820302_Routine Inspection_20231009

liypc of visit; ,u v,umpuance inspection lJ t/peratlon Review U structure Evaluation O 1'ecanical Assistance I
Reason for Visit:. Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ' 00 oV Departure Time: ! ' p County: Region: / �d
Farm Name: ez z2 F., ti Owner Email:
Owner Name: %�� �� % N�q/�yt Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: i'fi71,�tG*� Title:
r,
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Al
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: r7��
�r
Certification Number: �,,.'2 31
Certification Number:
Longitude:
E1{
fll il; K. t
(E $,1j}IPi �` �
I� l IIA�} i�' I
Not
��.
t€�' ,;n
1 C a, �v.lE
.E
3iii
I�ale���i
r€'i31% '
E
Wean to Finish
ILayer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 8
11}!
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to WeanS�
I
+"
D Cow
Farrow to Feeder
I
i I f
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
j lt�f
'y E,��iI1�EE
�
IIE!'j1 E
Turkeys
4ES.i; I
j E i
HY
.i'E
i iE��]Turkey
Poults
�lit 11 WIM=
,n.ri
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
RrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes =Efl"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: �c! Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
-❑"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: kl&j G�.p
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1 y aa• t;
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
oNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
,2'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
..yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
;no
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
J2 NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
J�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop
Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
(.ta/�//1'2
12. Crop TYpe(s): ,'4 i g am. 6a4.t <.� �tv to 1JG /� cS
13. Soil Type(s): ,y
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes . ❑'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
['Yes 00ko
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ,❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes , o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ]:�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes •n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes f5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes L No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: /U
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [34,;o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes .0'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAW-W?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes _[No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ,❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes e''No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes l❑i No
❑ Yes E:�No
❑ Yes ❑' No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Li /I#12,e6vPhone: /�Q r3S — %S�'—
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: p�LpQ�Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020

FACILITY#: 9)-3g FARM NAME: d4lz,. / v .�G�J�� LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (m)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR N
WASTE REPORT (mi)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER /
DATE /f0/.3 NITROGEN LEVEL LL
DATE `?" P- 3 NITROGEN LEVEL �9'
DATE °2/��! �j NITROGEN LEVEL �• S �o 2 - -3 L
SOIL REPORT
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE �U 16 411 /�
P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400) _ //
PH (Notelt4.,l.) (//em
CUIZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU Z� N
(IF PEANUTS NO MORETHEN 300)
IRR2 (#TI)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES _ NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (xzq
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE C#T,,A/, DI EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIB I
FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (x2t &25)
-DUE EV��jRY YEAR: DATE l �W��
O: `! P: .31 U % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: 3,0 % RATIO OF SLUDGE c Y
0 P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM ,CROP YEILDS_MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1-t- Ends March 31 st
Corn: Opens February 15u - Ends June 30t
Cotton: Opens March 15w- Ends August 1�
Rye: Opens September 1n-Ends March 31A
Oats: Opens September I�f- Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30t
Soybeans: Opens April 1st -Ends September 15t
Fescue: Opens August 1st -Ends July 31A
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15t - Ends August 31 st