20231435 Ver 1_401 Pre-filing Request_20231019

Monday, May 8, 2023 at 14:35:31 Eastern Daylight Time
Page 1 of 1
Subject:Surry County - Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restora4on: 401 Pre-filing Mee4ng Request
Date:Monday, May 8, 2023 at 2:33:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time
From:David Brown
To:[e-mail]
AFachments:image001.jpg, Stream Repairs 30% Plan Drawings-Horne Creek and Tributaries Project.pdf,
Parcel Map.pdf
This is the pre-filing mee4ng request for a proposed stream restora4on project on a UT of Horne Creek and
Horne Creek in Surry County. See aTached preliminary design for the stream restora4on project. The project
will implement natural channel design techniques to restore approximately 2,517 linear feet of stream
channel. The project is located at: 36.26504, -80.48909.

Thank you,
David Brown, PG
Sr. Scientist / Geologist | Jennings Environmental, PLLC
828 384 1890
[e-mail]
Asheville, NC | jenningsenv.com

This information is confidential and is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. Any disclosure, copying, distribution
or taking action in relation to this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
StreamStats Report
Basin Characteristics
P a r a m e t e r
C o d e P a r a m e t e r D e s c r i p t i o n V a l u e U n i t
R e g i o n I D :N C
W o r k s p a c e I D :N C 2 0 2 0 0 9 0 3 1 1 1 5 4 4 4 2 2 0 0 0
C l i c k e d P o i n t (L a t i t u d e , L o n g i t u d e ):3 6 .2 6 4 3 1 , -8 0 .4 8 6 8 9
T i m e :2 0 2 0 -0 9 -0 3 0 7 :1 6 :0 2 -0 4 0 0
P a r a m e t e r
C o d e P a r a m e t e r D e s c r i p t i o n V a l u e U n i t
D R N A R E A A r e a t h a t d r a i n s t o a p o i n t o n a s t r e a m 2 .2 4 s q u a r e
m i l e s
P C T R E G 1 P e r c e n t a g e o f d r a i n a g e a r e a l o c a t e d i n R e g i o n 1 1 0 0 p e r c e n t
P C T R E G 2 P e r c e n t a g e o f d r a i n a g e a r e a l o c a t e d i n R e g i o n 2 0 p e r c e n t
P C T R E G 3 P e r c e n t a g e o f d r a i n a g e a r e a l o c a t e d i n R e g i o n 3 0 p e r c e n t
P C T R E G 4 P e r c e n t a g e o f d r a i n a g e a r e a l o c a t e d i n R e g i o n 4 0 p e r c e n t
P C T R E G 5 P e r c e n t a g e o f d r a i n a g e a r e a l o c a t e d i n R e g i o n 5 0 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 I M P P e r c e n t a g e o f i m p e r v i o u s a r e a d e t e r m i n e d f r o m N L C D 2 0 0 6 i m p e r v i o u s d a t a s e t 0 .3 5 p e r c e n t
B A S I N P E R I M P e r i m e t e r o f t h e d r a i n a g e b a s i n a s d e f i n e d i n S I R 2 0 0 4 -5 2 6 2 9 .3 9 m i l e s
B S L D E M 3 0 F T M e a n b a s i n s l o p e , b a s e d o n s l o p e p e r c e n t g r i d 1 3 p e r c e n t
C S L 1 0 _8 5 f m C h a n g e i n e l e v a t i o n b e t w e e n p o i n t s 1 0 a n d 8 5 p e r c e n t o f l e n g t h a l o n g m a i n c h a n n e l t o b a s i n
d i v i d e d i v i d e d b y l e n g t h b e t w e e n p o i n t s f t p e r m i
7 7 .2 3 f e e t
p e r m i
E L E V M e a n B a s i n E l e v a t i o n 9 4 5 f e e t
E L E V M A X M a x i m u m b a s i n e l e v a t i o n 1 2 5 0 f e e t
I 2 4 H 5 0 Y M a x i m u m 2 4 -h o u r p r e c i p i t a t i o n t h a t o c c u r s o n a v e r a g e o n c e i n 5 0 y e a r s 7 .1 6 i n c h e s
L C 0 1 B A R E P e r c e n t a g e o f a r e a b a r r e n l a n d , N L C D 2 0 0 1 c a t e g o r y 3 1 0 .1 3 4 p e r c e n t
L C 0 1 C R P H AY P e r c e n t a g e o f c u l t i v a t e d c r o p s a n d h a y, c l a s s e s 8 1 a n d 8 2 , f r o m N L C D 2 0 0 1 5 0 .0 2 7 p e r c e n t
L C 0 1 D E V P e r c e n t a g e o f l a n d -u s e f r o m N LC D 2 0 0 1 c l a s s e s 2 1 -2 4 5 .4 6 p e r c e n t
L C 0 1 F O R E S T P e r c e n t a g e o f f o r e s t f r o m N LC D 2 0 0 1 c l a s s e s 4 1 -4 3 3 8 .0 2 p e r c e n t
L C 0 1 H E R B P e r c e n t a g e o f h e r b a c e o u s u p l a n d f r o m N LC D 2 0 0 1 c l a s s 7 1 6 .0 6 9 p e r c e n t
L C 0 1 I M P P e r c e n t i m p e r v i o u s n e s s o f b a s i n a r e a 2 0 0 1 N LC D 0 .3 5 p e r c e n t
L C 0 1 S H R U B P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y s h r u b l a n d u s i n g 2 0 0 1 N L C D 0 .2 9 1 p e r c e n t
L C 0 1 W AT E R P e r c e n t a g e o f o p e n w a t e r, c l a s s 1 1 , f r o m N LC D 2 0 0 1 0 p e r c e n t
P a r a m e t e r
C o d e P a r a m e t e r D e s c r i p t i o n V a l u e U n i t
L C 0 1 W E T L N D P e r c e n t a g e o f w e t l a n d s , c l a s s e s 9 0 a n d 9 5 , f r o m N L C D 2 0 0 1 0 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 B A R E P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y b a r r e n r o c k u s i n g 2 0 0 6 N L C D 0 .0 9 2 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 D E V P e r c e n t a g e o f l a n d -u s e f r o m N LC D 2 0 0 6 c l a s s e s 2 1 -2 4 5 .4 6 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 F O R E S T P e r c e n t a g e o f f o r e s t f r o m N LC D 2 0 0 6 c l a s s e s 4 1 -4 3 3 9 .2 7 5 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 G R A S S P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y g r a s s l a n d /h e r b a c e o u s u s i n g 2 0 0 6 N L C D 5 .9 1 7 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 P L A N T P e r c e n t o f a r e a i n c u l t i v a t i o n u s i n g 2 0 0 6 N L C D 4 8 .9 0 6 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 S H R U B P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y s h r u b l a n d u s i n g 2 0 0 6 N L C D 0 .3 5 1 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 W AT E R P e r c e n t o f o p e n w a t e r, c l a s s 1 1 , f r o m N LC D 2 0 0 6 0 p e r c e n t
L C 0 6 W E T L N D P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y w e t l a n d u s i n g 2 0 0 6 N L C D 0 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 B A R E P e r c e n t a g e o f b a r r e n f r o m N L C D 2 0 1 1 c l a s s 3 1 0 .0 9 2 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 C R P H AY P e r c e n t a g e o f c u l t i v a t e d c r o p s a n d h a y, c l a s s e s 8 1 a n d 8 2 , f r o m N L C D 2 0 1 1 4 8 .5 3 4 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 D E V P e r c e n t a g e o f d e v e l o p e d (u r b a n ) l a n d f r o m N LC D 2 0 1 1 c l a s s e s 2 1 -2 4 5 .4 6 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 F O R E S T P e r c e n t a g e o f f o r e s t f r o m N LC D 2 0 1 1 c l a s s e s 4 1 -4 3 3 8 .7 9 9 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 G R A S S P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y g r a s s l a n d /h e r b a c e o u s u s i n g 2 0 1 1 N L C D 5 .7 9 3 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 I M P A v e r a g e p e r c e n t a g e o f i m p e r v i o u s a r e a d e t e r m i n e d f r o m N L C D 2 0 1 1 i m p e r v i o u s d a t a s e t 0 .3 5 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 S H R U B P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y s h r u b l a n d u s i n g 2 0 1 1 N L C D 1 .3 2 2 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 W AT E R P e r c e n t o f o p e n w a t e r, c l a s s 1 1 , f r o m N LC D 2 0 1 1 0 p e r c e n t
L C 1 1 W E T L N D P e r c e n t a g e o f w e t l a n d s , c l a s s e s 9 0 a n d 9 5 , f r o m N L C D 2 0 1 1 0 p e r c e n t
L C 9 2 F O R E S T P e r c e n t a g e o f f o r e s t f r o m N LC D 1 9 9 2 c l a s s e s 4 1 -4 3 6 2 .8 0 3 p e r c e n t
L F P L E N G T H L e n g t h o f l o n g e s t f l o w p a t h 3 .3 3 2 m i l e s
L U 9 2 B A R E P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y b a r r e n r o c k u s i n g 1 9 9 2 N L C D 0 p e r c e n t
L U 9 2 D E V P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y a l l d e n s i t i e s o f d e v e l o p e d l a n d u s i n g 1 9 9 2 N LC D 0 .0 2 9 p e r c e n t
P a r a m e t e r
C o d e P a r a m e t e r D e s c r i p t i o n V a l u e U n i t
L U 9 2 P L A N T P e r c e n t o f a r e a i n c u l t i v a t i o n u s i n g 1 9 9 2 N L C D 3 7 .1 3 9 p e r c e n t
L U 9 2 W AT E R P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y w a t e r u s i n g 1 9 9 2 N L C D 0 .0 2 9 p e r c e n t
L U 9 2 W E T L N P e r c e n t o f a r e a c o v e r e d b y w e t l a n d u s i n g 1 9 9 2 N L C D 0 p e r c e n t
M I N B E L E V M i n i m u m b a s i n e l e v a t i o n 7 9 0 f e e t
O U T L E T E L E V E l e v a t i o n o f t h e s t r e a m o u t l e t i n t h o u s a n d s o f f e e t a b o v e N A V D 8 8 .7 9 1 f e e t
P R E C I P M e a n A n n u a l P r e c i p i t a t i o n 4 6 .8 i n c h e s
P R O T E C T E D P e r c e n t o f a r e a o f p r o t e c t e d F e d e r a l a n d S t a t e o w n e d l a n d 0 .2 p e r c e n t
S S U R G O A P e r c e n t a g e o f a r e a o f H y d r o l o g i c S o i l Ty p e A f r o m S S U R G O 7 .3 4 p e r c e n t
S S U R G O B P e r c e n t a g e o f a r e a o f H y d r o l o g i c S o i l Ty p e B f r o m S S U R G O 9 1 .9 p e r c e n t
S S U R G O C P e r c e n t a g e o f a r e a o f H y d r o l o g i c S o i l Ty p e C f r o m S S U R G O 0 .3 p e r c e n t
S S U R G O D P e r c e n t a g e o f a r e a o f H y d r o l o g i c S o i l Ty p e D f r o m S S U R G O 0 .1 7 p e r c e n t
Peak-Flow Statistics Parameters[Peak Southeast US over 1 sqmi 2009 5158]
P a r a m e t e r C o d e P a r a m e t e r N a m e V a l u e U n i t s M i n L i m i t M a x L i m i t
D R N A R E A D r a i n a g e A r e a 2 .2 4 s q u a r e m i l e s 1 9 0 0 0
P C T R E G 1 P e r c e n t A r e a i n R e g i o n 1 1 0 0 p e r c e n t 0 1 0 0
P C T R E G 2 P e r c e n t A r e a i n R e g i o n 2 0 p e r c e n t 0 1 0 0
P C T R E G 3 P e r c e n t A r e a i n R e g i o n 3 0 p e r c e n t 0 1 0 0
P C T R E G 4 P e r c e n t A r e a i n R e g i o n 4 0 p e r c e n t 0 1 0 0
P C T R E G 5 P e r c e n t A r e a i n R e g i o n 5 0 p e r c e n t 0 1 0 0
Peak-Flow Statistics Flow Report[Peak Southeast US over 1 sqmi 2009 5158]
P I l : P r e d i c t i o n I n t e r v a l -L o w e r, P I u : P r e d i c t i o n I n t e r v a l -U p p e r, S E p : S t a n d a r d E r r o r o f P r e d i c t i o n , S E : S t a n d a r d E r r o r (o t h e r -- s e e r e p o r t )
S t a t i s t i c V a l u e U n i t P I l P I u S E p
2 Ye a r P e a k F l o o d 2 6 7 f t ^3 /s 1 5 3 4 6 5 3 4 .5
5 Ye a r P e a k F l o o d 4 8 9 f t ^3 /s 2 8 3 8 4 5 3 4
1 0 Y e a r P e a k F l o o d 6 5 5 f t ^3 /s 3 7 3 1 1 5 0 3 5 .1
2 5 Y e a r P e a k F l o o d 8 7 5 f t ^3 /s 4 8 1 1 5 9 0 3 7 .5
5 0 Y e a r P e a k F l o o d 1 0 7 0 f t ^3 /s 5 7 0 2 0 1 0 3 9 .6
1 0 0 Y e a r P e a k F l o o d 1 2 5 0 f t ^3 /s 6 4 3 2 4 3 0 4 1 .9
2 0 0 Y e a r P e a k F l o o d 1 4 3 0 f t ^3 /s 7 1 0 2 8 8 0 4 4 .3
5 0 0 Y e a r P e a k F l o o d 1 7 1 0 f t ^3 /s 8 0 9 3 6 1 0 4 7 .7
Peak-Flow Statistics Citations
W e a v e r, J .C ., F e a s t e r, T.D., a n d G o t v a l d , A .J .,2 0 0 9 , M a g n i t u d e a n d f r e q u e n c y o f r u r a l f l o o d s i n t h e S o u t h e a s t e r n U n i t e d
S t a t e s , t h r o u g h 2 0 0 6 —V o l u m e 2 , N o r t h C a r o l i n a : U .S . G e o l o g i c a l S u r v e y S c i e n t i f i c I n v e s t i g a t i o n s R e p o r t 2 0 0 9 –5 1 5 8 , 1 1 1 p .
(h t t p ://p u b s .u s g s .g o v /s i r /2 0 0 9 /5 1 5 8 /)
USGS Data Disclaimer: Unless other wise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which
the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S.
Geological Sur vey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor
shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
USGS Software Disclaimer: This software has been approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Although the software has been subjected to rigorous
review, the USGS reserves the right to update the software as needed pursuant to further analysis and review. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS
or the U.S. Government as to the functionality of the software and related material nor shall the fact of release constitute any such warranty. Furthermore, the software
is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
USGS Product Names Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Application Version: 4.4.0
United States
Department of
Agriculture
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Surry County,
North Carolina
Bean Shoals Horne Creek
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
June 20, 2023
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
Soil Map..................................................................................................................5
Soil Map................................................................................................................6
Legend..................................................................................................................7
Map Unit Legend..................................................................................................8
Map Unit Descriptions..........................................................................................8
Surry County, North Carolina..........................................................................10
CsA—Colvard and Suches soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded..................................................................................................10
FeC2—Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................11
FeD2—Fairview sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately
eroded...................................................................................................12
FsE—Fairview-Stott Knob complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes.....................13
References............................................................................................................16
4
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
5
6
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
40
1
3
3
0
0
40
1
3
3
6
0
40
1
3
4
2
0
40
1
3
4
8
0
40
1
3
5
4
0
40
1
3
6
0
0
40
1
3
6
6
0
40
1
3
7
2
0
40
1
3
7
8
0
40
1
3
8
4
0
40
1
3
3
0
0
40
1
3
3
6
0
40
1
3
4
2
0
40
1
3
4
8
0
40
1
3
5
4
0
40
1
3
6
0
0
40
1
3
6
6
0
40
1
3
7
2
0
40
1
3
7
8
0
40
1
3
8
4
0
545710 545770 545830 545890 545950 546010 546070
545710 545770 545830 545890 545950 546010 546070
36° 16' 6'' N
80
°

2
9
'

2
9
'
'

W
36° 16' 6'' N
80
°

2
9
'

1
2
'
'

W
36° 15' 48'' N
80
°

2
9
'

2
9
'
'

W
36° 15' 48'' N
80
°

2
9
'

1
2
'
'

W
N
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 100 200 400 600
Feet
0 40 80 160 240
Meters
Map Scale: 1:2,700 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Surry County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 27, Sep 12, 2022
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 18, 2019—May
21, 2019
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Custom Soil Resource Report
7
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
CsA Colvard and Suches soils, 0 to
3 percent slopes,
occasionally flooded
5.9 77.0%
FeC2 Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
0.3 3.4%
FeD2 Fairview sandy clay loam, 15 to
25 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
0.5 6.3%
FsE Fairview-Stott Knob complex,
25 to 45 percent slopes
1.0 13.3%
Totals for Area of Interest 7.7 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
Custom Soil Resource Report
8
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
Custom Soil Resource Report
9
Surry County, North Carolina
CsA—Colvard and Suches soils, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1jxj3
Elevation: 1,200 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 45 to 70 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost-free period: 120 to 170 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Colvard and similar soils:49 percent
Suches and similar soils:39 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Colvard
Setting
Landform:Natural levees on flood plains
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Parent material:Sandy and loamy alluvium derived from igneous and
metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 10 inches: fine sandy loam
C1 - 10 to 50 inches: fine sandy loam
C2 - 50 to 80 inches: gravelly loamy fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding:NoneOccasional
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Suches
Setting
Landform:Flood plains
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Linear
Custom Soil Resource Report
10
Parent material:Sandy and loamy alluvium derived from igneous and
metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 12 inches: loam
Bw - 12 to 54 inches: clay loam
C - 54 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 30 to 48 inches
Frequency of flooding:NoneOccasional
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
FeC2—Fairview sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2tqd7
Elevation: 660 to 1,640 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 43 to 51 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 59 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 230 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Fairview, moderately eroded, and similar soils:88 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Fairview, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform:Ridges, interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Interfluve
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or
saprolite residuum weathered from schist
Custom Soil Resource Report
11
Typical profile
Ap1 - 0 to 4 inches: sandy clay loam
Ap2 - 4 to 9 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 9 to 24 inches: clay
BC - 24 to 29 inches: clay loam
C - 29 to 79 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F136XY320VA - Northern inner piedmont acidic upland forest,
moist
Hydric soil rating: No
FeD2—Fairview sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes, moderately
eroded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2tqd8
Elevation: 660 to 1,640 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 43 to 51 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 59 degrees F
Frost-free period: 190 to 230 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Fairview, moderately eroded, and similar soils:88 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Fairview, Moderately Eroded
Setting
Landform:Interfluves, ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional):Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional):Interfluve
Down-slope shape:Convex
Across-slope shape:Convex
Custom Soil Resource Report
12
Parent material:Saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or
saprolite residuum weathered from schist
Typical profile
Ap1 - 0 to 4 inches: sandy clay loam
Ap2 - 4 to 9 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 9 to 24 inches: clay
BC - 24 to 29 inches: clay loam
C - 29 to 79 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F136XY320VA - Northern inner piedmont acidic upland forest,
moist
Hydric soil rating: No
FsE—Fairview-Stott Knob complex, 25 to 45 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1jxkd
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 48 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 59 degrees F
Frost-free period: 160 to 200 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Fairview and similar soils:60 percent
Stott knob and similar soils:28 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Fairview
Setting
Landform:Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional):Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional):Side slope
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Convex
Custom Soil Resource Report
13
Parent material:Saprolite derived from schist and/or gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 6 to 24 inches: clay
BC - 24 to 29 inches: clay loam
C - 29 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope:25 to 45 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F136XY320VA - Northern inner piedmont acidic upland forest,
moist
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Stott Knob
Setting
Landform:Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional):Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional):Side slope
Down-slope shape:Linear
Across-slope shape:Convex
Parent material:Saprolite derived from schist and/or gneiss
Typical profile
A - 0 to 3 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 3 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 7 to 24 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 24 to 30 inches: fine sandy loam
Cr - 30 to 47 inches: weathered bedrock
R - 47 to 80 inches: unweathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope:25 to 45 percent
Depth to restrictive feature:20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 40 to 80 inches
to lithic bedrock
Drainage class:Well drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Very low (0.00 to 0.00
in/hr)
Depth to water table:More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding:None
Frequency of ponding:None
Custom Soil Resource Report
14
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F136XY330VA - Northern inner piedmont acidic upland forest,
dry-moist
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
15
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
16
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
Custom Soil Resource Report
17
Y
z
10
N

FA
to
It %
I AT to I
NZ I IFi I- or
��� i✓inn- letv*Tf
�` MAP 0 MIT
rot
"rfam ' .r.It
F'� '
to I
F .i tNi NOW4 y C 5IT
rr
WIN 6
Tat 1.4
WN IN I: Its
It obt
1. c�..`sn rG.i ' q y ,D -ate d8f
'*`'���t, xWIT :: -Kr�y 9= r'&n
vI
t J2 il . K.y 4_Ni 3�
-OTt sae. max;. r
�*
WIN
It INNI
p., O.
f f
f*,`
WWN
*...
ITC
t.
NO
' e r
It
WIN ^INT
ItToW
IT NI I
z
ININ
NO
l i S ITI1
. AN
fit, iNo
-
�
. /.2�e•n .!.%"1a�`3 .f _t _.n3 ._ Y'h-t1A2 �.. ._ _� �" �-f �"` ..

d ,rc wr.
A. �: 'i y� ya°' � _ �'a.,` ` -c .'�y Wes+ Jp e I f IF
<
SI
PC
Ad
F,d IN
IF
IF v
A II
IF 41
IF
x..IV i3 "^ ry
F-A�, r _ wt , t: a�AI If,
IPF
AAFF
It
'%{'%a&IF
_ - yam= TIF
FA AI Ad
_ _ a,
_ c
k-
e If A-
A IF
F,r IF
IF
4� fF 1 -0 1 - V IA.
IF IFLo. IF
IV 'IF ee
d- R
r
vv
` -
FA .
PAPA/ j 'g N�
s i FAAIF
�
IFIF
SAIL F,FF,p ,fd AM �u.�IF
I �y� A A��v IFI "Ad a}W
IF
IF dd
is--•� `-�.�✓.w
FAA A
I AI
iFdAp ;
FdAqIpFFr
A pill
or
If If I
t� A, iyr - td a4t°:AI
-ddI—. - .. r is �. S ,..Tip' r+ ...os - t . �t-:� -�,a+ ., .�.. '�==d�i�.: �.e. icy

Ali A
a AI, I.I"• 1 p K s� d Y
ILL
e IN
itipit
tow
EANN,76,
Iol
IVIVI
r�2. sue' ��.
,.�
%l
7.
IV
9r.
1 1 fry`"�,VIIiII r
felleee
kkkkk .V,-
S —
14
It
Iti
� 9
Nor
J01 orpd
�}
� f _
--, -
z_ AA-
,. .

i a w W
Ip
i
A
n�
%IIL
It

If.
,r. f r y' rr If
k �� ; `� x y IIJI; a
i n t fi...
Tt r{r r
_.Ion-
1fr
: ,LLB• sP.! 1� _ _•.T
pf
14
If i vIf
r as }
> ," - s
- Ism;
—
_c ➢ % ` - 44
fr< r
a� 4 wI e
\'
x ;a
v
�IIIL If
If If
LW
�Kaf-
t
_� li Q {
L g If 9IL
Ir If �4 a
f
WF
:,IN

� � >��\�
� . . .
y=� §/ �� S
� i\� � /�� � ƒ .:
^.� �_/�� \\�« \\
' \� � � ��y� _ ,
� �� z . . .
� � ,� y . .
\� � .: y\�� ±^�

IF:
F;FtFy'�:(�IF
^P?' XI IF
`v a»:.;IT
S 4 yy Rix File,,e,,,z� •s'a '' rTZ
s
e 4 n a. r s;,z�>a
F.� D alTIN
ai IT
IN
y� t a s fir` �a9FIT Ill
a s
IF
r Fill I IF IT
IF
iyIF
yl,�. i- ♦ _ '< k '�. �.. ' . t S1' ```a' IT ., IT It IF III� tN
' `"� iIF
I" FF, FF
s `z
it r
i�. t
T Is FFIF Fill
IF
�n , is
' r • IF I
pli
IF IFFIli..
Ill IT
IF
FIT I
-IF IT s,c
IF
It
.q ypi \ -. :i ..II I
FF; I I
IF
'# Ill lit
- 01 Fill,
�._` �Y arc\T4 `� ". �
TL
I.
Tor IF IF
R� It
IF IF 0 44 IF IF 1- .i-
IT
.�FFIT I YIs
IF I
llFIT, I
Fil
Fit F.
IFIT
IFFIFF
F,I
_ '. F; `� 4 - _ `s`'!^= ,`� .. mow' -'.?q '• "`I IF
IF Ill IF IF - Mgt
y
IF
Cost �FFITF ZI Fill
­TF-.�.� ,'gym -.�: .. _
TIT,
I FIT
1� _Farr - c
IF
FIT FI ill
IF IF IF
WM�' iF •.... IF
_ _
TIFF
. IF ITT Fi I-�:n:. - - _ _
IF —
Fell
IF
TIFF It I
FIT
40
Fol
:�'.._
F1'dIT GOT:
j,F Is
AI Fill IT Fall—FIFF
IF
IF I IT
FIFF. FIT
TIF
�
.r� ,'ate•• r - .,.Ii it
"`;•-< v..t
t
IF Ill I IFIll-Ill. I.
IF
., _ ,..x :* � 'r°a' ..: C� `liIsmot 'sTII-'maml
c IT
I IF
t W. Y*r "� " z 4 aae
-' x
"' �ts Air
IF Asst _�_e� T'l ..._ t» ..
S;, �•_

