20231429 Ver 1_Wall Street NWP 3 14 Verification Request Compressed_20231018

Angela Petros
From: Angela Petros
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2022 1:17 PM
To: 401 PreFile
Subject: Wall Street Individual Certification Pre -Application
To whom it may concern,
Atlas will be submitting an Individual Certification application for the Wall Street project. This project is in
Statesville (Iredell County) and is an Industrial project. SL Statesville, LLC is the applicant.
Angela Petros
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] mobile
www.atiasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
N MENTAL

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
Prepare file folder
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Wall Street
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Assign Action ID Number in ORM
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional Government Commercial �✓
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The project is for road construction for the construction of an industrial development.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Owner: SL STATESVILLE LLC
Applicant: The Silverman Group Attn: Holden Sabato
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None Known
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
Lat: 35.760646, Long:-80.863402
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 4743698546.000
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A21b]: Iredell
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Statesville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Third Creek, Class C, Index #: 12-108-20-4
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: South Yadkin, 03040102
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
E
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
❑✓ Regional General Permit # 3/14
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
�✓ Section 10 & 404
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

VIRONMENTAL
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Krystynka B. Stygar
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Re: Wall Street - +/- 57.27 acres
1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
Nationwide Permit 3/14 Verification Request
SAW-2022-01127
Krysta, Stephanie:
October 17, 2023
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Attn: Stephanie Goss
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
The applicant, Holden Sabato of The Silverman Group, is requesting approval of the
enclosed nationwide permit 3/14 verification request for unavoidable impacts to Waters
of the United States. Atlas Environmental Inc. completed the delineation of aquatic
resources in February 2022. The approved jurisdictional determination was signed
September 16, 2022. The proposed project involves maintenance of an existing culvert
and the construction of a road extension for site access. Proposed impacts include
three permanent stream impacts, five temporary stream impacts, and one permanent
wetland impact. Impacts S1 and S2 are permanent impacts for culvert installation.
Impact S3 is a short section of open channel relocation to increase long term stability
near the proposed wetland impact at W1. Impact S4 is temporary maintenance by
replacement of an existing culvert for the road alignment. Impacts S5, S6, S7 and S8
are all for the establishment of a pump around and de -watering zone to prevent flowing
water in the construction areas. The section of open channel relocation is
approximately 13 linear feet and will allow for a more stable transition at the
downstream extent of the culvert at impact W1. The section of channel re -alignment will
be established using similar cross section morphology including slope, wetted
perimeter, and cross -sectional area as the existing channel. Native substrate will be
used for the channel bed in the re located reach of channel and the banks will be
matted and re -vegetated.
The roadway to access the site will consist of both public and private portions and will
be an extension of the existing Landson Drive. The road will be approximately 2,390
feet to a roundabout then an additional 540 feet to the proposed development. The
road has been designed and engineered to avoid and minimize proposed impacts to the
greatest extent possible. The road alignment has been designed to take advantage of
existing site access and an existing culvert. By using the existing culvert, the road
alignment has further avoided impacts. At impact S2 wing walls are being used to avoid
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / offices in Asheville and Charlotte

If
AQ
IRONMENTAL
additional impacts and minimize proposed impacts by reducing the length of side
slopes. At impact S1 a retaining wall has been proposed to be constructed to avoid and
minimize impacts by nearly eliminating side slopes. The retaining wall is approximately
11-12 feet in height and is 140 linear feet on the downstream side and 144 liner feet on
the upstream side of the crossing.
Enclosed are the necessary nationwide permit documents and additional information.
Thank you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please contact me if you need
any additional information.
Best regards,
aco Sinclair P.G., PWS
Senior Environmental Specialist
Atlas Environmental Inc.
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

I AS
VIRONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the properly properties identified Below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program,
Project Name: � 0 U :4— �
JaLL/L �-61^sri"t't�4�.L 4'Llt eve's ti siti.rrf F� j �t-/
Property Owner of Record: 0 cS fagtrK t [_P S nJ
Contact Name:
Address: I 1 r ,M o rr rs {o wry �►� { �!�=`c� ,aJT rJ �Q
Address:
Phone/Fax Number: � ' 3 ' 01 U "
Email Address: i 1 D (G/lYt Sc; s , t Ltt-"a-tJ
Project Address: 1553 Wall Street
Project Address: Statesville, NC 28677
Tax PIN: r ❑ � �3- - Q/4703~67-�_'406
Signature: �7H 3- of -UC07
Date: A 1.� U{7(1J-76— 56g7
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
-! _66-331$
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
�` _I,�
tl 7 3 - ! ' 4 OO
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
[e-mail]
y�7�f3 7-3www.atiasenvi.com

WALL SrREE�
I
,
r
J
�(vERi
a
�44y4
EX. PERENNIAL RPW
CHANNEL 0: 721 LF 0.065 AC—.,
W Q
O .. 2 �
ru
F, Q 2
, y N
/NTERSTATE77
BOHLER/I
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
I
---------------
I
v
.
I `
EX. ABUTTING WETLAND = �: I
WL 0 1000: 0.023 AC
EX. PERENNIAL RPW ; \ I
CHANNEL N: 1,431 LF 0.273 AC
n _
I
ti
----------------
/NTERSTATE77
r
EX. PERENNIAL RPW
CHANNEL P: 2,993 LF 0.417 AC
__J I
�J
I
I
I
� J
I I
OVERALL EXISTING DISTURBANCE EXHIBIT
Thell1
siiverman
Group
STATESVILLE, NC 286771 REV. 1
ANNOTATION LEGEND:
TBR: TO BE REMOVED
TR: TO REMAIN
TBRL TO BE RELOCATED
EXISTING PLAN LEGEND
EX/STING NOTE TYPICALNOTETEXT
LINE
CONCRETE CURB&
GUTTER
—LODLOD—
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
F WF WF
EXISTING WETLANDS
X
FENCE
pp�QJ
UTILITY POLE
(p
LIGHT POLE
y
UNDERGROUND
WATER LINE
UNDERGROUND GAS
LINE
OVER WIRE
©
TELEPHONE BOX
STORM
SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
MAIN
{�
HYDRANT
SANITARV
MANHOLE
®
STORM MANHOLE
STORM INLET
_e
HEADWALL
CI
WELL LOCATION
®WM
WATER METER
©
ELECTRIC METER
F�
GAS METER
mvwwvwvwvr•
WOODS
TREE
08/23/2023 I JPS I NCA220008.01 I Rev 1

