990012_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230712

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
M
Visit: Compliance Inspection O Operation Review p Structure Evaluation
O Technical Assistance
or Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: *_ �M Arrival Time:�7 i , Departure Tine:� County: Re ►on:FarmName: hCA Grove, Owner Email:
Owner Name: �h�y n,e, V Phone:
Mailing Address: O � ��� T\(�L�60 1__:�A q—. YA
Physical Address: Co � ��1`���J l ,�� , � F C Id n C/
Facility Contact. e Title: IPhonel:y
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number�� 1�31 d,5
Back-up Operator: Lv\Q��� �Q �m 1 h e�rY 1a1-) Certification Number:�\()Jys 1�2
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
U5 t�w/ 6-1 —2 RA�,l qyDvo� Vzk- --�Cgavdp(bvc 0,�I. 4J raY-V)A 6(\
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow C
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca acit Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey POUItS
Other
DischarEes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State'? (If yes, notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)'?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
D3 ' ere there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes No NA 0 NE
of the State other than from a Tisc urge.
Page 1 o f 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:'� I
—r
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: t�4( G(� `� �vV 1
Spillway?: �/ ✓�
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): V,tWe�yb
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrie structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
VDo any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): cU C \C3t l.'�tL �ll�'1?fAn � �.�`Cl F�\krie-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving•q�ops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
JD oes record keeping need improvement ❑ Yes (� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis rWaste Transfers Weather Code
a nfall t9Stocki Crop Monthly and 1" Rain all Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N No JJ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 51122120020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No M NA ONE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first Survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 k0lirs and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? IMMI
I A
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA 0 NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
IS ? A vq,. arm , rQA NCQA,
c v� h rn� c ►� a�a-1 . UXA�l b >x
� M
Uv em- -�l o vv WS►n S+thu5 �cn�G 1 cz
1. �1'�Q.I�CY-�l'� l��C�r�QS ,rye W i vt��r• �C'c.z- s-�-.�� +N�I n,1 . �l
r\AdCA.k'�j cafi Dyk e d�c� • �� k� r.�k�
17
C Ay
l
,� ( cum
2 �:� V Z.
r (� ��
Reviewer/Inspector Name: a W P W0VA
Milne:,
!d ��
Reviewer/Inspector Sig u Date:
Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020
0,Y) 11