20150813 Ver 1_401 Application_20150815

August 7, 2015
Eric Alsmeyer
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ANGLER
ENVIRONMENTAL
nC�C��MC
AUG 1 ? 2015
DENR • WATER RESOURCES
401 & BUFFER PERMITTING
�0
so
8 , 3
Re: Honeycutt Landing Phase II: Preconstruction Notification Application: Nationwide
Permit # 29, General Water Quality Certification # 3890, and Buffer Authorization
Dear Mr. Alsmeyer.
Angler Environmental is pleased to present the following Preconstruction Notification application
on behalf of Holland Road, Inc. The Honeycutt Landing subdivision is located on Old Stage
Road in Willow Springs, North Carolina (PIN No. 0685875171). Currently, Phase I of the
subdivision has been completed The proposed project consists of the development of Phase ll,
comprised of approximately 34 acres and includes the completion of Black Spruce Way, a 20-
foot wide paved roadway. The project site is comprised of both forested and agricultural lands.
The proposed project includes the installation of a 20 -foot wide N C Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) paved roadway with the required 50 -foot right -of -way limits Tree
clearing and grading will be needed in association with the construction of the roadway. A 48"
reinforced concrete pipe with concrete headwalls at each end will be installed at the stream
crossing along with a dissipater pad. Based on anticipated jurisdictional impacts, this project will
qualify for Section 404 authorization under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Nationwide Permit 29 (Residential Developments), the associated General Water Quality
Certification #3890, and a Buffer Authorization from the N.C. Division of Water Resources.
Angler completed the delineation of potentially jurisdictional areas on this property on April 15,
2015 and May 26, 2015 in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation
Manual and applicable Regional Supplement methodology Flags were numbered and placed
onsite to mark the limits of potentially jurisdictional wetlands and other Waters of the U.S.
(WOUS) All Waters of the U S present on the subject property are located within the Neuse
River Basin (Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201).
Approximately 3,062 linear feet of jurisdictional streams are present within the project area
including two perennial channels and one intermittent channel flowing south along both the
eastern and western boundaries of the project towards Little Black Creek In addition,
approximately 4.5 acres of wetlands are present within the project area comprised of two
primary wetland assemblages present along both perennial stream channels.
Based on the footprint of the proposed project, approximately 80 48 linear feet of perennial
stream and 0.15 acres of wetlands will be impacted by the completion of Black Spruce Way In
613 Poole Road, Garner NC 27529 1 P: 919 - 615 -0301 1 AnglerEnvironmental.com

Honeycutt Landing
Proposed Residential Subdivision
Preconstruction Notification Application
July 29, 2015
Page 2 of 2
addition, anticipated impacts to the Neuse Riparian Buffer include approximately 3,624 6 square
feet of Zone 1 and 1,117 6 square feet of Zone 2
The following items are included in the application:
• Signed Agent Authorization Form
• Pre - Construction Notification Package
• Vicinity Map (Figure 1)
Aerial Photograph (Figure 2)
• USGS Topographic Map (Figure 3)
• NRCS Soils Map (Figure 4)
• Site Plans /Impact Maps
• Agency Correspondence
• Mitigation Acceptance Letter
Copies of the Preconstruction Notification application and all supporting documentation have
also been forwarded under separate cover to the NC DWR Please feel free to contact me if
you have any questions or need additional information regarding this project.
Sincerely,
Anna Reusche, PWS
Cc. Jennifer Burdette, NC DWR -401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Douglas Ball, Holland Road Inc
Attachments
3751 Westerre Parkway, Suite A, Richmond, VA 23233 I P: 804 - 353 -6017 I F: 804 - 353 -6018
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

SIGNED AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

a�L&ANGLLR
ENVIRONMENTAL
April 30. 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive. Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Agent Authorization Letter
On our behalf, I authorise Angler Environmental, 613 Poole Drive Garner, NC to act as our agent
in the preparation of this application. I certify that the documents submitted are correct. I
acknowledge that all responsibility for complying with the terms and conditions of the certification
or approvals, still resides with
Dated this —Z5 Day of 20•—
Agency expirati( g
signature Printed
Title:
On behalf
Address. /4D`'._. -t,) t?'L- AIL
Telephone - q11 / Y 2 7–
613 Poole Drive, Garner, NC 27529 11): 9 19-01 -S-0301
« ��, Vi1'.}, n�IC !'I:F3L %i!'Ulllllf!ntdl.CUltl

PRE - CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION PACKAGE

_ 1 1
`O��F W A
o r
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no.
DWQ protect no
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number- 29 or General Permit (GP) number- 3890
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse ❑X Yes ❑ No
1d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
le Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below
1 h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a Name of project: Honeycutt Landing Site
2b County Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Willow Springs
2d Subdivision name- Honeycutt Landing
2e NCDOT only, T I P or state protect no
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed Holland Road, Inc
3b. Deed Book and Page No Deed Book 013002 Page No. 00059
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Douglas Ball
applicable):
3d. Street address: 1401 Aversboro Road
3e City, state, zip: Garner, NC, 27529
3f Telephone no 919- 779 -5997
3g Fax no.
3h Email address douglas @ballrentals.com
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑X No
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify-
4b Name -
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d Street address
4e City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.,
4g. Fax no
4h Email address
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name
Anna Reusche, PWS
5b
Business name
Angler Environmental
(if applicable):
5c
Street address-
613 Poole Drive
5d
City, state, zip:
Garner, NC 27529
5e
Telephone no
919 - 615 -0301
5f
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
areusche @anglerenvironmental com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property Identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID) 0685875171
lb Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)- I Latitude 35.5522 Longitude 78.7024
1c Property size acres 34
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Little Black Creek
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water C, NSW
2c River basin Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The subject property Is currently comprised of both forested and agricultural lands Areas surrounding the subject property Include Phase I of the
Honeycutt Landing subdivision to the east All other areas surrounding the site are primarily forested or agricultural in nature
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 4.5
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property. 3062
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The project consists of extending Black Spruce Way, a NCDOT roadway, for the development of Phase II of a planned residential subdivision
36 Uesulbe the uvCldll pIUfeut III detal;, IliduullllJ. the 'type UI equipi-i IClll lu be used.
The project Includes the installation of a 20 -foot wide NCDOT paved roadway with the required 50 -foot right -of -way limits Tree clearing and
grading will be completed In association with the construction of the road A 48" reinforced concrete pipe with concrete headwalls at each end
will be installed at the stream crossing Typical equipment used for roadway construction will be utilized
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments.
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company, Angler Environmental
Name (if known) Other: Anna Reusche, PWS
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
David Schaeffer performed a site review on May 19th James Graham performed a stream determination on March 31, 2015
S. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (Including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" Instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ❑X Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, explain
Phase I of the project has already been completed No impacts to Waters of the U S occurred from Phase I
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
1
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a 2b. 2c. 2d 2e
2f.
Wetland Impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 P Fill Bottomland Hardwood Forest Yes Corps
015 I
W2 Choose one Choose one Yes /No -
I
W3 Choose one Choose one Yes /No
I
W4 Choose one Choose one Yes /No
W5 Choose one Choose one Yes /No
W6 Choose one Choose one Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts:
0.15
2h. Comments.
W1 impacts will result from fill needed for the 20 foot wide roadway and land clearing for the required 50 foot right of way In addition, W, impacts
include the clearing and fill needed for a dissipater pad at the pipe outlet
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (Including temporary Impacts) proposed on the site, then complete
this
question for all stream sites Impacted
3a 3b. 3c 3d 3e 3f.
3g•
Stream Impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or width
(linear
i Temporary (T) (feet)
feet)
S1 P Culvert UT to Black Creek PER DWQ 3
8048
S2 Choose one
S3 Choose one
S4 Choose one
I
S5 Choose one
S6 Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
8048
31 Comments:
S1 impacts will result from the installation of a 48" reinforced concrete pipe, headwalls, and dissipater pad under the proposed roadway
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries,
sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below
impacts
4a 4b 4c
4d 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable)
Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary (T)
6e 6f.
01
Choose one Choose
O2
Choose one Choose
03
Choose one Choose
04
Choose one Choose
impact
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a 5b 5c 5d 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no.
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k Method of construction
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
❑ Other
6b 6c 6d
6e 6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B 1 P Clearing and Fill LIT to Little Black Creek
No
36246
11176
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4
I
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
36246
I 11176
61 Comments All impacts to buffers result from the proposed road crossing and are limited to that location
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The proposed roadway crossing is located at the most narrow point of the wetland within the vicinity of the existing roadway stub and crosses the
wetland, stream, and riparian buffers at a 90 degree perpendicular angle The 48" reinforced concrete pipe was designed not to exceed the minimum
length needed to complete to roadway
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Contractors will minimize impacts to adjacent areas by utilizing silt fencing along the construction corridor In addition, tree protection fencing will be
utilized throughout the protect
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for X❑ Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply).
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank- Restoration Systems, Pancho Bank
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
x❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Type- Riparian wetland Quantity 0 30
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Choose one Quantity
Type Choose one Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached ❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature. Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only). square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested- 030 acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires Yes OX No
buffer mitigation?
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c. 6d 6e
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required:
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
No man -made ditches or conveyances will be constructed ❑ Yes ❑ No
5
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 12.66 %
2b Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2c If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why.
No stormwater management plan is required The preliminary plan was submitted and approved prior to the stormwater management requirements
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project'?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply),
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
1
1
Wake County
❑ Phase II
❑X NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other.
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑X No NA
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
letter.) M No
Comments.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Septic layouts /permits have not been completed /obtained for each lot as of yet The water will be served from an existing community well in a
previously constructed phase
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
U S Fish and Wildlife County Endangered and Threatened Species by County, Durham County (updated 12/16/12) and the N C Natural Heritage
Program Database
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office on -line database, accessed 7/20/15
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
❑ Yes ❑X No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Floodplam Mapping, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel No 3720068400, dated 10/3/2006
Anna Reusche, PWS
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
a- " r" � XU � �
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided )
Page 10 of 10
Off` b -..1j-
G Date

FIGURES

v
�fi
Project Location
Willow
Spring
4'-
n
in
s�
Anoer
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE,
USGS, Intermap, increment P
=
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),
Esri (Thailand), TomTom
,
o
'5yd t,9sc
omb {id
s'
o`
b
Moor ^4brrd to
m
Q
o�
e�
Legend
Project Boundary
AhA
ANGLER
`Mb.—V ENVIRONMENTAL
e u PUULF na ive. G� ItNEH. voxtr+ cneouxA nszv
P: 919 615 -0301
11 „tl
ktl
z
C
FIGURE 1
VICINITY MAP
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 1, 2015
panrhe,
Latta v
i
i
P
0
0
h
a
b
1
h
b
a
Bloq SPrucv waY d,t�'
C�
o`
c
Ch°'iY Q, ci
d
b
O
O
7
h
0
A I�

f
sm IN
- :r,, r'
"too
Pa
l�:t ..•'s
Legend
Project Boundary
ANGLER
,Mb.--W ENVIRONMENTAL
G13 POOLE DRIVE, GARNER. NORTH CAROLINA 27529
P: 919615 -0301
PiF I
FIGURE 2
AERIAL MAP
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 1, 2015
r

jf
04. Iko
IF
%
/ 41
..■rte
zz ' 1
l JJ ti a
4 ,
� yl
�� "-� t "tip �., ►' f �� �
Legend ,r -, - •
Project Boundary - - * •''- = rf
If
FIGURE 3
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP N
�
•` ANGLER ANGIER QUADRANGLE
,%AD--w ENVIRONMENTAL HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
mi POOLE DRIVE. GARNER. NORTH CAROLINA :15.9 JULY 1, 2015
P'.9IAO15 -Ml

erg
Legend
Project Boundary
-Aml&ANGLER
'Wft.-I ENVIRONMENTAL
613 POOLE. DRIVE,. GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA 275_2V
P: 919.615 -0301
Zpw
$8=
c
l
m
FIGURE 4
SOILS MAP
(WAKE COUNTY, 1970)
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 1, 2015
0 250 500
9 1
Feet
__
w
I�
4

