20221095 Ver 2_Fire Tower Road_JD Packet_20231027

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, #FOLDER_NAME#,
#FOLDER DA NUMBER#
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 2200 Tramway Rd.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Lee City: Sanford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.439584' Long.:-79.187138"
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Skunk Creek (Class: C)
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
W 1
35.439479
-79.186883
0.25 acre
Wetland
Section 404
P1
35.439792
-79.186549
0.22 acre
Open water
Section 10/404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K: Sanford Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS. 20221006
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: FIRM Panel 3710964100
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Lit_„ 10/2023
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

10/27/21, 6:03 PM
Submission Completed
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
Contact Name*
Contact Email Address*
Project Owner*
Project Name*
Project County*
Owner Address:
Adam Carter
[e-mail]
Madport, LLC
Fire Tower Rd " South Park"
Lee
Street Address
2504 Brighton Point
Address Line 2
City
Sanford
Postal / Zip Code
27330
Is this a transportation project?* Yes No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Individual Permit
Shoreline Stabilization
STET[ ..
n
NOR H::A:: O_INA
Envrronmonrul (2—lify
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
Lee
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Modification
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
Yes No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Goss, Stephanie
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.
Impact for commercial space in Lee county. See attached wetland mapset. Mitigation will be required..47ac of wetland
impact.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401
Certification Rule.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 1/2

10/27/21, 6:03 PM
Submission Completed
I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting
location and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you
can submit an application.
Signature*
45�r�rrr�(�trPm C'��r�t
Submittal Date 10/27/2021
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Form/Submit 2/2

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC itECKTENIIVALD
Director
Mark Lyczkowski
Forge Investment Group, LLC
709 Croswell Court
Whitsett, NC 27337
Project: Fire Tower Road South Park
This is a conditional acceptance letter.
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 22, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 12/22/2023
County: Lee
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030003
Non -Riparian Wetland*
0.47
Won -riparian wetland credit is not available in this service area. In accordance with the directive
from the February 8, 2011 IRT meeting, non -riparian wetland impacts located in the mountain and
piedmont areas of North Carolina can be accepted as requested, but mitigated utilizing riparian
wetland mitigation credits. Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the
compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program
instrument dated July 28, 2010. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Ae�d_4�
FOR James B. Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Adam Carter, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
fk; C0.R[71 IRAAEQ 217 west Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
do.t.—MEP7...a f`� 919.707.8976

pfr pax
F7:#i4 uPe
NEFm IrE
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
'0-9CH 3k$5 Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: April 24, 2023
Project Code: 2022-0074691
Project Name: Fire Tower Road
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

04/24/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.govibirds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186.php.

04/24/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

04/24/2023
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

04/24/2023
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2022-0074691
Project Name: Fire Tower Road
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Proposed residential and commercial development.
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/035.43933575,-79.18730424949095,14z
Counties: Lee County, North Carolina

04/24/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
FISHES
NAME STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
INSECTS
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3739

04/24/2023
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

04/24/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.

04/24/2023
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
Breeds Apr 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

04/24/2023 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC LM_� IIL �AII 111161 in"1116 ___+ JIII IIII &-��i di
Vulnerable
Brown-hNuthatcheaded—� I'll Jill 1111111 Jill ---�
BCC -BCR
Chimney Swift III Jill IN Jill Jill 1111
++
BCC Rangewide ++ —+—+ —+++ 4-4-4-
(CON)
Prairie Warbler Jill Jill Jill ---1
BCC Rangewide +—+ ++++ ���— 4- +— 4 — —+—+ —+++ ++�+
(CON)
ProthonotaryJill Jill Jill Jill ---4- —+­+—+++++—+
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed �+-+++++ ���— +++_ +ill Jill Jill lik -+_� —+—+—+++++—+
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)

04/24/2023 4
Wood Thrush BCCRngewide + All 111111111111 +-� _+�+ _+++ ++�+
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
■ Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/librar3r�/
collections/avoidine-and-minimizinp--incidental-take-migratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator(RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

04/24/2023 5
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

04/24/2023
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

04/24/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Wetland Solutions LLC
Name:
Wesley Johnson
Address:
816 Merry Street
City:
Dunn
State:
NC
Zip:
28334
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9197560411
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.LM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPennitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

