20201288 Ver 2_North Creek Village Phase 2 e-PCN Attachments_20230920

Angela Petros
From: Angela Petros
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2023 1:38 PM
To: 401 PreFile
Subject: North Creek Village Phase II NWP 29 Pre -Application
To Whom It May Concern,
Atlas will be submitting an NWP 29 application for the North Creek Village Phase II project. This project is in
Huntersville (Mecklenburg County) and is a Mixed -Use project. Magnolia Huntersville II LLC is the applicant.
Angela Petros
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] mobile
www.atiasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
ONMENTAL

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - 200802707 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: North Creek Village Phase II
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑✓
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Mixed -use development
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Owner: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC and Charles Spencer Davis Jr
Applicant: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form AS — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: Phase 1 Action ID Is SAW-2008-02707
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
35.4537660 /-80.8009170
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 01107311, 01126113, and 01126148
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Huntersville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Ramah Creek, Class C , Index #: 13-17-4-4
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Rocky, 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit Pre -Application Request
✓ Nationwide Permit # 18, 29, 39, and 58 ❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Regional General Permit # 0 Compliance
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

IRaw
raw -. l
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Doug Perez
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
September 18, 2023
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Stephanie Goss
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: North Creek Village Phase II - +/- 84.716 acres
17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
Nationwide Permit 29, 39, and 58 Application
Action ID: SAW-2008-02707 / DWR Project #: 2020-1288
Doug/Stephanie:
The applicant, Stephen Vinson with Magnolia Huntersville II LLC, is requesting approval of the enclosed
Nationwide Permit 18, 29, 39, and 58 verifications for unavoidable impacts to Waters of the United States.
Atlas Environmental completed a stream and wetland delineation on February 08, 2023, March 07, 2023,
March 08, 2023, and June 30, 2023. Included in this package is a preliminary jurisdictional determination
request package for Phase 2. Stream Assessment Method stream forms are included for all streams
where impacts are proposed (Phase 2) or have been installed (Phase 1). Correspondence with the North
Carolina Historic Preservation Office and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Office is also
included in this package. A statement of availability from RES is included to cover the stream mitigation.
The 401-water quality certification and 404 nationwide permit for Phase 1 is enclosed. Finally, the
approved jurisdictional determination from the Army Corps is included.
There are eight streams and four wetlands within the review area of Phase 2. Ramah Creek (713 linear
feet), CH 100 (3,175 linear feet), CH 200 (1560 linear feet), CH 300 (66 linear feet), CH 400 (69 linear
feet), CH 500 (98 linear feet), CH 600 (33 linear feet), and CH 700 (61 linear feet) for a total of 5,775
linear feet. Ramah Creek and the lower reaches of CH 100 and CH 200 are perennial. Upper reaches of
CH 100 and CH 200 and CH 300, CH 400, CH 500, CH 600, and CH 700 are intermittent. WL 1000a
(0.006 acre), WL 1000 (0.001 acre), WL 1200 (0.044 acre), and WL 1300 (0.001 acre) are hydrologically
connected to CH 100. WL 1000a is an adjacent wetland near the Southern boundary.
The development will require three permanent stream crossings for road access, one permanent stream
impact for commercial/office space grading and parking, one permanent stream impact for grading at a
stormwater pond, one permanent stream impact for lot grading, two permanent stream impacts for sewer
line installation, and one temporary stream impact for sewer line installation. Additional impacts are being
avoided by the site engineering and design. Avoidance and minimization are occurring by the
construction of retaining walls. Impact S1 (191 LF, 0.012 acre) was located on the intermittent section of
CH 200 and is related to Phase 1 of the project. Since mitigation is required for Phase 2 of the project the
stream impact in Phase 1 has been added in this application to the mitigation calculation.
Impact S1 (320 LF, 0.014 acre) is located on the intermittent section of CH 100. 155 linear feet is for fill
related to grading and parking for a commercial or office building and 165 linear feet is for a road crossing
required for connectivity to Hwy 73. A retaining wall is proposed to the East to minimize additional stream
impact. Impact S2 (86 LF, 0.005 acre) is located on the intermittent section of CH 100 and is for the
installation of a culvert for a road crossing. Retaining walls will be used on either side of this road
crossing to avoid additional stream impacts. Impact S3 (86 LF, 0.004 acre) is for grading purposes for a
BMP. Impact S4 (68 LF, 0.009 acre) is located on the perennial section of CH 100 and is for the
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

(j%1RA0NMjEENTAL
installation of a culvert for a road crossing. Retaining walls will be used on either side of this road
crossing to avoid additional stream impacts. Impact S5 (56 LF, 0.003 acre) located on CH 400 and
Impact S6 (47 LF, 0.003 acre) located on CH 300, are both for installation of the proposed sanitary sewer.
A portion of impact S5 is for lot grading. The one temporary stream impact in Phase 2 is for one sewer
line crossing.
There is 0.068 acre of wetlands within Phase 1 and Phase 2. There are no wetland impacts proposed for
Phase 2. One minor wetland impact was completed during Phase 1 at the one road crossing (0.009
acre). There are 2,661 linear feet of intermittent streams and 5,243 linear feet of perennial streams
(7,904 linear feet total) within Phase 1 and Phase 2. Impacts for Phase 1 and Phase 2 are proposed to
13.2% of the wetlands, 29.5% of the low -quality intermittent streams, 1.3% of the perennial streams, and
10.8% of all streams. All but one of the intermittent stream impacts occur to the top reach of intermittent
streams that are actively eroding due to stormwater flows.
Phase 1 Impacts
Site #
Reason for
Impact
Wetland/
Name
Forested
Type of
Width
Impact
Im act
Type
Stream Type
Jurisdiction
Area
Si*
Road
P
Intermittent
CH
N/A
Both
3
191 LF
Crossing
200
0.012ac
S1**
Sewer Line
T
Seep
Yes
Both
N/A
0.009ac
Crossing
W1*
Road
P
Perennial
CH
N/A
Both
3
28 LF
Crossing
100
0.005ac
*NWP 29 approved June 8, 2021 / ** NWP 29/58 approved June 9, 2022
P=Permanent Impact / T=Temporary Impact
Total Phase 1 Impacts
Stream Impacts (Permanent): 191 linear feet (0.012 acre)
Stream Impacts (Temporary): 28 linear feet (0.005 acre)
Wetland Impacts (Permanent): 0.009 acre
Phase 2 Impacts
Site #
Reason for
Impact
Wetland/
Name
Forested
Type of
Width
Impact
Im act
Type
Stream Type
Jurisdiction
Area
S1
Road /
P
Intermittent
CH
N/A
Both
1.87
320 LF
Parking
100
0.014ac
S2
Road
P
Intermittent
CH
N/A
Both
2.66
86 LF
Crossing
100
0.005ac
S3
Pond
P
Intermittent
CH
N/A
Both
2.21
86 LF
Grading
500
0.004ac
S4
Road
P
Perennial
CH
N/A
Both
5.91
68 LF
Crossing
100
0.009ac
S5
Lot/Sewer
P
Intermittent
CH
N/A
Both
2.20
56 LF
400
0.003ac
S6
Sewer
P
Intermittent
CH
N/A
Both
2.36
47 LF
300
0.003ac
S7
Sewer
T
Intermittent
CH
N/A
Both
2.12
17 LF
100
0.001 ac
Total Phase 2 Impacts
Stream Impacts (Permanent): 663 linear feet (0.038 acre)
Stream Impacts (Temporary): 17 linear feet (0.001 acre)
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

AS
ENVIRONMENTAL
Total for Both Phases
Stream Impacts (Permanent): 854 linear feet (0.050 acre — rounded up) (2,170 square feet)
Stream Impacts (Temporary): 45 linear feet (0.006 acre)
Wetland Impacts (Permanent): 0.009 acre
NC DWR mitigation will not be required for this project as perennial stream impacts do not exceed 300
linear feet and wetland impacts are not greater than or equal to 0.10 acre. Corps wetland mitigation will
not be required since impacts do not exceed 0.10 acre. Corps stream mitigation will be required since
stream impacts exceed 0.02 acre. A copy of the Statement of Availability letter from RES Aster, LLC is
enclosed. The streams on site to be impacted rate as follows on NC SAM: S1, CH 100 intermittent = low
quality; S2, CH 100 intermittent = low quality; S3, CH 500 intermittent = low quality; S4, CH 100 perennial
= medium quality; S5 CH 400 intermittent = low quality; S6 CH 300 intermittent = low quality, S7 CH 100
intermittent = low quality. The SAM form for CH 200 which was impacted during construction of Phase 1
is low. The SAM stream ratings for the intermittent streams are because the streams are highly
entrenched, actively eroding due to storm flow velocities, presence of unnatural debris including bricks,
and lack of in -stream habitat. A mitigation ratio of 1:1 is proposed for all low -quality intermittent streams.
The SAM score for impact S2 perennial CH 100 is medium quality. A 2:1 mitigation ratio is proposed for
the perennial stream impacts. No wetland mitigation is required since impacts total 0.009 acre for both
Phases. No wetland impacts are proposed for Phase 2.
Enclosed are the necessary permit application documents for nationwide permits 18, 29, 39, and 58 as
well as additional supporting documentation. Thank you for your attention to the enclosed request.
Please contact me if you need any additional information.
Best regards,
Allyson Sinclair
[e-mail]
Jennifer L Robertson
[e-mail]
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Tommy Fennel, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Stephanie Goss, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name:
North Creek Village Phase 2
Property Owner of Record:
Magnolia Huntersville II LLC
Contact Name:
Stephen Vinson
Address:
9525 Birkdale Crossing Dr Suite 200
Address:
Raleigh, NC 27612
Phone/Fax Number:
919-414-6721
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Project Address:
17705 Davidson -Concord Rd
Project Address:
Huntersville, NC 28078
Tax PIN:
01107311, 01126113, and 01126148
Signature:��—
Date:
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
[e-mail]
www.atlasenvi.com

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: North Creek Village Phase II
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑✓
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The purpose of this project is for the construction of mixed -use development consisting of
single-family units, multi -family units, and commercial development.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Owners: Charles Spencer Davis Jr. and Stephen Vinson
Applicant: Magnolia Huntersville LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form AS — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: SAW-2008-02707 (Huntersville East) aka Phase 1
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
35.4537660/-80.8009170
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 01107311, 01126113, and 01126148
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Huntersville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Ramah Creek; 13-17-4-4; Class C
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Rocky 03040105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
R
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

-"10
TLAS
VIRQNMENTAL
September 01, 2023
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Doug Perez
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Re: North Creek Village Phase II- - 84.716 Acres
17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
Doug:
The applicant, Stephen Vinson of Magnolia Huntersville II LLC is requesting approval of
the enclosed delineation package of potential Waters of the United States for a
preliminary jurisdictional determination. Atlas Environmental staff was onsite February
08, 2023, March 07, 2023, March 08, 2023, and June 30, 2023, and assessed the
presence of eight streams (Ramah Creek, CH 100, CH 2O0, CH 300, CH 400, CH 500,
CH 600, and CH 700) and four wetlands (WL 1000a, WL 1000, WL 1200, and WL
1300). Ramah Creek flows across the Southern boundary of the review area and was
assessed to be perennial. Channel CH 100 flows into Ramah Creek and was assessed
to be perennial in the Southern reach and intermittent in the Northern reach. Channel
CH 200 is a tributary to CH 100 and was also assessed to be perennial in the Southern
reach and intermittent in the Northern reach. Channels CH 300, CH 400, CH 500, CH
600, and CH 700 were all delineated as intermittent. Wetland WL 1000a is located on
the floodplain of Ramah Creek. Wetland WL 1000 abuts the perennial reach of channel
CH 100. Wetlands WL 1200 and WL 1300 abut the intermittent reach of channel CH
100.
Enclosed are the necessary jurisdictional determination documents and additional
information. Thank you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please contact me if
you need any additional information.
Best regards, A
✓Jacob Sinclair, P.G., PWS
Senior Environmental Specialist
Atlas Environmental Inc.
Environmental, Inc.
338 S Sharon Amity #411, Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Carps
a1 Enginaers
AAWW40 + Dwnu
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re�zutatoryPet-rnitProuam/Contact/CounlyLocator.asl2x,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: if you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. if you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 17705 Davidson -Concord Rd
City, State:
Huntersville, NC 28078
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 01107311, 01126113, and 01126148
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Stephen Vinson of Magnolia Huntersville II LLC
Mailing Address: 4040 Ed Drive Suite 201
Telephone Number:
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-414-6721
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑� Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Two property owners
Mailing Address: See attached property report
Telephone Number: unknown
Electronic Mail Address: unknown
Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the dully authorized agent
�offtthe owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ✓❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
7 3
Date _
Si
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓� I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
W1Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 84.716 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.4537660
Longitude:-80.8009170
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
LJ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
G Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re2ulatoLy-Permit-
Pro 2ram/Juri s dicti on/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Fvl Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
z Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
Fvl USGS Topographic Map
W-1 Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LiDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
zLandscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑� NC Division of Water Resources Stream identification Forms
1J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.arMy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/rejzdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 Ann A Prelim JD Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see htti)://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Reaulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

TLAS
\ARONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Tommy Fennel, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Stephanie Goss, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name:
North Creek Village Phase 2
Property Owner of Record:
Magnolia Huntersville II LLC
Contact Name:
Stephen Vinson
Address:
9525 Birkdale Crossing Dr Suite 200
Address:
Raleigh, NC 27612
Phone/Fax Number:
919-414-6721
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Project Address:
17705 Davidson -Concord Rd
Project Address:
Huntersville, NC 28078
Tax PIN:
01107311, 01126113, and 01126148
Signature:
Date:
e
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
[e-mail]
www.atlasenvi.com

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
01126148 T
1126148
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
1.789 AC
Fire District
HUNTERSVILLE RURAL
Special District
FIRE SERVICE D
Account Type
INDIVIDUAL
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer Jurisdiction Huntersville
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I No District Huntersville
02/16/2023
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
CHARLES SPENCER JR
DAVIS
300 WATERS DR APT B217
PALM BEACH FL 33480
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
I Sale Date
Sale Price
37701-439
10/07/2022
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710466200J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
ITO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
BLACK FARMS RD UNINC
Site Location
ETJ Area
Huntersville
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
63.04
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name CLARKE
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
FEMA Panel#
3710466200J
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
15120 BLACK FARMS RD UNINC
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
01126113 T
1126113
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
44.93 AC
Fire District
HUNTERSVILLE RURAL
Special District
FIRE SERVICE D
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
USE VALUE HOMESITE
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer Yes
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Huntersville
District Huntersville
02/16/2023
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
MAGNOLIA HUNTERSVILLE
9525 BIRKDALE CROSSING
II LLC
DR STE 200
HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
37701-464
10/07/2022
$2,818,000.00
37701-439
10/07/2022
19251-304
08/29/2005
$0.00
09988-461
10/22/1998
1$0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Huntersville
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
63.04
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name CLARKE
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
01107311 T
1107311
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
NA
Land Area
37.997 AC
Fire District
HUNTERSVILLE RURAL
Special District
FIRE SERVICE D
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
FOREST - COMMERCIAL
PRODUCTION
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer Jurisdiction Huntersville
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes District Huntersville
02/16/2023
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
MAGNOLIA HUNTERSVILLE
9525 BIRKDALE CROSSING
II LLC
DR STE 200
HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date
Sale Price
37390-656
06/01/2022
$5,700,000.00
02047-401
02/01/1959
$0.00
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710466200J
FEMA Panel Date
03/02/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
ITO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
SAM FURR RD UNINC
Site Location
ETJ Area
Huntersville
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
63.04
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name CLARKE
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
Page 1/1

c�
aD °'
� U
— ca
ca E
U M
J ry
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O
M LO LO V m CO N m 00 LO CO LO
N LO CO I- O M 01 0 00 N r 0 M
-p V— V N— —— O M N— O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0) O O O O O O O O O O O O
C: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
p
J
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O
O V — I— LO — 01 CO 00 CO 00 I—
V LO CO a) CO 00 I- CO LO LO M
N V V V V V V O LO V V LO LO
LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO
co co co co co co co co co co co co
Q W W W W W W W W W W W W
H Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
2 z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_
p J J J J J J J J J J J J
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3
aD
Q
H H H H H H H H W W W W
O O O O O O O O QfQfQfw
O O O O O O O O UQ UQ UQ Q
M LO O 0 M 00 M — 0 — V
I— 0 0 0 M M 0 O O V O
I— — LO 0 0 0 0
CO— o 0 0 0
J J J J J J J J Q Q Q Q
N
-oW W W W W W W W
p z z z z z z z z
U I LL1 LL1 LL1 LL1
W W W W W W W W W W W W
O > > > > > > > > O O O O
aD
p
U
c
W W W W
z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_ z_
J J J J J J J J J J J J
000000000000
Of Of Of Of Of Of Of Of Of Of Of w
U U U U U U U U U U U U
of of of Of Of Of Of Of Of Of Of
2000000000000
wzzzzzzzzzzzz
aD _�e
E aD
m p
z U o 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m
N E N M V LO CO I—
m U U U U U U U