PARCEl58 i
47463811g PG
W8 2502
� 1 ZONED � a
N
KENNETN G — \ 16, ID
p5
\ r
RIF�IE�
G6 PR,15M
PAR 3000 ZONED 1- -
ZONED
i
4wM„A,
EX. PERENNIAL RPW
CHANNEL 0: 721 LF 0.065 AC�
1
W IWi Wy
OSm
N N I V Q 2
1 yN lti �
----------- L
/NTERSTATE77
I
J I
2
00
BU1�D1 p sp. ES
9000 ER SPPC
1032 �5 � RIG SPPGES
WALL SrREEr
1"kEX. ABUTTING WETLAND
—WIL 01000: 0.023 AC
P,
EX. PERENNIAL RPW
CHANNEL N: 1,431 LF 0.273 AC
I
1
I 1
I
I
,
,
I
i
I_
o0/
/ O ONM DA G 4 \
7 ��l PpRGEE
jp60 1
a \ 47g2qj0 pG
V Dg 23 FG 134
l l\ - � r NDY PRTN, \ l I P ZONED: 8-5
f
IOrPEOPG JS
ry
P��F-I/f/A
EXHIBIT 1
_ EX. PERENNIAL RPW
{ _ CHANNEL P: 2,993 LF 0.417 AC
_-----
EXHIBIT
/NTERSTATE77
-�---
pARSE_3g18
4J44-6PG 820 `�
08 2g64 pG 57 -
pZONED 0"5-
�b.
D
BUILDING SQUARE
FOOTAGE
BUILDING
11,W0
SO,OW
IMPACT TABLE
-T—TGTAI 0.014 AC (BN SF)
PERRENIAL 0.03E AC(1,—.1)315 LF /
CHANNELS
BOHLER#
OVERALL PROPOSED DISTURBANCE EXHIBIT 08/23/20231 JPS I NCA220008.01 I Rev 1
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132 The III
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310 7r�
oo so zs a o0
CHARLOTTE, N 03 Silvermano0
Phone: [phone] Group
rOGp
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail] STATESVILLE, NC 286771 REV. 1

o
------ _ ____________ _ _ ---_ _--_ - - ____ ____ ;; - _ _ _ ----- LEGEND
- --- ----- _ -- _____- —_ ______ _____ ___ ___ � - _- _--_ --"- ♦ " �' LOD— LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
\\ _ EXISTING STREAM
\ STREAM IMPACTS
_ - I IIII III/WETLANDS
y - -- ---- ------ _ -- ; s : --- -- PRESERVED
EiL WETLANDS IMPACTS
I ` `\ ` \ ---- --I I I � I � I ; 1 i --_ ♦ '1 ♦ `♦ \ ', I I I I \\�\\\ 1� 1 _, \ \ \ 1 1 \ -- �'_- �_' �� % � �''"-
1 ♦ ^^ \`\` III I I ; I I i , \ ♦♦ \ 1 I III \ \III \ I ^ \ \♦ -' � _- �� � �_��;% � "� _
, \ ♦\`♦ \♦ IIII ' I' 1 / \ , _ _ ^- "
`♦ `♦ �- � III ' I I I I / --�___ ___ i ♦ `\_ � `♦♦ ``\ ' \ I IIII ,r, r ♦ ♦ \�\`♦ \ 11 / � � /' �� �/%' '-�_ �
IMPACT TABLE
IMPACT NUMBER AREA
:'�:: ` \ :: ♦ \ - --- i i ; .' '' - --------- - ---- ---- - 1/ - `` I I` \ \ \ \ `\ _ _ ,; Impact S5 ----- --- --- PRE. CH. P 0 AC (0 SF) 0 LF
Temp. Pump Around -
! p p
til
1 I,� ,�,.\,1,� ll, I ,_--� \ - ♦' I , \ : ; _ i 20 LF, 0.001 Ac _ ---- II II �_ -^_ ' /. . /. / . / ,' �'_' / ,' / _ ♦ `.\ ♦♦.` \ `\ `. ♦ ` \
S6� 86
IIII
663
I _I -. , III \1 - '•� , • i / ,__ � � - \ 1 � ; `` � _'' �II� � � ------------
_-
Impact S4: NWP 3---
` Culvert replacement
Impact S5 400 LF
Continued
r PERM 14Z RP
a =- - - - . `---- - _ _ - - C
_ -- - y - _ 1 � f/ANNEL P• CONT/NUED
It
Z _-% .-,; II �\ `.� '', �;,-" \I 1 ! - _ � _ - ,,,_- '♦ \ / ,.� ;,;- / EX. PORT/ON OF PIPED STREAM
W/TH 54 ° CUL INERT (TR)
CULVERT A
; v:` (SEE EXHIBIT
4 FOR PROFILE)I $ it
/ ----
it
W -�' / ; I , � I I /IIII ! I ! I; 1 ♦ �-♦♦ �' /' � ,, i ' , /------ ` \ ♦ `^^^ --
s'== EX. PERENN/AL RPHI $�� ' "�� / < $64.^
° CHANNEL P. 1960,LF II � ' / ;'
0.281AC(TR)
IF
Ci --`-�j/ -- ,, ' ', I _ 1 i/ _01
�'/ -866- _ ' / / III I1 ,r_"''',- `\ `\\ `` �`♦
BOHLER//
1 MPA C T S EXHIBIT 1 08/23/231 JPS I NCA220008.01 I Rev 1
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132 The111 50 25 12.5 0 50
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310 Silverman
CHARLOTTE, INC 28203 Group 2
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (9-3401 STATESVI LLE� NC 28677 1 PLAN REV. 1 1"=50'
NC@,BohlerEng.com erEn

