NC0072699_Permit Issuance_19970709

State of North Carolina IT
Department of Environment, ffl�5TA
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary p E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 9, 1997
Mr. John Young, Public Works Director
Town of Beaufort
P.O. Box 390
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Dear Mr. Young:
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
Permit No. NCO072699
Pine Street WTP
Carteret County
In accordance with the application for discharge permit received on January 10,1997, the Division
is forwarding herewith the subject state - NPDES permit This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between
North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
The most significant modification from the last permit is the addition of a limit for total suspended
solids, settleable solids, turbidity and weekly effluent monitoring for flow and iron. This requirement was
added because of Division guidance concerning the chemical and toxicological effects of water treatment
plant discharges.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30)
days following redeipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative Hearings,
Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such a demand is made, this
permit shall be fmal and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. Part II, EA. addresses the requirements to be
followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required
by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Iand Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act, or any other Federal or Local governmental permits may be required.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jacquelyn M. Nowell,
telephone number [phone], extension 512.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
David A 3oo+rct�
A. Preston 1Iowar , r., .E.
cc: Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
Permits and Engineering Unit
Facility Assessment Unit
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone]a3 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

M�
Permit No. NCO072699
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
l T101 11% l l i i IT, I I RaiII
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1,
other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended,
Town of Beaufort
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Town of Beaufort WTP
intersection of Pine and Hedrick Streets
Beaufort
Carteret County
to receiving waters designated as the unnamed tributary to Town Creek in the White Oak River
Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I,11, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective August 1,1997
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2002
Signed this day July 9,1997
Original Signed By
David A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No. NCO072699
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
Town of Beaufort
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to discharge water softener backwash from a facility located at Pine Street
WTP, intersection of Pine and Hedrick Streets, Beaufort, Carteret County (See Part
III of this Permit), and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map
into an unnamed tributary to Town Creek which is classified Class SC waters in the
White Oak River Basin.

v Cr t
Gallant
Point L
-\BntOr head City 1
-'xun�clw.l.Aeoxetoxt 1^L
_- L, 8h
PIVNM ^-
iaiNlHa• � Bea
111'Al l OX M •
\ v\xIW IABDxxTOxY�
Cpwerl
2 a
;N
0
!
ul. Creek
point
.11
M •, ✓. &Town h
I� N
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY HIGHWAY UGHr'DURY ROAD. HARD OR
HARD SURFACE IMPROVED SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE E:=Emm= UNIMPROVED ROAD
Latitude 34043'04'
Longitude 76039122'
Map # 132NW
Sub -basin 3-05-03
Stream Class
SC
Discharge Code
22
Receiving Stream
UT to Town Creek
Design 0 Variable
Permit expires 7/31/02
7;.
i
•QM a '` �]
fit P5lig :::
fork
q'I
Highland
IDear7r-,p• I Park
I � ,
YZ-
SCALE 1:24 000
0 1 MILE
0 700D FEET
1 0 1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
QUAD LOCATION Town of Beaufort
NCO072699
Carteret County
Pine Street WTP

