820619_Routine Inspection_20230831

of visit:
for Visit:
inspection V iiperation Review
Referral
O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Q; Departure Time: j:OD County:
Farm Name: �C'Gy/J��� Owner Email:
Owner Name: ��G«/�� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ��l Title:
Onsite Representative: jo,
Certified Operator: gngp A �
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Region: ��
Phone:
Integrator: �t
a
Certification Numbers 2, 6
Certification Number:
Longitude:
x*aae $ 04.%bn &w 4ex bak
{$#a$:am aaYax{,a �. r•2 ak dh#fi TM$b AO:b 8#A"kpd
*d$.R3#R#U 3'GyT�#F4?F QQ4S •a'• �b$R$✓x $e ^i $.#•'�A$k$P F WS#SY y. #,$
Agog; aws *ab �*.n $ak84a6s6Yr�$aa2 #;ka :#V %+#Ra #ka,%r5�a$#G #p: # *'9a# 404 AAoa%#nbmk at*.•avu'x .•z +ya.5c,1ap*#kAA a6%3 y,0y�3a 9•%:
e 938:P 4` �� 9a§4y@g8is§M�4µ•40*04443�0dx#�uy��x *'�4L+�s4a
*SkF*i¢Yxt.'sYa5
g,�a,n sa
$(?.u4'flaaS&'s'NiDm**aaCa}a'�$ y} sa$�
d'f' 4 R... R•"bV� Q$ £'5 td
�• f ix yy6Pxea.tr�aCdJ+H�861.J{ae$dY#
.4N�5 $4 Pl4bMv¢30 d&A ffiNtR $8"ea#r�tat'.•i'Y
¢$
r'•
Wean to Finish a Layer
${ Dah Cow a'g
A Wean to Feeder Non La er$
Dai Calf ki
_ _
Feeder to Finish_ / 1)5, `i' g' a 'a.''t' $
i Farrow to Wean aaa a$$r a�i
Dai Heifer
a
D Cow
* ; 3a��
��tg� �
a Farrow to Feedera2 *uPa$ t.Y#$a• �,,..
�t
Non -Dairy.
.. Farrow to Finish I Layers
g Beef Stocker
g Gilts 3 Non -Layers
ig9 °
1gx jBeef Feeder I Ig
Boars Pullets
a Beef Brood Cow
g$
94#k4#2.&A". i$Ci �%A*F Mltkt4r$S ti#b 4T 8*u a i' a•#�#,
gaase a•a*xs"'a,$z $a k•e.aae.x aaa 3a#a RVAIa:
esa*' a�xa$•$ m�rse a:x$#aaa *#am.x aaar
ai'g sxaa(' enwre I*n.;$glgxzS4�4&*'NA.4a
Turkeys
gg 5o#{$6%a #i*a=aaiC x:AYs {lx#�fM {• >$###$+q as@'#34'$#
$ aa'$aaa„ a# aasaa $ mVasa.»$ *a$$ ar ,ra,aaa
sa. kx a*aa ga agg x as s a$a$a ea
,a as as
Turkey
b#i
#dma�a113aa
14411
�•
{Yk
Otheraatge$a$aQg9ag9o-@$gvam9$°sit
Ai3�n�a�6d %44k8$'$'k $1
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes EE�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �. o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of inspection: 3
a3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes _[21<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
.®r'es ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes Q-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes Eno
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes -Ef"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes f�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes 0>0
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �� d . Gl � p( .f � pP�%, L Pe
f
�? �
�DLN � C bin F ox( i
��0
13. Soil Type(s): u�GTn �fi�s.//t� (fin
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAW -MP?
❑ Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
'6..jV es ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes ❑ I10
❑ Yes ,❑-Qo
❑ Yes []-No
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ZI-Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 0T20 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes ®,No
[—]Yes EJ-740
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ']-No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes . E[ No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [—]Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
Facility Number: l
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes _0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesEE�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes` No
❑ Yes...E]�No
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .8' No
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes -E5'°No
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes EEJ"No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 21�0
I
a-Wa
zzr
Sjo�
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
4welsaj
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: 11_)
Date: p G.31112--3
511212020

FACILITY#: FARM NAME: as i LAGOON LEVEL .
PERMIT M9)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES
CROP TYPES
- ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
4 9
DATE / NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE) NITROGEN LEVEL fi
DATENITROGEN LEVEL
SOIL
//RFAQFO(A1)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES -
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
IRR2 (e2+)
NITROGEN (N)
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (xza)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATEP EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES 1:
RAIN FALL (mi)
-INITIAL AFTER I" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (#21 &25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE��%�a-�
0: 3,1 P: 9 �% % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O; P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
O: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND u21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDSMORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS_ LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS_ TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS_ GOOD HEALTHY CORPS_ CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS_ FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1 A- Ends September 30u
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1-t- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15* - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15n - Ends August 1't
Rye: Opens September 1st -Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1-t- Ends April 15th -
Wheat: Opens September 1 st - Ends April 30w
Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st