A -..
I INCH = 200 FEET
e O 200 400 600
'FEET
LEGEND
L -J APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS
- 5TREAM LIMITS
® PALU5TRINE FORE5TED (PFO) WETLAND LIMITS
® PERMANENT 5TREAM IMPACT LIMITS
® PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT LIMITS
- PERMANENT ZONE I BUFFER IMPACT
=PERMANENT ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT
= RIPARIAN ZONE I BUFFER
O RIPARIAN ZONE 2 BUFFER
4,11W l —.- J.1.51 -,- G -_ , ,.,. s . 2700 . "'! .- I . 11. _,
BI PERMANENT BUFFERIMPACT:
ZONE 1 - 3.624.6 50 FT
ZONE 2 - 1 . 117.G 50 FT
PE- ANE'JT 5TREAM IMPACT.
51 = 80.48 +/- LF
PERMANENT WE TIANO IMPACT:
W I - O. 15 ACRES
517E DATA:
TOTAL PROJECT AREA = 34.35 +/- AC
TOTAL WATER5 OF THE U.5. = 4.53 +/- AC
5TREAM-9
TOTAL STREAMS = 0.21 +/- AC (3.OG2 +/- LF)
WETLAN05
TOTAL PFO = 4.50 +/- AC
RIPARIAN BUFFERS
ZONE I = 3,G24.G 5F
ZONE 2= 1 .1 17.G 5F
51TE IMPACTS:
5TREAM IMPACTS
TOTAL 5TREAM IMPACTS = 198.04 +/- 50 FT (80.48 +/- LF)
WETLAND IMPACTS
TOTAL PFO IMPACTS= 0. 15 +/- AC
�aR
5
� �
WZ-
'
a
� e
liJ
r
a
Z
5
0 s
<3
�Q
wCCQ
=
Z 6L1^
i6
klL
I �
36 7
9
a
o
y z
_
a e
U
rno
z
Z J
J
BL
�Q
wCCQ
=
L
} o
LL-
O
00 �
o
�
z
Z
Q
w �_
Z
Q J
Q
O
OL
E
Q
3
lot• u�,ve; k..
rno
c >�sazo • s

PRELIMINARY JURISDICATIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
PACKAGE

ANGLLR
ENVIRONMENTAL
July 28, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — VIA EMAIL Attn: David Shaeffer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Re: Honeycutt Landing Site
Request for a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination - REVISED
Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Shaeffer:
Angler Environmental (Angler) has been retained by Douglas Ball to perform environmental
services for the above referenced property located in Wake County, North Carolina. As part of
this scope of work, Angler is submitting this request to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
for a confirmation of the limits of the Water of the U.S. on the subject site. The following
attachments are included as part of this submittal:
• Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
• Agent Authorization Form
• Project Vicinity Map (Figure 1)
• U.S. Geographic Survey Topographic Map (Figure 2)
• Natural Resource Conservation Service Soils Map (Figure 3)
• Aerial Photograph -Site Overview (Figure 4)
• Aerial Photograph - Wetland Close Up 1(Figure 5)
• Aerial Photograph - Wetland Close Up 2 (Figure 6)
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Determination Forms
• N.C. Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
The subject property consists of approximately 34 acres located entirely within the boundaries of
Parcel No. 0685875171, located at the terminus of Black Spruce Way in Willow Springs, Wake
County, North Carolina (see Figure 1). Angler completed the delineation of potentially
jurisdictional areas on this property on April 15, 2015 and May 26, 2015 in accordance with the
1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and applicable Regional Supplement
methodology. Flags were numbered and placed onsite to mark the limits of potentially
jurisdictional wetlands and other Waters of the U.S. (WOUS).
Based on the results of the delineation four jurisdictional channels are present on the subject
property (See Figures 2 and 3). One perennial channel (SA) flows south across the portion of the
subject property at the terminus of Black Spruce Way. SA was observed to be confined to a
613 Poole Drive, Garner, NC 27529 1 P: 919 - 615 -0301
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

Douglas Ball July 28, 2015
Honeycutt Landing Site Page 2 of 2
Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination - REVISED
channel for approximately 370 feet at which point SA dissipates into the wetland areas WA and
WB. The SAA channel branches off of SA and flows parallel to SA for approximately 50 feet until
SA dissipates into the wetland area. SAA continues to flow south off -site. SC, a perennial channel,
transects the western -most portion of the subject property. This channel begins off -site at a pond
outlet and flows southeast across the subject property. Stream SD, an intermittent channel, flows
northeast to SC. SD begins at the outlet of a pond located off -site to the east.
Three wetland areas were flagged during the site visit on April 15, 2015 and May 26, 2015. WA
and WB are contiguous, forested systems located on either side of SA and SAA in the
easternmost portion of the subject property. These areas make up approximately 3.1 acres within
the limits of the subject property
WD and WE are contiguous, forested systems located on either side of SC and SD in the
westernmost portion of the subject property. These areas make up approximately 1.4 acres within
the limits of the subject property.
Angler respectfully requests that the Corps confirm this delineation of WOUS on this property. I
will contact you in the coming days to arrange a site visit for this purpose. Please contact me at
(919) 615 -0301, if you have any additional questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Anna Reusche, PWS
Project Manager
Attachments
CC: Douglas Ball
Keith Roberts, Timmons Group
613 Poole Drive, Garner, NC 27529 1 P: 919 - 615 -0301
www.AnglerEnvironmental.com

Jurisdictional Request Form

Jurisdictional Determination Request
.... ... . ... . .... ... ..... . i nii... ..,i.m.,�YnYn�rvuaA� . \.
t
US army cows
of Erwnoats
l aPi nwn oivyox
This form is attended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Arnty Corps of Engineers. Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supportin
information. as described within each category. with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Ficid Office (or project manager, ifknown) via mail. electronic mail. or
fiacsirni1c. A cun`ent list of couniv assignments by Fielcl Office: and project manager can be
found on-line at: by
telephoning- 91( } -?.51- 46,13, or by contacting any of the field offices hsled below:
ASIIEVILLE REGLILA,roi4N vwtm ovvic1;.
1$1 Pat;nn Avemw. R(xvtn 208
Asht file. North C:.arolirta 2Rti0 1 ®5606
Gencral Nuntbw (S2N) 271 -74S0
Fet \unth::r'(K2'12`I -S124)
RALEIGH REGULATORY 1`11;L.D OFFICE
11i Army Corp,, v- fingtnctrs
-31 1•Icrit;�-, Tvadk Drive. Shirt: 105
Wakc Fw ar. Nlorat (,.mwhu r 275S7
General Numher:
Fax Numlx•r" (0N) 562-4421
WASHrwro.N 14FOULATORY I IF.t.n OFFICE
US Anny Corp. of linginccrs
2407 Mcst 1'01h Sneer
Washtnwu >r:, Nmih Cara ina 27SR9
Gencral Number: t91 fit 251- 610
Fax Numlvr. (252) 975 -1 399
\k 11AIINCTOIN REGULATORV FIELD OFFICE
US ,finny Corps of Eneini -cts
69 Darlington Avcnue
Wilnnnghen, North Caroliw 28405
(Jencral Nmnbcr'')1U -251 -463.,
Fax Nunibct. (QI())?51.4025
1
Version: December 2013 - Page I

jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRIXTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, K, f.`, D, E and F.
VOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: 1fyou are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency. please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D - PROPFRTY OWNER AUTHORi7_.,ATiON: I'lease be aware that all JO
requests must include: the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination. which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete requcst.
VOTE ON I'ART I) - NC'.DOT REOUirSTS: Property owner authorizationr'notification fvr JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NC;DOT) projects will be
conducted accordtnL, to the current NCDOT /I:SAC'E protocols,
NO`I'1�' "1'U USDA PROGRA,NI 1'ARTiC (PANTS: A Corps approvcd or preliminary 1I) may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If You or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or inticipate participation in USDA proLrams, you
should also reque.t u certified wetland deteniiination from,the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service. prior to starting work,
Version: Deceinber 2013 (,age 2

jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INTIFOR.NIATION
Street Address: iV,62 Ci:i Pcao
CitV, State:
CoUnIV:
DI rec I M 11."%: tats r-40 lrs.» the .4arrAwe 42 Eo)i am r4g*.,Way 42 ti, 7S M4(1& Tuft, 1.01 crit)
Parcel Index Numbeils'i (PIN): 0050,iy; ";
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Arnn Rm4cPa, •400S Aiqfw
N-1,61ing Address: 613 P:,Vii
Telephone Number: 9199-61h-0,01 t01-rel 91"IC-7,145 lCel,
Electronic %'IIil Address':
SCICCI one.
❑ I and the current property owner.
U ails an Authorized Agent or I-Invironmental ConsultanI2
F-1 Interested BUVCT Or Un(kr COMNICI TO JUrCIMC
r-1 (Mier, please: explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: 1) 6: J
Mailine Addr,�i-,-: :G err.:r.Rrsxt
Game% NC 27'14-t1
Telephone Nwilbcr: f? *. 5. 7. 9-1,107
Flecironic Mall Address`':
21 Proof of Ownership Altachcd (c.-I. a copy of'need. County GIS/1"arceliTax Record daw')
if available
Mustattach completed Agent Authorization Form
If avallable
Version: Deceinher 2013
Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
u. PROPERTY MN NEA( CERTIFICATION 4
1. the tlritlerrl,:ncJ. a dui autturvcd ov,net- ol record of the property properilc, identified herein,
do attthonze of the Mintinpon Wrrct. t: S, Ann) C oryu of Enpnems (CoMs)
it) enter upon the property, hcrein Clive rthed Aw the purpose of conducting musn m%vsticationi
.ar.cl =ng a dt' nilillailon t"1Rs2 votint Ah Wmen of the I A. wtINect to Federal 10risdiction
tulcicr Scion 404 o1`be CIcan %Vatc•i .pct and or Scc -,ion IC) ofihe R e.r% alld IIattws Act of
I N99
i. v_G-t om -jz2A• V-- - 5 ! .1- %
Properl)' Ownc•r f plc 1,e prull) Date
Property Wrier Sitnmure
V. JURISDICTIONAL DETLIOUNATIO\ TYPE
Select On.,,.
tell I am rcquc•;.nny that the (Ops Iront idea prchnnnar� 31.) 1'or (hi: property, ►cicioifed herein
`i hl, Joe, rra.-lud..= .a kichilcation
I Mn r'ecitse, imp ;flirt lhc' i or'p, provrcic' kI prclimoj;4_rr JD An the props „riy rcic,altafwd herein.
TI:1. E• ;larc:,a do”, \()T rilc'icrcic to c,:Ioi alwn.
oI mn rMI1T01-01110 tilat ih. t. 1U p% Inxecli g.av the propey project area for the prc:eenc;e fir
;lbs."lici c I' \k ,ri "S .alaaf fart,% I& in ajppju\ ed ID for Cite prvpert idemified herein This
reiltii.t d(WI \W" 111: IodO'n 1:`t rae,3 "iot a e21ltc'd delineation
I :tilt ioquesung thaa; .he C orf), dclhrazalt the boundaries of all Wfai_ S oil a properi), projcci
Me:a Alld pros id., an ij)prtavvd JD t thi, rwiai
or T nol anelt di: a .atmvy plat)
I affil requestarlr Ant the Corps c% alca:tte and appro%c :a clef ineatton of \Vo1, :S (conducted
by others) c'ul n propti q lil',9ic °i t alv a .inn pro% uk an :an trot A .iJ D (may or rvy licit
itac'iticic' :a ,un plat I
rot NICD13 T { , t -.,- f u i{ k NCCI 'ra'' 4 �S i a Protocols, 5 +IMM to P 4)',t r
�'• "JCtrs �s (rte ttri:te:� S:,tr.S•
. i, i iii ii i n n. i i n a ur i .� i •u. e i.
Vertiion: Den" ill hccr ,x(31 .5 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
DMap of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation
RISize of Property or Project Area 34
acres
IlI verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. 3D REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests•
Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form`'.
556 -78.7000
✓ Project Coordinates: 35. Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than l 1 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
® Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
® Aerial Photography ol'the project area
F✓ USOS Topographic Map
aSail Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps. LIDAR maps, FEMA tloodplam maps)
See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08 -02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

