20120317 Ver 1_Updated CAMA application_20220217

NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quil;
January 24, 2020
MEMORANDUM:
FROM: Gregg Bodnar, Assistant Major Permits Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
gregg.bodnarCa.ncdenr.gov
SUBJECT: CAMA Maior Permit Renewal Review
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director, Division ofCoastal
Management
Applicant: South State Development LLC. (Originally M and M Land Development)
Permit No: 62-12
Project Location: Wetherington Landing Rd., in Stella
DCM has determined that no substantial development has occurred since the last permit action, therefore, this
project does not qualify for a renewal under CRC rule 15A NCAC 07J.0404(b). However, subsection (c) allows
the Division of Coastal Management to circulate the request to the state agencies to determine if any changes
in circumstances or in development standards warrant a new application and CAMA major permit
review. DCM is not aware of any proposed changes to the previously authorized project.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed renewal request and return this
form to Gregg Bodnar at the address above by March 10, 2022. If you have any questions regarding the
proposed project, contact Curt Weychert [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with
supporting data is requested.
McPhearson [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the renewal request as proposed.
**Additional comments may be attached**
This agency has determined that circumstances or development standards have
changed and warrant a new CAMA major permit application review. See attached.
PRINT NAME
AGENCY
SIGNATURE
DATE
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
400 Commerce Ave. Morehead City, NC 28557 [phone]

,..s..,•,.z.....; a;.h.� �`" �af:,..a•w.r�;narr r.''rW.o.:....r. rr:•w�.-,.pN.,.... „- �:.a�..t...�„+a•R.,.rrn,.;;r.M�..; r•ae..,,•r.�snn ,.�.�:. ,, -� ... :....:r; o., .. r,. -, n�.w•,:.. _;.u..::�.s„ s.c.:.�..H ;.rat
NY IV
STATT OF NORTH CA:ROLI^J.
crtrrt,...J. M.' zi . `, _t:a ms�n.' - . d F3 ia' I
-TrAl JJ 1.0'R
ga ',
.f I
_X Nla"car Development i_,i. an Area of Enviror rental 1_:onc:el-rl
pursuant to N 'GS 113A-"113
Excavation and/or filling pursuant to NCGS 113-229
Issued to M and 1M Land Development Inc.,166 Center Street, Jacksonville, NC 28546
Authorizing development in Carteret County at adi. to the White Oak River at Wetherin on
Landing Road, in Stella , as requested in the permittee's application dated 2/16112. including the
attached drawings (4), 1 dated revised 2/16/12 2 dated revised 3--12, and 1 dated revised 1/25/12
This permit, issued on dune 6, 2012 , is subject to compliance with the application (where consistent
with the permit), all applicable regulations, special conditions and notes set forth below. Any violation of these terms may
be subiect to fines, imprisonment or civil action, or may cause the permit to be null and void.
1 } In accordance with 15A NCAC 07H.0208(b)(06)(E), the observation platforms located on both pier
A and pier B are not authorized.
Marina
2) The marina shall display a sign showing the location of the pumpout facility, including other
appropriate waste disposal information, at the entrance and exit from the main piers.
(See attached sheets for Additional Conditions)
This permit action may be appealed by the permittee or
otherqualified persons within twenty (20) days of the issuing
date. An appeal requires resolution prior to work initiation or
continuance as the case may be. .
This permit shall be accessible on -site to Department
personnel when the project is inspected for compliance.
Any maintenance work or project modification not covered
hereunder requires further Division approval.
All work shall cease when the permit expires on
December 31, 2015
In issuing this permit, the State of North Carolina agrees
that your project is consistent with the North Carolina Coastal
Management Program.
Signed by the autnonty or the 6ecretary or ULNA anu LIM
Chairman of the Coastal Resources Commission.
Braxton,7T.avis, Director
Division of Coastal Management
V
This permit and its conditions are hereby accepted.
Signature of Permittee

�' �'yY•54�Yt;wf:'e:.ra?r�rS�rMr"r..�^..:;c�+�u,�9 rrNf..---....,�rrr,...�..v
, ��r�......;,,..7 - •..dux..:.;.:s.r•sa+�.�.w1,wyFn•s•s.�r+.haY.,. ;.:.....,r ;^.,..!hs r<; :.oc;'��:uk. -,?.,..,;..�.:�,yfi�•u�n•x.,t;.q.�,:�_-.•Yrs�'<-:�Y�riv
?; M aad )d 1_,anJ Development =:ne,
Permit 2 19
Paul- 2 of 4
�
i'lV zN Div 27' L " -
L.1,_i,1,1 3l {�" r� v} a {� 1
?. �i�, C� :SL, `r�L {ll uc!'I�..: t1AW
L� 6
=GTYz1 a.L�G. il" �w ti
iir ..� .i `-( Chi' <:.15. !,. Cil.,f l:ca'.'5
.� a..r. is _
r �ti:a na. _A_ny se-je dz�,__:.:°��
' v - n� 1 j 1"n I v
at the <L al]. be c� n' d-If-�.. _ viola toll Oft, per_<tit f r ._ c.� the
. . ��� .
Ile- 3�.' -' J rv_'j ��j�;Jl �l'� � iL;
r{1 �1i ;��iu• sl�[�l} i)t., Cat Pi-e'-
A of th' pF_ tted
�.1 Unless specifically al-ter.d hureiu, this perp it authhorizes only the doclts, piers, and other s tuctures and
uses located in or over the -water that are expressly and specifically set forth in the pen -It application.
No other structure, whether floating or stationary, shall become a permanent part of this marina facility
without permit modification. No non -water dependent uses of structures may be conducted on, in or
over public trust waters without permit modification.
5) The authorized structure shall not extend more than'/4 of the width of the waterbody, as measured from
the waterward edge of the marsh on both sides of the water body immediately in front of the individual
piers.
6) All portions of the access pier/walkway located over Coastal Wetlands shall not exceed a width of 6 ft.
and shall be elevated a minimum of 3 feet above the marsh substrate as measured from the bottom of the
decking.
7) As depicted on the attached workplan drawing Sheet 4 of 4 dated revised 1/25/12, any portion of the
permitted pier B located over the tidal canal shall be elevated at least 5 feet above the normal high water
level.
8) The authorized covered platform shall not be enclosed. Any material used on the sides shall not obstruct
view and must be permeable to air and water. Screen or wire on the sides along with benches and knee
walls are permitted. Lattice is specifically excluded from being used under this authorization.
9) The roof of the covered platform shall not be designed for second story use.
10) No attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable
waters at or adjacent to the authorized work.
11) The permittee shall maintain the authorized work in good condition and in conformance with the terms
and conditions of this permit. The permittee is not relieved of this requirement if he abandons the
permitted activity without having it transferred to a third party.
12) This permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project, and the
permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage to the authorized structure or work, or injury
that may be caused from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public
interest.
13) This permit authorizes 10 slips at each pier for a total 20 formalized docking spaces.

