NC0071005_Wasteload Allocation_19920826

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0071005
PERMITTEE NAME: James R. Drais
FACILITY NAME: Creekside Villas Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major _
Pipe No.:
001
Minor
Design Capacity: 0.009 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
RECEIVING STREAM:
100 %
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-08-06
Reference USGS Quad: F10SW (please attach)
County: Polk
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 10/31/92 Treatment Plant Class: class I
Classification changes within three miles:
no change within three miles
Requested by: Randy Kepler Date: 6/8/92
Prepared by: Ac a Date: P L yZ
Reviewe y Date: �5 a
�L o0 �.., / 3
/f��
Modeler
Date Rec.
I #
Mn)
b 9 2.
Vi044
Drainage Area (mil ) .?. 7 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): -�', o
7Q10 (cfs) /. / Winter 7Q10 (cfs) ,2.3 30Q2 (cfs)
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acute/Chronic
Instream Monitoring:
Upstream
Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
30
NH3-N (mg/1)
n�c�ilcy
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
30
F. Col. (/100 ml)
av o
pH (SU)
C — 9
Comments-
for C4 Y �;;z...w.-

Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Creekside Villas WWTP
NCO071005
Domestic - 100%
Existing
Renewal
Skyuka Creek
C
030806
Polk
Asheville
Kepler
6/9/92
FlOSW
Request # 6964
Stream Characteristic:
USGS #
Date:
Drainage Area (mi2):
2.7
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
1.1
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
2.3
Average Flow (cfs):
4.0
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of existing NPDES permit. Tech Support recommends renewal of
existing limits with additional monitoring for fecal coliform (effluent, upstream, and downstream)
because dilution ratio is < 331:1.
Recommended by:
Reviewed by i
Instream Assessment: _
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineering:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:
Date:_8/4/92
SEP 0 3 1992
RECEIVED
Wafer Quality Soctiom
AUG 6 - 1992
Asheville Regional O}fitr
Maheville, North Caroft

Existing -Limits:
imits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg4):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µo):
OR & Grease (mgft
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg4):
V ;7770 7: �
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mgA):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mgft
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mgft
TP (mgA):
TN (mg/1):
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.009
30
monitor
nr
30
nr
6-9
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
0.009
30
monitor
nr
30
monitor
6-9
Limits Chances Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
19 riI NMf0 11
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity
of the immediate receiving water will be consumed This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A_dtuacv of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
n
*Instream monitoring for fecal coliform
Upstream site:100 ft upstream of outfall
Downstream site:100 ft, downstream of outfall
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

5 IZ7-� k
03oIfd/
t
-- - - - - - - - --- -- - - - 3 31"
jj A

creekside villas
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 1.1000 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 19.5000 mg/l
AL (1/1.8 mg/1) : 1000.00 ug/l
Upstream NH3 Conc.: 220.0000 ug/l
Design Flow: 0.0090 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 461.44 ug/l
0.461443 mg/l
NH3 Limit: 62505.37 ug/l
62.50537 mg/l
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 2.3000 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 19.5000 mg/l
AL (1/1.8 mg/1) : 1800.00 ug/l
Upstream NH3 Conc.: 220.0000 ug/l
Design Flow: 0.0090 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 336.23 ug/l
0.336232 mg/l
NH3 Limit: 262301.7 ug/l
262.3017 mg/1
(WINTER)

Creekside villas wwtp
• CHLORINE ANALYSIS
7Q10: 1.1000 cfs
CL2 Effl. Conc: 0.0000 mg/l
AL (17/19 ug/1) : 17.0000 ug/1
Upstream CL2 Conc.: 0.0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0.0090 MGD
Predicted CL2 Downstream: 0.00 ug/1
0 mg/1
CL2 Limit: 1357.501 ug/1
1.357501 mg/l