20220939 Ver 2_Griffon Pointe Additional Information - 090623_20230906

Additional Information
For Griffon Pointe
Subdivision
Lillington, NC
Harnett County

Wetland Sketch
& Impact Maps

uoyvaupap spin;a,y
aguwd uofJup
I fo l 1 -----
21,78HAN L 77HS
¢zoz 9 ,ag
31tl0
0
C �
'O C
C N
N � C
II
U U LL
L
a 1�
13 'NOOOAY HtlOV
Ps .1suq
:As NM
£ "°. !"aa
SS3 '3d nHO11N ll00S
LOtl1NOO 1SR 310S 1V1N3NNOdl
z u°1s1 ea
LZOZ 19 q..Id- : 3
mlmgrs I-A'O
ME ON '461a1°a
'ON NOISN3a
pooh uued goo[
1 6A= —.. : a03 O38tld
929GZ' OAT `YVI27YA AVl1bAg
90a JIIAS
9MY7 79V777d 7A70LS7Xti7 1091
V Yd7VLA79HAOUTAVg 779HDI-IW
r--
. . . . -
J.
z �
r / J
_
/
.92
om�o
C�
U
boo `�tCL
� CL
Q
a
C
O
a
W
1
T
ysnp���
� M
I—
I
I
I
I

d.N s;..d 111.....0
(11 SSYHJ) :lOVLNOO aoA3naf5
UIS S.LNIOd VO991219 ----- r w!s!"sa SSl'3d'113N011N 1103S 90.91,0 .ill TAIUVA AVAbnd
Z .a�ssea :IOtl1NOO 1SEN310S 110S aNV d33NION3 SOzi +7.LIAS
j' f o rzoz'azzlm :31va HiVV7 VDV77IA ViVO1STYV7 IOSI
_____ Icll!w9�S l..!6po 90azz JN '46aW21 ! ! 60-0
'
939iYlliv LVVHS aa�aX� dsoroi Vd 7V.L1VVNAIOUTAN7777H�.LHP
3LV0 'ON NOISIA3a oil Tb PMH -�M1 : a01 03atld3dd
O
- O
'Z
¢ e� •ay^,
_ 4-
'r [31,
` A
R
l`
,r
J� -
K -
0
-
_-
'f..::Cis -
- - rt,•p
- •Y
_ygt:'`5y
t� z
Z <_
Q
Z
o
="
M (nm
- s
ia. W Z
W Z
..� 4
_ `tom '�"•;' �''%,',• ,.,Y.a .
F-
- Q
z W w
- -
W
0
Y.
—- N
lii� y
;h = =. y 'r.
(A x<• f� -
a _
u w,• _
J
p s, -A
- a
^•e
2 -
_ •( �1,. 2 S
`eG''
__Z,
tier ' '�(., ;-•: � `= '- -
Qg
4' yy
ter=:
-
F __M. •: ai%: 71j itlf+,ii!',"'�:,:-"-,x.(`'��'`�:r..,. - - -
- _ "•O
- ".1@5, ,-y,. :�'i'i +%i'J` _ )'re".�'_Sjl3 - - •;i die
X.
al
pr
r-t -
-°ti I.
yt -
Q ^;'•.„
t
4.
42
xl -

(II SSVHd)
TIS V.LVIOd M0991213
-9 fo a
939MMV IVVHS
LZI
I-S -MIA
c wls"d
Z ..-a
pjpqrS ..!6po
--------------
-----------
-- -------------------
----------
------ ------------------- ----- -------- ----
----------
--- ------ ----- ---- --
------ --------
---------------- ----
-----------------
--------------------- ---------- ------ ------------ ----
SSI '3d '1131131111 1103S 90.91'0 JA7 TATIUVA AVAbAd
10VIN03 ISE 310S 110S aNV d33NION3 -9 0 z 171 if] s
zoz qz KIT : 31V0 ViVV7 79V771A 7iV01RVYV7 10.91
Oazz jN '46jaf-21 P-8 77
X­d Oro' 311 �B-pl-H -�al Vd 7VlJVVNA10WIA
: aOJ 03aVd3dd 'jV-V -VHJLIN
LL
(3
U)
LL
LL
C)
z
ry
<
LU
<
a_
z
ry
<
0
o
a_
z
z
LU
LU
<
a-
(D
F
LU
LU
C)
<
C)
<
LU
a_
a_
73;
z
73;
Lu
Lu
LU
a_
F-
to
to
— ------- --
-X/
-------------------
- -------------- -----------------------
-------- ----------
------------- --------------------------------
---------------- -------------------
- --- ----- ------------- I --- --------------------- ----- -----------
--- ------------------------------------------
----- -----------
-
.0 -------
-C� , - - - - -- -------- '---- I-, -------------
----------- ----- ;;--, -- - - - - - - - - - ------- - ---
--- ---------- % --------------- ------------ -- -- ------------
sez
----- ------ ---------- --------------
----------

