20201280 Ver 1_Little Texas Sidewalk - EB-5844 - Permit Support Doc_20230906

TranSystems
1 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27603
www.transystems.com
September 5, 2023 Krysta Stygar Sue Homewood US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources Charlotte Regulatory Field Office Mooresville Regional Office 8430 University Drive, Suite 615 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Charlotte, NC 28262 Mooresville, NC 28115 Re: Application for Nationwide Permit 14 and General Water Quality Certification 4246 Little Texas Road and Ruth Avenue Sidewalk (EB-5844, WBS 44856.1.24) Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina Dear Ms. Stygar and Ms. Homewood: The City of Kannapolis (City) proposes to construct a sidewalk and curb and gutter on the east side of Little Texas Road between Ruth Avenue and Dale Earnhardt Boulevard (STIP EB-5844) in Cabarrus County, North Carolina. (Figure 1). Small portions of existing sidewalk will be repaired or replaced as needed. The typical section is a variable width planter with a five- to seven-foot-wide sidewalk. When completed, the City will have a continuous sidewalk along the east side of South Texas Road from Ruth Avenue to Dale Earnhardt Boulevard. The project is currently funded. The project is included in the 2020-2029 North Carolina State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as Project No. EB-5844 and is being funded through the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ), the Transportation Alternatives (Any Area) Program (TAANY), as well as local funds. Right-of-way acquisition is anticipated to begin October 2022, and construction to begin June 2024. In addition to this cover letter, the following has been included to assist your review: • Appendix A – SEPA Documentation • Appendix B – Stormwater Management Plan • Appendix C – Permit Drawings • Appendix D – Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination • Appendix E – NCSHPO Scoping Letter Response • Appendix F – FEMA Compliance Documentation PURPOSE AND NEED The purpose of this project is to improve pedestrian safety and mobility with the addition of new sidewalk facilities as well as fill in existing gaps in a pedestrian heavy area. A pedestrian crosswalk with a pedestrian refuge island is proposed to improve safety for pedestrians crossing Little Texas Road to access Forest Park Elementary School, and a pedestrian bridge is proposed over Chambers Branch to improve pedestrian safety since the existing roadway bridge contains a shoulder which serves as the only means for pedestrian travel. The addition of ADA compliant accessibility ramps will also improve access for mobility impaired populations.
Little Texas Road Sidewalk Project 09/05/2023 Page 2
2

PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Little Texas Road and Ruth Avenue Sidewalk project includes: • 8,800 linear feet (1.66 miles) of new 6-7 feet wide sidewalk along the east side of S.R. 2154 (Little Texas Road) from S.R. 1280 (Lane Street) to NC 3 (Dale Earnhardt Boulevard) in the City of Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. (The 7-ft wide section is proposed between Ontario Drive and 207 S. Little Texas Road, and Debbie St. and Lane St.) • Fill in existing sidewalk gaps on east side of Little Texas Road and Ruth Avenue • Realign Ruth Ave & Little Texas Intersection • New pedestrian crosswalk with a refuge island at Forest Park Drive and Little Texas Road (for Forest Park Elementary access) • New 10-ft wide pedestrian bridge over Chambers Branch Creek • New retaining wall (65-ft Long, 6-ft High) located approximately 10-feet from edge of pavement at 207 S. Little Texas Road • ADA compliant ramps and curb and gutter The approximate total length of the project is 2.1 miles. Within the project study area, Little Texas Road is an undivided 2-lane minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. The right-of-way along Little Texas Road is 60 feet wide and contains some segments of sidewalk, including: • along the east side of Little Texas Road from Dale Earnhardt Boulevard to 616 S. Little Texas Road, • 287 S. Little Texas Road to just south of the existing bridge over Sandy Creek, • immediately north of the existing bridge over Sandy Creek to 210 S. Little Texas Road, and • 103 S. Little Texas Road to 174 N. Little Texas Road. The project would connect these segments to complete the sidewalk network along the east side of the corridor and provide connectivity to the sidewalk along Forest Park Drive via a pedestrian crossing and refuge island, and sidewalks along Dale Earnhardt Boulevard. The proposed 10-foot wide pedestrian bridge will cross the Chambers Branch on the east side of Little Texas Road and will be constructed with pre-fabricated materials to accommodate the loads from two-way pedestrian traffic and golf carts. This bridge is proposed to have 15’ minimum horizontal clearance from the existing bridge over Chambers Branch (Bridge #120230 ) for ease of maintenance, access to the existing bridge and possible future roadway bridge replacement. INDEPENDENT UTILITY The EB-5844 project is a single and complete project. This project exhibits the following characteristics of independent utility of a project: 1) The project connects logical termini and is of sufficient length to address environmental matters on a broad scope.
Little Texas Road Sidewalk Project 09/05/2023 Page 3
3

2) The project is usable and a reasonable expenditure, even if no additional transportation improvements are made in the area. 3) The project does not restrict consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation improvements. SEPA DOCUMENT STATUS A Categorical Exclusion was completed to satisfy the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation requirements, approved June 6, 2022. RESOURCE STATUS The project is located entirely in the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin [U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03040105]. The North Carolina 2022 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters identifies UT to Coldwater Creek (Lake Concord) [13-17-9-4-2-(2)a] within the study area as an impaired water due to exceeding chlorophyll-a limits. The Unnamed Tributary to Coldwater Creek has been designated as CA, which labels it as a critical area. Therefore, the City will adhere to North Carolina Regulations entitled Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 04B. 0124) throughout the design and construction of the project. Hazardous spill catch basins are required. Appropriate notations are made in the erosion control plans and the appropriate special provisions are included in the contract plans for construction. The City is committed to incorporating all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the planning and SEPA compliance stages, and minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design. No permanent impacts are proposed as part of the project. The project will result in 0.01 acres of temporary surface water impacts from the pedestrian bridge construction over UT to Coldwater Creek. FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information Planning and Consultation tool (IPaC) lists the following federally protected species within the study area, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (Table 1).
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status Habitat Present Biological Conclusion
Perimyotis subflavus Tricolored bat PE Yes No Effect
Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz’s sunflower E Yes No Effect
IPaC data checked on August 29, 2023 E - Endangered PE – Proposed Threatened Tricolored bat USFWS optimal survey window: May 15-August 15
Little Texas Road Sidewalk Project 09/05/2023 Page 4
4

