SW8200502_Historical File_20210305

mi , _ \
ROY COOPER , 'S W-j-
Governer
Vil l = '!�
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary 'a�a ; '-
BRIAN WRENN NORTH CAROLINA
Fedor
March 5,2021
Perry Management,Inc.(Developer)
Attn:Ely Perry III-President
PO Box 1475
Kinston,NC,28503
And:
24 East Development,LLC(Property Owner)
Attn:.Leon Ward Sylvester III-Managing Member
108 W Franck Street
Richlands,NC,28574
And:
Sylvester Farm Investments,LLC(Property Owner)
Attn:Leon Ward Sylvester III-Managing Member
108 W Franck Street
Richlands,NC,28574
Subject: State Stormwater Management Permit No.SW8 200502
Sylvester Development
High Density Subdivision Project
Onslow County
Dear Mr.Perry and Mr. Sylvester:
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete State Stormwater Management Permit Application for the
subject project on March 5,2021. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that the project,as
proposed,complies with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC 02H.1000 amended on January
1,2017(2017 Rules). We are hereby forwarding Permit No. SW8 200502 dated March 5,2021,for the
construction of the built-upon areas(BIJA)and stormwater control measures(SCMs)associated with the subject
project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until March 5,2029 and the project shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein and does not supersede any other agency permit that may be
required. Failure to comply with these requirements will result in future compliance problems.Please note that
this permit is not transferable except after notice to and approval by the Division.
This cover letter,attachments,and all documents on file with DEMLR shall be considered part of this permit and
is herein incorporated by reference.
Please be aware that it is the responsibility of the permit holders,Perry Management,LLC("Developer")as well
as 24 East Development,LW and Sylvester Farm Investments,LLC("Property Owner"),to notify the Division
of any changes in ownership and request an ownership/name change for the stormwater permit. However, if the
development agreement between the Developer and the Property Owner is dissolved,cancelled or defaults,and
the Division is not notified by the Developer to transfer the permit,then the responsibility for permit compliance
reverts back to the Property Owner. A complete transfer request must be submitted to the Division within 30 days
as described below otherwise the Developer and Property Owner will be operating a stormwater treatment facility
without a valid permit which is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1. Failure to transfer the permit may
result in appropriate enforcement action in accordance with North Carolina General Statute§143-215.6A through
§143-215.6C being taken against the Property Owner.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality f Division of Energy.loHneral and Land Resources
,....01
,z Wilmington Regional Office 112TCatdma!Drive Extension I;Wilmington,North Carolina 28405
mar+ ra.er 910.7967215

State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 200502
Page 2 of 2
If any parts,requirements,or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable,you have the right to request
an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings(OAH). The
written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and must be filed with the
OAH within thirty(30)days of receipt of this permit. You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding
the filing fee(if a filing fee is required) and/or the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh,NC 27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000,or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com. Unless
such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions concerning this permit,please contact Christine Hall in the Wilmington Regional
Office, at(910)796-7215 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
"14 r'
Brian Wrenn,Director
Division of Energy,Mineral and Land Resources
Enclosures: Attachment A—Designer's Certification Form
Attachment B—Built-Upon Area Allocation
Application Documents
DES/canh: \\\Stormwater\Permits&Projects12020\200502 HD\2021 03 permit 200502
cc: Bart J McClain;William G.Daniel&Associates,PA
Onslow County Building Inspections
NCDOT District Engineer
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL AND LAND RESOURCES
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT
In compliance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations promulgated and adopted by the North
Carolina Environmental Management Commission, including 15A NCAC 02H.1000 amended on
January 1, 2017 (2017 Rules) (the "stormwater rules"),
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Perry Management, Inc., 24 East Development, LLC, and Sylvester Farm Investments, LLC
Sylvester Development
Westside of NC 24, Richlands, Onslow County
FOR THE
construction, management, operation and maintenance of built-upon area (BUA) draining to one (1)
wet pond ("stormwater control measures" or"SCMs") as outlined in the application, approved
stormwater management plans, supplement, calculations, operation and maintenance agreement,
recorded documents, specifications, and other supporting data (the "approved plans and
specifications") as attached and/or on file with and approved by the Division of Energy, Mineral and
Land Resources (the "Division" or"DEMLR"). The project shall be constructed, operated and
maintained in accordance with these approved plans and specifications. The approved plans and
specifications are incorporated by reference and are enforceable part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until March 5, 2021 and shall be subject to the
following specified conditions and limitations. The permit issued shall continue in force and effect until
the permittee files a request with the Division for a permit modification, transfer, renewal, or
rescission; however, these actions do not stay any condition. The issuance of this permit does not
prohibit the Director from reopening and modifying the permit, revoking and reissuing the permit, or
terminating the permit for cause as allowed by the laws, rules, and regulations contained in Title 15A
NCAC 2H.1000 and NCGS 143-215.1 et.al.
1. BUA REQUIREMENTS. The maximum amount of BUA allowed for the entire project is 603,770
square feet. The runoff from all BUA within the permitted drainage area of this project must be
directed into the permitted SCM. The BUA requirements and allocations for this project are as
follows:
a. SCM BUA LIMITS. The SCM has been designed using the runoff treatment method to
handle the runoff from 508,323 square feet of BUA within the delineated drainage area. This
permit does not provide any allocation of BUA for future development within the delineated
drainage area(s). This permit approves 95,447 square feet of BUA that was not able to be
collected and treated in an SCM due to grading and being unable to collect the runoff to
bypass the system.
b. BUA FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS. Each of the 10 lots or offsite areas are limited to a maximum
amount of BUA as indicated in Attachment B of this permit and as indicated in the approved
plans and specifications. The maximum BUA assigned to each lot via this permit and
the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants may not be increased or
decreased by either the individual lot owner or the permittee unless and until the
permittee notifies the Division and obtains written approval from the Division.
Page 1 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
2. PERVIOUS AREA IMPROVEMENTS. At this time, none of the pervious area improvements
listed in G.S. 143-214.7(b2) or the Stormwater Design Manual have been proposed for this
project. Pervious area improvements will be allowed in this project if documentation is provided
demonstrating those improvements meet the requirements of the stormwater rule.
3. OFFSITE LOT REQUIREMENTS. Each non-residential lot whose ownership is not retained by
the permittee shall submit a separate off-site stormwater permit application to the Division and
receive approval prior to construction. Prior to the discharge of stormwater runoff from any lot
into the approved stormwater system, the permittee shall ensure that the owner of the non-
residential lot has obtained the separate off-site stormwater management permit.
4. SCM REQUIREMENTS. The SCM requirements for this project are as follows:
a. SCM DESIGN. The SCM is permitted based on the design criteria presented in the sealed,
signed and dated supplement and as shown in the approved plans and specifications. This
SCM must be provided and maintained at the design condition.
b. PLANTING PLAN. The SCM landscape planting plan shown in the approved plans shall be
followed in its entirety during construction. After the plants are established, the operation
and maintenance agreement must be followed.
c. FOUNTAINS. At this time, a decorative spray fountain has not been proposed within the wet
pond. Decorative spray fountains will be allowed in the wet pond if documentation is
provided demonstrating that the proposed fountain will not cause resuspension of sediment
within the pond or cause erosion of the pond side slopes.
d. IRRIGATION. If the wet pond is to be used for irrigation, it is recommended that some water
be maintained in the permanent pool, the vegetated shelf is planted with appropriate species
that can handle fluctuating conditions, and human health issues are addressed.
5_ STORMWATER OUTLETS. The peak flow from the 10-year storm event shall not cause
erosion downslope of the discharge point.
6. VEGETATED SETBACKS. A 50-foot wide vegetative setback must be provided and maintained
in grass or other vegetation adjacent to all surface waters as shown on the approved plans. The
setback is measured horizontally from the normal pool elevation of impounded structures, from
the top of bank of each side of streams or rivers, and from the mean high waterline of tidal
waters, perpendicular to the shoreline.
a. BUA IN THE VEGETATED SETBACK. BUA may not be added to the vegetated setback (as
shown to be impacted by the application submitted on February 17, 2021 to the Division of
Water Resources) except as shown on the approved plans.
b. RELEASE OF STORMWATER NOT TREATED IN AN SCM. Stormwater that is not treated
in an SCM must be released at the edge of the vegetated setback and allowed to flow
through the setback as dispersed flow.
7. RECORDED DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS. The stormwater rules require the following
documents to be recorded with the Office of the Register of Deeds prior to the sale of individual
lots or groups of lots:
a. ACCESS AND/OR EASEMENTS. The entire stormwater conveyance system, including any
SCMs, and maintenance accesses must be located in public rights-of-way, dedicated
common areas that extend to the nearest public right-of-way, and/or permanent recorded
easements that extend to the nearest public right-of-way for the purpose of inspection,
operation, maintenance, and repair.
b. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. The operation and maintenance
agreement must be recorded with the Office of the Register of Deeds.
c. FINAL PLATS. The final recorded plats must reference the operation and maintenance
agreement and must also show all public rights-of-way, dedicated common areas, and/or
permanent drainage easements, in accordance with the approved plans.
Page 2 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
d. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS. Recorded deed restrictions and
protective covenants must include, at a minimum, the following statements related to
stormwater management:
i. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with State
Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8 200502, as issued by the Division of
Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (the "Division") under 15A NCAC 02H.1000,
effective January 1, 2017.
ii. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the extent
necessary to maintain compliance with the Stormwater Management Permit.
iii. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and parties
claiming under them.
iv. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded without
the express written consent of the Division.
v. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plans may not take place
without the concurrence of the Division.
vi. The maximum built-upon area (BUA) per lot is as shown in Attachment B. This
allotted amount includes any BUA constructed within the lot property boundaries,
and that portion of the right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the
pavement not shown on the approved plans. BUA has the same meaning as G.S.
143-214.7, as amended.
vii. The maximum allowable BUA shall not be exceeded on any lot until the permit is
modified to ensure compliance with the stormwater rules, permit, and the approved
plans and specifications.
viii. All runoff from the BUA on the lot must drain into the permitted system. This may
be accomplished via grading, a stormwater collection system and/or a vegetated
conveyance.
ix. A 50-foot wide vegetative setback must be provided and maintained adjacent to all
surface waters in accordance with 15A NCAC 02H.1003(4) and the approved
plans.
x. Any individual or entity found to be in noncompliance with the provisions of a
stormwater management permit or the requirements of the stormwater rules is
subject to enforcement procedures as set forth in NCGS 143, Article 21.
xi. Each non-residential lot within the subdivision whose ownership is not retained by
the permittee, must apply for and receive a separate offsite stormwater
management permit from the Division prior to construction.
e. DEEDS FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS. The permittee shall record deed restrictions and
protective covenants prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy to ensure the permit
conditions and the approved plans and specifications are maintained in perpetuity.
8. CONSTRUCTION. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded
areas of the on-site stormwater system will be repaired immediately.
a. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. During construction, all
operation and maintenance for the project shall follow the Erosion Control Plan requirements
until the Sediment-Erosion Control devices are converted to SCMs or no longer needed.
Once the device is converted to a SCM, the permittee shall provide and perform the
operation and maintenance as outlined in the applicable section below.
b. SCM RESTORATION. If one or more of the SCMs are used as an Erosion Control device
and/or removed or destroyed during construction, it must be restored to the approved state
stormwater design condition prior to close-out of the erosion control plan and/or project
completion and/or transfer of the state stormwater permit. Upon restoration, a new or
updated certification will be required for the SCM(s) and a copy must be submitted to the
appropriate DEQ regional office.
Page 3 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
9. MODIFICATIONS. No person or entity, including the permittee, shall alter any component
shown in the approved plans and specifications. Prior to the construction of any modification to
the approved plans, the permittee shall submit to the Director, and shall have received approval
for modified plans, specifications, and calculations including, but not limited to, those listed
below. For changes to the project or SCM that impact the certifications, a new or updated
certification(s), as applicable, will be required and a copy must be submitted to the appropriate
DEQ regional office upon completion of the modification.
a. Any modification to the approved plans and specifications, regardless of size including the
SCM(s), BUA, details, etc.
b. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of BUA or to the drainage area.
c. Further development, subdivision, acquisition, lease or sale of any, all or part of the project
and/or property area as reported in the approved plans and specifications.
d. Altering, modifying, removing, relocating, redirecting, regrading, or resizing of any
component of the approved SCM(s), stormwater collection system and/or vegetative
conveyance shown on the approved plan.
e. The construction of any allocated future BUA.
f. The construction of any permeable pavement, #57 stone area, public trails, or landscaping
material within the common areas to be considered a permeable surface that were not
included in the approved plans and specifications.
g. Other modifications as determined by the Director.
10. DESIGNER'S CERTIFICATION. Upon completion of the project, the permittee shall determine if
the project is in compliance with the approved plans and take the necessary following actions:
a. If the permittee determines that the project is in compliance with the approved plans, then
within 45 days of completion, the permittee shall submit to the Division one hard copy and
one electronic copy of the following:
i. The completed and signed Designer's Certification provided in Attachment A
noting any deviations from the approved plans and specifications. Deviations
may require approval from the Division;
ii. A copy of the recorded operation and maintenance agreement;
iii. Unless already provided, a copy of the recorded deed restrictions and
protective covenants; and
iv. A copy of the recorded plat delineating the public rights-of-way, dedicated
common areas and/or permanent recorded easements, when applicable.
b. If the permittee determines that the project is not in compliance with the approved plans, the
permittee shall submit an application to modify the permit within 30 days of completion of the
project or provide a plan of action, with a timeline, to bring the site into compliance.
11 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE. The permittee shall provide and perform the operation and
maintenance necessary, as listed in the signed operation and maintenance agreement, to
assure that all components of the permitted on-site stormwater system are maintained at the
approved design condition. The approved operation and maintenance agreement must be
followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals.
a. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REQUIRED. If the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, the
permittee shall take immediate corrective actions. This includes actions required by the
Division and the stormwater rules such as the construction of additional or replacement on-
site stormwater systems. These additional or replacement measures shall receive a permit
from the Division prior to construction.
b. MAINTENANCE RECORDS. Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made
available upon request to authorized personnel of the Division. The records will indicate the
date, activity, name of person performing the work and what actions were taken.
12. PERMIT RENEWAL. A permit renewal request must be submitted at least 180 days prior to the
expiration date of this permit. The renewal request must include the appropriate application,
documentation and the processing fee as outlined in 15A NCAC 02H.1045(3).
Page 4 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
13. CURRENT PERMITTEE NAME OR ADDRESS CHANGES. The permittee shall submit a
completed Permit Information Update Application Form to the Division within 30 days to making
any one or more of the following changes:
a. A name change of the current permittee;
b. A name change of the project;
c. A mailing address change of the permittee.
14. TRANSFER. This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. Neither the sale of the project and/or property, in whole or in part, nor
the conveyance of common area to a third party constitutes an approved transfer of the permit.
a. DEVELOPER AGREEMENT. It is the responsibility of the permit holders, Perry
Management, Inc ("Developer") as well as 24 East Development, LLC and Sylvester Farm
Investments, LLC ("Property Owner"), to notify the Division of any changes in ownership and
request an ownership/name change for the stormwater permit. However, if the development
agreement between the Developer and Property Owner is dissolved, cancelled or defaults,
and the Division is not notified by the Developer to transfer the permit, then the responsibility
for permit compliance reverts back to the Property Owner. A complete transfer request must
be submitted to the Division within 30 days as described below otherwise the Developer and
Property Owner will be operating a stormwater treatment facility without a valid permit which
is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1. Failure to transfer the permit may result in
appropriate enforcement action in accordance with North Carolina General Statute §143-
215.6A through §143-215.6C being taken against the Property Owner.
b. TRANSFER REQUEST. The transfer request must include the appropriate application,
documentation and the processing fee as outlined in 15A NCAC 02H.1045(2) and must be
submitted upon occurrence of any one or more of the following events:
i. The sale or conveyance of the project and/or property area in whole or in part,
except in the case of an individual residential lot sale that is made subject to the
recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants;
ii. The assignment of declarant rights to another individual or entity;
iii. The sale or conveyance of the common areas to a Homeowner's or Property
Owner's Association, subject to the requirements of NCGS 143-214.7(c2);
iv. Dissolution of the partnership, corporate, or LLC entity, subject to NCGS 55-14-05
or NCGS 57D-6-07 and 08;
v. Bankruptcy;
vi. Foreclosure, subject to the requirements of Session Law 2013-121,
b. TRANSFER INSPECTION. Prior to transfer of the permit, a file review and site inspection
will be conducted by Division personnel to ensure the permit conditions have been met and
that the project and the on-site stormwater system complies with the permit conditions.
Records of maintenance activities performed to date may be requested. Projects not in
compliance with the permit will not be transferred until all permit and/or general statute
conditions are met.
15. COMPLIANCE. The permittee is responsible for complying with the terms and conditions of this
permit and the approved plans and specifications until the Division approves the transfer
request.
a. REVIEWING AND MONITORING EACH LOT FOR COMPLIANCE. The permittee is
responsible for verifying that the proposed BUA on each individual lot, within each drainage
area and for the entire project does not exceed the maximum amount allowed by this permit.
The permittee shall review all individual lot plans for new construction and all subsequent
modifications and additions for compliance. The plans reviewed must include all proposed
BUA, grading, and driveway pipe placement. The permittee shall not approve any lot plans
where the maximum allowed BUA limit has been exceeded or where modifications are
proposed to the grading and/or to the stormwater collection system and/or to the vegetated
conveyance unless and until a permit modification has been approved by the Division. The
permittee shall review and routinely monitor the project and each lot to ensure continued
compliance with the conditions of the permit, the approved plans and specifications, and the
recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants. The permittee shall notify any lot
owner that is found to be in noncompliance with the conditions of this permit in writing and
shall require timely resolution.
Page 5 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
b. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD (ARB) OR COMMITTEE (ARC). The permittee may
establish an ARB or ARC to conduct individual lot reviews. However, any approval given by
the ARB or ARC on behalf of the permittee does not relieve the permittee of the
responsibility to maintain compliance with the conditions of the permit and the approved
plans and specifications.
c. APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. A copy of this permit, approved plans,
application, supplement, operation and maintenance agreement, all applicable recorded
documents, and specifications shall be maintained on file by the permittee at all times.
d. DIVISION ACCESS. The permittee grants Division Staff permission to enter the property
during normal business hours to inspect all components of the permitted project.
e. ENFORCEMENT. Any individual or entity found to be in noncompliance with the provisions
of a stormwater management permit or the requirements of the stormwater rules is subject to
enforcement procedures as set forth in NCGS 143 Article 21.
f. OBTAINING COMPLIANCE. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site
does not meet one or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time
frame specified in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the
Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide
copies of modified plans and certification in writing to the Director that the changes have
been made.
g. OTHER PERMITS. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the permittee from
obtaining and complying with any and all other permits or approvals that are required for this
development to take place, as required by any statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances,
which are imposed by any other Local, State or Federal government agency having
jurisdiction. Any activities undertaken at this site that cause a water quality violation or
undertaken prior to receipt of the necessary permits or approvals to do so are considered
violations of NCGS 143-215.1, and subject to enforcement procedures pursuant to NCGS
143-215.6.
Permit issued this the 5th day of March 2021.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
atio. . /nal
. Brian Wrenn, Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW8 200502
Page 6 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
Attachment A
Certification Forms
The following blank Designer Certification forms are included and specific for this project:
e As-Built Permittee Certification
• As-Built Designer's Certification General MDC
• As-Built Designer's Certification for Wet Detention Pond Project
A separate certification is required for each SCM. These blank certification forms may be copied and
used, as needed, for each SCM and/or as a partial certification to address a section or phase of the
project.
Page 1 of 1

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
AS-BUILT PERMITTEE CERTIFICATION
I hereby state that I am the current permittee for the project named above, and I certify by my
signature below, that the project meets the below listed Final Submittal Requirements found in NCAC
02H.1042(4) and the terms, conditions and provisions listed in the permit documents, plans and
specifications on file with or provided to the Division.
RCheck here if this is a partial certification. Section/phase/SCM#?
Check here if this is part of a Fast Track As-built Package Submittal.
Printed Name Signature
, a Notary Public in the State of
County of , do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day of , 20
and acknowledge the due execution of this as-built certification. (SEAL)
Witness my hand and official seal
My commission expires
— Permittee's Certification NCAC .1042(4) Completed/ i N/A
Provided
A. DEED RESTRICTIONS./BUA RECORDS
1. The deed restrictions and protective covenants have been recorded Y or N
and contain the necessary language to ensure that the project is
maintained consistent with the stormwater regulations and with the
permit conditions.
2. A copy of the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants Y or N
has been provided to the Division.
3. Records which track the BUA on each lot are being kept. (See Note Y or N
1)
B. MAINTENANCE ACCESS
1. The SCMs are accessible for inspection, maintenance and repair. Y or N J
2. The access is a minimum of 10 feet wide. Y or N
3. The access extends to the nearest public right-of-way. Y or N
C. EASEMENTS
1. The SCMs and the components of the runoff collection /conveyance Y or N
system are located in recorded drainage easements.
2. A copy of the recorded plat(s) is provided. Y or N
D. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS -Plats for residential tots that •, Y of V
have an SCM include the following:
1. The specific location of the SCM on the lot. Y or N
2. A typical detail for the SCM. Y or N
3. A note that the SCM is required to meet stormwater regulations and
that the lot owner is subject to enforcement action as set forth in Y or N
NCGS 143 Article 21 if the SCM is removed, relocated or altered
without prior approval.
E. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Y or N I
1. The O&M Agreement is referenced on the final recorded plat. Y or N
2. The O&M Agreement is recorded with the Register of Deeds and Y or N
appears in the chain of title.
. i ERATIOON AND MAINTENANCE PLAN — maintenance records are ;T--
k being kept in a known set location for each SCM and are available for Y or fi i
review.
G. DESIGNER'S CERTIFICATION FORM —has been provided to the Y N
Division.
Page 1 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
Note 1-Acceptable records include ARC approvals, as-built surveys, and county tax records.
Provide an explanation for every requirement that was not met, and for every "N/A" below. Attach
additional sheets as needed.
Page 2 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
AS-BUILT DESIGNER'S CERTIFICATION GENERAL MDC
I hereby state that I am a licensed professional and I certify by my signature and seal below, that I
have observed the construction of the project named above to the best of my abilities with all due care
and diligence, and that the project meets the below listed General MDC found in NCAC 02H.1050 in
accordance with the permit documents, plans and specifications on file with or provided to the
Division, except as noted on the "AS-BUILT" drawings, such that the intent of the storrnwater rules
and statutes has been preserved.
Check here if this is a partial certification. Section/phase/SCM #?
Check here if this is a part of a Fast-Track As-Built Package Submittal per .1044(3).
Check here if the designer did not observe the construction, but is certifying the project.
Check here if pictures of the SCM are provided.
Printed
Name Signature
NC Registration
Number Date
Consultant's Mailing Address:
SEAL:
City/State/ZIP—
Phone Number
Consultant's Email address:
O Circle N if the as-built value differs from the Plan. If N is circled, provide an explanation on Page 2.
ON/E = not evaluated (provide explanation on page 2) OO N/A= not applicable to this SCM or project.
P Consultant's Certification NCAC .1003((3)& General MDC '
#050 (=As-built WE (1 NJA
A. TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS _
1. The SCM achieves runoff treatment. Y or N
2_ The SCM achieves runoff volume match. Y or N
3. Runoff from offsite areas and/or existing BUA is Y or N
bypassed.
4. Runoff from offsite areas and/or existing BUA is directed Y or N
into the permitted SCM and is accounted for at the full
build-out potential.
5. The project controls runoff through an offsite permitted Y or N
SCM that meets the requirements of the MDC.
6. The net area of new BUA increase for an existing project Y or N
has been accounted for at the appropriate design storm
level.
7. The SCM(s) meets all the specific minimum design Y or N
criteria.
R. VEGETATED SETBACKS/ BUA — — I ---1. The width of the vegetated setback has been measured Y or N
from the normal pool of impounded waters, the MHW
line of tidal waters, or the top of bank of each side of
rivers or streams.
2. The vegetated setback is maintained in grass or other Y or N
vegetation.
3. BUA that meets the requirements of NCGS 143-214.7 Y or N
(b2)(2) is located in the setback.
Page 3 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
4. BUA that does not meet the requirements of NCGS 143- Y or N
214.7 (b2)(2) is located within the setback and is limited
to:
a. Publicly funded linear projects (road, greenway
sidewalk)
b. Water-dependent structures
c. Minimal footprint uses (utility poles, signs, security
lighting and appurtenances)
5. Stormwater that is not treated in an SCM is released at Y or N
the edge of the setback and allowed to flow through the
setback as dispersed flow. __
®As-built i ONlE C)NiA
C. STORMWATER OUTLETS-the outlet handles the peak Y
flow from the 10 year storm with no downslope erosion. 1
-a VARIATIONS I ,_
1. A variation (alternative) from the stormwater rule Y or N
provisions has been implemented.
2. The variation provides equal or better stormwater control Y or N
and equal or better rotection of surface waters.
E. COMPLIANCE�Hf=R REGULATORY PROGRAM —; ----
I has been met. Y or N -��
F. SIZING -the volurrve 04 the SCM takes the runoff from all
M surfaces into account and is sufficient to han-Se the required Y or N 1
storm depth. -I- -!. r---
1 G. CONTAMINATED SOILS- infiltrating SCM's are not Y or N I
located in or on areas with contaminated soils. _
H. SIDE SLOPES -_ C
1. Vegetated side slopes are no steeper than 3H:1 V. Y or N
2. Side slopes include retaining walls, gabion walls, or Y or N
other surfaces that are steeper than 3H:1 V.
3. Vegetated side slopes are steeper than 3H:1 V(provide Y or N
supportin documents for soils and vegetation.
I. EROSION PROT ON
1. The inlets do not cause erosion in the SCM. Y or N
2. The outlet does not cause erosion downslope of the Y or N
discharge point during the peak flow from the 10 year
storm.
J. EXCESS FLOWS-An ovr rflow/bypass has been Y Of t+i f
provided.
r
r K. ATER1NG.- standing Y or N� -_
�W ��rethad to drawdown water has :,
been provided to facilitate maintenance and inspection.
L. CLEANOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION -the SCM has beer Y or N I i
cleaned out and converted to its approved design state.
M. MAINTENANCE ACCESS I —"
1. The SCM is accessible for maintenance and repair. Y or N
2. The access does not include lateral or incline slopes Y or N
>3:1.
N. DESI'NERiQUALIFICATIONS(FAST-TRACK PERMIT)- !�
The designer is licensed under Chapters 89A 89C 39E. or Y or N i
1
L89F.of the General Statutes.
Provide an explanation for every MDC that was not met, and for every item marked "N/A" or"N/E",
below. Attach additional pages as needed:
Page 4 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
AS-BUILT DESIGNER'S CERTIFICATION FOR WET DETENTION POND PROJECT
I hereby state that I am a licensed professional and I certify by my signature and seal below, that I
have observed the construction of the project named above to the best of my abilities with all due care
and diligence, and that the project meets all of the MDC found in NCAC 02H.1053, in accordance with
the permit documents, plans and specifications on file with or provided to the Division, except as
noted on the "AS-BUILT" drawings, such that the intent of the stormwater rules and the general
statutes has been preserved.
Check here if this is a partial certification. Section/phase/SCM#?
Check here if this is part of a Fast-Track As-Built Package Submittal per .1044(3).
_ Check here if the Designer did not observe the construction, but is certifying the project.
Check here if pictures of the SCM are provided.
Printed
Name Signature
NC Registration Number Date
Consultant's Mailing Address:
SEAL:
City/State/ZIP
Phone Number
Consultant's Email address:
O Circle N if the as-built value differs from the Plan/permit. If N is circled, provide an explanation on
page 2
ON/E = not evaluated (provide explanation on page 2) ©N/A = not applicable to this project or SCM.
This Certification must be completed in conjunction with the General MDC certification under NCAC
02H.1050
Consultant's Certification (MDC .1053) WAs-built i ©N/E t)N1A
A. Forebay 1 Depths i Fountain
1. The available Sediment storage is consistent with the Y or N
approved plan and is a minimum of 6 in.
2. Water flow over the forebay berm into the main pond Y or N
occurs at a non-erosive velocity.
3. The provided Forebay Volume is 15%-20% of the main Y or N
pool volume.
4. The Forebay entrance elevation is deeper than the exit Y or N
elevation into the pond.
5. The Average Design Depth of the main pond below the
permanent pool elevation is consistent with the permitted Y or N
value?
6. Fountain documentation is provided. Y or N
B. Side slope-s t Banks i Vsg etat€d Shelf
1. The width of the Vegetated Shelf is consistent with the y or N
approved plans and is a minimum of 6 feet.
2. The slope of the Vegetated Shelf is consistent with the Y or N
approved plans and is no steeper than 6:1.
C. As-built Main Pool i Areas i Volumes?Elevations
1. The permanent pool surface area provided is consistent Y or N
with the permitted value.
2. The Temporary Pool Volume provided is consistent with Y or N
the permitted value.
Page 5 of 6

State Stormwater Management
Permit No. SW8 200502
3. The permanent pool elevation is consistent with the Y or N
permitted value.
4. The temporary pool elevation is consistent with the Y or N
permitted value.
©As-built I OWE O NIA J
D. Inlets/Outlet 1 Drawdown
1. The design volume draws down in 2-5 days. Y or N
2. The size of the Orifice is consistent with the permitted Y or N
value.
3. A trash rack is provided on the outlet structure. Y or N
4. Hydrologic impacts to the receiving channel are minimized Y or N
from the 1 yr 24 hr storm discharge?
5. The inlets and the outlet location are situated per the Y or N
approved plan and avoid short-circuiting.
E. Vegetation
1. The vegetated shelf has been planted with a minimum of 3 Y or N
diverse species.
2. The vegetated shelf plant density is consistent with the
approved plans and is no less than 50 plants per 200 sf or Y or N
no less than 24 inches on center.
Provide an explanation for every MDC that was not met, and for every item marked "N/A" or"N/E"
below. Attach additional pages as needed:
Page 6 of 6

Attachment B-BUA Lot Allocations
Sylvester Development
Master Permit No. SW8 200502
Lot#from Offsite Permit No. Date Offsite Project Name Allocated Proposed
Master Permit Issued BUA BUA
2 32,402
5 29,863
6 33,740
7 41,917
8 33,326
9 41,980
10 31,926
12 38,454
Offsite Area 3 0
Offsite Area 4 112,385
Total 395,993 0
Onsite 283,608 0
Offsite 112,385 0

DEMLR USE ONLY
Date eceived Fee Paid Permit Number
5 i / oo (80'i 4 505 Su)8 aooS
Applicable Rules: ❑Coastal SW-1995 ❑Coastal SW-2008 0 Ph II-Post Construction
(select all that apply) 0 Non-Coastal SW-HQW/ORW Waters 0 Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑Other WQ Mgmt Plan:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy,Mineral and Land Resources
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This farm may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name(subdivision,facility,or establishment name-should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications,letters,operation and maintenance agreements,etc.):
Sylvester Development
2. Location of Project(street address):
West side NC 24
City:Richlands County:Onlsow Zip:28574
3. Directions to project(from nearest major intersection):
Property is located on the west side of NC 24 beteen Koonce Fork Road and Sylvester Street
4. Latitude:34°53'28.88"N Longitude:77°32'55.93"W of the main entrance to the project.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1.a.Specify whether project is(check one): New ❑Modification ❑Renewal w/ Modificationt
tRenewals with modifications also requires SWU-102-Renewal Application Form
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit,list the existing
permit number ,its issue date(if known) ,and the status of
construction: ['Not Started ❑Partially Completed* ❑Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project(check one):
['Low Density ®High Density ['Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ['Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from
DEMLR requesting a state stormwater management permit application,list the stormwater project number,
if assigned, and the previous name of the project,if different than currently
proposed,
4.a.Additional Project Requirements(check applicable blanks;information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
❑CAMA Major ®Sedimentation/Erosion Control:25.43 ac of Disturbed Area
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater ❑404/401 Permit:Proposed Impacts
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name,Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? ❑No ®Yes
If yes,see S.L.2012-200,Part VI:http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/lr/rules-and-regulations tE
MAY 01 2020
Form SWU-101 Version Oct.31,2013 Page 1 of 6 B�

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1.a.Print Applicant/Signing Official's name and title(specifically the developer,property owner,lessee,
designated government official,individual,etc.who owns the project):
Applicant!Organization Perry Management,Inc.
Signing Official&Title:Ely Perry III - President
b.Contact information for person listed in item 1a above:
Street Address:518 Plaza Blvd
City:Kinston State:NC Zip:28501
Mailing Address (if applicable):PO Box 1475
City:Kinston State:NC Zip:28503
Phone: (252 ) 559-2629 Fax:
Email:[e-mail]
c.Please check the appropriate box.The applicant listed above is:
❑The property owner(Skip to Contact Information,item 3a)
❑Lessee*(Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information,item 2a and 2b below)
❑Purchaser*(Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information,item 2a and
2b below)
®Developer*(Complete Contact Information,item 2a and 2b below.)
2.a.Print Property Owner's name and title below,if you are the lessee,purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/Organization:24 East DevelopMent,LLC -Managing Member
Signing Official&Title:Leon Ward Sylvester III
b.Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:108 W Franck Street
City:Richlands State:NC Zip:28574
Mailing Address(if applicable):
City: State: Zip:
Phone: (910 ) 324-1107 Fax: (
Email:[e-mail]
3.a. (Optional)Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project
Other Contact Person/Organization:William G.Daniel&Associates,PA
Signing Official&Title:Bart T.McClain - Project Engineer
b.Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:1150 SE Maynard Road,Suite 260
City:Cary State:NC Zip:27511
Phone: (919 ) 467-9708 Fax: (919 ) 460-7585
Email:[e-mail]
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits:n/a
Point of Contact Phone#: ( )
�CEIVE
OCT 2 9 2uzu
Form SWIJ-101 Version Oct.31,2013 Page 2 of 6
BY:

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1.a.Print Applicant/Signing Official's name and title(specifically the developer,property owner,lessee,
designated government official,individual,etc.who owns the project):
Applicant/Organization:Perry Management,Inc.
Signing Official&Title:Ely Perry III - President
b.Contact information for person listed in item la above:
Street Address:518 Plaza Blvd
City:Kinston State:NC Zip:28501
Mailing Address (if applicable):PO Box 1475
City:Kinston State:NC _ Zip:28503
Phone: (252 ) 559-2629 Fax: (
Email:[e-mail]
c.Please check the appropriate box.The applicant listed above is:
❑The property owner(Skip to Contact Information,item 3a)
❑Lessee*(Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information,item 2a and 2b below)
❑Purchaser*(Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information,item 2a and
2b below)
Developer*(Complete Contact Information,item 2a and 2b below.)
2.a.Print Property Owner's name and title below,if you are the lessee,purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/Organization:Sylvester Farm Investments.LLC-Member
Signing Official&Title:Leon Ward Sylvester III
b.Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:108 W Franck Street
City:Richlands State:NC Zip:28574
Mailing Address(if applicable):
City: State: Zip:
Phone: (910 ) 324-1107 Fax: ( )
Email:[e-mail]
3.a. (Optional)Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project
Other Contact Person/Organization:William G.Daniel&Associates,PA
Signing Official&Title:Bart T.McClain - Project Engineer
b.Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:1150 SE Maynard Road,Suite 260
City:Cary State:NC Zip:27511
Phone: (919 ) 467-9708 Fax: (919 ) 460-7585
Email:[e-mail]
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits:n/a
Point of Contact: Phone#: (
flECEIVE
l)
OCT 292020
Form SWU-101 Version Oct.31,2013 Page 2 of 6
RY:

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below,briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Stormwater will be collected in storm drainage system and piped to a proposed Wet Detention Basin
where the first 1.5"will be held and released in approximately 3 days.Post development runoff
is below pre development runoff for all storm events 1 year through 100 year
2.a.If claiming vested rights,identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date:
❑Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑Other: Date:
b.If claiming vested rights,identify the regulation(s)the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑Coastal SW-1995 ❑Ph II-Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the White Oak River basin.
4. Total Property Area:33.37 acres 5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area:0 acres
6. Total Surface Water Area:0 acres
7. Total Property Area(4)-Total Coastal Wetlands Area(5)-Total Surface Water Area(6)=Total Project
Area+:33.37 acres
+ Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the following: the normal pool of impounded structures,the area
between the banks of streams and rivers,the area below the Normal High Water(NHW)line or Mean High Water
(MHV1)Iine,and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW(or MHTN)line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area(BUA). Non-coastal wetlands landward of the NHW(or MHYV)line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area/ Total Project Area)X 100 =41.54
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?2 (For high density,count 1 for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects,use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project,attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below. pov%0 04 , CO 55
Basin Information Drainage Area 1 Drainage Area 2 Drainage Area_ Drainage Area_
Receiving Stream Name Squires Run Squires Run
Stream Class * C;NSW C;NSW
Stream Index Number* 19-3 19-3
Total Drainage Area(sf) 997693 455904
On-site Drainage Area(sf) 563286 61571
Off-site Drainage Area(sf) 434407 394333
Proposed Impervious Area** (sf) 508323 95447
% Impervious Area**(total) 50.95 20.94
Impervious**Surface Area Drainage Area 1 Drainage Area 2 Drainage Area_ Drainage Area_
On-site Buildings/Lots(sf) 0 0
On-site Streets (sf) 105255 8431
On-site Parking (sf) 0 0
On-site Sidewalks (sf) 0 0
Other4m-site-(sf) 764 0
Future(sf) 283608 0
Off-site (sf) 112385 15011
Existing BUA***(sf) 6311 72005
Total (sf): 508323 95447
* Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/cvg/ps/csu/classifications
** Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including,but not limited to,buildings,roads,p
sidewalks,gravel areas,etc. EWE
t "d.A .5 o5A.4z DV' 1,a 3 +9 FEB 17 2021
Form SWU-101 Version Oct.31,2013 Page 3 of 6
BY:_

***Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development.Do not report any existing BUA that
is to be removed and whichwill be replaced by new BUA.
11. How was the off-site impervious area listed above determined?Provide documentation.Calculated from
ex centerline of surrounding streets.
Projects in Union County:Contact DEMLR Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened&
Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per 15A NCAC 02B.0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance(O&M)forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
from http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/bmp-manual.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Energy,Mineral and
Land Resources(DEMLR). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application
instruction sheet and BMP checklists are available from
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms docs. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DEMLR Office. (The appropriate office may be found by locating project on the
interactive online map at http:/I portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item.All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms docs.
4tials
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form.
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions&Protective Covenants Wirt
Form.(if required as per Part VII below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s)(sealed,signed and dated)and O&M
agreement(s)for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of$505 payable to NCDENR.(For an Express review,refer to
http://www.envhelp.org/pages/onestopexpress.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative(one to two pages)describing the stormwater treatment/management for /t
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the Nri4
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within lh mile of the site boundary,include the 1/2
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed,signed and dated calculations(one copy). /v
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5"x 14"(sealed,signed,&dated),including: 1/11
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures,the banks of streams and rivers,the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters,and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NEW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures,the banks of streams or rivers,and the MHW(or NEW)of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings&distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours,proposed contours,spot elevations,finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads,drainage features,collection systems,and stormwater control measures.
m.Wetlands delineated,or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans. I V
n. Existing drainage(including off-site),drainage easements,pipe sizes,runoff calculations. ECEG
o. Drainage areas delineated(included in the main set of plans,not as a separate document). OCT 2 9 2020
Form SWU-101 Version Oct.31,2013 Page 4 of 6
BY:

p. Vegetated buffers(where required).
9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations(Please identify 4-
elevations in addition to depths)as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs.Include an 8.5"x11"copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs,the report should also
include the soil type,expected infiltration rate,and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO:Schedule a site visit for DEMLR to verify the SHWT prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed.Deed book:Ii243 Page No:Mole/11 NtM
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations(LLC):Provide documentation from the NC Alin
Secretary of State or other official documentation,which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information,item 1a,2a,and/or 3a per 15A NCAC 2H.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State,otherwise the application will be returned.
http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/Corporations/CSearch.aspx
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions,outparcels,and future development,the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary,a table listing each lot number,lot size,and the allowable built-upon area must be
provided as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed
restrictions and protective covenants forms can be downloaded from http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/lr/state---
stormwater-forms does.Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner,it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s)below,the permit holder(s)certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project,if required,shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website,that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them,that they will run with the land,that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DEMLR,and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm(such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm)so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project(such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer:Bart T.McClain
Consulting Firm:William G.Daniel&Associates,PA
Mailing Address:1150 SE Maynard Road Suite 260
City:Cary State:NC Zip:27511
Phone: (919 ) 467-9708 Fax: (919 ) 460-7585
Email:[e-mail]
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION(if Contact Information,item 2 has been filled out,complete this
section)
I,(print or type name of person listed in Contact Information,item 2a)Leon Ward Sylvester III ,certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application,and thus give permission to(print or type name of person
listed in Contact Information,item la)Ely Perry III with(print or type name of organization listed in
Contact Information,item la)Perry Management;Inc. to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal,which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
DECEIVE
OCT 2 9 202k.
Form SWU-101 Version Oct.31,2013 Page 5 of 6 i
BY:

As the legal property owner I acknowledge,understand,and agree by my signature below,that if my designated
agent(entity listed in Contact Information,item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement,or pending sale,responsibility for compliance with the DEMLR Stormwater permit reverts back
to me,the property owner. As the property owner,it is my responsibility to notify DEMLR immediately and
submit a completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days;otherwise I will be operating a stormwater
treatment facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility
without a valid permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement
action including the assessm t of ivil a lties of up to$25,000 per day,pursuant to NCG/0/T//7
S143-215.6.
Signature:'%// Date:
I, T]o,us 14✓4J- e`+Lei "Sr ,a Notary Public for the State of / -� County of
O"fl o) ,do hereby certify that Lc c+h L...) .-J Sy luw14--e, ,LZ personally appeared
before me this ' da of Cr """"''''
y ,`�,,ANT s r�•.� ,and ac ow dgethe ution of the application for
/474,
a stormwater permit. WitnesJhand and oal seal, • ( _
L L 0 �v
„,' ►►
My commission expires 0//o"t/ }2c7
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I,(print or type name of person listed in Contact Information,item la)Ely Perry III
certify that the information included on this permit application form is,to the best of my knowledge,correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans,that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be rec ed,and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable stormwater rules unde NCAC 2 9-and any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
Signature: Date: 4/97/
I,IDavJC) Vse 'S).e - 0-e• C
a Notary Public for the State of County of
O n'2t.-,t) ,do hereby certify that E r cy personally appeared
before me this ay of O C7 4,,,,,and acknowledge th tion of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand ticicial sofcAli IS ea�ly
SEA
o (1 B L1G 9
VCC
My commission expires a/
IIEC
E ::
MAY 0 12020
Form SWU-101 Version Oct. 31,2013 Page 6 of 6 BY:

As the legal property owner I acknowledge,understand,and agree by my signature below,that if my designated
agent(entity listed in Contact Information,item 1)dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement,or pending sale,responsibility for compliance with the DEMLR Stormwater permit reverts back
to me,the property owner.As the property owner,it is my responsibility to notify DEMLR immediately and
submit a completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days;otherwise I will be operating a stormwater
treatment facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility
without a valid permit is a violation of NC General Sta a 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement
action including the assessment oofvil perytllties of u o$25,0 er day,pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
Signature: ,`� i4 A �% : //A4� j Date: tli 1 1 ' -0
4 * l J /y,,,
I, , .. . l 4eE P ,a Notary Public for jthe State off O eet ULil11�County of
khi J+Ch ,do hereby,certify thatt..Q( Ward ie�fI= personally appeared
before me this May of �11 ,anG o, owledge e due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
o1111I I I ilii,j/
P S. NZ
vie NS' SEAL
*OTAgy
.$y pv��id 2
. My commission expires c . 1 O�j •�OQ�Q�
TON COS
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I,(print or type name of person listed in Contact Information,item la)Ely Perry III ,
certify that the information included on this permit application form is,to the best of my knowledge,correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans,that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded,and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable stormwater rules and 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
rrequirements.
Signature: !' Date: 7 L 6 Za 2 C)
I,,,, OvTh eke ,a Not. Public or the .tate of 1 ,County of
1 ,do herebylIcertify that _ ,tom Irk _ 1 personally appeared
before me this I(Nay of -.30.4 , do- ,and ac o edge the d - •cution . 4 e appliFation for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal, /r / /_,
._J
,. �•.... 9s ,, SEAL
Z 0140 - .•/./.
UIa= s
t pU6�`t' U ' �f/4)(,/*
T.
ef,��_• �AZ My commission expires
1. /
•4% 0726?f1 ' a
I
liflECEIVEft
JUL 2 7 2020
Form SWU-101 Version Oct.31,2013 Page 6 of 6 BY:

SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE 6\41 a0-05D-k.
FORMS LOADED
PROJECT INFORMATION
1 Project Name I Sylvester Development
2 Project Area(ac) ! 33.37
3 Coastal Wetland Area(ac) 0 --_
4 Surface Water Area(ac) 0
5 Is this project High or Low Density? High
6 Does this project use an off-site SCM? No
COMPLIANCE WITH 02H.1003(4)
7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided(feet) 50
8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes
9 Is BUA other that as listed in.1003(4)(c-d)out of the setback? Yes
10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No
NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs:
11 Infiltration System 0
12 Bioretention Cell — 0
13 Wet Pond 1
14 Stormwater Wetland 0
15 Permeable Pavement 0
16 Sand Filter _ 0
17 Rainwater Harvesting(RWH) 0
-18 Green Roof 0 --�
19 Level Spreader-Filter Strip(LS-FS) 0
20 Disconnected Impervious Surface(DIS) _ 0
21 Treatment Swale 0
22 Dry Pond -_ -- 0 _..
23 StormFilter 0
24 Silva Cell 0
25 Bayfilter -�— 0
26 Filterra 0
FORMS LOADED
DESIGNER CERTIFICATION
27 Name and Title: Bart J. McClain-Project Engineer
28 Organization: ___- William G.Daniel&Associate PA
29 Street address: _ __ 1150 SE Maynard Road Suite 260
30 City,State,Zip: Cary, NC 27511
31 Phone number(s): 919-467-9708
32 Email: _ bmcclain@wmgda..com
Certification Statement
I certify,under penalty of law that this Supplement EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or
supervision,that the information provided in the form is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true;accurate,and complete,and
that the engineenng plans.specifications;operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent
with the information provided here.
Designer {/��R1111111Hitt:th,,
tett
fi
A 1 T+/Li�7 S i �L -}�
r
LP,4?):fig Orr
u�sAe� k •
0
CEIVE�j a d ignature of r igner
I i 21117 i 3
OCT 2 9 2020
111
,T •' ti
‘441, VI4L.00' /0/2° BY:
Sea! Date

DRAINAGE AREAS
1 Is this a high density project? Yes RECEIVED
2 If so,number of drainage areas/SCMs 1
Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule
3 versions? 140 C N 315�aI FEB 17 2021
NCDEQ
CLICK TO LOAD FORM WILMINGTON RO
DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION (Entire Site 1
4 Type of SCM N/A Wet Pond
5 Total BUA in project(sq ft) 603770 sf 508323 sf
New BUA on subdivided lots(subject to permitting)
6 (sq ft) _ 283608 sf 283608 sf
New BUA outside of subdivided lots(subject to
7 permitting)(sf) 113686 sf 106019 sf
8 Offsite-total area(sq ft) 828740 sf 434407 sf
9 Offsite BUA(sq ft) 206476 sf 112385 sf
10 Breakdown of new BUA outside subdivided lots:
-Parking(sq ft) N/A N/A
-Sidewalk(sq ft) N/A N/A
-Roof(sq ft) N/A N/A
Roadway(sq ft) 129461 sf • 106019 sf
-Future(sq ft) 144896ref 0 • sf 0 A • Cty 3/ /tea
-Other,please specify in the comment box
below(sq ft) N/A N/A
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
11 subdivided lots(sq ft) N/A N/A
New infiltrating permeable pavement outside of
12 subdivided lots(sq ft) N/A N/A
Exisitng BUA that will remain(not subject to
13 permitting)(sq ft) 78316 sf 6311 sf
14 Existing BUA that is already permitted(sq It) N/A N/A
15 Existing BUA that will be removed(sq ft) N/A N/A
16 Percent BUA 42% 51%
17 Design storm(inches) 1.5 in 1 5 in
18 Design volume of SCM(cu ft) N/A 63845 cf °
19 Calculation method for design volume N/A Simple
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
20 drainage area(s):
Drainage area for pre&post runoff calculations goes to centerline of adjoining
streets and is equal to the project boundary
flECEIVE
FEB 17 2021
BY:

WET EPOND
1 Drainage area number I 1 C
2lDesign volume of SCM(Cu ft) L 63845 cf
GENERAL MDC FROM 02H,1050
3 Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from all surfaces at build-out? Yes
4 Is the SCM located away from contaminated soils? Yes
5 What are the side slopes of the SCM(H:V)? 3:1
Does the SCM have retaining walls,gabion walls or other engineered
6 side slopes? No
Are the inlets,outlets,and receiving stream protected from erosion
7(10-year storm)? Yes
Is there an overflow or bypass for inflow volume in excess of the
8 design volume? Yes
9 What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance? Pump(preferred)
10 If applicable,will the SCM be cleaned out after construction?
11 Does the maintenance access comply with General MDC(8)? Yes
12 Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC(9)? Yes
If the SCM is on a single family lot,does(will?)the plat comply with
13 General MDC(10)? Yes
14 Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC(11)? I Yes _
15 Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC(12)? Yes
16 Does the SCM follow the device specific MDC? Yes
17 Was the SCM designed by an NC licensed professional? I Yes
WET POND MDC FROM 02H.1053
18 Method used ' __ SA/DA
19 Has a stage/storage table been provided in the calculations? _ _ Yes
Elevation of the excavated main pool depth(bottom of sediment
20 removal)(fmsl) 22.00
21 Elevation of the main pool bottom-(top of sediment removal)(fmsl) 23.00
22 Elevation of the bottom of the vegetated shelf(fmsl) 28.10
23 Elevation of the permanent pool(fmsl) 29.10 24 Elevation of the top of the vegetated shelf(fmsl) _
29 10_
25 Elevation of the temporary pool(fmsl) -__ sf _31-15
26 Surface area of the main permanent pool(square feet) 23528
27 Volume of the main permanent pool(cubic feet) 124260 cf __
28 Average depth of the main pool(feet) ___—5:10 ft
29 Average depth equation used Equation 3
30 If using equation 3,main pool perimeter(feet) 597.0 ft
31 If using equation 3,width of submerged veg.shelf(feet) 6.0 ft
32 Volume of the forebay(cubic feet) I 18910 cf
33 Is this 15-20%of the volume in the main pool? No
34 Clean-out depth for forebay(inches) I — 12 in
35 Design volume of SCM(cu ft) 63845 cf
36 Is the outlet an orifice or a weir? __ Orifice
37 If orifice,orifice diameter(inches) 3 in ----
38 If weir,weir height(inches)
39 If weir,weir length(inches)
40 Drawdown time for the temporary pool(days) 3.21
Are the inlet(s)and outlet located in a manner that avoids short- i ,
41 circuiting? ' __ Yes __
42 Are berms or baffles provided to improve the flow path? _ No
43 Depth of forebay at entrance(inches) 61 in
44 Depth of forebay at exit(inches) ___55 in __ L�M'f-
45 Does water flow out of the forebay in a non-erosive manner? Yes
46 Width of the vegetated shelf(feet) 6 ft —
47 Slope of vegetated shelf(H:V) — 8:1--
Does the orifice drawdown from below the top surface of the
48 permanent pool? II 1-
Yes
Does the pond minimize impacts to the receiving channel from the 1-
49 yr,24-hr storm? I Yes
Are fountains proposed?(If Y,please provide documentation that i
50 MDC(9)is met) 1 No
51 Is a trash rack or other device provided to protect the outlet system? Yes
52 Are the dam and embankment planted in non-clumping turf grass? __ Yes___
Bermuda or
53 Species of turf that will be used on the dam and embankment ( _ Centipede__
54 Has a planting plan been provided for the vegetated shelf? i Yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
55 wet pond(s):
Wet pond to serve as erosion control device until time all contributory areas
are developed and stabilized.Landscaping will be provided per Wet Pond
MDC(11).Landscape details on plans.
Wet Pond 1 7:40 AM 10/28/2020

High Density Commercial Subdivisions
Deed Restrictions & Protective Convenances
In accordance with Title 15 NCAC 2H.1000 and S.L. 2006-246, the Management Regulations, deed
restrictions and protective covenants are required for High Density Commercial Subdivisions where
lots will be subdivided and sold and runoff will be treated in an engineered stormwater control facility.
Deed restrictions and protective covenants are necessary to ensure that the development maintains a
built-upon area consistent with the design criteria used to size the stormwater control facility.
I, Leon Ward Sylvester, Ill , acknowledge, affirm and agree by my signature below,
that i will cause the following deed restrictions and covenants to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot
within the project known as Sylvester Development Phases 1 &2
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with State Stormwater
Management Permit Number Q0J503. , as issued by the Division of Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources under the Stormwater Management Regulations.
2. The State of North Carolina is made a beneficiary of these covenants to the extent necessary to
maintain compliance with the stormwater management permit.
3. These covenants are to run with the land and be binding on all persons and parties claiming
under them.
4. The covenants pertaining to stormwater may not be altered or rescinded without the express
written consent of the State of North Carolina, Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources.
5. Alteration of the drainage as shown on the approved plan may not take place without the
concurrence of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources.
6. The maximum allowable built-upon area per lot is (see below) square feet.
*Note: If the BUA per lot varies, please substitute the following statement for the one above and
provide a complete listing of the proposed BUA for each lot:
The maximum built-upon area per lot, in square feet, is as listed below:
Lot# BUA Lot# BUA Lot# BUA Lot# BUA
2 32,402 5 29,863 6 33,740 7 41,917
Lot# BUA Lot# BUA Lot# BUA Lot# BUA
8 33,326 9 41,980 10 31,926 12 38,454
DfizSitgArea
#3 BUA 0 #4 BUA 112,385
This allotted amount includes any built-upon area constructed within the lot property boundaries,
and that portion of the right-of-way between the front lot line and the edge of the pavement. Built
upon area includes, but is not limited to, structures, asphalt, concrete, gravel, brick, stone, slate,
coquina and parking areas, but does not include raised, open wood decking, or the water
surface of swimming pools.
7. All runoff from the built-upon areas on the lot must drain into the permitted system. This may be
accomplished through a variety of means including roof drain gutters which drain to the street,
grading the lot to drain toward the street, or grading perimeter swales to collect the lot runoff
and directing them into a component of the stormwater collection system. Lots that will naturally
drain into the system are not required to provide these additional measures.
8. The owner of each lot, whose ownership is not retained by the permittee, is required to submit a
separate stormwater permit application to the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
and receive a permit prior to construction. Ec E IVE
Form DRPC-1 Rev.2 05Nov2009 Page 1 of 2 JUL 2 l 2020
e
e

High Density Commercial Subdivisions
Deed Restrictions & Protective Convenances
9. The project and each lot will maintain a 30**foot wide vegetated buffer between all impervious
areas and surface waters.
**50 foot for projects located in the 20 coastal counties.
Signature: /1/ <// Date:
1, 'DI _.
eb o. a le-WA ;n5 , a Notary Public in the
State of () , County of )O
do hereby certify that U)MQ (i]UcSiz r personally appeared
before me this the day of (� , 20 , and acknowledge
the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
Signature `
My Commission expires 0---r7v g,e)
Deborah K Chewnirg
Notary
Public
Pitt County
North Carolina
flECE IVE
I)
JUL 2 7 2020
BY:
Form DRPC-1 Rev.2 05Nov2009 Page 2 of 2

Hall, Christine
From: William Daniel <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 5,2021 9:54 AM
To: Hall, Christine
Cc: Bart McClain; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail]); Kevin Martin
([e-mail]); Gavin; Ely Perry III
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Development -Additional Impacts Requested
Attachments: Sylvester O&M Pond Summary.pdf
CAUTION:Ex"6ema!e,:'tral Oa not click inks cr open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious atrial!as an attac,iunent to
Report Spam.
Good catch,Christine. Sorry about that!
Attached is a PDF of the summary page of the O&M with the corrected bottom elevations.
I really appreciate your help.
Take care,
Bill
Bill Daniel
William G.Daniel &Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
From: Hall,Christine <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 5,2021 9:44 AM
To:William Daniel<[e-mail]>; Ely Perry III <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bart McClain<[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Kevin
Martin ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Gavin<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External]Sylvester Development-Additional Impacts Requested
Bill,
I'm taking a look at the revised documents and the only outstanding item I see is that the bottom elevations for the
forebay and main pool are backwards in the pond design summary in the O&M agreement. Please email an updated
page with these bottom elevations listed correctly.
In the meantime, I'll get started drafting the permit.
Thanks.
Christine Hall, PE
Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 910 796 7215
Direct: 910 796 7333 *'Please note ih€ charge to my direct;chcrre.number"
Email: 6:7stine.h3'(''• ncdenr.gov
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
1

Wilmington, NC 28405
Email correspondence to and from this address;s subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: William Daniel [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent:Tuesday, March 2,2021 12:55 PM
To: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>; Ely Perry III <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bart McClain <[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Kevin
Martin ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Gavin <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Development-Additional Impacts Requested
CAUTION:Externid mat Do not act Fucks or open an achments unless yctr verify Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam,
Hi Christine,
Thanks for touching base and the update. I guess with Ted's departure,you have your hands even more full than
usual. We hope that you will find that opening in your schedule sometime soon so that you can issue the permit for
Sylvester and allow the express for Tractor Supply to be scheduled.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Take care,
Bill
Bill Daniel
William G. Daniel&Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
From: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>
Sent:Tuesday, March 2,2021 12:45 PM
To:William Daniel <[e-mail]>; Ely Perry III <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bart McClain<[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Kevin
Martin ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Gavin <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Development-Additional Impacts Requested
Bill,
I'm sorry for the delay in my response to both this and your voicemail. I had received an email from Holley about this
project that I wanted to follow up on before I responded. The timelines you describe below appear to be accurate. At
this point, I'm not waiting for confirmation from them. Instead, I'm trying to find time in my work schedule for plan
reviews such as this one.
I hope this explains the current status.
Christine Hall, PE
Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
2

Office: 910 796 7215
Direct: 910 796 7339 **Please note the change to my direct phone number*^k
Email: christine.halk ncdenr.gov
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
CV:0
Email al to.,sponcienos to and!Pon?this 2 d:ess:i.'rii_JE;1 c.,
Il;a:=i> ?cords Law Endmay 1:9 di4:ros d co third o.n o;:.
From:William Daniel [mailto:bdaniel wmeda.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24,2021 4:55 PM
To: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>; Ely Perry III <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bart McClain <[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Kevin
Martin ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Gavin<gavint baselinedevelopment.com>
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Development-Additional Impacts Requested
CAUTION;External email.Inc,not c?i k Irks or open attachments unless you verdy,Send all suspicious t as an attachment to
Report Soar .
Hi Christine,
I left you a voice mail earlier this week. Would you have a time when we could have a brief phone conversation
regarding this project.
When you, Bart, and I spoke several days ago, it was my understanding that in order to issue the stormwater permit for
Sylvester and schedule the express review for Tractor Supply,you wanted strong evidence of"good faith"that the
owner would proceed with and follow through with the application for stream impacts needed to eliminate the conflict
between built-upon area and the vegetated setbacks. We definitely intended to demonstrate that good faith. At the
owner's direction,Soil & Environmental Consultants prepared and submitted the application even though it will not be
officially logged into the State's system until March 16 when the new NW permit regs become effective.
In your e-mail response to Ely,you mention that you will be checking with the wetland folks to make sure they agree
with our course of action before you can proceed. It is my understanding that they will not even look at the application
until March 16th and that they would then have 60 days for the review. You are not implying that the stream impact
permit must be issued prior to you issuing the stormwater permit are you?
I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to speak with you regarding this matter and to determine if there is anything
else that we can do to resolve this problem.
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Daniel
William G.Daniel &Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-413-7477 CELL
From: Hall, Christine<Christine.Hall(a7ncdenr.gov>
Sent: Monday, February 22,2021 4:00 PM
3

To: Ely Perry III <[e-mail]>; William Daniel<[e-mail]>
Cc: Bart McClain <[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Kevin
Martin ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Gavin <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Development-Additional Impacts Requested
I believe it will. However, I will be following up with the wetland folks to make sure they agree with your course of action
before I can proceed.
Christine Hall, PE
Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 910 796 7215
Direct: 910 796 7339 **Please note the change to my direct phone number**
Email: [e-mail]
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
,11:)EC:0
7 r:3 cC:1;:t..,:,'!C FOni ti:'i d...SS is:.':b 2 i f' . .
P(,:.: .::Rec rds ci;sr bser a . :iru p•_etic:.
From: Ely Perry Ill [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 3:51 PM
To: Hall, Christine<[e-mail]>;William Daniel <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bart McClain<[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Kevin
Martin ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Gavin<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Development-Additional Impacts Requested
CAUTION:External email Do not dilA links or open attachments unless you l vrify.Sere;all suspicious email as ar attachment to
Report Spam.
Christine,
Good afternoon. Have you had a chance to confirm that our reply has addressed the outstanding issues per your email
below?
We have several contractual deadlines that we are trying to manage and we need to know that this issue has been
resolved.
Thank you,
Ely
Ely J. Perry Ill
President; Perry Management, Inc.
elv@p,nrysinc.com
www.perrysinc.com
518 Plaza Blvd!P C.Drawer 1475, Kinston; NC 28503
4

iMPCRTANT:T" cciterts of th'. n' ii:rd 2 ty attachmm are cor idential.They ers:nterded fc th,;is:ne:', = ?.ert(s)c il,.If
you emll:by r::t:;': .p;;.=:;e ncffy t'•: a st?ri ;iirmiAliately arid do net disclose ,;c.r:er:':=to.;ware or
c:oies'Tereof.
Working With Rcai Estate Agents Brochure
From: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>
Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:40 PM
To:William Daniel<[e-mail]>
Cc: Bart McClain <[e-mail]>; Ely Perry III <[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail])
<[e-mail]>; Kevin Martin ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Gavin
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External]Sylvester Development-Additional Impacts Requested
Thank you. When I return to the office on Thursday, I will confirm that this will address the outstanding issues.
Christine Hall, PE
Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 910 796 7215
Direct: 910 796 7339 "Please note the change to my direct phone number**
Email: christine.hallancdenr.gov
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
lit745?)---- •
Email norresporlCence to and from this address ;u •
`forth Carolina Prr;. Records Law and may be t_: : 'to t;.,. • s.
From: William Daniel [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 2:46 PM
To: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>
Cc: Bart McClain <[e-mail]>; Ely Perry([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki
([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Kevin Martin ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>;
Gavin<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Sylvester Development-Additional Impacts Requested
Importance: High
I CAUTION:External email. Do not clams links or open attachments unless you verify.Send atl suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spars,
Hi Christine,
Attached is a pre-filing request confirmation and PCN application that have been submitted by Bob Zarzecki of S&EC on
behalf of the owner of Sylvester Farms for the additional stream impacts that we have discussed.
5

I have also attached an EXCEL file of the SuppEZ along with a PDF of the latest revision of the Stormwater Management
Permit Application.
When we spoke by video conference last week, you requested that a hard copy of the application be provided to you. I
am overnighting to you via UPS a hardcopy of each of the above items and you should receive that
tomorrow. Hopefully,this provides you with all of the information that you need to issue the stormwater permit for
Sylvester Farms and to schedule the Express Review for Tractor Supply.
I appreciate your assistance and look forward to hearing from you.
Thank you,
Bill Daniel
Bill Daniel
William G. Daniel &Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
6

(r,o.
DWR Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form ..
NORTH CAROLINA
rmiroammrarquaR&
Contact Name* S&EC,PA-Bob Zarzecki
Contact Email Address [e-mail]
Project Owner* Sylvester Farm Investments, LLC-
Project Name* Leon Ward Sylvester,Ill
Project County* Onslow
Owner Address:* Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104
Address L.iie 2
City State/Rovince/Region
Raleigh NC
Fbstel/Zip Code Country
27615 United States
Is this a transportation project?* r Vest,' No
Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR:
la 401 Water Quality Certification- r 401 Water Quality Certification-
Regular Express
r Individual Permit r Modification
r Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
Please list all existing project ID's associated with this projects.*
DWR#2020-0248
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Robb Mairs(Wilmington Regional Office)
Please give a brief project description below.*
Attached is an application for additional impacts needed for the
previously approved Sylvester Development project in Richlands,
Onslow Co.,NC(DWR#2020-0248/SAW-2019-03132).Email copies
will be sent directly to Robb Mairs&Rachel Capito.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
flECE WEI)
2/23/2021
2/25/2021 FEB 17 2021 II
BY: Ili

Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Sylvester Development PCN
11.51MB
Application_16Feb2021.pdf
Pcf
By digitally signing below,I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre-Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre-filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your projects thirty-day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty-day clock has expired,and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 2/16/2021
flECEIv€
FEB 17 2021
BY:

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
E
C 8412 Falls of Neuse Road,Suite 104,Raleigh,NC 27615•Phone:[phone]• Fax:[phone]
sandec.com
February 16,2021
S&EC Project# 13594
To: US Army Corps of Engineers N.C.Division of Water Resources
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 401 &Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn:Rachel Capito Attn:Paul Wojoski
(sent via email)
Mr.Robb Mairs
Wilmington Regional Office
(sent via online portal& email)
From: Bob Zarzecki
Soil &Environmental Consultants,P.A.
Re: SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT
Richlands, Onslow County,NC
SAW-2019-02132
DWR#2020-0248
On behalf of the owner, 24 East Development,LLC/Sylvester Farm Investments, LLC,
please find attached a complete application and supplemental information requesting
written concurrence from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)and the N.C.
Division of Water Resources (DWR)that the activities proposed below may proceed
under Nationwide Permit 39 and General Water Quality Certification 4139.
In addition to those minimization& avoidance measures taken and justified by the
USACE and DWR in 2020 for the existing development currently under construction,the
developer has made every attempt to avoid impacts to these sections of
channelized/ditched intermittent stream sections.However,as discovered during
construction of the permitted impacts and the DEQ/DEMLR review process, it was
determined that piping these sections of channel were necessary to accommodate the
piping, fill and grading required to eliminate the steep embankment slope adjacent to the
street; eliminate the steep side slopes of the ditch; and establish a stable,maintainable,
and aesthetically pleasing open space adjacent to the public street.Note this is simply an
addition of piping connecting to previously permitted sections. The flow paths previously
reviewed and verified by the USACE and DWR within the 2020 permit approvals will
not change.
Please contact me at(919) 846-5900 if you have any questions or require additional
information. E E I v E
FEB 17 2021
BY:

