Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170887 Ver 2_Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel - MY5 Report_20230926ID#* 20170887 Version* 2 Select Reviewer: Katie Merritt Initial Review Completed Date 09/27/2023 Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/26/2023 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No Type of Mitigation Project:* Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name: * Email Address: Kaitlyn Hogarth khogarth@wildlandseng.com Project Information ID#: * 20170887 Version:* 2 Existing ID# Existing Version Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank Project Name: Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel County: Chatham Document Information Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Closeout Report File Upload: Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel - MY5 3.56M6 Report.pdf Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted... Signature ................................................... ......... ......... ...... ................................ ............................................. Print Name:* Kaitlyn Hogarth Signature: * 1441.TLYI NacaA-rV- Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DW R 1 D# 2017-0887v2 Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC's Cane Creek Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Monitoring Year 5 Report September 2023 WILDLANDS ENGINEERING PREPARED BY: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 Raleigh, NC 27609 Phone: 919-851-9986 MONITORING YEAR 5 REPORT Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC's Cane Creek Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................2 1.1 Project Description.................................................................................................................2 1.2 Bank Sponsor.......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Project History........................................................................................................................2 1.4 Project Location...................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Project Design......................................................................................................................... 3 2 VEGETATION MONITORING....................................................................................................4 2.1 Success Criteria....................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol................................................................... 4 2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring.......................................................................................... 5 2.4 Parcel Adaptive Management................................................................................................ 6 2.5 Conclusions.............................................................................................................................7 3 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF TABLE. Table 1 Project Reporting History Table 2 Tree Species Selected for Buffer Restoration Table 3 Character/Existing Tree Species Table 4 Monitoring Plot Summary — Planting (As -Built) Table 5 Monitoring Plot Summary — Year 5 APPENDICES Appendix A: Figures Figure 1 Parcel Location Map Figure 2 Service Area Map Figure 3 Credit Generation Map Figure 4 Monitoring Components Map Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 6 Vegetation Plot Success Summary Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Table 8 Average Planted Tree Height by Plot Graph 1 Vegetation Plot Trends Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Appendix E: Overview Photographs Fence Encroachment Resolution Photographs k4W Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 1 Monitoring Year 5 Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description The Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel (Parcel) is part of the Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC (Sponsor) Cane Creek Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank (Bank). The Parcel was designed in concurrence with the Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Bank: Bethel Branch Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-02365). The Chatham County project surrounds three unnamed tributaries which drain to South Fork Cane Creek, Cane Creek, and eventually to the Haw River. The Parcel location is depicted in Figure 1. The purpose of the Parcel is to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits to compensate for unavoidable buffer impacts in the 03030002 Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) of the Cape Fear River Basin, within the Haw River Sub -watershed of the Jordan Lake Watershed (Figure 2). Prior to construction, the Parcel had been mostly used for livestock grazing with small portions maintained as managed herbaceous cover since before 1993. The livestock pastures were dominated by fescue grasses (Festuca spp.) and although much of the riparian area on UT2 was wooded, livestock had access to the streams throughout. Riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams onsite were restored and livestock was fenced out in order to help reduce non -point source contaminant discharges to downstream waters in the Jordan Lake Watershed within the Cape Fear River Basin. Approximately 16.30 acres are now protected with a permanent conservation easement. Of the 16.30 acres, 10.86 acres were mitigated to generate Jordan Lake riparian buffer credit. Of those 10.86 acres, 3.44 acres qualify for buffer restoration, 4.87 acres for enhancement (via livestock exclusion), and 2.55 acres for buffer preservation (Figure 3). Riparian area widths are a minimum of 30 feet from the top of stream banks out to a maximum of 60 feet. Together these activities have generated 266,899.400 ftz of riparian buffer mitigation credits after applying the appropriate credit reductions and ratios. 1.2 Bank Sponsor The Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel is a part of the Bank. The Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) for the Bank was signed in March 2018. Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 Charlotte, NC 28203 Phone: 704-332-7754 Attn: Shawn Wilkerson Email: swilkerson@wildlandseng.com 1.3 Project History The construction of the Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank was completed in April 2019. No major adjustments were made during construction that would drastically affect the Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel. Due to a survey error some adjustments were made to the conservation easement boundaries, but the total acreage remains the same. The Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) for the Bank and the Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) were approved in March and November of 2018. Project reporting history dates can be found in Table 1 below. Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 2 Monitoring Year 5 Report Table 1. Project Reporting History Activity Completion Date Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC Cane Creek UMBI March 2018 Bank Parcel Development Package Approved November 2018 Conservation Easement September 2019 Bare Root Planting April 2019 As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document September 2019 Year 1 Monitoring Completed November 2019 Year 2 Monitoring Completed September 2020 Year 3 Monitoring Completed October 2021 Year 4 Monitoring Completed September 2022 Fence Post Relocated to Edge of Easement Boundary October 2022 Year 5 Monitoring Completed September 2023 1.4 Project Location The Parcel is located in Chatham County near the town of Snow Camp, NC (35° 49' 45.56" N and 79° 22' 11.37" W) in the Cape Fear River Basin (03030002) and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Subbasin 03-06-04 (Figure 2). From Raleigh, take US-64 West to the exit for NC-87 N. Continue north on NC-87 for 1.8 miles and turn left onto Silk Hope Gum Spring Road. Continue on Silk Hope Gum Spring Road for 8.1 miles. Turn right onto Silk Hope -Lindley Mill Road and continue for 2.9 miles. Turn left onto Moon Lindley Road and continue for 0.6 miles. Turn right onto R E Wright Road and the project area is accessible through the gate 0.1 miles on the left. 1.5 Project Design Approximately 16.30 acres are now protected with a permanent conservation easement. Of the 16.30 acres, a total of 10.86 acres of riparian areas have been mitigated to generate Jordan Lake riparian buffer credit. Credit generation is shown in Figure 3 and the current credit ledger is in Appendix B. All areas of the conservation easement were fenced using woven wire fencing and barbed wire to prevent encroachment by livestock. The pond and earthen dam at the upstream end of UT3 were removed and the stream channel was fully restored as a part of the Bethel Branch stream and wetland mitigation bank. The buffer restoration areas were replanted with appropriate native tree species within the project corridors. The revegetation plan included permanent seeding, planting of bare root trees, live stakes, herbaceous plugs, and controlling invasive species growth. Bare root trees selected for planting were native bottomland hardwood species typical