20160847 Ver 2_2016-02451 Cloud and Banner MY4 Report_20231023

3600 Glenwood Avenue. Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612

Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400

res.us

October 21, 2023

Kim Isenhour
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587

Cloud & Banner Year 4 Monitoring Report (SAW-2016-02451)
Ms. Isenhour,
Please find attached the Cloud & Banner Year 4 Monitoring Report. In Year 4, all 20 vegetation plots met the 320 stems per acre success criteria. Six bankfull events were recorded on the stage recorder on UT4.
This marks the fourth year of bankfull events in separate years, meeting the bankfull event success criteria. The flow gauge on UT2-A measured 223 consecutive flow days, the flow gauge on UT4 measured 209
consecutive flow days, and the flow gauge on UT6-A recorded 156 consecutive flow days. Additionally, 12 of the 13 groundwater wells met the 10 percent hydroperiod success criteria.
Chinese privet and Kudzu was treated along UT6-B in December 2022. A few additional areas of Chinese privet were noted during MY4 monitoring and will be treated in the upcoming monitoring year. As of
September 2023, the log jam structures have remained anchored in place where they were resecured in June 2022. Updated photos of the repaired structures and their updated locations are in the report.
Year 3 credit release letter comments and responses:
Casey Haywood, USACE
1. I Appreciate the layout of the cross-sectional data that included the tables. It was difficult to see the channel in many of the photos. I agree with last year’s comment, that it would be helpful to
include a few supplemental winter photos to show stream features. No cross-section monitoring was completed in MY4 in accordance with the Mitigation Plan. RES
will consider this request depending on the date of cross section monitoring in MY5.
2. Please continue to monitor the log jam structures on Back Creek. To clarify, were they reinstalled in roughly the same locations? It would be helpful to include the location/stationing on the Stream Problem Areas table in comparison to their original locations.
Updated photos for the log jam structures are included in Appendix B. The log jam structure most
upstream was originally installed at station 15+11, and it was resecured at station 16+50. The
downstream log jam has remained in the general vicinity as the original proposed station of
35+46.

2

3. Overall, vegetation appears to be doing well. Noted that kudzu and privet on UT6-A will be treated
(1.76 acres). Restoration on the lower portion of UT2 was PII (below the existing wetland). Please
use a random veg transect to capture this area in MY4.
RES mistakenly conducted a random vegetation transect above the existing wetland on UT2. RES
will plan on completing a random vegetation transect below the existing wetland area in MY5
monitoring.

Erin Davis, NCDWR 1. DWR appreciates the summary information and responses to previous IRT comments included in
the cover letter. We encourage continuing this practice with other bank project monitoring report submittals.
Noted. 2. The report had a good level detail provided in the narrative, CCPV and photos. I would just ask that
repairs like the log jam also be called out on the CCPV. And regarding the log jam, please include a follow-up stabilization status photo in the MY4 report.
Updated photos included in Appendix B and locations of the log 3. Since groundwater data is being reported on before the end of the growing season, I’m glad that
the data from last fall is included on each graph to close any year-to-year data gap. Noted.
Todd Bowers, USEPA
1. Vegetation appears to be performing quite well in terms of density and diversity. I am not quite impressed with the vigor shown in the photos so I am keen on seeing the MY5 height data.
Noted. 2. Stream cross sections are about as stable as I have seen.
Noted.
3. Supplemental Planting to a small low-density area near Veg Plot 11 occurred in March 2022. Supplemental planting in March 2022 deemed successful via visual observation during MY4 monitoring.
4. No areas of encroachment noted.
No further encroachment noted in MY4.

5. Only one ground water well is displaying consistently poor wetland hydrologic performance (AW3)
for consecutive days of saturation during the growing season.
AW3 continues to show poor wetland hydrologic performance. RES believes this is a well specific
or location specific issue and will install an additional well in the area to gather more hydrologic
data.

6. Corrective actions towards log jams and invasive species is complete or soon to be completed. Actions to resecure log jams occurred in June 2022. The boulder anchor technique proved to be successful as of September 2023.

3

RES is requesting a 5% stream credit release (206.2 SMUs) and a 5% wetland credit (0.36 WMUs) for the
completion of the Year 4 report. Additionally, RES is requesting a 10% stream credit release (412.50 SMUs)
for meeting the success criteria of the stream bankfull performance standard. Please see the enclosed credit
release timeline, an updated credit ledger, and Year 4 report.

Thank you,

Heath Hidlay | Ecologist

Project Name:
Sponsor Name:
USACE Action ID:
NCDWQ Action ID:
Non-Forested
Wetland
CreditsWarm
Water
Cool
Water
Cold
Water
Riparian
Riverine
Riparian
Non-Riverine Non-Riparian Coastal
4160 8.2
4238 8.2
Scheduled
Releases
Warm
Water
Cool
Water
Cold
Water
Scheduled
Releases
Riparian
Riverine
Riparian
Non-Riverine Non-Riparian Scheduled
Releases Coastal
1 (Bank/Site Establishment)1, 2 15%, 100%Ϯ*721.40 15%, 100%Ϯ 2.08 15%n/a 11/22/2019
2 (Year 0/As-Built)3 15%**629.20 15%1.08 15%n/a 8/18/2020
3 (Year 1 Monitoring)10%412.50 10%0.72 10%12/31/2020 12/18/2020
4 (Year 2 Monitoring)10%412.50 10%0.72 15%12/31/2021 12/1/2021
5 (Year 3 Monitoring)10%412.50 15%1.08 20%12/15/2022 10/25/2022
6 (Year 4 Monitoring)5%206.20 5%0.36 10%12/15/2023
7 (Year 5 Monitoring)10%412.50 15%1.08 15%12/15/2024
8 (Year 6 Monitoring)5%206.20 5%0.36 NA NA 12/15/2025
9 (Year 7 Monitoring)10%412.50 10%0.72 NA NA 12/15/2026
Stream Bankfull Standard4 10%412.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA 12/15/2023
Total Credits Release to Date 2,588.10 5.68
Date
Alamance County
3030002
2018
10/17/2023
County:
8-Digit HUC:
Year Project Instituted:
Date Prepared:
Actual Release Date
Potential Credits from As-Built Survey
Stream Credits
Credit Classification
Non-Forested Wetland
CreditsForested Wetland CreditsStream Credits
Current and Future Credit Releases
Credit Release Milestone
Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule
4 - A 15% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
1 - The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan.
2 - The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria:
1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3) Mitigation bank site must be secured;
4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
3 - The second credit release is based on the credit totals from the as-built survey, and may differ slightly from the credit totals stated in the mitigation plan.
Contingencies (if any): Ϯ15% of restoration and enhancement credits, 100% of preservation credits *based on Mitigation Plan Credits **based on 15% of As-built credits plus the difference from the Mitigation Plan credits
Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release
Cloud and Banner
RES
2016-02451
2016-0847v2
Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan
Forested Wetland Credits
Total Potential Credits
Projected
Release Date
Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited Current Credits
Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance Reserved Purchaser Project Permit Number HUC
1 721.40 11/22/19
2 629.20 8/18/20
3 412.50 12/18/20
4 412.50 12/1/21
5 195.60 Cary Creek Land, LLC c/o American Asset Corporation Alston Town Center (phase 2) SAW-2006-32842 8/11/22 03030002
6 412.50 10/25/22
Total 2,588.10 195.60 2,392.50 0.0
Credits Released Task 5
Credits Released Task 4
Credits Released: Task 3
Credits Released: Task 2
RES CAPE FEAR 02 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
CLOUD AND BANNER STREAM CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03030002)
9/26/2023
Date
Credits Released: Task 1
Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited Current Credits
Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance Reserved Purchaser Project Permit Number HUC
1 2.08 11/22/19
2 1.08 8/18/20
3 0.72 12/18/20
4 0.54 CFMO North Carolina National Guard NC National Guard McLeansville Regional Readiness Center SAW-2019-00996 2/18/21 03030002
5 0.02 AO Management Group, LLC. King's Grant SAW-2020-00547 3/12/21 03030002
6 0.77 ARE-NC Region No. 14, LLC 10 Davis Drive SAW-2020-01211 3/22/21 03030002
7 0.39 Leoterra Development Inc Corinth Village SAW-2020-01185 6/14/21 03030002
8 0.72 12/1/21
9 0.57 Fuller-Farrington LLC 4112 Farrington Road SAW-2002-02560 6/21/22 03030002
10 0.08 City of Greensboro Camp Burton Road Utilities SAW-2021-00325 6/29/22 03030002
11 1.08 10/25/22
12 0.446 City of Durham City of Durham - SE Farrington Sewer Improvements SAW-2022-00448 12/30/22 03030002
13 0.51 Town of Apex (Pulte Group) Hasse Avenue Extension SAW-2020-01905 2/7/23 03030002
14 0.12 M/I Homes of Raleigh, LLC Heelan SAW-2020-01098 3/1/23 03030002
Total 5.68 3.45 2.23 0.0
Credits Released: Task 5
Credits Released: Task 4
Credits Released: Task 3
Credits Released: Task 2
RES CAPE FEAR 02 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
CLOUD AND BANNER WETLAND CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03030002)
9/26/2023
Date
Credits Released: Task 1

