20200034 Ver 1_Pierce Terrace IRT As-Built Site Visit Notes

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home
tab.

Good deal thanks everyone. Attached are final site visit notes, we will pass along the info to Axiom and make sure those items identified will be captured in the MY1 report.

Alex

From: Polizzi, Maria <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 10:56 AM
To: Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Baldwin, Alex <[e-mail]>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Dow, Jeremiah J <[e-mail]>; Holz, Raymond <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: Pierce Terrace IRT As-built Site Visit Notes

Alex,

I also have nothing else to add. Thanks again for your flexibility and meeting with us on short notice.

Best,

Maria Polizzi

Stream and Wetland Mitigation Coordinator

401 & Buffer Permitting Branch

Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ

Office: (919)-707-9083 Cell: (919)-815-4586

Email: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>

Address: 512 N. Salisbury St., Archdale Building 942-H, Raleigh, NC

US Mail: 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

________________________________

From: Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 10:52 AM
To: Baldwin, Alex <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>; Polizzi, Maria <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Cc: Dow, Jeremiah J <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Holz, Raymond <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: [External] RE: Pierce Terrace IRT As-built Site Visit Notes

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home
tab.

Hi Alex,

Thank you for providing the notes from the site visit. I don’t have anything else to add.

Thanks again,

Casey

From: Baldwin, Alex <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 10:36 AM
To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Cc: Dow, Jeremiah J <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Holz, Raymond <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] RE: Pierce Terrace IRT As-built Site Visit Notes

Todd, thanks for reviewing and providing the additional information from the site visit and for the mitigation plan modification.

I’ve updated the notes with those additional comments but was going to wait and see if Maria and/or Casey had any additions before sending back out.

Thanks,
Alex

From: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 1:20 PM
To: Baldwin, Alex <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Cc: Dow, Jeremiah J <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Holz, Raymond <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: RE: Pierce Terrace IRT As-built Site Visit Notes

Thanks Alex. I appreciate you taking the time to meet us on the site. Normally, we would respond to minutes once they are reviewed/received from DMS, but because Jeremiah was not
able to make the visit, I wanted to go ahead and provide a response. Below are a few additional things to note about the site visit:

1. When looking that the non-riverine swamp forest, we discussed our concerns with how low the areas are relative to the adjoining areas, which could promote standing water that may
further prevent vegetation growth. There is also the possibility that these low areas may result in some drainage effect to the immediately adjacent slopes that are all supposed to
be restored to wetland. These are definitely areas to watch.
2. Similarly, the borrow/creation area appeared to be very bowl-like with less herbaceous cover. You did note this in the minutes, but I just wanted to reiterate that this area needs
to be watched.
3. We noted some growth of cattails within the low areas that need to be monitored.
4. We noted that there were posts that have not yet been installed that are intended to prevent further scalloping along the boundary between the ag field and the easement. Please ensure
these are installed with markers, and continue to monitor for encroachments, noting the results in future monitoring reports.
5. We discussed the relocation of a gauge to a reference area in Merchants Millpond State Park, and you indicated that you are still trying to identify the location of a previously used
gauge. Once the reference gauge has been installed, please be sure to note the specific location of the gauge and provide photo points and a soil profile of the spot in next year’s
monitoring report.

Since the site visit, I was also able to review the as-built and proposed modification in more detail. We are still in the IRT review stage for the modification, but I wanted to provide
some initial comments. I will forward on any additional responses as we receive them, and will provide a response to DMS following the conclusion of the comment period, which ends
on Aug. 30th.

1. Some sheets on the as-built design sheets incorrectly label wet hardwood forest as non-riverine swamp forest (e.g., AB-12).
2. It would be helpful to have a clearer picture of the grading, particularly in the area of the creation and re-establishment additions, to demonstrate how much grading occurred in
areas that are proposed to be added as re-establishment. This is especially true around the reestablishment areas near the borrow zone to the northeast. As we noted during the site
review, we normally do not treat areas that have excessive grading/filling as re-establishment. We did not required that filled ditches be called out as creation during our review
of the mitigation plan and I’m not suggesting that these areas be revised now, but we would like to know if any areas that are now being proposed as re-establishment were graded during
construction.
3. The as-built submittal proposes additional wetland re-establishment areas that were not previously identified in the mitigation plan. Some of these areas (approx. 0.01 acre) were
due to errors in the survey of the conservation easement; however, other areas were due to either observed additional hydric soil conditions or observed roughened surfaces post-construction.
I understand that survey errors may result in changes at as-built, but we would typically expect that the final mitigation plan would identify all areas proposed to be restored to
wetland unless there were unanticipated changes that occurred during construction, which does not seem to be the case with the areas proposed to be added. I am concerned that some
of the areas identified as additional re-establishment many not be sufficiently monitored to demonstrate whether they are meeting performance standards. Additionally, the additional
area proposed for re-establishment along silver springs road are immediately adjacent to the roadside ditch, which will continue to have an effect on the site. If we concur that these
areas can be added to the wetland credit, additional information, such as soil borings, or monitoring may be required to demonstrate this.

