20231428 Ver 1_Whispering_Branch_Attachment_A_Combined_20231017

Attachment A
Proposed Bank Stabilization
3806 Whispering Branch Road, Raleigh
The purpose of this project is to stabilize and repair a streambank which has failed and exposed a
previously buried gravity sewer pipe. An exposed gravity sewer ductile iron pipe has become uncovered
in the streambed due to high velocity flows and will remain exposed in the stream bed. The project will
temporarily impact a total of approximately 40 linear feet of stream length during dewatering and will
permanently impacts approximately 20 linear feet of streambank via riprap and coir fiber matting
stabilization impacts. Total length of stream impacts is 40 linear feet due to overlapping dewatering and
bank stabilization impacts. These impacts will occur on UT to Hare Snipe Creek near 3806 Whispering
Branch Road at 3S.892960,-78.704228 decimal degrees.
Work will entail creating a dry work area, establishing a stable toe, constructing a stable bank using coir
matting or rip -rap or a combination and establishing a stable segment of stream bed at the base of the
bank. Rip rap will be installed if 2:1 slope can be achieved and geo soil lifts or similar construction will be
employed if slopes must be greater than 2:1. The existing concrete collar on the sanitary sewer will be
removed. Restraints will be added to exposed joints. The site will be accessed from the existing sanitary
sewer easement from Whispering Branch Road. The temporary disturbance will occur inside the
maintained easement. There will be no tree removal as the easement has been maintained as
herbaceous. Erosion control measures will be installed prior to work.
A "pump around" will be established to create a dry work area. Disturbed area will be reseeded and
mulched when work is complete. It is expected that a tire or track -mounted excavator and a dump truck
will be used to place the boulders, reconstruct the streambank, and stabilize the streambank. Please see
the eight attached details: "pump around", temporary silt fence, temporary construction entrance,
stream crossing, bank stabilization, geo soil lifts, restraint joint, and seeding details.

�h":111IOl� 0
►siilic�.1/�T�.`� 1��6�d �,1�- �� 1�I�Lfl�flll� ►`�I�' .`_„_:
UT to Hare Snipe Creek
3806 Whispering Branch Road
35.892960,-78.704228

78043'43.39"W 35055'26.4"N
k 91
+�li"t
f�`i •Y k i
{,+j
IL
• JA E M. T ; " AIKE DU TY {'+7*` - `
UNINCORPORATED AREAS ' #•ti UIIRPfRATED S
dWM
- 4d
RL
41
46
dp
AE
cJ,�E
� . R' ; `r� ,}� t � _�li
•' ' 77
d1b T
F000W,
FLrdbDI�w elf
rt
one,
g '
T/�fy}y1p y I�
Y+
Zane �E -� r
4F
;IL
i
r
4
L JP
41
4Wy 6L
- 1<
# y `IT Q R: I;EIGH , + + " 1
�� _ r k '• ,, `' ARE9.01P M I NI MA.LI FLOOD HARD
r s
_ + 86
". -
�r42-
�# + ; } �1
� t
F # '
w #i i
+ - * I # # f #
! F ' � "' ' �. r ' � •� '1' 'fir -
i y 1 akP
#
4-N
* A 4 ' t _ _ ice' , J
i - �,_y 1+
up
, � it `` *_ ,T�+��►'S_R, . � ' - � -��
410.
•r P. SIT OF RLEICH �., v f'.•
E TRATERRITD"I II-TION t.. *' t EXTRATERRITORIAL URKPVlk�' IIO •
-
* ► ## I_
AL
r T�'. r y + + r 7 F�+ I y — I` - ` 3 •� —
to
+, y, 1 � � #tom •� �` , � �'• { .` lit � � k � � �� 4F
-4pa OR
04
L ; td
�* i t
LF
- -4LIF
—
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION
SEE FIS REPORT
FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP
FOR
DRAFT FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS
LISr Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mile Zone X
L\XNZ
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood Hazard Zone X
i///Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
See Notes Zone X
OTHER AREAS OF
�//// Area with Flood Risk due to Levee zone D
FLOOD HAZARD
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard
Zone X
Effective LOMRs
OTHER AREAS
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazardzone D
GENERAL
-- - -- - -- - a Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
STRUCTURES
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
20.2
BCross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
08 Coastal Transect
-- -- - — -- Coastal Transect Baseline
— - - Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
^^^� 513 ^^^^^' Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
OTHER
Limit of Study
FEATURES
Jurisdiction Boundary
NOTES TO USERS
SCALE
For information and questions about this Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), available products associated with Map vro/ectlon:
this FIRM, including historic versions, the current map date for each FIRM panel, how to order products, GCS, Geodetic Reference System 1980;
or the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at Vertical Datum: NAVD88
1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Flood Map Service Center website at https:Hmsc.fema.gov. For information about the specific vertical datum for elevation features, datum
Available products may include previously issued Letters of Map Change, a Flood Insurance Study Report, conversions, or vertical monuments used to create this map, please see the Flood
and/or digital versions of this map. Many of these products can be ordered or obtained directly from the website.
Insurance Study (FIS) Report for your community at https://msc.fema.gov
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Flood Map Service Center at the number 1 inch = 500 feet 1:6 000
listed above.
For community and countywide map dates, refer to the Flood Insurance Study Report for this jurisdiction. 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National Meters
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
0 50 100 200 300 400
Basemap information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the United States Geological Survey (USGS).
The basemap shown is the USGS National Map: Orthoimagery. Last refreshed October, 2020.
This map was exported from FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) on 10/3/2023 3:01 PM and does
not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may
change or become superseded by new data over time. For additional information, please see the Flood Hazard
Mapping Updates Overview Fact Sheet at https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/118418
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards. This map image is void if the one
or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar,
map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date.
78041'50.03"W 35053'20.72"N
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
2
PANEL 788 OF 2725
CL
PL4
CIO'{
A
.
Panel Contains:
,
COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL
CITY OF RALEIGH 370243 0788
T�
WAKE COUNTY 370368 0788
0
0
U.
yYl�
c
i
4P
1
�I
ex
MAP NUMBER
3720078800K
EFFECTIVE DATE
July 19, 2022

3806 Whispering Branch Road Disclaimer
Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
0 100 200 400 ft
the most current and accurate information possible.
i I i i i I However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
1 inch equals 200 feet ,are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

City of Raleigh, 3806 Whispering Branch Road Sanitary Sewer Repair Project FN
Photograph 1 — Bank stabilization needs and restrained pipe in sewer easement, facing west (Dated July
25, 2023)
Photograph 2 — Bank stabilization needs in sewer easement, facing southeast (Dated July, 2023)
Photopage 11

City of Raleigh, 3806 Whispering Branch Road Sanitary Sewer Repair Project FN
Photograph 3 — Bank stabilization needs and restrained pipe in sewer easement, facing southwest (Dated
July 25, 2023)
Photograph 4 — Access through easement from Whispering Branch Road, facing southeast (Dated July
25, 2023)
Photopage 12