CLOUD AND BANNER
MITIGATION PROJECT

ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

SAW-2016-02451

RES CAPE FEAR 02 STREAM UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK

YEAR 4 MONITORING REPORT

Provided by: Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC

Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1055

October 2023

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Project Location and Description ......................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................. 2
1.3 Project Success Criteria ......................................................................................................... 2 Stream Success Criteria ................................................................................................................. 3
Wetland Success Criteria ............................................................................................................. 3
Vegetation Success Criteria ......................................................................................................... 4
1.4 Project Components ............................................................................................................... 4
1.5 Design/Approach .................................................................................................................... 5
Stream ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Wetland .......................................................................................................................................... 6
1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions ................................................................................. 7
1.7 Year 4 Monitoring Performance (MY4) ............................................................................... 8
Vegetation ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Stream Geomorphology ............................................................................................................... 8
Stream Hydrology ......................................................................................................................... 9
Wetland Hydrology ....................................................................................................................... 9
2.0 Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 10
3.0 References .......................................................................................................................................... 11
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Background Information Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map

Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Wetland and Flow Gauge Photos
Vegetation Plot Photos
Stream and Vegetation Problem Areas

Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data (MY3)
Cross Section Overlay Plots
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9: Cross Section Morphology Data Table

Appendix E: Hydrology Data
Table 10. 2023 Rainfall Summary
Table 11. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
MY4 Stream Flow Hydrographs
Table 12. 2023 Max Hydroperiod
Table 13. Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
MY4 Groundwater Hydrographs

Cloud & Banner 1 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
1.0 Project Summary

1.1 Project Location and Description The Cloud and Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project (the Project) is located within a watershed dominated by agricultural, forested and low-density residential land use in eastern Alamance County, North Carolina, approximately three miles north of Mebane. The Project streams and wetlands were significantly impacted by hydrologic alterations and agricultural practices. The Project involves the restoration and protection of streams and wetlands in the Haw River Sub watershed of the Jordan Lake watershed, in the Cape Fear River Basin. The Project consists of stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation on a segment of Back Creek and several tributaries that drain directly to Back Creek. The Project presents 8,150 linear feet of Stream Restoration generating 4,238 Stream Mitigation Units (SMU), and 18.05 acres of wetland mitigation generating 8.20 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs). A combination of Priority 1 and Priority 2 Restoration, Levels II and III Enhancement, and Preservation were applied to stream reaches in the project area. Benefits include storing excess water during flood events, preventing
erosion of stream banks, reducing in-stream sedimentation, and removing nutrients. SMU totals
were adjusted using the most recent non-standard buffer width guidance documents.

The Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin, within Cataloging Unit USGS HUC 03030002,
14-digit USGS Hydrologic Code 03030002030070. The current State classification for Back Creek
is Water Supply-II (WS-II), High Quality Waters (HQW), and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
(NCDWQ, 2011).

The Project’s total easement area is 59.76 acres. The main hydrologic features include Back Creek
and four Unnamed Tributaries (UTs) to Back Creek; UT2, UT4, UT5, and UT6. There are also six
areas of wetland mitigation.
The stream design approach for the Project combined the analog method of natural channel design with analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain. The analog method involves the use of a “template” stream adjacent to, nearby, or previously in the same location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach are replicated to create the features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and boundary conditions are similar between the design and analog reaches. Hydraulic geometry was developed using analytical methods in an effort to identify the design discharge. The Project will be monitored on a regular basis throughout the seven-year post-construction monitoring period, or until performance standards are met. Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the Project will be transferred to Unique Places to Save (UP2S). UP2S will be responsible for periodic inspection of the Project to ensure that restrictions required in the Conservation Easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld.

Cloud & Banner 2 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives The Project was identified as a stream and wetland restoration opportunity to improve water quality, habitat, and hydrology within the Cape Fear River Basin. This project provides SMUs and WMUs to be applied as compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to waters of the United States under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C 1344) and support the goal of “no net loss” of aquatic resources in the United States. The principal goal of this project is to address degraded water quality and nutrient input stressors identified in the 2009 Cape Fear RBRP. The project goals and related objectives are outlined below.

Project goals include:
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non-erosive stable channel;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbanks flows
and connection to the floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation;
• Restore and enhance wetland hydrology and soils;
• Restore appropriate riparian and wetland plant communities;
• Preserve high quality stream and wetland resources
Project goals are addressed through the following objectives:
• Designed and reconstructed stable stream channels with appropriate pattern, dimension,
and profile based on reference reach conditions;
• Added in-stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and
enhanced streams;
• Installed habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and
pools of varying depth to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduced bank height ratios and increased entrenchment ratios to reference reach
conditions;
• Increased forested riparian buffers to at least fifty feet on both sides of the channel along
the project reaches with an appropriate riparian plant community;
• Raised stream bed elevations adjacent to wetland restoration and enhancement areas,
plugged surface ditches, and planted native wetland plant species;
• Established a permanent conservation easement on the Project to protect wetlands,
stream channels and their associated buffers in perpetuity

1.3 Project Success Criteria The Site follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the “Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update” dated October 24, 2016. Cross section

Cloud & Banner 3 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
and vegetation plot data will be collected in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream and wetland hydrology data and visual monitoring will be reported annually.
Stream Success Criteria Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull events have been documented in separate years. There should be little change in as-built cross-sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example
down-cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example
settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross
sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored
cross-sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design
stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less
than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross-sections on a given restored reach. Channel stability should
be demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events documented in the seven-year
monitoring period.

Stream restoration reaches will be monitored to document at least intermittent surface flow. This
will be accomplished through direct observation and the use of flow gauges. Intermittent reaches must demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow. Flow gauges were installed on UT4, UT2-C, and UT6-A. Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Wetland Success Criteria The NRCS has a current Wetlands (WETs) table for Alamance County upon which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing season. The closest comparable data station was determined to be the WETS station for Burlington Fire Station #5, NC. The growing season for Alamance County is 244 days long, extending from March 16 to November 15, and is based on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten years.

Based upon field observation across the Project, the NRCS mapping units show a good correlation
to actual site conditions in areas of the site. Most of the soils at the Project are most similar to the
local alluvial land map unit. Mitigation guidance for Common Piedmont Soil Series does not list
local alluvial land but suggests for a Typic Endoaquults a hydroperiod of 10 to 12 percent during

Cloud & Banner 4 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
which the water table is within 12 inches of the surface during the growing season. Hydric soils documented throughout the Project are most like the Typic Endoaquults of Local alluvial land where the soils are characterized by having a clayey (argillic) horizon. Depressional areas will have longer hydroperiods due to storage capacity. Based on the mitigation guidance, hydrologic success for these soils is greater than 10 percent saturation during the growing season.

Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the site
follow IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover
a minimum of two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring shall occur annually
between July 15 and leaf drop. The interim measures of vegetative success for the site are the
survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 five-year
old trees that are at least 7 feet tall at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria
is 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees are
to be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but do not
count towards the success criteria of total planted stems unless they have been in the plot for
more than two years.

