20231229 Ver 1_Arrowridge PCN Submittal 9.6.23_20230906

OBOLTON
M & MENK
Real People. Real Solutions.
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 6, 2023
To: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, NC 28262
From: Chad Ponce (BM I) — [e-mail]
CC: Carlos Edde — [e-mail]
Lauten Crow — [e-mail]
Chris Larson — [e-mail]
Subject: Mecklenburg County — AJD/NWP 39 PCN — Arrowridge Industrial Site
116 N Markley Street
Suite 101
Greenville, SC 29601
Ph: 1864) 478-1700
Bolton-Menk.com
At the request of Brick O, LLC, Bolton & Menk (BM I) is submitting this pre -construction notification
(PCN), including an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) request, to prepare for site
development at the Arrowridge Industrial Site (Study Area), located in Charlotte, NC. The Study Area is
located northeast of the intersection of Interstate 77 and Interstate 485 with Mecklenburg County
Parcel ID# 20303151.
Construction is planned to begin at this site in October -November 2023.
Setting
The project is in the Sugar Creek Watershed (HUC 0305010301). Sugar Creek is located near the site to
the south. Land use in the vicinity includes undeveloped and industrial properties.
The 9.953-acre study area is comprised primarily of successional hardwood forested uplands. The
southern edge of the site includes emergent wetlands in the floodplain of Sugar Creek. Based on a
review of historical aerial photographs, a portion of the site was cleared in early 2006, presumably for
site development that was not completed. A sediment basin (Non -jurisdictional Wetland 2) was built as
part of the construction activities and has since been abandoned.
The following species were observed in uplands at the site: trees including sweetgum, red maple (Acer
rubrum), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), eastern red cedar
(Juniperus virginiana), water oak (Quercus nigra), willow oak (Quercus phellos), and winged elm (Ulmus
alata), and American elm (Ulmus americans); shrubs including autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellate),
Japanese privet (Ligustrum japonicum), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and winged sumac (Rhus
copallinum); and other herbs/vines including fireweed (Erechtites hieraciifolius), sawtooth blackberry
(Rubus argutus), pokeweed (Phytolacca americans), and Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis).
These species were observed in and near wetlands at the site: trees including boxelder (Acer negundo),
river birch (Betula nigra), green ash, water oak, black willow (Salix nigra), and American elm; shrubs
including American holly (Ilex opaca); and herbs/vines including: devil's beggarticks (Bidens frondosa),
shallow sedge (Carex lurida), swamp rose mallow (Hibiscus moscheutos), common rush (Juncus effusus),
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.

broad -leaf arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia), woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus), and common cattail (Typha
latifolia).
Soils at the site consist of Mecklenburg find sandy loams and Monacan loam. The soil is slightly acidic
with pH ranging from 6.1 to 6.5 (1:1 water, NRCS 2023).
Wetland Delineation —JD Request
A wetland and stream delineation was completed on July 18, 2023 to determine the location and types
of aquatic resources at the site. The wetland boundaries were delineated and staked in the field using
methods described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0) Supplement. Wetland determinations were based on wetland
features meeting all three mandatory criteria: hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils. Prior
to conducting a field investigation of this site, Exhibits A through E were used to complete a preliminary
evaluation.
No tributaries and two wetlands (Wetland 1 and Wetland 2) were observed at the site. These two
wetlands met the three mandatory criteria for a wetland. Greater than 50% of the vegetation observed
was facultative or wetter, including the observance of obligate vegetation in both wetlands. The
wetlands also met wetland hydrology indicators including geomorphic position and fac-neutral test. The
dominant hydric soil type observed was a depleted matrix with distinct or prominent redox seen in the
soil surface. See the wetland data sheets included as Attachment X for further details for Wetlands 1
and 2. Data sheets for soil borings ending in "A" or "AA" (e.g., WI -A) are wetland borings and soil
borings ending in "B" or "BB" or labeled "SB-X" (e.g., WI-B or SB-1) are upland borings. Delineated
wetlands are shown on Exhibit F. The locations of photographs included in the Photograph Log are
shown on Exhibit G.
Wetland 1 is a non -tidal freshwater marsh, dominated by herbaceous wetland vegetation. The northern
end of wetland 1 is situated in a linear depression between two berms. The berms are not present near
the southeast portion of the property and there Wetland 1 opens up to the larger floodplain of Sugar
Creek.
Wetland 2 was created as a sediment basin for site construction that began in 2006. Aerial imagery from
2006 and 2007 show portions of the site cleared and graded and the sediment basin can clearly be seen
(Mecklenburg County Time Machine available at https:Htimemachine.mcmap.org). Earlier imagery from
the 30s and 50s show that the area later excavated as a sediment basin is located in uplands northwest
of the apparent drainage feature that includes a portion of Wetland 1. Historical aerial photographs are
shown on Exhibit H. Redox features and low chroma observed in soil at Wetland 2 is limited to the top
few inches, indicating recent development of hydric soil.
Site photos show water coming from an air -release manhole for a water main northwest of Wetland 2.
That water and stormwater drainage from an upland drainage swale drain to the sediment basin. A large
diameter riser pipe was installed to drain the sediment basin. Soil berms are located on the south and
east sides of the sediment basin. See photographs 3 through 6 showing the sediment basin.
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.

