20110497 Ver 2_401 Application_20150815

20150794
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Gary Beecher
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
From: Kevin C. Martin
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Re: Deacon Jones Auto Dealerships
Goldsboro, Wayne County, NC
August 4th, 2015
AI' S &EC Project # 12075
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — gth Floor
512 North Salisbury Street D lS ► I M .
Raleigh, NC 27604
AUG 0 4 2015
DENR - WATER RES&i�
401 & BUFFER PERMITTING
On behalf of the applicant, The Three J's Inc. (Attn: Ken Jones) please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 18 (impact S1, S2 &
W1) & 39 (Impacts W2 and 01), a request for approval to utilize general water quality certification 3890
and a request for an associated buffer authorization from the N.C. Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR).
The proposed impacts are required to allow for access to and the development of the site into 3 auto
dealerships. The wetland area to be impacted is within an existing agricultural field and is of low quality. It
appears to have been created by the placement of ditch spoil that has trapped water behind it (see
photo). The actual wetland area to be impacted is less than indicated because the upland spoil are
adjacent to the ditch is included within the wetland delineation area. This was reviewed onsite with Gary
Beecher of the Corps of Engineers. Rather than trying to modify the delineation, the owner prefers to
apply for the impacts as mapped and mitigate for them at a 1:1 ratio to expedite the permitting process.
The mitigation ratio, confirmation that the ditch being impacted is a ditch and not a jurisdictional stream
and nonriparian mitigation type has been field verified by the Corps. The stream impact is to the day
lighted section of a stream that receives stormwater discharge from upslope commercial developments.
That stream is not buffered (does not show up on soils or usgs maps), and is in a maintained area
adjacent to the existing service road (see photo). Total stream impacts onsite are less than 150' so
stream mitigation is not proposed. Please contact me at (919) 270 -7941 if you have any questions or
require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
Deacon Jones Auto Dealerships
Project Type
Commercial
Owner / Applicant
The Three J's Inc.
County
Wayne
Nearest Town
Goldsboro
Waterbody Name
UT Stoney Creek
Basin
Neuse
Class C, NSW

IMPACT SUMMARY (see PCN form & Impact Maps for Buffer impact quantities)
Stream Impact (feet): 93'
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.38
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.07
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
Attachments:
Pre - construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
DWR Buffer determination Letter
Site Plan /Impact Exhibits (4 pages)
FEMA FIRM panel
0.45
93
2 Site Photos
Acceptance Letter from Mitigation Bank
Owner certification /Agent Authorization

