WQ0044547_Staff Report_20230809

DocuSign Envelope ID:47CF6000-6A13-4717-9EAD-72F85DF2E1 E4
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑NPDES Unit®Non-Discharge Unit Application No.: NC/WQ0044547
Attn: Cord Anthony Facility Name: 6713 Moon Lake
Lane SFR-Princess
Holdings LLC
County: Wake
From: Dorothy M Robson
Raleigh Regional Office
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ❑ Yes or®No
a. Date of site visit: TBD
b. Site visit conducted by:
c. Inspection report attached? ❑Yes or❑No
d. Person contacted: and their contact information: xxx ext.
e. Driving directions: N/A
2. Discharge Point(s): N/A
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: N/A
Classification:
River Basin and Sub-basin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: SFR Description: Surface dispersal by means of drip irrigation system is
limited to 480 gallons per day. The system shall consist of. a 1, 500 gallon baffled septic tank with an effluent
filter, a 2,500 gallon(two compartment)Recirculation/Storage Pump Tank, a Model 600(600 GPD)EZ
Treat Polystyrene Recirculating Media Filter, dosed by a 20 gallon per minute(GPM)recirculation pump, a
flow splitting device, a io GPM UV disinfection unit, a 3,500 gallon Field Dose Tank, a 0. 34 acre drip
irrigation area with a minimum of 4,025 linear feet(LF)of drip line, 2,012 emitters, a rainfall sensor to
prevent irrigation during inclement weather, and all associated piping valves, controls, and appurtenances
Proposed flow: 480 gpd
Current permitted flow:NA
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions(soils, depth to water table, etc.)consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain: Still needs to be assessed.
FORM: WQROSSR04-14 Page 1 of

DocuSign Envelope ID:47CF6000-6A13-4717-9EAD-72F85DF2E1E4
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ N/A
If no,please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ® Yes or❑ No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ®No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions(Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: NA
11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only): NA
III.EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
ORC, cat C-ate ceftiriC-ate r:
2. Are the design,maintenanee and operation of the tfeatment faeilities adequate for-the type of waste and disposal
system? n Yes or-
if
He please o ,.1,,;fi.
Dese iptior of existing fae lifies:
Proposed flow:
Explain affything obsetwed dur-ing the site visit that needs to be addressed by the pei:mit, E)r-that may be impeft—ant
, ,
e"
NI-
if no,please 3. Are the site eenditions (e.g., sails,tepegr-aphy, depth to watef table, ete.) maintained appfopfia4ely afid adeEtuatel�
4. Has the site ehanged in any way that may affeet the peftnit(e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
>,",,, d .,deve ors et )? n Yes "r n 1,T"
if yes,please e"Iaia.:
5. is the r-esidualsmanagement
if no,please explain:
., hydfaulie,
nutfient) still aeeeptable? El Yes Of El No
if no,please explaiw
7. is the existing groundwater-, ,ninon ade ,ate? n Yes El NE)if no, e"lain and r-eeetmnefid any ehanges to the gr-euadw4er-monitoring
•
areas.8. Are there a*y sethaek eenfliets for-existing tfeatment, storage a-ad disposal sites? D Yes or-EIN-0
if yes, attaeh a map showing eenfliet
9. is the desef4ption of the f4eilities as"#ea in the existing peffRit e0ffeet? El Yes or-
if He,please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:47CF6000-6A13-4717-9EAD-72F85DF2E1E4
10. Were r;tefi ,ells r o.l . nstr-tiete and 1,,e T.ted? n Yes n NO n /�
T
11. A fe the n;tefin well , ,,,-din.tes , Eleet;n BIMS? n Yes No n T.
if ne,please eemplete the following(ex-pand table if neeessafy):
MonitoFing
Latitude Leftg e
Pr-&vide input to help the pefmit wr-itef evaltt4e any r-e"ests for-r-edueed monitoring, if 12. Has a review of all self monitoring data been condueted(e.g.,DN4R,NDN4R,NDAR, GW)? [] Yes or No
13. Are there any pefmit ehanges needed in order-to addfess ongoing BIMS violations? D Yes oF D No
if yes,please explain.:
14. Cheek all tha4 apply.:
Please e"lain and a4aeh a"doettments that fna-y help elafify answer-,leon*nents (i.e.,NON',NOD, ete.)
if the f4eility has had eemplianee problems "r-ing the pefmit eyele,please explain the st4us. Has the RO been
Lease explaiw —
15. Are ther-p.g 'lated to eamplianee/enfer-eement that should be r-esolved before issuing this peffnit?
n Yes n ,, n,.T A
if yes,please •
16. Possible texim,impacts t s„-face w tors•
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ® Yes or❑No
If yes,please explain: See next comment
2. List any items that you would like the Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an additional
information request:
Item Reason
Form SFRWWIS 06- Please answer question 4 and 18
16.Sec.V.
Drainage Coefficient A drainage coefficient of 9.5%is proposed. Please explain how you arrived at
this number.
Page 1 of Engineering Calculations Summary page. A 20%flow reduction is
Conceptual Basis Design requested to reduce the flow from 600 gpd to 480 gpd. However,no
documentation was provided.
Map 3 of&,Enlarged Field Plan Map indicates the instantaneous rate of 0.14
Correct Instantaneous Rate in/hr. This number does not match with previous rates indicated in the report.
Please correct in report or on the map.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 4

DocuSign Envelope ID:47CF6000-6A13-4717-9EAD-72F85DF2E1E4
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: ® Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer:
DocuSigned by:
uAvi,SSa, f. ha.v,ttit L
Signature of regional supervisor: R,g16F RAR32144F
Date: 8/9/2023
V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 4 of 4