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 9/l/2023
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Stephen Vinson of Magnolia Huntersville II LLC
4040 Ed Drive Suite 201 Raleigh, NC 27612
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, North Creek Village Phase II,
SAW-2008-02707 (Huntersville East, aka Phase 1)
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville,
NC 28078. The review area is primarily forested with dilapidated barn structures within the Western region of the
review area.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Huntersville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.453766' Longitude:-80.800917'
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Ramah Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): February 08, 2023, March 7-8, 2023
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount
Geographic authority to which
of aquatic resources
Type of aquatic
Latitude
Longitude
the aquatic resource "may be"
Site Number
decimal de
( degrees)
decimal de
( degrees)
in review area
resources (i.e., wetland
subject (i.e., Section 404 or
(acreage and linear
vs. non -wetland waters)
Section 10/404)
feet, if applicable
Ramah Creek
35.44410000
-80.80459000
713 linear feet
Potential Non -Wetland
404
CH 100
35.44944000
-80.80165000
3175 linear feet
Potential Non -Wetland
404
CH 200
35.44751000
-80.80475000
1560 linear feet
Potential Non -Wetland
404
CH 300
35.44867000
-80.80204000
66 linear feet
Potential Non -Wetland
404
CH 400
35.44895000
-80.80199000
69 linear feet
Potential Non -Wetland
404
CH 500
35.44931000
-80.80196000
98 linear feet
Potential Non -Wetland
404
CH 600
35.45089000
-80.80102000
33 linear feet
Potential Non -Wetland
404
CH 700
35.45173000
-80.80089000
61 linear feet
Potential Non -Wetland
404
WL 1000a
35.44368000
-80.80328000
0.006 acre
Potential Wetland
404
WL 1000
35.44856000
-80.80215000
0.001 acre
Potential Wetland
404
WL 1200
35.45158000
-80.80106000
0.044 acre
Potential Wetland
404
WL 1300
35.45197000
-80.80095000
0.001 acre
Potential Wetland
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved 7D (AID) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of 7Ds and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AID for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AID
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AID
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID
or a PJD, the 7D will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AID, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AID to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester:
Map: Topo, USGS Topo, Lidar, WSS, NWI, NHD, HUC 12, HUC 8, Aerial, Parcel Map
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U. S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 Cornelius-
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Citename: GIS Database
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Google Earth FEMA Tool
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): North Carolina GIS and 2021 Google Earth Imagery
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site Photographs February 08, 2023 and March 7-8,
2023
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Click here to enter a date.
September 01, 2023
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

rer

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Ln
e.Ftd 21a5. rt o
. 40%
�-
•• a
t
Legend
O Review Area
o Streets
O Meck. Co. Parcels
NC OneMap Aerial
Imagery 2019
Delineation
M Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
` a
k 0 200 400 600 800 Ft
❑
�lRpNMEEVAL
Page 2 of 7 Figure: lb
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: May 30, 2023

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
0
Potential Non
Wetland
CH 2O0: - 1560 LF,
0.084 Ac
INS
Potential Non Wetland
CH 100: - 3175 LF, 0.237 Ac
Legend \
O Review Area
Streets Potential Wetland
C' Meck. Co. Parcels WL 1000a: - 0.006 Ac
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation Potential Non Wetland
Ramah Creek: - 713 LF, 0.147 Ac
Perennial
Intermittent 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Wetland �,Ks�r
rkna§
Page 3 of 7 Detail 1 Figure: 1c
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766, -80.800917
Date: May 30, 2023

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Potential Non Wetland
CH 500: — 98 LF, 0.005 Ac
CH 100 Continued
Potential Non Wetland
CH 400: — 69 LF, 0.003 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 300: — 66 LF, 0.003 Ac
Potential Wetland
WL 1000: — 0.001 Ac
CH 100 Continued
Legend
O Review Area
o Streets
C' Meck. Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Perennial \
Intermittent 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Wetland
na§
Page 4 of 7 Detail 2 Figure: 1d
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: May 30, 2023

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Legend I i
CH 100 Continued
Potential Non Wetland
CH 700: — 61 LF, 0.002 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 600: — 33 LF, 0.001 Ac --
O Review Area
o Streets
C' Meck. Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation CH 100 Continued
Perennial
GO
Intermittent FEW 100 200 300 400 Ft
Wetland
ly
5,JFJJJ)JJ11"J_h1W__ wlffll
7kna§
Page 5 of 7 Detail 3 Figure: le
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: May 30, 2023

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
CH 200 Continued
8
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
C' Meck. Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
W Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
CH 200 Continued
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
❑
NVlRONMEIVAL
Page 6 of 7 Detail 4 Figure: 1f
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: May 30, 2023

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
C' Meck. Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
CH 200 Continued
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
❑
�IRONM,EIV`LAJL
Page 7 of 7 Detail 5 Figure: 1g
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: May 30, 2023

C)
� C)
O
O
O
7
O
O
Q
O
O
(Y)
c)
\«
0
\
/
o
m / &
+
0
aCL #_
/
7
¥
a �
j �
«
\ \ .
E fu
f b 2
E
r-L S
o E E
f S S d
2 o U
§f0 7
k�7� \ < R
�fu Rna)
=AE
/ fu
E 2 \ o
� Q
g
3 / \
C)
00
/
k
6
\
\
E
\
0-
—
_
CO
\
f
e
k
1
2
C)
>
\
/
/
g
_
@
1
\
§
/
\
\
$
£A
e
\
/
z
/
T-
co
§
rC-D
§
%
§
Z
/
\
\
•�
g
\
.
.
/
2
\

O
U)
m
L
a_
Y
U
0
z
E
m
z
U
O
O
CV
O
CV
O
A
L
m
7
L
O
LL
O
(B
0
C
O
C
C
O
L
Q
O
CO
C
_ o
a
CD
CD
JCD
CO
J p
i
o
j w
U) m
(3) clo
Lo
2 Lo
m
o
O
pL
LL

Ll
LO
73
LM

�.i� � � I/ 6�'tir ���.^� y—• 1. � �}_ — ._� � , � T — �—
I I�
IAA \
co
N
O
N
O
(6
O
LL
(B
0
U
Z
o
c
—
(3)
sn
m
•�
s=
_
p
s=
O
Cl)
a_
_
>
0
O
U
Q
J
J
-
o
o
00
O
0?
a)
L
Z
(L
�
0
°�
D
m
I:_
E
�
Lo
O
a-
U
_j
o
U_
g
U
73
J p1
L�
Z

•L
0
CD-
E
2
�
q
m
LO
O
O
�
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
�
0
O
O V)
@
N R
d
CO
(D
CO
Z)
j
§
J
u
}fu
4- o
oEE
$ S
0
U
R
S
£20
%
U
§
[
S _0Ln
f \
o
a)® _
2
kfu
£& E
2
0 Efu'
7 m 2
� o
Ln
% & Ln
(D
o� z
�
(D
af§
J
C)
00
/
k
6
\
\
E
\
0-
—
_
CO
\
f
e
k
1
2
>
\
/
/
/
g
_
@
\
§
/
\
)
$
£A
e
\
/
z
/
T-
co
§
rC-D
§
%
§
z
/
\
\
•�
g
\
.
.
/
2
\
\

N
.Q
�V 7
cn E CO`.�
� , 1
Z.
� � t
04 cu
L , 4
o
fn CC6 O
O
O
co O O N
.� Qco
,
o E E N
O O
•s+..w O
co
` J y}c ■ ■ co
LL
_ f • /�■ •'y"r is
■ *� 00
f:. r O
�r_ • 00
y N
S C.) o
Z V)
•'- > C
(3)
V) L
4) 0-
CO
fn =
•�s0 ti t o CD J 000
~ t r # f p J O
U 00
Lo
c O = M
r`
r` • -' G l.J
��• ` 00
rr
'.
.. :. a LL
c ! JAR. ISJ
JF C =t' ��i ,• 1 +� r� �3
G? � :t;1 ' �• � rl

O
U)
m
L
a_
Y
U
0
z
E
m
z
U
O
O
CV
O
CV
O
A
L
m
7
L
O
LL
O
(B
0
C
O
C
C
O
L
Q
O
CO
C
_ o
Q�
CD
CD
JCD
CO
J p
i
o
j w
U) m
(3) clo
Lo
2 Lo
m
o
O
pL
LL
702
N
L
73
C!� a
I=
lw

E
-J
0
, Q)
Q)
E >,
cu
Q)
E <
CQ)
0
5 E
R 3:
cn
0 Q)
0
>
Q)
Q)
<
Z3
2 0
cn 0
cu
0CL 0D
C cu cn
.7 E cn
0 — Z3
cu 0) p Q)
E 7 Q") —CL
E E
70
- } } � } ®
Ar
} .
cl
v
Q9
u
LLI
, , § $ \ $ \ �\ • u \ } § 2 2 0 qb
16
� \ ' . � � ,.
-
C)
z
0 c
U)
>.s
(3)
U)
U)
(3)
T—
(3)
0-
CO
0)
>
0
0
C)
C)
CD
00
q
1
-e
(3)
(3)
-
c)
0
C)
(L
0
-0 U)
5
IM
0
U)
2
C
0?
0 -
w (.0
r-
C')
LO
14�
z
E
m
Z
Lr)
CD
D
T—
Lr)
co
0
-1
L:
o
8
1)
CN
P
LU

35° 75'32N
�•r�; _ EnB �-
HeB
CeB2
■ y i
� CeB2
e
EnB _
�r �EnB WkB
EnD _
=� EnD � s
I
MeB
EnB
.f
EnB
�- EnD
w
I. y
+ EnD
ke* EnB EnB
EnB
e
i.
MO
ry` 1
35° 75'32N
5172M 5173M 517400 517500 5176M 517700 5178M 5179M 518000 518100 518200 518MO
3 3
Map Scale: 1:7,310 iF printed on A porbait (8.5' x 11') sheet
id Mears
N 0 100 200 400 600
0 151 700 1400 2100
Map pr4emon: Web Mercator Corm coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
Natural Resources
i Conservation Service
rJf
A
t a -■
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
2/8/2023
Page 1 of 3
Figure: 13a

MAPLEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
r r
Soil Map Unit Lines
13
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
[moo
Blowout
Borrow Pit
a
Clay Spot
3
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
t Lava Flow
ram; Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
y; Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
NaNatural Resources
Conservation Service
�I
M
cat 'a
Soil Map —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
(Dissolved)
„.: Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
_] Other
- Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
+A_+ Rails
_ Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 22, Sep 12, 2022
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 13, 2022—May
9, 2022
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
2/8/2023
Page 2 of 3
Figure: 13b

Soil Map —Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
6.7
8.0%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8
26.9
31.7%
percent slopes
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15
31.6
37.3%
percent slopes
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8
1.1
1.3%
percent slopes
MeB
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam,
12.2
14.4%
2 to 8 percent slopes
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent
5.2
6.1 %
slopes, frequently flooded
WkB
Wilkes loam, 4 to 8 percent
1.0
1.2%
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
84.7
100.0%
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
TLAS
IRDNIUENTAL
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
Dissolved
2/8/2023
Page 3 of 3
Figure: 13c

E7� M 1j
8 f•-
WT
'■ -3r ? s\ter
4
W c4
MEMO
N
O
LL I1�
I
� I
co
' I o
co
OZ U)
k L j aS >
U) o
c0 o = c-0
U)
+ -- o
CD
s cO
) o U o
J 00
LLi U U) -5 w
Q o u)
LO
as
C3 CT: CD m co
o m
-7 Y ° g
J LL U
cn

N
LO
LO
O
c�
� O
O
Ln
T
ED
U O
U rD
CD
O
i M
aU+ O
cc
' ^
V/
c
13)
i
L
C6
N
Y '~ 0)o
vCD
Lo
Y CZ)
O
U o
ro
73
O
N N
7 L
73
V
m
O L
w O
a
Y --I
O
O O.
U
Ov Ov
— O
a� �
N
o oC
p
4 .0
o O
U fM
CD
U
O L 4
m O
0
CE
CL
^`
CD
•�
0 E
m p1 (n
z O�
A
CW
LL G T
O L
ai CD
Ln
6O
0
L
O
J
HI L
co
N
O
N
C)
7
L
0
00
r—
O
00
CV
U
o
Z
U)
m
a�
a
U)
C)
C
0
J
—_
00
>
O
J
O
()
=
00
1
�
�
o-
L
�
w
)
Lo
=
cci
co
ai
rC-D
m
m
O
a�
Z
p)
(B
m
g
m
8 8
0
Lo
ri
73
J cn
ESJ
Z

�
q
m
m
O
O
/CD
a\
CD
�
�
�
U)
m
�
00
O
�
Z)
2
j
§
u
u
}fu
/ / \\
L.LCl /\
tro
C) �
\ / = o
£20 7 U
§/f S�
o E
\ \ :
J & E00
f .g
/ & /
�
2�7
a§ fJ
C)
00
/
k
_
5
/
E
\
—
�
_
CO
\
f
e
2
C)
>
\
/
/
g
_
@
1
\
§
/
\
)
$
£A
e
\
/
z
/
T-
co
§
rC-D
§
%
§
z
/
\
\
•�
g
\
.
.
/
2
\
\

O
U)
m
L
a_
Y
U
0
z
E
m
z
U
O
O
CV
O
CV
O
A
L
m
7
L
O
LL
O
(B
0
C
O
C
C
O
L
Q
O
CO
C
_ o
Q�
CD
CD
JCD
CO
J p
i
o
j w
U) m
(3) clo
Lo
2 Lo
m
o
O
pL
LL
4
N
L
73
C!� a
I=
lw

