20150837 Ver 1_401 Application_20150815

To:
From:
Re:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
r
®p -
F,
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: David Shaeffer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Deborah E. Shirley
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Suncrest Village -Phase 4
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Perm
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — gth Floor
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
20150837
August 18, 2015
S &EC Project # 12590.W5
it W111 gI p Win.
AUG l � 7015
L• �••, 'AGES
401 & BUFFc_R NERIJIITTING
On behalf of the applicant, Mitchell Mill Investments, LLC (Attn: Allen Duncil) please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
the N. C. Division of Water Resources ( NCDWR) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide
Permit 14 & 29 and Water Quality Certification 3886 & 3890. Please contact me at (919) 846 -5900 if you have any
questions or require additional information.
Please note we have included the Tree Conservation Plan for the property, 5.03 acres of the total 9.17 acres
will remain in a Tree Conservation Area for the project.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
Suncrest Village -Phase 4
Project Type
Residential Development
Owner / Applicant
Mitchell Mill Investments, LLC
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Raleigh
Waterbodv Name
UT to Toms Creek
Basin
Neuse
Index Number
27422.5)
Class
C, NSW
IMPACT SUM VIARY
Stream Impact (acres):
Wetland Impact (acres):
Open Water Impact (acres):
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
Total Riparian Buffer Impacts (square feet):
Attachments:
Pre - construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
USGS Topographic Map
NRCS Soil Survey Map
NCDWR Buffer Determination letter - NBRRO #15 -279
Restoration Systems -SOA letter
Restoration Systems- Reservation Letter
0.015
0.122
0
0.137
82
Zone 1: 7,491; Zone 2: 2,939
Existing Conditions & Overall Impact Map
Crossing Plan & Profile
Tree Conservation Plan
DWR ONLY:
Stormwwater Calculations
$240 DWR Application Fee

A0 W A L!Ry Office Use Only:
y Corps action ID no.
o DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
® Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
Corps:
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 & 29 or General Permit (GP) number: NIA
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes
below.
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? []Yes
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Suncrest Village -Phase 4
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
Suncrest Village
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
NIA
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mitchell Mill Investments, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
D. B. 7688; Pg. 199
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
Allen Duncil
applicable):
3d. Street address:
8512 Society Place _
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
3f. Telephone no.:
919 - 422 -6183
3g. Fax no.:
NIA
3h. Email address:
NIA
® No
® No ;
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
i
i

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner please send correspondence to Agent and
Applicant
4b. Name: Allen Duncil
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consu%
5a. Name:
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
Mitchell Mill Investments, LLC
8512 Society Place
Raleigh, NC 27615
919- 422 -6183
N/A
N/A
ant Information (if applicable)
Deborah Edwards Shirley
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
919 - 846 -5900
919 - 846 -9467
5g. Email address: I DShirlevaOSandEC.com
Page 2 of 13

IB. Project Information and Prior Project History
11. Property Identification
11a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
11 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): IMPACT #2
11c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
Parcel ID: 1737 -93 -1781 & 1737 -83 -7790
Latitude: 35.8744 Longitude: - 78.5291
(DD.DDDDDD)
± 9.17
(- DD.DDDDDD)
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to UT to Neuse River 27- (22.5)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse River Basin; Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: Existing conditions consist of forested land with an existing 50' Right of Way and gravel road with a 58 LF
30" CMP at the end of the existing Suncrest Village Lane. The general land use in the vicinity of the project is residential
with the Neuse River to the west.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 1. 12 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 378 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential development. As such, the current gravel road will need
to be constructed per the City of Raleigh's design standards, and minimal lot rill will be required.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of the construction of a road with utilities and 15 single family lots for a residential
subdivision. Specifically, there are stream, wetland & riparian buffer impacts associated an with upgraded culvert
necessary to replace an existing culvert, and additional wetland impacts associated with lot fill. Equipment typically
used for construction and earthwork such as backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be utilized
for this project.
14. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Comments: A JD request package has previously been ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
submitted by Steven Ball. The wetland survey will follow this
PCN application.
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Steven Ball
Agency /Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Consultants, PA Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USA CE-an email request from S &EC was sent requesting a site visit, David Shaeffer with the Corps determined that a
site visit would not be needed (email correspondence dated July 20, 2015); Project file number assigned SAW -2015-
01552; DWR -a site visit with the Sara Knies was conducted on June 24, 2015 (NBRRO #15 -279)
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for I ❑ Yes ® No* ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *per the project engineer
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? I ® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Per the project engineer, this project is the last phase of a subdivision.
Page 4 of 13

