20150823 Ver 1_401 Application_20150815

WERG
Wetlands and Emnronmental Planning Group
Mr. Crystal Amschler
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Bryan Tompkins
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
August 10, 2015
A
Leonard S. Rindner, PL
LC.
�-o150
823
Subject: Pre - Construction Notification for NWP #3 City of Charlotte Storm Water
Services, 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive
Dear Ms. Higgins, Ms. Amschler and Messrs. Johnson and Tompkins,
Enclosed is a request for a Nationwide Permit 43 for the proposed replacement of an undersized
culvert and removal of an abandoned culvert located at 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The site was delineated on July 28, 2015 with the
identified stream being the only jurisdictional feature identified. Proposed total permanent
impacts total 88 linear feet and are associated with the culvert replacement, installation of rip rap
and downstream step -pool structures.
The site plan was designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional features to the maximum extent
practicable while still providing improved channel stability and flood mitigation. The existing
culvert will be replaced with an upsized box culvert to better accommodate anticipated flows. A
riprap stilling basing will be placed downstream of the upsized culvert and step pool structures
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands- epg.com Asheville Offles:
10612 -D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suhe 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, MC 28277 Asheville, NC 26805
(704) 904 -2277 (828) 708 -7059
len.rindner@ wetlands- epg.com 1 amanda.lonestlands-epg.com

YYE E .....
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S.
Rindner, PLLC.
will be installed within the channel to provide greater channel stability during high flows.
Additionally, an abandoned culvert crossing and endwalls, downstream of the current crossing,
will be removed from the streambed to relieve impeded steam flow. Permanent stream impacts
associated with the proposed in- channel structures will be approximately 68 linear feet. The
length of stream channel to be restored through the removal of the abandoned crossing is
approximately 18 linear feet.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened /Endangered Species Evaluation for the site in which
limited habitat exists for the recently listed Northern Long Eared Bat (NLEB). The site is
partially wooded so habitat for NLEB does exist but due to its location which is at least 50 miles
away from a known occurrence, the fact that there will be minimal tree clearing (less than 1-
acre) and since it is within an existing road right of way, we believe this project is not likely to
adversely effect the Northern Long Eared Bat and will have no effect on any other listed species.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information. Please contact me at 828 - 708 -7059 or
amanda.ionesa,,wetlands -emcom if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Amanda Jones, PWS Heath Caldwell, PWS
Regulatory Specialist Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office: www.watlands- epg.com Asheville Office:
10612 -D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, MC 28277 Asheville, NC 28605
(704) 904 -2277 (826) 708 -7059
len.rindner@wotlands- epg.com 2 [e-mail]

V7�!

OF WAT�9
p Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
• �r Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: I ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
❑ Yes ❑X No
or in -lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
❑ Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Thomas Harmon
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: PO Box 18971
3e. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28218
3f. Telephone no.
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Government
4b. Name:
Isaac Hinson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Charlotte Storm Water Services
4d. Street address:
600 East 4th Street
4e. City, state, zip:
I Charlotte, NC 28202
4f. Telephone no.:
1 704 - 336 -4495
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
I ihinson @ci.charlotte.nc.us
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Amanda Jones
5b B
(if appplicplic
us able): name Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c. Street address: 1070 Tunnel Road, Bldg. 1
5d. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28805
5e. Telephone no.: 828- 708 -7059
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: amanda.jones @wetlands - epg.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 35.2003
1 c. Property size:
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
16101202,16104315
Longitude: -80.7847
3.8 acres
Edwards Branch
Class C
2c. River basin: Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is a roadway stream crossing adjacent to residential properties. General land use in the vicinity consists of residential and commercial
developments.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 200
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Purpose of the project is to replace an existing undersized culvert and in- stream stabilization immediately downstream of crossing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Culvert replacement and stream work will be constructed using standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
14. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? El Preliminary E] Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
6b. If yes, explain.
❑ Yes ❑X No
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b. 2c.
2d.
2e.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
number
Stream impact Type of impact
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
Corps (404,10) or
Permanent (P) or
length
Permanent (P) or
width
DWQ (401, other)
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P Fill
Stream A PER Corps 6
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
-
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
S5 - Choose one
W3
Choose one
Choose one
- -
Yes /No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
I Yes /No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
habitat.
Yes /No
-
W6
Choose one
Choose one
I Yes /No
I -
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream
impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact Type of impact
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P Fill
Stream A PER Corps 6
28
S2 P Stabilization
Stream A PER Corps 6
60
S3 - Choose one
-
S4 - Choose one
S5 - Choose one
S6 - Choose one
- -
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts I
88
3i. Comments:
Impacts are associated with placement of additional
rip rap in downstream section at outlet of culvert (28') and an additional 60 linear feet of impact to
the stream channel associated with the installation of in- stream step pool structures to reduce velocity, reduce bank erosion, and increase
habitat.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b.
4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable)
Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary (T)
01
Choose one Choose
O2
Choose one Choose
03 -
Choose one Choose
04
Choose one Choose
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
Zone 1
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list
all buffer
impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, tren you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
❑ Other:
6b. 6c.
6d.
6e. 6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone 2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1
Yes /No
B2 I
Yes /No
B3 - I
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 - I
Yes /No
B6 - I
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Project was designed to replace a currently undersized pipe which is causing flooding of adjacent residences. Pipe size is minimum needed to pass
anticipated flows and minimize flooding occurrences. Downstream stabilization is being proposed to further minimize impacts to downstream waters
from bank erosion. An existing culvert is also being removed and replaced with in- stream step pool structures which will dissipate stream velocities,
reduce bank erosion, and enhance in- stream habitat potential.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Concrete, riprap and fill associated with the culvert replacement and downstream channel stabilization has been minimized to avoid additional stream
impacts to the smallest extent practicable while still providing improved channel stability and flood mitigation. Additionally, 18 linear feet of stream
channel will be restored through removal of a culvert and headwalls of an abandoned crossing downstream of the existing culvert.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
1 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Project is replacement of an existing culvert/drainage. No new impervious surface will be added /expanded.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of charlotte
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑ No
attached?
14.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the 0 Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes 0 No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes 0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? El Yes 0 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in El Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No cumulative effects are anticipated from the project as an existing culvert is being replaced and downstream/in-stream conditions will be improved
through culvert removal and bank stabilization.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not applicable due to project type /purpose.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened /endangered species assessment was conducted on the site in which no species /habitat was identified. Report is included.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website http / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
hftp://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
Isaac Hinson 08 -10 -2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Wedands and Envirnnnn2ntal Plenimi Groin`, Leonard S Rindner, PLLC
ALYent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Enviromnental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and /or certification(s).
Project /Site Name: 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive
Property Address: 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive, Charlotte, NC 28205
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 16101202, 16104315
Select one: I am other
Name: Isaac Hinson
Company: City of Charlotte, Storm Water Services
Mailing Address: 600 East 4th Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704 - 336 -7924
Electronic Mail Address: ihinson @ci.charlotte.nc.us
�pa.o �_ �►nn� -R.--
-713, ' k9
Property Owner l Interested Buyer * / Other* Date
* The Interested Buyer /Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and /or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlou,� Office. y '.r, l'I ;'dct!anils- ep,,.cc,m Asheville Office:
10612 -D Providence Rd, 1070 Tl111116 Rd , Bldg. i
PI"ld 55o Sure 10, PM8 283
Charlouc, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
(70-1) 901 -2; {77 (,828) 708 -7059
leis nndu,:rGi�,veil.in�l; ,�I,�t COH'i com

LA
O-
0-
td

5�
ti
Independence Wace .�.
Y'
l ^
SITE i
Brookhursi Or
Levy WSY
Z
Cr
1
Q
0
1
it
a
A
T
4018 HIDDENBROOK DRIVE
Mecklenburg Co., NC
VICINITY MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION
N
d�
tOr
r
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
7/27/15
1

Y�
0 250 500
^ A W- -
4018 HIDDENBROOK DRIVE
Mecklenburg Co., NC
USGS MAP 1- WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
7/27/15

1
IL
ORR%, IMF-
�f �1
r
4018 HIDDENBROOK DRIVE Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Mecklenburg Co., NC HAC LSR
DATE:
USGS MAP 2 - WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 7/27/15
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION

x I
r
t f
i
.,RAr-
Ist
r
• 9
1
it -� E '� .�► � .
jqle�
rids and Environmental Planning Group
A S. Rindner. PLLC.
len.rindner @wetlands- epg.com
(704) 904 -2277
www.wettands-epg.com
'ys
ON

1
1
CL
y T
MS '
", t
MAIL
1
nb f o ok Oil 14"
t�d�E 1
o
A
V�
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group /
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC. TV
[e-mail]
wetlands- epg.com
(704) 904 -2277 • i •
www.wetlands-epg.com

Map Unit Legend
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC112)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In A01
CUB Ceal -Urban land complex. 2 to
8 percent slopes
IVIS Monacan and Arents sods
frequently flooded
PaF Pacolet sandy loam. 25 to 45
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
4018 HIDDENBROOK DRIVE
Mecklenburg Co., NC
2.4
16
13
5.2
SOILS MAP 2 - WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION
Percent of AOI
45.8%
30.296
240%
1 00.0%
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
7/27/15

-e 4� ...
1
Carnover 2020 LLC
242 Hillside Ave,
Charlotte, NC 28209
PID:16101202
r
a a;5t
o
woo,
�J
p
0
14 1e�
rids and Environmental Planning Group
rd S. Rindner. PLLC.
len.rindnerOi wetlands- epg.com
(704) 904 -2277
www.wetiands-epg.com
:i
�y
Thomas Harmon
PO Box 18971
Charlotte, NC 28205
PID:16104315
VULIN

4018 HIDDENBROOK DRIVE Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Mecklenburg Co., NC HAC LSR
DATE:
Navigation Pathway Map
*Approximate boundary 7/27/15

'
INDEX Of SHEETS
Y
i CONVENTIONAL SIGNS 1
f
j
E.M., P.,- Lne_ ..... _..........
nn.n Shnn .......
JA•28
PRELIMINARY 1
FknKSlnaDeL.Rer...anl —e•- k
ProRlr Ylew
a
C.—nn.IlJr..n_
ECIEC2
Tnllk Ccend DneRa?bn _,
__Tel
TOTALSHEETS II
VICINITY MAP
NTS
r
SURVEY PREPARED BY:
LOCALIT I—AST ONATE SYSTR NC DEVEILOPED
HNATER THIS
ESTABLI H RASED C( STATE FLANS COOIIDINATLS
ESTABLISHED
.DIO(T I STA:NCG3h COOK INATES F WITH
NAD HNl11STATE rLANE COORDINATES Oi
NLEvATI : SA/J•J..1 EASTDSG: 11khlES.aa
THEVATIONNAYO NS.]a
TOO
PROJECT (GROUND COMBINED GRm FALTOR USED ON THIS
PROJECTICROUNDTO`D ft ls: F.nWHIiJ
VERTICAL DATUM: NATTI p
T DISTANES. DIMENSIONS ARE LOCAL IZF.n HORIZONTAL
kDISTANCES. DATE OFSURT'EY RANGE5:9OIiII TD IViIn1
I' 1
PLANS PREPARED BY:
A�
5Sl1 Vl7J.11Vn �St
9�1TIt�fi U OFC AROLJ A, IRNS F/� OF CAROLINA, INC MC .
I .00wT.w„n :nen E.� .
nNaonR. Rc mm
_ P.IRr<: rE..s,rs c�«mmlT,wc ma.
- m.aJ..ss. N.c.lccrae.orwo
■�H* T—
a l-
ENGINEERING & PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT
Construction Plans of Proposed
4018 HIDDENBROOK DRIVE
Emerald Number: 5108368
Munis Project Number: SWDES00413
Munis Code: 807020 0004
Project Features:
Wre Dnn.p 4 (1...N lapmennr
A,Phw r..rR
Ore 6 G.nn Rep1.n.Ml
SlaewaO Repkmea.r
Begin Project
Sta. 11 +10.00 -LI -\
End Project
am pV
w Mu,DT•1'H�`ZH
N - NDDVER Rp op t
r
m
4018 Hiddenbrook Drive
LOCATION MAP
NTS
♦.,.. 1 .. FOR v dN
GRAPHIC SCALES
ii.. I <'amnr� Aaneannn - -
smm N.I.. cananrme
N at N
Nar>_Pnnk.__ml � CDOT -De1R.
veer rr.nle ` � L � earr.l.pe.Mnw.
q u Is cATD
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS e.a. seem..._....
' ` � �Snry N'.ler PnIM M.n.pr
•L
a
y
eC
7
Know TMbatN3 68lovIt
Call betom you dug
A
Y
O
L
d
e0
'kTei�
Bid Set No.
z
— d
APPRON'ED ^O
t 111 t.,Y1:1 �I FH DATE a
PE SEAL
i CONVENTIONAL SIGNS 1
f
j
E.M., P.,- Lne_ ..... _..........
PRELIMINARY 1
FknKSlnaDeL.Rer...anl —e•- k
Do Noe U.. T., Con.bK1)on
Sl.rm Dr.le.l. E...nnm...._.....
SSx COMPLETE
J Temp Cenkrenrn Fi.ewenr_.... _
E,Iwex Gn Ll.._ ...... _.........____
Record Drawings
E,iNIeR -
Pnep SOM
Emile, Sl..m
rrepeua Clerw Dr.reo-.._
—
NOertM
__.
_R.Nn....._..
Pro1nR
C.IaN _. .._.
PnpeHa One B.Jn.___..._._,_,.._.__._... a
E.InieR UUlily Pak.. __.._.._._---
w.
rrop...e A,rew i.n,rPn_.... _.._ ...... ____�. 0
O
Propaea Concrete Snrw.ik........ ..... .--------- _©
Pnpn.ea Temr. SIII Fnn.._...___......._...� �_y
•.
L
Trn R—.1 ........................ .......... __ X
E
e
am pV
w Mu,DT•1'H�`ZH
N - NDDVER Rp op t
r
m
4018 Hiddenbrook Drive
LOCATION MAP
NTS
♦.,.. 1 .. FOR v dN
GRAPHIC SCALES
ii.. I <'amnr� Aaneannn - -
smm N.I.. cananrme
N at N
Nar>_Pnnk.__ml � CDOT -De1R.
veer rr.nle ` � L � earr.l.pe.Mnw.
q u Is cATD
2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS e.a. seem..._....
' ` � �Snry N'.ler PnIM M.n.pr
•L
a
y
eC
7
Know TMbatN3 68lovIt
Call betom you dug
A
Y
O
L
d
e0
'kTei�
Bid Set No.
z
— d
APPRON'ED ^O
t 111 t.,Y1:1 �I FH DATE a