>.M
M N
z
m
C N
6 p
N
V N
N N
❑ ON
I"
N
�0
O N
I N
Q ON
N
N
O
N
(sapul) Ilpjuled

V
m
O N
0
-0
O
V
aJ
z
N
d
c
O
_
Q
a
C
T
�
U
❑
c6
o
E
m
m
z
N
�
01
❑
ai
d
C
C N
t
O
O rn
QM
0
0
h
O N
N
01
w
N
N
M
111 ON
N
Q
r-I
I!1 M
C
CO
o)
O 0
O
UL
Ci h
6
—
h
0
M
M
C
O
a)
>
y
U
w
DIM
N
Qo
a
-o
E
E
E
m
o a
O
o
Z
o
Z
y
U
ti
0
U
C
�
al
p
c
m
M n
ai
Tj
M
�
I!l ul
� O
C
Cil
Ill lCl
4�
—
='
M
C71
N
Ill
Lo
lfl
M
M
N
a
�
O
O
ul
l
rl
W
y
Ill
N
h
p
w
m
�o vl
C
ZN
O
6
O
D] O]
_
rl
l0
rl
� N
O
�
Ill I�
,�
vl
U
to
m
M
Ql
O]
a
I!1
m M
>.M
O
r
.--I
OJ
❑
K
W
�
N
N
n
ro
O
W
N
�
N
CP
I!1
Z
U
O7
�
_
OJ
rl
rl
C
Z
ti
�
M
N
N
U
❑
d
y
Ln
p
U
Z
z
L
p
pU
L M
tlry
U
Q�
C
'6
rn
6
rn
v1
0
v1
n
In
ai
C
W
9
9
9N
T
M
N
M
N
M
N
0
O
O
O
❑
O
M
N
N
N
fM
fo N
ON
I
O
Q
V
C
Cll
lfl
�
C
O
� O
CO
M
~
G
O
N
❑
q A coC
Q
a) N
C [ rS
G n 6 4 /I'
m12
LL M }
7
4
M
C ry
6 O
N
a N � a
m _ Vl V
❑ c a
O X CC
p 6 C
U w 2
ai a
❑ N p O
O
❑ v
h t0 Ill � M N rl O
(S@gDUI) IlpJuip�l

Site Photographs: February 08, 2023, March 07, 2023, March 08, 2023, and June 30, 2023
1- Ramah Creek
'kk� r
1 S Z
2- Confluence of Ramah Creek and CH 100
w
1
4- CH 100
`f1
fr
i
Of
ip
5- CH 100
rr �116!'r
kv
r�
6- CH 100 at perennial headcut

r .41
s ^i.
c.
f
V
-411
74 , S;g-�
4e ..P+ 'ply

��'
t
All
z
T•
i •ter . -- _ -
�s
�•. ky,
�
w
- I ...' „� �'
_ �k •ice �
� %-y
yyy�
Owl
•�� jai' -

Site Photographs: Februa
19- CH 300
2023, March 07, 2023, March 08, 2023, and June 30, 2023
w ±'a
IVY �. ..
p�
S
ti w
20: Non jurisdictional feature above CH 300
21: Non jurisdictional feature above CH 300
h !+h
L, �.
22- Non -jurisdictional feature above CH 300
23: Confluence of CH 100 and CH 400
rw®r
r '�
24: CH 400 at headcut

Site Photographs: February 08, 2023, March 07, 2023, March 08, 2023, and June 30, 2023
25- Non -jurisdictional feature above CH 400 28- CH 500
26- Non jurisdictional feature above CH 400
27- Confluence of CH 100 and CH 500
29- CH 500 at headcut
30- CH 600

Site Photographs: February 08, 2023, March 07, 2023, March 08, 2023, and June 30, 2023
J1
er
. 14
k
31 - CH 600
t '.
32- CH 600 end
33- CH 700
34- WL 1 000a
35- WL 1000
36- WL 1000

! 11
f
f `OW
m
7• WI 190C

I
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766, -80.800917

Photograph and Data Form Location Map
CH 200
1
I
CH 100
3
2
DWQ Stream Form
�1
Legend 34
O Review Area
o Streets WL 1000a
O Meck. Co. Parcels Ramah Creek
Delineation
Perennial Photo Location and Orientation
Intermittent
# Wetland Form Locations
— Contours: 2 Ft 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
KS ��
am
Page 3 of 7 Detail 1 Figure: 1c
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: March 13, 2023

Photograph and Data Form Location Map
ICH 100 Continued)
CH 100 Continued
Legend
O Review Area
o Streets
O Meck. Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
W Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
29
7
DWQ Stream Form i
Photo Location and Orientation
1 -
-4 Form Locations
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
❑
NVIRONMENTAL
Page 4 of 7 Detail 2 Figure: 1d
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: March 13, 2023

Photograph and Data Form Location Map
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
O Meck. Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
W Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
CH 100 Continued
WL 1300
CH 700
ill
Wetland Data Form
Upland Data Form
"CH600
CH 100 Continued
Photo Location and Orientation
1
-(b- Form Locations
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
❑
NVlRONMFEVAL
Page 5 of 7 Detail 3 Figure: 1e
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: March 13, 2023

Photograph and Data Form Location Map
CH 200 Continued
Legend
O Review Area
o Streets
O Meck. Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
Delineation
W Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
I
4
ICH 200 Continued)
Photo Location and Orientation
1
{ Form Locations
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
❑
NVlRONMFEVAL
Page 6 of 7 Detail 4 Figure: 1f
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: March 13, 2023

Photograph and Data Form Location Map
CH 200 Continued
Legend i
O Review Area
o Streets
O Meck. Co. Parcels
Contours: 2 Ft
DWQ Stream Form Photo Location and Orientation
Delineation
W Perennial Z�, Form Locations
Intermittent / 0 50 100 150 200 Ft
Wetland
❑
�lRpNMFEVAL
Page 7 of 7 Detail 5 Figure: 1g
Project Name: North Creek Village Phase II
Location:17705 Davidson -Concord Rd Huntersville, NC 28078
For: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC Attn: Stephen Vinson
Coordinates: 35.453766,-80.800917
Date: March 13, 2023

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 02-08-202 3
N. Creek Village Phase 11
Project/Site: Ramah Creek
Latitude: 35 443 80
Evaluator: T Casey A Baggarley
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.80409
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Cornelius Quadrangle
Stream is at least intermittent 43
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Pe vial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 24 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = a_S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Rinlnnv (SuhtntA = a.1 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
1
1.5
0.5
0.5
3
3
3
2
O
0.5
0
1
0
O

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 02-08-202 3
N. Creek Village Phase 11
Project/Site: 300-70o
Latitude: 35 4492 7
Evaluator: A Baggarley T casey
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.80482
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Cornelius Quadrangle
Stream is at least intermittent 27
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 3W
Ephemeral IntepAittent Perennial
-1I""
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 8 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Rinlnnv (SuhtntA = 7 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
O
1
1
1
1
1
3

NC DWn Stream identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 0-08-202
3 3
N. Creek Village Phase 11
Project/Site: CH 100-200
Latitude: 35 4494 8
Evaluator: A Baggarley T Casey
county: Mecklenburg
Longitude:-80.80160
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Cornelius Quadrangle
Stream is at least intermittent 38
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Pe vial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 10 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Rinlnnv (SuhtntA = a 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
O
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
3

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: North Creek Village Phase II City/County: Huntersville/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/08/23
Applicant/Owner: Stephen Vinson of Magnolia Huntersville II LLC / See Porperty Report State: NC Sampling Point: All WLs
Investigator(s): A Baggarley, T Casey Section, Township, Range: Cornelius Quadranlge
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope (%): 2-5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.45142 Long:-80.80107 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon sandy loam and Monacan loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Conditions are wetter than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 18
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 18
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: All WLs
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
Ligustrum sinense
5
Yes
FACU
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
2.
Elaeagnus umbellata
5
Yes
UPL
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
3.
Asimina triloba
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
4.
Sambucus nigra
5
Yes
FAC
Column Totals: 60 (A) 190 (B)
5.
Acerrubrum
5
Yes
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.17
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
- Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30
=Total Cover
-3
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Juncus effusus
5
Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Carex spp.
5
Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Microstegium vimineum 15 Yes FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: All WLs
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-3 5YR 6/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-16 5YR 5/1 80 5YR 5/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: North Creek Village Phase II City/County: Huntersville/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 02/08/23
Applicant/Owner: Stephen Vinson of Magnolia Huntersville II LLC / See Porperty Report State: NC Sampling Point: Upland
Investigator(s): A Baggarley, T Casey Section, Township, Range: Cornelius Quadrangle
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2-5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.45138 Long:-80.80102 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon sandy loam and Monacan loam NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Conditions are wetter than normal.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Conditions are wetter than normal.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Upland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
Acerrubrum
10
No
FAC
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes
FACU
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
4.
Juniperus virginiana
10
No
FACU
5.
Pinus virginiana
10
No
UPL
6.
Fagus grandifolia
10
No
FACU
7.
95
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
48
20% of total cover:
19
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1.
Acerrubrum
5
No
FAC
2.
Sambucus nigra
5
No
FAC
3.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
4.
Pinus virginiana
10
Yes
UPL
5.
Ilex opaca
10
Yes
FACU
6.
Fagus grandifolia
5
No
FACU
7.
8.
9.
55
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
28
20% of total cover:
11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Hexastylis arifolia
2
No
FAC
2.
Polystichum acrostichoides
8
Yes
FACW
3.
Polytrichum commune
8
Yes
UPL
4.
Huperzia spp.
5
Yes
UPL
5.
Festuca heterophylla
5
Yes
UPL
6.
Cynodon dactylon
5
Yes
FACU
7.
Fragaria vesca
5
Yes
FACU
8.
Viola sororia
5
Yes
FAC
9.
10.
11.
43
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
22
20% of total cover:
9
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
Vitis acerifolia
2
No
UPL
3.
Smilax rotundifolia
2
No
FAC
4.
Rosa multiflora
5
Yes
FACU
5.
14
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
7
20% of total cover:
3
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
14 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
21.4% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
x 1 =
0
FACW species 8
x 2 =
16
FAC species 49
x 3 =
147
FACU species 110
x 4 =
440
UPL species 40
x 5 =
200
Column Totals: 207 (A)
803 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
=
3.88
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-2 5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
2-16 5YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 1479 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U
Q
LL
J
r �LL
N �
0
O
LL 00
J
O Y
o
Q
-H
O 0 z_ M > W
0 V J = ()
U U
�w
LL
z Q
Q
Q J 2
�
W
Q' Q' Q'
U t� L
>w
~
a
O
Zo
g-H
w
3: /
d u
=0-
Z
IAz
ON00
d
d Z
w
OR J
ss

LL 6,
-1 00
OD LO
g- UOI
N /
U [2 U > U
U)°6-Lo
E E c:)
N O O J
\ E�CD U\
\ co 2 H
U c
a�
m_ W N / p
Q C/) U � C)
a
Df
Q 0
w a(Q LU
Q \�
LLLI a / LL W
O �� \� of
U)� U.
I �
d W
Z W
J W W co
LU � a
o-O
a W If I D W
.IYW <J
a 0 O _
I,
Q.
0
0
0
a
0
Q
Q�
Q
"
/
\1
a
OM
OJ
��
/
z
o
**
N z
o** co
o*+i
/
I
\I
W
Q) W
Q
Ir
t2
L
a w
a-
J
Q
J
Q
H�
W
0
HIII
O
H
O
U)
, �
1
z
J Z
0 W
�
a
LL,U)
/
0 Jo
W
z
p}H
dLU
cn0
W J Z
(n � W
0<
`10LL0
W
J
V\\
LU 11
0
O LU
00 W
W
L.L.
0
0
lzt
Y
W
V V N
d = m
w m
0
z

C
J
U
co
LL
d
N
LC) J
O
LL
Lo
J
N
CL
>
V
N U
Z
OU
Q
~
CM
N
Z
m
(n
Q W
W
of
v
6, E
o
d
LO
w
o
aa)
�
U
U
LL
O
cu Q
CDE
N J
O p�
0-Q
O
J
W O
H
UY
0-1�mo
�_ 2
o
0
a
U-H -
O
U
Mv
2
ii
I � 1
I, -07
I
I IO
OUZO
z cU)) - 0
+� fr
w>-<
y0 U ED
\+0
�tiO
O
Ln
d u
z
IA z
z
d E
dz
ss

0
LU
0
w� O
Q w
1
LU
N
U 'If Z }
0 O Z 0
O ofLLJ Q O
�
0
Q'
O 0
Q
0 d O =
Q
O
�
O
Ir
z
O
0
W
=co
co
1
X
w
T
LL
0
O1
1
O
O
Y
Q LU
w
z �
O v
H =
V H
w W
m O
z
m
N
m
m
d V
C Z
O
N hi
Ca Z
W
N E
C Z
d
w
� J

LL
J
O U
LC)
I,:
r-
0- a
�: E
Z
U
U N
N
p
Q
E
+�
L
o EU
I .'
O m m
L
J
CD
Q
O N
UU)
L
OU
d
(n W
O>
J
J <
d
Er U
w
o-
\ af
rY
U
U)
I a00
I LL U > U
/ J Z a
(O 7 E
I / O U N
/ C') Lo =
/ M E
m
Q / U '� (0
W L
0-1LL - N O U`
H U) / p LO
} m / O=
oU
< 00 Q / z /
d co
Q J O / }
d r O / H
~ * / / w O U
Q
° / IL
/ O/ a ��
/ w
/ tr
/ c~n
/
/
m J
Q -H N
d
Q
Q o
W O
rn
N
Ir O
* U)
d>
> N
LL
J Z
E
o m
CC) U N 0)
U)� cn
CD cn
U O OL
ao U
E O coo
- o 0
�0
U
/®
m
.Y,-4

O
O1
I
o
N
o
o
°
Q
UJ
z
O
U)
O>
O
O
X
0-�
w
1
0
d U
T
w
2
U
�
Z
LL
O
O1
I
O
O
N
Y
m w
Z LU
O v
H =
V H
w w
m O
z
m
N
m
li
m
0J
=z
O -
OU Z
W
N F.
c 40
C Z
w
� J
V�

/
/
U /
LU
Q LL 1
LU o
') U
dLLJ JO
00 of CC) C?
D H * O* O
ILL N
0- U
� Ll
001)
/ (O U l�
� C
/ U) O c N
N
U 00 0
Qo aU /
O co
/ J U
/ oQ
w k / ILU
r /
U) L11 (n
z
/ aw /
Ir /
/ 1
Y
V w
m
V V N
Q = m
a
w
0
z

O
O1
I
N
o
o
Q
Ir
p
z
O
U
)
O
LU
O-
O
X
Ir
ofD
w
1
p
d U
T
u1
O
Z
-+4F-1hu,
O
O1
I
O
Y
V w
w
z �
O v
H =
V H
w w
m O
z
m
N
m
li
m
0

OD
LO
a
N J
O
Nfl-
LL
J IL
v-za
N
U C) N
C
a- E
C � L
O
O U)
CM
U
LU J 0
U)*o
164
CO
LO
m W
N "� i�
J
(fl N > C' U
.. U Z U a
U.) - N
U)CM C d /
U O Eco
/
a0 ELL
O J
v u'
U /
/
Fl//////i