Biological Conclusion: Unresolved On September 14, 2022, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced a proposal to list the tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus - PESU) as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. USFWS has not provided an official effective listing date, but it is anticipated to occur in the second half of 2023. Upon listing, USFWS is expected to provide habitat descriptions and an area of influence/distribution range for PESU. When this information is provided, it will help to inform determinations on habitat that could be impacted by the proposed actions. In lieu of the formal listing, habitat and structure checks were performed on August 14, 2023, by Dominique DiLandro, permitted bat biologist, for evidence of bats (i.e staining, guano, etc). No evidence was observed. Schweinitz’s sunflower USFWS optimal survey window: late August - October Biological Conclusion: No Effect Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) is typically found along roadside rights-of-way, maintained power lines and other utility rights-of-way, edges of thickets and old pastures, clearings and edges of upland pine woods or other sunny or semi-sunny habitats. Habitat was the study area in the form of partially maintained roadsides and ditches adjacent to patches of woods. Surveys for Schweintiz’s sunflower were conducted on September 1, 2023. No individuals were observed. In addition, a review of NHP records on or updated August 29, 2023, indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. HISTORIC RESOURCES There are no historic resources that would be affected by the proposed project. The scoping letter response from the N.C. State Historic Office is included in the appendices. FEMA COMPLIANCE The City of Kannapolis received a No-Rise for the project in May, 2022. REGULATORY APPROVALS In consultations with relevant agencies, it was noted the project is applicable under a Section 404 Nationwide 14 and Section 401 General Water Quality Certification (WQC) 4246. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Anna Reusche at [e-mail] or 919-816-7745. Sincerely,
Anna Reusche, PWS Senior Environmental Project Manager TranSystems
APPENDIX A SEPA DOCUMENTATION
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 1
Type I or II Categorical Exclusion Action Classification Form
STIP Project No. EB-5844
WBS Element 47301.1.1
Federal Project No. TAP-2154(003)
A.Project Description: The proposed project includes:•8,800 linear feet (1.66 miles) of new 6-7 feet wide sidewalk along the east side of S.R. 2154(Little Texas Road) from S.R. 1280 (Lane Street) to NC 3 (Dale Earnhardt Boulevard) in theCity of Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, North Carolina. (The 7-ft wide section is proposedbetween Ontario Drive and 207 S. Little Texas Road, and Debbie St. and Lane St.)•Fill in existing sidewalk gaps on East side of Little Texas Road and Ruth Avenue•Realign Ruth Ave & Little Texas Intersection•New pedestrian crosswalk with a refuge island at Forest Park Drive and Little Texas Road (forForest Park Elementary access)•New 10-ft wide pedestrian bridge over Chambers Branch Creek
•New retaining wall (65-ft Long, 6-ft High) located approximately 10-feet from edge of pavementat 207 S. Little Texas Road•ADA compliant ramps and curb and gutter
The approximate total length of the project is 2.1 miles. Within the project study area, Little Texas Road is an undivided 2-lane minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. The right-of-way along Little Texas Road is 60 feet wide and contains some segments of sidewalk, including: •along the east side of Little Texas Road from Dale Earnhardt Boulevard to 616 S. Little TexasRoad,•287 S. Little Texas Road to just south of the existing bridge over Sandy Creek,•immediately north of the existing bridge over Sandy Creek to 210 S. Little Texas Road, and•103 S. Little Texas Road to 174 N. Little Texas Road.
The project would connect these segments to complete the sidewalk network along the east side of the corridor and provide connectivity to the sidewalk along Forest Park Drive via a pedestrian crossing and refuge island, and sidewalks along Dale Earnhardt Boulevard.
The proposed 10-foot wide pedestrian bridge will cross the Chambers Branch on the east side of Little Texas Road and will be constructed with pre-fabricated materials to accommodate the loads from two-way pedestrian traffic and golf carts. This bridge is proposed to have 15’ minimum horizontal clearance from the existing bridge over Chambers Branch (Bridge #1202301) for ease of maintenance, access to the existing bridge and possible future roadway bridge replacement.
The project falls within the regions of the Cabarrus-Rowan Metropolitan Planning Organization (CRMPO) and Division 10 of the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). The project location is shown on the attached vicinity map (Figure 1) and site photos.
The project is included in the 2020-2029 North Carolina State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) as Project No. EB-5844 and is being funded through the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Program (CMAQ), the Transportation Alternatives (Any Area) Program (TAANY), as well as local funds. Right-of-way acquisition is anticipated to begin October 2022, and construction to begin June 2024.
Description of Need and Purpose: The purpose of this project is to improve pedestrian safety and mobility with the addition of new sidewalk facilities as well as fill in existing gaps in a pedestrian heavy
1 NCDOT bridge Structure number derived from - https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=aa6c8a51fc744618ae45c8b105cf7ff7
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 2
area. A pedestrian crosswalk with a pedestrian refuge island is proposed to improve safety for pedestrians crossing Little Texas Road to access Forest Park Elementary School, and a pedestrian bridge is proposed over Chambers Branch to improve pedestrian safety since the existing roadway bridge contains a shoulder which serves as the only means for pedestrian travel. The addition of ADA compliant accessibility ramps will also improve access for mobility impaired populations. The project was listed in the 2016 Cabarrus Rowan Comprehensive Transportation Plan, which recommended a sidewalk for Little Texas Road from Brantley Avenue (SR 2000) to NC 3 (Dale Earnhardt Boulevard)2. The Cabarrus Rowan Comprehensive Transportation Plan includes both the addition of 5-foot bicycle lanes on each side of Little Texas Road as well as the addition of sidewalks on each side. The Cabarrus-Rowan MPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan also lists the project in the MPO Bicycle/Pedestrian List, which identifies MPO bicycle and pedestrian projects submitted to NCDOT under the 2018-2026 STIP. Although these long-range plans call for bicycle lanes along the facility, the City of Kannapolis views the project as primarily a sidewalk project and that funding is not available at this time for the additional right-of-way that would be needed for bicycle lanes. B. Categorical Exclusion Action Classification:
Type I(A) - Ground Disturbing Action
C. Proposed Improvements:
#3 Construction of [bicycle and] pedestrian lanes, paths, and facilities. D. Special Project Information: Construction Easements, Traffic Control and Staging: It is anticipated that vehicular traffic will be maintained through construction using temporary lane
closures and traffic staging as needed to construct the sidewalk and median refuge island. No off-site detours are anticipated. Minor delays in traffic are expected during construction, so local school, rail, and EMS (police and ambulance) staff will be notified to ensure scheduling accommodates current bus routes, rail schedules, and emergency response service. According to Concord-Kannapolis Area Transit, the project study area has six bus stops located at the following intersections: o S. Little Texas Rd/Forest Park Dr. o S. Little Texas Rd/Mission Tripp St.
o S. Little Texas Rd/Summit Ridge Ln. o S. Little Texas Rd/E 1st St.
o N. Little Texas Rd/El Paso St.
o N. Little Texas Rd/Chipola St.
It was also noted that Concord-Kannapolis Area Transit is implementing a system-wide bus stop design standard and requested the opportunity for the proposed project to incorporate these design standards.
The project will not have permanent or adverse effects on local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness and will not change access control along the project corridor.

2 https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/TPBCTP/Cabarrus-Rowan/CRMPO%20CTP%20Roadway%20Inventory%20(Amended%20March%2027,%202019).xlsx
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 3
Existing Structures: There are no culverts within the project area3; therefore, no culvert improvements or replacements are
included in the project scope of work. There is one existing bridge (NCDOT Bridge #120230) within the project area that crosses Chamber’s
Branch (located between Summit Ridge Lane and Mission Tripp Street).4 Although NCDOT GIS data does not indicate that the bridge is structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, with a Sufficiency Rating of 94.42, scour/erosion was observed at the guardrail post approaching the bridge and underneath the bridge. Although the current project scope does not include replacing the existing bridge, SEPI engineers noted that it was not hydraulically adequate under the 25-year design storm as well as during 100-year base flood conditions. Proposed Structures: A new pedestrian bridge is proposed to cross the Chamber’s Branch – a tributary to Cold Water Creek - at least 15’ east of the existing roadway bridge for ease of maintenance, access to the existing roadway bridge and adequate horizontal clearance for possible future roadway bridge replacement. Power lines are located on the east side of the existing roadway bridge and are considered in the horizontal clearance of the pedestrian bridge. The location (vertical and horizontal) and length of the bridge will be optimized considering the hydraulic modeling (no-rise and scour). The bridge will be 10-
feet wide to accommodate two-way pedestrian traffic and constructed of pre-fabricated materials. The design of the bridge will accommodate H5 loading (suitable for golf cart maintenance vehicles and appropriate for greenway pedestrian bridges).
The estimated construction costs, based on 2021 costs are as follows*:
Construction Costs: $1,764,0005 Right of Way/Utilities $ 400,0005 Engineering $ 640,0005 Total Cost $2,804,0005 *Costs subject to change. Costs estimates are from NCDOT 2020-2029 STIP, May 2022.
Agency Involvement: A Start of Study Letter with attached project information including project scoping sheets and maps, were distributed through the State Clearinghouse on January 7, 2020 as well as mailed to relevant review agencies. Comments and recommendations raised by responding agencies are summarized below.
Responses from the NC Division of Emergency Management received on February 18, 2020 noted that the project study area appears to encroach on Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and Floodway
of Chambers Branch. Comments received from the Superfund Section of the NC Division of Waste Management (NCDWM),
received on February 18, 2020, indicated that there two inactive hazardous waste sites located within 1-mile of the project. As recommended by NCDWM, site files were reviewed and no precautions are needed since construction activities will not encounter potentially contaminated soil or groundwater.