Office Use Only
,, ny i't. Corps Action ID no.SAW-2019-02132 Date received: [Click to enter.]
1 1 .:1 . f'` ' ; DWR project no. [Click enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.]
1 i ll t'-:-471;
i I Site Coordinates:
Latitude(DD.DDDDDD): 34.89265
Longitude(DD.DDDDDD): 77.549139
Environmental Qualify
Water Resources Form Version 1.5,September2020
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 1.5,September 2020)
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk*are required. The form is not considered complete until all mandatory
questions are answered.
The online help file may be found at this link:
https://edocs.dea.nc.qov/WaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN%20Help%20File%202018-1-30.odf
The help document may be found at this link:
htta://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Reaulatoty-Permit-Proa ram/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Before submitting this form, please ensure you have submitted the Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form as DWR will not be
able to accept your application without this important first step.The Pre-Filing Meeting Request Form is used to satisfy 40
C.F.R. Section 121.4(a)which states"At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall
request a pre-filing meeting with the certifying agency." In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and(c)(5), all
certification requests must include documentation that a pre-filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority
at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request.
Attach documentation of Pre-Filing Meeting Request to this Application.
Date of Pre-filing Meeting Request(MM/DD/YYYY) : Click or tap to enter a date.
DWR ID#Click to enter.Version Click to enter. (If applicable)
A. Processing Information
County(counties)where project is located: * Onslow Additional(if needed).
Is this a public transportation project? *
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail, ❑ Yes 0 No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project? * ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number: Click to enter.
If yes, NCDOT WBS number: * Click to enter.
® Section 404 Permit(wetlands, streams, waters,
la. Type(s)of a approval sought from the Corps: * Clean Water Act)
Rp g
❑ Section 10 Permit(navigable waters,tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Page 1 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

® Nationwide Permit(NWP)
1 b. Permit type(s)? ❑ Regional General Permit(RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits.All required items can be included as separate attachments
and submitted with this form.
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?* ® Yes ❑ No
NWP number(s): 39
RGP number(s): Click to enter.
ld. Type(s)of approval sought from the DWR(check all that apply): *
O 401 Water Quality Certification—Regular ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification—Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: ' ❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit: * ❑ Yes ® No
If. Is this an after-the-fact permit/certification application? ❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for ❑ Yes ® No
mitigation of impacts?
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? ®Yes ❑ No
1i. Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)? * ❑ Yes ►� No ❑ Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Requlatorv-Permit-
Proaram/Agencv-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 2 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

B. Applicant Information
1 a. Who is the primary contact?* S&EC, PA—Bob Zarzecki
lb. Primary Contact Email: * [e-mail]
1c. Primary Contact Phone: *(11##)#F##-/#144 [phone]
1 d. Who is applying for the permit/certification? *(check ® Owner ❑ A
all that apply) pplicant(other than owner)
le. Is there an agent/consultant for this project?* ® Yes ❑ No
2. Landowner Information
2a. Name(s)on Recorded Deed: * 24 East Development, LLC &Sylvester Farm
Investments, LLC
2b. Deed Book and Page No.: 4286/499;4223/201
2c. Responsible Party(for corporations): Leon Ward Sylvester, Ill
2d. Address
Street Address: PO Box 295
Address line 2: Click to enter.
City: Richlands
State/Province/Region: NC
Postal/Zip Code: 27574
Country: USA
2e. Telephone Number: *(###), -#### [phone]
2f. Fax Number: (###)## #### [phone]
2g. Email Address: * [e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name: * *applicant is the owner
3b. Business Name(if applicable): Click to enter.
3c. Address: *
Street Address: Click to enter.
Address line 2: Click to enter.
City: Click to enter.
State/Province/Region: Click to enter.
Postal/Zip Code: Click to enter.
Country Click to enter.
3d. Telephone Number: *(###)#t#tit itlttflt Click to enter.
3e Fax Number: (###)###- // Click to enter.
Page 3 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

3f. Email Address: * Click to enter.
4. Agent/Consultant(if applicable)
4a. Name: * Bob Zarzecki
4b. Business Name: Soil&Environmental Consultants, PA
4c. Address: *
Street Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address line 2: Suite 104
City: Raleigh
State/Province/Region: NC
Postal/Zip Code: 27615
Country: USA
4d. Telephone Number: *(###)„ 41:1## [phone]
4e Fax Number: (###)###-#### [phone]
4f. Email Address: * [e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter.A sample form may be found at this link:
httos://www.saw.usace.armv.mil/Missions/Reaulatorv-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 4 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project: * SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT
lb. Subdivision name(if appropriate): n/a
1c. Nearest municipality/town: * Richlands, NC
2. Project Identification
2a. Property identification number(tax PIN or parcel ID): portions of 4431-0649-1544;4431-0758-0727
2b. Property size(in acres): +/-0.75 acre addition to original 14.32 acres
2c. Project Address:
Street Address: Hwy 24&Koonce Fork Rd. (northeast quadrant)
Address line 2: Click to enter.
City: Richlands
State/Province/Region: NC
Postal/Zip Code: 27574
Country: USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits Latitude(DD.DDDDDD): 34.89265
after the decimal point): Longitude(-DD.DDDDDD): *-77.549139
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: New River(Stream Index No. 19-(1))
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving C;NSW
water: *
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcuis.com/apps/webac oviewer/index.html?id=6e125ad7628f494694e259c8Odd64265
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located? * New
Choose additional(if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is 03020302-0201
located: *
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcq is.com/apes/Pu blicl nformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85a0c6d644a0b97cd069db238ac3
Page 5 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application: *
The site is immediately adjacent to the service road permitted under SAW 2019-02132 which is currently under
construction along with the rest of the associated commercial/retail development located between the service
road and Hwy24.The property west of this service road is currently active cropland (agricultural fields)with
ditches.There's also stand of trees with wetlands within a portion of the stand just west of the project.A small
strip mall and post office exists to the north of the project across Sylvester Street. Richlands High School exists
to the east(across Hwy24), and a McDonald's fast food restaurant to the south (across (Koonce Fork Rd.).
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project(including all prior phases) in the past?*
4c. if yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps SAW-2019-02132
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000): DWR#2020-0248
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
4d. Attach an 8%x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e. Attach an 8%x 11"excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the 0.25 acres
property:
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams(intermittent 950 linear feet
and perennial)on the property:
4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the 0 acres
property:
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a commercial/highway business development
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The previously permitted project included the construction of a service road, entrance drives and twelve (12)
commercial lots suitable for highway businesses such as fast food restaurants, etc.A stormater management
pond is being constructed on Lot 11. The additional impacts requested in this application include piping additional
channelized/ditched sections of intermittent stream along the service road. It was the hopes of the developer and
engineer that they could avoid these sections of channel impacts, but was later determined after the road was
partially constructed that piping these sections is required to eliminate the steep embankment slope adjacent to
the street; eliminate the steep side slopes of the existing ditch; and establish a stable, maintainable, and
aesthetically pleasing open space adjacent to the public street. Heavy earth moving equipment typically used for
such civil works will be used to include but not limited to excavators, bulldozers, etc.
4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or in I ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Page 6 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

Comments:
S&EC has delineate all potential wetlands, streams and waters within the proposed project area. Note there are
wetlands adjacent to but not within the project area and no impacts to the wetlands are proposed associated with
this request. The channelized/ditched section of intermittent stream proposed to be impacted was originally
accounted for as a jurisdictional ditch in association with the NCDOT project along Hwy24 adjacent of the
development, but later in April 2020 it was determined to be a channelized/ditched intermittent stream by the
NCDWR and the USACE concurred with their determination during the 2020 permit review process (see
attached email documentation).
Name(if known): Bob Zarzecki
5b. If 5a is yes,who delineated the jurisdictional Agency/Consultant Com an S&EC PA
areas? Company:
Other: Click to enter.
5c. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, 0 Preliminary 0 Approved 0 Emailed Concurrence
what type of determination was made? * 0 Not Verified 0 Unknown
Note—The applicant is not asking for a JD for this project
Corps AID number(ex. SAW-0000-00000): and concedes to the potentially jurisdiction of the ditches
and channelized/ditched intermittent stream.
5d. List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
DWR Stream Determination 8ApriI2020&USACE Concurrence 13ApriI2020
April 20,2020 USACE NWP39 Verification
April 21, 2020 DWR GC4139 Approval
5d1.Attach jurisdictional determinations.
Page 7 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
With the inclusion of these additional impacts to the channelized/ditched sections of intermittent stream adjacent
to the service road, all anticipated phases to this project are depicted on the attached plans.The parcels are
stand alone properties independent of the agricultural land and properties to the west.Those agricultural
properties to the west will most likely be developed in the future, but no approved plans exist at this time. Future
anticipated development could potentially include multi and single family residential, possible additional
commercial along the service road, hotel, etc. This is addressed further in the cumulative impact section of this
application.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize
any part of the proposed project or related activity?This includes other separate and distant crossings for linear
projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre-construction notification.
No.
Page 8 of 21 PCN corm Version 1.5,September 2020

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
D Wetlands ® Streams-tributaries
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project
(check all that apply): ❑ Buffers L, Open Waters
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2a1. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. 2g.
Site# Impact Impact Wetland Name* Wetland Type* Forested Jurisdiction Impact Area
Reason/Type* Duration* ?* Type* (ac)*
W1 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter Choose one Y/N Choose one Click to
Perm
enter
W2 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter Choose one Y/N Choose one Click to
Perm
enter
W3 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter Choose one Y/N Choose one Click to
Perm
enter
W4 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter Choose one YIN Choose one Click to
Perm
enter
W5 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter Choose one Y/N Choose one Click to
Perm
enter
W6 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter Choose one Y/N Choose one Click to
Perm
enter
2g1. Total temporary wetland impacts Click to enter. ac
2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts Click to enter. ac
2g3. Total wetland impacts 0 ac
2h. Comments:
n/a
Page 9 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/tributary impacts(including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/tributary sites impacted.
**All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DVVR or delegated local government
3a. 3b. 3d. I 3e. 3f. 3g. I 3h.
Site#° I Impact Reason/ Impact Stream Name Stream Jurisdiction Stream Width I Impact length
Type* Duration
Type Type* (avg ft) (linear ft)
S1 Crossing/Culvert Permanent "Ditch 2" UT to New Intermittent Both 5 288
River
S2 Crossing/Culvert Permanent "Ditch 2" UT to New Intermittent Both 3.5 75
River
S3 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S4 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S5 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/lnt Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S6 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S7 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S8 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S9 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one • Click to enter Click to enter
S10 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S11 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S12 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Perlint Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S13 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S14 Choose one Tempt Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
S15 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter
3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch impact: 0 linear ft
3i2. Total permanent stream impacts: 363 linear ft
3i3. Total temporary stream impacts: 0 linear ft
3i4. Total stream and ditch impacts: 363 linear ft
3j. Comments:
Total proposed jurisdictional stream (channelized/ditched intermittent stream) impacts=363 If(0.038 acres)
Page 10 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries,tributaries, sounds,the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a. 4b. I 4c. 4d. 4e. 4e1. ' 4f.
Site#* Impact Reason/ Impact Waterbody Name' Waterbody Jurisdiction Impact area(ac)*
Type* Duration* Type* Type*
01 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter.
Perm
02 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter.
Perm
03 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter.
Perm
04 Choose one Temp/ Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter.
Perm
4g. Total temporary open water impacts Click to enter. ac
4g. Total permanent open water impacts Click to enter. ac
4g. Total open water impacts 0 ac
4h. Comments:
n/a
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table below. (*This does NOT include offline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID Proposed use or Wetland Impacts(ac) Stream Impacts (ft) Upland
# purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Impacts(ac)
P1 Choose one Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to
enter. enter. enter. enter. enter, enter. enter.
P2 Choose one Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to
enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter.
5f. Total Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to
enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter.
5g. Comments:
Click to enter.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.: Click to enter.
5i. Expected pond surface area(acres): Click to enter.
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): Click to enter.
5k. Method of construction:
l n/a
i
Page 11 of 21 PCN Form Version 1.5,September 2020

6. Buffer Impacts(DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)? ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
*(Check all that apply.)
❑ Other: Click to enter.
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Site#* Impact Type* Impact Duration* Stream Name* Buffer Zone 1 Impact* Zone 2 Impact*
Mitigation (sq ft) (sq ft)
Required?*
B1 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B2 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. YIN Click to enter. Click to enter.
B3 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B4 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B5 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B6 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B7 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B8 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. YIN Click to enter. Click to enter.
B9 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
B10 Choose one Temp/Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i. Comments:
n/a
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.)for the proposed project.
Page 12 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
In addition to those minimization &avoidance measures taken and justified by the USAGE and DWR in 2020 for
the existing development currently under construction, the developer has made every attempt to avoid impacts
to these sections of channelized/ditched intermittent stream sections. However, as discovered during the
construction and DEQ/DEMLR review process, it was determined that piping these sections of channel were
necessary to accommodate the piping, fill and grading required to eliminate the steep embankment slope
adjacent to the street; eliminate the steep side slopes of the ditch; and establish a stable, maintainable, and
aesthetically pleasing open space adjacent to the public street. Note this is simply an addition of piping
connecting to previously permitted sections.The flow paths previously reviewed and verified by the USACE and
DWR within the 2020 permit aprpovais will not change.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The project will obtain a modification to their existing land disturbance permit to include this additional area.A
post-construction stormwater management plan is already in review by DEQ/DEMLR.The BMPs included within
these State approved plans will help to protect downstream waters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S.,Waters of the State,or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? ❑ DWR ❑ Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes,which mitigation option(s)will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank
project? (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank (Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank: Click to enter.
3b. Credits purchased/requested: Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
3c. Comments:
As highlighted in the attached April 2020 emails and permit verifications, the USACE and DWR determined that
any justified and permitted impacts to this channelized/ditched intermittent stream would not require mitigation.
4. Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a. Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b. Stream mitigation requested: I Click to enter. linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation,what is the stream temperature: Choose one
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
https://ribits.usace.armv.mil/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO:RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:0
Page 13 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): Click to enter. square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres
4g. Coastal(tidal)wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres
4h. Comments:
Click to enter.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including the amount of mitigation proposed.
Click to enter.
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)—DWR requirement
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, please complete this entire section—please contact DWR for more information.
6b. If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact(square Multiplier Required mitigation
feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 Click to enter. Click to enter. Choose one Click to enter.
Zone 2 Click to enter. Click to enter. Choose one Click to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required Click to enter.
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or ❑ Yes ❑ No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i. Comments:
Click to enter.
Page 14 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? ❑ Yes ® No
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other forms of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures(SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https://deq.nc.aov/about/divisions/energv-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-
q uidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you ❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table-SHWT)
providing? ❑ Wetland Swale(higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply) ❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here:
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? * ❑Yes ® No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? * ❑Yes ® No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncactitle%2015a%20-%20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf
2c. IS the project over an acre? ®Yes 0 No
2d. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state- ® Yes ❑ No
approved local government stormwater program? *
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally-implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in-lieu programs should answer"no"to this question.
2e. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply? ❑ Local Government
(Check all that apply)
® State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Page 15 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

Local Government Stormwater Programs * ❑ Phase II GI USMP
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.*
Click to enter.
State Stormwater Programs* ❑ Phase 11 El HQW or ORW
® Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
The coastal stormwater permit application for this project is currently under review by the DEQ/DEMLR. The
Stormwater Permit#assigned to the project is SW8 200502. Christine Hall is the project manager fro
DEQ/DEMLR that will be approving the stormwater permit.
Page 16 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public(federal/state/local) ❑Yes ® No
funds or the use of public(federal/state) land?*
lb. If you answered"yes"to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or State(North Carolina) Environmental El Yes ❑ No
Policy Act(NEPA/SEPA)? *
1c. If you answered"yes"to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the ❑ Yes ❑ No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)*
Comments:
Click to enter.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules(15A NCAC 2H .1300),
DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules ❑ Yes ® No
(15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
2b. If you answered "yes"to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Click to enter.
3. Cumulative Impacts(DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project(based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development,which could impact nearby ❑ Yes ® No
downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered"no", provide a short narrative description:
There is no change to the purpose and type of the project as permitted in 2020.The project is being developed to
meet current needs along Hwy 24 for services such as fast food resaturants, etc. and is not anticipated to result
in additional development. The agricultural land to the west may of course be developed in the future for such
uses as multi or single family residential or possibly additional businesses along the servie road.The owners of
that land have been made aare of the potentially jurisdictonal wetlands that exist in the wooded area just west of
this project area, and are aware that any impacts to those wetlands or other potentially jurisdictional WOTUS
would require compliance with and most likely approval by the USACE and DWR regulations and may potentially
be cumulative to the jurisdictional impacts requested her and previously permitted in 2020.
3c. If yes, attach a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis (.pdf) in accordance with the most recent
DWR policy.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* El Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
Page 17 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions(non-discharge or discharge)of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
Wastewater generated from this project will be sent to and treated by the Onslow Water and Sewer Authority
(OWSA) collection system and treatment plant. OWSA and DEQ will ensure that adequate capacity exists for this
development.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat(Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected ❑ Yes o No
species or habitat?(IPAC weblink: https:/lwww.fws.gov/ipac/Ifws.govl)
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species ❑ Yes IZ No
Act impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Choose one
5d. Is another federal agency involved? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
If yes,which federal agency? Click to enter.
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? ❑ Yes ® No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the ® Yes Cl No
U.S.? '
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? " ❑ Yes ® No
Link to NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-req.usace.armv.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-
SLOPES&aoos.pdf
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind
turbine(s)? * CI Yes No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s)on the permit drawings/project plans (attach .pdf)
5i. Does this project involve blasting and/or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, ❑ Yes ® No
mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property(attach .pdf)
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? *
USFWS &NC NHP databases. There are no known elemental occurrences of Federally listed species within 1
miles of the project site. The porjeact area is currently open cropland agricultural fields and ditches, or otherwise
under construction per the 2020 permits, and lacks habitat for any Federally listed endangered or threatened
species.
Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat(Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat? * ❑ Yes ® No
Page 18 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

Are there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV)around
the project vicinity?* ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Explain: Click to enter.
6b. What data source(s)did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA EFH Mapper
Page 19 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources(Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map(does not include archaeological data):
http://qis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or ❑Yes El No
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?*
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?*
SHPO HPO WEB database.
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? * ❑ Yes Z No
8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
Click to enter.
8c. What source(s)did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA DFIRM & NC Flood databases and maps.
Page 20 of 21 PCN Form-Version 1.5,September 2020

H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
Click to enter.
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
I. Signature
® By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete,to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a"transaction"subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature;AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: S&EC, PA—Bob Zarzecki
Signature: Click to enter.
Date: * 2/16/2021
Page 21 of 21 PCN Form Version 1.5,September 2020

•
,.' '.E jrozune �.. • . ..,,, ,.- -
�y :
•
. .- --
-fpl, ;
- - -- . .. - , ----•-, =' ,,,,:„ -
,,; „.,. ..:, ... - ..:- . ..
.,
„ . . • .. .._ 111:
. ,„.. . .
: ...._ . .
. .
• -. , . - ,-.,:-.-PRO TY OV ' V1 1CATION,I AGENT A�ORIZATI N
Pro CCt Nam sc1 d 0.,
r
T p ! r
Dater S ' N
r 4
-7+
The De ►aran of , c 4-U.S.t y sO •4' r.69.Darl n ye e<
Attu 'Races. t4 O "USACB ._ �" 6 •#' p ,
I,the M.��,g ,�a ckaly a I / P ,,, d o ne{ of,. rd.V.Y e'� ' :'Mr [ �.
• +3U� i ,of a Nilnti�T Sttfct,U.S, y Copt of E ineer$ .. ° i
Errvlror�r tfia1 C insutta -.PA(5e3�s'faf ( sty to enter opal the=pr!J)ettY
j" �—, 'p t�j„fit }, } �y�. ��+ j /e f ^t 1 b .
forthi.f o and ngcti '�7, 5,. 3Biks and Issulnga � )
of the U,S, * ?1"a t,lli� t n<It . `M n 464aril*the wean water an or e ,_ fti.cf
n &t or
the Rlvers.�rxcl�artbr�Adt of�. `T3ais dar.��tent�iso nudes SB,C-C�C�r '�`a �- �!
behalFsand tsr`1'c�at actiocis new .for the essinn, issuance•an. ,a+c:e o aaperm or,,
ti
c•ertiftcaban and any attd alll and and pedal conditions:Th1s nait ficati n
ntfor tFiis
proilotlsc irrespondan- ooncaer�nf: 'i i •
N1SCE.•Tis�a ; a fovariian baly
avnr:anpa pnof
i ie
by S&Enal Cc ostautesy
f Y uonsc� cvah
a ;d olyt ofa nm t
ofcialsto enterthe d -'meeting pktovi5fkut stei•
•
P. ... .. .' -..-•. . ARGt�irai ' '{3Ii 'i. 1 ..u.
i ' 9 x 3i�7114 s 4....:..t-2,1-,,1-6,''' ''''''''' is
i 'y[y7�ay..�}y� t ttxtne r
,ate 4s�{r e a30z 4 i
A P t• & Sylvester Farm Investments, LLC-
' Name. ' F 3 .� •
Via ° ;. ;4 ld¢�
*... � • r `
y F r r
�
' 1 ra „rt ,� , 1 y x t � g,"�
.- .
r m 1 7 .f •
rya ny

?.:11 ° 02) 6/- ..4 "l . if,, a :`,-.),-.."."--7--- c*‘' , ,
•
1 ..,f,
..e.,:—_______ __ Ite -;)
o414;„ Rio;s1. ' _ r - _.--
,01.111 ...../--:/"..."-±-7.- 1111111riii&N. *46. "7 *414)0•44>>. ,,, :41111,- .7...4W-c,„
71/+���a� �e, Y 4a�i,i
) ,,...„0
s-, i .-N ,..,?..3 1.1r bp,A:44,'L + ' ' (C:Ab P Vill — '''.- C`
‘,...4<ft.._____")/ 7 4,,,. , , : /If
I �PyG fl° \_C (..............P I ! ‘ , `
/7,7''' '''''"
1\\,. _ , , .
_._
ir _armamosometric--..w )0 0
) /,,,_}, , ____,F .4--.)_. 1 11. - 1.......,..---.0-" - i • It_
".sii .1 lik at j --I — '
c\
,; 00,,,. , _.. - _.,ram .'
,mooV _, `-- .-,.� " -,'
_,,,
,,,
i 411
� ... 111��
N.
1 ( A '''' r 1r -3‘ ' ‘
( `-'-1 ._. i ' c(,\1
, ,,_..
,. .,
. -- \,.
1
_ 1
-16
) . 1 1
. - ..., IN, ?r, ,-,......
cf... ...5.." .:(.. ....:
.? .j '...\'-r\ —-—j6-.4 CO:i:
°Cg../....!„ .leN.:;)
"-'--...>c,_A
r •
ti\''.1
f r
� / ANC C ntef n or gepgrap pl frina ion 8 Anal
Project Number: 3594.W1 Map Title:
Figure 1 - USGS Map o 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: I I I I l I I I l
BZ _ Sylvester Development Lots 1-12 Feet
Scale: Onslow County, NC
1" = 1000' 5
Source: 4' Soil&Environmental Consultants,PA
Date: 2019 NC Richlands Quad E "' F°°�°��^°°"° �'°'"*�� �� '' +91»s*- ^•�p19) r
02/04/2020

•
•
•
' r•- F - r. l• ti-11"'.'
,ry .YJ� _ .%. =g:i'••:%3:; ,.} }jra~ . _.: ��x�4 Y off 'u . {.: r } •, :. ,rr• !t•" -
`• L}i iY • r,:'Y_G-'` .--�' r '.Nr'' • 1
�`,�p 7r:_ 'Y {may y •.�S' '%Y -
y�� :>:,S'J`j+'rf4.,��:??.,�.r ,'rr,'-ni.�. _ _ :. _ .- ">:;
.:sir':
s� f; .': '' �.. 'fit;. sc.:- 3k1+t .. kF'::fie•• { :. ;:i�. . •e#;
4': •• ..•, • - _ : =. .", .err -..,. ..
✓r�r, r •. tir h o�?v{,,y;3rt,Xi �q��+ •;,•�' {�i i'• 'Cv. I`! ,r.r.:.. •ct_F..S. f :�:'r�•:'r ���/r
��r�.`Irr'Y'i� .-.,::::'.:":..0::;;- - ln.iE :h. n `{jt ;% �{• s+$
•"•:rr• -.5rs;s'i:� h v '! 3 {;;: .{•Y ''I�.c.v`' }v. `}°y'.r'.; ' { alp :_?i,
•�tis •,h 7•.°•. �'{r'} •� i }".t. 4 �r✓i.;:.^4'. r 4'4Y �• ,t' 'f ..y.{{:
v 3l >. /. r rr n '
r r•• •) s s:>•ry r r {r r:r, :.4. I Sr. "'. y•}r..' � n`y y
' t�•a�! ,N"'rC'�1 •rTlit i • 7�° .'f✓•. s': T{ �� J tr'Sw'r v{ ��Zr ri•.: • �.✓{;r{•' {}:: 'r{ rF Y' r{�,•'•••..
':r ,r,��v�,Mk e ��,+tv "l �.s. / r.. f f,r,✓ � � rr }'� •2-'•r +tK :t.
._.��v rr ns7F..ri rP s .s` S✓ s :{ .''r4 ;:ems: {�•
;n`'. 5`" s� } - r 4:{,•_ nI'r•f.. s y;':'r r 1 • .Mr. • .F.,a,a ,^ h -lr p ::7' ••.r•
i -?%ry�.5 f'C. H.. : - • k•y•x� • nr4;,y'.k,,+r,,.? ,} •.k :1 �•sJ ' r} }'r , ,r.C,•r,.a Y. ': ':•tiryr
-' v syss t vim. �'{ E t S• �,.s•r -- r . -:••
a}.d4 ,,-, n, •.• „''/�, --
�.r 3_r }✓r �Iti f .A r rIf` y vy.{ .{
�i. J
''',0:,,,,,
? ,t4�*? 3 ~ .1✓ft.;-" ? ? S s_, ty hf' s\',5Y•. s_ ✓ ,.{r s K 7��x, r C-
.:i•lrfiy?' y.:'' Yr .. 15 ,r YsVS •y ><Y•_. - • :v+:' . •i XRfti
yr Z:::;,'At �s $ r3u i11x'r r •. ',. - y �� r s t s C,ry,-- ,,SX _ •.
r 42 y v ~ ?s r{}r r, ,• Y '��t�v' ,••.. ✓ ✓ kii .{
L {{• /•• i {}.,? •.. { I': . ••
.'3 A{NZ*-, r\ M1' v ~`y•LLyy " >' - fl ~rr S 1rr rr
,...._. Itt''y'-`• ; '' ^.-;:tom .r t> r ✓ ,�}ti{3� ,c' I
2,.',TP; - z•.,- •1 -a .,•:A,_,.'.):. ., -, *:.- -1' .i:••••-:•'.:: =•:%i:•''' ...„..•
..-'-..,:.
ft+yF,L , }e 'S f " k.5' _ •ti.{' ;fir _ -
. .
„, --/.... ,.., ... - _ ..
+ ' sri ft:. r d1 SrA.i ,iT%y, ✓-; { r , • r t .r•
IhE .-......!'• -;V . '....:,-..,,:,' ".1, • - -
r ff�"+ K X.A 1 y1 f
• v✓ T • 1Y •
r..fB8.Gt ♦ 4
4441 ah 9 r 4 M r "M Pe`cr 1f , -. P . ..,• y
,,,,,,s,m,- ,
.4„,,,,,„,-.=. .. ,. ... ,. . .,,„,;., .-. . . -. .. . ._ .. .,. .
`4 sue` l
'• .,,,A..,:.•:..=:-::•.:.••-,,,..,.,:•.._-.4•.,-:.."-..,.-..,,.:,:,:<"..;:.-••,•.'.,.-J.:•.:\::•,,...:.••--.--..:-,...':..„.•...-.,___.-„.-.:'-k•.-,•,.1:1:,',:_.-:.-..
F 1r
•
di
•
•
•tir {h,T ,wi y,. • . P • :fit,- .„
' tiY" ✓
ry ^r 1s 3 s ,v ryI,: < $ { r r ram L • s ;.i{ ,f r
-.-.:„-,W•:,,,":
wry{ .} Sv+ �•.tCy«' ,{Y',1C'Y .: rK wny .,y, rT 4 . .;..-- .-..,• ,,.',1.....,..•.,,.:,.!
i "�
3•' •s'rfr'+e `•kt ,.' !j { 'a i x Sl i ° •• ' "r,. r- ... { , t. .
--
-
.'..:.,'.,'.,.::,
.i...:'.,;:.1...i..1,....:0..*..4*-.,,..
P:-•,...„'z„':„„'...•,..-.,''.',:,'.,.,'-";—,,,.:'(-,
v f /i
- t Cam.. ] -.rr•{f :f.41fU�Y"{ �,._, ..j. 1 ~ .{ J
•. �y{L k ? ?y ryr 4't}t}Y _h .d 1 e# .._ k f:.s rsC r'. S- r?.}_.
s
Y z11y • r �X'i°'Y t..
t. .•-j
- ram= xr. r= k �` ✓k f.. ir'{ ''�y t ^t Y.
..~\} i "'°°°MMM►►► _ Y•J. c61,.Y A a'l,41.1b,� r
`. e P tr
N' C CC •aC ••ra t is Inform 5bn . ,, I, iY:
Project Number: 135.. . — Map Title: N
Figure 2 - Soil Survey 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: ! t t t I t t t
BZ Sylvester Development Lots 1-12 Feet
Scale: Onslow County, NC - `
Aii,„
1" = 500'
Source: `-,, Soil&Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Onslow County Soil E 6411RdbaNeweR •����5. ,o�),4671., :!,, '
02/04/2020 Survey Sheet 08 �m

NCHPO HPOWEB
M, =s
_ , .4.. /
' rti.
Sylvester New Ditch Impact Areas ••
Development Site see irrpat • - •
i ,
31/4
••N.y . i^ f s.
T
i
aNSLOW f
{
i -V xn nl; , !
tf
•‘00,6`
,it
1 -eat
C cf
I:f
_ 4{+iT
r/t f
,a.iw ...5 F. --0
2/13/2020, 9:44:40 AM 1:4,514
. . 0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi
•o :Local districts&boundaries l I % ', l i . r I
Local individual resources&centerpoints 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
ill Local Landmark
l■ Local Landmark,Gone
Source:Esri,DigitalGlobe,GeoEye,Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus
4. Local HD Center Point DS,USDA,USGS,AeroGRID,IGN,and the GIS User Community
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
NC CGIA,USDA FSA I

A
Sylvester Development Feb 13,2020
•
l ,
'lPti'' "I• ' ,ram•
Sylvester :1- ,F,.•-1: `a'.-
Development Site ""�� r'r i' '.~ T ''- F •
v •
I' �� ti
YO:. ' -
,,
. .. 4 ... :'. .10 4'14.14',. —NI
' � �• ,• ram- �/ * 6 •
"Ir
-:--� ,.
el.r----Vc• r..._ • .,.
/ -. r
.
„(411111.1tivf,, , r*oe'://H- — „., . }}
e le _ ;cS4" ...9.,:ii;,•:. .
/4
. ,
„t,
• ,
Legend North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
Panels Flood IlazardAreas
1 ( Political Areas [__:-- AE
Stream Centerline t'?,% Floodovay(AE) mow*
Cross Sections 02'IS Chance Annual Flood Hazard -,,� xl :.�� :,
Levee riaiMiN Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance Flood Hazard

(a
MENU
SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT SITE,RICHLANDS,ONSLOW CO.,NC
NO KNOWN ELEMENTAL OCCURRENCES OF FEDERALLY LISTED SPECIES ON NHP WITHIN 1
Switch ammo Add Resources create Preps MILE OF SITE.ONLY LISTING IS OF IRONCOLOR SHINER(NOtropla chalybaeus)Stator Ilotcel^cR^ --._
Layers Make a Map Feature Search r +. +•�xt �^ -
Element Occurrences
V� AV—I r '), Ri n Itly l'r� t° v f y'��
•
Element Occurrences Tier 1 .`
Conservation Areas,..__ _. Ar.N.1t ' ►.' 1. * ,
Managed Areas r t ' _ +9 •.4t'4.,. ' , � # ' - e:
i
ti
•
arcs and click o m idemiF f ,�
Conservati (fir �+s _ ..i v
. ment ccurrences Trer2 -»I.s 57 t' r'•^]f • a d �'�►'r• rti [t}A
Biod'rverSSittyv&g Wild'i s eNlI '• Y• j� z` ' ^rS r ,
IOedtlry On:'LLL le Layers m esource d y`' - .44 ,s e
Agricultural landsrr ssment - 1---� 1 �"t s 1io:""1ds t ;'•��_ •,
Forestr ale 611ga?AYE I, f. • �( '-' ='4 �,=t
Smoke AwSRrMl4reRLABr IN 1 - —... ��'i .�-+ �
CMI+84iR&S 6ryBsrffgsdNlttAlRq r v ,.l .• 3, ( �� ? •1 +s,.
Game Lan - 1 r /. � ::�rr
S Td ry Graph c t
Land and Water Resource. AV ( - .>.�;Y ra',T1+ iil'�',�r�,1
...,.WaterBodies -- —_- , f'a 4µ ;¢' 4 `' r,-..•
1 -
Coastal Wetlands, r .�� _iX- fr' i .C' - I ��
National Wetlands inventory •fir: - �r - p •`�v_ s"3 + -' Y
NRCS Soil Data & � • ��►-.,f
Fish Nurse . _ T- - -
Fishery Nursery Areas i I •
L,�
Drinking Water Susceptibility 6 "d - - aa
Subwatersheds(12-0igit RUC)
�-- •M! rpgto• r T •
Subba ms(8-digit HUC) �� r. '' t* 1 it...?iY.',•� .
State Histonc Preservation(SHPO) A Y.,, i � r ti [ �� "Vr I. .r + m.4•!�
NC Historic Resources t` - -~ •
Reference AN i • �-Z— �( _
sue`