jurisdictional Determination Request
iLlli �n n euaud,. d i d�i° ._._ _._..�..�...
Delineation Information (when applicable):
\lfct I: ►tui.:
FVI Welland Data Sheets"
Tributanes:
U USAGE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets �❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, it taken
FVI Field Sketch ovcrlain on legible ivTap that includes:
• All aquatic resources (fbr,iles with multiple re,,,ources, label and identify)
• l,.<> ations of wetland data points anda'or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage,1linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Appro\rcd JDs including Verification of Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates,:
rrdinates:
1,.:►titude
Longitude
INIaps (no larger than 1 I x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ L<►rgc, and smaTl scale maps that depict, at ntinimunt:.trccts. intcr;ectiotts. towns
❑ Aerial Photography ol'ihe pro -jecl arca
❑ USGS 'ropographic Map
Sail Survey N-lap
❑
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Welland Inventory :Map, Proposed Site Platt,
prcvious delineation Wraps) v
' 1987 Winual Rupiona! Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
tetip'1,r.�tiv�v u aC� �ct:,y mill Mtir;. iDntilCi. �f: AS' ori/ R7�ul a3cs "VPrpRr,ry�antPPrntttSirR„ppg
Wetland and Strearn Assesvnicnt Methodologies can be found at:
htjn;llrnrf l nsho+� plc /Qg�t�sCt}E,1, lilira:y?ket ( de? uusd= 76€ 3c5Sh• r'a hA.49C,0•ha43.45h?:ak?6fScRvrov m1d -3aH_ and,
x+22 2J�wtia"w.>a�3.tes a� .a-r7v.m,�l ortniz "59 efcsc- .hn^uia:c� �1:s:,5lcsarata: acf7C}j3J+Vf FAPIr 61rtff„ ;ef; Anu3I 23031$ pdf
Delineation informat= must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: I) {ace nher 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Dala Shcets"
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(wilcn appropriate)
❑ Land-,cape Pholos, if taken
❑ MapFielcd Sketch overlain on legible M
that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources. label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points anchor tributary ;assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acre iE!e: linear fpota�ge of aquatic resources
Suppoilin- Jurisdictional lnformaliciil (for Approved JDs oifly)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Dclerminalicm Fomi(s) (also known a. "Rapanos
Form(s) ")
Map(s1 depicting the potential (or lack or potential) hydrologic ccynnection(s),
adiacenc.v, etc, to navwable waters.
' Delineation information must include. at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland /community type.
Version: December 2014 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
1. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of Plat, the Wihiungton Districi recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one oritiitrrai Pim (lo scab:) that is no larttcr than 1 I "x17..
(tile use of match lines i'or larger tracts acccptable) Additional copies of a plat. including,
those larger than I i "x 17 ". may also be.. submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats. such as these transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDIr) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plat. and rc;ttim them via c -niail to the rcqucstor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
U N'lust be scaled and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
7 Mu t be to scale (all maps must ittr.lttde both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
1-lust hC le -ible
N'fuat include a worth Arrokv, Scale(s). Title:, Property inforrttation
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bcirinns /metes
and Bounds ,`Gl'S coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
nMust clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
ElMust clearly identify the known surveyed point(,) used as reference (e.g. property
corner. USGS nionument)
7 When wetlands are depicted:
• Ninst include acreage (<)r square footage) ofwctland polygons
• :Nlust icicntif} each w0and polygon usin- an alphanumeric s\-ctcm
Versiun: December 201 3 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries arc depicted:
• \4ust include either a surveyed. approximate centerline of tributary %vith
appnm mate width of tributary OR ,wrvcycd Ordimmy High Water Marks
(011WN9) of tributary
• Must identity each tribulary using; in alphaninneric system
• \dust include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed {il 11i►� \d )
• NIttst inclucle name of tributary (based oil the niosl recent USGS topographic
Wrap) or. when no t,JS(i$ name exists, identify is "unnanic(i tributary'
all depicie(i `W(_)US (�iwoland pol }eons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed proiccUproperty boundaries
Must include the location or wetland (kim points andlor tributary asse snient
reaches
Must include, label accordingly. and depict acreage of all Water: not currently
suhj`ct to the requirement cif the C.WA (c.g. "isolated wetlands ", "rion-
3timAlctional waters ") NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted to order to
make an official Corps detctmunation that a. particular waierbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
N
ust include and survcv all existing cotivevitnccs (pipes. culvers. etc.) that
trallspon FOE'S
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(?) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
0 When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is dejnicled:
111ciude the follcnving Coirs Certification lan (,uate:
'This certifies that this copy of this plot accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the Jaw or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (S) years from
this dote. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action 1D No.:
When uplands may be present xvithin a denicted Jurisdictional Boundarv:
include the following (corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plot identifies oil areas of waters of the United States
reguluted pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersiyned on Mis dote. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date, The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual. "
Regulotory Official:
ritle.
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013
Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) CPS SURN-1 YS
F or Sun-eys prepared usme a Global Positioning Sysieni (GPS), the Survey must include
all ofthc above. as well as:
he at uh -meler accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property comer, monument) shall bL located with the
Gl'S and cross - referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
0 include a brief de eription of the (JPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Agent Authorization Letter

ANGLER
°`*Io.4w*W INVIR0NMCNTAL
April 30, 2015
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive. Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Agent Authorization Letter
On our behalf, I authorize Angler EnAronmental, 613 Poole Drive Garner, NC to act as our anent
in the preparation of this application. I certify that the documents submitted are correct. I
acknowledge that all responsibility for complying with the terms and conditions of the certification
or approvals; still resides with
Dated this /(:; Day of 15- 20 /5--
Agency expiratign,,"e: _
Signature Printed
TItIP7
f �>
On behalf of.
ACiC1Ce5S' �t.a f rri� 999-- Alt-
Telephone- �� 9 �,2 7- 15 Z.
613 Poole Drive, Garner, NC 27529 1 P: 919 -61 S -0301
r jxv,.,.An- lerrnvironniental.com

FIGURES

6 V�
Willow
Fuquay• - Span;
Marina
7
Project Location
Angler Sources: Esri, DeLorme, HERE,
Mi
= USGS, Intermap, increment P
Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),
Esri (Thailand),,TomTom
a
O
VPS0mb 0.e
0V
0
r
e
a
0
V.ct/nCbnA Cn
6
n�
Legend
Project Boundary
ANGLER
'Ma.-OW ENVIRONMENTAL
60 POOLE DRIVE, GARNER. NORTH l': \ROLINA 27529
P: 919615 0301
li"" "P'< i -b
k,r
FIGURE 1
VICINITY MAP
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 1, 2015
8 lack SPI y�� way
O
n
ChalY 0' .�
A
a
r
e
h
0
4
p?
N
a
a
p0
f
Ga�ntlL``

J
*M�
�7 J
'7 +rr�• r�.�
.•.,�d+
I
� 1F,
Legend
Project Boundary
N.
1
�f
1
■.
r � �
.t k I
` .`
pi r
i
Wake County Parcels (2014)
Wetlands
Streams
Flow Regime
Intermittent
i
Perennial �—
ANGLER
,,ftw--w ENVIRONMENTAL
613 POOLE. DRIVE.. GARNER. NORTH CAROLNA 27529
P:919fi15 -0301
141i _
Y
A%N
1
4'
t
1
r,
P
r
4
% _ j
FIGURE 2
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
(WILLOW SPRINGS)
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 28, 2015
,f
�r.
0 340
TW
4;

:k. $.
WAS
-� -- p WxA
t
ti Noe
u�
ft v
U
Legend
Project Boundary
Wetlands
Streams
Intermittent
Perennial
ANGLER
"I%...V ENVIRONMENTAL
611 POOLE DRIVE. GARNER, NORTH CAROUNA:7519
P:919- 613 -0101
010
W9
FIGURE 3
NRCS SOIL SURVEY
(WAKE COUNTY, 1970)
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 28, 2015
P7 4r )!
A

►J
Legend
r---
Project Boundary
Wake County Parcels (2014)
Wetlands
Streams
Flow Regime
Intermittent
Perennial
T ..
r
_, 7
wM
FIGURE 4
"� ANGLER
AERIAL HONEYCCUTTT LR NDING 15) N
_�A
,wow.--w ENVIRONMENTAL WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 28, 2015 Ak
613 POOLE DRIVE, GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA 27529
P: 919 - 6150301
0
0
All
I

-A,A,AANGLLR
,Nft.--► ENVIRONMENTAL
60 POOLE DRIVE. GARNER. NORTHCAROLINA17529
P 919-615-0301
SAA
Farm Road
w/culvert
FIGURE 5
WETLAND-STREAM CLOSE UP 1
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 28, 2015
Legend
Project Boundary
Wake County Parcels (2014)
Wetlands
Streams
Flow Regime
Intermittent
Perennial
N
0 75 150
A1 1
k Feet
....
. ....
"A
WB-
SA
-A,A,AANGLLR
,Nft.--► ENVIRONMENTAL
60 POOLE DRIVE. GARNER. NORTHCAROLINA17529
P 919-615-0301
SAA
Farm Road
w/culvert
FIGURE 5
WETLAND-STREAM CLOSE UP 1
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 28, 2015
Legend
Project Boundary
Wake County Parcels (2014)
Wetlands
Streams
Flow Regime
Intermittent
Perennial
N
0 75 150
A1 1
k Feet

Legend
Project Boundary
Wetlands
Streams
Flow Regime
Intermittent
Perennial
_AWAANGLER
Nmw'1/ ENVIRONMENTAL
e i PUUL[ DRIk'[. 6: \RV FR. WORTH CAROL.[ %%!7i!v
p, 41Y- 15511GW
�V
Confluence
SAA and SID
FIGURE 6
WETLAND- STREAM CLOSE UP 2
HONEYCUTT LANDING
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
JULY 28, 2015
N
:150