3
.a
GENERAL NOTES
PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS:
E CONIRACTON SHALL AT AND ADJUST PROPOSED
NINE CONiHACTON
THE ELEVATONT AS NECESSARY TD
ENSURE PRDPER LONCITAIHK gRAW FON ORAMnGE. SHALL
E%IS WAN
TAIN
PAVEMENT, UNLESS 01HERNiSE NOTED,
DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS:
PROPOSED DM= ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ANE FRw EXPANSION JGNT TO EXPANSION
JONT. NAT. RERACE4ENT NAIENAlS 10 NNE EdsnNG _ACE ACCOROINPY
CENEH, ° ASPHHKTE- INCONNERCI�Rq NCH SY.SB CONCRETE COURSE ASND FOUR IN. IIB.OB
iERNEDIATE COURSE.
(RE M(AnK) TWO IN TF N COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGTE
e gIAVEl _ BABE (ABC) COURSE,
51% INCH IN ROENTK STONE
SGM_ SHALL BE FOUR NCHES THIN, AND SIX INCHES THI. AT oRIV AY CROSSHGS
PER CITY s., N0. 10.22.
WNTRACTOR 5 RESPOHSIPE FOR REPAIRING ALL DRIVEMArs. SIDEW'KRS KID LEAD WALRS
TO 'AR S' CON TTION w UNE AAERMLs
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES:
GT+AOES. EIEVAT10N5 AND LOGTONS ­
EN ARE APMOMMAIE As ORCCIFD BY THE
GWER, THEY YAY RE ADJUSTED TO ACLONMWAIE UNFOpESFEN s WEITES. STATIONS,
OFFA15
AND ELEVAilONS RET'FR TO THE CENTER a DROP INLETS NANNDLES. AND JUMCnON
BOXES AND TO THE WDPgNY a' THE UP F. CAT. BASINS CALL WT Fat R. HWD END
ACTONS GROSS PIPE END SECTgNS AHD END WALLS ARE TO THE CENTER OF ME OUTLET
END GULL OUTS FOR M- STREAM sIItUCTURES ARE AS DEFlNED ON ME CHANNEL DETNI
SIRE 5.
11F�FPHO ESPEAR s1roMICBIUCONSTRUCTED REWE Ifs ACRE TONO Bf WNS�TRI�ICNTERDE M ATINKN�TiOM Iii D
STRUCTURE ANO WVEL ON THE QUISDE ARE STRUCTURE By A THE MAW O RL1Eit
FABRC AND RLLED W /wl8 STONE. TTIflKE RILL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS MOM.
DRAINAGE PIPES: RE
ECo.P0T SR I. TO wBYR SIGNEDD AND sEALEO F rkinlNG DRAWNCS of CUL�vERTOinn)
PROVK PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, BEE PRWECT SPECIAL PROVSIONS.
ALL PIPES `NILE BE RCP 0.ATS w, UNLESS OMEPNA NOTED. PIPE JdN1S (ALL SIZES)
SHALL BE NRAPREG NiN GEOTEXTLE SALINE PER NLWi SPEgFlLATON ACTIONS ]00 AND
DIe. ON SHE TI .. ' FABRIC AT LEAST 12 RICHES BEYOND EACH SDE OF .PINT SEE
CETAL ON SHEET 18.
PIPE LENGTHS AND SLOPES ARE TD CENTER OT STRUCTURES.
UTILITIES:
TUNES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR HY—AT. PURPOSES ONLY. !jnAfj%74, fwQ V j l ­S v PIRj\f [$ T Rr unn
RIOR TO CONSTAUCTON. ME CwmACTW SHALL NOTIFY AND MILT NM ALL UTUTY
OYNERS TMF dTY UTUtt LOdtDNAltXt AND Gtt INSPFLTdR NNETT F ALL NLL P
A""C— TO DEiET E UTILITY LOCATONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UnUTES
Rw DAMAM CAYSED BY NISI OPERATIONS M THOSE 6 HIs AEEN15. ME LONOALTO!
SHALL XQD THE CITY HARYLE55 FOR ANY MIRE -PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY MORN
W NIS OWN FORCES OR THAT OF HIS AGENTS ANY DAMAGES NCURRm SNAL BE ME
Cd11RACTORS FNANOAL RESPaIyBIU,
G n ABBREVLAUONS
MAIL BOXES:
ARANp .... ........................ABANDONm
E Cal ACTOR SMN.L RELWATE ALL YNL BOXES AS REWIRED RY SECTION 107-12 O ME AD .......... ............... ........ AKE9RRAC
NCWi STANDARD SPEdRCATONS F. ROADS AND STR!C=s, COONDNATE MIS WORN NM aETEApYi / SPY .... ......... ... .............ASpNKT
Tiff V.s. PoSTA SRNCE. APPROx ......................... APPRO%NATELY
B
FENCES:
THE CONTRACTION SNAL RENOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NO1F0 ON l+E PUNS AND /OR AS
DIRECTED BY TTIF ONGITHM. lHE CONMALTOR SHALL COWMNAIE IEMPONARY FENCE
MELWATONS NM PNOPEATY DVMERS TO ENSURE SEWNtt TO THE PROPERTY WRING
ON-RN Ha TO NANTAN DAY TO DAT OPERAD.S NM UWTED IMPACTS
TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES:
LNADD,, SNGRH M FLANS TO B AN"GoTED 4AVON THOSESMAi"r LL,", Tnx ZEE TREE PR02Cn(M )
BARRIERS. TRH TRAC_ SHALL ALSO PROTECT TARES AND SHNNS .— O CUTrFIU LMEB IN
TMCE wvD, CUT ROOK Ct°EE, LYE UB�NCBA — MLb[ROCIA oMG�AwIMiOO xW PRUMMG IWImPNa
ACTION 01000 G, TE Ott O aUA1011E LANDSb,PE CONSIMl— STA,=_1 MKMINC
ARD G Mf EANOSCANE CCMSMyCM!N STANpAg05 WNUAL (Tm.j
Pmrn P IT w#il Biq¢ ROOTS Nw AD=T TO MroOSD CURB A aI11ER aR suwuN.
USA N. NO.II TOR YmOINO TqO RGO, (REFS SMOFlEp BT TE PIAxS TO NAY ASDIIKL
OR PROIECMN SNAU A N ACCOgpAx4 NM CID STD. 1002
M"N°EE
CITY ISMYacTIw ID v'nc 'TY a aAAOrn LAx9srw=E ca9srlACTroN sTANDAR05 NOUN r<
Cos TD ME W NOR%.IIi, TREE MDlECnw m STD. ID.tx SNARL BE USED.
HnNTRACra swu aBTAM APMaYK FRw TII CITY Paxw m AYDERC ANY TIRES. IN AGOT
TR tm MAi AAE TO RbuN AFTG CONSTR o- D1AIy BE INSPE -D
Bi THE DTr roMiIWr ARE sATAIAE ro RGRIAN.
�OR°F CaN51NC AY (C .;A — On MSRC —. On ARBORST
AND IMLrABLE) u NGn AN ON -SITE Y¢nNC ro GANf ME LI4TS G
R.O SAN¢ Ax0 MAi TPLFS PACPOAI M PNOTBCn. ARE Cl2ARLV OfIITIFwO.
MnP0A0 uLa tlal •p � ON M TREES TO BE MOtECRn AND MDSE TO �YO�E. eZ..
S AND —1 ANY ApM1WNK NOS to MOECT MAi Wpff NOi
ORIO SINAOI. M WrnRAra CURL
RE OVG APPROVAL FOrt TREE RFV WK N
R[YOyK'AFTYFR AppI�plA IRO PWTELNN XAS PEN NSTAUID AND BEF[TE AHY CKEARNO Ca CAN BEGN,
NNCW — BE NO —IT— PA,NENT FOR TREE —Co. MT_ ARGON, AN%nauL MRS
!D FOR MOACMW.
BEG YARNED FOR AOIICndI ae Npr YNpEp TOR RENJMMACEN T a TMfs DANAaD THAT NAVE
TOLERANCE:
STRUCTURES INCLUDING STONY OR- PIPE, STONM STRUCTURES YRER PIPE. AND NEINNING
µALES SHALL RAVE A TgERANCE a 30.10 FEET. STRUCTURES IN0.UdNG RIAPS. NETRS,
0 GRNXS. SMALL NAVE A TOLERANCE OF 30.05 RETCH
SDREAN INPROVEYENr STRUCTURES SHALL NAVE A VERTCAL TOLERANCE O 30.10 FEET.
AND A RAANEINL TPERANCE O 30.50 REi,
SIDE SLOPES:
LINITS D MOPOAD AOPES ARE INDICATE M THE PLANS. DETAILS AND STANDARD
GRANNGS E 4AOWN AOPE SHALL HDi E %GEED A Y.I ('HORIZONTAL 10 YRTCK)
UNLESS OESNNAtED BV TINE ENGINEER. A Wi SLOPE ? Z'.t MAXAUY NLL BE USED ONIv
AS ORE.— BY THE ENaNEER.
EROSION CONTROL:
rc ...... ...........................BACK
AIL ............. ....................-
BM...
OF CURB
BITUNINCUS
...............................
BRC.,.......
CH SIAM
.....BEARING
CS........ ...........................CAT.
LkG.... .._ ........................CURB
BASN
AND GUTTER
G .......... ........................OEANANCE
FENCE .....................CHAN
wP.......NG
CA
UNK FENCE
....................COPLtCTm
C.C..
CON
un
OE
......................CONCRETE
__
ST_........_._...._........DIED
ON ........ ...........................DEED
OW
BOON
SO.,
... ..........................DRUPE
P .. ...............................
CIA
CB
DROP INLET
...
BON .....
....
...ORYWAY
G`RW_
SET
NTS ..........................NOT
TO SCALE
Al ..........................CRIER
HEAD
ME
CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED —AS
SHALL BE SEEDED
NOW FOR
.
PC _ .................
.
POINT
.PGNT O CURVATURE
N
PERY ........................
PG . ...................
PMANEH,
1,DI, ........PAGE
PR ...............
PPR
........... PT TNT
NAIL SET
OP......_........
P . ....................Po
_
.......PX
DEf
.....PROPO SED
PB E ..........................PERM
PT .
S. ESNI
OF _ TANGENCY
...........................FONT
N ...........................PONY
OF PERT INT
PUE ..........................PERM
P..... ..........................RIGHT
i
UThJTY ESMi
.............................
RCP .. .......................RESTRANED
R
RIGHT
CONE PRE
R/w ....................._.
�TE
RIONT ONfDA1
S ..... ..........................SOUTH
SO .. ..........................STORM
DRAM
SF . .. .........................sARE
S/P FENCE ..............SPLIT
SS ... ........................SANITARY
QU FOOT
RNL FENCE
SERER
srA.._.._......._.........
s1D .. ........................STADAND
s N ........... ................SOMALI,
._G"
TAN . ................
TEE ........................
hMMP
........ T.ANGENT
TEMP —11 ESMT
....................l.PORART
T /w ......... .... ........
.. TRAVERSE PgNT
.... .raST ARE
iW..........................
H/ G .. .........................uTR1ER
ACA
CROUNo
VC .. .........................YRIICAL
VEXi ...
.................
W
WRVS
.....VERTCAL
.. ...........................NEST
W /........._ .................N
M
NUI ......................
API ........ ..........
MATER METER W
RATER vAPT
WV .........................
BOP .........................
TEA VAY
f� FENNY NAIL SIT
. : ..............................
... ...........................INCH
TXE CONTRACTOR SNKI SUPPORT AND PROTECT ALL EXISTNG
TO AND PROJECTTAANDDABYSRaEADI� �ESLOMyOfAE � .lT IT�TNESE PCl NS
NCDOT STANDARDS SHALL M USED. CHARLOTTE AN DE —.ENT STANDARDS,
.Al BE USED Y MERE IS NOT AN APPUCANLE HCDOT STANDARD.
NCDOT:
s,D. ND. RLL
AS NEEDED. THE CON TRACT. SHALL AD,UST/REIOCAfE THE SALUTARY SEVER
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NAMTAIN EROSION CONTROL O IN ACCORDANCE NM THE
•PPROPNATE CITY AND STATE .-ON AND SEDARRNT CONTRG GRDMANCES.
. VI........._ ...................... " "'..BMRIX CATCH BASIN
BID. O] .......... .............._................ AME. GRATE AND
AND HATER
LINES ONLY. ALL OMdR ADJUSIMENIS DUDYTUIN'BO'MNERS
ME
CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED —AS
SHALL BE SEEDED
NOW FOR
.
UTUTY pNNM. THE GONTAACTON SHArnLILLCOpppM,A1E RIONN NM 50 5
NOT TO AD—SELT AFFECT THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD
ANO YULCNED AT 1M ggECTON DF THE ENONEER. THE CONIRACIYM
SHALL FCLLON THE EROGION CONTROL MEASURES SHOGUN ON ERGS N 0.— SNEErT.
USE STANDARD CAT. BASH
6N). >2 ............ .. ..._........... .......... ..PIPE COLAR
RESPONSIBLE Tai ANv DELAYS DR DSRUPMIMS To THE MORN SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY 0Mi1
ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND DEPRESSED CURB:
CHARLOTTE:
L C
Tae LOCATES a unuTNS c.mACTaR SHAH CONTACT ac .E -Lnu AT
t- BOD-B32 -1919.
ME CONTRACT. SHALL CON51RUCi B -Mal 1HN][ CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT
INTERACTIONS
SID..tlO.: MILE,
CON RACTOR OF U UD M.M LAR0.MA ONE -CAL,
NAT ARE NOT NAGER
CONTRACTOR SHALL
IN ACCORpANO NM ME U1EST REN9ON5 FOR ACCESSRE RAND DETAILS.
CON5IRLKTON PLAINS k NEWT STANDARD DRANNGS.
10.1)A B e C......... .._ ............................ .. ............................CURB AND GUTTER
CONY .
CONTACT PRgEGi MANAGER k UTUTY CODROINATOR
CaNTAACroq ylAU Also xonFY THE CITY a CHARLOTTE UTILITY coORDINAraI
OUGHTS:
10 B ...... ....... CURB TRANSITION
..................
to22
OF
NINE UTUTY COCADNATOR SHALL BE CONTACTED . HRS 111. TO
........ .......... .. ......._................c.cRETE yoEwAlx
IG..
CODNRNNSTRR.cT
ME CONTIACT. SHALL GWWT EwsnNG ASPHALT AND /Ot CONCRETE SURFACES PRat
TO REMOVAL
............................ ...... I........................ ..................•........CATCH BASIN MARIE N VALLEY GUTTEF:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST Ail WA1M VALVES WAITA NITER BO %ES ANO
UNLESS OTIERNA gRECIm BY THE ENGINEER. SAIL Wi NOTN SHALL BE
I FWT MINNNY Fqw TIE EwSTNG EDGE OF PAVpIENT. TAW WT PAYMENT
20. JI .................................................._........ ..... .............. ......_OFTAL CAT. BASIN
30. GSA
WA1EP
VAULTS TO ZONED GRADE WATER NEIER$ LWAlEO IN 9DEWAKS ON CONORETE -W.1:
SHALL A INSTATED NTUM CONCRETE BOXES -
ALL BE
ROPOSEp AS NEIL AS AODInONA PAY.IIENT REWIRED N lE_N TO FACE a
PROPOSED CURIO AIND GUTTER.
....................................... ......................... ......................TFAIPONARY SIT RNCE
] U. OB .......................... ............................... ...........................MEET PRO1EClIDN
Gs LINES NLL A ADWTAGT" L M_T AS NEEDED BY PIEOYDIT NATURAL GAS THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT
PAVEMENT DEGRADATION
] 010 ............................................................ ............_...............RW% CHEIX DAM
3'
PIEDMONT XANRAL CAS AT LEAST TRIO NEEKs PRIOR TO
CONSIHUCTON.
— - FEE:
............... ................ ..................EROS. coNTRP WwATERINc
SO.OIAk B....
IXS1MG IfnlM LOCATIONS PRON(XD BY CARlNNp AND ARE APPRO %IWTE-
WWDOi NCI EDE.TENHTAVEDE ATHAT ED ONAMESI DST Drs FOR I� A PATENT
TAFETY R NL
TXE CONTRACTOR SNKI SUPPORT AND PROTECT ALL EXISTNG
CN DE�AMnoN
ENT $H ALL BE PAD NA INTERNAL Ott
YEd1I
N
UNDERGROUND LITUTIES
ENCOUNRREO DURING ... AND /ON PIPE INSTNUTIOX.
ANIAIDS ((DY) PRIOR TTo CONSTTRRUCTON.
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE:
TRAFFIC CONTROL:
BASE SURVEY DATA
'
THE LONINAGTON SNALI USE LINE wXON NOR%MG AROUND SANITARY ANERS ANO WATER
TRAFTRC C.rpa SMALL BE IN ACCORDANCE NTN THE MOST CURRENT EDT. O TTIE 'MdtN
LINES 91OILD T12 LONNACT. GZAGE E.S11NG AVER .WATER LINES NE SHALL
IYMEOAIELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE NTI
AREA TRAFRC CONTRO NANDBWN' (...CH.) AND SHEET TCt.
EMSTING CIXIGTONS TAKEN fNON A CwPRATON DATED 9- 21 -20 II O ORWND
D1CTL[ MON RPE. TIE p.INALTDt
'HALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND /bR WATER UNE NTH A MRMw TEN FWT ACTON
SLRYYS BY INSITE ENbNFFAING k sUpVEYING AND 9 -1 -11 BY R. AE HARRIS G
SOCIAIES ALL COatDINAlES BASED ON NAO
DE DUCTILE IRON RPE MIEN DRAINAGE %PE COPES N1NIN TAD fEET O SAD U.S.
NDRnCA11Y OR NatRONTALLY.
BJ ANO NAVO BB.
CON1RNC Is TO INSTALL GTE VALVES . EMSIING WATER LINE AS SHOWN PER DETAE ON
SHEET 2A E%IBTING 8' WATER UNE BETWEEN GTE VALVES IS TO BE REARGUED WMNp
CONSTRUCTION. ONO WLVERi NSTAUATON S COLPLLTE WATEH LINE
,
CURL BE
PECONNECTED. CYU INSPECTOR S TO BE PRESENT F. ­R LINE AND sWNANV SERER
WORK.
SUBSURFACE PLANS:
ND s"'S"WAE PLANS ARE ­ ON TMs PR— HOWEYN. A CEOTECHNDAL
RETORT RAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT. ME REPENTS AVKLARLE FM THE
CONTRACTOR'S USE UPD61 REQUEST.
C PRELIMINARY 1
bw
Go NOt L F.T CDlubuI J
�6X COMPEEEE
PINTA PreneTwO Br
Ugl USINFRASTRUCTURE
OF CAROLINA, INC.
IRIS E6 TV EAO STREET, SUITE 20.1
.AfEDTTE. N.1H'A 282pI
NC LICENSE If C -19W
� L
o��FW o
rrE,/-A�H .�liTByy
\E
aI�I
!€�n
t
a
Q
8
m o
w z
Q
x
00 zww
d V
M
O
L.
8
7
�i
a
.y.
.0
`p

