20231379 Ver 1_Revised LincolnBridge_SupplementalInformation_20231011

Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Stantec Raleigh NC 27606-3394
October 6, 2023
Project/File: Lincoln St Bridge
Krysta Stygar, Regulatory Project Manager
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
8304 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, NC 28262
Dear Ms. Stygar,
Reference: Lincoln St Bridge NWP #14 PCN
Following this letter please find supplemental information to the preconstruction notification (PCN) for a
Nationwide Permit #14 for impacts to Irish Buffalo Creek and one of its tributaries from a bridge
replacement and pedestrian access project in Concord, NC.
The goal of the project is to replace the structurally deficient Lincoln St SW bridge that has been closed to
vehicular traffic with a new bridge. The bridge, along with the approach along the roadway from the north
and south, will have sidewalks. The project is funded by the City of Concord.
A copy of the ePCN and supplemental data has been submitted through DWR's permitting portal.
Regards,
I;'1111r_1Ll III III x0Kd•1►6411NIIZl�'i=1:wlei *41LlLei
M lissa Ruiz PWS
Principal
Mobile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attachment: PCN Supplemental Information
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch, DWR, Mooresville Office
Design with community in mind

® Stantec
LINCOLN ST BRIDGE SW
Supplemental Information
October 6, 2023
Prepared for:
City of Concord, NC
Prepared by:
Stantec Consulting Service Inc

Lincoln St Bridge SW
Table of Contents
1 SITE PHOTOS................................................................................................................1
2 PRE -APPLICATION AND AGENT AUTHORIZATION..................................................3
3
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES.....................................................................................6
3.1
Vicinity Map...................................................................................................................................
7
3.2
USGS Map....................................................................................................................................
8
3.3
Potential Jurisdictional Features Map...........................................................................................
9
3.4
DWQ Stream Origin.....................................................................................................................
10
3.5
Stream Assessment Methodology (SAM)...................................................................................
11
4
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES.........................................................16
4.1
IPaC.............................................................................................................................................
17
4.2
Bat Bridge Assessment...............................................................................................................32
4.2
Agency Correspondence — USFWS and NCWRC......................................................................
42
5
CULTURAL RESOURCES...........................................................................................54
5.1
HPOWEB 2.0 Cultural Resources Map.......................................................................................
55
5.2
Agency Coordination - SHPO......................................................................................................
56
6
IMPACT DRAWINGS...................................................................................................61
7
ROADWAY EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITION AND SEDIMENT EROSION
CONTROLPLAN.........................................................................................................66
8 PROPERTY INFORMATION........................................................................................92

Lincoln St Bridge SW
1 Site Photos
1 Site Photos
Photo 1 Lincoln St Bridge over Irish Buffalo Creek looking upstream
1

AktL

Lincoln St Bridge SW
2 Pre -Application and Agent Authorization
2 Pre -Filing Meeting Request and Agent Authorization

From:
401PreFile
To:
Ruiz, Melissa
Subject:
Automatic reply: [External] 401/Buffer Pre -filing Meeting Request
Date:
Monday, May 1, 2023 2:43:12 PM
This email confirms receipt of your pre -filing meeting request. Please retain this email for your
records and submit this documentation as part of your 401 application (PCN Application) as
required by federal law. DWR will not be able to accept your application without this federally
required documentation. 401 applications received without documentation that a pre -filing
meeting request was submitted at least 30 days prior will be returned as incomplete.
Responses to this email are not monitored.
If you need to contact 401/Buffer Permitting Staff, please use the following link(s) to access of
staff contact list(s).
For Non -Transportation Central Staff:
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality_permitting/401-buffer-
permitting/401-buffer-permitting-contacts
For Non -Transportation Regional
Staff: httl2s://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/DocView.asl2x?dbid=0&id=2162034&cr=1
For all Transportation Projects Including NCDOT Projects:
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/transportation-
permitting/staff-contacts

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO, PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID: 12-038-0237.00
STREET ADDRESS: no physical address associated with this property. Located east
of Lincoln Street and north of Irish Buffalo Creek
Please print:
Property owner: City of Concord
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Melissa Ruiz of Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above);
PO Box 308 Concord, NC 28026
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature
Date:
Authorized Si nature
Date:

Lincoln St Bridge SW
3 Jurisdictional Features
3 Jurisdictional Features
Vicinity Map
USGS Map
Potential Jurisdictional Features Map
DWQ Stream Form
Stream Assessment Methodology Form

N
Nbrthlile
Shoppin
Cenle
h
Ra a �
J\ e
North y
R`v Camrrus
p1Qr`09e
PENE"
9 '
- '3'�UBV
31,
p
3 5ol
°ty
J Psn
,V•� 4va Or N. C
W
s
Poplar Tent Ro
C oaryln °cF i�ao Cree+ Concord Ccrbn I -"- =�
'l'Si
✓
-an�h
VVertrling tunlla Cabarrus
Country Club
ki fA�D V, -
ab sutd P'" -P•'c .1uh:
NA
n4�� CeIN Hi9hway4B'S'�
Sly IVo?e
" ��C-Colem an �Blvtl�S _
_ y
- n a
a
49
m a
11
7
- �6 Frank-
�� Lieka �UtL� _
Park ,W _ --Zion�'s -
�"�
W
'lea Flows "
.-
- r4 Park
- A
_ �1eY Chyy�"
p/nssc � �It
Ra t
�Jp/Hit
A 15a"
R-
1,0071
Ace-
52
� ___—_—_ �
sllavi--
erC ee"V R - - .. comeh 1. UPS iq Bi -
ro 0 .
Albemarle
;
�{7 03 *-.
za a
Harrisburgh.
- - - r ti \'I M� d
-
M51 a. uw 1w.� rvo
' yc
mt�ldl
Legend Pm;eci L.—f— 1710g2544 REVA
Cabarrus County, INC Prepared by GRG on 2a22-1PW
Project Stud Area 1echlIc.IReviewbyXC.n=o 5-10
Y
Independent Review by MMR on =-9512
Client/Project
City of Concord
Bridge Replacement on Lincoln Street
over Irish Buffalo Creek
Figure No.
Cabarrus County
mIe
Vicinity Map
Notes 0 0.5 1
1. C..rdinaie Sysiem: NAD 19M S1a1e Plane North
Carol ins FIPS 32M Feel ® Mlles
2. Base features NCDO1 INC Onemap, ESRI. 1:95,460 (at original docu...1,Ize of 8.5,11)
resp.nsioiliry ror g c c mcip Ie n c i aata supplies III, ale n.mc roans'. In taccepurull responsioiliry--iryingtne accuracy ana .mpl eter ness of the data. Ins ecipientre leiu.nite ases �tantec, rs, employees, .nsunants ana aents,
from anyrand alleclaims arsrg in any way from the content or provision of the data. e

Piiiiranµ. LF,.btr �i. � •�i�' _ _..\. �,; ,�/ '.�
Y, (� ti.n • c .• •• 1 Na
�; V.�t`,
— _
( ���©'�•-t,
6 y
d'c 9 j.
650
rt
f5/ �♦ .`7 j [TLFrfordSC
�- �Jacqkson Park c
Pit
Leg end Pmjeci Locafin 17 f544 REVA
Cabarrus County, NC Prepared by GRG on 2022-10-�
Technical Revlew by A C on Q 2023-05-10 Project Study Area ndependeni ReNew by MMR on 2023-05-12
Clieni/Project
City of Concord
Bridge Replacement on Lincoln Street
over Irish Buffalo Creek
Figure No.
Cabarrus County 2
1nle
Project Study Area Map
Notes 0 0.25 0.5
1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983Siaie Plane Nodh Carolina FIPS 3200Fee1
2. Jbrisdicf.nal Delinear,, completed by Sianiec on Sepiember 29, 2022. Mlles
3. USGS Topoq,,d: Concord 1969 1:24,000 (at orlglnal dooument,i,, of 8.5,1 I1
pons billy fora ata"Pirte a in a le cnomc format In recipientI—px til resp—billy for—Irryng the ac c uracy Ina complete—otin, Iota.in, recipientreleases btantec,It, orticers, employees, cons--1. Ina agents,
from nyrInd .11 claims arres
sing wa In any y from the content or provision If the data. e

Legend P,q-1L cnimn 17IDo2s REVA
Concord Cabarets County, NC Preparetl by GRG-2022-1PN
—Potential JurisdictionalStream Tch, I R.V_ by r Cnn 2022-10os
Intlepedeni Reuiew by MMR on 2022-10-0
Q Project Study Area cl;envP,n,ec,
City of Concord
Project Bridge Replacement on Lincoln Street
over Irish Buffalo Creek
Notes
1. Coortlinaie Sysiem: NM 198 Siaie Plane North Carolina FIPS 3200Fee1
2. Ju,i d[cf.n.I Delineation compleietl by Sianiec on Sepiember 29, 2022.
3. Or h.[—ge ry © NCO -Map, M21
Figure No.
3
mIe
150 300 Potential Jurisdictional Features
ed Map
I :2,000
J'Cresponsioiliry for a 1' supplies in a lectronic torn at.
from nyrana all claims a sing in any way from ttte content or provision dthe tlaia
ll�

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: September 29, 2022
Project/Site: 171002544
Latitude: 35.3902094
Evaluator: Melissa R. Grayson G.
County: Cabarrus
Longitude:-80.5809
Total Points: 30
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination: Perennial
other:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 13.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of bed and bank
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑✓ 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
❑ 0
❑✓ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑✓ 2
❑ 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑✓ 3
5. Active/relict floodplain
❑ 0
❑✓ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
❑✓ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
❑ 0
❑✓ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
8. Headcuts
❑✓ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
9. Grade controls
❑ 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑✓ 1.5
10. Natural valley
❑ 0
❑ 0.5
❑✓ 1
❑ 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
❑✓ No
❑ Yes
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology ( Subtotal = 9)
12. Presence of Baseflow
❑ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑✓ 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
❑✓ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
14. Leaf litter
❑ 1.5
❑✓ 1
❑ 0.5
❑ 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
❑ 0
❑✓ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
❑ 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑✓ 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
❑ No
❑✓ Yes
C. Biology ( Subtotal = 7.5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
❑✓ 3
❑ 2
❑ 1
❑ 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
❑✓ 3
❑ 2
❑ 1
❑ 0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
❑✓ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
❑✓ 0
❑ 1
❑ 2
❑ 3
22. Fish
❑ 0
❑✓ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
23. Crayfish
❑✓ 0
❑ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
24. Amphibians
❑ 0
❑✓ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
25. Algae
❑ 0
❑✓ 0.5
❑ 1
❑ 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
❑ FACW ❑ OBL
❑✓ Other
" perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes: Ohwm at 6" to 1'
Sketch:
Bank Height (ft): 10
Bank full Width(ft): 8
Water Depth (in): 6

USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any supplementary
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT / SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Lincoln St Bridge 2. Date of evaluation: 9/29/2022
3. Applicant/owner name: City of Concord 4. Assessor name/organization: Melissa Ruiz, Stantec
5. County: Cabarrus 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Irish Buffalo Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.3902094,-80.5809
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): SA 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 6 r Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 10 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? (' Yes C No
14. Feature type: Perennial flow { Intermittent flow { Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: { Mountains (M) (j Piedmont (P) { Inner Coastal Plain (I) (-Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic
valley shape (skip for { a ��� (i b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) {� Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) { Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) { Size 4 (>_ 5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? Yes { No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters r Water Supply Watershed ( { I { II { III (_ IV V)
[- Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area r High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
r7 Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
r Anadromous fish r 303(d) List r CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
r Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r- Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? (i Yes { No
1. Channel Water -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
(i A Water throughout assessment reach.
{ B No flow, water in pools only.
{ C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
{ A At least 10 k of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
{� B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
{� A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
{ B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
{j A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
{ B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip rap).
(` A < 10 k of channel unstable
{� B 10 to 25 k of channel unstable
{ C > 25 % of channel unstable
6. Streamside Area Interaction - streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A { A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
{� B { B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
{ C (0- C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors - assessment reach/intertidal zone metric

Check all that apply.
r A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
F_ B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
r C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
r E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Notes/Sketch"
section.
F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
r I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought, for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
{ A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
{ B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
(i C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
{ Yes (i No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ({ Yes { No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs iF> 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses o W r F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � m r G Submerged aquatic vegetation
r B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o . r H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation ° r I Sand bottom
r C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r F_ J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
r D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots O r K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
Fv, E Little or no habitat
"*"*"*"*"*"*----"'REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS"'****—...***************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. { Yes ({ No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
FJ A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
r B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R) = present but
<— 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R
C
A
P
Bedrock/saprolfte
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
{
{
{
{ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
{
{
{
{ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
{
{
{
{ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
{
(D
{
{ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
({
{
{
{
{ Detritus
({
{
{
{
{ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. (-Yes { No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. 4. Yes { No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. { No Water { Other:
12b. { Yes (—e No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r r Adult frogs
r r Aquatic reptiles
r r Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
r r Beetles (including water pennies)
r r Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
r r Asian clam (Corbicula )
r r Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
r Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r r Dipterans (true flies)
r r Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r r Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r r Midges/mosquito larvae
r r Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
r r Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula )

r r Other fish
r r Salamanders/tadpoles
r r Snails
r r Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r r Tipulid larvae
r r Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and
upland runoff.
LB RB
{ A { A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
{� B { B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
{ C {i C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches, fill,
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
(-A { A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water_ 6 inches deep
{ B { B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
(i C C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
{ Y { Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
IN N
16. Baseflow Contributors -assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
r B Ponds (include wet detention basins, do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
r C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam)
r D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
r E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
r F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
r A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
r B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
r C Urban stream (> 24 k impervious surface for watershed)
r7 D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
r E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
F F None of the above
18. Shading - assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
{ A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
{ B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
{i C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
{� A { A { A { A >- 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
{ B { B { B { B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
{ C { C { C { C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
{ D { D D { D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
{ E {i E { E {i E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB IRS
{ - A (- A Mature forest
{ B { B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
{� C (j C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
{ D { D Maintained shrubs
{ E { E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: F
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
{A {A {A {A {A {A Row crops
{ B { B { B { B { B { B Maintained turf
{ C { C { C { C {` C { C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
{ D {` D { D { D {` D {` D Pasture (active livestock use)

22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
A { A Medium to high stem density
5e B { B Low stem density
{ C {i. C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
(� A (0— A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
{` B { B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
{` C { C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
{ A { A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
(' B { B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C (j C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. { Yes 4 No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. { No Water {` Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
(' A <46 { B 46 to < 67 (' C 67 to < 79 ( D 79 to < 230 { E >— 230
Notes/Sketch:
Small stream flowing along toe of shoulder on northeast side of Licoln Street

NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Lincoln St Bridge
Stream Category Pb2
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Date of Evaluation 9/29/2022
Assessor Name/Organization Melissa Ruiz, Stantec
YES
YES
YES
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4) Microtopography NA
(3) Stream Stability LOW
(4) Channel Stability MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat LOW
(3) Baseflow MEDIUM
(3) Substrate MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat LOW
(3) Thermoregulation LOW
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(3) Flow Restriction NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat NA
Overall LOW

Lincoln St Bridge SW
4 Threatened and Endangered Species
4 Threatened and Endangered Species
16

Lincoln St Bridge SW
4 Threatened and Endangered Species
4.1 IPaC
17

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2024-0002127
Project Name: Linocln St Bridge
October 06, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The enclosed species list
fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Please note that new species information can change your official species list. Under 50 CFR
402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list
should be verified after 90 days. The Service recommends you visit the ECOS-IPaC website at
regular intervals during project planning and implementation to ensure your species list is
accurate or obtain an updated species list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A biological assessment (BA) or biological evaluation (BE) should be completed for your
project. A BA is required for major construction activities (or other undertakings having similar
physical impacts) considered to be Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c))
(NEPA). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a BE be
prepared to determine effects of the action and whether those effects may affect listed species
and/or designated critical habitat. Effects of the action are all consequences to listed species or
critical habitat that are caused by the proposed action, including the consequences of other

10/06/2023
activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action
if it is reasonably certain to occur and would not occur "but for" the proposed action..
Recommended contents of a BA/BE are described at 50 CFR 402.12. More information and
resources about project review and preparing a BA/BE can be found at the following web link:
https://www.fws. gov/office/asheville-ecological-services/asheville-field-office-online-review-
process-overview.
If a Federal agency determines listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected
by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR
402. The Service is not required to concur with "no effect" determinations from Federal action
agencies. If consultation is required, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed
species, proposed critical habitat, and at -risk species be addressed within the consultation. More
information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of
permit or licensed applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook"
at the following web link: https://www.fws.gov/media/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Act, there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -
related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds,
including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12
and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). More information about MBTA and BGEPA can be found at the
following web link: https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds.
We appreciate your consideration of Federally listed species. The Service encourages Federal
agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species in their project planning
to further the purposes of the Act. Please contact our staff at 828-258-3939, if you have any
questions. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference the
Consultation Code which can be found in the header of this letter.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether

10/06/2023
3
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

10/06/2023
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0002127
Project Name: Linocln St Bridge
Project Type: Bridge - Replacement
Project Description: replace bridge over Irish Buffalo Creek
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.v-oop-le.com/maDs/035.3899361.-80.58108454411892.14z
�Zari.4we 5IN
Counties: Cabarrus County, North Carolina

10/06/2023 5
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

10/06/2023 6
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Acti and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
There are bald and/or golden eagles in your project area.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.

10/06/2023
7
Probability of Presence (■)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC I 1 I I 114+ ++++ ++++ ++++
Vulnerable
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Managment https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-may-occur-
project-action
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.

10/06/2023 8
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Cerulean Warbler Dendroica cerulea Breeds Apr 28
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Jul 20
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/297
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Aug 25
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read the supplemental

10/06/2023
E
information and specifically the FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird
Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald
Non-BCCe ++1+ +++1616-1 I I I �ii
Vulnerable
Cerulean Warbler
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ -I I I-++ R1 + ++.+ ..++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Chininey Swift
BCC Rangewde ++++ ++++ ++++,+,"" �'+11 "+' 1+11 —1" 11++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Prairie Warbler BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ ++,+t�ttt ttt ++.+ ..++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Prothonotary 'Mmw
Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ Jill iiii Jill 1111 +1.+ ..++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed 00711111111+++1++
Woodpecker ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++ I I I I I I-+ I I I I I I I
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird +++-I I +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++.+ ..++ ++++'+'+ ++++
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush ++++ ++++ ++++ +++, ,++$ ++'+ ++++ ++—+ --'+ ++++ ++++ ++++

10/06/2023 10
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-mi rator.
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-mi ratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-ea les-may-occur-
project-action
WETLANDS
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
RIVERINE
• R4SBC
• R2UBHx

10/06/2023
11
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Private Entity
Name:
Melissa Ruiz
Address:
801 Jones Franklin Rd Sutie 300
City:
Raleigh
State:
NC
Zip:
27606
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9198657529
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers

Roy Cooper, Governor
0■0■� INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■�■m NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
October 6, 2023
Amber Coleman
Sta ntec
801 Jones Franklin Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE. Lincoln St Bridge update
Dear Amber Coleman.
d_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-23553
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here.
httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritageLdncr.nc.gov.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR71MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Lincoln St Bridge update
October 6, 2023
NCNHDE-23553
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Nam Owner Owner Type
Cabarrus County Open Space Cabarrus County Local Government
City of Concord Open Space City of Concord Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on October 6, 2023; source: NCNHP, Summer (July) 2023.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-23553: Lincoln St Bridge update
2
La `o�`o
Sy1
F
Je
v
a
m Lam.
IUr11Y)/ at
�
fsh
�
ro U.
tillage
s �F
N
Pve
��
z
Cabar"Js
�z
n
as
774ft
=
vc
N
�
o
`E4p<S
EaS�
m
�
a
Q.
o
e
S"
os�
West
Concord
Rutherford
Cemetery
on C
ti
PJe � 4io'
SrS
Ras
P•Je`
�
co
�a
S�
Je
714 ft
601
w
Pbb
3
Rol
T
d
N
rh
0
700 fr
W L
Jackson Park
s�
0.28 0.55 1.1 Miles
S
5�
Lit r Lin I j t I I j j j I
October 6, 2023
Managed Area (MAREA)
Q Buffered Project Boundary
Q Project Boundary
So uross. Fsh, Airbus DS. USGS. NGA. NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson. NCFAS.
NLS. OS, NMA. Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Geoland, FFMA,
It-mapand the GIS user community
Sources. Esri, HERE. Garm in. FAO. NOAA, USGS. © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User in,
Page 3 of 3

Lincoln St Bridge SW
4 Threatened and Endangered Species
4.2 Bat Bridge Assessment
32

® Stantec Memo
To:
From: Trevor Walker
Stantec
File: 171002544 Date: October 6, 2023
Reference: Bridge 320— Bridge Survey for Bats
The City of Concord proposes to replace Bridge No. 320 over Irish Buffalo Creek in Cabarrus
County, North Carolina. The existing bridge is a steel deck on steel bents and concrete abutments.
A bat habitat assessment and structure survey were conducted on June 19, 2023. The tri-colored
bat (Perimyotis subflavus) is listed as proposed. On September 14, 2022, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service published a proposal in the Federal Register to list the tri-colored bat (PESU) as
endangered under the Endangered Species Act. The Service has up to 12-months from the
proposal publish date to make a final determination to either list the tri-colored bat or withdraw the
proposal. PESU face extinction primarily due to range -wide impacts of white -nose syndrome
(WNS), which is a deadly fungal disease that affects cave -dwelling bats across North America.
Surviving PESU populations are now more vulnerable to other stressors such as habitat loss and
human disturbance due to the reduction in population from WNS. Species proposed for listing are
not afforded protection under the ESA, but as soon as listing becomes effective (usually 30 days
after the publication of the final rule in the Federal register), prohibitions against jeopardizing
PESU's surviving populations and "take" will apply.
According to the USFWS publication Species Status Assessment of the Tri-Colored Bat (Perimyotis
subflavus) (2021), during the spring, summer, and fall, tri-colored bats primarily roost among live
and dead leaf clusters of live or recently dead deciduous hardwood trees and have been
documented roosting within artificial roosts (i.e. bridges, culverts, barns, and concrete bunkers) as
well. Other roosting sites include pine trees, eastern red cedar, and rarely within caves. Females
are also documented to exhibit high site fidelity, returning to the same summer roosting locations
year after year. During the winter, tri-colored bats hibernate in caves and mines, however here in
the southern U.S., where caves are sparse, tri-colored bats often use road -associated culverts,
where tri-colored bats also exhibit high site fidelity returning year after year to the same hibernacula.
On June 19, 2023 Stantec biologists assessed Bridge No. 320 for potential bat habitat. Suitable
roosting crevices were present. No evidence (bats, staining, and guano) of bats using the bridge
was observed. Survey information was documented in the 2022 BSG Bat Habitat Assessment
Bridge Survey123 survey and is provided in the appendix (Appendix A). There is summer roosting
habitat in the surrounding trees for tri-colored bats. A desktop analysis using ArcMap showed
forested areas containing live and dead leaf clusters as well as dead or dying deciduous hardwood
trees accounting for approximately 0.5 acres of the approximately 3 acre study area. A Stantec
biologist did a habitat assessment of the project footprint and showed there is minimal to moderate
suitability for roost tree potential within the project area for tri-colored bats.