oa�F WAT�9Q
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: I ❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 & 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I X❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X -401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. IsIhis notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Deacon Jones Auto Dealerships
2b. County: Wayne
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Goldsboro
2d. Subdivision name:
2e.. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: The Three J's Inc.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if Ken Jones
applicable):
3d. Street address: P.O. Box 2280
3e. City, state, zip: Smithfield, NC 27577
3f. Telephone no.: 919 -631 -9700
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: kjones @deaconmaii.com
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑X No
F�
AUG 042015 !
UtIV Yt - VVH I CI'( RCJV V RV CJ
401 & BUFFER PERMITTING
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
,4e.
City, state, zip:
,
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
15a.
Name:
Kevin C, Martin
5b.
Business name
S &EC, PA
(if applicable):
5c.
Street address:
1 8412 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 104
15d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e.
Telephone no.:
1919
-270 -7941
5f.
Fax no.:
1 919 - 846 -9467
5g.
Email address:
I kmartin @sandec.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1 3519819241 ,3519900942,3519902525 & 3519901211
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 35.36859 Longitude: - 77.929414
1c. Property size: 18.43 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Stoney Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site is currently an open agricultural field with drainage ditches. Surrounding area is commercial or light industrial to the north, west and south
Agricultural or forested to the east.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.6
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 950
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Allow construction of 3 different auto dealerships (3 different brands)
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Typical equipment for grading and road /building construction
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑ Preliminary ® Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Neal Floyd and Assoc.
Name (if known): Neal Floyd Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A JD map was signed by Wiliam Wescott of the USACE on 11123/2011 (attached)
On May 31 st, 2011, the NCDWR (formerly DWQ) issued a buffer applicability letter #11 -0497 for the property (attached)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for I El Yes ® No El Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? I ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
If there are perennial or intermittent stream
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your
project (check all that apply):
3a. 3b.
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries
❑X Buffers ❑X
Open Waters
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland
area impacted.
Permanent (P) or
2a. 2b. 2c.
width
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
S2 P
Stabilization
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
Choose one
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
S5
Choose one
W1 P Culvert
Unknown
No I
Corps
0.01
W2 P Fill
Small -Basin Wetland
No I
Corps
0.37
W3 Choose one
,
Choose one
Yes /No
W4 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5 Choose one
'
Choose one
Yes /No I
'
W6 Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g. Total
Wetland Impacts:
0.38
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream
impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b.
3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
PER Corps 2
' 73
S2 P
Stabilization
PER Corps 2
20
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
Sg
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
93
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open.water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) ° Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Temporary (T)
01 P I Fill Other I 0.07
02 I Choose one Choose
03 I Choose one Choose
04 Choose one Choose
4f. Total °open water impacts 1 0.07
4g. Comments: Impact is to a jurisdictional ditch
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated -Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one I �°
e ° 5f. Total:
5g a °Comments:
J. 5h:° Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i., Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. 'Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. °Method of construction: a °�
e `6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
° If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart°below. If yes, then individually list
all -buffer impacts'
below. a If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? Q Neuse, ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba
.. .
E] Randleman
E] Other:
.
6b. 6c. 6d.
6e. 6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name
Buffer
Zone 1
Zone2
number —
mitigation
impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required?
(square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1 P Road crossing
No
1,052
.946
B2 P BMP discharge
No
1,150
522
B3
Yes /No
B4
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
2,202
I 1,468
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to the the perennial stream onsite have been avoided. The project was designed to included the minimum size building and parking required
for such dealerships. See attached Impact justification for more details. The northern access road was placed as close to Oak Forest Rd. as possible
to allow for adequate "stacking" at the stop sign intersection with the service road that serves this property The southern access road was placed so
as to avoid directly impacting the perennial stream.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts are to a low quality wetland within an existing agricultural field and a jurisdictional ditch. Construction of BMPs to treat stormwater for the
project will likely improve water quality as compared to the untreated agricultural runoff that is currently being discharged to the perennial stream
wetlands and ditches
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
N Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank, (the Casey -King site)
Type: Non - riparian wetland -
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
see attached acceptance letter from mitigation bank dated 7/2/2015
3c. Comments:
14. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.,Approval letter from in -lieu fee program "is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Quantity: .45
Quantity:
Quantity:
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires E] Yes FXJ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 I 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Impacts are below mitigation thresholds
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified 0 Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Stormwater plans will be reviewed by the City of Goldsboro
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 75%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Onsite impervious surfaces will be treated by bioretention ponds, see attached over all site plan for approximate location
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
City of Goldsboro
City of Goldsboro
N Phase II
® NSW
HUSMP
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
[]Session Law 2006 -246
[]Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑X Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the Yes OX No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in I Yes Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Programs" document
prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version 2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause
cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural
and silvicultural operations. The proposed auto dealerships is a small commercial developmen
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Connection to existing city of Goldsboro Municipal sewer
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
'Threatened /Endangered Species have been identified within the SE Goldsbro topographic Quadrangle but not necessarily in or near this project.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Habitat Conservation /Habitat Protection National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced. No
Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. No structures were observed during
the wetland evaluation and no structures are identified on the NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
© Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Yes but only the road crossing on the north side nearest Oak Forest rd. is within the FEMA mapped flood plain (see attached FIRM panel) The City of
Goldsboro is responsible for reviewing floodplain related matters in this area and they will be reviewing the plans for approval. That is why we are
requesting that these impacts be covered by NW18, the remaining impacts are outside the 100 year floodplain and should be covered by NW39.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA firm panel (attached)
Kevin C. Martin l i 8/3/2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Impact Justification
To U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or
Whom It may Concern
I recently purchased 17 acres of the McLean Street property fronting Goldsboro's Industrial Park. I
researched several properties during a course of approximately two years, including acreage within the
industrial park adjoining this property, acreage situated diagonally across highway 70 from the property
selected, as well as some acreage on the west side of Goldsboro proximate to the new by -pass being
constructed. All of these properties were available at a substantial discount to the acreage selected.
However, after seeking counsel from different folks with varying expertise, and with some exerted
pressure from one of the manufacturers, I made the decision to go with the final selected property. The
property within the Goldsboro Industrial Park was rejected because the visibility to the public is a
problem - pushed too far back from U.S. Hwy 70 and with no frontage on the main highway. The
property on the North side diagonally from the property selected was partially fronted by a tree line
within a protected area and thus had visibility challenges as well. The third alternative that was
rejected, on the west side of Goldsboro had some acreage limitations, but also was being rejected by
one of the manufacturers (and others may have also rejected that site) as being not central to the
concentrations of vehicle registrations indicate din their market study completed last year.
This property is ideal for the requirements of our industry- sufficient acreage to build several dealerships
adjacent to each other, but with significant road frontage on the major thoroughfare of Highway 70 for
public visibility. It has some road frontage on Oak Forest Road as well, which functions as the entry to
McLean Street so as to access this property. The road frontage is actually on McLean Street (a service
road) - albeit behind the guard rail and the waterway. The road frontage on McLean Street is the purpose
behind this letter of explanation and the reason for my request to you.
The N. C. Department of Transportation requires us to maintain a large buffer from the Oak Forest Road,
essentially preventing a bottle -neck of traffic turning in so close to the main intersection with U.S. Hwy
70, which means that we need permission to pipe approximately 50 -75 feet of the waterway in several
pieces, from near the north -end. The piping is necessary to maintain the water -flow currently occurring
in the uncovered drainage ditch when the access drive is constructed across the ditch. This would
provide us a North -end entrance to the property, as well as a Southern -end entrance, a requirement
because there will be three dealerships. More importantly, the additional entrances are a convenience
to the public who will be utilizing McLean Street to enter into the separate dealerships. Our
Manufacturer Sales & Service Agreements require us to comply with their established criteria for
building size, Customer access and parking spaces dedicated for employee parking, Customer parking,
new & used vehicle inventory display areas and service Customer parking, among many other
requirements. In general, the building size requirements vary, from approximately 20,000 sq.ft. to
35,000 sq.ft., depending on the manufacture and the sales "planning volume" assigned to our franchise.
Our facilities proposed for their review and approval, which is being prepared currently, meet their
requirements. I have the documents from Ford Motor Company and from Nissan North America which
delineate all of the criteria necessary to receive their building and site approvals, which are necessary
before construction begins and requiring a final inspection and approval when all is complete.
As a result of complying with the manufacturer site specifics, as well as needing to properly utilize the
road frontage for maximum visibility of the new vehicles available for sale along U.S. Highway 70 (refer

