310843_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230926

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access /�
Date of Visit: q�� 23 +Arrival Time: j Q:00 Departure Time: p' f County: b&n Region: L)i't'`6
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: ry U Ifami Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: �4�Y�� W ��ru vnS Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I ILayer I I Dain Co%%
Wean to Feeder Non-La er I I Dair% Calf
eeder to Finish :z no 'z 3y -t( Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pot). Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers 1 Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Co%%
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ l o ❑ NA I
Discharge originated at: ❑Structure ❑Application Field ❑Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ NF
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑No ONA ❑NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ZNo ❑NA ❑NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes e'No ❑NA ❑NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

FacilitV Number: 3► Date of Inspection: 2 6 z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ \I
waste management or clpsure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [�JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste stnuctures require ❑ Yes D No ❑NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Q No ❑NA ❑ N E
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13.Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Z No ❑NA ❑ CIE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 0 No ❑NA ❑ N E
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ['f No ❑NA ❑ L
18,Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑NA ❑ \E
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑Yes �o ❑NA ❑NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑Yes [21lo ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements []Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E}-No ❑NA ❑NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis []Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes [allo ❑NA ❑NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0-1q`o­ ❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: z6 2 3
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ON. ❑NA ❑NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Ye, [2 No ❑NA ❑NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [2 No ❑NA ❑NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2 No ❑NA ❑ NE
❑Application Field ❑Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [2] No ❑NA ❑NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Slvd .e atkx ;Z02q
' La (,'10rUfrOP7s 0 —io25
5011 Etna l ys,`J
a.oA y
9,pcor& lcw4- g-e-,--F
Reviewer/Inspector Name: WrV7_zrD Phone Q/0 • 7Y2. 5-61-5
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 91?6/23
Page 3 of 3 5 l 020