...'r..hrY.Y'S.FM.� rr}..ir•:'r•Yr'Y.Y.Y'F#L��Y'PYI'}4d'}�C-1'YM}FBMMd`}4`.Sri'F'P:)�'.r(sr.ri.t.Y.4arWi�Y`-is M�:vY•:..G..-..:rYhW.,.,.�,,;�YW'.,y..n+n`�s.•.rvNr;•h -:`• 8.}e}..:rr<r}•3--i�'}4':+%e.::r:,:r�.��....r'.,.:='...,•.F�.Yr•'w�:gr,.:.: y,.:4.v'+}fr-A+v
Y ' :
' 4 d Ni 1J a .n ai lr3e velopm:ent lCn
6242
J'a�e 3 of 4 F
ADDITIO AL CO -,ND,
711i? iS {{s
�o
8
Y
lA`. i.'i.. xriEtsv'�.• r��av L'� �"fS'���j.i�rS+d t'.l C�. fb. a sJ 1' �„ei [: �i,.
_ '.. �'..� 1�.�.�9 i. -.I zq�� �. ��i. 1�';��C�r,.1 :.-.-:!S4 o :S
17}�liH
Sze- iOOr(�i1�tlFtrty illct'.. cont'-.If- t;i' 7,5Fi �_i-_4'I.i1, �'.l'1 ^' dJ:.....,..1t � ri I' 5 �' �;.1{."'. f':';~i�1'A tt�' .S
�/,,t1�7C
iJai+�tiir;'e�l� Lit (71�'� JV ��4J�}z�r t; i�w '1wtLi.EY�tiiZcil fl'J .i,
t11�li l'.1�. LIB G;.-r li't...!..GI t.,4�L s_- 1 ..�lnelt 3
recluirrd, the pi:nnittee shall supply a cony oLL the ca'exntin., to 6Di`'JSiGiL 466in 30 days ofissuazlce of
the Easement.
Upland Develoement
15) Unless specifically altered herein, this permit authorizes the grading and other land disturbing activities
associated with the development of the above referenced property, including 4 feet wide earthen
pathways, all as expressly and specifically set forth in the attached permit application and workplan
drawings. Any additional land disturbing activities and/or construction may require a modification of
this permit. Contact a Division of Coastal Management representative at [phone] for this
determination.
Sedimentation and Erosion Control
NOTE: An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan will be required for this project. This plan must be
filed at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of any. land disturbing activity. Submit this
plan to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section, 127
Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405.
16) In order to protect water quality, runoff from construction shall not visibly increase the amount of
11
suspended sediments in adjacent waters.
17) Appropriate sedimentation and erosion control devices, measures or structures must be implemented to
ensure that eroded materials do not enter adjacent wetlands, watercourses and property (e.g. silt fence,
diversion swales or berms, etc.).
General
18) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States requires the
removal, relocation, or other alteration of the structure or work authorized by this permit, or if in the
opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause
unreasonable obstruction to free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee shall be required,
upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate or alter the structural work or
obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States or the state of North Carolina. No
claim shall be made against the United States or the state of North Carolina on account of any such
removal or alteration.
19) No Coastal Wetlands shall be excavated or filled, even temporarily.
20) The permittee and/or his contractor shall meet with a representative of the Division prior to project
initiation in order to discuss the conditions set forth in this permit.

..>:7^✓,n.}:Ny:;.hi?•a•kG-hryFe�s4•'•b:.'rby?'rrf.;•r�WrYr4wYYr.,}•W..ri-:w;� Yi.Nr':•aay.rrl.rr.' W..-5.>tN�r•}.�....;.;.rYr'aie....,:,.:prrvrt �+Y'.:-C•<-�vY•ra,�hq!.h:.s i•v,,.��,. }.,. .r5 if•}<-r.:r�:-Yi•�� :un:..�f•fn•F:�..y� >'.i-'rl•.w :w;:;p�N}.?•F•C=' MA-77Cw'..re
�r�d 1 nd Deveioptnent Inca Permit # 6211-12
1
Page 4o.f4
AD D TIONA1, 0ND I R eN71
3
r Lj 3 This does riot elinih ate th,S nCvd to obtahln-" ad
+ rr that e ZT 1-' a 1 ' "3 ` s: ', 1 f �Ln f : 7?q• y -hnr-^�,: Ls.�.�. ,�
r�r= is s th rr_a , ;,e r. � �xx;,cl. i�a, s �dir�, : u_ not 1_._ i � .. is
:t 1-n'?nag�,rner' approvals faon'1 tree N.C. Divi5i,,Dr, 1011' '.Lty.
' , ftV ?•i -1PX UiIr2 a trotilficc.':lon o� t 1?.5 per hilt:
tuv c.� �elopment of the p rm_i _ e.'� p: op.w r �,y l
Contact a representative of the Di-,dsion at (232) 808-280 prior to the cDm- �encernei;:t of any
such activity for this deterinina:tion. The permittee is further advised t .at niany non -water
dependent activities are not authori.d tivithin 30 feet of the normal high water level.
NOTE: The N.C. Division of Water Quality has authorized the proposed project under DWQ Project No.
12 0317 which was issued on 4/19/12.
NOTE: The U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers authorized the proposed project under COE Action Id. No.
SAW- 2007-04091.