A.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 2200 Tramw
City, State: Sanford, NC
County:
Lee
' • TO
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9641-44-2824-00
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions LLC
Mailing Address: PO BOX 244
Bunnlevel NC 28323
Telephone Number: 910 890 2779
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Mark Lyczkowski, Madport LLC
Mailing Address: 2504 Brighton Point
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
Sanford, NC 27330
919-842-0334
mark@fig.11c
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Samuel Adam Carter
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agent'
7/10/2023
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 6.13 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.43957894405612
-79.1868747252702(.
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
❑ Vicinity Map
a Aerial Photograph
❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑� Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latorregdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App_A_Prelim _JD_Form _fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

U5 Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations
Please note that the approval and signature of survey plats will only be done in association with
an Approved Jurisdictional Determination. The Corps accepts both electronic and hardcopy
plats for signature, however this will be at the discretion of the project manager. If a hard copy
is submitted, the Corps requires that all hard -copy submittals include at least one original Plat
(to scale) that is no larger than I I"x17". Submitted plats must be legible, including labeling (the
use of match lines for larger tracts are encouraged). Additional copies of a plat, including those
larger than I I "x 17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. Prior to final
production of a plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the surveyor electronically
submit a draft of the survey to the Corps project manager for review.
PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be signed and sealed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include an accurate graphic scale and verbal
scale)
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g.
property corner, USGS monument)
Jurisdictional wetlands depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, wetlands, etc.
• Include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
❑ Jurisdictional non -wetland waters (non -wetland tidal/navigable waters,
tributaries, impoundments, ditches, etc.) depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent waters (RPW), pond, etc.
• Mark the centerline of linear waters (tributaries), with
approximate widths to the Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHMW) OR a surveyed OHWM boundary of the tributary.
• List the linear footage of linear features and area (using
approximate widths)
• Mark the extent of OHMW for non -linear waters such as lakes,
ponds, etc.
• List the acreage of non -linear features
• Identify each feature using an alphanumeric system
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as non jurisdictional. Please
include the acreage and/or linear length of these features as appropriate.
Must include a legible Waters of the United States (wetlands and other
waters) Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/GPS
coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must ensure that all depicted wetlands or other waters intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of the Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section
404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. The
undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to
the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328
and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: May 2017 Page 2

❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundar3L
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part328 and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
GPS SURVEYS
For surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the survey must include all of
the above, as well as:
Rbe at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification. One of more of the known points (property
corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross referenced with the
existing traditional property survey (metes and bounds).
�✓ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: May 2017 Page 3

8/15/22, 10:57 AMA� II rGIS ConnectGIS Feature Report
�Av Printed August 15, 2022
WEB H05TING See Below for Disclaimer
S.
low". X
1 _181 Feet
Parcels
Streets
Railroad
Lee County
https://Iee2.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map1 d961 d9b3b1949699f02a5983ac2c6e2x.htm&t=printid 1/2

8/15/22, 10:57 AM ConnectGIS Feature Report
PIN Acres Parcel Address
9641-44-2824-00 6.13 2200 TRAMWAY RD
PARID Appraised Land Appraised Building
964144282400 57300 2100
Tax District Subdivision Legal 1
FTW TRACT 2
Legal 2 Legal 3 Owner
PLAT 2020/85 MADPORT LLC
Owner2 Mail Address Mail Suffix
2504
Mail Street Dir Mail Street MailADRSUF
BRIGHTON POINT
Mail City Mail State Mail Zip
SAN FORD NC 27330
Out BLDG Description Out BLDG YRBLT Sale Date
0 7/18/1966 12:00:00 AM
Dwelling Style Dwelling DESCR Dwelling YRBLT
C CONVENTIONAL 1940
Shape Length Appraised Total Out BLDG Area
2380.093676889 59400 0
Dwelling SFLA OBJECTID 1 TaxCard
1130 26428 http://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/
Data I ets/Data I etas px?
mode=&UseSearch=no&pin=964144
282400&j u r= 000&taxyr= 2023
Book Page
1581 130
This site is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats and other public records and data. Users
of this site are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this site.
The County of Lee and Dude Solutions, Inc. assume no legal responsibility for the information contained on this site. Please be advised that you must contact the Lee
County Tax Office for accurate tax values. Please contact the Lee County Appraisal Department if any building information is incorrect. The map, layer, data and website
(collectively known as a€cethe layers€ ) are for graphical and illustration purposes only. The Lee County Strategic Services Department (hereinafter a€oethe
Departments€ ) provides the layer and the information contained within to the general public and has not customized the information for any specific or general
purpose. Such information was generated from data maintained by different sources and agencies and as such, some limitations may apply based upon restrictions
imposed by other sources or agencies supplying data to Lee County (hereinafter a€oethe Countys€ ). While the Department strives to make the information on the GIS
ebsite as timely, reliable and accurate as possible, neither the Department nor the County local governments make any claims, promises, or guarantees about the
accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the contents of the layer. Areas depicted are approximate and are not necessarily accurate to mapping, surveying or engineering
standards. The County expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site and layer. No warranty of any type, implied, expressed, statutory,
UCC or otherwise, including, but not limited to, the warranties of non -infringement of third party rights, title, accuracy of data, merchantability, or fitness for a particular
purpose, is given with respect to the substantive content of this layer or its use in private or commercial financial transactions. The fact of distribution of the layer does
not constitute any warranty, express, implied or otherwise. The user assumes the entire risk related to the use of this data. If the user intends to make any legal or
financial decision based on this data, the user should independently verify the accuracy of the same. The Strategic Services Department and the Lee County local
governments are providing this data "as is.s€ In no event will any of the foregoing local governments or their officers and employees be liable to you or to any third
party for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special or exemplary damages or lost profit resulting from any use or misuse of this data. Unless otherwise noted
on an individual document, files, documents, and information contained in this layer may be copied and distributed for non-commercial use, provided they are copied
and distributed without alteration.
https://lee2.connectgis.com/Down load File. ashx?i=_ags_map1 d961 d9b3b1949699f02a5983ac2c6e2x.htm&t=printid 2/2