3 North Carolina Department of Transportation, “NCDOT Structures, State Maintained Roads, and MPO/RPO Boundary Map”. Accessed online on February 12, 2020 at: http://ncdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=b2f8ba9072c44a5db212b939a75f68bd
4 North Carolina Department of Transportation, “NCDOT Structures, State Maintained Roads, and MPO/RPO Boundary Map”. Accessed online on February 12, 2020 at:
http://ncdot.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=b2f8ba9072c44a5db212b939a75f68bd
5 North Carolina Department of Transportation, “NCDOT 2020-2029 STIP, December 2021“. Accessed online on January 12, 2022; at https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/STIPDocuments1/NCDOT%20Current%20STIP.pdf
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 4
Comments from the NC Division of Waste Management, Hazardous Waste Section (NCDWM) received on February 18, 2020 noted that any hazardous waste generated from the demolition,
construction, operations, maintenance, and/or remediation from the proposed project must be managed in accordance with the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Rules.
Responses from the NC Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section found no adverse impact on the surrounding community and knows of no situations in the community, which would affect the project from a solid waste perspective. The agency also noted that every feasible effort should be made to minimize the generation of wastes and to recycle materials for which viable markets exist. Comments from the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) noted that the project area is considered as having relatively low probability for containing a significant, intact National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligible archaeological site. Therefore, no archaeological survey is recommended. Additional comments from SHPO are provided under Cultural Resources below.
The U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) initially (at the time of project scoping) asked for time of work restrictions to address the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB, Myotis septentrionalis), a protected species listed for Cabarrus County.6 However, the requirements for species surveys have recently
changed, and NCDOT is now requiring surveys for these species. Completion of this survey and a resulting No Effect determination has been added as a commitment to this CE.
Additional comments from the USFWS noted that suitable habitat for the federally endangered Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) may occur onsite and recommended targeted surveys between late August and October. This survey was performed by SEPI in October 2021 and is valid
for two years. Other recommendations noted in USFWS comments include developing measures to discourage migratory birds from nesting in the project location, utilizing best management practices to reduce erosion and sediment impacts, and avoiding floodplain modifications. Comments from NCDOT Division 10 Planning Engineer Stuart Basham noted a project along Lane Street to reduce the street from four to three lanes and provide street resurfacing. However, it was mentioned that the project is due to be completed by the time this project is due to LET. A response provided by Cabarrus County Active Living and Parks Department mentioned no comments other than that this sidewalk is much needed.
In a comment from Concord-Kannapolis Area Transit Manager Andy Christy, the project study area has six bus stops located at the following intersections: o S. Little Texas Rd/Forest Park Dr..
o S. Little Texas Rd/Mission Tripp St. o S. Little Texas Rd/Summit Ridge Ln. o S. Little Texas Rd/E 1st St.
o N. Little Texas Rd/El Paso St. o N. Little Texas Rd/Chipola St. It was also noted that Concord-Kannapolis Area Transit is implementing a system wide bus stop design standard and requested the opportunity for the proposed project to incorporate these design standards.
6 USFWS initial NLEB condition: “the project would occur in a location greater than 0.25 miles from any known
hibernation site of the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and more than 150-feet from a known,
occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1 – July 31). Therefore, any incidental take that may result from project related activities would be exempt under the 4(d) rule. However, any tree clearing activities associated
with the project should be completed outside of the pup season (July 1 – July 30) and outside of the active season (April 1 – October 31) to reduce the chance of impacting any unidentified maternity roosts.”
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 5
Public Involvement: A start of study notification letter was sent on January 6, 2021, to all landowners with parcels within the project study area. This letter included a project description along with contact
information for the team project manager that could be contacted with questions or comments regarding the project.
Postcards were mailed to 411 surrounding property owners and tenants along the project area on January 6, 2021, to advertise a Project Public Meeting, as well as advertised on the City website. The public meeting was held from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. on January 26, 2021, (see summary in Appendices) with a virtual presentation on Zoom (which included online presentation and audience participation) and an in-person screening (that obeyed Covid restrictions for those without internet access) at the same time, hosted by the City and Project Consultant. In total, 12 citizens participated, and the following general comments were received:
• Most respondents (10/12) supported the project, with the only negative comment regarding the project timing (it is not happening quicky enough)
• Most respondents (10/12) involved asking specific questions about the project
• One concern was with construction impacts/property access
• Other concerns were related to unrelated issues in the neighborhood – flooding, traffic speeding, if a detour was planned (it isn’t)
Community Impacts: An Indirect and Direct Impact Screening tool was completed in lieu of a full Community Impact Assessment for this project. The results of this screening indicated that there are
not projected to be any adverse direct or indirect impacts to the nearby and surrounding communities in terms of impacts to pedestrian or bicycle facilities, transit, farmland soils, community resources, community cohesiveness or low-income, elderly, disabled or minority populations. This screening tool
is available in supporting documents for this CE Checklist. As no notably adverse community impacts are anticipated with this project impacts to minority and low-income populations do not appear to be disproportionately high and adverse. Benefits and burdens resulting from the project are anticipated to be equitably distributed throughout the community. No disparate impacts are anticipated under Title VI and related statutes. Cultural Resources: NCHPO recommended caution if ground disturbing activities are to take place near the Centergrove Cemetery (located at the northeast corner of S. Little Texas Road and Dale Earnhardt Blvd). A Commitment was added to note that if unmarked human remains are encountered during construction
activities, construction must cease and remains must be examined by the county medical examiner in compliance with North Carolina General Statute Chapter 70, article 3.
Railroad Involvement: There are no railroad crossings within the project study area. Prime Farmland: The project area is located in a moderately urbanized area in Kannapolis that
contains no prime or important farmlands or Voluntary Agricultural Districts. Threatened and Endangered Species: As of October 2021, the United States Fish and Wildlife
(USFWS) lists four (4) federally protected species, under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for Cabarrus County (Table 1)7. For each species, a discussion of the presence or absence of habitat is included below along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on survey results in the study
area.

7 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. “Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern and Candidate Species”. Accessed online February 13, 2020 at : https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/cabarrus.html
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 6
Table 1. ESA federally protected species listed for Cabarrus County.
Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status Habitat Present Biological Conclusion
Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle BGPA No No Effect
Myotis septentrionalis Northern long-eared bat T Yes Unresolved
Lasmigona decorata Carolina heelsplitter E Yes No Effect
Helianthus schweinitzii Schweinitz’s sunflower E Yes No Effect
E - Endangered T – Threatened
BGPA – Bald Eagle Protection Act Suitable habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter consisting of stable, silt-free stream bottoms was found within the project study area in Chamber’s Branch - tributary to Cold Water Creek. A freshwater mussel survey was conducted for the project in April 2020. No individual Carolina heelsplitter were identified. The biological conclusion for this species as presented in the NRTR for the project is No Effect. Suitable habitat consisting of early successional areas, and maintained roadsides, exists for Schweinitz’s sunflower in the study area. Field surveys for Schweinitz’s sunflower were performed on October 14, 2021 by SEPI biologists Robert Lepsic, PWS, and Anna Reusche, PWS. Surveys were performed along roadsides, early successional areas, open grassy areas, and in areas with dry soils in open sunlight, where habitat for Schweinitz’s sunflower occur. No occurrences of Schweinitz’s sunflower were observed. Additionally, an October 27, 2021 review of NC Natural Heritage Program records indicated no known occurrences within one mile of the study area. The biological conclusion for this species is No Effect. The USFWS also lists the Bald Eagle as occurring in Cabarrus County. The bald eagle is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and enforced by the USFWS. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests in proximity to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water. A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1.0-mile radius of the project limits, was performed on December 26 using October 2017 color aerials. Concord Lake (approximately 90 acres) is located approximately 0.40 miles downstream and east of the study area and could support Bald Eagle foraging. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project study area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was not conducted. Additionally, a review of the NHP database on December 10, 2019 revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to the lack of habitat within the study area, known occurrences, and minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been determined that this project will not affect this species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initially (at the time of project scoping) asked for time of work restrictions to be added to the project to address the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis), a protected species listed for Cabarrus County. This was because the project area is not subject to the Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO)8 for NLEB because the project falls within Division 10. However, the requirements for species surveys have recently changed, and NCDOT is now requiring surveys for these species. Completion of a NLEB survey has therefore been added as a commitment to this CE.
Sensitive Watersheds: There is one 303(d) listed stream (Unnamed Tributary to Cold Water Creek) located within the project study area. The North Carolina 2020 Final 303(d) list of impaired waters identifies Unnamed Tributary to Cold Water Creek (Lake Concord) [13-17-9-4-2-(2)a] within the study

8 The Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) for NCDOT Divisions 1-8 was developed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT.
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 7
area as an impaired water due to exceeding chlorophyll-a limits9. UT to Cold Water Creek is a WS-IV; CA classified waterway, which means the stream is within the Critical Area of a Class IV Water Supply
Watershed. Therefore, development in the area is subject to the NC Water Supply Watershed Rules, which aims to reduce the risk of nutrient runoff to protect water quality for drinking and culinary purposes as well as recreational purposes.
There are no designated High-Quality Waters (HQW) or higher class Water Supply Watersheds (WS-I or WS-II) within or within 1.0 mile downstream of the study area. No streams within the project study area are subject to the riparian buffer rules since they are located in the Yadkin-Pee-Dee river basin and are not subject to buffer rules administered by NCDEQ. There are National Wetland Inventory (NWI) mapped wetlands within the project study area totaling 2.8 acres as well as 100-year and 500-year flood zones totaling 4.4 acres. Permits: As the project study area is located within a Water Supply Critical Area (WS CA), the NCDOT must strictly adhere to North Carolina Regulations entitled Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 04B. 0124) throughout the design and construction of the project for any areas that drain to streams having WS CA (Water Supply Critical Area) classifications. Due to wetland and stream impacts, a USACE Nationwide 14 Permit and associated water quality certification from NCDEQ are required. An associated Jurisdictional Determination for Wetlands and Surface Waters has been submitted to USACE. An erosion and sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres are to be disturbed. A NPDES Construction Stormwater permit (NCG010000) is also usually issued should design features meet minimum requirements. Plans and specifications for the alteration of a public water system must be approved by the Division of Water Resources/ Public Water Supply Section prior to the award of a contract or the initiation of construction as per 15A NCAC 18C .0300. Despite encroachment on the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and Floodways of Chambers Branch, conclusions from the SEPI Hydraulics Study indicate that the encroachment into the floodways do not create a rise in flood water and qualify the project for a “No-Rise” designation. According to the No Rise Study (approved by Boyd V. Stanley, AICP on May 5, 2022), the revised project modifications will produce a slight drop in water surface elevations for the 100-yr (base flood event) qualifying the project for a “No-Rise” designation. It is to be noted that there are some river stations where the water surface elevation does not change from the Corrected Effective to the Revised model and some river stations where this slight drop in water surface elevations does occur between the Corrected Effective and the Revised model. It is also noted that FIS floodway widths that were for the added sections to meet FEMA requirements also did not cause any rise when comparing the 100-yr floodway water surface elevations from the Corrected Effective to the Revised model. The Revised and Existing models tie-in to the Effective model at River Station 11252. See the Appendices for copies of the Hydraulics (HEC-RAS Narrative and Supporting Documentation) Study, Topographic Workmap and Floodplain Development Permit for the project.