PROVIDE HIGH STRENGTH
DOUBLE STITCHED J
TYPE SEAMS
/-- SEWN IN SPOUT
HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING
FOR HOLDING HOSE IN PLACE
HEAVY DUTY WATERFLOW
FROM
DIRTBAG 55 FROM PUMP
OR EQUAL
OPENING TO ACCOMMODATE
UP TO 4" DISCHARGE HOSE
CEEEE)7� 97
SEDIMENT DIKE
AGGREGATE UNDERLAYMENT
(3" THICK NCDOT NO. 57 STONE)
DEWATERING BAG NOTES:
1. THE DEWATERING BAG SHALL BE MADE OF NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE WITH
A MIN. SURFACE AREA OF 225 SQUARE FEET.
2. ALL STRUCTURAL SEAMS SHALL BE SEWN WITH A DOUBLE STITCH USING
A DOUBLE NEEDLE MACHINE WITH HIGH STRENGTH THREAD.
3. THE SEAM STRENGTH SHALL WITHSTAND 100 LB/IN USING ASTM D-4884
TEST METHOD.
4. THE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE A 10 OZ NON -WOVEN FABRIC.
5. DISCHARGE FROM THE DEWATERING BAG SHALL BE DIRECTED SUCH THAT
PRE -DISTURBANCE HYDROLOGY IS NOT CHANGED.
DEWATERING BAG
ACCEPTED DEWATERING DEVICE (SILT BAG) PROVIDE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM SILT BAG TO STREAM
DISCHARGE HOSES
DEWATERING PUMP
FLOW / --INTAKE HOSE
CLEAN WATER
DIKE
WORK AREA
LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED
THAT WHICH CAN BE
COMPLETED IN ONE DAY
PT,AN VTF,W
STREAM
DIVERSION PUMPS
INTAKE HOSE
FLOW
PRSUMP-HOLE OR POOL
(12"TO 18" DEEP, 2'
DIA.)
NOTES:
1. SANDBAG DIKES SHALL BE SITUATED AT THE UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF THE
WORK AREA AND STREAM FLOW SHALL BE PUMPED AROUND THE WORK AREA. THE PUMP
SHOULD DISCHARGE INTO A STABLE VELOCITY DISSIPATER CONSTRUCTED OF RIP RAP OR
SANDBAGS.
2. WATER FROM THE WORK AREA SHALL BE PUMPED TO A SEDIMENT FILTERING MEASURE
SUCH AS A DEWATERING BASIN, SEDIMENT BAG, OR OTHER ACCEPTED DEVICE. THE
MEASURE SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THE WATER DRAINS BACK INTO THE CHANNEL
BELOW THE DOWNSTREAM SANDBAG DIKE WITHOUT CAUSING OUTLET EROSION BETWEEN
THE SILT BAG AND CHANNEL.
3. AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, THE DISTURBED CHANNEL SHALL BE MATTED.
4. WHEN REPLACING CULVERTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE SAND BAGS ACROSS THE
ENTIRE DOWNSTREAM FACE OF EACH PIPE TO PREVENT BACKFLOW DURING PUMP AROUND
ACTIVITIES.
PUMP AROUND DETAIL

STEEL POST
WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
0
N 5" FILL SLOPE
MIN
GRADE
_II I jllllllllllll�i. r.
$��I
MIN =11 _IIB'
o -
N
II III MIN SILT FENCE GEOTEXTILE
I I
I-
FABRIC
MAINTENANCE:
I
CLEAN OUT AT 50% CAPACITY
LIFE
OF FENCING: 6-9 MONTHS
SIDE VIEW
X MAXVARIABLE
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
PLASTIC OR
WIRE TIES
IIII.
■ ■ ■ ■ MEN
MIN. 10 GA.
W-01111
MIN. 12-112 GA.
LINE WIRES
INTERMEDIATE
WIRES
Iry N"I'll
IFPWI
GRADE
'
-11
I
1111-,
a
y
1FRONT
VIEW
m
ll
o
z
o
M
NOTES:
ED
1. FLOW SHALL NOT RUN PARALLEL WITH THE FENCE.
N
m
2. END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL.
Ou
t"
3. SEE NC DEQ SEDIMENT DESIGN MANUAL FOR CONSTRUCTION
Q
m
OITI
SPECIFICATIONS, WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES AND PLANNING
Z
+I
CONSIDERATIONS.
m
a
4. SILT FENCE SHOULD NOT BE USED ALONE BELOW GRADED
SLOPES GREATER THAN 10' IN HEIGHT.
a
m
■
■
■
■
■
■IIII
IIII
I
IIII
II

VAR.
STREAM
PLAN VIEW
NATURAL
GROUND
#5 OR #57 STONE, 6" DEPTH (MIN.)
CROSS PIPE(S) (SEE NOTE)
SECTION A -A
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES
NATURAL
GROUND
PIPE(S) FOR TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PASS THE PEAK OR
BANKFU L FLOW, WHICHEVER IS LESS, FROM A 2-YEAR PEAK STORM, WITHOUT OVER TOPPING.

Q
a
O
Of
0
z
H
U)
x
w
50' MIN
AND SUFFICIENT TO KEEP
0
SEDIMENT ON SITE
00
0
00000 00 0 00 0 0 000 0 00000 0 0
00000 000000o 0000o0o0�boo0o 0o g000 0
0 op00 0 0 000000000 00 0 0000 00 00
0 000 00 000 0 0 00 00
0,)00000 00 o000
0 000 o 0 00
0000000 3" 4" STONE TO BE USED o0
00 0 o0
00000000 0 0 (SURGE STONE OR 0 0
0000000o RAILROAD BALAST) 0 0 0
0 0000000 o 000p0
0000000 00000 0000 0000
00000000o 00% 0000 o o o 0000 00 o 00 000
�0 0000 00 o 000000000000 0o000 000
00
PLAN
SILT FENCE (SEE NOTE 1)
EXISTING ROADWAY
6" MIN
25' OR FULL WIDTH
OF PROPOSED STREET
OR ENTRANCE,
WHICHEVER IS
GREATER.
NOTES:
1. SILT FENCE SHOULD BE INSTALLED TO ENSURE
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IS USED.
2. IF MUD IS NOT REMOVED FROM THE VEHICLE TRAVELING
OVER THE STONE, THEN THE TIRES OF THE
VEHICLE MUST BE WASHED BEFORE ENTERING THE
PUBLIC ROAD OR THE LENGTH OF THE CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE EXTENDED.
NEW CONSTRUCTION
�5' RAIN ►�� 1.ri' MIN
CROSS SECTION
12" MIN.
MAINTENANCE:
ADD ADDITIONAL STONE AND "FLUFF" TOP
DRESSING WITH 2" STONE.
SEE N.C. DEQ EROSION and SEDIMENT
CONTROL PLANNING and DESIGN MANUAL
FOR CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES;
PLANNING CONSIDERATION & DESIGN CRITERIA.

