Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0023736_ERP_20200528NAME OF POTW Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) 1. Introduction It is the responsibility of the City of Lenoir Gunpowder Creek WWTP NCO023736 to enforce all applicable Federal, State, and local pretreatment regulations. These regulations are outlined in Federal regulation 40 CFR 403 and State regulation 15A NCAC 2H .0900, and the local SUO. This Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) has been established as an element of the POTW's pretreatment program. The purpose of the ERP is to provide for fair and equitable treatment of all Users for anticipated enforcement situations. In general, enforcement actions will be taken in accordance with this enforcement Response Plan. However, the enforcement actions available are not exclusive (NC Model SUO Section 8.4). Therefore, any combination of the enforcement actions can be taken against a non -compliant user. Enforcement actions taken in response to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 441 will be taken/decided on a case -by -case basis. 2. Enforcement Actions Available to the POTW The Director of the POTW is empowered through North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.6A and the local Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) to take a wide variety of enforcement actions. The following is a list of those actions and the corresponding section of the local SUO that describes each. Corresponding sections from the NC model SUO are listed as well. Notice of Violation Consent Orders Show Cause Hearing Administrative Orders Emergency Suspensions Termination of Permit Local SUO Section NC Model SUO Section 8.1(a) 8.1(b) 8.1(c) 8.1(d) 8.1(e) 8.1(f) Modeled after Comprehensive Guide, Chapter 8: ERP Page: 3 Appendix 8-A, revised June 2008; June 2019 Civil Penalties 8.2 Injunctive Relief 8.3(b) Water Supply Severance 8.3(c) In addition to the actions listed above, a User who violates the provisions of NCGS 143-215.613 may be referred by the Director to the District Attorney for possible criminal prosecution. In determining the amount of civil penalties for a particular violation the Director shall consider the following factors (NC model SUO section 8.2) 1. The degree and extent of the harm to the natural resources, to the public health, or to public or private property resulting from the violation; 2. The duration and gravity of the violation; 3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality; 4. The cost of rectifying the damage; 5. The amount of money saved by non-compliance; 6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally; 7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply; 8. The costs of enforcement to the POTW. Adjudicatory hearing procedures regarding permit decisions, civil penalties, and administrative orders may be found in the SUO (NC Model SUO Section 10). 3. Investigation of Noncompliance The Staff of the POTW will generally investigate User compliance with permits or the provisions of the SUO in three ways: 1. on -site inspections of the User to include scheduled and unscheduled visits; 2. scheduled and unscheduled sampling of the User's effluent, alone or in conjunction with other Users' effluents; 3. review of self -monitoring data, if required, from the User. The compliance status of Significant Industrial Users will be evaluated at a minimum once every 6 months. 4. Types of Violations The following is a list of different types of violations, by category. This list is not inclusive but serves as a general list of anticipated types of noncompliance. The User's permit, local SUO, and State and Federal regulations serve as additional references for pretreatment requirements. Unpermitted Discharges. Users are responsible for obtaining and renewing permits, if required. Modeled after Comprehensive Guide, Chapter 8: ERP Page: 4 Appendix 8-A, revised June 2008; June 2019 Permit Limits. Users are responsible for maintaining compliance with all effluent limits. The POTW will evaluate the extent of the limits violation(s). In determining the extent of violation(s), Significant Non - Compliance (SNC) as defined by State and EPA regulations will be determined. Self -Monitoring Violations. A User who fails to adequately conduct all the monitoring required in the permit, including monitoring frequencies and sampling methods specified, is in violation. This includes a User who does not resample per their permit when a limit violation occurs. Reporting Violations. A User who fails to provide information (e.g. self monitoring reports) required in their Permit or the SUO in the required time frame is in