20210514 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20230818

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
6/23/2023
BIMS # Assigned
20210514
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Lakewood Avenue Stream Stabilization and Enhancement
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Sandra Wilbur, P.E. (City of Durham)
1b. Primary Contact Email: *
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/18/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Third Fork Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
WS-V, NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.987591
A. Processing Information
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Durham
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Longitude:
-78.904621
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Zachary Thomas:[e-mail]
1c. Primary Contact Phone: *
[phone]
a
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

1a.Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 27 - Restoration
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? *
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying forthe permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
City of Durham (via easement)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
Sandra Wilbur, P.E.
2d.Address
Street Address
101 City Hall Plaza
Address Line 2
Ste. 3100
city
Durham
Postal / Zip Code
27701
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Country
United States
Yes No
Yes No

2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Mackenzie Richards, PWS
4b. Business Name:
Kimley-Horn
4c.Address
Street Address
421 Fayetteville Street
Address Line 2
Suite 600
city
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27601
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Durham
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
See Figure 5: Property Parcels Map and
Property Parcels Table
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Durham
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:
Third Fork Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V, NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300020602
4. Project Description and History
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Country
United States
4e. Fax Number:
2b. Property size:
3.05
State / Province / Region
North Carolina
Country
United States
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The proposed project, Lakewood Avenue Stream Stabilization and Enhancement, is located in two sections along the southern side of Lakewood Avenue between the intersection of
University Drive and South Duke Street and South Roxboro Street in Durham, Durham County, NC. The area surrounding the project is largely residential housing, with scattered
commercial development.

4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?"
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1,317 linear feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:"
The purpose of the proposed project is to repair, stabilize, and enhance two sections of stream S1 to improve the water quality functions of the stream and floodplain. This will be
completed through the enhancement of the natural ecosystem and riparian community, control and reduction of streambank erosion, and improvement of aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
Additionally, the existing sidewalk adjacent to stream S1 will be replaced within its existing footprint to improve pedestrian safety and reduce future erosion in the stream channel as part of
the repair and stabilization of the eroding banks of stream S1.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:
The project is proposing to stabilize and enhance two lengths of stream S1 located south of Lakewood Avenue. The proposed stream repair will include the grading of damaged and
unstable stream banks to match natural channel contours, the placement of rip rap, rock toe protection, and brush toe protection along the stream banks to provide stabilization, and the
installation of cross vanes, step pool structures, rock and roll riffles, and log J-hook riffles within the stream to establish grade control, reduce streambank erosion, facilitate sediment
transport, and enhance aquatic species habitat. The constructed riffles will also create profile variability that is currently lacking in the system. The Piedmont Regional Hydraulic Geometry
Curve data was used as a reference point for the proposed stream channel geometry and grade control structures. As part of the stream repair, stream banks that have been graded and
disturbed will be replanted with live stakes, bare roots, and herbaceous plugs to promote vegetation establishment and restore the overall function of the riparian buffers. Additionally,
portions of the existing sidewalk adjacent to stream S1 will be replaced within its existing footprint to improve pedestrian safety and reduce future erosion in the stream channel as part of
the repair and stabilization of the eroding banks of stream S1. Construction equipment typical of stream repair and sidewalk replacement projects will be utilized including bulldozers,
excavators, graders, cranes, dump trucks, concrete trucks, and pavers.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?"
Yes
No
Comments:
Kimley-Horn staff delineated the project corridor on June 1, 2020 and June 20, 2023 and identified 4
streams within 50 feet of the project corridor (S1, S2, S3, and S4) (Figure 3). A Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination Request for the Lakewood Avenue Stream Stabilization and
Enhancement project has been attached as part of this permit application. Additionally, small portions
of the project corridor overlap with an existing Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (SAW-2021-
00554) that was issued by April Norton of the USACE on May 13, 2021. A Buffer Determination
(NBRRO# 21-67) was issued by Chang Zhang of the NCDWR on April 29, 2021 that confirmed
streams S1-S4 and determined the applicability of protected riparian buffers for those features. The
above referenced determinations are included as part of this permit application package.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
Julia Tillery of the USACE assigned this project an AID Number (SAW-2023-01207 ) via email on
June 13, 2023.
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): M. Richards, PWS, E. Radford, WPIT, CA and B. Wyatt
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?"
O Unknown
Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No future phases or impacts are proposed as part of this project.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
❑ 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type" 3c. Type of impact" 3d. S. name" 3e. Stream Type" 3f. Type of 3g. S. width 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
Q
u