October 6, 2023
Page 2of2
Reference: Bridge 320 — Bridge Survey for Bats
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
Trevor Walker
Environmental Scientist/Bat Biologist
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attachment: Bat Survey Form

Appendix A.- Survey123 Form
NCDOT BSG Bat Habitat Bridges
Submitted by: Trevor.WaIke [e-mail]_stantec
General Bridge Information
Observer:
Trevor Walker
Jun 19, 2023
Time
13:28
Location-
Lat: 35.390044 Lon:-80.581285
'Z UNITED
it} STATES
4�
�Q
Mtxlco
Bridge Number:
320
County:
Ca ba rrus
Habitat
Submitted time: Oct 5, 2023, 3:43:27 PM
Esri, HERE, Garmin, ...

Urban/Commercial:
50
Caves in Project Footprint?
No
Caves in Vicinity?
No
Mines in Project Footprint?
No
Mines in Vicinity?
No
Water Features
Major water source in project footprint:
Stream/Creek
Suitable drinking habitat in the form of non -stagnant, smooth or slack water?
Yes
Photos

Water Photo:
Water Photo-20230619-173105.jpg
Bridge Features
Artificial Lighting?
No
Guard Rails?
• Metal
Deck Type(s)?
• Concrete
• Metal
Beam Type(s)?
• Steel
End/Back wall type(s)?
• Concrete
Creosote Evidence?
No

Suitable Roosting Crevices Present?
Yes
Deck Drains?
No
Night Roost Habitat Protected?
ILIr•.
NE/SW
Hours of sun exposure to bridge:
>3
Photos
Bridge Photo:

Bridge Photo:
�.V
Bridge_Photo-20230619-173314.jpg
Bridge Notes:
Bridge is failing and needs to be replaced
Human Disturbance
Human disturbance under bridge:
Low
Bat Evidence/Activity
Emergence count performed?
ILIr•.
Evidence of bats using bird nests, if present?
No
Evidence of bats using bridge?
No
Tree Characteristics (Based on Bat Species Selection)
Any Trees >3" DBH within Project Footprint?
N/A

Any Shaggy Trees or Snags >5" DBH?
NIA

Appendix B. Lincoln Street Photo Log
Client: NCDOT Project: Lincoln Street Bridge Bat
Survey
Site Name: Lincoln Street Site Location: Cabarrus County, SC
Bridge
Photo ID: 1�e�
Photo Label: Lincoln Street Bridge"
GPS Location:
35.39021 - 80.58137
Survey Date: 6/19/2023
Comments: Lincoln Street Bridge over
Irish Buffalo Creek
Photo ID: 2
Photo Label:
1IL-1.3
GPS Location:
35.38989 - 80.58111
Survey Date: 6/19/2023
Comments: Lincoln Street Bridge Top
View

Lincoln St Bridge SW
4 Threatened and Endangered Species
4.3 Agency Correspondence - USFWS and NCWRC

f NT OF Ty�'fi EIS &WHM iEE
SERVICE
N �o United States Department of the Interior
_ FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 4
q�cH,'�°� Asheville Field Office rM
ffi
160 Zillicoa Street Suite B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
February 13, 2023
Phillip Graham
City of Concord
635 Alfred Brown Junior Court SW, P.O. Box 308
Concord, North Carolina 28026
Subject: Scoping Request for Bridge 320 Replacement on Lincoln Street Southwest over Irish Buffalo
Creek in Concord, Cabarrus County (Service Log 923-219)
Dear Phillip Graham:
On January 31, 2023, we received your e-mail requesting our comments on the subject project. We have
reviewed the information that you presented, and the following comments are provided in accordance
with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§ 4321 et seq.) (NEPA); the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 703); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661 - 667e); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 - 1543) (Act).
Proiect Description
According to the information provided, the City of Concord and the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) is proposing to replace Bridge 320 on Lincoln Street SW over Irish Buffalo
Creek. The project is scheduled for construction in fiscal year 2025. The City of Concord has started the
project development, environmental, and engineering studies for the project and is requesting any
information that may be helpful in evaluating the potential environmental effects of the proposed project.
Federally Listed Species
The proposed project is in an area that has potential or known occurrence records of species with federal
designations. Below is a list of species which should be considered. No critical habitat is present within
the project vicinity.
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Little brown bat
Myotis lucifugus
At -Risk Species
Monarch butterfly
Danaus plexippus
Candidate
Schweinitz's sunflower
Helianthus schweinitzii
Endangered
Tricolored bat
Perimyotis subflavus
Proposed Endangered
In accordance with section 7 (a)(2) of the Act and 50 CFR Part 402.01, before any federal
authorization/permits or funding can be issued for this project, it is the responsibility of the appropriate
federal regulatory/permitting and/or funding agency(ies) to determine whether the project may affect any
federally endangered or threatened species (listed species) or designated critical habitat. If it is determined
that this project may affect any listed species or designated critical habitat, the lead federal agency or their
designated non-federal representative must initiate section 7 consultation with this office.

If there is no federal nexus for the proposed activities, then section 7 consultation is not required.
However, section 9 of the Act (Prohibited Acts)(a)(1)(B) still applies and explicitly states that it is
unlawful for any person — including private and public entities — to "take" individuals of an endangered
species and, by regulation, a threatened species (16 U.S.C. §1533(d).
To determine whether a project may affect listed species, we first recommend surveying the action area
for suitable habitat for the above species prior to any on -the -ground activities. The action area includes
all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the federal action and not merely the immediate area
involved in the action (50 CFR 402.02). The placement of new or the relocation of existing utility lines, if
it would not occur but for the proposed project and is reasonably certain to occur (50 CFR 402.02, 50
CFR 402.17), should be included in the action area. Suitable habitat surveys can be done any time of year.
In the event suitable habitat is present for any species, we recommend that the proponent conduct species -
specific surveys during the appropriate timeframe to ensure that no populations of rare species are
inadvertently affected by the proposed project. If surveys are not performed, you may assume presence of
the species and consult with us under section 7(a)(2) of the Act.
Information on optimal botanical survey windows can be found here: hops://www.fws. ovg /story/2022-
03/north-carolinas-federally-threatened-endangered-and-risk-plant-species. Active season bat surveys, if
conducted, should occur between May 15 and August 15. As a reminder, those completing animal surveys
must have a section 10(a)(1)(A) permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) or be
conducting surveys with a permitted individual/agency, if there is a chance that animals will be captured
and handled. A condition of the permit is to coordinate with the Service at least 15 days prior to surveys.
Guidance on conducting surveys for bats in suitable tree roosting, foraging, and commuting habitat can be
found here: hops://www.fws.gov/library/collections/range-wide-indiana-bat-and-northern-long-eared-bat-
survey-guidelines. These guidelines are designed to determine whether northern long-eared bats and
Indiana bats are present or absent at a given site during the summer (May 15 to August 15). NCDOT can
use the guidelines to survey for tricolored bat and little brown bat following the highest level of effort
presented in the document. The Service updates this guidance annually and will include tricolored bats in
the future. The Asheville Ecological Services Field Office does not have guidance for conducting bat
surveys in suitable structural roosts though endorses a training created jointly by the Service and Federal
Highways Administration (hitps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuFwkT7g8Ws) that may be a helpful
resource. If the project may impact bats, we recommend that experienced biologists conduct surveys of
suitable structural roosts within two years of construction. Bats can roost in many kinds of human -made
structures including buildings, bridges, and culverts.
Because Schweinitz's sunflower is known to occur in the area, it should be considered in any biological
evaluation and/or biological assessment (BE/BA) prepared for this project. A review of the project area
reveals existing records of Schweinitz's sunflower about six miles from the project area. Guidance on
what is included in a complete BE/BA can be found at hops://www.fws.gov/office/asheville-ecological
ig cal_
services/asheville-field-office-online -review-process-overview. If a "may affect" determination is made,
please include measures to avoid and minimize the potential impacts to each species. This will help
determine if a "may affect" determination is "likely to adversely affect" or "not likely to adversely affect"
the species and assist the Service in review of that determination. Effect determinations should be
supported by information and an analysis or justification in the BE/BA that provides the biological
rationale for the determination. Use tips at the following link to avoid common determination flaws:
hops://www.fws. ovg /story/endan eg red -species -act -federal -project -review -understanding -effect -
determinations.

A review of the project area reveals existing records of hibernating tricolored bat about 10 miles from the
project. On September 14, 2022, the Service published a proposal in the Federal Register to list the
tricolored bat as endangered under the Act. The Service has up to 12-months from the date the proposal
published to make a final determination, either to list the tricolored bat under the Act or to withdraw the
proposal. The Service determined the bat faces extinction primarily due to the range -wide impacts of
white -nose syndrome (WNS), a deadly fungal disease affecting cave -dwelling bats across North America.
Because tricolored bat populations have been greatly reduced due to WNS, surviving bat populations are
now more vulnerable to other stressors such as human disturbance and habitat loss. Species proposed for
listing are not afforded protection under the Act; however, as soon as a listing becomes effective
(typically 30 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register), the prohibitions against
jeopardizing its continued existence and "take" will apply. Therefore, if you suspect your project may
affect tricolored bats after the potential new listing goes into effect, we recommend analyzing possible
effects of the project on tricolored bats and their habitat to determine whether consultation under section 7
of the Act is necessary. Conferencing procedures can be followed prior to listing to ensure the project
does not jeopardize the existence of a species or adversely modify critical habitat.
Little brown bat is an at -risk species (ARS) and monarch butterfly is a candidate species (CAN). ARS and
CAN are not legally protected under the Act and are not subject to any of its provisions, including section
7, unless they are formally proposed or listed as endangered or threatened. We will be making listing
determinations on one of these species in the near future. While lead federal agencies are not prohibited
from jeopardizing the continued existence of an ARS or CAN unless the species becomes listed, the
prohibition against jeopardy and taking a listed species under section 9 of the Act applies as soon as a
listing becomes effective, regardless of the stage of completion of the proposed action. We are including
these species in our response to give you advanced notification and request your assistance in protecting
them. Although not required, we recommend that the presence or absence of these species be addressed in
any BE or BA for this or future projects, depending on your expected completion timeline.
Migratory Birds
The MBTA implements four treaties that provide for the international protection of migratory birds. The
MBTA prohibits taking, killing, possession, transportation, and importation of migratory birds, their eggs,
parts, and nests, except when specifically authorized by the Department of the Interior.
For many industries and activities, the Service has developed activity -specific guidance found at the
following website: https:llwww.fws.gov/birds/mana e�/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance.php.
These guidance documents are designed to help industry and project developers implement measures to
reduce activity -specific impacts to migratory birds. These documents provide important background on
the applicable laws and policies, helping clarify standards and expectations and/or offering suggested best
practices to avoid or minimize negative impacts to birds.
In general, to avoid impacts to migratory birds, we recommend conducting a visual inspection of
structures to be demolished or maintained and other migratory bird nesting habitat within the work area
during the migratory bird nesting season of March through September. If migratory birds are discovered
nesting in the work area, including an existing structure, impacts to the occupied nests should be avoided.
If birds are discovered nesting on or in a structure in the years prior to a proposed construction date, the
project proponent, in consultation with us, should develop measures to discourage birds from establishing
nests by means that will not result in the take of the birds or eggs.
Fish and Wildlife Resource Recommendations
We are also concerned about the potential effects the project could have on other natural resources within
and surrounding the proposed project location. We offer the following general recommendations for the
benefit of fish and wildlife resources:

Bat Conservation. To protect bats, we recommend the following conservation measures.
o If suitable roosting trees are present at the site and will be impacted, we recommend
either tree removal in the winter (October 16 through March 31) or a roost emergence
survey of any suitable roost trees one day prior to removal in accordance with the Range -
wide Indiana Bat and NLEB Survey Guidelines (Appendix E;
hiips://www. fws. gov/library/collections/range-wide-indiana-bat-and-northern-lon.
bat -survey -guidelines.).
o Verify the absence of bats and signs of bat use on bridges and culverts within 15 days of
construction and/or demolition activities.
o Avoid night work completely or reduce night work to the maximum extent practicable.
o Avoid addition of new lighting. Avoid the modification of existing lighting in ways that
make it brighter or allow it to reach farther into nearby natural habitats. We encourage the
removal of all existing permanent lighting where it is not needed for safety. Additional
lighting conservation measures are available if lighting cannot be avoided.
o Noise considerations for tree -roosting bats:
■ If suitable roost trees are present near high -decibel activity (81— 162 dBA) and
would experience noise above background levels (41 — 70 dBA), avoid conducting
those high -decibel activities during the bat maternity season (May 15 — August 15).
Alternatively, activity could avoid the pup season (June 1 and July 31).
■ To minimize noise levels, incorporate sound -dampening devices such as noise
shrouds for pile driving.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Construction activities near aquatic resources, streams,
and wetlands have the potential to cause bank destabilization, water pollution, and water quality
degradation if measures to control site runoff are not properly installed and maintained. In order
to effectively reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts, best management practices specific to
the extent and type of construction should be designed and installed prior to land disturbing
activities and should be maintained throughout construction. Natural fiber matting (coir) should
be used for erosion control as synthetic netting can trap animals and persists in the environment
beyond its intended purpose. Land disturbance should be limited to what can be stabilized
quickly, preferably by the end of the workday. Once construction is complete, disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native riparian grass and tree species as soon as possible. For
maximum benefits to water quality and bank stabilization, riparian areas should be forested;
however, if the areas are maintained in grass, they should not be mowed. The Service can provide
information on potential sources of plant material upon request. A complete North Carolina
Department of Transportation specific design manual, which provides extensive details and
procedures for developing site specific plans to control erosion and sediment and is consistent
with the requirements of the North Carolina Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act and
Administrative Rules, is available at:
https: //connect. ncdot.gov/resources/roadside/S`oilWaterpocuments/Erosion%20and%2OSediment
%20Control%2ODesILn%20andYo2OConstruction%2OManual.pdf.
Post -Construction Stormwater Management. Stormwater runoff is generated from rain and
snowmelt that flows over land or impervious surfaces (e.g., paved streets, parking lots, roofs) and
does not soak into the ground'. Studies' show that areas of 10 to 20 percent impervious surface
double the amount of stormwater runoff compared to natural vegetative cover and decreases deep
infiltration (groundwater recharge) by 16 percent. At 35 to 50 percent impervious surface, runoff
triples, and deep infiltration is decreased by 40 percent. Stormwater runoff collects pathogens,
'https://www. epa. gov/sourcewatelprotection/urbanization-and-storm-water-runoff
'Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group. (2001). Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles,
Processes, and Practices. GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN-0-934213-59-3.
https://www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb 1044574.pdf
4

metals, sediment, and chemical pollutants and quickly transmits them to receiving waters. Some
stormwater runoff from roads and highways is considered nonpoint source pollution. Nonpoint
source pollution is one of the major threats to water quality in the U.S.', poses risks to aquatic
life', and is linked to chronic and acute illnesses in humans'. Increased stormwater runoff also
causes streambank and stream channel scouring, directly damaging aquatic and riparian habitat.
Impervious surfaces reduce groundwater recharge, resulting in lower -than -expected stream flows
during drought periods, which can induce potentially catastrophic effects for fish, mussels, and
other aquatic life. Use of stormwater control measures (SCMs) will decrease the quantity and
increase the quality of stormwater runoff. We have the following recommendations:
o All roadway projects should implement stormwater retention and treatment measures
designed to replicate and maintain the hydrograph at the preconstruction condition.
o Use low impact development techniques,' such as reduced road widths, grassed swales in
place of curb and gutter, rain gardens, and wetland retention areas for retaining and
treating stormwater runoff rather than more traditional measures (e.g., retention ponds).
These designs often cost less and reduce the environmental impacts of development.
o Where detention ponds are used, stormwater outlets should drain through a vegetated
area prior to reaching any natural stream or wetland. Detention ponds should be designed
to allow for the slow discharge of stormwater, attenuating the potential adverse effects of
stormwater surges; thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical discharges.
o Because the purpose of SCMs is to protect streams and wetlands, no SCMs should be
installed within any stream (perennial or intermittent) or wetland.
o Ensure SCMs work as intended by performing routine inspection and maintenance.
o For projects that include bridges:
■ Do not allow bridge deck drains to discharge directly into surface waters.
■ Consider whether discharges from the bridge can occur outside the riparian
buffer to allow time and space for treatment.
■ Provide SCMs that ensure that stormwater discharged from bridge deck drains
will be released as diffused flow, preventing preferential flow.
Stream Buffers. Natural, forested riparian buffers are critical to the health of aquatic ecosystems.
They accomplish the following: 1) catch and filter runoff, thereby helping to prevent non -point
source pollutants from reaching streams, 2) enhance the instream processing of both point and
non -point source pollutants, 3) act as "sponges" by absorbing runoff (which reduces the severity
of floods) and by allowing runoff to infiltrate and recharge groundwater levels (which maintains
stream flows during dry periods), 4) catch and help prevent excess woody debris from entering
the stream and creating logjams, 5) stabilize stream banks and maintain natural channel
morphology, 6) provide coarse woody debris for habitat structure and most of the dissolved
organic carbon and other nutrients necessary for the aquatic food web, and 7) maintain air and
water temperatures around the stream. Forested riparian buffers (a minimum 50 feet wide along
intermittent streams and 100 feet wide along perennial streams [or the full extent of the 100year
floodplain, whichever is greater]) should be created and/or maintained adjacent to all aquatic
areas. Within the watersheds supporting federally listed aquatic species, we recommend
undisturbed, forested buffers that are naturally vegetated with trees, shrubs, and herbaceous
vegetation. These buffers should extend a minimum of 200 feet from the banks of all perennial
3 US Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). National Water Quality Inventory: 2000 Report. Washington, DC.
Report EPA-841-R-02-001.
' Sun, Z. et al. (2019). Impact of environmental factors on aquatic biodiversity in roadside stormwater ponds. Sci
Rep 9, 5994. https://doi.org/10.1038/s4l598-019-42497-z
5 Gaffield, S. J. et al. (2003). Public health effects of inadequately managed stormwater runoff. American Journal of
Public Health, 93(9), 1527-1533. https://doi.org/l0.2105/aiph.93.9.1527
'http://www. epa. gov/polluted-nmo ff-noMoint-source-pollution/urban-runoff-low-impact-development

streams and a minimum of 100 feet from the banks of all intermittent streams (or the full extent
of the 100year floodplain, whichever is greater.) Impervious surfaces, ditches, pipes, roads, utility
lines (sewer, water, gas, transmission, etc.), and other infrastructure that requires maintenance,
cleared rights -of -way and/or compromise the functions and values of the forested buffers should
not occur within these riparian areas.
Concrete. At no time should "live" or uncured concrete, concrete leachate, or excess concrete
waste come into contact with surface waters. Concrete contains lime which is highly toxic to
aquatic organisms. Until concrete is fully cured, lime is mobile and dissolves easily in water
(water soluble). Inputs of lime increase the pH of water which can cause a range of negative
effects to aquatic organisms including burns (just like an acid burn) on fish and direct mortality of
a wide variety of aquatic species. To avoid uncured concrete coming into contact with surface
waters, a dry work area should be established for any concrete work. Site specific measures
should be developed to contain concrete in dry work areas and plans should be established for the
safe disposal of any excess concrete waste.
Equipment Use in Riparian Areas and In -Stream. Equipment should be operated from the
streambank. If in -stream work is necessary, stone causeways, work bridges, or mats (designed for
the specific location and type of equipment) should be used. Work pads on streambanks or
approaches to in -stream work areas should minimize disturbance to woody vegetation. Equipment
operated in riparian areas and in/near aquatic resources should be inspected daily and maintained
regularly to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic
fluids, or other toxic materials. Construction staging, toxic material storage, and equipment
maintenance, including refueling, should occur outside of the riparian area. The project proponent
should report any toxic material spills in riparian areas and/or aquatic resources to the Service
within 24 hours.
Replacing Structures that Cross Rivers and Streams. We generally recommend the use of
clear -spanning bridge structures designed, at a minimum, to accommodate the active channel
width. Use of culverts is discouraged. Properly sized spanning structures will provide for the
passage of aquatic species and accommodate the movement of debris and bed material.
Furthermore, spanning structures usually: (1) can be constructed with minimal instream impacts,
(2) do not require stream channel realignment, and (3) retain the natural streambed conditions;
and the horizontal and vertical clearances may be designed to allow for human and wildlife
passage beneath the structures.
o If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the streams. Bents can collect
debris during flood events, resulting in the scouring of bridge foundations. In -stream
bents can also result in hydrologic changes, such as bedload scour or deposition, which
may adversely affect in -stream habitat.
o Deck drains of the spanning structures should not discharge directly into the streams;
instead, they should drain through a vegetated area before entering the streams. Removal
of vegetation in riparian areas should be minimized.
o Armoring of the bank with riprap should be minimized. The reseeding of disturbed areas
should be performed promptly after grading, and seed mixes should consist of native
vegetation to prevent the spread of invasive plant species.
o New structures should be constructed without the use of in -stream causeways or work
pads whenever possible. When causeways are necessary, using the largest washed stone
practicable for the application will prevent unnecessary damage to in -stream habitat and
will facilitate complete removal.
o We recommend that all equipment be refueled and receive maintenance outside of the
riparian zone. Refueling and maintenance should take place in designated refueling sites
that are provisioned to quickly contain any spills of fuel, lubricants, and other fluids.
o If bridges are not possible and culverts are the only option, we suggest using bottomless
culverts. Bottomless culverts preserve the natural stream substrate, create less disturbance

during construction, and provide a more natural post -construction channel. Culverts
should be of sufficient size to leave natural stream functions and habitats at the crossing
site unimpeded. Culvert installation and presence should not change water depth, volume
(flow), or velocity levels that permit aquatic organism passage; and accommodate the
movement of debris and bed material during bankfull events. Widening the stream
channel must be avoided.
o If a traditional culvert is the only option, the culvert design should provide for a
minimum water depth in the structure during low flow or dry periods. Sufficient water
depth should be maintained in all flow regimes to accommodate both the upstream and
downstream movement of aquatic species. Water depth inside the culvert must be
adequate for fish to be completely submerged and all other aquatic life to move freely,
even during low flow periods. The culvert should be designed and installed at the same
slope as the stream grade to maintain an acceptable water velocity for aquatic life passage
and for stream substrate characteristics to be retained within the culvert.
o Where feasible, we recommend the use of multiple barrels, in addition to a low flow
barrel, to accommodate flood flows. Floodplain barrels should be placed on or near
stream bankfull or floodplain bench elevations and discharge onto floodplain benches.
Where appropriate, install sills on the upstream end of floodplain barrels to restrict or
divert the base stream flow to a single barrel. If the culvert is longer than 40 linear feet,
alternating or notched baffles should be installed in a manner that mimics the existing
stream pattern. This will enhance the passage of aquatic life by: (1) depositing and
retaining sediment in the barrel, (2) maintaining channel depth and flow regimes, and (3)
providing resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Ms. Lauren B. Wilson of our
staff at lauren_wilson&fws.gov if you have any questions. In any future correspondence concerning this
project, please reference our Service Log 923-219.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
Electronic CC:
Joel Howard, Division 10 Environmental Specialist
Dave McHenry, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, NCDOT Liaison