8/15/22, 10:58 AMA� II rGIS ConnectGIS Feature Report
�Av Printed August 15, 2022
WEB H05TING See Below for Disclaimer
Parcels
Streets
Railroad
Lee County
IF
67
V� � 1 : 23 Feet
https://lee2.con nectg is. corn/Down load File. ashx?i=_ags_mapaaOb9ad5e3704c98bfcc5f88cf4ff1 f8x.htm&t=printid 1 /2

8/15/22, 10:58 AM ConnectGIS Feature Report
PIN
Acres
Parcel Address
9641-44-2783-00
0.11134441
2210 TRAMWAY RD
PARID
Appraised Land
Appraised Building
964144278300
2000
0
Tax District
Subdivision
Legal 1
FTW
2210 TRAMWAY RD NC 78
Legal 2
Legal 3
Owner
MADPORT LLC
Owner2
Mail Address
Mail Suffix
2504
Mail Street Dir
Mail Street
MailADRSUF
BRIGHTON POINT
Mail City
Mail State
Mail Zip
SAN FORD
NC
27330
Out BLDG Description
Out BLDG YRBLT
Sale Date
0
5/28/1963 12:00:00 AM
Dwelling Style
Dwelling DESCR
Dwelling YRBLT
0
Shape Length
Appraised Total
Out BLDG Area
280.997916991096
2000
0
Dwelling SFLA
OBJECTID 1
TaxCard
0
22790
http://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/
Data I ets/Data I etas px?
mode=&UseSearch=no&pin=964144
278300&j u r= 000&taxyr= 2023
Book
Page
1652
697
this site is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats and other public records and data. Use
:)f this site are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this sit
the County of Lee and Dude Solutions, Inc. assume no legal responsibility for the information contained on this site. Please be advised that you must contact the L,
:ounty Tax Office for accurate tax values. Please contact the Lee County Appraisal Department if any building information is incorrect. The map, layer, data and websi
;collectively known as a€cethe layers€ ) are for graphical and illustration purposes only. The Lee County Strategic Services Department (hereinafter a€oetl
Departments€ ) provides the layer and the information contained within to the general public and has not customized the information for any specific or gener
Durpose. Such information was generated from data maintained by different sources and agencies and as such, some limitations may apply based upon restrictioi
mposed by other sources or agencies supplying data to Lee County (hereinafter a€oethe Countys€ ). While the Department strives to make the information on the G
vebsite as timely, reliable and accurate as possible, neither the Department nor the County local governments make any claims, promises, or guarantees about tl
accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the contents of the layer. Areas depicted are approximate and are not necessarily accurate to mapping, surveying or engineerir
standards. The County expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site and layer. No warranty of any type, implied, expressed, statutoi
JCC or otherwise, including, but not limited to, the warranties of non -infringement of third party rights, title, accuracy of data, merchantability, or fitness for a particul
Durpose, is given with respect to the substantive content of this layer or its use in private or commercial financial transactions. The fact of distribution of the layer do
-lot constitute any warranty, express, implied or otherwise. The user assumes the entire risk related to the use of this data. If the user intends to make any legal
financial decision based on this data, the user should independently verify the accuracy of the same. The Strategic Services Department and the Lee County lo(
Dovernments are providing this data "as is.s€ In no event will any of the foregoing local governments or their officers and employees be liable to you or to any thi
Darty for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, special or exemplary damages or lost profit resulting from any use or misuse of this data. Unless otherwise not(
:)n an individual document, files, documents, and information contained in this layer may be copied and distributed for non-commercial use, provided they are copii
and distributed without alteration.
https://lee2.con nectg is. com/Download File. ashx?i=_ags_mapaaOb9ad5e3704c98bfcc5f88cf4ff1 f8x.htm&t=printid 2/2

