20231315 Ver 1_07_KellyFarms_PJD_Package_20230920_20230921

urisdictional Determination Reauest
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www. saw.usace. army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitPro gram/Contact/CountyLocator. as]2
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: US 421 N Lillington, NC 27546
City, State: Lillington, NC
County: Harnett County, NC
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0620-86-3296.000
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Kimley-Horn; ATTN: William Sullivan, PWS
Mailing Address: 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant)
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Gray Wolf Property, LLC; ATTN: Ed Lynch (Under option to purchase)
Mailing Address: 8325 US Hwy 70 West, Suite B2
Clayton, NC 27520
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
William Sullivan, PWS
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agent'
09/20/2023
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 56.5 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.416068
Longitude:-78.903201
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
14 Vicinity Map
IZI Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
7 NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Re atory-Permit-Proaam/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approvedjurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: williarn Sullivan, PwS;421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC27601
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Harnett County City Lillington
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.416068 Long.:-78.903201
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Fish Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See
Attached
Table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24,000 (Manners)
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Harnett County, 1994
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NC Statewide Orthoimagery, 2021
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
r-
09/20/2023
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Geographic
Estimated amount
Latitude
Longitude
authority to which
Site
of aquatic
Type of aquatic
(decimal
(decimal
the aquatic
number
degrees)
degrees)
resource in review
resource
resource "may be"
area
subject
W1
35.415726
-78.904417
0.13 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
W2
35.417133
-78.905127
0.02 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
W3
35.414641
-78.906848
0.05 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
W4
35.414536
-78.906986
0.02 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
W5
35.414864
-78.907256
0.09 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
W6
35.415004
-78.907053
0.14 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
W7
35.415349
-78.906435
0.47 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
W8
35.415925
-78.907733
0.15 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
W9
35.416289
-78.908742
1.05 ac.
Wetland
Section 404
Non -wetland
S1
35.416948
-78.905723
147 LF
Section 404
Stream
Non -wetland
S2
35.415774
-78.907510
968 LF
Section 404
Stream
Non -wetland
P1
35.416572
-78.904515
3.93 ac.
(Pond)
Section 404

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: (' RAy
W t LF
PROPESTY
Z-L C
Address: t73 2-5
05 lawy
70PsC�ar/0n
, 4-1 e 27 5 z a
Phone:
• 77
Project Name/Description: Kelly Farms
Date: // IS / 20 2-
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attention: Katharine Elks
Field Office: Wilmington Field Office
Re: Wetland Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Gray Wolf Property, LLC hereby designates and authorizes Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to act
in my/our behalf as my/our agent solely for the purpose of processing Jurisdictional Determinations,
Section 404 permits/Section 401 Water Quality Certifications applications, and to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward until successful
completion of the permitting process or revocation by the owner.
In addition, I, the undersigned, a duly authorized optionee of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Authorized this the ! s day of v S
Cc
E p 4YNc R
Print Responsible Party's Name
Stephanie Goss
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Responsible Parry's Signatu

Camels
Creek
C 8
e
I
Ne �
SC
Legend ~ee
U Project Study Area •
Lillington �--�
Harnett County
CHATHAM
/,...� I Project Location WAKE
JOHNSTON
LEE
HARNE FF
MOORE
421 �Q
?7
m•
> o
w
� �N
27
Miles
0 1 2
CUMBERLAND SAMPSON I Georgia � P� Atlantic Ocean
HOKE
Kimley>>> Horn
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Kelly Farms
Harnett County, NC
July 2023

Qtn()M
a) 2m E Z Cj
O
LL p u LL
Q O
2 Y U
O N
Q(ANN LN 12 co
co
NANCY LN oo co
L
N
L
LL
0
dr=�NS;S
r-
a i
Q O
U
N ^,
O V/
N
Z� J

r OEzN
L o
LLo p�C
o
i>o
yYU
r+ l rw -
fA 2
0
U
LO z
r 7
Y �
0
LL-
if
{
Q
O
U
N
^,
V/
O
N
J