9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Cameron Ingram, Executive Director
Via Email
20 February 2023
Phillip Graham
City of Concord
635 Alfred Brown Jr. Court SW
PO Box 308
Concord, NC 28026
Subject: Environmental Review
Lincoln Street Bridge Replacement over Irish Buffalo Creek
Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Graham,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject
information. Our comments are provided in accordance with the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48
Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The City of Concord (City) is requesting an environmental review concerning the potential impacts on
state and federally protected species from replacement of Lincoln Street Bridge over Irish Buffalo Creek
in Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. The project to replace the bridge is to improve safety and
traffic operations.
The bridge crosses Irish Buffalo Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin. Irish Buffalo Creek is
classified as a Class C water by the NC Division of Water Resources. We have no records of federal or
state -listed species or Critical Habitat within or adjacent to the property. The lack of records from the site
does not imply or confirm the absence of federal or state -listed species. An on -site survey is the only
means to determine if the proposed project may impact federal or state rare, threatened, or endangered
species. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists the federally and state endangered
Schweinitz's sunflower (Hehanthus schweinitzii), the proposed endangered tricolored bat (Perimyotis
subflavus), and candidate monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) as having potential to occur within the
project area if suitable habitat occurs. We recommend contacting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at
[phone] to ensure that any issues related to this species are addressed.
Although it is unlikely the project will have a significant impact on aquatic and terrestrial resources, we
recommend the following recommendations to minimize impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife
resources.
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
20 February 2023
Lincoln Street Bridge Replacement
Cabarrus County
1. We recommend surveying the bridge for bats that maybe roosting in the bridge. Surveys should
be conducted prior to construction. If bats are found, please contact me at 336.269.0074.
2. Avoid tree clearing activities during the maternity roosting season for bats (May 15 — August 15)
because of the decline in populations of several bat species, including the proposed endangered
tricolored bat.
3. If large rip rap will be placed on the banks under the bridge, we recommend leaving a small path
to allow wildlife to walk under the bridge.
4. Use stringent erosion and sediment control methods. Sediment and erosion control measures
should use advanced methods and installed prior to any land -disturbing activity.
5. The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices is strongly
recommended in riparian and upland areas. Silt fencing, fiber rolls, erosion control blankets,
and/or other products should have loose -weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials
with movable joints between the vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing that has been
reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial
wildlife species. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained.
Non-native plants should not be used for seeding disturbed areas. Specifically, avoid using
Bermudagrass, redtop, tall fescue, and lespedeza, which are invasive and/or non-native. A list of
alternatives to non-native species has been attached. Alternatively, use a grain, such as oats,
wheat, or rye for temporary cover and native seed mixes for permeant seeding. We recommend
planting native, wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator habitat within the project
boundary.
If I can be of additional assistance, please call [phone] or email olivia.munzerkncwildlife.org.
Sincerely,
Olivia Munzer
Western Piedmont Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
ec: Ryan White, Stantec

RECOMMENDED NATIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR NON-NATIVE GRASSES IN
NORTH CAROLINA"
(Species are appropriate for all geographic regions unless otherwise indicated)
NON-NATIVE SPECIES
NATIVE SPECIES
Big bluestem
Andropogon gerardii
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
Crownvetch
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Centipede
Beaked panicgrass
Panicum anceps
Bermuda
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Roundheaded bushclover
Lespedeza capitata
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata
Big bluestem
Andropogon gerardii
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Indiangrass
Sorghastrum nutans
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Kentucky bluegrass
Beaked panicgrass
Panicum anceps
Tall fescue
Purpletop
Tridens flavus
Sudangrass
Broomsedge
Andropogon virginicus
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Canadian wildrye
Elymus canadensis
Virginia wildrye
Elymus virginicus
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata
Switchgrass
Panicum virgatum
Splitbeard bluestem
Andropogon ternarius
Sericea lespedeza
Beggarlice
Desmodium spp.
Kobe lespedeza
Deer tongue
Dicanthelium clandestinum
Sensitive partridge pea
Chamaecrista nictitans
Partridge pea
Chamaecrista asciculata

NC Native Plant Recommendations
**A recommended revegetation/stabilization mix would ideally include a combination
of the species listed in this table. In addition, please note that additional consideration
may be needed in areas that are (highly) erodible and/or have sloped terrain. The
following species could be included in all regions for additional stabilization and
wildlife benefit:
Black-eyed Susan:
Plains coreopsis:
Lance -leaved coreopsis:
Narrow -leaved sunflower:
Created October 2018
Rudbeckia hirta
Coreopsis tinctoria
Coreopsis lanceolate
Helianthus angustifolius

Lincoln St Bridge SW
5 Cultural Resources
5 Cultural Resources
54

§.]
n
ing-Hartsell
m,e0
�
H POWE B 2.0 Cultural Resources Map
® Egx aeS
ƒ /
- -T / a
/ �\
},GemG,a:
4444 ` -
» ®�
:CA(01362
lemFrank�2pmL,u /
Mill
2 2
%
&%
�
+
�
«
�
�
�
SL m #HE% & boundarie5
STATUS
71 SE(tSuGList)

Lincoln St Bridge SW
5 Cultural Resources
5.2 Agency Coordination - SHPO
56

VNO RTH CAROLINA
High Performance Living
I■■■■■■■■■■■■1111
Crystal Amschler
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
635 Alfred Brown Jr. Court SW., P.O. Box 308, Concord, NC 28026 - concordnc.gov
January 16, 2023
Subject: Start of Study Notification
Replacement of Lincoln Street Bridge over Irish Buffalo Creek in
Concord, Cabarrus County
The City of Concord has started the project development, environmental, and engineering
studies for the replacement of the Lincoln Street Bridge over Irish Buffalo Creek. The
project proposes to replace the bridge to improve safety and traffic operations. The project
is scheduled for construction in fiscal year 2025. Figure 1 shows the vicinity map for the
proposed project.
City of Concord staff or their consultants may be contacting you to request project -specific
information. While we do not expect a response to this notification, we welcome your input
if you have time -sensitive concerns. Your input will be used in the development of
environmental documentation prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
and/or State Environmental Policy Act. We would appreciate any information that may be
helpful in evaluating the potential environmental effects of the proposed project, as well as
recommended alternatives to be considered. If applicable, please identify any permits or
approvals which may be required by your organization.
If you have any questions concerning the project, please contact me at [phone] or
by email at grahampkconcordnc.gov.
Sincerely,
Phillip Graham, PE
Director of Transportation
Transportation
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
March 7, 2023
Ryan L. White P.E.
Stantec
801 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina
27606-3563
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
aan.whitegstantec.com
Re: Replace bridge and add sidewalks, Lincoln Street SW over Irish Buffalo Creek, Concord, Cabarrus
County, ER 23-0418
Dear Mr. White:
Thank you for your February 2, 2023, email providing information about the above referenced undertaking.
While we understand that no North Carolina Department of Transportation funds will be used for the
project, we need to know if it will be using funds from the Federal Highway Administration and/or require
a permit from the US Army Corps of Engineer thereby requiring our comments pursuant to Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act. If they are required, we provide the following.
The Area of Potential Effects is located within the Logan Neighborhood, a property placed on the State
Study List in 2021 and for which we understand the City of Concord is developing a National Register of
Historic Places nomination. Based on the information in our files the district represents one of the largest
and most intact African American neighborhoods in the region and has at least 13 platted areas from 1904-
1946, and a proposed period of significance through 1970. A map of the area is enclosed for your review.
Given the amount of information on hand, we do not recommend the preparation of a Historic Structures
Survey Report for the district. Rather, we are willing to offer a Finding of No Adverse Effect on Historic
Properties, conditioned upon the undertaking's being implemented as described in your letter. Please let us
know if this is acceptable to the City of Concord.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

ER 23-0418, March 07, Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Encls: Historic Districts Map with Logan Neighborhood outlined in red.
cc: Phillip Graham, City of Concord
Autumn James, Concord HPC
grahamp(2concordnc. gov
j amesagConcordNC.gov
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Piiiiranµ. LF,.btr �i. � •�i�' _ _..\. �,; ,�/ '.�
Y, (� ti.n • c .• •• 1 Na
�; V.�t`,
- _
( /��©'�•-t,
6 y
�- \Vest Conco d /' �•� ; r„ in
- _ l/ ,
d'c 9 j.
650
rt
�- �Jacqkson Park c
Ail
Pit
'`� �'`+• NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Legend. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION 10
Q Project Study Area a...,a'
Project Loc.f.n 1]10025 4 RFVA
Cob., —County, NC Preparetl by GRG on M22-10 W
Technical Review by A C on 2022-..
Intlepentleni Review by MMR on M22-xx-xx
Client/Project
NCDOT- Division 10
Cabarrus County Bridge Replacement on Lincoln Street
over Irish Buffalo Creek
Figure No.
2
lnle
N1.0 o 0.25 0.s Project Study Area Map
2 CoodIcf.eSystem: NAD —pl.aie P 11 ne ni.c Carolina lb ,W, Feel
2. Juristlicfionll Delinelfion compleietl by Silniec on September 29, 2022. Miles
3. UI Topoq—d: Conc.,d 1969 1:24,000 (at orlglnl doo.ment,i,, of 8.5,1 I1
pons oiliry for a—s'ppliea in ale C—Io--..Ine "Cip IentI—pxt'll resp—billy for—Irryng the lCcuracy"acompIete—otin, I —.in, reopientreleases btante C, its'no", employees, Cons 1-1. Ina agents,
rom n fyrand .11 claims Irres
sing rom C in any way fthe 1-1 or provision of the d.l..

Lincoln St Bridge SW
6 Impact Drawings
6 Impact Drawings
61

U)
4-
0
J
U)
L
0
F
0
L
o�
w
,P
L
N
n
0
L
w
/
0
C\ILn
oo�
N-)CD
C\I
00
NO
4-
CV X C\1
See Sheet I A For Index of Sheets
ncess
me_
E
M
F
:rrtave Ea
o
c')
Y d
High
ve.
cn
Rohe
q.
Bve•
ooke
Dr. m
Ave.
L°
Carve Q Griffi
ir.
Av
a,
iet e
_ x
o
Dr
Ct. O Crowe
"' Melrose Dr. Polk
�t Dr.
GooAve.
a Dr urClll
ac'�ir.
Brie
e c or
°1 = Ave.
Parkviewgve.
Ha
IbeCha Ct.
tsell cho
c0
FaI-ryieMve.
tea.
Lee Ct
CozartAve
�y
BEGIN PROJECT
v
Office Dr I l
Iq
ber
%
Ru ord
Ln
Memorial
Dr
n
I
r
c Cross
O
� Ave.
Rutherfor
_
a
St.\,,-
hortm St.
1157.
i
P,.
6 01
1157
.14 Webb
115 5
N4$
Greenwoocb
G eJ
Grier
Ave. P
.O,
roplc
1157
Pie
END PROJECT Pie.
t
e
on /
of
4e
I
St
a�
VICINITY MAP NOT ToSCALE
BEGIN PROJECT
—L— STA. 10 +25.00
I°1['Y OF CONCORD
NORTH CAROLINA
CABARR US COUNTY
LOCATION. BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF LINCOLN STREET CROSSING
IRISH BUFFALO CREEK
TYPE OF WORK. GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURES
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
CkIr% DDi^ ICii^
kh.-'W W,&� W-1
PTO AMBER COURT _
�)/ -DK
RUTHERFORD
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
STATE PROJ. NO.
F. A. PROJ. NO.
DESCRIPTION
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 4
GUM
gVENU
LINCOLNST SW
------_-- TO COZART E—,v,
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R// W ACOUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
Prepared in the Office of: uVLIQ��10 �unt
l �
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
50 25 0 50 100
ADT 2018 - 1 900
I I I E. Hargett Street. Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 01
919 dhunt.com
aF
ce
'
LENGTH OF ROADWAY = 0.08 MILES
NC L nse No 1235
FOR THE CITY OF CONCORD
BRAD SMITH
PLANS
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
LENGTH OF STRUCTURE = 0.03 MILES
P.E.
50 25 0 50 100
SIGNATURE:
LENGTH OF PROJECT = 0.11 MILES
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
STEPHEN SMALLWOOD
�IlraTOTAL
PROJECT ENGINEER
TBD
ROADWAY DESIGN
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
ENGINEER
l0 5 0 10 20
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR COLLECTOR
SUB -REGIONAL TIER
LETTING DATE:
TBD
JAMIE WILLIAMS
STEPHEN SMALLWOOD
P.E.
CITY OF CONCORD
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
SIGNATURE:

WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
Sta. = STA 10+25 TO 11+25 -L- RT
Q = 1.73 cfs
V= 3.11 fVs
d = 0.5 ft
s = 0.091 ftft
n = 0.055
Liner=CLASS B
Sta. = STA 11 + 25 TO 11 + 50 -L- RT
Q = 1.73 cfs
V= 3.78 fVs
d = 0.5 ft
s= 0.153 ft4t
n = 0.055
Liner=CLASS B
DETAIL 5 F;,,
CHANNEL RELOCATION Slope
( Not to Scale)
5
Natural
Groun
? S•�
Natural Ground OR
2 �.1 Construct I"/Ft. Berm
S.� p ti•
5' Floodplain d
Bench B Min. D= 2.0 Ft.
d = 2.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= NATURAL BED MATERIAL B= 8.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 13 + 98 RT TO STA. 14 + 42 RT
-L- PC Sto. 10 +25.00
-L- POT Sta /0 +00.00
15" HDPE _
_.*-TO AMBER COURT
NOTE: PROPOSED ROADWAY GRADE DIRECTION
IS LEFT TO RIGHT
M
DETAIL 1
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Front
Ditch
o Natural het Slop e
Ground
d 2.7 D Tuck Geotextile a
Minimum of lft (TYP)
Geotextile
Min. D=1.4 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class B Rip -Rap, Keyed -In d=1 Ft.
FROM STA. 10 + 25 TO STA. 11 + 50 -L- RT
DETAIL 2
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground Ground
d 2•� D Tuck Geotextile
a Minimum of lft
(n'P)
Geotextile
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class I Rip -Rap, Keyed -In d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 13 + 31 TO STA. 13 + 73 LT
C
a1
Q
3
E
L
Q
L
m
cn
C
0
J
3
L
+-)
F
E
0
L
C
!n
E
L
0
L
W
BEGIN FqNSTRUCTION
- STA10+20.00
NOTE: ALL PROPO STORM RAIN INLET"
MUST BE EMBFCO
D WITH A F SH LQC
AND "DUMP WASTE, DRAINS T `STREAM"
OR OTHER VALENT LANGU APPROVED
BY CITY CONCORD
DETAIL 3
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
( Not to Scale)
Ditch 5'min.
Grade 1.0'min•
1.0, min
Place Geotextile Under
FROM STA 13+7R TO STA IR+RA -L- LT
STA. 15 + 91 -L- RT
0
-L- PRIC Sta. ll+
E
RCP IV_
� � R
W
DETAIL 4
LATERAL BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Fill
Ground ?S,7 D L�jA 1",,Ft. Slope
d
B
Min. D= &0 Ft
d = 1.0 Ft.
B = 8.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= NATURAL BED MATERIAL b= 5.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 14 + 42 TO STA. 15 + 48 -L- RT
BEGIN SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L - STA /0 +25 RT
ELEV=600.47'
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L- STA 11 +25 RT
ELEV=591.40'
10 11
� m
�Y
oQ /
m
oy
D
-E f
TS
r TS _
TS TL-2
CB F TS
NzzH`
PUE PUE
SS
/(E s 3/
E E
PT S o. l
ey
oy O�
�o
-L-
30
PI =
10 +45.00
JPI =
12 +00.00
JPI =
15 +70.00
EL
= 600.93
EL
= 588.20'
EL
= 581.07'
VC
= 40'
VC
= 165'
t VC
= 60'
K=44.6
t K=26
K=39.8
DS
= 30 MPH
DS
= 25 MPH
L DS
= 30 MPH
END SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L - STA 11 +50 RT
ELEV=587.58'
12
13
14
P
T
by
TING R/w
- 15" w�ELBOWS
s
St . 14 +7/.19
REMOVE APPROX. 65 LF
ABANDONED SS PIPE
SITE 2
POT Sto. 17+5
4
30" RCP -IV
� � �_ EXISTING
" RCP -Iv_
-E To COZART AVENUE-j..-
Lrl� EXISTIN R
T8-�TB - D O STRUCTI-
PUE TB -
_-2-
81
-L- PT Sto. 15 +99.63
Sta. = STA 13 + 31 TO 13 + 71 -L- LT Sta. = STA 14 + 42 TO 15 + 30 -L- LT
Q = 6.50 cfs Q = 209 cfs
V= 4.65 ft/s V= 3.7 fVs
d= 0.8 ft d= 3.4 ft
s = 0.110 ftft s = 0.003 ftft
n=0.055 n=0.035
Liner=CLASS I Liner=NATURAL BED MATERIAL
BEGIN LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA /4+42 RT
ELEV=569.40'
LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA /4+75 RT
ELEV=569.50' (MATCH EXISTING)
15
END LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA /5+48 RT
ELEV=568.80' (MATCH EXISTING)
16
17
SS
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
04
RNV SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
DO NOT USE FOR TW .ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMIT D RAWI N G
SHEET 2 OF 4
D ETAI L 6
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground �Do Ground
Min. D= 0.5 Ft. "B
B= 2.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 15 + 91 -L- RT
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

V)
z
O
>
w
a1
C-
n
0_
C
0
3
E
L
Q
L
m
-P
cn
C
0
J
3
ro
L
ro
+-)
C
E
C
0
L
C
!n
E
L
ro
L
W
r--Ln
N('7
-CV
CV
N�
O�
NC'7
N of
NX(
WETLAN11k AND SURFA
Sta. = STA 10+25 TO 11+25 -L- RT
Q = 1.73 cfs
V= 3.11 fVs
d = 0.5 ft
s = 0.091 fbft
n = 0.055
Liner=CLASS B
Sta. = STA 11 + 25 TO 11 + 50 -L- RT
Q = 1.73 cfs
V = 3.78 ft/s
d = 0.5 ft
s= 0.153 ft4t
n = 0.055
Liner=CLASS B
I
DETAIL 5 Fill
CHANNEL RELOCATION Slope
Not to Scale)
Natural 5
Ground
2 S! Natural Ground OR
g•
N Construct I"/Ft. Berm
5' Floodplain d TD
fi.
Bench B Min. D= 2.0 Ft.
d = 2.0 Ft.
\ ^ Type of Liner= NATURAL BED MATERIAL B= 8.0 Ft.
JJ FROM STA. 13 + 98 RT TO STA. 14 + 42 RT
L
�-.a--TO AMBER COURT
NOTE: PROPOSED ROADWAY GRADE DIRECTION
IS LEFT TO RIGHT
C
B STR
G�% - A.
NOTE: L 6 ST
MUST i E D
AND W D
OR O UI A
BY CI C N �6
FROM STA. 10 + 25 TO STA. 11 + 50 -L- RT
DETAIL 2
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground Ground
d 2•� D Tuck Geotextile
a Minimum of lft
(n'P)
Geotextile
Min. D= 1.5 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class I Rip -Rap, Keyed -In d= 1 Ft.
FROM STA. 13 + 31 TO STA. 13 + 73 LT
D ETAI L 3
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
( Not to Scale)
Ditch 5'min.
Grade 1.0'min•
1.0' min
Place Geotextile Under
FROM STA U4+7R TO STA IR+RA -L- LT
WATER IMPACT
m�
E
SITE 1
DETAIL 4
LATERAL BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
b
Natural Fill
Ground ?S,y d D L1'/Ft. Slope
B
Min. D= &0 Ft
d = 1.0 Ft.
B = 8.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= NATURAL BED MATERIAL b= 5.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 14 + 42 TO STA. 15 + 48 -L- RT
BEGIN SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L - STA /0 +25 RT
ELEV=600.47'
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L- STA 11 +25 RT
ELEV=591.40'
10 11
E
PERMIT
-L-
TS
� TS
F TS
P
T
L- C St�. 144�[
PI =
10 +45.00
JPI =
12 +00.00
JPI =
15 +70.00
EL
= 600.93
EL
= 588.20'
EL
= 581.07'
VC
= 40'
VC
= 165'
VC
= 60'
K=44.6
K=26
K=39.8
DS
= 30 MPH
DS
= 25 MPH
DS
= 30 MPH
END SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L - STA 11 +50 RT
ELEV=587.58'
12
13
14
/j REMC
ABAJ
s
APPROX.65 LF
NED SS PIPE
TD
ti
SITE 2
to
O
OQ
s
30" RCP -IV
6[5
085
E nes
�s> ------
-L- PT Sto. 15 +99.63
Sta. = STA 13 + 31 TO 13 + 71 -L- LT Sta. = STA 14 + 42 TO 15 + 30 -L- LT
Q = 6.50 cfs Q = 209 cfs
V= 4.65 ft/s V= 3.7 fVs
d= 0.8 ft d= 3.4 ft
s = 0.110 fbft s = 0.003 fbfF
n=0.055 n=0.035
Liner=CLASS I Liner=NATURAL BED MATERIAL
BEGIN LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA /4+42 RT
ELEV=569.40'
LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA /4+75 RT
ELEV=569.50' (MATCH EXISTING)
15
END LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA /5+48 RT
ELEV=568.80' (MATCH EXISTING)
16
17
COZART AVENUE--j,-
SS-
9
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
04
RNV SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
INCOMPLE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR % W .ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 4
D ETAI L 6
STANDARD BASE DITCH
( Not to Scale)
Natural Natural
Ground 47 D �.1 Ground
Min. D= 0.5 Ft. "B
B= 2.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 15 + 91 -L- RT
SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
VVETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
-L- 13+83 - 13+92
Bank Stabilization
0.001
0.001
4
12
1
-L- 13+73 - 14+18
Proposed Bridge
0.000
0.004
7
55
2
-L- 13+92 - 15+58
Stream Relocation
0.029
0.003
151
16
TOTALS':
0.00
1 0.00
1 0.00
1 0.00
1 0.00
1 0.03
1 0.01
1 162
1 83
0
'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
b