Thanks,

Todd Tugwell

Chief, Mitigation Branch

Regulatory Division

Wilmington District, USACE

[phone]

From: Baldwin, Alex <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 3:48 PM
To: Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Haywood, Casey M CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
Cc: Dow, Jeremiah J <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >; Holz, Raymond <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Fw: Pierce Terrace IRT As-built Site Visit Notes

Todd, Casey, & Maria,

Hope everyone was able to dry out and had a safe trip back. Attached are the site visit notes for your review let me know if anything needs to be revised and/or added.

Thanks,
Alex

Alex Baldwin | Project Manager

Davey Mitigation

1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211

Raleigh, NC 27604

P: 919-274-2419

E: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>

Learn More About Davey Mitigation

________________________________

Email correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an authorized state official.

齀䒴ⵧ椰ㇶ껩쮗謖찻⅚ﵝ�놏૦▚럖忳ྒྷ鯕햢猎鿑�鷵쪒⏘泘燴㨺趭嬵婖搣ᨔㇵ켵䅼권ڠ㎙㷜琕猥箆䤷訥䲿医坤ㄲ瓘瞉뇲ቱ佯ܶ䦬槿㞹갎纋껨ꉖ싽�᷇䤶ꩶ퉾矇纔ኴ躿圳鎸♖巀豽딻年봔쐼⽪갵훏餡睥垕⭸륥팺庾皅즨魘䋉濴ᔃ씴険勌顯᎘ᛖ猴�犢櫍ⷷ뾂ꗺᔯⵕ吓퀝ᵫ䇌ㇵ魳㯉놮冧勞搳먨䔹쫅�ᜯꫠ㎊ﾎ�珝퉯䈀鄋ᜤȂ咁䄆䂔ኒ戠ꏊ䂄☞चݠ蒄鑠聗㸪␐༠礅⁣ᴣ鱠葠┊퍂ዲ䀦ม嚶祬蠈ꃭ�ｬ�ꐛ瘳㋆ꦝ㝓뼳㶜箻﮷Ἵⷶ蹠螔笔
鋛庹켖᭭볂ꅚ툻硰㜇ൄ䥢ロ寥㵊돼쑪ೳ㯰㦡൲ﵣỰ松ꏗ᪯᥂எ៴貢컧臼힖嚵롭㺠嚨絞꬐ꠒ㴿篖꺄﫢뉕ﺣ鑐⫫凕跿柯ፙ杻㴽瀈斯㳖焨㦑䝕៽췚埞縞䬥衱흹⼡곱蘎暳ﱰ葉㺢헫⚑牣ﺹ폊Ñ럮퀫㫝뽑瞆鋦珬ᏻ廅鍽果푮私女͑䅵ި鱂ꩅ왝券瓄❝儺䲉凪疦혈諸뮒ᜯ쳦抩麬瘤놑䒺抣絲貅꾪珠ᢨᚊȢ疺伉陵鮬頂ឋᛵ丵哯墳晫⯫Ꙏ럓ꩴ㸵畲ꐦ⦫㚾ﾜ봇韓燎秗귷睩볩⎫呸ꄦ螈ཥ⻝구퉾렯ᖟ强툶찥뜳�哬郙�
惮⟐晪勺茜鮺緯谚ꃧ풿뉏糍ᝊffl㖐來㟷쉻僸㋿䕙䎪䂹い芞蒹ᒾܜ௳峍❏鷱䋱⑟৽뇣౦鏗䥉�郺쐝믫扮麳쭸㿝੽勗㣭૷哳䛆ￔ쾕踔눯 ﷙壷䁙룻侬韘濵˄쪔퐅뙈≎ộᕲ诟᭘왍ᄭ抯墊็隳슚ⷱ⏨銷嗀�꾬❚螩ꠗ꼷거欫㣗铌줽䑰퇋ᚈ壓ᴏ澡ꠝ銿奃狣㔽猏䋕闌ꝵ潩䡕䬦塜贿浣쑙㍯溽뮟ﴮ᭤ι檥鵷홺✅边额࣢熮褓粞즷⃘荧麬钼闕躋첮�끯ꊾ溼➟偯㇦첞뤡鍩⻡첮貤겮貞㙑왏鲐겞펔垕챼痟⾨ퟩ텪Ὁ赜뒶躕㩶�檄箌᭝凌
䁸䃌義ਪཽ濐䇵�ꚁ걵뉭ຝ趴�ᡊ燽洍⍻헒왥疪ꃺꕘ믷ᚵꛫ혚᤹ժ䏩啪庌㌬诵꣪ꐮ齿뚥曑툎�忟囹嗖伍෿藆峣ጿ磋ķ盖빅ﯬ犔ĝᗳ⛐㇜鷼༰�戛셙䖼፷妼䯫컆崸✨柫㛅䞽뺽ჽỎ論瘶㎩倨᱕鳿뫻餲솵밙娩䬢ꃅᲅ⾣緱�ꭻ砮騷汵系졑驵딠踡ﭹ赯覟햀Ỗ蕧ꌌ⥿쾤矣䚸犮퍣옰㊗鶽➾㆝롸꼗ꋚ벟ᲈ⯎꾧冮⠑磢脆霷⨵秆䟪鯱訙ᡳ牿�㣏䆐즦谇뮍眙렲僎�휘짟紸玛杸頇뱗츭럱탧ﺍ쌿㿝럷ಘ髦烯蕭␁뱖Ɔ됮㻻邤颺阦䴢辷뜰