e
R
I
8
k
5
gg
2
NOTES:
t.
"SE TTEO E ROLN EIRE 1' a ] '. +.S FOR BOULDER) UNBE9 .G IT RQR SpYF YARYTgN IN BOULDER HEILHt IS
PERIkTI[O FQ1 HEWER RO.N R' • 7' . Ij.
7. 11—S SNOULD BE Hµ0 PIOREO MID N--Lr FITTED TO AV00 C 5
3. COARSE BRCNTLL Of TK ROON O110P SfNU.RME SMALL BE OF A MN OT CUSS A µD .LASS B RIPRAP PIAQ
.OYtSE BWN11LL f0 FILL NTI GWS BETWEEN M Vµx1Ui STONE SIZES. COHSE BWNFILL SNUI BE PI.S.ED IN GCN
GNQ CONppL STRLIDTME 10 A TIRCxNEE3 EOML TD ME TOT& OEPM Of ME XEALpI AMO (DOTER BOUlMWS
E RNEM OF UGH GRAQ CONPOL sTRUCME SW1 BE mNSIRUCTED FAS}, IOU0R0 B OK VINE ARYo MEN
TK OTNU VANE LL BOtRDERS CONKCRIIO ME INONIOIYL GRADE mMROL SIMICNIIES 3,, NM BE WSfMLED
ilY ROWPIAM SLLS SHUT BE CdR1RlCTm LAST,
5. STEP POOL STRUCTURES SHALL BE BUILT AS Cd101VE�
A BE— WRH rK 006NSTREw DRApE CONT9oL SIRUCNRE
B. �R Cx=A E $DIEAY BEO 10 A OERN EOU.Y TO TK roiu In,_,, OI ME HLLp[R µp f0p1ER 901A0[It5
C. L NON -.WEN QOTExILE ABMC.
D. —E To0T09 BOULD[RS LUVNO NO GAPS IN BLTWEEEI BOULDERS.
E PU COHSE FILL BEIND NE FEET BWLQ95.
1. ML NFADER BOULDERS ON TOP 0< Ala) SEf e- BWx TWY iK r0p1ER BWLQRS SVCN tWi PNN Q ME
NEWm BOULDER IS RESTING Ox 111E CONSE 9ACNRlI NEWCR BOIRD[R SMALL 5Pµ ME SEµS o1 TK FODTER
BOULDERS MERE SHAILBEIBEWIN° GNK BCMEN BOIAQRS.
D. PVq CONtSE BKx1iL D xUOER BOULpEM [NSURMG M1LRi MO Mro5 BEiWEEM LK BDLLQRS AK RUED
6. SEE CIPNIIFL PRprtLE Ox SHEET 3 Fp1 EfATONE Mq ELE -.1 01 rK CND[ CONTROL STRUCILI M
]. SET ELEVA— 'INN A TOLE— a 0.7'
B. E TIE FLODOI"N SIDS A YM Q 3' -0 ME I—IL BµR
ROCK DROP STRUCTRE aVIERi
CONTROL PARR [LEVAlp1I
- � IG -0-
HEADER BOUIDER (TIP.)
_
r
DETAIL 2
'NOTES:
3/4' M /A" TE RODS SWLL BE
Sfulm PER vMVE
1
PAVEKNI
—�� TRUCTM IxvERf
tanm4 PONT nEVRTwN (rrP )
1' a'
1
___ ---
oOiD[N9h -------------- -
T.5- I -(9.00
'° PRELIMINARY
e" WlE VALVE PER
5.019 POOL fl' 0NP M.)
10 , 95% COMPLETE
Ftlq N19OC
PROFILE VIEW
EDGE a
BOTTOM O1
OW J
EDGE M CHANNEL BOrtp11 �/
PITVr PnR_ M'
USINFRASMUCnmE
OF CAROLINA• INC.
INS E. VWHEAD SBEET. S TE 703
wR om, ,mN CYEm M O,
w ucm I c -1930
8
COHSE BWxFILL (CLASS A 9 9 / - R Q
RPRAP 110 _ 1M.)J -
lOVO PIMN SILL (TVP)J
COWSE °K11TTLL - 1NOY VANE ARY TO BINK (M.)
PLAN VIEW
PROPOSED STEP POOL STRUCTURE
EIEVATgNS USTm µE FOR ME TOP µ0 WITOU OF TK KaOER
ROCN. TOP ELEVAMNS IS TK NVERT C TRIA PONT SNOWN IN MTAL
STATION LOP EL "MN BOTTgI E E ATOM
11.+0 en.e I N/A
1 T.«RO I an.b enb
llsb 61).33 I 617.]3
1i..0 61B.m erJ.aO
91A6]
11.90 6)e.SS ell 1O
n.TO 6n.m .19.m
SECTION VIEW A-A
0x)P RU
SICTURE -- WI ­O. P0N} ELEVAipN,
NOTE 1 I—)
DEB OWLDER (M.) �CL. 55 n 9IPRAP (TrP)
TER souLmR (m.) �. SCOUP POOL (TVP.)
R
STEP POOL STRUCTURE
NoT 10 soar
_c .. SLOPE (TN.)
T 7•
cdIPACT BN>OTLy TO
9Se1 STAIOYID
WW n
_
r
DETAIL 2
'NOTES:
3/4' M /A" TE RODS SWLL BE
Sfulm PER vMVE
1
PAVEKNI
—�� TRUCTM IxvERf
tanm4 PONT nEVRTwN (rrP )
SECTION VIEW A-A
0x)P RU
SICTURE -- WI ­O. P0N} ELEVAipN,
NOTE 1 I—)
DEB OWLDER (M.) �CL. 55 n 9IPRAP (TrP)
TER souLmR (m.) �. SCOUP POOL (TVP.)
R
STEP POOL STRUCTURE
NoT 10 soar
_c .. SLOPE (TN.)
3
c',L
r HEAR
rc rAO .;R °E NsDS AT
[KN MR El .)
SECTION A-A
6' GATE VALVE AND THRUST BLOCK
NOI TO S
f. 111E GONIRACTpR SMALL INSLAU TIE
MT° �°M �I�SEMC�T� P�b�WSTD
E FTxt CL9RIIG. TER SEFCC
sNU1 9E w++TNNm Dumw MRUEI
BLOCK RTSTMLAIpN.
7. ALL CONCRf.1E SNNl BE 36Q1 P4.
E lY STRENGTH CONCKIE YAr BE UT, SED
3. AFTER TIIE mNCRER HAS SET, ME
COVTRFCTw WT "LT OFf ME RATER
MST— ME 7- wrE VMVES Alq
Hors PROYQ A NIxIYUU Q b xOLINS
rcE To cLU AND ML M1ECreD WTER
cusiaLCRs
a. TK THRUST W.O Yusl BE PpOPERI,r
BRCItTYlED BEFORE TLTMINO ON WAiEN.
S MTER INST,•LUT,LR.I 01 NE BOx NLVFRI,
TIE LS —)':;.:E__­ NSTI) 6. OI.P.
v � 350) N TWO HEW wrt
V
/O�kPE -{ss2
Nil
t
e EE
d;a� Fd
Y�
v.%
1.5" YkLIHG k RESURFACNG
1.5- ASPnMI PATCH (MN,) LE AS
°' YIN. $IIDWN M PAKYENT SCKd1LE
•(BETTER TO NOTES BELOR3 •(I6:FER TO NOTES BELW1
T 7•
cdIPACT BN>OTLy TO
9Se1 STAIOYID
WW n
_
r
DETAIL 2
'NOTES:
3/4' M /A" TE RODS SWLL BE
Sfulm PER vMVE
1
PAVEKNI
ROLRRELExrs (. Tofu)
1' a'
1
___ ---
oOiD[N9h -------------- -
T.5- I -(9.00
'° PRELIMINARY
e" WlE VALVE PER
PAVEMENT REPAIR Not Us9 Fw ComWRtlOe
10 , 95% COMPLETE
on1D SKRSAROxS
L ra L°ONwIN_
k�
mDP. • msoR.R.
_
COxcntTE
_
_
TIMUR SOt9
(]600 P51)�.
PROP e' O.I.P.
(CI. SE 350)
PROFILE VIEW
3
c',L
r HEAR
rc rAO .;R °E NsDS AT
[KN MR El .)
SECTION A-A
6' GATE VALVE AND THRUST BLOCK
NOI TO S
f. 111E GONIRACTpR SMALL INSLAU TIE
MT° �°M �I�SEMC�T� P�b�WSTD
E FTxt CL9RIIG. TER SEFCC
sNU1 9E w++TNNm Dumw MRUEI
BLOCK RTSTMLAIpN.
7. ALL CONCRf.1E SNNl BE 36Q1 P4.
E lY STRENGTH CONCKIE YAr BE UT, SED
3. AFTER TIIE mNCRER HAS SET, ME
COVTRFCTw WT "LT OFf ME RATER
MST— ME 7- wrE VMVES Alq
Hors PROYQ A NIxIYUU Q b xOLINS
rcE To cLU AND ML M1ECreD WTER
cusiaLCRs
a. TK THRUST W.O Yusl BE PpOPERI,r
BRCItTYlED BEFORE TLTMINO ON WAiEN.
S MTER INST,•LUT,LR.I 01 NE BOx NLVFRI,
TIE LS —)':;.:E__­ NSTI) 6. OI.P.
v � 350) N TWO HEW wrt
V
/O�kPE -{ss2
Nil
t
e EE
d;a� Fd
Y�
v.%
1.5" YkLIHG k RESURFACNG
1.5- ASPnMI PATCH (MN,) LE AS
°' YIN. $IIDWN M PAKYENT SCKd1LE
•(BETTER TO NOTES BELOR3 •(I6:FER TO NOTES BELW1
¢
r? III B 1,
_
DETAIL 2
'NOTES:
1. N05TNI[0 a MEEI4N a
PAVEKNI
tY$i6IG PAVmT
- --
___ ---
oOiD[N9h -------------- -
T.5- I -(9.00
'° PRELIMINARY
PAVEMENT REPAIR Not Us9 Fw ComWRtlOe
—MM­ O BE BA tLEO
YATERlu A gRECIEpIB gr
v` ME ENONECR
OEMSh
WOM
\ \ / / \ \ / /
- ,�� /\
_
DETAIL 2
'NOTES:
1. N05TNI[0 a MEEI4N a
At ow°Em1prl NLL QPM
OPICN S CIgS[M, S' YEASVeEYENi TO BE TANEN (ROY mGE OF
3.
Is" S- SCN[DULE.
S" 5 -9 SB
T.5- I -(9.00
'° PRELIMINARY
PAVEMENT REPAIR Not Us9 Fw ComWRtlOe
10 , 95% COMPLETE
Q
8 h
.O
z
ao F o
tj A N k R