"iirIpm
aI67" U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Invento I Sylvester Development NWI Map
fir' -III
1:�• �.• }
•
•
,i 44 ..
1 7 11 ... A .T.
•
I/ '''
_ii
•
.- .- : - .
ry �l�'
___e•ki:1
�^5r
1 7._-
r^a I'1 13.105
0 01 0.2 OAi __ h._- '': . — -1I
.„
I rt • ' • ' I - wal1M s+nx w• .ma ands.pwc,in n.
a 175 0,35 0.7 km t _ ` i _hT
October 30,2019 This map is for general reference only.The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsthle for the accuracy or currentness of the
Wetlands �' base data shown on this map.All wetlands related data should
Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapperweb site.
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater `] Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland ❑ Other
❑ Estuarine and Marine Wetland ❑ Freshwater Pond ❑ Riverine
National Wetlands!men tory(NW!)
This page was produced by the NW mapper

Bob Zarzecki
From: Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday,April 13, 2020 10:39 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki; Mairs, Robb L
Cc: Steenhuis,Joanne; Benson,Tyler G
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Request for additional information 2020_0248 Sylvester Development
Hey Bob,
I just talked with Robb and wanted to follow up.We ask that you revise the PCN to reflect the features as intermittent
streams.As the features are intermittent you can still utilize the NWP 39.The Corps utilizes all new information provided
from all sources including the State in making our determinations of stream calls. I sent my email prior to Robb and
Joanne's site visit.After their visit they submitted the stream documentation and the Corps agrees.The features
themselves seem to be of lower quality so mitigation will not be required, but if you could add an additional statement
about avoidance and minimization.The Corps does not consider this to be a new submittal and the turnaround time
should be quick as soon as we get the updated PCN. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.You can
submit the revised PCN directly to myself and Robb.
Thanks,
Rachel
Original Message
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday,April 13, 2020 10:01 AM
To: Mairs, Robb L<[e-mail]>;Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)
<[e-mail]>
Cc:Steenhuis,Joanne<[e-mail]>; Benson,Tyler G<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: Request for additional information 2020_0248 Sylvester Development
Importance: High
Robb&Rachel:
Ok, please provide me guidance on how to handle this one.The USACE considers the channels jurisdictional ditches (per
attached email and previous emails and DOT permit) and the DWR considers them jurisdictional intermittent streams
(per today's email below).
The roadside ditch (impact#1)was previously permitted as a linear wetland (I assume by both the USACE and DWR) per
Rachel's research that she provided me in an email back on November 1st last year, excerpt below.
"It appears as though a few year back our DOT Regulator went out and made a determination that those features were
jurisdictional. He looked mostly at the roadside feature and called it a linear wetland, but made comments about the
other features onsite as well that I can use to make my jurisdictional call along with your pictures. It appears as though
the Corps would consider the features to be considered jurisdictional and impacts would require a permit. ..."
i

As such and in good faith,we had been considering them to be jurisdictional ditches up until this point and had been
referring to them as such in several emails since last November.
I saw no need to bring DWR out to make a stream determination for the applicability of the buffer rules as this is not in a
State buffered basin(Neuse,Tar-Pam,etc.). It's my understanding that the USACE makes the determination as to stream
vs.wetland or ditch in those cases.
Also,our PCN application was submitted on February 13th and I did not hear form DWR until April 7th (54 days into the
60 day review)and they didn't make their stream determination until April 8th (55 days into the 60 day review)and
notify me as such until today April 13th (60 days since the application was submitted).
Sorry, but this is all very frustrating that I'm now going to have to go back to my client and inform them that these
ditches are considered intermittent streams by DWR and that they need to provide further justification for the impacts.
I'll go back to the client and inform them as such, but will need guidance on how to revise the PCN to call these
jurisdictional ditches by the USACE and intermittent streams by DWR.
Rachel I'll also confirm the flow paths that you requested in your email, but believe your assumptions to be correct.
Regards,
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil&Environmental Consultants, PA
Original Message
From: Mairs, Robb L<[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday,April 13, 2020 9:27 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki<[e-mail]>
Cc:Capito, Rachel A CIV USARMY CESAW(USA)<[e-mail]>;Steenhuis,Joanne
<[e-mail]>; Benson,Tyler G<[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] RE: Request for additional information 2020_0248 Sylvester Development
2

Hey Bob,
I hope you and your family had a nice holiday weekend. Joanne Steenhuis and I were on-site last Wednesday(4/8/2020)
to take a look at these features within the project area,and determined that the feature depicted as#2 impact in the
PCN is an intermittent stream(see attached DWR Stream ID form).The feature depicted as impact#4 would also be
considered an intermittent stream. We walked the feature along HWY 24 towards the south up to Koonce Fork Road,
and this feature depicted as#1 impact appears to be an intermittent stream, based on the flora and fauna that were
observed. We concur that feature that is depicted as#3 impact would be a ditch. Based on information from the USGS
StreamStats GIS,it appears these streams are within an approximately 108 acre drainage area(see attached USGS
StreamStats image and LIDAR map). Further,based on the information you provided in the PCN application(Soil Survey
map,and NWI map),appear to be consistent with our determination.
At this time,we are placing this application on-hold,and we are requesting that the PCN and site plans reflect this
determination,and we also request additional information in regards to demonstrating avoidance and minimization.
Thanks,
Robb
Robb Mairs
Environmental Specialist II
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
910 796.7303 office
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Blockedhttps://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-branch/40]-
wetlands-buffer-permits<Blockedhttps://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-
permits/wastewater-bra nch/401-wetlands-buffer-perm its>
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
3

r
f , ►j ��a .a i r I
'' f + + �' I�f {
� k , _ . , r t i" Fry 7 ..
`+`
. it. ,,,,i14 1 ."4 ..r 5 » , '
. I I 'f•X'M. 1 ..• : • •-• ••'•i". . 1
•
�� .i ' r t i . I I
r i. ' ,
iiiiii ..fri
... / .
4 7
. - ..,-:'.4"..455,,,i
e -4, 1111.: --' .:
I'
r.
s 4 ,�e
Sit \,,
1 il
1
f
1
i r,
i -1 .
•
fil
��r NC Count 1NCCGLA,NC�fhi ap USyg-\DsSin!HERE CeI arm. MapmvIndln , O ri reetMap
`I i - con[nbulors., ihd the GIS uOtt �mnmunst}o turc Srs Dtjit.11G•c me CeuEye Ed II,v,r Cr e•N phtes,
ONES/Airtiva DB,USDA Ut- :-' r CF"ICf(.I$ _md the GIS User;,'rrmunity

Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 34.89052,-77.54801
Time: 2020-04-09 15:51:36-0400
.., ,
t, 'c,li i — . ' -,. .• k
\ el
E.)I
\ 'I•f'fr, .
NI,
1 t ' • 4?
I
RithiandS - .-' .''cf •
k•.,
4,.... f:Margin St
)
I'
.,
-74 :
Vvocklson St a'
._.
1,-
et..-- ...._
GL
0,se;
:77
,o,
/ %.410
ue,
c•
Leaflet I
Richlands Sylvester Dev.Site
Basin Characteristics
Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit
DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 0.17 square miles

IBC Division of Water Quality-Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v.4.11
•
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
�rra-rt 6 V
1 bate: i/d! h7/Gj Lt}et� i+ r 2e,sl+t/)Wr betide:
Evaluator: J 1V 1'nt�r r�S County: N S LOCH Longitude:
snJufs
Total Poi A�rv�
nts: Stream Determine i•I circle one) Other
Stream is at least intermittent n, 6� Ephemeral l �Perennial e.g.Quad Name:
if a 19 or perennial if 2 30* OW,•Gt
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=_ Li ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank .Onik€JiJk td 7.4.) 0 (1 2 3
2.Sinuosity of channel along thalweg _ 0 t 2 _ 3
3, In-channel structure:ex.riffle-pool,step-pool, 1 2 3
ripple pool sequence _ 2 3
4.Particle size of stream substrate 1-.1)xo Vc f ro e13 1
5.Active/relict floodplain E,i-0 rlfr M Ili iV 0 _ '1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 0 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits k
1 2 - 3_8. Headcuts 123 -
9. Grade control • _ 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 • 0.5 0 1.5
11.Second or greater order channel ! o� . Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= - )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 J 1 0 _..-. 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 2 3
14. Leaf litter '1.5 1 0.5 0
15.Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 Cb 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or plies 0 0.5 1 (1
17.Soll-based evidence of high water table? No-o Yes=3 .
C. Biology (Subtotal= i..C:A6 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed �3 _ 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed - _ 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) '71-ES_ 0 • 1 2
21.Aquatic Mollusks SOTS of at Awl 0 1 2 • 3 J
� •
22.Fish 5i,t 0 1 1.5-Ft5tf 0
23.Crayfish _ ` 1 1.5
24.Amphibians OttZc Elbe) yAc?port:4 0 0.5 1 3 5)
25.Algae 0 i 0.5� 1
26.Wetland plants in streambed 5-ryiAtt7'Weelj.SU 14,'cU FACW 4 0.7 ' OBL=1.5 Other=0 j
*perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Ot/ rn% fvl t V:fyC ,7p19(A:4.5 SN n it 9 O 124NErly t-Rri 1A.E.2 SuN i'+ N S ,/ItV6rAT£6 J frr7 €L1-Y
EG�c? OA Sim J C .AYfi,H rMou►vas, ►6 ;I_.gc
Sketch: T/16 fC/1`lamre, is AN. iN C12.I4Arlit ell 5712Ein 0,11 7:F1 /1•t "9 /75 et/3-)
z. l) Legu -1 /r?C: /45 A. 'F�r2 v4I 9.17 1/-/ c4 r' r7
I �(Air � ��� . . -rum f rr,�,r
LL f 11$/TS Sd 04 A- 7 1-341171(`: i 6t(-f 11 r. , /l 17 O
vfi V: c-_J ' F/-e-i,ar:1r . TE-) r-He F=0e?-ES or 'me,: Jtopt
w� 4t.50 No f-IJ Tf--/ )oT r/(1i ()F VI /to 7/e..r=5 . rrov )(16---.
I / U) G-Wmyfl fit,) /K)7 F// eezikyri cF 77f/3 Viz-/7 tt c 0`6.,
41

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id.SAW-2019-02132 County:Onslow U.S.G.S.Quad:NC-Richlands
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE)VERIFICATION
Applicant: 24 East Development,LLC Agent: S&EC
Leon Ward Sylvester III Bob Zarzecki
PO Box 295 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Richlands,NC 28574 Suite 104
Raleigh,NC 27615
Size(acres) 14.32 Nearest Town Jacksonville
Nearest Waterway New River River Basin Onslow Bay
USGS HUC 03020302 Coordinates Latitude:34.890957
Longitude:-77.548469
Location description:Project area is located northwest of the intersection of Richlands Highway and Koonce Fork Road in
Richlands,Onslow County,North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity:This verification authorizes the permanent discharge of 894 linear feet of fill
material into an intermittent stream for the construction of commercial outparcels.An additional 0.005 acres of open water
ditch will also be impacted for the construction of a road.The flow from the onsite wetland will be rerouted,but still
directed to downstream waters offsite and into the New River.
Applicable Law(s): ®Section 404(Clean Water Act,33 USC 1344)
❑Section 10(Rivers and Harbors Act,33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 39.Commercial and Institutional Developments
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL,AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions,your application signed and dated 2/14/2020,and the enclosed plans Wetland Impacts dated 1/20/2020.Any violation
of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order,a restoration
order,a Class I administrative penalty,and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended,revoked,or is modified,such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit,activities which have commenced(i.e.,are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit,will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration,modification or revocation,unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify,suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above)may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources(telephone [phone])to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA),prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C.Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington,NC,at(910)796-7215.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,State
or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification,any of the conditions of the Permit,or.the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Regulatory Specialist,Rachel Capito,(910)-251-4487 or Rachel.A.Capito ausace.army.mil.
Digitally signed by
SUGG.MICKEY.T.1229800830 SIIGG.MICKEY.T1229800830
Regulatory Chief Wilmington Field Office,Mickey Sugg: D8te:2020 0420 1E40469-04ro0' Date:4/20/2020
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022

Action ID Number: SAW-2019-02132 County: Onslow
Permittee: 24 East Development,LLC,Leon Ward Sylvester III
Project Name: Sylvester Development
Date Verification Issued: 4/20/2020
Chief Wilmington Field Office: Rachel Capito
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
or
[e-mail]
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S.Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit,and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

DITCH IMPACT MAP IA II Ditch Impact:
FOR , I q 1 #1 133 LF 0.019 Ac. LEGEND
SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT `:i' .. I #2 668 LF 0.093 AD. I
Impacts 1-4 Engineering Planning #3 70LF 0.005Ac. I �i"''" El
Ste Design
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA MO�NIS MO HMO #4 93 LF 0.008 Ac. I rum°°Y"""""°
SCALE 1"=200' April 17,2020 MY.
,", Total 964LF 0.125 Ac.
.�. '°'°' f_
_ WPC SOU • .o min //,'. ."". ws.
...,m
r .v Of Or1 I I
.w inn
-Liar I!/ Eaza 1
MO 161.11r
MOW NW •
V j A ;
"y • iMgr 3
I
Zsa :.: ...; vac.....
=i si r; ,�;
1 1 ii/I
,p x7�II ih 1 10 '--
l_
I ti ------1 6 2
•
_ _ ,,, _ .
ono1Y17.1.1.011MIS MI1 . •(�� _ _
s mrI 11 11 i R.mow mi.) i ,
I I
I j I tl1 I
i. i I j-.-1
y/I C i • i
I g
1 I l ."....,,., 1 Omar=MY MOO
i .p ,.m ; allAW NV
m .ice. i I g IIP
,: A1�,Aa1..�,ArSCHOOL UM ,.
v.WL - � ' � I �� �� I '
Engineering Planning
Site Design t
11317 SE 11.111M0 AVM
CNN.xc EMI
NI .n-.ins
c-attv
PREPARED BY:Bart J.McClain,PE SHEE 1 p
CAPI1O.RACHELAN .....,
N.1536276790 vaww.raaav

DITCH IMPACT MAP 1 t lI i� / „o
FOR Ti f, /�� > . �r -- � i1�=1l—
SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT
Impacts#1&#2 Engineering
Desg Planning �/ '; q�rt r E
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1305E„E�""" ,—'��/ % /P nn..« /
SCALE 1"=60' April 17,2020 n.iOW:n'm. i rf ,no,,, co �„
.11.!*/ 1
`I Il
_�;$ / / ------ .�� V------'
na..a Asr mmecrcx o.r.
t II
64pc, j , I l� `PROPOSED y ---- � wxa aID
Lor to
4 1 I 1. '1 ._ ..Zs,934.03 SF �(�I f.,,,-,--_ ---
` ` -� qy� i/l 1 "`L-AG''(t7)T.3LJw -�I ( ` I)IIISI , "�:/p fir/ /1 7 073 ACEXCL.EASEMENT i \ �II III
' j - �// ��_ PROFIOSED i/ _\.iw / f r� ;I� n
�y �/ / 1 szor'aATER 'II j
/ !1 IMPOUNDMENT I / /Y
r JY,�--. I III - NY 30.00 irr ` II 1 I tifil
PROPOSED i
/ 11yit I- i /� / II I 1 LOT9
�' 't --}- J / '/ / I II 1 wI5997t90 SP !,l �QN1q(8. '%� / IIII 1iI
_ ----- l.37,AC
N�aiI JO&H778' ,'II�� f 7i 1 / IIII 1 PROPOSE l�l /' IDiv - _ - ! 1 t/rA ` I III 1,, LoT taw1i15 /r
j��. I- p / �. w I
A — EITail
--- .4%, am
------ ------- -
_ -- s�,�_— — -- -�.--i...._� ---`- -------------- --___-
__ IItylP`�k.,fi 1
' RAP / — _—______-
mmilmn
' 77-1 PANE,
I pU�7'Y1S8 14 ��=__ _ '�.GS't?.�..C7. -
I B71c v' = _
1 �_
PREPARED BY:Ban J.McClain,PE SHEET 2 OF 3
CAPRO.6ACHEL.°w°' w „mow
ANN.1536276790 ywy� wv

DITCH IMPACT MAP 1 1m > 1.w.cvr + _ �
FOR I r 1 , , m o `��.v.` LEGEND .`
w
SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT ` . I � o
Engineering Planning w®e • .aaw�
Impacts#3,&#4 Site Design I a��:::. ^°' ^°"°� `�
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA "30SEYAMS,1.0 '^^°"•v°
SCALE 1"=60' April 16,2020 n :.,'nine SINE 2.0 `�`., 4 A \ ` a
- `` ` -., \�'` .`.' `gJ l • ' ° • l ^ rt • `• `\ ��I ��`'°o��mm na . ra.tt ,•a
•
•
0B 4220 v0 9 •'�. `,�� ' i mil`• vr .•r • .`.. DITC 1t_
YAM Sny l� - i .1 .r,,,.
2Tm'a-p \FIR TONWV.14.1.11. t \ �\\. L Y \ •�N.%
�, 'I x �Ac / /!)':
- i _
Millir, ___________________ _
�— .+tea �! -,�11 • • • • • • • _ ga i' ::a-tF- '+FA'I.-. - /
t-S _ �'R —ter y €
/A 0: -.: 1 -I I -. -. -4"Mlk--;F..-4.I I ll I I I I...--"IR—i—i I I I.•..mi.m i.;.:_-_...7T-, __.......,....__.....0.7,I,-----•--___.__..0 5.711,0 _ ,v,/ _...,/
1 i t ', 1 ���'�I ��h�_ ",i♦ MOH PACT 3 /
I 0 LF i
♦ etO TRACT 2 i u�° 11S
If I !.1105 /
i / 24 EAST ♦ ♦ ♦ i
/ EIEVELOPMENT, C / •� I �, LB^ - ..♦ /r♦j ♦DB 4880, 86 357 - �l 1 -� /r ; r5 f iRICNUNDS HWY , /� /f/SE.• NT / �. / �� / rr •
!ZONm:C-2 iIING I / ///r �iimn,"° ' /xm ano. amx EN$PDYG mum, / % 'f/ ♦ s9e8 73sn�/ l /� ♦ r.37s,�C rrhr��� -'a,�� i (I I
♦♦ ; l.093AC r- / r /♦j 33.2AT . 68�S7aJC/ / / �V 410.93AC f1,960.6S' I ¢,23 2i / / PAW2 I '3 / 0.983AC /46,287.895F/ ITCH fI �j // `i, / 1.063 AC/ / 88 LF 1/r iO b/ .093 AC. / K r // f 7 y I I OLD T%,T 2 r
.l�n. / fL ff24/ T
�i'�+�'1+ w ' . / IIDEVEZPME T,LLC /�1S`4,a14�,,/. � a-- �"��� I1 „ 0,�,8/A♦'Jj'g8'B"0, - 357 /
We®/:Pdd'�sn9el��ve. ��� ® 1 - �ICHLANr' HWY /fir ;-_ _= -tom_._ `A / '/� - ma a _ ZONED: -2„,./
/�
1\ a T
- - - �— -Fes— - --- — - - - - —  _
PREPARED BY:Bert J.McClain,PE SHEET 3 OF 3
CAPRO.RACHEL.'tar ux°m.°u�°e."xx,vum.
ANN7 536276790°°,.mu°u,,,,...n°

DocuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
ROY COOPER 1 -
-' �.
Governor � �N`
MICHAEL S.REGAN .
V r
Secretary '''�awa..0_`
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environneenta[Quality
April 21,2020
DWR#2020-0248
Onslow County
24 East Development,LLC
C/o Leon Ward Sylvester
PO Box 295
Richlands,NC 28574
Subject: Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Sylvester Development—Richlands,NC 28574
Dear Mr. Sylvester:
You have our approval,in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below to allow for the
permanent impacts involving approximately 0.005 acres of open water area and approximately 894 total
linear feet of intermittent stream area,as described in your application received by the N.C.Division of
Water Resources(DWR)on February 13,2020,sequential information received April 14,2020,April 17,
2020,April 20,2020,and April 21, 2020.After reviewing your application,we have decided that the
impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 4139(GC4139).
This Certification allows you to use the Nationwide Permit 39 when issued by the U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers. In addition,you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,state or
local permits before you go ahead with your project including(but not limited to)Erosion and Sediment
Control,Non-discharge, and stormwater regulations. Also,this approval to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the
404 Permit.This Certification can also be found on line at: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Certificate-of-
Completion.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application.If you change your
project,you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions.If total fills for this project(now or in the future)exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream,compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506(h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions of
this Certification(or Isolated Wetland Permit)are met. No other impacts are approved including
incidental impacts:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
DE -,,,-) Wilmington Regional Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension : Wilmington,North Carolina 28405
NORTH CAROLINA
m"°'m'°°°"e"""'"m°°"® 910.796.771.5

DocuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
Amount Approved(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Open Waters "Ditch 3"—Approximately Updated Impacts Map—Received
0.005 acres of impacts April 17,2020
Revised PCN—Received April 14,
2020,with additional comments
from USACE received April 20,
2020 and April 21,2020.
Coastal wetlands N/A
404/401 wetlands N/A
Streams(Intermittent) "Ditch 1"—133 linear feet Updated Impacts Map—Received
"Ditch 2"—668 linear feet April 17,2020
"Ditch 4"—93 linear feet
Revised PCN—Received April 14,
Approximate impact total 2020,with additional comments
(Ditch 1,2,and 4)of 894 from USACE received April 20,
linear feet 2020 and April 21,2020.
This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application.The plans and specifications for
this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification. If you change your project,you
must notify the Division and you may be required to submit a new application package with the
appropriate fee.
1. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application.The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification. If you
change your project,you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit a new
application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold,the new owner must be given a copy
of this approval letter and General Certification and is responsible for complying with all conditions. Any
new owner must notify the Division and request the Certification be issued in their name {15A NCAC
02H.0501 and.0502}.
2. Any final construction plans for this project must include or reference the application and plans
approved by the Division under this authorization letter and certification. The applicant will also be
required to evaluate all acquired permits to assure that they are consistent and all relative impacts are
accounted for and shown on the construction plans. [15A NCAC 02H.0502(b)and 15A NCAC
02H.0506(4)] The applicant shall require his contractors(and/or agents)to comply with all of the terms
of this Certification,and shall provide each of its contractors(and/or agents)a copy of this Certification.
3.A pre-construction meeting is recommended to be held with the Division prior to the start of the project
phases so that the contractors and/or agents fully understand the conditions associated with this
certification. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)and 15A NCAC 02H.0502(e)]
4. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 25 NTUs(Nephelometric Turbidity Units)shall not be exceeded as described in
15 A NCAC 2B .0220.Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices must be used to meet this
standard. Turbidity curtains shall be used as appropriate. Please notify this Office if any turbidity
issues arise at 910.796.7215

DocuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
5. All wetlands, streams,surface waters, and riparian buffers located within 50 feet of the
construction area on the project site shall be clearly marked(example-orange fabric fencing)prior to any
land disturbing activities and must be maintained on the property until the project phase is completed.
[15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)and(c)(2)and 15A NCAC 02H.0507(c)]
6. Appropriate measures should be installed prior to any land clearing activities to protect waters
and wetlands from turbidity and/or sedimentation. These measures should be routinely inspected and
properly maintained,and excavated materials should be contained outside the wetland boundary.
Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including
destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs,and clogging of gills of aquatic species. [15A
NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)and(c)(3)]
7. This General Certification shall expire on the same day as the expiration date of the
corresponding General Permit. The conditions in effect on the date of issuance of the Certification for a
specific project shall remain in effect for the life of the project,regardless of the expiration of this
Certification.
8. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms of this permit in
the construction and maintenance of this project,and shall provide each of its contractors and/or agents
associated with the construction or maintenance of this project a copy of this certification. A copy of this
certification including all conditions shall be available at the project site during the construction and
maintenance of this project. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)and 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)and(c)(2)]
9. Continuing Compliance:
The applicant/permittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner consistent with
State water quality standards(including any requirements resulting from compliance with 303(d)of the
Clean Water Act),and any other appropriate requirements of State and Federal law. If the Division
determines that such standards or laws are not being met,including failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use,or that State or Federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to
assure compliance,than the Division may reevaluate and modify this General Water Quality Certification.
[15A NCAC 02H.0507(d)]
10. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters or wetlands will be regularly inspected
and maintained to prevent contamination of waters and wetlands from fuels,lubricants,hydraulic fluids or
other potential toxic chemicals. In the event of a hydrocarbon or chemical spill,the permittee/contractor
shall immediately contact the Division of Water Quality,between the hours of 8 am to 5 pm at the
Wilmington Regional Office at 910.796.7215 and after hours and on weekends call(800)858-0368.
Management of such spills shall comply with provisions of the North Carolina Oil Pollution and
Hazardous Substances Control Act. [15A NCAC 02H.0506 (b)(3) and(c)(3), 15A NCAC 02B .0200
(3)(f),and GS 143 Article 21A].
11. Fueling,lubrication and general equipment maintenance should not take place within 50 feet of a
waterbody or wetlands to prevent contamination by fuel and oils. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)and
(c)(3)and 15A NCAC 02B .0200 (3)(f)].
12. This certification grants permission to the director,an authorized representative of the Director,
or DEQ staff,upon the presentation of proper credentials,to enter the property during normal business
hours 15A NCAC 02H.0502(e).
13. Certificate of Completion

DocuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules,and any subsequent modifications,the applicant and/or authorized agent is required to return a
completed certificate of completion form to the NCDEQ DWR 401 and Buffers Unit North Carolina
Division of Water Resources, 1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC,27699 within ten days of project
completion. The certification of completion is available at:https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Certificate-of-
Completion).
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to
conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 150B by filing a
written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings(hereby known as
OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAR at http://www.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH
Clerk's Office at(919)431-3000 for information.
Within sixty(60)calendar days of receipt of this notice,a petition must be filed with the OAH. A petition
is considered filed when the original and one(1)copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is
received in the OAH during normal office hours(Monday through Friday between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm,
excluding official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at(919)431-3100,provided the original and one copy of the
petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five(5)business days
following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS,
FedEx, etc):
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh,NC 27699-6714 Raleigh,NC 27609-6285
One(1)copy of the petition must also be served to DEQ:
Bill Lane,General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Resources under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions,please telephone Robb Mairs in the DWR Wilmington Regional
Office at 910.796.7303 or Robb.Mairs(a,ncdenr.go' .
Sincerely,
EDocuSiyned by:
E3AeA14ACT3C434_

DocuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
Morella Sanchez King,Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ
Enclosures: GC 4139
Cc: Bob Zarzecki, Soil and Environmental Consultants,PA,EC
Rachel Capito,USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office,EC
DWR 401 &Buffer Permitting Branch file-LF
WiRO

DITCH IMPACT MAP 1 1 {
•
FOR ` I , i I- Ditch Impact: I LEGEND
SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT #1 288 LF 0.032 Ac. _.. t4:, --
Im Impact &#2 Engineering Planning
p Site Design #2 49 LF 0.004 AC. I 1110P.m.o.oo um...Fe„ 4
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 1130 SE SPISPRO
"°° Total 337 LF 0.036 Ac.
SCALE 1"=200' February 11,2021 GYM
�""°'L., °"
OIPICSVIS
I I ....---.-..---- -..-..—.—
I _
�G —
NI/ZZIS 22 ,'• rail)i hb,.
17 •
PAM
I
jp.r I + I
1 1 ii
...v.�.i. .}_:0.,:ti':'......• I 1 Iffii w°�i
10 MOO I
l 1
(1_,_.::.........."_._,_i
��'' 11 2 �` 'c'mek�.
ta air
' : , .unc y,,Marx awl
r _.1-'-- 133
IMMITIVI i
N
i i i .
``,1 " 1 �, I� I Iy
wcncwnarxaeur aar.wt l I
:•V: ' I axaxannrrarSCHOOL ' nn me am
I
Engineering`Planning II, I I
Site Design {
'r cIre.NCi Mr,
(°re us-c-0a°n7a
PREPARED BY:Bart J.McClain,PE SHEET 1 OF 2

DITCH IMPACT MAP 1 t I 1
LEGEND I WIC
"` I�
FOR 1 ,t. pg..•na
SYLVESTER DEVELOPMENT `it I I01 1, I - Cam''''' E
Impacts &#2 Engineering Planning 1,,,.,,,®,,,�,a,R„ „0•,1•ri �`�
P site Design ��� `, .
ONSLOWCOUNTY', NORTH CAROLINA 110gSWF'"='"1B1O �°"0f1e"°'"• \\\ �`.�` `�`.� �X
GM:AC 21,11
SCALE 1"=60' February 11,2021 a121-0>0. '
-07?�_M \♦ Sa VEGETATES 1_ __ _f—�` ___``` _-_ -"-_ \ SETBACK \ `` * 1
Al
r. ___-_ i ___ - _ --_ Iy \ 1 Imo.Rj /;?,1/ 1 1\
IRAGT 4 040 0N4 /
v `3`` ��``� "--�- 'b..I-r...-:1 4TL }Ic�/ ```` \`• ` \�t.,vl-l ; 75L ` 1` `,/JI ,` 11
. .
I \ * * . *-'* * * * ******** . “ailEffil . ":':A‘"' 'e 0.4°' 44......_________
0.0
r,. j
T • '
// / l 1
• / ,-'' MPACTED NTERMITTENT 1
:�� _ ,/ STREAM(Permit SAW-2019-02132) \
60'PURLI4IttisN,„ 1 i i o.,, /
........\„_____________ ____
_ __,._
1
i ‘.,
, ..„
—1 ! •,.i c•�.____......::„7 "„ 1 �+ •DITC / /MPACTED OPEN WATER i 11
/ %(ice / ' — I '' *. 288 i •ITCH(Permit SAW-2019-02132) 1 \
�;y , Ir 1 / i / 1 \
/ i E{7&TTNG / i - 1 '�
.!!�','�e;• // /'' I I TRACTS / / i 1
� / _ E47S77NG /ce• / `��SA /" rRC�yi :.ii:------ --iiI_[
l ` 116,287.89 SF,t,
I 1.061 AC
/ MPACTED INTERMITTENT / i 1
STREAM(Permit SAW-2019-02132)/ 41 -- I /i - 71/ / 1\'\
/1 / j 14yi sj�— I i / \`
li
9 I _1 `f
i /' `a
PREPARED BY:Bart J.McClain,PE SHEET 2 OF 2

... '
•
DITCH ©Impact#1 i •:-... • ..r ": • • -,• '•—',"•;:i-,,,,.• ••.....J•:4.0 ..,.i, , . ..:....-
Ix...;!, z_.- . ....4 - ''• : •••••:' ". •-.. ''....' . '•-e:••-',..10. • • •••••:••4-...'., '•46"
*:3*. :.••-.•:.'.'7 i''..••... z:‘ '''. •' ' :'•••.• '4..... ..!j-( .
7...$... -1." ...-ti- n..: •.-., •',4' : ' ,,.....4;t:-.- .....li•'.-••••••••:.
..• ..„......
• -;#.,.'•.•••', •••V'Iii‘.• '.,- ''',. .4....V ' .• •'. •. ••• .....N.4...,1:.,•,.„..4_I,
. ...•....
-••,•9.. • .. •Tr"
.e . •l'e it:: . t '4.k •:.:'• ...qr.`••• ' .. ...,.....:,... ... ,• ,, ••.
't ..-,'•;„ ;„ ,I, ••••• •••• ...e
, 1...f..
-.--••"--• •3;•:..: ,• -,-.?....*:•••4"F•••: • • - • • ••
..
••
••••.
. ' .1...- .•- A ' • t• ••••'+'::4-V- If: . i••• •,' • v-
,.•
-. .
..- .
lira,_Awix ''•1;i.-,, . • • • I •••••••,..40111.•:•`‘2,..• ' ' ' ', ..,. '1,.. •:•.;4.• -,...r..., .-..::•••,/k; •. :V.-
.., •
• '.••,..r-
. r••' —
•1_•-• ' ,..‘..-'- ".•••••••"i-i4..11 ' . .. •••• •
• •--'44•'''S IMPP' -"•••i•;"',...;• '.•-:`,4t‘
- -•-,-•-'•
. •. . • ..._.9-..- '.
• -', '''':',7444ibiy. L•'••
' .._:•,•-•'- :‘ •;L••••'--
- 'r•
-1•• .:,.,••,',. '
•'•.:•••••:'''.C.:::•
. .„.. ,-... '•• • r.".
.8. •-••••••• .,_.:.....t.'-:• L... 1. . •
,i._:.,..,..•
. .. •
.. t
_ . .
,. ... . . ,_. „. ..
....
-••-;.•,,
•4• • ••• : • ••••••• '
- _ .-i.,• J•••••-••••.. l•
Ls
. .•. . •
.._.._ _•
•
.ife•
_. . . .. -—-,•- • -...•
-- , •
••;,.., ... ..•_-. ._,••,....-.--,.. ._... , • .
.. ..._..-. _ . ,-..... . ..,
• - •
• •
• 1
. .. . ,. ...., .
• • .• , .., . ..._ .- •,- • -, -. .. .. -
• .-. .., - .
,_. . •_. . .• .r. - ..".. . : •
. ,•._... • . •,
•' • • ... .. .
••••• "••-•-•-• '•i'.-.1-.•,-:7.-:-;:-:. • e-7....- - ..:-..',...-.:7.ti.:..,,,.;, 7,.:.: ....:7..T..,:,...- -: ...• .'-.:--- :. .;'. '.... .:....,"::•!,--..i...ir:71.1r:'.T•.::'-- •
• •- . .•- .- . ''-.T.-...-:''.."-7:•' .
.• ... ..-.. •...• ..
-'• •-- • .
, .. , ••.• . • ., , .••... _ .•,.......,•••,,.•••••••••• , ..... •.•. ........-..• . ..--•--.-- •-- . - • •. .. • . :. .7.--yr. 7. • .---
......... .• • -•:, •
.-.• •-• : —..... • --..
• • •• .... - • . •
• .,•• - -- .•-•••.•••• •::• .. .
-:„.„. . .;.- _,,... ,„ •,...., - .
- • • - --..- •• •
• . .- •,. . ••..,7 .. • •
. .
. .. - •.. -.- . . . ..,...,..._ .....• .,• .....,_,, ....„„:„...,:_
• .
.. -... • . . .
- ••-• .-.:...' ' ••- • =:•=....,-.:::•!.•••,. .-.•--..7';' •-iTi.:-..,:,...:-.•:.•,:::,',..?.,.....-1-=•••2';---,•-•
• • • • 1 •
.. •.. •.-, .:
... .
...:-_-...-...,••';',i--.....:.--•-•6.,:.:•-•••,:rt.:,c ,:: . 7.
. . ....•...„7„..4.,cii-;Z•*;."§L:AT4- :•'.-4•*6•• '
'''...::•'.7'..,^.Y.:•.;.,....i•''.••.'....:,..1.1.•.:t:',7•••:,••, ,..,._, ' Sito••..:':: ". • .• ....:. .• ' ....'',,, .'-...--"....•,.. .. .':.•..5.,-,. ..- .. -. .'..:r. '... .'.IL ...
- -' ••.. " • '. ••-• • . .-. . ....•
• --'• • .- . .1 ........'Ll:-. ....'..t.. .:;..: ' r• ..1 ..... .:'.."...,.."`......': .:•...-.-!i.7-'''.: ! ....' .I.-. .i..:-.. '''':•'''..l. --.- ..1..... ' i••••
.......,.. ..' -•• - •••,. ' .
.. •
t''''.••-4...-''''''. .7.r. ..1L,77a-::::: .,;0,17, 3::4:0.:',"i•,;;,'..•.•„:.::.,;,.........r.."•,.;,.....'::: ...7...•:,
'- 4;IL',.:4115017,•7'... ... 7.-•..'"''-''.!..7-'.?)..N!1-:•.--:0''':7.7:" ••jr.'''......-.:'..7''':• ...,. ... i. .'
pirex • , . . . .. ...
, .., -...• • • :-
--•• .... -''' . ' .. • ._ , .

