20210303 Ver 2_Macon County - B204 - MCDC Final (2023)_20231025

MINIMUM CRITERIA DETERMINATION CHECKLIST
The following questions provide direction in determining when the Department is
required to prepare environmental documents for state -funded construction and
maintenance activities. Answer questions for Parts A through C by checking either "Yes"
or "No". Complete Part D of the checklist when Minimum Criteria Rule categories 98,
912(i), or 915 are used.
TIP Project No.:
State Project No.: 17BP.14.R.159
Project Location: Bridge No. 204 on SR 1533 (Walnut Creek Road) over Walnut
Creek in Macon County, North Carolina.
Project Description: Replace Bridge 204 a 20' W x 2 Span 13' L timber deck on I-
beam structure on existing location and replace with a 2 Barrel 12' W x 6' H x 204' L
Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert near Franklin, North Carolina. The project will utilize
an onsite detour during construction.
Anticipated Permit or Consultation Requirements: Regional General Permit 50 and
401 Certification.
1. Outside river corridor = Yes.
2. Below impact threshold. = No. RGP 50.
3. Tree clearing = Yes. (follow winter clearing moratorium).
4. Trout watershed = Yes. (follow moratorium unless verification NCWRC letter
states no).
5. NLEB HUC = No, greater than 0.25 miles from known hibernacula site.
Project will require a written Regional; General Permit and written 401
Certification.
Special Project Information:
The bridge and surrounding area were surveyed on 9.30.2020, 5.26.2021 and 6.8.2023
and no listed species were observed. The bridge is too low to support bat roosting (lack
of bat roosting will be confirmed before construction). Tree clearing will occur from
October 16 to March 31 to protect possible Indiana Bat roosting.
08/18/23 1 of 4

PART A: MINIMUM CRITERIA
YES NO
Item 1 to be completed by the Engineer.
1. Is the proposed project listed as a type and class of activity allowed under X
the Minimum Criteria Rule in which environmental documentation is not
required?
If the answer to number 1 is "no", then the project does not qualify as a
minimum criteria project. A state environmental assessment is required.
If yes, under which category? (9) Reconstruction of existing crossroad or
railroad separations and existing stream crossings,
including, but not limited to pipes, culverts, and
bddges•
If either category 98, #12(i) or #15 is used complete Part D of this checklist.
PART B: MINIMUM CRITERIA EXCEPTIONS
Items 2 — 4 to be completed by thn inee
2_ Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse air quality
impacts?
3. Will the proposed activity have secondary impacts or cumulative impacts
that may result in a significant adverse impact to human health or the
environment?
4. Is the proposed activity of such an unusual nature or does the proposed
activity have such widespread implications, that an uncommon concern
for its environmental effects has been expressed to the Department?
9 Iq
Item 5-8 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer:
5. Does the proposed activity have a significant adverse effect on wetlands;
surface waters such as rivers, streams, and estuaries; parklands; prime or
unique agricultural lands; or areas of recognized scenic, recreational,
archaeological, or historical value?
6. Will the proposed activity endanger the existence of a species on the
Department of Interior's threatened and endangered species list?
7. Could the proposed activity cause significant changes in land use
concentrations that would be expected to create adverse water quality or
ground water impacts?
08/18/23 2 of 4