Google Ea�rt"w 900R N

M
Google'€arth��

N
Googl earth +�., . o � 4" a ft

GOOg12Ea th � °" �J� "4, ° 900rt 'Y

Legend
� `tt
GoogleEarth 900ft
„.. I I

r'
Google Earth age
Image US Gtelaglal surv.,

This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown herein does not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES MAP
therefore is not for design, construction, or recording or transfer of title. The Exhibit was compiled from
a - f1C11 500 feet
available wererecordedusinfrom imbleR sources listed
subeter Streams and Wetlands: All features located
in the field were recorded using aTrimble R-1 with submeter accuracy,
Horne Creek Stream Restoration Repair and Bridge Installation
Scenic
GRAPHIC SCALE
Sources:
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
Wetland and Stream Determinations (Unverified)
Consulting ENVIRONMENTAL &COASTAL
g
Soils: USDA Surry County Soil Survey
ENGINEERING SERVICES
Aerial and Topographic Mapping
Feet
October 2020
Group

USGS 7.5 Min Quad
6/20/2023, 2:01:10 PM
N�
1:18,056
0 0.13 0.25 0.5 mi
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 km
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
USGS
2021 USGS

6/20/2023, 2:03:44 PM
USGS Hydrography Dataset
o
J
J
100 6
�iy}r
r�
F-r
1:4,514
0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS,
EPA, USDA, USGS TNM — National Hydrography Dataset. Data Refreshed
USGS
2021 USGS

LiDAR Hillshade
6/20/2023, 2:05:04 PM
w,
r
00
(004
1:4,514
0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS,
EPA, USDA, USGS National Map 3D Elevation Program (3DEP). May 16,
USGS
2021 USGS

;90
6/20/2023, 2:06:08 PM
LiDAR Slope
. J. •
i
r
F I �
a
1
1:4,514
0 0.03 0.06 0.12 mi
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS,
EPA, USDA, USGS National Map 3D Elevation Program (3DEP). May 16,
USGS
2021 USGS

1 of 6
Wednesday, October 18, 2023 at 09:28:31 Eastern Daylight Time
Subject:Re: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Horne Creek Restoration, Surry County -
Log 4-2-21-004
Date:Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 11:28:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time
From:Hamstead, Byron A
To:David Brown
Attachments:Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restoration NLAA Consistency Letter_
Northern Long-eared Bat Rangewide Determination Key 2023-07-
10.pdf, image003.jpg, image002.jpg, image001.jpg
Thanks David,
We offer the following comments/concurrence to inform prudent effect determinations to
federally listed species from the appropriate action agency:
Based on the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC) submission and the standing
analysis for the D-Key, this project has reached the determination of “may affect, not likely to
adversely affect” for the federally endangered Northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis). The letter generated by the D-Key, dated July 10, 2023 is incorporated by
reference.
The information provided indicates that hibernacula, caves, and manmade cave-like features
providing suitable habitat for the federally endangered gray bat (Myotis grisescens) do not
occur onsite. Although forested riparian areas within the proposed action area provide
suitable forage and/or commuting habitat for this animal, all proposed tree clearing activities
would be accomplished in the Winter between November 16 and March 14 when gray bat is
less likely to utilize these habitats. We believe this impact minimization measure reduces the
probability for take of gray bat to a level that is insignificant and/or discountable, and we would
therefore concur with a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination from the
appropriate action agency for this species.
The information provided indicates that suitable habitat is present within the proposed action
area for the federally endangered Schweintiz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii). However,
targeted botanical surveys conducted within the appropriate timeframe (October 26, 2022),
did not detect evidence for this plant at that time. Based on the presence of suitable habitat
within the proposed action area, but negative survey results, we believe the probability for
inadvertent loss of this species is insignificant and/or discountable. We would therefore
concur with a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination from the appropriate
action agency for this species. Botanical survey results are valid for 2 years for the purposes
of Endangered Species Act (ESA) consultation (https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-03/north-
carolinas-federally-threatened-endangered-and-risk-plant-species)
The information provided indicates that suitable forage and/or roosting habitat for the
proposed endangered tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus), occurs within the proposed action
area. The tree clearing moratorium described above for gray bat would also be protective of
this animal and would support our concurrence with a "may affect, not likely to adversely
affect" determination from the appropriate action agency should this species become listed in
the future.
2 of 6
Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is a candidate species, and we appreciate the project
proponent’s consideration of monarch butterfly when evaluating the action area for impacts to
federally listed species and their habitats. This animal is also not subject to section 7
consultation, and an effects determination is not necessary. If requested, general
recommendations for pollinators including monarch butterfly can be provided should the
project proponent choose to implement them in the future.
The information provided indicates that suitable habitat is not present within the proposed
action area for any other federally listed species. Our concurrence with "no effect"
determinations from action agencies is not required. Please be aware that obligations under
section 7 of the ESA must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of the
identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously
considered, (2) the identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not
considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that
may be affected by the identified action.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Regards,
Byron
___________________________________
Byron Hamstead    
(he/him)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act
and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: David Brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 10:26 AM
To: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Horne Creek Restoration, Surry County - Log 4-2-21-004

Byron,

I just got the attached species assessment for Schweinitz’s sunflower from Kimley Horn. The
survey was conducted in October 2022 and no plants were found. Let me know if you need
anything else for this project.

Thanks,
3 of 6
David

David Brown, PG
Sr. Scientist / Geologist | Jennings Environmental, PLLC
828 384 1890
[e-mail]
Asheville, NC | jenningsenv.com

This information is confidential and is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. Any disclosure, copying,
distribution or taking action in relation to this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

From: David Brown <[e-mail]>
Date: Monday, July 10, 2023 at 1:57 PM
To: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Horne Creek Restoration, Surry County - Log 4-2-21-
004
Byron,

Attached are the IPaC generated species list and NLEB DKey results. IPaC project code is
2023-0102444. There is no bog turtle habitat in the project area. Open areas within the project
site may be suitable for Schweinitz’s sunflower. A previous survey (2020) of the site did not
identify any Schweinitz’s sunflower at the site. The site was checked again in late June 2023
for the sunflower and no plants were found.

Consideration of potential effects to NLEB and gray bat assumes the presence of the species,
even though it is not known if the species actually occur in the project area. The project site is
not located near any known occurrences of hibernacula for gray bat or NLEB. Onsite
evaluations conducted in June 2023 indicated there are no caves, no cave like features, no
sizeable rock cervices, and no out-buildings within the project area which may provide
roosting habitat. The forested areas of the project site could be used for roosting and/or
foraging by NLEB and gray bat. An approximate 0.75 acre area of the project site will have
trees removed from it between November 16-March 14 when these bat species are not active
on the landscape.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Have a good afternoon,
David

From: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Date: Monday, July 10, 2023 at 9:19 AM
To: David Brown <[e-mail]>
Cc: Greg Jennings <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Horne Creek Restoration, Surry County - Log 4-2-21-004
Hey David,
4 of 6

Sorry your June request slipped by me.  The subject line in your quoted email suggests it may
have ended up in my spam folder.

Send us an "Official" IPaC species list when you can.  The consultation areas for several
listed species have changed since the original consultation.  We also need the IPaC code for
project tracking.  If NLEB is on your IPaC list, please process your project through the NLEB
Dkey and send us the response letter it generates (more on the NLEB DKey below).  

The 2020 consultation suggests that suitable habitat for listed plant species are present within
the proposed action area.  If Schweinitz's sunflower is on your IPaC list, botanical survey
results for collected in 2020 cannot be used to support a prudent effect determination now.  If
suitable habitat is present within the proposed action area for listed plant species on your
IPaC list, targeted surveys should be conducted during the appropriate
timeframe: https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-03/north-carolinas-federally-threatened-
endangered-and-risk-plant-species.  If suitable habitat is no longer present within the
proposed action area, then make sure that is well documented in your biological evaluation.    

NLEB Dkey
On November 29, 2022, the Service published a final rule in the Federal Register to reclassify
the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) from threatened to endangered, nullifying the existing 4(d)
rule.  An Interim Consultation Framework (Framework) and a Range-wide Determination Key
(Key) were developed to help project proponents consult on NLEB:  The Framework and Key
can be found at https://www.fws.gov/species/northern-long-eared-bat-myotis-septentrionalis.
Your analysis of the impacts of the project to NLEB should follow the Framework and be
screened through the Key to complete consultation.  An effects determination and next steps
will be provided by the Key.  Please include a copy of the letter generated by the Key in your
consultation request for other species

Please contact me if you have any other questions.

Regards,
Byron

___________________________________
Byron Hamstead    
(he/him/his)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801

This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act
and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: David Brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 8:50 AM
To: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Cc: Greg Jennings <[e-mail]>
5 of 6
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Horne Creek Restoration, Surry County - Log 4-2-21-004

 This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on
links, opening attachments, or responding.  

Byron,

I hope your 4th Holiday went well. I’m following up on the email (below) and submittals sent
June 4 for the Horne Creek restoration project in Surry County. Let me know if you have any
question or need additional information.

Have a good week,
David

David Brown, PG
Sr. Scientist / Geologist | Jennings Environmental, PLLC
828 384 1890
[e-mail]
Asheville, NC | jenningsenv.com

This information is confidential and is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. Any disclosure, copying,
distribution or taking action in relation to this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

From: David Brown <[e-mail]>
Date: Monday, June 5, 2023 at 2:31 PM
To: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Cc: Zan Price <[e-mail]>
Subject:
SG9ybmUgQ3JlZWsgUmVzdG9yYXRpb24gLSBTdXJyeSBDb3VudHksIExvZyBOby4g
NC0yLTIxLTAwNA==
Byron,

I hope your Puerto Rico detail went well. All is well here at Jennings Environmental. We are
working on the Horne Creek stream restoration project & obtaining a new or updated letter
from FWS has fallen to us. FWS issued the attached letter in November 2020. With the 4(d)
rule no longer in place for NLEB we need to re-engage with FWS. The project area will be
roughly 7 aces (see the areas outlined in red on the attached jurisdictional features map). We
are planning to conduct the work this winter & will cut trees from an approximately 0.5 – 0.75-
acre area for use as toe-wood. The trees will be cut between November 15, 2023 and March
31, 2024. The project will involve restoration of 2,725 lf of Horne Creek & 252 lf of a UT Horne
Creek (see attached 30% design sheets). The restoration will include planting an riparian
buffer (herbaceous seed mix, live stake shrubs, & bare root trees). Call me if you have any
question or comments.
6 of 6

Enjoy the week,
David

David Brown, PG
Sr. Scientist / Geologist | Jennings Environmental, PLLC
828 384 1890
[e-mail]
Asheville, NC | jenningsenv.com

This information is confidential and is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. Any disclosure, copying,
distribution or taking action in relation to this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Surry Cou ntyMay 8 , 2 023 0 0.5 10.25 mi
0 0.8 1.60.4 km
1:30,2 43

PAR CEL ID:596 40 046 53 52OWNER:PIL OT M TN STATE PARK 179 2 PIL OT KNO B PAR K R D PIN NAC LE, NC 270 43 -9 090ADDRESS:179 2 PIL OT KN OB PAR K R D
LAN D VA LU E:$9,57 5,96 0BLDG VA LUE:$1,41 7,47 0OBX VA LUE:$85 ,6 30ASSESSED VAL UE:$11 ,0 79 ,0 60
AC RES:294 6.45 ACDEED R EF:002 96 /0 49 5
Dis claimer: T he inf orm ati on con tain ed on this page is t aken fro m aerial m appin g, t ax mappin g, and pub lic rec ord s and is NOT t o be con st rued or us ed as a s urvey or 'legal desc ription'. On ly a lic ens ed pro fess ional land s urv ey or can le gally d eter min e p rec ise locations, elev atio ns, length and direction of a line, and areas.
Kimley»>Horn
MEMORANDUM
To: Phillip Todd
North State Environmental, Inc.
From: William Sullivan, PWS
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Date: November 3, 2022
Subject: Bean Shoals Design -Build Project
Federally Protected Species Assessment: Schweinitz's Sunflower
Pilot Mountain State Park, Surry County, NC
This technical memorandum outlines the results of the Schweinitz's sunflower habitat assessment and
survey conducted for the Bean Shoals Design -Build Project in Pilot Mountain State Park, Surry County,
North Carolina. Surry County proposes the construction of three bridges, a parking area with shelter, and
an ADA compliant campground and bathhouse in Pilot Mountain State Park, Surry County, NC (Figure 1).
The Schweinitz's sunflower survey area (the "study area") is an assemblage of four segments of land,
primarily composed of undeveloped forestland and riparian corridors, with a gravel roadway corridor
(Yadkin River Park Trail) bisecting and adjoining the four segments from northwest to southeast.
Methodology
Kimley-Horn completed a desktop evaluation and database review utilizing readily available state and
federal agency databases to identify potentially suitable Schweinitz's sunflower habitat and any known
occurrences of Schweinitz's sunflower in or within a 1.0-mile radius of the study area. These databases
include the US Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) database and
the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) element occurrence database (updated July 2022). Following
the desktop review, Kimley-Horn conducted pedestrian surveys on October 26, 2022 for Schweinitz's
sunflower within areas of suitable habitat identified during the desktop review. Coordination with the US
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was not conducted as part of this assessment.
Schweinitz's sunflower
Biological conclusion: No Effect
Schweinitz's sunflower is endemic to the Piedmont region of North and South Carolina. The sunflower is
most often found along roadside and utility rights -of way, forest and field edges, and other similar habitats
where disturbances have created an opening allowing for partial or full sun exposure. Schweinitz's
sunflower generally grows in areas containing poor soils (i.e., sandy/gravelly soils, clay hardpans, shallow
rocky soils) and is intolerant of shade and excessive competition from other plant species.
Potentially suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower is present along the cleared roadside of Yadkin River
Park Trail and previously cleared/disturbed areas within the study area. Kimley-Horn scientists conducted
pedestrian surveys on October 26, 2022 for Schweinitz's sunflower within areas of suitable habitat in the

Kimley»>Horn
Page 2
study area, and no individuals were observed. Although these areas provide potentially suitable habitat,
Kimley-Horn concluded the roadside edges and cleared areas, such as the recreational picnic area within
the study area, are too frequently maintained through the regular mowing maintenance schedule and would
likely inhibit the plant's success. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database records (updated July 2022)
identified no known Schweinitz's sunflower occurrences in or within 1.0 mile of the study area. Due to the
lack of known occurrences and the lack of observed individuals, it has been determined that the proposed
project will have "No Effect" on the Schweinitz's sunflower.

W7
L
ndProject Study Area
Kimley>>> Horn
- a . A ..�,.,-.._.�
Feet
0 400 800
Figure 1: Aerial Imagery Map
Bean Shoals Site
Pilot Mountain State Park, Surry County, NC
October 2022

"
16
5
17'-5
"
16
11
18'-6
C
U
L
V
E
R
T
L
E
N
G
T
H
=
36
'-0
"
"8
511
'-4
"8
511
'-4
"4
1
CLEAR
OPENING
= 22
'-9
C
L
E
A
R

R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
1
6
'
-
0
"
S
H
O
U
L
D
E
R
3
'
-
0
"
S
H
O
U
L
D
E
R
3
'
-
0
"
8'-0"
6'-0"
6.96'
"16
96'-11
SPAN
20'-11"
R
I
S
E
6
'
-
1
"

13+00
PLAN
800
FOOTINGS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
824
820
816
812
808
804
14+00
(-)0.5000%(+)0.8610%(+)0.8610%(-)4.0000%
V.C. = 210'
EL. = 817.80'
P.I. STA. = 13+90.00 -L1
SECTION ALONG -L1-
TYPICAL SECTION
LOCATION SKETCH
-L1- GRADE DATA -L1- GRADE DATA
V.C. = 100'
EL. = 815.95'
P.I. STA. = 11+75.00 -L1-
SITE #1
GABION BASKETS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
*
AESTHETIC APPEARANCE.
AND AROUND THE GABION BASKETS TO MAINTAIN THE
LOOSE STACKED BOULDERS SHALL BE PLACED ABOVE
AND NO LOWER THAN 5' UP THE CULVERT.
LENGTH SHOWN AND TO A HEIGHT NO HIGHER THAN 6'
GABION BASKETS SHALL BE STACKED TO THE RELATIVE
CULVERT INLET.
SHIFTING OF BOULDERS AND EROSION/SCOUR AT THE
BOULDERS ENCLOSED IN A CAGE TO PREVENT THE
GABION BASKETS SHALL CONSIST OF LOOSED STACKED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
9
/
15
/
2
0
2
3
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
RALEIGH, N.C. 27601
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
ENGINEER
K
:
\
R
D
T
_
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
\
_
B
r
i
d
g
e
\
N
C
\
0
16
0
0
7
0
0
0

-

B
e
a
n

S
h
o
a
l
s
\
C
a
d
\
D
g
n
\
S
i
t
e

1_
G
D
0
1_
16
0
0
7
0
0
0
.d
g
n
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
BEAN SHOALS
STRUCTURAL DESIGN STRUCTURAL
TO CURVE)
(TANGENT
117°-56'-51"
BRIDGE I.D.
STA. 13+16.72 -L1-
CROSSVANE
EXISTING
ALUMINUM BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED 20'-11" x 6'-1"
{ CULVERT
C
R
E
E
K
HO
R
N
E
C
R
EEK
H
O
R
N
E
TO SR 2072
-L1-
TO SITE #2
(TYP.)
GUARDRAIL
AESTHETIC
IRONWOOD
PROPOSED
FILTER FABRIC (TYP.)
W/ #57 STONE ON WOVEN
STACKED BOULDERS
HEADWALL (TYP.)
WELDED ALUMINUM
~
~
(TYP. INLET)
GABION BASKETS *
113°-16'-52"
E
L
.

8
0
8
'
|
FILL
GRADE
PROPOSED
GROUND
NATURAL
APPROX.
FILL
BRIDGE I.D.
G.P. ELEV. 817.06'
STA. 13+16.72 -L1-
E
L
.

8
0
7
'
|
E
L
.

8
0
8
'
|
E
L
.

8
0
9
'
|
E
L
.

8
0
8
'
|
E
L
.

8
1
0
'
|
E
L
.

8
1
1
'
|
E
L
.

8
0
9
'
|
{ CULVERT
FOOTING (TYP.)
C.I.P. CONCRETE
GRADE
PROPOSED5.0' (MAX. FILL)
1.4' (MIN. FILL)
GUARDRAIL
AESTHETIC
IRONWOOD
GROUND
NATURAL
APPROX.
FILTER FABRIC (TYP.)
W/ #57 STONE ON WOVEN
STACKED BOULDERS
HEADWALL
ALUMINUM
WELDED
HORNE CREEK
CREEK
HORNE
HORNE CREEK
TO SHOALS
Y
A
D
KI
N RI
VER
T
O
SITE #3
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
(TYP.)
GRAVEL ROAD
EXISTING
SITE #2
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
SITE #1
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
"8
511'-4 "8
511'-4
"4
1
CLEAR OPENING = 22'-9
1
8'-
0
"
1
8'-
0
"
C
U
L
V
E
R
T
L
E
N
G
T
H
=
3
6'-
0
"
C
L
E
A
R

R
O
A
D
WA
Y
16
'-
0
"
S
HO
U
L
D
E
R
3
'-
0
"
S
HO
U
L
D
E
R
3
'-
0
"8'-0" 6'-0"

SPAN
20'-11"
R
I
S
E
6
'
-
1
"

13+00
PLAN
800
FOOTINGS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
812
808
804
(+)3.1500%(-)2.2000%
SECTION ALONG -L2-
TYPICAL SECTION
LOCATION SKETCH
796
792
V.C. = 100'
EL. = 809.16'
P.I. STA. = 12+65.00 -L2-
-L2- GRADE DATA
SITE #2
*
GABION BASKETS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
AESTHETIC APPEARANCE.
AND AROUND THE GABION BASKETS TO MAINTAIN THE
LOOSE STACKED BOULDERS SHALL BE PLACED ABOVE
AND NO LOWER THAN 5' UP THE CULVERT.
LENGTH SHOWN AND TO A HEIGHT NO HIGHER THAN 6'
GABION BASKETS SHALL BE STACKED TO THE RELATIVE
CULVERT INLET.
SHIFTING OF BOULDERS AND EROSION/SCOUR AT THE
BOULDERS ENCLOSED IN A CAGE TO PREVENT THE
GABION BASKETS SHALL CONSIST OF LOOSED STACKED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
9
/
15
/
2
0
2
3
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
RALEIGH, N.C. 27601
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
ENGINEER
K
:
\
R
D
T
_
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
\
_
B
r
i
d
g
e
\
N
C
\
0
16
0
0
7
0
0
0

-

B
e
a
n

S
h
o
a
l
s
\
C
a
d
\
D
g
n
\
S
i
t
e

2
_
G
D
0
2
_
16
0
0
7
0
0
0
.d
g
n
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
BEAN SHOALS
STRUCTURAL DESIGN STRUCTURAL
BRIDGE I.D.
STA. 12+69.66 -L2-
{ CULVERT
ALUMINUM BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED 20'-11" x 6'-1"
64°-45'-20"
S 55°-15'-22.3" E
PT STA. 12+58.16 -L2-
-L2-
T
O
SI
T
E
#1
CROSSVANE
EXISTING
C
R
E
E
K
H
O
R
N
E
C
R
E
E
K
H
O
R
N
E
C
R
E
E
K
H
O
R
N
E
TO SITE #3
(TYP.)
GUARDRAIL
AESTHETIC
IRONWOOD
PROPOSED
HEADWALL (TYP.)
WELDED ALUMINUM
FILTER FABRIC (TYP.)
W/ #57 STONE ON WOVEN
STACKED BOULDERS
(TYP. INLET)
GABION BASKETS
~~
113°-16'-52"
E
L
.

7
9
9
'
|
FILL
GRADE
PROPOSED
GROUND
NATURAL
APPROX.
G.P. ELEV. 808.51'
STA. 12+69.66 -L2-
E
L
.

7
9
8
'
|
E
L
.

7
9
9
'
|
E
L
.

8
0
1
'
|
E
L
.

8
0
2
'
|
E
L
.

7
9
9
'
|
BRIDGE I.D.
FILL
E
L
.

7
9
9
'
|
{ CULVERT
FOOTING (TYP.)
C.I.P. CONCRETE
5.0' (MAX. FILL)
1.4' (MIN. FILL)
GUARDRAIL
AESTHETIC
IRONWOOD
GROUND
NATURAL
APPROX.
FILTER FABRIC (TYP.)
W/ #57 STONE ON WOVEN
STACKED BOULDERS
HEADWALL
ALUMINUM
WELDED
GRADE
PROPOSED
HORNE CREEK
CREEK
HORNE
HORNE CREEK
TO SHOALS
Y
A
D
KI
N RI
VER
T
O
SITE #3
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
(TYP.)
GRAVEL ROAD
EXISTING
SITE #2
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
SITE #1
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
"
1611
2 0'-0
"
165
2 0'-5
C
U
LV
ER
T LEN
G
TH
= 40'-6 "
"4
1
CLEAR
O
PEN
ING
=
2
2'
-9
"8
5
1
1'
-4
"8
5
1
1'
-4
C
L
E
A
R

R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
1
6
'
-
0
"
S
H
O
U
L
D
E
R
3
'
-
0
"
S
H
O
U
L
D
E
R
3
'
-
0
"

8'-0" 6'-0"
SPAN
20'-11"
R
I
S
E
6
'
-
1
"

13+00
PLAN
788
FOOTINGS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
800
796
792
(+)1.2095%(-)2.8000%
SECTION ALONG -L3-
LOCATION SKETCH
784
13+00
-L3- GRADE DATA
V.C. = 110'
EL. = 798.29'
P.I. STA. = 12+30.00 -L3-
SITE #3
TYPICAL SECTION
*
GABION BASKETS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY
LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
AESTHETIC APPEARANCE.
AND AROUND THE GABION BASKETS TO MAINTAIN THE
LOOSE STACKED BOULDERS SHALL BE PLACED ABOVE
AND NO LOWER THAN 5' UP THE CULVERT.
LENGTH SHOWN AND TO A HEIGHT NO HIGHER THAN 6'
GABION BASKETS SHALL BE STACKED TO THE RELATIVE
CULVERT INLET.
SHIFTING OF BOULDERS AND EROSION/SCOUR AT THE
BOULDERS ENCLOSED IN A CAGE TO PREVENT THE
GABION BASKETS SHALL CONSIST OF LOOSED STACKED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
9
/
15
/
2
0
2
3
R
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
RALEIGH, N.C. 27601
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PRELIMINARY PLANS
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
ENGINEER
K
:
\
R
D
T
_
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
\
_
B
r
i
d
g
e
\
N
C
\
0
16
0
0
7
0
0
0

-

B
e
a
n

S
h
o
a
l
s
\
C
a
d
\
D
g
n
\
S
i
t
e

3
_
G
D
0
3
_
16
0
0
7
0
0
0
.d
g
n
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
BEAN SHOALS
STRUCTURAL DESIGN STRUCTURAL
ALUMINUM BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED 20'-11" x 6'-1"
BRIDGE I.D.
STA. 12+39.45 -L3-
TO CURVE)
(TANGENT
125°-13'-01"{ CULVERT
TO SITE #2
CROSSVANE
EXISTING
TO YADKIN RIVER
-L3-
C
R
EEK
H
O
R
N
E
C
R
EEK
H
O
R
N
E
(TYP.)
GUARDRAIL
AESTHETIC
IRONWOOD
PROPOSED
HEADWALL (TYP.)
WELDED ALUMINUM
FILTER FABRIC (TYP.)
W/ #57 STONE ON WOVEN
STACKED BOULDERS
(TYP. INLET)
GABION BASKETS *
~~113°-16'-52"
E
L
.

