20231199 Ver 1_GreenbriarRidge_PCN_081423_20230828

oe'oF wA rE�Q�
� r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑x Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes X❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑Yes X❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Greenbriar Ridge
2b. County:
Iredell
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Statesville
2d. Subdivision name:
Greenbriar Ridge
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
multiple; see attached owner information included with original PJD request.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Buyer, under contract to purchase
4b. Name:
Tim Derylak
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
D.R. Horton
4d. Street address:
8025 Arrowridge Blvd.
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
4f. Telephone no.:
704-534-1533
4g. Fax no.:
n/a
4h. Email address:
j [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Perry Isner (consultant)
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
5c. Street address:
328 East Broad Street, Suite D
5d. City, state, zip:
Statesville, NC 28677
5e. Telephone no.:
704.773.4239
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
perryisnercc wetlands-waters.com
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
4754236335.000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.778733 Longitude:-80.845472
1 c.
Property size:
87 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Fourth Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Yadkin Pee Dee
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of primarily vacant, forested land. The general land use in the vicinity of the project is primarily residential development.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.75
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 4690
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a single family residential development in order to meet the growing need for housing of this type
in the region.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes the proposed development and supporting infrastructure including internal roads, stormwater facilities, amenities, and both on
site and off site utilities. Typical earth -moving equipment will be utilized including but not limited to pan, excavator, bulldozer, dump truck, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
X❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑x Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Tamp Bandy / Chris Huysman
Agency/Consultant Company: W&W, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
SAW-2022-01214
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes X❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
X❑ Wetlands X❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.009
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.03
W3 T
water line installation
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.2
W4 T
waterline temp constructio
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.2
W5 P
Road fill (T-1)
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes/No
Corps
0.23
W6
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.719
2h. Comments:
0.23 Total Permanent impacts from road crossing and lot fills (see Sheets 5, 7, and 8 attached impact drawings). 0.4 Total Temporary impacts from
utility installations. 0.2 acres of temporary construction impact is located within existing sewer easement for construction. Water line installation will
result in 0.2 acre of permanently maintained easement adjacent to existing sewer easement (no loss / conversion from wooded to herbaceous)
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Tributary 1
PER
Corps
4
193
S2 T
sewer utility crossing
Tributary 1
PER
Corps
4
10
S3 T
sewer crossing (offsite)
Tributary 1
PER
Corps
4
10
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
202
3i. Comments:
Permanent stream impacts for road construction 193 If (0.016 ac)
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B 1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Project has been designed to avoid multiple road crossings of aquatic features. Proposed water line to run parallel and abuts existing sewer
easement and crosses sewer easement at locations to avoid stream crossings and provide for maximum stream buffers on existing streams.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Utilization of headwalls at road crossing.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
X❑ Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
n/a linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.33 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: 1:1 for road crossing impacts (0.23ac) plus 0.5:1 x 0.2ac utility line conversion of wooded to herbaceous Total: 0.33 ac
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Offsite water line will be placed immediately adjacent to existing offsite sewer. Expansion of existing maintained easement will result in 0.2 acres of
adjacent tree clearing and conversion to maintained 1 0'additional maintained easement for water line. 0.1 ac of mitigation provided for widened
easement. Proposed road crossing wetland impact consists of wetlands primarily within existing sanitary sewer easement. 1:1 mitigation proposed
for road crossing wetland impacts. Total NC DMS compensatory wetland mitigation proposed 0.33 ac. Total stream impacts reduced to less than
0.02 acres - No compensatory mitigation proposed for stream impacts)
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes X❑ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
oho
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Phase II
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
State
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Statesville
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
El Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑x No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes X❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No
additional impacts anticipated
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Tie to existing on -site sanitary utility
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes X❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑x No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCNHP.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
none
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes X❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC HPO gis layers
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
GIS
Digitally signed by Timothy J Derylak
DM [e-mail],
Tim Derylak
CN-Timothy J Derylak. OU-Users,
Timothy J Derylak o'U-HameSt�i; °r, DC-drhortcn,
D.R. Horton Land Entitlement Mgr
7
DC -cam
Contact Info: t;derylakpadrhorton.com
Date: 2023.08.14 15:24:17-04'00'
8/14/23
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