ON ;;--H _____ laS ,aMm
(11 SSYHJ) :10tl1N00 a0A3nans
UIS S.LN10d H0991219 ----- SSl Id'113N011N 1100S 90.91,0 .ill `VLVIUVA AVAbnd
Z vo�s�a 10tl1N001SEN310S 110S aNtl d33NION3 SOzi ,7,LIAS
j' f o �' fzoz'ezKIT :31tla HiVV7 VDV77IA TV01SVYV7 IOSI
_____ Ioll!w9�S I..!6po Oazz JN '46jap21 ! ! 60-3
Y-VUlff"V L77HS aaOBOro'Vd 7V1JVV A10WIAN7 77,7HJLILP
31tl0 'ON N05V�3a TUP10
'777 uppN aua!1 : a0J 03atld3ad
--------- 3 -- --
- --- -- --- 3 � ��� yam' � •-�`��_ ���-_--;
= _
., N
I -- --- - -----
t'.
Q'
F f, LU
U-
--• ---,- - ----- -
w �
LL
w
d
U)
w
w
CO
J
J
0)
0)
M
O
z
ry
Q
w
Q
a_z
ry
Q
O
o
L
a
w
z
Q
a
O
wLU
J
Q
Q
w
a
a
z
w
w
LU
F
w
a_
F-
to
to
0
1
1
1

S ;..dual
ON "Rl'�'^�0 ;;--H _____ laS ,aMm
(11 SSYHJ) :10tl1N00 a0A3nans
UIS S.LN10d H0991219 ----- SSl Id'113N011N 1100S 90.91,0 .ill `VLVIUVA AVAbnd
Z vo�s�a 10tl1N001SEN310S 110S aNtl d33NION3 -90 z ,7,Lif] S
j' f o fzoz'ezKIT :31tla HiVV7 VDV77IA TV01SVYV7 IOSI
_____ Ioll!w9�S I..!6po Oazz JN '46jap21 1 160-3
Y-Vff1ff1)V L77HS aaOBOro'Vd 7V1JV9 )V0WIAN7 77,7HJLILP
31tl0 'ON N05V�3a TUP10
'777 uppN aua!1 : a0J 03atld3ad
•
--
w
,
------------ `,.--
----.
LL
LL
d
U)
C)
Q
a
w
(fir
W
J
(fir—
z
LU
Z
Q
ry
LU
LU
a_
a
0
-------------
VL
4
4
4

g ;—d-1
ON "Rl'�'^�0 ;;--H _____ laS ,aMm
(11 SSYHJ) :10tl1N00 a0A3nans
UIS S.LN10d H0991219 ----- SSl Id'113N011N 1100S 90.91,0 .ill ` ATIUVA AVAbnd
Z vo�s�a 10tl1N001SEN310S 110S aNtl d33NION3 -90 z ,7,Lif] S
j' f o fzoz'ezKIT :31tla HiVV7 VDV77IA TV01SVYV7 IOSI
_____ Ioll!w9�S I..!6po Oazz JN '46jap21 ! ! 60-3
Y-VUlff"V L77HS aaOBOro'Vd 7V1JV9 A10WIAN7 77,7HJLILP
31tl0 'ON N051/�3a TUP10
'777 uppN aua!1 : a0J 03atld3ad
U)
�_
e--------------------
----
/
-------------
----------- -
-----------
-------
LL
LL
(7
U)
Lc)
rn
v
C)
C)
Q
a
n
z
w Q
cD -
w
J
z
z
LU
Z
Q
ry
LU
LU
a_
a
0
Sllt/AM
T�
AAA
-------- "---------------
-----------
-------------
----------------------
- -----.--
-
-----------------
__