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
Rating Calculator Version 2
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evalu;
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See I
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any suppleme
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area)
PROJECT 1 SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): North Creek Village Phase II 2. Date of evaluation: 02/08/2023 and 03/08/2023
3. Applicant/owner name: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environments
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ramah Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.45280,-80.80120
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH 100 int 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 423
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 J- Unable to assess channi
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? ` 'Yes
14. Feature type: ` Perennial flow `.Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ` Mountains (M) `.Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) Outer
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for: a b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper va
17. Watershed size: (skip r.Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) r: Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) ` 'Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) ` q
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? `.Yes ` 'No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters i Water Supply Watershed ( ` , I ` -911
F7 Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource W
Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish F- 303(d) List F- CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached?
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
+]A Water throughout assessment reach.
'4B No flow, water in pools only.
r'C No water in assessment reach.
�A
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
` .,A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction c
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or eb
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
rB Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
r-,A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert;
r B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
`«]A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing dar
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from
these disturbances).
r'B Not
�A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instabi
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabior
rl�A < 10% of channel unstable
r: B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
r.0 > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A ,A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B ,B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that advers
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditl
C ,C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zoi
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incisioi
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment re
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
F—A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
F— B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
F— C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
F— D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
F— E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Nc
section.
F— F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
F— G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F— H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
F— I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F7 J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is consid
drought.
r�A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r�B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r+ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
.,Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Si
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ro.,Yes No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, ani
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r—A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses N I- F 5% oysters or other natural hard bo
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � F G Submerged aquatic vegetation
F 7- B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o N - F— H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation N 0 1 Sand bottom
F7 C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) m F—J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
F 77 D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots v F— K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
F— E Little or no habitat
*********** REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS--
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. r.Yes r: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r7A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not subs
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Presei
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%.
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r F, E, E, E, Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)

Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
L '
L A
Are pools
filled
with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Stream.,
12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. `.Yes ` 'No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ` ]No Water ` 'Other:
12b.' Yes ''No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r7 (—Adult frogs
r— r—Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles (including water pennies)
r— r7- Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/shrim p)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans (true flies)
r 77 r— Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
r7e r— Salamanders/tadpoles
r— r— Snails
r7e r— Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r— r—Tipulid larvae
r— r—Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley type
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow an
upland runoff.
LB RB
A ,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B Z, B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C ,C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A ,A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
B , B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C Z*-,C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or wit[
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
r: Y r: Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
r '9N r '9N
�A �A
16. Baseflow Contributors —assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
F—A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F— B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
F— C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam
F— D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F— E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
7 F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A .7vidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installatior

F— B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment di
F C Urban stream (>> 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F— D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F— E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
f7 F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
` .,A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
` AB Degraded (example: scattered trees)
` 'C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
r�A r�A r�A r�A >_ 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E E E E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
,:�A
r: A
Mature forest
e ]B
r.B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C
C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D
D
Maintained shrubs
E
E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A ,A r.,A r.,A Row crops
`A 'B r,B r,B �B �B Maintained turf
` 'C C ,C AC C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
` ' D D , D D r., D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
`+'A `.,A Medium to high stem density
` �B ` �B Low stem density
` AC ` AC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer— streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
A ,A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B ,B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C r—,C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it cc
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
r: A MA Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of nati
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B rB Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed c
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearin(
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expect
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or c
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities compose
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no ve

25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ` 'Yes `+]No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons.No Water Other:
Check the box L. ding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A <46 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ? 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name North Creek Village Phase II Date of Evaluation J2/08/2023 and 03/08/2022
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
HIGH
NA
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

(2) In stream Habitat
(3) B asetlo w
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -stream Habitat
)Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Th erma reg u latio n
(2)Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(3) Flo-w Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal 1.1arsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Harsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
Overall
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
Rating Calculator Version 2
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evalu;
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See I
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any suppleme
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area)
PROJECT 1 SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): North Creek Village Phase II 2. Date of evaluation: 02/08/2023 and 03/08/2023
3. Applicant/owner name: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environments
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ramah Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.44737,-80.80307
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH 100 per. 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 68
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 J- Unable to assess channi
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 8 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? ` I
14. Feature type: `.Perennial flow ` Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: —Mountains (M) `.Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) ` 'Outer
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for: a b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper va
17. Watershed size: (skip r.Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) r: Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) ` 'Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) `
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? `.Yes ` 'No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters i Water Supply Watershed ( ` , I ` -911
F7 Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource W
Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish F- 303(d) List F- CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached?
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
+]A Water throughout assessment reach.
'4B No flow, water in pools only.
r'C No water in assessment reach.
�A
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
` .,A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction c
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or eb
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
rB Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
r-,A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert;
r B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
`«]A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing dar
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from
these disturbances).
r'B Not
�A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instabi
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabior
A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A ,A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B ,B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that advers
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditl
C ,C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zoi
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incisioi
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment re
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
F—A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
F— B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
F— C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
F— D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
F— E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Nc
section.
F— F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
F— G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F— H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
F— I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F7 J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is consid
drought.
r�A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r�B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r+ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
.,Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Si
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ro.,Yes No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, ani
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r—A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses N I- F 5% oysters or other natural hard bo
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � F G Submerged aquatic vegetation
F 7- B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o N - F— H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation N 0 1 Sand bottom
F— C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) m F—J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
F 77 D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots v F— K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
F— E Little or no habitat
*********** REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS--
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. r.Yes r: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r7A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not subs
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Presei
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%.
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
F, E, E, E, Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)

Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
Are pools
filled
with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Stream.,
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. `.Yes ` 'No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ` ]No Water ` 'Other:
12b.' Yes ''No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r (-,/Adultfrogs
r- rAquatic reptiles
rAquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles (including water pennies)
r- r7- Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
rAsian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/shrim p)
F7 Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r- F.75 Dipterans (true flies)
r F- Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r F- Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r-.- Midges/mosquito larvae
r- r7e Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
r7e r- Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r- rTipulid larvae
r- r-Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley type
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow an
upland runoff.
LB RB
A ,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B Z, B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C ,C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A ,A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
B , B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C Z*-,C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or wit[
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
r: Y r: Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
r '9N r '9N
�A �A
16. Baseflow Contributors -assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
rA Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F- B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
F- C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam
F- D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F- E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
7 F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A .7vidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installatior

F— B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment di
F C Urban stream (>> 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F— D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F— E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
f7 F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
` .,A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
` AB Degraded (example: scattered trees)
` 'C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
r�A r�A r�A r�A >_ 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E E E E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
,:�A
r: A
Mature forest
e ]B
r.B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C
C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D
D
Maintained shrubs
E
E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A ,A r.,A r.,A Row crops
`A 'B r,B r,B �B �B Maintained turf
` 'C C ,C AC C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
` ' D D , D D r., D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
`+'A `.,A Medium to high stem density
` �B ` �B Low stem density
` AC ` AC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer— streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
A ,A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B ,B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C r—,C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it cc
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
r: A MA Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of nati
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B rB Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed c
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearin(
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expect
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or c
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities compose
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no ve

25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ` 'Yes `+]No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons.No Water Other:
Check the box L. ding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A <46 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ? 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name North Creek Village Phase II
Stream Category Pa2
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Date of Evaluation J2/08/2023 and 03/08/2023
Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
NO
NO
NO
Paronnini
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography LOW
(3) Stream Stability MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1) Water Quality HIGH
(2) Baseflow HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat LOW

(9) Habitat LOW
(2) In stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3)Stream Stability
h;1ECIUh;1
(3) In -stream Habitat
h;1ECIUh;1
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HI13H
(3) Stream -side Habitat
h;1ECIUh;1
(3)Thermoregulation
HI13H
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
N-
(3) Flaw Restriction
NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Harsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal ZDne Habitat
NA
Overall MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
Rating Calculator Version 2
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evalu;
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See I
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any suppleme
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area)
PROJECT 1 SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): North Creek Village Phase II 2. Date of evaluation: 02/08/2023 and 03/08/2023
3. Applicant/owner name: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environments
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ramah Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.44602,-80.80531
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH 200 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 191 It
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3 J- Unable to assess channi
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? ` I
14. Feature type: ` Perennial flow `.Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: —Mountains (M) `.Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) ` 'Outer
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for: a b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper va
17. Watershed size: (skip r.Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) r: Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) ` 'Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) `
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? `.Yes ` 'No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters i Water Supply Watershed ( ` , I ` -911
F7 Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource W
Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish F- 303(d) List F- CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached?
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
+]A Water throughout assessment reach.
'4B No flow, water in pools only.
r'C No water in assessment reach.
�A
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
` .,A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction c
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or eb
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
rB Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
r-,A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert;
r B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
`«]A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing dar
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from
these disturbances).
r'B Not
�A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instabi
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabior
rl�A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A ,A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B ,B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that advers
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditl
C ,C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zoi
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incisioi
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment re
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
F—A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
F— B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
F— C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
F— D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
F— E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Nc
section.
F— F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
F— G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F— H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
F— I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F7 J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is consid
drought.
r�A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r�B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r+ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
.,Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Si
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ro.,Yes No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, ani
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r—A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses N I- F 5% oysters or other natural hard bo
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � F G Submerged aquatic vegetation
F 7- B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o N - F— H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation N 0 1 Sand bottom
F— C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) m F—J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
F 77 D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots v F— K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
F— E Little or no habitat
*********** REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS--
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. r.Yes r: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r7A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not subs
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Presei
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%.
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r F, E, E, E, Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)

Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
L '
L A
Are pools
filled
with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Stream.,
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. `.Yes ` 'No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ` ]No Water ` 'Other:
12b.' Yes ''No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r (-,/Adultfrogs
r- rAquatic reptiles
rAquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles (including water pennies)
r- r7- Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
rAsian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/shrim p)
F7 Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r- F.75 Dipterans (true flies)
r F- Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r F- Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
r-.- Midges/mosquito larvae
r- r7e Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
r- r7e Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r- rTipulid larvae
r- r-Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley type
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow an
upland runoff.
LB RB
A ,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B Z, B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C ,C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A ,A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
B , B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C Z*-,C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or wit[
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
r: Y r: Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
r '9N r '9N
�A �A
16. Baseflow Contributors -assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
rA Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F- B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
F- C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam
F- D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F- E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
7 F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A .7vidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installatior

F— B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment di
F C Urban stream (>> 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F— D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F— E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
f7 F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
` .,A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
` AB Degraded (example: scattered trees)
` 'C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
r�A r�A r�A r�A >_ 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E E E E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
,:�A
r: A
Mature forest
e ]B
r.B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C
C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D
D
Maintained shrubs
E
E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A ,A r.,A r.,A Row crops
`A 'B r,B r,B �B �B Maintained turf
` 'C C ,C AC C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
` ' D D , D D r., D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
`+'A `.,A Medium to high stem density
` �B ` �B Low stem density
` AC ` AC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer— streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
A ,A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B ,B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C r—,C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it cc
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
r: A MA Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of nati
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B rB Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed c
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearin(
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expect
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or c
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities compose
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no ve

25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ` 'Yes `+]No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons.No Water Other:
Check the box L. ding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A <46 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ? 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name North Creek Village Phase II Date of Evaluation J2/08/2023 and 03/08/2022
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
HIGH
NA
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

(1)Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -stream Habitat
(2) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Therm o reg u I ati o n
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(2) Intertidal Zone Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
LOIN
HIGH
LOIN
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
INA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
Rating Calculator Version 2
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evalu;
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See I
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any suppleme
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area)
PROJECT 1 SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): North Creek Village Phase II 2. Date of evaluation: 02/08/2023 and 03/08/2023
3. Applicant/owner name: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environments
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ramah Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.44869,-80.80209
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH 300 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 47
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2 J- Unable to assess channi
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? ` I
14. Feature type: ` Perennial flow `.Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: —Mountains (M) `.Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) ` 'Outer
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for: a b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper va
17. Watershed size: (skip r.Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) r: Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) ` 'Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) `
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? `.Yes ` 'No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters i Water Supply Watershed ( ` , I ` -911
F7 Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource W
Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish F- 303(d) List F- CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached?
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
'A Water throughout assessment reach.
,.]B No flow, water in pools only.
r'C No water in assessment reach.
�A
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
` .,A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction c
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or eb
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
rB Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
r-,A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert;
r B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
`«]A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing dar
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from
these disturbances).
r'B Not
�A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instabi
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabior
rl�A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A ,A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B ,B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that advers
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditl
C ,C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zoi
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incisioi
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment re
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
F—A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
F— B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
F— C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
F— D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
F— E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Nc
section.
F— F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
F— G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F— H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
F— I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F7 J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is consid
drought.
r�A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r�B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r+ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
.,Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Si
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ro.,Yes No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, ani
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r—A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses N I- F 5% oysters or other natural hard bo
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � F G Submerged aquatic vegetation
F 7- B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o N - F— H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation N 0 1 Sand bottom
F7 C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) m F—J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
F 77 D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots v F— K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
F— E Little or no habitat
*********** REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS--
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. r.Yes r: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r7A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not subs
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Presei
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%.
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r F, E, E, E, Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)

Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
Are pools
filled
with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Stream.,
12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. `.Yes ` 'No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ` ]No Water ` 'Other:
12b.' Yes ''No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r (—Adult frogs
r— r—Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles (including water pennies)
r 77 r— Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/shrim p)
Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans (true flies)
r 77 r— Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r— r—Tipulid larvae
r— r—Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley type
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow an
upland runoff.
LB RB
A ,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B Z, B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C ,C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A ,A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
B , B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C Z*-,C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or wit[
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y r.Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
r+� N -:� N
16. Baseflow Contributors —assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
F—A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F— B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
F— C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam
F— D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F— E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
7 F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A .7vidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installatior

F— B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment di
F C Urban stream (>> 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F— D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F— E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
f7 F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
` .,A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
` AB Degraded (example: scattered trees)
` 'C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
r�A r�A r�A r�A >_ 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E E E E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
,:�A
r: A
Mature forest
e ]B
r.B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C
C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D
D
Maintained shrubs
E
E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A ,A r.,A r.,A Row crops
`A 'B r,B r,B �B �B Maintained turf
` 'C C ,C AC C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
` ' D D , D D r., D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
`+'A `.,A Medium to high stem density
` �B ` �B Low stem density
` AC ` AC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer— streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
A ,A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B ,B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C r—,C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it cc
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
r: A MA Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of nati
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B rB Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed c
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearin(
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expect
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or c
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities compose
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no ve

25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ` 'Yes `+]No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons.No Water Other:
Check the box L. ding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A <46 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ? 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name North Creek Village Phase II Date of Evaluation J2/08/2023 and 03/08/2022
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
NO
HIGH
NA
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

(2) In -stream Habitat
C3) Basetlow
(3) Substrate
C3) Stream Stability
C3) In -stream Habitat
(2) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream -side Habitat
C3) Th erma reg u latia n
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
C3) Flow Restriction
(3}Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream -Geomorphology
Ca} Tidal I'Aarsh In stream Habitat
(2) IntertidaIZane Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
H[ H
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall LOW I LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
Rating Calculator Version 2
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evalu;
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See I
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any suppleme
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area)
PROJECT 1 SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): North Creek Village Phase II 2. Date of evaluation: 02/08/2023 and 03/08/2023
3. Applicant/owner name: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environments
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ramah Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.44869,-80.80209
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH 400 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 56
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 4 J- Unable to assess channi
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 3 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? ` I
14. Feature type: ` Perennial flow `.Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: —Mountains (M) `.Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) ` 'Outer
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for: a b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper va
17. Watershed size: (skip r.Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) r: Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) ` 'Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) `
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? `.Yes ` 'No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters i Water Supply Watershed ( ` , I ` -911
F7 Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource W
Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish F- 303(d) List F- CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached?
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
+]A Water throughout assessment reach.
'4B No flow, water in pools only.
r'C No water in assessment reach.
�A
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
` .,A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction c
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or eb
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
rB Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
r-,A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert;
r B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
`«]A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing dar
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from
these disturbances).
r'B Not
�A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instabi
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabior
rl�A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A ,A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B ,B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that advers
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditl
C ,C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zoi
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incisioi
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment re
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
F—A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
F— B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
F— C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
F— D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
F— E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Nc
section.
F— F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
F— G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F— H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
F— I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F7 J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is consid
drought.
r�A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r�B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r+ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
.,Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Si
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ro.,Yes No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, ani
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r—A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses N I- F 5% oysters or other natural hard bo
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � F G Submerged aquatic vegetation
F 7- B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o N - F— H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation N 0 1 Sand bottom
F7 C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) m F—J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
F 77 D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots v F— K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
F— E Little or no habitat
*********** REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS--
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. r.Yes r: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r7A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not subs
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Presei
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%.
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r F, E, E, E, Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)

Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
Are pools
filled
with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Stream.,
12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. `.Yes ` 'No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ` ]No Water ` 'Other:
12b.' Yes ''No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r (—Adult frogs
r— r—Aquatic reptiles
Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles (including water pennies)
Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
Asian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/shrim p)
r7e r— Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
Dipterans (true flies)
Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r— r—Tipulid larvae
r— r—Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley type
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow an
upland runoff.
LB RB
A ,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B Z, B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C ,C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A ,A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
B , B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C Z*-,C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or wit[
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y r.Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
r+� N -:� N
16. Baseflow Contributors —assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
F—A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F— B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
F— C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam
F— D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F— E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
7 F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A .7vidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installatior

F— B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment di
F C Urban stream (>> 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F— D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F— E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
f7 F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
` .,A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
` AB Degraded (example: scattered trees)
` 'C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
r�A r�A r�A r�A >_ 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E E E E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
,:�A
r: A
Mature forest
e ]B
r.B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C
C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D
D
Maintained shrubs
E
E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A ,A r.,A r.,A Row crops
`A 'B r,B r,B �B �B Maintained turf
` 'C C ,C AC C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
` ' D D , D D r., D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
`+'A `.,A Medium to high stem density
` �B ` �B Low stem density
` AC ` AC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer— streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
A ,A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B ,B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C r—,C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it cc
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
r: A MA Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of nati
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B rB Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed c
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearin(
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expect
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or c
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities compose
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no ve

25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ` 'Yes `+]No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons.No Water Other:
Check the box L. ding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A <46 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ? 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name North Creek Village Phase II Date of Evaluation J2/08/2023 and 03/08/2022
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
NO
LOW
NA
LOW
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

C2) In stream Habitat
(3) Etasetlow
C3) Substrate
C3) Stream Stability
C3) In -stream Habitat
C2) Stream -side Habitat
C3) Stream -side Habitat
C3) Th ermo reg u latio n
C2}Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
C3) FIDw Restriction
C3}Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(4}Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(4)TidaIMarsh Stream Geamorphalagy
C3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(2) IntertidaIZane Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
HIGH
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 2
Rating Calculator Version 2
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evalu;
property, identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See I
Manual for detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if any suppleme
measurements were performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area)
PROJECT 1 SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): North Creek Village Phase II 2. Date of evaluation: 02/08/2023 and 03/08/2023
3. Applicant/owner name: Magnolia Huntersville II LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environments
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River Basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Ramah Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.44932,-80.80197
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH 500 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 86
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 3 J- Unable to assess channi
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp stream? ` I
14. Feature type: ` Perennial flow `.Intermittent flow Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM RATING INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: —Mountains (M) `.Piedmont (P) Inner Coastal Plain (I) ` 'Outer
16. Estimated geomorphic \ /
valley shape (skip for: a b
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper va
17. Watershed size: (skip r.Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) r: Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) ` 'Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) `
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? `.Yes ` 'No If Yes, check all that appy to the assessment area.
Section 10 water r Classified Trout Waters i Water Supply Watershed ( ` , I ` -911
F7 Essential Fish Habitat r Primary Nursery Area High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource W
Publicly owned property r NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect r Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Anadromous fish F- 303(d) List F- CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
r Designated Critical Habitat (list species):
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached?
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
'A Water throughout assessment reach.
,.]B No flow, water in pools only.
r'C No water in assessment reach.
�A
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
` .,A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is adversely affected by a flow restriction c
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impounded on flood or eb
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates).
rB Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
r-,A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert;
r B Not A.
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
`«]A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing dar
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from
these disturbances).
r'B Not
�A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instabi
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabior
rl�A < 10% of channel unstable
B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
A ,A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
B ,B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that advers
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditl
C ,C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zoi
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incisioi
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment re
man-made feature on an interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
F—A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
F— B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
F— C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
F— D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
F— E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in the "Nc
section.
F— F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
F— G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
F— H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc.)
F— I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
F7 J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather —watershed metric
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is consid
drought.
r�A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r�B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
r+ C No drought conditions
9 Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
.,Yes No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Si
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ro.,Yes No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, ani
(evaluate for size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
r—A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses N I- F 5% oysters or other natural hard bo
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) � F G Submerged aquatic vegetation
F 7- B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o N - F— H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation N 0 1 Sand bottom
F7 C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) m F—J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
F 77 D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots v F— K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
F— E Little or no habitat
*********** REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS--
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. r.Yes r: No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
r7A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
r C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffles sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not subs
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain Streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Presei
absent, Rare (R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) = > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%.
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
r F, E, E, E, Bedrock/saprolite
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)

Sand (.062 - 2 mm)
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
Detritus
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
Are pools
filled
with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Stream.,
12. Aquatic Life - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. `.Yes ` 'No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ` ]No Water ` 'Other:
12b.' Yes ''No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes
all that apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for size 3 and 4 streams.
r (-Adult frogs
r- rAquatic reptiles
rAquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
Beetles (including water pennies)
Caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera [T])
rAsian clam (Corbicula)
Crustacean (isopod/am phi pod/crayfish/shrim p)
F7 Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
r- F.75 Dipterans (true flies)
r F- Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera [E])
r F- Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
Midges/mosquito larvae
Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
Other fish
r7e r- Salamanders/tadpoles
Snails
Stonefly larvae (Plecoptera [P])
r- rTipulid larvae
r- r-Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley type
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow an
upland runoff.
LB RB
A ,A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
B Z, B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
C ,C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples include: ditches
soil, compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage - streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
A ,A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
B , B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
C Z*-,C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence - streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or wit[
normal wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
Y r.Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
r+� N -:� N
16. Baseflow Contributors -assessment reach metric (skip for size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
rA Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
F- B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
F- C Obstruction that passes some flow during low -flow periods within assessment area (beaver dam, bottom -release dam
F- D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron oxidizing bacteria in water indicates seepage)
F- E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
7 F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors - assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
A .7vidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installatior

F— B Obstruction not passing flow during low flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment di
F C Urban stream (>> 24% impervious surface for watershed)
F— D Evidence that the stream -side area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
F— E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
f7 F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
` .,A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
` AB Degraded (example: scattered trees)
` 'C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top
of bank out to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
r�A r�A r�A r�A >_ 100-feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
B B B B From 50 to < 100-feet wide
C C C C From 30 to < 50-feet wide
D D D D From 10 to < 30-feet wide
E E E E < 10-feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
,:�A
r: A
Mature forest
e ]B
r.B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
C
C
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
D
D
Maintained shrubs
E
E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: r
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
A A A ,A r.,A r.,A Row crops
`A 'B r,B r,B �B �B Maintained turf
` 'C C ,C AC C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
` ' D D , D D r., D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
`+'A `.,A Medium to high stem density
` �B ` �B Low stem density
` AC ` AC No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer— streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10-feet wide.
LB RB
A ,A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
B ,B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
C r—,C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — First 100 feet of streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it cc
to assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
r: A MA Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of nati
species, with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
B rB Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed c
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearin(
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expect
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
C C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or c
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities compose
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no ve

25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ` 'Yes `+]No Was a conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons.No Water Other:
Check the box L. ding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
A <46 46 to < 67 C 67 to < 79 D 79 to < 230 E ? 230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 1
Rating Calculator Version 1
Stream Site Name North Creek Village Phase II Date of Evaluation J2/08/2023 and 03/08/2022
Stream Category Pa2 Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
Function Class Rating Summary
USACE/
All Streams
NCDWR
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
(2) Baseflow
(2) Flood Flow
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
(4) Floodplain Access
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
(4) Microtopography
(3) Stream Stability
(4) Channel Stability
(4) Sediment Transport
(4) Stream Geomorphology
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
LOW
LOW
MEDIUM
LOW
MEDIUM
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
(2) Baseflow
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
(3) Thermoregulation
(2) Indicators of Stressors
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
NO
HIGH
NA
HIGH
HIGH
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
NO
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW

(1 } Habitat
(2) In -stream Habitat
(3) Baseflow
(3) Substrate
(3) Stream Stability
(3) In -stream Habitat
(2) Stream -side Habitat
(3) Stream side Habitat
(3) Thermo reg u latio n
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
(3) Flow Restriction
(3) Tid a 11.1 a rsh Stream Stability
(4) Tidal tlarsh Channel Stability
(4)Tidal 1.1arsh Stream Geomorphology
(3)Tida114arsh In -stream Habitat
(2) IntertidaIZone Habitat
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
LOW
LOW
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
HIGH
P.IECIUP0
HIGH
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
L(YW

David Rabon
From: Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 9:09 AM
To: David Rabon
Cc: Jennifer Robertson
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] North Creek Village Phase II T&E Report of Findings and Review
Request (Mecklenburg County)
Hey David,
We offer the following comments/concurrence to inform prudent effect determinations to federally listed species from
the appropriate action agency:
Based on the information provided, the proposed action occurs within the consultation area for the federally
endangered Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus scwheinitzii), Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii), and the federally
threatened smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata). These species are known to occur in a variety of habitats
including maintained utility and road rights of way, forest edges, old pastures, and woodland openings. These species
may occupy habitats where the disturbance regime reduces competition from other species. They do not typically occur
in areas with dense understory vegetation, or in areas that experience frequent mowing or disturbance during
consecutive reproductive seasons. Your correspondence indicates that suitable habitats for these species are not
present present within the proposed action area (50CFR 402.02). Our concurrence with "no effect" determinations from
action agencies is not required.
Based on the information provided, suitable forage and/or roosting habitat for the proposed endangered tricolored bat
(Perimyotis subflavus), may occur within the proposed action area. To avoid impacts to this species, we encourage
project proponents to accomplish any necessary tree clearing outside of the "active season" for this animal. The active
season for tricolored bat occurs during the warmer time of year from April 1 - October 15. Although this species is not
currently afforded legal protection under the Endangered Species Act (Act), this impact minimization measure would
support our concurrence with a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination from the appropriate action
agency should this species become listed in the future. If the proposed action would not affect suitable habitat for this
animal, we would not object to a "no effect" determination from the appropriate action agency.
The information provided indicates that suitable habitat is not present within the proposed action area for any other
federally listed species. Therefore, we require no further information and consider consultation to be complete at this
time. Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals
impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) the
identified action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Regards,
Byron
Byron Hamstead
(he/him/his)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and maybe disclosed to third
parties.
From: Hamstead, Byron A <byron_hamstead @fws.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2023 7:37 AM
To: David Rabon <[e-mail]>; Reid, Rebekah N <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jennifer Robertson <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] North Creek Village Phase II T&E Report of Findings and Review Request (Mecklenburg County)
Hey David,
I have added this request to my list for review and will respond w/in 30d.
Regards,
B
Byron Hamstead
(he/him/his)
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
This email correspondence and any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the Freedom of Information Act and maybe disclosed to third
parties.
From: David Rabon <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 8:30 AM
To: Reid, Rebekah N <[e-mail]>; Hamstead, Byron A <[e-mail]>
Cc: Jennifer Robertson <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] North Creek Village Phase II T&E Report of Findings and Review Request (Mecklenburg County)
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
responding.
Rebekah/Byron,
Please find attached a T&E report of findings and review request for North Creek Village Phase II in
Mecklenburg County.
Fish and Wildlife Service comments are being requested proactively as an Army Corps of Engineers
NWP 29 may be required for the project. A preliminary site plan has been developed and is included

in the report. The Aquatic Resource Sketch Map also is included within the report along with
additional resources. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
David
David Rabon, Ph. D.
Senior Environmental Specialist
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
www.atlasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
AONMENTAL
LM
«L`

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
April 24, 2023
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
Layla Tallent ltallent e,atlasenvi.com
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road 9411
Charlotte, NC 28211
Re: Construct North Creek Village Phase II mixed -use development, 17705 Davidson -Concord Road,
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, ER 23-0761
Dear Ms. Tallent:
Thank you for your email of March 13, 2023, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments:
One archaeological site has been previously recorded adjacent to the project area (this resource was
determined not eligible for the National register of Historic Places (NRHP), and most of the project area
has not been systematically surveyed for archaeological resources. The project area contains several high
probability land forms with well drained soils, particularly in the southern portion adjacent to an unnamed
tributary and bottom lands associated with Ramah Creek. Numerous archaeological sites have been
identified in similar settings in the vicinity, including ones determined eligible for the NRHP. Based on the
topographic and hydrological setting, we expect the project area may contain intact, significant
archaeological sites.
Prior to the initiation of any ground disturbing activities within the project area, we recommend that a
comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted. The purpose of this survey will be to identify and
evaluate the significance of archaeological sites that may be damaged or destroyed by the proposed project
and make recommendations regarding their eligibility status in terms of the National Register of Historic
Places.
The archaeological survey should be conducted by an experienced archaeologist that meets the Secretary of
the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. A list of archaeological consultants who have
conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North Carolina is available at
hgps://archaeology.ncdcr.gov/archaeological-consultant-list. The archaeologists listed, or any other
experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey.
Please note that our office requests consultation with the Office of State Archaeology Review
Archaeologist to discuss appropriate field methodologies prior to the archaeological field investigation
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

ER23-0761, April 24, Page 2 of
and discuss our current Draft Archaeological Methodology Guidelines for Solar Farms. You can find the
Review Archaeologist for your region at hM2s://archaeology.ncdcr.gov/about/contact. OSA's
Archaeological Standards and Guidelines for Background Research, Field Methodologies, Technical
Reports, and Curation can be found online at: hiips://files.nc.gov/dncr-
arch/OSA_Guidelines_Dec20l 7.pdf.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

fires
RES Aster, LLC Stream Mitigation Bank
Statement of Availability September 15, 2023
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Doug Perez
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Re Project: North Creek Village Phase 2
This document confirms that the Stephen Vinson (Applicant) for the North Creek Village Phase 2 (Project)
has expressed an interest to utilize 922.00 Stream Mitigation Credits from the RES Aster sponsored RES
Yadkin 05 Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically 922.00 Stream credits from the Cardinal site, in the Yadkin
HUC 03040105. As the official Bank Sponsor, RES Aster, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available
for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the issuance
of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has fully secured
credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation obligation requiring
the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the purchase
price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and a
documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate,
with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the proper
documentation.
Please contact me at 919-209-1055 or [e-mail] if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Amy Staley
Credit Sales Manager
Bank Sponsor— RES Aster, LLC

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 9, 2022
DWR #20-1288
Mecklenburg County
Stephen Vinson
Magnolia Hunterville Development
9525 Birkdale Crossing Dr., Ste. 200
Hunterville, NC 28078
sent via email to: [e-mail]
Subject: Approval of Individual 401 Water Quality Certification - Revision
North Village Creek (formerly Huntersville East)
Dear. Mr. Vinson:
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. WQC004384 revision issued to Stephen Vinson, dated June
9, 2022. This approval is for the purpose and design described in your application. The plans and
specifications for this project are incorporated by reference as part of this Water Quality Certification. If
you change your project, you must notify the Division and you may be required to submit a new
application package with the appropriate fee. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy
of this Certification and is responsible for complying with all conditions. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2)].
This Water Quality Certification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain all other
required Federal, State, or Local approvals before proceeding with the project, including those required
by, but not limited to, Sediment and Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, Water Supply Watershed, and
Trout Buffer regulations.
This Water Quality Certification neither grants nor affirms any property right, license, or privilege in any
lands or waters, or any right of use in any waters. This Water Quality Certification does not authorize
any person to interfere with the riparian rights, littoral rights, or water use rights of any other person
and does not create any prescriptive right or any right of priority regarding any usage of water. This
Water Quality Certification shall not be interposed as a defense in any action respecting the
determination of riparian or littoral rights or other rights to water use. No consumptive user is deemed
by virtue of this Water Quality Certification to possess any prescriptive or other right of priority with
respect to any other consumptive user regardless of the quantity of the withdrawal or the date on which
the withdrawal was initiated or expanded.
Upon the presentation of proper credentials, the Division may inspect the property.