극骕爺଍�ꍞ᣼謨ᣱ맛⣪拇➐枌釒飃䬴옞菉جܨઉꞘ抺쪆濢긌雒痉ⵥꭦ᳥솏镀걺徖ꅠ씼汯ﻤィ呁론跚喧絛뺘멾䂪派ṽ藹޵�頹ᵣ燃⹻멖騵ᐳ搓紌⃌跆ะ탅繦ᫍ䘰䏿꼽즯긌퀟곗聓얓ᛷ豖챑꒭㹘ᤞ곃甏驰허�뭱⽄䙲혰ꉾ짏ꊟし㇎ෆⓁ禮�녊䀿䈾뮗⿺ꃏ켓颭ㅱ跑ﺳᐄ叻⽈蒒偍�ﴁ驲㽻珲磛䗅蜾늩鬆獔喬鐁ꗉ쏴墨ᇪ傔ꩯ泤㉔뷆輭褣百窘㽾꠶�⑉国猞斬又摿⿿Ꝺꈏ겿秦쎏㤦㊖繯篌谹攇甤߮针釛Ὃ䇙썝儺跪鍏뱙㋫꧔崤㧏
퓑돝龢斮촼἗珩ཎ弾ꯕ䫄喞娝⼺肣饧὏揖責㹂𢡊量刢ᑯ男媹龊ꜳꤙ譾灏⍺㦗⣭룦刅ὲ푑蔵蹸쯅㱰�᳅媱鈏澹⿓ꔈ᠓ἣ둂诏ቿࢵጸⶐ壷ҤϨꤲᴏ槄담ﴖ绺῎ﻇ魸⬨ৱ춞ꐲ㳲닺⯸ⷴ⺢ 끹鿼휘᣹鲳쎥ޒꃌ뼮閏�㾋뗱쾧譞杈�꺥役濧ꘟ务퉖ໆ㧠꣺뉣䣧勌装绢蓼㼭꟯켼ڻ栽䖳잴첅謽㻤ꤤ⣾썑㯨챼묥ೳꧢ�羸ꛪ騳í飢ᝫ韙頰鎔뻃Ჩ썯ೱ鿎﯏츦㰠ᱮ㣚ꊏ뵘珇䃟ꏙ༘㳣뺝뙗髗夸ꓬ㨹뷳䞧컐撒뺤뭆觼쯜ᄼ
飆৙笴쿷撚忸툠蘌໯惎ﭔﾊ５ﾉ숏羷∻뿢冦翪�鍌澬⦦텫䭦㷾밿驃ㅯ컼㲈�聏ㆨ茆惁ﰰ裷⁎಻됍ڒ솃だఘ茆惁ᠰ،솃だఘ茆惁ᠰ،솃だఘ茆惁ᠰ،솃だఘ茆篡ւ�앪֢셎ᬏꅷ昋䶉슻䔛汣翡恁㻚쎽�蔯˚엍僼뉛ṝ㭪潬딏䡽蜔팸憒덜�ꢝ�捆㔧ᛔ쿬딈�䏓蝭諭魐燻녪넑蛨탻क൬壆鏼諾溎쫢Â눾उֲ஖ᒙɈ㇆肐ᓀ荣㝱༘瓘ᩙ草赥䤘̘Ȇ鬡ꛬ蓷툐℈ऊ刼椈䏞㞤诒췳虼泝✹�ᙳ�ﮝ믞摯粏⦒则ᄌ闈쫢ꊔ俶㈯긺刢鉌䢯
죵ꔅڑ吵섯㽏崪㥒骮톑㚤푔㕡欍䠴⊕捕盥鮬瞰株ꉷఠ듔㶁莔᜽⍊㕱둨澔ૅ푑�诗걽簵䭒浗䘥搡뮭㬗鹸ﭵ�쁏๾咊熂奘ﶯ縔䙿掮鵴녔䥷껠㻏臯�릆鶦ꁉ濊㔿串鶐醫퀪瑴幻组䖮糶껍ꓐ㵩뽥叽䃨抭揧柶ꎪΗ�콟�ꎏᴋ挳੸瑩⓻쇺硳껭쾬濟槯�齢纻➷轨�䃻둩汢㉽�셝攖轰ꍒ䳻昣ꥊ䙡팍휛䢍㊁ᰩ惵Ḩ颵⹦ﳑ긅굲퓙铚ꢺ椖轨䩪략䣝闄ᆰ緔쾊뚈횛씌륚ꑰ�瑢劾෯䍇륊簳젭ᩖ袡鹒쟰綬䈚䱺）㫭쌁䩔蛳꺕儝恣╓
⑦齌墦뛭䵹䥍ﱄꦚ䏄劚텓咠㻫ር諓颔⦦歚毷╾곌ퟢ㹢轓읚毰꽱踞㐕확呖ิ卦嘟윑➏䚻譖╞穮嫽힫公Œ㫛瓸ꚃ袑楚톟瑆嘭῰ེＸ⛿鿸፹퓹�ꤊᩑ矺藯졡믆㸲鏻ꈎ냯虽㸿�陋祟奿ﮝ鴫ﴬ羓篛奌젦医짚酒ڗ죚鄒ᘷ䠤▜鄱ї酌ื☬扑번⃱婂ℹ婌샄恉턑샅ဒ̒䅋Ґ䚈쓼ে鳍◠礋ů⾙䰆峈蜲⛌ꑍ첑㌢䪉䠚餽Ꙏ㪑⭒䰆㔆唜⪓䥒䠪餹쩊ᓈ夲囤劀宑䨉Ⓢⱒꭲ䓀䄲囤ᱤ∩쥣㈌殆졺⹨訶䂜⎚ࣉᯎ੎燉肤異㺜뇞ᣤ㑲ܫ䆓炜㤔悎⅄줲
̣ｅずﺊꁵ漢廲툟즛鈜뉍⽸뢓척꣠꓉ꒋ㒓ⓢ䐽榿ム濑㠺璔蜧源䤬⣥㢅撈뼤徒৬龎塀ﲉ繈�럈�隷耶즯䬅✾㆟⧹蓹䱼戾蟉ὤ胹�瞑㯉礬벛礦벃郞ӌ醯ꈽⳏ⫰蕹韉䯉빌幈켠䜬烏㓴詹⟉Ꮙ燤ᣲ鑹辕螐粙㲈Ṉ�⽸봓舧쥻ꈽ᳷鮰䷜⋮鉷젻擭䛝㉶⭹薹䳜≮蠻�漹笛醹ᮣ囈岖鉏㫤薲쭜魹☚鄷즫牊뤅沜霤鲉끦岁爪恼좽菱䑋ڎᘮĹᅰ邹䁜⟎釧쥳∹ே枚쵱뤳᧦瓤紮✚藼駼ꞕ鄔芣焿鎱�爺⬒狗㖕纜夢噍閑莤€짋鄲瞃ꎲ㮝淒।
