310800_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230908

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: (D'Conipliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: aRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Z Z Arrival Time: r D Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: ckc-d eS lh(oG4 (Q+t,fttitll ,tlUr�er�y) Owner Email:
Owner Name: Clnui1e3- f}btOtf- Phone:
Mailing Address:
i
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: cyIad-eS lt/irI'Chew y<oG� _ Certification Number: 17 61 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder R 6w U 1 jNon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layer Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:] Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA 0 NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Cofrtinued

Facilit Number: 3 - 00 jDate of Inspection: ? 7 2-
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 26
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [/3'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6, Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 21/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [?T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Ej No [] NA [] NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ZN o ❑ NA [] NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes E�J`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [:]Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard []Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and t" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 'LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes E:fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - `FOO Date of Inspection: c/1712 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Eallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fait to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [/]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No e-NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [7f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes R] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
• 1wbo,If .�P �rtcr`�i' �iCJ� > j a
Way o� bv4 h ✓° me w
Reviewer/Inspector Name: /l/I*t'lx P �LZ-ro Phone: `/G. '7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j�G ✓' `I Date: 7/7/23
Page 3 of 3 511212020