DITCH @ Impact#2
..r P. r!; -ter• •••`�
_• -• _ _: i h_: r_ 'mod. ..+.a a:. 4ta.�_. v - -- _..
_ ram• -�•L�.f
•
- _ - - _w+i•� SAT}- _ - • r• • •4 � =1
�. r�r ^lamteT� " i' .• F- S}-. ' y i,x ..7:-•• 1 _ ' .._ i- - .k..-' - - .3 �•... .'tip II - !'• • -•-•- .'-
-...„.,•.4,10.-e-_,_,•'•-_•-4.7-: ..„%'4*,:t••••-•-1:•.4. '-.--;..7'7-:--=f..-- "''''. -•- •
e` f.
' ,°�a • Y
*-4,w,
.4441A_
Via,'.;. r • '' t ",'.j- :_..:...
} _ 4: . Fes'f
ft
•
..�.. y }ram ' _ -�
.•! - - — -
•
r D. '- 1• r 1:'
r s - fir° -L„r,, •.•1 ,.i --•. ' - t_• j .,l .._•- - ' • --7 .
], _f Sri' ;,tee_.., ,•-}' : .::_ :_.,. r f9 F:•P-
7 4I ft ; ~te��aa•..{ :, rS_ ;ii.f q\:�- ,- ,' -.6 • •%vr .---
�•! ,sy'/IF 'v-Syr r.• _' . �-:, •f-
-117
..•sc
„[— •1 1.•l,- ..): yam(•./ /:I :f' s=
S ii
•• ti
�'M . 1 is f' � se- % •
kr' .'E, /%: - e - ` i - `: :t • • - r,. '7'Y p
•
.. f • • _ :'i• �. fir; .•.`J ,l .�:. `.. I �.` �,�k
f f ^•.r ` Z. _+ `T •k V .^ J ,�l • - •'C. • .l...•f' .. f if _
•
' ." . f 1_.• _�..'i r - , s `"�.r >-r ti •---��+' _: ', _. _ :• , .. .fir.
` Ire -_ • .; /.', _ '
•
ir
L•. . •
'IE- ram ;µ f� k/1 - .. I " o _ " Y =• J- ,; i
• ai• �t r , � .�r .-
q' •; i

bD cuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-887791614FAB
ROY COOPER 1' 4. '
Governor ' , VV;sMICHAEL S.REGAN nra.,; ,, ,
Secretary VVAM
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
April 21,2020
DWR#2020-0248
Onslow County
24 East Development,LLC
C/o Leon Ward Sylvester
PO Box 295
Richlands,NC 28574
Subject: Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Sylvester Development—Richlands,NC 28574
Dear Mr. Sylvester:
You have our approval,in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below to allow for the
permanent impacts involving approximately 0.005 acres of open water area and approximately 894 total
linear feet of intermittent stream area, as described in your application received by the N.C.Division of
Water Resources(DWR)on February 13,2020, sequential information received April 14,2020,April 17,
2020,April 20,2020, and April 21,2020.After reviewing your application,we have decided that the
impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 4139(GC4139).
This Certification allows you to use the Nationwide Permit 39 when issued by the U.S.Army Corps of
Engineers. In addition,you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,state or
local permits before you go ahead with your project including(but not limited to)Erosion and Sediment
Control,Non-discharge,and stormwater regulations. Also,this approval to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the
404 Permit.This Certification can also be found on line at: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Certificate-of-
Completion.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application.If you change your
project,you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions.If total fills for this project(now or in the future)exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506(h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general conditions of
this Certification(or Isolated Wetland Permit)are met. No other impacts are approved including
incidental impacts:
r MAY 0 1 2020
-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental3y Imo'
p Quality I Division of Water Resou7c!
�._!)� Wilmington Regional Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington,North Carolina 28405
NORTNCAROUNA
Divarbrnet of Emtramental qualny 910.796.7215

Docusign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
Amount Approved(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Open Waters I "Ditch 3"—Approximately Updated Impacts Map—Received
0.005 acres of impacts April 17,2020
Revised PCN—Received April 14,
2020,with additional comments
from USACE received April.20,
2020 and April 21,2020.
Coastal wetlands N/A
404/401 wetlands N/A
Streams(Intermittent) "Ditch 1"— 133 linear feet Updated Impacts Map—Received
"Ditch 2"—668 linear feet April 17,2020
"Ditch 4"—93 linear feet
Revised PCN—Received April 14,
Approximate impact total 2020,with additional comments
(Ditch 1,2, and 4)of 894 from USACE received April 20,
linear feet 2020 and April 21,2020.
This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application.The plans and specifications for
this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification. If you change your project,you
must notify the Division and you may be required to submit a new application package with the
appropriate fee.
1. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application.The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of the Certification. If you
change your project,you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit a new
application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold,the new owner must be given a copy
of this approval letter and General Certification and is responsible for complying with all conditions. Any
new owner must notify the Division and request the Certification be issued in their name {15A NCAC
02H.050] and.0502}.
2. Any fatal construction plans for this project must include or reference the application and plans
approved by the Division under this authorization letter and certification. The applicant will also be
required to evaluate all acquired permits to assure that they are consistent and all relative impacts are
accounted for and shown on the construction plans. [15A NCAC 02H .0502(b)and 15A NCAC
02H.0506(4)]The applicant shall require his contractors(and/or agents)to comply with all of the terms
of this Certification,and shall provide each of its contractors(and/or agents) a copy of this Certification.
3.A pre-construction meeting is recommended to be held with the Division prior to the start of the project
phases so that the contractors and/or agents fully understand the conditions associated with this
certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0507(c)and 15A NCAC 02H.0502(e)]
4. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 25 NTUs(Nephelometric Turbidity Units)shall not be exceeded as described in
15 A NCAC 2B .0220.Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices must be used to meet this
standard. Turbidity curtains shall be used as appropriate. Please notify this Office if any turbidity
issues arise at 910.796.7215

'DocuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
5. All wetlands, streams, surface waters,and riparian buffers located within 50 feet of the
construction area on the project site shall be clearly marked(example-orange fabric fencing)prior to any
land disturbing activities and must be maintained on the property until the project phase is completed.
[15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)and(c)(2) and 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)]
6. Appropriate measures should be installed prior to any land clearing activities to protect waters
and wetlands from turbidity and/or sedimentation. These measures should be routinely inspected and
properly maintained,and excavated materials should be contained outside the wetland boundary.
Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic resources including
destruction of spawning habitat,suffocation of eggs, and clogging of gills of aquatic species. [15A
NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)and(c)(3)]
7. This General Certification shall expire on the same day as the expiration date of the
corresponding General Permit. The conditions in effect on the date of issuance of the Certification for a
specific project shall remain in effect for the life of the project,regardless of the expiration of this
Certification.
8. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms of this permit in
the construction and maintenance of this project,and shall provide each of its contractors and/or agents
associated with the construction or maintenance of this project a copy of this certification. A copy of this
certification including all conditions shall be available at the project site during the construction and
maintenance of this project. [15A NCAC 02H.0507(c)and 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)and(c)(2)]
9. Continuing Compliance:
The applicant/permittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner consistent with
State water quality standards(including any requirements resulting from compliance with 303(d)of the
Clean Water Act),and any other appropriate requirements of State and Federal law. If the Division
determines that such standards or laws are not being met, including failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use, or that State or Federal law is being violated,or that further conditions are necessary to
assure compliance,than the Division may reevaluate and modify this General Water Quality Certification.
[15ANCAC 02H .0507(d)]
10. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters or wetlands will be regularly inspected
and maintained to prevent contamination of waters and wetlands from fuels,lubricants, hydraulic fluids or
other potential toxic chemicals. In the event of a hydrocarbon or chemical spill,the permittee/contractor
shall immediately contact the Division of Water Quality,between the hours of 8 am to 5 pm at the
Wilmington Regional Office at 910.796.7215 and after hours and on weekends call(800)858-0368.
Management of such spills shall comply with provisions of the North Carolina Oil Pollution and
Hazardous Substances Control Act. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)and(c)(3), 15A NCAC 02B .0200
(3)(f),and GS 143 Article 21A].
11. Fueling, lubrication and general equipment maintenance should not take place within 50 feet of a
waterbody or wetlands to prevent contamination by fuel and oils. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)and
(c)(3)and 15A NCAC 02B .0200 (3)(f)].
12. This certification grants permission to the director, an authorized representative of the Director,
or DEQ staff,upon the presentation of proper credentials, to enter the property during normal business
hours 15A NCAC 0211.0502(e).
13. Certificate of Completion

'DocuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer
Rules,and any subsequent modifications,the applicant and/or authorized agent is required to return a
completed certificate of completion form to the NCDEQ DWR 401 and Buffers Unit North Carolina
Division of Water Resources, 1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC,27699 within ten days of project
completion. The certification of completion is available at: https://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Certificate-of-
Completion).
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to
conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification shall
expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of General Statute 150B by filing a
written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of Administrative Hearings(hereby known as
OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at http://www.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH
Clerk's Office at(919)431-3000 for information.
Within sixty(60)calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the OAH. A petition
is considered filed when the original and one(1)copy along with any applicable OAH filing fee is
received in the OAH during normal office hours(Monday through Friday between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm,
excluding official state holidays).
The petition may be faxed to the OAH at(919)431-3100,provided the original and one copy of the
petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within five(5)business days
following the faxed transmission.
Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS,
FedEx, etc):
Office of Administrative Hearings Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center 1711 New Hope Church Road
Raleigh,NC 27699-6714 Raleigh,NC 27609-6285
One(1)copy of the petition must also be served to DEQ:
Bill Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Resources under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act. If you have any questions,please telephone Robb Mairs in the DWR Wilmington Regional
Office at 910.796.7303 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
DoouSignad 6y
E3ABA14AC7DC434...

"DocuSign Envelope ID:9BE9212B-2CAD-46F9-9643-B87791614FAB
Morella Sanchez King,Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Water Resources,NCDEQ
Enclosures: GC 4139
Cc: Bob Zarzecki, Soil and Environmental Consultants,PA,EC
Rachel Capito,USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office,EC
DWR 401 &Buffer Permitting Branch file-LF
WiRO

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS pe ,
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
7
' MAY 01 �Action Id. SAW-2019-02132 County: Onslow U.S.G.S.Quad:NC-Richlands
BY•
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Applicant: 24 East Development,LLC Agent: S&EC
Leon Ward Sylvester III Bob Zarzecki
PO Box 295 8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Richlands,NC 28574 Suite 104
Raleigh,NC 27615
Size(acres) 14.32 Nearest Town Jacksonville
Nearest Waterway New River River Basin Onslow Bay
USGS HUC 03020302 Coordinates Latitude: 34.890957
Longitude: -77.548469
Location description:Project area is located northwest of the intersection of Richlands Highway and Koonce Fork Road in
Richlands,Onslow County,North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the permanent discharge of 894 linear feet of fill
material into an intermittent stream for the construction of commercial outparcels.An additional 0.005 acres of open water
ditch will also be impacted for the construction of a road.The flow from the onsite wetland will be rerouted,but still
directed to downstream waters offsite and into the New River.
Applicable Law(s): ❑X Section 404(Clean Water Act,33 USC 1344)
❑Section 10(Rivers and Harbors Act,33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 39.Commercial and Institutional Developments
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions,your application signed and dated 2/14/2020,and the enclosed plans Wetland Impacts dated 1/20/2020.Any violation
of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order,a restoration
order,a Class I administrative penalty,and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended,revoked,or is modified,such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit,activities which have commenced(i.e.,are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit,will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration,modification or revocation,unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify,suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources(telephone [phone])to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act(CAMA),prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C.Division of Coastal Management in Wilmington,NC,at(910)796-7215.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification,any of the conditions of the Permit,or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Regulatory Specialist,Rachel Capito,(910)-251-4487 or Rachel.A.Capito(a,usace.army.mil.
Digitally signed by
SUGG.MICKEY.T.1229800830 SUGG.MICKEY.T.1229800830
Regulatory Chief Wilmington Field Office,Mickey Sugg: Date:2020.04.201h0839-04.00' Date: 4/20/2020
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022

Action ID Number: SAW-2019-02132 County: Onslow
Permittee: 24 East Development,LLC,Leon Ward Sylvester III
Project Name: Sylvester Development
Date Verification Issued: 4/20/2020
Chief Wilmington Field Office: Rachel Capito
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Rachel Capito
Wilmington Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington,North Carolina 28403
or
[e-mail]
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

14
i =8
m aq
0
a3$
S5 '
W 5
I I
W
I
Ili
� V2
fit 4
L i
§::: t, ,,\,1_j
1 J
�G , LL______i___......t___t1
F1 ill \,\' - sr
;y, ::,
W
I:: l:-—i A I.
i.
� 0;
I 8 �Msgt ' i' IN
■o„raw sr. _ }
E 56$ �i \ Ni .11 i
f 1
1
- to Ls) '
1' 1
1
' i
U U U U U -'--- ' ,
Q Q Q Q Q 1 '/' I -I
0 o 0 0 0 IT
.. tLLLLL It b '.yd 10 ,I ! ::,I.:'1;
ij J J J ..J J Y' Et % 1 I y
�� � � � � E ii ill 1
t1 Ni
• �� 1 W 1'>
li
o . vas —•— �
' i
l'Rl
Js c 8 @ al b �!
— 1' _ 411;
__Dc _ i ,
D+
—~' ! 1 !
/ m V1 R as i $$ri
, c . g a CD if , I,
La I
----------------
/ ,
Z o ix N 1j �� -~ j II ig S
LJJ < N 1 l•� ,
if
i 1= r �-J ��, ti
.` _ ,;
H O v O ¢ '��+. �_-� r f i"
V > r Z 'ter. `- ��.EL
iE. I ,(j,. t _�
2 i-' E H N i 'mr raa' - - A }. rn
I- h" nc 1 III i cir7j1$ 3 _ o
a'., E.2
ss a e OU i --_.• °i
i i— l

IF
ic„ . ..
„ \
.6 ill
...
_ ' I I , I e
I II ,
. `. ° 1 I 1 I w a,g
I {; V 1 1 11 it I ' \\ \ I 1 `1 i 2 w
A 11I. I I . q I I 4 1 rn
fl" \ '� ' WLLag \ !!� 1
1 \ j � SgaRg gm II I ,' I I I Sa
S s Ey ao� 11 , 1
0. h \
rt 1 \ u1, 11i
1'\ ` I I \- n r II
IIi I! ' I •�
vy j 'v i III ::
I 1 I,W IU=ern , ttl
,,z.„.,,, , Mit---------7-41111Cir, I 1',1-.--Q--, I
I 1s $�' ire
I Vl i i1 I I
�_ I.. 1 I 1 /, 1 W
ii \ CD
r� y�,� j i I
I � I
I I
\\ ® I 1 8 1 :! r 1
' I j
po N 1 i ?1?TitTh4
/ f I U Ij
I I rI I 11 I
1 _� 1 1 I 1 1 i
jilop
vV 7:- 1 it f 1 ., j
�\ \ i 1il 1yg I j
\` \ ff �i1,1F\ � 7)//fiii, "
�r11111 �'\ \a . ,� 'II '1 I I r 1 � ,
1 � j
•
hillil
cr. keg•�J/.•1 Se LL p 1 N� 11 1 ii :'
'ti 1,„• aNv v\`.\`---,— 1 ' i i rl 1 !I I, 1 1111 ; � /1/ II Ii 'iII '
a5' it 4 �1 'I 1 1 I HI1 li '1 j
�,}'` _ _ 114 I:
, ` oM ES R e !t � _"�`_� if i`,�'11�II I f i 1Ili 1 I, 4 ,;s
1
1 I I d -\•, -.' I I I i 1 I 1 I
1 1 i I , -' f I1 1 I j
J p 71 / r I ' 1 I
1 p I 1 f I� I , 1 i
W � � j ii 1 , p�o, .� / I 1 1 fl 1 /f Ill 1 'i ,
N I ( o�q1� 1 / I f i 'I li I
2 U , 1 I I .,11 d i� ,
U W °t Z Q f 1 1 ; I gat/
r I 11 I I r �--
Q � � _ / , ! I �� (11 Ij // 1 I 1
CI W *k r j / y� I i Iar ; i ,t , , J1
Oa N - 1 I'•�1,fIN ' 1
W m } w ` '�'__, sI I Ir11j1 �; 1 ' I
f
U E Z 11 .,.E -<>:. i 1�I�;:i r , i I
„w -�- I i, 1j
v �_ti`1
f
0 I , , 1
' ,17q/ �oo)I -_- I _ - —

1 "s
/� :: �1 �\ o�N�, \vv Ii w Sao
/ \ \� m �j \ �F.m! II I w wn
/ �V= Q \ Vme �+ II CB-7= 2 va
o tD u
/ [1I
am, ,, a 1-J \� St ~ 1\ �to
M
r
SiT ` \ \\ 1 8 z
f U�J I \ l �a
F_-
\ 1 i
1.
�— — ., ►il 1 1 I I Ili „§ \\:t.4 jit‘ :g ' ` -
•
• v i.I
vlr , �y�1,11
� ,\iit 1\ \ 1J h C.3
\ Ir l' I \•
1
``,;f Iaa am:yo \;' I '\ cF o �,N w
> > > III ,,r I.... .//:,,,,;(ili,://..:
a 111� I •\1:04.4.'
2 cc
�, a I4 if 1
::,1
/ ' > > a > a .�
';('/ / > A > >>> dell { \ :II
; cts
I , ✓ \> > a > /I> . \\ 1 Im
4� > > .3
/> I I I 1 i
,:
III r g:,1 (i f i• ,z b � i p� 51 I I I 11 I a
it 1 > > > a �1 �!I 1 , I II
111°111i o f.>1 � 4 i r I �® ii
gg Y.
$ gS 1 > >\l> > > a BU , I II. •I
I a 8 1 > > >> > S11. a8 I //
�l ',� IIIMINIL
*s�log > a > ' >> > > a > AV- ,`` II i/MRI anandpOL '..S i! �.".
1 .1 > a a tj h I
1 1 WOODS\ > > >1> > > > 1 !. I \
rg ' . \
al 1
- �� > > > > e i I, z Ldd?LLS QSSbdOXd �. I 1
Oa i
a ®
/ . 1
,� / ram + ' \` •
1 "Pfl
l!
b 4p:
•
,/ I
i
m_d-••F
/ s \ aF°po•W , \ 4 I> i�
''.>‘----- 1 ill ',.,,
I \ �� \ � � JI
z // !!!!IIJ
I 7-1
i .
I\L ` IZN Pg IQ 1A •,� , / 1� •
N NJ — $° g Ititi� `. 1cO- a _ \oN
%L-L. w t-y >_-8 ,.!-I Eft---11
u.l O J I n e • tie-
1
I .

Hall, Christine
From: Hall, Christine
Sent: Wednesday, February 10,2021 1:34 PM
To: William Daniel
Cc: Bart McClain
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Farms--stormwater permit
Thanks for the email. I was working my way up to responding to you after receiving Annette's email. I'll be happy to
discuss this. I'm available anytime tomorrow between 9 and 3. i will hopefully be teleworking and will not have access
to the file, but I'm hoping the exhibits provided in these emails should be sufficient to facilitate our discussion.
In the meantime, I can provide our concerns regarding the equal or better proposal:
1. The area in question is partially listed as"offsite DA non-contributing to pond" and partially"offsite DA to
pond" so this development has limited control over this area.
2. If the project area is revised to include this as onsite project area, it is not likely to be developed anyways due to
its location between the surface waters and the stream.
3. This area is already not allocated any BUA.
I'm just not seeing how this proposal will add much, if anything,to offset the untreated BUA. The explanation provided
also calls the drainage area delineation into question. The recent emails note that this area has a non-jurisdictional
feature so I don't understand how a portion of this area is included in the pond drainage area when the runoff from this
offsite area appears to be intercepted by the surface waters or this jurisdictional feature.
As for the proposal to proceed with permitting additional impacts,that is still an option. In order to proceed with that
option,you will need to submit the revised impacts application or other good-faith documentation showing that you
have started that process.
I hope this helps. Please let me know what time you'd like to talk tomorrow.
Christine Hall, PE
Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 910 796 7215
Direct: 910 796 7339 *`'Please note the chsnge to my directahcne number**
Email: christine.hai':' ncdenr.gc l
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
fo an 'fioin this 2LC:f'C.r :..the
ras Law np!_ i!• ;r?i'..a.: third parties.
From:William Daniel [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:29 PM
To: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>
1

Cc: Bart McClain <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Sylvester Farms--stormwater permit
CAUTION:External email.Do not ckck rmiks or open attachments unless you liargy.'Send all suspicious email as an aRsclinwt
Report Spam.
Hi Christine,
It appears that we have exhausted all options to intercept and treat a sufficient amount of off-site BUA to fully off-set
the total BUA of the project,and therefore we cannot provide the documentation that you need to allow the BUA of the
street to encroach into the vegetated setback of the remaining intermittent stream on the site based on providing
interception and treatment of 100%of the BUA of the project.
We prepared the attached 2-page exhibit (Sylvester Development Vegetated Setback Replacement 020521) and e-mail
proposing an easement to establish additional permanently protected vegetated setback as a means to mitigate the
encroachment of the BUA within the existing vegetated setback. I sent this to you and Annette this past week. I
understand from Annette's latest e-mail that you have reviewed this and that you have some concerns about it
meeting the "equal or better" provision in the rules. We would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss
this proposal and your concerns in a phone call.
Our preference (and hope) is that the proposed dedication of additional permanently protected vegetated
setback in combination with the fact that the BUA that would be located within the existing vegetated setback
is entirely contributory to the SCM for the project, will be regarded as meeting the equal or better provision of
the rules and that you will see fit to issue the stormwater permit for Sylvester Farms on that basis. However, if
for some reason you determine that you cannot approve the stormwater permit based on this proposal, it
appears that we would be back to the option that you suggested in our phone conversation of several days ago—i.e:
pursue a permit for impacting additional intermittent stream such that the BUA of the street will not be located within
the vegetated setback of the remaining intermittent stream.
That option seemed counterintuitive to me, but having fully explored the alternative options, and having gained a
greater appreciation of the complexities involved with those alternative options, I can now see why you suggested it.
In our phone conversation with you and Ted the other day,we discussed a way to allow the stormwater permit for
Sylvester Farms to be issued based on our providing to you confirmation that we are pursuing the permit for the stream
impacts necessary to resolve the issue of BUA being located within the vegetated setback. We have prepared impact
maps (copy attached for reference)and our consultant is in the process of preparing the necessary applications to DEQ
and ACOE. It is our understanding that the applications cannot be submitted under the 2021 NWP until March 15tn
Would a firm written commitment by the developer and his engineer to apply for that permit to DEQ and ACOE and to
diligently pursue the permitting process, provide the assurances that you would need to issue the stormwater permit for
Sylvester Farms and initiate review of the stormwater permit application for Tractor Supply that has obtained site plan
approval for construction on one of the outparcels within Sylvester Farms?
We would greatly appreciate an opportunity to discuss this matter with you by phone so that we can identify a way to
move forward with this project.
Would you be willing and available to participate in such a call sometime tomorrow?
Bill Daniel
William G. Daniel &Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
2

Hall, Christine
From: Lucas,Annette
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 4:07 PM
To: William Daniel
Cc: Vinson,Toby; Hall, Christine; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail]); Kevin Martin
([e-mail]); Bart McClain; Ely Perry([e-mail])
Subject: RE: [External] FW: Sylvester Farms Stormwater Permit--BUA within vegetated setback
(Richlands, NC)
Daniel,
I have not had the opportunity to review the proposal, but Christine and Corey have and they have some
concerns about it meeting the "equal or better" provision in the rules.
Christine will follow up with you and will resume her role as the lead DEMLR staff member on this project.
Thanks,
Annette
Annette Lucas, PE
Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: annette.lucasencdenr.aov
Web site: dea.nc.aov/SW
Physical Address: 512 North Salisbury Street, Office 640L, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing Address: 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
1:1E g!,
this address is subject to the
rid may be disclosed r0 Mari parries
Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19,the Department of Environmental Quality has
adjusted operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or
are on staggered shifts.To accommodate these staffing changes,all DEQ office locations are limiting public access to
appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices,as we may be able to handle your
requests by phone or email.We appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this challenging
time.
i

From: William Daniel<[e-mail]>
Sent:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 3:33 PM
To: Lucas, Annette<[e-mail]>
Cc:Vinson,Toby<[e-mail]>; Hall, Christine<[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Kevin Martin ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Bart
McClain<[e-mail]>; Ely Perry([e-mail])<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] FW:Sylvester Farms Stormwater Permit--BUA within vegetated setback(Richlands, NC)
CAUTION:Extern&ernad.Do not deck fmks or open 8111KtIfftelts unless you verify.Send alb suspiam email as an attationent to
Report Sparn,
Hi Annette,
I am just checking back with you to see if you have been able to look over the exhibit that I sent you on Friday, and to
identify a time when we could discuss the proposal via Zoom or Teams.
Timing is extremely crucial to both our client and those entities who have entered into purchase agreements within the
project,and we badly need to resolve this situation.
I look forward to your response.
Thanks,
Bill
Bill Daniel
William G. Daniel&Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
From:William Daniel
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 10:18 AM
To: Lucas,Annette<[e-mail]>
Cc: Hall, Christine<[e-mail]>; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Kevin
Martin ([e-mail])<kmartint )sandec.com>; Bart McClain<[e-mail]>; Ely Perry
([e-mail])<[e-mail]>
Subject:Sylvester Farms Stormwater Permit--BUA within vegetated setback(Richlands, NC)
Hi again Annette,
Thank you for your time and attention to date. You have been responsive and generous with your time. We appreciate
that.
Based on our past exchanges, it appears that there are possible options to overcome the problem of having built-upon
area within the 50'vegetated setback of the remaining intermittent stream on the site. Our team has evaluated these
options described below:
1. Intercepting and treating a sufficient area of off-site BUA to fully off-set the non-treated BUA of the project—thereby
satisfying the spirit and purpose of the provision of the regulations requiring 100%of the BUA
within the project to be treated as a condition of allowing BUA to be located within a vegetated setback
2. Applying for and obtaining a permit to impact additional segments of the existing stream—thereby eliminating the
vegetated setback from the area of the proposed street.
2

3. Identifying a method of providing equivalent or better protection of the waters of the State—thereby justifying the
placement of BUA within a portion of the vegetated setback..
We have concluded that we simply cannot intercept a sufficient area of off-site BUA to fully off-set the area of BUA
within the project that is currently not contributory to the SCM of the project. As a result,the first option listed above
will not work.
We have wrestled with the prospect of obtaining a permit for impacting additional length of stream, but we have
concluded that the probability of obtaining such a permit is low due to the fact that the only justification for the impact
would be to eliminate the vegetated setback associated with the stream. We would not be able to document physical
factors that require the impacts to the stream—especially since we have already proven (as part of the 404 permit for
the previously permitted impacts)that the street can be built in its proposed location without impacting more of the
stream than we have already impacted in conformity to the permits that have already been obtained. For these
reasons,we feel that the second option described above would be highly improbable.
That leaves us with the third option—identifying a method to achieve equivalent or better protection of the waters of
the State. We think that we have identified such a method. Essentially,this option would involve dedicating additional
vegetated setback area along a conveyance(in this case,a jurisdictional ditch)that is contributory to the stream of
concern. We have identified a potential area of additional vegetated setback that is twice as large as the area of the
proposed BUA within the existing vegetated setback. Attached is a 2-page PDF depicting the proposed additional
vegetated setback.
We would very much appreciate the opportunity to discuss this option with you and Christine at your first
opportunity. Would you please let me know of your availability to discuss this option in a TEAMS or ZOOM session with
Bob Zarzecki, Kevin Martin,and myself?
I would appreciate your consideration and I look forward to hearing from you.
Bill Daniel
William G. Daniel&Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road, Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
3

Hall, Christine
From: William Daniel <[e-mail]>
Sent Monday, February 1, 2021 4:16 PM
To: Lucas,Annette
Cc: Hall, Christine; Kevin Martin ([e-mail]); Bob Zarzecki
([e-mail]); Bart McClain; Ely Perry([e-mail]);Anen, Steven C
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Farms Stormwater(BUA within vegetated setback)
CAUTION:External snail.Dia not ctE Finks or open dents unless you vent.Send all susp6rious email as an attachment to
Repqrt Spam.
Thank you,Annette. It seems that we have thoroughly pursued the equivalent area method and we just can't make that
work.
I will get back with Christine to follow-up and pursue the other options that she and I discussed.
Take care,
Bill
Bill Daniel
William G.Daniel&Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
From: Lucas,Annette<[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 3:22 PM
To:William Daniel <[e-mail]>
Cc: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>; Kevin Martin ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Bob
Zarzecki ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Bart McClain<[e-mail]>; Ely Perry
([e-mail])<[e-mail]>;Anen,Steven C<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External]Sylvester Farms Stormwater(BUA within vegetated setback)
Good afternoon Daniel,
The BUA associated with the turn lanes is part of the common plan of development for Sylvester Forms. In
other words, that BUA fails to meet the requirements of 15A NCAC 02H .1001(c)(iii) to be excluded from the
Post-Construction stormwater rules (see highlighting below).
We have consistently implemented the program this way and we also consulted with our general counsel to
ensure that our interpretation of our rules is correct.
Please let me know if you have further questions.
Sincerely,
Annette
i