Wetland and
Upland Data
Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Griffin Pointe s/d City/County: Harnett Sampling Date: 4-14-2022
Applicant/Owner: Tierra Holdings LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wet 2
Investigator(s): Mitchell Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear slope Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: 35.4019 Long:-78.8643 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb loam NWI classification: hardwood headwater forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No x
within a Wetland? Yes X No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No x
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑✓
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
LJ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
El Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
a
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No X Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X
No X Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wet 2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
Nyssa sylvatica
40
YES
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2
Quercus nigra
25
Yes
FAC
3
Acer rubrum
20
yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Pinus taeda
10
No
FAC
5
Acer rubrum
10
No
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
110
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
60
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Quercus nigra
25
YES
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
Acer rubrum
20
YES
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3
Pinus taeda
15
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
Ligustrum sinense
10
No
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Arundinaria gigantea
10
No
Facw
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
Ilex opaca
6
No
Fac
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
86
= Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
33
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
35
Yes
Facw
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
Fac
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
Fac
Woodwardia aerolata
8
No
Obl
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
Woodwardia virginica
8
No
ON
height.
6
Liriodendron tulipifera
6
No
Facu
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
76
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
1
Toxicodendron radicans
6
Yes
Fac
2
Smilax rotundifolia
4
Yes
Fac
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
100
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wet 2
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc
0-12 2.5y 3/1 100 2.5y 6/1 5 D M
7-15 2.5y 6/2 90 2.5y 3/1 10 MS M
Texture Remarks
Loam soil falling out of auger at 12"
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
.❑,
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)❑-I Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑,
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) El Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
.❑,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
.®, Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Griffin Pointe s/d City/County: Harnett Sampling Date: 4-14-2022
Applicant/Owner: Tierra Holdings LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wet 2
Investigator(s): Mitchell Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear slope Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: 35.4019 Long:-78.8643 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb loam NWI classification: hardwood headwater forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No x
within a Wetland? Yes X No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No x
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
®
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
LJ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
®
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
El Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
M Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
a
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No X Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X
No X Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wet 2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
Nyssa sylvatica
40
YES
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2
Quercus nigra
25
Yes
FAC
3
Acer rubrum
20
yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Pinus taeda
10
No
FAC
5
Acer rubrum
10
No
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
110
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
60
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Quercus nigra
25
YES
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
Acer rubrum
20
YES
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3
Pinus taeda
15
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
Ligustrum sinense
10
No
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Arundinaria gigantea
10
No
Facw
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
Ilex opaca
6
No
Fac
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
86
= Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
33
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
35
Yes
Facw
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
Fac
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
Fac
Woodwardia aerolata
8
No
Obl
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
Woodwardia virginica
8
No
ON
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
76
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
1
Toxicodendron radicans
6
Yes
Fac
2
Smilax rotundifolia
4
Yes
Fac
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
100
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wet 2
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc
0-12 2.5y 3/1 100 2.5y 6/1 5 D M
7-15 2.5y 6/2 90 2.5y 3/1 10 MS M
Texture Remarks
Loam soil falling out of auger at 12"
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
.❑,
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)❑-I Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑,
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) El Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
.❑,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
.®, Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Griffin Pointe s/d City/County: Harnett Sampling Date: 4-14-2022
Applicant/Owner: Tierra Holdings LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wet 2
Investigator(s): Mitchell Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear slope Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: 35.4019 Long:-78.8643 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb loam NWI classification: hardwood headwater forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
®
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
LJ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
®
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
El Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
M Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
a
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No X Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wet 2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
Nyssa sylvatica
40
YES
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2
Quercus nigra
25
Yes
FAC
3
Acer rubrum
20
yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Pinus taeda
10
No
FAC
5
No
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
110
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
60
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Quercus nigra
25
YES
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
Acer rubrum
20
YES
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3
Pinus taeda
15
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
Ligustrum sinense
10
No
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Arundinaria gigantea
10
No
Facw
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
Ilex opaca
6
No
Fac
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
86
= Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
33
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
35
Yes
Facw
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
Fac
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
Fac
Woodwardia aerolata
8
No
Obl
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
Woodwardia virginica
8
No
ON
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
76
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
1
Toxicodendron radicans
6
Yes
Fac
2
Smilax rotundifolia
4
Yes
Fac
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
100
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wet 2
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc
0-12 2.5y 3/1 100 2.5y 6/1 5 D M
7-15 2.5y 6/2 90 2.5y 3/1 10 MS M
Texture Remarks
Loam soil falling out of auger at 12"
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
.❑,
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)❑-I Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑,
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) El Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
.❑,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
.®, Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Griffin Pointe s/d City/County: Harnett Sampling Date: 4-14-2022
Applicant/Owner: Tierra Holdings LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wet 2
Investigator(s): Mitchell Environmental Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): Linear slope Slope (%): 3
Subregion (LRR or MLR,,,. LRR P Lat: 35.4019 Long:-78.8643 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb loam NWI classification: hardwood headwater forest
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes x No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
®
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
LJ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
®
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
El Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
M Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
a
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wet 2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
Nyssa sylvatica
40
YES
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2
Quercus nigra
25
Yes
FAC
3
Acer rubrum
20
yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Pinus taeda
10
No
FAC
5
No
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
110
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
60
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
FAC species x 3 =
1
Quercus nigra
25
YES
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
Acer rubrum
20
YES
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3
Pinus taeda
15
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4
Ligustrum sinense
10
No
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5
Arundinaria gigantea
10
No
Facw
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
Ilex opaca
6
No
Fac
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
86
= Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
33
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Arundinaria gigantea
35
Yes
Facw
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
Fac
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
Fac
Woodwardia aerolata
8
No
Obl
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
Woodwardia virginica
8
No
ON
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
76
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover:
40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' x 30' )
1
Toxicodendron radicans
6
Yes
Fac
2
Smilax rotundifolia
4
Yes
Fac
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
100
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wet 2
to
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
0-12 2.5y 3/1 100
to document the indicator or confirm the absence
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
Loam soil falling out of auger at 12"
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑,
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
.❑,
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
.❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)❑-I Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑,
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) El Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
.❑,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
.®, Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Vicinity and
Topo Map

