Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout790001_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20211023 Division of Water Resource.v Facility Number H 9 - ] 0 Division of Soil and Watei ►servation `��' 0 Other Agency M Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance or Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: (� Arrival Time:l Departure Time: County: egion: Farm Name: �v1�lV l S Owner Email: Owner Name: M\AJ y4a I K—C- Phone: Mailing Address: -t 30 l /� a � G Physical Address: - r L --�( Is Jam` 'lb "- Facility Contact: Title: Phone: v V Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: �{J� 1 �Q Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Nay � dS\/i I Iz ►�d �( �5g 7 L 15g I-Iw� Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish I JLaver Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder L Non-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Ca acit Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults Other Discharees and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: —J l - ( ) t I jDate of inspection: Waste Collection &Treatment 4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ONE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.) 6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? X, If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 7 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ( No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents T 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP [:]Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need ent? If yes,check the a1212ropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application Weekly Fre oar Waste Ana is s ❑ ers Weather Code Rainfa BS+eelc-i�g Crop ie 120 Minute Inspections onthly and 1" Rainfall Inspec udge 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Yes No NA ❑ NE 23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:] No �.NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - ni jDate of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste apl ,ation equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. to ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an active l =operat� charge? Yes }No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. LN 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: Ix 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES,answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain`situations(use additional pages as necessary). 1,J 0-V) G v\ S 1 c /�.�.�v,c-� �i r��fu<< `�V�-►SSA n , � � � Q Reviewer/Inspector Name: C C'�' CA,ti h Phone: �b,��—��C7 J Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Page 3 of 3 511212020