This Water Quality Certification shall expire on the same day as the expiration date of the corresponding
Section 404 Permit. The conditions shall remain in effect for the life of the project, regardless of the
expiration date of this Water Quality Certification.
Non-compliance with or violation of the conditions herein set forth may result in revocation of this
Water Quality Certification for the project and may also result in criminal and/or civil penalties.
If you are unable to comply with any of the conditions of this Water Quality Certification you must notify
the Mooresville Regional Office within 24 hours (or the next business day if a weekend or holiday) from
the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances.
The permittee shall report to the Mooresville Regional Office any noncompliance with, and/or any
violation of, stream or wetland standards [15A NCAC 02B .0200] including but not limited to sediment
impacts to streams or wetlands. Information shall be provided orally within 24 hours (or the next
business day if a weekend or holiday) from the time the permittee became aware of the non-compliance
circumstances.
This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless contested [G.S. 143-215.5]. Please be aware
that impacting waters without first applying for and securing the issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification violates Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 2H .0500. Title 15A
NCAC 2H .0500 requires certifications pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act whenever
construction or operation of facilities will result in a discharge into navigable waters, including wetlands,
as described in 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 323. It also states any person desiring
issuance of the State certification or coverage under a general certification required by Section 401 of
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act shall file with the Director of the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality. Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A, these violations and any future violations are subject to a
civil penalty assessment of up to a maximum of $25,000.00 per day for each violation.
This Certification can be contested as provided in Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes by
filing a Petition for a Contested Case Hearing (Petition) with the North Carolina Office of Administrative
Hearings (OAH) within sixty (60) calendar days. Requirements for filing a Petition are set forth in Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and Title 26 of the North Carolina Administrative Code.
Additional information regarding requirements for filing a Petition and Petition forms may be accessed at
http://www.ncoah.com/ or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
One (1) copy of the Petition must also be served to the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality:
William F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the Division's review under section 401 of the Clean Water Act and 15A NCAC
02H .0500. Please contact Doug Perez at 704-235-2200 or Doug. [e-mail] if you have any
questions or concerns.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NCRT", C/+AOLNA 01
MA�m^ l0.an 704.663.1699

Sincerely,
cc:
CA
DocuSigned by:
414 4 H pul" n' for
F161FB69A2D84A3...
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
Jennifer Robertson, Atlas Environmental, email
Bryan Rhoden Reynolds, USACE Regulatory Field Office
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Electronic file
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NORTH CAPOLMA
D-INJO
704.663.1699

NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATION #WQC004384 is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401, Public Laws
92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to North Carolina's Regulations in 15 NCAC 02H .0500
and 15A NCAC 02B .0200, to Stephen Vinson (Magnolia Huntersville Development Co.), who have
authorization for the impacts listed below, as described within your application received by the N.C.
Division of Water Resources (Division) on May 6, 2021, and subsequent information on June 25, 2021, and
by Public Notice issued by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and received by the Division on May 17, 2021.
The State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will comply with water quality requirements and
the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of the Public Laws 92-500 and PL 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application, the supporting documentation, and conditions
hereinafter set forth.
The following impacts are hereby approved. No other impacts are approved, including incidental
impacts. [15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)]
Type of Impact
Amount Approved (units)
Permanent
Amount Approved (units)
Temporary
Stream (culvert)
191 (linear feet)
28 (linear feet)
404/401 Wetlands
0.009 (acres)
n/a (acres)
This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the certification below.
CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION [15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)]:
1. Stormwater Management: The applicant may provide documentation that the project will not impair
water quality to the receiving stream(s) from stormwater runoff or provide an approved stormwater
management plan. Any high density project and/or project that exceeds density thresholds must
provide a stormwater management plan for the entire project, for review and approval including all
forms and pertinent items that complies with the high density development requirements. Low
density development shall meet all condition for stormwater management required by the state and
be reviewed if required. The plan may be approved by the Division, State Stormwater Program or a
local delegated authority. The plan shall consider the impact of the volume and velocity of discharge
and runoff to the receiving stream and adjacent riparian areas to prevent scouring and erosions of the
features.
Citations15A NCAC 02U .1017, 15A NAC 02H .1003 (2)(a) , 15 NCAC 02B .0614 (8), 15A NCAC 02B
.0607(h)
Justification: In order to protect against impairment of water quality standards and best usage of
receiving and downstream waters, water quality based management practices must be employed to
protect against direct or indirect discharge of waste or other sources of water pollution. Surface
water quality standards require that conditions of waters be suitable for all best uses provided for in
state rule (including, at minimum: aquatic life propagation, survival, and maintenance of biological
integrity, wildlife, secondary contact recreation, agriculture) and that activities must not cause water
D Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NCRT", C/+AOLNp
MA-1 1 704.663.1699

pollution that precludes any best use on a short-term or long-term basis. In determining that the
proposed activity will comply with state water quality standards (including designated uses, numeric
criteria, narrative criteria and the state's antidegradation policy), the Division must evaluate if the
activity has avoided and minimized impacts to waters, would cause or contribute to a violation of
standards, or would result in secondary or cumulative impacts
2. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and erosion control
measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and turbidity. This includes
interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
Justification: Failure to reduce erosion of runoff conveyances and to provide for maximum reduction of
erosion on areas not related to ongoing construction, shortens basin holding times, increases turbidity
of discharge and creates a greater potential of bypass discharge.
3. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be matted. 15A
NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(1) and15A NCAC 02H .502 (c)
Justification: A project that affects waters shall not be permitted unless the existing uses, and the water
quality to protect such uses, are protected. In determining that the proposed activity will comply with
state water quality standards (including designated uses, numeric criteria, narrative criteria and the
state's antidegradation policy), the Division must evaluate if the activity has avoided and minimized
impacts to waters, would cause or contribute to a violation of standards or would result in secondary or
cumulative impacts
4. The permittee shall report to the DWR Mooresville Regional Office any noncompliance with, and/or
any violation of, stream or wetland standards [15A NCAC 02B .0200], including but not limited to
sediment impacts to streams or wetlands. Information shall be provided orally within 24 hours (or
the next business day if a weekend or holiday) from the time the permittee became aware of the
non-compliance circumstances.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
Justification: Timely reporting of non-compliance is important in identifying and minimizing
detrimental impacts to water quality and avoiding impacts due to water pollution that precludes any
best use on a short-term or long-term basis.
5. Erosion control matting that incorporates plastic mesh and/or plastic twine shall not be used along
streambanks or within wetlands.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
Justification: A project that affects waters shall not be permitted unless the existing uses (including
aquatic life propagation and biological integrity), and the water quality to protect such uses, are
protected. Protections are necessary to ensure any remaining surface waters or wetlands, and any
surface waters or wetlands downstream, continue to support existing uses during and after project
completion. The Division must evaluate if the activity has avoided and minimized impacts to waters,
would cause or contribute to a violation of standards, or would result in secondary or cumulative
impacts.
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NCRT CbRpVNA
O.P. M ] V EnNm^.-1 704.663.1699

6. No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands or waters beyond the footprint of
the approved impacts (including temporary impacts).
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506, 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
Justification: Surface water quality standards require that conditions of waters be suitable for all best
uses provided for in state rule (including, at minimum: aquatic life propagation, survival, and
maintenance of biological integrity, wildlife, secondary contact recreation; agriculture), and that
activities must not cause water pollution that precludes any best use on a short-term or long-term
basis.
7. All work in or adjacent to streams shall be conducted so that the flowing stream does not come in
contact with the disturbed area. Approved best management practices from the most current
version of the NC Sediment and Erosion Control Manual, or the NC Department of Transportation
Construction and Maintenance Activities Manual, such as sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, and
other diversion structures shall be used to minimize excavation in flowing water.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c), 15A NCAC 02B .0200
Justification: Surface water quality standards require that conditions of waters be suitable for all best
uses provided for in state rule, and that activities must not cause water pollution that precludes any
best use on a short-term or long-term basis. As cited in Stream Standards: (12) Oils, deleterious
substances, or colored or other wastes: only such amounts as shall not render the waters injurious to
public health, secondary recreation, or to aquatic life and wildlife, or adversely affect the palatability
offish, aesthetic quality, or impair the waters for any designated uses, and (21) turbidity in the
receiving water shall not exceed 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) in streams not designated
as trout waters and 10 NTU in streams, lakes, or reservoirs designated as trout waters, for lakes and
reservoirs not designated as trout waters, the turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTU; if turbidity exceeds
these levels due to natural background conditions, the existing turbidity level shall not be increased.
8. Culverts shall be designed and installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles are not
altered and allow for aquatic life movement during low flows. The dimension, pattern, and profile
of the stream above and below a pipe or culvert shall not be modified by widening the stream
channel or by reducing the depth of the stream in connection with the construction activity. The
width, height, and gradient of a proposed culvert shall be such as to pass the average historical low
flow and spring flow without adversely altering flow velocity. If the width of the culvert is wider than
the stream channel, the culvert shall include multiple boxes/pipes, baffles, benches and/or sills to
maintain the natural width of the stream channel. If multiple culverts/pipes/barrels are used, low
flows shall be accommodated in one culvert/pipe and additional culverts/pipes shall be installed
such that they receive only flows above bankfull.
Placement of culverts and other structures in streams shall be below the elevation of the streambed
by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20% of the culvert diameter
for culverts having a diameter less than or equal to 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water
and aquatic life. If the culvert outlet is submerged within a pool or scour hole and designed to
provide for aquatic passage, then culvert burial into the streambed is not required.
For structures less than 72" in diameter/width, and topographic constraints indicate culvert slopes
of greater than 2.5% culvert burial is not required, provided that all alternative options for flattening
the slope have been investigated and aquatic life movement/connectivity has been provided when
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NCRT", C/+AOLNA 01
MA�m^ l Q°anry 704.663.1699

possible (e.g. rock ladders, cross -vanes, sills, baffles etc.). Notification, including supporting
documentation to include a location map of the culvert, culvert profile drawings, and slope
calculations, shall be provided to DWR 30 calendar days prior to the installation of the culvert.
When bedrock is present in culvert locations, culvert burial is not required, provided that there is
sufficient documentation of the presence of bedrock. Notification, including supporting
documentation such as a location map of the culvert, geotechnical reports, photographs, etc. shall
be provided to DWR a minimum of 30 calendar days prior to the installation of the culvert. If
bedrock is discovered during construction, then DWR shall be notified by phone or email within 24
hours of discovery.
Installation of culverts in wetlands shall ensure continuity of water movement and be designed to
adequately accommodate high water or flood conditions. When roadways, causeways, or other fill
projects are constructed across FEMA-designated floodways or wetlands, openings such as culverts
or bridges shall be provided to maintain the natural hydrology of the system as well as prevent
constriction of the floodway that may result in destabilization of streams or wetlands.
The establishment of native woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
shall be used where practicable instead of rip -rap or other bank hardening methods.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
Justification: Surface water quality standards require that conditions of waters be suitable for all
best uses provided for in state rule, and that activities must not cause water pollution that precludes
any best use on a short-term or long-term basis. Ensuring that structures are installed properly in
waters will ensure that surface water quality standards are met and conditions of waters are
suitable for all best uses.
9. If concrete is used during construction, then all necessary measures shall be taken to prevent direct
contact between uncured or curing concrete and waters of the state. Water that inadvertently
contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to waters of the state.
Citation: 15A 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c), 15A NCAC 028 .0200, 15A NCAC 028 .0231
Justification: A project that affects waters shall not be permitted unless the existing uses, and the
water quality to protect such uses, are protected. Activities must not cause water pollution that
precludes any best use on a short-term or long-term basis. As cited in Stream Standards: (12) Oils,
deleterious substances, or colored or other wastes: only such amounts as shall not render the waters
injurious to public health, secondary recreation, or to aquatic life and wildlife, or adversely affect the
palatability offish, aesthetic quality, or impair the waters for any designated uses. As cited in
Wetland Standards: (c)(1) Liquids, fill or other solids, or dissolved gases shall not be present in
amounts that may cause adverse impacts on existing wetland uses, and (3) Materials producing
color or odor shall not be present in amounts that may cause adverse impacts on existing wetland
uses.
10. All proposed and approved temporary fill and culverts shall be removed and the impacted area shall
be returned to natural conditions within 60 calendar days after the temporary impact is no longer
necessary. The impacted areas shall be restored to original grade, including each stream's original
cross -sectional dimensions, planform pattern, and longitudinal bed profile. All temporarily impacted
sites shall be restored and stabilized with native vegetation.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NCRT", C/+AOLNA 01
MA�m^ l Q°anry 704.663.1699

Justification: A project that affects waters shall not be permitted unless the existing uses, and the
water quality to protect such uses, are protected. Protections are necessary to ensure any remaining
surface waters or wetlands, and any surface waters or wetlands downstream, continue to support
existing uses after project completion.
11. Any rip -rap required for proper culvert placement, stream stabilization, or restoration of
temporarily disturbed areas shall be restricted to the area directly impacted by the approved
construction activity. Soft/natural stabilization shall be utilized to the maximum extent practicable.
All rip -rap shall be placed such that the original streambed elevation and streambank contours are
restored and maintained and shall consist of clean rock or masonry material free of debris or toxic
pollutants. Placement of rip -rap or other approved materials shall not result in de -stabilization of
the stream bed or banks upstream or downstream of the area or be installed in a manner that
precludes aquatic life passage.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
Justification: Surface water quality standards require that conditions of waters be suitable for all best
uses provided for in state rule, and that activities must not cause water pollution that precludes any
best use on a short-term or long-term basis. The Division must evaluate if the activity has avoided
and minimized impacts to waters, would cause or contribute to a violation of standards, or would
result in secondary or cumulative impacts.
12. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters shall be inspected and maintained
regularly to prevent contamination of surface waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other
toxic materials. Construction shall be staged in order to minimize the exposure of equipment to
surface waters to the maximum extent practicable. Fueling, lubrication, and general equipment
maintenance shall be performed in a manner to prevent, to the maximum extent practicable,
contamination of surface waters by fuels and oils.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c), 15A NCAC 0213 .0200, 15A NCAC 028 .0231
Justification: A project that affects waters shall not be permitted unless the existing uses, and the
water quality to protect such uses, are protected. Activities must not cause water pollution that
precludes any best use on a short-term or long-term basis. As cited in Stream Standards: (12) Oils,
deleterious substances, or colored or other wastes: only such amounts as shall not render the waters
injurious to public health, secondary recreation, or to aquatic life and wildlife, or adversely affect the
palatability offish, aesthetic quality, or impair the waters for any designated uses. As cited in
Wetland Standards: (c)(1) Liquids, fill or other solids, or dissolved gases shall not be present in
amounts that may cause adverse impacts on existing wetland uses, and (3) Materials producing color
or odorshall not be present in amounts that may cause adverse impacts on existing wetland uses.
13. Heavy equipment working in wetlands shall be placed on mats or other measures shall be taken to
minimize soil disturbance and compaction.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c), 15A NCAC 0213 .0231
Justification: Wetland standards require maintenance or enhancement of existing uses of wetlands
such that hydrologic conditions necessary to support natural biological and physical characteristics
are protected, populations of wetland flora and fauna are maintained to protect biological integrity
of the wetland; and materials or substances are not present in amounts that may cause adverse
impact on existing wetland uses.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NCRT", C/+AOLNA 01
MA�m. ^ I0.an 704.663.1699