YES NO
8. Is the proposed activity expected to have a significant adverse effect on
long-term recreational benefits or shellfish, finfish, wildlife, or their
natural habitats
If any questions 2 through 8 are answered "yes", the proposed project may not qualify as a
Minimum Criteria project. A state environmental assessment (EA) may be required. For
assistance, contact:
Manager, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
P. O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
(919) 733 —3141
Fax: [phone]
PART C: COMPLIANCE WITH STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Items 9-12 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
YES NO
9. Is a federally protected threatened or endangered species, or its
habitat, likely to be impacted by the proposed action?
10. Does the action require the placement of temporary or permanent
fill in waters of the United States? RGP 50/401 Certification
11. Does the project require the placement of a significant amount of
fill in high quality or relatively rare wetland ecosystems, such as
mountain bogs or pine savannahs?
12. Is the proposed action located in an Area of Environmental
Concern, as defined in the coastal Area Management Act?
Items 13 —15 to Vcompleted by the Engineer. M
13. Does the project require stream relocation or channel changes?
Cultural Resources
14. Will the project have an "effect" on a property or site listed on the
National Register of Historic Places?
15. Will the proposed action require acquisition of additional right of
way from publicly owned parkland or recreational areas?
Questions in Part "C" are designed to assist the Engineer and the Division Environmental
Officer in determining whether a permit or consultation with a state or federal resource
agency may be required. If any questions in Part "C" are answered "yes", follow the
appropriate permitting procedures prior to beginning project construction.
08/18/23 3 of 4

PART D: (To be completed when either category #8, #120), or #15 of the rules are
used.
Items 16- 22 to be completed by Division Environmental Officer.
16. Project length:
17. Right of Way width:
18. Project completion date:
19. Total acres of newly disturbed ground
surface:
20. Total acres of wetland impacts:
21. Total linear feet of stream impacts:
22. Project purpose:
If Part D of the checklist is completed, send a copy of the entire checklist document to:
Don G. Lee
State Roadside Environmental Engineer
Mail Service Center 1557
Raleigh, NC 27699-1557
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
DocuSignedb'y,,
ES "'/� / �
Reviewed by: B01EC543F Date:
Zach T. Shuler, P.E.
Bridge Program Manager
Division 14 DocuSigned by:
EPA2DAC8979C7943DDate:
Patrick J. Breedlove
Division 14 — PDEA Engineer
08/18/2023
08/18/2023
08/18/23 4 of 4

Bridge 204 SR 1369 (Walnut Creek Road) over Walnut Creek
near Franklin, North Carolina (Macon County)
17BP.14.R.159
Regional General Permit will be required and a written 401 Certification. A
trout moratorium may be applied to the permits at the request of NCWRC.
• Project will adhere to NCDOT best management practices. Avoidance of
erosion and sedimentation into Walnut Creek (Class C; Tr.) and
downstream habitats.
• Trees will be cleared from October 16t" to March 31 st to avoid potential
roosting by Indiana bats.

`} r
1'� 1, o
+, .^+'I .pi d
°� e w U o F u ` v a .•. N
.=L7
O
°;e � � ®b � fir. l 0
v 1 yl8 . ocv P' ;7 O1 r,"�,:]+
u �
ell
W
S0
G
n
G Y N
t7 ~
O ;ltr
�Ar
O O 4
z�
j 0 0
o l
n .
y � a
JJ1
0
ulall'1
a a E
,C
O
b
�+cin
o
O O d
O 4
az
�_ E
c_'a
v
A
{_
m
r
M
t
N
Q
LO
� O
C
C
U
N Ili
o N
a o
d
d
o
J