--------- -----
-- - - -
\--------------------------- _- -
- LEGEND
----- „ \ ' ---- I mpact S1 ------------------ \ \`
\ EX. PERENN/AL RPW - __ — =__` "\\ - --836 -------- - -- - __-__-- LOD— LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
------ ; \ `` - --- _ EX. PERENN/AL RPO' _ a0�..
CHANNEL N 701 LF 835 CHANNEL N• 49 LF g�"� / _
0.140 AC �TRj � ` � ``. '� - - ------------------ EXISTING STREAM
\ p+Gr% - _ - 0. 01 AC (MR) 429 SF
`\ �.t -` ``--- -- ii, -1 ` L — — — STREAM IMPACTS
- \` CULVERT D '\ `\ ` ----- \
\ r \ \\ \ `. ` \ . \ \ `-- ` r.�"`\ • - - -- -\
(SEE EXHIBITN.
WETLANDS
` 5 FOR PROFILE), ,' �� d $4.� 8 \
834 ` `Y, r ��``.� ` - �\ `-------- ------ ``- `\ PRESERVED
iY Impact 6 J ,, ---_--------- = = ao
_ -
�` N =- CH N: — 20 LF, 0.001 Ac - ,=--- -"-_ y"'� ;:
--� t\ \ \ • \\\ \\ \\ M \\\ ` -�
00
`\ \ _ - - --- ilr' __ -- - WETLANDS IMPACTS
( aO M M EX. ABUTTINGN. ftlL
-
---' 833 WETL/4N0 WL 0 1000. -- - - ---- u ` - - - ;
EX. PERENN/AL RPW - i 0014,40 �TBR% - � i i i _ , , (f ),\ 1 : ; '-- -
CHANNEL 0.• 708 LF
-I- _ 629 SF Impact W1
% 10+50 , -
0.062 AC TR _-
'E. ABUMNc
Impact S8 �,,''/ b' - -__ WETLAND WL 0 1000.
CH O: — 20 LF, 0.001 Ac Imp act S3 = \` = � 0. 009 AC �TR) \` ' I ^ _ —
,-- _- \\\------- -
382 SF l\ __--- _ ,
EX. PERENN/AL RPw - A i___-> X ------
CHANNEL 0- 13 LF EX. WETLAND TO BE
i h'/ CULVERT C
yl ' u ,
0.002 AC (TBR) 87 SF P/PED AND CONT/NUED
,yll (SEE EXHIBIT
`4 FOR PROFILE) 1 --------
-- �
/ l,r „I ; / ,�\``\ `�'♦ '\ ' \ 3 ;' `I EX. PERENN/AL RP{f/ F�/ - �----------- --
,..\\\ ``\♦``\ `. `\ \ \ ,�_ , \1 N 1 \I 111♦, 1\ N �\ �.t CHANNELJ19 LF -% ----------------------------- ---
1 `` 'I'll r /''' l ' r / / ' /' -\` ♦` �' ` ` ` ` --- _^---.--- . \` , © N.
N.
`.�
N.
Impact 7 ---- ---
I�\I, CH N: — 20 LF, 0.001 Ac
z ',- ° 1�� I 1 i 1 1 1 '\ N. \ \ \\\ W \ I 1 832 831�\
.`, \ \
\ \
1,� 834 \ ` -- i 1 \ \ ` \ \\ \
_ ✓ / i / / / OD j 835 - - `♦ \\♦ \ \ Impact S2 0 -
/ - ` ` EX. PERENN/AL RPW-''-
s CHANNEL N. 153 LF 8�
0.024 AC (TBR) 1047 SF
(SEE EX IT
4 FOR PROF!L
834 \\ `\ `_ p ', \\ 6 ,
/ � \ ` i i ` `\ \ ` 5r
\` EX. STREAM TO BE - 833 (
�;- 831 EX. PERENN/AL RPW ♦� `
♦ �, r 835) w P/PED AND CONT/N. CP_NUED _ CHANNEL N. >09 LF \ N \ -- `
o `8�s`\ I IQ711P $30' ;1 0.028 AC �TRj _ `\ `` $ cp ``
cp
BOHLER// IMPACTS - EXHIBIT 2
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132
The 1N
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310
Silverman
CHARLOTTE, INC 28203
Group
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (2-3401
STATESVILLE� NC 286771 PLAN REV. 1
lerE
[e-mail]
IMPACT TABLE
IMPACT NUMBER
AREA
PER. CH. N
0.034 AC (1,473 SF) 202 LF
PER. CH. 0
0.002 AC (87 SF) 13 LF
TOTAL
0.036 AC (1,560 SF) 215 LF
(PERENIAL)
WL O 1000 j
.014 AC (629 SF)
08/23/231 JPS I NCA220008.01 I Rev 1
50 25 12.5 0 50
1 "= 50'

865 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' r 1. "Aln nn. 'n ' 865
860 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 860
855 ; ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 855
850 DMAV 54' 1ID&T 850
EX,_----
845 845
840 i 840
835 835
DATUM ELEV
832.50
BOHLER//
EXISTING C UL VERT A EXHIBIT 3 08/23/23 I JPS I NCA220008.01 I Rev 1
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCEELS P-1132 rho,', 50 25 12.5 0 50
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310 Silverman
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 Group
1 "= 50'
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (2-3401
[e-mail] STATESVILLE� NC 286771 PLAN REV. 1
lerE