F
1
a
9
i
•:yir R:!L�� . r r� •.
Fa•• P n.a
U5l USINFRAST'RUCTURE
OF CAROLINA, INC.
1013 F MORENEAD SMELT. SUTE 703
0W40TTE, NORM CARO -NA 282D9
NC UCEIM I C -1950
RIPRAP STILLNIG BASIN
xglp rX•[ `na
SOX CULVERT INSTALLATION DETAIL
rm ro w.a
S f
f
AO }' -6- CURB AND GuR[R, ttD 510. 10.1)A L.••� !'
6 suctt 9Nt, cLD sm. sD.a A 6 s ��
© e' -0' SOEwAUt. cm
�� T . F rNLF •n1 aawR
TYPICAL SECTION AT BOX CULVERT
� L w• can �
PIPE JOINT WRAPPING DETAIL
PRELIMINARY 1
Il De Mot Uw Fw C.-b -0 l 1
95%C001PLIETE
Will
Ti
rim'.
it
n5 $Y L
.M+
`Q
O
O
W
O D
0 �
ai L'
z �
w �
v
7
.Ir
N 15 O
�n
s
lag 3
MATES, O
��= x
k'
S
yy�� ZZZ
a"
A B
D
O
S O
G
15 28
W y
ul
.6 t
µµ
PEIMFB(5
E F G u
13.0.39
O.p -
701
700 405.9
6711.80 11MM 1.05
OD
t).8
1. w
O.p -
20D
M'S
43124"
W&I LT
102
101 MIT
051.00 605.32 263
27
1 470 1
1 1
1h15 .+a
100) 11
101
200 6W3
678.52 eM 26 1 ne
21 + sOp 11
13.46]
1515 LT W
102
-- 051.12
?e
--
AAUNENN ENDS 0PEB A70
1NSl,8o
1818 RT.
102
66118
e
--
WWMNExSTING StDPEB AT0
—M
--
I
--
- EPT
LAYER S
-
DRAND TOTALS
K 37.05 77 q 2 4.34 4.72 f
1 2 0 0 1
-
ne
xglp rX•[ `na
SOX CULVERT INSTALLATION DETAIL
rm ro w.a
S f
f
AO }' -6- CURB AND GuR[R, ttD 510. 10.1)A L.••� !'
6 suctt 9Nt, cLD sm. sD.a A 6 s ��
© e' -0' SOEwAUt. cm
�� T . F rNLF •n1 aawR
TYPICAL SECTION AT BOX CULVERT
� L w• can �
PIPE JOINT WRAPPING DETAIL
PRELIMINARY 1
Il De Mot Uw Fw C.-b -0 l 1
95%C001PLIETE
Will
Ti
rim'.
it
n5 $Y L
.M+
`Q
O
O
W
O D
0 �
ai L'
z �
w �
v
7
.Ir
N 15 O

a
� �•4or 4�*,wna \ �
r�r anim e:�a_
NaRppK
USI IISINFRASFRUCTURE
OF CAROLINA, INC.
lNJ E. MOREHEAD STREET. SLATE 203 m.
D �RLOTTE. NORM CAft A ISIO.
NC ENINSE I C -ISSO
NMI-
OWN
1
/ 1
R , r-
Is
k Me SF c I \ r
/ rd
PROPOSED CURB, SIDEWALK AND WALL
ELEVATIONS
E-1 -
S:
II-
�;�� I
im,
;I� SI�
R _ ; RIS
e°
A � W
s^
8
>
PRELIMINARY
Do Not U.. (e, Cow.WeUOn
�-
l SSt. tOMPLEiE J
q
rl G

- -P Bross
USI
USINMASTRUCTURE
OF CAROLINA, INC.
IN3 E WOREK SWET, WE X3
CH,qtorTE, RNN CAROL04A 28204
NC UUNSE I C-1959
8" SANITARY SEWER
REPLACEMENT
LINE L-1
PRELIMINARY
De Mot Ufe fer 95% empt
fill
L
z
t;
ju
91 it
=7 =1
- — — — — — —
— — — — —
8" SANITARY SEWER
REPLACEMENT
LINE L-1
PRELIMINARY
De Mot Ufe fer 95% empt
fill
L
z
t;
ju