o-
z
n4°
r
J r
v -
Lee County, NC, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, Intermap, NGA, USGS

2
D-
w
TRAMWAY RD - HWY 7 ----
100' PUBLIC R/W
_—w--
M
O
0
Q
z
THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING
TYP 8' RADIUS SPACES AND AISLES
UNLESS NOTE SHALL HAVE A MAX. 2%
OTHERWISE JINCLUDING
LL DIRECTIONS
THE DIAGONAL
oo,aSTALL
24'
AISLE STALL
NOTES:
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB.
INSTALL HC-VAN ACCORDING TO NC ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
TYPICAL PARKING DIMENSIONS
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
— - — - — EXISTING ROAD CENTERLINE
ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED CENTERLINE
PROPOSED EDP
— — — — BUILDING SETBACK
— — — PROPOSED LOT LINE
PERIMETER BUFFER
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
PHASE LINE
0 0 0 0 0 PROPOSED 100 YR FLOODPLAIN
® EXISTING WETLANDS
N EUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
CIVIC SPACE
TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES
1. ALL SITE SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM
YAN
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND NCDOT STANDARDS.
access" E
SIGN MUTCD STD. SIZE
RESERVED
PARKING
ACCESSIBLE PARKING R7-1 12"x18"
STOP R1-1 30"00"
2. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE MOUNTED WITH 5-FT MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE TO THE
MAXIMUM
PENALTY
BOTTOM OF THE SIGN ON 2-LB. GALV. STEEL U-CHANNEL POST SET IN 18-IN
$250
DEEP x 8-IN DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING. SIGNS MOUNTED ADJACENT TO
SIDEWALKS MUST BE MOUNTED WITH 7-FT MIN. VERTICAL CLEARANCE
TO THE BOTTOM OF SIGN.
3. ALL PAVMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MUTCD AND
NCDOT STANDARDS AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
MARKING NCDOT STD. SIZE COLOR
PARKING SPACE - 4-IN WHIT.
NO PARKING - FIRE LANE4-IN YEL.
CROSSWALK 1205.07 4-IN WHIT.
* NO PARKING - FIRE LANE MARKING SHALL CONSIST OF A 4" SOLID YELLOW
STRIPE AND 8" HIGH YELLOW TEXT "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" AT 40' INTERVALS.
STRIPING SHALL BE PLACED AS INDICATED BY THE FOLLOWING LINETYPE - —
— — — -
4. ALL PAVMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE RESIN TYPE PAINT AS REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY.
SCALE 1 "=40'
0 40' 80'
KNOW WHAT'S BELOW.
CALL 811 BEFORE YOU DIG.
E
O
U
N
O O
O O
n E
N
Luu E
= Z
a Z
LL. IUI N
L 0 o M
00
Z W C)-%
J X
< ra LL
Ln
Trn
LL V]
r
O Ib
rl O�
-I
Lo M
J
Lu
H
z
O
_d
U
(n
LU
z
O
\Lf)
LU
Lu
Q
DATE
0813112021
DRAWN BY
331
DESIGNED BY
331
CHECKED BY
M. ZACCARDO
SCALE
AS SHOWN
JOB NO.
49165
SHEET NO
L
0 a
(n L
L