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 3/30/2023
Project/Site: Kelly Farms -Stream S1
Latitude: 35.416948
Evaluator: w sullivan & S. Lindstrom
County: Harnett County
Longitude:-78.905723
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 37.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
1Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Mamers
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 16.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 9.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5; Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream S1 is a perennial stream that flows out of a beaver impoundment at the
base of a large pond (P1) and continues offsite. Strong continuity of channel bed
and bank and baseflow was observed within stream S1. Large amounts of iron
oxidizing bacteria and many fish, tadpoles, and algae were observed within the
channel of stream S1.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
Date: 3/30/2023
Project/Site: Kelly Farms - Stream S2
Latitude: 35.415774
Evaluator: w. sullivan & S. Lindstrom
County: Harnett County
Longitude:-78.90751
(Kimley-Horn)
Total Points: 30
Stream Determination (circle one)
1Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Mamers
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 12
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
poolsequence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5; Other = 0
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Stream S2 is a perennial reach that originates offsite and flows northwest
onsite. Strong baseflow was observed throughout the channel of stream S2,
with recent rainfall contributing to the baseflow. Strong amounts of algae and
some iron oxidizing bacteria were observed within the channel of stream S2.
No other biology was observed within stream S2.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-10-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Kelly Farms City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 03/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Gray Wolf Property, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W1-UP
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan, PWS & S. Lindstrom (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: None
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Slight hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.415735 Long:-78.904466 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
The representative upland data point W1-UP was taken approximately 15 from and 3 feet higher in elevation than wetland W1 on a slight hillslope
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1-UP
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
25
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Prunus serotina
15
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Acerrubrum
5
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 70.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
45
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
23
20% of total cover:
9
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FAC species 95 x 3 = 285
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FAC
FACU species 50 x 4 = 200
2.
Symplocos tinctoria
20
Yes
FAC
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
3.
Ilex opaca
10
No
FAC
Column Totals: 165 (A) 555 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.36
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
60
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Rubus allegheniensis
10
Yes
UPL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Arundinaria gigantea
5
Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Onoclea sensibilis 5 Yes FACW
4.
Athyrium asplenioides
5
Yes
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
25
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
15
Yes
FAC
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
3.
Lonicera japonica
5
No
FACU
4.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
No
FACU
5.
Hydrophytic
35
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 2/1 100
Loamy/Clayey Greater than 50% uncoated sand grains
8-12 10YR 3/2 95
10YR 4/6 5
Sandy
12-24 2.5Y 5/3 100
Sandy
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA
149A)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
No surface water or saturation were observed within 24 inches of the soil surface.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-10-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Kelly Farms City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 03/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Gray Wolf Property, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W1-WET
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan, PWS & S. Lindstrom (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: None
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.415726 Long:-78.904417 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bb - Bibb soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
The representative data point for wetland W1 was taken within the wetland approximately 30 feet from pond P1
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Surface water was observed to be approximately
1 inch above deep throughout wetland W1. Saturation and water table were observed at the soil
surface. Water -stained leaves and drift deposits were observed throughout the wetland.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1-WET
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Ilex opaca
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
30
Yes
FACU
5
No
FAC
35
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1. Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
3. Ilex opaca
10
Yes
FAC
4. Ulmus americana
5
No
FAC
5. Magnolia virginiana
5
No
FACW
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 25
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2. Woodwardia areolata
3. Athyrium asplenioides
4. Boehmeria cylindrica
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3. Smilax laurifolia
4.
5.
50 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 10
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 87.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
FAC species 85 x 3 = 255
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 195 (A) 515 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.64
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
40 Yes FACW Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
20 Yes OBL present, unless disturbed or problematic.
10 No FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
10 No FACW Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
80 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 16 height.
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
5 No FACW
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 100
Loamy/Clayey
6-18 10YR 3/1 95
10YR 4/6
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)—Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA
149A)
Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
—Dark
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Surface water was observed to be approximately 1 inch above deep throughout wetland W1. Saturation and water table were observed at the soil
surface.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-10-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Kelly Farms City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 03/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Gray Wolf Property, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W2-UP
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan, PWS & S. Lindstrom (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: None
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 0-4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.417125 Long:-78.905093 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: BnB - Blaney sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
The representative upland data point W2-UP was taken approximately 10 feet from and 4 feet higher than wetland W2 on the berm of pond P1
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Acer rubrum
3. Quercus nigra
4. Ilex opaca
5. Liriodendron tulipifera
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 23
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Vaccinium sp.
2. Aronia melanocarpa
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Magnolia grandiflora
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute
Dominant
% Cover
Species?
15
Yes
15
Yes
5
No
5
No
5
No
45 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
idicator
Status
FAC
FAC
FAC
FAC
FACU
9
10 Yes
FAC
10 Yes
FAC
5 No
FAC
5 No
FAC
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
i VA
50% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Vitis rotundifolia