UEA
)J11,I/j� �jIII IIII Ir
//I/ IIII
////IIII
/ l I/// im
Project boundary (tYP) \\\\'V��\���'�Jrrl�li�i'�'
i'JIAYy,JJ/�lll%jlllt\��\=/JIJRi
Ora Dr.\� ! r JrJ / J ¢�-j / / / I/ r lyrJ / r/i��I///111111�/�i I )
/ Wetland 3000 - 0.03 ac
rr / 1 / /l l
il� Tributary 1 -2810 LF
i lJf \ \11 (IIII/`f,I !
f1JIs J/, 1 IJr 71
\\\1 III
`
II I1\\
Tributary 6 -800 LF
Tributary 5 -20 LF
111\\\ \IY ✓ / /J//'�i//i / / 1\\1�1\y�llr�J J'
Wetland 2000 - 0.12 ac \),V ril
/ U/ //I/ll /iJJ •. ! "/ii'�ri'/ /'/-l\ llllll)I///�/% �'// \
Wetland 4000 - 0.10 ac
Tributary 2 -65 LF 1/ '
IJ
Tnbuta 4-580 LF
✓ / r-s✓/iirOi� �\1 I//ll / ' / ull"v �� /-�I)Il J
-
I Ill %/� i � r� //i/��\\\\\\� \ 11\\\ \\ 1\1 \ y• + I I1J1 / //// / �� _-�
� I/ //// /, / � 'i' ,\\\\\�\��•i1111\\I'\ 11 l \1\ 1lIIII /'� _
Wetland 1000
Tributary 4 -415 LF
// 111 /Irl�i I\t\ 1\ \\ \ I\I J�/ lIr I I ✓ \\ , \\ \\ yi0 "l,.
1IQ1%lIll
\` I PI
Scale: 1" = 350' N
ee�
- M -" 0 125 350
°❑i°❑ MERRIM Greenbriar Ridge Existing Conditions
000 Map
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300 PROJECT No: 6512-1067
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 ISSUE DATE: 07/18/2023
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone] SHEET NO OF

r-
a
Ir � �
Tributary 7(offsite) -445 LF
Project boundary (typ)
of o MERRIM Greenbriar Ridge
❑❑❑
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
Tributary 8(offsite) -275 LF
Tributary 1(offsite) -1265 LF
Approx. wetlands - 2.70 ac.
Scale: 1" = 350' N
` << 0 425 350
Existing Conditions
Map
PROJECT No: 6512-1067
ISSUE DATE: 07/18/2023
2 12
SHEET NO OF

°❑i°❑ MERRICIC
❑❑❑
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
Greenbriar Ridge Overall Site Plan
PROJECT No: 6512-1067
ISSUE DATE: 07/18/2023
3 12
SHEET NO OF

Tributary 7(offsite) -445 LF ill
No impacts
C
Project boundary (typ) her
°❑i°❑ MERRICIC
❑❑❑
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
Greenbriar Ridge
Tributary 8(offsite) -275 LF
No impacts
I \�
Tributary 1(offsite)
Temporary impact 60 SF (0.001 ac)
See sheet 11
Tributary 1(offsite) -1265 LF
I
Permanent impact 8555 SF (0.20 ac)
Temporary impact (within ex. esmt) 8584 SF (0.20 ac)
See sheets 10 & 11
Overall Site Plan
Scale: 1" = 350' N
0 425 350
PROJECT No:
6512-1067
ISSUE DATE:
07/18/2023
4
SHEET NO
12
OF