B 4
�_ 04
•rUnviz Berme
SECTION A.A { SECTION B-8
1�
.. .pM nnurtB B:nm n oaanL.
L elag6gB ua f W�inm ro• saUR .°w xvn ni s�.0 nw
]. aM¢r m�.mYCncw� ,rmro[°rm� ear Nv.• mA+ ow t O•h¢m N a[ Warp ur . •wBrr a ]m
1 ^reorn ero°a�0u r�4wn s,•� � „vm awa , rtr w ., M mrtsn,rw eb o tK rcsvMN°
.1111 E � � �e ro Mu�� �� ,er°wer rwc m° w. caner +a rer rt°. nu urmnv
]. e¢r e/OOO¢ ov] ran erP °uvec sa•na6 me snrr OxOrB°..
.m.`rt`".o .oM rv"°M°aiM ag v u'o�.na aw.`•m. g ."'° a.. +�`:rora +a �`°.e.'e`+..se"rta".+w°
Nn >K ci6YKM]s aK. M
•eo xu �ows..c 0404] u sew .rt..iart °.nm. n s.sm a°n„� .wu .>»
STREAM DNERSIONSUMPAROUND
x
5
6 Bern rn__esnB BA .
USI USINFRASTRUCTIM
OF CAROLINA, INC.
1043 E. BORENEAO STREET, SIM 70.3
i
DNARDOTTE. NORTH CHINA 78704
NC LICENSE I C -19W
5n �.. ,
r
PLAN VIEW
m �• NOT TO 9 E
,,i�rip.n L11Y 01 fNAMOr19
�]w IuxO nE°n°vsTnNa'"Nel TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
enWm ^. Brtab _ ]0.06]..
NOT TO SCkE
clrr of cx]91mn
QIi/ IArDBVmrt nNnv]90s EROSION CONTROL DEWATERING
° amvirt 30.1,..
DEWATERING SAG
. exuERA] NO
Tp�n me ecva mm n ne Bru.
A � �
"a
a. euom Bar.* >.'•e y 9oa9rm
raap M.r iT eAi e0T Opp(.
n
.Man �E u assvr�
4r•B]
4 In
NOT TO SCALE
or callum
IOn
lum DIeBIpNI - 91ANDAAMI
STONE INLET PROTECTION
'FOR LATE WINTER AND
EARLY SPRING:
,��mj��'• Wee
I �.v w,a'A mee .oa roa.mw.
r•m o�rw. euw°..,rt„aa•.wi +°se
FOR SUMMER'.
��- �rrtvau /•w, ._�ess�°s�.�.wr mr. vw. fve. anima. v.v �ese
n•..,arc o. a°na w va �4. wsr
FOR TALL: u'�1q,.evew rye mn.® um ,yv sar a.ww. uov
'��i. n. ✓ee a'm .w w•m nvr.fre,ruv�em.a.ru .es�v
®.•.m. a. �ftl'wm� ,mc v tram iObi ]zs°• +ena •�i w°
rn I CMUBITH
wm cm . Dnpmmn "MDAIO]I TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE
BO]]•] aMBne N 30.1) 9,
- n oaiu us mina. K°aan a m wc:rt
e°.a 0404 Isa wa,. man aa.. '1
1. ' 10 SCALE
�m ne rxa91 RTTY.
^ urn on'n0rnanT RNm]xusl TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM I I
PRELIMINARY 1
l lb Nd Uw Fp C—b—a— J
99% COMPLETE
tl S
:e
VI
� o
a o
a o
g z
O C �
� m
0c0
� W V
— N
' `L—1, x
C

ol
6
r 4
?�'
s
\\
`�•
r
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
\
/Sw.7�11i°
\
�—
\.,I
\
\ \\ \ \ \ \ \�✓f �I
IIt
i I it /-Ir
—
r.mft �ow�"�f�fM wfil
-�_
/ � � I � I�
OwFq. 4 Ffwace MFK Fu F �MUf moo F.n, Y.H Forst' wu,slFwTMr MOM
MOM rtFIMM Kwf[IS,
V \
ISTURRANCE (TY
\
\
\
40P. TEMP. ROCK CHEC`k\ DAM
\ CLD STD. 5.0.70 (TYP.)
\ \ k
\
\
\
PROP. \TEMP. t1LT FENCE \ )
CLD STD 30.06A�(YPP
''w° "°�""�°NO��•i em.i'.fo.""`o .vu on,fvw,...m..a. s�wo z.on<nnw, MO r«awn
V
PR Oj TEMP.�FILTER MEDIA I
Y
:.<. ,ff
\ \� I
?�'
\\
`�•
r
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
\
/Sw.7�11i°
\
�—
\.,I
IT,
f. a,wcY sl
j,r
/
\• I
1
i I it /-Ir
—
r.mft �ow�"�f�fM wfil
-�_
/ � � I � I�
OwFq. 4 Ffwace MFK Fu F �MUf moo F.n, Y.H Forst' wu,slFwTMr MOM
MOM rtFIMM Kwf[IS,
J \ \
ISTURRANCE (TY
fes<,.nw 1•os<x cos,so, Fri« , own s afrulewra.
\
?\
\
\
\
''w° "°�""�°NO��•i em.i'.fo.""`o .vu on,fvw,...m..a. s�wo z.on<nnw, MO r«awn
V
PR Oj TEMP.�FILTER MEDIA I
Y
:.<. ,ff
\ \� I
T \,
x / J
, .�<, Me F •< a „w.< .. s r,.,Y
nM..f .a. fKa `�
`„ M<o . ,.,
��� �fiEWATERIJ•1�>;�P�EOIEC'R MEDIA jT�iP.) I sw°s `'�i `<02`0:
\X SEE Q�YAI S H ( a� rz,'�- w.°'`•• ma,w`ac�w ,ss .
\`
•��� r. � I � I � �' \I ....ai.w .swns•M�...f .sa.so '<TS v....r . s.F< a sMe o vscFw Mww ...an ,..m,..
f � . ° \ ->z,.. f
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
/_ � � 1 � rf — �� — < wa r.weFO��Mfn.�c,F..<nF.<: M.,< :1M Mfµ.Mfnl�Ma•�„� ,rowM,. r<.a,fLf
f MAINTENANCE PLAN
1 \ VEGETATIVE PLAN
\ a/ µ. W.. \ 1 r m n.a.ort t FwRrr aaa. �ssarF .ru ks v,.uw ef.w o °mn.su .au
\. � ram u s ,M.FS •.,as .w
c ,..... 1 •"° �� z ;, wo.z i f>"`O.,n",fF`, K.M., a .< �swM�,f ++ `sw:°Mm s"°°,.s row."'::.;,°
)r;
l6�1s1
X
3
c
3
5 EAM \DkERSION, LEGEND
F R U P ROTTUI1��NNT�D
\\ I �1E1p.IL 1SH�EET}EC7 1\ Z
T
ROP I11
�. INLET'PFVTiCtON Cn
—C�D STI. 30.81 (TIYP)
\ r,.
zIm
TEMP. DI I l i 0 Z
\ \\ SEE (DETAIL SUkk7 EC7 ` PRELIMINARY h
I \ amF w,°..a es- D. nee u» F. Cee.4Fenen d0 C a9
3 USINWLSTAUC7T E .excoR1nERt Q w
\ OF CAROLINA. INC.
LAN C lt. N 0 C STREET, GLI 2 04 .��� *
CMAiROrIE. h01rTM CM(lINA m7d 0 U U
NC LICENSE 0 C -1950 xuc r -ie• 5 w L7
Al
PROP. LIMITS OF1
J \ \
ISTURRANCE (TY
IF
1 \ \. \ \\ •
\
?\
\
\
\
��� �fiEWATERIJ•1�>;�P�EOIEC'R MEDIA jT�iP.) I sw°s `'�i `<02`0:
\X SEE Q�YAI S H ( a� rz,'�- w.°'`•• ma,w`ac�w ,ss .
\`
•��� r. � I � I � �' \I ....ai.w .swns•M�...f .sa.so '<TS v....r . s.F< a sMe o vscFw Mww ...an ,..m,..
f � . ° \ ->z,.. f
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
/_ � � 1 � rf — �� — < wa r.weFO��Mfn.�c,F..<nF.<: M.,< :1M Mfµ.Mfnl�Ma•�„� ,rowM,. r<.a,fLf
f MAINTENANCE PLAN
1 \ VEGETATIVE PLAN
\ a/ µ. W.. \ 1 r m n.a.ort t FwRrr aaa. �ssarF .ru ks v,.uw ef.w o °mn.su .au
\. � ram u s ,M.FS •.,as .w
c ,..... 1 •"° �� z ;, wo.z i f>"`O.,n",fF`, K.M., a .< �swM�,f ++ `sw:°Mm s"°°,.s row."'::.;,°
)r;
l6�1s1
X
3
c
3
5 EAM \DkERSION, LEGEND
F R U P ROTTUI1��NNT�D
\\ I �1E1p.IL 1SH�EET}EC7 1\ Z
T
ROP I11
�. INLET'PFVTiCtON Cn
—C�D STI. 30.81 (TIYP)
\ r,.
zIm
TEMP. DI I l i 0 Z
\ \\ SEE (DETAIL SUkk7 EC7 ` PRELIMINARY h
I \ amF w,°..a es- D. nee u» F. Cee.4Fenen d0 C a9
3 USINWLSTAUC7T E .excoR1nERt Q w
\ OF CAROLINA. INC.
LAN C lt. N 0 C STREET, GLI 2 04 .��� *
CMAiROrIE. h01rTM CM(lINA m7d 0 U U
NC LICENSE 0 C -1950 xuc r -ie• 5 w L7