1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
M And M Land Development, Inc.
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
James
Maides
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
n/a
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
166 Center Street
Jacksonville
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
28546
USA
910 - 938 - 5900 ext.
- -
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
nla
-
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Flame
Coastal Planning Services, Inc.
Agentl Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Kathy
B.
Vinson
Agent! Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
n/a
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
827
Morehead City
IBC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
28557
252 - 240 - 9297
ext.
252 - 354 - 4916 ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
252 247 5765
n/a
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
n/a
-
Email
[e-mail]
<Form continues on back?

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 2 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Carteret
Wetherington Landing Road
1101
Subdivision Name
City
state
Zip
nla
Stella
NC
28582 -
Phone No.
Lot No. (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
nla - - ext.
nla,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak
White Oak River
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
White Oak River
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
❑Yes ®No
work falls within.
Carteret County
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
7,000
6,042,208
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
8' ®NHVV or ❑NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Coastal and non -coastal wetland vegetation, shrubs, trees, grasses.
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
The tract is undeveloped. An existing dirt road approximately 10' wide connects the site to Wetherington Landing Road.
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses da iacent to the proposed project site.
Camp Lejeune to Cherry Point Railroad to the north, camp ground to the east.
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i, Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
not zoned
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes []No ®NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? CJYes ®No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy, Yes ONO EINA
If yes, by whom?
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a Yes ONO ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next pages
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ®Yes ❑No
(it) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ®Yes []No
(iii) If yes to either (1) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ®Yes ❑Nc
(Attach documentation, if available)

Form DCM (VIP-1 (Page 3 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
none
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source,
none
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
none
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? Commercial ❑Public(Government
® PrivatelCommunity
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
Project will provide for water access to the White Oak River by owners of the tract.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
Conventional marine construction technology will be used. A barge with pile -driving capability will be stored in deep water in
the White Oak River. Walkway pilings will be installed by portable pile -driving equipment. A small tractor for mowing and light
grading will be used to construct the earthen paths. The portable pile -driving equipment and tractor will be stored onsite on
high ground.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Construction of two 10-slip piers, with platforms, gazebos, and boat lifts connecting to earthen paths (two) on highg round
portion of site.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? new
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 7500 ®Sq.Ft or ❑Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area NYes ❑No ONA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Sheet flow runoff to the White Oak River.
1. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ENo ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA
J. Is there any mitigation proposed? []Yes ZNo EINA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on backs
6. Additionallnformation
In addition to this completed application form, (MP-1) the following items. below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (fj are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross -sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.

Form DCM MP-1 (Page 4 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name United States of America
Phone No.
Address Commanding Officer, Public Works Code 408 Harold Napier, PSC Box 20004, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, NC 28542-0004
Name First & Last Child, LLC
Phone No.
Address 322 C-Wood Farm Road, Stella, NC 28582
Name
Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
SW8 091210 issued to James Maides, President, M and M Land Development, Inc. on March 9, 2010.
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
i, Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
i. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my. knowledge.
Date February 16, 2012 Print Name Kathy B. Vinson
Signature QY4(� ry
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill information ❑DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
®DCM MP-3 Upland Development
®DCM MP-4 Structures Information

Form DCM MP-3
UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
(Construction and/or land disturbing activities)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information. .
I GENERAL UPLAND DEVELOPMENT
a. Type and number
proposed.
or structures
Two earthen paths connecting the highground portion of the
site to the proposed piers and elevated walkways are the
only upland development proposed at this time. The
earthen path connecting to Pier A will measure 166' x 6'.
The path connecting to Pier B will measure 709' x 6'. Both
earthen paths will be located to avoid impacts to wetlands
(see project plans).
c. Density (give the number of residential units and the units per
acre).
n/a
e. If the proposed project will disturb more than one acre of land, the
Division of Land Resources must receive an erosion and
sedimentation control plan at least 30 days before land -disturbing
activity begins.
(€) If applicable, has a sedimentation and erosion control plan been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources?
❑Yes ®No [DNA
(€€) If yes, list the date submitted:
g. Give the percentage of the tract within the coastal shoreline AEC to
be covered by impervious and/or built -upon surfaces, such as
pavement, building, rooftops, or to be used for vehicular driveways
or parking.
0%
I. Give the percentage of the entire tract to be covered by imperious
and/or built -upon surfaces, such as pavement, building, rooftops,
or to be used for vehicular driveways or parking.
.086%
j. Describe proposed method of sewage disposal.
There are currently no plans to develop the site. No method
of sewage disposal is proposed at this time.
I. Describe location and type of proposed discharges to waters of the
state (e.g„ surface runoff, sanitary wastewater, industrial/
commercial effluent, "wash down" and residential discharges).
Sheet flow runoff to the White Oak River.
b. Number of lots or parcels.
one
d. Size of area to be graded, filled, or disturbed including roads,
ditches, etc.
Current proposal will disturb approximately 7500 sf.
f. List the materials (such as marl, paver stone, asphalt, or concrete)
to be used for impervious surfaces.
Dirt, wood chips, pine straw.
h. Projects that require a CAMA Major Development Permit may also
require a Stormwater Certification.
(i) Has a site development plan been submitted to the Division of
Water Quality for review?
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, list the date submitted: _A low -density stormwater
permit was issued by the NC Division of Water Quality .on
3/9/2010.
k. Have the facilities described in Item (i) received state or local
approval?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.
m. Does the proposed project include an innovative stormwater
design?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach appropriate documentation.