for Piedmont Bottomland Forest communities as defined by Schafale (2012). Tree species selected, as well as size specifications, planting density, and plant composition are detailed in Table 2. Table 2. Tree Species Selected for Buffer Restoration Scientific Name Common Name Size (feet) Planting Density (Stems/Acre) Planting Composition N Betula nigra River Birch 2-3 129 20 Celtis occidentalis Northern Hackberry 2-3 20 3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 2-3 109 17 Liriodendron tulipifera I Tulip Poplar 2-3 39 6 Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 3 Monitoring Year 5 Report Scientific Name Common Name Size (feet) Planting Density (Stems/Acre) Planting Composition N Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 2-3 129 20 Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak 2-3 64 10 Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak 2-3 44 7 Quercus phellos Willow Oak 2-3 64 10 Ulmus americana American Elm 2-3 44 7 Totals 642 100 Natural recruitment of desirable Character Tree species shall be counted towards the survival and success rate of the restored site. "Character Trees" are defined as planted or volunteer species identified from a survey of local vegetation on less degraded sections of the specified stream and from reference literature that details native species. A partial list of Character Tree species is included in Table 3 below. Table 3. Character/Existing Tree Species Scientific Name Common Name Acer rubrum Red Maple Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum Quercus alba White Oak Quercus nigra Water Oak Quercus phellos Willow Oak Ulmus americana American Elm Source: Schafale (2012) 2.0 VEGETATION MONITORING 2.1 Success Criteria Buffer vegetative success criteria are based upon the density and growth of Character Tree Species, as defined in Tables 2 & 3. Vegetative success criteria are based upon guidelines set forth in the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015). Success is defined as a minimum of 260 live stems per acre at the end of the 5-year monitoring period with a minimum of four native hardwood species, where no one species comprises more than 50 percent of stems. Height, DBH, and visual assessment of damage and vigor will be used as indicators of overall health. Desirable volunteer species may be included to meet the success criteria upon NCDWR approval. If vegetative success criteria are not achieved based on acreage density calculations from combined monitoring plots over the entire restoration area, or if an inspection of a buffer restoration site indicates that portions of the Parcel do not have sufficient stem densities or are otherwise deficient, supplemental planting shall be performed with tree species approved by NCDWR. Supplemental planting shall be performed as needed until vegetative success criteria are met. No quantitative measurements of herb assemblages will be required to meet the vegetative success criteria. 2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol The quantity of monitoring plots was determined in accordance with the Carolina Vegetative Sampling (CVS) Protocols (Levels I & 11) such that at least 2 percent of the restoration area is encompassed in Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 4 Monitoring Year 5 Report monitoring plots. Two 10-meter by 10-meter and one 5-meter by 20-meter vegetation monitoring plots were installed within the buffer restoration area to measure the survival of the planted trees (Figure 4). GPS points were taken, and PVC pipe was used to mark the four corners of each plot. Each year a reference photo is taken from the southwest corner of each plot. All planted stems within the plots were marked with flagging tape and recorded. The total number of each tree species planted within the monitoring plots, as well as planting density and composition at as -built are included in Table 4 for comparison purposes. No planting was required in livestock exclusion or preservation areas, however visual assessments are conducted each year and any issues identified will be photographed, corrected, and reported as part of the annual monitoring report. Table 4. Monitoring Plot Summary— Planting (As -Built) Scientific Name Total Stems Flagged (MYO) Calculated Planting Density (Stems/Acre) Planting Composition N Betula nigra 9 121 20 Celtis occidentalis 1 14 2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6 81 13 Liriodendron tulipifera 3 40 7 Platanus occidentalis 12 162 27 Quercus lyrata 3 40 7 Quercus pagoda 7 95 15 Quercus phellos 3 40 7 Ulmus americana 1 14 2 Totals 45 607 100 2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring The three vegetation plots were sampled in September 2023 at the end of the fifth growing season. Reference photos taken from the southwest corner of each plot can be found in Appendix D along with the stem count raw data. The total number of each tree species planted within the monitoring plots, as well as planting density and composition, for Monitoring Year 5 are detailed in Table 5 below. Vegetation result tables with planted stem density, stem count by plot and species, as well as a vegetation plot success summary are available in Appendix C. Vegetation monitoring during Year 5 resulted in an average planted stem density of 364 stems per acre, with individual plots ranging from 283 to 445 stems per acre. All plots individually exceed the final requirement of 260 stems per acre. The density in planted stems has remained stable since Monitoring Year 3, with the trees continuing to grow larger. When volunteer stems are included in density calculations, the average stem density across vegetation plots rises to 769 stems per acre. Volunteer stems include desirable species, such as river birch (Betula nigra), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and multiple elm species (Ulmus spp.). The average planted stem height for each of the three vegetation plots is 8.2, 14, and 9.6 feet. Table 8 in Appendix D shows average planted stem heights for each vegetation plot across all 5 monitoring years and Graph 1 shows the upward trend in average height across all vegetation plots. All plots have 5 planted species per plot and all but one of the surviving planted stems have a vigor of excellent (4), as can be seen in Appendix D. Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 5 Monitoring Year 5 Report Table 5. Monitoring Plot Summary —Year 5 Scientific Name Total Stems Flagged Calculated Live Stem Density (Stems/Acre) Live Stem Composition N Betula nigra 2 27 7 Celtis occidentalis 1 14 4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 67 19 Liriodendron tulipifera 1 14 4 Platanus occidentalis 11 148 41 Quercus lyrata 2 27 7 Quercus pagoda 0 0 0 Quercus phellos 3 40 11 Ulmus americana 2 27 7 Totals 27 364 100 Visual assessments of the livestock exclusion and preservation areas within the conservation easement concluded: • Fencing is in good condition throughout the site; • no livestock access within the conservation easement; • no encroachment has occurred; • diffuse flow is being maintained in the easement area; and • there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would negatively affect the function of the buffer. 2.4 Parcel Adaptive Management In January 2023 scattered resprouts of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) along UT1 and UT2 received follow up treatments using glyphosate in a cut stump herbicide application. The persistent stems of tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) along UT2 also received follow up treatments via cut stump and basal bark application in January 2023. Another follow-up cut stump treatment was done in July. Additionally, herbicide ring sprays were applied to thick vegetation around tree stems on UT2 and UT3 in April 2023. Later, soil amendments were added to the base of smaller trees to help them continue to thrive despite the competition. It was discovered that the corner of the conservation easement on the south side of UT2 Reach 1 was in the middle of a gravel farm road and the fencing contractor had installed the fence corner at the edge of the road inside the conservation easement. The situation was discussed with USACE in June 2022 and the corner of the fence was moved outside the easement on October 19, 2022. The omission of this fencing encroachment discovery from the MY4 Report was an oversight. The affected area covers approximately 132 square feet. Vegetation is growing, the area is stable and protected by the fence, and is no longer a concern. The location of the fence post relocation is shown in Figure 4 and current pictures from September 2023 have been included in Fence Encroachment Resolution Photographs in Appendix E. Adaptive measures will be developed, or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented in the event that the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in the BPDP. Parcel maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include but are not limited to; excess tree mortality caused by fire, flooding, drought, easement encroachment, or insects. Any actions Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 6 Monitoring Year 5 Report implemented will be designed to achieve the success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. 