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: Fire Tower Rd
Applicant/Owner: MADPORT LLC
Investigator(s): Adam Carter
City/County: Sanford/Lee
state: NC
Section, Township, Range: Sanford
Sampling Date: 6-15-2023
Sampling Point: W1 Al
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat: 35.439643 Long:-79.186863 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: GhD— Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: Upland Forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes= No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation= Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed'=Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes = No
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No 0
Hydric Soil Present? YesO No Is the Sampled Area
�/ ��
within a Wetland? Yes = No I v �
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requirec
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (810)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Mass Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (81 )
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (B3)
=Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (06)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Iron Deposits (135)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
=FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
7---JWater-Stained Leaves (69)
r--lSphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes = No= Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes = No = Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No =✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
rks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W1 A15
app. Stratum IP rf cizP• 25ft x 25ft
2.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Cover -SP-Friag? _Status_
-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
1
1
(A)
(B)
3 -
4. -
-
Percent of Dominant Species
100
5.
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
6.
-
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover: 0
Tol ta% Cover of,
Mniti 1]
LY Y—
Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft
OBL species
xi = 0
.SaDlina
-
-
FACW species
x 2 = 0
1.
_
FAC species
x 3 = 0
2
_
_
FACU species
x 4 = 0
3
_
0
4 _
UPL species
x 5 =
5 -
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0
(B)
6. - Prevalence Index - B/A- NaN
0 = Total Cover Hy drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shnih Strahim (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft ) ✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2.- Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.-
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5. -
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.- -
Defirrtions of Five Vegetation Strata:
0 = Total Cover
0
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 Wiregrass, Pinelawn Three Awn (Aristida stricta) FAC_
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 - _
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5 _ _
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6..- -
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7 _ _
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
10. - '
V = i otai cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1. Cat Greenbrier (Smilax glauca) 1 % FAC
2.- -
3.- -
4.- -
5. Hydrophytic
1 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 0•5 20% of total cover: 0-9 Present? Yesyl No=
Site has been cleared and graded. no veg with the exception of Wire grass and a few sprigs of Smilax.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1 Al
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-24 10YR 4/6 100Q' LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (88) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑2
cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑_
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
HPiedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑_
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑Anomalous
Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑_
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
HVery
Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
01
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150113)
❑Sandy
Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑Stripped
Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks: Soil profile is all fill material.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑, NoF_v_71
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: Fire Tower Rd
Applicant/Owner: Madport, LLC
Investigator(s): Adam Carter
City/County: Sanford/Lee
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Sanford
Sampling Date: 6/15/2023
Sampling Point: W1 Al
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): HIIISIope Local relief (concave, convex, none): CaoncaVe Slope (%): 8%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat_ 35.439609 Long:-79.186862 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: GhD— Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes NCWAM> NWI classification: Hillside See
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes= No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation= Soil or Hydrology= significantly disturbed'=Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes= No
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology= naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No 0
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes = No =
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requirec
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (85)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (810)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Mass Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (81 )
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (133)
=Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (06)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Iron Deposits (135)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
=FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
7TJWater-Stained Leaves (69)
r-- 1Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes = No Q Depth (inches): 5lnches
Saturation Present? Yes = No Q Depth (inches): 1 inch Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0✓ No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
rks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1 A15
wee Strahim (Plrt size 25ft x 25ft
1 Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica)
2 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Cover -Speriec? _Status_
5% Yes FAC
50/o Yes FACI�y
3.
'
4.
-
5.
-
6.
-
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover:
2
.SaDlinc Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft
1 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
8% Yes
FACU�
2 Red Maple (Ater rubrum)
4% Yes
FAC/Fd
3 Black Willow (Salix nigra)
4% Yes
0131-
4.
5.
-
6. -
-
16 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8
20% of total cover:
3.2
Rhruh Strahim (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1 Wax Myrtle (Morelia cerifera)
5% Yes
FACW
2 Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinese)
5% Yes
FAC
3 Sweet Pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
3% Yes
FACW
4 Fetterbush (Lyonia lucida)
2% No
FACW
5.-
-
6.-
-
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover:
3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of
MnitiQlyljY_
OBL species
x 1 = 0
FACW species
x 2 = 0
FAC species
x 3 = 0
FACU species
x 4 = 0
UPL species
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 0
(A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index - B/A- NaN
Hy drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1 False nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica) 2° NO
EAC\46 Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2 Microstegium vimineum 5% Yes FAC approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
R h J 1 r) Y than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
3. us ( uncus spp.)
o
eS FACV�S
-
5. -
-
7.
-
8._-
'
10. -
-
11.-
'
17
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8.5
20%
of total cover: 3.4
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1. Yellow Jasmine (Gelsemium sempervirens)
3%
yes FAC
2. Laurel -leaved Greenbrier, Bamboo Vine (Smilax lauirfolia)
1 %
No FAMb
3 Cat Greenbrier (Smilax glauca)
1 %
No FAC
4 Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
2%
Yes FAC
5 Grape (Vitis spp.)
1 %
NO FACV�
8
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4
20%
of total cover: 1.6
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1 Al
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3-2 100 LS
4-10 10YR 5-2
10-24 10YR 6-1
97% 10YR6/8 3% C
90 10YR6/8 10% C
M LS
M LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (88) (LRR S, T, U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑2
cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑_
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
HPiedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑_
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑Anomalous
Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑_
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
HVery
Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
01
cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150113)
❑✓
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑Stripped
Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes, No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