Table 1. Wetland Summary Table
Name
Type (Cowardin)
Type (NC WAM)
Size (acres)
Jurisdiction
Jurisdictional Wetland 1
PEM
Non -Tidal
0.23
404
Freshwater Marsh
Non -Jurisdictional
PEM
-
0.10
Non -
Wetland 2 (Former
Jurisdictional
Sediment Basin)
Wetland and/or Stream Impacts
The planned site layout is included as Exhibit I. This project will have no impact on streams and will
impact two wetlands. See the impact summary table below. Proposed impacts are shown on Exhibit J.
Table 2. Wetland Impact Table
Name
Impact Type
Impact Size (acres)
Jurisdictional Wetland 1
Temporary
0.02
Non -Jurisdictional Wetland 2
(Former Sediment Basin)
Permanent
0.10
Purpose and Need
The purpose of this project is to build warehouse space divided into three sections for lease. There is a
demand/need for this type of space within the area.
Avoidance
The Clean Water Act requires that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives
exist. Two project alternatives that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site include:
1. No build Alternative: The no build alternative avoids wetland impacts, however, is not
considered feasible because it does not meet the needs of the client to develop the property
with a warehouse for lease.
2. Smaller Building Size: A smaller building and routing the sewer around the site was considered in
order to avoid wetland impacts. The current building size is 78,800 square feet. To avoid
impacts, the building size would be reduced by approximately 20,000 square feet, reducing the
feasibility of the project. The sewer is planned to be connected to an existing sanitary sewer line
to the southeast of the site. The current path of the planned line cuts into the wetlands at a 90
degree angle straight to the sewer connection. Routing the sewer line in any other direction
would cause more impacts than the current proposed configuration.
Minimization
The CWA requires that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest
extent practicable. The following minimization techniques were used for this project:
• Impacts were constrained to Wetland 2 only, which is a constructed sediment basin
• Slopes near wetlands are 2:1 and 3:1 to avoid impacts
• Erosion and sediment control measures will be used to prevent impacts to aquatic resources
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.

Mitigation
This project will have no impact on streams, 0.02 temporary impacts to Wetland 1, and 0.10-acre
permanent impacts to non -jurisdictional Wetland 2. Impacts are minimal, below mitigation thresholds
and therefore mitigation is not proposed.
NWP General Condition #18. Endangered Species
A threatened and endangered species habitat evaluation was completed to determine the potential for
occurrence of federally listed threatened and endangered species at the Site and immediate vicinity in
preparation for site development. The Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), a federal and state
listed mussel species, is listed by NCNHP as occurring on site, however, this species was not listed by the
USFWS IPaC search. There are no streams occurring on site therefore the heelsplitter does not occur at
the site. Potential habitat for three federally listed vascular plant species (smooth coneflower,
Schweinitz's sunflower, and Michaux's sumac) may be present at the site. A field survey for these
species was conducted by a field biologist on September 61h. The listed species were not observed at the
site during the field survey.
NWP General Condition #20. Historic Properties
To comply with NWP General Condition #20, we reviewed the North Carolina Department of Natural
and Cultural Resources (NCDNCR) — Historic Preservation Office (HPO) HPOWEB 2.0 GIS tool to search
for nearby listings on the National Register (NR) or Study List (SL). No NR or SL listings were found within
a 1-mile radius of the site.
Please let us know if you have any questions or need further information.
Respectfully,
Chad Ponce, PWS
Natural Resources Specialist
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
116 N. Markley Street, Suite 101
Greenville, SC 29601
Cell 813-833-2592
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.