NCDOT Bat Bridge Habitat Assessment Form Updated 3/23/21
Bat Habitat Assessment Form
NCDOT Bridges
Observers: 13 r-ee oYoe TIP or DOT project number: /ME. /4Z./?.45�
Date: ('• . Zo23 Bridge Road (Name of facility carried) W,/n.t - eyet Ral �S•G /5-53e
County: Ma evo7 Bridge Number:_
Crossing (Name of the feature intersected): - WA),nK� C"efok.
% Surrounding habitat w/in 1 mi. Urban/Commercial Q
Suburban/Residential 7-0'�
of project footprint (approx) Herb/Shrub/Grassland 5"/•
Agricultural_-Z
Deciduous/Evergreen/Mixed Forest (A0V•_
Woody Wetland/Herb Wetland/Open Water Df.
Any trees >3" DBH within project footprint? N/A des
no
_ _
Complete this section for Indiana bat counties (Avery: Cranberry Mine area only, Cherokee,
Clay, Graham, Haywood,
Jackson, Macon, Rutherford: Bat Cave/Lake Lure area only, Swain)
Any shaggy trees or snags >5" DBH? N/A]
no
If yes to shag/snag, how much sunlight do they receive during the day? N/A
1-3 hours A-6 hours 7+ hours
If yes to shag/snag, list species of habitat trees >5" dbh //yy/octt 5.0 rv►raod.
agk-
kIf snags >S"DBH are present in sunlit areas, provide photos and location.
If large hollow trees are present, provide photos and location.
Presence of: In project footprint
In vicinty (0.5 mi)
Caves yes no
yes Q
Abandoned mines yes no
yes
if 'yes' to any of the above, provide photos, description, and location.
Major water source in project footprint N/A river stream/cree
pond lake swamp
Suitable drinking habitat in the form of non -stagnant, smooth or slack water?
�os no N/A
Structure specific questions:
Artificial lighting unknown yes no
Guard rails
Deck type
Beam type
End/back wall type
Creosote evidence
none concrete
concrete metal
none concrete
oncrete timber
Suitable roosting crevices present (%2 - 1'/e" wide)
Deck drains
amber metal
er open grid
tee timber
masonry
Max height of bridge deck above ground or water (ft): (.0_
Bridge alignment N/S E/W W/S
Human disturbance under bridge high med
Evidence of bats using bridge? (photos needed)
Below section completed only if bats/evidence of bats observed:
Emergence count performed? (If yes, complete form next page)
Evidence of bats using bird nests, if present?
Type of Evidence (circle all that apply) guano
Roost Type
Roost Material
Bat species present (list all species):
0 no
yes
yes
NE/SW
none
yes S)
yes
no
yes
no
staining
bats observed
crevice
open area
metal
concrete
Notes (list each species locations and estimated number of each species):

jrr h
4�
North Carolina Department of Transportation — Division 14
Botanical Survey
Project Name: Maco&i 2014
Project Location: NgI nw4- C,rcyw -Zaad r! 5rt
Observers: Date
County:
(0. 8. 2023
Streams Presents: Yes No Stream Name: VJdm t4- C-frck,
Wetlands Present: Yes No Wetland Name:
Canopy Description: ba1G tiw, lock la olu u �o d
Understory Description: wad
vns or% do
s rc m.
LAvyoffy:hqsixes
o ht v
USFWS iPAC Threatened & Endangered Species List:
❑
Bunched Arrowhead
Habitat Present:
Yes
No
Species Present:
Yes
No
❑
Green Pitcher Plant
Habitat Present:
Yes
No
Species Present:
Yes
No
JZ
Mountain Sweet Pitcher Plant
Habitat Present:
Yes
Vo
Species Present:
Yes
Rock Gnome Lichen
Habitat Present:
Yes
No
Species Present:
Yes
No
Small Whorled Pogonia
Habitat Present:
es)
No
Species Present:
Yes
&
❑
Spreading Avens
Habitat Present:
Yes
No
Species Present:
Yes
No
Swamp Pink
Habitat Present:
Yes
(N�
Species Present:
Yes
❑
Virginia Spiraea
Habitat Present:
Yes
No
Species Present:
Yes
No
❑
White Irisette
Habitat Present:
Yes
No
Species Present:
Yes
No