1.4 Project Components
The summarized credits below reflect the as-built conditions of the site. Following Mitigation Plan
approval, a design change was made to UT2-C that resulted in more of the creditable channel being aligned within the easement area. This change is detailed further in the Section 1.6. RES requested and received approval to use the as-built crediting scheme for this project in replacement of the mitigation plan credits as changes were caused by design considerations rather than construction or survey. RES submitted a mitigation plan modification request letter in coordination with the USACE Project Manager and IRT review. The net difference between Mitigation Plan and As-Built stream credits was an increase of 78 SMUs with wetland credits remaining the same. Project credits are detailed more in Table 1; Appendix A. and Figure 2; Appendix B displays design centerline with as-built top of bank to compare how streams were built as they were designed. The constructed alignment is very close to the design.
The Cloud and Banner Project Mitigation Credits
Summary of Mitigation Credits
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian Wetland
Totals 4,238 8.20 N/A

Cloud & Banner 5 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
1.5 Design/Approach
Stream Back Creek Enhancement Level II and Preservation were used along Back Creek to address existing impairments, particularly, floodplain dislocation, bank erosion, and buffer degradation. The watershed that drains through the project is approximately 14.52 square miles, and land use is primarily forested and agricultural. The project addresses limited instream habitat and bank erosion by grading existing banks to reestablish bankfull depth and installing bank protection and habitat measures in select areas. The riparian buffer was also revegetated along the entire reach to a minimum width of 75 feet, but up to and exceeding 150 feet along the majority of the reach. A 63-linear foot reach break was inserted downstream of the existing UT2 alignment to allow for
an existing ford crossing to be retained and rehabilitated. Near the confluence of UT2, Back Creek
partially flows outside of the easement boundary for 399 feet before it re-enters the boundaries.
This section of Back Creek does not generate credit but received Enhancement Level II treatment.
Finally, below the confluence with UT5, there is 621 linear feet of preservation until the terminus
of Back Creek within the easement.

Reach UT2
A combination of Preservation, Priority I Restoration, and Priority II Restoration was used for Reach
UT2 to address existing impairments, particularly aggradation, degradation, bank erosion and
floodplain dislocation. The UT2 watershed is approximately 51 acres, and land use is an even mix
of forest and rural residential. Priority I Restoration was used for the upstream portion of UT2 but
is credited at 1:1.5. The restoration approach involved meandering the proposed channel within the natural valley, installing grade control/ habitat structures, backfilling the existing stream and excavating a new channel. A minimum buffer width of 50 feet is provided for all portions of the reach. Preservation was used for the portion of UT2 located within the existing wetland. Priority II Restoration was used for UT2 just downstream of the existing wetland. This reach has a 79-foot crossing that is not used to generate credit but received Restoration treatment. The restoration approach involved meandering the channel within the natural valley, installing grade control/ habitat structures, backfilling the existing stream and excavating a new channel. A minimum buffer width of 50 feet was provided for all portions of the reach. Reach UT4 A combination of Priority I Restoration and Priority II Restoration was used for Reach UT4 to address existing impairments, particularly degradation, bank erosion and floodplain dislocation. The UT4 watershed is approximately 73 acres, and the land use is heavily forested.

The restoration approach transitions from Priority I to Priority II as the stream profile lowers to tie
to Back Creek. Both restoration approaches involved meandering the channel within the natural
valley, installing grade control/ habitat structures, and backfilling the existing stream. The Priority
I portion was reconnected to its natural floodplain, and a new floodplain was excavated for the

Cloud & Banner 6 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
Priority II section. A minimum buffer width of 50 feet was provided for all portions of the reach. A 24-linear foot easement break was inserted in the middle of the reach to accommodate a ford crossing. Reach UT5 Enhancement Level III was used for Reach UT5 to address existing impairments, particularly buffer degradation. The UT5 watershed is approximately 155 acres, and the land use is heavily forested.
A minimum buffer width of 50 feet was provided for all portions of the reach. UT5 received invasive
species treatment and supplemental planting areas (Figure 10).

Reach UT6
A combination of Restoration and Preservation was used for Reach UT6 to address existing
impairments, particularly degradation, bank erosion, and floodplain dislocation. The UT6
watershed is approximately 32 acres, and land use is an even mix of forest and rural residential.

Restoration was used for the upstream portion of UT6. This included the installation of grade
control structures to step down to the floodplain/wetland area, as well as floodplain
grading/reconnection along the right bank. Preservation was used for UT6 beginning at its
intersection with the existing wetland and extending to the confluence with Back Creek. There is a portion of UT6 between the restoration and preservation treatments that hits the floodplain and dissipates into the wetland that is not generating stream credit. A 30-linear foot easement break was inserted in the middle of the reach where there is no jurisdictional stream channel.
Wetland Wetland A - Wetland A is preservation at a ratio of 10:1, but benefits from the channel filling of the old UT4 alignment during Restoration and allowing reconnection of the hydrologic system to the wetland restoration component of Wetland B. Wetland B - Portions of Wetland B were re-established at a credit ratio of 1:1, and some were enhanced at a credit ratio of 3:1. Those areas being re-established benefit from the Priority I stream restoration treatment along UT4. Additionally, this area was planted with native tree and shrub species commonly found in Bottomland Hardwood Forests. The areas being enhanced in WB benefit from the adjacent wetland preservation and by providing connectivity to the restoration component of Wetland B. Wetland C - Portions of Wetland C were re-established at a credit ratio of 1:1, and some were
enhanced at a credit ratio of 3:1. Those areas being restored benefit from the plugging of several
ditches in the wetland, and the planting of native tree and shrub species commonly found in
Bottomland Hardwood Forests. The area being enhanced was planted with native tree and shrub
species commonly found in Bottomland Hardwood Forests and benefit from the plugging of
adjacent ditches.

Cloud & Banner 7 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
Wetland D - Portions of Wetland D were re-established at a credit ratio of 1:1, some were re-established at a credit ratio of 2:1; the remaining portions were preserved at a ratio of 10:1. Wetland D benefits from the restoration on the upstream portion of UT2. This included removal of an undersized 15-inch CMP and corresponding crossing that have caused significant sediment deposition upstream. The existing spoil pile located along the right bank from the crossing downstream to the intersection of UT2 was also removed. Moreover, portions of wetland D that were not forested were planted with native tree and shrub species commonly found in headwater
forests.

Wetland E and F - Wetlands E and F are preservation only: these areas remain intact and benefit
from the establishment of the permanent conservation easement.

1.6 Construction and As-Built Conditions
Stream construction and planting was completed in April 2020. Overall, the Cloud & Banner
Mitigation Site was built to design plans and guidelines, with a few changes. Mitigation Plan versus
As-Built stream length differences (Table 1; Appendix A) are within the normal ranges except for
UT2-C (detailed below). A few changes were made to UT2 and UT6-A after mitigation plan
submittal and approval, and during construction.

The first change was downstream of the ford crossing on UT2-C. Channel design was revised to
prevent impacts to the adjacent parcel. RES had discussed the proposed impacts with the adjacent property owner and both parties reached a verbal agreement for a temporary construction easement. Unfortunately, the written agreement was never completed due to unforeseen concerns from the adjacent property owner. RES therefore revised the design to eliminate the need for a temporary construction easement by realigning the stream to meet Back Creek without grading on the adjacent property owner’s parcel. This change increased the length of UT2-C in the easement by 84 linear feet as well as eliminated an impact to Wetland F, preserving 0.02 acre. The next change was the addition of a crossing to the top of UT2-A (outside of the easement) which consists of two 24” RCP culverts. This change increased the net impacts to Waters of the US on the project and therefore, modifications of the 404 and 401 permits were obtained. Also, on UT2, two log sills (3+85 and 6+38) were shifted upstream (3+50 and 6+00) to allow channel top of bank to match the existing floodplain. On UT6-A, the proposed log drops shifted in location and two additional log drops were added
during construction to address channel degradation that had progressed between design and the
start of construction. Lastly, the log jam that was installed on Back Creek at 35+50 washed
downstream during a storm due to incorrect installation and was re-secured with stronger
hardware and according to specifications in its new location at 37+00. A redline version of the as-
built survey calls out these changes and is included with the sealed plat in the Baseline Report.

Planting plan changes included removing green ash, northern red oak, water oak, and paw paw
and replacing them with pin oak, red mulberry, southern crabapple, bald cypress, sugarberry, and

Cloud & Banner 8 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
silky dogwood. Planting plan changes were based on bare root availability. Minor monitoring device location changes were made during as-built installation including adding an extra random plot and adding flow gauges to UT2-A, UT4, and UT6-A.
1.7 Year 4 Monitoring Performance (MY4) The Cloud & Banner Year 4 Monitoring activities were performed in September 2023. Geomorphology data was not collected in MY4 per the approved Mitigation Plan. All Year 4 Monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation, stream, and wetland interim success criteria.