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Determination
Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Honeycut Landing City /County: Wake Sampling Date: 15- Apr -15
Applicant /Owner: Douglas Ball State: NC Sampling Point: WA & WB -UP
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Angler Environmental Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.0 0/0-/ 0.6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: 35.556 Long.: -78.7 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains soils NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes OO No O
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No OO Yes O No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No OO within a wetland?
Remarks:
Data point was taken aproximately 5 feet upslope from W13-9.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
O
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes O No
Depth (inches)
Yes O No 0
Saturation Present?
Yes O No O'
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches).
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Approximately 0 9 inches of rain in last 48 hours.
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Sampling Point: WA & WB -UP
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 . Unodendron tulipifera
20
❑
667%
FACU
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC* 8 (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10❑
33.3%
FAC
-
❑
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
0.o%
Species Across All Strata 10 (B)
4.
0
❑
o o%
5
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.0% (A /B)
6.
o
❑
o.o °% °
7
0
❑
00%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g,
0
❑
00%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of Total Cover 15 20% of Total Cover
6
30
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling or Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1 Ligustrum sinense
30❑
600%
FAC
FAC species 160 x 3 = 480
2. Acer rubrum
20
400%
FAC
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
3.
0
❑
00%
uPL species 0 x 5= 0
4.
0
❑
00%
Column Totals: 210 (A) 640 (B)
5.
5.
o
❑
% o.o
El
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.048
0
o.o
7,
0
❑
o o%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8.
0
❑
0 o%
❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover. 25 20% of Total Cover.
10
50
= Total Cover
2 - Dominance Test is > 5o%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 30 )
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0 1
1. Arundinaria gigantea
20
1000%
FACW
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
2
0
❑
00%
3.
0
❑
0.o%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
-
❑
°%
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
o
o.o °
5.
0
❑
00%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
50% of Total Cover. 10 20% of Total Cover.
4
20
= Total Cover
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 )
d❑
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 , Athynum filix - femina
40
-
57.1%
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2. Microstegium vimineum
30
429%
FAC
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
3.
0
❑
o o%
4,
0
❑
o.o%
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
5.
0
❑
o.o%
6.
0
❑
0.o%
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
0
❑
00%
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
g,
0
❑
00%
Q,
0
❑
00%
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10,
0
00%
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
11.
0
❑
0.o%
3 ft (1 m) in height
12.
0
❑
00%
50% of Total Cover 35 20% of Total Cover
14
70
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
20❑
500%
FAC
2. Lonicera japonica
10❑
25.0%
FACU
3. Rubus argutus
10❑
25.0%
FAC
4.
o
❑
o.o%
5
0
❑
0 0%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes * No ❑
50% of Total Cover 20 20% of Total Cover
8
40
= Total
Cover
Present?
Remarks, (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA & WB -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)_ % Color (moist)_ % Tvpe 1 Loc? Texture Remarks
0 -6 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy Loam
6 -12 10YR 4/3 100 Silty Clay Loam
1Type. C= Concentration. D= Depletwn RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Ochric (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
3Indicators of hydrology must vegetation en and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A)
unless disturbed or problematic
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type*
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No
Remarks-
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Honeycut Landing City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 15- Apr -15
Applicant /Owner: Douglas Ball State: NC Sampling Point: WA -WET
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Angler Environmental Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 1.0 % / 0.60
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: 35 5561 Long.: - 78.6992 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains soils NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes OO No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No O
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes OO No O Yes O' No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes OO No O within a wetland?
Remarks:
WA is located within the floodplain of perennial stream. Wetland data point taken approximately 5 feet downslope from WA -3.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply_)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
El Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑1 Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BI)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
OO O
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches). 2
Water Table Present? Yes No O
Depth (inches): 0
Yes NO O
saturation Presents
Yes OO No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches) 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Approximately 0.9 inches over last 48 hours
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Dominant
Sampling Point: WA -WET
Species?
Absolute
Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 . Uriodendron tulipifera
50
❑
714%
FACU
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 5 (A)
2. Acer rubrum
20
d❑
286%
FAC
❑
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
0 0%
Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
4.
0
❑
00%
5
0
El
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 714% (A/B)
6
o
El
00%
7.
0
❑
0 0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8,
0
❑
o.o%
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
50% of Total Cover 35 20% of Total Cover
14
70
= Total Cover
OBL species 40 x 1 = 40
Sapling or Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
0
❑
0.0%
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
2.
0
❑
00%
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
3.
0
❑
00%
IIPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. _
0
El
o.o%
column Totals: 170 (A) 500 (B)
5.
o
❑
00%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.941
6,
0
❑
00%
7,
0
❑
00%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8,
0
❑
00%
❑ i -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover 0 20% of Total Cover.
0
0
= Total Cover
2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 )
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
1.
0
❑
00%
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
2.
0
❑
0o%
3.
0
❑
00%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
0
❑
0.0%
5.
0
❑
00%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6,
0
❑
00%
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
50% of Total Cover. 0 20% of Total Cover
0
0
= Total Cover
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 )
1 Woodwardia
30
d❑
50.0%
OBL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
, areolata
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2. Polysbchum acrosbchoides
20❑
333%
FACU
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
3.Osmunda regalis
10
❑
16.7%
OBL
4,
0
❑
o.o%
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
5,
0
❑
00%
6.
0
❑
00%
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
0
❑
00%
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8,
0
❑
00%
9,
0
❑
0.0%
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10.
0
00%
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
11.
0
❑
00%
3 ft (1 m) in height
12.
0
❑
00%
50% of Total Cover. 30 20% of Total Cover
12
60
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
20
❑
500%
FAC
2. Rubus argutus
10
0
250%
FAC
3. Smilax rotundifolia
10
❑
250%
FAC
4.
o
❑
00%
5.
0
❑
0 0%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes * No ❑
50% of Total Cover 20 20% of Total Cover.
8
40
= Total Cover
Present?
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
_(inches) Color (moist)_ % Color (moist)_ % Tvoe 1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 -8 10YR 4/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 D M Loam
8 -16 10YR 5/1 100
Loamy Sand
1 Type- C= Concentration D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains 21-ocation PL =Pore Lining M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
d❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 1536)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Ochnc (Fil) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type*
Depth (inches)-
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes * No 0
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Honeycut Landing City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 15- Apr -15
Applicant /Owner: Douglas Ball State: NC Sampling Point: WB -WET
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Angler Environmental Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): flat Slope: 1.0 % / 0.60
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: 35 556 Long.: - 78.6998 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Rain soils NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes OO No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes * No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes OO No O
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No O Yes * No O
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes OO No O within a Wetland?
Remarks-
Wetland data point taken approximately 5 feet downslope from WB -9.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
E:1 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturabon (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑d Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)❑
Thin Muck Surface (0)❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (BS)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
d❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No OO Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes O No O Depth (inches) 6
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes * No O
(includes capillary fringe) Yes No O Depth (inches) 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Approximately 0.9 inches of rain in last 48 hours
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Dominant
Sampling Point: WB-WET
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30
)
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 . Linodendron tulipifera
30
❑
60.0%
FACU
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 9 (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
20
❑
400%
FAC
""-
❑
Total Number of Dominant
3.
0
00%
Species Across All Strata 11 (B)
4.
o
❑
0 o%
5.
0
❑
0 o%
Percent of dominant Species
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 818% (A/B)
7.
0
❑
0.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8,
0
❑
o.o%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of Total Cover 25
20% of Total Cover 10
50
= Total Cover
OBL species 40 x 1 = 40
Sapling or Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1 Acer rubrum
20
500%
FAC
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2. Ligustrumsinense
20
❑
50.0%
FAC
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
3.
0
❑
00%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4.
0
❑
on.
column Totals: 240 (A) 660 (B)
5.
5.
o
El
o % o
o
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.750
0
❑
0
7.
0
❑
00%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8.
0
-
❑
00%
❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover. 20
20% of Total Cover 8
40
= Total Cover
2 - Dominance Test is > so-/.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
d❑ 3 -Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
1. Arundinaria gigantea
40
d❑
1000%
FACW
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation t (Explain)
2
0
❑
00%
3
0
❑
0 0%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
0
-
El
o o%
5,
0
❑
0.0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
00%
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
50% of Total Cover. 20
20% of Total Cover. 8
40
= Total Cover
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Herb Stratum (Plot size. 30
)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 , Polysbchum acrosbchoides
30
-
42.9%
FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2. Woodwardia areolata
20
28.6%
OBL
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
3.Osmunda regalis
20
28.6%
OBL
4.
0
❑
0.0%
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
5,
0
❑
0.0%
6.
0
❑
00%
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7,
0
❑
00%
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8.
0
❑
0.0%
9,
0
❑
00%
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10,
0
00%
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
11.
0
❑
00%
3 ft (1 m) in height
12.
0
❑
0.0%
50% of Total Cover 35
20% of Total Cover 14
70
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans
20
500%
FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia
10
25.0%
FAC
3. Rubus argutus
10
250%
FAC
4,
o
❑
o o%
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes * No O
50% of Total Cover. 20
20% of Total Cover 8
40
= Total
Cover
Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)_ % Color (moist)_ % Tvue_1 Loc? Texture Remarks
0 -4 10YR 4/2 100 D M Sandy Loam
4 -16 10YR 2/1 60 10YR 3/1 40 Silt Loam Streaking present
1 Type: C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation• PL =Pore Lining M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Ochnc (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) 3Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches). Hydric Soil Present? Yes (i) No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Honeycut Landing
City /County: Wake Sampling Date: 15- Apr -15
Applicant /Owner: Douglas Ball
State: NC Sampling Point: WC -UP
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Angler Environmental
Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat
Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope: 1.0 % / 0.6 °
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
Lat.: 35.5572 Long.: -78 7034 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk loamy sand
NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this
time of year? Yes * No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ ,Soil ❑ y gy ❑
or Hydrology
significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" resent? Yes * No O
g y p
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes OO No O
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No
Yes O No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No OO
within a wetland?
Remarks:
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Upland data point taken approximately 5 feet from WC -5
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No O
Depth (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes O No OO
Depth (inches).
Yes O No
Saturation Presents
Yes O NO OO
Wetland Hydrology
Depth (inches)
Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available:
Approximately 0.9 Inches of rain in last 48 hours.
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Remarks- (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Area appears to have been historically disturbed.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Dominant
Sampling Point: WC -UP
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30
)
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 . Linodendron tulipifera
20
R]
667%
FACU
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6 (A)
2. Acer rubrum
10
91
333%
FAC
❑
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
o o%
Species Across All Strata 8 (B)
4.
0
❑
o.o%
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0 %_ (A /B)
6,
o
O
00%
7
0
❑
o o%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8•
o
❑
o.o%
Total % Cover of: Multiply btf:
50% of Total Cover 15
20% of Total Cover. 6
30
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq or Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 30
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1 Liqustrum sinense
30
60.0%
FAC
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
2. Acerrubrum
10
20.0%
FAC
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
3. Lincidendron tulipifera
10
❑
200%
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
0
❑
o0%
Column Totals: 150 (A) 460 (B)
5.
o
❑
00%
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.067
6,
o
El
0 0
7.
0
❑
00%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8,
0
❑
0.0%
❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover 25
20% of Total Cover 10
50
= Total Cover
W 2 - Dominance Test is > s0%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0 1
1. Arundlnaria gigantea
20
❑
1000%
FACW
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
2
0
❑
0.0%
3
0
❑
00%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
0
_
El
0 0%
5.
0
❑
o o%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6,
o
❑
00%
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more In height and 3 in
50% of Total Cover 10
20% of Total Cover 4
20
= Total Cover
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30
)
❑
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 ,