Project Tracking No.:
16-02-0114
o NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
1 tfill
0 ,1 valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
-
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: NA County: Macon
WBSNo: 17BP.14.R.159 Document: Minimum Criteria
F.A. No: na Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP 3 or 14 and TVA
Project Description:
The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 204 on SR 1533 (Walnut Creek Road) over Walnut
Creek in Macon County. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the project is defined as
a 600 foot (182.88 m) long corridor running 300 feet (91.44 m) north and 300 feet south along Walnut
Creek Road from the center of the bridge. The corridor is approximately 150 feet (45.72 m) wide
extending 75 feet (22.86 m) on either side of the road from its present center.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
Bridge No. 204 is located east of Franklin and west of Thorpe Lake in Macon County, North Carolina.
The project area is plotted in the southeast corner of the Corbin Knob USGS 7.5' topographic quadrangle
(Figure 1).
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on February
22, 2016. No previously recorded archaeological sites have been identified within the APE or within a
mile of the bridge. According to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office online data base
(HPOWEB 2016), there are no known historic architectural resources within the APE that may yield
intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps, USDA soil survey maps, aerial photographs (NC One
Map), historic maps (North Carolina maps website), and Google Street View application were examined
for information on environmental and cultural variables that may have contributed to prehistoric or
historic settlement within the project limits and to assess the level of ground disturbance.
Bridge 204 and Walnut Creek Road cross Walnut Creek north to south. The creek drains to the south and
it a tributary to the Cullasaja River. A stream confluence with Ledford Branch is immediately southwest
of the bridge. These waterways are part of the Little Tennessee drainage basin. The project area consists
mostly of steep side slopes with narrow benches west of the road and adjacent to the creek (Figure 2).
Houses and concrete/gravel parking lots occupy the benches or have been cut into the hillside. Ground
disturbance is heavy in this area. Property to the east belongs to the US Forest Service. Disturbance on
this property is minimal, but the road has been cut into the hillside.
According to the USDA soil survey, the Cullasaja-Tuckasegee complex (CuD) covers most of the APE
(see Figure 2). This series is well drained, but has a slope of 15 to 30 percent. The Edneyville-Chuestnut
complex (EdE) also falls within the APE primarily to the east on US Forest Service property. It too is
considered well drained but with a much steeper slope of 30 to 50 percent. Hillsides with slopes of 15
percent or more are not typically tested, since they are unlikely to yield significant archaeological sites.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 6

Project Tracking No.:
16-02-0114
A review of the site files shows no previous investigations or known sites within a mile of the bridge.
Although more research is needed in the area, this project will not provide the necessary data as slope is
steep and has a low potential for contain significant resources.
Lastly, a historic map review was conducted. The 1907 USGS Cowee topographic map is one of the first
in which an approximate location for the project area can be determined (Figure 3). This map shows a
road with a similar alignment as Walnut Creek Road and a crossing at or near the current bridge location.
All structures are depicted outside of the project limits. The circa 1910s US Post Office map illustrates a
similar road layout with a new structure southwest of the stream confluence (Figure 4). While, the 1933
Soil Map for Macon County is missing this structure (Figure 5). As a result of this map review, it appears
unlikely that any remains of significant historic structures will be encountered within the APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The defined archaeological APE for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 204 in Macon County is
unlikely to impact intact and significant archaeological deposits. This is due to steep hillside slopes and
previously ground disturbance from development along the benches. As long as impacts to the subsurface
occur within the defined APE, no further archaeological work is recommended for the proposed
replacement of Bridge No. 204. If work should affect subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further
archaeological consultation might be necessary.
Also, this state funded project requires a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) 26(a) permit. A copy of this
form is being provided to TVA for their use in their Section 106 compliance including Tribal
consultations as appropriate. Copies of this form are also being provided to The Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians, The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, and The United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee
Indians.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED
C. Damon Jones
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
❑ Photos El Correspondence
Other: images of historic maps
3/1/16
Date
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 6

Project Tracking No.:
16-02-0114
Soy
7 i IJ
7.
F
one Mile Radius (Shaded)
Around Prqlec:Area
r
j!. AL5
J, rV z
-4
-7-
N
-2 1
v
Z17
- -J 0
U.V
V,
Bridge 204
WA
APE (Rea)
k: D.
• f
J
�1111 I'M 1,
v
q
%
rrr
A
_J
vv�
J,
q.,
IN
Miles
1.500 w E
Macon County [Deters S
Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, Corbin Knob (1946; photorevised 1978), NC USGS
7.5' Topographic Quadrangle.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of