f9 �
T � x
z n o
� z ado
� � Q
� Q O
� r �
O
A
w
kIJVNIwll3Hd
l �
j
h
. w1D 'Arwrw T"n wl w wJ latT3) 1MWm ,MISw 1MK OM 'xhca{W 'MYllp
J0, '>wV
\
AY .K .I , ,[ 0)SOaOw yu !]rvu5rq> .hr5 w1JV W w]
3 � � f .
a,aa] 9 wLLJnWSNOJ rn WNn AvL w xnnH rnK Oxr SJwrowM Try
OArb E rnK SxOF OxamM ]]mJWV w 'wirM w W AmOW »r N Wu D
H a ww.
raw rbM
xp'MMOw xtH aq frA. awxwn IArI]frlsNw m Aw rnK wiriWw> w
OwlSKJ lY3'.M ]MYYq YnOtl Mla♦H wf Y Mwra ay 3rW0 wO1Yp»x AaL
Y ,
-I'7as
Ir wrnorla 9s: wrtlona luyrmrn 3srxJ
awl �.
�xxlf woruoor s.WOV o. ww s)rwn Yn .s a1M •wtl .oc 'aw
, [ J 'fMMmJ mEUtwof w iB¢YOa sr +glvl sr lJntllsfD] mK wiTWlm w
vnatl WgaH
Taos
1]el/'@C)fq, 9 NOMOMYSM] rn Wx"ilp04q waxfK'�Ofr f?aYa �r m
almaH ww NAtl4°OHO 9a�"c aK�w+� w xuwi w W. nmmzJr w ,m. D
wYOWISIW] rn A4 ,,.K 191]rWw0 w
�yFFrri�
(69'S','C SW YtlIIV 10 HJ)r.N) 135YIN
31n0a anolaa
3ansoio ovoa 3Alaa A00daN3aalH
,V-Wvvo a
el re,
cm
r� r_
` �� ar3Nti
\ 03SO10 Q btl6-
it avoa F
� z•oc
a 11 L -Wr
,I
OV3Htl ,L,
`1
AMA311,, ffl�
\ aJOlooae
- � xaLLJ)JnW w a adw xqH .rw wW]nW9go nxMrxo F Arw'moNf
',oWw] tlmvu onNn Nw woMpf9x SNOh Aaro] ArJaa a3rwsr Tru ml5w -N, w0
Taaf 4W950f
OwW 1>anq OEOww w ASiMI]IWIS• J w JI),Iq] lirK x01 WnwJ 'J+MWnUJ awanr b03nura YxN.)06 '1]Hls
�W4 i WxY"•' A wuanWSxW wJ SYHr MqM olxr K IJ)aw w
TaIIS 0 SJ,M�N ♦lO,f1A vnr S3YHxN
( 109 'G'x'f fWYaDYIU HJ1Y.N1'11135YHd aYwASYe wJ SSA]r YvnpAr ANOw alTbwox0]]r xrw w i5rrm M
[� ww SYJCYe wY) wM SSDT
xralo 3AJrKnf am SlnOx wmv,gx� p00aw.lwrn 3e i9w siwjw3 OW n3mr
v3tiv w JZM1wis rnK wi�rWw> wf'rglw>'yMS�i.O] A Erw !O )'A Ox, l u lv
Yrotl amiA avr"on Ta J.xq wowxa001 tiJM sw R) • mo q.
UMO W IDu5 wwN pl 1 ToV OEaro w�f was anO1H 'K mwvq lvM
(,OfYxOJ abOrL) auMW Oq '♦rN -L i IMJgrq IDivM•
Ux3nWrd w lxHwroww wqn) xxivvE b rLF )IIgY Y wr10 win•
Ulw9.ra w JxJNwrOww wnn) aArgK w rJYr MvOM a mlpl0 wlw•
UMA.r1 n>aJ awn w .tl w]'NK b r1M N9111 S m� xYVY•
x05tly,q/Wglb xrr"a116 i m q rOlvF•
Jwwq rM.Jm r mwrq wtr..
w A wW]nlMSrq] w nYn H Ol fMVYOra ]IA3eS u]row OIr Smwrq
yarn b 150 r v OKgJgJ>Y 1Mrl ®Jr H Snrwrq OM SIWmJpw YOwOMIi
ttir @ALC 9IrK wW AT l,r iti ON !r lh 'axn H Yrn SANH O+MMM
YHrJVWY9 YJwJ Yw6 JIMgI w SM'1e ,oal� W w w WOIS 9lrwrq
s>� Jww n. �is iY wHo-J w Aww.ahwar a�x n°Ir�"9wlo Q31°°J
Ywuuw auJ w ]+aW !
fmwrgw�xo '�°QO,s,eA}1'P11s"°nirolr:i xoo5o x ,'''w^o,Y,mwJl„v� ,.,w�iMO.i]W"Wro�'u,
sr»rw ,oWIAa ]IaMW JlAx a StlaH Owrw >wno+nJ w
1 Owe mBgl0pgA H a IMn wv1YA x0J aIIOM
OHWI53p 1xY Tn'"(a Arw AL aLf a Oaaa)Aw au0faf OYIYq> H rn�
TM>�w D � n vxai`irrol0"'r"01tl a,. )Ey a iwaarow�w uYJWw H
xl r'�' rnK wl]r'WwJ w YeY�S'ppjn OArq S� Jew pyylxl" Sqw>
- a rtNx
�13fra1lfafHl E -rw
O1 O
a3saio O el • K
a
MOM I
�� �$
§
itlmm� Oros D S.rO G• Wow 0]•+Lp -H H rnK Nxq wOlrfx]OOM :YOx
7r450w ItlEYtl w lr lN)FDw)V )rv, YHA Om wur.T )M
tlYra Hnaxr oS,r rnxi xoY]OYSpJ 'i4xtl wares Ol ita,ll wer15 IIOw (xwga
h
. w1D 'Arwrw T"n wl w wJ latT3) 1MWm ,MISw 1MK OM 'xhca{W 'MYllp
J0, '>wV
O, ySal,H —
AY .K .I , ,[ 0)SOaOw yu !]rvu5rq> .hr5 w1JV W w]
3 � � f .
a,aa] 9 wLLJnWSNOJ rn WNn AvL w xnnH rnK Oxr SJwrowM Try
OArb E rnK SxOF OxamM ]]mJWV w 'wirM w W AmOW »r N Wu D
H a ww.
raw rbM
xp'MMOw xtH aq frA. awxwn IArI]frlsNw m Aw rnK wiriWw> w
OwlSKJ lY3'.M ]MYYq YnOtl Mla♦H wf Y Mwra ay 3rW0 wO1Yp»x AaL
Y ,
-I'7as
Ir wrnorla 9s: wrtlona luyrmrn 3srxJ
awl �.
�xxlf woruoor s.WOV o. ww s)rwn Yn .s a1M •wtl .oc 'aw
, [ J 'fMMmJ mEUtwof w iB¢YOa sr +glvl sr lJntllsfD] mK wiTWlm w
vnatl WgaH
Taos
1]el/'@C)fq, 9 NOMOMYSM] rn Wx"ilp04q waxfK'�Ofr f?aYa �r m
almaH ww NAtl4°OHO 9a�"c aK�w+� w xuwi w W. nmmzJr w ,m. D
wYOWISIW] rn A4 ,,.K 191]rWw0 w
�yFFrri�
- � xaLLJ)JnW w a adw xqH .rw wW]nW9go nxMrxo F Arw'moNf
',oWw] tlmvu onNn Nw woMpf9x SNOh Aaro] ArJaa a3rwsr Tru ml5w -N, w0
Taaf 4W950f
OwW 1>anq OEOww w ASiMI]IWIS• J w JI),Iq] lirK x01 WnwJ 'J+MWnUJ awanr b03nura YxN.)06 '1]Hls
�W4 i WxY"•' A wuanWSxW wJ SYHr MqM olxr K IJ)aw w
TaIIS 0 SJ,M�N ♦lO,f1A vnr S3YHxN
( 109 'G'x'f fWYaDYIU HJ1Y.N1'11135YHd aYwASYe wJ SSA]r YvnpAr ANOw alTbwox0]]r xrw w i5rrm M
[� ww SYJCYe wY) wM SSDT
xralo 3AJrKnf am SlnOx wmv,gx� p00aw.lwrn 3e i9w siwjw3 OW n3mr
v3tiv w JZM1wis rnK wi�rWw> wf'rglw>'yMS�i.O] A Erw !O )'A Ox, l u lv
Yrotl amiA avr"on Ta J.xq wowxa001 tiJM sw R) • mo q.
UMO W IDu5 wwN pl 1 ToV OEaro w�f was anO1H 'K mwvq lvM
(,OfYxOJ abOrL) auMW Oq '♦rN -L i IMJgrq IDivM•
Ux3nWrd w lxHwroww wqn) xxivvE b rLF )IIgY Y wr10 win•
Ulw9.ra w JxJNwrOww wnn) aArgK w rJYr MvOM a mlpl0 wlw•
UMA.r1 n>aJ awn w .tl w]'NK b r1M N9111 S m� xYVY•
x05tly,q/Wglb xrr"a116 i m q rOlvF•
Jwwq rM.Jm r mwrq wtr..
w A wW]nlMSrq] w nYn H Ol fMVYOra ]IA3eS u]row OIr Smwrq
yarn b 150 r v OKgJgJ>Y 1Mrl ®Jr H Snrwrq OM SIWmJpw YOwOMIi
ttir @ALC 9IrK wW AT l,r iti ON !r lh 'axn H Yrn SANH O+MMM
YHrJVWY9 YJwJ Yw6 JIMgI w SM'1e ,oal� W w w WOIS 9lrwrq
s>� Jww n. �is iY wHo-J w Aww.ahwar a�x n°Ir�"9wlo Q31°°J
Ywuuw auJ w ]+aW !
fmwrgw�xo '�°QO,s,eA}1'P11s"°nirolr:i xoo5o x ,'''w^o,Y,mwJl„v� ,.,w�iMO.i]W"Wro�'u,
sr»rw ,oWIAa ]IaMW JlAx a StlaH Owrw >wno+nJ w
1 Owe mBgl0pgA H a IMn wv1YA x0J aIIOM
OHWI53p 1xY Tn'"(a Arw AL aLf a Oaaa)Aw au0faf OYIYq> H rn�
TM>�w D � n vxai`irrol0"'r"01tl a,. )Ey a iwaarow�w uYJWw H
xl r'�' rnK wl]r'WwJ w YeY�S'ppjn OArq S� Jew pyylxl" Sqw>
- a rtNx
�13fra1lfafHl E -rw
O1 O
a3saio O el • K
a
MOM I
�� �$
§
itlmm� Oros D S.rO G• Wow 0]•+Lp -H H rnK Nxq wOlrfx]OOM :YOx
7r450w ItlEYtl w lr lN)FDw)V )rv, YHA Om wur.T )M
tlYra Hnaxr oS,r rnxi xoY]OYSpJ 'i4xtl wares Ol ita,ll wer15 IIOw (xwga
•
E
. w1D 'Arwrw T"n wl w wJ latT3) 1MWm ,MISw 1MK OM 'xhca{W 'MYllp
J0, '>wV
gg 3
AY .K .I , ,[ 0)SOaOw yu !]rvu5rq> .hr5 w1JV W w]
3 � � f .
a,aa] 9 wLLJnWSNOJ rn WNn AvL w xnnH rnK Oxr SJwrowM Try
OArb E rnK SxOF OxamM ]]mJWV w 'wirM w W AmOW »r N Wu D
H a ww.
5 � �
xp'MMOw xtH aq frA. awxwn IArI]frlsNw m Aw rnK wiriWw> w
OwlSKJ lY3'.M ]MYYq YnOtl Mla♦H wf Y Mwra ay 3rW0 wO1Yp»x AaL
3wuonaasvadril� Isn q
-w-fau; aBu
-I'7as
Ir wrnorla 9s: wrtlona luyrmrn 3srxJ
awl �.
�xxlf woruoor s.WOV o. ww s)rwn Yn .s a1M •wtl .oc 'aw
, [ J 'fMMmJ mEUtwof w iB¢YOa sr +glvl sr lJntllsfD] mK wiTWlm w
Taos
1]el/'@C)fq, 9 NOMOMYSM] rn Wx"ilp04q waxfK'�Ofr f?aYa �r m
almaH ww NAtl4°OHO 9a�"c aK�w+� w xuwi w W. nmmzJr w ,m. D
wYOWISIW] rn A4 ,,.K 191]rWw0 w
�yFFrri�
(69'S','C SW YtlIIV 10 HJ)r.N) 135YIN
,� Of�O
iu,B,3
iwVV+ NOUrii 0l i00• wll _ _,
ilwrq;�arxlrH�'Mq•
FOYI ]]�wJV TtlYVI w awn]tllnpax mW1530b wM ♦bW a anxpq ,t OH]Jigil6
awJ irl A3JJr E TW l a]IA1 0AMUxrvxB OANq i�,r'MOrOtl'� Igvl wm[a vJw'II+Mi )Iw'u
E00HralI1F4 wotl Jw
:��,iLL.1vU -Y1, 45t I� �NYtl'rvl<I rI,�r Nr vlHV Yllt,n
1`.J..f�B
N FMS
�U3fINI].NOJI ONISVNd NOIJ.JnU.LSNOJ
Ww"d MOLL- 0HISNOO
tl �IY130
-3 f a5�)fal'1I N
f02a1 YNIlOw761
ME UMS'AMS 0,31 of 3 fro:
'ONI'tlN77OaY03O a