Annette Lucas, PE
Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: annette.lucas(rD.ncdenr.gov
Web site: deq.nc.gov/SW
Physical Address: 512 North Salisbury Street, Office 640L, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing Address: 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Et
Email correspor dan^e io arc'from `!l:s adt:ass is tha
North Carolina Put';Reco ds Lew and riay ba dis�.'osed lo third parties
Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19,the Department of Environmental Quality has
adjusted operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or
are on staggered shifts.To accommodate these staffing changes, all DEQ office locations are limiting public access to
appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices, as we may be able to handle your
requests by phone or email. We appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this challenging
time.
From:William Daniel <bdanielPwmgda.com>
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 12:33 PM
To: Lucas,Annette<[e-mail]>
Cc: Hall,Christine<[e-mail]>; Kevin Martin ([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Bob
Zarzecki (bzarzecki(c SandEC.com)<[e-mail]>; Bart McClain <[e-mail]>; Ely Perry
([e-mail])<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Sylvester Farms Stormwater(BUA within vegetated setback)
CAUTION:Exterral email.Do not dick links or open attachments unLss you..'artfy Send al suspicious email as an attachment to
RcportSpam.
Hi Annette,
Thank you and Christine for your time and efforts this past week in responding to Kevin's e-mails regarding the stormwater
permitting review for Sylvester Farms. I also appreciate your suggestion of a possible method of moving forward. Obviously,
we are beyond eager to pursue any avenue that is available to us to resolve this matter so that the stormwater permit can be
issued and the developer can proceed with the project to meet his contractual time-critical obligations to the end users who
have contracted to purchase the sites within the development.
In your e-mail to Kevin of this past Friday,you indicated that one option is to treat"an equivalent amount of offsite BUA
runoff to offset the BUA on the development(including the additional ROW)that is not being treated". We want to pursue
2

this suggestion. However,toward this end,there are a few factors and parameters that require some discussion and
clarification of interpretation. I have listed those below in hopes that you can provide the guidance and answers that I need
to properly provide the information and responses that your staff needs to complete its review for the permitting. I
apologize for my confusion regarding some of the overlapping regulations, but frankly, it appears that there is
ambiguity regarding interpretation. I hope that you will be willing to address the following items:
1. The BUA that you refer to within the R/W is attributable to the addition of turn lanes on NC-24 as required by NCDOT.
a. From a regulatory standpoint,we did not include the BUA attributable to the improvements on NC-24 in the
stormwater permit application for Sylvester Farms. We regarded these roadway improvements within the
NCDOT R/W that were required, reviewed,and approved by NCDOT as being an off-site linear public
improvement rather than being a part of the development project. It is our understanding that in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02H .1001(1)(c),the requirements of this section would not be applicable to this
linear improvement. For ease of reference,an excerpt of the applicable sections of the code is appended to the
bottom of this e-mail.
b. Due to physical constraints specific to the roadway project, feasible stormwater management measures were
limited to the Construction and Erosion and Sediment Control Mechanisms listed in the NCDOT Stormwater Best
Management Practices Toolbox. These constraints include the fact that the roadside ditch along NC-24 is, in
fact,the receiving conveyance for the stormwater runoff from the abutting project. The roadside ditch is at a
lower elevation than the abutting property that comprises the Sylvester development project. The slope of the
roadside ditch is very flat,and the available area of existing R/W is insufficient to accommodate permanent
BMPs within the R/W even if such measures were not precluded by the slope of the ditch. It would be
physically impossible to collect the runoff from the required improvements within the R/W of NC-24, and route it
through an SCM located outside of the R/W that would necessarily then discharge into this same existing
roadside ditch. Due to these described conditions,the only measures that were available to us for stormwater
management for the work within the NCDOT R/W were those elements from the NCDOT Toolbox such as
maximization of shoulder width, erosion control measures and revegetation.
2. Our current stormwater collection and treatment system for the Sylvester Farms project was designed to intercept
runoff from as much of the existing off-site impervious area within the R/Ws of Sylvester Street and Koonce Fork Road as we
deemed practical at the time of design. As you have observed,the area of the off-site BUA that is being intercepted and
routed to the project's SCM as the project is currently designed is slightly less than the BUA area within the project limits that
is non-contributory to the SCM. In investigating ways to intercept additional off-site BUA to achieve treatment of BUA
equivalent to the BUA of the project,we have determined that by adding a roadside ditch along the south side of Sylvester
Street, we can intercept runoff from additional BUA(the existing gravel road)within the R/W of Sylvester Street west of the
proposed street connection to Sylvester Street. The amount of additional off-site BUA that can be intercepted and routed to
the SCM in this manner is 2,510 s.f. A PDF is attached of an exhibit depicting and identifying the on-site and off-site BUA of
the project. Interception of the additional off-site BUA results in the total area of BUA treated by the SCM exceeding the total
area of on-site BUA proposed within the project boundary by approximately 1,868 s.f.
My hope is that you will regard the stormwater management configuration and measures described in this e-mail as an
acceptable alternative that will provide equal or better protection of water quality per 15A NCAC 02H .1003(6).
I would greatly appreciate your consideration in this matter and I look forward to your response.
Take care,
Bill Daniel
Wm.G. Daniel&Assoc.,P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Rd,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 office
919-413-7477 cell
3

Excerpt from 15A NCAC(for ease of reference)
15A NCAC 02H .1001 POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this Section is to protect surface waters and aquatic resources from the adverse impacts of stormwater runoff
from development activities.
(1) APPLICABILITY.This Section shall apply to development projects and major modifications of development projects
for residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional use that are subject to one or more of the post-
construction stormwater management programs listed in Item (2) of this Rule.This Section shall not apply to:
(a) [and management activities associated with agriculture or silviculture;
(b) activities of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)that are{SEP]regulated in accordance
with the provisions of NPDES Permit Number NC5000250;
(c) linear transportation projects undertaken by an entity other than the NCDOT when:
(i) the project is constructed to NCDOT standards and is in accordance with the NCDOT Stormwater Best
Management Practices Toolbox(Version 2,April 2014 Edition)which is herein incorporated by reference, including any
subsequent amendments and editions,and may be accessed at no cost
at https://connect.ncdot.Bov/resources/hydro/HSPDocuments/2014 BMP Toolbox.pdf;
(ii) upon completion,the project will be conveyed either to the NCDOT or another public entity and
will be regulated in accordance with that entity's NPDES MS4 stormwater permit; and
(iii) thf.,project is not part of a common o^!an of devetcam ent;.
Bill Daniel
William G.Daniel&Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
4

Hall, Christine
From: Kevin Martin <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday,January 29, 2021 4:39 PM
To: Lucas,Annette;William Daniel
Cc: Bob Zarzecki; Hall, Christine;Anen, Steven C;Vinson,Toby; Sams, Dan
Subject: [External] Sylvester Farms, Richlands--vegetated setback issue
CAUTION:Extern email,Do not click! la or open attachments uuniess you verity,Sent all suspedicus email as an attachment to
Report SAam,
Annette I am copying the project engineer (William Daniel)in on this email string so he can
answer some of your questions but It has been my understanding that linear projects such as
the improvements along an existing highway can be exempted if the NCDOT "toolbox" of
measures is employed to ensure sediment control and proper stormwater management during
construction.
Kevin C. Martin
Principal
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
[phone] Office Phone
[phone] Fax
[phone] Mobile
kmartinasandec.com
Visit us at SandEC.com!
This electronic communication,including all attachments,is in'ended only for the named addressee(s)and may contain confidential information. This electron;c
communication may not have passed through of standard review/quality control process. Design d to and recommendaticns included herein are provided as a
matt+'r of convenience and should not be used for fnjl design. Rely only on final.hardcopy materials beari;ig the consultant's original signature and seal. If you
are not the named addressee(s),any use.dissemiration,,i:stribution or copyinc of this cuinmun cati.n i4 prohibited. '`you lave rc,zeived this electronic
communication:a error,pease notify the sender by return e-mail and de:ate the original communication from your system. Thank you
From: Lucas,Annette [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday,January 29, 2021 4:02 PM
To: Kevin Martin <[e-mail]>
Cc: Bob Zarzecki<[e-mail]>; Hall,Christine <[e-mail]>;Anen,Steven C
<[e-mail]>; Vinson,Toby<[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External]Sylvester Farms, Richlands--vegetated setback issue
Kevin,
That was one option and the other (actually I believe I am the one who suggested this) is to treat an
equivalent amount of offsite BUA runoff to offset the BUA on the development (including the additional ROW)
that is not being treated.
Thanks,
Annette
1

r
From: Kevin Martin<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday,January 29, 2021 3:55 PM
To: Lucas,Annette<annette.lucas(a7ncdenr.gov>
Cc: Bob Zarzecki<[e-mail]>; Hall, Christine<[e-mail]>; Anen, Steven C
<[e-mail]>; Vinson,Toby<[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Sylvester Farms, Richlands--vegetated setback issue
CAUTION:External emaii_Do not click'Stinks or open attachments unless you verify.Sand all suspicious email-as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Also would you please send me the options Christine has shared? I have not seen them. I know
one option was to request filling more ditch/stream and if we were to make such a request to
DWR and the Corps we would have to use a justification that we have to to comply with the
states interpretation of their stormwater requirements. Which seems bizarre but I have done
that in Durham, not sure that will work here though
Kevin C. Martin
Principal
Soil & Environmental Consuitants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Fails of Neuse Roar', Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
•
(919) 846-5n0 Office PFone
[phone] Fax
[phone] Mobile
kmartin ansandec.com
Visit us at SandEC.com!
Thus electronic communication,including at;attachments,is intended only for thy_.iam=:d addressee(s;and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communi cation may not h,tire passed through our standard review/quality control proce_c.,. Desi;;:i data and recomm..atdations included herein are provided as a
matter of convenience and should not be used for final descgn. Rely only c:n f ai,hardcopy materials tr)_.ring the consultant's original signaure and seal. If you
are riot the r.amed addressee(s),any use,dissemination,distribution or copying of this communication is:prohibited. if you have received this electronic
communication in error,;please notify the sender by return a-mali and delet'the original communication from your system. thank you
From: Lucas,Annette [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday,January 29,2021 3:43 PM
To: Kevin Martin<[e-mail]>
Cc: Bob Zarzecki<bzarzeckiPsandec.com>; Hall,Christine <Chris:[e-mail]>;Anen,Steven C
<[e-mail]>; Vinson,Toby<[e-mail]>; Sams, Dan <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: [External] Sylvester Farms, Richlands--vegetated setback issue
Kevin,
Several of the stormwater program staff have reviewed the diagram and explanation that you
provided. While we sympathize with the challenges you face on this project, we do not
believe that the plan, as it currently stands, meets the requirements of § 143-214.7(b2)(2),
which allows BUA in the vegetated setback "provided the stormwater runoff from the entire
impervious area of the development is collected, treated, and discharged so that it passes
through a segment of the vegetative buffer."
2

The diagram that was provided does not include yellow shading on all of the road
improvements that are part of this development project. Stormwater runoff from these
impervious areas is not being collected and treated prior to discharge. I have circled in the
diagram below some of the areas where we are noting omissions.
1
/ `� /
: t i Ii•-•=7-1,,,,,ii..,.... ..0
.w P r
....., i -; ..7%.,„.141.4,14r46/1:
At ' aerr1� we _,-.+ �� 1 rti / .`'4 + emu__
N'5).j.,...7..!
W'".*•' AutoCAD RIX Text __
C R 25.00 r - 39.27' •-.-.-,_ =.•
. '-ji 4'. 411/ ' - --.'.V:1...'1.•••• -. -. _,..
1 I 4 ! tom_~-=•.--I- _ bIMP'' V~ •' P of T- -
-.7 ....._- - - Ilikihilk:--- -_,--- ;j--"7-::::ccia,,tilellikil: 1:7:Ti: -
-tr.' ,--_ - _---_— _ _. -______ , ___-_ -• ...__ _ -7.-
�• -• ♦'may+ ������ ti �`wc :). -
Illikiii
I /\-paw iti ,
Pbwcier D admege 1 "M +'' A
_......... ..
MTPCP1 L men
Christine has shared some of the options that would be compliant with the stormwater rules
and statutes. Your staff may be able to formulate additional options. We are glad to consider
alternatives that provide equal or better protection of water quality per 15A NCAC 02H
.1003(6).
Please let me know if you have questions.
Sincerely,
Annette
3

Annette Lucas, PE
Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: annette.lucas a ncdenr.gov
Web site: deq.nc.gov/SW
Physical Address: 512 North Salisbury Street, Office 640L, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing Address: 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Email corre ipcw: n;e to o`ld from ?:` Zd:eSS iS SUi^•,:'eC to the
North Carr;'i: a Pubi+•:Recor is L9 I and r°sc.^sed to third parti-s
Based on the current guidance to minimize the spread of COVID-19,the Department of Environmental Quality has
adjusted operations to protect the health and safety of the staff and public. Many employees are working remotely or
are on staggered shifts.To accommodate these staffing changes, all DEQ office locations are limiting public access to
appointments only. Please check with the appropriate staff before visiting our offices, as we may be able to handle your
requests by phone or email. We appreciate your patience as we continue to serve the public during this challenging
time.
From: Kevin Martin <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday,January 28, 2021 1:15 PM
To: Lucas,Annette<[e-mail]>
Cc: Bob Zarzecki<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Sylvester Farms, Richlands--vegetated setback issue
CAUTION:External email. Do not clink Conks or open attachments unless you verify_Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
depart Spam.
Annette exhibit attached with description by engineer below:
Specific areas of built-upon area are identified and labeled on the exhibit.
Within the boundaries of the parcels comprising the project, the development plans include
509,679 s.f. of impervious area. 113,686 s.f. of this impervious area is attributable to the
proposed streets, and of this area, 105,255 s.f. of impervious area is contributory to the
SCM. The street built-upon area that is contributory to the SCM is designated by the blue area
on the exhibit. The impervious area associated with the portions of the on-site proposed
streets that are not contributory to the SCM are those two areas at the street connections to
4

NC-24. These non-contributory street areas are designated as yellow on the exhibit. The area
of the non-contributory impervious area of the streets is 8,431 s.f.
All additional impervious area within the boundaries of the parcels comprising the project
proposed as part of the requested stormwater permit application are those areas allocated as
built-upon area for the individual lots created by the development. 100% of the proposed on-
site built-upon area within the lots that will created will be routed to SCMs for treatment.
In addition to the on-site areas that are contributory to the on-site SCM, two areas of off-site
built-upon area are contributory to the SCM. These two areas are shown in purple on the
attached exhibit for reference. The combined area of off-site contributory area is 7,075 s.f.
which is slightly less than the area of on-site built-upon area that is non-contributory to the
SCM.
Based on the built-upon area determinations as presented above, the total area of built-upon
area contributory to the project's SCM is 508,323 sf, or 99.73% of the total built-upon area
located within the boundaries of the parcels comprising the project
Kevin C. Martin
Principal
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27515
[phone] Office Phone
[phone] Fax
[phone] Mobile
kmartin(csandec.com
Visit Ls at SandEC.com!
This electronic communication,including all attachments,is intends only for tI n.med addressee(s)and may contain confidential l information. Trio electronic
c
communication may not have p assed through our st-rdnid isviewfquacty control process. ueci,on data ar.a recommendations included herein are provided as a
matter of convenience and ar,ould not be used;or final design. Rely ody or final.hardcopy materials oear'•i the con ulteni's original signature and seal. If you
are not th•-r named a;i,ressee(s),any use,d acem'rati• n,distributor or copyir.j of this commt n•c ticn'_s ps.,h ;'ted. you have received this eisctrcn c
:Omrnur..::cation in error,please notify the sesider by return e-mail and delete the original con nuric lion from you.;s •;tern Th iuk ycr;
5

Hall, Christine
From: Snider, Holley
Sent: Friday,January 22, 2021 12:22 PM
To: Hall, Christine
Subject: RE:Sylvester(Commercial) Development
Good day Christine,
Please call me at your convenience to discuss this project. I can be reached at 910-416-0290. Thanks in advance.
Sincerely,
Holley Snider ... ><((((°>•—•.,,..><((((°>.•—
Environmental Specialist II
Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Phone: [phone]
E1144:, )
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
c„?:'..'c:;;;raespcnder Lo r. from this a' dies.: .s subieci
Ak ti; Ca;c•Th a Plibiks, Records Law and n: y be disclosed to is u"parties
From: Hall, Christine<[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday,January 14, 20214:37 PM
To:Snider, Holley<[e-mail]>; Mairs, Robb L<[e-mail]>
Cc:Triantafillopoulos,Ted<[e-mail]>
Subject:Sylvester(Commercial) Development
Holley/Robb,
I'm not sure who is most familiar with this project in Onslow Co. (Ted has the SAW number but I don't have it in front of
me.) We are having a problem in that the proposed internal road is to be located within the 50'vegetated setback of
the stream. Their documentation shows that the stream impacts stop short and does not extend along the stream and
parallel road. 15A NCAC 02H.1003(4) prevents them from placing any BUA within the vegetated setback unless they
collect and treat the entire development,which they cannot do. The other problem is that they are fairly far along in
the process,started construction of the utilities,and are not looking to change the site layout. In order to proceed with
permitting, is it possible to extend the impacts along the stream such that they no longer need a vegetated setback?
We are open to ideas but this one seems a bit unusual. Thanks.
Christine Hall
Wilmington Regional Stormwater Program Supervisor
Division of Energy, Mineral and.Land Resources—State Stormwater Program
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 910 796 7215
Direct: 910 796 7333 -•"Ptease note t!"e^lunge to my direct phci7e nur..ten '-
Email: chrstine.hallancdenr.cov
Address: 127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
1

I\C\ r\ftco ir
Hall, Christine
From: William Daniel <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday,January 19, 2021 4:21 PM
To: Lucas,Annette
Cc: Hall, Christine; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail]); Kevin Martin
([e-mail]); Bart McClain; Ely Perry ([e-mail])
Subject: [External] RE:Sylvester Farms, Richlands--vegetated setback issue
Attachments: Sylvester Development Vegetated Setback Exhibit 011921.pdf; SAW-2019-02132.pdf;
20200248_Sylvester Development_Onslow_Apr.20.docx.pdf
ICAUTION:Ex ernai c Ana ii. Glo stint click Enks or open hn mts mess you venly.Send a#susp zic is email as an i',17-rachmett to
I Report 5r ra.
Hi again,Annette. I just realized that in my e-mail of earlier today, I mistakenly cited the 401 WQ#instead of the
Stormwater Permit Application#. The Stormwater Permit#is SW8 200502.
Please let me know if you anything else that we can provide.
Thanks you,
Bill
Bill Daniel
William G.Daniel&Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
From:William Daniel
Sent:Tuesday,January 19,2021 3:36 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; Bob Zarzecki ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Kevin Martin
([e-mail])<[e-mail]>; Bart McClain<[e-mail]>; Ely Perry([e-mail])
<[e-mail]>
Subject:Sylvester Farms, Richlands--vegetated setback issue
Hi Ms. Lucas,
My name is Bill Daniel. My firm is the design engineer for a development project in Richlands, N.C. I understand that
any"variations" to the vegetated setbacks go through your office, and Kevin Martin of S&EC recommended that I email
you to explain this situation that we have encountered.
The project is known as Sylvester Development(a.k.a. Sylvester Farms). It is located on the west side of US Hwy 258/NC
24 between Sylvester Street to the north and Koonce Fork Road to the south. An exhibit(2 pages) is attached for
reference. The situation is rather unusual and frankly,complicated.
Bob Zarzecki of S&EC has assisted us in the environmental permitting for the project. An initial assessment by the
USACE at the end of 2018 indicated their concurrence with S&EC's assessment that the conveyances on the site would
be classified as ditches and not streams.This was consistent with past determinations and permits issued to NCDOT for
improvements along NC24.A subsequent determination by DWR in April of 2020 classified the ditches as intermittent
1

streams. The USACE changed their determination to be consistent with DWR, but identified them as "low" quality,
eligible for a waiver for impacting greater than 300 If and would not require stream mitigation. Accordingly, a Section
404 permit and a 401 Water Quality Certification were issued for construction of a proposed roadway and lot fill on April
of 2020 (attached). The configuration of the proposed roadway with associated grading and impacts were depicted in
the applications for those permits, and the permittee was able to justify the size of the commercial lots and thereby
alignment of the road and associated impacts.
In April of 2020,we applied for a stormwater permit from DEQ(DWR#2020-0248). Due to Covid restrictions and
apparent heavy workload, DEQ's review cycles have been prolonged. Currently,the only unresolved comment for that
permit relates to the configuration of the vegetated setback along the remaining portions of non-impacted intermittent
stream on the site. The configuration of the vegetated setback associated with the non-impacted portions of the
intermittent stream was not delineated on the exhibits accompanying the permit applications and the permits. Our
assumption—which we think is only logical, is that the configuration of the vegetated setback applicable to the
remaining intermittent stream on the site would be delineated to reflect the configuration of the built-upon area for
which the USACE& DWR permits were issued. This would, in my opinion, be analogous to the way riparian buffers are
delineated for remaining buffer-applicable streams in regulated basins. I realize that riparian buffers and vegetated
setbacks are quite different, but it seems to me that the principles governing post-impact delineation should be
consistent.
The permit supervisor for the project,Christine Hall (copied on this email), does not concur with the above described
interpretation regarding delineation of the vegetated setbacks. Her interpretation, as understand it, is that the
vegetated setback would be applicable (without modification of shape or configuration)to all portions of remaining
intermittent stream on the site. We pointed out in our discussions with Christine that all of the runoff from the built-
upon area within 50'for the remaining stream will be collected and routed through the SCM for the project. We
inquired about the applicability of an exemption of built-upon area in accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .1003(4)(c) and/or
02H .1003(6). She has indicated that an exemption under 15A NCAC 02H .1003(4)(c)and/or 02H .1003(6)to allow built-
upon area within the vegetated setback would be applicable only if absolutely 100%of the built-upon area of the entire
project is collected and treated via approved SCMs. Even though the vast majority of the built-upon area of the project
(including all built-upon area located within 50'of the remaining portions of intermittent stream)will be collected,
routed to,and treated via SCMs;very small portions of impervious area—such as at intersection tie-ins with the existing
abutting roadways—will unavoidably not be contributory to the SCMs, and therefore the 100%criteria cited by Christine
cannot be met for the project. It seems that there should be some latitude for application of judgement regarding this
provision. We would like to ask for your opinion regarding this, and the process of obtaining a "variation" as allowed for
under 15A NCAC 02H .1003(4)(c) and/or 02H .1003(6) .
Other than relocating the proposed roadway to avoid the vegetated setbacks associated with the remaining intermittent
stream on the site, which Is not possible for the reasons described below, Christine has indicated that the only option
she knows of is for the developer to obtain permits for additional stream impacts such that the vegetated setback
associated with the remaining intermittent stream would be outside of the proposed built-upon area of the
roadway. This approach is problematic for several reasons:
• First and most significantly, it seems totally counter to the intention and purpose of the stormwater
regulations. The design of the roadway and its associated stream impacts was prepared to minimize the length
of streams and areas of vegetated setbacks that would be impacted. The suggested additional impacts would
result in the unnecessary loss of 363 I.f. of intermittent stream and 36,964 s.f. of regulatory vegetated setback—
as delineated on the attached exhibit.
• The plans for which the 404 and 401 permits were issued document that the roadway can, in fact, be
constructed without additional stream impacts—copies of the 404 and 401 are attached for reference. As such,
we see no credible way of claiming that additional impacts are now necessary when the plans have not changed.
• The proposed roadway cannot be relocated to avoid the vegetated setbacks due to a number of factors:
o The connection point to US HWY 256/NC 24 is required to align with the existing driveway for an existing
school on the opposite side of US 258/NC 24. This has been designated by NCDOT as a signalized
intersection and the developer has been required to design and install the signal.
2

o An area of existing wetlands is located just to the west of the alignment of Proposed Street#1 thereby
prohibiting a shift of Proposed Street#1 to the west.
o The required vehicle queuing distance within Proposed Street#2 between the intersection with NC 24
and Proposed Street#1 precludes the shifting of Proposed Road#1 to the east.
o The storm collection system has been installed and the waterlines within the street have been installed
in conformity to permits issued by ONWASA.
I am writing to request a conference call or virtual meeting to discuss this matter in hopes that you can provide guidance
that will assist us in resolving this matter.
Specifically,we would like to know:
1. Is there flexibility regarding interpretation of the exemption criteria of 15A NCAC 02H .1003(4)(c)or.1003(6)
such that the proposed roadway could be treated as an allowable exemption?
2. Can the configuration of the vegetated setback from a remaining intermittent stream be interpreted so as to
reflect the configuration of the built-upon area for which stream impacts have been issued?
I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss this matter with you. Would you be available for and willing to
participate in a conference call or virtual meeting to discuss this matter in the near future?
Your consideration would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Bill Daniel
William G. Daniel &Associates, P.A.
1150 S.E. Maynard Road,Suite 260
Cary, NC 27511
919-467-9708 OF.
919-413-7477 CELL
3

William G. Daniel & Associates Letter of
Engineering•Planning•Site Design Transmittal
TO: NCDEQ-Stormwater DATE: 10/28/2020
Att:Ted Triantis
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington NC 28405 910-796-7215 ii PROJECT: Sylvester Development Proj.#SW8 200502 �.
Please find the following items
Transmitted by: EFax Fax Number: Pages:
Mail Pick-Up Delivered EOvemight Fed Ex Ground
For your: 0Approval Information 0Use Records Distribution
Review&Comment
1
Copies Revision date Description
2 10/27/2020 Revised sets of project plans(24x36)
2 10/27/2020 24X36 Color drainage area plans(4 sheets in each set)
2 Stormwater Permit Apps with page 3 revised.Yoou have original signature pages
2 10/28/2020 Stormwater booklet.
1 Supplmental Form Original
1 Written responses tO comments
1 CD with all above
REMARKS: Mr.Triantis,
I have added blowup grading sheets to the plans.This is why the plans are
being resubmitted.I have also replaced the supplemtal form,pond design calc
sheet,and exhibits in stormbook.This is why the stormbook is being resubmitted.
I have included all requested information.Please let me know if you have any questions.
Work has begun on the site and the stormwater permit is greatly needed.
Thanks for your help. Sincerely,
COPIES TO: file BY: Bart McClain
[e-mail]
1150 S.E.Maynard Road,Suite 260,Cary,N.C. 27511 • [phone] • Fax [phone]

WmGDA RESPONSES BELOW IN RED.
October 20,2020
Via email only:[e-mail]
Perry Management,Inc. (Developer)
Attn: Ely Perry III- President
PO Box 1475
Kinston, NC,28503
And:
Via email only:[e-mail]
24 East Development, LLC (Property Owner)
Attn: Leon Ward Sylvester III-Managing Member
108 W Franck Street
Richlands,NC,28574
And: flECEIVE
Via email only:[e-mail] OCT 2 9 2020
Sylvester Farm Investments,LLC (Property Owner) BY'
Attn: Leon Ward Sylvester III- Managing Member
108 W Franck Street
Richlands,NC, 28574
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No.SW8 200502
Sylvester Development
Onslow County
Dear Mr.Perry III:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a State Stormwater Management Permit Application for the
subject project on May 1,2020 with additional information requested on July 10, 2020 and received on July 27,
2020.A preliminary in-depth review of that information has determined that the application is not complete and
that additional information is needed.To continue the review,please provide the following additional information
in a single,hard copy submittal package:
1. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(a)(iv):
a.The information presented in the drainage area section of the supplement is still not consistent
with Section IV.10 of the application.The entire site column of the Drainage area section of the
supplement is proposing additional roadways and includes a future that isn't shown on Section
IV.10 of the application.The additional improvements proposed outside of the pond drainage
area that cannot be collected and treated in the pond should be documented in additional drainage
areas in Section IV.10 of the application.Please confirm that the resulting drainage areas and
built-upon areas are presented consistently between the application documents.
Areas shown in the supplement and Section IV.10 of the application have been redone to match. Section 9 of the
application has been changed to 2 drainage areas and Drainage Area#2 representing the area outside of the pond
contributory area has been added to Section IV.10.Drainage areas 1&2 combine to make the entire 33.37 project
area.Application and supplement are now consistent with each other.

b.It is still unclear why the proposed deed restriction allocations,Section IV.10 of the application
and the drainage area section of the supplement are showing inconsistent numbers for the
impervious square footage proposed.Please explain why Section IV.10 of the application shows
113,149 sf of BUA offsite but the deed restrictions show only Lot 4 offsite with 112,385 sf of
BUA.Please confirm the information is presented consistently or,explain why these numbers are
inconsistent.
The deed restriction is for on-site and off-site BUA contributory to the pond and does not include the proposed
764sf of BUA located within the Sylvester Street Public R/W.The deed restriction is just for the BUA that will be
developed on the future BUA that will be located on off-site area#4(112,385 sf).The two added
112,385+764=113,149.
State Stormwater Permit No.SW8 200502
Page 2 of 3
2. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(iii)and.1003(4): It appears that proposed Street 1 may be within the
required 50'vegetated setback.The vegetated setback is to remain vegetated.Please confirm that the street is out
of this 50'setback and that all the rules for vegetated setbacks are being met.
The portion of channel between the western limit of the Street 1 and the western ROW of NC-24 was eliminated as
part of Permit SAW-2019-02132. Our plans show the remaining portion of channel(west and north of Street 1)
with the associated 50'vegetated setback.
3.15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(iv): Please provide more proposed contours and drainage patterns along the
drainage divides to support the proposed drainage area to the pond.Extra elevations and/or spot elevations at the
drainage divides as well as contour labels on sheet CS-8 would be helpful.
Recommendation:In the case where the contour interval on a "topographic"map is too large to
adequately reflect the existing and proposed drainage patterns of a relatively flat property,spot
elevations and/or a site-specific elevation survey may be needed.
Both proposed and existing contours are at 1 foot intervals.Additional contour labels have been added to the overall
grading sheet and the two additional 50 scale blowup sheets. Please note that the grading depicted on the proposed
lots is of an interim nature. All BUA resulting from the development of these lots will be collected and made
contributory to the SCM.
4.15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(g)(iv),.1042(3)(b),and.1050(1)to support.1042(2)(a)(iv): Please provide 2 full size
copies of a signed,sealed,and dated drainage area map supporting the identified drainage areas and associated
built-upon areas presented in the application documents.The current copies are small and hard to read.
Two(2) copies of the color drainage area maps have been included separately.One overall showing areas non-
contributory to the pond and 3 plans contributory to the pond(1 overall and 2 blowups)for clarity.
5. 15A NCAC 02H.1050(11) and (12) and.1053(3):As requested in item 19 of the previous request for additional
information,please confirm that the information presented on page 5 of the operation and maintenance agreement
is presented consistently with the intended design.The main pond and forebay sediment top and bottom
elevations appear to be inconsistent with the rest of the design.Please send in a revised page 5 of the O&M
separate from the stormwater calculation package to attach to the original O&M.
Page 5 of the O&M is correct.No revision required.Main pool is shown 6.1'deep to top of sediment and 7.1'to
sediment bottom and forebay is shown 5.1'deep to top of sediment and 6.1'to sediment bottom as shown on pond
cross section sheet CS-14 of the plan set.

6. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(f) and.1053(5)(a):The forebay calculation provided shows the forebay pool area to be
21.08%of the area in the main pool.The forebay shall be sized at 15-20%of the volume of the main pool. Please
re-evaluate your design.
This percentage on the calculation is for area.The volume percentage (15.22%)has been added based on stage
storage pond charts from hydraflow.See revised Wet Detention Basin calculations for both area and volume
percentages for forebay to main pool.
7. 15A NCAC 02H.1053(7): Please confirm the correct number for the drawdown calculation. Row 40 of the
supplement shows 2.79 days; however,the calculations show 3.21 days.Please confirm the correct drawdown,and
update the necessary documents.
Row 40 of the supplement has been changed to reflect 3.21 days as shown in the calculations.
8. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2)(h)(ii): Row 36 of the supplement says the outlet is a weir,however sheet CS-14 of the
plans shows a 3"orifice for the outlet device.The response to item 13 on the previous request for additional
information confirms that a 3"orifice is being used.Please update Rows 36-39 of the supplement to reflect the
outlet provided to drawdown the storage volume.
Row 36 has been updated to orifice and line 37 has been filled in to show 3".
9. 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2): Please email the supplement form to the email address provided below so that it can be
preserved electronically per the regulatory requirements.
Supplemental form has been emailed to [e-mail].
Please remember to confirm that any revised information is presented consistently throughout the application
documents including calculations,supplements,narrative,and plans.Please also remember to provide two hard
copies of any updated documents per 15A NCAC 02H.1042(2).
All of the requested information listed above should be received in this Office by November 4,2020,or the
application will be returned as incomplete.Please note that only two letters requesting additional information is
allowed in the State Stormwater Program for a total of 30 days to submit the requested additional information.If the
information is not satisfactorily provided after either the second request or 30 days, the project will be returned. If the
project is returned and you wish to re-submit later,you will need to resubmit all required items at that time,
including the application fee.
The construction of any impervious surfaces,other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan,is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence.If you have any questions concerning
this matter,please feel free to call me at(910) 796-7215 or email me at [e-mail].
State Stormwater Permit No.SW8 200502
Page 3 of 3
Sincerely,
Ted Triantis
Ted Triantis
Engineer

DES/tjt: \\\Stormwater\Permits&Projects\2020\200502 HD\202010 addinfo 200502
Bart]McClain;William G.Daniel&Associates,PA;via email:[e-mail]
cc: Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File

STORMWATER
CALCULATIONS
FOR
Sylvester Development
West Side NC 24
Richlands, North Carolina
October 3, 2019 o+t++imitun.,,
Revised: October 28, 2020 NA CAR ,'N
VP I's
SEAL
ya`°,�,'`1 •` IAI�E�'.%;was
PREPARED BY: �`°°° T J. MCG�'�'b�
WILLIAM G.DANIEL & ASSOCIATES,P.A. ��'��"$9g'�`�7-�
1150 S.E. MAYNARD ROAD, SUITE 260 1df'i
CARY,NC 27511
[phone]

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Stormwater Impact Statement
Storm Drainage Section 1
Pre-Post Development Section 2
Storm Water Run-Off and Routing
Wet Pond (SCM) Section 3
Exhibits Appendix
L

Sylvester Development
West side NC 24 -Richlands, NC
Stormwater Management Statement
The proposed project known as the Sylvester Development is contained on Tract 2
shown on Plat Book 75 Page 167 consisting of 7.92 acres and the Tract directly south
of Tract 2 shown on Plat Book 77 Page 35 consisting of 6.411 acres and located on
the western side of NC HWY 24 between Sylvester Street and Koonce Fork Road and
located within the White Oak River Basin. No buildings or individual Tract Site Plans
are proposed.
Implementation of the proposed development plan will result in an increase of
3.06 acres of impervious area (2.61 acres of roadway within property
boundaries 86 0.45 acres of road widening within NC 24, Sylvester Street, and
Koonce Fork Road. To ensure compliance with applicable regulations governing
control of first 1.5" of rainfall , peak rates of stormwater discharge, and control
of TSS, these plans propose one (1) Wet Detention Pond for peak runoff control
to capture 93.5% (2.44 acres) of the 2.61 acres of new roadway impervious area
along with 9.09 acres of impervious area allocated to Lots 2, 5-12, and west of
Street 1. The proposed SCM will achieve 85% TSS removal. The stormwater
collection system within the proposed roadways collects and transports storm
water to the SCM. Stormwater piping is also proposed from the existing
interior wetlands to the ditch wetlands located along Hwy 24 to maintain a
hydrologic connection. The peak rate of stormwater discharge from the analysis
area (33.37 ac.) is controlled to less than the pre-development levels for the 1,
2, 5, and 10 year return-interval stormwater events and slightly increase runoff
for the 25 and 100year return-interval stormwater events.(see table at bottom
of report). The SCM has been designed to safely pass the 100-yr return interval
stormwater event. Supporting calculations and exhibits for peak rate of runoff,
impervious calculations, adequacy of stormwater collection & transport
elements, and design of the SCM are included in this report.
Pre-Development Conditions
Point 1 Year 2 Year 5 year 10 year 25 year 100 year
# (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
1 5.64 13.21 30.77 49.42 80.84 146.33
I Post-Development
Conditions
Point 1 Year 2 Year 5 year 10 year 25 year 100 year I
# (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
Pond 1.50 2.09 11.59 31.46 62.57 119.09
Remaining 0.63 2.06 6.22 11.07 19.85 38.83
Pt 1 Total 2.13 4.15 17.81 42.53 82.42 157.92

Section 1
STORM DRAINAGE
DATA
CALCULATIONS

W
▪ J
Cr Et tO
to
00 0 0 Cr 0 to LC)) C. 0 o U) 0 0 b O U) CStO ttotoW V CO co 0 co co N-- o) co co M h co CA F N 7 to h M to co h
Cq 5 ai of of O � e< cV CV Cr) O � F N N N N N N CCV C'') C') of eF er
Z 0) 0) M M 0) 0") M M 0) 0) M M M CO 0) M M 0) M 0)F•
CO
uJ
h fr CK
COc0O NO0 1.11 0NAtO W V CO FF O COC) COhh0) CO to Cohc ) O LC)
zQ N N N N M C) ez M M M co0 co) co co co co) coN co) M CC j coM C j fey
g CI
ili a
co co 0 C j O O) 0 co At 0 0 N. N. O 0) (0 0) At LC) 0) N N. 0 to N. 0 N.> Z U. 0 Cr) Co Al- o 0 0 co M et F rn e- h F et to CC CA N Co 0) N.
a) ` 0 0 CV O O O O O C) CV CV CV M CV 0 0 V.: N O O (Ni tJ
0 O) O) F F co et et et h O O) CO 0 e), CO N M F U) O 0)O ciaN
O N N M O F F F F N. St
M CV C) h O Cs� et O O F
`.U o o a) N t-i r) Cti Cy N cV C") e; cci tV N F F O) tap •tci •Al- •cV •
of` co co N N N N F F F F
CC 0 O O O O C:) O 0 O O O O O 0 O CI C) O C) O 0 0 0
� � F F F F F F F F !- F F F F F F F F F F F F F F
eh Al: et Al: 'Al: et Al: Al: Al: Al: Al: et et Ni: et et et Ni: et et Ni: et et
I
U) U) tO C> to LC) U) t0 U) IC) LC) to LC) to LC) U) U) U) to tO U) to U)
() CO O F N F F F h N. F CO CO CO h N. N. CO co CO N. N. CO N.
0 0 0 CS CS 0 0 0 0 0 CJ O O O d tj g 0 0 0 CJ 0 0
Z C^i
W co h et M h co N N 0 CO F Fs- co 0 coQ) to CO CO N 0) 10
Lc. cc O M h IC) 0 CO 0 F F 0) 00 F M CC O F U) N. O co F o N
CO cr
0 0 M 0 0 0 0 C] O Cti O r; e- 0 0 0 0 0 e- O 0 e` O
jQ
`.1 M N O N Z` 7 NI-: er N O et eF M 0) M Co N U) U) CO co 0) N.
~ C•j •N F F O 0) tC) N. Co co et M N CO 0) co N. O to
F F F F NI- et et er eh C•) oS t` Cfl tJ et of eF C`j CV F e- O
Q
o CCU) N N N CO et N et M N N N CCAI 'U al N CO) C01 CM) C`o) co et V' ef0'
CO C, CS CS C? O Cj CS 0 0 cV O O O O O tj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cc a 4 4 a a a a a a a a a 4 a a 4 a a a a 4 4 Q Q
o a ZZ Z i Z Z Z t Z z Z x° = Z Z Z Z Z r Z Z x Z
I-
w
Z Z o er o N. CO — A o h o in
COF C.
F O F o0 0 w
ti - c0 c0 O M et et O O c0 co CO b 0,
0) `I N CO eh N r N M Cl. r M eF N OF et At tO At At At
a
El:
CO CO co CO At Co CO o m CO 0 0 O U) o et Al- At et CO CO to to
O `, M M C') M N F F F F F M M M F M N N N N F F F F
J lLl 0 0 0 O CO O O U) U) O h et et CO 0 O IC) CO N O et F
W IX 0 o� cod w 0 co cd o� ooi oo) o N
O▪ Q M M M M M M M M M CI CI COC') Cr) enC') C.) C.) CO et et et
CO
I
I I
*..1 z I I I
a1
GI w Q N M et U) cO h CO CA FO F N M_ M et tO I CO NI CO N Q .
IZ C U CO CO 00 Z Z CO c0 t-
04
F N� M Zt3UUUUggUUW CO CO CO (0 CO CO 00 CO CO 0]
U U U V U U U U U U U V U0. C c
U w
m I iI
o � W
N--
Q
%) N y 'C -...IX
e' N C") et tO cO t. co 0) et — (N CM- V- At F CO eh- (0 0) N N
IV
t CO
Z w Z 0 0 03 0 0 Z Z 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 O m
o) U U U U U U UI U U U UI U
c g4 �I a IIIII 1 1I IIIIIIIII

|
2 Lo 0 0 0 N 0
e CO 0 CO .
R / O) % R § m
m R 2 2 0 2 0
k kkkk § 07
-5 k
2 % Q Q 2 8 m /
d o 0 0 0 o g 7 7
0
2 § II
2 « 2.1s a 0 \
¥ ¥ * R
la
R k
2 r 2 2 r r § C
O o 0 0 - 0 ci 2 k
\ 2
7;
G r 2 r % 8 k
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 / § 0
k N
R N 2 Q % 0 ' N
O U U U U U CO
3
isAp . 2 % t U - 2 § q
® 0. 0. 0. 4 4 § LU
2 cc U \ E ct 2 2 M
) 2 §
m 8 2 2 S 7 © E
• R t / f % J \ §
§ \ \
• & ' 2 o & \
2 @ / o
( z >. /
| G 2 / CO 0 q » R °
. % % % U % % Z § )
1.0 0 '-
8 CO § 2
0 § Q /
2 k =
2 I % q Rl7 % it 2 m 0
m 9 w
O | S E 0 0 i ƒ § ( § Et
itu. co E \
CO_ ( [ 0 k
§ ( CO
0 N Cr) » 0 ) § ) D
& m % CO CO � - x \ u 6 0
q § q § § E $ \ ( 2 § %
II | | | § CO \ § •

W
O CO co O cocoO to co O O O O
W U CO CO O 4 n co co N CO LC) tt O CO
CO O r r N N N O N N N O - T
Z a IX N C) Cr) M M M M N M M C1 CI CO C1
♦•
Cr• I:t
a) O . N O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 O lLJ ~ tl- r co M CO co N N CO CO O y
N N Z j O CV CV CV O) O CV CV O) O) t;
N C`) M CO M M Cl) N Cl) CO Cl) N N Cl) O
O N Q
O I co Q U
CO
o
coy Q FO CC) ti CD O 0 CD CD CD V' CO N. CD N- CD CT
Q ) Z I.L. Ch M r O CO Cl) O N O. CD M CC) O
CD ` O O n O CCU O O O O r CD 0 0
O
0 n 0 ..0 CD N- 0 CD CD CD CO CD CV N- CD CO CD CO
U- I~ tl CO CO CO ti CC) O CO N co Cr
V, r NZ N n CO C() O CO r e- r CO r 0 0
_ co
N
0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O g.�
' tl• tl' tl' Ni 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
G C
a
C
co co 11) co co co co c•) CO co co co co co O
O N COLD CO CC) CD 4 CD CD CD CD CD N E
O CJ O O O O O O O O co O O O C„
N
a
Z o
• m
Q' Q Q 0— CO CO COCD 0 CD - co O r ' COO r N
F` Z O O O CM O N O O O O O N O O Cn O
CO o
Q Z
1
o
0 co O O r co co n O O N CD
etI-- '"' r C.) CD CO CO CO CD CC) 1: C.) tl: N
Ili QQ O t v CM N N O C+) O 0 0 c i 0 0
Q CC)
N O I,- N. N N C') N CD CD 0) CO N CD -
g N CC) CO M tl' tl' CO CD N- 0) CA 0) 0 4 l
co O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O .- r v 3
W
eC W w a 0_ a O CL 0_ CL W a a a a 0- 0_ y Cu
¢O a CL W OC OC CL CL - z 0 = 0 0 0 0 R o U
Z O } LL
o
O O co O O O O O O O O 0 co
O Ili 2
•--� O co co co O co O C` co co N O j.
• M CO') et 4 coN 0 N 1' U) CCOO r tt 0O ti
a ? 0 o
Er. _ _ 3 I_
co N N N N N co *Cr N W
0 -: r r o O 2 O
u_
1 O a QR ro
JQ 0 CC) U
U-I N O N N O O CC•) CO CD O O - O O 0Cr 0
W a ' v Q co Q N O CD CD O N O O o - CL
F— U (O CO z cfl z ti Co ti N- ti o) �p �p o `u. 00
OCq C') co co M Cl) Cl) M M C�') C') M 8 U j
jF' o
cd
I- co - Q W U
I (NI o 2 o °z
0.) Cn o C(
tt
co to
co
c 4 co
v co a co co
CO U U U Q U U g P o cc
C to. O Cl) I 0) I- W Z
col V m �I w o z_ ou. w
cu
I m vco O) N 03 Ca UyN coCco n N. N. N
, .c CO U CO Cl) CO m CO T CO Ca CO a) Ca Do m tiW Z CD
Co3 . U U g UUUU U V
' � IL U U. U XO ¢
!_ � � ^'
Q Q 'IO I I I a Q
U_ 2. 2 W

LU
§/[ % &
$/ER %
§
o �.
0, §\[ 8 % co
§ / k § )
a
t71 RC \ �
° . t a
\ k // R � \ f
k &� ° ^ $ J
G [
%/ § § \ /
in
o
\ / e e
\ Ni:
m k
o e e \ \
« ƒ 3 f
\k Q oo # \
/$« 2 ) \ \
2 k m
\§ \ §
K §
a m m 2
k® © ° )
0 3
/ 0- 0- (
) 0 k \
W 03
/k \ / \ ()
m § n 2 2 §
CO Cl. ! § §
y k t
/7 » » 0 q w »
Q m @ ) §
2 / ( ) k
Z $ CO ` \
m %§ f \ \ \ \ \
}/ 7 m m ) ( § k
7 iz m LL
@ ` § 9
m § 2
■ $ 2 £ _
LU 2 CI 0 CA q )
§ w F G = $ ¥ 2 .
% ) E k 7 § k §
6 ( m m )- m
% S R \ § I
§ a ƒ § 3 { A
14.4 L.
/ 7 w LE ) m &
§ % t as /) 2 a 3 %
\ . \ \ \ \ \
« > o
C / / / G % ) .
1

Sylvester Development Date: 10/03/2019
Velocity Dissipator Calculations Revised: 02/05/2020
< OUTLET PROTECTION >
PIPE DIAMETER. SLOPE MANNINGS 0 V ZONE Length Minimum Rip-Rap Rip-Rap
NUMBER n Width Type Thickness
(inches) (%) (cfs) (fps) (ft) (ft) (inches)
FES 1 36 0.34 0.011 ' 30.29 7.0 , 2 12 6 Class B 18
FES 30 24 0.31 0.013 6.37 4.0 1 10 5 Class A 18
FES 40 18 0.27 0.013 8.56 4.8 2 8 4 Class B 18
FES 50 24 0.50 0.013 7.78 5.1 2 12 6 Class B 18
FES 60 24 0.47 0.013 5.86 4.6 2 12 6 Class B 18
FES 65 15 0.83 0.013 0.36 2.5 1 8 4 Class A 18
FES 70 24 0.83 0.011 8.48 7.1 2 12 6 Class B 18
Note: Velocity Dissipation design per NCDOT method.
Velocity adjusted for less than full flow in pipe.
Geotextile underliner to be placed under rip-rap dissipation pad(with#57 stone).

Section 2
PRE-POST DEVELOPMENT
STORMWATER RUNOFF
AND ROUTING
DATA
&
CALCULATIONS
1
1
I
1
i
1
I

Sylvester Development 02/03/2020
NC 24
Richlands,North Carolina
Stormwater Run-Off Point Data
Pre-Development Conditions :
Point Impervious Managed Managed Wooded Total(Ac)
# (Roadway) (Shoulder) (Farmland)
1 1.77 1.86 27.16 2.58 33.37
Point# CN See spreadsheet this report for CN calculation
1 57
33.70 Min Time of Concentration same for both pre&post
Pre-Development Conditions
Point 1 Year 2 Year 5 year 10 year 25 year 100 year
# (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
1 5.64 13.21 30.77 49.42 80.84 146.33
Note:
Point#1 pre-development peak rate of runoff has been calculated using the SCS method.

Pre-Development Conditions
Cover Type Treatment Curve Numbers for Hydrologic Soil Type
A B C D
CULTIVATED AGRICULTURAL LANDS hydrologic condition
Fallow Bare soil ---- 77 — —86 91 94
Crop residue(CR) poor --76 -- 85 --- 90 -----93
Crop residue(CR) good ---74 —83 88 -------90
Row Crops Straight row(SR) poor ----72 81 — 88 ---91
Straight row(SR) good 67 ---- 78 85 -------89
SR+Crop residue poor . 71 -----80 87 90
SR+Crop residue good --------64 -----75 82 85
Contoured(C) poor 70 -------79 --- 84 88
Contoured(C) good —65 ----------75 -- 82 -----86
C+Crop residue poor --69 ----78 ---- 83 ---------87
C+Crop residue good --------64 -------74 -- 81 -------85
Cont&terraced(C&T) poor - ---66 -74 ---- 80 82
Cont&terraced(C&T) good --62 -71 ------78 ----81
C&T+Crop residue poor -------65 73 79 -------81
C&T+Crop residue good ---------61 -----70 77 ---- 80
Small Grain Straight row(SR) poor -------65 ---------76 84 -------88
Straight row(SR) good --------63 ----------75 -- 83 ---------87
SR+Crop residue poor ---------64 ----------75 83 86
SR+Crop residue good -----------60 -------72 ----------80 ------84
Contoured (C) poor ---------—63 ----------74 ---------82 -----85
Contoured (C) good -----------61 -------73 -------81 --------84
C+Crop residue poor ---------62 ----73 -------81 -------84
C+Crop residue good ----------60 —72 -------80 83
Cont&terraced(C&T) poor -----------61 ---72 -79 ---------82
Cont&terraces(C&T) good ---------59 -------70 -------78 -----81
C&T+Crop residue poor -------60 -----71 -------78 -----81
C&T+Crop residue good ---------58 ------69 ---------77 ------80
Close-seeded Straight row poor ---------66 ------77 ---- -85 89
or broadcast Straight row good 27.16 58 72 81 85
legumes or Contoured poor ---------64 --------75 83 -------85
rotation Contoured good -------55 ------69 78 ------83
meadow Cont&terraced poor ------63 -----73 80 83
Cont&terraced good ----51 --------67 --------76 80
OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS
Pasture, grassland or range poor -----68 --------79 -------86 89
fair -------49 ----------69 ----------79 84
good -------39 —61 -------74 -----80
Meadow-cont. grass(non graz— 30 -----58 ---------71 --- 78
Brush-brush,weed, grass mix poor ------ 48 -----67 ----77 -----83

fair 35 56 -70 --- 77
good -----30 48 -- 65 ----73
Woods-grass combination poor ------57 73 — 82 --- -86
fair — -43 -- -65 - 76 82
good --- 32 ------58 72 79
Woods poor -- -45 66 77 -------83
fair 2.58 36 -----60 73 --------79
good ------30 -----------55 70 ---77
Farmsteads ---- 59 -------74 82 ------86
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS(Veg Established)
Open space(Lawns,parks etc.)
Poor condition; grass cover<50% ----------68 --------79 --- -86 ------89
Fair condition; grass cover 50%to 75 % 1.86 49 -----69 - 79 ------84
Good condition; grass cover> 75% --- 39 ---61 74 -------80
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways ------98 ---------98 98 —_98
Streets and roads
Paved; curbs and storm se 98 --------98 ----- 98 --------98
Paved; open ditches(wlright-of-way) 83 --89 ----- 92 -------93
Gravel (w/right-of-way) 76 --- --85 --- 89 —91
Dirt (w/right-of-way) 72 --82 -87 --89
Urban Districts Avg % impervious
Commercial &business 85 ---------89 --------92 --_-94 ------95
Industrial 72 -------81 -------88 ---------91 -------93
Residential districts by average lot size Avg % impervious
1/8 acre(town houses) 65 -------77 ---------85 --.90 ------92
1/4 acre 38 -61 ---- --75 ----------83 -------87
1/3 acre 30 -------57 --------72 -- 81 --------86
1/2 acre 25 --------54 -------70 ---- 80 -----85
1 acre 20 -------51 -------68 ----79 -----84
2 acre 12 46 -------65 -----77 ---82
User defined urban
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA(No Vegetation)
Newly graded area(pervious or ----77 __—___--86 _—_—____-91 ------94
33.37 0 0 0
ITotal Acres 33 1
Weighted Runoff Curve Number (RCN) 57

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday, Feb 3 2020, 12:55 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Existing Conditions
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 5.64 cfs
Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 33.370 ac Curve number = 57
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
. Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 3.39 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=46,014 cuft
Existing Conditions
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3-- 1 Yr Q(cfs)
6.00 -- -- -- 6.00
5.00 -_ -_-__-_ -_.._-- -- _____ - 5.00
4.00 --- -- - -- - --- -- - - 4.00
3.00 - - _._... .- 3.00
2.00 -- - - 2.00
1.00 __ -_ -- - 1.00
NI
0.00 - 0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
- Hyd No. 3 lime(hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020, 12:55 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Existing Conditions
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 13.21 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 33.370 ac Curve number = 57
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 4.11 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=81,782 cult
Existing Conditions
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3--2 Yr Q(cfs)
--- --- ----T — 14.00
12.00 -_ 12.00
10.00 -- ---- _._..._.__._.
8.00 __ - -- -- - _ — _----L-- 8.00
6.00 —- -- - - - 6.00
4.00 --- — - 4.00
2.00 - — 2.00
0.00 - I I 1 I I I 0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No. 3
Time(hrs)
E
i

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020,12:55 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Existing Conditions
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 30.77 cfs
Storm frequency = 5 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 33.370 ac Curve number = 57
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 5.32 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=156,891 cuft
Existing Conditions
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3--5 Yr Q (cfs)
35.00 --- — -- --- — _ _-- 35.00
30.00 ----- - - --- -- — - 30.00
25.00 _._._® —__ .. .__.—_-- --- -_- ---__-.— - 25.00
20.00 —......_. _..— 20.00
15.00 -- - — -- - 15.00
10.00 — --- 10.00
5.00
— 5.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Time(hrs)
- - Hyd No. 3

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020,12:55 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Existing Conditions
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 49.42 cfs
1 Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 33.370 ac Curve number = 57
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
{ Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 6.37 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=233,641 cuft
Existing Conditions
Q (cfs) Q (cfs
Hyd. No. 3-- 10 Yr )
50.00 ,-- — --- 50.00
40.00 -- — --. _____
40.00
30.00 — ..._ - -._..,. ._ ... ..-
30.00
20.00 -- 20.00
10.00 — 10.00
0.00 I I ----- _ \ L 0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
HydNo. 3
Time(hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020,12:55 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Existing Conditions
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 80.84 cfs
Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 33.370 ac Curve number = 57
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 7.95 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=363,856 cuft
Existing Conditions
Q(cfs) Q(cfs)
Hyd. No. 3--25 Yr
90.00 ---- — —_-- - 90.00
80.00 -- ---- 80.00
70.00 ---- -_ — -- -- -- - — --_ 70.00
60.00 -f 60.00
50.00 - _.__ . .
50.00
40.00 40.00
30.00 ---- --- - -----
0
20.00 ! — 20.00
10.00
0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No. 3
Time(hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020,12:55 PM
Hyd. No. 3
Existing Conditions
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 146.33 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 33.370 ac Curve number = 57
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 10.90 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=638,726 cuft
Existing Conditions
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 3-- 100 Yr Q (cfs)
160.00 1 .T
160.00
140.00
140.00
.
120.00 • .
100.00 -- - --._.._____.. 100.00
80.00 — — -- 80.00
60.00 -- -- - 60.00
1_
40.00 40.00
20.00 20.00
0.00 --) \\--.-----------__ _____ _ _
- 0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No. 3 Time(hrs)
1

Sylvester Development 07/22/2020
NC 24
Richlands,North Carolina
Lot Impervious Area Allocation
Lot Total Impervious Impervious
# Area (sf) Area (sf)
2 46287.89 32402 70.00%
5 42662.05 29863 70.00%
6 48199.38 33740 70.00%
7 59882.13 41917 70.00%
8 47608.67 33326 70.00%
9 59971.90 41980 70.00%
10 45608.28 31926 70.00%
11 51845.53 0 0.00%
12 54934.03 38454 70.00%
Off-Site
1 6847.00 3574 52.20%
2 5574.00 3501 62.81%
3 172567.00 0 0.00%
4 249419.00 112385 45.06%
Impervious Note:
All impervious areas shown above are contributory to the
proposed SCM on these plans.The lot impervious areas and off-site
area#4 impervious area are also recorded in Deed Restrictions
L

m �, v, c
.40 ; .4 .4 .00 ,c ,4 .4 .4
N M O O 0 0 CO 0 l
P.1 O O O O O O O O C
O
r7 1
o g E-N
O 0
"0
Li; :ii �, ; . 0
1- I—
U
0 CD O ` - . I I I 6 co
�rTa '
v 1 .
o .0
U ;3
c cu
0 ^gym
^
Q «s 0 el ctl q a y
Er -a c 0
Cl)73 cd
a c=:
va
c0 as
W o3 z � �
of n3 0
U 0C4 w OA Al ...( •—)
g W ^ 4,1
�, 0 c 0
q 0 a cg c o
° col .�
d 4)
Z q H CV
0
1-1 c z0z C.,.) _ cei
a)
l g E 0
C QE. Z = act cn b N N En
Z d C_ ° w 0 ° rs� o V A bp
c" m Q A ! w o y > ? ti
03CAD
W fn.44 o g
, o
Cd d0 eI "Cl ea
W } w F., 000 0000
IA cZi� o O a a aaaa
E 1 c� 0 0 w � � cn, v1 O,O,O O
L

1
Sylvester Development 02/04/2020
' NC 24 07/22/2020
Richlands,North Carolina
Stormwater Run-Off Point Data
Post-Development Conditions :
Point Impervious Managed Managed Managed Wooded Total (Ac)
# (Road+Lots) (Shoulder) (Grassed) Field
Pond 11.67 0.00 11.23 0.00 0.00 22.90
Remaining 2.18 3.83 0.00 1.86 2.58 10.45
#1 Total 13.85 3.83 11.23 1.86 2.58 33.35
Point# CN See spreadsheet this report for CN calculation
Pond 69
Remaining 52
33.70 Min Time of Concentration same for both pre&post
Note: For these calculations,impervious area on lots based on 80%.
Post-Development Conditions
Point 1 Year 2 Year 5 year 10 year 25 year 100 year
# (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
Pond 1.50 2.09 11.59 31.46 62.57 119.09
Remaining 0.63 2.06 6.22 11.07 19.85 38.83
Pt 1 Total 2.13 4.15 17.81 42.53 82.42 157.92
Ii

Post Development Remaining Area Conditions
Cover Type Treatment Curve Numbers for Hydrologic Soil Type
A B C D
CULTIVATED AGRICULTURAL LANDS hydrologic condition
Fallow Bare soil --- 77 -----86 ----91 -------94
Crop residue(CR) poor 76 -----85 -90 93
Crop residue(CR) good 74 ----83 -------88 90
Row Crops Straight row(SR) poor 72 81 ---------88 91
Straight row(SR) good 67 78 — 85 ----89
SR+ Crop residue poor -------- 71 80 ---------87 ---90
SR+Crop residue good - 64 75 ---82 ---85
Contoured (C) poor ----- 70 79 ---84 --------88
Contoured (C) good --------65 —75 -------82 -------86
C+Crop residue poor -------69 78 — 83 ------87
C+Crop residue good 64 74 ----- 81 85
Cont&terraced(C&T) poor --------66 -----------74 —80 82
Cont&terraced(C&T) good --------62 -------71 ----78 —81
C&T+Crop residue poor -------65 -----73 ------79 81
C&T+Crop residue good ------61 ---------70 --------77 80
Small Grain Straight row(SR) poor --------65 -----76 --------84 88
Straight row(SR) good 63 -----75 -----83 87
SR+Crop residue poor ----------64 -----75 ----------83 86
SR+Crop residue good ------60 ---72 ------80 84
Contoured (C) poor -----63 ----74 -----82 85
Contoured(C) good ---------61 ----73 --------81 84
C+Crop residue poor ------- 62 -- --73 -----81 84
C+Crop residue good 60 --72 80 -------83
Cont&terraced(C&T) poor 61 -72 -79 -------82
Cont&terraces(C&T) good ------ 59 -----70 -----------78 --------81
C&T+Crop residue poor -------60 71 --------78 -------81
C&T+Crop residue good ------- 58 -----69 -------77 ----____-80
Close-seeded Straight row poor 66 77 85 89
or broadcast Straight row good 1 RR 58 --- 72 ----------81 85
' legumes or Contoured poor ----------64 ----75 -------83 85
rotation Contoured good ------- 55 ----69 -------78 83
{ meadow Cont&terraced poor 63 ------73 ------80 —--------83
Cont&terraced good ------ 51 67 76 -- 80
OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS
Pasture, grassland or range poor 68 --- ---79 86 --- 89
fair 49 ------69 79 ---- 84
good 39 --------61 74 -----80
Meadow-cont. grass(non graz--- 30 ------58 ------- 71 --78
Brush-brush,weed, grass mix poor 48 ----67 77 -----83
l
1

fair 35 ------56 ------70 --77
good 30 - --48 --65 ---73
Woods-grass combination poor 57 - --73 -82 ------86
fair 43 --65 -----76 -----82
good 32 ----58 — --72 -----79
Woods poor ----45 - ---66 -----77 —83
fair 2.58 36 60 — —73 —79
good 30 ------55 70 -----77
Farmsteads --- -------59 -------74 — —82 ----86
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS(Veg Established)
Open space(Lawns,parks etc.)
Poor condition; grass cover<50% ---- 68 --------79 --- 86 ------89
Fair condition; grass cover 50%to 75% ---- 49 -------69 — 79 -----84
Good condition; grass cover>75% 3.83 39 -- 61 - 74 ---80
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways -----98 _--. 98 98 ---_-98
Streets and roads -------
Paved; curbs and storm se 0.65 98 —98 98 ----- 98
Paved;open ditches(w/right-of-way) 1.53 83 --- 89 92 93
Gravel(w/right-of-way) --- 76 ----------85 --------89 -- 91
Dirt (w/right-of-way) -----72 ------82 - 87 --- 89
Urban Districts Avg % impervious
Commercial&business 85 ------89 •-------92 -----94 95
Industrial 72 --------81 ------88 ---------91 93
Residential districts by average lot size Avg % impervious
1/8 acre(town houses) 65 77 -------85 -90 ---92
1/4 acre 38 61 -------75 ---83 87
1/3 acre 30 57 --------72 ------81 86
1/2 acre 25 54 ---------70 -----80 85
1 acre 20 ---- 51 --- 68 ----79 -----84
2 acre 12 46 ------65 -77 ----------82
User defined urban
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA(No Vegetation)
Newly graded area(pervious or 77 ----86 --------—91 ----- 94
10.45 0 0 0
Total Acres 101
Weighted Runoff Curve Number (RCN) 52

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020,1:0 PM
Hyd. No. 4
I Post Remaining Area
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.63 cfs
I Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 10.450 ac Curve number = 52
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 3.39 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=8,471 cuft
Post Remaining Area
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4- 1 Yr Q(cfs)
1.00 --- - - -- pi
1.00
0.90 - -_ 0.90
0.80 - _---- - - - --__.. —._—.- 0.80
0.70 -- - . .---------------_ _ .—. 0.70
0.60 - - ___ _A— 0.60
0.50 - _._ _ 0.50
0.40 --- — 0.40
0.30 0.30
0.20 0.20
0.10 0.10
1
i I
0.00 - 1 0.00
I
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No. 4
Time(hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020,1:0 PM
Hyd. No. 4
Post Remaining Area
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 2.06 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 10.450 ac Curve number = 52
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 4.11 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=17,100 cuft
Post Remaining Area
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4--2 Yr Q(cfs)
3.00 — • _. 3.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 ------ --- -- - 1.00
0.00 J 0.00
0 2 5 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No. 4 Time(hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020, 1:0 PM
Hyd. No. 4
Post Remaining Area
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 6.22 cfs
Storm frequency = 5 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 10.450 ac Curve number = 52
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 5.32 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=36,476 cuft
Post Remaining Area
Q (cfs) Hyd. No.4—5 Yr Q(cfs)
7.00 1 I - 7.00
.............
6.00 --- — - -- ---- _.._.— -- - 6.00
5.00 ---- ---- -- -- --- 5.00
4.00 -. --- 4.00
3.00 -- •- -- _ — 3.00
2.00 — - — — 2.00
1.00 1.00
0.00 ' 0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No. 4 Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020,1:0 PM
Hyd. No. 4
Post Remaining Area
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 11.07 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 2 min
' Drainage area = 10.450 ac Curve number = 52
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 6.37 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=57,146 cuft
Post Remaining Area
Q(cfs) Hyd. No.4-- 10 Yr Q(cfs)
12.00 - --- - 12.00
_f-
10.00 ---- ---._. — _ - ------ _- - --- - 10.00
8.00 -- --- - -- --- -- -- -- 8.00
6.00 - -- --- - -- - 6.00
4.00 --- - — I 4.00
2.00 --- - 2.00
0.00 - I I y I I Z L 0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No.4 Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020, 1:0 PM
Hyd. No. 4
Post Remaining Area
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 19.85 cfs
Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 10.450 ac Curve number = 52
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 7.95 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=93,315 cuft
Post Remaining Area
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 4-25 Yr Q(cfs)
21.00 -- - 21.00
18.00 18.00
15.00 - - --__ ,__....___ ___®.- ------ 15.00
12.00 -- - - — —_ -- 12.00
•
9.00 — - -- -
- 9.00
1.
6.00 - 6.00
3.00 — - 3.00
0.00 -I I I J 0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No. 4
Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Monday,Feb 3 2020,1:0 PM
Hyd. No. 4
Post Remaining Area
Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 38.83 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Drainage area = 10.450 ac Curve number = 52
Basin Slope = 0.0 % Hydraulic length = 0 ft
Tc method = USER Time of conc. (Tc) = 33.70 min
Total precip. = 10.90 in Distribution = Type II
Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484
Hydrograph Volume=172,186 cuft
Post Remaining Area
Q(cfs' Hyd. No. 4-- 100 Yr Q(cfs)
' 40.00
I.
30.00 -- - . _.---.. ------- — 30.00
20.00 - — 20.00
10.00 10.00
0.00 / I I ] L 0.00
0 2 5 7 9 12 14 16 19 21 23 26
Hyd No. 4 Time(hrs)