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a. 2b. 2c.
2d.
2e. 2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known)
DWQ — non -404, other) (acres)
Temporary (T)
W1(#1) ® P [:IT Fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps 0.06
I ❑ DWQ
Road Crossing-
W2 ( #2) ® P ❑ T Culvert &
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.06
Dissipater
Hardwood Forest
El No
❑DWQ
W3 ( #2) ❑ P ® T Construction
Bottomland
I
® Yes
I
® Corps
I
0.002
Corridor
Hardwood Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts I 0.122
2h. Comments: Temporary wetland impacts will be brought back to pre - existing wetland contours, stabilized and allowed to
regenerate with existing wetland seed source.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c.
3d.
3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - Permanent
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10 stream length
(P) or Temporary (T)
intermittent
DWQ — non -404, width (linear
(INT)?
other) (feet) feet)
S1 ( #2) ®P ❑ T
Road Crossing -
Culvert & UT to Neuse River
❑ PER
® Corps 6'
51
Dissipater
INT
DWQ
S2 ( #2) ❑ P ® T
Construction
Corridor I
UT to Neuse River
El PER
I ® INT
® Corps
I ❑ DWQ
6'
31
S3 ❑ P❑ T
I I
I❑ PER
I❑ Corps
[:1 INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P❑ T
I I
I❑ PER
I❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑P ❑T
I I
I
I
❑NTR
❑DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts I 82
3i. Comments: Previous to site plan design was an existing 58 linear foot 30" RCP
for the existing gravel road. Temporary
stream impacts will be brought back to pre- existing stream bed elevations and the stream banks stabilized.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water impact Name of
number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or (if applicable)
Temporary (T)
01 ❑P [IT
0. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or ake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres)
number pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c.
Buffer impact
number — Reason
Permanent (P) or impact
Temporary (T)
B1 ( #2) ® P ❑ T Road Cro
B2 ❑P ❑T
B3 ❑P ❑T
B4 ❑P ❑T
B5 ❑ P ❑T
B6 ❑ P ❑T
B7 ❑ P ❑T
6i. Comments:
for
ssing
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
UT to Neuse River ❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Page 7 of 13
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
7,491
7,491
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
Z939
2,939