Vegetation
Monitoring of the 14 permanent vegetation plots and six random vegetation plots was completed
in September 2023. Vegetation data are in Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B,
and plot locations are in Appendix B. MY4 monitoring data indicates that 20 out of 20 plots are
exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities
ranged from 486 to 971 planted stems per acre with an average of 698 planted stems per acre across all the plots. A total of 15 planted species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were noted at Year 4 monitoring, increasing the total species count to 16, and are expected to increase in upcoming years. The average planted stem height was 3.5 feet. Although the average planted stem height for all trees in MY4 is relatively low, the top eight trees in each plot (which still meets the 320 stems/acre success requirement) average stem height is 4.9 ft. RES believes that some of the wetland plots are lowering the average stem height. RES will continue to monitor plots stem heights closely. Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is becoming well established throughout the project. A few small areas of re-sprouted Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and kudzu (Pueraria montana) were observed along UT6 and in the wooded areas. These areas were treated in December 2022 and will continue to be treated as needed throughout the monitoring period. In MY4, Chinese privet was observed in wooded areas along UT5 and a few small areas along UT2-A (Figure 2). These areas will be treated in the
upcoming monitoring period.

Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data was not collected in MY4 as per the Mitigation Plan. Geomorphology data
for MY3 was collected during June 2022. Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix
D. Overall the current year’s cross sections relatively match the design. The current years
conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all
restoration/enhancement reaches. All reaches were designed as sand bed channels and remain classified as sand bed channels post-construction.

Cloud & Banner 9 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation. A beaver dam at the confluence of UT4 and Back Creek was noted and removed in April 2021. No additional signs of beaver were observed in MY4. In April 2022, it was observed that both log jam structures in Back Creek had dislodged and moved downstream. In June 2022, RES resecured both structures with boulders, instead of duckbill anchors. The log jam structures are functioning as
proposed with the boulder anchors. Recent photos of the structures are in Appendix B and the
locations in Figure 2.

Stream Hydrology Three flow gauges and one stage recorder were installed in April 2020. In MY4, UT2-A
documented 223 consecutive flow days, UT4 documented 209 consecutive flow days, and UT6-A
documented 156 consecutive flow days. The stage recorder on UT4 recorded six bankfull events with the highest event being 2.06 feet above the top of bank. This marks the fourth year of bankfull events in separate years, meeting the bankfull event success criteria. The increase in flow days is likely attributed to the increase of rainfall and the inclusion of the last four months of the 2022 calendar year. Stream hydrology data is in Appendix E and monitoring device locations are on Figure 2.

Wetland Hydrology Ten groundwater wells were installed prior to construction in May 2017 and two additional groundwater wells were installed in April 2020. An additional well (AW13) was installed on June 16, 2022. The four gauges that are located in preservation areas are used as reference. MY4 groundwater well data showed 12 of the 13 wells met the wetland success criteria. Hydroperiods ranged from five to 39 percent. Well three continues to not meet the success criteria of 10 percent
and RES believes that this is due to a location and well specific issue. RES believes the lack of
success is due to well installation error. The visual assessment of wetland vegetation in the
surrounding areas suggests that this area should meet hydroperiod success criteria. Additionally,
our data suggests that this area drains quickly and if March/May would have had normal
precipitation, the well would have met hydroperiod success criteria. Therefore, additional wells
will be installed adjacent to Well Three in the upcoming dormant season. RES expects
groundwater levels to continue to improve in Wetland B over the monitoring period. Well nine
was destroyed at some point in early 2023 and reinstalled in June 2023. Therefore, data was only
collected from June 13 – September 6, 2023. Well 11 data was corrupted from July 11 – September
6, 2023, and therefore, was not included in the well chart. This hobo will be replaced in the
upcoming dormant season. Groundwater well locations can be found on Figure 2 and associated
data is in Appendix E.

Cloud & Banner 10 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
2.0 Methods Stream monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at 14 cross-sections. Survey data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. The stage recorder and flow gauges include an automatic pressure transducer set in PVC piping in the channel. The elevation of the bed and top of bank of the stage recorder location was recorded to be able to document presence of water in the channel and out of bank events. The elevation of the bed and the crest of the downstream riffle are used for the flow gauges to determine flow events. Visual
observations (i.e. wrack or debris lines) will also be used to document out of bank events.

Vegetation success is being monitored at 14 permanent monitoring plots and six random
monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species composition and density
of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners
of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the other
corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. The random
plots are to be collected in locations where there are no permanent vegetation plots. Random
plots will most likely be collected in the form of 100 square meter belt transects with variable
dimensions. Tree species and height will be recorded for each planted stem and the transects will
be mapped and new locations will be monitored in subsequent years. Wetland hydrology is monitored to document success in wetland restoration and enhancement areas where hydrology was affected. This is accomplished with 12 automatic pressure transducer gauges (located in groundwater wells) that record daily groundwater levels. Eight have been installed within the wetland restoration area and four within reference wetland preservation areas. One automatic pressure transducer is installed above ground for use as a barometric reference. Gauges are downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods are calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory guidance. Visual observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are also recorded during quarterly site visits.

Cloud & Banner 11 Year 4 Monitoring Report Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project October 2023
3.0 References Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function-Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP
Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2

Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274

Resource Environmental Solutions. 2019. Cloud & Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Final Mitigation Plan.

Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs,
CO. Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. USACE. 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Cloud & Banner - Mitigation Assets and Components
Existing Mitigation
Footage Plan Mitigation As-Built
or Footage or Mitigation Restoration Priority Mitigation Plan Footage or As-Built
Project Segment Acreage Acreage Category Level Level Ratio (X:1)Credits Acreage Credits Comments
Back Creek 2453 2454 Warm Enhancement II 2.5 982 Planted buffer, select areas of bank protection and habitat measures, CE
Back Creek 155 155 Warm Enhancement II 2.5 62 Planted buffer, select areas of bank protection and habitat measures, CE
Back Creek 1251 1251 Warm Enhancement II 2.5 500 Planted buffer, select areas of bank protection and habitat measures, CE
Back Creek 352 621 Warm Preservation 10 62 621 62 Permanent conservation easement
UT2-A 242 329 Warm Restoration 1 1.5 219 336 224 Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT2-B 206 242 Warm Preservation 10 24 242 24 Permanent conservation easement
UT2-C 0 347 Warm Restoration 2 1 347 Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT2-C 498 169 Warm Restoration 1 1 169 Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT4 354 606 Warm Restoration 1 1 606 Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT4 381 477 Warm Restoration 2 1 477 Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT5 363 726 Warm Enhancement III 7.5 97 726 97 Permanent conservation easement, invasive species treatment, planting
UT6-A 460 459 Warm Restoration 2 1 459 486 486 Full channel restoration, planted buffer, CE
UT6-B 243 243 Warm Preservation 10 24 243 24 Permanent conservation easement
WA 7.26 RR Preservation 10 0.73 7.258 0.726 Permanent conservation easement
WB 3.81 RR Re-establishment 1 3.81 3.81 3.810 Floodplain connection, planting
WB 0.67 RR Enhancement 3 0.22 0.661 0.220 Planting
WC 2.19 RR Re-establishment 1 2.19 2.187 2.187 Plugged ditches, planting
WC 0.54 RR Enhancement 3 0.18 0.538 0.179 Planting
WD 0.73 RR Re-establishment 1 0.73 0.733 0.733 Floodplain connection, planting, culvert repair, spoil pile removal
WD 0.15 RR Re-establishment 2 0.08 0.155 0.078 Floodplain connection, planting
WD 1.28 RR Preservation 10 0.13 1.28 0.128 Permanent conservation easement
WE 1.19 RR Preservation 10 0.12 1.195 0.120 Permanent conservation easement
WF 0.22 RR Preservation 10 0.02 0.236 0.024 Permanent conservation easement
Project Credits
Non-Rip Coastal
Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv Wetland Marsh
Restoration 2367.0
Re-establishment 6.81
Rehabilitation
Enhancement 0.40
Enhancement I
Enhancement II 1535.6
Enhancement III 96.8
Creation
Preservation 110.6 0.997
Total 4110.0 Total 8.20
NSBW Adjustment 128
Total Adjusted SMUs 4238
Restoration Level
Stream Riparian Wetland
3839
590
1067
1536
590
1067
Elapsed Time Since grading complete:3 year 6 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete:3 year 6 months
Number of reporting Years1:4
Data Collection Completion or
Activity or Deliverable Complete Delivery
Mitigation Plan NA Sep-18
Final Design – Construction Plans NA Mar-19
Construction NA Apr-20
Site Planting NA Apr-20
As-built (Year 0 Monitoring – baseline)Apr-20 Jul-20
Invasive Species Treatment NA Apr-20
Year 1 Monitoring VP: Oct-20
XS: Oct-20 Nov-20
Supplemental Planting NA Jan-21
Beaver Dam Removal UT4 NA Apr-21
Invasive Species Treatment NA Oct-21
Year 2 Monitoring XS: June-21
VP: Sep-21 Sep-21
Supplemental Planting NA Mar-22
Log Jam Structure Maintenance NA Jun-22
Year 3 Monitoring XS: June-22
VP: Sep-22 Sep-22
Invasive Species Treatment NA Dec-22
Year 4 Monitoring VP: Sep-23 Oct-23
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
1 = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Cloud & Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
Designer WK Dickson and Co., Inc. / 720 Corporate Center Dr., Raleigh,
NC 27607
Primary project design POC Thomas Murray, PE
Construction Contractor RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27610
Construction contractor POC Paul Dunn
Survey Contractor WSP USA / 434 Fayetteville St, Suite 1500, Raleigh, NC 27601
Survey contractor POC Christopher Mielke, PLS
Planting Contractor H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC Matt Hitch
Monitoring Performers RES / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27610
Stream Monitoring POC Ryan Medric [phone]
Wetland Monitoring POC Ryan Medric [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC Ryan Medric [phone]
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Cloud & Banner Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site
USGS 8-digit HUC 03030002
Back Creek UT2 UT4 UT5 UT6
9,163 51 73 155 32
P I I P I
Supporting
Docs?
SAW-2016-
02451
DWR # 16-0847
Mit Plan
Mit Plan
N/A
Mit Plan
N/AEssential Fisheries Habitat No N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)No N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance N/A N/A
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes
Water of the United States - Section 404 Yes Yes
Water of the United States - Section 401 Yes Yes
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable?Resolved?
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)9,291 ac (14.5 sqmi)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <2%
Drainage area (Acres)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS 14-digit HUC 03030002030070
DWR Sub-basin 03-06-02
Physiographic Province Souther Outer Piedmont
Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name Cloud & Banner
County Alamance
Project Area (acres) 59.76
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)Latitude: 36.143777 N Longitude: -79.271535 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)23.2
Project Watershed Summary Information
0 1,000500
Feet
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Cloud and Banner Mitigation Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
Legend
Proposed Easement
Service Area- HUC 03030002
14 Digit HUC- 03030002030070
©Date: 3/6/2019
Drawn by: MDE
Checked by: BPB
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t

