIN THE PERMIT 04:01:32_P 1-20-2011 \,.BOUND LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WIT THE BASE ENTRY ROAD (PI382)'.' (-051 !FICA GROU ATER PRE -TREAT D GROUND AND STORYWATER WITHIN THE W ICH M ETS TH QUALITY CRITERIA CAN BE DISCHARGED VIA e, TE ORARY T G BASIN OR SPECIAL STILLING BASIN IN ACCORDANCE H E DETAILS.THE INTENT IS TO KEEP THE CLEAN AND SEDIMENT N ATER STREAMS FROM MIXINGAND REDUCING THE LOAD ON THE SINS. DT7 V N W1 F E WIT H ING GROUND WATER m ST MWATER EVEN ow MACTEC I RK&K JV NO UP .S im. Na J- T. -11. C,4 IL E t LEGE u z PERMIT BOUNDARY 0 (14.34 AC) TEMP HAUL ROAD (0.32 AC) z NEW BOY SCOU ROAD {F , z AS NOTED ■ ................ 3, CG402 i�I TEMPORARY SNG BASIN AG) CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROAD 4 FL01 41 STREAM CHANNEL CLASS B RIP RAP A Existing Ground f Sediment Control Stone J Outlet to Existing Ground did be sized based on the volume of pi, flow rate), quantity and type permittivity of the given bag size per ications. Ad also be given to location. (Steep typically not recommended as the bag can handle a 2", 3" or 4" discharge NATURAL be placed along any edge by making GROUND _ t he tothefabric, n sertinhoseviawire, ties, clamp, the hose rope a good seal. area and performance of the bag, ble/porous surface such as hay bales, Take care to select a media that will • use of a ground cloth can alleviate 'g. s be taken to properly monitor FzLTO FABRIC re that pump rates or concentrations excessive. Failure to do so may Ste discharges into one bag. One bag :ommended. toff from the bag should be dispersed. .ausing erosion. bag when capacity as defined by the NOTE: PIPES) FOR TEMPORARY STREAM CRO,hed. Properly dispose of used BANKFULL FLOW, WHICHEVER IS LESSe• : sediment bag when pumping to Ming properly. Replace bags that are Ir otherwise not performing effectively. NAMAC :55:08 P �I-20-2011 SW 029447 A RK MACTEC I RK&K JV CONSLR. CGMTM... ,—IC MARX M0. 12559371A tipA &9 CG530 IN i 0 (TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING WM. SPECIAL STILLING BASIN (FILTER BAG) Existing Ground am ;A 6" •57 STONE IN ACCORDANCE Special Stilling Basin WITH SECTION 1005 OF NC DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION � - Existing Terrain .�. / 03:55:OSpP�1iF4�� 20-2011 CROSS PIPE(s): SIZE / (-OS' j DETERMINED BY CONTRACTORSEAL 02844T a g nw _ :w _- — 15.0' to 20.0' J ----- -- 1 — -- THI — S� J STREAM CHANNEL 8" of Sediment Control Stone CUSS B RIP RAP CLASS B RIP RAP Filter Fabric --- MACTEC / RKSK IV �A Not To Scale PLAN VIEW NATURAL GROUND / STONE, 6" DEPTH (MIN.) NATURAL GROUND 10:1 ;LASS B RIP RAP ) (SEE NOTE) "A. SECTION A -A Wr TO SLUE NOTE: PIPES) FOR TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PASS THE PEAK OR BANKFULL FLOW, WHICHEVER IS LESS, FROM A 2-YEAR PEAK STORM, WITHOUT OVER TOPPING. I NOTES: 1. Provide Stabilized Outlet to Existing Ground 2. Sediment bags should be sized based on the volume of LDS JRs water being pumped (pump flow rate), quantity and type SNN of sediment and the permittivity of the given bag size per GSP manufacturer specifications. uTM 3. Consideration should also be given to location. (Steep E sloped surfaces are typically not recommended as the bag may roll.) ' FvF 4. Each sediment bag can handle a 2", 3" or 4" discharge Z hose. The hose can be placed along any edge by making g a small incision into the fabric, inserting the hose and then clamping the fabric to the hose via wire, ties, clamp, rope or similar to create a good seal. X 5. To improve