0
0 o%
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
0
❑
0.0%
than 3 In (7 6 cm) DBH
3.
0
❑
00%
4,
0
❑
0.0%
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
5•
0
❑
0 o%
6,
0
❑
0 o%
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
0
❑
00%
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8.
0
❑
00%
9,
0
❑
00%
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, Including
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10,
0
0.0%
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
11.
0
❑
o.o%
3 ft (1 m) In height
12.
0
❑
0.0%
50% of Total Cover 0
20% of Total Cover. 0
0
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
30 )
1 • Rubus argutus
30
W
60.0%
FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia
20
Rj
400%
FAC
3.
o
❑
00%
4.
o
❑
o o%
5
0
El
0%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes * No O
50% of Total Cover 25
20% of Total Cover 10
50
= Total
Cover
Present?
Remarks- (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Area appears to have been historically disturbed.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches , Color (moist)_ % Color (moist)_ 0 TvrLe_1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
0 -16 10YR 5/3 100 Sandy Clay Loam
1 Type- C= Concentration D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains 21-ocation, PL =Pore Lining. M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches)-
Remarks:
❑ Marl (1`10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochnc (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) 3Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 1538)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Marl (1`10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochnc (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) 3Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Honeycut Landing City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 15- Apr -15
Applicant /Owner: Douqlas Ball State: NC Sampling Point: WC -WET
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Angler Environmental Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Channel (abandoned) Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope: 1.0 % / 0.60
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: 35.5573 Long.: - 78.7032 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk loamy sand NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes OO No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ❑ Yes * No ❑
within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No O
Remarks:
WC is confined to a linear dramageway witm a forested wind break between two active agricultural fields. The wetland is very sparsely vegetated.
Data point was taken approximately 2 feet from WC -5.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BI)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)❑
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)❑
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
O No
Surface Water Present? Yes
Depth (inches)-
Water Table Present? Yes O No OO
Depth (inches)-
Yes * No O
Saturation Present?
Yes * No O
Wetland Hydrology
Depth (inches). 4
Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Approximately 0.9 inches of rain over last 48 hours.
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Remarks- (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Wetland area is sparsely vegetated. Wetland is confined to drainageway within forested wind break between two active agricultural fields.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0
Dominant
Sampling Point: WC -WET
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 )
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
0
❑
00%
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 3 (A)
2.
0
❑
00%
❑
Total Number of Dominant
3
0
00%
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4.
o
❑
0.0%
5
0
❑
o.o%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A /B)
6
o
El
0.o%
7
0
❑
00%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g.
0
❑
00%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of Total Cover. 0 20% of Total Cover.
0
0
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling or Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1
0
❑
0o%
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
2.
0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
3.
0
❑
0 0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4
0
❑
o.o%
Column Totals: 70 (A) 190 le)
5.
5.
o
El
o o °r°
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.714
0
❑
0 0%
7.
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8.
0
❑
0.0%
❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover 0 20% of Total Cover.
0
0
= Total Cover
0 2 - Dominance Test is > so%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 )
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
1. Arundinaria gigantea
20
�/❑
1000%
FACW
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
2
0
❑
00%
3
0
❑
00%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
El
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4. �
0
_
0 o%
5.
0
❑
0.0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
00%
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
50% of Total Cover 10 20% of Total Cover
4
20
= Total Cover
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 )
❑
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1
0
00%
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2,
0
❑
0 o%
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
3.
0
❑
00%
4,
0
❑
0.o%
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1m) tall
5.
0
❑
00%
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
0
❑
00%
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
8.
_ 0
❑
0.0%
9,
0
❑
0.0%
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10,
0
❑
00%
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
11.
0
❑
0 o%
3 ft (1 m) in height
12.
0
❑
0.0%
50% of Total Cover 0 20% of Total Cover.
0
0
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. 30 )
1. Rubus argutus
30
d❑
600%
FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia
20
d❑
40 o%
FAC
3.
o
❑
o.o%
4.
o
❑
o.o%
5.
0
❑
0.o%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Yes * No O
50% of Total Cover. 25 20% of Total Cover
10
50
=Total Cover
Present?
Remarks- (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Wetland area is sparsely vegetated. Wetland is confined to drainageway within forested wind break between two active agricultural fields.
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches Color (moist)_ %� Color (moist)_ % Tvoe 1 Loc? Texture Remarks
0 -2 10YR 3/2 100 Clay Loam
2 -4 10YR 3/3 100 Sand
4 -16 10YR 3/2 60 10YR 5/6 40 D M Sandy Clay Loam
1 Type• C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains 21-ocation. PL =Pore Lining. M =Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (outside MLRA 150A,6)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Ochric (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
3Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes * No ❑
Remarks•
Suface layers of soil profile indicated alluvial deposition from upslope and adjacent agricultural fields.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Honeycut Landing City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 15- Apr -15
Applicant /Owner: Douglas Ball State: NC Sampling Point: WD /WE UP
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Angler Environmental Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): rolling Slope: 0.0 % / 0 0 "
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: 35.5569 Long.: - 78.7039 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee and Bibb Soils NWI classification:
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes OO No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes OO No O
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes O No O Yes O No
within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes O No OO
Remarks:
WD and WE are located within the same drainageway and are transected by SC. Data point was taken approximately 5 feet upslope from flag WD -5.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required,
check all that apply)
❑ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (Bl)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (0)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Agwtard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes O No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes O No
Depth (inches)
Yes O NO
saturation Presents
Yes O No OO
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Depth (inches)
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Remarks• (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Dominant
Sampling Point: WD/WE UP
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30
)
% Cover
Cover -
_ _
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Unodendron tulipifera
30
❑
600%
FACU
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)
2. Acer rubrum
20❑
400%
FAC
❑
Total Number of Dominant
3.
0
0 0%
Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
4.
0
❑
00%
5.
0
❑
00%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A /B)
6
0
El
o.o%
7
0
❑
o.0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8,
0
❑
0 o%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by•
50% of Total Cover 25
20% of Total Cover 10
50
= Total Cover
08L species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinq or Saolinq /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Ugustrum sinense
20
❑
1000%
FAC
FAC species 90 x 3 = 270
2.
_____
___ 0
❑
0.0%
FACU species 50 x 4 = 200
3.
0
El
0 0%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4.
0
❑
00%
Column Totals: 160 (A) 510 (8)
5,
5.
o
El
o.o °io
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.188
o
El
0 0%
7,
0
❑
0.0%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
g,
0
❑
o.o%
❑ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover 10
20% of Total Cover 4
20
= Total Cover
2 - Dominance Test is > so%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
1. Arundmana gigantea
20
❑
100.0%
FACW
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
2.
0
❑
o.o%
3.
0
❑
00%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
0
❑
0 o%
5.
0
❑
0 0%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
o.o%
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
50% of Total Cover. 10
20% of Total Cover. 4
20
= Total Cover
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30
)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 , Asplenium platyneuron
20
100 0%
FACU
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2.
0
❑
0 o%
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
3.
o
❑
On.
4,
0
❑
0 o%
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
5.
0
❑
o.0%
6.
0
❑
On.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
0
❑
o o%
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
g,
0
❑
0.0%
9,
0
❑
0 o%
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
El
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
1 Q,
0
0 0%
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
11.
0
❑
0 o%
3 ft (1 m) in height
12.
0
❑
00%
50% of Total Cover 10
20% of Total Cover 4
20
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
30
d❑
60.0%
FAC
2. Rubus argutus
20
91
400%
FAC
3.
o
❑
0.0%
4.
0
❑
o o%
5.
0
❑
0 0%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Yes No
50% of Total Cover 25
20% of Total Cover 10
50
= Total Cover
Present.
Remarks• (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WDIWE UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)` % Color (moist)_ ?/o TvDe 1 Loc? Texture, Remarks
0 -12 10YR 4/3 100 Sandy Loam
1 Type. C= Concentration D= Depletion RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains zLocation. PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Ochnc (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
❑ Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR 0, S) ❑ Delta Ochric (1`17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) 3Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) unless disturbed or problematic
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches).
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project /Site: Honeycut Landinq City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 15-Apr -15
Applicant /Owner: Douqlas Ball State: NC Sampling Point: WD /WE WET
Investigator(s): Anna Reusche, Anqler Environmental Section, Township, Range: S T R
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope: 0.0 070 / 0.00
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat.: 35.5568 Long.: - 78.704 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee and Bibb Sods NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes * No O (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No O
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes OO No O
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes OO No O Yes O' No O
within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No O
Remarks:
WD and WE are located within the same drainageway and are transected by SC. Data point was taken approximately 5 feet downslope from flag WD-
5.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of 2 required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
d❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) E:1 Marl Deposits (BSS) (LRR U)❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
-1 Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) d❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (BS) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0) ❑ Dry Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) d❑ Thin Muck Surface (0) Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
❑
d Water - Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No O Depth (inches)- 2
Water Table Present? Yes OO No O Depth (inches) 0
Saturation Presents Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes * NO O
(includes capillary fringe) Yes No O Depth (inches) 0
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Approximatley 0.9 inches of rain over last 48 hours.
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology was readily visible throughout system.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five /Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Remarks- (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
Dominant
Sampling Point: WD/WE WET
Species?
Absolute Rel.Strat.
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30
)
% Cover
Cover
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Uriodendron tulipifera
50
❑
71.4%
FACU
That are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6 (A)
2. Acer rubrum
20❑
286%
FAC
❑
Total Number of Dominant
3 •
o
0 o%
Species Across All Strata 8 (B)
4.
0
❑
o o%
5.
0
❑
00%
Percent of dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
6.
o
El
00%
7
0
❑
o 0%
Prevalence Index worksheet:
g•
0
❑
o.o%
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of Total Cover 35
20% of Total Cover. 14
70
= Total Cover
OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
Saplinq or Saolinq /Shrub Stratum (Plot size. 30
)
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1 • Acer rubrum
20❑
667%
FAC
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
2. Ligustrumsinense
10❑
33.3%
FAC
FACU species 60 x 4 = 240
3.
0
❑
00%
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4.
0
❑
00%
Column Totals: 190 (A) 550 (B)
5.
5.
o
❑
00%
El
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.895
0
0.0%
7.
0
❑
00%
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
g•
0
❑
0.0%
❑ i - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of Total Cover 15
20% of Total Cover 6
30
= Total Cover
0 2 - Dominance Test is > 500/0
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30
)
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0 1
1 Arundinaria gigantea
40
Se
1000%
FACW
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 (Explain)
2.
0
❑
0 0%
3.
0
❑
o o%
1 Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
El
�o
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
o
o o
5,
0
❑
00%
Definition of Vegetation Strata:
6.
0
❑
o o%
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
50% of Total Cover 20
20% of Total Cover 8
40
= Total Cover
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30
)
❑
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1 • Woodwardia areolata
20
66.7%
OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
2. Polystichum acrostichoides
10
❑
333%
FACU
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
3.
0
❑
o.o%
4.
0
❑
0 0%
Sapling /Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
5,
0
❑
00%
6.
0
❑
0.0%
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
0
❑
00%
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
g,
0
❑
00%
9,
0
❑
o o%
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
❑
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10,
0
00%
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
11.
0
❑
0 o%
3 ft (1 m) in height
12.
o
❑
0.0%
50% of Total Cover 15
20% of Total Cover 6
30
= Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
20
d❑
100 0%
FAC
2.
o
❑
o.o%
3.
o
❑
o.o%
4.
0
❑
0.0%
5
0
El
o.o%
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Yes No
50% of Total Cover 10
20% of Total Cover 4
20
= Total Cover
Present. i
Remarks- (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
*Indicator suffix = National status or professional decision assigned because Regional status not defined by FWS
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)_ % Color (moist)_ % TY,oe 1 Loc? Texture
0 -2 10YR 5/2 100 Mucky Peat
2 -12 10YR 4/2 60 10YR 5/6 Sandy Loam
1Type. C= Concentration. D= Depletion. RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains 21-ocation. PL =Pore Lining. M= Matrix
WD/WE WET
Remarks
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Sandy Muck Mineral (Sl) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches)-
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes (i) No 0
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