violation. Late or incomplete reports will also be considered violations. A SIU who submits a report more than 30 days late is possibly considered in SNC. Permit Conditions. Failure to apply or reapply for a permit is considered a violation. Users who violate the general or other conditions (e.g. slug loading, dilution prohibition) outlined in their permits or the SUO shall be considered to be in violation. Enforcement Orders. Failure to meet the requirements of an order (e.g. interim limits, milestone dates), whether the order was entered into voluntarily or mandated by the POTW, shall be considered a violation. Missing a scheduled compliance milestone by more than 90 days is considered SNC. S. Responses: Timeframes, Responsible Officials, Escalated Actions. The attached chart further outlines types of violations and specifies POTW actions (initial and escalated), timeframes, and the officials responsible for completing the actions. This chart shall be considered a part of the Enforcement Response Plan. Responses to violations affecting the operation of the POTW, resulting in POTW NPDES violations, or resulting in environmental harm or endangerment to human health will be taken immediately or as soon as possible following discovery. A User may be sent a Notice of Violation (NOV) or Notice of Noncompliance (NNC) for each individual violation. Alternatively, violations over a period of time may be summarized. In general, NOVs in response to violations will be issued within 30 days of discovery of the violations. Users found to be in SNC for two (2) consecutive 6-month periods will be issued an enforceable order to return to compliance. In all cases, escalated or continuing enforcement action will be taken against Users who do not return to compliance in a timely manner. Cases of falsifying reports, tampering with monitoring or sampling equipment, or otherwise preventing the collection of representative data may be referred to the District Attorney for possible criminal investigation. Show cause hearings may be held at the Director's discretion prior to taking enforcement actions. Modeled after Comprehensive Guide, Chapter 8: ERP Page: 5 Appendix 8-A, revised June 2008; June 2019 6. Chart: Responses Applicable to SIU/CIUs and Users Not Subject to 40 CFR 441 (see #7) Type of Violation POTW Action Timeframe Responsible Expected Action Escalated Action Official from User if Needed Unpermitted Discharges Unpermitted Discharge Notice of Violation Within 30 Days of Pretreatment File Permit Suspend Service Unaware of Discovery of Coordinator Application Until Permit Is Requirement Discharge Issued Unpermitted Discharge Notice of Violation with Within 30 Days of Director File Permit Suspend Service Aware of Requirement Penalty Discovery of Application Until Permit Is Assessed Discharge Issued Unpermitted Discharge Order to Cease Process Order to Cease Director File Permit Suspend Service results in NPDES or Causing Violation Immediately Application Until Permit Issued other State issued Notice of Violation with Notice of Violation Steps Taken to avoid permit or State General recommended minimum within 7 days violation Statute violations of $1,000 and up to $25,000/day per violation Penalty Unpermitted Discharge Suspend Service Suspend Service Director File Permit results in Notice of Violation Immediately Application Endangerment with recommended Notice of Violation Steps Taken to avoid minimum $1,000 and up within 7 days future endangerment to $25,000 per day per violation Penalty Modeled after Comprehensive Guide, Chapter 8: ERP Page: 1 Appendix 8-A, revised June 2008; June 2019 Type of Violation POTW Action I Timeframe I Responsible Expected Action Escalated Action Official from User if Needed Permit Limits Violations Permit Limits Violation Single Event Minor Permit Limits Violation Technical Review Criteria (TRC) Permit Limits Violation Significant non - Permit Limits Violation results in NPDES or other State issued permit or State General Statute violations Permit Limits Violation results in Endangerment Notice of non - Compliance or Notice of Violation with $0 to $25,000 Within 30 days of receiving data Pretreatment Conduct Additional Coordinator Monitoring and Return to Compliance Notice of Violation with Within 30 days of Pretreatment $0 to $25,000 Penalty receiving data Coordinator Notice of Violation with Within 30 days of Pretreatment $0 to $25,000 Penalty Receiving all Data Coordinator Order to Cease process causing Violation Notice of Violation with recommended minimum $1,000 and up to $25,000/ day per violation Penalty Suspend Service Notice of Violation with a recommended minimum $1,000 and up to $25,000 per day per