Exhibits:
A. Site Location Map
B. Aerial Photograph Map
C. USGS Topographic Map
D. NWI Map
E. NRCS Soils Map
F. Aquatic Resources Delineation Map
G. Photo Location Map
H. Historical Photographs Map
I. Site Layout Map
J. Proposed Impacts Map
Attachments:
1. Agent Authorization Form
2. Wetland Data Sheets
3. Photographic Log
4. ORM Form
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer.

Exhibits

Lincoln
Gaston
3 nary r =.ti*
Cabarrus
Zt
�a
- 5edgefield
SouthMecklenburg Fr�
r%a,Carolina
r y
Union
$'Renaissance
r°
- - Shapton
r gym•:'. :, _ �
MW
son .. m Yorkmont Park „_ ti -•
•aeon r •7` � y : � �T y v_ol i
.V Selwyn
40
ti Archdarelldr'
1 r '
a�
•� t� x 'Starmount
•,Steel Cieek'�j 1!� i%,
Ram III
Ar
oil z r P v-c �t 4f district r
S •■•. t� r � � � BS.
1. 1�`j �' � � � • '/t f •' ,; t-
r
j,
V 1 i• � ��
P,inevill
i I
Legend
.7City of Chadotte Z
Study Area Ink
AW
Ak
z
as Regent Park
5 '"Forest Lake �. GgSource: Maxar Ovid Advanced Imagery 2022
lfCl�rb
x �atth f
�P_in�� $
n
n
x
.eve

Arrowridge Industrial Site Exhibit B: USGS Topographic Map B M E N K
TN
h 8362 Arrowridge Blvd, Carlotte, NC August 2023 S
Real People. Real Solutions.
ti �[
st
I �
f_ L
LJI
'r
Y.
�F-III II r' f �l II I15 •.k •'�
I7,7
1 � � y i 'L�� _ y J� • _
I I
Legend ��jj �D L
Study Area
0 400 800
Feet .- � •
Sourew USGS Topo Maps 1:24,WO wala: Dinkins
Wes[ CharIotte, NC 2022 and Fort MiN. SC 2020 o- +j1

Arrowridge Industrial Site
8362 Arrowridge Blvd, Charlotte, NC
4620778674 f# Ir • •
r ■
Exhibit C; Aerial Photograph Map BOLTON
8c MENK
August 2023
Real People, Real Solutions-
45208891
• &7,79; 3
1 45209727�33�
4520875694
� r
i Yr�
Study Area
8362 Arrowridge Blvd
PIN 20303151
9.953 acres
,�f � � l� s �._*• / l' �.•r,+. 3�r��•?.jai
* i 4��0860358 l
3r,
,,r �' r f + + ... ► s
s s'e
F / � r � t�• • '� r' �
rr '
Legend
310
�'
4J3 600
Study Area I / , r f • ' i '�' -.. 4 _ / r
r I Mecklenburg County Parcels
t — — Ir 1'a
Feet V
520768095Source'Maxar Vivid Advanced Imagery ry2022- I4
Meckienburg County Parce+S
..�

Arrowridge Industrial Site
8362 Arrowridge Blvd, Charlotte, NC
0
PF01A
iry�5!
M
r
Legend
Ir M
W,•:a
.?
Exhibit Q: National Wetlands Inventory Map BOLTON
cr MENK
August 2023
Real People, Real Solutions-
r
■
1 40 r40
NA:rA
1
p r r -;
=,
or. IWO
•.�i'P.
X.V
A JIM, V!, _ e
Fr ■fir r . r ..r. al= a.*�.YA.
0.
T �''�.41 }�'�` f. r •� �� � {+l1 +fir
IF
, W7,�
= Study Area
bw NWI Wetlands
0 100 200
Feet
Source' Maxar Vivid Advanced Imagery 2022:
USFWS National Wetland Inventory "4122
E
�•r it ' �r
.:; PF
PF01A

Arrowridge Industrial Site
8362 Arrowridge Blvd, Charlotte, NC
Exhibit E: NRCS Soil Map BOLTON
& MENK
August 2023
Real People, Real Solutions.
r
Symbol
Name
Slopes Hydric Rating
Hydric Class
MeB
Mecklenburg fine sandy loam
8-15% 0%
Non-Hydric
MkB
Mecklenburg -Urban land complex
2-8% 0%
Nan-Hydric
Mo
Monacan loam
0-2% 5%
Non-Hydric
r
Legend
Study Area
NRCS Soil Type (Nan-Hydric)
0 100 200
Feet
Source: Maxar Vivid Adanced Imagery 2022;
Naheral Resources Conservation Service
Soil, all non-hydric in the map frame

Arrowridge Industrial Site
8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC
Exhibit F: Aquatic Resources Map B M E NK
August2023
Real People. Real Solutions.