Lincoln St Bridge SW
7 Roadway Existing and Proposed Condition and Sediment Erosion Control Plan
7 Roadway Existing and Proposed Condition and
Sediment Erosion Control Plan

See Sheet 9 A For Index of Sheets
,r
�06 s er
Ave
�a
,Re; Lti. S
Phr.rl
"urc�illN
�r
e c or
Iberia Ct.
Ha tsell Cho
tea• fee Ct.
BEGIN PROJECT
Office Dr
Dr.
\ber
Q�.
Pru
mcess ;_
L
c) 9h
Hi
rt a �, Ave.
Rorie
Ave.
AV v u r.
in
x
0
Melrose pr. Polk
Ave.
adooCir.
Brie
LO
= Ave.
ParkviewAve.
F ieMve.
1157
Pie• �" �-,�,.
�� v� ote� O�J� Pie•
Grier
Ave.
A/
roplc
Q/ .v
1157
Pie
Pie
END PROJECT Pie.
Jo�r
�y
emon
reAve.
Crabtree
�e
Ct. �a
enttetnn
m"' \' , " \
McAllister
14 Webb 115 5
Greenwoactj
VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
BEGIN PROJECT
-L- STA. 10 +25.00
CABARR US COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF LINCOLN STREET CROSSING
IRISH BUFFALO CREEK
TYPE OF WORK. GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURES
BEGIN BRIDGE
-L- STA. 13 + 13.56
jq
�-
To AMBER AMBER COURT RUTHERFORD STSW
LENGTH OF ROADWAY = 0.08 MILES
END BRIDGE
-L- STA. 14 + 51.
STATE
CITY PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
LINCOLN ST
I
CITY PROJ. NO.
F. A. PROD. NO.
DESCRIPTION
N rr—
END PROJECT
-L- STA. 16 + 00. 00
LINCOLN SW
Now ---
TO— Co
RT gVENUE�
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR ➢8% W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2018 1,900
FUNC CLASS =
MINOR COLLECTOR
SUB -REGIONAL TIER
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ROADWAY = 0.08 MILES
LENGTH OF STRUCTURE = 0.03 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT = 0.11 MILES
Prepared in the Office of:
Stantec
8n1 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 300
Raiei9n NC 2]6n6
Tel. [phone]
wvnv LiSeen�Bc co 024
cen No. F-W72
FOR THE CITY OF CONCORD
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
BRAD SMITH, PE
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
PLANS
50 25 0 50 100
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
STEVE SMALLWOOD, PE
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
AUGUST 2023
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
STEVE SMALLWOOD, PE
P.E.
SIGNATURE:
PROJECT ENGINEER
JAMIE WILLIAMS, PE
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
10 5 0 10 20
LETTING DATE:
JUNE 2024
CITY OF CONCORD
PROFILE (VERTICAL)

GENERAL NOTES:
2018 SPECIFICATIONS
GRADING AND SURFACING OR RESURFACING AND WIDENING:
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET NUMBER SHEET
1 TITLE SHEET
1A INDEX OF SHEETS, GENERAL NOTES, AND STANDARD DRAWINGS
I CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS CLEARING:
THE GRADE LINES SHOWN DENOTE THE FINISHED ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED
SURFACING AT GRADE POINTS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTIONS° WHERE NO GRADE LINES
ARE SHOWN, THE PROFILES SHOWN DENOTE THE TOP ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING PAVEMENT
ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SURVEY ON WHICH THE PROPOSED RESURFACING WILL BE
PLACED. GRADE LINES MAY BE ADJUSTED BY THE ENGINEER IN ORDER TO SECURE A
PROPER TIE-IN.
2A-1 PAVEMENT SCHEDULE AND TYPICAL SECTIONS CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY
METHOD III.
2D-1 CHANNEL RELOCATION DETAILS
3B-1 EARTHWORK, PAVEMENT REMOVALS CURB AND GUTTER AND GUARDRAIL SUMMARIES
3D-1 DRAINAGE SUMMARY
4 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET
PFL-1 THRU PFL-2 STORM DRAIN PROFILES
TMP-1 THRU TMP-8 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS
SPM-1 THRU SPM-4 SIGNING & PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS
EC-1 THRU EC-5 EROSION CONTROL PLANS
RF-1 THRU RF-3 REFORESTATION PLANS
UC-1 THRU UC-12 UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION PLANS (TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY)
UO-1 UTILITIES BY OTHERS PLANS
X-IA CROSS-SECTION SUMMARY SHEET
X-1 THRU X-11 CROSS -SECTIONS
2018 ROADWAY ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWINGS
The following Roadway Standards as appear in "Roadway Standard Drawings" Highway Design Branch -
N. C. Department of Transportation - Raleigh, N. C., Dated January, 2018 are applicable to this project
and by reference hereby are considered a part of these plans:
STD.NO. TITLE
DIVISION 2 - EARTHWORK
200.03 Method of Clearing - Method III
225.02 Guide for Grading Subgrade - Secondary and Local
225.04 Method of Obtaining Superelevation - Two Lane Pavement
225.06 Method of Grading Sight Distance at Intersections
225.07 Grading for False Cut at Grade Separations
DIVISION 3 - PIPE CULVERTS
300,01 Method of Pipe Installation
DIVISION 5 - SUBGRADE9 BASES AND SHOULDERS
560.01 Method of Shoulder Construction - High Side of Superelevated Curve - Method I
DIVISION 6 - ASPHALT BASES AND PAVEMENTS
654.01 Pavement Repairs for superpave mix types
DIVISION 8 - INCIDENTALS
840.00 Concrete Base Pad for Drainage Structures
840.01 Brick Catch Basin - 12" thru 54" Pipe
840.02 Concrete Catch Basin - 12" thru 54" Pipe
840.03 Frame, Grates and Hood - for Use on Standard Catch Basin
840.14 Concrete Drop Inlet - 12" thru 30" Pipe
840.15 Brick Drop Inlet - 12" thru 30" Pipe
840.16 Drop Inlet Frame and Grates - for use with Std. Dwg 840.14 and 840.15
840.22 Frames and Wide Slot Sag Grates
840.25 Anchorage for Frames - Brick or Concrete or Precast
840.29 Frames and Narrow Slot Flat Grates
840.45 Precast Drainage Structure
840.54 Manhole Frame and Cover
840.66 Drainage Structure Steps
840.71 Concrete and Brick Pipe Plug
846.01 Concrete Curb, Gutter and Curb & Gutter
848.01 Concrete Sidewalk
848.02 Driveway Turnout - Radius Type
848.03 Driveway Turnout - Drop Curb Type
848.04 Street Turnout
848.05 Curb Ramp - Proposed Curb & Gutter
848.06 Curb Ramp - Existing Curb & Gutter
852.01 Concrete Islands
852,02 Concrete Mountable Median - for Use with Rigid or Flexible Pavement
852.06 Method for Placement of Drop Inlets in Concrete Islands
876.02 Guide for Rip Rap at Pipe Outlets
876.04 Drainage Ditches with Class 'B' Rip Rap
s
w
un
u'
Ln
ry
i
O
L
a-
i
s
�o
Cu 3
Ore
cu �
\ O
MEL
�O
SUPERELEVATION:
ALL CURVES ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE SUPERELEVATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
STD. NO. 225.04 USING THE RATE OF SUPERELEVATION AND RUNOFF SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
SUPERELEVATION IS TO BE REVOLVED ABOUT THE GRADE POINTS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL
SECTIONS.
SIDE ROADS:
THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO DO ALL NECESSARY WORK TO PROVIDE
SUITABLE CONNECTIONS WITH ALL ROADS, STREETS, AND DRIVES ENTERING THIS PROJECT.
THIS WORK WILL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE FOR THE PARTICULAR ITEMS
INVOLVED.
DRIVEWAYS:
DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STD® 848.02
USING 3 FOOT RADII OR RADII AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. LOCATIONS OF DRIVES
WILL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STD. 848.03
AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
STREET TURNOUT:
STREET RETURNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STD. NO. 848.04 USING
THE RADII NOTED ON PLANS.
TEMPORARY SHORING:
SHORING REQUIRED FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC WILL BE PAID FOR AS "EXTRA
WORK" IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 104-7.
UTILITIES:
UTILITY OWNERS ON THIS PROJECT ARE Century Link, City Of Concord,
Dominion Energy, Duke Energy
ANY RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY OTHERS, EXCEPT
AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
PER CITY OF CONCORD CODE OF ORDINANCE CHAPTER 62, ARTICLE J, SECTION 62-98 (2)
ALL MATERIALS, EOUIPTMENT, LABOR, AND WORKMANSHIP ASSOCIATED WITH PUBLIC WATER
AND/OR SEWER EXTENSION AND/OR MODIFICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND
SUBJECT TO THE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY OF CABARRUS COUNTY'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS;
THE CITY OF CONCORD'S ORDINANCES, POLICIES, AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS.
IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THE WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY OF CABARRUS COUNTY'S
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS; THE CITY OF CONCORD'S ORDINANCES, POLICIES; AND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS,
OR THE NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE PLANS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER, CONTRACTOR, OR DEVELOPER FROM MEETING
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF CONCORD'S OR CABARRUS COUNTY ORDINANCES, POLICIES, AND STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS, (AS APPLICABLE), CONCORD WATER & SEWER POLICIES AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS;
THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR WASTEWATER COLLECTION & WASTE DISTRIBUTION FOR CABARRUS COUNTY
(WSACC MANUAL) AND ANY OTHER LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS & APPROVALS.
THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE CITY OF CONCORD ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT 704-920-5425
AT LEAST 24-HOURS PRIOR TO INITIATING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.
THE EXISTING WATER MAIN VALVE RIMS AND STEMS AND THE EXISTING SEWER MAIN MANHOLES RIMS ARE TO BE
RAISED OR LOWERED TO FINAL GRADE, AS APPLICABLE, AND AT LEAST 3-FT OF GROUND COVER IS TO BE
MAINTAINED OVER THE EXISTING UTILITIES AT ALL TIMES PER THE CITY OF CONCORD CODE OF ORDINANCE
CHAPTER 62, ARTICLE 3, SECTION 62-98.
PER THE CITY OF CONCORD CODE OF ORDINANCE CHAPTER 62, ARTICLE 3, SECTION 62-98 - THE FOLLOWING
MINIMUM SEPARATIONS MUST BE INDICATED, UNLESS OTHERWISED APPROVED BY THE CITY.
A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF FIVE FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ANY TYPE OF
MAINTENANCE OBSTRUCTION AND THE CITY'S WATER DISTRIBUTION LINES, WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES,
AND ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES, UNLESS AN EXCEPTION IS GRANTED. GREATER SEPARATION DISTANCES
MAY BE REQUIRED AS SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REGULATIONS.
A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF TWO FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN ANY TYPE OF MAINTENANCE
OBSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY OTHER UTILITY PROVIDER'S LINES OR EOUIPTMENT,
AND THE CITY WATER DISTRIBUTION LINES; WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES, AND ASSOCIATED
APPURTENANCES, UNLESS AN EXCEPTION IS GRANTED. IF AN EXCEPTION IS GRANTED, A MINIMUM VERTICAL
SEPARATION OF ONE FOOT MUST BE MAINTAINED AND THE CITY WATER DISTRIBUTION LINES, WASTEWATER
COLLECTION LINES, AND ASSOCIATED APPURTNENANCES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE
OR AN APPROVED FERROUS MATERIAL WITH JOINTS THAT ARE EQUIVALENT TO POTABLE WATER MAIN STANDARDS
FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE POINT OF CROSSING. GREATER SEPARATION DISTANCES
MAY BE REQUIRED AS SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REGULATIONS.
A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF TEN FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE CITY WATER DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM AND WASTEWATER COLLECTION LINES, AND ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES, UNLESS AN EXCEPTION IS GRANTED.
RIGHT-OF-WAY MARKERS:
ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY MARKERS ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PLACED BY OTHERS.
CURB RAMPS
CURB RAMPS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS AT APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS.
CONSTRUCT ALL CURB RAMPS ACCORDANCE WITH STD 848.05 and/or 848.06.

c_D
ED
BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.-
State Line
County Line
Township Line
----- -----
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line
Existing Iron Pin
O
Computed Property Corner
Property Monument
EC
Parcel/Sequence Number
@
Existing Fence Line
-X x X-
Proposed Woven Wire Fence
Proposed Chain Link Fence
El
Proposed Barbed Wire Fence
Existing Wetland Boundary
- - - -WLB- - - -
Proposed Wetland Boundary
WLB
Existing Endangered Animal Boundary
EAB
Existing Endangered Plant Boundary
EPB
Existing Historic Property Boundary
HPB
Known Contamination Area: Soil
-
Potential Contamination Area: Soil
- S -
Known Contamination Area: Water
w
Potential Contamination Area: Water
- w
Contaminated Site: Known or Potential
X 0
BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE:
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
O
Sign
S
Well
w
W
Small Mine
Foundation
0
Area Outline
Cemetery
fi
Building
School
Church
Dam
HYDROLOGY.-
Stream or Body of Water
Hydro, Pool or Reservoir
IF—
Jurisdictional Stream
—is
Buffer Zone 1
Bz 1
Buffer Zone 2
Bz 2
Flow Arrow
< -- ---
Disappearing Stream
Spring
Wetland
Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch
< FLOW
False Sump
RAILROADS:
Standard Gauge -
RR Signal Milepost
Switch
RR Abandoned
RR Dismantled
STATE IL' O1l" NORTH H CAROLINA, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS
Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering
CSX TRANSPORTATION
0
MILEPOST 35
0
SWITCH
RIGHT OF WAY & PROJECT CONTROL:
Secondary Horiz and Vert Control Point
Primary Horiz Control Point 0
Primary Horiz and Vert Control Point 10
Exist Permanent Easment Pin and Cap 0
New Permanent Easement Pin and Cap O
Vertical Benchmark
Existing Right of Way Marker 0
Existing Right of Way Line
New Right of Way Line R
New Right of Way Line with Pin and Cap R
Ar
New Right of Way Line with
Concrete or Granite R/W Marker
New Control of Access Line with
Concrete GA Marker
Existing Control of Access
New Control of Access
Existing Easement Line
New Temporary Construction Easement
New Temporary Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage Easement
New Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement
New Permanent Utility Easement
New Temporary Utility Easement
New Aerial Utility Easement
ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES:
Existing Edge of Pavement
Existing Curb —
I\A)
-E-
-E-
TDE
PDE
DUE
PUE
TUE
AUE
Proposed Slope Stakes Cut
- - - C - -
Proposed Slope Stakes Fill
- - - F - -
Proposed Curb Ramp
2
Existing Metal Guardrail
T T
Proposed Guardrail
T T T
Existing Cable Guiderail
n n n
Proposed Cable Guiderail
n n n
Equality Symbol
Pavement Removal
VEGETATION. -
Single Tree3
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
Orchard
Vineyard
EXISTING STRUCTURES:
MAJOR:
Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall -
MINOR:
Head and End Wall
Pipe Culvert
Footbridge
Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB
Paved Ditch Gutter
Storm Sewer Manhole
Storm Sewer
UTILITIES. -
POWER:
Existing Power Pole
Proposed Power Pole
Existing Joint Use Pole
Proposed Joint Use Pole
Power Manhole
Power Line Tower
Power Transformer
U/G Power Cable Hand
Hole
H-Frame Pole
U/G Power Line LOS B
(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS C
(S.U.E.*)
U/G Power Line LOS D
(S.U.E.*)
TELEPHONE:
Existing Telephone Pole
Proposed Telephone Pole
Telephone Manhole
Telephone Pedestal
Telephone Cell Tower
U/G Telephone Cable Hand
Hole
U/G Telephone Cable LOS B
(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS C
(S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Cable LOS D (S.U.E.*) -
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS
B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS
C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Telephone Conduit LOS
D (S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS
B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS
C (S.U.E.*)
U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS
D (S.U.E.*)
Vineyard
CONC
) CONC WW
CONC HW
CB
E
- T - - - -
-T- -
T
-TC- - - -
-TC- -
TC
-T FO- - -
- -T FO- -
T FO
Water Manhole
Water Meter
o
Water Valve
Water Hydrant
U/G Water Line LOS
B (S.U.E*)
- - - -W- - - -
U/G Water Line LOS
C (S.U.E*)
- -W- -
U/G Water Line LOS
D (S.U.E*)
W
Above Ground Water
Line
A/G Water
TV:
TV
Pedestal
TV
Towe r
U/G
TV Cable Hand Hole
HH
U/G
TV Cable LOS B
(S.U.E.*)
- - - -TV- - - -
U/G
TV Cable LOS C
(S.U.E.*)
- -TV- -
U/G
TV Cable LOS D
(S.U.E.*)
TV
U/G
Fiber Optic Cable
LOS B (S.U.E.*)
- - - -TV FO- - -
U/G
Fiber Optic Cable
LOS C (S.U.E.*)
- -TV FO-
U/G
Fiber Optic Cable
LOS D (S.U.E.*)
TV FO-
GAS:
Gas Valve
Gas Meter
U/G Gas Line
LOS
B (S.U.E.*)
- - - -°- - - -
U/G Gas Line
LOS
C (S.U.E.*)
- -G- -
U/G Gas Line
LOS
D (S.U.E.*)
°
Above Ground
Gas
Line
A/G Gas
SANITARY SEWER:
Sanitary Sewer Manhole
Sanitary Sewer Cleanout
U/G Sanitary Sewer Line
Above Ground Sanitary Sewer
SS Forced Main Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS C (S.U.E.*)
SS Forced Main Line LOS D (S.U.E.*)
MISCELLANEOUS:
Utility Pole
Utility Pole with Base
Utility Located Object
Utility Traffic Signal Box
Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B (S.U.E.*)
U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc.
AIG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil
Geoenvironmental Boring
U/G Test Hole LOS A (S.U.E.*)
Abandoned According to Utility Records
End of Information
O
O
A/G Sanitary Sewer
- - - -FSS- - - -
- - FSS - -
FSS
•
0
(D
0

C
CS
Q
1
7f
7f
Ln
N
CD
ED
0
L
CL
�co
N3
o-0
�o
MCC
P A V E M E N T S C H E D U L E
FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN PROVIDED BY SB&B
PROP. APPROX. 1.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE S9.513,
C1
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 165 LBS. PER SQ. YD.
J 1
PROP. 6" AGGREGATE BASE COURSE.
PROP. APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE S9.513,
C2
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 165 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO
R1
2'-6" CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER.
LAYERS.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.513,
C 4
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO
S
4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK.
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 1.5" IN DEPTH.
D1
PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
T
EARTH MATERIAL.
TYPE I19.00, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SO. YD.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE,
D 2
TYPE I19.00, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1"
U
EXISTING PAVEMENT.
DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 2/2 IN DEPTH OR
GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH.
E1
PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.00,
W
VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE STANDARD WEDGING DETAILS).
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SO. YD.
PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.00,
E 2
AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO
BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER
THAN 5 %2" IN DEPTH.
NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
HE NEW PAVEMENT TO EXISTING
EXISTING PAVEMENT
SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT
PAVEMENT - FULL DEPTH (SEE TYPICAL FOR
REQUIRED PAVEMENT STRUCTURE)
MINIMUM WIDENING AND SAWCUT DIMENSIONS
EXIST GROUND
EXIST GROUND
EXIST GROUND
EXIST GROUND
S ` .•
Ot
J PR
3�
O'
nee
O!
a�
�q
R SFF
FCT70�/s �?�I
Z.�
S
S�G\\O\
S
-4 P�
q SURVEY Ct EXISTING
L-sviull J11uw111y /vIvilluU VI vvfz:u 111
W: WEDGING DETAIL FOR WEDGING
VARIES
-L- (LINCOLN STREET SW)
10, 2' 12'-14' 12'-14' 6
9' W/GR
I
I
I
S Rl GRADE
POINT
12"
_i 0.020 FT/FT 0.020 FT/FT�, 0.08 FT/FT
6„ TUWC2T771 El
SEE DETAIL "A" J1*-�
GRADE TO THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1
8'
4:7
GRADE TO THIS LINE
—L— STA. 10 + 25.00 TO 11 + 50.00
—L— STA. 15 + 00.00 TO 16 + 00.00
*SHELF TO BE PLACED UNDER CURB AND GUTTER
VARIES
-L- (LINCOLN STREET SW)
I
10, 2' 14' 14' 2'
MIml
6"
T
-i -
_ I _
I
I
GRADE
POINT
12" � 12'
�� 0.020 FT/FT 0.020 FT/FT,, 1-
SEE DETAIL "A" ' \
GRADE TO THIS LINE
I
7„ C2
I J1�
E1 E1
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2
6"
R1)rS
T
10,
SEE DETAIL "B"
GRADE TO THIS LINE
—L— STA. 11 + 50.00 TO 13 + 13.56
—L— STA. 14 + 51.44 TO 15 + 00.00
*SHELF TO BE PLACED UNDER CURB AND GUTTER
-L- LINCOLN STREET SW
*SEE TYPICAL FOR MIX TYPE TIE TO EXISTING 1'_3" 51'-6" F-F
PAVEMENT
9'-9" 2' 14' 14' 2' 9'-9"
I
C�k
I
— — — — — — — — — — GRADE
C2 W
L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — POINT
Z 0.020 FT/FT 0.020 FT/FT,,F
U MILL 25 LF U 100100100100100100100100100 00 00100100 00 00 00 00 00
PER 1" OF DEPTH
54' (OUT TO OUT)
18 CORED SLAB UNITS
INCIDENTAL MILLING TIE—IN DETAIL FOR OVERLAY
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
(PROFILE VIEW) —L— STA. 13+13.56 (BEGIN BRIDGE) TO 14+51.44 (END BRIDGE)
l EXIST GROUND
S
N P�
�qR
SFF
x SF
CTIO
NS /?•I M� .
J EXIST GROUND
1'-3"
TWO -BAR METAL RAIL
EXIST GROUND
EXIST GROUND
311
MIN.
ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN
DETAIL "A"
ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN
DETAIL "B"

