HomeMy WebLinkAbout790001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211023 Division of Water Resource.v
Facility Number H 9 - ] 0 Division of Soil and Watei ►servation
`��' 0 Other Agency
M
Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
or Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: (� Arrival Time:l Departure Time: County: egion:
Farm Name: �v1�lV l S Owner Email:
Owner Name: M\AJ y4a I K—C- Phone:
Mailing Address: -t 30 l /� a � G
Physical Address: - r L --�( Is Jam` 'lb "-
Facility Contact: Title: Phone: v V
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: �{J� 1 �Q Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Nay � dS\/i I Iz ►�d �( �5g 7 L 15g I-Iw�
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I JLaver Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder L Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca acit Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued
Facility Number: —J l - ( ) t I jDate of inspection:
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? X,
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? 7
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents T
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [:]Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need ent? If yes,check the a1212ropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Fre oar Waste Ana is s ❑ ers Weather Code
Rainfa BS+eelc-i�g Crop ie 120 Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspec udge
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Yes No NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:] No �.NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued
Facility Number: - ni jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste apl ,ation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. to
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an active l =operat� charge? Yes }No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. LN
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: Ix
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES,answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain`situations(use additional pages as necessary).
1,J 0-V) G v\ S 1 c
/�.�.�v,c-� �i r��fu<< `�V�-►SSA n , � � � Q
Reviewer/Inspector Name: C C'�' CA,ti h
Phone: �b,��—��C7 J
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3
511212020