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S &EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property in order to identify
natural resources so that impacts could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact #1 is
proposed lot fill. This impact is necessary to make lots 10 & 11 buildable. This impact is proposing 0.06 acres of
wetland till. Impact #2 is a proposed road crossing. This impact is necessary to access the property and construct
a road per the City of Raleigh's design standards. Proposed impacts include 51 linear feet of permanent stream, 31
linear feet of temporary stream, 0.06 acres of permanent wetland, 0.002 acres of temporary wetland and associated
riparian buffer impacts. Headwalls have been utilized to minimize stream, wetland and riparian buffer impacts. At
temporary stream impact areas, the stream bed will be brought back to pre- construction elevation and the stream
bank will be stabilized post construction. Additionally, temporary wetland impacts will be brought back to pre - existing
wetland contours, stabilized and allowed to regenerate with existing wetland seed source.
Furthermore, the applicant is aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permits 29. With
respect to residential developments (NWP 29- Regional Conditions section 4.0) the applicant does not anticipate
any impacts to streams or wetlands associated with stormwater facilities, there are no impact associated with
single- family recreation facilities, the permanent wetland fill required by the road will utilize a NWP 14, the stream
classification for this project is C, NSW (i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters, High Quality Waters, Coastal
Wetlands or wetland adjacent to these waters) and riprap stabilization is not anticipated. The applicant is also aware
of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permit 14. The applicant is not proposing to create any
upland for this project; the proposed stream crossings are strictly an upland to upland crossing. The stream
classification for this project is C, Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) (i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters or High
Quality Waters).
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
As per the project engineer, the proposed project will be constructed in accordance with an approved E &S plan
approved by the City of Raleigh. The plan will include silt fencing, sediment basins, cofferdam and pump around for
pipe installation.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
® Yes ❑ No
❑ DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Restoration Systems — Pancho Stream, Wetland & Nutrient Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) I Type: Wetland I Quantity: 0.12
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments: Restoration Systems will release the mitigation credits if NWP verification not authorized and
mitigation paid within a total of 85 days of the date of their Reservation letter, dated August 12, 2015. Additionally,
Restoration Systems will then notify the USA CE project manager of the release of credits, suggesting the need for a
permit modification. See attached RESERVATION LETTER
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
❑cold
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires I ❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: As per the project engineer, the stormwater from the road will not be
discharged into the riparian buffer at the road crossing. Stormwater will be ❑ Yes ® No
discharged into an existing conveyance at the end of the cul -de -sac at a point over
550 feet from the Neuse River. The stormwater will be discharged at a non - erosive
velocity.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 21%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Please see attached Stormwater Calculations for Suncrest Village Phase 4, dated June 9, 2015
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWO 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Raleigh
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs ® NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been I ❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply El HQW El ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? I ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? I ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the I ❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered 'yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in I ❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill,
most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. The
Suncrest Village -Phase 4 project is a residential development. Additionally, the project is located within the City of
Raleigh jurisdiction, therefore the adjacent properties that have potential for development will have the following
regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these
regulations require limited development within the riparian buffer area in addition to "diffuse flow "requirements at a
minimum and could require Best Management Practices that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved, 2)
the Phase 11 NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal
Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post - construction stormwater management requirements.
We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be treated by the City of Raleigh
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
❑ Yes ®No *
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or *Threatened /Endangered Species have
habitat? been identified within the Raleigh East &
Wake Forest topographic Quadrangles but
not necessarily in or near this project.
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. E] Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? The NC- Natural Heritage Programs Data Search was used to search for elemental occurrences of federally protected
species listed within the Raleigh East & Wake Forest Topographic Quadrangle maps. it was determined based on the search
that there are four (4) elemental occurrences that are listed as federally Threatened /Endangered within the Raleigh East 8
Wake Forest Quad maps. Please note that the Bald Eagle was removed for the federal list of Threatened and Endangered
Species; however Bald Eagles remain protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act. Additionally, the interim 4(d) rule identifies the Northern Long -eared Bat as a Threatened species within Wake County.
Please note we have included the Tree Conservation Plan for the property, 5.03 acres of the total 9.17 acres will remain
in a Tree Conservation Area for the project. See sheet 4
Common Topo Map State Federal
Scientific Name Name Status Protection Protection Habitat Comments
Status Status
mature forests near large bodies of water (for
Haliaeetus Bald Eagle Current T BGPA nesting); lakes and sounds (for foraging)
leucocepha /us [nesting sites only]
Alasmidonta Dwarf Tar and Neuse drainages, mainly near Fall Line
heterodon (syn.) Wedgemussel Historical E E
Myotis septentrionalis Northern roosts in hollow trees and buildings (warmer
(syn.) Long -eared Current SR T -4(d) months), in caves and mines (winter); mainly in
Bat the mountains
Rhus michauxii (syn.) Michaux's sandhills, sandy forests, woodland, woodland
Sumac Current E E edges
References: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Online Database Search [August 12, 2015]. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources, Office of Land and Water Stewardship, Raleigh, NC. htto : / /www.ncnhv.ora/
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Habitat Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website
was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
Page 12 of 13

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The NC
State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service interactive map was referenced on August 12, 2015, no historic
structures were identified within the property boundaries. Additionally, no structures > 50 yrs old were identified while
onsite evaluating wetlands.
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? 10 Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The project engineer will work with the City of Raleigh to ensure
that all FEMA requirements are met for this project. The only impact to jurisdictional areas is a small wetland impact on
the north side of Impact #2.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Per project engineer & NC Floodplain Mapping
Program
Deborah E. Shirley
Applicant/Agent'L—P reI
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization lette from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
August 18,
2015
Date