EXISTING GROUND
TIE TO GRACE
5 T MIN
NOTES:
1. RIP RAP AND GEOTEXTILE ALONE SHOULD NOT BE USED ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 2H:1V.
2. ON SLOPES BETWEEN 2H:1 V
AND 1.5H:1 V RIP RAP MAY BE BEDED IN 6" OF #57 STONE. CONSULT ENGINEER PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION.
3. THICKNESS OF RIP RAP (T)
SHOULD BE NO LESS THAN 1.5 X D50 (APPROXIMATELY 21" FOR
CLASS II).
4. DEPTH OF THE TOE SHOULD
BE APPROXIMATELY 1.5 X THICKNESS (APPROXIMATELY 30" FOR
CLASS II).
5. RIP RAP SLOPE PROTECTION
IS MODIFIED FROM VDH&T AND NCDENR LAND QUALITY SECTION
EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL DESIGN MANUAL.
STREAM BANK STABILIZATION

APPROXIMATE
BASE FLOW
WATER SURFACE
TOE OF BANK
CROSS SECTION
PROPOSED TOP
OF BANK
EXISTING TOP
- OF BANK
TOP OF BANK MATTING ANCHOR
(SEE DETAIL, SHEET 2)
BACK FILL
(SEE NOTE 5)
EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
TYPICAL (SEE NOTE 4)
\/ COARSE BACKFILL
(SEE NOTE 2)
STREAM BANK TOE PROTECTION,
NCDOT CLASS B RIPRAP TOE
PROTECTION
0
TOE OF BANK
STREAM BANK TOE PROTECTION,
NCDOT CLASS B RIPRAP
TOE PROTECTION
GEO SOIL LIFTS
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
MATTING STAKE
DEAD STOUT STAKE,
TYPICAL (SEE DETAIL,
SHEET 2)
0
C3
0
o
0 CT
0 0
O
1:3
0
o
O
0
o O
O
0
\\
0
1:3
0
EZI
0 0
0
m
0
0
0
1:3 0
0
m
0
r3l
I
I
0
I 0
0
I 0
PLAN VIEW
(SEE NOTE 6)
X10
TOP OF ANCHOR
(SEE DETAIL, SHEET
"Xl
EXISTING TOP OF BANK
NOT TO SCALEI
NOT TO SCALE

APPROXIMATE BASE
FLOW WATER SURFACE
0
Xg
� BACKFILL (SEE NOTE 5)
STREAM BANK TOE PROTECTION,
NCDOT CLASS B RIPRAP TOE
PROTECTION
EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
TYPICAL (SEE NOTE 4)
MATTING WRAPPED LIFT DETAIL
4"
UNTREATED
2" X 4" (NOMINAL)
BOARD
X15
0» - 1 /2"
DEAD STOUT STAKE DETAIL
GEO SOIL LIFTS
NOT TO SCALE
PHOTO: VEGETATED GEOGRID UNDER CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING TOP
OF BANK
EROSION CONTROL
X11 1 1 MATTING
X14
BACKFILL
(SEE NOTE 5)
DEAD STOUT STAKE /\ TRENCH BACKFILL
(SEE DETAIL, THIS SHEET) \\ �. (SEE NOTE 4)
TOP OF BANK FABRIC
ANCHOR DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE

DIMENSIONS (VALUES TO BE PROVIDED BY DESIGNER)
VARIABLE
VALUES
TYPICAL
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
X1
2' MIN
FT.
GEO SOIL LIFTS PLACEMENT FROM TOP OF BANK
X2
6
FT.
GEO SOIL LIFTS HEIGHT
X3
2
FT.
TOE PROTECTION HEIGHT
X4
18
IN..
GEO SOIL LIFTS RELATIONSHIP TO APPROXIMATE BASE FLOW WATER
LEVEL
X5
2
FT.
FIRST SOIL LIFT FACE HEIGHT
X6
2
FT.
SOIL LIFT FACE HEIGHT
X7
6
FT.
BASE WIDTH OF STREAM BANKISLOPE REPAIR
X8
4
FT.
TOP WIDTH OF STREAM BANK/SLOPE REPAIR
X9
4' MIN.
FT.
WIDTH OF LIFTS
X10
6
IN..
DEAD STOUT STAKE SPACING - TOP OF ANCHOR
X11
6
IN.
MATTING STAKE SPACING
X12
18
IN.
TOP OF BANK ANCHOR TRENCH SETBACK FROM TOP OF BANK
X13
6
IN..
TOP OF BANK ANCHOR TRENCH WIDTH
X14
4
IN.
TOP OF BANK ANCHOR TRENCH DEPTH
X15
6
IN.
DEAD STOUT STAKE LENGTH
X16
0.5
NONE
BANK SLOPE (HORIZONTAL COMPONENT)
X17
8' MIN.
FT.
BANK HEIGHT
X18
1
FT.
GEO SOIL LIFT SET BACK
GEO SOIL LIFTS
NOTES:
1. GEO SOIL LIFTS SHALL CONSIST OF PLANTINGS PLACED ON SOIL LIFTS WRAPPED WITH
EROSION CONTROL MATTING.
2. GEO SOIL LIFTS MAY BE INSTALLED OVER A STREAM BANK TOE PROTECTION MEASURE
(E.G. -BOULDER OR RIP RAP TOE PROTECTION, ROOT WADS; ETC.).
3. THE LIVE CUTTINGS USED IN THE GEO SOIL LIFTS SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE
DESIGNER (SPECIES, LENGTH, DIAMETER) AND SHOWN IN THIS DETAIL IN A TABLE OR
ELSEWHERE IN THE PLANS (E.G. -A PLANTING PLAN) AND REFERENCED HEREIN.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT LIVE CUTTINGS INCLUDING HARVESTING AND HANDLING
INFORMATION SHALL BE DETAILED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS.
4. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL BE OF A TYPE SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER. IT
SHALL BE USED TO WRAP THE SOIL LIFTS AND ALSO BE PLACED FLAT AND STAKED
AGAINST ALL OTHER PREPARED (GRADED, TILLED, SMOOTHED; ETC.) AND SEEDED AND
MULCHED SLOPES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EROSION CONTROL MATTING,
SLOPE PREPARATION, AND SEEDING/MULCHING SHALL BE ADDED TO THE GEO SOIL LIFTS
DETAIL OR DETAILED SEPARATELY AND REFERENCED HEREIN.
5. THE SOIL PLACED BELOW, WITHIN, AND ABOVE THE LIFTS SHALL BE AMENDED AS
SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER. ALSO THE DESIGNER SHALL SPECIFY MAXIMUM LIFT
HEIGHT AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. INSTALLATION OF GEO SOIL LIFTS SHALL
PROGRESS GENERALLY AS FOLLOWS:
A. TOE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER.
B. PLACE LAYER OF EROSION CONTROL MATTING OVER TOE PROTECTION. MATTING
SHALL EXTEND OVER THE TOE PROTECTION TO THE FACE OF THE EXISTING SLOPE.
A SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF MATTING SHOULD REMAIN TO WRAP THE FACE OF THE
SOIL LIFT AND EXTEND BACK ON TOP OF THE LIFT A MINIMUM DISTANCE SPECIFIED
BY THE DESIGNER.
C. PLACE FIRST LIFT OF SOIL OVER THE MATTING. THIS LIFT SHALL BE THE SPECIFIED
LIFT HEIGHT AT THE 'BACK -OF THE LIFT (WHERE IT MEETS THE EXISTING SLOPE
FACE). THE LIFT SHALL SLOPE UPWARD TOWARD THE PROPOSED SLOPE FACE TO
ACHIEVE THE SPECIFIED SLOPE OF THE PROPOSED STREAM BANK FACE.
D. COMPACT SOIL LIFTS AS SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER.
E. WRAP COMPACTED SOIL LIFT WITH THE REMAINING EROSION CONTROL MATTING.
F. CONSTRUCT REMAINING LIFTS IN SIMILAR FASHION AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT(S).
G. THE FACE OF THE COMPLETED GEO SOIL LIFTS SHALL MATCH THE PROPOSED BANK
SLOPE.
6. THE PLAN VIEW ILLUSTRATES A PERPENDICULAR PERSPECTIVE OF EACH SURFACE
DEPICTED IN THE CROSS SECTION. THERE IS NO FORESHORTENING OF THE STREAM
BANK (OR ANY OTHER SLOPED SURFACE) IN THE PLAN VIEW.
NOT TO SCALEI
NOT TO SCALE