Arrowridge Industrial Site
8362 A rrowri dg e Blvd, Charlotte, NC
Exhibit G: Photograph Location Map B M E TON D K
August 2023
Real People, Real Solutions-
41# #
■F.
■
F.
4.
E�
r Y
r
1
■y
r
eJob oe
f ■ / � r r' r!'� �• j.; +� '.fir
,:• / / ■ r-• r s yr #. .-•/ .l i.- s� � ��
■ i i •�
/ ■ s r r r i
' r
~ .w
Legend
Study Area
O Photograph Locations �' R•
r•
i
Feet ►`;
Source' Maxar Vivid Advanced Imagery 2022; y, • ~�• 15 • ', 1 '+?
Mecklenbu g County Parce+s {
r

ZY
OZ
JW
BE
m obi
0
Qm
cc N
N
C N
N �
? 7
d a

Arrowridge Industrial Site
8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC
Exhibit I: Site Layout Map BOLTON
August2023 ' & M E N K
Real People. Real Solutions.

Arrowridge Industrial Site
8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC
Exhibit J: Proposed Impacts Map BOLTON
" August 2& MEN K
Real People. Real Solutions.

Attachment 1

OBOLTON
& MENK
Real People. Real Solutions.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL ID: 20303151
STREET ADDRESS: 8362 Arrowridee Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
116 N Markley Street
Suite 101
Greenville, SC 29601
Ph: [864) 478-1700
Bolton-Menk.com
I, the undersigned, registered property owner of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Chad Ponce , of Bolton & Menk, Inc. (Contractor / Agent) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
enter the property. I also authorize the above agent to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary
for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this permit or certification and applicable standard and
special conditions.
Property Owner Information
Name: 8362 Arrowridee, LLC
Address: 2645 NE 2074th St., Aventura, FL 33180
Phone No.: 954-328-0980
Email: [e-mail]
AP(Wo V Ayak all
Property Owner Signature: Adolfo DA%aldan(Sep 6,202310:10 EDT)
Date: 06/09/2023
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge.

Arrowridge - Agent Authorization Wetlands form
Final Audit Report
Created: 2023-09-06
By: lauten crow ([e-mail])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA7hIAg7lzMYDF83pvfkyRSs8mzFly-oz-
2023-09-06
"Arrowridge - Agent Authorization Wetlands form" History
Document created by lauten crow ([e-mail])
2023-09-06 - 1:35:43 PM GMT- IP address: 204.111.224.205
Document emailed to Carlos Edde ([e-mail]) for signature
2023-09-06 - 1:35:47 PM GMT
Email sent to [e-mail] bounced and could not be delivered
2023-09-06 - 1:35:55 PM GMT
Email viewed by Carlos Edde ([e-mail])
2023-09-06 - 2:08:14 PM GMT- IP address: 74.125.213.45
Signer Carlos Edde ([e-mail]) entered name at signing as Adolfo D Avakian
2023-09-06 - 2:10:15 PM GMT- IP address: 172.59.221.239
Document e-signed by Adolfo D Avakian ([e-mail])
Signature Date: 2023-09-06 - 2:10:17 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 172.59.221.239
Agreement completed.
2023-09-06 - 2:10:17 PM GMT
Adobe Acrobat Sign

