820265_Routine Inspection_20231003

Type of Visit: e`Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ..Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: `,3[7 Arrival Time: Departure Time: a a County:
Farm Name: Evil -1- F*.2 Owner Email:
Owner Name: C�44e,W d6 t�',� Aa&'Z� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Lt/ 4ew4& Title:
Onsite Representative: //
Certified Operator: !i>40
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Region:
Certification Number: 200 e12
Certification Number:
Longitude:
• 3 I� I t, I+� (F 3 �
�I[b l�sat# ' � Ft
t`�
t't'hiA',
�i r'o E�t
ai
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
�d fit
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
g
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean��E�
r
Dry Cow
11 Farrow to Feeder
,(�Ic6a
f„I i�9;
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
j Beef Brood Cow
j( IFJ
TurkE 9
�iE l�i ��jEt��� r t" S}.pfi 11
f
�I'{ESA E7
(
Torke Poults
�� 1' ��{'
k�:
IN
Other
iu4
aea
niaira uu�a Grp ��t�
ium��id ll�it.i unu nrumnE
UtWd.!
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ YesIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[—]Yes []No
❑ Yes ';�o
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: a j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes J2]'190 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: f
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes ']'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes _EJNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
_,[:]-No
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes 1—,]'No
[__j NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[:]Yes C]'Qo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes _E�rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): (� Cry 114,e '5ts
� ) i
13. Soil Type(s): '& 1'c g
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes JZ/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes EyNo
❑ Yes E5,No
❑ Yes �' o
❑ Yes P'&o
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [2'5No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes 4E]" o
❑ Yes ® No
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection: Q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes _[Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes L3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes _`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
13'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
DIo
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
f3'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
J2'1Vo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
12No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[3%No
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
A2"No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Uigl? < I` Welsod Phone: /16 ?,35^'fP?P
`
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: GJL' ��a , Date: 16 F ,3! /J-'
Page 3 of 3 511212020