2. Smilax laurifolia
3.
4.
5.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
FAC species 80 x 3 = 240
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 110 (A) 310 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.82
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is:53.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20 Yes FACW Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 4 height.
10 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACW
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-2 7.5YR 2.5/3 100
Sandy
2-10 10YR 4/4 90
7.5YR 5/6 10 C M
Loamy/Clayey
10-24 10YR 5/3 85
10YR 5/8 15 C M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)—Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
—Dark
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
A 24 inch soil sample was taken on the berm of pond P1. Sandy clay soils were observed 2 inches below the soil surface with clay soils at the bottom
of the soil profile.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-10-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Kelly Farms City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 03/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Gray Wolf Property, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: W2-WET
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan, PWS & S. Lindstrom (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: None
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-1%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.417133 Long:-78.905127 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: BnB - Blaney sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
The representative data point for wetland W2 was taken within the wetland depression approximately 15 feet from the berm of pond P1 and 80 feet
from a maintained roadway corridor (US-421).
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
X Iron Deposits (135) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Pockets of standing surface water were observed to be approximately 4 inches above the ground surface. Saturation and water table was observed at
the soil surface. Strong iron deposits and water -stained leaves were observed throughout wetland
W2. Wetland hydrology is primarly fed by roadside
runoff and seepage from pond P1.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-WET
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
5 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
5 =Total Cover
OBL species 30 x 1 = 30
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FAC species 5 x 3 = 15
1.
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
2.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 60 (A) 105 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.75
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Juncus effusus
30 Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Arundinaria gigantea
20 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
50 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/1 100
Loamy/Clayey
4-16 2.5Y 5/2 90
10YR 5/6 10 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
16-24 2.5Y 5/2 85
10YR 5/6 15 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Reduced Vertic (F18)
_Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)—Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA
149A)
Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
—Dark
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Redox concentration increase with depth
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-10-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Kelly Farms City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 03/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Gray Wolf Property, LLC State: NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan, PWS & S. Lindstrom (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: None
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Slight hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 0-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 34.416047 Long:-78.908428 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: BnB - Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes; Bb - Bibb soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
A representative upland data point for wetlands W3, W4, W5, W6, W7, W8, and W9 was taken approximately 25 feet from and 2 feet higher in
elevation than wetland W9 on a slight hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No primary or secondary hydrology indicators were observed.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: -W-51-w-8-UP
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acerrubrum
15
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Prunus serotina
5
No
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
70
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
FAC species 100 x 3 = 300
1.
Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FAC
FACU species 70 x 4 = 280
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
3.
Acerrubrum
5
No
FAC
Column Totals: 175 (A) 605 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.46
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
45
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
23
20% of total cover:
9
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Athyrium asplenioides
15
Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Rubus allegheniensis
5
Yes
UPL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Lonicera japonica
30
Yes
FACU
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5
Hydrophytic
40
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W3W4.W5W6W7W8W9LP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3/1 100
Loamy/Clayey
6-12 10YR 4/4 90
10YR 5/8 10 C M
Loamy/Clayey
12-24 2.5Y 5/4 100
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
No surface water or saturation were observed within 24 inches of the soil surface.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp: 1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-10-20; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Kelly Farms City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 03/30/2023
Applicant/Owner: Gray Wolf Property, LLC State: NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): W. Sullivan, PWS & S. Lindstrom (Kimley-Horn) Section, Township, Range: None
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 133A Lat: 35.416289 Long:-78.908742 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: BnB - Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes; Bb - Bibb soils, frequently flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
A representative data point for wetlands W3, W4, W5, W6, W7, W8, and W9 was taken with wetland W9. Wetlands W3, W4, W5, W3, W4, W5, W6,
W7, W8, and W9 are bottomland hardwood wetlands located along stream S2.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Pockets of standing surface water were observed to be 1 inch deep, and saturation and water table
were observed at the soil surface. Drift deposits,
drainage patterns, and water -stained leaves were oberved throughout the wetland at the data point location.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Acer rubrum
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FACU
20
Yes
FAC
20
Yes
FAC
60
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1. Ligustrum sinense
30
Yes
FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
3. Ilex opaca
5
No
FAC
4. Magnolia virginiana
5
No
FACW
5.
6.
7.
8.
50
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Arundinaria gigantea
50
Yes
2.
Athyrium asplenioides
10
No
3.
Boehmeria cylindrica
5
No
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
65
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
30
Yes
2.
Lonicera japonica
30
Yes
3.
4.
5.
60
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
IN
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
FAC species 125 x 3 = 375
FACU species 50 x 4 = 200
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 235 (A) 695
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.96
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
FACW I 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
FAC present, unless disturbed or problematic.
FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
13 height.
FAC
FACU
12 1 Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W,w4/W5W6WVWWMWET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 3/1 90
10YR 5/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Saturation
Depth (inches): 16
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Could not auger and collect data below 16 inches within the soil profiel due to saturation in the soils.
ENG FORM 6116-2, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0