䡷鞰褸㽱펓錗ㄨ葈銴椰凡焖鴿䒄⣎␐鄁ڽ≨﫛쁕눧禭䳍䕺ㅶ졘ˤ悕좞୞諦痬蹠싈낗뙣쫈䴃冤㥤ⳁ匲�誡簬㮿젚刌눯㗰飯눮연飮Ꙅ痕좭̬ꐵ즚刪擉⤅匧♅㞾攝餬剤�䅓炉罛鎔뮄ᐑ看頓�솳㈄롞�燖袤▌董⡻ࣰ㹷ⴘ揜⣀色孰ᴛ跏鉆숑㵭傤궸礇⤜⽠䣃嬾쨚蚖掐틙㙨頱∌酇㤣࣡Ṗ雎㘔猡㲿進Ε⹈ﴧ彈봡惙줎齦�錨㦸茯⋴褽▋ᳩ覥禌⧀ẃ挢㠁᲌멊䎓�閍䲩Ⴆ鄇㮊❡绪뾅縠ﱆ뤑〟篱罜戍꽿復쑫뵗붗蠗ᇏ↟䔾᏾쟄옑∟⇶䀾込
篼瞈ﵱ簎拶⛼෢히笐꼐೶꿊೴⿉帣뱂碈뤁衳ᅧ惏㓼੼⓱ৢ있輐Ḣ㱁櫬ᾑ蕲ߥ䍝ߤ﷠粮㻹긽륖玸殷粑䮷蕲㯤휎殺쑶쐮粦穫빌㴥�뢌넉挃뜁暣쑆蠍袭ᇫ쑉衵椭퍫즖펛뒦槕졕襟ʸ㥱⍢㋢ۄꗄ䮈蛒៉⸣湲⾖湴⾒츣鱃㢋ᧇ쾒깶쾑깲쾗湴쾐湰侔﹇쐴풺ꥉ礞쎭꼣坑➫圦ꮫ໔敵䎲ꑰ呶Ⱶ䣯⣩峮⺡靓霧魪㒺ꛙ䫮唹ꐊ劜丼鉝ꡌዝ觙≸罵釂㡌✦蔜䜉钊䣈褨檸놪ꦤ猴릵둖�ꙫꙈ맃玳໷㜳ಯ꼖崰攙喋赃ദስ啨ꄗ�
吓쥃᪠ⵕ埩鹽핦姫⺨쳰玩댽㧕�鍪冧薝駺ڞ䵕꠶㰳헓땴収횫弢ꧣꭒ喓ꕪ岧䢭ꮖ㵓ᰔᩞ鋓ビԌ泽锾䠔郒꥖„ŕ଄軄⥚፸深骑蔢뀣멈ආඈ⎟Ѱ넇腠㜄ᇨ۠荰Ꝡ셢ⶆ똰볞㴙濋턪˕唻হ쁲煟糦⌸ᇈ诎♃賩茻퐛횆ථ綩፣ᥚご㒫㤖ڵꯖ滵䲍ꬱ첱ꦑ疛ᢓ鬪�㧡㜷벇隺畧�乹ꀍ殆균ͷီ㪁Ȁቝ젩ޙ尰鹎薤⣐렂㭍콭ḋ돇䂃Ҏ詜뚹沪➿⻆㨅ᷬ卵԰뽠퐷埧꥗㸉寧ꢁ뮵껮蟦㢁㵓祣ꦟ줞႑⋥鄵稟�붏�ꀨ寲ꏹ豌絧掠腊賒䙢ᱥ牚塋겕塄畩펝客꫄
䕤뉢璢覅ຽ骧ꛃꮶꙡ嬵榜⭋篼ﳲ⽇撉쯄咯ࡑꕽ攽᮫刧펫㗏绲烄퉌ⱱ粑즙꿏ⷾ럠꣣䜜ʟ
䚟ꈰ਍湥獤牴慥൭湥潤橢ㄍ㈳〠漠橢㰍⼼楆瑬牥䘯慬整敄潣敤䰯湥瑧⁨㌳㸲猾牴慥൭䠊岉춒荮ర詹�䕃楋ꕨ꤈궢懄᨟ϛ쓐䡴䐣ẁﭸ燙䧕䒋䯼鍬攤ꩵ㝜ఽ蚦뙉뎝영ỡ젌�✺ꤶ鶴ẙ㢫뺛⋱Ṻ휫䈎饫ꁼ鱳Ⳃ䜗尻⥡랒Ⅰᜦ敟钽絉ﻷ稇鍰쭜邢娖퇼魟搞팒镖罅촷찫诹鳸젽긴ⰷೆ䘖ᣟ贈膻毐蔜។蔜最刺铓껓玲艮⧐꼅棗쾐柌㈱ꄚ踳⣉띦貍框覵ڌ�飏㢎칧篌Ϣ至쾘瑕⪮䮙Ꮲ觳疘툪⺩磌鵙麳⧤䩳竌퉲⮓䕦竌僐ạꄕ憒ᾳỦ똂똢ꪀ㧟빸㼐襸
徉؁대ꀽ෵攊摮瑳敲浡攍摮扯൪㌱″‰扯൪㰼䈯瑩偳牥潃灭湯湥⁴⼸潃潬卲慰散䐯癥捩剥䉇䘯汩整⽲䍄䑔捥摯⽥效杩瑨㈠㜷䰯湥瑧⁨㜱㔹⼰慎敭堯匯扵祴数䤯慭敧启灹⽥佘橢捥⽴楗瑤⁨㔲㸹猾牴慥൭＊￘î䄎潤敢搀