N.C. Division of Water Resources
Stream Identification Form

NC UWU Stream Identi
Date:
t
Evaluator. ,` W"' L,,,
Total Points:
Stream hs at tees? •- -rfelmarent
:r : 19 or pereAgiBr if a 30'
fleation F
Al SAA
orm Verxion 4.11
Pro}ectfSite: c.yo,,z, , ; _u - f� •�
County:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermitter item
Latitude:
Longitude: -'I
.f' 4
Other �-
e.g. Ou+ad Aram$:°
A. Geomorphology SSubtotal= t •^ _)
Absent
Weak
Moderate (
Strong
1' Continc,tt of arne4 bed ac; bank
y dt
c
_
?
2. S,rwxrity of channel along thalweg
i 0
1
2
j
3 In- channel slructurie; ex nff'e -pool, step pool,
0
nWe -poet s"ttttnce
(�
3
a. Parucle size of stroam substrate
(p ;
2
5. Aciwelrelia. fioodplain
0
=
2
3 °)
{ 6 Depositional bars or tenches
3
7. Reoent ailuvtai de Posits
0
3
E Hoadcuts
_
a 1
1
1 2
3
5 Grade control
45
10. Natural wilI v
` y
0
0 5
F
r 5
x
11. Seccno or . rea.e=r order channel
_1
a
a
( Y ° 3 = 3
.
Is rnifirkO etches are net rated, see aincusvons in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12 Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron ox4izinq baaeria
1 C� f
1
�
� 2
3
14, Leaf liter
,�
1
05
�
0
5 SeJ,nlent c`a't ;slants or debris
h
>
i �0
05
1
1 5 �
''
6...•rpas ce!)rrs lines or piles
..a
0 I
0,5
1 �.
$
1.5 i
17 Scrt- based! evidence oa high +rater table?
No = 0
� es = 3 )
C Biology fSubtotal
f 18 FiWo:.s roots in streambea
3
?
1
_.._
g 19. Rcc €ed ctpMnd plants in streambed �
3
�';
'>
i ++
0
12''), fAncrobenthos (?late ahvrr;,ty and a0undance)
1
2t Acualic floll,,sks
0 _
1
2
3
22 Fish
0_
Ci.s
1
1.5
23 Crayfish i
_ ..
_..
5
y _
r_a1..�#
1.5
i' 24, Amphittans i
�
0.5
25. Af;:a S
a 0
3.5
f
1.5
+ 26.- Wettanct plants cn streamoed (
FACW = 0.75.
OBL = 1.5 06he: = 0
I -pewnneai streams may also sac: joerr lea using titre: mr.meas See i? 36 u; manual
-
i i ; : _
Notes C r , .2
,...
_. _
1 �.. iS
j
• "v -f fir. � � "� r k C / t �'� �° .'"
"•+' r� 'lv
Sketch,
�rr
-Y17
// I
R )

NC D% Q Stream [dewification Form Version 4.11
Date: `� ' t r ProjectlSite :� { x 1
Evaluator: County:
Total Points: ._
Stream a at lead xtlerrndtent Stream Determination {circle one)
.V : 19 or oe,ervioisr if z 30' Ephemeral Intermittent rtastni$
Latitude: r, to
Longitude:
Other ° {; e „C
e.g' Quad!.'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strgnq
t° ConWriu. y of ona nel bed arm bank
0
t
2
�3 y
2 Sinu13ity of channel ale thale�,e
� 9
( 0
t
2
3
3. In•cnannet structure: ex ri 0001, step pool,
rt, 1e pCCd sequence
0
t
j
3I.
4. Particle size Ct stream substrate
0
_..
1
2
A-
5 Activefrelict floodplatn
) C
(2 '1
3
_
6 C3eE"C'FsilJCrs2t bars or oertcheS
o.
24 Amphibians
2
3
9 7. Recent a luost deposits
(Q,s
( t
2
3
&. He ""Cuts
(0
( 1
.......... .
j 2
3
0 Grace m -itrol
rJ
N 0.5
( 1
1,5
W Natural valley
( 0
� 0.5
a 1 )
1.5
1 t Second or greater order channel
( (_
Nc =.
Yes= 3
a- Wifiaal dccrte—s are rice raters sae: asxtussanrr, in manual
f
Sketch -
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1
12. Presence of Basellow
0
1
2 °t
3
13. Iron oxidi=9 b1claria
0
b
14 Leaf litter
15
4
�.
15. Sediment on plants or aeod Es
0
� �0 S�
1
1.5
1 g Organic debt #s line -5 or piles
1 5
17. Soil-based evidence of hk2n water table?
i
No - 0
(Yes =
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Pfbrous roots in stream bed
r'3 F (
2
t
0
i9. Rooted upland pl3nis in str€;arnbed I
2
0
tlnrrc , •and �ah.� '
�} ndance)
Qu , �
1
� .. 2
3
2�. Aquata. ?1i 1 u3�ctoec
�� 1
2
3
22 Fish
+,
05
t
15
j 23 Crayfish
0
24 Amphibians
0
(6 5j
25 Xgae
05
( 1
16
2E 4hredand plants in strearrmt;ec
F4C1N- 015, (BBL - 1 5
Either = 0
Pewnnipl streams wy also !x mcnts "oo using other rr*thad�. Sce p 35 of maruraf.
l Notes, .t-,
f
Sketch -
b
4
�.

NC DWQ Stre am Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: L; ! (� r ProjccUSite:4;�g t Latitude: .rE. ; Ej •�
Evaluator: �4r.��, t,,M ! A"U_ - County: +,�o,� Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Dete "all circle one) Other
If 1 n.s a teas&Fnferrr;:dtent � �_ E hemoral ntermitte Perennial � o. Quadn+arite�
.f 3 19 a� oerenndq +�f >_ .30• p �-
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
J, Absent
Weak
Moderate_
Strong
_ .
i" Continuity of channel tied and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along tna2weg
0
2 � �
3
3 In- channel stru:�uro: ex riffle -pool. Step -pool,
1l
3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle site of stream substrate
0 (
1
2 ;
3 j
5 Actrverrelict floodplain
0
1
Ctl
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
C
2
3
7. Reoem alluviril dusts
3",
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
r
3
S. Grade control
0.5
1.5
10. Natural vaUuy
0
( 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or gtealer order channel
Yes = 3
' anificial Vane, are not raten ; ro 0,mrssions o manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =� E
12 Presence of Baseilo`N
0
1
3
13 Iron oxidizing bactena
G t;
a
14. Leaf later
1
0.5
0
1 15. Sediment on plants or 6e3ris
(-0j
0.5
1
1.5
16. Orgarnc debris {fines c( piles
(0>
0,-5---,-,
5
1 (_
1.5
17. Soil-based evtonce of high water tabte?
No = 0
L,_Yes = 3 t
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
r 3
2
i 1
0
19 Rooted upland plants In streamoed
? '3-
2
1
0
20 Kwotonthos (note diversity and abundance)
(`Q;
1
� 2 I
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
�
Q
1
2 I
3
22. Fr;h
mil.
05
1
1.5
.
23 C,ayfrsh
0 9
05
1 I_
1,5
24, Amphibians _
0.5
1
15
25. AV;
iG-
`_
1
15
26. Wetland cants ut straambed
p
- _ r _
FACW 0.75
r
O SL = 1.5 Other = {:
.;x- renniial s"tams may also be identirned using Critter trejftoft See p. 35 of manual
Notes:' -C? t.,€. -r °" ! A � •.. 16 � ° p t, � r± ` ..+ :.i v� �� � , �+..f.�..� -'^ �!n
.-✓ .r
`t l,� s .*. t_,
1 p
Sketch-

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet

USACE AlDr D11 Q v Sitc „ (indicate on attached inapt f
STREAM (,QUALITY ASSESSMENT T WORiiSHEET
Provide the following information for the siream reach under assessment:
/
� ,w_ 2. I valnilUf s nantC: �
1. Applicant -s nante' (u
-, .LP d{ v ✓.{ rr.ry,_O.t }� 4
1J
3. Gate ofe:<'iluauat:
° 4.T'inicofesaluation. ✓-
�. \.ime ofstre7m: `' is 6. River basin: tK(0
7. Apptr►vinr:te drainage arcs: 15 S. Stream otder: "
9. Length of reach evaluated: �' � %:�' 10. County:
11. Site c4wdinates (if known): prefer in,14,6mal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (ifany): rr: r f v. �r es f: �r•. < -+
,om �— t.a"�rt�,HUti!► tear -77 3i(a611 E: " � C� . ��r �� �'i
tiieth�:n� l,�eati+sn d.terrui,t�.l (+eerie►: t("f� 'ropo Shen Ortho (Aerials Photo,(, IS 01h.i (JIS Uther
13. Location of retch under evaluation Wnc nearby Kinds .md landmarks and attach rnap identifying stm-inttsl I ation):
14. Proposed channel %vofk (ifan} 1: 'r r r_. 0 /:
..
1S . Recent weather conditions. `" - � ' � � "' +'9'.,'t
16. Site c( ►ndrtiL)ns ;1t tittle of Visit' E� 4 P.,
17. Identify any special tvalcrway classification& known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters �Eswntial Fisheries Habiw
_Trout Waters �Uuutattding llrsourcr Waters _,_,_ Nutrient Sensitive Waters —Water Supply Watershed (I -iV)
IS. Is there a land or lake located upstream of'the evaluating point?, Ltr NO If yes. citinuae the water surface area: r--
19, Does channel appear ors t }S6S, quad map:'ti, l'F NO 20, l�,rs channel appeat an (,;SDA Soil Survey °? l "FS `'t7
21. Lstimmed watershed land ure: Lt! to Residential �� Commercial _ %' Industrial "o Agricultural
_Q% Forested � °. o Cleared r Logged _% Other ( 1
22. 1.3;vikfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel elope dim. n center of stream: +Hat (0 to 2%) !Gentle (2 to, 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 1'0 _Stecp (> l0 %)
2S. Channel sinuosity : Stru f ht _CKcasiottal trend& �r Frequent meander _Vern' sinuous Braided channel
Instruction-s for completion of wotl shert (locatc-A on page 2): Wgin by determining the most appropriate ccoregion based on
location, terrain vegetation, sirratm classificatit,m. etc. Every characteristic must be 3c'orcd using the same ccorcgimi. Assign points
to each characteristic :within the range shown for the ecoregicm, Pa��r provides a brief description of i~row to rcvie.v the
characteristic;: klt nmilied in the w'orkshcei. Scrires should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reawh under evaluation. If a
chary ocristic cannot be evaluatcd duc to site or we -titer conditions. enter 0 in the scoring boa and provide in explanation in the
comrnelit section. Where there are obvious changes in the chartcier cal a stream under review the stream flows from a pasture
into ai forestl. the stream may he divided into smaller reaclees that display more continuity, and a separate forest uied to evaluate each
reach. The towl wore assigned to a stirant reach roust range between 0 and 100. with a scare of 100 mprrsenting a stream of site
highest quality.
Total Scure (from reverse): ' Comments: 'i1'
""t,. ... :�.A.>^/''./\ ./ t•1 � �' "✓.- `.x�Jt'�»E a rw�-`� � }.c - �i !n .s �� .. �: _r� ) C' t. F h fw ter ` ' .- �,tt�..., ( 11 8 =. :f � - �`� ..�
Evaluator'sSignaturr `� ',Ys_ Date :t +l5 ..
This rhannt-t evaluation form is intcnded to be used only ai. a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United !'states Army Corps cif Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to US.aCE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigxitic►n ratio or requirement. Form subject to charagc version 06101. To Commem, please call 919-8764441 x 26.

