490040_Compliance Report_20231017

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number o - d 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
p Other Agency
Type of Visit: 101 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: q Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I jojlj Arrival Time:II Q� Departure Time:�� County: =1-e kt,�j Region: ,i,leo
Farm Name: Uby c� fia'( rn Owner Email:
Owner Name: KbUCY10-0 th Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: U`-t' L,1 o!Ad 9,n0.d 5 alcski
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Y h 1k Ip V'Q�((� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer I I I Dairy Cow 00 300
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer I I Dairy Calf /DO
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow 30o 300
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultr Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 5/1212020 Continued

Facility Number: qq - b Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes b6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes 54 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
M1 Structure 1 Structure 2 V1 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 3(p dos
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [%No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes % No ❑NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
%PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Cn(n S1� 00._ (S nx o, raj tq
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes CKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes " No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes fR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 1KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 15� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available. ❑ Yes _A No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
�kWUP AChecklists Design Maps M Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?if 3 mpahmk tit »:,^t ^, 1v=m ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis sis . �te�ratt5fzrs Weather Code
NK Rainfall EAStocking Crop Yield tions Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections [ it
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? / ` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5Q NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: p 1 jDate of Inspection: 10 4 1'+ 'ljj
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No [v'l NA ❑NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:] Yes CKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes XNo 'D NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? LeApay
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N G
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No %NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes I;Z,7,T,,No ❑ NA ❑NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 10 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
b i � ��Vld be i v�� �,v>,n o �.(� b� ��� ► S-�"�c�-P��& r�R.sC-�--t-�`^,P��`r
YY�i 1 2 V � (�� U YV l Y� 1'G i a ( f1 i r`'�T6+1
nap
C,tk
i �Y' Co ��e a-ed vt ►3122 (d,u
� b
CV\.Q,G <' i �0. ✓'
io D l��
CAP3 �� v_)8 rye x-I ea r
(o ►`-� Z� - �N h . N N q l 3 23 `�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: YEA, PakAtrVoo o vJ Phone: b a d
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I D 13 j- ZOL3
V If
Page 3 of 3 511212020