\\ \ \`�
I \\\ Greenway (typ) -
\ b
30' undisturbed f
TO B (tYp)
stream buffer (typ)
- Prop. 134 LF 60"
RCP Culvert TOE (typ) ,
60" Culvert: 825.00 ---- -- __ '/ �/ \ /�
�. ,/' \` _ 60" Culvert: 823.50
Channel: 824.00 , , /
84" Culvert: 823.00 - I-, � ` � \� - Channel: 822.50
84" Culvert: 821.50
--
Existing Maintained r
(� C r
Easement
r ' \
r \
Tributary 1
Prop. 134 LF 84"
Sewer relocation - -- _ RCP Culvert
Tributary 1
Permanent impact 193 LF, 683 SF (0.016 ac) \\ r r
\ Wetland 1000 - 0.5 ac
\---- ��\ Permanent impact 9838 SF (0.23 ac) - — `----
FI Scale: 1" = 30'
---- 0 15 30
°❑i°❑ MERRIM Greenbriar Ridge Tributary 1 Stream
000 Impact
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET and Wetland 1000 PROJECT No: 6512-1067
SUITE 300 Impact
Cp ISSUE DATE: 07/18/2023
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone] (Plan View) 5 12
FAX [phone] SHEET NO OF

Restore natural
channel bed depth
after construction
of culvert
60" Culvert: 825.0(
84" Culvert: 823.0(
0+00 1+00 1+55
IN
°❑i°❑ MERRICIC
❑❑❑
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
Greenbriar Ridge
Tributary 1 Stream
Impact Exhibit
(Profile View)
Restore natural
channel bed depth
after construction
of culvert
'Culvert: 823.50
' Culvert: 821.50
Scale: 1" = 40'
0 20 40
PROJECT No:
6512-1067
ISSUE DATE:
07/18/2023
6
SHEET NO
12
OF

oz
\------- -\— \
---y, ---_'-
Gree
Wetland 2000 - 0.12 ac _
L r r Permanent impact 385 SF (0.009 ac.)
_SS
r
4000,
r 1
r r
TOE (typ) i / \\. \\�� \ \ �t��
TOB (typ)
Ex. SS esmt. \ \
Ex. sanitary sewer line -
— — --30_
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-_--------- to /% Scale: 1" = 30'
\
Tributary 1
— �� i 30' undisturbed \
' / I i
stream buffer (typ) 0 15 30 e
AN
°❑i°❑ MERRICI� Greenbriar Ridge Wetland 2000
ppp Impact Exhibit
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET (Plan View)
SUITE 300 PROJECT No: 6512-1067
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204 ISSUE DATE: 07/18/2023
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone] SHEET NO OF

ICI r� ----------
-----------
--1 -A-r—=--7'��� —
Wetland 3000 - 0.03 ac----,___-
_ Permanent impact 1294 SF (0.03 ac.) _
/
/ / '
f
r
W
Retaining wall (by others)
Greenway _
_--------
Ss
-�s
Tributary 1 N\- \
Temporary impact 99 SF (0.002 ac)
Ex. SS esmt.
TOE (typ) _SS, G:: -_ _- Ex. sanitary sewer line
,,
/
°❑i°❑ MERRICIC
❑❑❑
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
82
Tributary 1 --------
0000
30' undisturbed
Scale: 1" = 30'
stream buffer (typ)
1 = ) 0 15 30
Greenbriar Ridge Wetland 3000
Permanent Impact &
Tributary 1
Temporary Impact
(Plan View)
PROJECT No:
6512-1067
ISSUE DATE:
07/18/2023
8
SHEET NO
12
OF

roLTi1
E
99 SF temporary impact
1
°❑i°❑ MERRICIC
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
i
Stream bed E
i
roLTil
0+00 0+42
Greenbriar Ridge
;anitary sewer
Tributary 1
Temporary Impact
Exhibit
(Profile View)
Scale: 1" = 40'
0 20 40
PROJECT No:
6512-1067
ISSUE DATE:
07/18/2023
9
SHEET NO
12
OF

