310245_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231010

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 j - 2 4 S O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: aCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Qf Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: to l0 23 Arrival Time: %US Departure Time: , County: DV.0 1 Region: (,J"
Farm Name: CIS 11011 176,r01 't Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ,&Wl es or-o'nob. cl s lvh Certification Number: Z 3 G 5
Back-up Operator: CA LDS foh Certification Number: 3GF'd
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish L
ayer DairyCow
Wean to Feeder Dairy Calf
/ Feeder to Finish ;LTTO 2 0 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish iLayers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layer Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
ET_ Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [?fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ZNo 0 NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Rl"'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 3 — 2ej 5 jDate of Inspection: 10 tU .2
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [`TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes E3"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes []'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Eallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes []'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [�jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes allo D NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes L]-No ❑ NA [] NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [2'Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers []Weather Code
[Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 31 - Z 15 jDate of Inspection: 10 /C) 2 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [f]NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [T"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EfNo ❑NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
(( ,,e $orv�l dr Cal,'brct -[V tr />e 4e ,this yta✓ c7pw
� Sry m W C'tl<'l rccrr+ 6� 7
Reviewer/Inspector Name: rvl«t��t�i{ PL /1 ZZc� Phone: ?10. 7q 2. g65�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��CC��GcY/! +��`T'17 .��� Date: I0 4 2-3
Page 3 of 3 511212020