' Forni ®CM MP-3 (Upland Development, Page 2 of 2)
m. Describe proposed drinking water supply source (e.g., well,
community, public system, etc.)
There are no current plans to develop the site. No source
for drinking water supply is proposed at this time.
o. When was the lot(s) platted and recorded?
June 5, 2007
February 16, 2012
Date
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
Project Name
M and M Land Development, Inc.
Applicant Name �+
�C1 • (/iUliL.�3`1/�
Ap icant Sig ure
n. (i) Will water be impounded? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(il) if yes, how many acres?
p. if proposed development is a subdivision, will additional utilities be
installed for this upland development?
❑Yes ONO ®NA

Form DCM MPA
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP-1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
9, DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA CHARACTERISTICS El This section not applicable
a. (1) Is the docking facility/marina: b. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
❑Commercial ❑Public/Government ®Private/Community []Yes ®No
c. (1) Dock(s) and/or pier(s)
d. (1) Are Finger Piers included? ®Yes []No
(ii) Number 2
If yes:
(iii) Length Pier A = 766' Pier B = 822'
(1i) Number 6 per gier. total of 12
(iv) Width 61
(iii) Length 16,
(v) Floating ❑Yes ®No
(iv) Width 3'
(v) Floating ❑Yes ®No
e. (i) Are Platforms included? ®Yes []No
f. (i) Are Boatlifts included? ®Yes ❑No
If yes:
If yes:
(ii) Number 2 per pier, total of 4
(Ii) Number 10 per pier, for a total of 20
(iii) Length 12'(platform wl azebo and 8' observation
(iii) Length 12.5'
latform
(iv) Width 12.5'
(iv) Width 24' (platform w/oazebo) and 8' (observation
platform)
(v) Floating ❑Yes ®No
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
g. (i) Number of slips proposed
h. Check all the types of services to be provided.
10 per pier, for a total of 20
❑ Full service, including travel lift and/or rail, repair or
(ii) Number of slips existing
maintenance service
❑ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
0
® Dockage ("wet slips") only, number of slips: 20
❑ Dry storage; number of boats:
❑ Boat ramp(s); number of boat ramps:
❑ Other, please describe:
i. Check the proposed type of siting:
❑ Land cut and access channel
❑Open water, dredging for basin and/or channel
®Open water; no dredging required
❑Other; please describe:
k• Typical boat length: 20' - 26'
m. (i) Will the facility have tie pilings?
❑Yes ®No
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
n/a
j. Describe the typical -boats to be served (e.g., open runabout,
charter boats, sail boats, mixed types).
mixed types
I. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
❑Yes NNo
2. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA OPERATIONS 0This section not applicable

Form '®If M MP-4 (Structures, Page 2 of 4)
a. • Check each of the following sanitary facilities that will be included in the proposed project.
❑ Office Toilets
❑ Toilets for patrons; Number: Location,
© Showers
❑ Boatholding tank pumpout; Give type and location:
b. Describe treatment type and disposal location for all sanitary wastewater.
none
c. Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and trash.
trash receptacles located on highground
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats be controlled?
none allowed
e. (1) Give the location and number of "No Sewage Discharge" signs proposed.
two signs - one at each pier
(ii) Give the location and number of "Pumpout Available" signs proposed.
none
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
n/a
g. Where will residue from vessel maintenance be disposed of?
n/a
h- Give the number of channel markers and "No Wake" signs proposed. hone
i. Give the location of fuel -handling facilities, and describe the safety measures planned to protect area water quality.
none
j. What will be the marina policy on overnight and live -aboard dockage?
not allowed
k. Describe design measures that promote boat basin flushing?
n/a
I. If this project is an expansion of an existing marina, what types of services are currently provided?
not an existing marina
m. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area?
®Yes ❑No
n. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area?
®Yes ❑No
o. Is the marinaldocking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
®CW 5280 sf shaded ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL 2404 sf shaded ❑None

Form DCM MP-4 (Structures, Page 3 of 4)
p.. Is the proposed marinaidocking facility located within or within close proximity to any shellfish leases? ❑Yes ONO
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder(s), and give the proximity to the lease.
3. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts) E This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the boathouse structure(s):
❑Commercial ❑Public(Govemment ❑PrivatelCommunity
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iv) Width
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
4. GROIN (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc. if a rock groin, use MP-2, Excavation and Fill.) ® This section not applicable
a. (i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
5. BREAKWATER (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc.) ®This section not applicable
a. Length b. Average distance from NHW, NWL, or wetlands
c. Maximum distance beyond NHW, NWL or wetlands
6. MOORING PILINGS and BUOYS ®This section not applicable
a. Is the structure(s): b. Number
❑Commercial ❑PubliclGovernment ❑PrivatelCommunity
c• Distance to be placed beyond shoreline d. Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present.
e. Arc of the swing
7. GENERAL
a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines
950' to east, 150' to northwest
Note: For buoy or mooring piling, use are of swing including length
of vessel.
c. Width of water body
506' at Pier A. 667' at Pier B
e. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ONO ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
b. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent docking facilities.
1,950' to east, 840' to northwest
d. Water depth at waterward end of structure at NLW or NWL
- 3.7' NLW at Pier A. - 10' NLW at Pier B
8. OTHER E This section not applicable