ww 11
— ____
3wuonaasvadril� Isn q
-w-fau; aBu
I
awl �.
♦„�,
r r•l
JW D (Sxourtl>aswa mmfH)el M wuax 01 xplrmir „JUadi ,re nvK tlariWwa w (r
FOYI ]]�wJV TtlYVI w awn]tllnpax mW1530b wM ♦bW a anxpq ,t OH]Jigil6
awJ irl A3JJr E TW l a]IA1 0AMUxrvxB OANq i�,r'MOrOtl'� Igvl wm[a vJw'II+Mi )Iw'u
E00HralI1F4 wotl Jw
O
D sAa woe w Nu]M a mxorn )e lox +Wi¢ wlTWro] p
wr w r !r sanxw 5 mw Jwn wJ awrW cols a aHOrn H lox nrK uo ar'Wwiiu N
O
1aJan 'wITWIIOJ JW ,a al oaf°e ie °h'"YK°>'arx1pe °iiwiW°�e w`w airiaxoaxl'wonsir
'(I Arw A L dYf a OwmAOw ]w1H OYlitlga H nrK xrw D + dYf A WrGN]aY"H
. x.w a Jxgn]ow
'Axvx xgJH aYJtln0] H nrK 1 xrw D ssxHHraY Ha :s,rtv.Jl
ga w nls wn n ssrglgWlWftl w uJ1Nq] rnK wu.Wrw w'w!s aw @Ha
ETb
sr
\ a�F'K a01� rw] J]. �A M 35Yw xOtOnWSxOJ wY3 A WxH]unpH w Y)WrrpJ
W 3w 0l"wfA n O'6Vw w MJag1 nrK wiTWM> w fn
111wVB A awgm w EYI,gA et lY0 lar3 wolf ]w 01
xW]OW�IW] ual a,rK wiriWxm w Ml1.r'IM3 Y YB OYOWYw ErwwO
O3 31•i
LfOaOSrG O�Xq S1W60� �l � �l >wwrlr� wpeWrrx
Y y (w1e0 M
r 1r uJWS Jrq a wu]NYSWa tan rnK wlriWwa w K
A OwOlp,) ll)f Z xrWKMlIwrJA b0 a Tro) 91lOWVgJ 0v' Jy l 1"�h wrW
A DW la],i.E Axrwlo TMYr, a xlao wrnH ,rn sH]L wYJNLLSx0] a frn, axlrirar 4
,OZAU3q wf Jeb hnpww wr w SWLLVN5
1HV �D•0� m �,yev p5M nxG.��l w OYp'w E tOn nM arlr,
- K• M m m8i-In Oe� p Sal�`Oxf w •INWa SZ
L �6yM w em KYVF w D WrOVexq]y w xvb ,pWK] ytryW sW FOne�J a0x fA0
D IKY ]lEr1J KYr )Fql Am mli a OIIYgwD
ounYTw wf]nrlfw> .. fY,Wltw AM@Yt if � .t
a A 5wW)f awWa x>A NnnH ,MK SFM, E.rW
�Hr�SNIYWrlMEL1eY1 OYHOtlr
ww w rALLrllDesxrW A ixaalwaA 3LOrww w l@xorlJ uD w (i
!
urWWx Jw a arve H,MK xwxYlr „a>a laMaw w x. aY]vM
f]wnHa �. SJ�Y.ENB ,M a aMwlwrN E rnK ifm) e•M fiJww 'tt
),�, Y,q lanYriw �Y]NYfwa � „n tlYxA w SYaw o: �.W
� °w. wfwwx �ar. w D,I ,�rlax w. Dmo,�]. w,,,,ww w
�+9 a «IIw,,,„Twal�wl�JN� aw . „„ f,]nNraJ
>w AVS w Mwr
yYr �..w
�• rnK ]qJ:W �+ lr BEn , IfM Wwa ws� � aJLYr�"laJ,a:Y.n�;,.a �;tl,„
]nYfxw ]wMq MLWYxA�"xl ]IM.W a>,
a
A 30@ lfwnr Owr,"0rp JwOMrOH ,rvl A R OM
„w�NFawq, HrW w IgaJ .rM. i,v YI li.J, ..
sssWaon w w'"�%nNn roMilm ]uJ.W Yrhooa wo,e o
� w r +GK w a],tive H iow 3MK lxHrnp) 'iww it w kneriw A Se0nga twM (O
,r- 41 Yox a Mafill K
'axn H 3MK SYw llY5 swwH alurW w .r, rrlA
wY 3JNY ,r1prY H T,rl6 rllrr 'lrgWlp,O IarlrE 0� wN
l mw air]p S}m •JlHlH IIFw w ANHL,] r w wHAU
,T Iv w!tq>xN Orlr Lx'Y x 3tlr SDFJO W4MDWw`}I Y 11�ra WA�6p�"1T� a0l]']aWy'WxO�
- ,gypye SKpy+ttf aIM AW M Jw Sl]nA AW� ]lfMW rn lrw lYn9W a \IrwK!
r !r) ar0 axo• wv3 D OIO OM1
w ♦ ,�
SwwAH w lY Y w ,OMlre a,•K wlriWwq w (a
rrm
ONl w lr SAWUr wu]nu5•m ♦B OYrxyrEp x�
OHrx�w �SOwwrn iqq \ra OwlsuJ ,w AryH TryK wiTWK] w vl
rn axgq,re OKO,Mq.'1,w i•LNH nYK wlTWxa] w a+
lallrW �� fiN SlAiwe I]rlM] IWtgw aY'p6
9gtl'AUIOxry yM)w
''�wMw 01 A mlW'vn v On'�G � IrWM1 r y�jr"!'j]�l wY"lMYW aYMpYfr w Ot�6Ai�
Jw Hrx ow sswMlmo elM sM9W0 wavow m �mm'♦o uuax a 9 wariWxw w to
UI/OJ• wLLnOnH txOryhe O,Wa Wlt MOU]nlYSroJ wTYLL ]lafrW l >LFI
of aHtlgH H JrN (rt -OU) (sbc ,]BN ♦s arsx aAOnJ 9ry (f1tlAOYU f�
tla Wat65b]r L f w�i ryry faMOU xaDMe NMaM a aw1011 li Tom".• wgtlwtTW Wa (n
n)auH MD reap
I]Naf t,u AwsMp'M0MVip lwir ♦Mw]li Yl r� O.i Nriwr TwIVK —1—TM
J
sowxwn iNJn),re .wxoe:y
fWx10 ♦• aHwfMJ. H a
is awK`"Y'alav u 1i>'o�aJ iu11 01°�`�wfl°HA"iwoY01�rnW ('D]xvw`+°a °t'"tlal°s°pa°
SJaoae mm aYJ,JgJ H nqE r a.w A l eais A WNHIaagH
fw rnK wlriWwa w (n
avll a unMr w unu]r wua�W!°9'"WanO;tlo swim TMH xJw wmrY aJrnTm ]wsn >ryr
OxYrfa xMixnn l9M aariWxoa w is
w
Arw of Ow3ID]w 3AlH OY),enaJ H V,rK r xrw A WraagwgH
w )bFrw1 Axfrax w 4315 IxM
D uxJglgH w YTenOO rnK
wJ w Yaaf aw YJYwq 9 xrw wYrElfwJ r xJMA
w xrw xoua�sw wr3 A 9xJraMgH w YlLnw rnW gITWM]
@BWJSA sr'N6Yxe w WTaJ rnK wiJrWwa w t�
f �]0 ,Oxiw] JIJnW tlpuo w swF �wnAVie w wuvJO>nl w 9rgH ,Wivww ,v
OrrraAH a afore fN>,, aW ti]wR w6x.W A ixJaweA YlaHrw A,1q ;xl
wr (fwZ- Kt -W[) aArxrn wYJx rgLLVin3nlyw 'awr SrO I]rlw] nrK w!]rWwJ w If
n SOBxwn IxHNrs �wMbnY xW�
rn♦ rnOY� �Sr w�
AB ONOYevr Om OTFIfW ]w SDNH >Mtn➢Wr�O w/Om 'JM
♦ Z+
TMM �
w1vM a
J(Ir>rxwv YrO6""OOJIMgYr
w b rn Wxn iavt5 lOx rnK r4Gru µNUri YrweA ♦w w i >iow w b wA• (r
OrMWpJ.'M 3xK0y lxrl lWltl wf SANA OMwrM A+h � JFISw n
'wllr13J0 OWrO
Y)3woNl w of O WO10n B Tt�ixf�t 5•qa A SSJYDYe w OwWq @wqH Sr
0AONr w'aDwrA mlxH] bens AnA ox¢0]wnw w/OM hwxwM Yra6
Y]]r]Wwf rn YMOY Ow]Hw] S1Yr30
OEOwW
a ix#6•w OwSY) Iqw wY6xrW WOOIE ♦ xrvimN rnK wlriWw> w a�
OR19NwvJTM Ow 0 �M�30✓ f Yxe6
L
awrlmn -nH Wr lJl0ae w D real w xww (x
tl3]OVL x1MM IdA[l @+.r16q H lOx lTK ri -OV Mf6 lMr xlr> O�II
3Mq OM JtiJrW ores WON wOE O! tl3lI1Rl w M
aaJ ♦NA]w H a d7]xWl w ae OY]3tlp ! W.,'q b'1"riW
OYJAw
A aA,r� YrnK (wY;l -OLr) ShD6 1]iM5 !O'A'/4 6h (f WOOVL 1WI xSO.
•
bm!$q !w6 OwND15 nnnxw f•n
516> a 1+6JrOr w wrq,a4 SOlI]pllV ]UMW JW v
xrq w D Axr/.Or w 5•AH
HROro Hvt 1 � �@Oq![l� �K vJw IWI w'Y.WD NJxD)rwx w ISYq JrNIaN v
>nWSwJ
N mwra wlrM
>Sn 'irMl3xrW A H@ A'u s Wur Hx' ixhero3 w /Ow aMNNrsay xBM v
w awMr H avgK lIa+AW w> u
wJItWO ShxMrw awOwlS araar0tl awOn flwyy
sMw wuJrxusxw JKNq auMW xWwa a oJwmw'rO"v'.: s`fmQ1uJn1Y0nrae i
w ♦B� we�V M K SAnH Ew A ]wrWY6W �iwWYaa1 w �YxW w ro YKVw
,�. Jatltsxoa w w� ♦vm a JwssAH sr @4onH w 'LLJSww 'p,uays. 'oanfw
f,vlWi
x» NO�xY t WY,Iw O+r Etlfa w A JJm.w N SwOH JMi50,J Jxri IYw
�n)r +nOr5
Ew w @lvgoSSr SANA OnanOWVw - }D w OAn
H SOhOMIf w SMgVa NavM riJle4 Yaw w fMU lYW YYa]a �r� fxarw xOIMYlf11w ()
♦�,ywx, w ♦B Oiu]36 xvwwa
wH w w 9 rJwrnw JnxlSapJ J
u lVwh,wxr�H 01 W]VWnDJ v
SSIMn Smb DW wJ ]ufvW M WOr¢ fr SLIWY W!A
� TMvwM a�J SLN yOwirtLWr�p
W wri '
avoa vl Eon a woxn in�f"c
A H JMK 530rJWw9 ' @w11r BU ,Aa wr 530r]xwr9 B JMV fxFn bM f
NOM r]0av Thl KW W al B4MWlx H VFK WUN`WlM w�f0
a a WJwJ ix3owns
A H aMK sYnJxKrf 'aaavur eu nx wr clOaxwre . 3MU S•afn +qIW •
YHMly �OlgrlpH )vION Mra6 a alvtw SAU0x wJ - wllrJ.uar uJ lav1H � LJbW
/ no1fNH TwH mwgH w wxn aufac H ton a,rxs sJw, >uMW a.
w Wra wOIJT'] K A Ilmlrlw r (KOJ -YY / qw• 9q) aArmn xou]A rqurixHJ,M
+�su rwx
w w� rJOf EypYe %)9n apry M' 01 On L
H rnK SJONH Olen}IxvIO Y y`0wr� nTVrV� t
MotriWwa w YwenH nxo" mmH wir ssM, >w.W oTMn;x
om
Ol A .iwf61g6H w H ,W 50YH ,rW6 D 9f6 w f1a5xH hMM
� W JWarJ JPG w NOME OHErT `JOrw OWSfU lr
xOUY • a 'U G IIEOA M mlvJ01 H rnK fJ.MJO 'atllNW JaJVW t
w11JE WM J%xreYN]Jr w SMa rfTrW Nf0mN WJVM w
3WN00 OYOf Am A AxrnOY M Yr0 5w,b,w 01 OKxM'w lOw YJYOH O+ 9 w�riW+oa ww (e
SWL lallaM ]ulrW
.aJVVe aw wf T1on MYNA 5� OEn H a ODNYFliOw Hr'SYDxYi"]YpwMf
aw SOrrrV'"OUawyMS� vs�wJ fxourxw3 �aw a` 1H� x w ql ixHwq JW
A lwwurel0 r wxOM!)Y '(p]!M) fANH yMy �w�l p jY��W
�J VxINp]
'(HYrw xwoe0 .Ton Jw A�M`aaxq YIgV. UOD7) xOYV'a]eSmW A IWeH )u0,ww w A
'O ' � xJx o! Wq,w, .xs TAnD WwJ ,�ff.W rr 1.
S3.LON 132trONd I S3,LON - tVH3.V3O