A(1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS - FINAL
Permit No. NC0072699
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee Is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number
001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
.. - ...... .... .. .... ..... ..
. •! :''\ �+
•} ;C �•} Y
-: .. :' '•• •. :: r ' '• •: :• ' v:.
T :OA AQTttSTtQS {
. ... ..... ..... . . •..... . ... • .. •. . r:./{�
l.• •.•:.: : .: . : • ..L
..,}:{ •:%}}:M::':\}:•:•�':. . .LL..... Y.;. '}. h :
• }L.. • .w •? .. J.. }i!'• :l r?• •::{•. J�' ?. •. ••}jj�[:}L,.}� }
$Y.v Yh• V} ':1{. •L'L 1r.. r.{L. �•� `{•: •l.:l}.'
�ly�'•. • �•;, -� .f:. L} '?•} •. h. V:
T•. • '{ J.{{. yyJJ.. ,• 11 �•.'{{.�� .}
•� rrJ; •T,.,. ; '•L •JW :.'.'1' '1 r,{l: l
:LyL 1..•:LL. l�.
L•.SS11•:: ..; :.: r....; ....,.;. .. ..: :L :v :•r x... ;.
'{ V::'•: • Y } y? ' L• L'.L• L. ...,.. .- .YI.. "YJ ' ; J t, J
.Y :.•: v: r w: r. Y.L•::.wr.LLv.v • 1•r L•.OEM
$ }:{vv:•' • #�� •} ..,'S•.. •r{{r...
rrv;;f} .$.Lr:. 7.•• : hL { `M�. �a1. .�y. . ;} L .';+�:.�}$:.:•X•
•r.•nv. .r•.. #1�'LL?J$X• .
} Y¢L :, ' }
..••��: '•:• LL• •. :. •': :•.Y •:.Y: ::Y::: •: r • . L• , $' •• '•} •�lJ
�•. h. • :V}}.{•:}'::L.. r L. • .L r . k J { ., A
: �L.•,rr{'•:•}}}:V: . r L' '... •.L rJ� r.:L{ .. u7r�
.,^v '.'.L .:,.}} .• 1.. r/. {• { •. :.
r:{r {. .{}J: L'!.• J:{:'•f Y.r.'. ! ,{•: •y}L''•.}•},{•'•::•}{ hr} •' ?
:UK.,
t •.1•'}:{:'y.',. A; t':.L;h}, ' 'L�•�••�. .}: •i.Y.r •.:.{ S'. J`�J�
V{{Y.LY..Y...L J.. }' •yam '{' 'j.LJy��[�:r�YA•.L{{{'.... IJ..Y.. 'L •: L ' •r• •i� .r ti
r
:}:.VL}�•.,•}: r:•.1'�' ! }:l1Nh•Y: JJrrr :• V .•.Y.Vr:t{ }= rJ::• .': ..�.'.
..r{{•:: .,� v .L:•'•'? {•• .
ff C •{ LY.'L. ;;�
F.4}{.v :•Y}2 : ••r• }rY}rtv}. rr
:r}. "i •.•.i II/�,,�== .�IM:.Y. .v . L
•}. �, .lYJY........ y{v}:•Y•Y.. .{. { .
•;•,� ., •Y• . 'f. Y r•,L..;; .:..:::....:: Y V • . ::. •}•r •:.Y •y .•. 1... Jr. .J {.
.•l • • N :•:: ..1:.} } � :•i.L•:7 ..L{'{:'.{•.'{� • � ''{l:: r :: L N . .} . : rl .
•.. .ia'; 4 v, •. h r� ryr. L. �., }fir{ J!•�'Lv S ,{L }• $'{'y •.;}�,•{; •j,• e�
l}?L J. � ? •'L � }}•• .V : •.. �:
${•yJ'{•Y• '' V . y T•�•r.� { l.'. rJ:{ �•/�7:r, JG•,: . J.•J�{„�Lf'4 Y
J.: .}r • ? . • L• •?L }.• •A Y \V�'L ,�.}•. ':. 1•, r.L ..
.ti{ 1r t'}•: '.��'{�j� $}:•r J':}. rNh'Yr'�}.•'�}. LS '{"yam'$' �f .1• f {.�1f,,}�/ µ 14 �{. {JJ.. �•. �L: Y Yfi�,•
f. A'ti:} '':'{:,�,-' h�h•?.' J r, .'J'.... }..: ^r �} .V ��}.'.' Y~.':}%.'„l?N:L$:}{.4.{'. f.'.'•}•Y.N•':1l•}
: h•
'
•••.•.;
•'r •. : •X•L tY�}�}. , , . f .•J O L J . • v.^
.. • r •Y '{l} • it• .. 1 �k .�. .L . {f
,{•k :}. }L '$
.L . J r 4 '$}:•: i : r .}:
.Y.•'L VY .�.? . , C • O. Y. • r �
..$$}' %r...; },$..•{'{.?,}! l• '• L. r
1?i'r'�'•
.. ., .. ... .} •:. �. }. N•. Y•S
L• {:?rr :•,,, LY'r { •• h ••,.f ,. JL L: 1. L L.
'{},L�rr�: 7• Y�G•:r9t 'ry' ..i�•: r'L.'.L•::. vY'i., �� �L•.
J�J��� � �• • Y.
: iSLY r r # s.
r. \ .:�.{ •r.Y. •: 1.: ••}••:: •: • • {. �J •J} YJL�. :Y •::: :
j.-
� •':::::: .vx: :v' ::. h:... ^4'�.:. }{�r. Y r •}hf•: v •: v:
1,�
L, � •'. �,'' L}' .'{•r:Y: •: L •.Y •: ':ti':::•.
}fi}JMC�7•i}*R+R�: ]�ti v ::�'"': •• •{h• n :�yu�,.$:r �$y'.
h..
J ., C;�:: •:
Y.Yrr:.•r. :.Y::::: r r}:: •
L • .
k�• r •: '.•xv: rvf. : ?r$: r {S''� ii{:}::: �{:'::•.: �.•Ji{.• • .; L {....:..
�.qyy {''JJ
'•��t
37; •'•.v
--..pp�� t .{ . .'
: ?•'� 4 v •.J,rr.{�fi;..}v.,L.. . .. .;N r Si .,
ti:IXfi ;.5y.vhv♦ %v,.•}Yfi •{. Lti.. L .
',•
'L ............ .}}k1^•:C : : •'•}
L• • L , Y.•J.� •yy'' ``�'�'t,
:} :•r.• ;{..J.
{•y'JJ.•{:; //�� ]�■1
�•T�T'1•
J n•
.LG$YL n. r ti •� • •' ,,},•
1Y{.•�{A
.3j¢ J{��}.{::v:.}.v
'•�'?��,� �■-( �•ri
Y;:�.' �-I.7
!:G+}:rY.{.yyfi}l'}.yyy.;....Y.•.:i•••.•:•L. r.�}' } rC.i,} .., .;ft:+�irJY "•.•.{ {� { }
:: }}:: ......4'... •. J..L JJr..... {•:.{•..r'.LY:.'�:}•:. �:•. l:. •�.}A'$M,}:{•N.Y J':'r: �5•.•.Y. Y:�r. h.{ .. n•$:
•Yr.,
•r: y- �/!�. •n:., !•
1'...�.'1''?•:����: '�:N.�.L .�{L•r.. •h�:Y.•:•:1--�;��
{L' :{; IL•:•�����.
hLYlr::T:�: '�•-•��' . �. M1�IZL'.YJ• :�:RJ..{Y•'.
Flow MGD
Weekly
Estimate
E
Total Sus ended Solids
30.0 m I
45.0 1
2/month
Grab
E
Settleable Solids
0.1 mIA
0.2 ml/I
Weekly
Grab
E
Turbidity
25 NTU
Weekly
Grab
E
Iron
Weekly,Grab
E
I Sample Locations: E -Effluent
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