\ // / / //—• ' ,� � tea//. ' l/ •//•�/� ; I I / j / % % �� /' %
\;; ��'.' ;�'\ •� ail %%,�; ;� ,
6' jl Permanent impact 8555 SF (0.20 ac)
Temporary impact (within ex. esmt) 8584 SF (0.20 ac)
�
//
I IIIf/ jl1/f I l // I I III l
TOB (tYp)
I I IIII I I I I —1 /
k o
Tributary1
TOE (tYp)
Prop. 8" WM (tYP)
30' undisturbed
/' /' i i 1i i\\ \�'\\ , 1 \\\ \\`\`\\\ stream buffer (tYp)
c5 it �; 1 ;IliVllf
It `II Ijlfill llff/ /
I I l l l 1 r/ CO'
Ex. SS esmt. t / \ \
I I I 1 1 1 1 \ I I I I \ \\ I 1' • /IIII , l/ /// /,/l I I , I 1 I I
I
,1 .' � 1
Scale: 1 = 50 _.
Co Ex. sanitary sewer line
0 25 25 _
°❑i°❑ MERRICW Greenbriar Ridge Offsite Water Tie-in
ppp Temporary &
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET Permanent Impacts PROJECT No: 6512-1067
SUITE 300 (Plan View) ISSUE DATE: 07/18/2023
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone] SHEET NO OF

% /
i— -- — — — ----- --
-
l ..
Permanent impact 8555 SF (0.20 ac)
Temporary impact (within ex. esmt) 8584 SF (0.20 ac)
fill
�`�`�\ \�\ • i i i i \ Tributary 1(offsite)
Temporary impact 60 SF (0.001 ac)
Open cut
\1\� 1\ I\ 1 II �� I • yI /� % / I
�1\�\ Tributary 1 i
\ /
Prop. 8" WM (typ)
co
\ I 1
Ex. SS esmt. (typ)
Ex. sanitary sewer line./
I
1
°❑i°❑ MERRICIC
❑❑❑
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
��
I '
•
\�\\1\\ i /' CO 30' undisturbed
i I %
\ I I stream buffer t
1 1; I
. Prop. utility esmt.
,///
/
(typ)
TOB (typ)
Scale. 1 —50
IIII I I I 1 �
1
\•
�� 1 l l 1 i i 1 I\ \ 0 25 25
1,10 A l t \, k\
Greenbriar Ridge
Offsite Water Tie-in
Temporary &
Permanent Impacts
(Plan View)
PROJECT No:
6512-1067
ISSUE DATE:
07/18/2023
11
SHEET NO
12
OF

60 SF temporary impact
Stream bed E
1
oio MERRICIC
301 S. MCDOWELL STREET
SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
r-: - grade
0+00 0+50
Greenbriar Ridge
0
Y)
Bic
3" water main
a
Tributary 1
Temporary Impact
Exhibit
(Profile View)
Scale: 1" = 40'
0 20 40
PROJECT No:
6512-1067
ISSUE DATE:
07/18/2023
12
SHEET NO
12
OF

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2022-01214County: Iredell U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Statesville East
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: D. R. Horton
Rachel Hayes
Address: 8025 ArrowridgeBoulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704-330-3602
E-mail: RMHayeskdrhorto n.co m
Size (acres) 87
Nearest Waterway Fourth Creek
USGS HUC 03040102
Nearest Town Statesville
RiverBasin Upper Pee Dee
Coordinates Latitude:35.778733
Longitude:-80.845472
Location description: Project is located at 2215 E a st Greenbriar Road, near Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina. PIN:
4754236335.000
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appearto be waters onthe above described project area/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has beenverifiedby the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation mapdated 10/1/2021. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction determination
maybe used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of
impacts, compensatory mitigationrequirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a
preliminary JD will treat allwaters and wetlands thatwould be affected in anyway by the permitted activity on the site as if they
are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable
action, by contactingthe Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of C WA/RHA
jurisdiction over allof the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate andreliable to support anenforceable
permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultantto conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above describedproject area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers andHarbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 ofthe Clean WaterAct
(CWA)(33USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waterson the above described project area/property subjectto the permit requirements of Section 404 ofthe Clean
WaterAct(CWA)(33USC§ 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination maybe
relied upon fora period notto exceed five years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may notbe able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation thatcan be verified by
the Corps.
❑ The waters on yourproject area/property have been delineated and the delineation has beenverifiedby the Corps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown onthe enclosed delineationmapdatedDATE. We strongly suggest youhave
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey

SAW-2022-01214
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWAjurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations, maybe relied upon for a periodnotto exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determinationmay be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, pre sent on the above described project area/property which are subj ectto the
permit requirements of Section404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for a period notto exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one ofthe 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of CoastalMa nagement in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill materialwithin waters of the US, in cludin g wetlands, without a Department ofthe Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section301 of the Clean WaterAct (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
rega rdin g this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Krystynka B Stygar at 252-545-0507 or
krystynka.b.stygar&msacc.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Based on information submitted by the applicant and available to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, the proiect area exhibits criteria for waters of the U.S. as defined in 33
CFR 328, Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-05, the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, and/or the
Regional Supplement to the 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0: See the
preliminary jurisdictional determination form dated 06/07/2022.
D. Remarks: See approximate aquatic resources on map," 2215 East Green briar Road—] 010112021 "
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determinationhas been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction forthe particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may notbe valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appealunder Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 33 1. Enclosed
you will find a Notification ofAppealProcess (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. Ifyourequest to appealthis
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth StreetSW,FloorM9
Atlanta, Georgia 3 0303-8803
AND
PHILIP.A.SHANNINnar USACE.ARMY.MIL
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, thatit meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, andthat it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days ofthe date ofthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit anRFAform to th Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: /A40
Date of JD: 06/07/2022 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2022-01214
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Wetlands & Waters, Inc
Perry Isner
Address: 328 East Broad Street, Suite D
Statesville, NC 28677
Telephone Number: 704-773-4239
E-mail: perryisncr jctlands-watcrs.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: D. R. Horton, RachelHayes File Number: SAW-2022-01214
I Date: 06/07/2022
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMITDENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies yourrights and options regarding an administrative appealof the above decision.
Additional information may be found at orhttp://www.usace.army.miUMissions/CivilWorks/Regulatory Pro aamandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictionaldeterminations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain term sand conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit yourright to appealthe permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a)modify the permit to address allof your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluatingyour objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appealthe permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictionaldeterminations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appealthe declined permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of
this form and sendingthe form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appealthe denialof a permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative AppealProcess by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept orappealthe approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appealthe approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appealthe approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative AppealProcess by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which maybe appealed),
by contactingthe Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide newinformation for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FORAPPEAL OROBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appealis limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum forthe
record of the appealconference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant northe Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additionalinformation to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/orthe
If you only have questions regarding the appealprocess you may
appealprocess you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: Krystynka B Stygar
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Charlotte Regulatory Office
CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
Cha rlottc, No rth Carolina 28262
PHONE: [phone]; FAX[phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNINna,USACE.ARMY.MIL
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appealprocess. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate m all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Krystynka B Stygar, 8430University Executive Park Drive, Suite
615, Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CE SAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atla nta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 06/07/2022
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: D. R. Horton, Rachel Hayes, 8025
Arrowridge Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28273
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, 2215 East Greenbriar Road,
SAW-2022-01214
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Project is located at 2215 East
Greenbriar Road, near Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina. PIN: 4754236335.000
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County:Iredell City: Statesville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decim a I form at): Latitude:35.778733 Longitude:-80.845472
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearestwaterbody: Fourth Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: June 7, 2022
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amountof
aquatic
resources in
reviewarea
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic
authority to which
the aquatic resource
"may be" su bje ct
(i.e.,Section 404or
Section 10/404)
Tributary 1
35.779656
-80.845420
2810 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Tributary 2
35.7803610
-80.844739
65 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Tributary 3
35.780598
-80.843952
415 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Tributary
35.777955
-80.846270
580 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Tributary 5
35.779916
-80.845011
20 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Tributary 6
35.780804
-80.843925
800 LF
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Wetland 1000
35.777836
-80.847383
0.5 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 2000
35.778801
-80.846515
0.12 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 3000
35.779845
-80.845410,
0.03 acres
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 4000
35.779216
-80.845780
0.1 acres
Wetland
Section 404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may bejurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AID for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subjectpermit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative orjudicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/orthat there "maybe" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affectedby the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
El Office doesnotconcurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
El Corps navigable waters' study:
El U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data:
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: figure 3, 10/01/2021
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: figure 4,10/01/2021
®Nationalwetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: figure 5, 10/01/2021
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: Figure 6, 10/01/2021
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
®Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): IredellCountyGIS.Fiore 2,10/01/2021
or ® Other (Name & Date): Field photos. 10/04/2021
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corns
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
4�0 )��
Signature and date o Rea latory
staff member completing PJD
06/07/2022
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtainingthe signature is
impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respondwithin the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action_