to the 15S paragraph above outlining the reason for selecting this property over others available), for the
Kia dealership that is scheduled for the southern -most section of the McLean Street property, it will
necessitate that we provide inventory and Customer parking spaces and road frontage parking for
vehicle display (and the Southern -end property access from McLean Street), which is within a wetland
designated piece of the property at the Southwest corner of the property.
I look forward to an opportunity to discuss the specifics of how we can design and construct passages
that will satisfy your requirements (and those of any other affected agencies), and our needs, to
expedite approval of our request.
Sincerely,
Kenneth Jones

Apr 11 2015 5:03PM HP Fax
page 1
'falmq mo p paq eta
I
• �a jAq&D4 Aft
sow
�°`
?•IltRWf(�r1O: LLS�>C7!`� �'i''-} 4dL'L' e
o9Zb4r°?-b16 s �;
on Map rwA 'ow 8EmA4 V* Joe C%
AW PW Sl "sue A>m+m pwMNWW pwftM X4 tapwswWw OU --=WN
*u vxwm pwh pw pww pwPow R
c wWe 5o mi pw fyaq Aw m W cq ka a ', M SNVOWW OW =N=op
SILM '654'[ P M 5XKm m s"w "P oT WORMS go/p o rrimm UND app ow
pw swqo6qmm4 aWw boxpmpa# joj
un p sdwDkwvn vww umoww map mAmpokidmi awaow cv'w
�r mamma r�
Ptana
Awv a + wmwmfsa emu.
3WT --D7-,;5- :spa
BIOt.L!'�Lt1HLt1Y �t$aM Jl�LLV�LLi1�.7 $Hl+i�►Q �
t�6'llp/ � �# R 41p `�� r43�Ki :i1F19 T� •i111� t�r��*.cP � iii®
V41 � J C�
LM!a►� � N�1J
Lib -1iks 6/6

