820408_Routine_20231011

Facility No. -M Time In Time -Out
---- DateFarm Name Intearacoy
Owner Site Ra7z:
No. I�— ---- C �, d
Back -up HOC No. yGO.,
n � 1
No.
General , or NPDES
- Feed Farrow - Feed
- Finish Farrow - Firiis!
rallu-.vvean 1oCC7�� 1 f jrOthe<<
FREEBOARD: Design Sludge Survey _
n
Observed
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test
Weekly Freeboard
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes
Waste Analysis:
Date
L NK"r M
Wettable Acres
Daily Rainfall
120 min Inspections .
Nitrogen (N)
Calibration/GPM /
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections _
Date Nitrogen (N)

....,...Y.......... �...,Y...,..,.... v vt...a .a..avu iw•w.. `/ IJ LL a U■ G L' ValaaLLVlI l./ 1 OL:ul11Ga1 t1 WMauCO
in for Visit: (� Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: I6: b County: Region:
Farm Name: P' 3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: pr-�gfag-, fa I 1117 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: Facility Contact: J a wCj (a
mTitle: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 1 W Integrator•
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current `,
=° Design
Current
Design
Current¢
Swine Capacity fop
Wet Poultry
},Capacity
Pup
Cattle
Capacry
.1Pop":
$ems
e
-
_
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
�
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish``
Design
,
Current
s
Dairy Heifer
=
Farrow to Wean
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dry Pou_Itr
y_Ca
Capacity
Pup
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
o
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
jPullets
Beef Brood Cow
TurkeysAh
Other ��
Turkey Pouets`
..
Other
a
,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): ?j 5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes LNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
� � � G0
12. Crop Type(s): � J
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes qNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes EL No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes 'E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes )S�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes-,qNo
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes t]�No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA 0 NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
b No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes QN1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
S/l212020