P
a
t
h
:

S
:
\
@
R
E
S

G
I
S
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
N
C
\
C
l
o
u
d

a
n
d

B
a
n
n
e
r
\
M
X
D
\
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

P
l
a
n
\
F
i
g
u
r
e

1

-

V
i
c
i
n
i
t
y

M
a
p

-

C
&
B
.
m
x
d
1 inch = 1,000 feet
Cloud and BannerSite

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

!?
!?
!?!?
!?!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
!?
X
X
!R &3
!R
&3
&3
Back Creek
BackCreek
B a c k C r e e k
1
2
10
9
8
7
12
1314
6 5
11
4
3
AW9
AW10
AW4 AW2
AW1
AW3
AW7
AW6
AW5
AW8
AW12
AW11
AW13
2
5
6
9
10
1
4
13
3
12
8
7
1
1
14
WA
WB
WC
WD
WD
WE
WF
1
2
4
5
3
6
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
©
0 250125
Feet
Date: 10/16/2023 Drawn by: HKH
Checked by: JRM
Document Path: R:\Resgis\entgis\Projects\100142_Cloud_and_Banner\MXD\Monitoring\MY4 2023\USACE\C&B CCPV MY4 USACE.mxd
Legend
Conservation Easement
Wetland Mitigation
Re-establishment (1:1)
Re-establishment (2:1)
Enhancement (3:1)
Preservation (10:1)
Fixed VP
>320 stems/acre
MY4 Random VP
>320 stems/acre
MY3 Random VP
>320 stems/acre
Invasive Area MY4
Stream Top of Bank
Ditch Plug
Structure
Cross SectionXLog Jam Location
Stream Mitigation Type
Restoration
Restoration (1.5:1)
Enahncement II
Enhancement III (7.5:1)
Preservation
&3 Flow Gauge
!R Stage Recorder
!R Ambient
MY4 Well Success
!?>10%
!?5-9%
1 inch = 250 feet
UT6-A
UT6-B
UT4
UT2-C
UT2-A
UT2-B
UT5
Vegetation Condition Assessment
AbsentPresentMarginal
Absent
Present
Target Community
Invasive Species
No Fill
Privet treated inDecember 2022
Kudzu treated in December 2022
Figure 2. Current ConditionsPlan View
MY4 2023
Cloud and Banner Mitigation Site
Alamance County, North Carolina
Cloud & Banner MY4 Stream/Wetland Gauge Photos
Flow Gauge UT2-A (06/08/2023) Flow Gauge UT4 (06/08/2023)
Flow Gauge UT6-A (06/08/2023) Stage Recorder UT4 (06/08/2023)
AW1 (09/06/2023) AW2 (09/06/2023)
AW3 (09/06/2023) AW4 (09/06/2023)

AW5 (09/06/2023) AW6 (09/06/2023)
AW7 (09/06/2023) AW8 (09/06/2023)
AW9 (09/06/2023) AW10 (09/06/2023)
AW11 (09/06/2023) AW12 (09/06/2023)
AW13 (09/06/2023)

Cloud & Banner MY4 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (09/12/2023) Vegetation Plot 2 (09/12/2023)
Vegetation Plot 3 (09/12/2023) Vegetation Plot 4 (09/12/2023)
Vegetation Plot 5 (09/12/2023) Vegetation Plot 6 (09/12/2023)
Vegetation Plot 7 (09/12/2023) Vegetation Plot 8 (09/12/2023)

Vegetation Plot 9 (09/06/2023) Vegetation Plot 10 (09/06/2023)
Vegetation Plot 11 (09/12/2023) Vegetation Plot 12 (09/06/2023)
Vegetation Plot 13 (09/06/2023) Vegetation Plot 14 (09/06/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 1 (09/06/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 2 (09/12/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 3 (09/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 4 (09/12/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 5 (09/12/2023) Random Vegetation Plot 6 (09/06/2023)

Invasive species (privet) present in wooded area along UT5
and a small area along UT2-A. These areas will be treated in
the upcoming monitoring year.
Stream Problem Areas
Cloud & Banner
Vegetation Problem Areas
PhotoFeature Category / Location / Size
Tree fallen into vegetation plot 8 but is not affecting success
of the plot. We will continue to monitor the plot and remove
tree if necessary.
Cloud & Banner
PhotoFeature Issue / Location
Log Jam Repair (Station 35+46)
Log Jam Repair (Station 16+50)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 5. Planted Species Summary

Common Name Scientific Name Total Stems Planted
Willow Oak Quercus phellos 4,560
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 3,700
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 2,800
Pin Oak Quercus palustris 2,500
Red Mulberry Morus rubra 2,100
Southern Crabapple Malus angustifolia 2,000
Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 2,000
River Birch Betula nigra 1,800
Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 1,300
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata 1,300
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 1,200
Silky Dogwood Cornus amomum 700
25,960
23.2
1,119
Total
Planted Area
As-built Planted Stems/Acre
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary

Plot #Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
1 809 81 890 Yes 5.1
2 890 121 1012 Yes 2.8
3 486 81 567 Yes 5.0
4 931 202 1133 Yes 3.9
5 728 81 809 Yes 3.3
6 607 0 607 Yes 4.1
7 607 0 607 Yes 2.3
8 567 40 607 Yes 4.0
9 850 971 1821 Yes 2.5
10 486 243 728 Yes 2.2
11 607 162 769 Yes 3.5
12 890 688 1578 Yes 2.9
13 971 40 1012 Yes 5.0
14 809 0 809 Yes 4.2
R1 567 0 567 Yes 2.9
R2 809 0 809 Yes 3.8
R3 607 0 607 Yes 3.0
R4 647 0 647 Yes 2.5
R5 567 0 567 Yes 3.2
R6 526 0 526 Yes 2.9
Project Avg 698 208 862 Yes 3.5
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species

PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo boxelder Tree
Acer rubrum red maple Tree 9 5 13
Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 7 7 7
Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 1 1 1 8 8 8 4 4 4
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 7 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 3 3 3 1 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 7 7 7 1 1 2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 1 1 1 1 1
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 5 5 5 1 1 3 6 6 6 10 10 10 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 18 1 1 1 4 5 5 5 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 6 6 6 4 4 4 10 10 10 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus palustris pin oak Tree 1 1 1 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 6 6 6 2 2 2 4 4 4
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 8 8 8 10 10 10 4 4 4 1 1 1
Salix nigra black willow Tree
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 12 12 13
20 20 22 22 22 25 12 12 14 23 23 28 18 18 20 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 15 21 21 45 12 12 18 15 15 19 22 22 39 24 24 25
8 8 8 7 7 8 4 4 6 4 4 5 6 6 7 7 7 7 5 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 7 4 4 5 4 4 5 6 6 7 6 6 6
809 809 890 890 890 1012 486 486 567 931 931 1133 728 728 809 607 607 607 607 607 607 567 567 607 850 850 1821 486 486 728 607 607 769 890 890 1578 971 971 1012
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer negundo boxelder Tree 2
Acer rubrum red maple Tree 27
Betula nigra river birch Tree 16 16 16 26 26 26 25 25 25 16 16 16 28 28 28
Celtis laevigata sugarberry Tree 13 13 13 15 15 15 13 13 13 17 17 17 18 18 18
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 4 4 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 9 9 9
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 23 23 31 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 7 7 7 38 38 45 33 33 54 28 28 32 16 16 26 33 33 33
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 11 11 13 13 13 42 5 5 6 7
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 4 1
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 19 19 19
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 22 22 22
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 21 21 21
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 52 52 72 62 62 92 66 66 76 30 30 30 22 22 22
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 7 7 7 2 2 2 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 53 53 54 51 51 51 43 43 43 30 30 30 36 36 36
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus palustris pin oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 27 27 27 28 28 28 39 39 39 45 45 45 20 20 20
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 6 6 6 1 1 1 52 52 52 52 52 52 59 59 59 60 60 60 50 50 50
Salix nigra black willow Tree 3
Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 9 9 9 7 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 44 44 45 56 56 56 51 51 51 35 35 35 41 41 41
20 20 20 14 14 14 20 20 20 15 15 15 16 16 16 14 14 14 13 13 13 345 345 412 371 371 458 358 358 375 289 289 307 324 324 324
4 4 4 6 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 15 15 16 15 15 17 14 14 15 13 13 15 12 12 12
809 809 809 567 567 567 809 809 809 607 607 607 647 647 647 567 567 567 526 526 526 698 698 834 751 751 927 724 724 759 835 835 887 937 937 937
Cloud and Banner
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
04202020-01-0001 04202020-01-0002
1
0.02
04202020-01-001304202020-01-0007 04202020-01-0008 04202020-01-0009 04202020-01-0010 04202020-01-0011 04202020-01-001204202020-01-0003 04202020-01-0004 04202020-01-0005 04202020-01-0006
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
14
0.35
14
0.35
20
0.49
14
0.49
Species count
Stem count
size (ares)14
0.49
1 1 1 1 1
0.02 0.02
R2 R3 R4 R5 R6
Stems per ACRE
Current Plot Data (MY4 2023)
Current Plot Data (MY4 2023)Cloud and Banner
MY0 (2020)MY1 (2020)MY2 (2021)MY3 (2022)MY4 (2023)
Annual Means
R1
1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.020.02
1
04202020-01-0014Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
size (ACRES)
Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data
(Data from MY3 2022)
Parameter Gauge
2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD
5 n Min Mean Med Max SD
5 n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD
5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)--- --- ------ --- 9.3 --- --- --- --- --- 10.9 --- --- --- --- 6.3 --- 4.2 8.2 7.1 13.4 4.7 3
Floodprone Width (ft)--- --- >20 --- --- --- --- --- 50.0 --- --- --- --- >14 --- 45.7 48.5 49.8 50.0 2.4 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)--- --- ------ --- 0.4 --- --- --- --- --- 1.0 --- --- --- --- 0.8 --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)--- --- 0.9 --- --- --- --- --- 1.7 --- --- --- --- 1.1 --- 0.5 1.0 1.1 1.4 0.5 3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)--- --- ------ --- 3.9 --- --- --- --- --- 11.0 --- --- --- --- 4.7 --- 1.0 3.6 4.2 5.6 2.4 3
Width/Depth Ratio --- --- 22.3 --- --- --- --- --- 11.9 --- --- --- --- 8.4 --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Entrenchment Ratio --- --- >2.2 --- --- --- --- --- >2.2 --- --- --- --- >2.2 --- 3.4 7.1 7.0 10.9 3.83
1Bank Height Ratio --- --- 1.0 --- --- --- --- --- 1.3 --- --- --- --- 1.0 --- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3
Riffle Length (ft)5 --- ---
23 --- ---
4 --- ---
19.9 --- ---
--- --- --- 1.1 12.9 10.3 79.1 13.9 33
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)------ --------- --------- --------- ------ --- --- 0.001 0.057 0.018 0.914 0.161 33
Pool Length (ft)6.5 --- ---13 --- ---6.9 --- ---21.6 --- ------ --- --- 1.5 9.1 7.8 26.4 5.3 32
Pool Max depth (ft)--- --- --- --- --- --------- --------- ------ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Pool Spacing (ft)25.2 --- ---37 --- ---40.3 --- ---109.8 --- ------ --- --- 7.7 30.4 27.4 71.1 14.6 29
Channel Beltwidth (ft)--- --- --- --- --- --- 41.2 --- --- 43.5 --- --- 12 --- 27 12 --- --- 27 --- ---
Radius of Curvature (ft)--- --- --- --- --- --- 13.1 --- --- 24.6 --- --- 13 --- 17 13 --- --- 17 --- ---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)--- --- --- --- --- --- 1.2 --- --- 2.3 --- --- 2 --- 2.7 2 --- --- 2.7 --- ---
Meander Wavelength (ft)--- --- --- --- --- --- 49.5 --- --- 64.9 --- --- 38 --- 66 38 --- --- 66 --- ---
Meander Width Ratio --- --- --- --- --- --- 3.8 --- --- 4 --- --- 1.9 --- 4.3 1.9 --- --- 4.3 --- ---
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps) --- --- ---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs) --- --- ---
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Channel slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Profile
Pattern
Transport parameters
Additional Reach Parameters
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cloud & Banner Mitigation Site - Reach UT2
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline
C6 E5 E6 E6
--- --- --- ---
------
856 375 600 ---
748 285 495 ---
---
0.0059 0.0023 --- ---
--- ---
--- ---
--- ---
0.0052 0.025
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.003 ---
--- ---------
1.14 1.32 1.21
Parameter Gauge
2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Mean Med Max SD5 n Min Med Max Min Mean Med Max SD5 n
Bankfull Width (ft)--- --- ---6.8 --- --- 11.4 --- ---
--- --- 7.8 --- --- ------ 7.8 --- 8.1 9.5 8.8 12.1 1.8 4
Floodprone Width (ft) 9.0 --- --- >25 --- ---
--- --- 100.0 --- --- ------ >18 --- 42.7 48.2 50.0 50.0 3.7 4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)--- --- ---0.6 --- --- 0.9 --- ---
--- --- 0.7 --- --- ------ 0.7 --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
1Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.1 --- --- 1.1 --- ---
--- --- 1.0 --- --- ------ 1.0 --- 0.8 1.3 1.0 2.2 0.6 4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)--- --- ---6.0 --- --- 7.0 --- ---
--- --- 5.7 --- --- ------ 5.7 --- 4.2 7.6 5.0 16.4 5.9 4
Width/Depth Ratio 7.7 --- --- 18.5 --- ---
--- --- 10.7 --- --- ------ 8.3 --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 --- --- >2.2 --- ---
--- --- 12.8 --- --- ------ >2.2 --- 3.5 5.3 5.7 6.2 1.2 4
1Bank Height Ratio 1.0 --- --- 2.5 --- ---
--- --- 1.0 --- --- ------ 1.0 --- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 4
Riffle Length (ft) 8 --- ---18 --- --- 3.1 --- --- 30.7 --- --- --- --- --- 4.5 20.3 19.5 43.9 10.1 25
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)--- --- --- ------ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.000 0.006 0.005 0.020 0.005 25
Pool Length (ft) 11 --- ---16 --- --- 4.2 --- --- 9.5 --- --- --- --- --- 4.1 12.1 11.4 30.7 6.2 25
Pool Max depth (ft)--- --- --- ------ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Pool Spacing (ft) 31 --- ---70 --- --- 17.5 --- --- 59.8 --- --- --- --- --- 13.8 43.5 45.0 65.2 13.3 24
Channel Beltwidth (ft) --- --- --- --- --- ---
13.6 --- --- 31.8 --- --- 18 --- 34 18 --- 34 --- --- ---
Radius of Curvature (ft) --- --- --- --- --- ---
11 --- --- 27.6 --- --- 14 --- 22 14 --- 22 --- --- ---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) --- --- --- --- --- ---
1.4 --- --- 3.5 --- --- 1.7 --- 2.8 1.7 --- 2.8 --- --- ---
Meander Wavelength (ft) --- --- --- --- --- ---
34.9 --- --- 68.3 --- --- 54 --- 107 54 --- 107 --- --- ---
Meander Width Ratio --- --- --- --- --- ---
1.7 --- --- 4.1 --- --- 2.3 --- 4.4 2.3 --- 4.4 --- --- ---
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)--- --- ---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)--- --- ---
Valley length (ft)
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Channel slope (ft/ft)
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in-line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary (continued)
Cloud & Banner Mitigation Site - Reach UT4
Regional Curve Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design Monitoring Baseline
Profile
Pattern
Transport parameters
Additional Reach Parameters
C6 - E6 E5 E6
---
E6
--- ---
---
---
---
---
844 274 ---
900 309 ---
910
1114
1.07 1.13 ---
0.0017 0.004 ---
1.22
---
0.0011 0.003 ---
---------
0.002
---
---
------
------
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 545.3 545.3 545.3 545.4 543.3 544.8 544.8 544.8 539.6 539.6 539.6 539.6 539.5 539.5 539.5 539.5 538.9 538.9 539.8 538.9
Bankfull Width (ft)1 4.2 4.2 4.2 3.9 3.9 4.2 5.9 4.4 13.4 7.0 9.5 12.9 5.9 5.9 9.0 10.8 8.4 8.3 9.8 9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50 >47.6 >49.3 >47.3 ---->45.7 >46.8 >46.6 >45.9 --------
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)545.3 545.4 545.3 545.5 543.3 544.8 544.8 544.9 539.6 539.5 539.4 539.6 539.5 539.5 539.4 539.5 538.9 538.9 538.8 538.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.4 2.1 2.1 2.4 1.9 4.2 3.5 3.0 4.3 4.6 4.2 4.1 4.4 6.6 6.1 6.5 6.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >10.9 >11.4 >11.8 >12.3 ---->3.4 >6.7 >4.9 >3.6 --------