IAV
P pi
Pi
'1\
0
30 0
'5
App
Parcel Boundary — 8.13 acres
0 Delineation Flags P1-P35
Preliminary Wetlands — 0.47 acre
r
W1 (Sec 404) — 0.25 acre
A
P1 (Open water) — 0.22 acre
clIUL11t,1iW�1C17, IIIUIIILYJ
cal -al, c1l
Project Name: Pettus Property N
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC .. Figure: 2
. Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00
P.O. Box 244 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet 11 April 2023
Bundevel, NC 28323 1 1 1 1 1

1 ,
Ik
`qk• 1
•
l+yh�' I 1. • \ is • � • , .•• •
• �' _
- - /
;.Sanford-L du
' •.�` a'� �, Ck A field ". • �
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet Parcel Boundary — 8.13 acres
• I Ik 6 -
Project Name: Pettus Property N
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC
SO; UTIONB LLC Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00 Figure: 3
P.O. Box 244 USGS 7.5-Minute Topo: Sanford Quadrangle 11 April 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

✓u^- NC DEQ 24K Hydrology
nParcel Boundary
Y�
� Soil Map Units
DoA—Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
GhB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
0 100 200 300 400
0 500 Feet �� 0 GhD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Source: Esri, Maxar, E�rtKstarGeographies, and the GIS User C�ommun'ity
Project Name: Pettus Property N
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC
"°N5 "° Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00 Figure: 4
P.O. Box 244 NRCS Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) 11 April 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

W
0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet
I I I I I I
j4 --R4SB
Project Name: Pettus Property N
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC
1--'�—TICNS "° Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00 Figure: 5
P.O. Box 244 USFWS National Wetland Inventory (20221006) 11 April 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
TPUBHh'r
40
. 4;0,0
1, 4 JW
' ,� '�:� �� "fir, •
Parcel Boundary — 8.13 acres
NWI Wetland Type
JFreshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Jh Freshwater Pond
Riverine
C SourOE-Maxar, E7arth"star Geograph'I'cs, and the G'I�5 User Co�mmu fty

171
3710964200
17109631
r1
Parcel Boundary — 8.13 acres
FIRM Panel
Flood Zone
0.2 Percent Annual (500-year)
c
-1 AE - 100-year
170 3710964000
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet
X -Low risk
I I I I I I
Source: Esri, Maxar, __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Y
Project Name: Pettus Property N
Location: 2200 Tramway Rd, Sanford, NC
s "°N5 "° Property ID: 9641-44-2926-00 Figure: 6
P.O. Box 244 NC Flood Risk Information System 11 April 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

Agent Authorization Letter
September 9, 2021
Owner Information
Owner Name: Mark Lyczkowski, Madport LLC
Mailing Address: 2504 Brighton Point
City, State, Zip: Sanford, NC 27330
Phone#: [phone]
Properly Description
PIN: 9641-44-2824-00
Project: Fire Tower Road
Address: 2200 Tramway Road, Sanford NC
County: Lee
I, MpAK L-y`ZK'WSjcl as owner/agent of the above
referenced property, authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDWR to
enter the subject property for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination.
I also authorize Mr. Adam Carter of Wetland Solutions, LLC to act in my behalf as
my agent in processing applications for wetland certification and/or permits.
Signature Tfile Date
Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244 Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.WetlandNC.com

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Lee County,
North Carolina
Pettus Property
September 22, 2019

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Lee County, North Carolina.............................................................................13
DoA—Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes .......................................
13
GhB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes ........................................
14
GhD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes ......................................
15
References............................................................................................................18
4

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
0

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
7

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
0

Custom Soil Resource Report
3 Soil Map
0
a�
66M 664440 664490 664W 664590
35' 26 31" N
M
a
35° 2616" N
664390 664440 654490 664540 664590
3
0
Map Scale: 1:2,190 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet
Meters
N 0 30 60 120 180
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
9
664690
35° 26' 31" N
35° 26 W N
664690
3
i

