Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310475_Remission (Decision)_20230907 (2)STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DUPLIN BEFORE THE REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION DWR-PC 2022-0009 IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST: RUFUS E. ROUSE ) ) ) FINAL DECISION THIS MATTER came before the Civil Penalty Remissions Committee (“Committee”) of the Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B- 282.1, on July 13, 2023, upon the recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Resources (“DWR”) designee, Ramesh Ravella, Branch Supervisor of DWR’s Animal Feeding Operations Branch, for entry of a final decision on the assessment of a civil penalty and investigation costs against Rufus E. Rouse, totaling Two Thousand Four Hundred Fifty-five Dollars and Twenty Cents ($2,455.20). On February 24, 2022, Rufus E. Rouse was assessed civil penalties of $2,455.20, which included $455.20 investigative costs for several violations of N.C.G.S. 143-215 et seq. and the General Permit AWG100000 as follows:  $1,000.00 - for failure to prevent noncompliant waste levels in the lagoons that rose to dangerous levels and impacted the structural integrity of the lagoon in violation of Condition V2 of the General Permit AWG100000.  $1,000.00 - for failure to notify the Division of noncompliant waste levels in the lagoons for more than twenty-four (24) hours and the 5-day written report of the occurrence; and failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to the requirement of Condition V2 in violation of Condition III.17(e) of the General Permit AWG100000. On July 28, 2022, the DWR received a request for remission of the assessed civil penalty, including a “Justification for Remission Request” and a “Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts.” On December 5, 2022, the DWR’s director, -2- through his designee, considered the request for remission of the assessed penalty and the justification submitted by Rufus E. Rouse as well as the required statutory factors. No grounds were found to modify the initial assessed civil penalty. Rufus E. Rouse has had two previous enforcement actions during the prior five-year period, both for failing to pay annual fees. Mr. Rouse appeared before the Committee. The request for remission was presented to the Civil Penalty Remissions Committee based on the written submissions from the DWR and the oral presentation made by Mr. Rouse. Having considered the facts contained in the record and the factors set forth in N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(b) and (c), the Civil Penalty Remissions Committee, Group I, for consideration on July 13, 2023, finds and incorporates herein the facts contained in the Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated to by Rufus E. Rouse. Additionally, the Committee concludes that the record supports the Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact in turn support the Conclusions of Law. The Committee further concludes that the DWR properly considered and applied the factors set forth in N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1 in determining the amount of the civil penalty and considering the request for remission. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c), the Committee has considered the statutory factors and the recommendation of the Director, and concludes that NO GROUNDS have been shown by Mr. Rouse nor are facts present in the record to support the Request for Remission or reduction of the penalty assessed by the Director for the violations. Upon duly made motion and vote, the Committee DENIES the Request for Remission and, therefore, UPHOLDS the civil penalty assessment of Two Thousand ($2,000.00) with investigative costs of Four Hundred Fifty-five -3- Dollars and Twenty Cents ($455.20) for the total amount of Two Thousand Four Hundred Fifty- five and Twenty Cents ($2,455.20). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. The Request failed to demonstrate the presence of any grounds sufficient to remit the civil penalty pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c), and the Request is, therefore, DENIED. Because no grounds exist to support the remission of the penalty at issue, the civil penalty of $2,000.00, and investigative costs in the amount of $455.20 are UPHELD in the total amount of $2,455.20. 2. This Final Decision and Order shall be served upon Rufus E. Rouse and upon receipt hereof, the amount of Two Thousand Four Hundred Fifty-five Dollars and Twenty Cents ($2,455.20) shall be paid to the Department of Environmental Quality within thirty days as required by law. This the 7th day of September, 2023. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION _____________________________________ Robin W. Smith, Chair Environmental Management Commission -4- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION on the parties listed below by the methods indicated: Rufus E. Rouse Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested Reedy Meadows Farm 1&2 Receipt #: 7002 3150 0000 1285 5447 1658 Pasture Branch Rd. Beulaville, NC 28518 Richard Rogers, Director electronically: richard.rogers@deq.nc.gov Division of Water Resources Thomas E. Tharrington electronically: tom.tharrington@deq.nc.gov Assistant Regional Supervisor Wilmington WQ Regional Office Ramesh Ravella, Supervisor electronically: ramesh.ravella@ncdenr.gov Animal Feeding Operations Branch Michael P. Pjetraj, Ass’t Branch Chief electronically: michael.pjetraj@ncdenr.gov WQ Permitting Section Miressa D. Garoma electronically: miressa.garoma@deq.nc.gov Animal Feeding Operations Program This the 7th day of September, 2023. JOSH STEIN Attorney General /s/ Phillip T. Reynolds Phillip T. Reynolds Special Deputy Attorney General N.C. Department of Justice P. O. Box 629 Raleigh, N.C. 27602