7
8
9
'
|
FILL
GRADE
PROPOSED
GROUND
NATURAL
APPROX.
G.P. ELEV. 797.65'
STA. 12+39.39 -L3-
E
L
.

7
8
9
'
|
E
L
.

7
8
9
'
|
E
L
.

7
9
1
'
|
BRIDGE I.D.
FILL
12
E
L
.

7
9
1
'
|
{ CULVERT
FOOTING (TYP.)
C.I.P. CONCRETE
GRADE
PROPOSED5.0' (MAX. FILL)
1.4' (MIN. FILL)
GUARDRAIL
AESTHETIC
IRONWOOD
GROUND
NATURAL
APPROX.
FILTER FABRIC (TYP.)
W/ #57 STONE ON WOVEN
STACKED BOULDERS
HEADWALL
ALUMINUM
WELDED
HORNE CREEK
CREEK
HORNE
HORNE CREEK
TO SHOALS
Y
A
D
KI
N RI
VER
T
O
SITE #3
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
(TYP.)
GRAVEL ROAD
EXISTING
SITE #2
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
SITE #1
HEADWALLS AT
C.I.P. CONCRETE
ARCH CULVERT W/
PROP ALUMINUM PIPE
July 10, 2023
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project code: 2023-0102444
Project Name: Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restoration

Federal Nexus: yes
Federal Action Agency (if applicable): Army Corps of Engineers

Subject:Technical assistance for 'Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restoration'

Dear David Brown:
This letter records your determination using the Information for Planning and Consultation
(IPaC) system provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on July 10, 2023, for
'Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restoration' (here forward, Project). This project has been assigned
Project Code 2023-0102444 and all future correspondence should clearly reference this number.
Please carefully review this letter. Your Endangered Species Act (Act) requirements are not
complete.
Ensuring Accurate Determinations When Using IPaC
The Service developed the IPaC system and associated species’ determination keys in accordance
with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) and based on a standing analysis. All information submitted by the Project proponent into
IPaC must accurately represent the full scope and details of the Project.
Failure to accurately represent or implement the Project as detailed in IPaC or the Northern
Long-eared Bat Rangewide Determination Key (Dkey), invalidates this letter. Answers to certain
questions in the DKey commit the project proponent to implementation of conservation
measures that must be followed for the ESA determination to remain valid.
Determination for the Northern Long-Eared Bat
Based upon your IPaC submission and a standing analysis, your project is not reasonably certain
to cause incidental take of the northern long-eared bat. Unless the Service advises you within 15
days of the date of this letter that your IPaC-assisted determination was incorrect, this letter
verifies that the Action is not likely to result in unauthorized take of the northern long-eared bat.
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   2

▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
1.
2.
3.
Other Species and Critical Habitat that May be Present in the Action Area
The IPaC-assisted determination for the northern long-eared bat does not apply to the following
ESA-protected species and/or critical habitat that also may occur in your Action area:
Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii Similarity of Appearance (Threatened)
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens Endangered
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered

You may coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may cause prohibited take
of the animal species listed above. Note that if a new species is listed that may be affected by the
identified action before it is complete, additional review is recommended to ensure compliance
with the Endangered Species Act.

Next Step
Consultation with the Service is necessary. The project has a federal nexus (e.g., Federal funds,
permit, etc.), but you are not the federal action agency or its designated (in writing) non-federal
representative. Therefore, the ESA consultation status is incomplete and no project activities
should occur until consultation between the Service and the Federal action agency (or designated
non-federal representative), is completed.
As the federal agency or designated non-federal representative deems appropriate, they should
submit their determination of effects to the Service by doing the following.
Log into IPaC using an agency email account and click on My Projects, click "Search by
record locator" to find this Project using 800-128821097. (Alternatively, the originator of
the project in IPaC can add the agency representative to the project by using the Add
Member button on the project home page.)
Review the answers to the Northern Long-eared Bat Range-wide Determination Key to
ensure that they are accurate.
Click on Review/Finalize to convert the ‘not likely to adversely affect’ consistency letter to
a concurrence letter. Download the concurrence letter for your files if needed.
If no changes occur with the Project or there are no updates on listed species, no further
consultation/coordination for this project is required for the northern long-eared bat. However,
the Service recommends that project proponents re-evaluate the Project in IPaC if: 1) the scope,
timing, duration, or location of the Project changes (includes any project changes or
amendments); 2) new information reveals the Project may impact (positively or negatively)
federally listed species or designated critical habitat; or 3) a new species is listed, or critical
habitat designated. If any of the above conditions occurs, additional coordination with the
Service should take place before project implements any changes which are final or commits
additional resources.
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   3

If you have any questions regarding this letter or need further assistance, please contact the
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office and reference Project Code 2023-0102444 associated
with this Project.
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   4

Action Description
You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action.
1. Name
Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restoration
2. Description
The following description was provided for the project 'Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restoration':
Stream restoration and replacing 3 ford stream crossing with bottomless arch
culverts. Planning to conduct the work this winter (2023-2024) & will cut trees
from an approximately 0.5 – 0.75-acre area for use as toe-wood. The trees will be
cut between November 15, 2023 and March 31, 2024. The project will involve
restoration of 2,725 lf of Horne Creek & 252 lf of a UT Horne Creek (see attached
30% design sheets). The restoration will include planting an riparian buffer
(herbaceous seed mix, live stake shrubs, & bare root trees).
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@36.2659369,-80.49002759023779,14z
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   5

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
DETERMINATION KEY RESULT
Based on the answers provided, the proposed Action is consistent with a determination of “may
affect, but not likely to adversely affect” for the Endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis).
QUALIFICATION INTERVIEW
Does the proposed project include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, intentional take of
the northern long-eared bat or any other listed species?

Note: Intentional take is defined as take that is the intended result of a project. Intentional take could refer to
research, direct species management, surveys, and/or studies that include intentional handling/encountering,
harassment, collection, or capturing of any individual of a federally listed threatened, endangered or proposed
species?
No
Do you have post-white nose syndrome occurrence data that indicates that northern long-
eared bats (NLEB) are likely to be present in the action area?

Bat occurrence data may include identification of NLEBs in hibernacula, capture of
NLEBs, tracking of NLEBs to roost trees, or confirmed acoustic detections. With this
question, we are looking for data that, for some reason, may have not yet been made
available to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
No
Does any component of the action involve construction or operation of wind turbines?

Note: For federal actions, answer ‘yes’ if the construction or operation of wind power facilities is either (1) part
of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for a federal agency action (federal permit, funding, etc.).
No
Is the proposed action authorized, permitted, licensed, funded, or being carried out by a
Federal agency in whole or in part?
Yes
Is the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA),
or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding or authorizing the proposed action, in
whole or in part?
No
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   6

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Are you an employee of the federal action agency or have you been officially designated in
writing by the agency as its designated non-federal representative for the purposes of
Endangered Species Act Section 7 informal consultation per 50 CFR § 402.08?

Note: This key may be used for federal actions and for non-federal actions to facilitate section 7 consultation and
to help determine whether an incidental take permit may be needed, respectively. This question is for information
purposes only.
No
Is the lead federal action agency the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or Federal
Communications Commission (FCC)? Is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) funding or authorizing the proposed action,
in whole or in part?
No
Is the lead federal action agency the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)?
No
Have you determined that your proposed action will have no effect on the northern long-
eared bat? Remember to consider the effects of any activities that would not occur but for
the proposed action.

If you think that the northern long-eared bat may be affected by your project or if you
would like assistance in deciding, answer “No” below and continue through the key. If you
have determined that the northern long-eared bat does not occur in your project’s action
area and/or that your project will have no effects whatsoever on the species despite the
potential for it to occur in the action area, you may make a “no effect” determination for
the northern long-eared bat.

Note: Federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representatives) must consult with USFWS on federal
agency actions that may affect listed species [50 CFR 402.14(a)]. Consultation is not required for actions that will
not affect listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, this determination key will not provide a consistency or
verification letter for actions that will not affect listed species. If you believe that the northern long-eared bat may
be affected by your project or if you would like assistance in deciding, please answer “No” and continue through
the key. Remember that this key addresses only effects to the northern long-eared bat. Consultation with USFWS
would be required if your action may affect another listed species or critical habitat. The definition of Effects of
the Action can be found here: https://www.fws.gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-
selected-definitions
No
[Semantic] Is the action area located within 0.5 miles of a known northern long-eared bat
hibernaculum?

Note: The map queried for this question contains proprietary information and cannot be displayed. If you need
additional information, please contact your State wildlife agency.
Automatically answered
No
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   7

11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Does the action area contain any caves (or associated sinkholes, fissures, or other karst
features), mines, rocky outcroppings, or tunnels that could provide habitat for hibernating
northern long-eared bats?
No
Does the action area contain or occur within 0.5 miles of (1) talus or (2) anthropogenic or
naturally formed rock crevices in rocky outcrops, rock faces or cliffs?
No
Is suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat present within 1000 feet of
project activities?
(If unsure, answer "Yes.")

Note: If there are trees within the action area that are of a sufficient size to be potential roosts for bats (i.e., live
trees and/or snags ≥3 inches (12.7 centimeter) dbh), answer "Yes". If unsure, additional information defining
suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat can be found at: https://www.fws.gov/media/northern-
long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-selected-definitions
Yes
Will the action cause effects to a bridge?
No
Will the action result in effects to a culvert or tunnel?
No
Does the action include the intentional exclusion of northern long-eared bats from a
building or structure?

Note: Exclusion is conducted to deny bats’ entry or reentry into a building. To be effective and to avoid harming
bats, it should be done according to established standards. If your action includes bat exclusion and you are
unsure whether northern long-eared bats are present, answer “Yes.” Answer “No” if there are no signs of bat use
in the building/structure. If unsure, contact your local U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Ecological Services Field
Office to help assess whether northern long-eared bats may be present. Contact a Nuisance Wildlife Control
Operator (NWCO) for help in how to exclude bats from a structure safely without causing harm to the bats (to
find a NWCO certified in bat standards, search the Internet using the search term “National Wildlife Control
Operators Association bats”). Also see the White-Nose Syndrome Response Team's guide for bat control in
structures
No
Does the action involve removal, modification, or maintenance of a human-made structure
(barn, house, or other building) known or suspected to contain roosting bats?
No
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   8

18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Will the action cause construction of one or more new roads open to the public?

For federal actions, answer ‘yes’ when the construction or operation of these facilities is
either (1) part of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for an action taken by a
federal agency (federal permit, funding, etc.).
No
Will the action include or cause any construction or other activity that is reasonably certain
to increase average daily traffic on one or more existing roads?

Note: For federal actions, answer ‘yes’ when the construction or operation of these facilities is either (1) part of
the federal action or (2) would not occur but for an action taken by a federal agency (federal permit, funding,
etc.). .
No
Will the action include or cause any construction or other activity that is reasonably certain
to increase the number of travel lanes on an existing thoroughfare?

For federal actions, answer ‘yes’ when the construction or operation of these facilities is
either (1) part of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for an action taken by a
federal agency (federal permit, funding, etc.).
No
Will the proposed action involve the creation of a new water-borne contaminant source
(e.g., leachate pond pits containing chemicals that are not NSF/ANSI 60 compliant)?
No
Will the proposed action involve the creation of a new point source discharge from a
facility other than a water treatment plant or storm water system?
No
Will the action include drilling or blasting?
No
Will the action involve military training (e.g., smoke operations, obscurant operations,
exploding munitions, artillery fire, range use, helicopter or fixed wing aircraft use)?
No
Will the proposed action involve the use of herbicides or pesticides other than herbicides
(e.g., fungicides, insecticides, or rodenticides)?
No
Will the action include or cause activities that are reasonably certain to cause chronic
nighttime noise in suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat? Chronic noise
is noise that is continuous or occurs repeatedly again and again for a long time.

Note: Additional information defining suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat can be found at:
https://www.fws.gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-selected-definitions
No
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   9

27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
Does the action include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, the use of artificial lighting
within 1000 feet of suitable northern long-eared bat roosting habitat?

Note: Additional information defining suitable roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat can be found at:
https://www.fws.gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-selected-definitions
No
Will the action include tree cutting or other means of knocking down or bringing down
trees, tree topping, or tree trimming?
Yes
Has a presence/probable absence summer bat survey targeting the northern long-eared bat
following the Service’s Range-wide Indiana Bat and Northern Long-Eared Bat Survey
Guidelines been conducted within the project area? If unsure, answer “No.”
No
Does the action include emergency cutting or trimming of hazard trees in order to remove
an imminent threat to human safety or property? See hazard tree note at the bottom of the
key for text that will be added to response letters

Note: A "hazard tree" is a tree that is an immediate threat to lives, public health and safety, or improved property
and has a diameter breast height of six inches or greater.
No
Are any of the trees proposed for cutting or other means of knocking down, bringing
down, topping, or trimming suitable for northern long-eared bat roosting (i.e., live trees
and/or snags ≥3 inches dbh that have exfoliating bark, cracks, crevices, and/or cavities)?
Yes
[Semantic] Does your project intersect a known sensitive area for the northern long-eared
bat?

Note: The map queried for this question contains proprietary information and cannot be displayed. If you need
additional information, please contact your state agency or USFWS field office
Automatically answered
No
Will all tree cutting/trimming or other knocking or bringing down of trees be restricted to
the inactive season for the northern long-eared bat?

Note: Inactive Season dates for summer habitat outside of staging and swarming areas can be found here: https://
www.fws.gov/media/inactive-season-dates-swarming-and-staging-areas.
Yes
Will the action cause trees to be cut, knocked down, or otherwise brought down across an
area greater than 10 acres?
No
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   10

35.
36.
37.
38.
Will the action cause trees to be cut, knocked down, or otherwise brought down in a way
that would fragment a forested connection (e.g., tree line) between two or more forest
patches of at least 5 acres?

The forest patches may consist of entirely contiguous forest or multiple forested areas that
are separated by less than 1000’ of non-forested area. A project will fragment a forested
connection if it creates an unforested gap of greater than 1000’.
No
Will the action result in the use of prescribed fire?
No
Will the action cause noises that are louder than ambient baseline noises within the action
area?
Yes
Will the action cause noises during the active season in suitable summer habitat that are
louder than anthropogenic noises to which the affected habitat is currently exposed?
Answer 'no' if the noises will occur only during the inactive period.

Note: Inactive Season dates for areas within a spring staging/fall swarming area can be found here: https://
www.fws.gov/media/inactive-season-dates-swarming-and-staging-areas.

Note: Additional information defining suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat can be found at:
https://www.fws.gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-selected-definitions
No
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   11

PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE
Enter the extent of the action area (in acres) from which trees will be removed - round up
to the nearest tenth of an acre. For this question, include the entire area where tree removal
will take place, even if some live or dead trees will be left standing.
0.8
In what extent of the area (in acres) will trees be cut, knocked down, or trimmed during the
inactive (hibernation) season for northern long-eared bat? Note: Inactive Season dates for spring
staging/fall swarming areas can be found here: https://www.fws.gov/media/inactive-season-dates-swarming-and-
staging-areas
0.8
In what extent of the area (in acres) will trees be cut, knocked down, or trimmed during the
active (non-hibernation) season for northern long-eared bat? Note: Inactive Season dates for
spring staging/fall swarming areas can be found here: https://www.fws.gov/media/inactive-season-dates-
swarming-and-staging-areas
0.0
Will all potential northern long-eared bat (NLEB) roost trees (trees ≥3 inches diameter at
breast height, dbh) be cut, knocked, or brought down from any portion of the action area
greater than or equal to 0.1 acre? If all NLEB roost trees will be removed from multiple
areas, select ‘Yes’ if the cumulative extent of those areas meets or exceeds 0.1 acre.
Yes
Enter the extent of the action area (in acres) from which all potential NLEB roost trees will
be removed. If all NLEB roost trees will be removed from multiple areas, entire the total
extent of those areas. Round up to the nearest tenth of an acre.
0.8
For the area from which all potential northern long-eared bat (NLEB) roost trees will be
removed, on how many acres (round to the nearest tenth of an acre) will trees be allowed
to regrow? Enter ‘0’ if the entire area from which all potential NLEB roost trees are
removed will be developed or otherwise converted to non-forest for the foreseeable future.
0.8
Will any snags (standing dead trees) ≥3 inches dbh be left standing in the area(s) in which
all northern long-eared bat roost trees will be cut, knocked down, or otherwise brought
down?
No
Will all project activities by completed by April 1, 2024?
Yes
07/10/2023 IPaC Record Locator: 800-128821097   12

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:Jennings Environmental, PLLC
Name:David Brown
Address:7 Samuel Ashe Drive
City:Asheville
State:NC
Zip:28805
Email [e-mail]
Phone:[phone]
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency:Army Corps of Engineers
7 Samuel Ashe Drive, Asheville, NC 28805 1 919-600-4790 1 [e-mail]
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Project Name: Bean Shoals Horne Creek Site
Project Address/Location: Along Yadkin River Park Trail southeast Hauser Road
Bean Shoals Communty (36.26504.-80.48909)
The undersigned is the
11 Property Owner
Assigned
Representative
0
Easement
Holder
11
Right -Of-
Way Holder
Lease Holder
and will be the applicant on the request for permit(s) and/or jurisdictional determination. I
hereby authorize Jennings Environmental PLLC to act on my behalf and take all actions
necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of the permit or certification and any
and all standard and special conditions attached. Additionally, I authorize the representative(s)
of the permitting agency(s) to enter the property for the purpose of conducting activities
associated with verification of the request for permit(s) and/or jurisdictional determination. I
hereby certify that the information submitted in this document is true and accurate to the best
of our knowledge.
Name: Chris Knopf, County Manager
Company Name
(if applicable):
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1467
Phone Number: 336-401-8201
Email Address: knosfpfc0co.s�ur�rymcus
Signature:
Date: 08/03/2023
Check if applicable
✓❑ The property owner has executed a binding agreement with the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) for this stream/wetland restoration project. The above is the assigned representative
for the NRCS and is authorized to act on behalf of the NRCS and the property owner through a signed
mutual agreement for the stream sabilization/restoration project.
Jennings Environmental PLLC is licensed with the North Carolina Board of Examiners for Engineers and Surveyors and is
authorized to practice engineering under the provisions of Chapter 89C and 55B of the General Statutes of North Carolina
License Number P-1932.

Requestor:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 2020-01887 C ounty: Surry U.S.G.S. Qu ad: NC- Pinnacle
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Scenic Consulting Group
Eric Black
2011 Corporate Drive, Unit #1
Wilmington, NC 28405
919-612-2591
[e-mail].
Size (acres) 3872 Nearest Town Pinnacle Nearest Waterway Yadkin River River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040101 Coordinates Latitude: 36.265692 Longitude: -80.489848
Location description: The property is located at 1792 Pilot Knob Park Road, Pinnacle, NC 27043-9090. It is the Ben Shoals
Access within Pilot Mountain State Park. Plat # 1909507. PIN 5964-00-46 -5352
Indicate Which of the Following Apply :
A. Preliminary Determination
☒There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated October 2020
Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource
protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be
affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminarydetermination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part
331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
☐There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, whichis not sufficiently accurate and relia ble to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
☐There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
☐There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
☐We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated . As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation tha t
can be verified by the Corps.
2020-01887
☐The waters, includi ng wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
☐The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
☐There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our publishedregulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
☐The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questio ns
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Brandee.C.Boggs at 8282717980x4224 or [e-mail].
C.Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 03/17/2021.
D.Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identif ied in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F.Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
abo ve)Not applicable.
Co rps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________
Date of JD: 03/17/2021 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Brandee C. Boggs

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL Applicant: Scenic Consulting Group, Eric Black File Number: 2020-01887 Date: 03/17/2021
Attached is: See Section below
☐ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
☐ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
☐ PERMIT DENIAL C
☐ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
☒ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evalua ting your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Sta ndard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is a lready in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Attn: Brandee.C.Boggs Asheville Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.

________________________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Date: Telephone number:

For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Brandee.C.Boggs, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403

For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMAT I ON
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 03/17/2021
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Scenic Consulting Group, Eric Black, 2011
Corporate Drive, Unit #1, Wilmington, NC 28405
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Horne Creek, 2020-01887
D. PROJECT LOCAT ION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMAT ION: The property is located at 1792 Pilot
Knob Park Road, Pinnacle, NC 27043-9090. It is the Ben Shoals Access within Pilot Mountain State Park.
Plat # 1909507. PIN 5964-00-46-5352
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Surry City: Pinnacle
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.265692 Longitude: -80.489848
Universal Transverse Mercator:
17S 545824 4013538
Name of nearest waterbody: Yadkin River
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
☒Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
☐Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
.
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE” SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site
Number
Waters Name Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in review
area (acreage and linear
feet if applicable
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Type of aquatic resource (i.e.
wetland vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to which the
aquatic resource “maybe” subject
(i.e., Section 404 or Section 10/404)
1 Horne Creek 2921 36.266216 -80.490131 Non-wetland waters 404
2 Tributary SA 104 36.265181 -80.489576 Non-wetland waters 404
3 Tributary SB 42 36.26730 -80.489436 Non-wetland waters 404
4 Tributary SC 214 36.264576 -80.487363 Non-wetland waters 404
5 Tributary SD 128 36.26779 -80.492224 Non-wetland waters 404
6 Wetland WA 0.05 36.264501 -80.487322 Wetland waters 404
7 Wetland WB 0.13 36.264056 -80.488088 Wetland waters 404
8 Wetland WC 0.03 36.264468 -80.487919 Wetland waters 404
9 Wetland WD 0.02 36.267713 -80.489813 Wetland waters 404
10 Wetland WE 0.01 36.267141 -80.489546 Wetland waters 404
11 Wetland WF 0.15 36.266439 -80.490776 Wetland waters 404
12 Wetland WG 0.02 36.267887 -80.491919 Wetland waters 404
1.Th e Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2.In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of th e use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
☒Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Lidar NC 1”=500’
☒Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets: 10/07/2020-10/08/2020
☒Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
☐Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
☐Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
☐ Corps navigable waters' study:
☐U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
☐USGS NHD data:
☐USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
☒U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24000 Pinnacle, NC
☒Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. NRCS So il S urvey 1’=500’Citation: October
2020
☐National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
☐State/local wetland inventory map(s):
☐FEMA/FIRM maps:
☐100-year Floodplain Elevation is:(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
☒ Photographs:☒Ae rial (Name & Date): USDA Soil Survey topo 1 ”=500’
or ☒ Other (Name & Date): Site photos 20201007
☐Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
☐ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD
03/17/2021
Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) 1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Brandee C. Boggs
GFGF
GFGF
GFGF
GFGF
GFGF
GFGF GFGF
Ho
r
n
e

C
r
e
e
k
S
C
SD
SA
SB
I
0 250 500 750 1,000125
Feet
1 inch = 500 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown herein does not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and
therefore is not for design, construction, or recording or transfer of title. The Exhibit was compiled from
available information obtained from the sources listed below. Streams and Wetlands: All features located
in the field were recorded using a Trimble R-1 with submeter accuracy,
Sources:
Soils: USDA Surry County Soil Survey
Aerial and Topographic Mapping
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES MAPHorne Creek Stream Restoration Repair and Bridge InstallationWetland and Stream Determinations (Unverified)October 2020
GF
GF
Wetland WA S
C
GF
GF
GF
GF
Wetland WB
Wetland WC
Horne
C
r
e
e
k
GF
GF
GFGF
SB
Wetland WD
Wetland WE
Horn
e

C
r
e
e
k
GF
GF
Wetland WF
GFGF
Wetland WG
SD
Horne Creek
SA Hor
n
e

C
r
e
e
k
Wetland WA
Wetland WB
Wetland WC
Wetland WE
Wetland WD
Wetland WF
Wetland WG
Legend
Study Area
Potential Wetland Waters of the US
Potential Stream Waters of the US
Culvert
Sample Point
GF Upland
GF Wetland
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

November 2, 2020

Eric Black
Senior Environmental Project Manager
1017 Main Campus Drive, Suite 2300
Raleigh, NC 27606
[e-mail]

Dear Eric Black:

Subject: Horne Creek Restoration; Surry County, North Carolina Log No. 4-2-21-004

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence received on October 30, 2020, for the project referenced above wherein you
solicit comments regarding potential impacts to federally protected species. We submit the
following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321
et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543) (Act).