1 � ��Ir� � i� � • r' I / f.
+ ;
L i L 1 i t `� ►_rrr r�ir !1
4 � ; rirl�rl *fir
rri �� fir
tt •; �t, ti �4 *; � rim �iI'w �r�
IL
EVD
r_r I
`•
• �__►____ y if • j
1 �~ -_V rrr ��•!* fr`
t .i r!�_►►�y�► - --ram i! ! �
►`►w ►�-►err r-'
� 1
�-----
:Evl
NkAi !
�1014,
D'�

Project Tracking No.:
16-02-0114
` (HV
�=r
t
Pro'ect Area:'
r -
_ 1 +
f�P1 10
if
4 .
I
Figure 3. The 1907 Cowee USGS topographic map showing the location of the project area.
Project Area
7
7
4 i
v •
z.
Figure 4. The circa 1910s Rural Delivery Routes for Macon County showing the location of the project
area.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 6

Project Tracking No.:
16-02-0114
r
Project Area
�iC, I
4
Figure 5. The 1933 Soil Map for Macon County showing the location of the project area.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
6 of 6

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
16-02-0114
t'iRb HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
R r, NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
` This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Macon
WBSNo.:
BP17.14.R.159
Document
Type. -
MCC
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
® State ❑ Federal
Federal
Permits :
® Yes ❑ No
Permit
Type(s):
NWP 3 or 14
TVA and Cert. 401
Proiect Description:
Replace Bridge No. 204 on SR 1533 (Walnut Creek Rd) over Walnut Creek.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and
indexes was undertaken on April 11, 2016. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL, or SL
in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). The bridge itself, Iredell County Bridge No. 204, was
built in 1973. The structure does not exemplify any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type and
is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The Macon County online tax data
reveal no properties in the APE greater than fifty years of age. No survey is required.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there
are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project
area:
Using HPO GIS website and county tax data provides reliable information regarding the structures in the
APE. These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of
historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
.N
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY RF,QUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 2

�07
'wo
v 44.
It
Jvv
dm W)c fw
*4r"
if!
9 4w
-1
' � � Via. � , x,� .ra�yy,, � F( _
14.

e lK
■
Y4
Macon 2 - Vicinity Map
�
0 'tR
r
U
-..p it w 7-
- f—,t
le
T m n rm p in -r rn n P rp.- GE.6 Ll• FA - NP
4
n,
_ — yew �n
e
3 a
I
M
J932 ft
JO..�w
f -
r. Ono { 14 I
� � fti•,�� � � � � � �� y,?tiR t�wrX�t
rreva N �3030__ o `,•
t7eaOoveo
Om Qa0nd0� [53�5p L r ;

17BP,14.R.159 - Macon 204 - Quay! Map
OSDV
• «_l .-ti � 5 s� #� • a • 4 w� - , A �/i 1.
�M
f Keener �ti `` _ f _
I '(� ���[ �`ree� :gib `� fl �•- ` � � y/t#
tl • �� !� �Z ; �� tarp s ,rtt, ���_ Sack i1Va�r'
M to
vi lle
nut
. *ram � '•� r I } ' 1 r �r`� �� _ . � � � r
•� f r