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 ----1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 --------
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 538.8 538.8 538.7 538.8 539.8 539.8 539.7 539.8 539.6 539.6 539.5 539.6 539.5 539.5 539.3 539.5 539.2 539.2 539.2 539.2
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.1 7.1 7.4 7.9 8.1 7.5 9.8 10.9 8.3 8.1 10.3 7.9 10.8 11.3 10.5 10.9 8.1 7.7 8.4 7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 49.8 49.8 >49.8 >49.8 ---->50 >50.2 >50.2 >50.1 ---->50 >49.9 >49.8 >49.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.6 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)538.8 538.8 538.8 538.8 539.8 539.6 539.8 539.8 539.6 539.5 539.5 539.6 539.5 539.4 539.2 539.5 539.25 539.5 539.5 539.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 5.6 5.6 6.4 5.6 7.2 5.8 8.0 7.0 4.2 3.8 4.1 4.1 8.2 7.0 6.9 8.2 4.5 7.6 7.5 5.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >7.0 >7.0 >6.7 >6.3 ---->6.0 >6.2 >4.9 >6.3 ---->6.2 >6.5 >5.9 >6.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 ----1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ----1.0 1.0 1.3 1.1
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 538.8 538.8 538.8 538.9 538.8 538.9 538.9 539.0 549.3 549.3 549.2 549.3 547.3 547.5 547.4 547.5
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.3 8.1 9.8 8.4 9.3 9.4 15.7 9.8 12.1 12.6 13.3 13.4 12.0 11.0 14.6 14.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50 >50.3 >50.2 >50.2 ---->42.7 >42.3 >42.1 >42.5 ----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.6 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.2 2.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)538.8 538.8 538.8 538.9 538.8 538.8 538.8 539.0 549.3 549.2 549.1 549.3 547.3 547.1 546.7 547.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.6 8.2 7.8 7.0 8.5 16.4 14.9 15.0 16.5 15.7 12.0 8.0 14.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >5.4 >6.2 >5.1 >6 ---->3.5 >3.3 >2.3 >3.2 ----
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ----1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 ----
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Cross Section 10 (Riffle) UT4
Cross Section 11 (Riffle) UT4 Cross Section 12 (Pool) UT4
Cross Section 6 (Riffle) UT2-C Cross Section 7 (Pool) UT4 Cross Section 8 (Riffle) UT4
Cross Section 13 (Riffle) UT6-A Cross Section 14 (Pool) UT6-A
Cross Section 9 (Pool) UT4
Appendix D. Table 9 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross Sections)
Project Name: Cloud and Banner
Cross Section 1 (Riffle) UT2-A Cross Section 2 (Pool) UT2-A Cross Section 3 (Riffle) UT2-C Cross Section 4 (Pool) UT2-C Cross Section 5 (Pool) UT2-C
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT2-A -Cross Section 1 -Riffle -Restoration (1.5:1)
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022
Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 545.31 545.31 545.33 545.4
Bankfull Width (ft)1 4.2 4.2 4.2 3.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50 >47.6 >49.3 >47.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)545.31 545.35 545.3 545.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio1 >10.9 >11.4 >11.8 >12.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT2-A -Cross Section 2 -Pool -Restoration (1.5:1)
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022 Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 543.28 544.82 544.75 544.8
Bankfull Width (ft)1 3.9 4.2 5.9 4.4
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)543.28 544.82 544.8 544.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 2.1 2.1 2.4 1.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 ----
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio1 ----
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT2-C -Cross Section 3 -Riffle -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022
Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 539.64 539.63 539.55 539.6
Bankfull Width (ft)1 13.4 7.0 9.5 12.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 46 >46.8 >46.6 >45.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft)539.64 539.53 539.4 539.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 4.2 3.5 3.0 4.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 >3.4 >6.7 >4.9 >3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT2-C -Cross Section 4 -Pool -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022 Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 539.49 539.53 539.48 539.5
Bankfull Width (ft)1 5.9 5.9 9.0 10.8
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)539.49 539.48 539.4 539.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 4.6 4.2 4.1 4.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 ----
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 ----
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner Reach UT2-C -Cross Section 5 -Pool -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022 Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 538.91 538.92 539.84 538.9
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.4 8.3 9.8 9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)538.91 538.86 538.8 538.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 6.6 6.1 6.5 6.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 ----
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 ----
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT2-C -Cross Section 6 -Riffle -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022
Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 538.78 538.75 538.67 538.8
Bankfull Width (ft)1 7.1 7.1 7.4 7.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 49.8 49.8 >49.8 >49.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft)538.78 538.75 538.8 538.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 5.6 5.6 6.4 5.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 >7.0 >7.0 >6.7 >6.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT4 -Cross Section 7 -Pool -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022 Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 539.77 539.82 539.72 539.8
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.1 7.5 9.8 10.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.5 1.2 1.6 1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)539.77 539.63 539.8 539.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 7.2 5.8 8.0 7.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 ----
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 ----
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner Reach UT4 -Cross Section 8 -Riffle -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022
Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 539.57 539.58 539.51 539.6
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.3 8.1 10.3 7.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50 >50.2 >50.2 >50.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft)539.57 539.53 539.5 539.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 4.2 3.8 4.1 4.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 >6.0 >6.2 >4.9 >6.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT4 -Cross Section 9 -Pool -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022 Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 539.49 539.47 539.34 539.5
Bankfull Width (ft)1 10.8 11.3 10.5 10.9
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)539.49 539.35 539.2 539.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 8.2 7.0 6.9 8.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 ----
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 ----
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT4 -Cross Section 10 -Riffle -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022
Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 539.25 539.21 539.17 539.2
Bankfull Width (ft)1 8.1 7.7 8.4 7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50 >49.9 >49.8 >49.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 0.8 1.2 1.3 1.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)539.25 539.52 539.5 539.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 4.5 7.6 7.5 5.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 >6.2 >6.5 >5.9 >6.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.1
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT4 -Cross Section 11 -Riffle -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022
Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 538.78 538.79 538.80 538.9
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.3 8.1 9.8 8.4
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >50 >50.3 >50.2 >50.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft)538.78 538.80 538.8 538.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 >5.4 >6.2 >5.1 >6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT4 -Cross Section 12 -Pool -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022 Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 538.81 538.89 538.88 539.0
Bankfull Width (ft)1 9.3 9.4 15.7 9.8
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)538.81 538.84 538.8 539.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)2 8.2 7.8 7.0 8.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 ----
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 ----
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT6-A -Cross Section 13 -Riffle -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022
Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area Low Bank Height
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 549.28 549.30 549.24 549.3
Bankfull Width (ft)1 12.1 12.6 13.3 13.4
Floodprone Width (ft)1 >42.7 >42.3 >42.1 >42.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.2 2.6 2.0 2.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft)549.28 549.20 549.1 549.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 16.4 14.9 15.0 16.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 >3.5 >3.3 >2.3 >3.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0
Cross Section 13 (Riffle)
1 - Uses the as-built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
Upstream Downstream
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Distance (ft)
Cloud and Banner -Reach UT6-A -Cross Section 14 -Pool -Restoration
MY0 2020 MY1 2020 MY2 2021 MY3 2022 Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA1 547.34 547.46 547.37 547.5
Bankfull Width (ft)1 12.0 11.0 14.6 14.0
Floodprone Width (ft)1 ----
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2 2.2 1.9 1.2 2.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)547.34 547.11 546.7 547.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2 15.7 12.0 8.0 14.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1 ----
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1 ----
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Table 10. 2023 Rainfall Summary