Potentially Jurisdictional
Wetland Waters of the
U.S.
Wetland 3000
--0.03 ac
Potentially Jurisdictional
Wetland Waters of the
U.S.
Wetland 2000
—0.12 ac
Potentially Jurisdictional
Non -Wetland Waters of
the U.S.
Tributary 2
--65 LF ^;
D F2
DF3 —
SF1
DF1
tW
Potentially Jurisdictional
Non -Wetland Waters of
the U.S.
Tributary 1
--2810 LF
Potentially
Jurisdictional
Non -Wetland
Waters of the
U.S.
Tributary 6
--800 LF
Potentially Jurisdictional
Non -Wetland Waters of
the U.S.
Tributary 5
--20 LF
Potentially Jurisdictional
Wetland Waters of the
U.S.
Wetland 4000
--0.1 ac
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -Wetland
Waters of the U.S.
Tributary 4
--580 LF
*Wetland Sketch provided for illustrative purposes
for preliminary planning use only. Not intended to
Potentially Jurisdictional be relied upon for exact location, dimensions, or
r Wetland Waters Of the U.S.orientation. All findings and assessments made by
wetland consultants regarding limits ofjurisdiction
Wetland 1000 or permitting requirements are subject to
—0.5 ac verification b the US Arm Cor s of En ineers and
vrojeci iName:
Owner / Developer:
WETLANDS City/County:
Wa4 WATERS, INr—,
Tax PIN(s):
Figure 1: Approximate Delineation Coordinates:
of Surface Waters and Wetlands Lat: 35.778733 Long:-80.845472
Y Y p g
other appropriate state and local authorities.
2215 East Greenbriar Road
D.R. Horton
Statesville/Iredell
4754236335.000
Scale: Date:
Graphic
10/01 /21

■ now
■■ ■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
■■�■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
October 1. 2021
Meagan Jolly
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
328 East Broad Street
Statesville, NC 28677
RE: 2215 Greenbrier Road
Dear Meagan Jolly:
Ray Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walker Clark
Director, Division of Land and Water5tewwdship
N CN H D E-15886
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