Project Description
According to the information provided, the proposed project involves restoration and
enhancement of Horne Creek and its unnamed tributaries in Pilot Mountain State Park, North
Carolina. Design plans and descriptions of proposed impact minimization measures are not yet
available. Based on aerial imagery and the information provided, onsite riparian habitats are
dominated by successional forest. A small portion of the site contains cleared lands and
edge/transitional habitats. Surrounding areas are composed of forested and agricultural lands.

Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
Suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project area for this animal. However,
the final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-
eared bat associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation
site, and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season
(June 1 – July 31). Based on the information provided, the project (which may or may not
require tree clearing) would occur at a location where any incidental take that may result from
associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Although not required, we encourage you
to avoid any associated tree clearing activities during this animal’s maternity roosting
season from May 15 – August 15.

The information provided suggests that potential habitat for the federally endangered
Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) occurs onsite (e.g. transitional areas along
2

forest edges, fencerows, roadsides, utility rights-of-way, etc.). However, targeted surveys
conducted during the optimal survey window did not detect any evidence for this species. Based
on the presence of suitable habitat onsite, but negative surveys collected during the optimal
survey window, we would concur with a “may affect, not likely to adversely affect”
determination for this species from the appropriate action agency.

The proposed project area occurs within two miles of Stokes County which contains known
populations of small-anthered bittercress (Cardamine micranthera). However, this species is
presumed to be endemic to the Dan River Basin in North Carolina, and there are no known
records of this species within project receiving waters or within the project vicinity. Therefore,
the Service would not object to a ‘no effect’ determination for this species from the appropriate
action agency.

Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.

We offer the following comments in the interest of protecting this species and other natural
resources:

Bald Eagle
Service records indicate occurrences of a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nesting sites
within the vicinity of the project area. The bald eagle has been removed from the federal list of
endangered and threatened species due to its recovery. However, this species is afforded legal
protection by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 668d) and the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 712). The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, enacted in
1940, and amended several times, prohibits anyone without a permit issued by the Secretary of
the Interior from “taking” bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. “Take” includes
pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb (16 U.S.C.
668c; 50 CFR 22.3). “Disturb” means “To agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to the degree
that interferes with or interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits, causing injury,
death, or nest abandonment.” In addition to immediate impacts, these definitions also cover
impacts that result from human induced alterations initiated around a previously used nest site
during a time when eagles are not present if, upon an eagle’s return, such alterations agitate or
bother the eagle to a degree that interferes with or interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or
sheltering habits and causes injury, death, or nest abandonment.

If any active nests are located within a half mile of the project site, we request that work at the
site be restricted from mid-January through July in order to prevent adverse impacts to the bald
eagle. This will prevent disturbance of the eagles from the egg laying period until the young
fledge, which encompasses their most vulnerable times

Additional Surveys
3

Only historic records of small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) are known from Surry
County and there are no known records within 20 miles of the project area. However, detecting
and protecting novel populations of this species is essential to its recovery and eventual delisting.
Moreover, distribution for this species does not exhibit a high degree of endemism in North
Carolina and this plant may occur in a variety of upland, mid-successional and mixed-deciduous
forest habitats. Although not required, we encourage the Applicant to conduct voluntary surveys
during the optimal survey window, (mid-May through early July) where suitable habitats for this
species may be impacted by the proposed project

Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground-disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is completed.
Ground disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of
the workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.

Stream Channel and Bank Restoration
A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and
associated sediment bed load while maintaining channel features and neither degrading nor
aggrading. Alterations to the dimension, pattern, or profile of the stream channel as well as
changes to streambank vegetation, floodplains, hydrology, or sediment input can significantly
alter this equilibrium.

We offer the following recommendations for the Applicant’s consideration:

1. Streambanks with deep-rooted woody vegetation are the most stable, and stream
restoration efforts should incorporate the use of native vegetation adapted to the site
conditions. Live dormant stakes may be used to reestablish root structure in riparian
areas. In areas where banks are severely undercut, high, and steep, whole-tree revetment
or rock may be used as a stabilization treatment (small rock, gravel, sand, and dirt are not
recommended due to their erosive nature), and it should not extend above the bank-full
elevation (the elevation of the channel where the natural floodplain begins).
Deep-rooting woody vegetation should be established along banks where any channel
work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced at intervals no greater
than 10 feet along banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths should be as wide as practical
but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream channel.

2. Only the absolute minimum amount of work should be done within stream channels to
accomplish necessary reconstruction. Restoration plans should account for the
constraints of the site and the opportunities to improve stream pattern, dimension, and
profile with minimal disturbance.

3. Reconstruction work should follow natural channel design methodologies that are based
on the bank-full, or channel-forming, stage of the stream. Bank-full stage maintains the
4

natural channel dimensions and transports the bulk of sediment over time. Natural
channel conditions should be identified using a reference reach (nearby stream reaches
that exemplify restoration goals). Restoration design should match the pattern,
dimension, and profile of the reference reach to ensure the project’s success.

4. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area to the
extent possible. Sandbags, cofferdams, bladder dams, or other diversion structures
should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. These diversion structures should
be removed as soon as the work area is stable.

5. Equipment should not be operated in the stream unless absolutely necessary. Machinery
should be operated from the banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance to woody
vegetation. Equipment should be: (a) washed to remove any contaminant residue prior
to project construction, (b) in good working order, and (c) checked to ensure there are no
leaks of potential contaminants (such as oil or other lubricants) prior to and during
construction.

6. Adequate measures to control sediment and erosion must be implemented prior to any
ground-disturbing activities in order to minimize effects on downstream aquatic
resources. In North Carolina, non-cohesive and erosion-prone soils are most common in
the felsic-crystalline terrains of the mountain and upper piedmont regions. Therefore,
reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas would be stabilized with
seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion-control matting prior to the end of
each workday. Matting should be secured in place with staples; stakes; or, wherever
possible, live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to temporary seed
establishment, additional measures should be implemented to protect water quality along
slopes and overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be covered with plastic or
other geotextile material and surrounded with silt fencing).

The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at [e-mail], if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-21-004.

Sincerely,

- - original signed - -

Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
PROJECT DIRECTORY
PROJECT OWNER SURRY COUNTY
DESIGN - BUILD TEAM
ENGINEER - STREAM RESTORATION JENNINGS ENVIRONMENTAL PLLC
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE - President
[phone]
[e-mail]
ENGINEER - CIVIL KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC
Jeff Moore, PE - Senior Vice President
[phone]
[e-mail]
BUILDER NORTH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
Darrell Westmoreland - CEO & Founder
[e-mail]
[phone]
SURVEYOR PILOT SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC
Cory George, PLS, PE - President
[e-mail]
[phone]
SHEET INDEX
COVER SHEET 0.1
PROJECT NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS 0.2
STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN CHANNEL SECTIONS 1.1 - 1.3
STREAM RESTORATION DESIGN PLAN AND PROFILE 2.1 - 2.6
STREAM RESTORATION GRADING SECTIONS 3.1 - 3.3
STREAM RESTORATION DETAILS 4.1 - 4.3
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN 5.1 - 5.2
SITE STABILIZATION AND RE-VEGETATION PLAN 6.1
SURRY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
0.1
AS NOTED
CO
V
E
R

S
H
E
E
T
PILOT MOUNTAIN STATE PARK
HORNE CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
PERMIT DRAWING
JUNE 20, 2023
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
UPPER YADKIN RIVER BASIN HUC: 03040101
USACE PIN: TBD
NCDWR WQC#: TBD
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
0.2
AS NOTED
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
O
T
E
S

A
N
D

S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
GENERAL PROJECT NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
1. DEFINITIONS:
1.1. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS: THE CONTRACT AND
APPLICABLE DRAWINGS, DETAILS, SPECIFICATIONS, PERMIT(S),
AND/OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS (MEETING MINUTES, PUNCH
LISTS, BID TABS, ETC.) FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION ABOUT
THE REQUIRED WORK. ANY ONE OF THESE PARTS OF THE MAY
NOT CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO
COMPLETE THE PROJECT WORK.
1.2. PROJECT OWNER: SURRY COUNTY
1.3. BUILDER/CONTRACTOR: NORTH STATE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC
1.4. ENGINEER - STREAM RESTORATION: JENNINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL PLLC (JE)
1.5. ENGINEER - ROADWAYS AND CULVERTS: KIMLY-HORN &
ASSOCIATES, INC (K-H & A)
1.6. SURVEYOR: PILOT SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC
2. THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT SHALL ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING
SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS AND/OR REGULATIONS:
2.1. NC DEQ'S "EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND
DESIGN MANUAL" (2013)
2.2. GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF USACE'S
NATIONWIDE PERMIT 13 AND 27.
2.3. GENERAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF NCDWR'S 401 WATER
QUALITY CERTIFICATION
2.4. THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
3. NOT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN. SOME LOCATIONS MAY
BE ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL
UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION. ANY UTILITIES SHOWN ON
THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY AND IN NO WAY RELIEVES THE CONTRACTOR
FROM COORDINATING, VERIFYING AND PROTECTING EXISTING
UTILITIES. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE PROTECTED AND REMAIN ACTIVE
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. THE BUILDER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROJECT AREA UNTIL
COMPLETION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE PROJECT OWNER.
THE BUILDER SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY AND
SHALL BEAR ALL RISK OF LOSS OR DAMAGE. THE BUILDER WILL
FURNISH ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT, TOOLS, LABOR,
TRANSPORTATION, AND SUPERVISION TO COMPLETE THE WORK
ACCORDING TO THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND APPLICABLE FEDERAL,
STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. THE BUILDER SHALL
CONFINE ALL ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING EQUIPMENT STORAGE, TO
THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, STAGING AREAS, AND DESIGNATED
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINTS.
5. THE BUILDER SHALL MAINTAIN ALL LIGHTS, GUARDS, SIGNS,
TEMPORARY PASSAGES, OR OTHER PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY FOR
THE SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND ON GOING MINING OPERATIONS
AT THE SITE. THE BUILDER SHALL ABIDE BY ALL SAFETY RULES AND
CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENTAL
AUTHORITIES AND OTHER ENTITIES, INCLUDING RAILROADS, SO
THE PUBLIC IS SAFEGUARDED FROM ACCIDENTS AND DELAYS.
GUARDS AND FLAGS REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENTAL OR RAILROAD
AUTHORITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE BUILDER'S EXPENSE,
UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE DESIGNATED
REPRESENTATIVE. BUILDER SHALL AT NO TIME COMPROMISE
EITHER SAFETY OR ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE BUILDER SHALL ONLY USE ACCESS POINTS, ACCESS PATHS AND
STAGING AREAS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ANY ALTERNATE
ACCESS PLANNED BY THE BUILDER SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
PROJECT OWNER PRIOR TO USE. ANY NEW ACCESS ROUTES OR
STAGING AREAS NEEDED FOR STREAM RELOCATION ACTIVITIES
MUST FIRST BE FLAGGED AND MAPPED FOR EVALUATION AND
WRITTEN APPROVAL BY MARTIN MARIETTA MUST BE OBTAINED
PRIOR TO ANY DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES.
7. NO NON-PERMITTED FILL IN WETLANDS MAY OCCUR. ALL EXCESS
SOILS FROM MASS EXCAVATION, STREAM RELOCATION AND
CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN THE
DESIGNATED FILL AREAS.
8. ANY ELECTRONIC OR COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (COLLECTIVELY
REFERRED TO AS “CAD”) FILES ARE SUPPLIED AS A MATTER OF
COURTESY ONLY. THE ENGINEER MAKES NO REPRESENTATION,
WARRANTY, OR GUARANTEE AS TO THE ACCURACY, RELIABILITY,
SUITABILITY, OR FUNCTIONALITY OF SUCH FILES, AND ANY SUCH
WARRANTIES THAT MAY OTHERWISE BE IMPLIED BY LAW OR
STATUTE ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. CAD FILES DO NOT
INCLUDE A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S STAMP AND ONLY
DRAWINGS WITH SUCH STAMP AND THE ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE
ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS TRUE AND FINAL. ANY PERSON(S) OR
ORGANIZATION(S) MAKING USE OF OR RELYING UPON CAD FILES IS
SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING THE ACCURACY AND
COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION INCLUDED IN SUCH FILES,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CONFORMANCE WITH THE
CURRENT SEALED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ACCEPTS
ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND RISK ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOWNLOAD
AND USE OF SUCH FILES. THE ENGINEER WILL HAVE NO LIABILITY
OR RESPONSIBILITY TO THE RECIPIENT AND/OR USER OR ANY
OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR ANY LIABILITY, LOSS, OR DAMAGE
CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY
USE OF CAD FILES. IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT OR DISCREPANCY
BETWEEN THE SEALED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CAD
FILES, THE SEALED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL
CONTROL.
TOPOGRAPHIC SPECIFICATIONS AND NOTES
8. CLASS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY: CLASS A
9. THE DESIGN ELEVATIONS AND GRADES SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS
ARE BASED ON THE SEPTEMBER 2021 SURVEY FROM WHICH ALL
COMPUTATIONS OF CUT AND FILL ARE BASED. SLIGHT
DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE SURVEYED EXITING GROUND
SURFACE AND FIELD CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION
CAN RESULT IN VARIATIONS OF TOTAL EXCAVATED QUANTITIES.
THESE VARIATIONS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO
CONSTRUCTION.
QUANTITIES AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS
10. THE BUILDER SHALL FURNISH ALL MATERIALS NECESSARY TO
COMPLETE THE PROPOSED WORK UNLESS OTHER PROVISIONS
HAVE BEEN AGREED UPON PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL DELIVER ALL MATERIALS TO THE DESIGNATED
ACCESS POINTS AND STAGING AREAS. MATERIAL QUANTITIES,
DIMENSIONS AND SIZES SHALL CONFORM TO THE DRAWINGS,
NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS OR ON THE WORK QUANTITIES AND MATERIALS LIST.
THE ENGINEER MAY INSPECT AND APPROVE ALL MATERIALS PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION. IF MATERIALS DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS,
THE ENGINEER SHALL REJECT THE MATERIALS.
11. THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS ARE
TO BE INSTALLED AS NEEDED TO KEEP ALL SEDIMENT ON SITE AND
OUT OF STREAMS AND WETLANDS. ADDITIONAL EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES (ABOVE THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS
AND ON THE QUANTITIES AND MATERIALS LIST) MAY BE REQUIRED
IN ORDER TO KEEP ALL SEDIMENT ON SITE AND OUT OF STREAMS
AND WETLANDS.
12. THE USE OF ANY BRAND NAMES/MANUFACTURERS OR MODELS IS
INTENDED SOLELY TO DENOTE THE QUALITY STANDARD OF THE
DESIRED PRODUCT. ANY USE OF BRAND NAMES IS NOT INTENDED
TO RESTRICT BIDDERS TO A SPECIFIC BRAND, MAKE,
MANUFACTURER, OR NAME. THE BRAND NAMES /
MANUFACTURERS OF MODELS ARE INTENDED TO CONVEY THE
GENERAL STYLE, TYPE, CHARACTER, AND QUALITY OF PRODUCT.
EQUIVALENT PRODUCTS WILL BE ACCEPTABLE IF THE PROJECT
OWNER OR ENGINEER HAS GIVEN APPROVAL OF THE SPECIFIC
PRODUCT IN WRITING.
13. THE BUILDER SHALL WARRANTY ALL MATERIALS AND
WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR FROM THE DATE
OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE PROJECT OWNER AND SHALL REPLACE ANY
PORTIONS THAT FAIL DUE TO FAULTY MATERIALS OR
WORKMANSHIP, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE PROJECT
OWNER. A SIX (6) MONTH AND ELEVEN (11) MONTH INSPECTION
WILL BE PERFORMED DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD. THE
BUILDER SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPAIR ALL ITEMS DETERMINED BY
THE PROJECT OWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE TO BE
DEFECTIVE UPON NOTIFICATION. THE BUILDER SHALL
IMMEDIATELY REPAIR OR REPLACE FAILED ITEMS UPON
NOTIFICATION BY THE PROJECT OWNER. SEASONALLY INSTALLED
ITEMS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED DURING THE NEXT
AVAILABLE INSTALLATION PERIOD. ITEMS REPAIRED OR REPLACED
UNDER THIS PROVISION SHALL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR
WARRANTY PERIOD FROM THE NEW DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. AREAS
AND/OR OTHER WORK DISTURBED WHILE ACCESSING AND/OR
REPAIRING/REPLACING WARRANTY COVERED ITEMS SHALL BE
STABILIZED.
STREAM RESTORATION NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
14. FIELD CONDITIONS AND PROJECT VARIABILITY MAY REQUIRE
ADAPTATION OF THE DRAWINGS AND/OR DETAILS PROVIDED.
MINOR VARIATION(S) OR ADAPTATION(S) OF THE PROPOSED WORK
SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR DETAILS ARE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK.
15. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE FILLED IN A DESIGNATED AREA
OUTSIDE OF FEMA REGULATED FLOODPLAINS AND JURISDICTIONAL
WETLANDS.
16. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TRACKS AND ACCESS PATHS SHALL BE
GRADED AND RE-CONTOURED AFTER CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT
RILL AND GULLY EROSION.
17. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE AN EXCAVATOR WITH A HYDRAULIC
THUMB TO INSTALL IN-STREAM STRUCTURES.
18. DESIGN ELEVATIONS AT THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM
EXTENTS OF THE WORK AND IN THE VICINITY OF TRIBUTARIES AND
CONFLUENCES MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED TO MEET FIELD
CONDITIONS. ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE IN CONJUNCTION
WITH THE ENGINEER AND ARE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO
CONSTRUCTION.
19. CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED AND
STABILIZED PRIOR TO ALLOWING FLOW TO ENTER INTO THE NEWLY
CONSTRUCTED STREAM CHANNEL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT
OPEN UP MORE THAN 200 FEET OF CHANNEL WITHOUT EROSION
CONTROL MATTING IN PLACE OR BY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.
IF THE CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION WORK IS NOT COMPLETED PRIOR
TO ABANDONING THE OLD CHANNEL, A TEMPORARY DIVERSION
CHANNEL OR PUMP AROUND SYSTEM SHALL BE USED ACCORDING
THE APPROVED E&SC PLAN AND DETAILS. IN-LINE CHANNEL WORK
SHALL UTILIZE THE TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND SYSTEM AT ALL
TIMES TO MAINTAIN DRY CONDITIONS IN THE WORK AREA.
20. STREAM RESTORATION WORK SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY FIRST
GRADING THE FLOODPLAIN ADJACENT TO THE CHANNEL TO THE
ELEVATIONS AND GRADES SPECIFIED IN THE PLANSHEETS. THE
DESIGN CHANNEL SHALL THEN BE EXCAVATED TO THE DESIGN
CHANNEL CROSS-SECTION GEOMETRY AND LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. THE THALWEG CAN FIRST
BE EXCAVATED TO THE ELEVATION SPECIFIED IN THE
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE AND EXCAVATION AND FINE GRADING OF
THE CROSS-SECTIONS SHALL THEN BE PREFORMED. ANY
TEMPORARY STOCKPILING OR DOUBLE HANDLING OF EXCESS
EARTH NECESSARY TO BUILD THE CHANNEL SHALL BE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
21. BANKFULL CHANNEL DIMENSION TOLERANCES WILL BE HELD TO
THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION
PLANSHEETS. ELEVATIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 0.1'
(VERTICAL). WIDTHS AND DEPTHS MUST FALL WITHIN RANGES
SHOWN IN THE PLANSHEETS. CHANNEL CROSS-SECTION
DIMENSIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.2' (HORIZONTAL).
22. IF THE EXISTING GROUND IS LESS THAN 0.2' HIGHER THAN THE
PROPOSED BANKFULL ELEVATION, IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO
EXCAVATE TO THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS AND GRADES IN THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
23. THE BUILDER SHALL UTILIZE NATIVE ONSITE ROCK, WOOD AND
VEGETATION MATERIALS WHERE AVAILABLE AND APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER.
24. IN-STREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS THE CHANNEL IS
BEING CONSTRUCTED. INSTREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE FINISHED
TO A SMOOTH SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES
AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. THE
FINISHED STRUCTURE SLOPES AND PROFILE ELEVATIONS SHALL BE
WITHIN 0.1' (VERTICAL) OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
25. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE USED FOR IN-STREAM STRUCTURES. ALL
FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE 8OZ. NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE UNLESS
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN STRUCTURE DETAILS OR SPECIFICATIONS.
FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE TRIMMED TIGHT TO THE SURFACE OF THE
STRUCTURE AND SHOULD NOT BE OBSERVED BY VISUAL
INSPECTION.
26. BOULDER STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM BOULDERS
THAT ARE CUBICAL OR RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE AND SIZED
ACCORDING TO THE STRUCTURE DETAILS.
27. LOG STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM LOGS THAT ARE
INTACT, WITH BRANCHES TRIMMED AND IN NON-DECOMPOSED
CONDITION AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER.
28. AFTER THE STRUCTURE IS COMPLETE AND FLOW IS RESTORED TO
THE CHANNEL, SOME ADJUSTMENT TO THE STRUCTURE OR
ADDITIONAL STABILIZATION MEASURE MAY BE NECESSARY TO
ACHIEVE THE DESIRED FUNCTION.
29. THE CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL AND FLOODPLAIN SHALL BE
STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BY INSTALLING TOP SOIL,
TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING, ADDING STRAW MULCH
TO BARE SOIL AND INSTALLING EROSION CONTROL MATTING
FROM THE TOE OF THE BANKFULL CHANNEL TO 6.0' BEYOND THE
BANKFULL STAGE. PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE EROSION CONTROL
MATTING, APPLY SEED AND THEN STRAW MULCH. SEED SHALL BE
BROADCAST EVENLY OF THE AREA USING A BROADCAST SPREADER
PRIOR TO COVERING WITH THE EROSION CONTROL MATTING. THE
MATTING SHALL BE ROLLED OUT IN THE DIRECTION OF
ANTICIPATED RUNOFF FLOW. INSTALL MATTING IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE DETAIL INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
MATTING MATERIAL USED FOR STREAMSIDE STABILIZATION MUST
BE CERTIFIED WEED-FREE STRAW OR OTHER NATURAL WEED-FREE
/ NON-PROPAGATING VEGETATIVE MATERIALS. REWORKING OF
AREAS THAT DO NOT ESTABLISH VEGETATION OR BECOME
UNSTABLE SHALL BE NECESSARY IN THE MATTING SEPARATES
FROM THE SOIL.
35. EXCESS EARTH MAY BE USED TO BACKFILL THE OLD CHANNEL.
TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM EXCAVATION AND FILL AREAS
PRIOR EXCAVATION AND GRADING AND RE-APPLIED TO AREAS
AFTER ROUGH GRADING IS COMPLETE. 4" - 6” OF TOPSOIL SHALL BE
PLACED ON DISTURBED AREAS TO THE ELEVATIONS AND GRADES
INCLUDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
36. ANY AREA DISTURBED BY THE BUILDER SHALL BE PROMPTLY
STABILIZED FOR INTERIM AND PERMANENT PURPOSES CONSISTENT
WITH STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
STABILIZATION INCLUDES RE-VEGETATION OF ANY EXPOSED SOILS.
PLANTED GROUNDCOVER MAY ONLY BE NATIVE VEGETATION.
MULCH SHALL BE SPREAD TO COVER DISTURBED CHANNEL AND
FLOODPLAIN AREAS. MULCH SHALL BE KEPT OUT OF THE CROWNS
OF SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER.
1.1
DE
S
I
G
N

C
H
A
N
N
E
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
:

