Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820260_Routine Inspection_20230915It(Ia v, ((ii{{l$I� I fjk y, � �fja-��( lyili�lk s j , Type of Visit: ompliance Inspection Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: } Arrival Time: Departure Time: O 3d County: Region: F2d Farm Name: /1,54- K /tl.(.!� � N; Owner Email: OwnerName:_ yvyhtiC Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Onsite Representative: /, /® Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: r�0 Certification Number: .4, 3 $—/ Certification Number: Longitude: t�;� kill d' IidEf ill �11r$ a Wean to Finish La er aiWean ID to Feeder D Non -La er ai Calf Feeder to Finish Eft airy Heifer Farrow to Wea n p Cow Farrow to Feeder '`" Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow i# E� tyli. $,ii•i•�� Turkeys i I� # 1 Turkey Poults t''liE�jjl it'd �I( untOther Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _ d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 4'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �yNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: ,2- - 0 I I Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑-fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in):a 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes -0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑"No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2-No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes ,0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Yes L—=No ❑ Yes [�PNo ❑ Yes allo ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes Q-�o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [2440 ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes EfrNo 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 00 ❑NA ❑NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey mm�mm ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: plod 1Date of Inspection: / . g� 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �/ No ElNA ❑ NE the appropriate boxes) below. /— ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes .E�o ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes _Q-j o ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes LjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the ReviewerQnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? n Yes F,_j'Ko n NA I —I NE Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: 9/Q J5' � Date: 511212020 FACILITY#: FARM NAME: r/J �l LAGOON LEVEL�� PERMIT - DUE EVERY 5 YEARS - EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS . - CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL - - OIC CARD YES OR NO - WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (420) SOIL TYPES CROP TYPES ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT -GOODFOR6/0 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER �j DATE ° II�II i� NITROGEN LEVEL .0 � DATE y !l ! a' NITROGEN LEVEL DATE lL, NITROGEN LEVEL EVERY 3 YEARS: P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400) PH (Note R4 or less) Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) SOIL REPORT (*21) DATE Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RA IRR2 (#21) NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CALBRIATION (#24) EACH REEL SHOULD BE C BRpTED EVERY OTHER YEAR - DATE OF CALIBRATION ''��//JJ���y FLOW RATES RAIN FALL p2q -INITIAL AFTER I" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED. %11 , I��LUDGEf#21s251 -DUE,.EV f YEAR: DATF 6 O: �-i P: U v % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: '� P: b(oS— % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0:. P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (a22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY. *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS _ PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS_ TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens March III- Ends September 30th Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 13t-Ends March 31st Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th Cotton: Opens March 151^ - Ends August 1st Rye: Opens September 1,t-Ends March 31 It Oats: Opens September 1-t- Ends April 151h - Wheat: Opens September 1st- Ends April 30th Soybeans: Opens April 1st -Ends September15th Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31 It Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st