SA A
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
2
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SWIM
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain.
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
O - S
0­4
0-3
(no flo-Ar or saturation = 0, stronarflow - max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive aftcration = 0: no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no butter - 0: contiguous. wide buffer = at&-< points)
4
Evidence of nutrienuor chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive arxts - max points)
#��s = 0; no disch,
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
31
(no dischaver m 0- sprines. seem wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floWplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
t4
(no floodplain = 0: extensive floodDlain = maxwials)
Q
7
Entrenchment / noodplain access
0-5
0-4
0­2
(deeply mtmnchcd = 0: frequent floodinst = max points)
8
Presence of adj acent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0. fame adiacent wetlands = max pounts)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-3
0 -4'
0-3
(extensive charinclization = 0, natural meander = max points),
10
Se(timent input
0-5
0 -4
0-4
3
(extensive deposition- 0. 1 ittic or no sediment = max coints)
-Skit & diversity o(channel bed substrate
W
N
0 -4,
0 -3
v) A
(fine. homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
1
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
O - S
0-4
0-5
fdoeviv incised = 0: stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of major bank riailurcs
0-5
0-5
0-5
_e
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion. stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0 -5°
(no visible roots .= 0: dense roots throuaboui = max points)
is
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-3
0-4
0-5
?
(substantial impact --0: no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pooL/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
C.
(no riffles/ripples or "is " 0. well-dcvcloi)cd max points)
17
IlAbitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or W habitat - 0: frcqueat, varied habitats = max points)
Canopy cover-age over strearnbcd
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shading.Lwewtiois = 0: continuous canoov = nm roiws)
19
Sisbstrate, embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
1 jA
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure - max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see pnSt 4)
0-4
0-3
0-3
1
( no evidence = 0, common. numerous types = max. pohns)
0
11
-
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
(W evidvnce - 0: common. numerous ivoes = max points)
22
-Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common. numerous t%,Pcs = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-3
0 - 5
no evidence = 0: abundant evidence max poin4),
.
T01AI Points Possible
100
100
100*
TOTAL SCORE also inter on., pagc)
These are not tswsscd itic-oastal wcains.
2

USACI- AIDN'` DWO Site » findicate on attached neap)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
t
1. Applicant's namc :.L�4 W� may. _.. 2. Evaluator'", namc.n" Qtt s Ica_ r nr+;c-4 n",
•�d7 _. i ys
3. a. Time of evafuawn:
S. \,ante of stream: = - 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: C-": + 8. Stream order. { °�
9. Lcngth of reach cv:tluated: -' 10. C olinly: '-�'n
11. Site ccn}tdittatrs lif known): paeter in decimal dt:�nti•5. t2, suhdivisicrn nattae (if �tny l: .- ,�`��_c� k n.•� ° <.!
I.ait itaad' tc-N 34,37,13121: -� � : ^ 1 ongnukic (ct -77 j5 6l h: i' C3 • ~� S rf
Method lox- eaticm dcwrmincd fctretct: �_ (;I ;", loan Sh-,t 0filiv IAc :iutyt'holwGIS (hhcr6IS Other
13. 1_cxaiion of reach under evaluation Inote nearby foods and landmarks and attach map tdentifytne 5trrain(5) location):
area .... _t `,-i? :'.�.+.! •. _'� i' �'') "�`' `.,n� °'-+. .�^+.r At: �i a ; ,.....tii.. ¢ . ="fr Civ.r'!h
14. Proposed channel work 1 if any): • t • rJ, ""
! r
1S. Recent wcather condi tions: d= =4r v 4 n,00 <
16. Site conclitioris at time of visit: t` .a s c> >I
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Seaton i0 Tidal Waters �i;.vratial Fisheries Habitat
�T`roat Watcrs _ Outstanding Recouatc Water: ___-.. \nutrient Sensitive Waters ____Water Supply, Watcfsited _(I IV
18. !s tltcrc 3 pond or' lake (uc atccf upstream o1'the cvalatatiora point :' YU NO If yes. estimate the water %urfacc a'rrca: n ';- zJ 4-t C-
19. floes channel appem on USGS (Iti ad map'+ a NO 20. Doe-- channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? \a,,� NO
21. Etitirnated wwershed land use: °ro Residential , °o Commercial o Agricultural
_
°•ro i-arested ? s C1e:ared ( Logged % Other i ;1
22. li:ankfull width: _ _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope do »o center ofstream: f=lat (0 to 214) ` °, (-;cntic (2 to aid) _,Niodrrtaic (4 to lieu) _Steep (:-101%)
25. Channel sinuosity: StraaSht �(hcasional bends Friquent meander very itnuuus �Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ccoregion h ased on
location. terrain. vegetation, %trcam classification. etc. Even• chanwicristic must be scored u;tng the same "oregion. Assign Points
to each charweristic within the range shown for the ecorcgion. Page 3 provides a brief description of Itow to rcvirw the
characteristics identified in the ►vork4hcct. Scores should reflect an overall assessnaew of the stremam reach under evaluation. If a
charactrrislic cannot be evaluated due to site or wcathcr conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and providt an explanation in the
commem section. 11 °liter ihrrr are obvious charaa r; in the character of a stream under review (e.e., the stream fln%%- from a pasture
into a foresi), the stream may he divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a iepaurate fomi used to evaluate eaclt
reloch. 'rhe total Sc''`ott assigned to a stream reach, must range between 0 and 101), with a score of 100 rcprescntirig a sarcoma of the
highest (khalif%.
Total Score (rroi revere): t t ommcnts: _y v ^` + r' r,t P
iar��, -4u t. Oft_` G• f'yi• `A.cC .�. A'. �i A1, ^a :).fl'� f,i�t'�c13
Evaltiator's Sig'natur'e 6' `` f-° �.%I, !�J ��l ✓ , 1)htr Dt•
Thin channel evaluation form is intend -JI to be used only as a guidc tot assist landownery and environmental professionals in
leathering the data requireel by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make it preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total %rorc resulting front the completion of this form is subject to USACF: approval and does not imply it
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form cukajeci to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x'26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
BCOREGION POWT
RAIS'GE,:
CHARACTERtSTICS
SCORF,
I
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain.
. .
Presence ornowk. i persistent pooU in stream
0-5
0-4
0--5
V:�
(no flow or saturation = 0. stronv flow = may Points)
Evidence of post human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0: no alteration max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
tno buffer - 0: cond ituous., wide buffer max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
(cxtcns,ive, discharges = 0; no discharges = max Points)
0-5
0-4
0-4
41t
5
Groundwater dischme
(no discluitrim - 0: sprinvs. seeps. wetlands. etc. - max ooints)
0-3
0-4
0-4
u
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
Presence
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no fl = Ot extensive floodotain max corals)
7
Entrenchment I floodpl a it n recess
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeptv entrenched = 0: frequent floodirtz - max points)
8
Presence of fadjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0. 1,cmc adiaocnt wetlands = max ooints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4,
0-3
(extensive eMnnelization, = 0: natuml meander max points)
10
,
'Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deDosition 0: little or no sediment max Doints)
Sim & diversity of channel bed substrate
(fine. )
homogenous = 0, taree, diverse sizes = mar: points)
NA*
0-4
0-5
NA
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
LM
(dccvlv incised = 0: stable W & banks - max voints)
13
Presence of inajor bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
(severe erosion = 0. no erosion. stable banks = max points.)
M -
<
14
Root depth and density on banks
I
0-3
0-4
0-5
I-
(no vi
visible roots = 0. dense roots throuehout max Points)
Ae,>
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0 s
(substantial impact =0: no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle- pool/ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-S
0-6
(no riffiesirioples, or pouts = 0 . well-devclopcd max points)
E-
17
Itabitat complexity
0-6
0-6
-
06
�-J
P-
(little or no habitat - 0; frequent, varied habitats max points)
IZ
<
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shading vegetation - 0: continuous canoov = ntax oomis)
19
Substrate embeddedness
OA•'
0-4
0, -4
(deeply embedded = 0,, loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (sue page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0. common. numerous twes = nuix Points)
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence - D. common, nurnerous tvg)cs - mwx poinis)
Presence or fish
(no evidence = 0; common. numerous tyres = max voints)
0-4
0-4
0-4
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0 -5
(no evidence = 0: abundant evidence max points)
Total Points•Possible
too
too
160.
TOTA n
.1, SCORE (also enter o First page)
"I'licsc charade-ristieswe ix)t -ta csscd in coastal streams.

USACE AID= 1)'s1 Q it Site r: (indicate vn attachod map)
C. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET �.
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment., L
1. Applicant's naine: r 2. Evaluator's name: 1 t . �( C{ � �•t na�np sr
3. Date of evaluation tt• t� 4.'I'imcofrsnluation:
k I
S. I\tanic ofwcatn: :A + G. River basin.— ".►
7. Approximate draltlage area: i 4,, t 8. Stream order: l
9. Lcneth oi'rcach evaluated: j v��` 10. Counts:
11. Site ceutrclin ;etas (if known): titetcr in d«ir:t il dcgrcrc .. 12. Subdivision name: (if any):
(atitt.IrIex ytS ^2.t_): � + .� f.� LuqgittWv lea - 71 37(a4tt1: —I '�LN
\terhrei ttiiC�tinn ctct:'tntnA�cl (cucic): r°e.,t'ti1 'I )PO tihect Untie tlierill) Photol(il1 Othct (CIS Uldt:t
13. Location of teach tinder evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach snap idewifying strearnis) location):
01e
14. Proposed channcI work ( if any } = :a. 6� t-au LA
li. decent weativer conditions: 4 ++ n�? r� ",: { rr .^r U(?) 11%11 '1i `
lb. Site conditions eft tinte of visit: t z :a .:� ,
17. Idcntitj• any special waterway classifications known:
_Tr(Kil Walcr3 _Outstanding Rcsourt -c Walets _
18. is there a pond or lake located upzarcam of tie evaltiatio
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad inap", 1'I;.S vC)
21. Fstim ;atex! wsttershcd land use: 1 % Residential
4 �' ,) Fore %tcd
r
22. Bankfull width;
,_._._Section 10 _ l'idal Waters _iascntial Fisheries Habitat
Nulrient Sensitive Waters _Mlatcr Supply Watershed (1-IV)
n point? t /Y PI N() If yes, estimate the water surface area
20. Does channel appear on GSDA Soil Survey :'� YES NO
Conuvencial __- �Jo Industrial �c� °.o Agricultural
Cleared { Lorgcd __ % (7ther {
23. llank hcic;hI t ftom bed to top of bank): ,
24. Channel slope down center of stroi n; —Flat (0 to 20t1 ,Gentle (2 to 4%J Moderatc (-1 to 100%1 _Steep (> )0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straieht — (Xc:asion:al hends �< Frequctlt meander Very sinuous �Braidcd channel
instructions for completion of Aork,hevt (located on page 2): I'iegin by cdetcrmining the most appropriate e_comsion, hosed on
kyuation. terrain, vegetation. stream classification. etc. livery characteristic must be ,cored using the s;rrne ct oregion. Assili paint,
to each chary ;teristic within the ranee shown for the cc(iregion. Paige . provides a brief deseriptiun of how to review the
ch;iractcristics identified in the ssarl :!reef. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If :a
ehartacteftslic cannot he evaluated due to site or weather conditions. enter 0 in the i4.ortng box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. When shirt: sire obvious changes in the chara.ier of a stream under review (c.e., the stream fle'tsw I'ntirn a pasture
into a finest), the dream may be divided into sinaller rcaehr% that display more continuity. and a wparatc 1iinm used to evaluate each
reach. The total score ;t:3igned to a stracam reach must range betsseen 1) and 100. with a store of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
r
'fatal Score (frnna rever%r):
'� I r •
r ; r r; { fir, t
contrneuts: z .sat n � t �1 +�+ i }, ra, • " tv k %d"3 c.pFt, 1r 4•
(ao.t 4..
Evaluator's Signature �� 1`f °C.�- '�'<a` Date 01-4 J f
This channel evaluation form is intended to lie used only as a guide to assist landownem and cm °ironmental profe.Aoniets in
gathering the data required by the United States army Corps of Firiginctrs to make a preliminary asst,,%sment of stream
qu;aliq. "I'he foul wore resulting front the comlilelion of this form is subject to l SAC E, approval and does tint imph u
particular mitigation ratiu or requ i rein ent. Form subject to oningr version OfitO To Comment. please call 919-876-8441 x 26,