Jurisdictional Determination
Information
O
.4-J
c�
.E
v
4
w
O
_u
LA
�l
C
O
.4-d
E
O
C

Photo 1: View of Stream A upstream from Hiddenbrook Drive culvert (view
downslope /south).
4018 Hiddenbrook Drive
YVEPG Mecklenburg County, NC - Photos taken 07/28/2015
Wedands and Emnronmental Planning Group Leonard S. Wndner. PLLC.

•
l�w
s J .
1_
0
AL
Ir
yr'

Photo 3: View of historical culvert crossing downstream from existing culvert
(view downs lope/so uth).
4018 Hiddenbrook Drive
FPC; Mecklenburg County, NC - Photos taken 07/28/2015
Wetlands and Enwronmennl Planning Group Leonard S. RWxkw. PLLC.

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: 7/28/2015 I Evaluator: I H. Caldwell Easting: - 80.7847
Project: 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive /Stream A Northing: 35.2003
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30` 30.E
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A. Geomorphology
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
i 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In- channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active /relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade controls
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
Absent Weak
Moderate Strong
SCORE
0 1
2 3
3
0 1
2 3
1
0 1
2 3
2
0 1
2 3
2
0 1
2 3
0
0 1
2 3
2
0 1
2 3
1 1
0 1
2 3
0
'
0 0.5
1 1.5
1 5
0 0.5
1 1.5
1
No =0
Yes =3
0
Geomorpholoqy Subtotal 10113.5 1
a Man -made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2 I
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
11.0
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL=
1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
6.0
" perennial streams may also be identified using other
methods.
See page 35
of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
I
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodoloav for Identification Heath Caldwell, WEPG
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Oriains.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form #PC039

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive City/County: Charlotte, Mecklenburg Sampling Date. 7/28/2015
Applicant/Owner: City of Charlotte State: NC Sampling Point: UDP
Investigator(s) H Caldwell Section, Township, Range:
Landform ( hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope ( %)- 0 -2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)• MLRA 136 Lat. 35 2003 N Long• -80 7847 W Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: MS Monacan and Arents soils NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ' , Soil ' or Hydrology - significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes F✓ No =
Are Vegetation ' Soil ' or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No = Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No 0✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No 0✓
Remarks:
Upland data point taken along western stream bank downstream from existing roadway culvert.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that aooly)
=]Surface Soil Cracks (66)
=Surface Water (Al) =True Aquatic Plants (614)
Elsparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
E::]Drainage Patterns (B10)
=Saturation (A3) =Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (B1) =Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (B3) =Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4) =Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (65)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water- Stained Leaves (B9)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No �✓
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UDP
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1 Hedera helix
2 Lonicera japonica
3 Polystichum acrostichoides
4 Rosa multiflora
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30'
1 Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
30 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
02 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
04 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
5
N FAC
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
40
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4
(A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3 Asimina triloba
10
N
FAC
Species Across All Strata:
5
(B)
4 Morus rubra
10
N
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
80%
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
95
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of-
Multiply bv:
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1
OBL species
x 1 =
1 Asimina triloba
20
Y
FAC
FACW species
x 2 =
2 Ilex glabra
5
N
FAC
FAC species
x 3=
3. Ligustrum japonicum
5
N
UPL
FACU species
x 4=
4.
UPL species
x 5 =
5
Column Totals
(A)
(B)
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1 Hedera helix
2 Lonicera japonica
3 Polystichum acrostichoides
4 Rosa multiflora
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30'
1 Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
30 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
02 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
04 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
I:
5
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
= i olai t,over
Y FAC
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes= No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
= Total Cover
80
Y FACU
5
N FAC
5
N FACU
5
N FACU
I:
5
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
= i olai t,over
Y FAC
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes= No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UDP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix F edox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) _ % Tvoe' Loc' Texture Remarks
0-16 7.5YR 4/3 100 silt loam
'Type: C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL =Pore Lininq, M= Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
=Histosol
=Dark Surfact;
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
=2 cm Muck 147)
(Al)
= Histic Epipedon (A2)
(S7)
=Polyvalue B(dow Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
(A10) (MLRA
=Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
=Black Histic (A3)
=Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
=Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
=Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
=Stratified Layers (A5)
=2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
=Depleted Matrix (F3)
= Redox Dark :surface (F6)
(MLRA 136, 147)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
=Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
=Depleted Dam Surface (F7)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Thick Dark Surface (Al2) = Redox Depressions (F8)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, =Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
=Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) =Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
=Sandy Redox (S5) =Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
=Stripped Matrix (S6) =Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Applicant: City of Charlotte
Site: 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive
Form for: Perennial RPW A
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish /borough: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.2003° N, Long. - 80.7847° W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Edwards Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TN W) into which the aquatic resource flows: Catawba
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 03050103
® Check if map /diagram of review area and /or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
❑ Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RUA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Pire'no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
C] Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are "waters ofthe U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):'
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent watersz (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: 200 linear feet: 6 width (ft) and /or 0.03 acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM.1
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable):3
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TN W and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e g , typically 3 months)
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and /or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.I. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section HIM below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent ":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section IILC below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 276'sgdare miles'
Drainage area: 53 acres��
Average annual rainfall: 44 inches
Average annual snowfall: 0 inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through 5 tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are 30 (or more); river miles from TNW.
Project waters are 11 (or Tress) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are :15 =20 aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNWS: Jurisdictional features on the site flow into an unnamed tributary to Edwards Branch, to
Edwards Branch, to Brier Creek, to Little Sugar Creek, to Sugar Creek, to the Catawba River (TNW).
^ Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e g , tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW

Tributary stream order, if known: 1.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that annlv):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: 6 feet
Average depth: +/ -3 feet
Average side slopes: 2 1.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type / %cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition /stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle /pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry: Relatively straight
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasorial__ .flo_ w
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 (or greater):
Describe flow regime: Flow of RPW A is perennial. See attached stream evaluation forms.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Discrete and °confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Unknown. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
® changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ High Tide Line indicated by: ❑ Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings /characteristics ❑ vegetation lines /changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: water color is clear - no signs of pollutants.
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
'A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e g , where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e g , flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings: likely amphibians present.
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:Forested/open water.
Wetland quality. Explain:Fair to Good.
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow_ Relationship with Non -TNW:
Pi
Flow is: ck List. Explain:
Surface flow is: Pick.List
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: Pick List. Explain findings:
El Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximitv (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pick List, river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: P cr L' isi.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Pick List floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish /spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick L si t'
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directiv abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Z. Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Perennial RPW A exhibits geomorphology, hydrology, and biological indicators consistent with
perennail flowing streams in the piedmont ecoregion as documented by the attached NCDWQ Stream Identification
Assessment Forms.
Tributaries of TN W where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are.

❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 200 linear feet 6 width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters: .
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
❑ Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW: .
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
❑ Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
❑ Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED ]INTERSTATE OR INTRA - STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
"See Footnote # 3
v To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps /EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
❑ Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non - jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
❑ Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
❑ Lakes /ponds: acres.
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: See map.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Applicable /supporting case law:
❑ Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
❑ Other information (please specify):

B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

m
rD A'
n_ . cQ
rD rD
Ln -N
m fD
<
EL
pF O
® n
rD
C
rD
m
Threatened & Endangered/ Protected
Species Evaluation

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.
Endangered Protected/Species Survey
For City of Charlotte Storm Water Services:
4018 Hiddenbrook Drive Project
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
By: Heath Caldwell
August 3, 2015
Charlotte ", '" '' '0" 'ffi "c'e':' ' ' ' ' ' " i .... ........ w" v w", - wi, et"I "a' n ic—s'-' 'e" pg.c, 'o" 'm" 'A' 's' h, ' e' v i I ' I el' ' Office: 1 ' Il " "
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] [e-mail]

CSWS 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive - Endangered /Protected Species Survey
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The project site is located at 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina. The site can be found on the Charlotte East USGS Topographic
Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.2003 °N, longitude is - 80.7847 °W. The topography
consists of a sloping upland stream corridor with the elevation ranging from 674 to 694
ft. (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1: Charlotte East USGS Quadrangle
fir' -_qmbyr 1• 1W,
WEN"
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
r
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

CSWS 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive — Endangered /Protected Species Survey
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website htta: / /www.fws.2ov /endan2ered/ was
referenced to determine the occurrence of Threatened and Endangered species for
Mecklenburg County North Carolina (Table 1). Table 1 summarizes listed /protected
species recognized in Mecklenburg County as of April 2, 2015. Maps and aerial
photographs were assembled and the site was investigated on July 28, 2015.
Three plant species with federal protection were included` in the survey efforts:
• Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally Endangered,
is typically found in open habitats which historically have been maintained by
wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most occurrences are limited to
roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility rights -of -way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides, clear cuts, dry limestone
bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring abundant sunlight and little
competition from other plant species.
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered, requires
habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species requires periodic fire
as a part of its ecology.
A total of three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring
in Mecklenburg County:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of open water
such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are suitable fish
populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally Endangered, is
restricted to cool, clean, well- oxygenated water. Stable, silt- free stream beds
are required for this species. Typically stable areas occur where the stream banks
are well- vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Northern Long -eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally Threatened.
During summer, northern long -eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath
bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non -
reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. It has
also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds. Northern long -
eared bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.Table
1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for Mecklenburg County
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

CSWS 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive — Endangered /Protected Species Survey
County: MecklenburLy, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
* *Database search performed on July 30, 2015
Group Name Status Lead Office
Clams Carolina heelsalitter
(Lasmizona decorata)
Flowering Smooth coneflower
Plants (Echinacea laevizata)
Endangered Asheville Ecological
Services Field Office
Endangered Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office
Flowering Schweinitz's sunflower Endangered
Plants (Helianthus schweinitzii)
Flowering Michaux's sumac (Rhus Endangered
Plants michauxii)
Mammals Northern Lone -Eared Bat Threatened
(Mvotis sententrionalis)
RESULTS:
Habitat Descriptions
(Species lists reflect the seasonality of the survey)
Asheville Ecological
Services Field Office
Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office
Twin Cities Ecological
Services Field Office i
The site is bisected by Hiddenbrook Drive and is characterized by residential properties
which abut the stream corridor. Steep, wooded slopes extend from residential lawn areas
to the stream bank. Vegetation along the riparian corridor consists of typical residential
varieties found within the region. A majority of the wooded canopy within the site
included Red Maple (Acer rubrum), Sweet -gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), pawpaw
(Asimina triloba), and mulberry (Morus rubra). Understory shrub /sapling species
included juvenile species of the abovementioned canopy trees as well as inkberry (Ilex
glabra), and Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense). Herbaceous and vine species found on
site included English ivy (Hedra helix), Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),
Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia),
Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), Christmas Fern (Polystichum acrostichoides) and
multiflora rose (Rosa multiora).
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard 54 Rindner. PLLC.

CSWS 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive — Endangered /Protected Species Survey
Endangered/Protected Species Results
• Although limited habitat exists within the transitional areas between the
residential lawn and wooded areas for Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's Sumac
and Smooth Coneflower, examination of these areas revealed no occurrences on-
site.
• No habitat exists on the site for Bald Eagles, and there were no sightings nor were
any nesting sites observed.
• The on -site stream is degraded and does not supply a consistent volume of
hydrology to provide suitable habitat for the Carolina Heelsplitter. No individuals
were observed during the visual survey nor would any be expected on -site.
• According to information supplied by USFWS, potential late spring /summer
habitat exists for the Northern Long- Eared Bat (NLEB) within the forested
riparian areas of the site. Typically sites requiring cutting or clearing of woody
vegetation would be subject to section 7 and /or section 9 of the ESA which would
restrict these activities from May 15 through August 15. However, due to the
nature of the project (maintenance of transportation right -of -way), the location
and its limited footprint, this project would not be expected to have any adverse
effect on NLEB habitat and should be exempt from any clearing moratorium
associated with the NLEB rule.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
We have no recommendations for this site as it relates to the occurrence or management
of federally threatened and endangered species.
Respectfully submitted,
cao'4
Heath Caldwell, Environmental Scientist
August 3, 2015
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

CSWS 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive — Endangered /Protected Species Survey
Curriculum Vitae for Heath Caldwell
Education: B.S. Zoology, Miami University
M.S. Environmental Science, The Ohio State University
Mr. Heath Caldwell, PWS, has more than 15 years of experience in environmental
consulting performing natural resources investigations and permitting for
transportation, utility, commercial, residential, institutional, and other infrastructure
facilities. He has managed the preparation of numerous environmental documents
including protected species studies, wetland delineations, Section 404/401 and
related permitting, NEPA documents and ecological restoration. His extensive
experience in the Midwest and Southeast has provided the opportunity to work on
many diverse projects and develop multiple productive relationships within these
regions including:
❖ Multiple Residential /Commercial Developments, North /South Carolina 2014-
2015 in which Mr. Caldwell provided assessments of critical habitat areas for
T &E species, presence /absence determinations, stream /wetlands assessments and
delineations, acquired appropriate jurisdictional determinations from the USACE
and NCDENR. Identified potential project alternatives for avoidance and
minimization of impacts in reducing permitting (Section 404/401) time and
mitigation cost.
❖ City of Charlotte CSWS, North Carolina 2012 -2014 in which Mr. Caldwell
provided technical direction and project management for multiple storm water
capital improvement projects /stream restoration projects throughout
Charlotte /Mecklenburg County. Project components involved coordination and
scheduling of monitoring tasks, development of assessment strategies, provide
oversight for field assessments of stream geomorphology, long profile and cross -
section survey, data review and report preparation. Additional appurtenant tasks
included wetland delineation /assessment, Section 404/401 permitting, threatened
and endangered species evaluations, and mitigation siting and design.
❖ North Carolina Department of Transportation, North Carolina 2012 in which Mr.
Caldwell delineated jurisdictional wetlands and streams, evaluated wetlands and
streams using state and Federal methods, developed conceptual wetland and
stream mitigation plans, performed surveys for threatened and endangered species
evaluations, and assisted with the submittal of Section 404 and 401 permit
applications for proposed roadway expansions /extensions.
❖ Chesapeake Energy, Wheeling, West Virginia 2011 Mr. Caldwell assessed
surrounding environmental resources associated with a proposed natural gas
extraction facility in Wheeling, WV. Project tasks included jurisdictional
determinations of onsite wetlands and streams, stream and wetland quality
assessments, assessments of critical habitat areas for T &E species,
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rmdner, PLLC.

CSWS 4018 Hiddenbrook Drive — EndangerediProtected Species Survey
presence /absence determinations, and consultation with commenting federal and
state agencies.
❖ SCDOT On -Call Environmental Permitting Services, South Carolina 2011 Mr.
Caldwell assisted with Section 401/404 permitting and related services for
roadway and bridge projects associated with the environmental permitting
services contract with South Carolina Department of Transportation. Tasks
included permit application preparation, wetland delineations and jurisdictional
determinations, federal and state threatened and endangered species habitat
assessments, GPS /GIS mapping, and regulatory negotiations.
YVE E
r ........ . ....... ..,..a,,,,.,H,._,.,..,......,
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.