760003_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201130

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 760003 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS760003 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Randolph Region: Winston-Salem
Date of Visit: 11/30/2020 Entry Time: 10:50 am Exit Time: 12:50 pm Incident#:
Farm Name: Applefield Farm-Lower&Upper Owner Email: [e-mail]
Owner: Philip Faucette Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7725 Friendship Rd Browns Summit NC 27214
Physical Address: 4599 Riverside Dr Ramseur NC 27316
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: N G Purvis Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 37' 15" Longitude: 79' 36'55"
Hwy 220 south from GSO.Take Hwy 64 east to Hwy 42 and turn right(east)towards Coleridge.Turn right onto Riverside Rd.
Exactly 1.2 miles turn left into farm. 3/4 mile down the road. Farm is at 4599 Riverside. Fam#336.879.6500
Question Areas:
Dischrge&Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, &Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Philip W Faucette Operator Certification Number: 20372
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Craig Wilson 336-465-5303
On-site representative Craig Wilson 336-465-5303
Primary Inspector: Rebecca D Chandler Phone: [phone]
Inspector Signature: Date: 12/29/2020
Secondary Inspector(s): AB94CAC558544E9...
Inspection Summary:
21. Soils due again 2022.
24. Calibration due 2021.
25. 2019 sludge survey? Not onsite, 2020 sludge survey was completed 6/2020. Upper: 0.2 Lower: 0.42
Lower getting close to POA requirement, consider making plans in coming years for cleanout.
21. Check 2019 yields-done and completed.
21. Missing some 120-minute inspection initials, DWR to provide IRR-3
21. F4 needs soil resample.
7. Lower lagoon need weed/vegetation control on upland sides to be able to inspect whole system. Piping (drain pipe)on lower
near recycle pump needs repair
1. 2. 30. Cleanout at House 8 on Upper had previously backup with flow evidence downslope into grassy area, unlikely that it
made it to surface water. Cleanout behind lower houses previous backup with evidence downslope, activly backed up and flowing
downslop during inspection. Unlikely that it made to surface water. Flush pit behind lower house#1 had previously overflowed
and run downslope. No notification of the previous backups was received by the regional office.
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWS760003 Owner: Philip Faucette Facility Number: 760003
Inspection Date: 11/30/20 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine- Feeder to Finish 12,400 I 10,781
Total Design Capacity: 12,400
Total SSLW: 1,674,000
Waste Structures
Effective Built Closed Designated Observed
Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon LOWER 05/31/2005 D3/16/1994 19.00 29.00
Lagoon UPPER 05/31/2005 10/13/1994 16.00 27.00
Page 2 of 5

Permit: AWS760003 Owner: Philip Faucette Facility Number: 760003
Inspection Date: 11/30/20 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn(Grain)
Page 3 of 5

Permit: AWS760003 Owner: Philip Faucette Facility Number: 760003
Inspection Date: 11/30/20 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 2 Fescue(Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain(Wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Soil analysis? ❑
Waste Transfers? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit: AWS760003 Owner: Philip Faucette Facility Number: 760003
Inspection Date: 11/30/20 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment(PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit, N ❑ ❑ ❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5