CO\
\
/
CO
\
a a
v
\
-
\ \
3
/
\
CO\
±
}
/
u
3 /
4 \
z
.0
CO CO
\
®
® U
3
j
0Ln
�:
�
CO Ln
��
\\
%
J 2
/\
2
/
»
2
t t t
G}
E E E
3 /
-
u
\
\
e 5 5 5
»®
2
E\
z e e e
%:
\
/
x
x
/ /
\ \ \
/ \
§
u
<
e
3 3 3
{ s
?
®
/ a a a
3
/
u
\
/\\\
%
\ \
E
3
/
E \
CO e
<
J
e
2
_ _
\ CO o
/
»
\
\.z
0)± /
CO
ƒ /
`2/\
»=eg
}\
z
CO\ea
t b
e
2\
\( 0
cc, Z
±
<
e/
o a
ƒ
\ 2
0
\
/
CO \ Z
u
\
e
CO
\�
0
\�
<
a
±
<
g
u
y
.. /
§
/
u\
e
s x x
/ t t
y
\
COm
Z
\
E
CO
0
\
y
o__
:
§
co
\
\
\ \
\
/
u
5=
CO3±
$
2
0 3 3
\
=
COx
\
yss
)
\
\
(
CO\
0
/ /
§
O / /
/ \
\
\
e
\ \
y
=
g
u
COy
2
7
/ :
MO /
�s
\
CO/
y
D-
2
\
\ \
g
2e
co
e
}
g
\:
\
\ \
u
O
CO
E \
\
CO
`CO
e
E
`
®�
-
s
e
u
.e
< 0-S
CO
«
z
\
\
~5
\
z
°°
e
g%>=
e
2 E
± ®
e
s
u
\ /
D
\
\ / /
2
\
0
\
e
/ /
2 \
CO
0
/
\
E
\\
//
/
e \ \ \
E
\
2
I\
\
\
/
/
\ / f f
/
\
%
/
/
\ \
©
x
/
J
)
E
%
®
±
e
± U) y
_ \
/
/
/
±
e \
»
« o \ \
:
/
/
E 9
\
\ G / /
\
\
_
/
CO
/
CO \
/
/ 2 \ \
\
(
/
\
/
\
/
j
CO
%
%
/ /
CO
353
Ze
>
Zac
xxe__
\/
§
/

m
O
W
�L
�W
u%
^^ 11L
L J
N
N
00
00
LO
T-
W
w
■i
ii
,p Pn oIS
kOA
.o
0
1
1. meP ,e. na,a�g,n 5e rn`�c cr -
F1
8
Itz"IA lH Py QA,o IW
Srym Or �� We 3 e Ilr
�s,=vos
I
-
r O
�
:fFoj
:❑ 0.��'1�0.Y
rP (:Yn1I�H 51 �
Vr,Y''15ifa�i,i R�
Ln
O
Y � g„s,wMtl
RD
2
- antl von
a
r;
F'°f PJL
-
N'n91p1�
m
Is �Iwanelq^I
N EaS�C
S
�. -
m g �l tiurlloy ¢ V
-
::l
_ M m
J.ecLe'A
?J
,P .Imo Aj 5 '^n lser�V,lS
a
o
isi
V
pa �
rg
uy
z Q
z Of
O V Q
2 m N
-0 N Q
C p
� � Q
m _0 ca (1)
N 2 Z a>
N .a) d co
a m z 2
a`)
O ❑ ❑ El
M
O
M
N
a

Legend
NR individual
Boundary ofDestroyedl
SLdistricts &
DOE, Gone
Surveyed Only
Surveyed Area, No
resources &boundaries
Removed NR Listing
SL and DOE
individual
designation
centerpoints
SL individual
STATUS
SL and DOE, Gone
resources &
Surveyed Area in NHRD
resources &DOEHD
Center Point
centerpoints
Local individual
Status, LocalStat,
centerpoints
❑ Study List Boundary
SLDOEHD Center Point
resources &
HDstatus
Status, LocalStat,
Both SL and
El Determined Eligible
DOE districts &
Status, LocalStat,
centerpoints
p
• NR Individual Listing
HDstatus
Boundary
boundaries
HDstatus
LocalStat
• NR Listing, Gone
SL Individual Entry
DOE individual
STATUS
Surveyed Only
■ Local Landmark
* NRHD Center Point
• SL and DOE entry
resources &
Surveyed in NRHD
■ Local Landmark, Gone
NR districts &
• Study List Entry, Gone
centerpoints
❑ Determined Eligible
Boundary
Surveyed Only, Gone
* Local HD Center Point
boundaries
Surveyed in NRHD,
- SL and DOE, Gone
Status, LocalStat,
❑ Both DOE and Study
Gone
Local districts &
STATUS
SLHD Center Point
HDstatus
List Boundary
� Blockface- Multiple
boundaries
❑ National Register
SLDOEHD Center Point
Determined Eligible
properties
Boundary
Blockface in NRHD
ss Gay�St/y�
: J �ti 4 i■
■
Project Name:
1 weruRos Ovmer/Devel
1 6 WATE RB, INC. City/County:
NC Historic Preservation Office GIS Overlay TaxPINs:
Coordinates:
rL —
��
4_.
East Greenbriar
.
L Rip
i
0.
■ ' �,
ti
Ao
N
W+E
s
i W Date: 07-31-2023

