20140090 Ver 2_Permit Site 12_20150819

Strickland, Bev
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 9:58 PM
To: Wanucha, Dave; Thomas, John T JR SAW ([e-mail])
Cc: Guy, Jeremy M; Panek, Lindsey F; Suggs, Phillip H; Wyrick, Scott D; Archer Sr, Wright
Subject: Fw: Permit Site 12
Attachments: image2.JPG; image3.JPG; ATT00001.txt
We'll review this site tomorrow. The contractor removed the orange fence and silt fence and drove the track
hoe in the creek. DOT was not notified that crews were working in area, and discovered it late afternoon.
Below is an email with pictures from our lead inspector on the project. It's my understanding that there were no
permitted impacts at the location of the unauthorized activity; however I'll have to confirm that tomorrow.
I had them protect the area in case we had rains overnight.
Our Resident Engineer has shut all operations down, except erosion control repair, maintenance and
installations until further notice.
Amy
Sent using OWA for iPad
From: Wyrick, Scott D
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 7:06:33 PM
To: Guy, Jeremy M; Panek, Lindsey F
Cc: Euliss, Amy; Suggs, Phillip H; Archer Sr, Wright
Subject: Permit Site 12
At permit site 12 Dragados removed the orange fence that designated a permit area. Then Dragados removed the silt fence that ran
along the bank of the jurisdictional stream. Dragados then operated a trackhoe in the jurisdictional stream and cleared. At no time did
anyone inform the inspection crew of this work. If they had communicated the work plan for this area we could have been involved
and prevented this incident. We had the Dragados reinstall silt fence along the stream bank to prevent anymore sediment loss.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1