Form DCM MP-4 (Structures, Page 4 of 4)
a. Give complete description:
February 16, 2012
Date
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
Project Name
M and M Land Development, Inc.
Appiica t Name
Ap licant SigrWure

oy_ �
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: M & M Development, Inc.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Wetherington Landing Road adjacent to the White
Oak River Stella, Carteret County
Photo Index - 2000: 37-471 (A 12-13), (B 9-14), (C 9-16), (I) &E 9-17), (F 9-16), (G 9-
15), (H-J 10-12), (K 10)
2006: 37-6507 (O 14-15), (P 13-15), (Q 12-15), (R 9-15), (S-U 8-15), (V
10-15), (W-X 11-12)
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2556507.736 Y: 376806.286
LAT 34046' 15.82 LON 77008'48.37
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — several visits within the past...
, most recent 2/27/12
Was Applicant Present No, No
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received — 3/I/12
Office — Morehead City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan— Carteret County 12/22/2010
Land Classification from LUP — Rural with Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Public Trust Area, Estuarine Water
(C) Water Dependent: pier -yes, upland development- no
(D) Intended Use: Private/Community
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — none
Planned — none
(F) Type of Structures: Existing- undeveloped with the exception of an existing dirt
road
Planned — 2 earthen paths, two 10-slip docking facilities
with covered platforms., finger piers, pilings, fish
cleaning stations and boatlifts.
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: NIA
Source — N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
DREDGED F11JXD OTHER
(A) Shallow Bottom Dock A
NIA
NIA
1,698ft2 Shaded
3,91 Oft' lnco .
(B) Shallow Bottom Dock B
N/A
NIA
180 ft2 Shaded
180 ft2 Incorp.
(C) Deep Bottom Dock B
N/A
N/A
1,176 ft2 Shaded
3,580 ft' Incorp.
(D) High Ground Earthen Path A
NIA
996 ft2
N/A
(E) High Ground Earthen Path B
j N/A
4254 ft2
j N/A

Field Investigation Report
M & M Development, Inc
Page 2of5
(G) High Marsh/Jurisdictional
NIA
N/A
4,374 ft� Shaded
Wetlands Dock B
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 17,564 ft2
(E) Primary Nursery Area: yes
(F) Water Classification: SA/HQW Open: no
PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to build (2) private/community 10- slip
docking facilities with fish cleaning stations, 4 platforms, 12 finger piers, 20 boatlifts and 2
earthen pathways. Other than the earthen pathways no other high ground development is
proposed at this time. This site previously received subdivision sketch plan approval from the
Carteret County Tech Review Committee as well as a low density residential stormwater
permit (SW8091210); however, per the applicant, due to the poor economy and pessimistic
outlook for residential sales; they have abandoned their previous plans for development. A
multi agency meeting was conducted previously on 6/3/09 by Mr. Barry Guthrie (previous
field rep for the Stella Area within Carteret County).
9. NarrativeDescription:
The M & M Land Development, Inc project is located along Wetherington Landing Road,
approximately 1,800' south of the Stella Bridge in Stella, Carteret County. Wetherington
Landing Road is found by following NC Hwy 24 east from the Swansboro area over the
existing Swansboro/Cedar Point Bridge. Follow until you reach the 4-way stoplight within
Cape Carteret (El to the right) and turn left onto NC 58 (North toward Stella).Follow NC 58
for approximately 8.49 miles and turn left onto Stella Road. Follow Stella Road until it
intersects Wetherington Landing Road then turn left. The property is located on the right
approximately 1/4- of a mile (1,169'). This area of Stella is known for large bear population so
all agencies should be aware and prepared due the current time of year (hibernation ending).
The subject property is 138.7 acres (6,042,208 sf) in its entirety, has 7000' of shoreline on
the White Oak River and averages 8' in elevation above NHW. Currently on the high
ground portion of the site is an existing open field, dirt road, typical vegetation (grass) and
native trees (pines etc.). Along the property (adjacent to the White Oak River) is densely
populated with coastal and 404 jurisdictional wetlands that is approximately 320' x 1,500'
in area and contains Juncus roemerianus (Black Needlerush).There are several canals (relic
mosquito ditches that are a max width of 30') that were previously dredged through the
coastal wetlands. The ditches are not navigable during nlw due to the shallow water depths
but are navigable at high tide with kayaks and small john boats. There is a tidal creek along
the eastern portion of the site that would not be impacted by this project.
Field verification determined that the water depths along the White Oak River shoreline
for proposed dock A are an average of -3.6' with connecting water depths ranging from -5'
nlw inshore to-14'nlw offshore. The water depths along the river for dock B are an
average of -7.25' with connecting depths ranging from -5' nlw to -16' nlw depending on
location. The Division of Water Quality classifies this area as SA/HQW Waters. The

Field Investigation Report
M & M Development, Inc
Page 3 of 5
White Oak River within this area is designated as a Primary Nursery Area and is closed to
the taking of shellfish. Carteret County's Land Use Plan dated 12/22/2010 classifies this
area as Rural with Conservation within the AEC. There are no shellfish resources within
the project area. The shoreline is a total of 7000'. There is undeveloped farm land to the
south with the Stella Bridge to the north of the project site., is a railroad trestle to the
north of pier A. The site is also bordered to the north by the Camp Lejune to Cherry Point
railway which is owned by the federal government and managed by Camp Lejune Marine
Core Base. The property is bordered to the east by a campground.
10. Proiect Description:
The applicant is proposing to(.build two .1-0-slip docking facilities; finger piers, platforms,
boatlifts and two earthen pathways for the undeveloped tract. No other upland development is
proposed at this time.
�'Atotal-of 7;500'ft2 of high ground would be:graded, filled or disturbed during `the process
for the proposed earthen pathways (approkimately 640'<above nhw for path A and 30'
above nFw (canal area) for path-B).- The impervious surface is .086% within the Coastal
Shoreline AEC and 0% for the entire tract. The applicant previously obtained a Stormwater
Management Permit (SW8 091210) and preliminary subdivision sketch approval from the
Carteret County Technical Review Committee however no documentation was supplied
with the major permit application due to the fact there are no other plans for high ground
development due to the poor economy. A Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan was not
submitted to the Division of Land Resources due to the minimal land disturbance (<1
acre).
The applicant is proposing to disturb 7,500 square feet of high ground with the placement
of two earthen paths for the proposed docking facilities. All portions of the earthen
pathways would be a minimum of 30' above nhw for path B and 640' above nhw for path
A. Path A would be 3' above existing grade, 6' in width, 166' in length and would connect
to pier A which is located on the northeast side of the property (near the existing railroad
tracts). Path B would be 3' above existing grade, 6' in width, 709' in length and would
connect to pier B which is located on the southeast side of the property. No parking is
proposed in this application.
The applicant is also proposing a 6' x 766' fixed pier and access (A) along the (northeast)
White Oak River portion of the property. It would house 10 slips with 13' x 13' boatlifts,
(6) 3' x 16' finger piers, one 8'x 24' platform and one 12' x 24' covered platform with an
12' x 12' unenclosed covered gazebo on the south east side of the platform located at the
end of the pier. Pier A would extend from the earthen pathway (640' above nhw) west for
335' in which it would then connect to an 8' x 24' observation platform located on the
north side of the pier and over jurisdictional and coastal wetlands. The pier would continue
west from this point over coastal and 404 jurisdictional wetlands for 320' until the edge of
marsh appears. It would then continue from the edge of marsh over open water for a final
110' and intersect an 8' x 24't-head platform. The south east side of the platform would
house an 8' x 12' unenclosed covered gazebo. The 10 slips would be located on the