tn
Z
O
W
w
m
m
m
w
i
�m
cv co
o�
cv ro
0-)o
N
m�
TIE TO EXISTING BED
ELEVATION=564.4
BANKFULL
ROCKS IN VANE ARM SHOULD
NOT BE GAPPED OR HAVE ANY
SIGNIFICANT SPACES
A
POOL
HEADER
ROCK ,
00
FOOTER -�
0
ROCK
2 MIN.
(TYP.)
EXCAVATED
POOL, TYP.
MAX. STEP
DEPTH 1.0'
ROCK CROSS VANE
SET HEADER ROCK BACK 1/3
WIDTH OF FOOTER ROCK
GEOTEXTILE w POOL DEPTH,
SEE PROFILE
SECTION A -A
#57 STONE
GEOTEXTILE
BANKFULL
'OOL 8I CPOUgAFLOW
I I
0.0 ' Oo0
BANKFULL
PLAN VIEW
HEADER ROCK, TYP.
ELEVATION=569.4
FLOW
------------
BED
BACKFILL, TYP.
#57 STONE, TYP.
FOOTER ROCK, TYP.
Ll
NOTE:
SEE ROCK CROSS VANE
DETAIL FOR SPECIFICS STEP POOL DETAIL
1/3 1/3 1/3
BANKFULL BANKFULL BANKFULL
WIDTH WIDTH WIDTH
17�
N
NOT TO SCALE
HEADER ROCK, TYP.
ELEVATION=569.4
FLOW
A
BACKFILL, TYP.
° 00 0°0 200 TO
0 300 U.
- - - - #57 STONE, TYP.
z
0 a
m
EXCAVATED TRENCH
FLOW #57 STONE FOR ROCK CROSS VANE
0°0 CONSTRUCTION
o
O /--- GEOTEXTILE
POOL - o
HEADER%
ROCK
FOOTER POOL EXCAVATED PER
ROCK DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
A
KEY IN VANE TO BANK
MINIMUM OF AT AN
ELEVATION EQUAL TO
BANKFULL OR SLIGHTLY
LOWER
PLAN VIEW
BOULDER
DIMENSIONS (FT)
STATION
HEIGHT
LENGTH
WIDTH
1.01
3.0'
2.5'
BANKFULL
FLOW
BACKFILL, TYP.
#57 STONE, TYP.
NOTES:
1) STEPS TO BE SPACED 8' TO 12' APART.
2) POOL SPACING SHALL BE INVERSELY
PROPORTIONAL TO STREAM SLOPE,
AND DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO
BANKFULL WIDTH.
3) POOL DEPTHS AT BANKFULL ELEVATION
SHALL BE TYPICALLY 2 TO 3 TIMES
DEEPER THAN STEP DEPTHS AT
BANKFULL ELEVATION.
4) ADEQUATE NUMBER OF FOOTER BOULDERS
TO BE USED IN ORDER TO HOLD UP THE
BOULDERS AT HEAD OF STEPS DURING
HIGH ENERGY/HIGH FLOW EVENTS.
5) STEP POOL DEPTH SHOULD BE 2 TO 3
TIMES BANKFULL DEPTH.
SET HEADER ROCK BACK
A MINIMUM OF 1/3 WIDTH
OF THE FOOTER ROCK
BED
\-- EXCAVATED POOL
2' MIN. FOOTER ROCK, TYP.
ROCKS IN VANE ARM SHOULD
NOT BE GAPPED OR HAVE ANY
SIGNIFICANT SPACES
GEOTEXTILE, TYP.
SECTION A -A
TIE VANE ARM INTO
BANKFULL ELEVATION
HEADER
ROCKS
4% T0� SLR
2' . � �
MIN. GEOTEXTILE, TYP.
SECTION B-B
ROCK CROSS VANE DETAIL
FOR STEP POOLS
NOT TO SCALE
FOOTER BED
ROCKS
ROCKS IN VANE ARM SHOULD
NOT BE GAPPED OR HAVE ANY
SIGNIFICANT SPACES
NOTES:
1) DEEPEST PART OF POOL TO BE IN LINE WITH WHERE
VANE ARM TIES INTO BANKFULL.
2) DO NOT EXCAVATE POOL T00 CLOSE TO FOOTER BOULDERS.
3) CLASS "A" STONE CAN BE USED TO REDUCE VOIDS
BETWEEN HEADERS AND FOOTERS.
4) COMPACT BACKFILL TO EXTENT POSSIBLE OR AT THE
DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
5) POOL DEPTH SHOULD BE 2 TO 3 TIMES BANKFULL DEPTH.
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET NO.
LINCOLN ST BRG
2D-I
R/W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
INCOMPLETE
DO NOT USE FOR
PLANS
// W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED

] D
COMPUTED BY:THH
CHECKED BY:
DATE: 04/05/23
DATE:
PROJECT REFERENCE NO
LINCOLN ST
SHEET NO.
3B -I
CT
m
N
E
7f
7f
N
N
N
N
i
0
L
CL
i
�co
N3
N-0
N�
�o
MCC
N�
0L=
S UMMAR Y OF EARTHWORK
(IN CUBIC YARDS)
STATION
STATION
UNCL.
EXCAV.
UNDERCUT
EXCAV.
EMBANK.
+%
BORROW
WASTE
-L- 10+25.00
-L- 13+13.56
565
1,711
1,146
-L- 14+51.44
-L- 16+00.00
24
917
893
SUBTOTALS:
589
2,628
2,039
PROJECT SUBTOTALS:
589
2,628
2,039
LOSS DUE TO CLEARING & GRUBBING
ADDITIONAL UNDERCUT
WASTE IN LIEU OF BORROW
PROJECT TOTALS:
589
2,628
2,039
5% TO REPLACE TOP SOIL ON BORROW PIT
102
GRAND TOTALS:
589
2,628
2,141
SAY:
600
2,200
Earthwork quantities are calculated by Stantec. These earthwork
quantities are based in part on subsurface data provided by
S&M E.
Approximate quantities only. Unclassified Excavation, Borrow
Excavation, Fine Grading, Clearing and Grubbing and Removal
of Existing Asphalt Pavement are paid for at the lump sum price
for "Grading".
PAVEMENT REMOVAL S UMMAR Y
SURVEY
LINE
STATION
STATION
LOCATION
LT/RT/CL
2
YD
-L-
11 + 50.00
13 + 15.00
CL
516
-L-
14+52.00
15+00.00
CL
157
TOTAL:
673
SAY:
700
CURB AND GUTTER SUMMARY
SURVEY
LINE
STATION
STATION
LOCATION
LT/RT/CL
LENGTH
-L-
10+25.00
16+00.00
LT
578'
-L-
11 +37.75
15+12.20
RT
371'
TOTAL:
949'
SAY:
950'
"N" = DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF LANE TO FACE OF GUARDRAIL.
TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH = DISTANCE FROM EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE TO SHOULDER BREAK POINT.
FLARE LENGTH = DISTANCE FROM LAST SECTION OF PARALLEL GUARDRAIL TO END OF GUARDRAIL. ]� ]� ]�
W = TOTAL WIDTH OF FLARE FROM BEGINNING OF TAPER TO END OF GUARDRAIL. GUARDRAIL S UMMAR Y
G = GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
NG = NON -GATING IMPACT ATTENUATOR TYPE 350
SURVEY
LINE
BEG. STA.
END STA.
LOCATION
LENGTH
WARRANT POINT
"N"
DIST.
FROM
E.
TOTAL
SHOUL.
WIDTH
FLARE LENGTH
W
ANCHORS
IMPACT
ATTENUATOR
TYPE 350
SINGLE
FACED
GUARDRAIL
REMOVE
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
REMOVE
AND
STOCKPILE
EXISTING
GUARDRAIL
REMARKS
STRAIGHT
SHOP
CURVED
DOUBLE
FACED
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
APPROACH
END
TRAILING
END
TYPE
III
_
EA
G
NG
-L-
12 + 37.68
12 + 98.69
RT
56.25
12 + 98.69
11.75
WA
50'
WA
1'
WA
1
1
-L-
12+69.17
13+28.43
LT
56.25
13+28.43
11.75
WA
WA
50'
WA
1'
1
1
-L-
14+36.57
14+96.83
RT
56.25
14+36.57
11.75
WA
WA
50'
WA
1'
1
1
-L-
14+66.31
15+24.85
LT
56.25
14+66.31
11.75
WA
50'
WA
1'
WA
1
1
SHEET TOTALS
225
4
4
LESS ANCHOR DEDUCTIONS
TYPE III
4
@ 25
-100
TL-2
4
@ 18.75
-75
TOTALS
50
SAY
50
4
4
ADDITIONAL GUARDRAIL POST = 5 EACH

All
,
........
.....
.
...
... ..
::.........
-
■■m■■■■■
0®0
■©©■
■■
■MEN
■■■■
MEN
■■■■■■■
MEN
■■■■■■■
MEN
■■■■■■©..
m�

03
j
Cl-
ET
LO
N
CD
0
CL
�co
�3
oC)
0 Q
0 L
0_)CC C
E
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
° ,:, LINCOLN ST 04
+ + + P t + 4
PI Sto l0 74.22 PI Sto l2 05.45 PI Sto l5 35.47 / Sto l9 67.7 PIEDMONT H �DWooD LUMBER INC � � � � RAW SHEET NO.
� - 5 38 09.9 (LT) � - 9 23 06.4 (RT) � - 6 07 56.0 (RT) � = 2% 05 52.8 (LT) 1331 PG n5 ° �>
„ y ., ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
D = 5 43 46.5 D = 5 43 46.5 D = 4 46 28.7 D = l5 /6 43.9 3 ° ° a3 ENGINEER ENGINEER
L = 98.37' L = 163.80' L = 128.43' L = 138.09' 3 � PO
_ _ _ _ 0 N
T - 49.22 T - 82.08 T - 64.28 T 69.83
R = 1,000.00' R = /,000.00/ R = 1,200.00' R = 575.00' STANDARD ' ITCH
e = NC e = NC e = NC e = EX � i CLASS RIP RAP , � � 1�°3 � INC®1�II][��,]E ]� ][�l[,A1\TS
SE-6ETAIL 2 �� � DO NOT USE FOR / W ACQUISITION
O E .15 TONS C
-L- PRC Sto. 11+23.37 PIEDMONT HARDWOOD LU BER INC �° 32 SQ YD GEOTEXTILE o /
z Psi DE=7.0 CY �e a N
DB 1259 PG 4°� = 0.094 FT/FT j
s o 160a00'
o� Sr°�
CLASS I RIP RAP tea, 0 50 CLEAN CLOTHES ENTERPRISES INC
35+ 6 7 EST. 3 TONS - o TRANSITION DB 600 PG 482
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION �� EST. 7 SY GF ,l z + 2 .00 O
BIN RIP RAP AT EMBA K NT ° CITY OF CONCORD 6
-L- PC Sto. 10+25.00 CRO OF AS MED 42" SS = 564. o CL 1 RI RAP SEE ETAIL 3 / - O DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
CALCULATED CROWN OF 8" SS = 590.9' +20.00 + -b 0 INVER OF 15" RCP = 5 .2 PP ACH B �� o � DB 294 PG 139 -L PC Sto. 18+97.91 UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
CALCULATED INVERT OF 15" RCP = 595.8' 4' 66. 7' 12 99.70 +/ o ti o
35' & EX VERTICAL SEP ION o +60.00 -
_ 56.78' & 94' z VERTICAL SEPARATION °` mo P � ACi1 SLAB � -'
( i 2 RMOVE ABANDONED
IO+OO.00 /
(EXCLUDING PIPE THICKNESS) _ -L- POT Sto.EXCLUDING PI E THICKNE - 19.0' i s END o: +20.00
-L- POT Sto. 8+00.00 AHD BRG N 19° 02' 50.6" E +25.04 CRO N OF 8" = 575.28 + SS co
INVER OF CP = 583.72 �2 14+ 60 +/- S MANHOLE WOODS 94; N
i o �o� G o + 00.00 o 3 o
ERTI L SEPARATION �_ �� a 2 ° 18' 55 E rn o
E E o EXCLUDING E THICKNESS) = 8.44' o 0 0 o TYP 47' & EXSRiW E -
E +90.00 18, PUE END BRIDGE �o� 0
TYP O PU 1 PUE RE OVE APPROX. ° 14+51.44 +/ -L- PT Sto. 20+36.00
66' & EX o F f, �� 0 + 30" RCP IV +68.43 E
2 LF 15" HDPE 0 0 2 EX 60'
TIE TO EX SW UE � _ _ RfP- V +23 7 C F ° } ° \ PUE PUE
RETAIN +35.00 TIE C&G 5 00' _ 2 _ - - -
p L-2 ° _ TIE C&G D U TION +30.00
EXISTING CB w 94' & EX R/W +25.00 w R 8' SIDE AL P I 1p 1 10 F 00.00- - +75.60 EX RNV
RETAIN 15" HD P a- CB 4 RCP -IV 04 -L- STA. 16 + 00. � 20 rn
-r _ okIST �0
MOVE
_ g 5�3„
- - - - CB J
1iNc Riw _ _ _ _ - - -- xrn o o �g � = 4.0 - - , S CB x 1 F _ �` Ll _ 7
4' BST rn - �„ �N STREET SW 23 BST ss / /
- LINCOLN STREET SW 2 E-TO MB X _ �' - - 0 �� -AIL- - _ - i Riw o � _L-2 " RCP -IV
C BO S F TC
- SEE DETAIL b ExisTiN R�w� -- - - _ Ex�s��N° Riw
- F - R ® L -� R�P����P AT EMBANKMENT - - - - RUTS- - j
PUE r" P ° o ® CC 1 RIP EE-' DETAI�3 °
xisTiN ; +80.00 - ®® �� P_ PUE GAS TEST STATION
+ + Ln +23.37 ° 35.00' BEG BRIDGE _ - PUE
0 18 35.00� 5 000� o +13.56 +/- --� PUE P s
+ 05.0
o 25, o P o o� �� �35' & EX RAN �'� WOODS ��A3 EX5R/W
TRANSITION +18.00 E E o pE � B ASa ,
TO EX 34.73' & E D OF - 25' + 05.00 4SB �I P P + 72.00
/ EG SIDEWALK TDE -° TRANSITIO 60 EST.5 TON +45.00 41'
s°� � SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH +50 +00.00 a� X N EST. 16 SY GF +85.00
DETAIL 1 i_ + 00' °� °° �� o TO EX 45' 45
/ -L - PT Sto. l5 +99.63
+ 20.00 / n o -L - PT Sto. l2 +87.17 �+ 610 0 0 100 0 0 0 + 60.00 TIE TO
��
N° 35 & EX RNV sz° 90'
50� O TIE TO � + 5.00 ,� +71.19 00 +38.00 EXISTING CHANNEL
i ss TRANSITION EXISTING ���11� 35.00' � 83'
�� CHANNEL DETAIL 4
DETAIL 1 �� 0 � LATERAL BASE DITCH
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH F�END C&G [Nat to Scale) b
( Not to Scale) � END SIDEWALK
/ APARTMENTS AT WOODCREST,LLC
Front + 00.00 �_
Ditch DB I4588 PG 285 Ground ? r• , �t. Slope
, S•I p �,.
o� � T� R E APPROX. 65 LF dNatural
Ground Aar<et slope NOTE: ALL PROPOSED RM DRAIN IN S �� 0 ANDONED SS PIPE+35.00
B
d ?•ID �� Tuck Geotextile a MUST BE EMBOSSED ITH A FISH L / STABILIZE BANKS 110'
yp) CROWN OF 42" SS = 568.98 Min. D= 6.0 Ft.
Minima. oft. (TFt. AND "DUMP N -WASTE, DRAINS (REAM" ° � WILIZE TAK S INVERT OF 15" RCP = 577.53 d= 1.0 Ft.
Geotextile OR OTHER E IVALENT LANGQA APPROVED/
Min. D=1.4 Ft. / VERTICAL SEPARATION
Type of Liner= Class B Rip -Rap, Keyed -In d=1 Ft. BY CITY CONCORD JLP HOLDINGS II LLC (EXCLUDING PIPE THICKNESS) = 8.6' B= 8.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= NATURAL BED MATERIAL b= 5.0 Ft.
DB 9010 PG 291 FROM STA. 14+42 TO STA. 15+48 -L- RT
FROM STA. 10+25 TO STA. 11+50 -L- RT DETAIL 3 � BM 4 PG 61 DETAIL 5 Fill
DETAIL 2 RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT RELOCATE CHANNEL EE EXTEND SS PIPE CHANNEL RELOCAT ON Slope
Not to Scale) DETAIL 5 FOR CHANNEL GE ETRY
STANDARD 'V' DITCH STEP POOLS w/ROCK CRO VANES ENCASEMENT (Not to Scale)
( Not to Scale) Ditch 5'min. CLASS B RIP RAP 5' MIN _ DETAIL 6
SEE DETAILS ON HEET 2D-1 EST. 1 TON Natural
Grade 1.0'EST. 5 SY GF 2 STANDARD BASE DITCH
1.0' min Groun
Natural Natural S•I ( Not to Scale)
Ground OR
Ground �.� Ground
?• D Tuck Geotextile LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH ConstrNaturauct
2S D rLS' Natural Natural
I �i� Place Geotextile Under I 1 Construct 1' Ft. Berm Ground
d a Minimum of lff Riprap in Locations Press Riprap into SEE DETAIL 4 5' Floodplain d 4•I D �� Ground
(NP) Directed by Engineer Channel Bottom DDE = 800 CY Bench B Min. D= 2.0 Ft.
Geotextile Until Refusal Min. D= 0.5 Ft.
Min. D = 1.5 Ft. -L - PC Sto. l4 +7/.l9 d = 2.0 Ft. rrr __""{++
Type of Liner= Class I Rip -Rap, Keyed -In d= 1 Ft. Type of Liner= 4 TONS,CL I Rip -Rap, Keyed -In Type of Liner= NATURAL BED MATERIAL B= 8.0 Ft. B= 2.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 13 + 31 TO STA. 13 + 73 LT FROM STA. 13 + 73 TO STA. 13 + 84 -L- LT FROM STA. 13 + 98 RT TO STA. 14 + 42 RT FROM STA. 15 + 91 -L- RT
STA. 15 + 91 -L- RT
PK IN ROOT OF 20 INCH SYCAMORE
E .4 577.7411 LT OF -L - STA, /3 +34.04
- L-
1
1
PI = 10+45.00
EL = 600.93'
VC=40'
K = 44.6
DS = 30 MPH
PI = 12+00.00
EL = 588.20"
VC=165'
K = 26
DS = 25 MPH
PI = /5+70.00
EL = 581.07'
VC=60'
K = 39.8
DS = 30 MPH
DITCH
LEGEND
RIGHT
DITCH
-------------600
-
°
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DESIGN DISCHARGE = 5400
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 578.5
BASE DISCHARGE = 7100
BASE FREQUENCY = /00
BASE HW ELEVATION = 580.5
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 6500
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 100-
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 578.5-
-NOTE LOCATION OF OVERTOPPING
DATE OF SURVEY = 0111212025
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY = 565.72
CFS
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
FT
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
590
580
580
°
Ha
°
70
Z
S E
F
T.
41/
10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17

N�
Q
Lf��
M
N
O
N
i�
Q'
i
N�
N

N�
Q
Lf��
M
N
O
N
i�
Q'
i
N�
N

(4W
V
W
O
C
M
U
W
V
Ln
(\j
G)
i
0
C
0
U
C
0
0
L
w
i
C
E
C
Ln0
e�
Mw C
N
0'
0 m,
(ncD
n-0
a�
'o
"rr
/
S
U
III
CABARR US COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT OF LINCOLN STREET CROSSING
IRISH BUFFALO CREEK
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, AND STRUCTURES
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
RIVER BASIN: YADKIN PEE DEE
BEGIN PROJECT
-L- STA. 10 +25.00
-----
�-TO AMBER COURT -- SW
RUTHERFORD ST
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
THESE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS COMPLY WITH
THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY THE NCG-010000
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 2019
AND ISSUED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES.
Mead
&-+Iunt
END PROJEC
-L- STA. 16 +
r
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
LINCOIIN
ST
BRG
EC-4
STATE PROJ. NO.
F. A. PROD. NO.
DESCRIPTION
EROSION AND
SEDIMENT
CONTROL
MEASURES
Std.
Description
Symbol
1630.03
Temporary
Silt Ditch
TO
1630.05
Temporary
Diversion
� TD
1605.01
Temporary
Silt Fence
1606.01
Special Sediment
Control Fence
1622.01
Temporary
Berms and Slope
Drains _________________-'-
1650.02
Silt Basin
Type B-------------------------------
�
1633.01
Temporary
Rock Silt Check
Type -A
Temporary
Rock Silt Check
Type -A with
Matting and Polyacrylami4e
(PAM)
1033.02
Temporary
Rock Silt Check
Type-B
'
Wattle // Coir Fiber Wattle
EW
CFW
Wattle / `l oir ]Fiber Wattle
with Polyacrylamile (PAM)
Pp1634.01 Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type -A
1634.02 Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type-B----
1655.01 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type -A of ro
1635.02 Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type-B ------ 00
1630.04 Stilling Basin------------------------------------------------�
1630.06 Special Stilling Basin -------------------------------
Rock Roc➢ Inlet Sediment Trapp
1632.01 Type A A
1632.02 Type B B
LJ
RIDDIDDIDOR
00"bo 1632.05 Type C CLJ
Skimmer BasinTiered Skimmer Basin
Prepared in the Office of:
I I I E. Hargett Street, Suite 300
MeadI unt 919- Raleigh, 4-86701 maeaidhunt. com
NC License No. F-1235
BRAD T. SMITH
NAME
Designed by:
3520
LEVEL III CERTIFICATION NO.
/ L IAI��nInfiltration Basin ------------------------------------------ LEE�D
STSW
TO COZART VENUE
Roadway Standard Drawings
THIS PROJECT CONTAINS
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR CLEARING AND
GRU�3ING PHASE OF
CONSTRUCTION.
THIS PROJECT HAS
SEEN DESIGNED TO
SENSITIVE WATERSHED
STANDARDS.
ENVIRONMENTALLY
SENSITIVE AREA(S) EXIST
ON THIS PROJECT
Refer To E. C. Special Provisions
for Special Considerations.
The following roadway english standards as appear in "Roadway Standard Drawings"- Roadway Design
Unit - N. C. Department of Transportation - Raleigh, N. C., dated January 201E and the latest
revison thereto are applicable to this project and by reference hereby are considered a part of
these plans.
1604.01
Railroad Erosion Control Detail
1605.01
Temporary Silt Fence
1606.01
Special Sediment Control Fence
1607.01
Gravel Construction Entrance
1622.01
Temporary 3erms and Slope Drains
1630.01
Riser 3asin
1630.02
Silt 3asin Type 3
1630.03
Temporary Silt Ditch
1630.04
Stilling 3asin
1630.05
Temporary Diversion
1630.06
Special Stilling 3asin
1631.01
Matting Installation
1632.01
Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type A
1632.02
Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type 3
1632.03
Rock Inlet Sediment Trap Type C
1633.01
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type A
1633.02
Temporary Rock Silt Check Type 3
1634.01
Temporary Rock Sediment Darn Type A
1634.02
Temporary Rock Sediment Dam Type 3
1635.01
Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type A
1635.02
Rock Pipe Inlet Sediment Trap Type 3
1640.01
Coir Fiber 3affle
1645.01
Temporary Stream Crossing