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies user Manual Version b.0
USACE AID #
NCDWR#
Project Name
Greenbriar Ridge
Date of Evaluation
08/14/2023
Applicant/Owner Name
D.R. Horton
Wetland Site Name
WL 1000
Wetland Type
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
P. Isner, W&W, Inc.
Level III Ecoregion
Piedmont
Nearest Named Water Body
Fourth Creek
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03040102
County
Iredell
NCDWR Region
Mooresville
F— Yes M No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
35.77824-80.84677
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition —assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
El ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ®A ®A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
El ❑C ❑C >_ 20% coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D >_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E >_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F ❑F >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
®G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer —assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
®A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
®<_ 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
El ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ®D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
®B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
®B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 500 acres
❑B ❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ❑D ❑D From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E ❑E ❑E From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F ❑F ❑F From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G ❑G ❑G From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H ❑H ❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
®I ®I ®I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K ❑K ❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
®B
From 100 to < 500 acres
®C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
❑F
❑F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
®A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
❑B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
TAA WT
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
m ®B ®B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
T
o ❑A
❑A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
®B
®B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
❑C
❑C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
- ❑A
❑A
Dense shrub layer
Moderate density layer
1E ®B
®B
shrub
U) ❑C
❑C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
-0 ®A
®A
Dense herb layer
_ ❑B
❑B
Moderate density herb layer
❑C
❑C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22
Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
®B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WL 1000 Date of Assessment 08/14/2023
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization P. Isner, W&W, Inc.
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence
(Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Veaetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

7/31/23, 2:57 PM
wetlands-waters.com Mail - 401 Pre -file, Greenbriar Ridge
V
WETLANDS
�. & wATER5, INC.
401 Pre -file, Greenbriar Ridge
Perry Isner <[e-mail]>
To: 401 [e-mail]
Cc: Tamp Bandy <[e-mail]>
Tamp Bandy <[e-mail]>
Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:29 PM
This email serves as the required 30-day pre -filing notification to your agency of an impending 401 application for impacts
to aquatic resources.
Applicant: D.R. Horton
Project Name: Greenbriar Ridge
Lat/Long: 35.778733,-80.845472
County: Iredell County, NC
Perry Isner
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
328 East Broad St. Suite D
Statesville, NC 28677
704.773.4239
[e-mail]
TWETLANDS
1 � Sc WATERS
The information contained in this email message is confidential and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If you are not an intended recipient or if you have received this message in error, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify us by return email or telephone if the sender's phone number is listed above, then promptly and permanently delete
this message. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1 /?ik=ffbb424d40&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1772508856646916997&simpl=msg-f:1772508856646916997 1 /1

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Tim Derylak
DR Horton
8025 Arrowridge Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
Project: Greenbriar Ridge
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 14, 2023
Expiration of Acceptance: 2/14/2024
County: Iredell
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040102
Riparian Wetland
0.33
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Atv�d_L�
FOR James B. Stanfill
Deputy Director
cc: Tamp Bandy, agent
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
h(h�TH :.AROI iRA IV
o �nmmmenni w�a 919,707,8976