9 N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. Water Quality Assessment
and Impaired Waters List (2018 Final 303(d) list. https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/TMDL/303d/2018/2018-NC-303-d--List-Final.pdf
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 8
Floodway Water Surface Elevation (ft.) Analysis Results. NCDOT has reviewed the flood study and approved the study through the MOA process. E. Project Impact Criteria Checklists:
F2. Ground Disturbing Actions – Type I (Appendix A) & Type II (Appendix B)
Proposed improvement(s) that fit Type I Actions (NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreement, Appendix A) including 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, 18, 21, 22 (ground disturbing), 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, &/or 30;
&/or Type II Actions (NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreement, Appendix B) answer the project impact threshold questions (below) and questions 8 – 31. • If any question 1-7 is checked “Yes” then NCDOT certification for FHWA approval is required. • If any question 8-31 is checked “Yes” then additional information will be required for those questions in Section G.

PROJECT IMPACT THRESHOLDS (FHWA signature required if any of the questions 1-7 are marked “Yes”.) Yes No
1 Does the project require formal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)? ☐ 
2 Does the project result in impacts subject to the conditions of the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA)? ☐ 
3 Does the project generate substantial controversy or public opposition, for any reason, following appropriate public involvement? ☐ 
4 Does the project cause disproportionately high and adverse impacts relative to low-income and/or minority populations? ☐ 
5 Does the project involve a residential or commercial displacement, or a substantial amount of right of way acquisition? ☐ 
6 Does the project require an Individual Section 4(f) approval? ☐ 
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 9
7
Does the project include adverse effects that cannot be resolved with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) or have an adverse effect on a National Historic Landmark (NHL)?
☐ 
If any question 8-31 is checked “Yes” then additional information will be required for those questions in Section G.
Other Considerations Yes No
8 Is an Endangered Species Act (ESA) determination unresolved or is the project covered by a Programmatic Agreement under Section 7?  ☐
9 Is the project located in anadromous fish spawning waters? ☐ 
10 Does the project impact waters classified as Outstanding Resource Water (ORW), High Quality Water (HQW), Water Supply Watershed Critical Areas, 303(d) listed
impaired water bodies, buffer rules, or Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)?  ☐
11 Does the project impact Waters of the United States in any of the designated mountain trout streams? ☐ 
12 Does the project require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual Section 404 Permit? ☐ 
13 Will the project require an easement from a Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) licensed facility? ☐ 
Other Considerations for Type I and II Ground Disturbing Actions (continued) Yes No
14 Does the project include a Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) effects determination other than a No Effect, including archaeological remains? ☐ 
15 Does the project involve GeoEnvironmental Sites of Concerns such as gas
stations, dry cleaners, landfills, etc.? ☐ 
16
Does the project require work encroaching and adversely affecting a regulatory floodway or work affecting the base floodplain (100-year flood) elevations of a water course or lake, pursuant to Executive Order 11988 and 23 CFR 650 subpart
A?
 ☐
17 Is the project in a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) county and substantially affects the coastal zone and/or any Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ☐ 
18 Does the project require a U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) permit? ☐ 
19 Does the project involve construction activities in, across, or adjacent to a designated Wild and Scenic River present within the project area? ☐ 
20 Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) resources? ☐ 
21 Does the project impact federal lands (e.g. U.S. Forest Service (USFS), USFWS,
etc.) or Tribal Lands? ☐ 
22 Does the project involve any changes in access control or the modification or construction of an interchange on an interstate? ☐ 
23 Does the project have a permanent adverse effect on local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? ☐ 
24 Will maintenance of traffic cause substantial disruption? ☐ 
25 Is the project inconsistent with the STIP, and where applicable, the Metropolitan Planning Organization’s (MPO’s) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)? ☐ 
26 Does the project require the acquisition of lands under the protection of Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act, the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), ☐ 
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 10
Tribal Lands, or other unique areas or special lands that were acquired in fee or
easement with public-use money and have deed restrictions or covenants on the property?
27 Does the project involve Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) buyout properties under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)? ☐ 
28 Does the project include a de minimis or programmatic Section 4(f)? ☐ 
29 Is the project considered a Type I under the NCDOT Noise Policy? ☐ 
30 Is there prime or important farmland soil impacted by this project as defined by the Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)? ☐ 
31 Are there other issues that arose during the project development process that affected the project decision? ☐ 
F. Additional Documentation as Required from Section F (ONLY for questions marked ‘Yes’): Question 8: - As noted under Special Project Information, one species (Northern long-eared bat, Myotis septentrionalis) has a current biological conclusion of unresolved, given that further surveys within their optimal survey periods are required in order to reach No Effect biological conclusions. That survey has been added as a Project Commitment. Question 10: - The study area falls within a 303(d) listed impaired stream (Chamber’s Branch – tributary to Cold Water Creek). In their comments submitted on February 18, 2020, the NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), noted that surface waters classified as Water Supply IV Critical Areas (WS-IV CA) are located in the project study area. Therefore, hazardous spill catch basins will be required. NCDOT must strictly adhere to North Carolina Regulations entitled Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds (15A NCAC 04B. 0124) throughout the design and construction of the project for any areas that drain to streams having WS CA (Water Supply Critical Area) classifications. NCDOT will ensure that appropriate notations are made in the erosion control plans for the project as they are developed and that the appropriate special provisions are included in the contract plans for construction. Question 16: - The project will encroach on base floodplains (100 year) as well as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA) and floodways of Chambers Branch. It has been determined through the flood study, and review that the project qualifies for a FEMA “No-Rise” Certification, which was approved/received for the project on May 5, 2022. A USACE Nationwide 14 permit is now required for the project, and has been added as a Project Commitment.
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 11
G. Project Commitments (attach as Green Sheet to CE Form):
NCDOT PROJECT COMMITMENTS
STIP Project No. EB-5844
Proposed sidewalk for SR 2154 (Little Texas Road) from SR 1280 (Lane Street) to
NC 3 (Dale Earnhardt Boulevard) in the City of Kannapolis, NC.Cabarrus County Federal Aid Project No. TAP-2154(003) WBS Element 47301.1.1
1.Biological survey for Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) must be conducted prior toconstruction, during the USFWS optimal survey window between May 1 and September 15.2.Caution is recommended for any ground disturbing activities during construction near CentergroveCemetery at the northeast corner of S. Little Texas Road and Dale Earnhardt Lane. Should anyunmarked remains be encountered, construction activities must cease and remains must beexamined by the county medical examiner in compliance with North Carolina General StatuteChapter 70, article 3.3.Because the project falls within a Water Supply Watershed Critical Area (WS CA), NCDOT mustadhere strictly to adhere to North Carolina Regulations entitled Design Standards in SensitiveWatersheds (15A NCAC 04B. 0124) throughout the design and construction of the project.Hazardous spill catch basins are also be required. NCDOT must ensure that appropriate notationsare made in the erosion control plans for the project as they are developed and that theappropriate special provisions are included in the contract plans for construction.4.The City of Kannapolis will coordinate with Concord-Kannapolis Area Transit to incorporate theirsystem wide bus stop design standards into this project, as applicable.5. The City of Kannapolis will coordinate with Kannapolis City Schools prior to letting the project toconstruction to avoid impacting bus routes.Kannapolis City Schools Superintendent – Dr. Chip BuckwellEmail - [e-mail] - 704-938-1131
6.An US Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 14 is required as project impacts to
jurisdictional streams and wetlands fall within the threshold. An NCDEQ Water Quality Certification
(401)will also be required prior to construction.
v2019.1 EB-5844 Type I(A) CE Page 12
I.Categorical Exclusion Approval:
STIP Project No. EB-5844
WBS Element 47301.1.1
Federal Project No. TAP-2154(003)
Prepared By:
6/3/22 Date Michelle Suverkrubbe, AICP SEPI Engineering and Construction, Inc.
Prepared For:
Reviewed By:
Date Jeff Burleson, Locally Administered Projects Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation
Date Joel Howard, Division Environmental Program Supervisor I North Carolina Department of Transportation
Date Sean Epperson, Division Project Development Engineer North Carolina Department of Transportation
☐Approved •If NO grey boxes are checked in Section F (pages 2and 3), NCDOT approves the Type I or Type IICategorical Exclusion.
☐Certified
•If ANY grey boxes are checked in Section F (pages 2and 3), NCDOT certifies the Type I or Type IICategorical Exclusion for FHWA approval.•If classified as Type III Categorical Exclusion.
FHWA Approved: For Projects Certified by NCDOT (above), FHWA signature required.
Date for John F. Sullivan, III, PE, Division Administrator Federal Highway Administration
Note: Prior to ROW or Construction authorization, a consultation may be required (please see
Section VII of the NCDOT-FHWA CE Programmatic Agreement for more details).
Division 10, North Carolina Department of Transportation
06/03/2022
X
06/06/2022
06/06/2022
APPENDIX B STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 3.00; Released August 2021)
47301.1 TIP/Proj No:EB-5844 County(ies):Cabarrus Page 1 of 2
TIP Number: Date:
Phone: Phone:
Email: Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
No
Design/Future: Year: Existing: Year:
The EB-5844 project consists of adding sidewalk and curb & gutter along Little Texas Road and Ruth Avenue. Most of this sidewalk is proposed sidewalk, but the project also
includes some repair/replacement of isolated section of existing sidewalk along the project. The typical section is a 4' planter at the back of curb with a 6' sidewalk. Some
intersection design improvements will be included at Ruth Avenue and Little Texas Road. A pedestrian bridge will be included over Chamber's Branch to remove pedestrians
from Little Texas Road. Permanent stream impacts were minimized at Chamber's Branch by using a single span greenway bridge instead of a culvert alternative.
General Project Narrative:
(Description of Minimization of Water
Quality Impacts)
The existing site is mainly open shoulder with existing roadway ditches.
N/A
Residential, Industrial, Commercial
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
Project Type:
716 W. Main St.Address:
General Project Information
EB-584447301.1
Address:
5/31/2023
704-983-4461
Raleigh, NC 27603
Contractor / Designer:
919-624-5906
1 Glenwood Ave., Suite 600
[e-mail]
CabarrusKannapolis
Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
N/A
The proposed typical sections add curb and gutter and includes a berm between 5' to
17.5' for a proposed sidewalk that spans the project length.
[e-mail]
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Existing Site
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
ac.ac.
City/Town:
4.0
Typical Cross Section Description:
Surrounding Land Use:
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
2.6
2.01 mi.
Project Description
Proposed Project
Yadkin-Pee DeeRiver Basin(s):
Jeff Burleson
Albemarle, NC 28001
WBS Element:
Non-Road FacilityWBS Element:
TranSystemsNCDOT Contact:
(Version 3.00; Released August 2021)
47301.1 TIP/Proj No.:EB-5844 County(ies):Cabarrus Page 2 of 2
Aquatic T&E Species?No Comments:
Yes N/A
No
Aquatic T&E Species?Comments:
Yes No
No
Aquatic T&E Species?Comments:
Yes
No
SA Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
UT to Unnamed Tributary to Coldwater Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.:13-17-9-4-2-(2)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification:
None
13-17-9-4-2-(2)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
Other Stream Classification:
Supplemental Classification: NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Surface Water Body (3): UT to Unnamed Tributary to Coldwater Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.:
Primary Classification: Water Supply IV (WS-IV) None
None
(If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
UT to Coldwater Creek Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?No
Impairments:chlorophyll a
NRTR Stream ID:SB Buffer Rules in Effect:
None
N/A
NRTR Stream ID:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
Impairments:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element:
Supplemental Classification:
Surface Water Body (2):
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)
NRTR Stream ID:N/A
Surface Water Body (1): Chambers Branch NCDWR Stream Index No.:13-17-9-4-2-(2)
General Project Information
Supplemental Classification:
Waterbody Information
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
APPENDIX C PERMIT DRAWINGS
A
R
T
MEN
N
A
S
O H
DE
P
T
OF TRA SPORT
TIO
N
TA TEOFN RT
CAR
O
LI
N
A
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
STATE SEPI PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.TOTALSHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES

PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:
09
/
0
8
/
9
9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
6
/
8
/
2
0
23
...
\
EB_
5
8
44
_
h
y
d
_
p
r
m
_t
s
h
.d
g
n
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
:
Prepared in the Office of:
VICINITY MAP
See Sheet 1B For Conventional Symbols
See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets
US
E
R:b
s
t
e
f
f
e
n
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
1
PE
T
I
P

P
R
O
J
E
C
T
:

E
B
-
5
8
4
4
1020 20 40
40201020
1055
EB-5844
COUNTY LIMITS
4
5
6
7
8
12 13
14
15
16
17
18
21
11
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT EB-5844= 1.46 MILES
(NOT TO SCALE)
License: F-0453
Fax:[phone]
Tel:[phone]
Raleigh, NC 27603
1 Glenwood Avenue
19
601
3
29
29
29
TYLER NEAL, EI
TO 11TH STREET
D
ALE
EARN
H
ARD
T
BLVD
-L- SR 2154 (Little Texas Road)
LAN
E
ST.
END PROJECT -Y-
BEGIN PROJECT -L-
STRUCTURE & DRAINAGE
GRADING, PAVING, SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER,
RUTH AVENUE FROM LANE STREET (SR 2180) TO N LITTLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154)
-L- Ruth Avenue
BOULEVARD (SR 2126) TO RUTH AVENUE
AND N LITTLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154) FROM DALE EARNHARDT
-L- STA. 118+08.36
END TIP PROJECT EB-5844
-L- STA. 14+33.20
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION EB-5844
-L- STA. 10+00.00
BEGIN TIP PROJECT EB-5844
WATER CREEK/ LAKE CONCORD
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO COLD
-BR-
TO I-85
TO NC-29
-Y- SR 2154 (Little Texas Road)
KELLIE TASSELLI, PE
20
9
10
2.5
D
T
V

K
DESIGN DATA
the plans.
This is a partial controlled access project with access being limited to points shown on
This project is within the municipal boundaries of Town or City.
Clearing on this project shall be performed to the limits established by Method II.
MAJOR COLLECTOR
FUNC CLASS =

ADT (2020) = 3800
ADT (2040)= 4640
= 40 MPH
* TTST = UNKNOWN
= UNKNOWN
= UNKNOWN
= UNKNOWN
"SUB-REGIONAL" TIER
PROJECT C-5502
DESIGN DEVELOPED UNDER
(CABARRUS COUNTY)
RUTH AVENUE SIDEWALK
LITTLE TEXAS ROAD AND
7
5%