Attachment 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: SB-1
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Dip Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.127875 Long:-80.912689 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
r Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This is a swale meant to convey
stormwater
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: SB-1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Celtis occidentalis
10
Y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2. Populus deltoides
10
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.00 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
20.0
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
10.0 20% of
total cover:
4.0
OBL species 0.00 x 1 = 0.00
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
FACW species 0.00 x 2 = 0.00
1
FAC species 65.00 x 3 = 195.00
2
FACU species 13.00 x 4 = 52.00
3
UPL species 0.00 x 5 = 0.00
4
Column Totals: 78.00 (A) 247.00 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.17
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 -Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
0
= Total Cover
_
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
-
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Microstegium vimineum
50
Y
FAC
-
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
50.0
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
25.0 20% of
total cover:
10.0
30
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
height.
1, Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
2. Parthenocissus puinguefolia
3
Y
FACU
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
8.0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover:
4.0 20% of
total cover:
1.6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Swale with herbaceous vegetation, trees at the edges.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: SB-1
to the death needed to document the indicator or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-12 7.5YR 4/6 100 C Hard clay, dry
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hard clay
Depth (inches): 12
Remarks:
No redox within top 12 inches. Very hard clay soil, dry.
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: SB-2
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Dip Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.127233 Long:-80.913733 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
✓ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
✓ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
A shallow swale cut through the
southern portion of the property
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: SB-2
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Betula nigra
15
Y
FACW
3. Quercus nigra
10
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.00 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
45.0
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
22.5 20% of
total cover:
9.0
OBL species 0.00 x 1 = 0.00
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
FACW species 35.00 x 2 = 70.00
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20
Y
FACW
FAC species 30.00 x 3 = 90.00
2
FACU species 0.00 x 4 = 0.00
3
UPL species 0.00 x 5 = 0.00
4
Column Totals: 65.00 (A) 160.00 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.46
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 -Dominance Test is >50%
9.
V 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
20.0
= Total Cover
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
10.0 20% of
total cover:
4.0
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
0
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
30
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Somewhat sparsely vegetated, no herbaceous
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: SB-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-10 7.5YR 4/6 100
FSL Dry, hard, crumbly texture
10-24 10YR 4/4 100
FSL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Not low enough chroma and no redox
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W1-A
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Dip Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.127680 Long:-80.912120 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
r Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Northern end of Wetland 1, this part of wetland 1 is a linear feature
with a berm on the east and west
sides.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W1-A
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.00 (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
OBL species 10.00 x 1 = 10.00
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
FACW species 40.00 x 2 = 80.00
1
FAC species 2.00 x 3 = 6.00
2
FACU species 35.00 x 4 = 140.00
3
UPL species 0.00 x 5 = 0.00
4
Column Totals: 87.00 (A) 236.00 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.71
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
_ 2 -Dominance Test is >50%
9.
V 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
0
= Total Cover
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
-
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Scirpus cyperinus
40
Y
FACW
-
2. Rubus argutus
25
Y
FACU
3. Solidago canadensis
10
N
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Carex lurida
10
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
85.0
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
42.5 20% of
total cover:
17.0
30
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
height.
1, Toxicodendron radicans
2
N
FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
2.0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover:
1.0 20% of
total cover:
0.4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Blackberry increases when moving toward upland and decreases to nonexistent within the wetland
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1-A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/2 95
7.5YR 4/6 5 C M
FSL
2-24 10YR 5/8 60
FSL
10YR 4/6 40
FSL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:
PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Redox and low chroma in the upper 2 inches. This is the northern edge. The amount and depth of
redox quickly increases to the south within Wetland 1.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W1-AA
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.126987 Long:-80.913397 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
r Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
r High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
r Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches):.5
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wet, soft ground. Standing water nearby.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1-AA
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5 )
1. Leersia orywides
80
Y
OBL
2. Impatiens capensis
20
N
FACW
3. Sagittaria latifolia
10
N
OBL
4. Carex lurida
3
N
OBL
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
113.0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
56.5 20% of
total cover:
22.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
1
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
1
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100.00
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 93.00
x 1
= 93.00
FACW species 20.00
x 2
= 40.00
FAC species 0.00
x 3
= 0.00
FACU species 0.00
x 4
= 0.00
UPL species 0.00
x 5
= 0.00
Column Totals: 113.00
(A)
133.00
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.18
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
v 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
0 = Total Cover Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover: 0.0 20% of total cover: 0.0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Strong wet vegetation, standing water in some areas. Cattails also nearby
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1-AA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3/1 95
7.5YR 4/6 5 C M
FSL
6-24 10YR 3/1 60
FSL
10YR 4/6 40
FSL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:
PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Surface soil has low chroma and redox features
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W1-B
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Dip Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.127791 Long:-80.912097 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This location is in a depressed linear feature updgradient of Wetland 1.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1-B
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5 )
1. Rubus argutus
15
Y
FACU
2. Solidago canadensis
15
Y
FACU
3. Scirpus cyperinus
5
N
FACW
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
35.0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
17.5 20% of
total cover:
7.0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
2. Toxicodendron radicans
2
Y
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
2 (A)
4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.00 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0.00
x 1
= 0.00
FACW species
5.00
x 2
= 10.00
FAC species
7.00
x 3
= 21.00
FACU species
30.00
x 4
= 120.00
UPL species
0.00
x 5
= 0.00
Column Totals:
42.00
(A)
151.00 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.6