840
835
830
825
m
x
w 820
0
a
DATUM ELE\
Y 817.50
ROP.GRADE
/SI7N0 GRVf-
PROP. GRAD
13 .49' 48" RCP @ 0.15°/
z-A
�EX/
LING GR40E
BOHLERI
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
NCA220008 - Culvert B
SCALE: 1"= 50' HORIZONTAL
1"= 5' VERTICAL
840 840
835 835
830 830
825 825
820 820
DATUM ELE\
817.50
P.GRADE
PR
PROP. GRADE
z
VO GR40E
88.34'
- 48" RCP @ 0.12%
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50
NCA220008 - Culvert C
SCALE: 1"= 50' HORIZONTAL
1 "= 5 ' VERTICAL
PROPOSED CULVERT B AND C - EXHIBIT 4
The III
Silverman
Group
STATESVILLE, NC 286771 PLAN REV. 1
840
835
830
825
820
08/23/23 1 JPS I NCA220008.01 I Rev 1
50 25 12.5 0 50
1 "= 50'

840
835
830
825
820
DATUM ELE�
817.50
ROP.
RADE
43.00' - 4
" RCP @ 0.00%
Ex1577NG cRWE
Z
[f:::lLPROF::G:RADE
10+00 10+50 11+00
NCA220008 - Culvert D
SCALE: 1"= 50' HORIZONTAL
1"= 5' VERTICAL
840
835
830
825
820
BOHLERI PROPOSED CULVERT D - EXHIBIT 5
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132 The IN
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 310 Silverman
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 Group
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (2-3401
[e-mail] STATESVILLE� NC 286771 PLAN REV. 1
lerE
08/23/23 I JPS I NCA220008.01 I Rev 1
50 25 12.5 0 50
1 "= 50'

r
Detail 7:
0
Detail 4: Page 6
Detail 3: Page 5
Detail 2: Paae 4
IN11111111111111
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
Illlllli Intermittent
M Wetland
= Culvert
uatic Resource Sketch Ma
VI �
�1
I
A
% 1 M1 r7
Sketch Map provided for illustrative
purposes and preliminary planning
only. Not intended to be relied upon
for exact location, dimension, or
orientation. All findings and
ar
�P:ed
assessments are subject to
verification from the Army Corps of
9?a/e/
Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources, and/or other appropriate
local authorities. Do not reproduce
map set except in its entirety.
1 ■■■■may■■■■ ■�■`{yy
' ■ ��
VIRON MENTAL
Page Page 1 of 9 Figure: 1A
Project Name: Wall Street
g
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
JACO 1.
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
3:80 P-wa
WO
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

TL/6
11IRONMENTAL
Page 2 of 9 Figure: 1 B
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Intermittent RPW
CH A Int: - 1225 LF, 0.074 Ac
Abutting Wetland
WLA1000:-0.010Ac =
Perennial RPW
CH A Per: - 119 LF, 0.004 Ac
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
M Wetland
= Culvert
\O
I� o
Perennial RPW
Third Creek: - 2297 LF, 0.590 Ac
141
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
TL/6
VIRONMFNTAL
Page 3 of 9 Detail 1 Figure: 1 C
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Isolated Wetland
D 1100: — 0.012
Isolated Non-RPW
CH D: — 261 LF. 0.018
Isolated Wetland
WL D 1000: — 0.187 Ac
Abutting Wetland
WL C 1000: — 0.003 Ac
Legend
0
Perennial RPW
CH C: — 228 LF. 0.050 Ac
Third Creek Continued
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
M Wetland 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
= Culvert ,
TL/6
5VIRONMENTAL
Page 4 of 9 Detail 2 Figure: 1 D
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Intermittent RPW
CH E: — 267 LF. 0.015 Al
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
M Wetland 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
= Culvert ��
TL/6
5VIRONMENTAL
Page 5 of 9 Detail 3 Figure: 1 E
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
OPerennial RPW CH K: - 328 LF, 0.021 Ac
I CH I Continued
I1rA0a11I1I1Z6ZTiiP I - aI
Perennial RPW
CH I: - 1863 LF, 0.268 Ac
Perennial RPW
CH H: 460 LF, 0.090 Ad
Abutting Wetland
WL F 1000: - 11.924 Ac
Perennial RPW
CH G: - 223 LF, 0.033 Ac
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
= Wetland
M Culvert
L
WL F
Continued
Perennial RPW
CH L Per: - 327 LF, 0.026 Ac
Intermittent RPW
CH L Int: - 102 LF. 0.010 Ac
Perennial RPW
CH J: - 50 LF, 0.007 Ad
End of CH F
Included within WL F
Perennial RPW
CH F: - 1004 LF. 0.260 Ac
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
TL/6
VIRONMFNTAL
Page 6 of 9 Detail 4 Figure: 1 F
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Perennial RPW
CH N: - 1431 LF. 0.273 Ac
Abutting Wetland
WL M 1000: -- 0.572 Ac
Legend
Abutting Wetland
WL O 1000: - 0.023 Ac
Perennial RPW
CH O Per: 721 LF, 0.064 Ac
Intermittent RPW
CH O: 247 LF, 0.017 Ac
Abutting Wetland
WL N 1000: - 1. 168
L Review Area
Streets
0 Iredell Co. Parcels Perennial RPW
Contours: 2 Ft CH M: - 180 LF, 0.035 Ac
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
= Wetland 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
M Culvert
TL/6
VIRONVIENTAL
Page 7 of 9 Detail 5 Figure: 1 G
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Perennial RPW
\ \Ac • I 'ail �r .
ICH N Continuedt
Legend
L Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
= Wetland 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
M Culvert
TL/6
VIRONMENTAL
Page 8 of 9 Detail 6 Figure: 1 H
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Intermittent RPW
CH R: — 70 LF, 0.003 Ad
Intermittent RPW
'H S: — 64 LF, 0.004
� CH P Continued
Perennial RPW
T: — 28 LF, 0.004 Ac
Abutting Wetland
WL P 1300: — 0.003
Abutting Wetland
WL P 1200: — 0.002
CH P Continued
Legend
Abutting Wetland
WLP1100:-0.619Ac
IntermitteJR
CH Q: — 98
Abutting Wetland
NL P 1000: 0.01 f
L Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
= Wetland 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
M Culvert ,
TL/6
(75 IRONMENTAL
Page 9 of 9 Detail 7 Figure: 11
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies user manuai version z.-i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Wall Street
3. Applicant/owner name: The Silverman G
5. County: Iredell
7. River basin: Yadkin-PeeDee
2. Date of evaluation: 02/21/2022
4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental Inc
6. Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Fourth Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.7650262,-80.8642350
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH N 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): - 665
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 9 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) ❑Size 4 (>- 5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? []Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach —whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
® ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
® ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
® ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
® ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ®A ®A
®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure —
streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A
Mature forest
❑B ❑B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ®Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑ B 46 to < 67 ❑ C 67 to < 79 ❑ D 79 to < 230 ❑ E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Wall Street
Stream Category Pb2
Date of Assessment 02/21/2022
Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental Inc
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
MEDIUM