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND
MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, SPECIFICALLY
THE SEDIMENT POLLUTION CONTROL ACT OF 1973, AS AMENDED, AND THE LOCAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL ORDINANCES.
THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE OF EVENTS AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROJECT AND SHALL APPLY TO ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN
PROJECT LIMITS:
1. INSTALL SILT FENCE, CHECK DAMS, AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AS DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS AND IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE EROSION CONTROL REVIEW AND INSPECTION WILL BE ADDRESSED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES (NCDENR) LAND QUALITY SECTION, NOT THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
3. AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED BY FENCING, FLAGS, SIGNS, ETC.
4. UPON ACCEPTANCE OF ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, COMMENCE EXCAVATION AND/OR
GRADING ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESTRICTED TO A 25 FOOT WIDE AREA FOR EXCAVATION,
EQUIPMENT STAGING ACTIVITIES AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILING OF EXCAVATED SOIL ALONG THE LENGTH OF
PIPELINES 4-INCH THROUGH 8-INCH AND 30-FOOT WIDE ALONG THE LENGTH OF PIPELINES 12-INCH
THROUGH 20-INCH. TEMPORARILY STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UPSLOPE OF THE EXCAVATION.
FOR ANY DEMOLITION OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DESIRED PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, INTERIM MEASURES ACCEPTABLE TO AND PRE -APPROVED BY ENGINEER,
AND NCDENR DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL LAND RESOURCES, LAND QUALITY SECTION MUST BE PROVIDED.
LIMIT CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE TRENCH TO THE AMOUNT OF PIPE THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED IN
ONE DAY. LIMIT TRENCH EXCAVATION TO THE AMOUNT OF PIPE THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED AND
BACKFILLED IN ONE DAY, OR 50 LINEAL FEET, WHICHEVER IS LESS. EXCAVATED TRENCH MATERIAL MUST BE
STOCKPILED UPSLOPE OF THE TRENCH. OPEN TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND STABILIZED AT THE
CESSATION OF EACH WORK DAY. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES MUST RECEIVE TEMPORARY STABILIZATION AT
THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. PROVIDE PUMP FILTER BAGS OR OTHER APPROVED DEWATERING DEVICES
FOR DEWATERING OF TRENCH EXCAVATION AS NEEDED. SOIL SUPPLEMENTS, SEED AND MULCH, IF
APPLICABLE, SHOULD BE APPLIED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER THE PIPELINE/UTILITY LINE IS CONSTRUCTED.
ANY TEMPORARY ACCESS CONSTRUCTED FOR PIPELINE WORK MUST BE STABILIZED WITH A NON -GRADE
AGGREGATE.
6. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TEMPORARY PROTECTION AND PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF
ALL SOIL STOCKPILES ON SITE AS WELL AS SOIL INTENTIONALLY TRANSPORTED FROM THE PROJECT SITE.
INSPECT ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ONCE PER SEVEN DAYS, AND IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING ANY RAINFALL OF 0.5" OR MORE IN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATIONS ALONG
SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED. THE PROJECT
SUPERINTENDENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES.
7. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL WILL BE CHECKED REGULARLY FOR UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION AND
BUILDUP OR CLOGGING WITH SEDIMENT. CORRECTIVE ACTION WILL BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY.
8. ANY AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE FURTHER GRADED WITHIN A 14-DAY PERIOD, OR WHICH HAVE NOT
BEEN GRADED WITHIN 14 DAYS SHALL BE SEEDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
SITE DESCRIPTON
STABILIZATION TIME
TIMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES,
7 DAYS
NONE
DITCHES, AND SLOPES
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HQW)
7 DAYS
NONE
ZONES
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
7 DAYS
LENGTH AND ARE NOT STEEPER
THAN 2:1, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED
SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN
50' IN LENGTH
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES
14 DAYS
NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND
FLATTER THAN 4:1
ZONES
F)l E&SC Notes

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTINUED:
9. PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DISTURBED AREAS BY SEEDING AND MULCHING PER THE
STANDARD DETAILS.
10. ALL SEEDED AREAS WILL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO ENSURE THAT A GOOD STAND OF GRASS IS
MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. UPON FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF
COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF THE SITE BY THE ENGINEER AND NCDENR, REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REMOVED. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
MEASURES TO BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL SITE STABILIZATION OR AFTER MEASURES ARE NO
LONGER NEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE LOCAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR.
11. UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT, THE SELF-INSPECTION/SELF-MONITORING FORMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO
THE ENGINEER FOR CONVEYANCE TO THE OWNER FOR REGULATORY RECORD MAINTENANCE TIME PERIOD.
12. WHERE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTES INTERSECT WITH PAVED PUBLIC ROADS, PROVISIONS SHALL
BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT ONTO THE PAVED SURFACE. WHERE SEDIMENT IS
TRANSPORTED ONTO A PUBLIC ROAD SURFACE, THE ROAD SHALL BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AT THE END
OF EACH DAY. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ROADS BY SHOVELING OR SWEEPING, AND
TRANSPORTED TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL DISPOSAL AREA (STREET WASHING SHALL BE ALLOWED ONLY AFTER
SEDIMENT IS REMOVED IN THIS MANNER).
13. SITES UTILIZED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PURPOSE OF STORING EQUIPMENT, EXCESS EXCAVATED
MATERIALS, STRIPPED TOPSOIL, ETC, SHALL BE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE FOR SUCH PURPOSES AND
SHALL BE APPROVED IN ADVANCE BY THE OWNER. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUITABLE SITES SHALL BE LEVEL,
DEVOID OF MATURE STANDS OF TREES, AND ISOLATED FROM DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND FEATURES, WETLANDS
STREAMS, AND STREAM CORRIDORS. SITES SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF CARY.
14. THE CLEANUP AND DISPOSAL OF EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIALS SHALL BE DONE AS SOON AS PRACTICAL
AND AS THE OWNER MAY DIRECT.
15. CHECK DAMS, SILT FENCE, OR OTHER FILTERING DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT AREAS OF STOCKPILED
MATERIALS, EXCAVATED AREAS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STORM WATER INLET STRUCTURES IN
CONSTRUCTION AREAS TO CONTROL SILT RUNOFF.
16. ALL DEWATERING FLOWS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SILT, SEDIMENT, DEBRIS, AND OTHER POLLUTANTS
THROUGH APPROPRIATE MEANS (SETTLING BASINS, FILTER, ETC.). FOLLOWING THIS, THE FLOWS SHALL ONLY
BE RELEASED DIRECTLY INTO STORM SEWERS, STREAM CHANNELS, TO OTHER STABILIZED DRAINAGE
COURSES AND NOT INTO EXPOSED SOILS, STEEP SLOPES, OR ANY OTHER SITE WHERE FLOWS COULD
CAUSE FURTHER DAMAGE.
17. CUT AND FILL SLOPES ARE TO BE VERTICALLY TRACKED, HORIZONTALLY SCARIFIED, MATTED, OR OTHERWISE
CONSTRUCTED TO ENHANCE VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND EXPEDITE STABILIZATION. SEEDING SHALL BE
INSTALLED AS PORTIONS OF THESE SLOPES ARE COMPLETED.
18. THE EXISTING EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SUCH AS ROCK CHECK DAMS AND RIP RAP ALONG THE NEW
RECLAIMED WATERLINE ROUTE MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED TO FACILITATE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW
RECLAIMED WATERLINE AS SHOWN.
19. IF AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF THE CONTRACT BOND ANY PART OF THE SEEDED AREA IS NOT
IN GOOD CONDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FERTILIZE AND RESEED AS OFTEN AS NECESSARY TO GET A
GOOD STAND OF GRASS.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CROSS ANY DITCH WHEN FLOWING WATER IS PRESENT OR DURING WET WEATHER
UNLESS A PUMP AROUND SYSTEM IS PROVIDED DURING INSTALLATION OF PIPELINE (SEE DETAIL).
PRIOR TO CROSSING A DITCH, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP OR CHECK
DAM EXISTS DOWNSTREAM OF CROSSING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PIPELINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER
BACKFILLING OF PIPELINE, DITCH SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL GRADE AND STABILIZED. USE EXCELSIOR
MATTING OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE DITCH. INSPECT DITCHES IMMEDIATELY AFTER WET
WEATHER EVENT FOR STABILIZATION.
21. WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION CAUSES LAND DISTURBANCE OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF A DITCH, THE
CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL EXCELSIOR MATTING OR RIP RAP AS NECESSARY TO STABILIZE THE DITCH.
22. ALL OPEN CUT CROSSINGS OF DITCHES SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ONE WORK DAY.
23. ALL CHECK DAMS SHOULD APPROPRIATELY FILL THE DITCH THEY ARE PLACED IN, SO THAT DRAINAGE IS
FORCED THROUGH THE STRUCTURE. THE ENGINEER WILL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR IN WRITING IF ANY
CHECK DAM IS INSUFFICIENTLY SIZED BASED ON THE ENGINEER'S JUDGEMENT. CONTRACTOR WILL REMEDY
THE PROBLEM WITHIN 3 DAYS.
01 E&SC Notes

SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES CONTINUED:
24. GROUND STABILIZATION SHALL BE ACHIEVED CONSISTENT WITH NC DENR GENERAL PERMIT NCGO10000 EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL
1, 2019. WHERE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE
LAST LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY EXCEPT FOR ALL PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES, PERIMETER SLOPES, AND ALL SLOPES
STEEPER THAN 3:1 (H:V), WHICH SHALL BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITH GROUND COVER
WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
25.IF EXCAVATED SOIL IS PLACED ON ANY ROADWAY PAVEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE SAND OR SCREENING FINES ALONG PAVEMENT SURFACE FOR SUFFICIENT REMOVAL OF SEDIMENT.
26.IN THE EVENT THAT SEEDING IS PERFORMED AFTER EXCELSIOR MATTING IS PLACED AS A STABILIZING
FEATURE, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE MATTING WHEN APPLYING GRASS SEED AND FERTILIZER.
CONTRACTOR MUST REPLACE THE MATTING AT THE END OF EACH DAY TO STABILIZE THE SOILS.
27. SPOIL OR DEBRIS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN 50' OF STORM DRAINS OR STREAMS.
28. PROVIDE PORTABLE SELF-CONTAINED CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT SYSTEM. ALL CONCRETE TRUCKS WILL
UTILIZE PORTABLE WASHOUT SYSTEM FOR CLEAN OUT. NO CONCRETE TRUCK WASHOUT WILL BE ALLOWED
TO REACH GROUND, AND NO CONCRETE WASHOUT DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED ON GROUND.
29. REMOVE DEMOLITION DEBRIS FROM SITE ON A DAILY BASIS AND DISPOSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS.
30. HYDROSEEDING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT. CRIMPING STRAW MULCH SHALL NOT BE
ALLOWED ON THIS PROJECT.
31. SEED SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AND LIGHTLY CULTIVATED PRIOR TO MULCH AND TACKIFER
OPERATIONS.
32. MULCH AND TACKIFIER OPERATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF SEEDING.
33. CONTRACTOR STAGING, TEMPORARY STORAGE, LAY DOWN AREAS, AND DIRT PILES SHALL BE WITHIN LIMITS
OF DISTURBANCE.
34.OBTAIN AND PAY FOR EROSION CONTROL PERMITS FOR OFF -SITE STORAGE YARD, BORROW AREA, AND
DISPOSAL AREAS AS REQUIRED. INSTALL AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPROVED PLAN.
35. A LAYER OF SAND, FINES, OR SCREENINGS SHALL BE PLACED ON PAVED SURFACES BEFORE DEPOSITION
OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL. AFTER REMOVAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM PAVED SURFACES, A MECHANICAL
SWEEPER SHALL BE USED TO REMOVE ALL MATERIAL FROM PAVED SURFACES. PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE
SWEPT ON A DAILY BASIS WITH MATERIAL PLACED ON NON -PAVED SURFACES WITHIN LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
36. ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 5:1, DITCHES, PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILL
AND GRADING.
37. NOTIFICATION OF LAND RESOURCES SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL SELF -INSPECTION PROGRAM:
THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT WAS AMENDED IN 2006 TO REQUIRE THAT PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT
TO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING FOLLOWED.
RULES DETAILING THE DOCUMENTATION OF THESE INSPECTIONS TOOK EFFECT OCTOBER 1, 2010. THE
INSPECTIONS MUST BE CONDUCTED AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECT, AND CONTINUED UNTIL
PERMANENT GROUND COVER IS ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCGS 113A-54.1 AND 15A NCAC
4B.0131. TO SIMPLIFY DOCUMENTATION OF SELF -INSPECTION REPORTS AND NPDES SELF -MONITORING
REPORTS, A COMBINED FORM IS NOW AVAILABLE. THE NEW FORM WAS DEVELOPED TO SATISFY
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AND THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCG010000. BEGINNING AUGUST 1, 2013, THE DIVISION OF ENERGY, MINERAL,
AND LAND RESOURCES IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING BOTH THE SPCA AND THE NPDES STORMWATER
PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, NCG 010000. THE COMBINED FORM SHOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO
COMPLY WITH SELF -INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. THE COMBINED SELF -MONITORING FORM IS AVAILABLE AS A
PDF AND WORD DOCUMENT FROM THE LAND QUALITY WEB SITE,
HTTP://PORTAL.NCDENR.ORG/WEB/LR/EROSION. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR CANNOT ACCESS THE FORM,
PLEASE CONTACT THE LAND QUALITY SECTION OF THE RALEIGH DENR OFFICE AT [phone].
F)l E&SC Notes

