960056_Compliance Report_20231023

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 1_"1� 1 - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: fO Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 111 Arrival Time: Departure Time: 2dQ County: Region: �Q
Farm Name: \ (j,-L vA Owner Email:
Ij
Owner Name: Q j Phone: q1 f — y Cam%
Mailing Address: 3 A -od- . Q, `([ A 7
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: rv\l �Y Title: 60 �— Phone: �!�- t73t�'�� Qf
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: c
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder pq
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
L_LGilt
Boars
Other
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Laver
Non -Lai er
Lay ers
Non -Lai ers
Pullets
Other
Dischar-_es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Poults
Design Current
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
DR, Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes Ey o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �zo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes L2"Noo ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes UA�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 61<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
4b1"""
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): �]
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
ED4 roO
NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [QTo- _❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ea<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CieA\ L-L&-i'
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [o'fio ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes G�e<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes [ Ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
A es Ll;
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes E3'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L2 o
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �lo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [2-1�o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes (4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes Lj,'O ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any addil
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as
1{�p, JcP A'A0A \50 gj J ,'(%doz� I j = a.S3-
4� 3a1 a.� �%� 0.-v -
C.Q,1�`�✓��h�� (cam-- l�/a � 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: fj 4✓
A44-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes [�o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
L2(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
4o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
L21No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes to
[-]Yes �No
❑ Yes 010
❑NA ❑NE
DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
recommendations or any other comments.
Phone: � /� W:2- (,0
Date: / L/ — 3- 09'j
511212020