y
I�
I�

e.
J

AM
Mi
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
May 31, 2011
B.R. Kornegay, Inc.
Mr. Jeffery Kornegay
Post Office Drawer 1435
Goldsboro, NC 27533
Subject Property: Ted Ivey Site off McLain Street (SR 1758)
Unnamed Tributary to Stony Creek, Neuse River Basin
Dee Freeman
Secretary
DWQ EXP# 11 -0497
Wayne County
On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233)-
EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
Dear Mr. Kornegay:
On May 24, 2011, at your request, l conducted an on -site determination to review a drainage featum located on the subject
property for applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (I SA NCAC 2B .0233). The features are labeled "11 -4497 A to 11-
0497 H" on the attached maps and initialed by me on May 25, 2011.
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the feature labeled as "11 -0497 A" on the attached
maps, and highlighted in hive is subjrrr to the Neuse Buffer Rules. The features labeled as "11 -04W B through 11-
0497 H and 11 -0299 A to 11-02" B" on the attached traps, and highlighted in refi are not subject to the Neuse
Buffer Rules. The subject feature is marked on the ground with yellow DWQ flagging and starts at the culvert outlet that
crosses under McLain Street and Hwy. 70 and flows down gradient along the east side of McLain Street to the inlet of a
second culvert that passes under McLain Street and Hwy. 70. The sabject site is labeled t 1-0497 A (N 35° 22.148' W 77°
55.868').
The second drainage feature is labeled as 11 -0497 B (N 350 21.987' W 77° 55.674') and 11 -0497 C (N 350 22.119' W 77°
55.599') and highlighted in i c on the attached maps. The feature starts at the perennial stream labeled I ] -0497 A and
continues up gradient, heading due east for sever hundred feet, and branches off southeast to end at a farm path culvert
crossing marked on the ground with yellowing DWQ Buffer flagging. Feature I 1 -0497 C continues northeast from the
split and is marked on the ground with yellow DWQ flagging. Please note that drainage features continue past the flagged
end point and are considered not subject to the Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules.
The third drainage feature labeled as 11 -0299 B to I 1 -0299 C, highlighted in ::.1 on the attached maps, is a separate
stream determination conducted in April of 2011. This section of drainage is not considered subject to the Neuse Riparian
Buffer Rules,
Nom Camim mvww of water Gamy
913 ws9ftbon square Mal
WsaNnOW. NC MW
Phone: [phone]$1 t FAX: 252 - 946 -9215
Immeu www.nc*a*gwWV,oro
An F04 OPPUrk Nty � AtharaGve Action Einpoyer
I Dj)1 Caro ina
�C� WAMA

The fourth drainage feature reviewed starts at point 11-0497 D (N 35° 21.833' W 77° 55.715') marked on the ground with
yellow DWQ Buffer flagging, and continues south southeast to the edge of the subject field and ends at point I 1 -0497 F
(N 35° 21.758' W 77° 55.594') highlighted in,,,!,,, and marked on the ground with yellow flagging. The fifth feature starts
at point 11 -0497 F (N 35121.758' W 77° 55.715') adjacent to power lines and continues up gradient northeast to point 11-
0497 G (N 35° 21.917' W 77° 55.205'), marked on the ground with yellow flagging, the drainage feature makes a right
hand turn southeast and ends at point 1 1 -0497 H (N 35° 21.779' W 770 55.114') in the far back southeast corner of the
field marked with yellow DWQ flagging (see attached maps).
Please note that although the subject features highlighted in ,cc are not subject to the Neuse Riparian Buffer rules
they may be considered 404 wetlands. It is therefore recommended that the US Army Corp of Engineers be
contacted to determine if wetlands exist before any grading or excavation commences on this site.
The owner (or future owners) should notify the DWQ (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future
correspondences concerning this property. 'Ibis on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this
letter. landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o John Domey, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 2321
Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604 -2260. Individuals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated Local
Authority that "exempts" a surface water from the buffer rule may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within
60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60 -day statutory appeal time does
not start until the affected parry (including downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DWQ
recommends that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party appeals are made in a timely
manner. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative I learings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This
determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers. Nor
does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any additional
questions or require additional information please call Roberto Scheller in the Washington Regional Office at (252) 948-
3940.
incer0y,
F o e,
Attachments: Wayne County Soil Survey map
USGS Southeast Goldsboro Quad map
Goggle Earth map
cc: DWQ 401 /Wetland Express Unit
File Copy
1'ilenamc 11-0497

x •-
h rC = S
in
AL
wocr4r,� ° A atG L a t
olw
•,� • "� Z `
.` , •V TT rl ..
t iy','
ol