PLAN
S
TAP-2154(003)47301.1.1
47301.1.2 TAP-2154(003)
47301.1.3 TAP-2154(003)
ROW
CON
SITE 1
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 1 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
Lake
Concord
Lake
Fisher
S.
Cannon
S.
Dr.
Midlake
Ave.
Lane
St.
Lane St.
China
Grove
Rd.
Hileman
Rd.
Rd.Cline
Independence
Little
Texas
Rd.
Jackson
Rd.
Park
Brantley
Rd.
Blvd.
Earnhardt
W.
"A"St.
Vance
St.
Grove
Rd.
Center
E.
Universal
St.
Haven St.
JennieLinn St.
Hunter
Ave.
Clay St.
KiserAve.
Bostian
Ave.
Wright
Ave.
Ave.
Florence
Dr.
Commonwealth
Dr.
Dalewood
Ave.
RavendaleSt.
Oakdale
Ave.
Crosswinds
Ct.
St.
Sides
LarrySt.Breckenridge
Rd.
Sumner St.
Rush Rd.Colony
Dr.Hagler
St.
Frederick
Ave.
Ave.
Rogers
Ave.
Ave.St.
Windermire
Dr.SheffieldAve.
CarltonAve.
Chambers
Ave.
HeritageCt.
Pine
Cape
Ct.
Forrestbrook
RedleafRd.
Windingbrook
Dr.BrushwoodCt.
Lake
Fisher Dr.
Dundee Dr.
EdinburgDr.
MiddaleSt.
JamaicaRd.
ShepardSt.
IrisAve.
Kingston Dr.
SundaleSt.
Beaumont
Ave.
SteepltonDr.
EstherCir.
Debbie Cir.
TylerSt.
Odessa
St.St.
El PasoSt.
E.1st St.
McBeth Dr.Tybeth
Cir.
OntarioAve.
Waco
Ave.BaldwinAve.
Ft.Worth
Ave.
InezAve.Lakeview
St.SkylandAve.
Fairview
St.CoronaAve.
Coggins
DixieDr.St.HillsideSt.
KentSt.St.
Dodge
St.
Irene
Ave.
Sweetgum
St.
PlumSt.
TerraceDr.
Peach St.
St.Park
St.
NorlandAve.
McLain
Rd.
Delane St.
Barnett
SearsSedanAve.
CoachSt.St.
Desoto
Ave.
BelairAve.
EastwoodDr.
Brook St.
RussellSt.
Prince St.
Austin
Ave.
Browdis
Ave.
CaldwellSt.
LandmarkDr.
May St.
SharonSt.Aggie
Valwood St.
VantageSt.
Hyde
St.
LydiaSt.
Leroy
St.
Utah St.
Eastway
Ave.
Villa
St.
St.St.St.
ValwoodValwoodCt.Ter.
LyndonSt.
Holland
OpalAve.
Rhode Island St.
Indiana St.
OnyxAve.
BernardAve.
Eddleman Rd.
CottageRd.
Brookshire
St.
Suburban
Ave.
CrestwoodCt.
Yost
Pennsylvania
CabarrusDr.
"E"
St.
CopelSt.
Huron
HudsonSt.Foster
PineviewSt.St.PackardAve.James
St.
St.
Center
St.FrontSt.
Cadillac St.
St.
SharpeAve.
Flowe
Ave.
Celia
S.
Harding
Wood
Smith St.Johndy
Ave.
Melinda
Ave.
Isabelle
Pearl
Tuttlewood St.
St.
Nance St.
Basin
Ave.
Idlewood
Dr.Heather
Dr.
Betty St.
Chipola St.Ruth
Wisteria
Ln.Wedge - wood
SextonSt.
St.
Ave.
Lee
Ave.
Rd.
St.
E.
5th
E.
4th
St.E.
3rd St.
N.
Ave.
Rose
S.
Rose
Ave.
Ross
Ave.
Janie
Helen
St.
E.2nd
St.N.
East
Ave.
S.
East
Ave.
N.
Ridge
St.
S.
Ridge
St.BrownHigh
Dr.DenverSt.
EllisSt.
St.
Knollwood
Dr.
York
Ave.
Jean
St.
KennedyAve.
DebbieSt.Debbie St.
Ave
N.
BaldwinS.Ave.
St.Joseph
St.
DallasBryan
St.Lindsay
St.
Hillcrest
St.
RuthSloop
Mabel
Louise
Ave.
Ave.
Ave.
Ave.Ave.
VenusSt.
HazelCentral
McCombs
Ave.
McCombs
Cole
St.St.
Dr.
Cir.Edwards
GenoaSt.
McLain
Rd.
McLainRd.Ext.
ForestParkDr.Forrestbrook
Dr.Dr.
GarnetSt.St.
CambridgeAve.
Carolina
Ave.
Penny
Ave.
V - 8Branch
Ave.Meadow
Ave.
Oakshade
Ave.
CharlesSt.
Chev - rolet Cadillac
St.Chry - slerAve.
Desoto
Charles
Ave.
Ford
St.
Buick
Ave.
CenterSt.
E.
E.
E.
"C"
"D"
St.
St.
"F"E.
St.YorkAve.
OldCentergroveRd.SpringSt.
Center
View
St.
Laundry St.
Walter
Gem
St.
Wilson St.
Ave.ReidSt.
Lowe
Ave.
Hopedale
Patterson
Ave.
Joe St.
QueensGate
Eatminister
Dr.
Patterson
Ave.
Clay St.
Collins
Ave.
Earley
St.
Annex
St.
Tara
Ave.
Ave.
Laura
Carolyn
Ave.
Ave.
Dr.
Ave.Grace
Ave.
Marie
Ave.
NolaAve.
Yates
Ave.
Horseshoe
Cir.RaccoonRidgeTr.
LakeDr.
W.1stSt.
St.
Brook
Ave.
Nevada Ave.Coliseum
Ave.
Ave.
West
Ave.
W.
St."B"
Ave.
St.
LincolnSt.OakshadeAve.
WalterAve.
ChapelSt.
Dot
Ave.
Fairview
St.
VeronaSt.
MessinaSt.
Ridge
St.
S.
TreigeSt.
St.
Earley
Cir.
Plymouth PlymouthSt.
St.
Cook
Cook
St.
St.
2122
2000
2000
2000
2180
2202
2180
1766
1625
1706
1947
2154
2154
2198
2198
2118
2114
2114
2123 2119
16091927
1689
1920
1008
1008
1008
2290
2291
2126
McIver School (historical)
Baycock School
Brown School
Cannon Junior High School
Carver School
Concord
Centergrove
Rd.
3
Cold
Water
Three
Mile
29
29
29
FCA
601
Norfolk
So
ut
hern
8
0
°

3
5
'
.65
.93 .13.05
.04
.42
.29
.05
.05.27.05
.0427391308
1308
1238
1136
Kidd
Moose Rd.
Rd.
China
Main
N.
N.
PoplarSt.
Juniper
W.7thSt.
KellerAve.Ave.AlmaAve.
WinfieldSt.
Echerd
Scott
Joyce
Bertha St.
Woodlawn
Englewood St.
St.
CenterfieldSt.
St.
Ave.
Forest
OakCir.N.LoopRd.N.
Loop Rd.
Poplar
Ave.
N.Walnut
St.
Juniper
St.N.
N.Walnut
N.W.9th St.ChurchAve.
W.
7th
St.
W.8th St.
FirehouseDr.
Brookdale St.
SecuritySt.Floyd
St.
Sides
Craven
Goble
Ingram
Ave.
Ave.
Ave.
Ave.
Ave.
Carolyn
Ave.
Laura
Frances
St.
Evelyn
Ave.
WashingtonLn.Glenwood
WoodlawnSt.
St.BostianAve.
Cora
St.IsenhourSt.
Glenwood St.
St.
St.
ShadyOakCir.Mt.VernonAve.
Keever
Ave.
Doris
Hawthorne
St.
St.
Grace
Jimmy
MarthaSt.
Marie
Ave.
E.11th St.
Louise
Louise
Ave.Rosemary
Ave.
St.
Sloop
Ave.
E.10th St.
Brookdale
Woodlawn
Jackson St.
St.
St.
Mabel
Ave.
Mabel
Ruth
Ave.
Ave.McCombsMapleAve.
Washington
Kath-erine
Metro WorshipCenter
Friendship Church
Norfolk
29
LANE ST (SR 2180)
LANE ST (SR 2180)
VAR PAVED ROADWAY
LITLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154)23' PAVED ROADWAY
VAR PAVED ROADWAY
VAR PAVED ROADWAY
20' PAVED ROADWAYBRANTLEY RD (SR 2000)
19' PAVED ROADWAY
BRANTLEY RD (SR 2000)
VAR PAVED ROADWAY
18' PAVED ROADWAY
ROADWAY24' PAVED
20' PAVED ROADWAY
DEBBIE CIR
SHEPARD ST21' PAVED ROADWAY
24' PAVED ROADWAY
KENNEDY AVE20' PAVED ROADWAY
PAVED LOT
23' PAVED ROADWAYLITTLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154)
EL PASO ST22' PAVED ROADWAY
EL PASO ST17' PAVED ROADWAY
60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALK
EAST FIRST ST
21' PAVED ROADWAY
24' PAVED ROADWAY
60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALKVAR PAVED DRIVE LITLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154)23' PAVED ROADWAY
VAR PAVED ROADWAY
ONTARIO DR VAR PAVED ROADWAY
ONTARIO DR
17' PAVED ROADWAY
16' PAVED DRIVE60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALK
MITCHELL GLEN ST
22' PAVED ROADWAY
SUMMIT RIDGE LN22' PAVED ROADWAY
DALE EARNHARDT BLVD (SR 2126)
DALE EARNHARDT BLVD (SR 2126)
23' PAVED ROADWAYLITLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154)VAR PAVED ROADWAY
19' PAVED ROADWAY
VAR PAVED ROADWAY
18' PAVED ROADWAY 36' PAVED ROADWAY
FOREST PARK DR
19' PAVED ROADWAY
VAR PAVED ROADWAYVALWOOD ST 60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALK 60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALK
VAR PAVED ROADWAY
22' PAVED ROADWAYMISSION TRIPP ST
DALE EARNHARDT BLVD (SR 2126)LITLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154)
STORM MANHOLE
LITLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154)23' PAVED ROADWAY
24' PAVED ROADWAY
CHAMBERS BRANCH
CHAMBERS BRANCH
LITTLE TEXAS ROAD (SR 2154)24' PAVED ROADWAY
NAD
83/ 2001
NAD 83/ 2001
TS TS TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
SHEET 2 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
ELEV. = 676.79'
BEGIN GRADE -BR- STA. 10+00.00 ELEV. = 677.77'
END GRADE -BR- STA. 13+84.43
PI = 10+95.00
EL = 674.39'
(-)2.5266%(+)0.1124%
VC = 60'
K = 23
PI = 13+05.00
EL = 674.63'
(+)0.1124%(+)3.9497%
VC = 70'
K = 18
REVISIO
N
S

INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
17
/
9
9
6/
8/
20
2
3
...\
E
B-5
8
44
_h
yd_
p
r
m
_ps
h_8
.dg
n
USE
R
:b
st
e
f
f
e
n
0 20 401020
HALF SIZE SCALE: 1" = 40'
FULL SIZE SCALE: 1" = 20'
EB-58441 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
License: F-0453
NAD 83/ 2001
5'5'
670
680
690
660
670
680
690
660
8
-BR-
ELEVATION 672.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EMBANKMENT
ELEVATION 672.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EMBANKMENT
EXCAVATION
CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
LEGEND
EST. 19 TONS; 40 SYGF
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS; EST. 35 SYGF
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
ELEV. = 674.446'
END BENT 1 STA. 11+45.12
ELEV. = 674.536'
END BENT 2 STA. 12+25.12
EST. 13 CY
ELEVATION=272.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EST. 10 CY
ELEVATION=272.2'
EXCAVATION TO
BENT CAP
ON 4'-0" END
PREFABRICATED STEEL TRUSS
PROPOSED 1@80'
SKEW=90 DEGREES
GP ELEV.=674.2'
L STA. 11+85.12 -BR-
EST. 19 TONS; EST. 40 SYGF
1-FT THICK
CL. 'I' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS; EST. 35 SYGF
1-FT THICK
CL. 'I' RIP RAP
C
DESIGN DISCHARGEDESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEV.
BASE HW ELEVATION
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATIONAT DATE OF SURVEY FT
= 1732= 25
= 675.6'
= 2546
= 100
= 676.2'
= 1170
= 5+
= 674.5'
= October 2020
= 0.5
INSET 8A
SITE 1
60" CONC WALK
30" C&G
30" C&G
60" CONC WALK
MTL
MTL
60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALK
30" C&G
30" C&G
30" C&G
60" CONC WALK
SEAT=672.33'BL-14
S
S
S
S
INV=675.66'
INV=676.42'
INV=676.48'
18" RCP
11
EOI
EOI
S
S
EOI
EOT
EOT
N
76°41'49" W
164.87'
EIP EIP
N 09°50'08" E
110.01'
S

80
°52'09" E
60.00'
20' SIDEWALK AND PDE EASEMENT
W
A
W
B
WB
WD
WD
WC
WC
S
SS
BRIDGE
CONC/BST
672.31'
SEAT=
671.29'
SEAT=
672.28'
SEAT=
CHAMBERS BRANCH
45+00
.00
.01
.02
.02
.01
.00
10+00
F
F
F
F
C
F
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
TS TS TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
SHEET 3 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
ELEV. = 676.79'
BEGIN GRADE -BR- STA. 10+00.00 ELEV. = 677.77'
END GRADE -BR- STA. 13+84.43
PI = 10+95.00
EL = 674.39'
(-)2.5266%(+)0.1124%
VC = 60'
K = 23
PI = 13+05.00
EL = 674.63'
(+)0.1124%(+)3.9497%
VC = 70'
K = 18
REVISIO
N
S

INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.8
/
17
/
9
9
6/
8/
20
2
3
...\
E
B-5
8
44
_h
yd_
p
r
m
_ps
h_8
_c
o
n
t
o
ur
s
.d
g
n
USE
R
:b
st
e
f
f
e
n
0 20 401020
HALF SIZE SCALE: 1" = 40'
FULL SIZE SCALE: 1" = 20'
EB-58441 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
License: F-0453
NAD 83/ 2001
5'5'
670
680
690
660
670
680
690
660
8
-BR-
ELEVATION 672.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EMBANKMENT
ELEVATION 672.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EMBANKMENT
EXCAVATION
CLASS 'B' RIP RAP
LEGEND
EST. 19 TONS; 40 SYGF
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS; EST. 35 SYGF
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
ELEV. = 674.446'
END BENT 1 STA. 11+45.12
ELEV. = 674.536'
END BENT 2 STA. 12+25.12
EST. 13 CY
ELEVATION=272.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EST. 10 CY
ELEVATION=272.2'
EXCAVATION TO
BENT CAP
ON 4'-0" END
PREFABRICATED STEEL TRUSS
PROPOSED 1@80'
SKEW=90 DEGREES
GP ELEV.=674.2'
L STA. 11+85.12 -BR-
EST. 19 TONS; EST. 40 SYGF
1-FT THICK
CL. 'I' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS; EST. 35 SYGF
1-FT THICK
CL. 'I' RIP RAP
C
DESIGN DISCHARGEDESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEV.
BASE HW ELEVATION
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATIONAT DATE OF SURVEY FT
= 1732= 25
= 675.6'
= 2546
= 100
= 676.2'
= 1170
= 5+
= 674.5'
= October 2020
= 0.5
INSET 8A
SITE 1
60" CONC WALK
30" C&G
30" C&G
60" CONC WALK
MTL
MTL
60" CONC WALK
60" CONC WALK
30" C&G
30" C&G
30" C&G
60" CONC WALK
SEAT=672.33'BL-14
S
S
S
S
INV=675.66'
INV=676.42'
INV=676.48'
18" RCP
11
EOI
EOI
S
S
EOI
EOT
EOT
N
76°41'49" W
164.87'
EIP EIP
N 09°50'08" E
110.01'
S

80
°52'09" E
60.00'
20' SIDEWALK AND PDE EASEMENT
W
A
W
B
WB
WD
WD
WC
WC
S
SS
BRIDGE
CONC/BST
672.31'
SEAT=
671.29'
SEAT=
672.28'
SEAT=
CHAMBERS BRANCH
45+00
.00
.01
.02
.02
.01
.00
10+00
66
7.0
667
.0
6
6
7
.
0
668.0
668.0
6
69
.0
6
6
9
.0
6
69.0
6
7
0.
0
67
0.0
6
7
0
.06
7
0
.0
670.0
670.0
6
7
0.
0
6
7
0
.
0671.0 671.0
67
1.0
67
1.0
6
7
1.
0
6
7
1.0
671.0
6
7
1.
0
6
7
1.0 672.067
2.0
672.0
672.0
6
7
2.
0
672.0
6
7
2
.0
672.0 67
2.0
672.0
672.0
6
7
2.
0
673.0
673.0
673.0
673.0
673
.0
673.0
674.0
67
4
.0
674.0674.0
674.0
674.0
674.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
6
75.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
6
7
5
.0
675.0
675.0
676.0
676.0
676.0
676.0
676.0
6
7
7
.
0
677.0
6
7
7.
0
677.0
677.0
678.0
678.0
678.0
678.0
678.0
6
7
8
.
0
679.0
680.0
F
F
F
F
C
F
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
TS TS TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIO
N
S

HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
6/
8
/
2
02
3
...\
E
B
-
58
4
4_
h
yd
_p
r
m_p
s
h_
8
A.d
g
n
USER
:b
st
e
f
f
e
n
8
/
17
/
99
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
License: F-0453
8AEB-5844
0 20 401020
FULL SIZE SCALE: 1" = 20'
SITE 1 SHEET 4 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
ELEVATION 672.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EMBANKMENT
ELEVATION 672.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EMBANKMENT
EST. 19 TONS; 40 SYGF
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS; EST. 35 SYGF
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
INSET 8A
60" CONC WALK
30" C&G
30" C&G
60" CONC WALK
MTL
MTL
60" CONC WALK
30" C&G
SEAT=672.33'BL-14
S
S
S
S
EOI
EOI
S
S
EOI
EOT
20' SIDEWALK AND PDE EASEMENT
WD
WC
BRIDGE
CONC/BST
672.31'
SEAT=
671.29'
SEAT=
672.28'
SEAT=
45+00
.0
0
.0
1
.02
.0
2
.0
1
.0
0
NAD 83/ 2001
C
F
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
TS TS TEMPORARY SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
REVISIO
N
S

HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
6/
8
/
2
02
3
...\
E
B
-
58
4
4_
h
yd
_p
r
m_p
s
h_
8
A_c
on
t
o
ur
s
.dg
n
USER
:b
st
e
f
f
e
n
8
/
17
/
99
INCOMPLETE PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
1 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Tel:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
License: F-0453
8AEB-5844
0 20 401020
FULL SIZE SCALE: 1" = 20'
SITE 1 SHEET 5 OF 6
PERMIT DRAWING
ELEVATION 672.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EMBANKMENT
ELEVATION 672.2'
EXCAVATION TO
EMBANKMENT
EST. 19 TONS; 40 SYGF
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
EST. 15 TONS; EST. 35 SYGF
CLASS 'I' RIP RAP
INSET 8A
60" CONC WALK
30" C&G
30" C&G
60" CONC WALK
MTL
MTL
60" CONC WALK
30" C&G
SEAT=672.33'BL-14
S
S
S
S
EOI
EOI
S
S
EOI
EOT
20' SIDEWALK AND PDE EASEMENT
WD
WC
BRIDGE
CONC/BST
672.31'
SEAT=
671.29'
SEAT=
672.28'
SEAT=
45+00
.0
0
.0
1
.02
.0
2
.0
1
.0
0
6
6
7
.
0
6
6
7
.0
6
6
8
.0
6 68 .0
6
6
9
.0
6
6
9
.0
6
7
0
.
0
6
7
0
.0
6
7
0
.0
6
7
0
.
0
6
7
0
.
0671.0 671.0
6
7
1.0
6
7
1
.
0
6
7
1.
0
6
7
1.
0
6
7
2
.
0
6
7
2
.
0
6
7
2
.0
6
7
2
.
0
672.0 6
7
2
.0
6
7
2
.
0 673.0
6
7
3
.0
6
7
4
.
0
674.0
674.0
675.0
675.0
675.0
6
7
5.
0
675.0
6
7
5
.
0
675.0
NAD 83/ 2001
C
F
C
F
C
F
F
F
F
F
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)

1 11+70 TO 11+99 -BR- Bridge Excavation and < 0.01 36
Floodplain Bench Stabilization

TOTALS*: < 0.01 0 36 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 6 OF 6
WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Cabarrus County
EB-5844
47301.1.1
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
06/08/2023

.008
.008
APPENDIX D PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT

Action Id. SAW-2020-00260 County: Cabarrus U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Concord

NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Requestor: City of Kannapolis
Elizabeth Hassenfritz
Address: 401 Laureate Way
Kannapolis, NC 28081
Telephone Number: 704-920-4235
E-mail: [e-mail]

Size (acres) 31.8 Nearest Town Kannapolis
Nearest Waterway Long Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040105 Coordinates Latitude: 35.487193
Longitude: -80.602138
Location description: The review area is located 100 feet North of the intersection of Mission Trip St and S Little Texas Rd in
Cabarrus County.

Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination

There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 1/2/2020. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.

There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination

There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2020-00260
The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Catherine M. Janiczak at 704-510-1438 or
[e-mail].
C.Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 03/11/2020.
D.Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps’ Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: ______________________________________________________
Date of JD: 03/11/2020 Expiration Date of JD:Not applicable
mit an RFA form to the Division Office if yo
____________________________________
Eiti DtfJDNt li bl
SAW-2020-00260
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0

Copy furnished:

Agent: Robert Lepsic, PWN

Address: 1 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone Number: 919-747-5857
E-mail: [e-mail]

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: City of Kannapolis, Elizabeth Hassenfritz File Number: SAW-2020-00260 Date: 03/11/2020
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B
PERMIT DENIAL C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
x ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit. x OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit x ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit. x APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information. x ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
x APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262

If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.

________________________________________
Signature of appellant or agent.
Date: Telephone number:

For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:

District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Catherine M. Janiczak, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403

For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:

Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 03/11/2020

B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: City of Kannapolis, Elizabeth Hassenfritz, 401 Laureate
Way,Kannapolis, NC 28081

C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, City of Kannapolis Sidewalk
Project PJD, SAW-2020-00260

D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located 100 feet North of
the intersection of Mission Trip St and S Little Texas Rd in Cabarrus County.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Cabarrus City: Kannapolis
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.487193 Longitude: -80.602138
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Long Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): 03/09/2020
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.

Site Number Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
“may be” subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
SA 35.482033 -80.602043 371.5 linear feet Non-wetland Sec. 404
SB 35.482261 -80.602565 404.4 linear feet Non-wetland Sec. 404
Unnamed
Trib to
Coldwater
Creek
35.483158 -80.602285 441.3 linear feet Non-wetland Sec. 404
WA 35.483008 -80.602158 1.4 acres Wetland Sec. 404
WB 35.482327 -80.60198 0.3 acres Wetland Sec. 404
WC 35.483163 -80.601018 0.4 acres Wetland Sec. 404
WD 35.482556 -80.6011055 0.7 acres Wetland Sec. 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 2 (Dated January 2, 2020)
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Officedoesnotconcurwithdatasheets/delineation report. Rationale:
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corpsnavigablewaters'study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S.Geological Survey map(s).Citescale&quadname: Concord, NC (2019)
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Cabarrus County Online Soil Survey
Nationalwetlands inventorymap(s). Citename:
State/localwetland inventorymap(s):
FEMA/FIRMmaps:
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs:Aerial (Name &Date):Figure 2 (Dated January 2, 2020)
or Other (Name&Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Otherinformation(pleasespecify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
03/11/2020
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.
Signature and date of Regulatory
ff b li PJD
Unnamed Tributary to Cold Water Creek (Lake Concord)
U
T

to
C
o
l
d

W
at
e
r

C
r
e
ek (
L
a
k
e C
o
n
c
ord)

Study Area
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetlands
Potentially Jurisdictional Streams - Intermittent
Potentially Jurisdictional Streams - Perennial
Culvert
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and shown hereindoes not meet NC 47-30 Requirements and therefore is notfor design, construction, or recording or transfer of title. TheExhibit was compiled from available information obtainedfrom the sources listed below.
Sources:NCDOT, NC OneMap, ESRI
January 2020 I
EB-5844 Little Texas Road Sidewalk
City of Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, NC
Figure 2. Jurisdictional Features
0 1,000 2,000 3,000500Feet
UT
t
o

C
o
ldw
a
ter C
r
e
ek
SB
SA
SA
WA
WD
WC
WB
APPENDIX E NCSHPO SCOPING LETTER RESPONSE

STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0148
DATE RECEIVED: 01/14/2020
AGENCY RESPONSE: 02/10/2020
REVIEW CLOSED: 02/13/2020
Due: 01/28/2020
Due:
H-- C9iffs
V\k'r
ER 20-0086, NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
COUNTY: CABARRUS H12: OTHER
Received: 01/17/2020
Historic Preservation Office
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
CENTRALINA COG
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: City of Kannapolis
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the construction
from Lane Street to Dale Earnhardt Blvd.
approximately 2.1 miles and will include
of sidewalks along Little Texas Road
The sidewalk project will be
ADA compliant ramps and curb and gutter.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED: 0 NO COMMENT KI COMMENTS ATTACHED

SIGNED BY: DATE: (
4,
JAN 2 1 2020

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History Secretary Susi H. Hamilton Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

January 29, 2020

Robert Lepsic [e-mail]
SEPI Inc. Glenwood Avenue Suite 600 Raleigh, NC 27603 Re: Proposed Little Texas Road Sidewalk (EB-5844), City of Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, ER 19-0086 Dear Mr. Lepsic:

Thank you for your letter of January 2, 2020, concerning the above-referenced project. We have reviewed the
information provided and offer the following comments:

The project area is considered as having relatively low probability for containing a significant, intact National
Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligible archaeological site. No archaeological survey is recommended.
However, the Centergrove Cemetery, which is located along the east side of Little Texas Road, is located
immediately adjacent to the project area.
Although there is a low likelihood of burials being impacted by sidewalk construction, we recommend caution if ground-disturbing activities are to take place near the cemetery. Please note that cemeteries are protected under NC General Statutes Chapter 14-148 and 14-149 and are afforded consideration under Chapter 65. If unmarked human skeletal remains are encountered during construction, the provisions of North Carolina General Statute Chapter 70, Article 3 apply. Construction activities should immediately cease, and the county medical examiner should be contacted.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579 or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,

Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer

Cc: Michelle Suverkrubbe [e-mail]
APPENDIX F
FEMA COMPLIANCE DOCUMENTATION
From:Elizabeth H. Hassenfritz
To:Kellie Tasselli
Subject:RE: EB-5844 - Little Texas Sidewalk - (FOLLOW UP FROM 5/10 MTG.)
Date:Friday, May 19, 2023 11:35:43 AM
Attachments:image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
Kellie,
Item 3 below – the City’s floodplain manager approved the no-rise study in May 2022. Nothing else
is required. NCDOT is aware.
Beth
From: Kellie Tasselli <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 11:15 AM
To: Elizabeth H. Hassenfritz <[e-mail]>
Subject: EB-5844 - Little Texas Sidewalk - (FOLLOW UP FROM 5/10 MTG.)
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Kannapolis email system. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Beth,
A few follow up items after our meeting this week.
1. I’ve attached the Pavement Report from F&R. I still need to go through and verify that all
NCDOT Geotech comments from the 60% review have been addressed.
2. I’ve touched based with our Survey Manager, who is getting started on RW exhibits. He will
be meeting with the CAD Tech next week and producing a proposed delivery schedule. I’m
hopeful that we can produce ~5-10 exhibits per week. Assuming 85 parcels (scope of services
document), this work can hopefully be completed in 9-12 weeks, with interim deliverables in
between. I’ll send you a proposed schedule next week.
3. I’ve attached an email chain from Brian Steffan, our Water Resources engineer. There seems
to be a history of a back-and-forth on who would be approving the MOA. Will the MOA be
handled by City of Kannapolis Floodplain Administrator? Or will it be going to NCDOT? This
item still has a chance to impact schedule.
Hope you have a great weekend.
Kellie
Kellie​ Tasselli, PE
Transportation Engineer/Project Manager
____________________________________________
c: 919-451-0531 | d: 919‑573‑9925
TranSystems
1 Glenwood Ave Suite 600 | Raleigh, NC 27603
www.transystems.com
[facebook.com][twitter.com][linkedin.com][instagram.com]
​ Note: The information contained in this transmission as well as all documents transmitted herewith are privileged and confidential
information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it was sent, and the recipient is obliged
to protect this information as appropriate. If the recipient of the e-mail, and/or the documents attached is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or reproduction, copy, or storage of this communication is strictly
prohibited. Thank you.

Pursuant to NC General Statutes Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic mail message
and any attachments hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) that may be sent inresponse to it may be considered public record and as such are subject to request and review
by anyone at any time. This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use ofthe intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary,
privileged, work product, and/or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Ifyou are not the intended recipient or receive this message in error, the sender does not intend
delivery to you and does not waive any privilege, protections, or other rights pertaining to thismessage and any attachments. You should therefore immediately contact the sender by reply
email and delete the original message, including any attachments.