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
im 0
Soil Map Unit Lines
■
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
.4
Gravelly Spot
0
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
+
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP INFORMATION
A
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
.-
Special Line Features
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Water Features
scale.
-
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
�}}
Rails
measurements.
Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
US Routes
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Major Roads
Local Roads
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Background
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Aerial Photography
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Lee County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 10, 2018
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 13, 2014—Feb
4, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
DoA
GhB
Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
1.9
3.8
23.9%
Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
46.5%
GhD
Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15
percent slopes
2.4
29.6%
Totals for Area of Interest
8.1
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Lee County, North Carolina
DoA—Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2wb8x
Elevation: 50 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 69 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 310 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dothan and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dothan
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
E - 7 to 13 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 13 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv - 40 to 79 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 59 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0
mmhos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 6.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Loamy and clayey soils on rises and knolls of mesic
uplands (G133AA321 FL)
Hydric soil rating: No
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Fuquay
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
GhB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t62
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: loamy sand
Bt1 - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt2 - 8 to 42 inches: sandy clay
Bt3 - 42 to 52 inches: sandy clay loam
C1 - 52 to 76 inches: clay
C2 - 76 to 80 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GhD—Gilead loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t63
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: loamy sand
Bt1 - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt2 - 8 to 42 inches: sandy clay
Bt3 - 42 to 52 inches: sandy clay loam
C1 - 52 to 76 inches: clay
C2 - 76 to 80 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
17

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290.pdf
19

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC itECKTENIIVALD
Director
Mark Lyczkowski
Forge Investment Group, LLC
709 Croswell Court
Whitsett, NC 27337
Project: Nash Rd South Park
This is a conditional acceptance letter.
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 22, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 12/22/2023
County: Lee
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030003
Non -Riparian Wetland*
0.47
Won -riparian wetland credit is not available in this service area. In accordance with the directive
from the February 8, 2011 IRT meeting, non -riparian wetland impacts located in the mountain and
piedmont areas of North Carolina can be accepted as requested, but mitigated utilizing riparian
wetland mitigation credits. Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the
compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program
instrument dated July 28, 2010. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Ae�d_4�
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Adam Carter, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
fk; C0.R[71 IRAAEQ 217 west Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
do.t.—MEP7...a f`� 919.707.8976

DWR
oirlslna of Water Resourcra
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN % 2OHelp % 20File % 202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
9/4/2021
If this is a courtesy copy, please fill in this with the submission date.
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Lee
Is this a NCDMS Project*
Yes No
Click Yes, only if NCDMS is the applicant or co -applicant.
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?*
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
39
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
check all that apply
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
Yes No
Yes No

1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? *
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or In -lieu fee program.
Yes No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Nash Rd South Park Acceptance Letter Aug22.pdf 285.5KB
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
1 In. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?*
Yes No
Link to trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-CoordinationfFrout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Adam Carter
1 c. Primary Contact Phone:
1 b. Primary Contact Email:" (xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail] [phone]
1d. Who is applying for the permit?*
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
(Check all that apply)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:"`
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
Mark Lyczkowski Madport, LLC
2d.Address*
Street Address
2504 Brighton Point
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Sanford
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27330
USA
2e. Telephone Number:*
[phone]
2f. Fax Number
2g. Email Address:
mark@fig.11c
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
3b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Q^J

3c. Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3d. Telephone Number:*
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
3f. Email Address:*
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:*
Samuel Adam Carter
4b. Business Name:
(if applicable)
Wetland Solutions, LLC
4c. Address*
Street Address
P.O. Box 244
Address Line 2
City
Bunnlevel
Postal / Zip Code
28323
4d. Telephone Number:*
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project:*
Fire Tower Rd
1 b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Sanford
2. Project Identification
State / Province / Region
Country
3e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
(xxxpxx-xxxx
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
(tax PIN or parcel ID)
(in acres)
964144-2824-00
6.13
2c. Project Address
Street Address
2200 Tramway Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Sanford
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27330
USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits
(unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude: * Longitude:*
35.439771-79.186673
ex: 34.208504-77.796371
U
l^J
L")