Field Investigation Report
M & M Development, Inc
Page 4 of 5
landward side of the proposed platform. Slips 1-5 would be located on the north side of the
pier, would have (6) 3' x 16' finger piers and (5) 13' x 13' boatlifts. Slips 6-10 would be of
the same design ((6) 3' x 16' finger piers, (5) 13' x 13' boatlifts) but would be on the south
side of the pier. Water depths within pier A are an average of -3.6' nlw with connecting
water depths ranging from -5' nlw closest to the shore up to -14' nlw offshore. Pier A
would be located a distance of 150' from the North West riparian corridor and would not
extend farther than 12 5' beyond the edge of marsh into a 506' wide water body.
The second docking facility (Pier B) would be located on the southeast side of the property
950' from the eastern riparian corridor. It would be 6' wide x 822' long and house two
platforms ( one with a unenclosed covered gazebo), 6 finger piers, 10 slips with (10) 13'
x13' boatlifts. Pier B would be 6' in width and extend over coastal and 404 jurisdictional
wetlands for 84'. It would then cross over the existing manmade mosquito canal (30' wide)
and would be elevated to a minimum height of 5' above nhw over the canal portion and a
minimum of 3' above the marsh substrate. It would continue for 295' over coastal
wetlands where at this point it would intersect an 8' x 24' observation platform. It would
then continue for 287' over coastal wetlands until it reaches the edge of marsh. At this
point it would extend over open water for a final 101' and connect with a 12' x 24'
platform which would house a 12' x 12' unenclosed covered gazebo on the south east end.
All slips would be located on the landward side of the platform with slips 1-5 located on
the west side of the pier and slips 6-10 located on the east side. Slips 1-5 would contain (3)
3' x 16' finger piers and (5) 13' x. 13' boatlifts with slips 6-10 consisting of the same
design (3) 3' x 16' finger piers and (5) 13' x 13' boatlifts. The water depths for pier B are
an average of -7.25' nlw with connecting water depths from -5'nlw nearshore and -16' nlw
offshore. The pier and platform would not extend farther than 113' from the edge of marsh
into a 667' wide water body.
11. Anticipated Impacts:
This proposed installation of the dock and pilings would result in temporary turbidity
during installation. The pier placement would shade 1,698 ft2 of shallow bottom habitat for
pier A and 180 ft2 of shallow bottom habitat for pier B while incorporating 3,910 square
feet for pier A and 180 square feet for pier B of this same habitat. Pier B would shade a
total of 1,170 square feet of deep bottom habitat while incorporating 4,254 square feet
Estuarine and Public Trust Waters. A total of 4,374 square feet of coastal and 404
jurisdictional wetlands would be shaded as well. The platforms located over the wetland
areas have the potential to cause greater shading impacts due to the 8' width (min. 6'
allowed over coastal wetlands).The high ground work would fill a total of 7,500 ft2 of the
property with 312 ft2 of fill/disturbance occurring within the 75' AEC. The impervious
surface would be .086% within the Estuarine Shoreline AEC and 0% for the entire tract.
There should be no impacts to shallow bottom from dock A due to the fact that the water
depths within this area are an average of -3.6' nlw. There should be no hazard to
navigation resulting from the pier placement due to its location, as well as the piers would
not extend farther than 1/4 of the width of the water body (in this case a maximum of 125'
for pier A and 113' for pier B). No coastal marsh would be filled or excavated during this
project, however there is a potential for rutting and substrate alteration during construction.

Field Investigation Report
M & M Development, Inc
Page 4 of 5
This could be minimized through the use of mats or logging tracks. There is not a potential
to impact SAV's or shellfish with this proposal.
HE THER STYRON Morehead City March 27, 2012

RIFC,,-E 51E ih
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
M and M land Development, Inc.;s�.�;,r
Stella, Carteret County, North Carolina
Project Narrative f4,�M-MIA CITY
Introduction
M and M Land Development, Inc. proposes to construct two 10-slip piers with associated
elevated walkways and earthen paths on acreage located along the White Oak River in Stella,
White Oak Township, Carteret County. The piers will include platforms, boat lifts, and fish
cleaning stations. Each pier will transition to an elevated walkway to cross over wetlands and
then connect to earthen walkways to connect to highground portions of the site. The structures
are identified as Pier A and Pier B on project plans.
The project consists of the two piers and associated walkways. There are no current plans to
further develop the property. Prior to the current economic downturn the owners hoped to
develop a single-family residential subdivision on the site. A sketch plan was reviewed by the
Carteret County Technical Review Committee in November 2007 and the owners also received
a low -density residential stormwater permit. However, due to the poor economy and the
pessimistic outlook for new residential sales the owners have now abandoned their original
plans. They hope to develop the site in the future, but at this point it is not known if or how a
residential plan will be pursued. In the event they decide to go further with the project, any
proposed development in the CAMA AECs will be addressed in a modification request for the
major CAMA permit that may be issued for this proposal.
Site Description
The project site consists of ± 138.71 acres of undeveloped land located adjacent the White Oak
River in Stella. The Camp Lejeune to Cherry Point Railroad passes along the north of the
property and is an adjacent riparian neighbor of the project site. The railroad property is owned
by the United States of America, and is managed through Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base.
The project site is connected to Wetherington Landing Road (NCSR 1101) by a recorded right-
of-way crossing and re -crossing agreement over the railroad property. The adjacent riparian
property on the east is owned by First and Last Child, LLC and 'is utilized as a camp ground.
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
M and M Land Development, Inc.
Major CAMA Permit Application
March 2, 2012 Page 1