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Holden Sabato
The Silverman Group
195 Morristown Road
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920
Project: Wall Street
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Qua[O
October 17, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 4/17/2024
County: Iredell
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040102
Warm Stream
202
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Aev�dj�
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Jennifer Robertson, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
,., pJ' I^AEQ QAj
217 West ]ones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raledgh. North Carolina 27699-1652
d 919.70T8976

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
April 19, 2023
Tasha Benyshek
TRC
705 Dogwood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
tben. s�(abtrccompanies.com
Re: Construct industrial building, 1553 Wall Street, Statesville, Iredell County, ER 22-1650
Dear Ms. Benyshek:
Thank you for your letter of March 6, 2023, submitting the Phase I archaeological survey report for the
above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We concur that the following property is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP) and concur with the site boundary:
Site 31ID552, the White's Mill Enslaved Persons/Rose Walker Cemetery, is eligible under Criterion A
(associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history).
Because the site is a cemetery, it must also meet one or more of the criteria considerations for cemeteries.
31ID552 meets Criteria Consideration D. As a rare example of a community cemetery for enslaved
peoples, this site represents an important aspect of Iredell County's community history for a group whose
impact on the community was significant but not well documented in other resources.
We concur that the following properties are unassessed for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP) and concur with the site boundaries:
31ID401 has the potential for intact deposits and may contain data that would provide information pertinent
to local history, particularly in association with 31ID403 (White's Mill).
31ID403 (White's Mill) has the potential for intact deposits and may contain data that would provide
information pertinent to historic research questions.
We concur that the following properties are not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places for the
reasons outlined in the report:
Sites 31ID393-31ID400 and 31ID402 do not have the potential to contain information pertinent to
prehistoric or historic research questions.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

ER 22-1650, April 19, Page 2 of 2
We have accepted the submitted document as the final compliance report for this archaeological survey. If
site 31ID401 and/or 31ID403 cannot be avoided, additional work should be done to assess their eligibility
for the NRHP. If those sites will be avoided for any ground disturbing activities, no further archaeological
work is necessary in association with this undertaking.
We concur with the short and long-term protection measures proposed for 31ID552 (the White's Mill
Enslaved Persons/Rose Walker Cemetery):
1. An initial temporary fencing installation and later permanent fencing along the northern drainage to
ensure that no disturbances are made to the cemetery during or after construction.
2. Cemetery marked on all construction plans.
3. Mapping of the cemetery boundary with five -meter buffer by a licensed surveyor.
4. Implementation of the Inadvertent Discoveries Plan included as Appendix C during construction
activities.
We look forward to consulting with TRC as needed to fulfill those protection measures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(ii)ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
�Sincerely,
�r Ramona Bartos, Deputy
(� State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

ua
United States Department of the InteriorSERVIUE
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa StreetFl
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
November 17, 2022
David Rabon
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
338 South Amity Road #441
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
[e-mail]
Subject: Wall Street Commercial Development; Iredell County, North Carolina
Dear David Rabon:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
revised correspondence dated October 17, 2022, wherein you solicit our comments regarding
project -mediated impacts to federally protected species. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
On July 5, 2022, the U.S. District Court of the Northern District Court of California vacated the
2019 regulations implementing section 7 of the Act. On September 21, 2022, the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals granted a request to stay the U.S. District Court of Northern California's July 5,
2022, order that vacated the 2019 Act regulations. As a result, the 2019 regulations are again in
effect, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has relied upon the 2019 regulations in
issuing our written concurrence on the action agency's "may affect, not likely to adversely
affect" determination. However, because the outcome of the legal challenges to the 2019 Act
regulations is still unknown, we considered whether our substantive analyses and conclusions
would have been different if the pre-2019 regulations were applied in this informal consultation.
Our analysis included the prior definition of "effects of the action." We considered all the "direct
and indirect effects" and the "interrelated and interdependent activities" when determining the
"effects of the action." We then considered whether any "effects of the action" that overlap with
applicable ranges of listed species would be wholly beneficial, insignificant, or discountable to
the species. As a result, we determined the substantive analysis and conclusions would have been
the same, irrespective of which regulations applied.
Project Description
According to the information provided, the Applicant proposes to construct a commercial
development and appurtenances on approximately 325 partially forested acres in Statesville,
North Carolina. The information provided suggests that the proposed project will require
authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for unavoidable impacts to Waters of the
United States. Site development plans and/or a description of impacts to Waters of the U.S. or
onsite habitats has not been prepared or provided at this time.

Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
Your correspondence indicates that suitable habitat is present within the action area (50CFR
402.02) for the federally endangered Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) and the
federally threatened dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora). However, targeted
botanical surveys detected no evidence of the genus Hexastylis (which can be diagnosed year-
round by its diagnostic evergreen leaves). Targeted botanical surveys conducted during the
appropriate timeframe for Schweinitz's sunflower (August 24, 2022), also did not detect
evidence for that species at that time. Therefore, we believe that the probability for inadvertent
loss of these plants is insignificant and discountable and would concur with "may affect, not
likely to adversely affect" determinations from the action agency for these plants. Botanical
survey results are valid for two years for the purposes of consultation under the Act:
hgps://www.fws. gov/asheville/pdfs/Optimal%20Survey%20Windows%20for%20listed%20plant
s%202020.pdf
Suitable habitat for tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) may be present within the proposed
action area. On September 14, 2022, the Service published a proposal in the Federal Register to
list the tricolored bat as endangered under the Act. The Service has up to 12 months from the
date the proposal published to make a final determination, either to list the tricolored bat under
the Act or to withdraw the proposal. The Service determined the bat faces extinction primarily
due to the range -wide impacts of WNS. Because tricolored bat populations have been greatly
reduced due to WNS, surviving bat populations are now more vulnerable to other stressors such
as human disturbance and habitat loss. Species proposed for listing are not afforded protection
under the Act; however, as soon as a listing becomes effective (typically 30 days after
publication of the final rule in the Federal Register), the prohibitions against jeopardizing its
continued existence and "take" will apply. Therefore, if you suspect your future or existing
project may affect tricolored bats after the potential new listing goes into effect, we recommend
analyzing possible effects of the project on tricolored bats and their habitat to determine whether
consultation under section 7 of the Act is necessary. Conferencing procedures can be followed
prior to listing to ensure the project does not jeopardize the existence of a species. Projects with
an existing section 7 biological opinion may require re -initiation of consultation to provide
uninterrupted authorization for covered activities. Please contact our office for additional
guidance or assistance.
Monarch butterfly is a candidate species, and we appreciate the project proponent's
consideration of monarch butterfly when evaluating the action area for impacts to federally listed
species and their habitats. The species is not subject to section 7 consultation, and an effects
determination is not necessary. General recommendations for pollinators can be provided and
would be protective of monarch butterfly should the project proponent like to implement them in
the future.
Your correspondence indicates that suitable habitat is not present within the action area for any
other federally protected species. Therefore, we consider consultation to be complete and require
no further action at this time. Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Act must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of the identified action may affect listed
species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) the identified action is
2

subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
We offer the following recommendations on behalf of natural resources:
Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native vegetation as soon as the project is completed. Ground
disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of the
workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
Impervious Surfaces and Low -Impact Development
Increased storm -water runoff also degrades aquatic and riparian habitat, causing stream -bank and
stream -channel scouring. Impervious surfaces reduce groundwater recharge, resulting in even
lower than expected stream flows during drought periods, which can induce potentially
catastrophic effects for fish, mussels, and other aquatic life. Accordingly, we recommend that all
new development, regardless of the percentage of impervious surface area they will create,
implement storm -water -retention and -treatment measures designed to replicate and maintain the
hydrograph at the preconstruction condition to avoid any additional impacts to habitat quality
within the watershed.
We recommend the use of low -impact -development techniques, such as reduced road widths,
grassed swales in place of curb and gutter, rain gardens, and wetland retention areas, for
retaining and treating storm -water runoff rather than the more traditional measures, such as large
retention ponds, etc. These designs often cost less to install and significantly reduce
environmental impacts from development.
Where detention ponds are used, storm -water outlets should drain through a vegetated area prior
to reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should be designed to allow
for the slow discharge of storm water, attenuating the potential adverse effects of storm -water
surges; thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical discharges. Also, because the
purpose of storm -water -control measures is to protect streams and wetlands, no
storm -water -control measures or best management practices should be installed within any
stream (perennial or intermittent) or wetland.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at [e-mail] if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-22-571.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
3

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2022-01127 County: Iredell U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Statesville East
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: The Silverman Group
Holden Sabato
Address: 195 Morristown Road
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920
Size (acres) 325.21 Nearest Town Statesville
Nearest Waterway Third Creek RiverBasin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040102 Coordinates Latitude:35.760646
Longitude:-80.863402
Location description: The project consists of eightparcels near the location of 1553 Wall Street, Statesville, Iredell County,
North Carolina. PIN(s): 4743698546.000.4743735651.000.4743772007.000.4743781262.000.4743644008.000.4743663318.000.
4743763697.000, 4743679906.000
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ There appearto be waters, including wetlands on the above describedproject area/property, that maybe subject to Section404
of the Clean WaterAct (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, andthe delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of thesewaters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction detennination maybe used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. Forpurposes of computation ofimpacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decisionmade on thebasis of a preliminary Mwill treat allwaters andwetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity onthe site as if they are jurisdictionalwaters of theU.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part3 31). However, you may
request anapproved JD, which is an appealable action, by contactingthe Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above describedproject area/property, that maybe subject to Section404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have notbeenproperly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction overall of the waters, including wetlands atthe project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to a ccomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain consultant to conduct delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters ofthe United States within the above describedproject area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers andHarbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 ofthe Clean WaterAct
(CWA)(33USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean WaterAct (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination maybe relied upon fora periodnotto exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
0 We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project a rea/prop erty delineated. As the Corps maynotbe
able to a ccomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verifiedby the Corps.
❑X The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated8/5/2022. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once