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
R412 VA „ t'14-1 a„,.t. gun. 114, RA ."Ad ru 27, I; . r'6,,,u ('aV, Ra,, i'✓•Y, • I — MV),, M u.!140
...,m
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Dmcription: S &EC Project # —JJ <
_J U
Date: 6 1Z 2-1.1-5'—
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington. NC 28403
PG✓t C
Attn: J
Field Office: ICG.i f,�\ 2,* 1G 6L -
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/ proderties Identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington DistriCt, U.S. Army Cotes of Engineers
(Corps) and Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the
property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Ad and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This
document also authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions
necessary for the processing, issuance and aomptance of a permit or certification and any and
all associated standard and special oonditions.This notification supersedes any previous
correspondence conoeming the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call
S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): / 73 -7.9 S/ %,-/
Site Address: ,49,n/
City, County, State: le.4,4. A/ L
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Ai iw:vr�rM/
Am Prope
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

Project Number:
12590.W I
Project Manager:
5B
Scale:
I" =500'
L�l N J11V
Map Title:
Figure I - U5G5 Mafg
5uncre5t Villages
Wake County, NC
Date: Source: Wake County GIS
5/20/15 U5G5 Raleigh E. t Wake Forest quad
I W -<-ftftj of O
i
FALLS LN
i
�Tq Y(
0 500 1,000 N
Feet
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Fa83 of N— Rod. S— 100. Mmgh, NC 37613 - Ph— (919) 8066900 • Fax [phone].

' LO L) - -
co WO
Loo
f
k
l pC2
Ap6 co
..� 2
!l ,
� L wr
1, f
rf'
A
co
1
co � A #A � I
tt j DUB
Wh
w 4
I �-
a - s
'roject Number: Map Title: Njure 2 - N
12590.W I 0 500 1,000
'roject Manager: 5011 5urvey Map I I I I I I I
5B 5uncre5t V11la63e5 Feet
Scale: Wake County, NC
I ((— 5 oOl
J4
)ate: Source: Wake County GIS
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8012 F.Ib of N— Ro.d Sidle 104. M.gh, NC 27613 - Pi— (919) 8&3900 • F. (919) 846-9'6.
5/20/15 Soil survey sheet 30 °m

4
FMA
N OVE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mitchell Mill Investments LLC
8512 Society Place
Raleigh, NC 27615
Determination Type-
Buffer Call
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B 0259)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267)
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
June 24, 2015
Subject: Buffer Determination
NBRRO# 15 -279
Wake County
Isolated or EIP Call
❑ Ephemeral /Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name: Sunerest Village (Suncrest Village Lane, Raleigh)
Location/Directions: Subject property is a privately owned lot located at project address;
Subject Stream: UT to Neuse River
Determination Date: June 24, 2015
Feature Not Subject E/11P*
/Flag Subject To
To Buffers
Buffers
A
X I
B' X E
*E/I/P - EphemeraUlnterrrtittent /Perennial
Staff: Sara Knies
Start@ Stop@ Soil USGS
Survey Topo
Throughout S- Ol/DWQ X X
Flag
X
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject! ' has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
pne
rcCa,o1��, ,a
It
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mall Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 -1628 Phona 1010) 701 -AW
Internet' WWW newatercivaldv orci Location 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunityrAffinnative Acton Employer - 50% Recyded110% Post consumer Paper

Suncrest Villages
Wake rounty
June 24, 2015
Page 2 of 2
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, Karen Higgins, DWR — 401 & Buffer
Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1617.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919)- 807 -6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919) -554 -4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Sara Knies at (919) 791 -4258.
e spe tfully,
W
Danny Smi , Supervisor
Water Quality Section
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: RRO /SWP File Copy

i fr
Project
5t 9\
�
0.W1
Project Manager:
SB
Scale:
lit = 500'
Date:
5/20/15
/9�w
( A
.5
< GROVEShIIRE
LA IDING FALLS LN
F'
a r
a
To YC
Map Title:
0 500 1,000
Figure 1 - USGS Map , , I , , I
Sunerest Villages Feet
Wake County, NC
Source: Wake County GIS Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
USGS Raleigh E. &Wake Forest quad id11 F.W of u;Rwd Sw Rala,q Nf 2 %P• %wn (919)8d6.59W•FU (91Y)a9_9d6
Yb
�VY*4