erwv: �M asti�df
i
Staff Review and Evaluation
NPDES Wastewater Permit
/ Beaufort WTP -Pine Street
NC0072699
•, (MGD) NA -Water Treatment Plant
Glass NA
STRFAM CHARACTERISTICS
Stream Name
UT to Town Creek
Stream Class
SC
Sub -basin
03-05-03
Drainage Area (mil)
NA -Tidal
S7Q10 (cfs)
W7Q10 (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
IWC N
Proposed Changes
Parameters Affected
Basis for change(s)
Monitoring Requirements
Flow, TSS, Settleable Solids,
DWQ Guidance for water
Turbidity, Iron, TRC, Chloride
treatment Plants
Parameter Removed
pH
No longer standard requirement
for water treatment plants
Compliance Schedule: none
Special Condition(s): none
Permits & Engineering Comments:
The Beaufort -Pine St WTP has requested renewal of its existing permit. The previous permit did not require
effluent monitoring for any parameters at the request of the WiRO. DWQ guidance for water treatment plants
now requires weekly effluent monitoring for several parameters. Request that WiRO staff evaluate
recommended parameters and comment on necessity of effluent monitoring for certain parameters.
Prepared by/ ILE _ � ' r I • / !�
�' Jacq� Nowe / e L / J iL �'
Regional Office Evaluatior�d RUe ommerfdations: JJ JJ ®� � , I�tA�• �l
/ // �� / 7
1 Ij I�/LwzS �t
s C�ar��/ ihi7D Y4 1 h e 11V-J/�e✓ r//1fi J�rrr� G�ra,n�
l/t S�i C orm I} �oal /1 Y/ e e A" //i oh' �/ 0/I / S ?? O f/^ec ol;tllvo �V/
init'� -5;;r � ece.,'u. �<®.y.5, %� 2teJ lf� C�
��'/ riloS e�Su m iA
�� A-(1 oU6.50 y. 7X-7

