420001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230922

A W F U Division of Water Resources
Facility Number tf Z - p 1 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: (D Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: .0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: - Z - x3 Arrival Time: ! 0 a Departure Time: County: t4 A 1I iA
Farm Name: Cr TG i iA 2wt & lL %Dia(1A- Owner Email:
Owner Name: %/ G D I&S Phone:
Mailing Address:
Region: A 26
Physical Address: 2 $�'�(p 4A Ic 4 Ile
Facility Contact: Title: j"I XA4 M h Ati4 kz /Z Phone: 1#1
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Ljj &4 (p 1.4 s 'A 2 s'z - 476 - D 100 Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer 169 p a
Non -La er
Pullets
Poults
Design Current
Design
Cattle Capacity
Current
Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No [] NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
VNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[] NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: < Z - 121 Date of Inspection: r 1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [] Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: PA1in A R C Ga S
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): $ , 2$ 'L d
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes E No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes O No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes 210 ❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes Ej_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[] Yes 21�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 21G'
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [] Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crap and/or land application site need improvement?
EIN
[—]YesN';
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
<No❑
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[:]Yes
NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[—]Yes KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes LfrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: A/ 2 - ol j I Date of Inspection: - 12.
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo
� ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[:]Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA
[:]Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes rNoD
NA
❑ Yes NA
❑ Yes NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
S ti G ,SuAv ZZ c��
.4 2— CA
p I �p.
mot: L ��z5
ar �n� y% - �1 - Z3 rt1- A] U�iZ�r i �//�?� iS h`
0 1 t5- i
n1 h t
1404
curtis.tyree@relge- N
work cell: 919-810-2691
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 1/ 9 7 91.- �L S
Date: / " Z S — Z 3
511212020