The parcel contains extensive coastal and non -coastal wetlands, including a large peninsula -
shaped area of coastal wetlands located on the western portion of the site. The US Army Corps
of Engineers approved the Section 404 wetland delineation of 28.02 acres on December 19,
2007 (copy enclosed with this application). Staff of the NC Division of Coastal ManagementREC�_.
IVED
provided assistance with the delineation of coastal wetlands and the locations of Normal High
Water as shown on project plans. The shoreline of the property measures about 7,0%Jinear
feet, including the wetland peninsula.
PC. 111w 10%!D _.fly,.
Several canals were previously dredged through the coastal wetlands and are not navigable at
normal low water, although some can be passed through at high tide. The site also contains a
tidal creek that meanders along the eastern portion of the site. The creek is not impacted by
this project.
The White Oak River varies in width at the site. It is 506' wide at the location of Pier A (see
plans) and 667' at Pier B, measured from the waterward edge of marsh.
Existing normal low water depths in the river range from -1.0' near the shoreline of the main
portion of the property to more than -15.0' in the center of the channel. Boat slips are located
in a minimum of -3.0' NLW as requested by the Division of Marine Fisheries. Depths at the
waterward end of Pier A measure -3.7' NLW. Depths at the waterward end of Pier B are -10'
NLW. No submerged aquatic vegetation or shellfish were observed at the site.
The White Oak River at the project site is classified as SA. by the Environmental Management
Commission. This portion of the river is also classified as a Primary Nursery Area by the Marine
Fisheries Commission and is considered to be an Essential Fish Habitat. Project impacts to
these resources will be minimal, with no dredging proposed. Boat slips will be located in a
minimum of -3' NLW and will extend no more than one-fourth the width of the river. The
bottom of the pier decking over wetlands will be elevated a minimum of 3' above the wetland
substrate. The proposed piers will provide for wet dockage only; no marina services are
included.
Earthen walkways connecting to the piers are the only proposed upland development. The
walkways have been located to avoid wetland areas and are outside the coastal shoreline AEC.
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
M and M Land Development, Inc.
Major CAMA Permit Application
March 2, 2012 Page 2

The average elevation of the site is 8' above normal high water. In addition to coastal and non -
coastal rv� �r
coastal wetlands, shrubs, trees, and grasses also exist on the site. There is an eA' iiig cleared
area located in the center of the parcel. An existing unpaved roadway connecting tP
Wetherington Landing Road is the only man-made feature on the site.
:�Vf.r
73 : ,'C I'
The parcel is unzoned by Carteret County. As previously noted, the Carteret County Technical
Review Committee considered a sketch plan for a residential subdivision at the site in 2007. The
owners did not pursue, nor did Carteret County review, any further project plans for the site.
Sheet 1 of the project plans provides an overview of the project and site. There are no existing
wastewater treatment facilities, drinking water supply sources, stormwater management or
treatment systems, or man-made structures on the site, other than the previously mentioned
unpaved road. The large peninsula -shaped area of wetlands located on the western portion of
the site will not be impacted by this project.
Project Description
The owners propose to construct two 10-slip fixed piers with associated elevated and earthen
walkways. The elevated walkway sections will cross wetland areas and will transition to earthen
paths or walkways to be constructed on the highground portion of the site. All components of
the two piers will be fixed.
Pier A measures 766' in length by 6' wide. The length measurement is based on 113' from the
waterward end of the pier to normal high water plus 653' of elevated walkway over coastal and
non -coastal wetlands. The proposed earthen path/walkway connecting to this pier measures an
additional 166' and is 6' wide.
Pier B measures 822' in length by 6' wide. Of this length, 101' extends from the waterward end
to normal high water with an additional 721' of elevated walkway over wetlands. The proposed
earthen path/walkway connecting to Pier B measures709' x 6'.
Pier B will be elevated a minimum of 5' above NHW for a span of 6' at the canal crossing, as
shown on Sheet 4 of project plans. (Pier A does not incorporate a canal crossing) The bottom of
the decking over wetlands (both Pier A and Pier B) will be elevated a minimum of 3' above the
wetiand substrate.
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
M and M. Land Development, Inc.
Major CAMA Permit Application
March 2, 2012 Page 3

