Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820213_Routine Inspection_20230928for Visit:-(2rPoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Other U Denied Access Date of Visit: / Arrival Time: ,� Departure Time: aid County: Region: — XLd' Farm Name:— A!a 6"n Owner Name: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Owner Email: Phone: Facility Contact: Title. Phone: Onsite Representative: /t Integrator: Certified Operator: (.,(k�t.C�Lc#� A�� Certification Number: G % yr' S. i Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Longitude: (4 i }d#d9#"Pda40++.bbx+dy.49 AfrLtb"#A-df(}414`GH4kX�lYp4##3•Wq%§'m%ma#&m#Vge9�iknb}'#S'•%q&-"3d$W 'dA@A $#A.iR katt nM et+!Aa A%att�t gs£AS:Y#kuP mtmk&n#h=A#%tUiYi'}A#Yd4'ffyad`K�%q.4tYFY###k3k#tFd&8Yt&AtPkm+k�i+l,,i{!&k #Ay dR}4j4�3y:kp6$%jA dV p {¢�{.�� /f yygy�y* s VIA a*L.GPdg 44.cY£S..&'8$'k#q. #Nfl9hP1&q 3 sp¢4a#5a#%R!r#Yt+xs sw a;#xxt+#+�}iY #aq�}�uxya�+?+..xa#a$=i(*txara6lttttYk"*'YOYii%4444#ffiYW6k'dx+EY4aa,a to@44¢ `L'+'Y>etSW sF %ap(6%Rtvhx Ai+a•••WSN4#. 4it#tnii#Atk$m k#ra iatt s gn4PfbNFtfi #+Ce s+R:#ks#&x/-1t Yr&a 0gix i59 b as¢a tk V4Pt*q I*a8 arort} j,yp�•,(.Sit a:amyn (�¢�$,k#tea �$#'&Yk •#it'+yv{,�y Oak+:e neM xn Ya A tq# A4 #4 4s�k `at #W4.%1b#iCse#["#r �04§<0a3'bAr`.fl6kT�t irtr iJR' E6wt ¢ &d#x,E#� Ceti@MINostiO4#'a,443�***6'-##&Y�&t;trtr d48r 'max#%%&#.at'*xrot a•q v48ffi5#R44 at4�Fi} �qk. Wean to Finish ltm La er is DairyCow `$ $ is Wean to Feeder Non Layer Dairy Calf F ¢g$g pa#a+k #xm�+ # x $%%A§q q� ?•§%, 8dR4oA%FBdlltl r+��p; �kx# %, a:s Dairy Heifer %b q:x}kgt A%#m ^Alto#kllctciTx #6% lot %u$§§#% k£## h§tt a ��. d# Dry Cow r#d kb# a 9q a4g q+ Rot Ak.#A@ i`L*'d# b p# # Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean ( Farrow to Feeder £ a ! y_ .' 114 ;.. Z t -Dairy tts#x# tY°Ltopfr aaaA• ef,.. Non to Finish Layers Beef Stocker sa lotFarrow gs Gilts F% Non -Layers �x Beef Feeder I Boars ; Pullets %qA A¥q Beef Brood Cow sum st k &4##4$rc sCMGaAfx{t3#4Gx9s#u+YY VSk##x&@4Aa A, q 77777s.v6+F4 kkaY8dk @d'496k4g9q.,{bS5 gv it pp5C9Y'&4}# a#xaA I o dt§H A#i%%at 01 .a4 Aqa##d$q £tPri 36kt8 d %d'VaV�{�Wy�I4to o' S4#5bt tVU..SAi94%¥F3'1 3 #ta:$3+#3#+dA#13R3 affi#§%###a y brF&#5#b##ia:A 96AqA¢g#i#�Wt #qt A}5'k�9t4#q}#k1 qF s. A?k Mkspte�rttdk@9"a4q�#b t6o q frR "#s#msa<sasgnaq "V TurkeyPeult$ i} 5Ms Other¢tvtrt#aa:mar�µtav,ce #4o xatto-attmxgwa.+..:aamxs #s#pkxrrs s «, ,«2st kx#ID'xk5h 4rt4 a#x##str#x4a k ms Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes e'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes A�!rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): 02-2 Observed Freeboard (in): 3- 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 10'No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes _[�No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes J77rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes -ED'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes '�a No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes J::VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes L�rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑LeaseAgreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 12�No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: 'Z Date of Inspection: $ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _[3-1qo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes , 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes t Io ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes E�"No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes .[3'Ro ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) _C]-N(o 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes _ED No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes E�JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ,❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Phone: //�S Date: / b-rl'-j Page 3 of 3 511212020 FACILITY#: ^` .)O FARM NAME:—�— LAGOON / PERMIT pna/ DUE EVERY 5 YEARS 20 0 d EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS —( CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL - OIC CARD YES OR NO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20) SOIL TYPES CROP TYPES - ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO - Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT Xi) -GOOD FOR 60DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE NITROGEN LEVEL (�/;3 DATE d ,0/�3 NITROGEN LEVEL �7 • ��,/ DATE/J"i<,}-,� NITROGEN LEVEL SOIL REPORT (#21) - EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE - P-1(NO MORE THEN 400) - PH(Note itaariess) - Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU ZN OF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) IRR2 (#21) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITRO Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CALBRIATION p24) - EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION, FLOW RATES Gf RAIN FALL p21) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED PDA NEEDED. LUDGE (x21 a2s) -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE II Jo2C. ?- 2 O: ___? „j� P: w % RATIO OF SLUDGE O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND e21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY_ *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS _ PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS_ LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens March 1�t- Ends September 30u Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31 A Corn: Opens February 15t - Ends June 30t Cotton: Opens March 15N- Ends August 1A Rye: Opens September Id -Ends March 31A Oats: Opens September 1�t-Ends April 15t Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30t Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15t Fescue: Opens August 1 st - Ends July 31 st Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15N - Ends August 31 st