2.5 Conclusions Vegetation is thriving across the Parcel and exceeding the final performance standard of 260 stems per acre. Monitoring Year 5 data shows an average planted stem density of 364 stems per acre across vegetation plots, with individual plots ranging from 283 to 445 planted stems per acre. When desirable volunteer species are included in calculations, the average stem density increases to 769 stems per acre. The average planted stem height across vegetation plots is eleven feet tall. Overall, trees look healthy and vigor ratings are excellent. As in all previous years, monitoring data shows positive trends in vegetation establishment and this trajectory is expected to continue. The fence encroachment was discovered, fence post relocated, and is no longer a concern. 3.0 REFERENCES Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., Steven D., & Wentworth, T.R. (2008). CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.2 [PDF file]. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1- 5.pdf NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. (2004). Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://ie.unc.edu/files/2019/10/buffer-restoration.pdf NC Department of Environmental Quality. (2015). 15A NCAC 02B .0259 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers [PDF file]. Retrieved from http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20- %20environmental%20quality/chapter%2002%20- %20environmental%20management/subchapter%20b/15a%20ncac%2002b%20.0295.pdf Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.R., & White, P.S. (1998). A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure [PDF file]. Castanea, 63:262-274. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/pubs/castanea63;262.pdf Schafale, M.P. (2012). Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation [PDF file]. Retrieved from https:Hfiles.nc.gov/dncr-nhp/documents/files/Natural-Community- Classification-Fourth-Approximation-2012.pdf Wildlands Holdings IV, LLC. (2018). Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Development Package. NCDWR, Raleigh NC. Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 7 Monitoring Year 5 Report APPENDIX A. Figures w y - Project Parcels Conservation Easement � C y - � C7 Russel! Fed A a dick Creev a,1i r. ALAMANCE CHATHAM fir, �o hnso n a Moon LindfPy Rry �eeK �Churen� c, �a Bethel Branch Parcel Location � �Oil'Car 5� se Vd1' nso+'�ra'rch �asrk g ftd mays` �� R aC k Fdr Jo hn rryv cc erg rak erlpboa Rd 772 ft r Wit/ gown Rd r �r Rd CO �� s1p�e Cr eaK t v Epps Clark F�a ax c�4F g� S n � inn Rd a �P P Y 52 �eK = �t pGp C \ c` 740 tt Figure 1. Parcel Location Map thW I L D L A N D S 0 0.5 1 Miles Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel E N G I N E E R I N G I I k Monitoring Year 5 Report Cape Fear River Basin 03030002 Chatham County, NC 1 County Boundaries HUC 03030002 Jordan Lake Sub -Watersheds Service Area - Riparian Buffer Credits Bethel Branch Parcel Location 177 i i _.._.. .'. ...... ...... _.......... r L7a A Lake Hra_h Point m 1 r 14..+l 1 1 oar, rr z � irrs� � � 1 � � I n i• • dl. 1 1 � r � � i I � i _.. ............ _.._.. .._.._.._.._.._.._+ _.._.._.._.... i • i i j HoISborou•.lf� r 0J030002 j ' I j i Haw River - 1 Upper N�w Hope . ]~ anznoro e 'Al r u. f rrl:[-oroJill - �• i+i1��r•I r Figure 2. Service Area Map W I L D L A N D S 0 5 10 Miles p Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel E N G I N E E R I N G 1 I f I I J' Monitoring Year 5 Report 4 Cape Fear River Basin 03030002 Chatham County, NC Conservation Easement (16.30 Ac) Wetlands (3.21 Ac) Project Stream (2.05 Ac) Credit Zones Buffer Restoration (2.04 Ac) Buffer Restoration - Ephemeral (0.68 Ac) Buffer Restoration - Pond Area (0.72 Ac) Livestock Exclusion (4.87 Ac) Buffer Preservation (2.55 Ac)' No Credit (0.18 Ac) , tt = Fencing ;+► �f r Non -Project Stream �. All �+ j r q Y +r M ,W. - Ilk qk� R� Y r 1 i �.1 K %i5w _._ _� Figure 3. Credit Generation Map AwW I L D L A N D S 0 175 350 Feet yjL',� Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel E N G I N E E R I N G I I I I I RI Monitoring Year 5 Report Cape Fear River Basin 03030002 Chatham County, NC F Conservation Easement (16.30 Ac) Wetlands (3.21 Ac) - Project Stream (2.05 Ac) Credit Zones` S , Buffer Restoration (2.04 Ac) ti Buffer Restoration - Ephemeral (0.68 Ac) Buffer Restoration - Pond Area (0.72 Ac) Livestock Exclusion (4.87 Ac) Buffer Preservation (2.55 Ac) No Credit (0.18 Ac) Vegetation Plot�� � r m — Fencing Non -Project Stream' wool` fiS I Y 4� WILDLANDS Oft ENGINEERING N VI Z,3=� .