S1
Impact Site 1: Stream
Permanent
Stabilization
Stream S1
Perennial
Both
14
1,023
Stabilization and
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
Enhancement (No Net Loss
of Water)
gy
Impact Site 1: Temporary
Temporary
Other
Stream S1
Perennial
Both
14
25
Construction Access
Average (feel)
(linear feet)
S3
Impact Site 2: Stream
Permanent
Stabilization
Stream S1
Perennial
Both
14
248
Stabilization and
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
Enhancement (No Net Loss
of Water)
S4
Impact Site 2: Temporary
Temporary
Other
Stream S1
Perennial
Both
14
21
Construction Access
Ave age (feat)
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
1,271
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
295
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
46
3j. Comments:
Unavoidable permanent impacts to an unnamed tributary (stream S1) will result from the enhancement of the channel and banks, resulting in no loss of
waters. Stream repair and enhancement activities will include the grading of damaged and unstable stream banks to match natural channel contours, the
placement of rip rap, rock toe protection, and brush toe protection along the stream banks to provide stabilization. These enhancement activities will also
include the installation of cross vanes, step pool structures, rock and roll riffles, and log J-hook riffles within the stream to establish grade control, reduce
streambank erosion, facilitate sediment transport, and enhance aquatic species habitat. Proposed temporary impacts to stream S1 will result from
temporary access to facilitate construction/installation of stream enhancement structures and streambank repair, and for temporary dewatering via
pump -around to allow for work in the dry. Upon completion of the project, temporary impacts will be returned to pre-existing conditions.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
Neuse Tar -Pamlico
Catawba Randleman
Goose Creek Jordan Lake
Other
6b. Impact Type
6c. Per or Temp
6d. Stream name
6e. Buffer mitigation required?
6f. Zone 1 impact
6g. Zone 2 impact
Impact Site 1: Stream Stabilization and
P
Stream S1
No
43,578
3,854
Enhancement
Impact Site 1: Temporary Construction Access
T
Stream S1
No
15,191
10,408
Impact Site 2: Stream Stabilization and
P
Stream S1
F
7,816
0
Enhancement
Impact Site 2: Temporary Construction Access
T
Stream S1
No
6,416
3,251
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 21,607.00 13,659.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 51,394.00
3,854.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 73,001.00
17,513.00
6i. Comments:
Permanent buffer zone 1 and zone 2 impacts along stream S1 will result from stream enhancement activities including the grading back of stream banks
and the installation of structures to prevent future erosion within the limits of disturbance (LOD). Outside of the LOD, permanent buffer zone 1 and zone
2 impacts at Impact Site 1 will result from a proposed permanent City of Durham stream easement along stream S1 for current and future protection,
access, and potential maintenance to the stream enhancement project. No permanent buffer impacts will result from the proposed sidewalk
replacement. The sidewalk will be replaced within its existing footprint, which requires temporary construction access only, resulting in temporary buffer
impacts only. Temporary buffer impacts to zone 1 and zone 2 along stream S1 will also result from the necessary temporary construction access to
complete the proposed stream enhancement. Temporarily impacted areas will be returned to pre-existing contours and planted with native vegetation
upon completion of the proposed work as shown in the Planting Plan Set attached as part of this permit application.