SAW-2022-01127
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subj ectto C WA j urisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or ourpublished regulations, maybe relied upon fora period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted onthe plat signedby the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination maybe relied upon fora periodnotto exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subj ectto the
permit requirements of Section404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination maybe relied upon fora period not to exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ The property is located in one ofthe 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contactthe Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of theUS, including wetlands, without a Department ofthe Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 3 01 of the CleanWa terAct (3 3 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Ann ypermit may
constitute aviolation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers andHarbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Krystynka B Stygar at 252-545-0507 or
kry stynka.b.stygarkgsace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Seethe approved jurisdictional determination form dated 9/16/2022.
D. Remarks: REMARKS
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determinationhas been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may notbe valid for the wetland conservationprovisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate p articipation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetlanddetermination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appealunder Corps regulations at 3 3 CFR Part 3 3 1. Enclosed
you will find a Notification ofAppeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. Ifyou request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, FloorM9
Atlanta, Georgia 3 0303 -8803
AND
PHILI P.A. SHANNIN(i4USACE.ARMY.Nn
In order for an RFA to be accepted bythe Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, thatit meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, andthat it has been receivedby the Division Office within 60 days ofthe date ofthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA fonn, it must be received at the above address by 08/08/2022.
**It is not necessary to submit anRFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: )L-iw
Date of JD: 9/16/2022 ExpirationDate ofJD: 9/16/2027

SAW-2022-01127
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Vp=136:4:0
Property Owner:
George Barkley E. Etal
PO Box 455
Zebulon, NC 27597
John Douglas Goforth
123 Wheatridge DR
Statesville,NC 28625
Sherrill J. N. Heirs
C/O Evelyn Sherrill
Statesville, NC 28677
William Ralph Pardue
1550 Wall Street
Statesville,NC 28677
Evelyn C Sherrill
1553 Wall Street
Statesville,NC 28677
Skeets Auto Body Repair Inc
906 ConoverBlvdW
Conover, NC 28613
OCB Properties LLP
C/o Enid Butler
Williamsburg, VA23188
Copy furnished:
Agent:
Atlas Environmental, Inc
Jennifer Robertson
Address:
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, # 411
Charlotte, NC 28211
Telephone Number:
704-903-8228
E-mail:
jrobertson(catlasenvi.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: The Silverman Group, Holden Sabato File Number: SAW-2022-01127 Date: 9/16/2022
Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
©
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies yourrights and options regarding an administrative appealof the above decision.
Additional informationmaybefoundatorhttl2://www.usace.anny.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Regulato yProgramandPennits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictionaldeterminations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard orLOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit yourright to appealthe permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address allof yourconcems, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appealthe declined permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of
this form and sendingthe form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appealthe denial of a permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may acceptor appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appealthe approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appealthe approved JD underthe Corps of Engineers
Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe yourreasons forappealing the decision or yourobjections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appealis limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum forthe
record of the appeal conference ormeeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant northe Corps may add new information oranalyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regardingthis decision and/orthe
If you only have questions regardingthe appealprocess you may
appealprocess you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: Krystynka B Stygar
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Charlotte Regulatory Office
CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
8430 University Executive ParkDrive, Suite 615
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 303 03-8803
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(a,USACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appealprocess. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi rations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Krystynka B Stygar, 8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite
615, Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1 OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FORAPPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 9/16/2022
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Wall Street, SAW-2022-01127
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project consists of eight parcels near the location of 1553 Wall
Street, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina. PIN(s): 4743698546.000,4743735651.000, 4743772007.000, 4743781262.000, 4743644008.000,
4743663318.000, 4743763697.000,4743679906.000
State: NC County/parish/borough: Iredell City: Statesville
Center coordinates of site (lat/longin degree decimal format): Lat. 35.760646 , Long.-80.863402
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Third Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows:
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03040102
® Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different JD form:
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): February 16, 2022, February 17, 2022, and February 21, 2022
SECTION H: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review area.
[Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There are "waters of the U.S."within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters 2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 14, 376 LF linear feet, 1-6 wide, and/or 2.272 acres.
Wetlands: 14.082 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established OHWM
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 Forpurposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally" (e.g.,
typically 3 months).
Page 1 of 8 Form Version 10 June 2020

Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non -regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional. Explain:
CH D 100 and WL D 1000 and WL D 1100 .
SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete Section
HI.A.1 and Section HI.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections HI.A.1 and 2 and Section
HI.D.1.; otherwise, see Section 111.11 below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
WetlandadjacenttoTNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
0 CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps determine
whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent waters"
(RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3 months). A wetland
that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round (perennial) flow, skip to
Section HI.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow, skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and EPA
regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a relatively
permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even though a significant
nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must consider
the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for analytical purposes,
the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is the tributary, or its adjacent
wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HI.B.1 for the tributary, Section HI.B.2 for any
onsite wetlands, and Section HI.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite and offsite. The determination whether a
significant nexus exists is determined in Section M.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Choose an item.
Drainage area: Choose an item.
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑Tributary flows through Choose an item. tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Choose an item. river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Choose an item. river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Choose an item. aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Choose an item. aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
a Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.
'Note that the histructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and West.
Page 2 of 8 Form Version 10 June 2020

Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑Natural
❑Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: Choose an item..
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ® Muck
❑Bedrock ❑Vegetation. Type/%cover:
El Other. Explain:
Tributarycondition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Choose an item.
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Choose an item.
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Choose an item.
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Choose an item.. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Choose an item.. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑OHWM6(check all indicators that apply):
El clear, natural line impressed on the bank El the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving ❑ the presence of wrack line
❑vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ❑ sediment sorting
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ sediment deposition
❑water staining
❑ other (list):
El Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
❑ scour
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
® abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
'Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.
'A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where the
OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow regime (e.g., flow
over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.
Page 3 of 8 Form Version 10 June 2020