��4._ ;. Fence Post Relocation it =� Figure 4. Monitoring Components Map Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel 0 175 350 Feet Monitoring Year 5 Report I i I I Cape Fear River Basin 03030002 Chatham County, NC APPENDIX B. Bank Credit Ledger 'Credits shown below are only for mitigation credits approved by the UMBI, BPDP, and As -Built. Cane Creek Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument: Bethel Branch Mitigation Site Buffer Credit Ledger Cape Fear(HURiver Subwatershed A I 1 A A❑ C Date Last Updated:9-21-2023 HOLDINGS DWR Bank Parcel Project#: 2017-0887v2 Total Credits Released To Date: 240,209.46 sq. ft. Sale/ Release Date Purchaser Name or %of Credit Release Project Name Project w/ 14 Digit HUC Credits Released/Available to Bank Credits Debited/Sold From Bank Buffer Credit Balance Local Gov't Requiring Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres Square Feet Acres 10/11/2019 Tasks 1&7 Release (Excluding Pond Footprint) - 25% 54,558.50 1.25 54,558.50 1.25 NCDWR 12/11/2019 Tasks 2 & 3 Release (Excluding Pond Footprint) - 30% 75,084.42 1.72 129,642.92 2.98 NCDWR 12/11/2019 ITasks 1, 2, 3 & 7 Release (Within Pond Footprint) - 55% 17,151.75 0.39 1 146,794.67 3.37 NCDWR 3/11/2020 Task 4 Release -5% 13,344.97 0.31 160,139.64 3.68 NCDWR 4/3/2020 Task 4 Release -5% 13,344.97 0.31 173,484.61 3.98 NCDWR 6/4/2020 Epcon Holt Road, LLC Courtyards at Holt (19-011) 03030002050050 5,718.00 0.13 167,766.61 3.85 Town of Apex 6/18/2020 Construction Masters, LLC Humie Olive Place (19-015) 03030002050050 2,189.00 0.05 165,577.61 3.80 Town of Apex 9/4/2020 Friends Homes, Inc. Friends Home West Campus Multi -Family Residential (TRC#2020-0768) 03030002050050 1,179.00 0.03 164,398.61 3.77 City of Greensboro 11/2/2020 City of Greensboro Reedy Fork Creek Sewer Outfall (DWR #20200768) 03030002050050 1,416.00 0.03 162,982.61 3.74 NCDWR 1/15/2021 Tasks Release -10% 26,689.94 0.61 189,672.55 4.35 NCDWR 2/19/2021 CFMO North Carolina National Guard NCNG McLeansville Readiness Center (DWR #20201260) 03030002050050 62,425.50 1.43 127,247.05 2.92 NCDWR 7/14/2021 Coulter, Jewell, Thames, PA Olympic Mill- Mill House (TRC# 2020-2237) 03030002050050 567.00 0.01 1 126,680.05 2.91 City of Greensboro 3/4/2022 Task 6 Release -10% 26,689.94 0.61 153,369.99 3.52 NCDWR 4/25/2022 Mr. Joe Meyer 3538 Riverside Dr. 03030002050050 165.00 0.00 153,204.99 3.52 City of Greensboro 11/28/2022 Chatham Park Investors LLC Chatham Park North Village 03030002050050 46,390.50 1.06 106,814.49 2.45 Town of Pittsboro 2/23/2023 Task Release -5% 13,344.97 0.31 120,159.46 2.76 NCDWR 3/13/2023 The Carroll Companies Brittway E. Elmsley Drive Ext. (DWR tt20221179) 03030002050050 39,112.50 0.90 81,046.96 1.86 City of Greensboro 7/28/2023 1 & H Homes, Incorporated 3542 Riverside Dr. 03030002050050 131.00 0.00 80,915.96 1.86 City of Greensboro Total Balance 240,209.46 5.51 159,293.50 3.66 80,915.96 1.86 APPENDIX C. Vegetation Assessment Data Table 6. Vegetation Plot Success Summary Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 5 - 2023 Plot Year Northing Easting Planted Living Stems Missing/ Dead Stems Volunteer Stems Total Living Stems Planted Living Stems per Acre Total Living Stems per Acre Number of Planted Species Vegetation Threshold Met?* 1 (Stream VP 2) 5 758000.566 1890708.177 7 1 17 24 283 971 5 Yes 2 (Stream VP 5) 5 757574.451 1891721.689 11 0 1 12 445 486 5 Yes 3 5 757789.695 1892010.374 9 0 12 21 364 850 5 Yes *Target density is a minimum of 260 trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period. Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitorin¢ Year 5 - 2023 Current Plot Data (MY5 2023) Scientific Name Common Name Species Type VP 1 (Stream VP 2) VP 2 (Stream VP 5) VP 3 PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Betulo nigro River Birch Tree 2 2 2 4 Celtis loevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree Celtis occidentalis Northern Hackberry Shrub Tree 1 1 1 Diospyros virginiano American Persimmon Tree Froxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 2 2 13 1 1 1 2 2 3 luglons nigra Black Walnut Tree Liquidomborstyracifluo Sweet Gum Tree 3 Liriodendron tulipifero Tulip Poplar Tree 1 1 1 Nyssa sylvatica Black Gum Tree Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 2 2 2 6 6 6 3 3 3 Quercus lyroto Overcup Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 2 Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Quercus ruhro Northern Red Oak Tree 1 Ulm us Sop. Elm Tree Ulmus olota Winged Elm Tree 3 Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 1 2 2 2 Ulmus rubra Slippery Elm Tree 3 1 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 7 7 24 11 11 12 9 9 21 1 1 1 0.02 0.02 0.02 5 5 7 5 5 1 6 5 5 9 283 1 283 1 971 445 445 1 486 364 364 850 Color