°F NORTH NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ATTENTION i'EMP. REPAIR -PLATES WELDED TO BEAMS AT
ti� 490� SCATTERED LOCATIONS.
ytiv v DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BRIDGE MANAGEMENT UNIT
OF TBRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
INSPECTION TYPE: Routine Inspection
COUNTY MACON
ROUTE SR1533
LOCATION .2 MI.S.JCT.SR1531
BRIDGE NUMBER 550204 INSPECTION CYCLE 2 YRS
ACROSS WALNUT CREEK
SUPERSTRUCTURE TIMBER FLOOR ON CONT. I -BEAMS
SUBSTRUCTURE ABUTSNOUNT MASONRY;CRUTCH BT:TIM. CAP/TIM.POST&SILL
SPANS 2 @ 13' CONT.
LONGITUDE 83015' 33.11"
PRESENT CONDITION POOR
INSPECTION DATE 09/11/2012
PRESENT POSTING Not Posted NOT POSTED
COMPUTER UPDATE
POSTING LETTER DATE
OTHER SIGNS PRESENT DELINEATORS [4]
LOOKING NORTH
LATITUDE 350 9' 74.73"
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
PROPOSED POSTING
ANALYSIS DATE
SUFFICIENCY RATING
M.P. 0
SIGN NOTICE
ISSUED FOR
No
WEIGHT LIMIT
No
DELINEATORS
No
NARROW BRIDGE
No
ONE LANE BRIDGE
No
LOW CLEARANCE
NUMBERED
REQUIRED

Roy Cooper, Governor
0■0■� INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■�■m NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
June 9, 2023
Patrick Breedlove
NCDOT-Division 14
253 Webster Road
Sylva, NC 28779
RE. Macon County - Bridge 204, 17BP.14.R.159
Dear Patrick Breedlove.
d_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-22261
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butlerWncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTh1EN7 OF NATURAL_ AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Macon County - Bridge 204
Project No. 17BP.14.R.159
June 9, 2023
NCNHDE-22261
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present, it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner -
Nantahala National Forest - Nantahala Ranger US Forest Service
Owner Type
Federal
District
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on June 9, 2023; source: NCNHP, Spring (April) 2023. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Macon County - Bridge 204
Project No. 17BP.14.R.159
June 9, 2023
NCNHDE-22261
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID
ntific Name
Common Name
Element Accuracy
Federal State
Global
State
Group
L
Observation
Occurrence
Status Status
Rank
Rank
i
AL
Date dbm
Rank < <
M i
_11111
Dragonfly or 33445
Calopteryx amata
Superb Jewelwing
2004-Pre
H? 5-Very
--- Significantly
G5
S1S2
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Freshwater Fish42043
Salvelinus fontinalis
Brook Trout
2022-10-26
E 3-Medium
--- Significantly
G5
S4
Rare
Natural 31061
Chestnut Oak Forest
---
2011-05-09
BC 3-Medium
--- ---
G5
S5
Community
(Dry Heath Subtype)
Natural 29040
Montane Red Cedar-
---
2011-05-09
AB 2-High
--- ---
G2
S2
Community
Hardwood Woodland
Vascular Plant 9551
Gentianopsis crinita
Fringed Gentian
1968-Pre
H 5-Very
--- Endangered
G5
S1
Low
Vascular Plant 23934
Hackelia virginiana
Virginia Stickseed
1968-Pre
H 5-Very
--- Significantly
G5
S2
Low
Rare
Peripheral
Natural Areas Documented
Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
rite Name
esentational Rating
_ Collective Rating
Grindstone Knob/Cedar Knob
R3 (High)
C3 (High)
Houston Knob
R5 (General)
C5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name wner Owner Type
Nantahala National Forest - Nantahala Ranger US Forest Service Federal
District
Highlands -Cashiers Land Trust Easement Highlands -Cashiers Land Trust Private
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on June 9, 2023; source: NCNHP, Spring (April) 2023. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-22261: Macon County - Bridge 204
June 9, 2023
® NHP Natural Area (NHNA) Q Buffered Project Boundary
® Managed Area (MAREA) Q Project Boundary
Natural Heritage Element Occurrence (NHEO)
Sources: Esn, Airbus DS, USGS, NCA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS,
NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA,
Intermap and the GIS user community
Sources Esn, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NCAA, USGS, ® OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the CIS User Community
Page 4 of 4