� / I
.s!' k � • f III
APC2 Me
ApfY
V
wM
N
4
wh.
Project Number: Map Title: Figure 2 -
12590.W1 0 500 1,000
Project Manager: SOII Survey Map I i i i I i i i I
SB Suncrest Villages Feet
Scale: 500' Wake County, NC
1 " =
Source: , Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Date: Wake County GIS 9412 Falk *M Rosa. SwY 191•Ralagk.W 27613, flma(9i "lS46.!9W• FU:(919)31694G,
5120115 Soil sunrev sheet 30
"�
Vol 1

Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Pancho Stream, Wetland and Nutrient Mitigation Bank
August 12, 2015
Mr. David Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Availability of Compensatory Riparian Wetland Credits
Project: Suncrest Village — Phase 4
We are providing this letter in accordance with 33 CFR §332.8(r), to confirm that .12 Riparian Wetland Mitigation
Credits (Credits) from the Pancho Stream, Wetland & Nutrient Mitigation Bank (Bank) are currently available and
may be used, once transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Suncrest Village — Phase 4 project, and
as proposed by Mitchell Mill Investments, LLC (Applicant).
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance. Should the
Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Compensatory Mitigation
Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price.
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's US
Army Corps ( USACE) Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. In addition, we will provide USACE
with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank
Ledger will include relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited
Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919.334.9123.
Sincerely,
J &A w
Tiffani Bylow
Restoration Systems, LLC

RESERVATION LETTER
Pancho Mitigation Bank
August 12, 2015
Mitchell Mill Investments, LLC
Attn: Allen Duncil
Re: Reservation of Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits
Project: Suncrest Village — Phase 4
We are providing this letter to confirm that .12 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits (Credits) from the Pancho
Mitigation Bank (Bank) are currently available and may be used, once transferred, for compensatory mitigation
relative to the Suncrest Village — Phase 4 project and as proposed by Mitchell Mill Investments, LLC (Applicant).
Our company hereby confirms that the Credits are currently available for transfer from the Bank's Ledger to the
Applicant at a cost of $14,200.
As of today we are placing these credits on reservation for a period of forty -five (45) days, or until the permit is
issued, whichever occurs first. If the Permit is not issued within forty-five (45) days of the date of this letter, we will
require the Applicant to place a non - refundable deposit in the amount of twenty percent (20 %) ($2.840) of the total
purchase price of mitigation needed. This will extend the reservation of credits for another thirty (30) days. The
Applicant will have ten (10) days from the date of Permit Issuance to tender full payment to the Bank. Following the
expiration of this ten (10) day period, if full payment has not been received by the Bank the Credits will be released
from reservation. We will then notify the US Army Corps (USACE) Project Manager triggering the requirement for a
permit modification by the Applicant.
Should the Applicant purchase the Credits within the relevant timeframe, we will complete and execute the
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within three (3) business days of the Bank's
receipt of the full purchase price.
We will further provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's USACE
Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. Finally we will also provide to the USACE an updated
copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank Ledger will include
relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919.334.9123.
Sincerely,
Jhlu, 007 A7_
Tiffani Bylow
Restoration Systems