�
�
-
|
Ln
Lu LU
/
2
% � 0 0
\ $ — _ ! /
/ m =
/\° \
%
§:
� z§{
�
§LLI
L«f
f �§0
| §e
;,..- ƒƒ) %
~ _ / )#/ of
CO r g U) 2
f oI0 e \ L
w /�a \ / } ) j /
\\�
77{ /
/)[ 7
�/\ �
2 cu �
\ \\§ \ o
1pf
) k \ \ /
.m
�
0
� � *
L
2 a
� t \
` / \ R 3 \
J 2 / ± §
� �I
?
/
q \
L
Ln
3
.3sn IV9]]11O]ION

URATHAAR�ET
A ry96•
v
0, _
,372,
c ..e ■ 3L "'lfff O
t7�
.. a 288'
E y T2,
• e 6d
a 2TS ,
248'
� 2aq ■
a
y

21
� w
o r
1�11�N A'" i,�eds War '

21
20
19

21
20
19

21
� w
o r
1�11�N A'" i,�eds War '

iPaC and
H POweb

R"'M H POD Find address/historic resource e1
am, House
Audience
• "NI Y
HT0880�Hause -- HT06827WosNiev Memorial
e eGardens
c.t-fW0881 f�iause i '-
HT * WK4--Salmon r' L
House HT6878 House
It
J421'
HTOBT3 House -
* IT 08.74 H ouse
1
4 ■ HT
A
HT0871 House
K
-78.852766 35.403493 Degrees
_ HT0927 House
C�
pone 5r 4Y
Paw Green Ale rnorf
HT0877/ House al Hwy
?T HT0926 Mouse
HT092 Mar Count+ HT092.3 House �• Roardin-g"Hor�ie' andFarmr,HT0922 House yi�� 14H
All
*HT0921 House ~,
6T0920 House
9
Rode❑Ln
Mcoougafd Rd
HT0916 House
HT 0919 Feed mill
04, VS
d2 7
x t
t
0.2nni

IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
F 1 �
Location
Harnett County, North Carolina
J�
he Do Cga iQ
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F

Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
�o�
FOB

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and.,
project -specific information is often required. �NA
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action'' for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so). V
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species-1 and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries2).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under theirjurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Birds
NAME STATUS

Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Fishes
NAME
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this s ecies The location of the
Endangered
STATUS
SAT
STATUS
End
p
critical habitat is not available.
llttps://ecos.fws.gov/ecpLpecies/6063
Flovvering Plants
Im
fo_�40
NAME A CJ
STATUS
_
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
Wherever found = ( N
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.goy/ec plspec ies/2747
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.

Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
http://www,fws.goy/m igrato rybi rds/pd f/management/nati ❑nwi desta nda rdco n se rvation measu res.pd f
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC} list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds an your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip;
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA
.................................. ......
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
I .................. ......
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
......................................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
..............................................................................................................
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
.........................................................................................
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
........................................................................................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
...................................................................................
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
.........................................................................................
''BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
............................................................................................................
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
.............................................................................................................
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
........................................................................................................

American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds elsewhere
0
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report. - _ k
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cells) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.) A
taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1, The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.

To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events far that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information, The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
SPECTS
American Kestrel
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC} only
in particular Bird
........................................... .
Conservation
.....................................
Regions (BCRs) in
the continental
. ............................... .. .......
U$A)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
...... ................... . . .
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
. ..-..._................. .
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
.............. •.......... .--._....
range in the
..................................
continental USA
.............................................
and Alaska.)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
...................
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental USA
.............................................
and Alaska.)
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort no data
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN jUL AUG SEP f - r•: _ _
WON^ moo
'Oeo
-V Ilkiiri moo

Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
............................................
(CON) (This is a
..........................................
Bird of
Conservation
.....................................
Concern (BCC)
........................................
throughout its
........................................
range in the
..................................
continental USA
.............................................
and Alaska.)
..................................
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site. V�
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern {B). and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location. -, \ N
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKIN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 1 Qkm grid celI(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.

What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information ❑n
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study_ and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a sunset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
Fish hatcheries
0
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
i
WETLAND INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
This can happen when the National Wetlands Inventory {NWI} map service is unavailable, or for very
large projects that intersect many wetland areas. Try again, or visit the NWI map to view wetlands at
this location.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.

Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
1�01\qw
�o�
FOB

Avoidance &
Minimization

Avoidance and Minimization
During the design and redesign process for Griffon Pointe subdivision, measures were taken to
minimize impacts to streams and wetlands. Avoidance of wetlands and streams is not practical
for this site, otherwise upland portions of the property would not be assessable. Proposed
stream and/or wetland crossings for roadway infrastructure were planned for areas where
streams and/or wetlands are the narrowest, to the maximum extent possible. Furthermore,
side slopes of the road were reduced from 3:1 to 2:1, where practical, as to minimize the fill/cut
slopes and grading needed for the road crossings. Headwalls were added to all roadway
crossing to help minimize impact to streams on this site. The redesign of proposed crossing
reduced permanent wetland impacts by 1,881.32 s.f., permanent stream impacts by 36 LF, and
temporary stream impacts increased by 2 LF.

Mitigation
Letters

Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Barra Farms II Wetland Mitigation Bank
August 29, 2023
Attn: Sarah (Liz) Hair
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District— Regulatory Division
Re: Availability of Compensatory Wetland Credits: USACE ID SAW-2022-01056
River Basin/HUC: Cape Fear 03030004
We are providing this letter in accordance with 33 CFR §332.8(r), to confirm that 0.30 Non -Riparian Wetland
Mitigation Credits (Credits) from the Barra Farm II (Bank) are currently available and all or a portion may be used,
once transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Griffon Pointe Subdivision project, SAW-2022-01056
upon approval by the USACE.
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance. Should the
Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Compensatory Mitigation
Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price.
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's US
Army Corps (USACE) Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. In addition, we will provide USACE
with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank
Ledgerwill include relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited
Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919.334.9118.
Sincerely,
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
On behalf of Southern Produce Distributors, Inc. (Bank Sponsor)

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Dirertor
Bryant Montague
17 East Development. LLC
10305 Penny Road
Raleigh, NC 27606
Project: Griffon Pointe
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 31, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 3/2/2024
County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.244
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
AAW�d
FOR James. B Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Adam Aycock, agent
North Carolina l3epartment of Environmen[aE QUaiity I Division of Mitigailon Services
_ 217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 276991652
„• w c w o�. 919.707.8976