surface area and performance of the bag, 1 w V' J place it on a permeable/porous surface such as hay bales, N ,C a aggregate or similar. Take care to select a media that will 00 O C7 not damage the bag * use of a ground cloth can alleviate p damage from occurring. Z' 6. Care should always be taken to properly Monitor C (D performance to ensure that pump rates or concentrations O Wcr of sediment are not excessive. Failure to do so may Z cause bag to fail. : 7. Avoid multiple pipe discharges into one bag. One bag m per discharge is recommended. 8. Filtered water runoff from the bag should be dispersed. Z 3 Take care to avoid causing erosion. uA w E Z Np 9. Replace sediment bag when capacity as defined by the W- w manufacturer is reached. Properly dispose of used —' sediment bag off site. u a 10. Routinely inspect sediment bag when pumping to ensure it is functioning properly. Replace bags that are torn, at capacity, or otherwise not performing effectively. a Z NAVFAC ORAWIM No. 12559'_ WET 68A CG530 _. ,_ Ghernikov, Sergei From: Chernikov, Sergei Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 11:04 AM To: 'loslate@mactec.com' Subject: FW: application for a new permit (Camp Lejeune) Louise, I have reviewed the new permit application that you submitted on January 27, 2011 and found several deficiencies that have to be corrected. 1) Complete evaluation of discharge alternatives. The Division requires applicants for new and expanding discharge permits to fully document all alternatives to surface water discharge (15A NCAC 2H.0105 (c)(2)). Each discharge alternative should be thoroughly evaluated and each conclusion should be substantiated by appropriate documents and itemized budgets. The Alternatives Analysis that you have submitted with your application is not sufficient to satisfy our requirements. You need to provide itemized budget for each alternative, including land application, and wastewater reuse (this option is currently missing from you analyses). One example of the supporting documentation is a quote from the real estate agent/company with an estimate of cost for the land parcel needed for spray irrigation. You can use a County Soil Survey to determine suitability of soil for land application, there is no need for a geological study or for a soil consultant. 2) Please provide a list of any chemicals found in detectable amounts in the groundwater at the site, with the maximum observed concentration reported for each chemical. Please include volatile organic compound analysis, EPA method 624/625 should be performed. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! Sergei Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. Environmental Engineer II Complex Permitting Unit Phone: 919-807-6393, fax 919-807-6495 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Express mail: 512 North Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27606 E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 1 I V. NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet D Regular Addition E3 Discretionary Addition O Score change, but no NPDES No.: I_I_I_I_I_I_I_f_I _I status change D Deletion Facility Name: I E 1 01 R I&I O! Vl1 I_I� I�ITI S 1_I 2-1_1 A, I g I D 1_I 3 1 City: It. I HI f� I_! L-I E 1�1 E Receiving water: ! N LC) Igl=1 4 _E- Reach Number. I I-54— is this facility a steam clecWc power plant (SiC=4911) is this permit for a municipal separate storm sewer with one or more of the following characterisda7 serving a population greater than 