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
0
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed enhancement and stabilization of stream S1 has been designed to improve the water quality functions of the streams and the associated
floodplain, enhance and protect the natural ecosystem and riparian community, control and reduce future streambank erosion, restore aquatic habitat,
while also promoting long-term stability of the sidewalk and ensuring pedestrian safety. As part of the project, the sidewalk was designed to be replaced
in its existing footprint to avoid any permanent impacts from this activity. Temporary construction and staging areas for the stream enhancement and
sidewalk replacement have been located outside of jurisdictional areas to the greatest extent possible, while still allowing for the necessary access
points to construct the project.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Impacts to streams and protected riparian buffers within the limits of disturbance will be avoided throughout the construction process by equipment,
materials, and access corridors to the greatest extent possible. Where feasible, staging and construction access routes will be located in upland areas.
Silt fencing will be installed around the limits of disturbance to help ensure that all construction equipment will remain within the project limits throughout
the construction process. Sediment control measures will be used to reduce stormwater impacts to receiving waters and minimize runoff from the
construction sites. Pump-arounds or water diversion devices will be installed within the streams to allow for work in the dry. All temporarily impacted
areas will be returned to pre-existing conditions and replanted with native vegetation upon completion of construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
The proposed stream enhancement serves to improve the water quality within the watershed and will not result in a loss of water; therefore, no stream mitigation is proposed. Additionally,
in accordance with the Jordan Lake Watershed Buffer Rules, buffer impacts resulting from "stream restoration" or "streambank stabilization" are considered "allowable" and, therefore, do
not require mitigation. No permanent buffer impacts will result from the proposed sidewalk replacement. The sidewalk will be replaced within its existing footprint, which requires temporary
construction access only, resulting in temporary buffer impacts only.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
Stormwater will not be concentrated, collected, or discharged as a result of the proposed stream enhancement. Additionally, as part of the stream repair, streambanks that have been
regraded and disturbed will be replanted with live stakes and bare roots and will be hand -planted with herbaceous plugs to promote vegetation establishment, restore the overall function of
the riparian buffers, and maintain diffuse flow (see Planting Plan Set attached as part of this permit application). Pavement removed is being replaced within its existing footprint, resulting
in no addition of impervious surfaces.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? *
Yes No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments:
N/A
�O
u
O
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? *
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional or cumulative impacts are anticipated due to the activities of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? *
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?
Yes No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
As of August 18, 2023, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consulting (IPaC) tool lists three protected species with
potential to occur within the project vicinity. The USFWS IPaC database tool also identifies tricolored bat as a species proposed for listing as endangered
with potential to occur in within the project vicinity. Kimley-Horn reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) element occurrence database
(updated July 2023) to determine if there are any known occurrences of federally protected species within the project study area or its vicinity. The
NCNHP database records indicate that there are no known occurrences of any federally protected species within the project study area.
The Tricolored bat is currently proposed for listing and is not currently protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). A review of the NCNHP
database records (updated July 2023) indicates that there are no known occurrences of the tricolored bat in or within 1.0 mile of the project study area. If
listed prior to construction of the project, the City of Durham will coordinate with the USFWS as appropriate.
Potentially suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac is present along the maintained lot edges, sidewalk shoulders, and roadside within the project study
area. Although these areas provide potentially suitable habitat, the regular mowing maintenance schedule and herbicide application, shading, and
invasive species overgrowth observed within these areas would likely inhibit the plant's success. Additionally, a review of the NCNHP database records
(updated July 2023) indicates there are no known occurrences of Michaux's sumac in or within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to the lack of
suitable habitat and lack of known occurrences within the project study area, it has been determined that the proposed project will have "No Effect" on
Michaux's sumac.
Potentially suitable habitat for smooth coneflower is present along the maintained lot edges, sidewalk shoulders, and roadside within the project study
area. Although these areas provide potentially suitable habitat, the regular mowing maintenance schedule and herbicide application, shading, and
invasive species overgrowth observed within these areas would likely inhibit the plant's success. A review of the NCNHP database records (updated
July 2023) indicates no known occurrences of smooth coneflower within the project study area, however, there is one known occurrence of smooth
coneflower within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to the lack of suitable habitat and the lack of known occurrences within the project study area, it