CE
PROJECT NO. SHEE
LINCOLNFSTN BRG ECf 2
TEMPORARY ROCK
SI
LT
CHECK TYPE 'A' WITH
R/W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
`"�""° `"°'""°
EXCELSIOR MATTING
AND
POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM)
EXCELSIOR
NOTES:
MATTING
FLOW
B-
INSTALL TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECK TYPE
A IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWING
N0. 1633,01,
SEDIMENT CONTROL STONEUR5
USE EXCELSIOR FOR MATTING MATERIAL AND
ANCHOR
MATTING SECTION AT TOP AND BOTTOM WITH CLASS
B STONE.
lajjili"I
v V
A
a
PRIOR TO POLYACRYLAMIDE (PAM) APPLICATION,
OBTAIN
� °° '�°�°°b°°
Lo, ID 0
`o,
�
A SOIL SAMPLE FROM PROJECT LOCATION, AND
FROM OFFSITE
o , 0,2`0 �;ao
0 0
MATERIAL, AND ANALYZE FOR APPROPRIATE PAM
FLOCCULANT
° �f"0
0 °b°
TO BE APPLIED TO EACH ROCK SILT CHECK.
02`00 0 00 $ 020
o aoo 'oo Sao
INITIALLY APPLY 4 OUNCES OF POLYACRYLAMIDE
(PAM)
TO TOP OF MATTING SECTION AND AFTER EVERY
RAINFALL
010 0
EVENT THAT EQUALS OR EXCEEDS 0.50 INCHES.
STRUCTURAL STONE
B
PAM
(a oz.�
PLAN
INSET A
See
Inset A
CLASS B STONE
2/3 CHANNEL
i, MIN
EXCELSIOR
WIDTH
MATTING
1' MIN moo o � ;�o,
�
12°
H = 2' MI
ooo
-
I
EXCELSIOR
MATTING
SECTION B-B
CLASS B STONE
SECTION A -A
NOT TO SCALE

EXAMPLE OF PUMP -AROUND
NOTES:
1) All excavation shall be performed in only dry or isolated
areas of the work zone.
2) Impervious dikes are to be used to isolate work from
stream flow when necessary.
3) Maintenance of stream flow operations shall be incidental
to the work. This includes polyethylene sheeting, diversion
pipes, pumps and hoses.
4) Pumps and hoses shall be of sufficient size to dewater
the work area.
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
Utilize a Stabilized Outlet Instead of
a Special Stilling Basin If Pumping
Clean Water
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
(SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS)
TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE HOSE
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
/
i
1`
OPERATION
1
I
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
i
I
DEWATERING PUMP
1
1
1
1
I EXISTING STREAM
► CHANNEL
I
,I
► CULVERT
IN
PUMP —AROUND PUMP
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TYPICAL WORK AREA
1. INSTALL SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S).
2. INSTALL UPSTREAM PUMP AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE.
3. PLACE UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING
OPERATIONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. PLACE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING
APPARATUS. DEWATER ENTRAPPED AREA. AREA TO BE DEWATERED SHALL
BE EQUAL TO ONE DAYS WORK.
5. INSTALL CULVERT(S) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS.
6. EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL
OF IMPERVIOUS DIKES. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND
TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE. (DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKES FIRST).
7. REMOVE SPECIAL STILLING BASIN(S) AND BACKFILL. STABILIZE DISTURBED AREA
WITH SEED AND MULCH.
` IMPERVIOUS DIKE
` (SEE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS)
TOP OF BANK

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
LINCOLN ST BRG EC-2B
Raw SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
' O' N `HJI3�b'�I
T
r
Q
' O' N `HJI3�b'�I
T
r
O
S/kVMHJIH 30 NOISIAIG
o
■
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIO
o
ENGINEER ENGINEER
NOIl`d1dOdSN`ddl 30 '
1d34
NOIlb'l�IOdSNb'dl 30 '
ld3a
T
�
b'N I10d`d0 H1dON
3ON3�
l� IS
JI�I�d�lOdW31
�
�
`dN I10d`d0 H1dON
3ON3�
�O�IlNOO
1N3WIa3S
�bIO3dS
30 31`d1S
HOd ONIM` UO OUVONViS
HSI10N3
w
r
d0 31`d1S
HOA
ONIM` dG OUVON`d1S HSIlON3
w
=
r
=
Lu
z
o
W
�
J
O
H
=
O
U
Lu
N
1--
;z
Lu
c:
.H
+,
4-
m
~p
E
I
�
Lu
�
N
O
cn
`--
z
Q
r
I I-
ICI
o
!Y
m
J
I—
Cn
m 2
I I=
W
Q z
,,,
w
-----
w
cn
*-------
LL- I=
—
-- ----,
O
------------------------
� z
Lu
�
00
'
U)
LuCn
m
H
z
+J
Lu=
H
�
0
00
pp
+J
z
Lu Lucr
Lup
�
N
.-.
Lu �
w z
—
W
W J Q Lu
J
r\
oC O E
—
cc
Lu H U
m H Q
J
I
3: U) +,
4-
1I—
H
H
LL
r\ O r
I I I
ZD W N
> r�
m
Q
p
w
- -_-+
2
= O
H 2 N
W
U
z
OU
w
z
m
Qw
. m
w
z
O
c
H
a x J
H
LL
0
4-
w
J
LL
O Q
m
LL
r\
N
W
u,co
Q
.
z
�
m
wo
Lu
J H
co U)
J
H W
H
LL
w
Q
_
>o
----
=
o
zwCn
comma
I -I
I -I
F- Q CC Cn
Lu
F-
W
LL- Z
Q H
N m
r
Cn LUJ CL
Q W W
Lu
z
Lu
=
cl)
w
Q
LL- OC z J
Cn
W
U)
�
�Q
� CUO�C'3WL.0
0
w
H
H I-qz
IY
zw-i
Q W W ~
(D
w
U)
w
DC
(D
Cn Q=
�z
w_
Q
oc
O
Q
•
Q
oc
m3:
W LL.
m
H 2
o o
oc
LL
w
LL
Luce)
az�
w3~�inz
Lu
� z
Lu
z
�O
z
QH
w
wQ
>-m
w
O
0z
LL
�Q
m
w -iz
-i wF
w
cn •
O
OCR
H2Z
R
■HHW00Cn
i--l0LL
�LuHQ
u)
NO
LLm
�O
p r
o-iz
U) LU
H W
= QF- >LL
CO D U O
I`
Lo
_=
LL H
::)
co
LuCn �
(o U C)
Cy)a Lu Cr
LL
C)
OW w
J z
WH
H
Lu
HZ)
QZ)
WctCL-1
o
w2
cn�
<
m
z
z H
O cn
O Q o
U)
Q J
••
C
W U
W
Q
J
w
ow
= z
LL W
CL Q
F-
Ln
0
Ln
c
O�
z
•c~n
=�
J
a-
O
Q
ALL
z-J
=r
Q
w
Q
O
�N
U
cc
W1=
W
U)
Q
Lu
w
cn=
z
a-
z
D
"w
cl)
Lu
o
H
o
0
U
STATE OF
ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR
STATE OF
ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR
�
NORTH CAROLINA
TEMPORARY SILT
FENCE
o
4
NORTH CAROLINA
SPECIAL
SEDIMENT
CONTROL FENCE
0
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
r
Lo
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
T
w
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
0
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
0
RALEIGH, N.C.
w
RALEIGH, N.C.
w
r
r

0' N `H013-lVd T O
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIO o •
NOIlb'ldOdSNb'dl 30 ' 1d30 30Nd�I1N3 NOIlO�b1SN00 �3nd�IJ � o
`dN I IOHVO HiHON W
ui
30 31` iS 190-LI HOJ ONIMVHG OUVONVIS HSI-19N3 r
Lu
N
Lu
I --I
0
J
p
H
w
Lu Q
o
w
Lu
1= 0>-
O CL
Q
CL Cn U) Lu~
Q
p
z cn w H m
cn
O
O J • w CO H
W w
~
H
o
Q w z U p
Q 0
U'a
�
2�WM
�
Q
�0m>-
Q�w
w 0
o
_ -iQ �U
Q
F—
p 3: O J3: w z H
z
H p U p>
O W
z
0 00�0 <W0
Lu
LL H w C= cn
U Q
H
�pz Lu Lu
D •0
U
w •HZ)Ow zoC2
oCOCU
I —I
pC!)p�H2 WL'SH
HW
U)~ w
LL
> J O LL Z LL
Z Z w
D
o 0 0 0 2 0 000
O H=
Uz0
C2Q3Hz •�Qc�
0>z-i -in o
Owl[
H
"LL00w=ww
w0
Q
—00H"Ye<w = 0
0 Lu
W"wowo"zo
H z
`-�zwv�apoz�
��o •
(�
WU�ocWacWU�Z
Qm�ac
Z
UpQw
U Cl) Lu
H
zoc�pp MJLLD
Op w
z
Q�z m-wOC3
•-iw- z
=W"mcQ > ww
zQ"
�
�zQo���QCnaCUp�
c�
�
LLZzmwz
WU (D0Lu (D ;z
QQccCnw
Lu
LuzI--I�p Hwz
wQ
0wwwmH0Qww00woC�ww
J YO�z�CL"HLuLuU2
>UQQ�U" QQ >zmm
..Omo W<=>-wUWo"m
w
cnaCac0>-m=wz-10-1=<mww
mm�mQUJQmmzmDm
0
.
zr
N m It Ln
c�
00
z
O
U)
Lu
w
m
H
m
LL
W
J
H
LL
Lu
U
J
m
Lu
0
z
STATE OF 11,-uo ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR T r
NORTH CAROLINA GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 0 o
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION TI`
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w
RALEIGH, N.C.CD
r
0' N `H013�VH T O
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIO NIVHa 3dOlS aNV 0
NOIl`dlHOdSN`dHl 30 ' 1d30 SW}!38 A�Ib�lOdW31 �10� 3a I �0 � N
VN I IOUVO HiHON Lu(1O
Lu
30 31ViS Z�_ H03 9NIMV80 OUVONViS HSI-IJN3 r
J J
L CD
H w
O ui
Lu
J W 0,
W I wJ -JQ 0
M y ! z z 0 cccc LL M /
mo
m i � o I o /
2 2 m U
cc H I Un LLJ
w I m Z Q
Lu o U)00 I Ua O�
0 Ua I Q 0 OJ
U W �Z
Lu I
a ! I °o • a
I ---- I ti!aA
00
I I ° �
z
I I w
z >
C 3
Lu
ct
mI o I W Lu>
! m I O Z L` UY) cap = m FO-I
O 0 0
J w �..� J J o=
C I Lu
� °C I a s c = CL H o o W
I o 0 I H O U o Q "' o � z o
W U I J a � cm ~ o o O
i oz l Z on o w O
J w
Lu m I••I
= Z Ca �"� CO m M Lu CC H H
M Lu (a cc
w
`L o °c I o ZD
ff = L
I "' 0
Lu I 0cc
w= a w z
zw w w
LuH cr
Un w z a w oU
Lu a Q � Un
w0 0 m o ~ F-
m H Lu O m CA w . w
J� 0 CL U LuJ� J 0= C'3>
J F- w O Z H O Z LuZ Luaz m J a Uaz C �m
=Lu 0 Un w w cc
wo �� w a �� m Q o0
Mw w z •o "'o
J � C32H =�O O CLCnH OW
0LL ccHw o CL J camLu Ua`� HN
0 >0 cA2Y �x LL w aOZ U�
Y W W H
�U LL CaW Y ZHm �- LL. comF ZMm 7�
=0 I I zo aw HH� ao
wJ z I oc my Ua a�LL wT o Unz zo •mow
Lu cn,� craw scam
0W0 J H2Ua
_= I w I UnzO -j co
m Cr mow a w Qa z�w mzc0n
HU O - U �U 2 Oi""'2 W Um Ow0 zOJ
QH ,,� I °° U wz� — moo=
I Z �Z �O�
wo o I cn� ma Xo� UM0 a�
wLL -mUa� mwULLmo
JLLJ
� OU aUa Lu
' CL l Uw o ♦ m in:vwm °CwU
m J ♦ W Cr- UD 2JH
Lu :D 0 ♦� in C3W waU HH>
I I m zo : ♦% i CLb
'0- 00 oo
a U w
o(V I• -I IL Z 00 H J LL
h-I T
IN
� ' M� GC Z�oc J� o
0 aLL.O 20Z N
w H z u'm O Q Y�L` ��� w
WH
♦ r� YZ U N ZZ 0
! I z m Tmi ' <� a s m0 zlt -1L)0 CD
I O �� Un O wz0 TZc~a
�` � ♦ � �CW N Q W� NHcC a
(� CL
T ' ♦ U CC w 02 Z:) � o a o LuUa
I I I W* _ ♦. O W �Uo H m cc=
H Z Z m W W Z
o I ~ lz Z ♦ m m J z¢Q Q Lu ZOO �o=� Q
I m O J 2 w H y m �00 •oc
a �[ I �..� ' ♦♦ ♦ I U O L O U U LL. Un O
U m a ,r ♦ •0 � J 2Z)w Ua OCZ
Z H D L CL Hoch zwoow
I CL Y ��• I� o 0 0 H�0 HZ-- HUL
Lu I ~ O i o u' 'f♦ lo0c M 0 w W �zCLLuQF-zQ-J
o f � o L== w J Y m H w0 o=m(Aa0cn
J I J m co w ,� O w m o ULUU 0
Lu a Z cn o IJ m J � wa�mcaJ�
w l m I �--� U J I '[r 2 W mozocA��M
m F- cA m H 0 0c y I� H m OC3�WcaWa -q
CC za m aaJx
ZD I I Lu0 U U) y l a w w WCAC��C3Ummm
w Ua m I Z o y ' z Q z ��� �0
a J w
w I M= im i I c~n .. W x w w w wm0w"ww"N -w
Lu Lu
m Z T N co ':I- LO
W
H
STATE OF 1-02 ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR r
T 0
NORTH CAROLINA GUIDE FOR TEMPORARY BERMS
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND SLOPE DRAIN T N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w cm
RALEIGH, N.C. r

0 ' N ` H0I 31VU r m
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIG o
NOIlb'1dOdSNVU1 d0 ' ld3a H�lId 1� I$ A�I�d�lOdW31 � M
VN I � OdVO H1HON wLU
O
30 31ViS UOd !DNIMVU(l GUVONV1S HSI-10N3 r
w �O
� QH
Q �-
� o
O
T
0
H
N
W
a-
0
J
U)
3:
W
H
J
a
z
0
H
U
W
V
U
0
cc
CU
STATE OF ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR T M
NORTH CAROL I NA TEMPORARY LT I DITCH
T C H o 0
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION S T O
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS wCMO
RALEIGH, N.C.co
r
0 ' N ` H0131VU r Lo
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIG o 0
NOIlb'1dOdSNVU1 HO ' ld3a NDI$�13/�Id Jll��d�lOdW31 � M
VN I �OdVO H1HON w O
LU
30 31ViS UOd 0NIMVU(1 GUVdNV1S HSI-10N3 r
O
J
U-
- z
w
H
Q
z
H
v ♦w^
H
♦cn
V J
N p
J
H
O
cn
in
W
H
U
Q
O
U
STATE OF ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR T Lo
NORTH CAROLINA TEMPORARY DIVER 0 o
DIVERSION
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION $ T O
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w
RALEIGH, N.C. r

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
LINCOLN ST BRG EC-2E
' 0 ' N ` H0I 3�Vd r 0 ' 0 ' N ` H0I 3�Vd r 0 ROADWAY DESIGN EET NO.
HYDRAULICS
SAVMHOIH d0 NOISIAIG O ■ S/kVMHDIH d0 NOISIAIO O ENGINEER ENGINEER
NOIl`d1dOdSNVdl d0 ' 1d30 N I$b/9 JN I � � I1S ��dI03dS � M NOIlb'1dOdSNVdl d0 ' 1d30 NOI l�d� ��d1SN I JN I11�dW T r
VN I �OdVO H1dON w O VN I �OdVO H1dON w
d0 31`d1S 90-L dOd ONIMVHG GdVONV1S HSI-]ON3 r d0 31b'1S dOd JNIMVdO GdVGNV1S HSI1rJN3 c r
w
J
U
CA
O
Cz H
� � Z
E
Cz U
U)
O �� O
O +-' z z
4-, O 0 ow= ow= O O
Q
O i..ip dWH dWt—
°° �-J 70 W p �- Z N �- Z
� r-I
N cz
}, /
L ° O
O cz o LL
,�°° ° O
cl)0
o� O
�oa000 Qi � � ~73
�
pOo°° Cn
W
4-
Qo
.�
0o (/)
<
O OJWzo
W O
00 co Z J QC= ~
�
LL yZLL
\ Q LU
Q
O m N U LU
m z F IL
�Qo O �
Q J z ,L
� W
.rl °a 0 s � c¢A
� N
H
. rl 00.
°0 p O cn
U) W O
rl�000o O < z
Cz w 0
Lo a W
� ,° '�� z o
U) oo III— = 0
—I I �
goo III J
o° ui
W W Z
°°o IIII x co W
W co Cn
I I [LLJ
<
`" C°
°000 III =111=1 I F I I—III-III=1
° °° I I=1 � 1=III=III=III=III=1 I I=11
.3� I11T11T111 ` [ [ III=111=1111T111 III [ [ ~ z
[ [ M1a a Q o J
III m ��., 1111 O Q z
III o A [ cn J
W cn a=
•�°off° `� �`` l ��� Z II O Q [[ O z
4-1
O
LU LL o [
1= �-111 � 111 I I � I[T
11 I_I=11 [
�-11�11�11T11�1� � IIII
1111111111— J U
1=1 1=i Q =
11T11T11 111 � c� IIII
I I—III-
1=1
STATE OF 7-06 ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR T STATE OF ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR T O
NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL STILLING BASIN o NORTH CAROLINA MATTING INSTALLATION 0 ■
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION T O DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION r r
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w
RALEIGH, N.C. RALEIGH, N.C.
c r U r
Q�
X
X
9
1 1/2
Cfl

0' N `HDI3�Vd r M
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIO o O
NOIl`d1dOdSNVd1 30 ' ld3a 0 3dA1 dVHJL 1N3WI a3S 131 N I )13OU � M
VN I108VO H1dON ► LU CO
HO 31d1S dOd JNIMVda (IMINV1S HSII0N3 w
� T
LU
m
LU
T\
w
m
w
H
Z
O
H
H
U
U)
LU
0
Cn
CL
im
O
LL
LU
O
Z
W
W
U)
LU
J
00
a
H
X>
O
co
0
0
LL
'30
= w
wm
,. ..
Q
�• .• �` N N
. ••C•`�• `•b . o
U)
LU
LU
H
Q�
U-
w
c
Z
Ja O
LL v
W
0
a= -
O T
iZ J
LU O
Cc
LUo
Cn U
0
W
LU , W 3: J
Z W DC O J
a
F-o�= =w w F-
c/)F- F- -cnoo o .U)
zo
r��Z)�0mF- Z:)="z Z)
LO-im z O o a� m
O H= H w O> _ F— w H
- CC Z H Z CC LL Z U) CA Z X
OHHOLu
zZmJCLw mJ0DHwM
CrWEL
L)LU LLOOZwrJza>- a
O OLU=O HpCHwHLLH
F-mmw LL�COHZ I H
W OR: m o O OU ~ CL J W O
•M O F- mJZJ �LUW WCL
OHqtor= »OJF-_ WU)H
ZONaULuMOHaZLnLU U) LU
LU =ZUH=wH W w U
WC)W H<;zw=wMW =Wa_`
LUC/) U) JH wZHCq_ HJCL t
H=CC=CA'tCLM W>HO=Lo 0 U)
O O w=H w •LLZ LL
Z LL mr aH0 w rOa O
=
U) LU
_ J
W m
NI X >
4 .♦4
ju- -
O
mz
_ O
N 0 CA
�w
LU m
a
o a
w
Z
-J
h-I ~
LL V
LU
cn
J
Oct
z
O
H
V
W
H
1
W
J
C3
z
H
3
O
J
LL
STATE OF ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR rCo
NORTH CAROLINA ROCK INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE 'C' 0 o
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION T N
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w M
RALEIGH, N.C. m T
0 ' N ` H0131VU T O
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIG o •
NOIlb'1dOdSNVdl 30 ' ld3a d 3dA1 )103H0 1l IS )13OU AUVUOdW31 M
VN I 1 OdVO H1dON ► wLU
0
30 31ViS dOd 0NIMVda adVaNV1S HSI10N3 r
O �
J y
U-
z
LU
W
H
z
o
cL �
�O
V J
J
O
O
U-
LU
z
z
0
0
cn
z
H
W
Ln
cn
z
0
0
•
oc�o
LU
cn
z
J
•
cn
_
Q
O
w
oc
z
CDDLno
a
U
n
J
D
o
W
cn
w
cc
LU
W
cn
D
D
o
o
o
z
LL
C)
LU
z
O
J
H
U
Cc
CA
00 0
r �°
0�' 0
a
m
P"P
M
W
co
°
O P �O
�
T
�+
000 0o
P �P P
z
.
Oo 0 0
C
�o
H
o
0 0
Lu
N
r
N
cn
o
�
Oo
°cl°
aLU
J
P
00
°U
Q
o°�°
Z
O
a
= 0
O
O P
O
M
C
o 0
LUV
cn
STATE OF ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR T T
NORTH CAROLINA ` ' o O
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECK TYPE A T M
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w
RALEIGH, N.C. r