3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Skunk Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located."`
030300040201
River Basin Lookup
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The current conditions on site are cleared and graded uplands with the exception of wetland area and open water pond. The land use in the surrounding area are commercial and
residential use with farmland surrounding developments.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
.47
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
0
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
The purpose of the project is to construct a commercial base in the proposed parcel at the intersection of Fire Tower RD and Tramway Rd
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project will consist of fill and grading of open water pond with a wetland head. Excavator and bulldozer will be utilized for the construction and grading of the site. See attached map.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?
Yes No Unknown
Comments:
Yes
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
Example: SAW-2017-99999
SAW-2022-00039
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Samuel Adam Carter
Agency/Consultant Company: Wetland Solutions, LLC
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other
separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
No other impacts are possible on abutting or adjacent to will have any future impacts.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary

1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
2a1 Reason * (?)
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
2g.impact
area
Development
P
Headwater Forest
W1
Yes
Both
0.250
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.250
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.250
21. Comments:
Because of building envelope and parking spaces for commercial build. Impact is unavoidable. The Seep is actually a older pond that has been filled in
by sedimentation and is very degraded.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open
water impacts below.
4a1. Impact Reason
4b. Impact type*(?
4c. Name of waterbody (?)
4d. Activity type*
4e. Waterbody type*
4f. Impact
area *
Commercial
Development .
L
No Name
Fill
Pond
0.22
(acres)
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts:
0.00
4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.22
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.22
4h. Comments:
Man made pond in drainage way.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: *
The design has been altered several time to avoid impacts, but impacts are unavoidable because of size and location of building and parking spaces
required.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
We will using BMPs to help minimize and avoid any impacts from sedimentation transport on and off site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
u
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program

4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
(linear feet)
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
.47ac
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information.
Yes No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
If no, explain why:
Not in buffer area
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes - No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is not a phased project and will not incur additional impact.
U
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)

4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWRfor this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?*
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?*
Yes No
Link to the NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the constructionlinstallation of a wind turbine(s)?* *
Yes No
Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS IPAC web site
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA's Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http_//gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust
designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO web mapping application shows 3 sites. Two structures one pond.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: hftps://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Lee County GIS website and the /msc.fema.gov/portal/search website.
Miscellaneous
Comments
401 packet is attached with supporting documents. Please let me know if you need any additional information.

Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
116.55KB
Fire Tower Rd PJD_2022815.pdf
150.98KB
Fire Tower Road_IPAC report.pdf
623.27KB
Fire Tower Road JD Request.pdf
293.46KB
Fire Tower Road —Parcel 1 details.pdf
254.71 KB
Fire Tower Road —Parcel 2 details.pdf
188.41 KB
Fire Tower Road_ Upland_Datasheets_Atlantic _and _ Gulf_ Coastal_ Plain_Fillable.pdf
447.53KB
Fire Tower Road_Wetland_DatasheetS_AtlantiC_and_GulfCoastal_Plain_Fillable.pdf
469.55KB
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 2 - Wetlands Update_20191123.pdf
1.35MB
Fire —Tower —Rd Fig 3 - Topo.pdf
1.31 MB
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 4 - Soils.pdf
1.13MB
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 5 - NWI.pdf
1.28MB
Fire_Tower_Rd Fig 6 - Flood.pdf
946.26KB
Fre Tower Rd Soil_Report.pdf
495.05KB
Nash Rd South Park Acceptance Letter Aug22.pdf
285.5KB
Signed AA for Firetower Rd.pdf
216.83KB
Fire Tower Road_Site plan.pdf
716.16KB
Fire Tower Road_IPAC report.pdf
623.27KB
Fire Tower Road _SHPO map.pdf
49.05KB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:*
Samuel Adam Carter
Signature*
Date
8/15/2022
u

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC itECKTENIIVALD
Director
Mark Lyczkowski
Forge Investment Group, LLC
709 Croswell Court
Whitsett, NC 27337
Project: Fire Tower Road South Park
This is a conditional acceptance letter.
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 22, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 12/22/2023
County: Lee
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030003
Non -Riparian Wetland*
0.47
Won -riparian wetland credit is not available in this service area. In accordance with the directive
from the February 8, 2011 IRT meeting, non -riparian wetland impacts located in the mountain and
piedmont areas of North Carolina can be accepted as requested, but mitigated utilizing riparian
wetland mitigation credits. Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the
compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program
instrument dated July 28, 2010. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you
have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Ae�d_4�
FOR James B. Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Adam Carter, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
fk; C0.R[71 IRAAEQ 217 west Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
do.t.—MEP7...a f`� 919.707.8976