rJ
HERBACEOUS PLANTS -Seeding recommendations for primary stabilization
Successfull development depends on planting date (effectiveness goal: 6 mo. - 3 yrs. without an ongoing maintenance program) Table 6.11.c (con't)
NATIVE SPECIES
Optimal Planting Dates
Common Name
Botanical Name /
Cultivar
Native /
Introduced
See Table
6.11.d for
variety
seedling rates
Fertilization/
limestone
Ibs/acre
Mountains
Piedmont
Coastal Sun/Shade
Plains tolerant
Wetlands
Riparian
Buffers
Invasive
Yes or
No
Installation / Maintenance
Considerations
Other information,
commentary
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans/
N
B
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 411
12/1-4/1 Sun
NR
I Well
No
IlResponds well to controlled
Western coastal plain only
Cheyenne
drained
burns. Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
varieties that have similar soil
drainage ada tations.
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans /
N
B
By soil test
NR
12/1 - 5/1
1/1 -5/1 Sun
NR
Well
No
Responds well to
Only Indiangrass adaptable to
Lomenta
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
Eastern coastal plain Zone 8
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
draina a ada tations.
Deerton ue
Dichanthelium
N
C
By soil test
5/14/15
511 - 4/1
NR Sun &
Yes
Poorly
No
Responds well to
clandestinum /Tio a
Shade
drained to
controlled bums. Mix with
drought
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Big Bluestem
Andropogon gerardii/
N
D
By soil test
12/14/15
12/1 - 4/1
NR Sun
NR
Welll
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
Rountree
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage ada tations.
Big Bluestem
Androo on gerardfi/
N
D
By soil test
12/14/15
12/1 - 4/1
NR Sun
NR
Welll
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
Kaw
drained
controlled bums. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Big Bluestem
Androo on qerardfiI
N
D
By soil test
12/14/15
12/1-4/1
12/1-5/1 Sun
NR
Weill
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
Earl
drained
controlled bums. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
draina a adaptations.
Little Bluestem
Schizach num
N
E
By soil test
12/1-4/15
NR
NR Sun
NR
Welll
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
scoparium /Aldous
drained
controlled bums. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.
Little Bluestem
Schizach rium
N
E
By soil test
12/14/15
12/1 - 4/1
NR Sun
NR
Weill
No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
sco adum/Cimmaron
drained
controlled bums. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage adaptations.

HERBACEOUS PLANTS -Seeding recommendations for primary stabilization
Successfull development depends on planting date (effectiveness goal: 6 mo. - 3 yrs. without an ongoing maintenance program) Table 6.11.c (con't)
NATIVE SPECIES
Optimal Planting Dates
Common Name
Botanical Name /
Cultivar
Native /
Introduced
See Table
6.11.d for
variety
seedling rates
Fertilization/
limestone
Ibs/acre
Mountains
Piedmont
Coastal Sun/Shade
Plains tolerant
Wetlands
Riparian
Buffers
Invasive
Yes or
No
Installation / Maintenance
Considerations
Other information,
commentary
Little Bluestem
Schizach rium
N
E
By soil test
NR
NR
12/1-4/1 Sun
NR
Well
I No
Responds well to
Warm season grass
scoparium/Common
drained
controlled burns. Mix with
3 to 5 other seed varieties
that have similar soil
drainage ado tations.
Sweet Woodreed
Cinna arundinacea
N
F
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
12/1-4/1 Sun &
Yes
Poorly to
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Warm season grass
mod. Shade
well draine
Ivarieties that have similar
soil draina a adaptations
Rice Cutgrass
Leersia oryzoides
N
G
By soil test
12/1-4/15
12/1 - 4/1
12/1-411 Sun
Yes
Poorly
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Warm season grass
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Indian Woodoats
Chasmar ium latifolium
N
H
By soil test
3/1 -5/15
2/15 - 4/1
2/15-3120 Sun &
NR
Well
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Cool season grass
7/15-8/15
3115 - 10/1
9/1 - 11/1 mod. Shade
drained
Ivarieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Virginia Wild Rye
Elymus virginicus,
N
I
By soil test
3/1 -5/15
2/15 - 4/1
2/15-3120 Sun &
NR
Well
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Cool season grass
7/15-8/15
3115 - 10/1
9/1 - 11/1 mod. Shade
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Eastern Bottlebrush
Elymus hystrix
N
J
By soil test
3/1 -5/15
2/15 - 4/1
1 NR Sun &
NR
Well
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
Cool season grass
Grass
7/15-8/15
P115 - 10/15 mod. Shade
drained
Ivarieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Soft Rush
Juncus effusus
N
K
By soil test
12/1 - 5/15
12/1 - 5/1
12/1-4115 Sun
Yes
Poorly
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15
911 - 11/1
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Shallow Sedge
Carex lunda
N
L
By soil test
12/1 - 5/15
12/1 - 5/1
12/1-4115 Sun
Yes
Poorly
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15
911 - 11/1
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
Fox Sedge
Carex vul inoidea
N
L
By soil test
12/1 - 5/15
12/1 - 5/1
12/1-4115 Sun
Yes
Poorly
No
Mix with 3 to 5 other seed
8/15-10/15
9/1 - 11/1
drained
varieties that have similar
soil drainage adaptations
NOTE:
1. Seeding rates are for hulled seed unless otherwise noted.
2. Fertilizer & Limestone - rates to be applied in absense of soils tests. Recommended application rate assumes significantly disturbed site soils with little or no residual value.
3. NR means Species not recommended for this region or application area.
4. Native, warm season grasses require six or more months to germinate under optimum conditions. If they are planted in the summer, then a whole year will have to pass before they germinate.
5. Invasive designation as determined by the N.C. Exotic Pest Pant Council and N.C. Native Plant Society .
6. Sprigging is not recommended for immediate stabilization unless terrain is flat, heavymulch is applied and no other immediate stabilization method is practical.
0
7. Sodding for immediate stabilization - see primary stabilization charts (other information column) and Section 6.12.
00 8. Long term stabilization can only be accomplished with an adequate, immediate, and primary stabilization program. To achieve long term protective cover with the species listed in
this chart, the approved plan, construction sequence and maintenance schedule must include sufficient detail to assure vegetation will be established and maintained. To assure the
long term protective cover will be established, the reviewing and approving governing body may require a performance/maintenance bond.
0

Practice Standards and Specifications
Table 6.11.d
Seed Mixes for Native Species (Ibs/ac)
When Mixed with 3, 4, or 5 Other Native Species
(See Table 6.11.a for nurse crop species to be added to these mixes)
3 Other
(total 4 species)
4 Other
(total 5 species)
5 Other
(total 6 species)
Switch Grasses (A)
3.5 lbs.
3.0 lbs.
2.5 lbs.
Indian Grasses (B)
7.0 lbs.
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
Deertongue (C)
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
4.0 lbs.
Big Bluestem (D)
7.0 lbs.
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
Little Bluestem (E)
7.0 lbs.
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
Sweet Woodreed (F)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Rice Cutgrass (G)
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
4.0 lbs.
Indian Woodoats (H)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Virginia Wild Rye (1)
6.0 lbs.
5.0 lbs.
4.0 lbs.
Eastern Bottlebrush Grass (J)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Soft Rush (K)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
Sedges (L)
2.5 lbs.
2.0 lbs.
1.5 lbs.
NOTE:
With the native varieties, the seed mix should be in the range of 15 pounds per acre.
Depending on availability of native seeds adaptable to North Carolina, the percentage
of a particular variety used may be reduced or increased accordingly. Although
diversity is desirable, it is imperative that the primary crop develop and become an
effective protective cover. In addition to the native species mix, additional nurse crop
species must be included to provide immediate stabilization and an adequate ground cover.
Rev. 5/08 6.11.19