0 ' N ` HOI 3�Vd r N
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAICI U-
NOIl`d1dOdSN`ddl 30 ' 1d34 8 3dA1 �103H0 1� IS �100�1 A�I�dbOdW31 � M
`dN I IOdVO H1dON ► w
30 31`d1S 90 - L dOH ON IMVHO OUVONV1S HS I ION] r
z
a
cC 2 w
OW 0cn�- w0
w H m
w z J 0 HCD z
o 000a wJ H
ci a-H0 �0 - L-
J Oaa OZ • r w
o w = LL 0 aC
LU W
�cnW WUW = Owz
Z wOC ZF-Z U cn0 >
o a 0zH se U)
Z
U wncw cimz �-1 O
z � 0 Hw LL w ;O F-o �
O o z y\0 � W W O � CL::
O ~ Q
■ W
11
00LU w<z ow~ Q NLu�' r� W
a rr m rU)� ; J
w0 mZ00= zUam -- ----, W
m� OC�wJ ;
wcn= 00-0
J W 0 CD W
cn a =:: a cn Lo
coa w •0
a= 0; .�_j .Jw
•• J I- z T O O=
Cn 00 w Cn `-'w Z cc H ; --- ----
W Z) U) 0 � 0
wcc wawa wz
O Cn � 2 J Z= cn 0 cn R
z 0cn 000 0Ua � m
o W
Z w
o CL
O z �
L-
z O 0 F— ;z
W JCc cf)
LU Q 0z m
W
Q
CL Q cc J
LL z �H
O Q o cn
w z
0
w
r2 y�0 _
s O
Y o w p c H p o L
pQ cn
o 6U cn 0 LU
O Icl) Q
cn
cy1� N W O LV O O
L O U) LW p N
O �p0 O > cC a
cn o v t. a
w
z
w Y \ O
z U U)
ow
cf) U J
cc
•_ D
0- U
m �— U
W H
L- 0 pC
H
cn
STATE OF 7-06 ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR CV
T
NORTH CAROLINA TEMPORARY ROCK SILT CHECK TYPE 'B' 0
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION r M
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w
RALEIGH, N.C. r
0 ' N ` HOI 3�Vd r N
SAVMHDIH 30 NOISIAIO o 0
NOIl`d1dOdSN`ddl 30 ' 1d34 9 3dA1 dbbl 1N3WIa3S 131 N I 3d I d )IOOb M
VN I IOdVO H1dON ► w
HO 31ViS 90-L dOH ONIMVdd adVaNV1S HSIION3 0 r
oTr)IInTII�AL STON
H /
N
T
LU
•
0c•
•• ko 0
•
1 o ���o►'�
H
N
T
LU 0
Z HC)0Lu
W 00 00 H 0000
z � �UZ)CC 0M
O 0
Ln J n 0c 00 O 0 Lu +I c0 w
cn O O cn O H H 0c
0 cc LL LL cC O 0 W > H
1= O H O w J 00 2 0 cn
wccwzz w0 • T LL I— 0c Z
O z 0 0- Z J F- F- O CL 3:
Q ILO00000�z0LL IL 0
I-0 I- 0BI-0w0w0
z cn H LL 2 0 0c m
cn0 LOZI— OcnCLawc.)w
Cnl—J LULU mam>-0
a cn a • m Z) m Lu z Lu D o a •
J = 0 H CC D 2 O O J 0c Cn M CL cn
U J=) Z 0 F- M F- H H O w =) J
0 F- W cn H cn >> 0- W 0
.. w cc 0 w Cn z z3: cc 0 • m cc 0c
W Cn H Z) Cn O�-q O W= M H a D W H
H D Z CC D= 0 M J> 0- Q W W J 2 Z
O 0O W H 0c W 0c0E-0
z U Cn LL a o0 0 F- W a> O C)
I-
z
0
oL
z
O
H
U)
0c
W
H
0
w
z
O
0
H
0
U
LU
H
0
U)
STATE OF 7-06 ENGLISH STANDARD DRAWING FOR CV
T
NORTH CAROLI NA ROCK PIPE INLET SEDIMENT TRAP TYPE ' B'
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION r Lo
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS w M
RALEIGH, N.C. r

OF HIGHWAYS
UTORTH CAROLINA
SOIL STABILIZATION
TIM.EFRAMES
SITE DESCRIPTION
STABILIZATION TIME
TIVEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND SLOPES
7 DAYS
NONE
HIGH QUALITY WATER (HOW) ZONES
7 DAYS
NONE
SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3el
7 DAYS
IF SLOPES ARE 10' OR LESS IN LENGTH AND ARE
NOT STEEPER THAN 201, 14 DAYS ARE ALLOWED.
SLOPES 321OR FLATTER
14 DAYS
7 DAYS FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 501IN
LENGTH.
ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 401
14 DAYS
NONE, EXCEPT FOR PERIMETERS AND HOW ZONESe

Q a
NP
-L - POT Sta. 8 +00.00
Sta.= STA 10+25 TO 11+25 -L- RT
Q= 1.73 cfs
V = 3.11 ft/s
d = 0.5 ft
s = 0.091 ft/ft
n = 0.055
Liner=CLASS B
Sta.= STA 11+25 TO 11+50 -L- RT
Q= 1.73 cfs
V= 3.78 ft/s
DETAIL 5 Fill
CHANNEL RELOCATION Slope
( Not to Scale)
Natural 51 Groun
? S•7
Natural Ground OR
2 y.1 Construct 1'iFt. Berm
S•7 D `L•
5' Floodplain d
Bench B Min. D= 2.0 Ft.
d = 2.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= NATURAL BED MATERIAL B= 8.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 13 + 98 RT TO STA. 14 + 42 RT
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION
-L- PC Sta. 10+25.00
-L- POT Sta. /O +00.00
d = 0.5 ft E E
s = 0.153 ft/ft
n = 0.055
Liner=CLASS B
RETAIN
EXISTING CB w
RETAIN 15" HDP
DS EX040'
TOP=632.07'
INV=629.77'
o -
•
STREE�PSW 2 "
O
/
/
ISQ
T NDARD 'V' DITCH
CLASS I RIP RAP J
SEE DETAIL 2
EST. 15 TONS
32 YDEOTEXTIL
DqE=7.0 C
S = 0�94 F_rT
CLASS I RIP
EST. 3 T
LOD EST. 7 S
PUE
- C_-
'-y.. OVE APPROX.
ww+ 226 LF
DETAIL 1 - - - ' P
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH LOD v o
( Not to Scale)
S
Front tL S C
Ditch 0 Natural
1 ° Slope NOTE: ALL PR O I�STORM RAIN INLET E E
L• e<
IMPERVIOUS
DIKE
I
Ground F\a MUST BE E FCO
D WITH A FISH LOGO' LOD / L
?• D ��� Tuck Geotextile a AND P WASTE DRAINS T "S'TREAMd Minimum oflft(TYP) OR ER VALENT LANGU APPROVED / By
Geotextile B ITY CONCORD SPECIAL LATERA 'DITCH �y
Min. D=1.4 Ft. E DETAIL 1
Type of Liner= Class B Rip -Rap, Keyed -In d =1 Ft. / \
FROM STA. 10 + 25 TO STA. 11 + 50 -L- RT DETAIL 3 D ETAI L 4
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT LATERAL BASE DITCH
DETAIL 2 Not to Scale) ( Not to Scale)
STANDARD 'V' DITCH b
( Not to Scale) Ditch 5'min. Natural
Fill
Grade 1.0'min. Ground ?S• D �5'1 1' Ft. Slope
Natural Natural 1.0' min d
Ground Ground
d 2•y D Tuck Geotextile Place Geotextile Under �� B
a Minimum of lft Riprap in Locations Press Riprap into Min. D= 6.0 Ft
Geotextile (TYP) Directed by Engineer Channel Bottom d= 1.0 Ft.
Until Refusal
Min. D = 1.5 Ft. B = 8.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class I Rip -Rap, Keyed -In d = 1 Ft. Type of Liner= 4 TONS,CL I Rip -Rap, Keyed -In Type of Liner= NATURAL BED MATERIAL b= 5.0 Ft.
FROM STA. 13 + 31 TO STA. 13 + 73 LT FROM STA. 13 + 73 TO STA. 13 + 84 -L- LT FROM STA. 14 + 42 TO STA. 15 + 48 -L- RT
z STA. 15 + 91 -L- RT
BEGIN SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L - STA /0 +25 RT
ELEV=600.47'
SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L - STA // +25 RT
ELEV=59/.40'
°yA,
0 +TIE TO
EXISTING
CHANNEL
-L-
i
OD
P/ =
10 +45.00
P/ =
12 +00.00
P/ =
/5 +70.00
EL
= 600.93
EL
= 588.20'
EL
= 581.07'
VC
= 40'
VC
= 165'
VC
= 60'
K=44.6
K=26
K=39.8
IDS
= 30 MPH
NDS
= 25 MPH
DS
= 30 MPH
END SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH
-L - STA // +50 RT
ELEV = 587.58'
RIP RAP 4' BANKMENT � LOD
F
.�. G
NOTE:
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (LOD)
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 1.45 ACRES
O
4? {JIVLCaa ALL aiumnI umr-a VVIV1ri= 1 CIJ
REMOVE ABANDONED FINAL GRADE
SS MANHOLE I EROSION CONTROL FOR
- LOD o 'k CONSTRUCTION SHEET 04
o E
30" RCP IV E
PUE
� PUE
DU I ON
- -L STA. 16 + 0 m
EXISri1gG
I �v
R Q
�1 FROM STA. 15+91 -L- RT
-".IV STf'L SW SS
23_BST
F E TAI LDdi'MCF
SEE DETAL b- uTL-
XI ?
E
Ts-ors
PUE rP PUE
P �- PUE s
ES .5 TON al_ el Te� PUE P y -A
4�ST. 16 SY GF el�� e� oo `sue
Tp --
,. �� SS PPPE EXISTING CIAt1dxk�_
DE ENCASEMENT -L- PT Sta. 15 +99.63
STABILIZE BANKS
W/LIVESTAKES LOD
RELOCATE CHANNEL - SEE
DETAIL 5 FOR CHANNEL GEOMETRY CLASS B RIP RAP
STEP POOLS w/ROCK CROSS VANES EST. 1 TON
SEE DETAILS ON SHEET 2D-1 EST. 5 SY GF
REMOVE APPROX. 65 LF NOTE:
ABANDONED SS PIPE LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
SEE DETAIL 4 UTILIZE SPECIAL STILLING BASINS FOR DRILLED PIERS.
Sta. = STA 13 + 31 TO 13 + 71 -L- LT Sta. = STA 14 + 42 TO 15 + 30 -L- LT
Q= 6.50 cfs Q= 209 cfs
V= 4.65 ft/s V= 3.7 fVs
d= 0.8 ft d= 3.4 ft
s = 0.110 ft/ft s = 0.003 ft ft
n=0.055 n=0.035
Liner=CLASS I Liner=NATURAL BED MATERIAL
BEGIN LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA 14 +42 RT
ELEV=569.40'
LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA 14 +75 RT
ELEV=569.50' (MATCH EXISTING)
END LATERAL 8' BASE DITCH
-L- STA 15+48 RT
ELEV=568.80' (MATCH EXISTING)
NOTE:
PLACE MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL ON
2:1 OR STEEPER SLOPES AS WORK ALLOWS

PLANTING DETAILS
SEEDLING / LINER 3AREROOT PLANTING DETAIL
HEALING IN
1. Locate a healing —in site in a shady, well
protected area.
2. Excavate a flat bottom trench
12 inches deep and provide drainage.
3. -3ackfill the trench with 2 inches well
rotted sawdust. Place a 2 inch layer of
well rotted sawdust at a sloping angle
at one end of the trench.
4. Place a single layer of plants ' r
against the sloping end so that
the root collar is at ground level.
5. Place a 2 inch layer of well rotted
sawdust over the roots maintaining
a sloping angle. ,
6. Repeat layers of plants and sawdust
as necessary and water thoroughly.
DI��LE PLANTING METHOD
USING THE K3C PLANTING 3AR
1. Insert planting bar 2. Remove planting bar
as shown and pull handle and place seedling at
toward planter. correct depth.
AN
4. Pull handle of bar 5. Push handle forward
toward planter, firming firming soil at top.
soil at bottom.
PLANTING NOTES:
PLANTING -JAG
During planting, seedlings
shall be kept in a moist
canvas bag or similar
container to prevent the
root systems from drying.
K3C PLANTING 3AR
Planting bar shall have a
blade with a triangular
cross section, and shall
be 12 inches long,
4 inches wide and
1 inch thick at center.
ROOT PRUNING
All seedlings shall be root
pruned, if necessary, so that
no roots extend more than
10 inches below the
root collar.
3. Insert planting bar
2 inches toward planter
from seedling.
6. Leave compaction
hole open. Water
thoroughly.
STATE
STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
SHEET
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
LINCOLN ST ERG
RF-1
STATE PROJ. NO.
F. A. PROJ. NO.
DESCRIPTION

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
LINCOLN ST BRG
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.
RF -2
PLANTING
LIVE STAKES PLANTING DETAIL
LIVE STAKE
SQUARE CUT
BUDS (FACING UP
LIVE CUTTING
(1/2"-2" DIAMETER)
2 - 3 Feet
ANGLE CUT 30'
COIR FIBER MAT
LIVE STAKES
T�
EXISTING/PROPOSED
GROUND
EXISTING/PROPOSED
STREAMBED
BANK STABILIZATION WITH LIVE STAKES
NOTE -
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE SPACED APPROXIMATELY 4 FEET
ON CENTER
LIVE STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN UNTIL APPROXIMATELY 3/4
OF LIVE STAKE IS WITHIN GROUND
DETAILS
3AREROOT PLANTING DETAIL
DI��LE PLANTING METHOD
USING THE K3C PLANTING 3AR
1. Insert planting bar 2. Remove planting bar
as shown and pull handle and place seedling at
toward planter. correct depth.
AN
4. Pull handle of bar
toward planter, firming
soil at bottom.
5. Push handle forward
firming soil at top.
PLANTING NOTES:
PLANTING 3AG k
During planting, seedlings
shall be kept in a moist
canvas bag or similar
container to prevent the
root systems from drying.
K_3C PLANTING SAR
Planting bar shall have a
blade with a triangular
cross section, and shall
be 12 inches long,
4 inches wide and
1 inch thick at center.
ROOT PRUNING
All seedlings shall be root
pruned, if necessary, so that
no roots extend more than
10 inches below the
root collar.
3. Insert planting bar
2 inches toward planter
from seedling.
6. Leave compaction
hole open. Water
thoroughly.
❑ TYPE 1 STREAM-3ANK REFORESTATION SHALL 3E PLANTED 3 FT. TO 5 FT.
ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 4 FT. ON CENTER,
APPROXIMATELY 2724 PLANTS PER ACRE.
❑ TYPE 2 STREAM-3ANK REFORESTATION SHALL �E PLANTED 6 FT. TO 10 FT.
ON CENTER, RANDOM SPACING, AVERAGING 8 FT. ON CENTER,
APPROXIMATELY 680 PLANTS PER ACRE.
❑ NOTE: TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 STREAM3ANK REFORESTATION SHALL �E
PAID FOR AS "STREAM-3ANK REFORESTATION"
STREAM3ANK REFORESTATION
MIXTURE, TYPE, SIZE, AND FURNISH SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING:
Ni6"d9!il
50% SALIX NIGRA
50% CORNUS AMOMUM
TYPE 2
25% LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA
25% PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS
25% PRUNUS SEROTINA
25% 3ETULA NIGRA
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
LACK WILLOW 2 ft - 3 ft LIVE STAKES
SILKY DOGWOOD 2 ft - 3 ft LIVE STAKES
TULIP POPLAR
SYCAMORE
LACK CHERRY
RIVER _3IRCH
❑ SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR AREAS TO �E PLANTED
12 in - 18 in 3R
12 in - 18 in 3R
12 in - 18 in _;R
12 in - 18 in _311
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
STREAM.-3"ANK REFORESTATION
DETAIL SHEET I OF 2
N.C.D.O.T. -ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
LINCOLN ST BRG
SHEET NO.
RF -3
DIRECTION
OF FLOW
ANChwnQ un
1 CENTERS
COIR FIBER
MATTING
ANCHORS ON
3' CENTERS
EXTEND MATTIN
TO NWSEL
MATTTAIt'_
PLAN
------ ------ -V----- ------ --A
STREAM BED
COIR
VIEW
TYPICAL
18„
(TYP)
ANCHORS ON
1' CENTERS
IN TRENCH
MATTING SHALL BE
PLACED IN TRENCH
AND BACKFILLED
ANCHORS ON
1 CENTERS
CROSS SECTION
FIBER MATTING
DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
HORS ON
CENTERS
ANCHORS ON
1 CENTERS
FLOODPLAIN/
EXISTING
GROUND
►T► f�`►1
2►► x 2" (nominal)
WOODEN STAKE
12Ar
#10 STEEL
REINFORCEMENT BAR
4'
411
IAMETER
24"
1" (nominal)
STAPLE
ANCHOR OPTIONS
R/W SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER I ENGINEER
STREAM-3ANK REFORESTATION
DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 2
N.C.D.O.T. -ROADSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT

Lincoln St Bridge SW
8 Property Information
8 Property Information

16304 0341
FILED ELECTRONICALLY
CABARRUS COUNTY NC
M. WAYNE NIXON
FILED Dec 08, 2022
AT 11:56:00 AM
BOOK 16304
START PAGE 0341
END PAGE 0345
INSTRUMENT # 34190
EXCISE TAX $0.00
NORTH CAROLINA QUITCLAIM DEED
Excise Tax: $0.00
Parcel ID #: Multiple Parcels (See Exhibit "A") Verified By: Cabarrus County on the day of , 20
By:
Mail/Box to: EBJ Law, 6801 Carnegie Boulevard, Suite 110, Charlotte, NC 28211
This instrument was prepared by: EBJ Law, NO TITLE WORK HAS BEEN PERFORMED.
Brief description for the Index: 21 Parcels, Lots 1-20, WOODCREST PARK, B23/P105
THIS DEED made this day of December, 2022, by and between
GRANTOR
L'Audace Equity VI, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
2201 South Boulevard, Suite 220
Charlotte, NC 28203
GRANTEE
Wickenden Brunting VII, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
2201 South Boulevard, Suite 220
Charlotte, NC 28203
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall
include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land
situated in the City of Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit "A"
NC Bar Association Donn No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association
submitted electronically by "EBJ Law"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the Memorandum of understanding with
the office of the Register of Deeds of Cabarrus county. NCGS 47-14(al)(5).

16304 0342
All or a porlion of the properly herein described [ ] includes or [ X ] does not include the primary residence of the Grantors.
The property herein above described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 16289, Page 0327.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Map Book 23, Page 105.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the
Grantee in fee simple.
Grantors make no warranty, express or implied, as to title to the Property. No title work has been performed.
NEITHER THE INDIVIDUAL NOR LAW FIRM PREPARER OF THIS INSTRUMENT PERFORMED ANY TITLE
EXAMINATION WORK, NOR CONDUCTED OR PARTICIPATED IN ANY CLOSING RELATED TO THE
TRANSACTION INVOLVING THIS INSTRUMENT.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto se(his hand, or if corporate, has caused this to be signed in its corporate
name by its duly authorized officers by authority of its Board of Directors, the day and year first above written.
L'Audace Equity Vl, LLC,
a North Carolina Limited Liability Company
By its Manager:
L'Audace, LLC, a North Carolina Limited Liability Company
By:
ojdehi,
STATE OF 6(L, 0,A -R,0 _-t 0A
COUNTY OF MU C-V t-C-W 't AfLC,,
1, the undersigned, a Notary Public of the slate aforesaid and county of M 1� aMQII A)l = ,
certify that Cyrus Mojdehi personally came before me this day and acknowledged that he is Manager of L'Audace, LLC, a
North Carolina Limited Liability Company, as Manager of L'Audace Equity VI, LLC, a North Carolina Limited Liability
Company, and that he as Manager, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing on behalf of the Limited Liability
Company.
WITNESS my hand and Notarial Seal this,
,:UI %1t� SI AI. 1
Barbara K Flanders
NOTARY PUBLIC
Mecklenburg County
North Carolina
My Commission Expires April 26, 2027
day of December, 2022.
4-0k(s--�
Notary Public
�Pt•cta �-Rh n `FL/�N t�-�
Printed Name of Notary Public
My Commission Expires: N ?'IL a(c)' ao
NC liar Association ronu No. 3 © 1976, Revised O ]/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association

16304 0343
L'Audace Equity V1, LLC,
a North Carolina Limited Liability Company
Bj, its Manager.
Boxwood Lane Holdings LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company
I >
By:
Daniel Hirsc i erg, Manage
STATE OF 0-X-e,,0 iJA
COUNTY OF iJ1.1Wllh
I, the undersigned, a Notary Public of the state aforesaid and county of N1JLIL��IJJZ� ,
certify that Daniel Hirschberg personally came before me this day and acknowledged that he is Daniel Hirschberg, Manager of
Boxwood Lane Holdings LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company, as Manager of L'Andace Eqnity VI, LLC, a
North Carolina Limited Liability Company, and that lie as Manager, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing on
behalf of the Limited Liability Company.
r�
WITNESS my hand and Notarial Sea] this —1 day of December, 2022.
i ;1.1M,N1t1'.`,I :11_ �
Barbara K Flanders
NOTARY PUBLIC
Mecklenburg County Notary Public
North Carolina
My Commission Expires April 26, 2027 �jpQ ��dZS
Printed Name of Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
NC Bar Association Form No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Associalion

16304 0344
Exhibit "A"
Lying and Being in Number Eleven (11) Township, Cabarrus County, North Carolina on the eastern side of
Rutherford Drive and on the northern side of Wilshire Drive, adjoining the property of the United States of America,
James L. Props[, Cannon Holding Corporation, American Legion Post 172 and others and being more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin in the eastern edge of Rutherford Drive, northwestern corner of the United States of
America property (Deed Book 573 Page 333) and runs thence N. 20-49-32 W. 282.59 feet to a stake in the western
edge of Rutherford Drive, in the line of American Legion Post 172; thence N. 18-09-27 E. 1,188.0 feet to an iron pin
in the line of Ester Lovill; thence continuing with the fine of Lovill N. 32-48-11 E. 303.89 feet to a point in Irish
Buffalo Creek; thence with Irish Buffalo Creek, nine calls as follows: 1) S. 33-42 E. 217.34 feet; 2) S. 20-01-20 E.
118.22 feet; 3) S. 09-41-35 W. 129.22 feet; 4) S.08-33-52 W. 230.86 feet; 5) S.10-56 E. 169 feet; 6) S.01-44-32 W.
153.77 feet; 7) S. 16-49-34 E. 207.14 feet; 8) S. 31-03-03 E. 122.39 feet; 9) S. 40-42-22 E. 236.16 feet, to a stake in
Wilshire Drive; thence, with Wilshire Drive S. 30-03-10 W. 214.78 feet to a stake, corner of United States of
America; thence two calls with the United States of America as follows: 1) N. 49-13-39 W. 422.32 feet to a stake; 2)
S. 51-09-04 W. 532.54 feet to the Beginning, as surveyed and platted by Concord Engineering and Surveying January
2, 1986.
The above description includes the subdivision known as WOODCREST PARIC, Lots 1 through 20, Map Book 23
Page 105, Cabarrus County Registry.
Parcel ID# 5529.89.8769.0000
Property Address: Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.5645.0000
Property Address: 248 & 250 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.6663.0000
Property Address: 249 & 251 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.7503.0000
Property Address: 255 & 257 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.5517.0000
Property Address: 256 & 254 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.7423.0000
Property Address: 261 & 263 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.4590.0000
Property Address: 262 & 264 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.7342.0000
Property Address: 267 & 269 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.5460.0000
Property Address: 268 & 270 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.6284.0000
NC liar Associalion Donn No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010
hin led by Agreement with the NC Bar Association