100,0007 1. Pourer output 500 MW or greater (not using a coding pond/fake) 2. A nuclear power plant ❑ �Y ; score is 700 (stop here) 3. Cooling water discharge greater than 25% of the receiving stream's 7010 flow rate W NO (continue) ❑ YES; score is 600 (stop here) [NO (continue) FACTOR 1: Toxic Pollutant Potential PCS SIC Code: I_I_+_I_I Primary SIC Code: 1 4 I -1� 1 2-1 Other SIC Codes: Industrial Subcategory Code: 1 U I 0 10 1 (Code 000 If no subcategory) Determine the Toxicity potential from Appendix A. Be sure to use the TOTAL toxicity potential column and check one) Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points Toxicity Group Code Points U No process ❑ 3. 3 15 ❑ 7. 7 35 waste streams 0 0 ❑ 4. 4 20 ❑ 8. 8 40 ❑ I. 1 5 ❑ 5. 5 25 ❑ 9. 9 45 ❑ 2. 2 10 ❑ 6. 6 30 ❑ 10. 10 s0 Code Number Checked: i O 1 1 Total Points Factor 1: 1 01 01 FACTOR 2: Flow/Stream Flow Volume (complata atthar5actton A orSacAon 6; cheek only one) Section A Wastewater Flow Only Considered Section B Wastewater and Stream Flow Considered Wastewater Type Code Points Wastewater Type Percent ofln;tream Code Points (See Instructions) (See Insructions) Wastewater Concen- Type I: Flow < 5 MGD ❑ 11 0 tntion at Receiving Flow 5 to 10 MG D 12 10 Stream tow Flow Flow >10 to 50 MGD ❑ D 13 14 20 30 TYPE 11111: < 10% ❑ 41 0 Flow> SC MOD T),pe It: Flow <1 MGD ❑ 21 10 2 10% to <50% ❑ 42 10 Flow 1 to 5 MGD ❑ 22 20 2 50% ❑ 43 20 Flow >5 to 10 MOD ❑ 23 30 Flow >10 MOD ❑ 24 SO Type II: < 10% D 51 0 / Type il!: Flow <1 MGD O/ 31 C 2 10% to <SO% ❑ 52 20 Flow 1 to 5 MOD ❑ 32 10 Flow >5 to 10 MOD ❑ 33 20 ?r 50% 0 53 30 Flow > i C MCD O 34 30 Code Checked trorr 5ect;on A or B: I Total Points Factor 2: ! 0 10 NPOES Permit Rating Work Sheet FpkcToR 3: conventional Poliutonh NPDES No.: I�I_I,I_lrl_I_I_I�( (only when kmNoe bi` F+)e pormll) f. G•xyger G!-ianding Pdiut,n imr- one) lr j BCD ❑ COD ❑ Other: Code Points i Prrnl; UmiV. (c�rcl �,e �� <100 lbsiday 1 0 ' 00 to 1000 ibs/day 2 5 .1000 to 1000 lbs/day 3 15 U >3000lbs/day 4 20 'Ma! ,;r;Pendrd 5a!id: '`SS` Code Points Permit ':ml s: :rz? <100 lbs/day 1 0 t� tC0 to 1000lbs/day 2 5 A00 to 5000 Ibs/day 3 15 Q >5000lbs/day 4 20 C. Nit gen Foi!.�r. rr. �r..1 ❑ Ammonia D Other _. . Nitrccer Eauiwlent Code Points Permit Urr , tut2ci onr; � e300 Ibs/day 1 0 100 to 1 OOO lbs/day 2 5 D >1000 to 3000lbs/day 3 15 ❑ >3000lbs/day 4 20 Code Checked; I! I Points Scored: I D I DI Code Checked: I { Points Scored: 101al Code Checked: I I Points Scored: 10 i I Total Points Factor 3: I-D-1 5 I 4: Pule iiE+ratth Impact tbe-e a public r. akie,y water supply located within S 0 mlies downstream of the effluent discharge (this indudes any body of ;rfe to Wh:: it the rece-Wng water Is a rrtlwtnry)7 A public drinking water supply may Include infiltration galleries, or other ,n(ho61s of —inclance that ultimately get tvater from the above referenced supply. } 1' yes, cheat wxi.::. -xential number below) no, gc.:(, Factor r)etermfne' he human health toxlctty potential from Appendix A. Use the same SIC code and subcategory reference as In Factor 1. (tie uri- tc ase the human h.Taith toxicity group column -- • check one below) r'r, •lrft, Iitrup Cod,? Points Toxicity Group Code Points Toxldty Group Code Prints i] !`!o Pnxe 3. 3 0 ❑ 7. 7 15 streams 0 0 4. 4 0 ❑ a. 8 20 ❑ 0 ❑ 5 5 5 ❑ 9. 9 25 (� 2. 2 0 ti 6 10 Cl 10. 