has been determined that the proposed project will have "No Effect" on smooth coneflower.
Suitable habitat for the Atlantic pigtoe is not present within stream S1 within the project study area. Stream S1 is an urban, perennial stream that has
eroded, unstable banks and is impacted by sediment discharge. Stream S1 is also lacking hydrological in -channel structures, such as riffle -pool
complexes, and grade control. Stream S1 is likely not well -oxygenated due to the lack of these riffle -pool complexes, the little variation within the stream
profile, and the influence of sedimentation within the stream. Additionally, the nearest known population of Atlantic pigtoe is located approximately 49.5
miles downstream in the Cape Fear River. Stream S1 is separated from the nearest known Atlantic pigtoe population by B. Everett Jordan Lake. A
review of the NCNHP database records (updated July 2023) indicates there are no known occurrences of Atlantic pigtoe in or within 1.0 mile of the
project study area. Due to the lack of suitable habitat and the lack of known occurrences within the project study area, and the lack of connectivity to
known populations, it has been determined that the proposed project will have "No Effect" on the Atlantic pigtoe.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Yes
No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
The NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper was reviewed on August 18, 2023. No essential fish habitat was identified within the project study area or
within the vicinity of the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? *
Yes
No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
A review of the State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service database performed on August 18, 2023 and no National Register,
Study List, or Determined Eligible sites were identified within the project study area. However, additional historic resources were located within 0.5 mile
of the project study area:
Southern Railway Bridge (Determined Eligible) - located approximately 0.38 miles northeast of the project study area
Harriet Tubman YWCA (Determined Eligible) - located approximately 0.39 miles southeast of the project study area
Oldham Towers (Determined Eligible) - located approximately 0.49 miles northeast of the project study area
Urban Renewal Project 6a District (Determined Eligible) - located approximately 0.49 miles northeast of the project study area
W. T Blackwell and Co. (Bull Durham) Tobacco Factory (NHL) (National Register) - located approximately 0.47 miles north of the project study area
Greystone (Stagg House) (National Register) - located approximately 0.45 miles north of the project study area
St. Joseph's AME Church (National Register) - located approximately 0.31 miles southeast of the project study area
John Sprunt Hill House (National Register) - located approximately 0.26 miles northwest of the project study area
American Tobacco Company Manufacturing Plant (National Register) - located approximately 0.25 miles north of the project study area
Venable Tobacco Company Prizery and Receiving Room (National Register) - located approximately 0.28 miles northeast of the project study area
Hillside Park High School (Whiffed School) (National Register) - located approximately 0.35 miles south of the project study area
Venable Tobacco Company Warehouse (National Register) - located approximately 0.28 miles northeast of the project study area
Durham Hosiery Mill #2 (Gone) (National Register District) - located approximately 0.31 miles east of the project study area
Morehead Hill Historic District (National Register Historic District) - located approximately 0.04 miles northwest of the project study area
Morehead Hill Historic District Boundary Increase (National Register Historic District) - located approximately 0.15 miles northwest of the project study
area
Forest Hills Historic District (National Register Historic District) - located approximately 0.21 miles southwest of the project study area
- Stokesdale Historic District (National Register Historic District) - located approximately 0.42 miles southeast of the project study area
Downtown Durham Historic District (National Register Historic District) - located approximately 0.40 miles northeast of the project study area
- Durham County Courthouse (former) (Study List) - located approximately 0.35 miles northeast of the project study area
- Stanfrod L. Warren Library (Study List)- located approximately 0.44 miles southeast of the project study area
Scarborough House (National Register) - located approximately 0.47 miles south of the project study area
Due to the nature of the project and the minimal visual impact resulting from the enhancement and stabilization of stream S1, it is anticipated that the
proposed project will have no effect on any historical, cultural, or archaeological resources within the project vicinity.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
The FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Map (DFIRM) Panels 3720082100L (effective October 19, 2018) was accessed on August 18, 2023. FEMA-regulated
floodways, 1 % annual chance flood hazard areas, and 0.2 % annual chance flood hazard areas are not present within the project study area. However,
future conditions 1 % annual chance flood hazard areas (Zone X) are present within the project study area.
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is
helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
00_LakewoodStream_PCN Cover Letter_20230818.pdf
530.19KB
02a_LakewoodStream_Agent Authorization Form -City of Durham_Signed.pdf
272.51<13
02b_LakewoodStream_Signed _AAs.pdf
3.74MB
03_LakewoodStream_Figures.pdf
4.98MB
04_LakewoodStream_PJDRequest_20230810.pdf
9.07MB
05_BufferDetermination_Lakewood Avenue Sewer Replacement and Stream Enhancement.pdf
935.04KB
06_PJD_Lakewood Avenue Sewer Replacement and Enhancement (SAW-2021-00554).pdf
1.29MB
07_(2023-08-10)_LAKEWOOD PERMIT DRAWINGS.pdf
3.7MB
08_(2023-07-03)_LAKEWOOD AVENUE STREAM ENHANCEMENT.pdf
20.64MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Please see attachments to aid in the review of this permit application package.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.

• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Mackenzie Richards, PWS
Signature
f y�a�Yhr.Z4i��hF2tel'O
Date
8/18/2023