16304 0345
Property Address: 273 & 275 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.5313.0000
Property Address: 274 & 278 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529,89.6128.0000
Property Address: 279 & 281 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.4267.0000
Property Address: 282 & 284 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.5163.0000
Property Address: 285 & 287 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.3291.0000
Property Address: 290 & 292 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.4097.0000
Property Address: 291 & 293 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.4022.0000
Property Address: 297 & 299 Brunting Lane Southwest, Concord, NC 28025
Parcel ID# 5529.89.6920.0000
Property Address: 451 & 453 Rutherford Street Southwest, Concord, NC 28205
Parcel ID# 5529.89.6810.0000
Property Address: 457 & 459 Rutherford Street Southwest, Concord, NC 28205
Parcel ID# 5529.89.6702.0000
Property Address: 463 & 465 Rutherford Street Southwest, Concord, NC 28205
Parcel ID# 5529.89.4440.0000
Property Address: 481 & 483 Rutherford Street Southwest, Concord, NC 28205
NC Bar Association Pone No. 3 © 1976, Revised © 1/1/2010
Printed by Agreement with the NC Bar Association

I*
� 0
5 CABARRUS COUNTY 11-09-95 02 882 s ac1331 fa V5
74.00.1 1.1LED
gTAvR�HBow PACE
CA -t Exci egTax Nnr 9 a to Pit r9+1
CABARRUS COUNTY 11-e9-94 C1ln�l'�5 S pEEDS
REG", ,1OF N.C•
$76.00
STATE OF
_ SO JNA �� Heal Estate
Excise Tax
Recording Time, Book and Page
Tax Lot No. ........ otlt of 11-14-4 Parcel Identifier. No. .......,.
Verified b County on the . ..... day of
by................... .............. .............................. ..... .
Mall after recording to Piedmmt Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc.
S. IRVxN, P.A., At 291Z4...
Post Office ..
53 Mt plt3asafit, North Cax+olirki .......
This Instrument was prepared by torMY At LalV! Obnoord, North Carolina
....
Brief description fur the Index Rutherford Street
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR
GRANTEE
71RI—F IwES'11dms, INC.► PIFIY[Fim' fPldM= UMM C.D., INC.
a North Carolina Corporation a North Camliria Coxporatian
Enter In appropriate block for each pnrlyi name, address, and, If appropriate, character of entity, e.a. corporation or partnershtµ
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and
shall Include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that
certain lot or parcel of land situated In the City of . 0x4oxd Ntlnlher E]d3V6f1 111) Township,
- CbbilYl[118 .... County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows; i
SM EMIT NO ATE HEEM0 iM A DESOM IM Q P FFUPERjft�il,,J 11 It i
CCHYSYO HMMM
j�
N. C. a.r Arne. Feria Na 7 0 I e7e, RnWd b 177T -,.,� nwww • p., x.., s. rn, wr...r. t a, raw i

W1331 rut 176 ,
The Drapery horehubove described was Required by Grantor by Instrument recorded In ......................................
Cabarru
................................................ bud Soak... ZS9.., Rtge..43....°..Itegietxy.................................-.................................... l
A map showing the above described ro
D May is recorded In Plat Book .................................... Dage.........................
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appNrtsR&fta thereto belonging to
the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor Is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey
the same In fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and
defend the title against the lawful claims of all persona whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
1. Subject to all utility rights Of way and easements; �
2. Subject to the right of way for Southern Railroad;
3. Subject to riparian riots, if any., for Irish Buffalo Creek;
4. Subject to 3o.o toot sewer right of way reserved above.
aorpnt at-, Ali duly aptporrl2*Grantor I and If,, it q ri M.r1 NN a* `*$ �r 4!Aoiir it Its
nYN M pjrM �� M M .o1y[11N M (p
aNYa wrinos. tNti Ake air an( rear f4M
w (wtv
Corp___ oms) •`_____ a _.___________________________________„---. ,----.-_,_,---.(aRAw
°yj.A� * 'c.......----------------- -A ......................
------•------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------
.11"retary (Carp"41" goal) ...__
............... ,....__....._..., _..teHAw
s[A1,•/.i;Ytd1p1���11a NORTH CAROWNA,
a� 1. r News ftwk M 91e County and state .roreMld, NnHy N1at
------,•-•-----,---••_„--••------•----------------------•--..•--------•---" --- Qeanlar
Personally .ppearad Mien. Me "'a day and acknowkdsod eta oaocadical of eke aneetaN IMtrnaletaL wlMee' May i
phand and eNlCkl .Mir[ ee ash. a. ........ ay of ......................•-- --------. te.,....
my Commission eaplenl -------------------------------------------------- ,
NORTH CAROLINA,r1ltH
I, a Notary Public of tke Canada, and state afareeald, eot{Ny, am ..J011tVlx.�1. FlBte.ttele
�} +1 Nnwwtlr eases kefare re 'his dayy and aekrewkM
d[ee WAIT .... he Is ....«........ ............. aneer at
mar +l
�A_ . q r_______________ a Norte CarNlua corporation, sad that by authority Arty �
d Milan and as tee act er the earstnsuou. as retesting ta'Irumaat was meted Me He acme ►y R........_
P
lnMdont, scaled with its eet/•nk 'eat and aWotN by _ him •_ , as ao ..... ' __..
-•-••• enntary,
wane' any bead and ernela sump er soot, this Rift —day .rDecemb___,November 94
efy compassion ezplwl 7, 1998
...................... .... Notary ftuw
i
fCe �Crirta r .(. 9f
__•..................:.................
............•-,....._.,,........
........
...................................
y [• _..
r,riaMortified r�r be Correct, This Inez fESne• W.�.. fkato an duly I* kgnd at the d end t ♦tad In Ike Rusk and !rye awn on rM
7Er11STER OF. DEEM
••----•--•�--- •r -•••••__••••••__...... ••}�••1 ........RNOIaTRR OF Rliapa
• -- -• - - .._._COUNTY i
rr ...........
•••-----•- Ragkke W RNd
i
l
hN. C. War Arse. Form NO- J O 1970. Rerlm,r
d ® 1977 - aw.www r a., 1... mr Ifs. vrwCrrR M. C. sips
171

RECORD p DEEDS 3 294
139
RECORD 214
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA—CA IARRUS COUNTY.
THIS INDENTURE Made this the .. -.... hsh- - day of .... „..... „. ._ lose »- ......................................... ...
........
In the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and....F.LftyrXLne..41zq).- .................... „. »._................. , .......... between
.Ct?.LleweilY.n..and,wtfx_Ruth. ........................... W _.... ....._ ...
».................... .._.»....—........ _........ _.._............... .......................... ...... .».»..».............
_ _ _ _ ..... _ ._....._._......_......_..».
of the County of ............. Cabarsus...... _...._...... ............... .,........................... _............. and State of North Carolina of the first part, and }
.................... City...of..Caacard,...a..lfunIaLpal..C=p aratl.aa........»......................................_............................................................._._
...:......... _............ ........ ................................ »...... ............................... .......... _»....... __.............. ..:............. ............. ....................................... _.
of the County of ....:.... �n)is ........ .................................... _....... and State of North Carolina, of the second parts
WITNESSETH, That the said part 1111 of the &A part, for and In consideration of the sum of ...................
i Tan.an:L.ather v.aluab.Le..cans.tdczat.Lans...........,....DOLLARS,
to the said part ..y..... of the first part in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, ha_ zfbargained sold and
r;rs
conveyed, and by these presents do .......... bargain, sell and convey unto the said part ....y._. of the second part, ......,.,,��ieiris-and
ts suceesd
f iE1 assigns . ............................................... _............................. -..................... ..... .................................. _..................................... ........................._...., i the following described real estate, situate, lying and being in the County of Cabarrus and State of North Carolina, bounded a; i
follows, to -wit:
A tract of land lying and being In Ward No.4 of the C Ity of Concord and No.11 Township in Cabarrus !
CDunty,NDtth Carolina, and being a part of the subdivision known as"HARTSELL-ACRES" and also a part of
the Junkin Reed PrDperty,and lying on the East sideof Irish Buffalo Creek and described as foliowss 1
BE:rINNINv at an Iran stake to the West edge of Lincoln Street,satd point being the Southeast corner of
Lot Na,i in Block I" of Lincoln Park (said point being South 12-30 :.lest 125 feet from the Southwest
corner of the Intersection of Cozart Drive and Lincoln Street) and runs thence with the line of Lincoln
Park North 77-30 W=st 425 feet tD an Iron stake the Southwest corner of Lot No.17 In Black "C" on Ltneoln
Park; thence North 12-30 East 125 feet to an Iran stake, the Northwest corner of Lot ND.17 In the South
edge Df•CSzart Drive; theme along the South edge of Cazart Drive, North 77-30 West 150 feet to an Iron
stake; thence North 12-30 East crDssin; CDzart Drive and with the :West line of Lot ND.27 to Block "B",
142.5 feet to an Iran stakc,a corner of Lots Nos. 27, 33 and 34 In Block "B" of Lincoln Park; thence
North 77-30 West 150 feet to an Iron stake, the Southwest corner of Lot ND.28 In Black "B" of Lincoln
Park; thence North 12-30 last 112.5 feet to an Iran stake, the Northwest corner of Lot ND.23 in the Ssth
edge of Logan Drive; thence with the South edge of Logan Drive North 77-30 West 154.E feet to an Iron
stake on the aid nine between the Hartsell and Reed properties; thence North 30-12 Enst 271.9 feet with
the Did line to an Iron stake on said old line thence a new line North 78-30 'Jest 378.2 feet to an Iran
stake, a new corner; thence a new line North 14-00 West 1108.7 feet to an Iron stake, a corner of Lot No.
34, In Block "F" of HVISELL ACR43 and anthe line of G.T.Croweii prapertytthence with the line of the
CrDwzli property South 45-30 West 245 feet to the center of Irish Buffalo creek; thence with the center
of the said creek South 16-27 East 1160.9 feet to a stake In the center of the creek; thnce with the creek+
South 30-15 East 411 feet to a point to the center of the creek, an Did corner of Hartsell Acres; thence
North 29-43 East 30 feet to an Iran stake on the last edge of the creek; thence along the east edge of
the creek South 37-27 East 1062.0 feet to an Iron stake on the east side of the creek and on the line of
the Property of J.W.Prapst,Jr.;thence with the line of J.W. Propsj,,Jr. North 30-00 last 499.5 feet to an
Iron stake, J.a.Propst,Jr.. corner; thence North 12.30 East 82.7 feet to the BEuINNING,contalntng 16.33 acre
I.R-Stamps-M.45. {�
i

•
•
:1
gookUU PAGE V7
P,y39 M
Lying and Being in the City of Concord, Number Eleven (11) Township of Cabarrus County, North
Carolina on the West side of Rutherford Street, on the East side of Southern Railroad, and
Being more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron stake in Rutherford Street, a new corner (said Beginning point being
two (2) lines as follows from the old Northeastern corner of Lot Number 37 of Goodman Heights
Subdivision (Map Book 13, Page 51): First, North 21-51-23 West 450.00 feet to an iron stake,
and Second, North 31-54-01 East 71.18 feet to an iron stake, the point of Beginning) and rune
thence a new line North 65-01-00 West 1984.68 feet to an iron stake in the centerline of the
right of way of Southern Railroad, a new corner; thence with the centerline of said Southern
Railroad 200.0 foot right of way as it curves in a generally Northern direction at a radius
of 6927.66 feet, in a counterclockwise direction, an arc distance of 1218.55 feet to a point;
thence continuing with said centerline North 07-15-20 West 384.05 feet to a point in the
centerline of said right of way, a corner of DHM Holding (Deed Book 606, Page 766); thence
with the line of DHM Holding North 86-06-23 Fast 867.93 feet (passing an iron stake in line
at 125.00 feet) to an iron stake, a corner of the City of Concord (Deed Book 294, Page 139);
thence with the line of the City of Concord four (4) lines as follows: First, South 15-46-49
East 1175.00 feet to an iron stake; thence Second, South 29-27-16 East 411.00 feet to an iron
stake; thence Third, North 30-47-44 East 30.00 feet to an iron stake; thence Fourth, South
38-44-08 East 1039.40 feet to a p.k, nail, an old corner of the City of Concord in the old
line; thence South 31-54-01 West 254.78 feet (passing an iron stake in line at 15.34 feet)
to the point of BEGINNING, containing 54.88 acres, more or less, as surveyed and platted by
Samuel L. King, Jr., R.L.S., May 19, 1994.
The above described property is also a portion of the Dr. J. F. Reed and Mrs. Mary Reed
Buchanan 136.46 acre tract of the Joel Reed Lands, as shown in Map Book 4, Page 21 of the
Cabarrus County Registry.
This conveyance is made TOGETHM WITH a 60.0 foot right of way, for purposes of ingress,
egress, and regress from the above described property to the end of Amber Drive (as sham
in the Subdivision plat for Goodman Heights, Map Book 13, Page 51), which right of way is
more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron stake in the Southern line of the above described property (said stake
being South 65-01-00 East 433.61 feet from an iron stake in the centerline of the 200.0 foot
right of way of Southern Railroad, which is also the Southwestern corner of the above described
property) and runs thence South 24-59-00 West 359.99 feet to a point; thence continuing in
a Southern direction at a radius of 481.36 feet, in a counterclockwise direction, an arc
distance of 142.83 feet to a point; thence continuing South 07-58-57 West 20.14 feet to a
point in the centerline of Amber Drive (as shown on said recorded plat), and in the Southern
boundary of the property retained by the grantor herein; said right of way to be 60.0"feet
in width, 30.0 feet on both sides of the centerline, as described herein.
This conveyance is made and accepted SUBJB= M a 30.0 foot sewer right of way, reserved by
the grantor herein, its successors, and assigns, for installation and maintenance of a sewer
line to be erected and connected to the existing 42 inch sanitary sewer right of way, the
centerline of said sewer right of way being more fully described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point in the Southern line of the above described property (which point is
North 65-01-00 West 75.27 feet fran the Beginning point of the above described property) and
runs thence North 29-48-03 Fast 192.39 feet to a point in the centerline of said existing
sewer line.

9010. FILED
CABARRUS COUNTY NC
0291 LINDA F. McABEE
REGISTER OF DEEDS
FILED Dec 29, 2009
AT 10:26 am
BOOK 09010
START PAGE 0291
END PAGE 0294
INSTRUMENT # 31947
EXCISE TAX $0.00
NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax $ -0-
Tax Lot No. Parcel Identifier No, 5630-12-7453-0000 and 5620-91-5174-0000
Verified by County on the _ day of
By
Mail after recording to Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A. (HS) (NO TITLE EXAMINATION)
......—.....,.,—._..—_..., _ ..... _ ._.......... .— .,.
101 N. Tryon Street, State 1900, Charlotte, NC 28246
- -- .....` ........ ........_.........,—.......... _.,-.,— .....
This instrument was prepared by Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A,
_.._....... ..., ......... ............ ..-. _ T .......... _..
Brief description for the Index
THIS DEED made this'Z) day of December 2009 by and between
JAMES L. PROPST, joined by his wife
PATTY A. PROPST
JLP Holdings II, LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
829 Davidson Dr. NW
Concord, North Carolina 28025
Enter in appropriate block for each party: name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g. corporation or
partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall
include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey onto the Grantpe in fee sim le, all of his one-half (112) undivided
interest in that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the_City.of_ Township, Cabarrus County,
North Carolina and mare particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit A
Patty A. Propst joins in the execution of this Deed for the purpose of conveying whatever interest she may have in the subject
property by virtue of her marriage to James L. Propst but does not join in the warranties being made hereunder.
N. C. Bar Assoc. Form No. 6 ® 1977

02.72 The property heremabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 455 Page G.?. and Book.317,
Page.320.in the Gabamis-Cop�gy.Registrx -------------------------------------- ......._..... .........._...----- ...........
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 61, Plat Book 7, Page 56 and Plat Book 7,
Page 68.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the one-half (1/2) undivided interest in the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor has done nothing to impair such title as Grantor received, and
Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, under or through Grantor,
except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
General utility easements and rights of way of record.
2. Restrictions and covenants of record in Cabarrus County Registry.
Rd valorem taxes for 2009 and subsequent years.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this instrument to be ex cuted as of the day and year first above written.
a (Corporate Name) PROPS
O
By - -�
� _........ _ (SEAL)
President PATTY A, PROP T
_. .....� ..._._,_.. . ......- .
(SEAL)
rn
Secretary (Corporate Seal)
(SEAL)
SEAL — STAMP NORTH CAROLINA, {.G County.
1, a Notary Public of 1244d ar—� County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that TAMES L.
m PROPST, as Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and acknow_ ledged the due execution of the
�q foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this ...� -- y of �LE ---�10---
- ---
a
I certify that the Grantor personally appeared before me this day, and
/ (check one of the following)
t✓ (l have personal knowledge of the identity of the Grantor); or
(I have seen satisfactory evidence of the Grantor's identity, by a current state or federal
identification with the Grantor's photograph in the form of: l
(check one of the following) �� ©�
=a driver's license or
in the form of }; or
(a credible witness has sworn to the identity of the �Grantor). �, w
Notary Public
�1� 1'l� � • �e gal �' ��' � � r� �,
Not 5 printed or typed name
CNote: Notary Public must sign exactly as on notary seal]
My Commission Expires: My CoIT mi55ion Expif®s J ar!(!nl'V 24. PTO 13
C-10183110 084455.01011

0293 SEAL -- STAMP NORTH CAROLINACounty.
-----
' 1, a Notary Public of A#V* i--' County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that PATTY A.
PROPST, as Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and acknowled ad the due execution of the
foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, thiO�day AU".6AQ9.
I certify that the Grantor personally appeared before me this day, and
(check one ofthe following)
(I have personal knowledge of the identity of the Grantor); or
(I have seen satisfactory evidence of the Grantor's identity, by a current state or federal
identification with the Grantor's photograph in the form of:
(check one of the following)�t .
a driver's license or
_ in the form of ); or
(a credible witness has sworn to the identity of the Grantor).
Q.
-_ `firs O:
Notary Public
Notary's printed or typed name " +"
[Note: Notary Public must sign exactly as on notary seal]
My commission Expires.
C,omdIssion Expires J aunty 24, ?_013
The foregoing Certificate(s) of ......................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ ..............
------------------------- ................................. -------------------- -............. --................................................................. --- ------
is/are certified to be correct. This instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and
Page shown on the first page hereof.
-------- ................ .. ........................... ........................... ....... REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR ..................... -COUNTY
By ----------- ---................................ ..... Deputy / Assistant -Register of Deeds
N. C. Bar Assoc. Form No. 6 ® 1977
C•1018311w3 08465.01011

gold
0294
Exhibit A
TRACT 1
Lying and being in No. 11 Township, Cabanas County, North Carolina, adjoining the City Limits of the
City of Concord, and being the property on which the business and offices of PROPST
CONSTRUCTION CO. arc located, consisting of approximately 140 acres, more or less, and more
particularly described as follows:
(1) That real property consisting of 153.91 acres, more or less, conveyed and described in
deed dated November 26, 1934, recorded in Deed Book No. 132, page 242, from A. J. Dayvault, et al, to
J. William Propst, Jr, and wife, Margaret Miller Propst, being the Dayvault Farm as surveyed and platted
by Reece I. Long, a map of which is duly filed in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Cabarrus County
in Map Book No. 4, page 61.
(2) That real property conveyed and described in deed dated March 17, 1939, recorded in
Deed Book No. 149, page 42, from Roxie Dayvault to J. W. Propst, Jr., and wife, Margaret M. Propst,
being Lots Nos. 25, 26, and 27 of Dayvault property plus a 15-foot extension into Blume Street.
(3) That real property conveyed and described in deed dated February 5, 1964, from Benny
Max Sides, et ux, to J.W. Propst, Jr., and wife Margaret M, Propst, being Lot No. 64 of the Dayvault
property, a map of which is duly filed in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Cabarrus County in Map
Book No. 7, page 68.
LESS AND EXCEPTING FROM the tracts above described, all property conveyed by J. W.
Propst, Jr., and wife, Margaret M. Propst, specifically the tract of approximately 17.22 acres conveyed
unto A.R. Hoover, Jr., a conveyance unto The American Legion, and a small strip of land along Park
Street, as well as any and all other conveyances.
For back reference see Deed Book 424, page 330, and Deed Book 455, page 62, Cabarrus County
Registry.
TRACT 2:
Lying and being in Ward No. 4, City of Concord, N.C., and being Lots Nos. 67 and 68 of the Dayvault
Subdivision, a map of which is duly filed in Map Book No. 7, page 56, and more particularly described as
follows:
BEGINNING at an iron stake on the west side of Dayvault Street, front corner of Lots Nos. 66
and 67, and runs thence with the west side of Dayvault Street, S. 33-21 E. 100 feet to an iron stake,
southeast corner of Lot No. 68 in the line of Kluttz; thence with the line of Kluttz and with the southern
line of Lot No. 68, S. 51-51 W. 200 feet to an iron stake, a comer of Lot No. 68 and Kluttz in the line of
Propst; thence with the line of Propst and the back of Lots Nos, 68 and 67, N. 33-21 W. 100 feet to an
iron stake, the back comer of Lots Nos. 67 and 66; thence with the dividing line of Lots Nos. 66 and 67,
N. 51-51 E. 200 feet to the BEGINNING.
For back reference see Deed Book 357, page 196, and Deed Book 455, page 62, Cabarrus County
Registry,
TRACT 3:
Lying and being in Ward No. 4 of the City of Concord, North Carolina, north of Wilshire Drive, and
adjoining the property of Propst, Dayvault Subdivision, W. C. Broome, J. F. Barr, R. D. Furr, and others,
and bounded as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron stake, an old comer of Kluttz and Lot No. 68 of the Dayvault
Subdivision, in the line of Propst; and runs thence, with the Dayvault Subdivision, N, 51-30 E. 315 feet to
an iron stake, a comer of W. C. Broome; thence with the line of Broome prolonged, S. 49-06 E. 134.5 feet
to an iron stake, a corner of J. F. Barr; thence with the line of Barr, S. 49-55 W. 125 feet to an iron stake,
a comer of R. D. Furr; thence with the line of Furr, S. 47-14 W. 75 feet to an iron stake; thence a new line
of Kluttz, S. 51-30 W. (passing an iron stake at 144.5 feet) 152.7 feet to an iron stake in the branch and in
the line of Propst; thence with the line of Propst, N. 33-24 W. 141.8 feet to the BEGINNING, containing
1.05 acres, more or less.
For back reference see Deed Book 357, page 109, and Deed Book 455, page 62, Cabarrus County
Registry,
C-NIX3110 OW5.01011 A -I