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
2
1COREGY0y POWT RA�YGE.
e
CHARACTERISTICS
C oastal'
° `� Piedmont.
i
Mountain.'
1
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
0 5
d - 4
0-3
(no flow or saturation = 0: strone flow = max points)
-%
-
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 -5
0 - 15
(extensive aitcration - 0; no alteration = may points),
3
Riparian zone
O;6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; condiuous. wide buffer= max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 - 4
0- 4
(extensive discharges - 0: no discharges =max points$
,,.
5
Groundwater discharge
0 -3
0 -4
0 -4
(no disch3me = 0: inrintts, seeps. wetlands. etc. - max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
d- 4
0-4
0 - .
>;
(no floodplain - 0: extensive floodplain = max points)
'
Entrenchment t floodplain access
0-5
0 - 4
0' �
`*
(deeply entrenched z- 0: fre;auent floodune .- max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0 -2
a
(no wctlands = 0: lark adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 - 5
0-4'
0-3 °
extensive = may: points)
ensive clumnelization 0: natural nn
!!
10
Sediment input
0-3
0 - 4
0-4
( extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment - max points)
1 1
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
'N
0-4
0 -5
(fine, bornopcnous = O: larecc, divcne sizes = nuax tints)
•
=
1
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0- S
0- 4
0- 5
C j
>•
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banns - max points)
°
13
Presence of major bank failures
-5
0 1-3°
0 -5
-�
-
,--0-p inns)
(severe erosion - o erosion„ stable banks = max toll
Q... .
� �
t de
Ruo... th and density on banks
a 3
0-4
0 5
r -.
.�..
Q°
(no visible roots `� 0: dense roots throughout =max points)
�
15
Impuct by agriculture, tivostock, or timber production
0-3
0-4
0-5
(substanttai .. 4a - _ -
m CC —O` �IQ evidence `" max DOinIS)
.�
16 °
Presence of riffle- pooltripple -pool complexes
0-3
0 - 5
0-6
E °
(ino riffle t ionles or pools - 0: well - developed =Hoax wints)
•�
17
Habitat complexity
o-6
0-6
0-6
F
- intsj
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats max po„
-'
1$
Canopy eoveragia over streambcd
0 -5
0 -5
0-°°5
a
_
-
(no Slttldinat vcoelstion = 0 continuous Caanopr� =max points)
° "
I9
Substrate embeddedneas
�q:
0-4
0 - 4
> �.
(deeply embedded = 0: loose structure = max)
n0
Presence of stream invertebrates (sec page 4)
0-4
0 -S
0-5
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous tvt� = max points)
1
Presence of amphibianx
0-4
0-4
0-4
r-
O
(no evidence = 0: common. numerous types = max pointst
22
Presence of fish
0- 4
0-4
0 - 4
Q9
(no evidence - 0: common, numerous tvpcs = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
-
0-5
I
(no evadertc€ ° 0; abundant evidence
nee - max pointy
e
Total Points Possible °
too
100
°
TOTAL SC4 � �atso enter � rst' �g c }
• Thcse elturacter6lic% are not assesscd in omstal sireams.
......
.
2

AGENCY COORESPONDANCE

C®ENR
North Carc:Ina Department of Environment and Natural Rescurces
Pat McCrory
Governor
Holland Road Inc.
Douglas Ball
1401 Uersboro Road Suite 206
Garner. NC 27129
1 Determination Type
Buffer Call
Z Neuse (15A NCAC 2B 0233)
❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B 0267)
June L 2015
I Isolated or EIP Call
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
Subject: Buffer Determination
N'BRRO 15 -225
Wake County
j
f
❑ Ephemeral /intermittent /Perennial Determination
I ❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
I
Project Name Honevcutt Landin,,
Loeauon,'`Directions• Property is located at the terntmus of Black Spruce Way in \Villow Springs.
;N C
Subject Stream Black Creel,
Determination Date: Nlay 27, 201-5
Staff: .James Graham
Feature
1 Subject Not subject
F /UP* Start,&,
1 Stopra7, J Soil Sure, j USCS '
/Flab
; to buffers to buffers
i i TOpo !
A
j I X
F
i t
B
i X
p
i - -- `
C
; X
I
( f X
D
X I
P I
i j \ I X
*E`I'P - Ephemer alr'lnternitttent'Perennia
Explanation I he feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the soil Survey of Wake County. North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS 'I'opouraphrc map at a 1 24.000 scale. l=ach feature that is checked
Not Subject' ha, been determined riot to he a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
" Subject" }hare been located on the propery and possess characteristics that qualify it to he a stream. -I -here may he
other streams located on %our property that do not shot& up yin the neaps referenced above beet. still may be
One
NoahCarohna
,Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1,628 Marl Service Center Raaeign, NC 27699.1528 Phone [phone]
Internet, www ncwaterauaiav onz Location 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax ;919) 788.7159
An Equal Qoponunityr'A';r;rmative Actioc Employe. - 5C'a Recycleo;10% Post Consumer Paper

1- 1 oil e"cutt I,,11dI[I,
W,ike Count�, L
JtInC I. 'U 1
Page "' of 2
considered 1urrsd]cu<m,al according it) the US :army Corps of Engineers andfor to the nrvt�iun (If �t'ctter ResOurccs
(DWR)
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing;. Ifseridinj; rite US Postal.Service c/o Karen Hiagins DN'R -401 &
Buffer Permittin;; Unit 1617:11ail.Sen•ice Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via delivers' sen-ice (taP.S, I-edEv,
etc.) Karen Higgins D1I,R — 401 & Buffer Permitting Licit 512 N. Salisburc Street Raleigh, :VC 2760.
This determination is final and hindinh unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within stab (60)
days.
The ownerifuture owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (including any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 403/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central Office) at (919) -807 -6300. and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919) -554 -1884.
If you have questions regardim- this determination. please feel tree to contact James Graham at (919) 791 -4256
Respr (fully. � f/
f
i!
Danny Stn Supervisor
Water C,)t, Itty Regional Operation Section
Raleigh ReLdonal Office
cc RROJSWII file Copy
F\nna,Reushe
:Anuder Environmental
61 , Poole Rd
('garner NC 27529

� `~j '� '• 1 � •,��, �7 •'•� Vii:' `. 40" ,•j
+�
^�
N -
Legend
Gb
. ■
_I C VO'CyCUtt M� Int
� {
Streams
Wetlands •�
FIGURE 2
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
ANGLE R ANGiER QUADRANGLE ipr� Stu
AAA :..'
.�—a► ENVfRUN1If iAl HONEYCUTT LANDING
'`
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC
MAY 4 2015
C)
& 1 S

IS-zzs
Yt
71
W&O
w NOS,
Was
Nos
N
W*C P
W%A ii I
i Oki -
Legend
Honeycutt Area of interest
Streams
A'el I a n d s
FIG R 3
MRCS SOILS M
�Vl COUNTY 197
-AAA L F. N,; K
HONEYCUTT LANDING
VJ'ILLO'N SPRINGS NC
MAY 4 2015
I:
r.
\T
,rdillh,

MITIGATION ACCEPTANCE LETTER

Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Pancho Stream, Wetland and Nutrient Mitigation Bank
August 10, 2015
Mr. David Schaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Availability of Compensatory Riparian Wetland Credits
Project: Honeycutt Landing Phase II
We are providing this letter in accordance with 33 CFR §332 8(r), to confirm that .30 Riparian Wetland Mitigation
Credits (Credits) from the Pancho Stream, Wetland & Nutrient Mitigation Bank (Bank) are currently available and
may be used, once transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Honeycutt Landing Phase II project, and
as proposed by Douglas Bell (Applicant).
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance. Should the
Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Compensatory Mitigation
Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's US
Army Corps ( USACE) Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies In addition, we will provide USACE
with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank
Ledger will include relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited
Credits
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919 334 9123.
Sincerely,
Tiffani Bylow
Restoration Systems, LLC

RESERVATION LETTER
Pancho Mitigation Bank
August 10, 2015
Douglas Bell
3610 Benson Road
Garner, NC 27529
Re: Reservation of Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits
Project: Honeycutt Landing Phase II, Willow Springs, Wake County
We are providing this letter to confirm that .30 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits (Credits) from the Pancho
Mitigation Bank (Bank) are currently available and may be used, once transferred, for compensatory mitigation
relative to the Honeycutt Landing Phase II project and as proposed by Douglas Bell (Applicant).
Our company hereby confirms that the Credits are currently available for transfer from the Bank's Ledger to the
Applicant at a cost of $21,300.
As of today we are placing these credits on reservation for a period of forty -five (45) days, or until the permit is
issued, whichever occurs first. If the Permit is not issued within forty -five (45) days of the date of this letter, we will
require the Applicant to place a non - refundable deposit in the amount of twenty percent (20 %) ($4,260) of the total
purchase price of mitigation needed. This will extend the reservation of credits for another thirty (30) days. The
Applicant will have ten (10) days from the date of Permit Issuance to tender full payment to the Bank. Following the
expiration of this ten (10) day period, if full payment has not been received by the Bank the Credits will be released
from reservation. We will then notify the US Army Corps ( USACE) Project Manager triggering the requirement for a
permit modification by the Applicant.
Should the Applicant purchase the Credits within the relevant timeframe, we will complete and execute the
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within three (3) business days of the Bank's
receipt of the full purchase price.
We will further provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's USACE
Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies Finally we will also provide to the USACE an updated
copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank Ledger will include
relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited Credits
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919 334.9123.
Sincerely,
J 4/� xr-
Tiffani Bylow
Restoration Systems