310773_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231010

GrDivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 / - 7 7 3 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
_ 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: (-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: QeRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I T0710 23 Arrival Time: (u % GU Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: J wC'R r (Z'Atc Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: „%�� h/�l�s Certification Number: g 36 S 3
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
eeder to Finish 2vro 2 yY Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
ET7Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

kacilit Number: 3 t - 77 3 Date of Inspection: U (O �3
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? LJYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the strictures lack adequate markers as required by the pennit? [] Yes No ❑ NA [] NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:] Yes 2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes EffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No [] NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes F] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly.operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes EfrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements []Otlier:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [DNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 3 ( - 7 7 3 Date of Inspection: 10110123
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes P�J`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ©'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [['NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
pvC Je Sor,jey y3Wk ,20 zq
CQlybe_w frays d neY 6 20 A5
` 50d 6(nalyf%3 be Ce+a+p 3
a ntt Ga��G�C SEnc� Loy � /��G�-e�• �JG��-`Z Z�@ DeQ Intl
f l'�' ion ardurld `a0 co`,y rcryve f on s�itil o� l��soh
Reviewer/Inspector Name: lu, pwn-tz'D Phone: %/(��;/]r/2: &6 SS
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020