14. When applicable, all construction activities shall be performed and maintained in full compliance
with G.S. Chapter 113A Article 4 (Sediment and Pollution Control Act of 1973). Regardless of
applicability of the Sediment and Pollution Control Act, all projects shall incorporate appropriate
Best Management Practices for the control of sediment and erosion so that no violations of state
water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
Design, installation, operation, and maintenance of all sediment and erosion control measures shall
be equal to or exceed the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual, or for linear transportation projects, the North Caroline
Department of Transportation Sediment and Erosion Control Manual.
All devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) sites,
including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project. Sufficient materials
required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and stormwater routing and
treatment shall be on site at all times.
For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures shall be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface
Mining Manual. Reclamation measures and implementation shall comply with the reclamation in
accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act and the Mining Act of
1971.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c), 15A NCACO28 .0200, 15A NCAC 028 .0231
Justification: A project that affects waters shall not be permitted unless the existing uses, and the
water quality to protect such uses, are protected. Activities must not cause water pollution that
precludes any best use on a short-term or long-term basis. As cited in Stream Standards: (12) Oils,
deleterious substances, or colored or other wastes: only such amounts as shall not render the waters
injurious to public health, secondary recreation, or to aquatic life and wildlife, or adversely affect the
palatability offish, aesthetic quality, or impair the waters for any designated uses, and (21) turbidity
in the receiving water shall not exceed 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) in streams not
designated as trout waters and 10 NTU in streams, lakes, or reservoirs designated as trout waters;
for lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout waters, the turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTU; if
turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural background conditions, the existing turbidity level shall
not be increased. As cited in Wetland Standards: (c)(1) Liquids, fill or other solids, or dissolved gases
shall not be present in amounts that may cause adverse impacts on existing wetland uses; and (3)
Materials producing color or odor shall not be present in amounts that may cause adverse impacts
on existing wetland uses.
15. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be installed in wetland or waters except within
the footprint of temporary or permanent impacts otherwise authorized by this Certification. If
placed within authorized impact areas, then placement of such measures shall not be conducted in a
manner that results in dis-equilibrium of any wetlands, streambeds, or streambanks. Any silt fence
installed within wetlands shall be removed from wetlands and the natural grade restored within two
(2) months of the date that DEMLR or locally delegated program has released the specific area
within the project to ensure wetland standards are maintained upon completion of the project.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c), 15A NCAC 0213 .0200, 15A NCAC 028 .0231
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NCRT",C/+A6VNp
O.P°"^,^^t a M. .-1 Q°anN 704.663.1699

Justification: A project that affects waters shall not be permitted unless the existing uses, and the
water quality to protect such uses, are protected. Activities must not cause water pollution that
precludes any best use on a short-term or long-term basis. As cited in Stream Standards: (12) Oils,
deleterious substances, or colored or other wastes: only such amounts as shall not render the waters
injurious to public health, secondary recreation, or to aquatic life and wildlife, or adversely affect the
palatability offish, aesthetic quality, or impair the waters for any designated uses, and (21) turbidity
in the receiving water shall not exceed 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) in streams not
designated as trout waters and 10 NTU in streams, lakes, or reservoirs designated as trout waters,
for lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout waters, the turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTU; if
turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural background conditions, the existing turbidity level shall
not be increased. As cited in Wetland Standards: (c)(1) Liquids, fill or other solids, or dissolved gases
shall not be present in amounts that may cause adverse impacts on existing wetland uses, and (3)
Materials producing color or odor shall not be present in amounts that may cause adverse impacts
on existing wetland uses.
16. If the project is covered by NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit Number NCGO10000 or NPDES
Construction Stormwater Permit Number NCG250000, full compliance with permit conditions
including the erosion & sedimentation control plan, inspections and maintenance, self -monitoring,
record keeping and reporting requirements is required.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c); 15A NCAC 028 .0200, 15A NCAC
028 .0231
Justification: A project that affects waters shall not be permitted unless the existing uses, and the
water quality to protect such uses, are protected. Activities must not cause water pollution that
precludes any best use on a short-term or long-term basis. As cited in Stream Standards: (12) Oils,
deleterious substances, or colored or other wastes: only such amounts as shall not render the waters
injurious to public health, secondary recreation, or to aquatic life and wildlife, or adversely affect the
palatability offish, aesthetic quality, or impair the waters for any designated uses, and (21) turbidity
in the receiving water shall not exceed 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) in streams not
designated as trout waters and 10 NTU in streams, lakes, or reservoirs designated as trout waters,
for lakes and reservoirs not designated as trout waters, the turbidity shall not exceed 25 NTU; if
turbidity exceeds these levels due to natural background conditions, the existing turbidity level shall
not be increased. As cited in Wetland Standards: (c)(1) Liquids, fill or other solids, or dissolved gases
shall not be present in amounts that may cause adverse impacts on existing wetland uses, and (3)
Materials producing color or odor shall not be present in amounts that may cause adverse impacts
on existing wetland uses.
17. In accordance with 143-215.85(b), the permittee shall report any petroleum spill of 25 gallons or
more; any spill regardless of amount that causes a sheen on surface waters; any petroleum spill
regardless of amount occurring within 100 feet of surface waters; and any petroleum spill less than
25 gallons that cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c), N.C.G.S 143-215.85(b)
Justification: Person(s) owning or having control over oil or other substances upon notice of
discharge must immediately notify the Department, or any of its agents or employees, of the nature,
location, and time of the discharge and of the measures which are being taken or are proposed to be
taken to contain and remove the discharge. This action is required in order to contain or divert the
substances to prevent entry into the surface waters. Surface water quality standards require that
conditions of waters be suitable for all best uses provided for in state rule (including, at minimum:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NCRT", C/+AOLNA 01
MA�m^ l Q°anry 704.663.1699

aquatic life propagation, survival, and maintenance of biological integrity, wildlife, secondary
contact recreation; agriculture), and that activities must not cause water pollution that precludes
any best use on a short-term or long-term basis.
18. The permittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner consistent with
State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with §303(d)
of the Clean Water Act), and any other appropriate requirements of State and Federal Law.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
Justification: Surface water quality standards require that conditions of waters be suitable for all best
uses provided for in state rule, and that activities must not cause water pollution that precludes any
best use on a short-term or long-term basis. The Division must evaluate if the activity has avoided
and minimized impacts to waters, would cause or contribute to a violation of standards, or would
result in secondary or cumulative impacts.
19. The permittee shall require its contractors and/or agents to comply with the terms and conditions of
this permit in the construction and maintenance of this project, and shall provide each of its
contractors and/or agents associated with the construction or maintenance of this project with a
copy of this Water Quality Certification. A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be available
at the project site during the construction and maintenance of this project.
Citation: 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b), 15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)
Justification: Those actually performing the work should be aware of the requirements of this 401
Water Quality Certification to minimize water quality impacts.
This approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in
your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit. The conditions in effect on the
date of issuance shall remain in effect for the life of the project, regardless of the expiration date of this
Certification. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(c)]
This, the 9th day of June 2022
CA
DocuSigned by:
414 4 H pul�ft for
F161FB69A2D84A3...
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 1 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
NORTH CAPOLMA
w_IN 704.663.1699

PERMIT MODIFICATION --- 06/09/2022
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2008-02707 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Cornelius
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: Magnolia Huntersville Development Co., LLC
Stephen Vinson
Address: 9525 Birkdale Crossing Drive, Suite 200
Huntersville, NC 28078
Telephone Number: 919-414-6721
E-mail: svinson( )magnoliadevco.com
Size (acres) 55 Nearest Town Huntersville
Nearest Waterway Ramah Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.45090
Longitude:-80.80475
Location description: The review area is located on the south side of NC-73 (Sam Furr Road); approximately 0.4 miles west of
the intersection of NC-73 and Ramah Church Road. PINs: 01107315. 01107337. 01107317. 01107322. 01107320. 01107318.
01107336, 011107319, 01126140, and 01126113 (partial).
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the permanent stream and wetland impacts of 191 linear
feet (0.012 acres) and 0.009 acres, respectively, to facilitate the construction of a multi -family townhome and single-family
residential development. In addition, 28 linear feet of temporary stream will occur as a result of the residential development.
All temporary stream impacts will be restored to pre-existing conditions after the completion of construction.
Applicable Law(s): ❑X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 29. Residential Developments
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated 5/18/2021, s, and the enclosed plans Construction Drawings (Existing Condition
Proposed Conditions, and Impact May Proposed Conditions) dated 4/15/2021. Any violation of the attached conditions or
deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative
penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA), prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management Morehead City, NC, at [phone].
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.

PERMIT MODIFICATION --- 06/09/2022
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Bryan Roden -Reynolds at 704-510-1440or brvan.roden-rcynolds(&usace.army.mil.
Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Corps Regulatory Official: 2022.06.09 09:08:01-04'00' Date: 6/9/2022
Expiration Date of Verification: 4/14/2026
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent:
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Jennifer Robertson
Address:
338 S. Sharon Amity Road
Charlotte, NC 28211
Telephone Number:
704-512-1206
E-mail:
irobertson(&atlasenvi.com

Action ID Number: SAW-2008-02707 County: Mecklenburg
Permittee: Magnolia Huntersville Development Co., LLC, Stephen Vinson
Project Name: Huntersville East
Date Verification Issued: 6/9/2022
Project Manager: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
or
bryan.roden-reynolds@us ace. army. mil
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SUBJECT: Department of the Army Memorandum Documenting General Permit
Verification
1.0 Introduction and overview: Information about the proposal subject to one or more of
the Corps regulatory authorities is provided in Section 1, detailed evaluation of the
activity is found in Sections 2 through 4 and findings are documented in Section 5 of this
memorandum. Further, summary information about the activity including administrative
history of actions taken during project evaluation is attached (ORM2 summary).
1.1 Applicant name: Magnolia Huntersville Development Co., LLC, Stephen Vinson
1.2 Activity location: Latitude- 35.45090 Longitude:-80.80475 Location description: The
review area is located on the south side of NC-73 (Sam Furr Road); approximately
0.4 miles west of the intersection of NC-73 and Ramah Church Road. PINs:
01107315, 01107337, 01107317, 01107322, 01107320, 01107318, 01107336,
011107319, 01126140, and 01126113 (partial).
1.3 Description of activity requiring verification -This verification would authorize the
permanent stream and wetland impacts of 191 linear feet (0.012 acres) and 0.009
acres, respectively, to facilitate the construction of a multi -family townhome and
single-family residential development. In addition, 28 linear feet of temporary
stream will occur as a result of the residential development. All temporary stream
impacts will be restored to pre-existing conditions after the completion of
construction.
1.4 Is this an After -the -Fact verification? No.
1.5 Date PCN determined complete for processing 5/26/2021
1.6 Jurisdiction Determination completed? An Approved JD was completed on
10/1 /2020.
1.7 Permit authority: Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344)
1.8 Applicable Permit: NWP 29. Residential Developments
1.9 Activity requires written waiver of NWP limits? No.
1.10 Activity requires a waiver from the requirements of a regional condition(s)? No.
2.0 Evaluation of the Pre -Construction Notification
2.1 Direct and indirect effects caused by the GP activity: The direct effects of the
proposed activity in waters would include the loss of jurisdictional waters (as
specified in Section 1.3) and their associated aquatic resource functions. The
proposed activity also has the potential to result in indirect effects to waters
including excess sedimentation in downstream waters, disruption and/or killing

of aquatic life in the direct vicinity of the project area, increase of downstream
flows, and blocking/restricting aquatic life passage transiting in and through the
project area. These indirect effects are expected to be minimal due to design
criteria and Best Management Practices (BMPs) required by Nationwide Permit
General and Regional Conditions. Additionally, indirect effects would be further
reduced through the implementation of BMPs required by state, local, and
Federal ordinances and regulations.
2.2 Site specific factors: The review consists of forested land that was timbered
approximately 10 years ago and single family residences.
2.3 Coordination
2.3.1 Was the PCN coordinated with other agencies? No.
Agency coordination with the USFWS is required for the Northern Long Eared
Bat. However, the Corps is not required to wait for a response from the USFWS
Asheville Office in accordance with local procedures.
2.3.2 Was the PCN coordinated with other Corps offices? No.
2.4 Mitigation
2.4.1 Provide brief description of how the activity has been designed on -site to avoid and
minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States
to the maximum extent practicable at the project site -The applicant provided a
detailed statement describing their efforts to avoid and minimized impacts to
waters of the United States on the project site in the preconstruction notification.
Based on this information, the Corps believes the applicant has avoid and
minimized impacts to waters of the United State to the maximum extent
practicable.
2.4.2 Is compensatory mitigation required for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional aquatic
resources to reduce the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects to a
minimal level?
No.
Provide rationale: No compensatory mitigation is required because the applicant
has minimized impacts and the loss of wetlands associated with the activity is
less than 0.10 acre. There are no specific circumstances that would warrant
compensatory mitigation. No compensatory mitigation is required because the
applicant has minimized impacts and the loss of stream channel associated with
the activity is less than 0.02 acres There are no specific circumstances that would
warrant compensatory mitigation.
3.0 Compliance with Other Laws, Policies and Requirements
3.1 Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA)

3.1.1 ESA action area: The action area includes the waters of the United States that will
be directly affected by the proposed work or structures and uplands directly
affected as a result of authorizing the work or structures.
3.1.2 Has another federal agency taken steps to document compliance with Section 7 of the
ESA and completed consultation(s) as required? No.
3.1.3 Known species/critical habitat present? No. The Corps has determined that it has
fulfilled its responsibilities under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA.
IPAC Species in Mecklenburg County:
NAME: Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) STATUS: Threatened
NAME: Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata) STATUS: Endangered
NAME: Rusty -patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis) STATUS: Endangered
NAME: Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) STATUS: Endangered
NAME: Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) STATUS: Endangered
NAME: Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) STATUS: Endangered
Effect determination (s), including no effect, for all known species/habitat, and basis for
determination(s): Based on the latest version of the Natural Heritage Program's
NHEO data, there are no protected species located within or in the vicinity of the
action area. The Corps has determined the proposed activity will not directly or
indirectly affect any species subject to the ESA. In a letter dated March 5, 2021,
the USFWS stated "The information provided suggests that potential suitable
habitat for the federally endangered smooth coneflower and Michaux's sumac
occurs onsite. However, targeted surveys for these species conducted during
their respective optimal survey windows, July 2020, detected no evidence of
these species. The information provided suggests that potential suitable habitat
for the federally endangered Schweinitz's sunflower occurs onsite. Targeted
surveys were conducted in September of 2008, however, survey results maintain
validity for no more than two years. Surveys for this species should be conducted
during the optimal survey window, of late August through October (or first frost),
where proposed project -mediated impacts overlap suitable habitats for these
species. Please submit your survey results to this office when they become
available to complete our review." The applicant conducted USFWS
recommended survey of August 31, 2020 and provided the results to USFWS on
May 4, 2021. The USFWS reviewed the results and stated "Based on the
information provided, suitable habitat occur onsite for the federally endangered
Schweinitz's sunflower, Michaux's sumac, and smooth coneflower. The
applicant's May 4, 2021, email indicates that the applicant detected no evidence
for Schweinitz's sunflower during the applicant's August 31, 2020 botanical
evaluation. Provided that the applicant also searched for Michaux's sumac and
smooth coneflower and also did not detect those species at that time, we would
concur with a may affect, not likely to adversely affect determination from the
USACE."
3.1.4 Consultation with either the National Marine Fisheries Service and/or the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service was initiated and completed as required, for any determinations other
than "no effect" (see the attached "Summary" sheet for begin date, end date and closure
method of the consultation).