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
7.0 =Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 3.5 20% of total cover: 1.4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Transition from wetland vegetation to more briars and goldenrod
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1-13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/3 95
7.5YR 4/4 5 C M
FSL
6-24 10YR 5/6 50
FSL
10YR 4/6 50
FSL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Not low enough chroma and no distinct or prominent redox to meet wetland criteria
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W1-BB
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): FOotSlope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.127083 Long:-80.913424 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This location is slightly uphill from Wetland 1 and is at the base of a slope to the north.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1 -BB
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Ulmus americana
25
Y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2. Acer negundo
20
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Celtis occidentalis
15
Y
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.00 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
60.0
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30.0 20% of
total cover:
12.0
OBL species 0.00 x 1 = 0.00
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
FACW species 25.00 x 2 = 50.00
1. Ligustrum sinense
10
Y
FACU
FAC species 30.00 x 3 = 90.00
2
FACU species 25.00 x 4 = 100.00
3
UPL species 0.00 x 5 = 0.00
4
Column Totals: 80.00 (A) 240.00 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.0
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 -Dominance Test is >50%
9.
V 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
10.0
= Total Cover
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
5.0 20% of
total cover:
2.0
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
0
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
30
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
height.
1. Smilax rotundifolia
10
Y
FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
10.0
=Total Cover
Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover:
5.0 20% of
total cover:
2.0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
This location Is outside of the emergent wetland and at the edge of a forest canopy.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W1-1313
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/4 100
FSL
6-12 10YR 4/6 100
FSL
12-24 10YR 4/3 100
FSL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Redox not present, dry soils
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W2-A
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Dip Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.127732 Long:-80.912271 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
r Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
This area was excavated as a sediment basin in early 2006.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W2-A
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3•
Species Across All Strata: 3 (g)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.67 (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
0
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
OBL species 20.00 x 1 = 20.00
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
FACW species 30.00 x 2 = 60.00
1
FAC species 2.00 x 3 = 6.00
2
FACU species 25.00 x 4 = 100.00
3
UPL species 0.00 x 5 = 0.00
4
Column Totals: 77.00 (A) 186.00 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.42
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 -Dominance Test is >50%
9.
V 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
0
= Total Cover
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
-
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Carex lurida
20
Y
OBL
-
2. Scirpus cyperinus
20
Y
FACW
3. Rubus argutus
15
Y
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Solidago canadensis
10
N
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5. Persicaria maculosa
10
N
FACW
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
75.0
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
37.5 20% of
total cover:
15.0
30
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
height.
1, Toxicodendron radicans
2
N
FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
2.0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover:
1.0 20% of
total cover:
0.4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Black willow and boxelder are located within and at the edges of this wetland. Cattail found within
wetland also.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2-A
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/2 95
7.5YR 4/6 5 C M
FSL
3-24 10YR 5/8 60
FSL Wet at 10 inches
10YR 4/6 40
FSL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:
PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Redox only in upper 3 inches. Indications that this is a relatively recently created wetland.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W2-B
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Dip Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.127756 Long:-80.912152 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
with a narrow linear feature that
opens up to the sediment basin to
the south
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-B
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
5 )
1. Rubus argutus
30
Y
FACU
2. Solidago canadensis
5
N
FACU
3. Scirpus cyperinus
5
N
FACW
4. Andropogon glomeratus
5
N
FACW
5. Sorghum halepense
5
N
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50.0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25.0 20% of
total cover:
10.0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
10
Y
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
0
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
2
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
0.00
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0.00
x 1
= 0.00
FACW species 10.00
x 2
= 20.00
FAC species 0.00
x 3
= 0.00
FACU species 50.00
x 4
= 200.00
UPL species 0.00
x 5
= 0.00
Column Totals: 60.00
(A)
220.00
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.67
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation ✓
10.0 =Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 5.0 20% of total cover: 2.0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
transition from wet vegetation to more upland veg with blackberry dominating
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2-13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 5/6 50
FSL Dry
10YR 4/6 50
FSL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hard clay
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Not low chroma and redox not present
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/site: 8362 Arrowridge Blvd., Charlotte, NC city/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 2023-07-18
Applicant/Owner: Brick O, LLC State: North Carolina Sampling Point: W2-BB
Investigator(s): Chad Ponce Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Dip Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.127460 Long:-80.912679 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 10
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Formerly wet, dried up
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-BB
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25
Y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Acer negundo
10
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3. Acer saccharum
10
Y
FACU
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4. Salix nigra
10
Y
OBL
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80.00 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
55.0
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
27.5 20% of
total cover:
11.0
OBL species 10.00 x 1 = 10.00
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15
)
FACW species 30.00 x 2 = 60.00
1
FAC species 10.00 x 3 = 30.00
2
FACU species 10.00 x 4 = 40.00
3
UPL species 0.00 x 5 = 0.00
4
Column Totals: 60.00 (A) 140.00 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.33
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 -Dominance Test is >50%
9•
V 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
0
= Total Cover
4 -Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
-
5
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Scirpus cyperinus
5
Y
FACW
-
2.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
5.0
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
2.5 20% of
total cover:
1.0
30
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
height.
1.
2.
3.
4•
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
0
= Total Cover
Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover:
0.0 20% of
total cover:
0.0
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Willow at edge of wetland, move from herbaceous to forest canopy
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W2-1313
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 4/2 95
7.5YR 4/6 5 C M
FSL
1-24 10YR 5/8 60
FSL Hard, dry
10YR 4/6 40
FSL
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Redox only in upper inch. Appears relict
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Attachment 3

