300010_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20180711

Division of Water Resources.
Facility Number �� - I O Division of Soil and Water l .ervation
O Other Agency "V
Type of Visit: qkCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: \ Arrival Time: Departure Time: 'Q 47,7 County: t QJ Region:
Farm Name: DeQy_y\ W :RLa� Owner Email:
Owner Name: J V a\4 h ej W L Phone: QCi
Mailing Address: 41 QQ 11, k/Mv, /V,DOLSVi (V L a](� D
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: V V V)_ I Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: V Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
o � r 6
Location of Farm: Latitude:" � Gj� y6 Longitude:
1440 V"I yo L9 CAlnw " • rV W+-b Lh
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes K.
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Q Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Ti�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: UPS p
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): I�
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes V�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ONE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes f� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Q
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 7N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable 0 Yes T� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis %Soil Analysis 1:1�4teste-�tsosfers Weather Code
Rainfall Stocking EgQopwiolder Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes EANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No MNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of Inspection: rj 1 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste appi._ucion equipment as required by the permit? i ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No Z NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ;n\No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
J
(�-2 V.C';Y) ()CAU' ,e, InSaCAl1e(i� �Z5 , flnc+�,� yGv f.
J
CM49gk-h6A JUb +�AAS \IeUY— CSA(.cbrU �C, � { USk_
-�-ro t I
OA&Akoy V�-
tf�vs� .9�0 de ac t(�►� ��o � U� �=FerS , �� ny �5 0 �noi�t�i n
� J
\Nor -tz I�>c 6Aaftalij frrn orgzA rn ,
- � � ,_.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: tC a1 �(/✓ Phone:'j?�6-~� �f j � f/
Reviewer/Inspector Sign Date: l
Page 3 of 3 21412015