WQ0001307_Staff Report_20231030

PLOY COOPER
Governor
ELUABETH S. BISER
secaerary
RICHARD E- ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Envlronmenwl Quality
To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: WQ0001307
Attn: Alys Hannum Facility name: 104 Kileway Drive
County: Durham County
From: Jane R. Bernard
Raleiah Reeional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the
review of both non -discharge and NPDES Dermit aDDlications and/or renewals. Please complete all
tions as they are appli
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: October 9, 2023
b. Site visit conducted by: Jane Bernard
c. inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No
d. Person contacted: Ronald Spiegel
e. and their contact information: ext.
e. Driving directions:
2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
Classification:
River Basin and Sub -basin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to
issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes
or ❑ No
If no, explain:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Qtiahty I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 BarrettDnve I Raleigh. North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted reports?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑
No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
5. is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑
N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes
or ❑ No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑
N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
III. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No
® N/A
ORC: Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #:
2. Are the design, maintenance, and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type
of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain: Description of existing facilities:
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow: 450 gpd
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or
that may be important for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function,
maintenance, a change in facility ownership, etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained
appropriately and adequately assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells
inside the compliance boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
S. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
Eno Q North Carolina Deparunenl of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
05
512 North Salisbury Street t 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699.1611
' ' �O.i 919.707.9000

6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage, and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or
® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please explain:
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A
If no, please complete the following (expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
1 11
o I 1r
O 1 a
, 6 r 1r
a r 1+
0 1 r
O r 10
I II
O 1 11
12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ❑
Yes or ® No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review. -
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if
applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes
or ®No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues
❑ Notice(s) of violation
❑ Current enforcement
action(s)
❑ Currently under SOC
❑ Currently under JOC
❑ Currently under
moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV,
NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the
status. Has the RO been working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Drvisicn of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
Q 919.707.9000

15. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑
No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
16. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before
issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No❑N/A
If yes, please explain:
17. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
18. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to
obtain through an additional information request:
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the
permit when issued:
Condition Reason
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality l Division of Water Resources
L IQ
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Semce Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611

S. Recommendation:
❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by
regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
Signature of report preparers
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date: _t)C,4ju, -To 2vZ3
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS:
C
E North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
U919.707.9000