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
A

0
+
0
0

T
O

1
+
3
8
NTS
DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. CONSTRUCT THE DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION TO THE LINES,
ELEVATIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND
DETAILS.
2. CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY FIRST
GRADING THE FLOODPLAIN ADJACENT TO THE CHANNEL TO THE
DESIGN ELEVATIONS AND GRADES SPECIFIED IN THE DRAWINGS
AND DETAILS. THE DESIGN CHANNEL SHALL THEN BE EXCAVATED
TO THE DESIGN CHANNEL GEOMETRY AND PROFILE. THIS CHANNEL
WORK SHALL BE DONE WITH LOW GROUND PRESSURE TRACK
EQUIPMENT. DRAWINGS PROVIDE DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS AND
SLOPES TO AID IN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL. THE THALWEG
(CENTERLINE) CAN FIRST BE EXCAVATED TO THE ELEVATION
SPECIFIED IN THE PROFILE. EXCAVATION OF THE SIDE SLOPES AND
FINE GRADING OF THE CHANNEL SHALL THEN BE PREFORMED. ANY
TEMPORARY STOCKPILING OR DOUBLE HANDLING OF EXCESS
EARTH NECESSARY TO BUILD THE CHANNEL SHALL BE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
3. BANKFULL CHANNEL DIMENSIONS WILL BE HELD TO THE
DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN THE DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION DETAIL ON
THIS SHEET. ELEVATIONS AND DEPTHS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO
WITHIN 0.1' (VERTICAL). CHANNEL WIDTHS AND OTHER
HORIZONTAL (X,Y) DIMENSIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.2'.
4. IF THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN IS LESS THAN 0.2' HIGHER THAN THE
DESIGN BANKFULL ELEVATION, IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO GRADE
THE FLOODPLAIN TO THE FLOODPLAIN TO THE ELEVATIONS AND
GRADES IN THE DRAWINGS.
5. IN-STREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS THE CHANNEL IS
BEING CONSTRUCTED. INSTREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE FINISHED
TO A SMOOTH SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES
AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. THE
FINISHED STRUCTURE SLOPES AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN
0.1' (VERTICAL) OF THE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS.
6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ON ALL DISTURBED
STREAMBANKS TO 3.0' (MIN.) BEYOND THE BANKFULL STAGE.
1.7'
DESIGN CENTERLINE
ALIGNMENT
DESIGN GRADE
MAX DEPTH AT CENTER OF
RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
HORNE CREEK RIFFLE
STA 0+00 TO 1+38
HORNE CREEK POOL
STA 0+00 TO 1+38
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
FLOODPLAIN
POINT B
A
R
FLOODPLAINFLOODPLAIN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
DESIGN BANKFULL
STAGE
DESIGN BANKFULL
STAGE
2.8 : 1
10.4'
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
1.7'
DESIGN GRADE
RIFFLE DESIGN SECTION AT
DOWNSTREAM P.T.
19.7'
25.7'
4.6
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
10.4'
6 : 1
DESIGN CENTERLINE
ALIGNMENT
9.8'15.9'
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
1.8'
7.2'
1.2
DE
S
I
G
N

C
H
A
N
N
E
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
:

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
A

1
+
3
8

T
O

2
3
+
4
2
NTS
DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. CONSTRUCT THE DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION TO THE LINES,
ELEVATIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND
DETAILS.
2. CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY FIRST
GRADING THE FLOODPLAIN ADJACENT TO THE CHANNEL TO THE
DESIGN ELEVATIONS AND GRADES SPECIFIED IN THE DRAWINGS
AND DETAILS. THE DESIGN CHANNEL SHALL THEN BE EXCAVATED
TO THE DESIGN CHANNEL GEOMETRY AND PROFILE. THIS CHANNEL
WORK SHALL BE DONE WITH LOW GROUND PRESSURE TRACK
EQUIPMENT. DRAWINGS PROVIDE DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS AND
SLOPES TO AID IN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL. THE THALWEG
(CENTERLINE) CAN FIRST BE EXCAVATED TO THE ELEVATION
SPECIFIED IN THE PROFILE. EXCAVATION OF THE SIDE SLOPES AND
FINE GRADING OF THE CHANNEL SHALL THEN BE PREFORMED. ANY
TEMPORARY STOCKPILING OR DOUBLE HANDLING OF EXCESS
EARTH NECESSARY TO BUILD THE CHANNEL SHALL BE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
3. BANKFULL CHANNEL DIMENSIONS WILL BE HELD TO THE
DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN THE DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION DETAIL ON
THIS SHEET. ELEVATIONS AND DEPTHS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO
WITHIN 0.1' (VERTICAL). CHANNEL WIDTHS AND OTHER
HORIZONTAL (X,Y) DIMENSIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.2'.
4. IF THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN IS LESS THAN 0.2' HIGHER THAN THE
DESIGN BANKFULL ELEVATION, IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO GRADE
THE FLOODPLAIN TO THE FLOODPLAIN TO THE ELEVATIONS AND
GRADES IN THE DRAWINGS.
5. IN-STREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS THE CHANNEL IS
BEING CONSTRUCTED. INSTREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE FINISHED
TO A SMOOTH SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES
AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. THE
FINISHED STRUCTURE SLOPES AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN
0.1' (VERTICAL) OF THE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS.
6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ON ALL DISTURBED
STREAMBANKS TO 3.0' (MIN.) BEYOND THE BANKFULL STAGE.
1.9'
DESIGN CENTERLINE
ALIGNMENT
DESIGN GRADE
MAX DEPTH AT CENTER OF
RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
HORNE CREEK RIFFLE
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
HORNE CREEK POOL
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
FLOODPLAIN
POINT B
A
R
FLOODPLAINFLOODPLAIN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
DESIGN BANKFULL
STAGE
DESIGN BANKFULL
STAGE
2.8 : 1
11.8'
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
1.9'
DESIGN GRADE
RIFFLE DESIGN SECTION AT
DOWNSTREAM P.T.
22.6'
29.4'
5.3
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
11.8'
6 : 1
DESIGN CENTERLINE
ALIGNMENT
11.3'18.1'
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
2.1'
8.2'
1.3
DE
S
I
G
N

C
H
A
N
N
E
L

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
:

T
R
I
B

S
T
A

0
+
0
0

T
O

2
+
5
3
NTS
DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION SPECIFICATIONS
1. CONSTRUCT THE DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION TO THE LINES,
ELEVATIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND
DETAILS.
2. CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BY FIRST
GRADING THE FLOODPLAIN ADJACENT TO THE CHANNEL TO THE
DESIGN ELEVATIONS AND GRADES SPECIFIED IN THE DRAWINGS
AND DETAILS. THE DESIGN CHANNEL SHALL THEN BE EXCAVATED
TO THE DESIGN CHANNEL GEOMETRY AND PROFILE. THIS CHANNEL
WORK SHALL BE DONE WITH LOW GROUND PRESSURE TRACK
EQUIPMENT. DRAWINGS PROVIDE DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS AND
SLOPES TO AID IN CONSTRUCTION OF THE CHANNEL. THE THALWEG
(CENTERLINE) CAN FIRST BE EXCAVATED TO THE ELEVATION
SPECIFIED IN THE PROFILE. EXCAVATION OF THE SIDE SLOPES AND
FINE GRADING OF THE CHANNEL SHALL THEN BE PREFORMED. ANY
TEMPORARY STOCKPILING OR DOUBLE HANDLING OF EXCESS
EARTH NECESSARY TO BUILD THE CHANNEL SHALL BE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
3. BANKFULL CHANNEL DIMENSIONS WILL BE HELD TO THE
DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN THE DESIGN CHANNEL SECTION DETAIL ON
THIS SHEET. ELEVATIONS AND DEPTHS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO
WITHIN 0.1' (VERTICAL). CHANNEL WIDTHS AND OTHER
HORIZONTAL (X,Y) DIMENSIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.2'.
4. IF THE EXISTING FLOODPLAIN IS LESS THAN 0.2' HIGHER THAN THE
DESIGN BANKFULL ELEVATION, IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO GRADE
THE FLOODPLAIN TO THE FLOODPLAIN TO THE ELEVATIONS AND
GRADES IN THE DRAWINGS.
5. IN-STREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AS THE CHANNEL IS
BEING CONSTRUCTED. INSTREAM STRUCTURES SHALL BE FINISHED
TO A SMOOTH SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LINES, GRADES
AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. THE
FINISHED STRUCTURE SLOPES AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN
0.1' (VERTICAL) OF THE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS.
6. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ON ALL DISTURBED
STREAMBANKS TO 3.0' (MIN.) BEYOND THE BANKFULL STAGE.
1.5'
DESIGN CENTERLINE
ALIGNMENT
DESIGN GRADE
MAX DEPTH AT CENTER OF
RIFFLE CROSS-SECTION
TRIB RIFFLE
STA 0+00 TO 2+53
TRIB POOL
STA 0+00 TO 2+53
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
FLOODPLAIN
POINT
B
A
R
FLOODPLAINFLOODPLAIN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
WIDTH VARIES
PER PLAN
DESIGN BANKFULL
STAGE
DESIGN BANKFULL
STAGE
2.8 : 1
9.0'
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
TIE TO EXISTING GROUND
PER PLAN
1.5'
DESIGN GRADE
RIFFLE DESIGN SECTION AT
DOWNSTREAM P.T.
17.3'
22.5'
4.0
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
9.0'
6 : 1
DESIGN CENTERLINE
ALIGNMENT
9.8'15.9'
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
1.6'
6.2'
2.2
2.
3
2.4
2.5
2.6
0
+
0
0
1+0
0
2+00
3+0
0
4+
0
0
5+
0
0
6+00
7+00
8+00
9
+
0
0
1
0
+
0
0
1
1
+
0
0
1
2
+
0
0
1
3
+
0
0
14+0
0
15+00
16+0
0
17+
0
0
18+00
19+
0
0
20+
0
0
21+00
22+00 23+00
24+
0
0
25+
0
0
26
+
0
0
27+00
27+9
2
0+0
0
1+00
2+00 2+53
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
2.1
AS NOTED
PR
O
J
E
C
T

O
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
Feet
0 100 200
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING SITE FEATURES
810 DESIGN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
PARCEL BOUNDARY
DESIGN STREAM CENTERLINE
DESIGN STREAM BANKFULL
FEMA SFHA ZONE AE100YR
DESIGN SITE FEATURES
EXISTING STREAM CENTERLINE
DESIGN STREAM FEATURES
DESIGN CHANNEL PLUG
DESIGN MAJOR CONTOUR
DESIGN MINOR CONTOUR
DESIGN GRADING LIMITS
STANDARD LINES AND SYMBOLS
810
DESIGN FLOODPLAIN TOE OF SLOPEFPT
DESIGN TOE WOOD PROTECTION
OVERHEAD POWER LINEP
RIGHT-OF-WAYR/W
DESIGN BOULDER RIFFLE
DESIGN LOG J-HOOK VANE
DESIGN BOULDER TOE PROTECTION
SHEET INDEX
2.2
2.
3
2
.
4
2.5
2.6
HORNE CREEK
HO
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K
TRIB
HORNE CREEK
TRIB
DESIGN BOULDER CROSS-VANE
DESIGN BOULDER J-HOOK VANE
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00
1.2%
1.2%
0.9%
0.8%
1.2%
EL
V
:

8
1
4
.
3
EL
V
:

8
1
3
.
9
EL
V
:

8
1
3
.
3
EL
V
:

8
1
2
.
7
EL
V
:

8
1
1
.
9
EL
V
:

8
1
1
.
1
EL
V
:

8
1
0
.
4
EL
V
:

8
1
0
.
1
EL
V
:

8
0
9
.
7
EL
V
:

8
0
9
.
5
EL
V
:

8
0
8
.
9
EL
V
:

8
0
8
.
5
BP
:

0
+
0
0
.
0
PC
:

0
+
3
2
.
8
PT
:

0
+
8
2
.
3
PC
:

1
+
3
8
.
5
PT
:

2
+
0
0
.
2
PC
:

2
+
6
8
.
2
PT
:

3
+
3
2
.
0
PI
:

3
+
5
9
.
6
PI
:

4
+
0
0
.
1
PC
:

4
+
1
7
.
1
PT
:

4
+
7
7
.
6
PC
:

5
+
2
8
.
0
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
1.5%
1.5%
EL
V
:

8
1
2
.
6
EL
V
:

8
1
1
.
9
EL
V
:

8
0
8
.
9
EL
V
:

8
1
1
.
7
EL
V
:

8
1
0
.
6
EL
V
:

8
0
6
.
9
EL
V
:

8
1
0
.
1
EL
V
:

8
0
8
.
8
EL
V
:

8
0
5
.
3
EL
V
:

8
0
8
.
4
EL
V
:

8
0
8
.
0
EL
V
:

8
0
7
.
4
EL
V
:

8
0
7
.
2
EL
V
:

8
0
3
.
8
EL
V
:

8
0
7
.
0
EL
V
:

8
0
6
.
2
EL
V
:

8
0
2
.
9
BP
:

0
+
0
0
.
0
PC
:

0
+
3
2
.
8
Mi
d
:

0
+
5
7
.
6
PT
:

0
+
8
2
.
3
PC
:

1
+
3
8
.
5
Mi
d
:

1
+
6
9
.
3
PT
:

2
+
0
0
.
2
PC
:

2
+
6
8
.
2
Mi
d
:

3
+
0
0
.
1
PT
:

3
+
3
2
.
0
PI
:

3
+
5
9
.
6
PI
:

4
+
0
0
.
1
PC
:

4
+
1
7
.
1
Mi
d
:

4
+
4
7
.
4
PT
:

4
+
7
7
.
6
PC
:

5
+
2
8
.
0
Mi
d
:

5
+
6
6
.
1
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100Y
R
100
Y
R
100YR
100YR
100
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR 100Y
R
100Y
R
100YR
10
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
100YR 100YR 100
Y
R
100YR 100Y
R
100YR
100YR
100YR
10
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
815
8
1
5
81
5
8
1
5
8
1
5
815
815 815
810
810
810
815
810
810
8
1
0
8
0
5
81
0
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT
FP
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT FPT
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FP
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FP
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FPT
FPT FPT FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT
FPT
820
82
0
8
2
5
8
3
0
815
815
815 8
1
5
815
815 815
820
825 820
815
815
82
0
825
820
8
1
0
8
1
0
8
1
0
82
0
8
2
5
815
83
0
835
84
0
8
4
5
8
1
0
81
0
8
1
0
0+00
1+00
2+0
0
3+00
4+00
5+00
6
+
0
0
7
+
0
0
8
+
0
0
B
P
:

0
+
0
0
.
0
P
I
:

3
+
5
9
.
6
P
I
:

4
+
0
0
.
1
P
C
:

0
+
3
2
.
8
PC
:

1
+
3
8
.
5
PC
:

2
+
6
8
.
2
P
C
:

4
+
1
7
.
1
P
C
:

5
+
2
8
.
0
PC:
6
+
7
3
.
7
PC: 8+13.2
PT
:

0
+
8
2
.
3
PT
:

2
+
0
0
.
2
P
T
:

3
+
3
2
.
0
P
T
:

4
+
7
7
.
6
PT:
6
+
0
4
.
3
PT: 7+46.1
0+0
0
1
+
0
0
2
+
0
0
2
+
5
3
MAT
C
H

L
I
N
E

S
T
A

6
+
0
0
2.2
1" = 40'
HO
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

D
E
S
I
G
N

P
L
A
N

-

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
:

S
T
A

0
+
0
0

T
O

6
+
0
0
Feet
0 40 80
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SHEET INDEX
19.7'
1.8'
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
10.4'
DESIGN CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1.7'
25.7'
4.6'
2.8 : 16 : 1
HORNE CREEK POOL
STA 0+00 TO 1+38
BANKFULL STAGE
BANKFULL STAGE
1.7'
2.2
2.
3
2
.
4
2.5
2.6
7.2'
HORNE CREEK RIFFLE
STA 0+00 TO 1+38
22.6'
2.1'
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
11.8'
1.9'
29.4'
5.3'
2.8 : 16 : 1
HORNE CREEK POOL
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
BANKFULL STAGE
BANKFULL STAGE
1.9'
8.2'
HORNE CREEK RIFFLE
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
GRADING LIMITS
FLOODPLAIN TOE OF SLOPE
DESIGN BANKFULL
DESIGN THALWEG
DESIGN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
HORNE CREEK
EXIS
T
I
N
G

G
R
A
V
E
L

R
O
A
D
T
R
I
B
PLUG AND FILL OLD CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.3
DESIGN BOULDER J-HOOK VANE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
DESIGN BOULDER CROSS-VANE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
EXISTING GROUND
TRIB CONFLUENCE WITH
HORNE CREEK AT
BOULDER J-HOOK VANE
DESIGN BOULDER TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
DESIGN LOG J-HOOK VANE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.2
DESIGN BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.2
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
DESIGN BOULDER RIFFLE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
PROPOSED ROAD AND ALUMINUM PIPE ARCH
CULVERT WITH CIP CONCRETE HEADWALLS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
HORNE CREEK
ALUMINUM PIPE ARCH CULVERT WITH CIP
CONCRETE HEADWALLS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
PROPOSED ROAD GRADING LIMITS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
HORNE CREEK
TRIB
PROPOSED ROAD
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
DESIGN RIPRAP STABILIZATION
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
0.9%
1.0%
0.8%
EL
V
:

8
0
7
.
9
EL
V
:

8
0
7
.
3
EL
V
:

8
0
6
.
7
EL
V
:

8
0
6
.
1
EL
V
:

8
0
5
.
5
EL
V
:

8
0
4
.
8
EL
V
:

8
0
4
.
3
EL
V
:

8
0
3
.
7
EL
V
:

8
0
3
.
1
EL
V
:

8
0
2
.
5
EL
V
:

8
0
1
.
9
EL
V
:

8
0
1
.
5
EL
V
:

8
0
1
.
2
EL
V
:

8
0
1
.
1
PT
:

6
+
0
4
.
3
PC
:

6
+
7
3
.
7
PT
:

7
+
4
6
.
1
PC
:

8
+
1
3
.
2
PT
:

8
+
8
8
.
5
PC
:

9
+
5
8
.
2
PT
:

1
0
+
1
8
.
9
PC
:

1
0
+
8
0
.
9
PT
:

1
1
+
3
8
.
4
PC
:

1
2
+
0
5
.
3
PT
:

1
2
+
6
4
.
8
PI
:

1
3
+
0
1
.
0
PI
:

1
3
+
4
1
.
5
PC
:

1
3
+
5
3
.
1
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
EL
V
:

8
0
6
.
0
EL
V
:

8
0
5
.
0
EL
V
:

8
0
1
.
6
EL
V
:

8
0
4
.
8
EL
V
:

8
0
3
.
8
EL
V
:

8
0
0
.
4
EL
V
:

8
0
3
.
6
EL
V
:

8
0
2
.
5
EL
V
:

7
9
9
.
2
EL
V
:

8
0
2
.
3
EL
V
:

8
0
1
.
4
EL
V
:

7
9
8
.
0
EL
V
:

8
0
1
.
2
EL
V
:

8
0
0
.
2
EL
V
:

7
9
6
.
8
EL
V
:

8
0
0
.
0
EL
V
:

7
9
9
.
4
EL
V
:

7
9
8
.
8
EL
V
:

7
9
8
.
7
PT
:

6
+
0
4
.
3
PC
:

6
+
7
3
.
7
Mi
d
:

7
+
0
9
.
9
PT
:

7
+
4
6
.
1
PC
:

8
+
1
3
.
2
Mi
d
:

8
+
5
0
.
9
PT
:

8
+
8
8
.
5
PC
:

9
+
5
8
.
2
Mi
d
:

9
+
8
8
.
5
PT
:

1
0
+
1
8
.
9
PC
:

1
0
+
8
0
.
9
Mi
d
:

1
1
+
0
9
.
6
PT
:

1
1
+
3
8
.
4
PC
:

1
2
+
0
5
.
3
Mi
d
:

1
2
+
3
5
.
1
PT
:

1
2
+
6
4
.
8
PI
:

1
3
+
0
1
.
0
PI
:

1
3
+
4
1
.
5
PC
:

1
3
+
5
3
.
1
100
Y
R
100Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR100YR100YR
100YR1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100YR
10
0
Y
R
100Y
R
100YR
10
0
Y
R
100Y
R
100Y
R
100Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100
Y
R
100
Y
R
100Y
R
100Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100
Y
R
100Y
R
100Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100
Y
R
100YR
100
Y
R
100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR 100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
100YR
8
1
0
8
1
0
810
805
810
805
805
805
805
810
805
805
8
0
5
800
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT
FP
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FP
T
FP
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT
FP
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT FPT
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT
80
0
8
1
5
810
810
810
810
810
810
81
5
820
82
5
830835
840
8
3
5
83
0
82
5
820
82
5
810
810
8
1
0
81
0
81
0
81
0
81
5
820
825
830
810
805
810
815
820
82
5
8
0
5
805
805
805
81
0
81
5
5
+
0
0
6+0
0
7+0
0
8+00
9
+
0
0
10+00
11+00
12+00
13+00
14+00
15
+
0
0
PI
:

1
3
+
0
1
.
0
PI
:

1
3
+
4
1
.
5
PC: 5+
2
8
.
0
PC
:

6
+
7
3
.
7
P
C
:

8
+
1
3
.
2
PC:

9
+
5
8
.
2
PC
:

1
0
+
8
0
.
9
PC
:

1
2
+
0
5
.
3
PC
:

1
3
+
5
3
.
1
PC:

1
5
+
2
8
.
8
PT: 4+
7
7
.
6
PT
:

6
+
0
4
.
3
P
T
:

7
+
4
6
.
1
PT:

8
+
8
8
.
5
PT
:

1
0
+
1
8
.
9
PT
:

1
1
+
3
8
.
4
PT
:

1
2
+
6
4
.
8
PT:

1
4
+
4
7
.
5
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

S
T
A

6
+
0
0
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

S
T
A

1
4
+
0
0
2.3
1" = 40'
HO
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

D
E
S
I
G
N

P
L
A
N

-

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
:

S
T
A

6
+
0
0

T
O

1
4
+
0
0
Feet
0 40 80
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SHEET INDEX
22.6'
2.1'
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
11.8'
DESIGN CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1.9'
29.4'
5.3'
2.8 : 16 : 1
HORNE CREEK POOL
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
BANKFULL STAGE
BANKFULL STAGE
1.9'
2.2
2.
3
2
.
4
2.5
2.6
8.2'
HORNE CREEK RIFFLE
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
GRADING LIMITS
FLOODPLAIN TOE OF SLOPE
DESIGN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AEPLUG AND FILL OLD CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.3
DESIGN BOULDER J-HOOK VANE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
DESIGN BOULDER TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
DESIGN LOG J-HOOK VANE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.2
DESIGN BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.2
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
HORNE CREEK
W-1
0.023 AC
EXISTING GRAVEL
R
O
A
D
DESIGN BANKFULL
DESIGN THALWEG
EXISTING GROUND
DESIGN BOULDER RIFFLE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
PROPOSED ROAD AND ALUMINUM PIPE ARCH
CULVERT WITH CIP CONCRETE HEADWALLS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
W-2
0.164 AC
PROPOSED ROAD GRADING LIMITS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
HORNE CREEK
TRIB
PROPOSED ROAD AND ALUMINUM PIPE ARCH
CULVERT WITH CIP CONCRETE HEADWALLS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
PROPOSED ROAD
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
DESIGN RIPRAP STABILIZATION
HO
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00
0.9%
0.9%
0.7%
EL
V
:

8
0
0
.
3
EL
V
:

7
9
9
.
6
EL
V
:

7
9
8
.
9
EL
V
:

7
9
8
.
2
EL
V
:

7
9
7
.
5
EL
V
:

7
9
6
.
9
EL
V
:

7
9
6
.
3
EL
V
:

7
9
5
.
7
EL
V
:

7
9
5
.
1
EL
V
:

7
9
4
.
7
EL
V
:

7
9
4
.
2
PT
:

1
4
+
4
7
.
5
PC
:

1
5
+
2
8
.
8
PT
:

1
6
+
1
3
.
0
PC
:

1
6
+
9
5
.
7
PT
:

1
7
+
7
5
.
0
PC
:

1
8
+
4
5
.
1
PT
:

1
9
+
1
5
.
6
PC
:

1
9
+
8
4
.
3
PT
:

2
0
+
6
1
.
3
PC
:

2
1
+
2
9
.
5
PT
:

2
1
+
9
7
.
2
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.0%
EL
V
:

7
9
5
.
3
EL
V
:

7
9
8
.
5
EL
V
:

7
9
7
.
3
EL
V
:

7
9
3
.
9
EL
V
:

7
9
7
.
0
EL
V
:

7
9
5
.
8
EL
V
:

7
9
2
.
4
EL
V
:

7
9
5
.
6
EL
V
:

7
9
4
.
5
EL
V
:

7
9
1
.
2
EL
V
:

7
9
4
.
3
EL
V
:

7
9
3
.
3
EL
V
:

7
9
0
.
0
EL
V
:

7
9
3
.
1
EL
V
:

7
9
2
.
4
EL
V
:

7
8
9
.
1
EL
V
:

7
9
2
.
2
Mi
d
:

1
4
+
0
0
.
3
PT
:

1
4
+
4
7
.
5
PC
:

1
5
+
2
8
.
8
Mi
d
:

1
5
+
7
0
.
9
PT
:

1
6
+
1
3
.
0
PC
:

1
6
+
9
5
.
7
Mi
d
:

1
7
+
3
5
.
3
PT
:

1
7
+
7
5
.
0
PC
:

1
8
+
4
5
.
1
Mi
d
:

1
8
+
8
0
.
4
PT
:

1
9
+
1
5
.
6
PC
:

1
9
+
8
4
.
3
Mi
d
:

2
0
+
2
2
.
8
PT
:

2
0
+
6
1
.
3
PC
:

2
1
+
2
9
.
5
Mi
d
:

2
1
+
6
3
.
4
PT
:

2
1
+
9
7
.
2
100YR
100YR
100YR100YR100YR
100YR100YR
100YR
100YR
100YR
100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
10
0
Y
R
100
Y
R
100
Y
R
100YR
100YR
100YR
100YR100YR
10
0
Y
R
100Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100
Y
R
100YR
100
Y
R
100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR 100YR 100YR
100Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR 100YR
100YR
100Y
R
100YR
100YR 100YR
100YR 100YR
100Y
R
800
800
800
800
79
5
7
9
5
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPTFPTFPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPTFPT
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FPT FPT FPT FPT FPT FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT FPT FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
8
0
0
800
805
8
1
0
81
5
820
805
8
0
5
8
1
0
815
805
805
810
80
0
800
800 810
815
800
800
810 805
800
800
810
815
805
14+00
15+00
16+0
0
17+
0
0 18+00
19+
0
0
20+0
0
21+00
22+00
PI: 1
3
+
0
1
.
0
PI: 1
3
+
4
1
.
5
PC: 1
3
+
5
3
.
1
P
C
:

1
5
+
2
8
.
8
PC
:

1
6
+
9
5
.
7
P
C
:

1
8
+
4
5
.
1
PC
:

1
9
+
8
4
.
3
P
C
:

2
1
+
2
9
.
5
P
T
:

1
4
+
4
7
.
5
PT
:

1
6
+
1
3
.
0
P
T
:

1
7
+
7
5
.
0
PT:

1
9
+
1
5
.
6
P
T
:

2
0
+
6
1
.
3
P
T
:

2
1
+
9
7
.
2
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

S
T
A

1
4
+
0
0
M
A
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

S
T
A

2
2
+
0
0
2.4
1" = 40'
HO
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

D
E
S
I
G
N

P
L
A
N

-

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
:

S
T
A

1
4
+
0
0

T
O

2
2
+
0
0
Feet
0 40 80
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SHEET INDEX
22.6'
2.1'
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
11.8'
DESIGN CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1.9'
29.4'
5.3'
2.8 : 16 : 1
HORNE CREEK POOL
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
BANKFULL STAGE
BANKFULL STAGE
1.9'
2.2
2.
3
2
.
4
2.5
2.6
8.2'
HORNE CREEK RIFFLE
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
GRADING LIMITS
FLOODPLAIN TOE OF SLOPE
DESIGN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
PLUG AND FILL OLD CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.3
DESIGN BOULDER TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
DESIGN LOG J-HOOK VANE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.2
DESIGN BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.2
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
HORNE CREEK
EXISTING G
R
A
V
E
L

R
O
A
D
DESIGN BANKFULL
DESIGN THALWEG
EXISTING GROUND
EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD
HORNE CREEK
TRIB
DESIGN BOULDER RIFFLE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
100
Y
R100
Y
R
100
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100YR
10
0
Y
R
100YR
100Y
R
100YR100YR
100YR
100YR100
Y
R
100YR100YR
100
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100Y
R
100
Y
R
100YR100YR
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
10
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR 100YR
100YR
100YR
100
Y
R
100YR
100YR
100
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100YR
1
0
0
Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
100Y
R
100YR
100Y
R
1
0
0
Y
R
795
79
5
795
795
FPTFPTFPTFPT
FPT
FPT
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
F
P
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT
795
8
0
0
800
795
8
0
0
7958
1
0
8
0
5
800
80
5
795
8
0
0
805
810
815
82
0
825
795
795
7
9
5
21+00
22
+
0
0
23+00 24+00
25+00
26+00 27+
0
0
27+92
EP
:

2
7
+
9
1
.
6
P
I
:

2
5
+
0
2
.
6
P
I
:

2
5
+
5
2
.
1
P
I
:

2
6
+
1
3
.
4
PI:

2
6
+
9
4
.
0
PI:

2
7
+
1
7
.
5
P
I
:

2
6
+
2
2
.
5
PC: 19+8
4
.
3
PC
:

2
1
+
2
9
.
5
PC:

2
2
+
6
7
.
0
PT
:

2
0
+
6
1
.
3
PT:

2
1
+
9
7
.
2
P
T
:

2
3
+
4
1
.
8
MA
T
C
H

L
I
N
E

S
T
A

2
2
+
0
0
775
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
775
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 27+92
1.0%
EL
V
:

7
9
1
.
5
EL
V
:

7
8
8
.
2
EL
V
:

7
9
1
.
3
PC
:

2
2
+
6
7
.
0
Mi
d
:

2
3
+
0
4
.
4
PT
:

2
3
+
4
1
.
8
1.5%
1.5%
EL
V
:

7
8
8
.
5
EL
V
:

7
8
8
.
2
EL
V
:

7
8
7
.
8
EL
V
:

7
8
8
.
4
EL
V
:

7
8
5
.
0
PI
:

2
6
+
1
3
.
4
PI
:

2
6
+
9
4
.
0
PI
:

2
7
+
1
7
.
5
PI
:

2
6
+
2
2
.
5
PI
:

2
6
+
5
8
.
0
0.6%
EL
V
:

7
9
2
.
4
EL
V
:

7
9
3
.
8
EL
V
:

7
9
3
.
3
PI
:

2
5
+
0
2
.
6
PC
:

2
2
+
6
7
.
0
PT
:

2
3
+
4
1
.
8
2.5
1" = 40'
SHEET INDEX
HO
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

D
E
S
I
G
N

P
L
A
N

-

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
:

S
T
A

2
2
+
0
0

T
O

2
7
+
9
2
Feet
0 40 80
22.6'
2.1'
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
11.8'
DESIGN CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1.9'
29.4'
5.3'
2.8 : 16 : 1
HORNE CREEK POOL
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
BANKFULL STAGE
BANKFULL STAGE
1.9'
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
2.2
2.
3
2
.
4
2.5
2.6
8.2'
HORNE CREEK RIFFLE
STA 1+38 TO 23+42
GRADING LIMITS
FLOODPLAIN TOE OF SLOPE
DESIGN CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
DESIGN LOG J-HOOK VANE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.2
DESIGN BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.2
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
HORNE
C
R
E
E
K
W-3
0.117 AC
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G

G
R
A
V
E
L

R
O
A
D
DESIGN BANKFULL
DESIGN THALWEG
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED ROAD AND ALUMINUM PIPE ARCH
CULVERT WITH CIP CONCRETE HEADWALLS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
PROPOSED ROAD GRADING LIMITS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
HORNE CREEK
TRIB
HORNE CREEK
TRIB
PROPOSED ROAD AND ALUMINUM PIPE ARCH
CULVERT WITH CIP CONCRETE HEADWALLS
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
PROPOSED ROAD
(DESIGNED BY K-H & A)
100
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR100YR
100YR
100YR
100YR
100
Y
R
100YR
100YR
100YR
100Y
R
100
Y
R
100
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100
Y
R
100
Y
R
10
0
Y
R
100YR
100YR
815
815
815
815 815
81
5
815
815
810
810
810
81
5
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT FPT FPT FPT
FPT
FPT FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FP
T
FP
T
FP
T
FPT
FPT FPT FPT FPT FPT FPT
FP
T
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FPT
FP
T
82
0
825
820
825
830
830
815
815
815
815
81
5
815
815
820
815
820
825
81
5
830
835
840
845
0+
0
0
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+0
0
5+0
0
0+00
1+00 2+00
2+53
B
P
:

0
+
0
0
.
0
P
C
:

0
+
3
8
.
2
PT
:

0
+
6
7
.
1
PC
:

0
+
9
7
.
8
P
T
:

1
+
2
5
.
5
P
C
:

1
+
5
4
.
4
PT
:

1
+
8
4
.
1
PC
:

2
+
0
7
.
8
PT
:

2
+
3
1
.
5
EP
:

2
+
5
2
.
7
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0+00 1+00 2+00 2+55
0.9%
1.0%
EL
V
:

8
1
4
.
8
EL
V
:

8
1
4
.
4
EL
V
:

8
1
4
.
2
EL
V
:

8
1
3
.
9
EL
V
:

8
1
3
.
6
EL
V
:

8
1
3
.
4
EL
V
:

8
1
3
.
1
EL
V
:

8
1
2
.
9
EL
V
:

8
1
2
.
6
BP
:

0
+
0
0
.
0
PC
:

0
+
3
8
.
2
PT
:

0
+
6
7
.
1
PC
:

0
+
9
7
.
8
PT
:

1
+
2
5
.
5
PC
:

1
+
5
4
.
4
PT
:

1
+
8
4
.
1
PC
:

2
+
0
7
.
8
PT
:

2
+
3
1
.
5
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
1.1%
EL
V
:

8
1
3
.
2
EL
V
:

8
1
2
.
8
EL
V
:

8
1
0
.
1
EL
V
:

8
1
2
.
6
EL
V
:

8
1
2
.
2
EL
V
:

8
0
9
.
6
EL
V
:

8
1
2
.
0
EL
V
:

8
1
1
.
7
EL
V
:

8
0
9
.
1
EL
V
:

8
1
1
.
5
EL
V
:

8
1
1
.
2
EL
V
:

8
0
8
.
6
EL
V
:

8
1
1
.
0
BP
:

0
+
0
0
.
0
PC
:

0
+
3
8
.
2
Mi
d
:

0
+
5
2
.
6
PT
:

0
+
6
7
.
1
PC
:

0
+
9
7
.
8
Mi
d
:

1
+
1
1
.
6
PT
:

1
+
2
5
.
5
PC
:

1
+
5
4
.
4
Mi
d
:

1
+
6
9
.
2
PT
:

1
+
8
4
.
1
PC
:

2
+
0
7
.
8
Mi
d
:

2
+
1
9
.
7
PT
:

2
+
3
1
.
5
2.6
1" = 40'
TR
I
B

D
E
S
I
G
N

P
L
A
N

-

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
:

S
T
A

0
+
0
0

T
O

2
+
5
3
Feet
0 40 80
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SHEET INDEX
17.3'
1.6'
2.8 : 1
2.8
:

1
9.0'
DESIGN CHANNEL
SECTIONS
1.5'
22.5'
4.0'
2.8 : 16 : 1
TRIB POOL
STA 0+00 TO 2+53
BANKFULL STAGE
BANKFULL STAGE
1.5'
2.2
2.
3
2
.
4
2.5
2.6
6.2'
TRIB RIFFLE
STA 0+00 TO 2+53
GRADING LIMITS
FLOODPLAIN TOE OF SLOPE
DESIGN BANKFULL
DESIGN THALWEG
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
HORN
E

C
R
E
E
K
EXISTING

G
R
A
V
E
L

R
O
A
D
TRIB
PLUG AND FILL OLD CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.3
DESIGN BOULDER J-HOOK VANE
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
EXISTING GROUND
TRIB CONFLUENCE WITH
HORNE CREEK AT
BOULDER J-HOOK VANE
DESIGN BOULDER TOE PROTECTION
SEE DETAIL SHEET 4.1
FEMA SFHA
ZONE AE
HORNE CREEK
TRIB
HORNE CREEK STA 0+16
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 2+34
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 5+03
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 7+80
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 10+50
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 0+95
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 3+46
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 6+39
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 9+23
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
795
800
805
810
815
820
825
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 11+72
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
3.1
HO
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

D
E
S
I
G
N

G
R
A
D
I
N
G

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
1" = 10'
HORNE CREEK STA 12+83
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 14+88
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
790
795
800
805
810
815
820
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 17+90
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 20+95
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 16+54
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 19+50
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
785
790
795
800
805
810
815
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
HORNE CREEK STA 22+32
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
780
785
790
795
800
805
810
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
3.2
DE
S
I
G
N

G
R
A
D
I
N
G

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
1" = 10'
TRIB STA 0+82
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
TRIB STA 1+96
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
TRIB STA 0+19
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
TRIB STA 1+40
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
800
805
810
815
820
825
830
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80-90-100
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
3.3
TR
I
B

D
E
S
I
G
N

G
R
A
D
I
N
G

S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
1" = 10'
BANKFULL
KEY BOULDERS INTO
STREAMBANK @ 1
2 TO 2
3 BKF STAGE
KEY BOULDERS INTO
STREAMBANK MIN. 15 FT
OR THREE FULL BOULDER LENGTHS PLACE BOULDERS INTO STREAMBED A
MINIMUM OF THE BOULDER DIAMETER
FIT BOULDERS TIGHTLY TOGETHER
SLOPE = 1 - 3%
P.C. ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
BOULDER J-HOOK SPECIFICATIONS
BOULDER J-HOOK DETAIL
GRAVEL BACKFILL
MATERIAL
SCOUR POOL
BELOW STRUCTURE
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
BANKFULL
NON-WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
1 FT OFFSET
GRAVEL BACKFILL
UPSTREAM OF STRUCTURE
HIGH DENSITY PLANTINGS
EXTEND VANE ARM
INTO STREAMBANK
MIN. 10.0' OR THREE
FULL BOULDER LENGTHS
NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
1. ALL BOULDERS USED FOR THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SHALL BE STRUCTURAL STONE, CUBICAL OR RECTANGULAR IN
SHAPE. THE ENGINEER MUST APPROVE THE USE OF BOULDERS THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE ONSITE. BOULDERS SHALL
BE 3.0' X 5.0' X 2.5' (W X L X H) +/- 0.5'. THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE BOULDER THICKNESS (H) IS 2.0'. BOULDERS
LONGER (L) THAN 5.5' WILL BE ACCEPTED.
2. DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES OF STRUCTURES DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL MAY BE ADJUSTED BY DESIGN ENGINEER TO FIT
CONDITIONS ONSITE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FIT BOULDERS TOGETHER TIGHTLY.
3. GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS SHALL BE MINIMIZED BY FITTING BOULDERS TOGETHER AND PLUGGING WITH NC DOT
CLASS A ROCK OR CHINKING STONE APPROVED BY ENGINEER.
2. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER BOULDERS TO PROVIDE A FOUNDATION UNLESS OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE OFFSET 1.0 FT UPSTREAM OF THE FOOTER.
3. SET BOULDER INVERTS AT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS. NO ELEVATIONS OF THE
BOULDERS MAY VARY FROM THE PLAN SHEETS WITHOUT DIRECTION FROM THE ENGINEER.
4. NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE TO PREVENT WASHOUT OF
SEDIMENT THROUGH BOULDER GAPS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTER BOULDER
TO THE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION AND SHALL BE PLACED THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE STRUCTURE. SELECT BACK
FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UPSTREAM OF THE GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL.
5. GRAVEL MATERIAL CONSISTING OF A WELL-GRADED BLEND OF NCDOT CLASS A RIPRAP AND ASTM #57 ROCK MIXED
WITH EARTH SHALL BE USED TO BACKFILL THE STRUCTURE. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED SUCH THAT
FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
6. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF
FINISH FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED.
7. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING
INSTALLATION OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
A'
A
B
SCOUR
POOL
B'
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION B - B'
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
SCOUR
POOL
GRAVEL BACKFILL
UPSTREAM OF STRUCTURE
BANKFULL
HIGH DENSITY PLANTINGS
1. ALL BOULDERS USED FOR THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE SHALL BE STRUCTURAL STONE, CUBICAL OR RECTANGULAR IN
SHAPE. THE ENGINEER MUST APPROVE THE USE OF BOULDERS THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE ONSITE. BOULDERS SHALL
BE 3.0' X 5.0' X 2.5' (W X L X H) +/- 0.5'. THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE BOULDER THICKNESS (H) IS 2.0'. BOULDERS
LONGER (L) THAN 5.5' WILL BE ACCEPTED.
2. DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES OF STRUCTURES DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL MAY BE ADJUSTED BY DESIGN ENGINEER TO FIT
CONDITIONS ONSITE. CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FIT BOULDERS TOGETHER TIGHTLY.
3. GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS SHALL BE MINIMIZED BY FITTING BOULDERS TOGETHER AND PLUGGING WITH NC DOT
CLASS A ROCK OR CHINKING STONE APPROVED BY ENGINEER.
2. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER BOULDERS TO PROVIDE A FOUNDATION UNLESS OTHERWISE
DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE OFFSET 1.0 FT UPSTREAM OF THE FOOTER.
3. SET BOULDER INVERTS AT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS. NO ELEVATIONS OF THE
BOULDERS MAY VARY FROM THE PLAN SHEETS WITHOUT DIRECTION FROM THE ENGINEER.
4. NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SHALL BE PLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE TO PREVENT WASHOUT OF
SEDIMENT THROUGH BOULDER GAPS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTER BOULDER
TO THE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION AND SHALL BE PLACED THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE STRUCTURE. SELECT BACK
FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UPSTREAM OF THE GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL.
5. GRAVEL MATERIAL CONSISTING OF A WELL-GRADED BLEND OF NCDOT CLASS A RIPRAP AND ASTM #57 ROCK MIXED
WITH EARTH SHALL BE USED TO BACKFILL THE STRUCTURE. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED SUCH THAT
FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
6. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF
FINISH FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED.
7. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING
INSTALLATION OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
EXTEND VANE ARM
INTO STREAMBANK
MIN. 10.0' OR THREE
FULL (3) BOULDER LENGTHS
BOULDER CROSS-VANE SPECIFICATIONS
DETAILED SECTION B - B'
NOT TO SCALE
BOULDER CROSS-VANE DETAIL
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
GRAVEL BACKFILL
MATERIAL
SCOUR POOL
BELOW STRUCTURE
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
BANKFULL
NON-WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
1 FT OFFSET
NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC
KEY BOULDERS INTO
STREAMBANK @ 12 TO 23 BKF STAGE
KEY BOULDERS INTO
STREAMBANK MIN. 10 FT
OR THREE FULL BOULDER LENGTHS PLACE BOULDERS INTO STREAMBED A
MINIMUM OF THE BOULDER DIAMETER
FIT BOULDERS TIGHTLY TOGETHER
SLOPE = 2 - 3%
P.C. ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
A'
A
B B'
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
A'A
B'
B
RIFFLE SLOPE VARI
E
S

P
E
R

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
RIFFLE MATERIAL
PER NOTES
P.C. STATION
PER PLAN
P.T. STATION PER
PLAN
BANKFULL STAGE
STREAMBANK TOE OF SLOPE
STREAMBED
RIFFLE LENGTH VARIES
PER PLAN
BANKFULL
P.C. ELEVATION
PER PROFILE
P.T. ELEVATION PER
PROFILE
FLOW
GLIDE
RUN
1. FOR INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OVER EXCAVATE THE LENGTH OF THE RIFFLE AND BACKFILL THE TRENCH
WITH THE SPECIFIED RIFFLE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL TO THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED PROFILE.
2. RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF
1
3 WBKF U/S OF THE P.T. INTO THE GLIDE AND A MINIMUM OF 1
3 WBKF
D/S OF THE P.C. INTO THE RUN.
3. THE RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED AT A UNIFORM THICKNESS SUCH THAT, IN CROSS-SECTION, ITS LOWEST
ELEVATION OCCURS IN THE CENTER OF THE CHANNEL.
4. RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED USING AN EXCAVATOR BUCKET SUCH THE DEEPEST POINT OF THE CHANNEL IS
ALONG THE CENTERLINE AND THAT FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
5. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLES SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH RIFFLE MATERIAL CONSISTING OF QUARRIED STONE. RIFFLE
MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED AT A UNIFORM THICKNESS SUCH THAT, IN CROSS-SECTION, ITS LOWEST ELEVATION
OCCURS IN THE CENTER OF THE CHANNEL. RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED USING AN EXCAVATOR BUCKET
SUCH THAT FUTURE SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
6. CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS:
·NCDOT CLASS 1 - 70%
·NCDOT CLASS B - 30%
7. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR
INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED.
8. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION
OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
KEY MATTING INTO RIFFLE TRENCH
RIFFLE MATERIAL
PER NOTES
BANKFULL
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE SPECIFICATIONS
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION B - B'
NOT TO SCALE
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE DETAIL
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
A'A
BANKFULL
1. ALL BOULDERS USED FOR THE BOULDER CASCADE SHALL BE STRUCTURAL STONE, CUBICAL OR RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE.
BOULDERS SHALL BE 3.0' X 5.0' X 2.5' (W X L X H) +/- 0.5'. THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE BOULDER THICKNESS (H) IS 2.0'.
BOULDERS LONGER (L) THAN 5.5' WILL BE ACCEPTED. DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES OF STRUCTURES DESCRIBED IN THE
DETAIL MAY BE ADJUSTED BY THE ENGINEER TO FIT CONDITIONS ONSITE.
2. CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FIT BOULDERS TOGETHER TIGHTLY. GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS SHALL BE
MINIMIZED BY FITTING BOULDERS TOGETHER AND PLUGGING WITH NC DOT CLASS A ROCK OR CHINKING STONE
APPROVED BY ENGINEER. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER BOULDERS TO PROVIDE A FOUNDATION
UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE OFFSET 1 FT UPSTREAM OF THE
FOOTER BOULDERS WHERE MICROPOOLS ARE ANTICIPATED TO FORM AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL.
3. SET BOULDER INVERTS AT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS. NO ELEVATIONS OF THE BOULDERS
MAY VARY FROM THE PLAN SHEETS WITHOUT DIRECTION FROM THE ENGINEER. THE BOULDER ARMS SHALL EXTEND UP
TO THE STREAMBANK AT A 1% - 2% SLOPE AND INTO THE STREAMBANK A MINIMUM OF 10.0' OR TWO FULL BOULDER
LENGTHS. MAXIMUM ELEVATION DROP OVER EACH BOULDER IS STEP IS 0.3' - 0.5'.
4. ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE BOULDERS, NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED ON THE ENTIRE
LENGTH OF THE STRUCTURE. FILTER FABRIC SHALL EXTEND FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE FOOTER BOULDER TO THE
FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION AND SHALL BE PLACED THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE STRUCTURE. RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL
BE USED AS BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND THE OFFSET BOULDER STEPS AND MICROPOOLS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED
BELOW EACH STEP.
5. BOULDER RIFFLES SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH RIFFLE MATERIAL CONSISTING OF QUARRIED STONE. RIFFLE MATERIAL
SHALL BE PLACED AT A UNIFORM THICKNESS SUCH THAT, IN CROSS-SECTION, ITS LOWEST ELEVATION OCCURS IN THE
CENTER OF THE CHANNEL. RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED USING AN EXCAVATOR BUCKET SUCH THAT FUTURE
SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
8. BOULDER RIFFLE MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS:
·NCDOT CLASS 1 - 70%
·NCDOT CLASS B - 30%
9. RIFFLE MATERIAL SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF
1
3 WBKF U/S OF THE P.T. INTO THE GLIDE AND A MINIMUM OF 1
3 WBKF
D/S OF THE P.C. INTO THE RUN.
10. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR
INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL
AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES
AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
STREAMBED
GLIDE
RUN
BOULDER STEP
MICROPOOL
BELOW STEP
BOULDER STEP
ELV = 0.3' - 0.4'
EXTEND BOULDER SILL INTO STREAMBANK
MIN 10.0' OR THREE (3) FULL
BOULDER LENGTHS
RIFFLE SUBSTRATE
DEPTH MIN. = 2.0'
30 - 40o
RIFFLE MATERIAL
RIFFLE MATERIAL
MIN. 2.0'
BOULDER SILL
EXTEND INTO STREAMBANK MIN 10.0' OR
THREE (3) FULL BOULDER LENGTHS
OFFSET HEADER
BOULDERS 1.0' U/S
BANKFULL
BOULDER STEP
FLO
W
TOE OF SLOPE
FLO
WFLOW
MOST DOWN STREAM STRUCTURE AT
PC MAY BE BOULDER J-HOOK VANE OR BOULDER
CROSSVANE PER PLAN AND DETAILS
RIFFLE MATERIAL
PER NOTES
SLOPE = 1 - 2%
BOULDER RIFFLE SPECIFICATIONS
BOULDER RIFFLE DETAIL
B'
B
RIFFLE SLOPE VARI
E
S

P
E
R

P
R
O
F
I
L
E
BANKFULL
EXTEND RIFFLE
SUBSTRATE INTO RUN
MIN. 1
3 WBKF
EXTEND RIFFLE
SUBSTRATE INTO GLIDE
MIN. 1
3 WBKF
EXTEND RIFFLE
MATERIAL INTO RUN
MIN. 1
3 WBKF
EXTEND RIFFLE
MATERIAL INTO GLIDE
MIN. 1
3 WBKF
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION B - B'
NOT TO SCALE
RIFFLE MATERIAL
MIN. 2.0'
4.1
ST
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