Summary
NCO072699
The Beaufort -Pine St WTP has requested renewal of its existing
permit. The previous 1992 permit did not require effluent monitoring for
any parameters at the request of the WiRO. DWQ guidance for water
treatment plants now requires weekly effluent monitoring for TSS,
Settleable Solids, Iron, Total Residual Chlorine and Chloride. Upstream
and Downstream monitoring for turbidity has also been recommended per
this guidance.
2/28/97 Telecon w/ Jim Bushhardt of WiRO. Said the Pine
St. system was brine backwash of water softeners units. Basically have
hardwater going through an ion exchange in soluble form. It discharges
into a storm sewer collection, travels about a mile, then discharges into
saline waters. Said that the effluent was clear, not a lot of suspended solids.
But he thought that there were some toxicity implications. Told him about
new requirements for monitoring for above parameters per Sept. 1992
memo.
Bushardt said that plant has 1) no flow meter so flow can't be measured.
2) don't chlorinate prior to going into water softeners, therefore chlorine
monitoring wouldn't be necessary 3) chloride monitoring should not be
required since there is no chloride standard or action level for saline
waters. 4) Did indicate that there appeared to be some iron residue in plant
pipes. 5) Said no upstream and downstream monitoring could be conducted
since the plant discharged into a storm sewer network, therefore no
instream monitoring for turbidity.
Told him I would not add monitoring for chlorine, chloride, turbidity, and
flow, would let him make comments and recommendations on remaining
"\ monitored per
parameters. However, I w111 Include all parameters to be
WTP guidance and will let Jim make his comments in writing for inclusion
or deletion of effluent monitoring for particular parameters.

Summary (p.2)
NCO072699
ME comments from D. Goodrich, recommended effluent limit of 25 NTU
for turbidity since there will be no instream monitoring. Also he thought
that ASTU indicated that chloride monitoring would still be needed in
discharges to saline water.
5/30/97 Talked to Matt Matthews at ASTU and he concurred with
deletion of chloride monitoring. Also will drop TRC monitoring.
Final recommended limits: Effluent monitoring for flow and
iron, TSS = 30 mg/l (mo.avg.); 45 mg/l (da. max.), settleable
solids = 0.1 ml/1 (mo.avg.); 0.2 ml/l (da. max.), and turbidity =
25 NTU.
See attached e-mail,