IMPACT LEGEND I I .2 �� RIP- RAPDISSIPATOR TEMPORARY/
1 I ; `� "" �� tea. ( PERMANENTIMPACT \ \i \ ETLANDS - 2 1 I I
2_ _ ,
WETLANDS ; I .� 'P� . .� `.� \ \ \a F� �� 1 1 I O
r . -- -- - -- --- : .. /,�
r`
\ I
- -- - - - - -- 9'Qi �dl� /�/ �',9 ' \'�•�
i \ -- - s / ���a \ I IMPACT2 I
ZONE 1 IMPACT ; \ �. 7 ' i\ J,Y �� ` \ ZONE 2 NRB 2,939 SF I w
\ � -- -- -- - -- -^ ,- --- _ - -- -- �Y.<t` -19$ rim / � `� ZONE 1 NRB 7,491 SF I o
- / r/ \ \ �` PERMANENT STREAM 51 LF - 329 SF (EXCLUDES EXISTING CULVERT LENGTH) — -
• • : •. • l : ��+ .l _ F,p 'P %r,'� X99' !�/ // \\ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 31 LF -304 SF —
ZONE 2 IMPACT - �• •* - (= - _ EXISTING STREAM IMPACT 58 LF (CULVERT)
t ' •• / \�� PERMANENT WETLANDS 2,709 SF
`- - -- . I ( • —195 ~• _ ^ _ •
TEMPORARY WETLANDS 102 SF �
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT EMPORARY
-- - = -}S— PERMANENT / nj
--- 9s-------------- -sr- - -- STREAM IMPACT STREAM IMPACT ^ Ojg i A"
SS-- .- -SS EX e• PVC � `•sg1r+ I 2Q1 \ � _ _ -
9) _ - a _ ti �--== _ =V = =-
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT i \ I ` -. -_ �j- %,�8\ 0
- - --- -^ / E
N't-mollPERMANENT STREAM IMPACT _� . � �I,,r-- f- F --'J� , �-- -- E--- _ I ed c t $ q o
� -� .� _ --
,IMPACil .. ; - - / 7�•����.:e -�_ -_, fA c a .m ro n m
_ _
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS - - - - -- e� 0.' w me m' m
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT J� 2,529 S F 1 - -- - - - -- - - - -- ` - - j` •� -.� r� _ _ - - 3 " ° m
r
r/rr/ \ ; .. I - i' ```� ,` _ ` \ �_� ` \' ' ' I W o
(34.
L a E
_ , .,.G co 203 1 0 'a a w
l! -— -200 1 c�; N
RIP -RAP DISSIPATOR �� % , . ` `i � �0 \ l ,in r-4 NiA' 1 ` ^ 1p
C'` .` , (� I \ WIC . �` _ �` 1\ `p�2 STREAM r N ���'N ' ^-.` �� I 0 ^
k •� r . ( ` / ` `. ` `� ` \,� m m CHANNEL Q �;Z .Z1 o "
m � iNl Z ja
`i Q7 , '� ' ' / �` ,`r 1 ( \ \7 I Z, ; Mc
V r /' ' I ,,� T { I [ �` ;ZI '
t
T I f I -,
i I I I / I
zos .205
i
0
I EXISTING GRADE I
W 0
I
Lo
i I
( PROPOSED GRADE
I zoo D a
zool i I� a °a
I 1 I I � 3 ., � I I •- � �_ • _ _ UPSTREAM CONCRETE HEA -I I
- - -
az.
I -
i
C/)
195 48" RCP!'
{
DOWNSTREAM CONCRETE HEADWALL
- — — — ` — — INV _
INV: in1.30 - 10_PIPE BURY-' - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
• �STRfA
T rr
48 RCP • , , -«• I• , • + •• + -_ 9; i-- : NEW STREAM X- SECTION
I I 1• + I I ! 190 2~ LL 8
1901
;GRAPHIC SCALE COFFERDAM TO BE CONSTRUCTED UPSTREAM OF REDIRECTED N
-- - - -BE iTABILIZEDWITH- VEGETATIONAIVD— o�
EA�71 STREAMTO
ao 0 20 j ao so i iso i _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ ALLOWED TO RETURN TO ORIGINAL ELEVATION. PIPE CULVERTS --
i
I TO BE INSTALLED AFTER STREAM REDIRECTION, CLASS TRIP -RAP r a
— UI»IrATOR70 -BE CONSTRUCTED;FOR AA -DISTANCE OF30'-
4 -- - - -- I - N FEET )- -- -- -- -- - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - — - — - -- -- - DOWNSTREAM_ -- - - SHEET
- - -- - - - -- -- - i- -- - - -; -- ; 3
i 1 in h = 40 ; ft. ,85
185
-1+00 0.00 1+00 2-DD 3.00 1400 5 +00