The USACE reviewed this project in accordance with (IAW) the NLEB Standard
Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (SLOPES) between the
USACE, Wilmington District, and the Asheville and Raleigh U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Offices, and determined that the action area for this project is
located outside of the highlighted areas/red 12-digit HUCs and activities in the
action area do not require prohibited incidental take; as such, this project meets
the criteria for the 4(d) rule and any associated take is exempted/excepted. IAW
the NLEB SLOPES, the USACE sent a Situation 1 email to the Service on May 26,
2021, informing them about this project.
Service Concurrence: as established in the NLEB SLOPES, this project does not
require prohibited intentional take of the NLEB and it meets the criteria for the
4(d) rule; therefore any associated take is exempt and it is not necessary for the
USACE to wait 30 days for the Service to object or concur.
Based on a review of the information above, the Corps has determined that it has
fulfilled its responsibilities under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA.
3.2 Magnuson -Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH) The NWPs/RGPs were coordinated with the NMFS during the permit
renewal process. NMFS coordination/EFH consultation is required if the activity
affects SAV. This activity does not affect SAV. Therefore, NMFS coordination/EFH
consultation has been completed.
3.2.1 Has another federal agency taken steps to comply with EFH provisions of Magnuson -
Stevens Act? No.
3.2.2 Did the proposed project require review under the Magnuson -Stevens Act? No.
3.3 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
3.3.1 Section 106 permit area -The permit area includes those areas comprising waters of the
United States that will be directly affected by the proposed work or structures, as well
as activities outside of waters of the U.S. because all three tests identified in 33
CFR 325, Appendix C(g)(1) have been met.
Final description of the permit area: All three test have been met and portions of the
larger project undertaken outside of waters of the U.S. are in the permit area.
Activities undertaken outside WOUS are included in the permit area because
those activities are directly associated and integrally related with the authorized
work and those activities would not occur but for the authorization of the work
within the WOUS.
3.3.2 Has another federal agency taken steps to comply with Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act and completed consultation(s) as required? No.
3.3.3 Known cultural resource sites present and/or survey or other additional information
needed? No. Based on the NCDCR "HPOWEB" service and aerial photographs,

there are no known historic properties located in the permit area or in close
proximity to the permit area.
Effect determination and basis for that determination: The Corps has determined the
proposed activity will have no effect on properties listed or eligible for listing in
the National Register of Historic Places. In a letter to the applicant dated March
5, 2021, the NCSHPO stated "Based on input from the USACE, which determined
the permit area would include only portions along the western edge of the parcel
and the upland areas directly adjacent to the impact area, we have determined
that these areas do not require an archaeological survey."
3.3.4 Consultation was initiated and completed as required with the appropriate agencies,
tribes and/or other parties for any determinations other than "no potential to cause
effects" (see the attached "Summary" sheet for consultation type, begin date, end date
and closure method of the consultation). The Corps has determined that it has fulfilled
its responsibilities under Section 106 of the NHPA.
3.4 Tribal Trust Responsibilities
3.4.1 Was government -to -government consultation conducted with Federally -recognized
Tribe(s)? No. There are no known tribal interests in the project area.
Provide a description of any consultation(s) conducted including results and how
concerns about significant effects to protected tribal resources, tribal rights and/or
Indian lands were addressed. The Corps has determined that it has fulfilled its tribal
trust responsibilities.
3.4.2 Other Tribal including any discussion of Tribal Treaty rights? Select Yes or No.
3.5 Section 401 of the Clean Water Act — Water Quality Certification (WQC)
3.5.1 Is a Section 401 WQC required, and if so, has the certification been issued or waived?
A general WQC has been issued for this permit.
3.6 Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
3.6.1 Is a CZMA consistency concurrence required, and if so, has the concurrence been
issued, waived or presumed? N/A, a CZMA consistency concurrence is not
required.
3.7 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
3.7.1 Is the projectlocated in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in
a river officially designated by Congress as a "study river" for possible inclusion in the
system? No. According to http://www.rivers.gov, the proposed project area is not
within a designated or study river.
3.8 Effects on Corps Civil Works Projects (33 USC 408)

3.8.1 Does the applicant also require permission under Section 14 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act (33 USC 408) because the activity, in whole or in part, would alter, occupy, or use a
Corps Civil Works project? No, there are no Corps Civil Works project(s) in or near
the vicinity of the proposal.
4.0 Special Conditions
4.1 Are special conditions required to ensure minimal effects, protect the public interest
and/or ensure compliance of the activity with any of the laws above? No.
If no, provide rationale: The terms and conditions of the general permit are
sufficient to ensure no more than minimal adverse effects, and no conditions are
needed for compliance with other laws or to protect the public interest.
5.0 Determination
5.1 Waiver request conclusion, if required or select N/A: N/A.
5.2 The activity will result in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse
effects on the aquatic environment and will not be contrary to the public interest.
5.3 This activity, as described, complies with all terms and conditions of the permit identified
in Section 1.5.
=MEM411WO
Bryan Roden -Reynolds
2022.06.09 09:08:22-04'00'
Date: 6/9/2022
Bryan Roden -Reynolds

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2008-02707 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Cornelius
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Magnolia Huntersville Development Co., LLC
Stephen Vinson
Address: 9525 Birkdale Crossing Drive, Suite 200
Huntersville, NC 28078
Telephone Number: 919-414-6721
E-mail: svinson(&magnoliadevco.com
Size (acres) 55 Nearest Town Huntersville
Nearest Waterway Ramah Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.45090
Longitude:-80.80475
Location description: The review area is located on the south side of NC-73 (Sam Furr Road); approximately 0.4 miles west of
the intersection of NC-73 and Ramah Church Road. PINs: 01107315, 01107337, 01107317, 01107322, 01107320, 01107318,
01107336, 01107319, 01126140, and 01126113 (portion). Reference review area description shown in Jurisdictional
Determination Request package entitled "USGS Topographic Mad' and Dated 07/09/2020.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 7/9/2020. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
® There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2008-02707
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Bryan Roden -Reynolds at 704-510-1440 or
brvan.roden-reynolds(&u sace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the approved iurisdictional determination
form dated 10/1/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 11/29/2020.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if y. ou donot object to the determination in this correspondence.**
RODEN Digitally signed by RODEN
REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574 REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574
Corps Regulatory Official: Date:2020.10.01 09:15:57 -04'00
Date of JD: 10/1/2020 Expiration Date of JD: 09/29/2025

SAW-2008-02707
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Jennifer Robertson
Address: 338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
Telephone Number: 704-512-1206
E-mail: irobertson(&atlasenvi.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
[I& REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Magnolia Huntersville Develooment Co.,
File Number: SAW-2008-02707
Date: 10/1/2020
LLC, Stephen Vinson
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑X
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.miUMissions/CivilWorks/ReaulatoryProgramandPenuits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
CESAD-PDO
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1 OM15
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportum to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
® NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): 10/1/2020
ORM Number: SAW-2008-02707
Associated JDs: \l/A
Review Area Location': State/Territory: City: Huntersville County/Parish/Borough: Mecklenburg
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.4509C Longitude 30.80475
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
J The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section 11.13).
❑x There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
DX There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
§ 10 Name § 10 Size § 10 Criteria Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A I N/A
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navi able Waters a 1 waters :3
a 1 Name
a 1 Size
a 1 Criteria
Rationale fora 1 Determination
Tributaries a 2 waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale fora 2 Determination
Stream
735
linear
(a)(2)
Intermittent Stream CH2O0 flows south into
CH2O0
feet
Intermittent
perennial Stream CH2O0 which continues to flow
tributary
south and offsite.
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
Stream
2,156
linear
(a)(2) Perennial
Perennial Stream CH2O0 flows south and
CH2O0
feet
tributary
continues offsite.
' Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor.
' If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable waters list, do
NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors
Act Section 10 navigability determination.
s A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river
or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-alone TNW determination should be
completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
® NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Tributaries a 2 waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale fora 2 Determination
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year
Stream
1,708
linear
(a)(2) Perennial
Perennial Stream CH100 flows south into Stream
CH100
feet
tributary
CH2O0 which continues to flow south and offsite.
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3 waters):
a 3 Name
a 3 Size
a 3 Criteria
Rationale fora 3 Determination
N/A
N/A I
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale fora 4 Determination
Wetland
0.009
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
Wetland WL2100 is a floodplain wetland that
WL2100
abuts an (a)(1)-
abuts intermittent Stream CH2O0.
(a)(3) water.
Wetland
0.007
Acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
Wetland WL2000 is a floodplain wetland that
WL2000
inundated by
abuts intermittent Stream CH2O0.
flooding from
an (a)(1)-(a)(3)
water in a
typical year.
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
Open Water P1
0.077
acre(s)
(b)(8) Artificial
During a site visit (09/23/2020) it was
lake/pond
determined Open Water P1 was constructed
constructed or
in uplands and its only connection to
excavated in
downstream waters was through overland
upland or a non-
sheetflow.
jurisdictional
water, so long
as the artificial
4 Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requester specifically asks a Corps district to do so.
Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
s Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1) exclusion, four sub-
categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply
administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Excluded waters b 1 — b 12 :4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
lake or pond is
not an
impoundment of
a jurisdictional
water that meets
(c)(6).
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
❑x Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: Multiple unnumbered figures.
This information Select. sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale: N/A or describe rationale for insufficiency (including partial insufficiency).
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Photographs: Aerial and Other: Aerial Imagery (ESRI Aerial Imagery) and Photographs 1-10
❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: 09/23/2020
❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): ORM Number(s) and date(s).
❑x Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section 111.B.
❑x USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Soil Map (Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County)
❑x USFWS NWI maps: NWI Map (USFWS NWI Mapper)
❑x USGS topographic maps: USGS Topographic Map (1:24,000 Cornelius, NC)
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source select
Name and/or date and other relevant information
JSGS Sources
Ni/Q
USDA Sources
USGS Topographic Ma 1:24,000 Cornelius, NC
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
N/A.
State/Local/Tribal Sour
Other Sources
Aquatic Resource Sketch Maps, Sheets 1-5 (Dated 07/24/2020), FEMA
National Flood Hazard Layer Map, and NCDWQ Stream Identification
Forms, Version 4.11 (Dated 07/06/2020)
B. Typical year assessment(s): The consultant (i.e., Atlas Environmental) conducted a site evaluation
on 05/14/2020. The Antecedent Precipitation Tool (APT) was used for this date and determined the
site was under normal conditions. The Corps conducted a site visit on 09/23/2020. The APT was
used for this dated and determined the site was under normal conditions.
C. Additional comments to support AJD: See Section II(D), Excluded Waters or Features for further
explanation on Excluded Wetlands A, B, and L and Open Water P1.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

_.I I '
- r [ LL
• 4 o - '� y...'� C)
»w �f C)
\t 8 C)
x
O
O
a,`a�o� y�anyJ yp4i p�
Q o
N
O
N
N
7
a--f
(O
(a
4-J �
� �
V) z
U v
L •� J
� J
O
V) c C:
fa
_ a
DC E
U rfa o v �
LL +�
a-J C)
ro N L L00
L C
N O Q%
Q � E L C)r C:fu d LO
Mi = Ln M q-
%.0 -p M
N u1 O
ro O N
fu
o
a 0
p v � O
ayes Rd s a - u
c�
�d
� J
a
z
LU
N
O
En v c E
O L-0 ra
N oCUl) N
0 0 111 cu
d

LL
LL
O
V-
C)
O
M
O
O
N
O
O
00
O
r
L t
C o
O
O
CL
fu
U
a- J
-114
V)
Q)
U
O
�V)^
W,
�
CL
U
a-+
V
D
cy
N
>
�
0
U
co
N
LL
i
J
p
p
' O
N
N
2
U
-
N ++
L LL
Q
d N
C
O
U
N
N1 �O
p i-�
C
(a
N
oC41
cnU
c
Ln
ra
Lu
C
73
2
N
E
ro
Z
ti
N
O
00
O
00
N
U
Z
N
L
4
C
7
fu
ra
O
73
LL
E
ra
Ln
O
LO
M
C
O
fu
V
O
J
U
J
J
C
f0
Q
E
O
U
L
Q
O
CL
M
O
O
C
_N
C7
L
LLO
O
N
O
N
N
7
N
fu
(O
M
LO
C)
O
00
Ci
00
1
O
m
O
LO
V-
Lf)
M
in
0)
f0
C_
L
O
O
U
0
LO
0
M
N

LL
LL
0
V-
C)
0
M
O
O
N
O
O
O
C
C
O
U
O
O
U
CL
fa
U
a- J
-114
V)
Q)
U
L
�O
W
CL
U
a-+
V
D
cy
L
N
C
N
t
O
0
C
OU
O
O
co
O
U
Ca
O
N
N
�
C cu
En
U
.
L
U LPL
• �
�
� N
a
a
C
L
Q
CD
U
E
N
N
�--,e .O
p �-0
(a
41
U
N
oCcn�U
+ O
C
Q)
ra
w
C
73
2
N
E
ro
Z
ti
N
O
00
O
00
N
U
Z
N
L
C
7
fu
ra
O
L
73
LL
E
ra
O
LO
M
C
O
fu
V
J
O
N
O
N
N
73
ai
fu
ra
M
LO
C)
O
00
Ci
00
1
O
m
O
LO
V-
Lf)
M
in
0)
f0
C_
L
O
O
U
N
N
0

LL
LL
O
a�
cL
r
c
� N
O
N
O
ca
M
0
cu
—
ca O
O
LL p
O
�
i
C 2
O
N
(a r
O
O
O
z
,- 4
O
CL
CIo
G
U
a- J
N
-114
V)
U
L
O
�V)^,
�W
LL
U
a-+
V
cy
LO
U
70
U
�Q
Cl)
� t
�oEn
�o
�^
O
Q)
�O
U
U
P
L L
iL 0 N
N
C
Np
Np
U
lip
a
a
I
N
U O
c0
U O
c0 N
N
O
ate1 V
O
C E
�
CV
Q J
Q J
= E
U
_0
�
��
N
a'
O L-0
c
N
Ul
U
a
.,
Q)
Ln
ra
LL
C
73
2
N
E
ro
Z
ti
N
O
a
00
O
00
N
U
Z
ai
L
4
C
7
fu
ra
O
L
73
LL
E
ra
O
LO
M
C
O
fu
V
O
J
O
N
O
N
N
7
N
fu
(O
M
LO
C)
O
00
Ci
00
1
O
m
O
LO
V-
Lf)
M
in
f0
C_
L
O
O
U
LO
0
LO
(1)