30 Percent 70 Percent
September 4.22 1.86 5.15 4.11
October 3.29 1.69 4.02 4.16
November 2.98 1.91 3.59 5.08
December 3.14 2.12 3.75 3.73
January 3.96 2.79 4.70 4.98
February 3.46 2.46 4.09 3.22
March 4.29 3.01 5.09 2.68
April 3.24 2.02 3.91 6.59
May 4.15 2.92 4.93 2.60
June 4.15 2.28 5.06 5.53
July 4.45 2.82 5.36 3.88
August 4.04 2.64 4.86 3.81
September 4.22 1.86 5.15 4.17
October 3.29 1.69 4.02 -
November 2.98 1.91 3.59 -
December 3.14 2.12 3.75 -
Total Annual **45.37 28.52 54.51 54.54
Above Normal
Limits
Below Normal
Limits
** Total Annual ranges from September 2022 - September 2023
Month Average Normal Limits Graham Station
Precipitation*
*Graham 2 Ene Station is approximatley 10 miles Southwest from the site.
Table 11. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events

MY1 2020 6 4.7
MY2 2021 7 2.12
MY3 2022 7 5.24
MY4 2023 6 2.06
MY1 2020 1 178 178 ---
MY2 2021 2 180 232 1/1/2021-6/30/2021
MY3 2022 6 126 221 1/1/2022-5/7/2022
MY4 2023 4 223 247 9/30/2022 - 5/11/2023
MY1 2020 6 92 147 ---
MY2 2021 3 209 219 1/1/2021-7/29/2021
MY3 2022 5 169 210 1/1/2022-6/19/2022
MY4 2023 5 209 252 11/11/2022 - 6/8/2023
MY1 2020 3 101 172 ---
MY2 2021 3 212 224 1/1/2021-8/1/2021
MY3 2022 4 151 161 1/1/2022-6/1/2022
MY4 2023 5 156 266 1/3/2023 - 6/8/2023
Flow Gauge UT2-A
Flow Gauge UT4
Flow Gauge UT6-A
Year Number of Bankfull
Events
Maximum
Height Over
Bankfull (ft)
Date of Maximum Bankfull Event
Stage Recorder UT4
6/12/2020
1/3/2021
3/9/2022
Year Number of Flow
Events
Maximum
Consecutive
Flow Days
Maximum
Cummlative Flow
Days
4/7/2023
Maximum
Consecutive Flow Date
Range
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner UT4 Stage Recorder Graph
Daily Precip (in)SR UT4 Top of Bank
Max Event - 2.06 ft. above TOB
4/7/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-1
0
1
2
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner UT2 Flow Gauge Graph
Daily Precip (in)FG UT2-A Downstream Riffle Elevation
223 Days of Consecutive Flow
9/30/2022 - 5/11/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner UT4 Flow Gauge Graph
Daily Precip (in)FG UT4 Downstream Riffle Elevation
208 Days of Consecutive Flow
11/11/2022 - 6/8/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-1
0
1
2
3
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
St
a
g
e

(
f
t
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner UT6 Flow Gauge Graph
Daily Precip (in)FG UT6-A Downstream Riffle Elevation
156 Days of Consecutive Flow
1/3/2023 - 6/8/2023
Table 12.

Table 13.

Days Hydroperiod
(%)Days Hydroperiod (%)
AW1 26 11 82 35 8
AW2 26 11 67 29 7
AW3 11 5 38 16 11
AW4 88 38 130 56 4
AW5 89 38 146 63 2
AW6 41 18 92 40 4
AW7 59 25 89 38 2
AW8 45 19 91 39 4
AW9 56 24 56 24 1
AW10 75 32 111 48 3
AW11 24 10 51 22 4
AW12 50 22 150 65 5
AW13 91 39 123 53 2
2023 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 10-Mar through 8-Nov, 232 days)
Well ID
Consecutive Cumulative
Occurrences
Pre-Con
(2019)Year 1 (2020)Year 2
(2021)
Year 3
(2022)
Year 4
(2023)
Year 5
(2024)
Year 6
(2025)
Year 7
(2026)
AW1 WB R (1:1)9 6 15 15 11
AW2 WB R (1:1)8 6 14 14 11
AW3 WB R (1:1)7 6 9 7 5
AW4 WA P (10:1)26 46 43 34 38
AW5 WC E (3:1)22 51 29 42 38
AW6 WD R (1:1)23 25 19 36 18
AW7 WD P (10:1)77 30 26 36 25
AW8 WC R (1:1)12 13 26 36 19
AW9 WA P (10:1)26 50 46 43 24
AW10 WA P (10:1)26 42 31 38 32
AW11 WB R (1:1)NA 8 15 15 10
AW12 WC R (1:1)NA 14 12 20 22
AW13*WB R (1:1)NA NA NA 4 39
*AW13 was installed in June 2022
Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Well ID Wetland
ID
Wetland
Treatment
Hydroperiod (%); Success Criteron 10%
Cloud & Banner
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW1
Daily Precip (in)AW1 Growing Season Start Growing Season End26 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/10/2023 - 4/4/2023
26 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW2
Daily Precip (in)AW2 Growing Season Start Growing Season End26 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/10/2023 - 4/4/2023
26 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW3
Daily Precip (in)AW3 Growing Season Start Growing Season End11 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
4/6/2023 - 4/16/2023
11 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW4
Daily Precip (in)AW4 Growing Season Start Growing Season End88 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/10/2023 - 6/5/2023
88 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW5
Daily Precip (in)AW5 Growing Season Start Growing Season End89 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/10/2023 - 6/6/2023
89 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW6
Daily Precip (in)AW6 Growing Season Start Growing Season End41 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/25/2023 - 5/4/2023
41 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW7
Daily Precip (in)AW7 Growing Season Start Growing Season End59 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/10/2023 - 5/7/2023
59 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW8
Daily Precip (in)AW8 Growing Season Start Growing Season End45 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/23/2023 - 5/11/2023
45 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW9
Daily Precip (in)AW9 Growing Season Start Growing Season End56 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
6/20/2023 - 8/15/2023
56 Consecutive Days
Missing Data due to destroyed groundwater
well, reinstalled 6/13/2023
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW10
Daily Precip (in)AW10 Growing Season Start Growing Season End75 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/10/2023 - 5/23/2023
75 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW11
Daily Precip (in)AW11 Growing Season Start Growing Season End24 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/10/2023 - 2/2/2023
July 1 2023 - September 6, 2023 water level readings
were unusable due to HOBO malfunction
24 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW12
Daily Precip (in)AW12 Growing Season Start Growing Season End50 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
7/1/2023 - 8/20/2023
50 Consecutive Days
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
-40
-38
-36
-34
-32
-30
-28
-26
-24
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
I
n
c
h
e
s

A
b
o
v
e
/
B
e
l
o
w

S
u
r
f
a
c
e
)
Date
2023 Cloud & Banner AW13
Daily Precip (in)AW13 Growing Season Start Growing Season End91 Consecutive Days of Hydrology
3/10/2023 - 6/8/2023
91 Consecutive Days