x���y, WIh�H/W ypap�W�AY./Na� pal0.TGdwF �y�pyy l25ls1Vll
,I
r4 a I
■T i
I as e
^A
N�
I \O �
/ {
i
=--I a
� \I
O
Imo,
N
Igl
--------- - - - - -- \j
1
r
r
J \ I
`\ll
I
I
I
• I
I
1
I
i
• I
p I
I
I y i
I
,
i I
f � �
Y I
I
z '
;• I
1 � y •;
� I
C
z
R� a
I 1 •d`
I ,
`\ I�
�R
I
z
v,
-rJz7 •X'�Y�
rY
'r}y��n eil•, • r'��klti�- •J��•'y' � ri ;'iy{li'
tz
--- - - - - --
•
r l
v - - --
�• � 40•
—6-
6 -24-2015
' BF
RALEIGH
to
JAL JR
-
r
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•aa x��N�nna
SUNCREST VILLAGE
PHASE FOUR
NORI
WAKE CW1N1't
TREE CONSERVATION PLAN
\
i
/ � 1
1 --, - \ \\\\-T
-rJz7 •X'�Y�
'r}y��n eil•, • r'��klti�- •J��•'y' � ri ;'iy{li'
JOHN A, EDWARDS 8. 80MPANY
Consulting En9
NC ticenso F4M
333 Wade Ave., Raleigh. N C' 27805
Phone: (919) 828+4428
Fax: (919 ) 828+1711
E rnO; infOOaOC° eom
I
BY
RElns

I
B
I
P
a
■
z
to
0
3:
0
0.
z
J
C%4
I
.t
0
(4 C040 -
E
•
o
z
0
C� co I
a
'0
SHEET
U. CC 40
m
a
ul 06
C* 'a
V-
it
i.
-j
w
C Z
O u.
E
CL
z
0
nit
■
I
3:
0
z
J
C%4
I
.t
co 7)
m
I
00
Li
I M
------------
o
�D
Z=)
SHEET
0
0
I
C%4
I
.t
co 7)
m
I
00
Li
I M
------------
o
SHEET

BM 2004, PC 1888
co
-T
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPAL
!T I I -Tr F —� T-,7=1
T I I
T
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
T- —71 14
BM 2004, 1888 :
co
.................
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT
X...... .......
... ............. TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
.........................
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
NN\ .....
............
..........
9N
.......... BM 2004, PG 1888
NN, ......
CURVE TABLE
..........
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD CHORD BEARING
(66
.. ...... J 100.72* 51 7° 06® 12"W
v .......... Cl 1,37.18' 52.00' 151 *09112"
..........
BM 2004, PG 1888 C2 99.49, 6045.97' 000'56*34!' 99,49' NOW 47' 51"W
....... — C3 46.83' 5984.82' ,83' 586® 33' 57"E 1V
04 28.56' 25.00' 065*2638" 27.03' N59' 57' 29"E
...... C5 33.42 '
5100' 03649'09" 32.84! N45* 38' 44"E
(65� 1 - -­-L , 'LL- -
_O6
52.16' 52.00 0572817 50.00 887' 12 33"E
tp
IN, BM 2004, PG 1888
( LINE TABLE
............. . ...
64
H
UNE # LEG N DIRECTION
....... BM 2004, PC 1888
. ...... Li 61.10' S84' 59' 12
-E
N
ks, 4 50' S05' 05' 39"
w
L2 .
(56�
. .........
SM 2004, PG 1887
I \
r
I
g,
(59�
No
- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -
Im
I
I I
I
W7
FES
00
yN
0,
ui
<
I
z
CL
04
0
4)
. 1
0
E
0
4)
co z
4
0
0
06
r
C4
40 t- co
u
I C4 co
u- .0 4* -
w
CD
c
4) 0)
1-0* 0)
r
75
:3 4)
(1)
0 -1 0 w
0
•
Z 4) = LL
o
13 a.
w
z
ce)
00
yN
0,
ui
<
I

I
HTN�
ni
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT
RIP-RAP DISSIPATOR
MIN
ml
195
El MIS
------­-----------
----- - ------- --
RIP-RAP DISSIPATOR ..... •
OR n� E ��L
TEMPORARY
0+00
CIC
STREAM IMPACT �
Ex. 8" F>vc sl"*,
0
N 17
j 0
i
.-1 19 00
F_ U- '(64
Lu (D
0) 0_
wi >
u z
0
M uj
cwl)
V)
DOWNSTREAM CONCRETE HEA#VTALL-----:::
�W :W�
a
•
I
0
-C 00
cr M
ow
0.
04 N
JV
C6
zSHEET
Cl