D
E
T
A
I
L
S
NTS
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
1.ALL LOGS SHALL BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT AND LIMBS AND BRANCHES SHALL BE TRIMMED FLUSH. LOGS SHALL HAVE
MINIMUM DIAMETER OF 1.5'. HEADER LOGS SHALL BE UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER LOGS TO PROVIDE A SILL UNLESS
OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. HEADER LOGS SHALL BE OFFSET SLIGHTLY DOWNSTREAM OF THE FOOTER
LOG. THE HEADER LOG OF THE VANE ARE SHALL TIE INTO THE STREAMBANK AT 1
2 TO 2
3 BANKFULL STAGE. THE LOG
VANE ARM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE OUTSIDE STREAMBANK AND STREAMBED A MINIMUM OF 10.0 FT ON EACH END.
ALL GAPS/VOIDS LARGER THAN 1 INCHES BETWEEN THE HEADER AND FOOTER LOGS SHALL BE CHINKED WITH LIMBS
AND/OR BRUSH ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE GEOTEXTILE.
2. ALL BOULDERS USED FOR THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE STRUCTURAL STONE, CUBICAL OR RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE. THE
ENGINEER MUST APPROVE THE USE OF BOULDERS THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE ONSITE. BOULDERS SHALL BE 3.0' X 5.0' X
2.5' (W X L X H) +/- 0.5'. THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE BOULDER THICKNESS (H) IS 2.0'. BOULDERS LONGER (L) THAN
5.5' WILL BE ACCEPTED. GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS SHALL BE MINIMIZED BY FITTING BOULDERS TOGETHER AND
PLUGGING WITH NC DOT CLASS A ROCK OR CHINKING STONE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE
UNDERLAIN BY FOOTER BOULDERS TO PROVIDE A FOUNDATION UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
HEADER BOULDERS SHALL BE OFFSET 1.0 FT UPSTREAM OF THE FOOTER.
3. SET BOULDER INVERTS AT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS. NO ELEVATIONS OF THE
BOULDERS MAY VARY FROM THE PLAN SHEETS WITHOUT DIRECTION FROM THE ENGINEER.
4. ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE A LAYER OF NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED AS
SHOWN IN THE DETAIL ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE LOG VANE AND BOULDER J-HOOK. SECURE ALL
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ON TOP OF FOOTER LOG USING 3 INCH 10D GALVANIZED COMMON NAIL ON 12 IN SPACING
ALONG LOG. NAIL NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO EDGE OF HEADER LOG AND BACKFILL.
5. GRAVEL MATERIAL CONSISTING OF A WELL-GRADED BLEND OF SURGE STONE AND ASTM #57 ROCK MIXED WITH
EARTH SHALL BE USED TO BACKFILL THE STRUCTURE. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED SUCH THAT FUTURE
SETTLEMENT OF THE MATERIAL IS KEPT TO A MINIMUM.
6. PLACE BOULDERS UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE LOG VANE ARM IN THE STREAMBANK. THE FINISHED
ELEVATION OF THE BOULDERS SHALL BE BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE ADJACENT FLOODPLAIN AND SHALL
NOT PROTRUDE OUT OF THE STREAMBANK.
7. DIMENSIONS AND SLOPES OF STRUCTURES DESCRIBED IN THE DETAIL MAY BE ADJUSTED BY DESIGN ENGINEER TO FIT
CONDITIONS ONSITE.
8. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR
INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED.
9. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING
INSTALLATION OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
VANE ARM INTO STREAM
BANK @ 1
2 TO 2
3 BKF STAGE
B'
B
A'
A
ARM SLOPE = 1 - 3
%
SELECT BACKFILL
BEHIND STRUCTURE
BANKFULL
EXTEND BOULDER SILL INTO
STREAMBANK MIN 10.0' OR THREE
FULL (3) BOULDER LENGTHS
HIGH DENSITY
PLANTING
HIGH DENSITY
PLANTING
EXTEND VANE ARM
INTO STREAMBANK
MIN. 10.0'
BURY LOGS INTO
STREAMBED MIN. 10.0'.
FIT BOULDERS TIGHTLY TOGETHER
HEADER BOULDER (SILL)
FOOTER BOULDER (SILL)
20 - 30o
ANCHOR LOGS IN-PLACE
WITH BOULDERS U/S AND D/S
LOG J-HOOK VANE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
LOG J-HOOK DETAIL
GRAVEL BACKFILL
MATERIAL
SCOUR POOL
BELOW STRUCTURE
HEADER LOG
FOOTER LOG
BANKFULL
NON-WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
SCOUR
POOL
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION B - B'
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
1. WOODY MATERIAL USED IN THE BRUSH TOE SHALL CONSIST OF LOGS, LARGE BRANCHES AND WOODY DEBRIS RANGING
IN DIAMETER FROM 1" TO 12". LARGE VOIDS SHALL BE FILLED WITH FINE WOODY MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. ALL
MATERIALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. WOODY MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN 1.0' LIFTS. EACH LIFT
SHALL BE COMPACTED WITH THE EXCAVATOR BUCKET AND COVERED WITH A LAYER OF ALLUVIUM OR MIXED SOIL AND
GRAVEL TO FORM A DENSE LAYER OF WOODY MATERIAL AND ALLUVIAL TO LINES, ELEVATIONS AND GRADES IN THE
DRAWINGS.
2. UNCONSOLIDATED GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE WOODY MATERIAL BEFORE THE LIVE CUTTINGS
AND SOIL LIFTS ARE INSTALLED.
4. PLACE LAYER OF LIVE CUTTINGS (MIN. 4' LENGTH) A 2.0' O.C. ON THE GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL LEVELING COURSE SUCH
THAT APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES TO 1 FOOT OF EACH LIVE BRANCH WILL BE EXPOSED AND THE REMAINDER (2' TO 4')
OF EACH LIVE BRANCH WILL BE COVERED BY THE SOIL LIFT. LIVE BRANCHES SHALL BE AN EQUAL FRACTION OF BLACK
WILLOW (SALIX NIGRA), SILKY WILLOW (SALIX SERICEA) AND SILKY DOGWOOD (CORNUS AMOMUM) AND APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. INSTALL A SOIL LIFT ABOVE THE LIVE CUTTINGS. THE SOIL LIFT SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0' THICKNESS. LIFTS SHALL INCLUDE
ALL SOIL PREPARATION, TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING AND MULCH. SOIL LIFTS SHALL USE TWO LAYERS OF
BIODEGRADABLE MATTING: 700 G/M2 COIR MATTING (OUTER) AND 320 G/M2 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (INNER).
EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS USED FOR SOIL LIFTS SHALL BE MADE OF 100% NATURAL FIBERS AND MATERIALS AND
BE BIODEGRADABLE UNDER NORMAL CLIMATE CONDITIONS. EROSION CONTROL MATTING CONTAINING PLASTICS OR
PLASTIC BASED MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE USED.
6. LIVE TRANSPLANTS AVAILABLE ON THE SITE MAY REPLACE SOIL LIFTS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
7. GRADE THE RIVER BANK AT 3:1 TO THE EXISTING GROUND. SEE BANK GRADING DETAIL ON THIS SHEET.
8. KEY EROSION CONTROL MATTING IN BENEATH BANK GRADING AREA AND INSTALL MATTING ON ALL DISTURBED RIVER
BANKS.
9. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
10. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION
OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
FLO
W
WOODY
MATERIAL
BANKFULL
LIVE CUTTINGS
LIVE STAKES AND BARE
ROOT PLANTINGS
POINT BAR ON INSIDE BEND
A
A
'
TOE WOOD PROTECTION WITH SOIL LIFTS NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
TOE WOOD PROTECTION WITH SOIL LIFTS DETAIL
SOIL LIFTS TO
BANKFULL STAGE
GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL LEVELING COURSE
LIVE CUTTINGS
SOIL LIFT SHALL USE TWO LAYERS OF
MATTING: 700 G/M2 COIR MATTING
(OUTER) AND 320 G/M2 EROSION
CONTROL BLANKET (INNER)
WOODY PLANTINGS
GRADE RIVER BANK AT 3:1 TO
EXISTING GROUND.
DETAILED SECTION A - A
NOT TO SCALE
EXCAVATION LIMITS
WOOD STAKE
2" X 2" X 18" - 36"
COMPACTED ONSITE
BACKFILL
3.0 MIN.
1.0' MAX.
BANKFULL STAGE
3 TO
1
WIDTH OF WOODY MATERIAL
1
3 WBKF OR GREATER
STREAM BED
KEY MATTING IN BENEATH BANK GRADING
AREA.
TOP OF WOODY MATERIAL
APPROX. 1.0' ABOVE BASE FLOW WSEWOODY MATERIAL
INSTALLED IN 1.0' LIFTS
FILL LARGE VOIDS WITH
FINE WOODY MATERIAL
AND ALLUVIUM
APPROX. BASE FLOW WSE
3.0'
MIN.
1. WOODY MATERIAL USED IN THE BRUSH TOE SHALL CONSIST OF LOGS, LARGE BRANCHES AND WOODY DEBRIS RANGING
IN DIAMETER FROM 1" TO 12". LARGE VOIDS SHALL BE FILLED WITH FINE WOODY MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. ALL
MATERIALS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. WOODY MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN 1.0' LIFTS. EACH LIFT
SHALL BE COMPACTED WITH THE EXCAVATOR BUCKET AND COVERED WITH A LAYER OF ALLUVIUM OR MIXED SOIL AND
GRAVEL TO FORM A DENSE LAYER OF WOODY MATERIAL AND ALLUVIAL TO LINES, ELEVATIONS AND GRADES IN THE
DRAWINGS.
2. UNCONSOLIDATED GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE INSTALLED ABOVE WOODY MATERIAL BEFORE THE LIVE CUTTINGS
AND SOIL LIFTS ARE INSTALLED.
4. PLACE LAYER OF LIVE CUTTINGS (MIN. 4' LENGTH) A 2.0' O.C. ON THE GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL LEVELING COURSE SUCH
THAT APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES TO 1 FOOT OF EACH LIVE BRANCH WILL BE EXPOSED AND THE REMAINDER (2' TO 4')
OF EACH LIVE BRANCH WILL BE COVERED BY THE SOIL LIFT. LIVE BRANCHES SHALL BE AN EQUAL FRACTION OF BLACK
WILLOW (SALIX NIGRA), SILKY WILLOW (SALIX SERICEA) AND SILKY DOGWOOD (CORNUS AMOMUM) AND APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
5. INSTALL A 4" - 6" THICK SOD MAT OR LAYER OF LIVE TRANSPLANTS WITH TOPSOIL INTACT. GRADE SLOPE AT 3:1 OR
FLATTER TO THE BANKFULL STAGE. ALL LIVE TRANSPLANTS USED FOR BANK PROTECTION SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
ENGINEER.
6. INSTALL SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS ON THE BANK AS SHOWN IN THE RE-VEGETATION PLAN.
7. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
8. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION
OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
TOE WOOD PROTECTION WITH LIVE TRANSPLANTS NOTES AND SPECS.
TOE WOOD PROTECTION WITH LIVE TRANSPLANTS DETAIL
GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL LEVELING COURSE
LIVE CUTTINGS
DETAILED SECTION A - A
NOT TO SCALE
EXCAVATION LIMITS
COMPACTED ONSITE
BACKFILL
BANKFULL STAGE
WIDTH OF WOODY MATERIAL
1
3 WBKF OR GREATER
STREAM BED
TOP OF WOODY MATERIAL
APPROX. 1.0' ABOVE BASE FLOW WSEWOODY MATERIAL
INSTALLED IN 1.0' LIFTS
FILL LARGE VOIDS WITH
FINE WOODY MATERIAL
AND ALLUVIUM
APPROX. BASE FLOW WSE
3.5'
MIN.
SUPPLEMENTAL LIVE STAKES AND BARE
ROOT PLANTINGS PER RE-VEGETATION PLAN
3:1 (OR FLATTER) SLOPE TO BANKFULL STAGE
LIVE TRANSPLANTS AVAILABLE ONSITE AND
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER
4" - 6" OF TOPSOIL
WITH LIVE TRANSPLANTS
OR SOD MAT
FLO
W
WOODY
MATERIAL
BANKFULL
LIVE CUTTINGS
LIVE STAKES AND BARE
ROOT PLANTINGS
POINT BAR ON INSIDE BEND
A
A
'
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
BOULDER WALL DETAIL
1. ALL BOULDERS SHALL BE STRUCTURAL STONE, CUBICAL OR RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE. BOULDERS AVAILABLE ONSITE
MAY BE USED IF APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. BOULDERS SHALL BE 3.0' X 5.0' X 2.5' (W X L X H) +/- 0.5'. THE MINIMUM
ACCEPTABLE BOULDER THICKNESS (H) IS 2.0'. BOULDERS LONGER (L) THAN 5.5' WILL BE ACCEPTED.
2. A BEDDING COURSE CONSISTING OF NCDOT CLASS A RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED BELOW THE FIRST ROW OF
BOULDERS. IF BEDROCK IS ENCOUNTERED ONSITE, THE FIRST LIFT OF BOULDERS SHALL BE PLACED DIRECTLY ON THE
BEDROCK. ALL BOULDERS SHALL FIT TIGHTLY TOGETHER. INSTALL EACH LIFT OF BOULDERS WITH A 1.0' SETBACK FROM
THE FRONT EDGE OF THE PREVIOUS LIFT OF BOULDERS.
3. UNCONSOLIDATED GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE INSTALLED AS A LEVELING COURSE THE ABOVE BOULDERS BEFORE
THE LIVE CUTTINGS AND SOIL LIFTS ARE INSTALLED.
4. PLACE LAYER OF LIVE CUTTINGS (MIN. 4' LENGTH) A 1.0' O.C. ON THE GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL SUCH THAT
APPROXIMATELY 6 INCHES TO 1 FOOT OF EACH LIVE BRANCH WILL BE EXPOSED AND THE REMAINDER (2' TO 4') OF
EACH LIVE BRANCH WILL BE COVERED BY THE SOIL LIFT. LIVE BRANCHES SHALL BE OF THE SPECIES SPECIFIED FOR LIVE
STAKES OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
5. INSTALL SOIL LIFTS FROM THE FIRST ROW OF LIVE CUTTINGS UP TO THE EXISTING TOP OF BANK ELEVATION. LIFTS
SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0' THICKNESS. LIFTS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SOIL PREPARATION, TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT
SEEDING AND MULCH. SOIL LIFTS SHALL USE 2 LAYERS OF MATTING: 24 OZ. / YD2 COIR MATTING (OUTER) AND 11
OZ./YD2 COCONUT FIBER BLANKET (INNER). EROSION CONTROL MATTING USED FOR SOIL LIFTS SHALL BE MADE OF
100% NATURAL FIBERS AND MATERIALS AND BE BIODEGRADABLE UNDER NORMAL CLIMATE CONDITIONS. EROSION
CONTROL MATTING CONTAINING PLASTICS OR PLASTIC BASED MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE USED.
6. PLACE SOIL BACKFILL UP TO THE LIFT HEIGHT SPECIFIED OF NO GREATER THAN 1.0 FT BEING CAREFUL NOT TO
PUSH/PULL OR TEAR THE FABRIC PREVIOUSLY PLACED.
7. REPEAT STEPS #4, #5 AND #6 AS NEEDED TO INSTALL SOIL LIFTS UP TO THE BANKFULL STAGE.
8. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR
ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
9. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION
OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.FLO
W
BOULDER TOE
PROTECTION
BANKFULL
LIVE CUTTINGS INSTALLED
BETWEEN LIFTS 2.0' O.C.
A
A
'
BOULDER WALL NOTES
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
SOIL GEOLIFTS TO
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
2.0' MAX
1.0' MAX
DETAILED SECTION A - A
NOT TO SCALE
3.0 MIN.
1.0' MAX.
3 TO
1
4.0'
MIN.
1.0' MIN
UNCONSOLIDATED GRAVEL AND TOPSOIL
LIVE CUTTINGS BETWEEN LIFTS
SOIL LIFTS SHALL USE TWO LAYERS OF
BIODEGRADABLE MATTING: 700 G/M2
COIR MATTING (OUTER) AND 320 G/M2
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (INNER).
LIVE STAKES AND BARE ROOT PLANTINGS
EXCAVATION LIMITS
WOOD STAKE
2" X 2" X 18" - 36"
BOULDERS
COMPACTED ONSITE
BACKFILL
PLACE BOULDERS ON ROCK BEDDING AND
LEVELING COURSENON-WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
NCDOT CLASS A
ROCK BACKFILL AND
BEDDING COURSE
TOP OF BOULDERS
EXISTING
TOP OF BANK
4.2
ST
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

D
E
T
A
I
L
S
NTS
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
A'A
OLD CHANNEL TOP OF BANK
OLD CHANNEL TOE OF SLOPE
100' MIN. LENGTH
PLUG SLOPE TO LINES,
GRADES AND ELEVATIONS
SHOWN IN THEPLANS
1. ALL CHANNEL WORK SHALL TAKE PLACE DURING DRY WORKING CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE
THE EXPORT OF SEDIMENT TO ADJACENT SURFACE WATERS TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE BY USING E&SC
MEASURES AS NEEDED.
2. FOR INSTALLATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE SUITABLE CLAY FILL MATERIAL IN THE EXISTING CHANNEL UP TO
THE TOP OF BANK. FILL MATERIAL SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SITE AND APPROVED FOR USE BY THE
ENGINEER. THE CHANNEL PLUG SHALL BE COMPACTED AS DIRECTED AND UNTIL APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER ON
SITE.
3. TOP SOIL SUITABLE FOR ESTABLISHING NATIVE VEGETATION SHALL BE INSTALLED ON TOP OF THE COMPACTED FILL
MATERIAL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 1.0' ABOVE THE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL.
4. TRANSPLANTS AVAILABLE ONSITE MAY BE INSTALL IN THE TOP SOIL AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER ON SITE.
5. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
6. RE-DRESSING AND STABILIZATION OF THE SURROUNDING WORK AREA WITH TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING
AND MULCHING WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF THE DITCH PLUG AND SHALL BE
CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
COMPACTED
FILL MATERIAL
MIN. 1.0'
COMPACTED
FILL MATERIAL
OLD CHANNEL
TOP OF BANK
TOP SOIL MIN. 1.0'
OLD CHANNEL BOTTOM
EXISTING GROUND
DEPTH VARIES
CHANNEL PLUG NOTES
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
CHANNEL PLUG DETAIL
2' TO 3' LIVE STAKE
TAPERED AT BOTTOM
1/2" TO 2"
DIAMETER
LIVE STAKESECTION A - A'
3.0'
2x
CONTAINER WIDTH
1.5x CONTAINER
DEPTH
1 2 3 4 5 6
TOB
BUFFER WIDTH
VARIES
10.0' O.C.
DIBBLE BAR
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A
BLADE WITH A TRIANGULAR
CROSS-SECTION, AND SHALL BE
12" LONG, 4" WIDE AND 1"
THINK AT THE CENTER.
ROOT PRUNING
ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED
TO AN APPROPRIATE LENGTH
FOR PLANTING TO PREVENT
J-ROOTIING.
NOTES
1. ALL SOILS WITHIN THE
BUFFER PLANTING AREA
SHALL BE FINE GRADED AND
/ OR DISKED, AS REQUIRED,
PRIOR TO PLANTING.
2. PLANT BAREROOT
SEEDLINGS 10.0' O.C. IN
OFFSET ROWS FROM 3.0'
BEYOND THE BANKFULL
STAGE TO THE GRADING
LIMITS
INSERT THE DIBBLE
STRAIGHT DOWN INTO
THE SOIL TO THE FULL
DEPTH OF THE BLADE
AND PULL BACK ON THE
HANDLE TO OPENT THE
PLANTING HOLE. DO NOT
ROCK THE SHOVEL BACK
AND FORTH AS THIS
CAUSES THE SOIL IN THE
PLANTING HOLE TO BE
COMPACTED, INHIBITING
ROOT GROWTH.
REMOVE THE DIBBLE AND
PUSH THE SEEDLING
ROOTS DEEP INTO THE
PLANTING HOLE. PULL
THE SEEDLING BACK UP
TO THE CORRECT
PLANTING DEPTH. THE
ROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE
1" - 3" BELOW THE SOIL
SURFACE. GENTLY SHAKE
THE SEEDLING TO ALLOW
THE ROOTS TO
STRAIGHTEN OUT. DO
NOT TWIST OR SPIN THE
SEEDLING OR LEAVE THE
ROOTS J-ROOTED.
INSERT THE DIBBLE
SEVERAL INCHES IN
FRONT OF THE SEEDLING
AND PUSH THE BLADE
HALFWAY INTO THE SOIL.
TWIST AND PUSH THE
HANDLE FORWARD TO
CLOSE THE TOP OF THE
PLANTING HOLE TO HOLD
THE SEEDLING IN PLACE.
PUSH THE DIBBLE DOWN
TO THE FULL DEPTH OF
THE BLADE.
PULLBACK ON THE
HANDLE TO CLOSE THE
BOTTOM OF THE
PLANTING HOLE. THEN
PUSH FORWARD TO
CLOSE THE TOP
ELIMINATING AIR
POCKETS AROUND THE
ROOT.
REMOVE THE DIBBLE.
CLOSE AND FIRM UP THE
OPENING WITH YOUR
HEEL. BE CAREFUL TO
AVOID DAMAGING THE
SEEDING.
LIVE STAKE
BARE ROOT SEEDLING
BARE ROOT PLANTINGS
3.0' FROM BANKFULL
A
A'
NOTES
1. PLANTS SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN IN A CONTAINER LONG ENOUGH FOR THE
ROOT SYSTEM TO HAVE DEVELOPED SUFFICIENTLY TO HOLD ITS SOIL TOGETHER
ONCE REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINER.
2. PLANTS WILL NEED TO BE WATERED REGULARLY AND PLACED IN SHADY
CONDITIONS UNTIL PLANTING OCCURS.
3. THE DIAMETER OF THE PLANTING PITS FOR EACH PLANT SHOULD BE AT LEAST
TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT MASS. SCARIFY THE PLANTING PIT
PRIOR TO EACH PLANT INSTALLATION.
4. SET PLANTS UPRIGHT IN THE CENTER OF THE PIT. THE BOTTOM OF THE ROOT
MASS SHOULD BE RESTING ON UNDISTURBED SOIL.
5. PLACE BACKFILL AROUND BASE AND SIDES OF ROOT MASS, AND WORK EACH
LAYER TO SETTLE BACKFILL AND TO ELIMINATE VOIDS AND AIR POCKETS. WHEN
PIT IS APPROXIMATELY 2
3 FULL, WATER THOROUGHLY BEFORE PLACING
REMAINDER OF THE BACKFILL. WATER AGAIN AFTER PLACING FINAL LAYER OF
BACKFILL.
2' - 3'
ZONE 1: 3' O.C. SPACING / 3' ROW SPACING
NOTES
1. LIVE STAKES MUST BE DORMANT WHEN CUT. KEEP LIVE STAKES MOIST UNTIL PLANTING. THE STAKE SHOULD BE PREPARED
WITH THE BUDS POINTED UP, AND THE BOTTOM SHOULD BE CUT AT AN ANGLE FOR INSERTION INTO THE GROUND. AN IRON
BAR CAN BE USED TO MAKE A PILOT HOLE TO PREVENT BARK FROM BEING DAMAGED DURING INSTALLATION.
2. LIVE STAKES SHALL BE 0.5" - 2" IN DIAMETER AND 2' - 3' IN LENGTH.
3. LIVE STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED WITH
2
3 TO 3
4 OF THE LENGTH OF THE STAKE BELOW GROUND AND ANGLED DOWNSTREAM.
ENSURE THE BASE OF THE LIVE STAKE WILL REACH THE WATER TABLE. AFTER INSTALLATION THE TOP OF THE LIVE STAKE SHALL
BE PRUNED WITH A SQUARE CUT LEAVING NO LESS THAN 3" AND NO LESS THAN 6" ABOVE THE GROUND.
4. PLANT LIVE STAKES AND HERBACEOUS PLUGS IN OFFSET ROWS AND SPACINGS PER PLANTING PLAN.
BANKFULL
TOE OF SLOPE
PLANT LIVE STAKES AND HERBACEOUS
PLUGS 3.0' O.C. IN OFFSET ROWS
FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO 3.0' BEYOND
THE BANKFULL STAGE
LIVE STAKES IN OFFSET
ROWS PER PLANTING PLAN
BARE ROOT DETAILS
LIVE STAKING DETAILS
CONTAINER PLANT DETAILS
RE-VEGETATION AND PLANTING DETAILS
HERBACEOUS
PLUG
ZONE 2: 10' O.C. SPACING / 10' ROW SPACING
PLANT BAREROOT SEEDLINGS
10.0' O.C. IN OFFSET ROWS
FROM 3.0' BEYOND THE BANKFULL
STAGE TO THE GRADING LIMITS
3.0' O.C.
HERBACEOUS PLUGS
1. ALL LOGS SHALL BE RELATIVELY STRAIGHT AND LIMBS AND BRANCHES SHALL BE TRIMMED FLUSH. LOGS SHALL HAVE
MINIMUM DIAMETER OF 1.5'. LOGS USED FOR LOG SILLS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 20.0'.
2. ALL BOULDERS USED FOR SHALL BE STRUCTURAL STONE, CUBICAL OR RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE. THE ENGINEER MUST
APPROVE THE USE OF BOULDERS THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE ONSITE. BOULDERS SHALL BE 3.0' X 5.0' X 2.5' (W X L X H) +/-
0.5'. THE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE BOULDER THICKNESS (H) IS 2.0'. BOULDERS LONGER (L) THAN 5.5' WILL BE ACCEPTED.
3. SET FLOODPLAIN SILL INVERTS AT 0.2' TO 0.3' BELOW THE DESIGN FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION. COVER THE SILL WITH 0.2'
TO 0.3' OF TOP SOIL.
4. ALL GAPS/VOIDS LARGER THAN 1 INCHES BETWEEN THE LOGS OR BOULDERS SHALL BE CHINKED WITH LIMBS AND/OR
BRUSH ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE.
5. INSTALL AND COMPACT BACKFILL AROUND THE SILLS SUCH THAT MOVEMENT AND SETTLING OF THE SILL IS KEPT TO A
MINIMUM.
6. THE SURFACE OF THIS STRUCTURE SHALL BE FINISHED TO A SMOOTH AND COMPACT SURFACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE LINES, GRADES, AND CROSS-SECTIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DEGREE OF FINISH FOR
INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE WITHIN 0.1 FT OF THE GRADES AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED.
7. RE-DRESSING OF CHANNEL AND BANKFULL BENCH/FLOODPLAIN WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOLLOWING INSTALLATION
OF IN-STREAM STRUCTURES AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO CONSTRUCTION.
FLOODPLAIN SILL SPECIFICATIONS
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
FLOODPLAIN LOG SILL SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
FLOODPLAIN BOULDER SILL SECTION B - B'
NOT TO SCALE
DESIGN FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION
EXISTING GROUND
FLOW
FLOODPLAIN SILL DETAIL
0.2' - 0.3' OF TOPSOIL
COMPACTED BACKFILL
AROUND SILL
LOG FLOODPLAIN SILL
LOG DIAMETER > 1.0' (12")
TRENCH EXCAVATION
LIMITS
DESIGN FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION
EXISTING GROUND
FLOW
0.2' - 0.3' OF TOPSOIL
COMPACTED BACKFILL
AROUND SILL
BOULDER FLOODPLAIN SILL
THICKNESS > 2.0'
TRENCH EXCAVATION
LIMITS
FL
O
W
FLOODPLAIN
TOE OF SLOPE
FLOODPLAIN
LOG SILLA'
A B'
B
FLOODPLAIN
BOULDER SILL
BANKFULL
8.0'
BANKFULL
2'
A A'
EROSION CONTROL MATTING FROM TOE OF CHANNEL TO
8.0' BEYOND BANKFULL STAGE
BANKFULL
TOE OF SLOPE
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
ECO-STAKE
MIN 12" LENGTH
4" MIN. HORIZONTAL
OVERLAP
1. EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS USED TO PROTECT RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED STREAM BANKS FROM EROSION. THE
MATTING WILL REMAIN INTACT WHILE THE BANK AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION MATURES, PROVIDING CRITICAL BANK
PROTECTION.
2. STREAM BANK EROSION CONTROL MATTING MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS:
2.1. MACHINE DIRECTION TENSILE STRENGTH: 77 LB/IN
2.2. CROSS MATCH DIRECTION TENSILE STRENGTH: 86 LB/IN
2.3. APPARENT OPENING SIZE: 0.59” x 0.67”
2.4. PERCENT OPENING: 49%
2.5. MASS: 700 G/M
2
3. BEFORE INSTALLING EROSION CONTROL MATTING, RAKE SOIL LEVEL, ADD TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEED, SOIL
PREPARATION AND MULCH.
4. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE NEW CHANNEL FROM THE TOE OF SLOPE
OUT TO A MINIMUM OF 8.0' BEYOND THE BANKFULL STAGE.
5. SECURE MATTING IN PLACE BY STAKING AND OVERLAPPING AT THE SEEMS WITH A SHINGLE-TYPE METHOD SUCH THAT
THE OVERLAPPING PIECE IS IN THE SAME DIRECTION AND AS THE STREAM FLOW AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL.
ADDITIONAL STAKING SHALL BE APPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST IF THE MATTING SEPARATES
FROM THE SOIL MORE THAN ONE INCH UNDER A REASONABLE PULL.
6. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL USED ON ALL STREAM BANKS SHALL HAVE A DENSITY OF MADE OF 100% NATURAL
FIBERS AND MATERIALS AND BE BIODEGRADABLE UNDER NORMAL CLIMATE CONDITIONS. EROSION CONTROL
MATTING CONTAINING PLASTICS OR PLASTIC BASED MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE USED.
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
SECURE MATTING WITH
4" OVERLAP AND
DOUBLED ECO-STAKES
VERTICAL OVERLAP
MIN. 12" WITH DOUBLE
ECO-STAKES
BURY 6" BELOW
STREAMBED
EDGE OVERLAP
MIN. 4" WITH DOUBLE
ECO-STAKES AT 2' O.C.
SINGLE 12" ECO-STAKES
OFFSET ROWS AT
2'-3' O.C.
BANKFULL STAGE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING SPECIFICATIONS
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED STAKING PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING DETAIL
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
4.3
ST
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N