violation Penalty Order to Cease Director Immediately Notice of Violation Within 7 days of Discovering Violation Suspend Service Director Immediately Notice of Violation within 7 days Modeled after Comprehensive Guide, Chapter 8: ERP Page: 2 Appendix 8-A, revised June 2008; June 2019 Conduct additional monitoring and return to compliance Report cause of Non-compliance and steps taken to prevent violation Report cause of Non-compliance and steps taken to prevent violation File for Reissuance of Permit Notice of Violation with Penalty Second Notice of Violation with Increased Penalty Enforceable Schedule (AO) if not resolved by end of 2nd 6-month period Suspend Service Until resolved Enforceable Schedule (AO) if not resolved by end of 2nd 6-month period Type of Violation POTW Action Timeframe Responsible Expected Action Escalated Action Official from User if Needed Other Violations Self Monitoring Notice of Violation with Within 30 Days of Pretreatment Conduct Missed Second Notice of Violations a recommended Discovery Coordinator Sampling Violation with Minimum Penalty Equal Penalty equal to or Greater Than Cost of Twice Cost of Missed Testing Missed Testing Reporting Violations Notice of Within 30 days of Pretreatment Submit Report Notice of Violation Late Report Non -Compliance the Report Due Date Coordinator Penalty Assessed Possible SNC if over 30 days Reporting Violations Notice of Within 30 days of Pretreatment Submit Revised Notice of Violation Incomplete or Non -Compliance Report Submission Coordinator Report Penalty Assessed Inaccurate Reports Reporting Violations Referred to District As soon as suspected Director Intentional Attorney Falsification Violation of Permit Notice of Violation with Within 30 Days of Pretreatment Varies Second Notice of Conditions Penalty up to $25,000 Discovery Coordinator Violation per day per violation or with Increased Director Penalty Violation of Permit Suspend Service Suspend Service Director Steps taken to Avoid Conditions Notice of Violation with Immediately Reoccurrence results in NPDES up to $25,000 per day Notice of Violation or other State issued per violation Penalty Within 7 days permit or State General Statute violations or Endangerment Modeled after Comprehensive Guide, Chapter 8: ERP Page: 3 Appendix 8-A, revised June 2008; June 2019 Type of Violation POTW Action Timeframe Responsible Expected Action Escalated Action Official from User if Needed Other Violations (cont) Violations of Notice of Violation Within Time frame Pretreatment Additional Same as Escalated Enforcement Order assess Stipulated listed in Coordinator Monitoring and Action for Same Conditions or Limits Penalty and Actions Enforcement Order or Steps taken to avoid Type of Violation listed for same violation or For the Same Director recurrence Possible Revocation type in ERP Type of Violation in of Order ERP Failure to Meet a Notice of Violation and Within 14 days of Pretreatment Submit a schedule to Show Cause Hearing Milestone Date in an Assess Penalty Discovery Coordinator complete the Enforcement Order Stipulated in Order Requirement (Does not Affect Other Dates Failure to Meet a Show Cause Hearing Within 30 days of Director Negotiate new Order Possible Milestone Date in an and Assess Stipulated Discovery and Abide by New Termination of Enforcement Order Penalties Conditions Service Affects Other Dates) Failure to Meet Final Notice of Violation and Within 14 days of Director Document Possible Compliance Date Assess stipulated Discovery Compliance Termination of penalties Service Modeled after Comprehensive Guide, Chapter 8: ERP Page: 4 Appendix 8-A, revised June 2008; June 2019 7. Chart: Responses Applicable to Dental Dischargers Subject to 40 CFR 441 Type of Violation POTW Action Timeframe Responsible Expected Action Escalated Action Official from User if Needed Failure to submit one- Reminder via phone, Within 60 days of PT Coordinator Submit report within NOV; require report time compliance report email or letter deadline 45 days within 30 days (10/ 12/2020) Continued failure to 2" d NOV with Notice of Within 30 days of PT Coordinator Submit report within Issue penalty up to submit one-time Intent (to issue penalty) most recent due date 10 days an amount equal to compliance report (Recommend certified the cost of installing mail) an amalgam separator Continued failure to Turn over to POTW submit report or pay attorney for collection penalty Enforcement actions taken in response to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 441 not listed above will be taken/decided on a case -by -case basis. Modeled after Comprehensive Guide, Chapter 8: ERP Pagc: 5 Appendix 8-A, revised June 2008; June 2019