Pond Drainage Area - Post Development Conditions
Cover Type Treatment Curve Numbers for Hydrologic Soil Type
A B C D
CULTIVATED AGRICULTURAL LANDS hydrologic condition
Fallow Bare soil --- 77 -------86 ---- 91 94
Crop residue(CR) poor 76 --85 ---90 93
Crop residue(CR) good --------- 74 -----83 -- --88 — 90
Row Crops Straight row(SR) poor ----72 -----81 -----88 91
{ Straight row(SR) good --------67 ---------78 — 85 —89
SR+ Crop residue poor --71 _--80 ------87 ----90
SR+ Crop residue good -------64 -----75 ----82 -------85
Contoured (C1 poor ----------70 -----79 -----84 ------88
Contoured (C) good 65 —75 --------82 86
C+Crop residue poor --------69 — 78 ---------83 87
C +Crop residue good -------64 ------74 ----81 85
Cont&terraced(C&T) poor ---------66 ------74 --------80 82
Cont&terraced(C&T) good --------62 ------71 ------78 81
C&T+ Crop residue poor ---------65 - 73 --------79 -- -81
C&T+ Crop residue good --61 -------70 ---------77 -----80
Small Grain Straight row(SR) poor -----65 ----76 --------84 ------88
Straight row(SR) good --------63 ----75 ------83 — 87
SR+ Crop residue poor -------64 -------75 --------83 —------—86
SR+ Crop residue good -----60 ----72 --------80 —------—84
Contoured (C) poor ----------63 ----74 -----82 —------—85
Contoured (C) good ----------61 --------73 -81 ------84
C +Crop residue poor -------62 -------73 --------81 -----84
C +Crop residue good -------60 ----72 -----80 ----------83
Cont&terraced(C&T) poor --------61 ------72 --------79 -----82
Cont&terraces(C&T) good --- 59 ---------70 --------78 —------—81
C&T+ Crop residue poor -------60 ------71 -------78 ----81
C&T+Crop residue good -------58 -------69 --------77 ------80
Close-seeded Straight row poor ----------66 -----------77 ----- -85 ----89
or broadcast Straight row good ----------58 --------72 --------81 -------85
legumes or Contoured poor --------64 --------75 ---------83 ---85
rotation Contoured good ---------w -- 55 =�=-Nw 69 — _---78 -r==N 83
meadow Cont&terraced poor -63 -73 ---80 -83
Cont&terraced good -----51 -----67 --------76 -------80
OTHER AGRICULTURAL LANDS
Pasture, grassland or range poor ---------68 ----------79 --------86 -------89
fair ------49 -----69 --------79 ------84
good ------39 I 61 -------74 ------80
Meadow-cont. grass(non graz-- --------30 ---58 ------71 ------78
Brush -brush,weed, grass mix poor -------48 I-------67 ---------77 -----83
i
L

fair 35 — --56 -------70 --77
good 30 48 -65 —73
Woods-grass combination poor 57 -73 82 --------86
fair 43 65 — -76 -----82
good 32 - 58 --72 ---79
Woods poor 45 ------66 -------77 ---83
fair 36 --60 — 73 ---------79
good 30 ------55 ---------70 -----77
Farmsteads --- 59 ------74 ---------82 ------86
FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN AREAS (Veg Established)
Open space (Lawns,parks etc.)
Poor condition; grass cover<50% 68 -------79 --------86 ------89
Fair condition; grass cover 50%to 75 % 49 ---------69 --------79 ----84
Good condition; grass cover>75% 11.39 39 61 ---74 80
Impervious Areas
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways 9.09 98 ---98 ----------98 -------98
Streets and roads
Paved; curbs and storm se 2.44 98 98 98 --------98
Paved; open ditches(w/right-of-way) 83 ----89 ---------92 93
Gravel (w/right-of-way) -------76 ---------85 -89 - 91
Dirt (w/right-of-way) --------72 ------82 ----------87 --------89
Urban Districts Avg %impervious
Commercial & business 85 ------89 ---92 -----94 -------95
Industrial 72 --------81 ----------88 ----------91 ----------93
Residential districts by average lot size Avg% impervious
1/8 acre (town houses) 65 77 ----85 --------90 -------92
1/4 acre 38 --------61 •----75 --------- 83 -------87
1/3 acre 30 -------57 •----72 --- 81 -----86
1/2 acre 25 --------54 70 80 -----85
1 acre 20 --------51 68 ---------79 --------84
2 acre 12 46 - 65 77 -------82
User defined urban ** --** ** --**
DEVELOPING URBAN AREA(No Vegetation)
Newly graded area (pervious or ------- 77 —86 91 ------94
22.92 0 0 0
ITotal Acres 23
Weighted Runoff Curve Number (RCN) 69

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Tuesday,Feb 4 2020,1:3 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Through Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 1.50 cfs
Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 30.25 ft
Reservoir name = Ph 2 Pond Max. Storage = 175,960 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation=29.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume=42,395 cuft
Through Pond
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2--1 Yr Q(cfs)
18.00 18.00
15.00 - -- - --- — 15.00
12.00 ---- ® - —„
12.00
9.00 — — - 9.00
!,1',
6.00 - ra1 I --- - 6.00
i�
3.00 I.--; 3.00
0.00 0.00
0 3 5 8 11 13 16 19 21 24 27
Time(hrs)
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 [I1L[I.ITI Req. Stor= 175,960 cuft

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Tuesday,Feb 4 2020,1:3 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Through Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 2.09 cfs
I Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 30.91 ft
Reservoir name = Ph 2 Pond Max. Storage = 197,205 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation=29.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume=80,295 cuft
i
Through Pond
Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 2--2 Yr Q (cfs)
28.00 — - 28.00
1
24.00 — - 24.00
20.00 -- - --- 20.00
16.00 16.00
f - { _.._ . _ _.
12.00 tl 12.00
'.4
8.00 ,k' 8.00
l,9.
__ ..... __..__..__.....-. ...__......__._........... ._........ ...___ __K _....._ _ .. _.._ . ...
4.00 4.00
tP'
0.00
i 0.00
0 3 5 8 11 13 16 19 21 24 27
Time(hrs)
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 11111111 Req. Stor= 197,205 cuft

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Tuesday,Feb 4 2020,1:3 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Through Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 11.59 cfs
Storm frequency = 5 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 31.62 ft
Reservoir name = Ph 2 Pond Max. Storage = 221,649 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation=29.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume=152,267 cuft
Through Pond
Q(cfs) Hyd. No. 2--5 Yr Q(cfs)
50.00 -F — — r 50.00
40.00 - -- -- _ _._.--- 40.00
30.00 ------__ — —..—®. 30.00
1'
j11
..
1
20.00 — — 20.00
10.00 10.00
0.00 J 1 _, 0.00
3 5 8 11 13 16 19 21 24 27 29
Time(hrs)
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 1111 1 1 1 11 Req. Stor=221,649 cult

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Tuesday, Feb 4 2020,1:3 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Through Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 31.46 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 32.04 ft
Reservoir name = Ph 2 Pond Max. Storage = 236,145 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation=29.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume=220,618 cuft
Through Pond
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2 - 10 Yr Q(cfs)
- - --i— -- 60.00
50.00 50.00
40.00 --— - - -- _- -- 40.00
30.00 - --- ---- - 30.00
{
20.00 - - -- 1 i— — — 20.00
Ii-
1000 10.00
L
0.00 - .. I I I N. - - 0.00
0 3 5 8 11 13 16 19 21 24 27 29
Time(hrs)
Hyd No. 2 Hyd No. 1 11111 1111 Req. Stor=236,145 cuff

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Tuesday,Feb 4 2020,1:3 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Through Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 62.57 cfs
Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 32.47 ft
Reservoir name = Ph 2 Pond Max. Storage = 252,017 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation=29.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume=330,360 cuft
Through Pond
Q(cfs) Q(cfs)
Hyd. No.2—25 Yr
90.00 90.00
80.00 80.00
70.00 70.00
60.00 60.00
50.00 50.00
!1_
40.00 40.00
30.00 30.00
20.00 20.00
10.00 10.00
rr I hlir
0.00 — 0.00
0 3 5 8 11 13 16 19 21 24 27 29
Time(hrs)
— Hyd No.2 Hyd No. 1 111111111 Req. Stor=252,017 cuft

Hydrograph Plot
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Tuesday,Feb 4 2020,1:3 PM
Hyd. No. 2
Through Pond
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 119.09 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 2 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 1 Max. Elevation = 33.09 ft
Reservoir name = Ph 2 Pond Max. Storage = 275,248 cuft
Storage Indication method used. Wet pond routing start elevation=29.00 ft. Hydrograph Volume=548,889 cuft
Through Pond
Q (cfs) Hyd. No. 2-- 100 Yr Q(cfs)
140.00 - — - 140.00
120.00 — - - 120.00
100.00 ---- 100.00
80.00 80.00
60.00 , 60.00
40.00 - — 40.00
20.00 20.00
0.00 - -- I _ ram 0.00
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
Time(hrs)
Hyd No. 2 - Hyd No. 1 I 1 1 I 1 1111 Req. Stor=275,248 cult

Section 3
WET POND (SCM)
DATA
CALCULATIONS

Sylvester Development Dated: 10/03/2019
Richlands,North Carolina Revised: 10/26/2020
2019 BMP Stormwater Wet Detention Basin Design Calculations
Coastal SA/DA Table
IMPERVIOUS PERMANENT POOL
DEPTHS IN FEET
PERCENT 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8 or greater
10% 0.78 0.61 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00
20% 1.48 1.04 0.87 0.70 0.52 0.35
30% 2.18 1.65 1.39 1.13 0.87 0.70
40% 2.96 2.26 1.83 1.39 0.96 0.78
50% 3.65 2.87 2.35 1.83 1.31 0.96
60% 4.35 3.31 2.78 2.26 1.74 1.13
70% 5.22 3.92 3.22 2.52 1.83 1.31
80% 5.92 4.52 3.65 2.78 1.91 1.57
90% 6.53 5.05 4.18 2.96 2.44 1.74
BMP Area(Ac.) Description
1 22.90 Wet Detention Basin ,
Normal Pool Surface Area Calculations
I Required I Forebay
IProvided Provided I I BMP I IMP. I DEPTH SA/DA Pool Area Pool Area Area Forebay
I # I % (FT)
1 51 5.1 2.34 23,342 23,528 4,960 21.08%
Provided Provided Provided
Pool Vol. Forebay Vol. Forebay%
(CF) (CF) Pool Vol.
Wet Detention Basin 124,260 18,910 15.22% 15<OK<20
Volume to be controlled from the 1.5"storm(Simple Method)
0.5090 =Rv (Runoff coefficient)
63,467 = Volume to be controlled(cf)
63,845 = Volume provided(cf) Note:No nutrient reduction required.Only peak runoff control.
' VPP=Total Volume of Permanent Pool(cf) VPP = 124,260
APP=Area of Permanent Pool(sf) APP = 23,528
V,helr=Volume over the shelf only(cf) Vshelf= 21;778.00
(0.5 *Depth ,,over shelf*Perimeterpermapentpool*Widthsubmerged portion of shelf
Depthmex over shelf(ft)= 1.0
Perimeterpermanent pool= 597
W idthsubmerged portion of shelf= 6.0
Abottom ofshelf =Area of Bottom of Shelf(sf) Abottom of shelf = 20,038
Davg=Avg Depth=VPP/APP(Shelf not Submerged) Davg = 5.28
Davg=Avg Depth (VPP-Vshelf)) / Abottom of shelf (Shelf Submerged) Davg = 5.11 5.10 Use
I
1

i
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Wednesday,Jul 22 2020,12:17 PM
Pond No. 1 - Ph 2 Pond (Main Pool & Forebay combined for Pond routing)
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on known contour areas.Average end area method used.
Stage/Storage Table
Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sqft) Incr.Storage(cult) Total storage(cuft)
0.00 22.00 13,741 0 0
1.00 23.00 16,095 14,918 14,918
2.00 24.00 17,598 16,847 31,765
3.00 25.00 19,159 18,379 50,143
4.00 26.00 20,775 19,967 70,110
5.00 27.00 22,446 21,611 91,721
6.00 28.00 24,173 23,310 115,030
7.00 29.00 28,063 26,118 141,148
7.10 29.10 NP 28,488 2,828 143,976
7.50 29.50 29,238 11,545 155,521
8.00 30.00 30,688 14,982 170,502
8.50 30.50 32,438 15,782 186,284
9.00 31.00 33,509 16,487 202,771
9.15 31.15 Temp Pool 33,833 5,051 207,821
9.50 31.50 34,594 11,975 219,796
10.00 32.00 35,693 17,572 237,368
10.50 32.50 36,806 18,125 255,492
11.00 33.00 37,933 18,685 274,177
11.50 33.50 39,075 19,252 293,429
12.00 34.00 40,230 19,826 313,255
13.00 35.00 42,584 41,407 354,662
Culvert/Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D]
Rise(in) = 18.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len(ft) = 15.00 20.00 0.00 0.00
Span(in) = 18.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El.(ft) = 31.15 31.50 0.00 0.00
No.Barrels = 1 1 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 2.60 0.00 0.00
Invert El.(ft) = 29.10 29.10 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Riser Broad - ---
Length(ft) = 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = Yes No No No
Slope(%) = 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
N-Value = .013 .013 .000 .000
Orif.Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.00
Multi-Stage = n/a Yes No No Exfiltration= 0.000 in/hr(Contour) Tailwater Elev.= 0.00 ft
Note:Culvert/Orifice outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control.
Stage I Storage/Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total
ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
0.00 0 22.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00
1.00 14,918 23.00 0.00 0.00 --- -- 0.00 0.00 --- -- 0.00
2.00 31,765 24.00 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 --- 0.00
3.00 50,143 25.00 0.00 0.00 - -- 0.00 0.00 -- - 0.00
4.00 70,110 26.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- - 0.00
5.00 91,721 27.00 0.00 0.00 -- -- 0.00 0.00 --- --- - 0.00
6.00 115,030 28.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 0.00 0.00
7.00 141,148 29.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00 0.00 --- -•- 0.00
7.10 143,976 29.10 0.00 0.00 --- 0.00 0.00 -- --- 0.00
7.50 155,521 29.50 0.11 0.11 --- -- 0.00 0.00 - 0.11
8.00 170,502 30.00 0.19 0.19 -- 0.00 0.00 --- - 0.19
8.50 186,284 30.50 0.26 0.25 -- 0.00 0.00 --- - -- 0.25
9.00 202,771 31.00 0.30 0.30 - 0.00 0.00 - - 0.30
9.15 207,821 31.15 0.31 0.31 -- 0.00 0.00 -- -- 0.31
9.50 219,796 31.50 8.23 0.09 - -- 8.14 0.00 -•- --- 8.23
10.00 237,368 32.00 10.94 0.03 -- - 10.90 18.38 - 29.32
10.50 255,492 32.50 12.75 0.02 - -- 12.71 52.00 -- -- 64.74
11.00 274,177 33.00 14.30 0.02 - -- 14.25 95.53 -- 109.80
11.50 293,429 33.50 15.70 0.01 -- - 15.59 147.08 162.68
12.00 313,255 34.00 16.98 0.01 - -- 16.94 205.55 222.50
13.00 354,662 35.00 19.29 0.01 --- -- 18.73 340.49 -- - 359.23

1
Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Tuesday,Jul 21 2020, 12:36 PM
Pond No. 2 - Main Pool
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on known contour areas.Average end area method used.
Stage i Storage Table
Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sqft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(cuft)
0.00 22.00 13,741 0 0
1.00 23.00 14,696 14,219 14,219
2.00 24.00 15,684 15,190 29,409
3.00 25.00 16,701 16,193 45,601
4.00 26.00 17,747 17,224 62,825
5.00 27.00 18,822 18,285 81,110
6.00 28.00 19,926 19,374 100,484
6.10 28.10 20,038 1,998 102,482
7.00 29.00 23,169 19,443 121,925
7.10 29.10 NP 23,528 2,335 124,260
7.50 29.50 24,011 9,508 133,768
Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D]
Rise(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No.Barrels = 0 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Invert El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = -
Length(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = No No No No
Slope(%) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N-Value = .000 .000 .u00 .000
Orif.Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multi-Stage = n/a No No No Exfiltration= 0.000 in/hr(Wet area) Tailwater Elev.= 0.00 ft
Note:Culvert/Orifice outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control.
Stage/Storage 1 Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total
ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
0.00 0 22.00 -- -- - - -- - - -- -- 0.00
1.00 14,219 23.00 - - -- - - - --- -- - 0.00
2.00 29,409 24.00 - - - -- -- - --- -- - 0.00
3.00 45,601 25.00 --- --- --- - -- - - - - 0.00
4.00 62,825 26.00 --- - --- --- - - -- 0.00
5.00 81,110 27.00 -- -- -- -- --- --- --- --- -- 0.00
6.00 100,484 28.00 - - -- -- --- 0.00
6.10 102,482 28.10 -- - -- -- --- - - -- 0.00
7.00 121,925 29.00 -- -- - -- --- -- - -- 0.00
7.10 124,260 29.10 -- - - -- --- -- - - 0.00
7.50 133,768 29.50 - -- - -- -- --- - --- 0.00

Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve Tuesday,Jul 21 2020,12:37 PM
Pond No. 3 - Forebay
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on known contour areas.Average end area method used.
Stage I Storage Table
Stage(ft) Elevation(ft) Contour area(sqft) Incr.Storage(cuft) Total storage(cult)
0.00 23.00 1,399 0 0
1.00 24.00 1,914 1,657 1,657
2.00 25.00 2,458 2,186 3,843
3.00 26.00 3,028 2,743 6,586
4.00 27.00 3,624 3,326 9,912
5.00 28.00 4,247 3,936 13,847
6.00 29.00 4,894 4,571 18,418
6.10 29.10 NP 4,960 493 18,910
6.50 29.50 5,227 2,037 20,948
Culvert 1 Orifice Structures Weir Structures
[A] [B] [C] [D] [A] [B] [C] [D]
Rise(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span(in) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No.Barrels = 0 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Invert El.(ft) = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = --
Length(ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multi-Stage = No No No No
Slope(%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N-Value .000 .000 .000 .000
Orif.Coeff. = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multi-Stage = n/a No No No Exfiltration= 0.000 in/hr(Wet area) Tailwater Elev.= 0.00 ft
Note:Culvert/Orifice outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control.
Stage 1 Storage I Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Exfil Total
ft cuft ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
0.00 0 23.00 - - -- -- - - - -- 0.00
1.00 1,657 24.00 - -- --- -- - - -- 0.00
2.00 3,843 25.00 - -- - --- --- -- --- - - 0.00
3.00 6,586 26.00 - --- - -- - - 0.00
4.00 9,912 27.00 --- --- ..- - --- - - 0.00
5.00 13,847 28.00 --- - - -- --- -- -- 0.00
6.00 18,418 29.00 -- -- - - - -- -- -- 0.00
6.10 18,910 29.10 - -- - -- --- - - ___ -_- 0.00
6.50 20,948 29.50 -- --- -- - --- --- --- --- --- 0.00

•
i.
au ›' 1
P D
C
3
Q.a %-I
3 (NJ
co
o Inj
O
N
O
N
N II
Q
lc-
0
0
• t
G ri N Ca A
0
W
a+
7
s C
00 E
m O
e-i w
*
0 O
a1 C a
E o a O
ri CO al L
a-+ 0
* Q C• fa IT
O 0 1HIHHIIHHHH
a '
> -°
s
< < O 0 m OOo0o$00a�I,0e•aslpc]Og0
-0 O , > 00000 0 ,010 0
.1 N N H 0 00000dd CCeC clod
W 0 3 .C_
rri w M
W 0_ a)
a vo
22 000s00000:1-mmoNdN
• +) F v ddddodddodddddm.-.-
o*4 3 s ec M m N 000 000o°pp
o ppore•e-olVi
4.1 ti O w NI a 00oofowoigo
H
O C L .0
0 NOdN101.moi ofp MtNNNNNNNNNOMMMMMM
► O 0 O O 2 W.
C...) L O V) O
E a) ve�
. 'Zia 7r V 5 m ate, m E a11p*-�hl rU111.".NC°N V
O I. I % drQh9aer 7OOSNNO ! yr NN
T O 4- a. v
m Lo a0 0
o00000 0 o.n o0
^: "' C�C E f6 ° c�ooac`�o• �io�ierq�n
�V V �C�J i C 0 ul a) (0 a 2 OraVOis'Ib(GPht�oa0alo)olod
��' �{ 04 6 LA > 0 Q u 0 go a:

-JPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE
FORMS LOADED
r EJECT INFORMATION
Project Name Sylvester Development
2 Project Area(ac) 33.37
3 Coastal Wetland Area(ac) • 0
Surface Water Area(ac) 0 . .
Is this project High or Low Density? High
6 'Does this project use an off-site SCM? • No
L_JPLIANCE WITH 02H.1003(4)
7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided(feet) 50 .
Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes
Is BUA other that as listed in.1003(4)(c-d)out of the setback? Yes
10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No
Ij ABER AND TYPE OF SCMs:
11 Infiltration System 0
Bioretention Cell 0
• ._. Wet Pond —..v�.—.��.�. 1
�w Stormwater Wetland 0
15 Permeable Pavement 0
Sand Filter ------___ _ 0
Rainwater Harvesting(RWH) 0
18 Green Roof 0
is Level Spreader-Filter Strip(LS-FSL _ . 0
Disconnected Impervious Surface(DIS) 0
Treatment Swale 0
22 Dry Pond 0
StormFilter 0
Silva Cell 0
25 _Ba liter 0
28 Filterra 0
FORMS LOADED
/FSIGNER CERTIFICATION
- __Name and Title: _ ._.........__. Bart J.McClain-Project Engineer
Organization: —.._._._.._William G.Daniel&Associates,PA
29 Street address: 1150 SE Maynard Road Suite 260
City,State,Zip: Cary, NC 27511
_Phone number(s): 919-467-9708
32 Email: [e-mail]
Certification Statement
I certify,under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or
supervision;that the information provided in the form is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete;and
that the engineering plans,specifications,operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent
with the information provided here.
Designer 4$p'BI.'8t1rF'�
.46
JSEAL
�. ignature of igner
21117 � I
044.4rattioto /0372-0#
Sea! Date

ZAI NAG E AREAS
1 Is this a high density project? Yes
r If so,number of drainage areas/SCMs 1
iIs all/part of this project subject to previous rule
versions? Yes
CLICKTO LOAD FORM
i ,INAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site i
Type of SCM N/A Wet Pond
5 Total BUA in project(sq ft) 603770 sf 508323 sf •
New BUA on subdivided lots(subject to permitting);
i (sq ft) 283608 sf 283608 sf
New BUA outside of subdivided lots(subject to
7 permitting)(sf) 113686 sf 106019 sf
8 Offsite-total area(sq ft) 828740 sf , 434407 sf.
i Offslte BUA(sq ft) 206476 sf 112385 sf
-I -
lu Breakdown of new BUA outside subdivided lots:
-Parking(sq ft) N/A N/A
1 -Sidewalk(sq ft) N/A N/A
-Roof(sq ft) N/A N/A
-Roadway(sq ft) 129461 sf 106019 sf
-Future(sq ft) • 112385 sf 112385 sf
-Other,please specify in the comment box
below(sq ftl. N/A N/A
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
11 subdivided lots(sq ft) N/A N/A
New infiltrating permeable pavement outside of
I subdivided lots(sq ft) N/A N/A
Exisitng BUA that win remain(not subject to
13 permitting)(sq ft) 78316 sf 6311 sf
la Existing BUA that is already permitted(sq ft) — N/A N/A
t Existing BUA that will be removed(sq ftl . . N/A v.� N/A
1, Percent BUA _ 42% 51%
g 17 De n storm(inches) 1.5 In 1.5 In
1 8 Design volume of SCM(cu ft,l_ I_ N/A 63845 cf _
ti Calculation method for design volume N/A Simple
p—
1, IITIONAL INFORMATION
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
20 drainage area(s): •
1 nage area for pre&post runoff calculations goes to centerline of adjoining'
i! sts and is equal to the project boundary.
I
I
i

I_ ET POND
1Drainage area number 1
Design volume of SCM(cu ft) I 83845 of I
6 rcl MDC FROM 02H.1050
l
3 Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from all surfaces at build-out? Yes
• 4 Is the SCM located away from contaminated soils? Yes
5 What are the side slopes of the SCM(H:V)? 3:1
i Does the SCM have retaining walls,gabion walls or other engineered
6 side slopes? No
Are the inlets,outlets,and receiving stream protected from erosion
7 (10-year storm)? Yes
Is there an overflow or bypass for inflow volume in excess of the
8 design volume? Yes
• 9 What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance? Pump(preferred)
10 If applicable,will the SCM be cleaned out after construction? Yes
11 Does the maintenance access comply with General MDC(8)? Yes
12 Does the drainage easement comply with General MDC(9)? Yes
If the SCM is on a single family lot,does(will?)the plat comply with
. 13 General MDC(10)? Yes
14 Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC(11)? Yes
15 Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC(12)? Yes
18 Does the SCM follow the device specific MDC? Yes
17 Was the SCM designed by an NC licensed professional? Yes
!FT POND MDC FROM 02H.1053
18 Method used SA/DA
19 Has a stage/storage table been provided in the calculations? Yes
Elevation of the excavated main pool depth(bottom of sediment
20 removal)(fmsl) 22.00
21 Elevation of the main pool bottom-(top of sediment removal)(fmsl) 23.00
22 Elevation of the bottom of the vegetated shelf(fmsl) i 28.10
23 Elevation of the permanent pool(final) 29 10
24 Elevation of the top of the vegetated shelf(fmsl) 29.10
25 Elevation of the temporary pool(fmsl) 31.15
26 Surface area of the main permanent pool(square feet) 23528 sf
27 Volume of the main permanent pool(cubic feet) 124260 cf
28 Average depth of the main pool(feet) 5.10 ft
29 Average depth equation used _ Equation 3
30 If using equation 3,main pool perimeter(feet) 597.0 ft
31 If using equation 3,width of submerged veg.shelf(feet) 6.0 ft '.
32 Volume of the forebay(cubic feet) 18910 cf
33 Is this 15-20%of the volume in the main pool? No
34 Clean-out depth for forebay(inches) 12 in
35 Design volume of SCM(cu ft) 63845 cf
38 Is the outlet an orifice or a weir? - ----1 Orifice
_
37 If orifice,orifice diameter(inches) _._ 3 in
38 If weir,weir height(inches)
39 If weir,weir length(inches)
40 Drawdown time for the temporary pool(days) 3.21
Are the inlet(s)and outlet located in a manner that avoids short-
i 41 circuiting? Yes
42 Are berms or baffles provided to improve the flow path? No
43 Depth of forebay at entrance(inches) 61 in
44 Depth of forebay at exit(inches) 55 In
45 Does water flow out of the forebay in a non-erosive manner? Yes
• 46 Width of the vegetated shelf(feet) 6 ft
47 Slope of vegetated shelf(H:V) _ 6.1
Does the orifice drawdown from below the top surface of the
I 48 permanent pool? Yes
Does the pond minimize impacts to the receiving channel from the 1-
49 yr,24-hr storm? Yes
Are fountains proposed?(If Y,please provide documentation that
50 MDC(9)is met.) No
I51 is a trash rack or other device provided to protect the outlet system? Yes
i 52 Are the dam and embankment planted in non-clumping turf grass? Yes 1
Bermuda or
53 Species of turf that will be used on the dam and embankment Centipede
54 Has a planting plan been provided for the vegetated shelf? Yes
1DDITIONAL INFORMATION
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
55 wet pond(s):
vet pond to serve as erosion control device until time all contributory areas r
ire developed and stabilized.Landscaping will be provided per Wet Pond
.^C(11).Landscape details on plans. !!!
Jet Pond 1 7:40 AM 10/28/2020

Operation & Maintenance Agreement
Project Name: Sylvester Development
Project Location: NC 24 Richlands NC
Cover.Page
Maintenance records shall be kept on the following BMP(s). This maintenance record shall be kept in a log in a known set location.
Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be corrected. repaired, or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can
affect the integrity of structures, safety of the public, and the pollutant removal efficiency of the BMP(s).
The BMP(s)on this project include(check all that apply&corresponding O&M tables will,be added automatically):
Bioretention Cell Quantity: Location(s):
Dry Detention Basin Quantity: Location(s):
Grassed Swale Quantity: Location(s):
Green Roof Quantity: Location(s):
Infiltration Basin Quantity:, Location(s):
Infiltration Trench Quantity: Location(s):
Level SpreaderNFS Quantity: Location(s):
Permeable Pavement Quantity: Location(s):
Proprietary System Quantity: Location(s):
Rainwater Harvesting Quantity: Location(s):
Sand Filter Quantity: Location(s):
Stormwater Wetland Quantity: Location(s):
Wet Detention Basin Quantity: 1 Location(s): SE Corner of property
Disconnected Impervious Area Present: No Location(s):
User Defined BMP Present: No Location(s):
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance procedures listed for
each BMP above, and attached O&M tables. I agree to notify NCDENR of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to
the system or responsible party.
*Responsible Party: Leon Ward Sylvester, III
Title &Organization: Member/Manager 24 East Development, LLC
Street address: 108 W. Fra&Street - (`
City, state, zip: Richlands,NC 28574
Phone number(s): 910-324-1107
Email: wardsylvesterrpigglywigglystores.com
Signature: 'L✓� /E c �� Date: i O f M 09
I, David pc ,I- Jr-14w1 1. , a Notary Public for the State of /YC.
County of O&7.>t a LA) , do hearby certify that Le 0: . We r d Sy I ties)-e r III
personally/appeared before me this q T1' day of CY e,F .-- do 1 q and
acknowledge the due execution of the Op rati s and aint nance Agreement.
Witness my hand and official seal, , 4
r 4) Cr
I 'o �OTAR� �4 a
E.
-2 SUB t_'C �0 =
,sN
i .0 4 q,i4_uu„C_u_,,,, 01 /0 I/Z 1P.Za
1 10/9/2019
erste0414 My commission expires O&M Manual Page 1 of 5

IWet Detention Pond Maintenance Requirements
The wet detention basin system is defined as the wet detention basin, pretreatment including forebays and the vegetated filter if
one is provided.
Important maintenance procedures:
Immediately after the wet detention basin is established, the plants on the vegetated shelf and perimeter of the-
basin should be watered twice weekly if needed, until the plants become established (commonly six weeks).
No portion of the wet detention pond should be fertilized after the first initial fertilization that is required to
establish the plants on the vegetated shelf.
Stable grourtdcover should be maintained in the drainage area to reduce the sediment load to the wet detention
- basin.
If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the flushing of sediment through the
emergency drain should be minimized to the maximum extent practical.
- Once a year, a dam safety expert should inspect the embankment
After the wet detention pond is established, it should be inspected once a month and within 24 hours after every storm event
greater than 1.0 Inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County). Records of operation and maintenance should be kept in a
known set location and must be available upon request.
Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall be repaired immediately.
IBMP element: !Potential problem: How I will remediate the problem:
[The entire BMP Trash/debris is present. Remove the trash/debris.
The perimeter of the BMP Areas of bare soil and/or Regrade the soil if necessary to remove the gully, and then plant a
erosive gullies have formed. ground cover and water until it is established. Provide lime and a one-,
time fertilizer application.
Vegetation is too short or too Maintain vegetation at a height of approximately six inches.
long.
IThe inlet device The pipe is clogged. Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the sediment off-site.
The pipe is cracked or Replace the pipe.
otherwise damaged.
Erosion is occurring in the Regrade the swale if necessary to smooth it over and provide erosion
swale. control devices such as reinforced turf matting or riprap to avoid future
problems with erosion.
Stone verge is clogged or Remove sediment and replace with clean stone.
covered in sediment(if
applicable).
IThe forebay Sediment has accumulated to Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if
a depth greater than the possible. Remove the sediment and dispose of it in a location where it
original design depth for will not cause impacts to streams or the BMP.
sediment storage.
Erosion has occurred. Provide additional erosion protection such as reinforced turf matting or
riprap if needed to prevent future erosion problems.
Weeds are present. Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. If pesticide is used, wipe it on
the plants rather than spraying.
IThe vegetated shelf Best professional practices Prune according to best professional practices
show that pruning is needed
to maintain optimal plant
health.
Plants are dead, diseased or Determine the source of the problem: soils, hydrology, disease, etc. I
dying. Remedy the problem and replace plants. Provide a one-time fertilizer
application to establish the ground cover if a soil test indicates it is
I necessary.Weeds are present. Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. If pesticide is used,wipe it on
the plants rather than spraying,
)RM-EZ 10/9/2019
ersion 1.4 O&M Manual Page 3 of 5

i Wet Detention Pond Maintenance Requirements(Continued)
IThe main treatment area Sediment has accumulated to Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if
a depth greater than the possible. Remove the sediment and dispose of it in a location where it
original design sediment will not cause impacts to streams or the BMP.
storage depth.
Algal growth covers over 50% Consult a professional to remove and control the algal growth.
of the area.
Cattails, phragmites or other Remove the plants by wiping them with pesticide(do not spray).
invasive plants cover 50% of
the basin surface.
The embankment Shrubs have started to grow Remove shrubs immediately.
on the embankment.
Evidence of muskrat or Use traps to remove muskrats and consult a professional to remove
I I beaver activity is present. beavers.
A tree has started to grow on Consult a dam safety specialist to remove the tree.
the embankment.
An annual inspection by an Make all needed repairs.
appropriate professional
shows that the embankment
needs repair. (if applicable)
'The outlet device Clogging has occurred. Clean out the outlet device. Dispose of the sediment off-site.
The outlet device is damaged Repair or replace the outlet device.
The receiving water Erosion or other signs of Contact the local NC Department of Environment and Natural
damage have occurred at the Resources Regional Office.
outlet.
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an accurate depth reading and not
readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
)RM-EZ 10/9/2019
ersion 1.4 O&M Manual Page 4 of 5

Wet Detention Pond Design Summary
Wet Pond Diagram
WET POND ID FOREBAY MAIN POND
Pond#1 Permanent Pool El. 29.1 Permanent Pool El. 29.1
Temporary Pool El: 31.15 Temporary Pool El: 31.15
Pretreatment other No Clean Out Depth: 6.1 Clean Out Depth: 5.1
than forebay? Sediment Removal El: 23 Sediment Removal El: 24
Has Veg.Filter? No
Bottom Elevation: 22 Bottom Elevation: 23
ORM-EZ 7/22/2C

APPENDIX
i .
L