Note for Jackie Nowell
From: Jackie Nowell
Date: Tue, Jul 8.199710:36 AM
Subject: RE: Beaufort WTP chloride monitoring
To: Matt Mathews
Thanks for your response, Matt. Jim had no particular concern about the Beaufort WTP, but
he did say that any testing that we could do to see the effects of WTPs on the rivers,
especially those with ion exchange water softening units, would be beneficial. He
recommended that ESB confer with Goodrich to see if he had any ideas for a broader study
on WTPs. im understanding him to say don't set up a trip only for that WTP but if you're
in that area, to run a test for data gathering would be good.
I will send the permit without chloride monitoring and if Dave has any further concerns, I'll
tell him to call you.
From: Matt Mathews on Mon, Jul 7,1997 5:18 PM
Subject: RE: Beaufort WTP- chloride monitoring
To: Jackie Nowell
You are con xt. We also had suggested the possibility of performing mysid shrimp testing
to evaluate whether there might be any non -salt toxics present. Do you recall if Bushardt had
any concerns in that area?
From: Jackie Nowell on Mon, Jul 7,1997 5:02 PM
Subject: Beaufort WTP chloride monitoring
To: Matt Mathews
Hey, Matt. What's up?
This plant is brine backwash of water softener units that discharges via a storm drain into Ut
Town Creek. I called you about the water plant back in late May and asked about whether
effluent monitoring for chloride could be deleted because the facility discharged into SC
waters. Jim Bushardt of WiRO was recommending that no chloride monitoring was
necessary. In addition, because there is no access for instreatn sampling, instream turbidity
monitoring was deleted but an effluent limit of 25 NTU was added
Back in May, you concurred with Jim that chloride monitoring could be deleted and with the
turbidity limit, I recommended both in the draft permit. Now that the permit is about to be
finalized, Dave has a question about the deletion of chloride monitoring. I just wanted to
verify that the deletion of chloride was okay with you guys.

Td: r.M. �{
Al"W LU
September 30,
429191
NPDES Group
FROM: Colee
SUBJECT: Water Treatment Plant Discharges
• guidance on water treatment
Finally, I am responding to your requests �fateso lant discharges can be completed. Per
plants until the full study characterizing P
• .. with L Ausley and Steve Tedder, the following limits and monitoring
discussion Larry rnuts for ba
requirements should be put into water treatment plant NPDES pe
water discharges:
Mo/Daiiy
Weekly (Estimate)
E
Flow
Total Suspended Solids 30145 (mgll)
0.* �0•2 ()
2 onth
We kl
G
�
E
E
Settleable Solids
Weems
U, D
Turbidity m
Iron
Weekly
Weekly
G
6
E
E
mg/1
Total Residual Chlorine nn�**
Weekly
G
E
Aluminum m***
Chloride
Weekly
C?
E
*Trout Waters 10 NTU
Lakes, Reservoirs and Tidal Waters 25TU
All other streams and surface waters 50
"All facilities that utilize alum flocculation
***All facilities that perform brine recharge of water softeners and
reverse osmosis plants
It has been decided that a toxicity condition will not be included in the pern formation is
recomended in memorandum dated 9/18/92 (copy attached),s is an interim sollution. Once we have
collected and reviewed. Let me reiterate
ts an t furrtaher review of the chemical and toxicological
completed a survey of water plants and
effects of these types
of discharges, we will be finalizing the permit requirements. If you
have any question, please contact me.
cc: Steve Tedder
Trevor Clements
Don Safrit
Ken Eagleson
Regional Water Quality Supervisors

To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Refer : Basinwide / Streamline WLA File
Completed By Permits & Engineering
At Front Of Subbasin
Date: July 21, 1992
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Carteret
Permit No. NCO072699
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATIONaG�.,�
1. Facility and Address: JUL 2 3 1992
Town of Beaufort
Pine Street Water Treatment Plant TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH
215 Pollock Street
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
2. Date of Investigation: July 16, 1992
3.
Report
Prepared by:
Dave Adkins
4.
Persons
Contacted and
Telephone Number:
Doug Mangold, Supervisor
919/728-2141
5. Directions to Site: The water treatment plant is located at
the intersection of Pine and Hedrick Streets in Beaufort.
6. Discharge Point: Latitude: 340 43' 04"
Longitude: 760 39' 22"
USGS Quad Sheet: Beaufort
7. Size: There is adequate land available to expand the
treatment works should the need arise.
8. Topography: The site is relatively level with an elevation
of approximately 10' msl.
9. Location of nearest dwelling: The nearest dwelling is
located within approximately 200 feet of the site.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Unnamed
tributary to Town Creek.
a. Classification: Class "SC" Waters
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 030503
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: Drainageways through a residential
area.

PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater: 100% Industrial
a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.015 MGD (Design Capacity)
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: The
discharge consists of brine backwash from four water
softener units.
C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: None
reported or expected.
d. Pretreatment Program is not needed.
2. Production rates in pounds per day: Not applicable.
3. Description of industrial process and applicable CFR Part
and Subpart: None Applicable
4. Type of treatment: The softener backwash discharges into a
small basin. The overflow enters a roadside ditch eventually
reaching Town Creek.
5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme: None
6. Treatment plant classification: Not classified.
7. SIC Code: 4941
Wastewater Code: Primary 22
Main Treatment Unit Code: 50000
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants
Funds? No
2. Special monitoring requests: It is recommended that no
reporting of the effluent monitoring be required.
3. Other: It is recommended that both the Pine Street and the
Glenda Drive facility be issued with the same expiration
date.

PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Town of Beaufort's Pine Street facility is served by two
wells presently being pumped at a rate of 900 gallons per minute.
The water is treated in a series of four ion exchange units which
are backwashed (2 to 3 per day) with a brine solution. The
effluent from the backwash flows through a small basin into a
roadside ditch. The discharge eventually enters Town Creek.
It is recommended a draft permit be prepared and placed at
public notice. If no significant adverse public comment is
received; it is recommended NPDES Permit No. NC0072699 be
reissued for a period of five (5) years.
--
ML
ality Regional Supervisor
2/ 199t
Date
NC72699.SR
cc: Wilmington Regional Files
Technical Support Branch
Central Files

Gallant ,
Point
bM
i..
}i
x
�P� �.- .i �\ Beau ci r head Cityi As
er
a �� �. ••
�., . -n' '
AV
op
r � ,-mil+ �I�... �rl� � � ��_� � �/. • • •,• •�•• • • : • ~^ • • «• -, � ` ��1; }` � • l
�� • _+, ! !♦ 1 y +ICI r \\ ` ••/. • •' • f�'ll • ••• , P
/ J
..� Ttrtc anes. �Sl
;_ G Rbck • • ...
: r • � ' . • ti _ �_ � �-� n `�.rti• , �:=:. � • -Fork : • �_ _ _.-.:
Cr k ., ... ]
•• , �..: D1� point • • • •••� y/' •
t • •. 'IL• (/
MAU
.-A . f: IW }LOGICAL I.AbOk \TORT y • . 1 r •• :: •- p: . •, ;: � ••
�• - Plv irs w,' • I._• \ . �(`�• �-�/ moil-1 �/Q.. s�.�iF.
Islamcps ' Beaufort Fl °' • CV
VIAL t 19I\•t:RSIT1 • � �-�_� .�.� / � •.c _
%I\ktlt. I•AN0kATf1R!' •/ / ... • • _� • ���'i Highland m.•
'z • ; earl,—u, Park_ ' o¢_=a="�
View'. ,.
pLight //�. • « • �� +ii•
/ + lIJJJ • • •
\"��"•97L7� �'LdTS�t .. QTownlyltash ;•; • . .t ' ••....«. • o'•,•.. , • �• O� -So
N - �4� 1 Gm
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY FRGHWAY, UGHT DUTY ROAD. HARD OR
HARD SURFACE IMPROVED SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE UNIMPROVED ROAD
Latitude _34°43'04'
Longitude 760391228
Map # 132NW
Sub -basin 3-05-03
Stream Class
Sc
Discharge Code
`22
Receiving Stream
UT to Town Creek
Design 0 Varia Iee Permit expires 7/3_1/02_
SCALE 1:24 000
0 1 MILE
0 7000 FEET
1 0 1 KILOMETER
CONTOUR INTERVALS FEET
QUAD LOCATION Town of Beaufort
NCO072699
Carteret County
Pine Street wTP