9/14/23, 2:10 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species VW4
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
3 1
i
Xo-
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
0 [phone]
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 1/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
MAILING ADDRESS
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, INC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, INC 27606-1487
�O�
0011\
\00
0
�G
FO
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 2/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under theirjurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 3/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAM E STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/10515
Birds
NAME STATUS
100
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangere
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/7614
Amphibians -0
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found i '* %—
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 4/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Insects
NAME
Threatened
Endangered
STATUS V("
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. 0011\
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
\ \00 V14*1
0
Flowering Plants 105
NAME Aoft STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/5217
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on
all above listed species.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 5/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald &Golden Eagles
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
bald or golden eagles, or their habitats, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Managment https://www.fws.gQv//program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
MUL
)Ne
There are bald and/or golden eagles in your project area.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list,click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAM E U
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Probability of Presence Summary
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 6/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score. rw 0
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ()
* nN.011—
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 7/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Non -BCC
C too$ 0+01000010111' +0*+ 11 I I ++*0
Vulnerable
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified
location?
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). The
AKIN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in
that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply). To see a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs of bald and golden eagles in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN),. The AKIN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Please contact your local Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office if
you have questions.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 8/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gQv//program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be
present and breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
Breeds May 15 to Oct 10
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 9/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska. w
\)
00
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and
understand the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before
using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 10/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score. rw 0
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ()
* nN.011—
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 11/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle I I I'$ J+01 I$$$ ICI I I' +$T+ III I 11 1 1 ��TT III T11� 1
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Black -billed ++++ TTTT TTTT TTTT
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Chimney Swift +++ TTTT
BCC Rangewide TTTT �111 111� Toll 1111 I I+ I 114 ++++
(CON)
Eastern Whip- __ _ I l l I yy1 y I++ I II 111�I
poor -will I _I _I I I _I__I__I- +TTT TTTT ++IIIIII 111* j + T+++ TTTT -f -�+ +++-I I-+++ TTT+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
ti
Kentucky ++++ ++++ ++++ Al FI I I I I I � � I � �► I I I I- I I I I I 11- 14 1-1I ++ +
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie Warbler + I ++ ++++ ++++ +$11 Jill Jill I + +l 4] 4 +++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary ++++ ++++ +++ I III I I I I I IIII 11 1 1 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Warbler
BCC Rangewide -
(CON)
Red-headed + I I it ++++ +4 ++ + I I t rl 1 111I11U1U 11 1111 IIII-10014 +Ih++ ++++ + I I i
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) I I 11 I ITT I I TT++ I yy
Rusty Blackbird + ++++ ++++ ++++ TT ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++T+ ++++
BCC - BCR
BWood Thrush
CC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ T41 dII IF 1"' !Ili I I � T+so ++tt ++++ ++++
(CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 12/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding, and
citizen science datasets. X N
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 13/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. 1 No
4k
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory
birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability
of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project
footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black
vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is
the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as
more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a
lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look
for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to
avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn
more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement
to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources
page.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 14/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) _G, ( )v
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to
determine the actual extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01A
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory_
website
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 15/16

9/14/23, 2:10 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the Imagery or fieldwork. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site. 00
Data exclusions'
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery. I k k
Data precautions "-
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/PDVLUINKTRH3FI35JLPHRHPAG4/resources 16/16

Roy Cooper, Governor
�00■0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
■ ■
■■u■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
Jessica Tisdale
HDR
555 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: 3806 Whispering Branch
Dear Jessica Tisdale:
September 14, 2023
Rd City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer Repair
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Micky Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-23332
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory_/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler(a)ncdcr.clov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR71MEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
fl 121 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. Nc 27699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX 919.707,9121

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
3806 Whispering Branch Rd City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer Repair
September 14, 2023
NCNHDE-23332
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that although the
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mean that
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the project
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update our
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managecl Area ame Owner
City of Raleigh Open Space City of Raleigh
Owner Type
Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/help. Data query generated on September 14, 2023; source: NCNHP, Summer (July) 2023.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
3806 Whispering Branch Rd City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer Repair
September 14, 2023
NCNHDE-23332
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name ast Element
Group Observation Occurrence
Date Rank
Amphibian 39375 Hemidactylium Four -toed Salamander 2020-03-23 E
scutatum
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre
Damselfly
Reptile 39355 Ophisaurus attenuatus Eastern Slender Glass 1987-05-19
longicaudus Lizard
Vascular Plant 1166 Solidago radula Western Rough 1967-10-18
Goldenrod
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
City of Raleigh Open Space
City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Open Space
City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Open Space
City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Open Space
City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh Open Space - Leesville Road Park
City of Raleigh
City of Raleigh/Wake County Greenway - Lake Lynn City of Raleigh and Wake County
Trail
City of Raleigh/Wake County Open Space - Lake
City of Raleigh and Wake County
Lynn Park
City of Raleigh Easement
City of Raleigh
Accuracy Federal
Status
3-Medium ---
H? 5-Very
Low
H 3-Medium
H 4-Low
Owner
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
State Global State
Status Rank Rank
Special
G5
S3
Concern
Significantly
G5
S2?
Rare
Special
G5T5
S1
Concern
Endangered
G5?
S1
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/helr). Data query generated on September 14, 2023; source: NCNHP, Summer (July) 2023.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-23332: 3806 Whispering Branch Rd City of Raleigh Sanitary Sewer Repair
5 50
Ha,,«ee Dr
0
a
a
c
In Strickland Rd 50
SaWYer �r
A
to m�
ooaO< 495ft erodes
Lake' gC
490 ft
3
fD
fD
T
a
a�a
mat
ountry TO
O
c
T�l�e
m
m
NL
� � d
N
N a
ro 3
W+E a 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles
Pik -a
S
September 14, 2023
® Managed Area (MAREA)
Q Buffered Project Boundary
Q Project Boundary
Sources: Esri, Airbus IDS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS,
NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Gecland, FEMA,
Intermap and the GIS user community
Sources: Esri. HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap
contributors; and the GIS User Community
Page 4 of 4

Rougeot, Katie
From: Rougeot, Katie
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 3:11 PM
To: 401 [e-mail]
Subject: 3408 Winslow Ridge, 7368 Berkshire Downs, 3290 Lynn Ridge, 3806 Whispering
Branch
Good Afternoon,
I am emailing you today to request a pre -filing meeting regarding the following areas where the City of Raleigh must
perform a repair on the sewer collection system, please let me know if you require any other information and we
will continue forward with our ePCN applications.
• 3408 Winslow Ridge
• 7368 Berkshire Downs
• 3290 Lynn Ridge
• 3806 Whispering Branch
Thank you,
Katie Rougeot
Water/Wastewater Designer
HDR
555 Fayetteville St
Raleigh, NC 27601
D 919.900.1604 M 860.307.1723
[e-mail]
h d ri n c. co m/fo I I ow-u s
1

DocuSign
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: CD1 E3F04A347437F8ADED6FFA5EDF5A1
Subject: Please DocuSign: COR_AgentAuthorization .pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 1 Signatures: 1
Certificate Pages: 5 Initials: 0
AutoNav: Enabled
Envelopeld Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Record Tracking
Status: Original Holder: Sarah Weisenburn
1/10/202212:12:51 PM [e-mail]
Signer Events Signature
Whit Wheeler S'g dby:[e-mail] ED
Q Wttt,t1w
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication 63607o23CE4c474...
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 1/10/2022 12:26:00 PM
ID:3e26a4f0-602c-42c7-8876-674cc93a825e
In Person Signer Events
Editor Delivery Events
Agent Delivery Events
Intermediary Delivery Events
Certified Delivery Events
Carbon Copy Events
Mary Brice
[e-mail]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 71.65.139.6
Signature
Status
Status
Status
Status
Status
COPIED
Jessica Tisdale COPIED
[e-mail]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Michael Murphy PI E �
[e-mail]
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Status: Completed
Envelope Originator:
Sarah Weisenburn
P.O. Box 590
Raleigh, NC 27602
[e-mail]
I Address: 208.81.142.10
Location: DocuSign
Timestamp
Sent: 1/10/2022 12:22:38 PM
Viewed: 1/10/2022 12:26:00 PM
Signed: 1/10/2022 12:26:09 PM
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Sent: 1/10/2022 12:26:09 PM
Sent: 1/10/2022 12:26:10 PM
Viewed: 1/10/2022 12:54:17 PM
Sent: 1/10/2022 12:26:10 PM

Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Matt Vessie� Sent: 1/10/2022 12:26:11 PM
[e-mail]
ED
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Accepted: 1 /3/2022 6:56:16 AM
ID: 233ea0a6-72d4-44cf-b1 db-50f11 e8754a2
Jack Johnson Sent: 1/10/2022 12:26:11 PM
[e-mail]
City of Raleigh Public Utilities
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Witness Events
Signature
Timestamp
Notary Events
Signature
Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events
Status
Timestamps
Envelope Sent
Hashed/Encrypted
1/10/2022 12:22:38 PM
Certified Delivered
Security Checked
1/10/2022 12:26:00 PM
Signing Complete
Security Checked
1/10/2022 12:26:09 PM
Completed
Security Checked
1/10/2022 12:26:11 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure

Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure created on: 6/27/2013 10:58:34 AM
Parties agreed to: Whit Wheeler, Matt Vessie
CONSUMER DISCLOSURE
From time to time, City of Raleigh Public Utilities (we, us or Company) may be required by law
to provide to you certain written notices or disclosures. Described below are the terms and
conditions for providing to you such notices and disclosures electronically through the
DocuSign, Inc. (DocuSign) electronic signing system. Please read the information below
carefully and thoroughly, and if you can access this information electronically to your
satisfaction and agree to these terms and conditions, please confirm your agreement by clicking
the a€ -I agreed€TM button at the bottom of this document.
Getting paper copies
At any time, you may request from us a paper copy of any record provided or made available
electronically to you by us. You will have the ability to download and print documents we send
to you through the DocuSign system during and immediately after signing session and, if you
elect to create a DocuSign signer account, you may access them for a limited period of time
(usually 30 days) after such documents are first sent to you. After such time, if you wish for us to
send you paper copies of any such documents from our office to you, you will be charged a
$0.00 per -page fee. You may request delivery of such paper copies from us by following the
procedure described below.
Withdrawing your consent
If you decide to receive notices and disclosures from us electronically, you may at any time
change your mind and tell us that thereafter you want to receive required notices and disclosures
only in paper format. How you must inform us of your decision to receive future notices and
disclosure in paper format and withdraw your consent to receive notices and disclosures
electronically is described below.
Consequences of changing your mind
If you elect to receive required notices and disclosures only in paper format, it will slow the
speed at which we can complete certain steps in transactions with you and delivering services to
you because we will need first to send the required notices or disclosures to you in paper format,
and then wait until we receive back from you your acknowledgment of your receipt of such
paper notices or disclosures. To indicate to us that you are changing your mind, you must
withdraw your consent using the DocuSign K-Withdraw Consentd€TM form on the signing page
of a DocuSign envelope instead of signing it. This will indicate to us that you have withdrawn
your consent to receive required notices and disclosures electronically from us and you will no
longer be able to use the DocuSign system to receive required notices and consents electronically
from us or to sign electronically documents from us.
All notices and disclosures will be sent to you electronically
Unless you tell us otherwise in accordance with the procedures described herein, we will provide
electronically to you through the DocuSign system all required notices, disclosures,
authorizations, acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or
made available to you during the course of our relationship with you. To reduce the chance of
you inadvertently not receiving any notice or disclosure, we prefer to provide all of the required
notices and disclosures to you by the same method and to the same address that you have given
us. Thus, you can receive all the disclosures and notices electronically or in paper format through
the paper mail delivery system. If you do not agree with this process, please let us know as
described below. Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the
consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures

electronically from us.
How to contact City of Raleigh Public Utilities:
You may contact us to let us know of your changes as to how we may contact you electronically,
to request paper copies of certain information from us, and to withdraw your prior consent to
receive notices and disclosures electronically as follows:
To contact us by email send messages to: [e-mail]
To advise City of Raleigh Public Utilities of your new e-mail address
To let us know of a change in your e-mail address where we should send notices and disclosures
electronically to you, you must send an email message to us at
[e-mail] and in the body of such request you must state: your previous
e-mail address, your new e-mail address. We do not require any other information from you to
change your email address..
In addition, you must notify DocuSign, Inc. to arrange for your new email address to be reflected
in your DocuSign account by following the process for changing e-mail in the DocuSign system.
To request paper copies from City of Raleigh Public Utilities
To request delivery from us of paper copies of the notices and disclosures previously provided
by us to you electronically, you must send us an e-mail to [e-mail]
and in the body of such request you must state your e-mail address, full name, US Postal address,
and telephone number. We will bill you for any fees at that time, if any.
To withdraw your consent with City of Raleigh Public Utilities
To inform us that you no longer want to receive future notices and disclosures in electronic
format you may:
i. decline to sign a document from within your DocuSign session, and on the subsequent
page, select the check -box indicating you wish to withdraw your consent, or you may;
ii. send us an e-mail to [e-mail] and in the body of such request
you must state your e-mail, full name, US Postal Address, and telephone number. We do
not need any other information from you to withdraw consent.. The consequences of your
withdrawing consent for online documents will be that transactions may take a longer time
to process..
Required hardware and software
Operating Systems:
WindowsA@ 2000, Windows,&@ XP, Windows
Vista,&@; Mac OSA@ X
Browsers:
Final release versions of Internet ExplorerA@
6.0 or above (Windows only); Mozilla Firefox
2.0 or above (Windows and Mac); Safaria„¢
3.0 or above (Mac only)
PDF Reader:
Acrobat,&@ or similar software may be required
to view and print PDF files
Screen Resolution:
800 x 600 minimum
Enabled Security Settings:
Allow per session cookies
** These minimum requirements are subject to change. If these requirements change, you will be
asked to re -accept the disclosure. Pre-release (e.g. beta) versions of operating systems and
browsers are not supported.

Acknowledging your access and consent to receive materials electronically
To confirm to us that you can access this information electronically, which will be similar to
other electronic notices and disclosures that we will provide to you, please verify that you were
able to read this electronic disclosure and that you also were able to print on paper or
electronically save this page for your future reference and access or that you were able to e-mail
this disclosure and consent to an address where you will be able to print on paper or save it for
your future reference and access. Further, if you consent to receiving notices and disclosures
exclusively in electronic format on the terms and conditions described above, please let us know
by clicking the WI agreed€TM button below.
By checking the WI agreed€TM box, I confirm that:
• I can access and read this Electronic CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC RECEIPT OF
ELECTRONIC CONSUMER DISCLOSURES document; and
• I can print on paper the disclosure or save or send the disclosure to a place where I can
print it, for future reference and access; and
Until or unless I notify City of Raleigh Public Utilities as described above, I consent to
receive from exclusively through electronic means all notices, disclosures, authorizations,
acknowledgements, and other documents that are required to be provided or made
available to me by City of Raleigh Public Utilities during the course of my relationship
with you.