10 30 Code Number Checked: I_I_i Total Points Factor 4: 2 r-- NP©ES Permit Rating Work Sheet FACTOR 5: Wafer Gudity Factors NPDES No.: I_ I,IlI�I_I_I_I_I_l A. Is (or will) one or more of the effluent discharge limits based on water quality factors of the receiving stream (rather than technology -based federal effluent guidelines, or technology -based state effluent guidelines), or has a wastelood allocation been assigned to the discharge? Code Points ❑/Ya 1 10 t� No 2 0 B. 1s the receiving water In compliance with applicable water quality standards for pollutants that are water quality limited in the permit? Code Points 2---Yes 1 0 ❑ No 2 5 C. Does the effluent discharged from ibis facility exhibit the reasonable potential to violate water quality standards due to whole effluent toxicity? Code Points ❑ /Yes 1 10 3 No 2 0 Code Number Checked: A 12 -1 B t l i C I", I Prints Factor 5: A; 6 (0I + B I _�j( + C t (::>i = 10 I U! TOTAL FACTOR 6: Proximity to Near Coastal Waters A. Base Score. Enter Now code here (from Factor 2): 13 1_(_I Check appropriate facility HPRI Code (from PCS): Enter the multiplication factor that corresponds to the Now code: 1 0 1 0 HPRI M Code HPRI Score Flow Code Multiplication Factor ❑ 1 1 20 11,31,or41 0. DO ❑ 2 2 0 12, 32, or 42 0.05 / 13, 33, or 43 0.10 [3' 3 3 30 14 or 34 0.15 ❑ 4 4 0 21 or 51 0.10 22 or S2 0.30 O 5 5 20 23 or 53 0.60 HPRI code checked: 13 1 24 1.00 Base Score; (HPRI Score) 30 x (Multiplication Factor) O O (TOTAL POINTS) B. Additional Points — NEP Program C. Additional Points — Great lakes Area of Concern For a fadilty that has on HPRI code of 3, does the facility For a facility that has an HPRI code of S, does the fad/try discharge to one of the estuaries enrolled In the National discharge any of the pollutants of concern into one of the Estuary Protection (NEP) program (see Instructions) or Great Lakes' 31 areas of concern (see Instructions) the Chesapeake Say? Code Points Code Points O/Yes 1 10 D/Yes 1 1C l7 No 2 0 2 No 2 0 Code Number Checked A 1 3 1 B 12-1 C I 2-1 Points Factor 6: A I n t 0! + B I V 1 01 + CIO 101 = 1 O ! TOTAL 3 r I , As NPDES Permit Rating Work Sheet SCORE SUMMARY NPDES No.: Factor Description Total Points 1 Toxic Pollutant Potential 0 2 Flowfstreamflow Volume O 3 Conventional Pollutants L 4 Public Health impacts O S Water Quality Factors 6 Proximity to Near Coastal Waters O TOTAL (Factors 1 through 6) _5_ Sl. is the total score equal to or greater than 807 ❑ Yes (Facility is a major) E No S2. If the answer to the above question is no, would you like this facility to be discretionary major? l:� No ❑ Yes (Add 500 points to the above score and provide reason below: Reason: NEW SCORE: 5 OLD SCORE: 4 Reviewer's Name U - Phone Number Date NCO089061 - Borrow Pits 2 and 3 Outfall #: 002 Outfall #: 003 Latitude: 34043'32" Latitude: 34043'23" Longitude: 77022'58" Longitude: 77022'11" Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek Stream Class: SC -NSW HQW Stream Class: SC -NSW HQW Subbasin: 03-05-02 Subbasin: 03-05-02 River Basin: White Oak River Basin: White Oak Hydrologic Unit: 03020301 Hydrologic Unit: 03020301 G Facility Location Onslow County ✓V (�L�L Map not to scale G<�q� ni «� NCO089061 - Borrow Pits 2 and 3 Outfall #: 002 Latitude: 34043'32" Longitude: 77022'58" Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek Stream Class: SC -NSW HQW Subbasin: 03-05-02 River Basin: White Oak Hydrologic Unit: 03020301 Outfall #: 003 Latitude: 34043'23" Longitude: 77022' 11" Receiving Stream: Northeast Creek Stream Class: SC -NSW HQW Subbasin: 03-05-02 River Basin: White Oak Hydrologic Unit: 03020301 Facility Location ����llQQ Onslow County �//odA ✓ Map not to scale