RECEIVED
The earthen pathways will consist of dirt, wood chips, pine straw, or other natural rna
The earthen pathways are located in non -wetland areas as shown on project plans (see sheets 2
and 3). OCUII_I�VTYD) CITY
Each pier will contain two platforms. A t-head platform measuring 12' by 24' will be located at
the waterward end of each proposed structure. A section of each t-head platform will contain a
covered gazebo measuring 9' x 12' with a 16" overhang. The remaining area of the t-head
platform will not be covered. An observation platform measuring 8' x 8' with 45'angled sides
will be located in the section to be elevated over wetlands (see proposed pier plan view on
sheet 4 of project plans).
The two piers will be located more than 1500' apart, as shown on project plans. Pier A will be
located 150' from the adjacent riparian corridor and more than 800' from adjacent docking
facilities (per Google Earth). Pier B will be located 950' from the adjacent riparian corridor and
more than 1900' from the adjacent docking facility.
As previously noted, each pier will contain 10 boat slips, for a total of 20 slips for the project.
Boat lifts measuring 12.5' x 12.5' are proposed for each slip. Six finger piers measuring 16' x 3'
are proposed for each pier, for a total of 12 finger piers. Cantilevered fish cleaning stations are
proposed adjacent the t-head platforms and along the pier landward of the slips, for a total of
two per pier or four total (see pier details on Sheet 4).
Upland Development
Proposed upland development is limited to the earthen walkways connecting to the elevated
walkway sections of the two piers. All upland work will occur outside the CAMA AEC. The
project will disturb approximately 7500 square feet, with .086 % of the entire tract being
covered with impervious surfaces (compacted dirt walkways). No impervious surfaces are
proposed for the coastal shoreline AEC.
No parking is proposed for this project. Parking for trailers is not needed since boats will be
placed in the water elsewhere and brought to the site, (There is no existing or proposed
boatramp on the property.) The existing stormwater permit SW8 091210 previously issued for
the site authorizes a roadway system, located outside the CAMA AEC, to serve a low -density
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
M and M Land Development, Inc.
Major CAMA Permit Application
March 2, 2012
Page 4

M
stormwater subdivision. Should the piers be constructed prior to development of a subdivision,
appropriate sections of permitted roads will be "roughed in" to allow parking for users of the
docks. Upon completion of any future subdivision, owners' vehicles will remain on individual
residential lots eliminating any need for additional parking areas associated with the piers. With
either possibility, vehicles will be parked outside the CAMA AEC a minimum gfwapp�rd�cimately
500' from Normal High Water.
01 _1 y i`I
!; L
Construction Methods
Dock construction in the river will employ conventional marine constructionLtechn146i using
barge mounted equipment with pile driving capability. Walkway pilings over wetlands will be
installed by portable pile -driving equipment. A small tractor for mowing and light grading will
be used for construction of the earthen walkways. The barge will be stored in deep water. The
portable pile -driving equipment and tractor will be stored onsite on highground.
Summary
The proposed project is limited to two 10-slip fixed piers in the White Oak River with elevated
sections over wetlands, connecting to earthen highground walkways. Each pier will include two
platforms — one at the waterward end of the structure and an observation platform over
wetlands. Lifts are proposed for each boat slip.
Project impacts will be minimal, with no dredging or other development proposed. Boat slips
will be located in a minimum of -3' NLW and will extend no more than one-fourth the width of
the river. Piers will be elevated a minimum of 5' above NHW for a span of 6' at the canal
crossings. The bottom of the pier decking over wetlands will be elevated a minimum of 3' above
the wetland substrate. The proposed piers will provide for wet dockage only; no services are
included.
Two earthen walkways (one for each pier) connecting to the piers are the only proposed upland
development. The walkways have been located to avoid wetland areas. No impervious surfaces
are proposed for the coastal shoreline AEC. This proposal will cover a very small percentage
(< .1%) of the entire tract with impervious surfaces.
The owners hope to eventually pursue further residential development of the site. At this time
it is not known if, or how, future plans will be developed. If additional plans proceed for
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
M and M Land Development, Inc.
Major CAMA Permit Application
March 2, 2012
Page 5

` 4 0..
residential development of the site, the proposed piers will enhance the project and create less
impact than individual piers.
RE N r v�P,
Stella Bridge Landing Piers
M and M Land Development, Inc.
Major CAMA Permit Application
March 2, 2012 Page 6

m Z Rioasze I.,el— - aoarszs (o1fl1:3Ndia
... aaes-asa ow
%u o flEseL 'a'u aa391w'Anm wom3aa e«es lit
-3'd '<mem4sai'H u4oC '3'd 'wosmaN mPneOaP" I no DNIQNF i 39afxs V'I'Id Ls w p a yd '6uuaaul6u3 aseo� leas/�� algozd sp upId X. xa?d a
aun yolen
wom+F
d Uo
-j, . U 7 @5
E mr
I.
.99 112 o, � W m w a
L-4 m3 a O
><� IMHN _
43H
cu
o�
I Ir 1 I!
1 1
II xx
t
I � x
i \ O
+' h
— o + O flr x -3`�II
sa_x r,,x
i�X q�X
sr_X m
j at�x
Ott_ att
se1,X <s,X
`X ax
aTE_X
<'B�x
y�X
"-x
U -
«'k V] C a
r `X
2t�x
x g
� t -
eui-1 yoleW

u
B
U
aBo (ouUxvi - soo iole!.auowe
'�a;em4sadH u4oC3'd--N'N pmn a;o
6,141 D leluawuainu3 pue I!^!JHd '6uw3auibu3 ;seoD te4s/U�
MI.3'd
alndlana�P�IW'3Wl6u3
alT;Ozd sg UUld „g„ iaid
o
o
t
x
i
auil
(4 of / ,R E slaays)
et
i
auil yuleW
yoleW
I
X x
i -
I/
r
/ I
m N m
e
00
1—
�, I
�
=_div9w
i
�
co m.
a m o a
Fw mwv
m m
j
al
a'u CO P
-.
Ea`m am
I�
x
O ® o
x e O m^
I
M
X
n a fx
X X
�p
IN
x 4
>
_
� 4 u
e%
x �
Ln
a
5
m
o 2 0,
¢ v a
—
§
m
s mX
I.
E .60
-�
a
x
N L U
u) O 2
O
I
E 9 ® a
o m y a
o
x Al a
p
IMHN
OD
aGa
A
o
U �
cn
a
z
yaw

omosg to W:rv, - mosze xoud P Jf�yyi -- -- - -, `
n '3'1 'faleuysafj 'y uyo[ '3'd 'wosMaN 'N P!ne0
yaa�!e�3 et!ams..D Iw awuo,lnu3 Pue n�o °a JI IIQNV I 3�QRIflt d I Iff LS m
yd '6uuaaui6u3 4seO3 leas,v:)
(4