❑ oil or scum line alongshore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell ordebris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
El tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
El Habitat for:
El Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
El Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Choose an item. Explain:
Surface flow is: Choose an item.
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Choose an item.. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
El Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Choose an item. river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Choose an item. aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Choose an item..
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Choose an item. floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed characteristics;
etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
Page 4 of 8 Form Version 10 June 2020

❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
El Habitat for:
El Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
El Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Choose an item.
Approximately acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.
For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions beingperformed:
SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERNIINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed by any
wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of a TNW.
For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, has more
than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW. Considerations when
evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow of water in the tributary and
its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine
significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a
tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of
significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and discussed in
the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to TNWs, or to
reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and other
species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearingyoung for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream food webs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or biological
integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings
of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IILD:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combinationwith all of its adjacent wetlands,
then go to Section IILD:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of presence or
absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD:
D. DETERNIINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
El TNWs: linear feet, wide, Or acres.
El Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
Page 5 of 8 Form Version 10 June 2020

2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is
perennial: Third Creek, CH A Per, CH C, CH F, CH K, CH I, CH H, CH G, CH J, CH L Per, CH N, CH O Per, CH
M, CH P and CH T all score higher than a 30 on the DWR stream form.
El Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year)are jurisdictional. Data
supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a TNW is
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑X Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary
is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is seasonal
in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with
similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supportingthis conclusion is
provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with
similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is
provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
El Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
'See Footnote# 3.
'To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
Page 6 of 8 Form Version 10 June 2020

E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE, DEGRADATION
OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY SUCH WATERS (CHECK
ALL THAT APPLY): to
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
El Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet, wide.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
N Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the "Migratory
Bird Rule" (MBR).
N Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: CH D, WL D
1000 and WL D 1100 are abutting. There is no hydrological correction to other waters.
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR factors (i.e.,
presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), usingbest professional judgment (check all
that apply):
NNon-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): 261 linear feet, wide.
❑Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
N Wetlands: 0.199 acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non -jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a
finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams):linear feet, wide.
❑Lakes/ponds: acres.
❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below):
N Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
N Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
10Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for review
consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.
Page 7 of 8 Form Version 10 June 2020

❑X
El
El
El
❑X
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑X Aerial (Name & Date):
Or ® Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify): Lidar, Antecedant Precipitation Tool
B.ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:
Page 8 of 8 Form Version 10 June 2020

r
Detail 7:
0
Detail 4: Page 6
Detail 3: Page 5
Detail 2: Paae 4
IN11111111111111
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
Illlllli Intermittent
M Wetland
= Culvert
uatic Resource Sketch Ma
VI �
�1
I
A
% 1 M1 r7
Sketch Map provided for illustrative
purposes and preliminary planning
only. Not intended to be relied upon
for exact location, dimension, or
orientation. All findings and
ar
�P:ed
assessments are subject to
verification from the Army Corps of
9?a/e/
Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources, and/or other appropriate
local authorities. Do not reproduce
map set except in its entirety.
1 ■■■■may■■■■ ■�■`{yy
' ■ ��
VIRON MENTAL
Page Page 1 of 9 Figure: 1A
Project Name: Wall Street
g
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
JACO 1.
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
3:80 P-wa
WO
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

TL/6
11IRONMENTAL
Page 2 of 9 Figure: 1 B
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Intermittent RPW
CH A Int: - 1225 LF, 0.074 Ac
Abutting Wetland
WLA1000:-0.010Ac =
Perennial RPW
CH A Per: - 119 LF, 0.004 Ac
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
M Wetland
= Culvert
\O
I� o
Perennial RPW
Third Creek: - 2297 LF, 0.590 Ac
141
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
TL/6
VIRONMFNTAL
Page 3 of 9 Detail 1 Figure: 1 C
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Isolated Wetland
D 1100: — 0.012
Isolated Non-RPW
CH D: — 261 LF. 0.018
Isolated Wetland
WL D 1000: — 0.187 Ac
Abutting Wetland
WL C 1000: — 0.003 Ac
Legend
0
Perennial RPW
CH C: — 228 LF. 0.050 Ac
Third Creek Continued
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
M Wetland 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
= Culvert ,
TL/6
5VIRONMENTAL
Page 4 of 9 Detail 2 Figure: 1 D
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

uatic Resource Sketch Ma
Intermittent RPW
CH E: — 267 LF. 0.015 Al
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
D Iredell Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
= Perennial
r Intermittent
M Wetland 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
= Culvert ��
TL/6
5VIRONMENTAL
Page 5 of 9 Detail 3 Figure: 1 E
Project Name: Wall Street
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402
Updated: August 5, 2022

EXAMPLE OF PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
NOTES:
1) All excavation shall be performed in only dry or isolated
areas of the work zone.
2) Impervious dikes are to be used to isolate work from
stream flow when necessary.
3) Maintenance of stream flow operations shall be incidental
to the work. This includes polyethylene sheeting, diversion
pipes, pumps and hoses.
4) Pumps and hoses shall be of sufficient size to dewater
the work area.
E44•
Silt Bag
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS)
TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE
PUMP —AROUND
Project Name: Wall Street
Silt Bag
DEWATERING PUMP
EXISTING STREAM
CHANNEL
— CULVERT
TOP OF BANK
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S).
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING
OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING
APPARATUS. DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA. AREA TO BE DEWATERED SHALL
BE EQUAL TO ONE DAY'S WORK.
5. INSTALL CULVERT(S) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
b. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL
OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND
TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST).
7. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND BACKFILL. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA
WITH SEED AND MULCH.
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
Location: 1553 Wall Street Statesville, NC 28677 1
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Holden Sabato
Coordinates: 35.760646,-80.863402 Date: October 17, 2023