Coding Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteer species included in total Abbreviations PnoLS - Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes P-all - All Planted Stems T - All Woody Stems Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 5 - 2023 Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species Type MY5 (2023) MY4 (2022) MY3 (2021) MY2 (2020) MY1 (2019) MYO (2019) PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Betulo nigra River Birch Tree 2 2 6 2 2 6 2 2 5 2 2 5 5 5 5 8 8 8 Celtis loevigata Sugarberry Shrub Tree 1 Celtis occidentalis Northern Hackberry Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon Tree 1 Froxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 5 5 17 5 5 16 5 5 10 6 6 13 5 5 10 6 6 6 uglons nigra Black Walnut Tree 1 1 Liquidamborstyrocifluo Sweet Gum Tree 3 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 Nyssa sylvotico Black Gum Tree 1 Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 Quercus lyrata Overcup Oak Tree 2 2 3 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Quercus pagoda Cherrybark Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 7 7 7 Quercus phellos Willow Oak Tree 3 3 4 1 3 3 1 4 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Quercus rubra Northern Red Oak Tree 1 Ulm usspp. Elm Tree 5 4 Ulmus olota Winged Elm Tree 3 1 Ulmus americana jAmerican Elm ITree 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ulmus rubra ISlippery Elm ITree 4 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems per ACRE 27 27 57 27 27 52 27 27 45 29 29 40 36 36 41 45 45 45 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8 8 12 8 8 11 9 9 13 8 8 9 9 9 9LIL 9 364 364 769 364 364 701 364 364 607 391 391 540 486 486 553607 Color Coding Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% Volunteer species included in total Abbreviations PnoLS - Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes P-all - All Planted Stems T - All Woody Stems Table 8. Average Planted Tree Height by Plot Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 5 - 2023 Average Height by Plot (feet) Plot MYO MY3 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 1 (Stream VP 2) 2.2 2.7 4.2 5.1 6.0 8.2 2 (Stream VP 5) 2.5 3.1 5.4 9.0 12.5 14.0 3 2.1 2.2 4.0 5.3 6.8 9.6 Average Height Across Plots 2.3 2.7 4.7 6.8 8.9 11.0 Graph 1. Vegetation Plot Trends Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Monitoring Year 5 - 2023 Average Planted Tree Height Across Vegetation Plots 12.0 11.0 10.0 8.9 8.0 _ 6.8 t 6.0 00 4.7 x 4.0 2.7 2.3 2.0 0.0 MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Monitoring Year APPENDIX D. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results b - E a ' xo b , Veg Plot 2 (Stream VP 5) - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) Vigor 16 Quercus pagoda 9.7 0.5 Dead 0 17 Betula nigra 9.7 4.2 390 4 18 Betula nigra 7.9 2.7 Dead 0 19 Betula nigra 6.4 1.4 380 4 20 Platanus occidentalis 4.2 3.4 570 4 21 Platanus occidentalis 4.7 4.7 570 4 22 Quercus lyrata 5.8 5.8 Dead 0 23 Platanus occidentalis 7.0 7.1 550 4 24 Platanus occidentalis 8.1 8.4 560 4 25 Quercus lyrata 8.9 9.8 205 4 26 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.5 9.8 Dead 0 27 Platanus occidentalis 2.7 9.9 480 4 28 Platanus occidentalis 2.5 8.2 590 4 29 Quercus phellos 1.2 5.9 318 4 30 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.2 10.0 85 1 4 Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 3 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) Vigor 31 Platanus occidentalis 0.9 0.3 Dead 0 32 Quercus phellos 1.0 2.2 214 4 33 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3.2 0.4 411 4 34 Quercus pagoda 5.2 1.2 Dead 0 35 Quercus pagoda 4.7 3.5 Dead 0 36 Platanus occidentalis 8.3 4.8 597 4 37 Platanus occidentalis 8.4 2.7 508 4 38 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.4 0.7 221 2 39 Betula nigra 11.6 3.2 Dead 0 40 Platanus occidentalis 11.5 0.4 310 4 41 Betula nigra 15.7 0.4 Dead 0 42 Quercus pagoda 15.8 3.4 Dead 0 43 Quercus lyrata 19.3 4.4 177 4 44 Ulmus americana 19.7 2.5 104 4 45 Ulmus americans 1 19.9 1 0.2 1 93 1 4 Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results APPENDIX E. Overview Photographs kBethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix E: Overview Photographs 1 Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix E: Overview Photographs FENCE ENCROACHMENT RESOLUTION PHOTOGRAPHS South side of UT2 — Fence Post Relocated Outside the Easement Corner (911912023) South side of UT2 — Fence Post Relocated Outside the Easement Corner (911912023) Bethel Branch Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix E: Fence Encroachment Resolution Photographs