D
E
T
A
I
L
S
NTS
5.1
AS NOTED
ER
O
S
I
O
N

A
N
D

S
E
D
I
M
E
N
T
A
T
I
O
N

C
O
N
T
R
O
L

(
E
&
S
C
)

P
L
A
N
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION (E&SC) PLAN
TBD WITH FINAL DRAWING
6.0'
BANKFULL
2'
A A'
EROSION CONTROL MATTING FROM TOE OF CHANNEL TO
6.0' BEYOND BANKFULL STAGE
BANKFULL
TOE OF SLOPE
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
ECO-STAKE
MIN 12" LENGTH
4" MIN. HORIZONTAL
OVERLAP
1. EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS USED TO PROTECT RECENTLY CONSTRUCTED STREAM BANKS FROM EROSION. THE
MATTING WILL REMAIN INTACT WHILE THE BANK AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION MATURES, PROVIDING CRITICAL BANK
PROTECTION.
2. STREAM BANK EROSION CONTROL MATTING MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS:
2.1. MACHINE DIRECTION TENSILE STRENGTH: 77 LB/IN
2.2. CROSS MATCH DIRECTION TENSILE STRENGTH: 86 LB/IN
2.3. APPARENT OPENING SIZE: 0.59” x 0.67”
2.4. PERCENT OPENING: 49%
2.5. MASS: 700 G/M
2
3. BEFORE INSTALLING EROSION CONTROL MATTING, RAKE SOIL LEVEL, ADD TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEED, SOIL
PREPARATION AND MULCH.
4. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE NEW CHANNEL FROM THE TOE OF SLOPE
OUT TO A MINIMUM OF 6.0' BEYOND THE BANKFULL STAGE.
5. SECURE MATTING IN PLACE BY STAKING AND OVERLAPPING AT THE SEEMS WITH A SHINGLE-TYPE METHOD SUCH THAT
THE OVERLAPPING PIECE IS IN THE SAME DIRECTION AND AS THE STREAM FLOW AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL.
ADDITIONAL STAKING SHALL BE APPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST IF THE MATTING SEPARATES
FROM THE SOIL MORE THAN ONE INCH UNDER A REASONABLE PULL.
6. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL USED ON ALL STREAM BANKS SHALL HAVE A DENSITY OF MADE OF 100% NATURAL
FIBERS AND MATERIALS AND BE BIODEGRADABLE UNDER NORMAL CLIMATE CONDITIONS. EROSION CONTROL
MATTING CONTAINING PLASTICS OR PLASTIC BASED MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE USED.
EROSION CONTROL
MATTING
SECURE MATTING WITH
4" OVERLAP AND
DOUBLED ECO-STAKES
VERTICAL OVERLAP
MIN. 12" WITH DOUBLE
ECO-STAKES
BURY 6" BELOW
STREAMBED
EDGE OVERLAP
MIN. 4" WITH DOUBLE
ECO-STAKES AT 2' O.C.
SINGLE 12" ECO-STAKES
OFFSET ROWS AT
2'-3' O.C.
BANKFULL STAGE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED STAKING PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING DETAIL
STEEL POST
2'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
24
"FILL SLOPE
GRADE
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
8' MAX.
GRADE
SILT FENCE FABRIC
INSTALLED TO SECOND
WIRE FROM TOP
MIN. 12-1/2 GA.
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
MIN. 10 GA.
LINE WIRES
4"
MIN SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
PLASTIC OR
WIRE TIES
6"
MIN
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL TEMPORARY SILT FENCE DETAIL
1. CLEAR THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT AREA OF ALL VEGETATION ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIOABLE MATERIAL AND
PROPERLY GRADE THE AREA.
2. PLACE THE 2"-3" STONE TO THE SPECIFIC GRADE AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAND AND SMOOTH IT.
3. USE GEOTEXTILE FABRICS TO IMPROVE STABILITY OF THE FOUNDATION IN LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO SEEPAGE OR A HIGH
WATER TABLE.
4. INSTALL SILT FENCE OR TREE PROTECTION FENCE UP TO ENSURE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS USED.
5. IF CONSTRUCTION ON THE SITES ARE SUCH THAT THE MUD IS NOT REMOVED BY THE VEHICLE TRAVELING OVER THE
STONE, THEN THE LENGTH OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE INCREASED.
6. SEE SECTION 6.06.1 OF NC DEMLR'S EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DESIGN MANUAL (2013) FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION, NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS.
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
1. CONSTRUCT THE SILT FENCE WITH STANDARD STRENGTH OR EXTRA STRENGTH SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRICS.
2. SUPPORT THE STANDARD STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC BY WIRE MESH FASTENED SECURELY TO THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE
POSTS. EXTEND THE WIRE MESH SUPPORT TO THE BOTTOM THE TRENCH. FASTEN THE WIRE REINFORCEMENT, THEN
FABRIC ON THE UPSLOPE SIDE OF THE FENCE POST. WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 50 POUND
TENSILE STRENGTH.
3. WHEN A WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE IS USED, SPACE POSTS A MAXIMUM OF 8 FT APART. SUPPORT POSTS SHOULD BE
DRIVEN SECURELY INTO THE GROUND A MINIMUM OF 2 FT.
4. EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC WITH 6 FT POST SPACINGS DOES NOT REQUIRE WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE.
5. EXCAVATE A TRENCH APPROXIMATELY 4 INCHES WIDE AND 8 INCHES DEEP ALONG THE PROPOSE LINE OF POSTS AND
UPSLOPE OF THE BARRIER.
6. PLACE 12 INCHES OF FABRIC ALONG THE BOTTOM AND SIDE OF THE TRENCH.
7. BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH SOIL PLACED OVER THE FILTER FABRIC AND COMPACT. THOROUGH COMPACTION OF THE
BACKFILL IS CRITICAL TO SILT FENCE PERFORMANCE.
8. DO NOT ATTACH FILTER FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES.
9. CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
10. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
11. SEE SECTION 6.62.1 OF NC DEMLR'S EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DESIGN MANUAL (2013) FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION, NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS.
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
DETAILED FRONT
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED SIDE
NOT TO SCALE
50' MINIMUM
EXISTING
ROADWAY
12' MINIMUM
NEW CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING ROADWAY
FILTER FABRIC UNDER STONE
6" MIN.
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
DETAILED CROSS-SECTION A - A'
NOT TO SCALE
2"-3" STONE TO BE USED
(NCDOT CLASS A OR RAILROAD
BALLAST)
50' MINIMUM
A'A
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND SYSTEM DETAIL
SEDIMENT FILTERING BAG. PROVIDE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM FILTERING
DEVICE TO STREAM.
P
WORK AREA LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED THAT WHICH CAN BE
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
FLOW
STREAMBAN
K
INTAKE HOSE
STREAM DIVERSION PUMP
DEWATERING PUMP
DISCHARGE HOSES
GRAVEL OR EARTHEN
BERM
GRAVEL OR
EARTHEN BERM
INTAKE HOSEFLOW
DISCHARGE ONTO STABLE
RIPRAP PAD TO PREVENT
SCOUR HOLE
SUMP-HOLE FOR INTAKE POOL
(12" TO 18" DEEP, 2-FT DIAMETER)
1. BERMS SHALL BE SITUATED AT THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF THE WORK AREA, AND STREAM FLOW
SHALL BE PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREA. THE DIVERSION PUMP SHOULD DISCHARGE ONTO A STABLE VELOCITY
DISSIPATER CONSTRUCTED OF RIPRAP. DIVERSION PUMP DISCHARGE SHALL NOT GENERATE SCOUR, EROSION OR THE
EXPORT OF EXCESS SEDIMENT TO SURFACE WATERS.
2. WATER FROM THE WORK AREA SHALL BE PUMPED TO A SEDIMENT FILTERING BAG. THE MEASURE SHALL BE LOCATED
ON A RIPRAP OR GRAVEL PAD SUCH THAT THE WATER DRAINS BACK INTO THE CHANNEL BELOW THE DOWNSTREAM
BERM WITHOUT CAUSING FURTHER EROSION.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SIZE THE PUMP AROUND SYSTEM SUFFICIENTLY FOR A RANGE OF POSSIBLE BASEFLOW
DISCHARGES AND THE SYSTEM SHALL RUN CONTINUOUSLY WHILE WORKING IN THE STREAM.
4. THE STREAMBANKS AND WORK AREA MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH DAY BEFORE THE PUMP AROUND
SYSTEM IS SHUT DOWN AND BEFORE FLOW IS RETURNED THE CHANNEL.
TEMPORARY PUMP AROUND SYSTEM NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
DETAILED PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
5.2
ER
O
S
I
O
N

A
N
D

S
E
D
I
M
E
N
T
A
T
I
O
N

C
O
N
T
R
O
L

(
E
&
S
C
)

D
E
T
A
I
L
S
NTS
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
0
+
0
0
1+0
0
2+00
3+0
0
4+
0
0
5+
0
0
6+00
7+00
8+00
9
+
0
0
1
0
+
0
0
1
1
+
0
0
1
2
+
0
0
1
3
+
0
0
14+0
0
15+00
16+0
0
17+
0
0
18+00
19+
0
0
20+
0
0
21+00
22+00 23+00
24+
0
0
25+
0
0
26
+
0
0
27+00
27+9
2
0+0
0
1+00
2+00 2+53
PI
L
O
T

M
N
T
.

S
T
A
T
E

P
A
R
K

-

H
O
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K

S
T
R
E
A
M

R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
7
S
A
M
U
E
L

A
S
H
E

D
R
I
V
E
AS
H
E
V
I
L
L
E
,

N
C

2
8
8
0
5
91
9
.
6
0
0
.
4
7
9
0
NC

C
O
A
:

P
-
1
9
3
2
SU
R
R
Y

C
O
U
N
T
Y

-

N
O
R
T
H

C
A
R
O
L
I
N
A
PERMIT
DRAWING
REVISIONS:
DATE: 06/20/2022
PLOT SIZE: 24" x 36"
H.D.: NAD83 (NCSP)
V.D.: NAVD88
JE PIN: 1109
PRE
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
NO
T

R
E
L
E
A
S
E
D

F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
6.1
AS NOTED
ST
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N

A
N
D

R
E
-
V
E
G
E
T
A
T
I
O
N

P
L
A
N
TL TL
Feet
0 100 200
TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE ZONE 2: FLOODPLAINZONE 1: STREAMBANKPERMANENT SEEDING SCHEDULE
TOTAL SEEDING AREA =5.0 AC
GENERAL RE-VEGETATION AND PLANTING NOTES
1. FINAL VEGETATION SPECIES SELECTION MAY CHANGE DUE TO
REFINEMENT OR SPECIES AVAILABILITY AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.
SPECIES SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE
BANK MANAGER, ENGINEER AND PLANTING CONTRACTOR PRIOR
TO THE PROCUREMENT OF PLANT/SEED STOCK.
2. LARGER NATIVE TREE SPECIES TO BE PRESERVED WILL BE FLAGGED
BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ANY TREES
HARVESTED FOR WOODY MATERIAL WILL BE UTILIZED TO PROVIDE
BED AND BANK STABILIZATION AND COVER OR NESTING HABITAT
ON THE FLOODPLAIN. ANY EXCESS WOODY MATERIALS MAY USED
TO BACKFILL OLD CHANNELS.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED USING TEMPRORY AND
PERMERMANET SEEDING AS DEFINED IN THE SEEDING SCHEDULE
AND THE APPROVED E&SC PLANS.
4. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING ACTIVITIES MAY BE REQUIRED WITHIN
THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING NOTES
5. TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL
AREAS AND ACCESS ROUTES DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
6. ALL SEED AND SEED VARIETIES MUST BE FREE OF STATE AND
FEDERALLY LISTED NOXIOUS WEED SEED AND INVASIVE SPECIES.
7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED WITH TEMPORARY SEED
AND MULCHED WITH WHEAT STRAW. SEEDING WILL BE
PERFORMED USING A BROADCAST SPREADER. OTHER METHODS
MAY BE USED BUT MUST BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN ADVANCE
OF INSTALLATION.
8. MAINTENANCE OF SEEDED AREAS SHALL CONSIST OF WATERING,
WEED AND PEST CONTROL, FERTILIZATION, EROSION REPAIR,
RESEEDING, AND INCIDENTAL OPERATIONS AS NECESSARY TO
ESTABLISH A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, WEED FREE AND DISEASE FEE
UNIFORM STAND OF GRASS. ALL AREAS WHICH FAIL TO SHOW A
UNIFORM STAND OF GRASS FOR ANY REASON SHALL BE TREATED
REPEATEDLY UNTIL A UNIFORM STAND OF AT LEAST 90%
COVERAGE IS ATTAINED WITH NO BARE AREA GREATER THAN FIVE
SQUARE FEET.
PERMANENT SEEDING NOTES
9. PERMANENT SEEDING SHALL OCCUR IN CONJUNCTION WITH
TEMPORARY SEEDING WHERE APPLICABLE. IDEALLY, PERMANENT
SEEDING SHALL OCCUR DURING THE PLANTING SEASON FOR EACH
SEED TYPE. AREAS FERTILIZED FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE
SUFFICIENTLY FERTILIZED FOR PERMANENT SEEDING; ADDITIONAL
FERTILIZER IS NOT REQUIRED FOR PERMANENT SEEDING.
10. ALL SEED AND SEED VARIETIES MUST BE FREE OF STATE AND
FEDERALLY LISTED NOXIOUS WEED SEED AND INVASIVE SPECIES.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOOSEN THE SOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH
OF 4-INCHES AND GRADE TO A SMOOTH, EVEN SURFACE WITH A
LOOSE, UNIFORMLY FINE TEXTURE. THE AREAS TO BE SEEDED ARE
THEN TO BE ROLLED AND RAKED TO REMOVE RIDGES AND FILL
DEPRESSIONS TO MEET FINISH GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO
LIMIT SUB GRADE AND FINISH GRADE PREPARATION TO AREAS
THAT WILL BE PLANTED IMMEDIATELY. PREPARED AREAS ARE TO BE
RESTORED IF ERODED OR OTHERWISE DISTURBED AFTER FINE
GRADING AND BEFORE PLANTING.
12. SEED SHALL BE SOWN WITH A SPREADER OR A SEEDING MACHINE.
SEED IS NOT TO BE BROADCAST OR DROPPED WHEN WIND
VELOCITY EXCEEDS 5 MPH. SEED SHALL BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED BY
SOWING IN TWO DIRECTIONS AT RIGHT ANGLES TO EACH OTHER.
WET SEED OR SEED THAT IS MOLDY OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED IN
TRANSIT OR STORAGE IS NOT TO BE USED. AFTER BEGIN SOWN,
THE SEED SHALL BE RAKED INTO THE TOP 1/4 INCH OF THE
TOPSOIL, LIGHTLY ROLLED, AND WATERED WITH FINE SPRAY.
SEEDED AREAS ON STREAM BANKS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH
COIR FIBER MATTING.
ZONE 1: STREAMBANK
13. LIVESTAKES AND HERBACEOUS PLUGS LISTED IN THE PLANTING
SCHEDULE SHALL BE PLANTED IN OFFSET ROWS AT A DENSITY OF
4,840 STEMS PER ACRE (3.0' O.C.) FROM TOE OF THE RESTORED
CHANNEL TO 3.0' OUTSIDE THE BANKFULL STAGE. HERBACEOUS
PLUGS SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG THE TOE OF THE CHANNEL IN
THE OUTSIDE OF THE POOL MEANDER BENDS.
ZONE 2: FLOODPLAIN
14. WOODY SPECIES LISTED IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE SHALL BE
PLANTED IN OFFSET ROWS AT A DENSITY OF 440 STEMS PER ACRE
(10.0' O.C.) FROM 3.0' OUTSIDE THE BANKFULL STAGE TO THE
FLOODPLAIN TOE OF SLOPE. EXACT PLACEMENT OF THE SPECIES
SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR’S VEGETATION
SPECIALIST PRIOR TO SITE PLANTING AND BASED ON THE WETNESS
CONDITIONS OF PLANTING LOCATIONS.
ZONE 3: UPLAND
14. WOODY SPECIES LISTED IN THE PLANTING SCHEDULE SHALL BE
PLANTED IN OFFSET ROWS AT A DENSITY OF 440 STEMS PER ACRE
(10.0' O.C.) FROM THE FLOODPLAIN TOE OF SLOPE TO THE
GRADING LIMITS. EXACT PLACEMENT OF THE SPECIES SHALL BE
DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR’S VEGETATION SPECIALIST
PRIOR TO SITE PLANTING AND BASED ON THE WETNESS
CONDITIONS OF PLANTING LOCATIONS.
TOTAL SEEDING AREA =4.0 AC
TOTAL SEEDING AREA =1.0 AC
TOTAL PLANTING AREA =1.0 AC
TOTAL PLANTING AREA =3.0 AC
ZONE 3: UPLAND
TOTAL PLANTING AREA =1.0 AC
HORNE CREEK
HO
R
N
E

C
R
E
E
K
TRIB
July 10, 2023
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0102444
Project Name: Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restoration

Subject:List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.

The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.

A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. E?ects of the action are all consequences to listed species or
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other
07/10/2023   2

▪
▪
▪
▪
activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur “but for” the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws.gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.

If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at-risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.

Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds.

We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.

Attachment(s):
Official Species List
USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
Migratory Birds
Wetlands
07/10/2023   1

OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]
07/10/2023   2

PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code:2023-0102444
Project Name:Bean Shoals Horne Creek Restoration
Project Type:Restoration / Enhancement of Waterbody
Project Description:Stream restoration and replacing 3 ford stream crossing with bottomless
arch culverts. Planning to conduct the work this winter (2023-2024) &
will cut trees from an approximately 0.5 – 0.75-acre area for use as toe-
wood. The trees will be cut between November 15, 2023 and March 31,
2024. The project will involve restoration of 2,725 lf of Horne Creek &
252 lf of a UT Horne Creek (see attached 30% design sheets). The
restoration will include planting an riparian buffer (herbaceous seed mix,
live stake shrubs, & bare root trees).
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@36.2659369,-80.49002759023779,14z
Counties:Surry County, North Carolina
07/10/2023   3

1.
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6329
Endangered
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Endangered
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Proposed
Endangered
REPTILES
NAME STATUS
Bog Turtle Glyptemys muhlenbergii
Population: U.S.A. (GA, NC, SC, TN, VA)
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6962
Similarity of
Appearance
(Threatened)
1
07/10/2023   4

INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Candidate
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Endangered
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
07/10/2023   1

USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
07/10/2023   1

1.
2.
3.
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act .
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Breeds Sep 1 to
Jul 31
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2974
Breeds Apr 28
to Jul 20
1
2
07/10/2023   2

NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Mar 15
to Aug 25
Eastern Whip-poor-will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 1
to Aug 20
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 20
to Aug 20
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 1
to Jul 31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to
Jul 31
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Breeds
elsewhere
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ()
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
07/10/2023   3

1.
2.
3.
no data survey effort breeding season probability of presence
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ()
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time-frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort ()
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data ()
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non-BCC
Vulnerable
Cerulean Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
07/10/2023   4

▪
▪
▪
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Eastern Whip-poor-
will
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Kentucky Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird
BCC - BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
07/10/2023   5

1.
2.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
"BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
"BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
07/10/2023   6

3."Non-BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non-eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
07/10/2023   7

me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
07/10/2023   1

WETLANDS
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
WETLAND INFORMATION WAS NOT AVAILABLE WHEN THIS SPECIES LIST WAS GENERATED.
PLEASE VISIT HTTPS://WWW.FWS.GOV/WETLANDS/DATA/MAPPER.HTML OR CONTACT THE FIELD
OFFICE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
07/10/2023   2

IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:Jennings Environmental, PLLC
Name:David Brown
Address:7 Samuel Ashe Drive
City:Asheville
State:NC
Zip:28805
Email [e-mail]
Phone:[phone]