Photograph Log
Arrowridge Industrial Site — Wetland Delineation
. .. - ' "_ ' �- ,,; • ; �t, ? ' . fir, .
Cx
Photo 1:
Facing east. The trail extends from the northwest to the northeast side of the property
JII
.� ' ,,,��> �-� •:.- a •'y'?�;�"'� ���?:
I►�v' ,�.� rro�cc ,,..�� .i' ' _ 'ti- ,7tr � . -
_ MA
Am
Photo 2:
Facing west. This stormwater swale conveys flow from west to east across the center
of the site. Soil boring SB-1 (upland) was collected at this location.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Arrowridge Industrial 14802.04
Page 1

Photograph Log
Arrowridge Industrial Site — Wetland Delineation
P> . ■:.OW'..
s:
.::':�-
��f ^y4N FYI � p'�� � ' � � •. f: *. � j F- �{ �. 3r
�� -ram' ; +�'�' f I �.' s•.p� -�.x:
Photo 3:
Facing East. Water main air -release manhole. This is downstream of the upland storm -
Water swale. This discharge supplies water to the constructed sediment basin (Wetland 2).
1-;
't
Photo 4:
The interior of the constructed sediment basin (Wetland 2).
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Arrowridge Industrial 14802.04 Page 2

Photograph Log
Arrowridge Industrial Site — Wetland Delineation
Photo 5:
Stormwater riser within the former sediment basin (Wetland 2).
n
x
w
Nr-
�a15 � AT_" Ji'. .� i� �''eYS���� ►�.•�.Ly�e 'YZ.r. �i'iL, l��
IVA.
Photo 6:
Facing south. The northern end of Wetland 2, where W2-13 (upland) was collected.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Arrowridge Industrial 14802.04 Page 3

Photograph Log
Arrowridge Industrial Site — Wetland Delineation
I
131�
gr+A r!•i F . II � .
v'r474
Photo 7:
Facing north at the northern edge of Wetland 1 where soil boring W1-A (wetland) was
collected.
,•ail ��:
Photo 8:
Facing south. Wetland 1 within the power line ROW. At this point the berm falls off
And wetland 2 extends to the west and east.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Arrowridge Industrial 14802.04 Page 4

4�•

Attachment 4

W W
Ir Ir
U U
Q Q
N 0
O
73 73
W W
as
zz
J J
00
Q Q
U U
F F
00
0 0
z z
w

r E
ms
£�
c�
oQo
os
o�
$�
al E
alb
E
5
E