�•,VVV
• NN3 523.061 OY��OOB perky '.' `t•'•. }: ,�:''••� ••• r•
N 35 23.065' .. ••
:Y 77 66.342' W77 66126'
Th
com
,: ' . llwrlhr• •. _ ♦ • Y Old MA-
i Park • ,•.• Y ,k •• :,:
�/, j. ••
r •.. � M� . • xun1. +i N 36 22626' � . • �� _..- ..,_.t•,� • • -
�.� w r a6.76r .... ; .-
8Ns 8 •
.N36 22.479' �• • .• '•,
Y t Sub W 77 66.670
SWA It
•• `r:
/' iti a •• '� I ' • i : 1 I 1741M7
07' • • °•. N 36 22.11!' 4 •; Ir^
• • • Of 7T 96.6M''k — l
r
..� � • II-OW ` A I
26 9
.♦ .t • • N K 22.1N' r 11-0209A `n
• N 35 21.003'
• w 77 UAW I W 77 66.220' k O
114WD ! ' •
36 21.99r 1141N7 0
+ • W TT 66,674' I N!i Mir
w 77 UAW �
N 36 21.063' •� -
± W 77 66.714'
114W H
_ >. N !f 21.779' `t
1 l w176 Ale _ •
Carp N 36 MAW
w TT 61.716'
p 1141M7 F •
N >s 21974' •
1141M7 E
N K 2 /.7W ; — •
of
i . - Tniar Ct>tn, : , 4' _ _ aa:. � - • � Jlr .
I / d
i
rw . I •• .
Name: SOUTHEAST GOLDSBORO LocaWn: 035.22' 04.56" N 077' 55'27.92* W
Deb: 5125J2011 Caption: Stroam Determination for Ted Ivey Propeft. SE Goldsboro, off
Sins: 1 inch equals 2000 Net McLain Road (SRI 768)
capvftm (c) INS, M ffigmN A. k1¢

a�
-arc {.��� 11�f C �►
w sr fd.4N'
�-0NI � 11 -02'iY A
N 39 2t 11/ N 35 21.Ot3
w 71 ti �' ;,. ;.�;,., W 77 55.22A
p-
1'li�T •
M ri 2LWr
W 77 8&47W
11.9 s '
N 36 21&W?T4Vlr MT
114m E
M 3i 21,rw
w77 f5.sw
1141 F
N ri MATO
w 77 SL4w
1147 A
N 39 21.117'
w n t6jw
11-0M7 H
K 35 21.77!'
w 77 w.11C

, , I N
EBX Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability July 2, 2015
NC Division of Water Resources
Ms. Katie Merritt
512 N. Salisbury St.
9th floor
Raleigh, NC 27604, Archdale Building
Re Project: Deacon Jones Auto Dealerships
mllm�
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mr. Gary H. Beecher
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
This document confirms that The Three J's Inc. (Applicant) for the Deacon Jones Auto Dealerships
(Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 0.49 Non- Rinarian Wetland Mitigation Credits from the
EBX - Neuse sponsored Bank: Neu -Con Wetland & Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically the
Casey -King Site in the Neuse HUC 03020202. As the official Bank Sponsor, EBX, attests to the fact that
mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits /units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 919 - 209 -1052.
Best Regards,
C4,1_ /� eo'�
Cara S. Conder
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

. 0. k
/
j
g P\-
\VF-�'
pEEp gp02 NEO 50 / / /
/
/
/
/
/
s v
' \ 0,11
•y6 s � \ s\ / / /
11 �
\ Js.
;\ Ss
j I oN
Z3 \
0
I \\
I
Q�QE�
I/•,�FiO I
�pP°�,, I
I
I
S�
yc
�i
\ �o
/
/
/
/
__ _ / //u
E% 36', 6• pO&D
STORM P} . � Mry�•KPRO� I
----------------- 3
` ST �M \S\ •
s, oy " �yc
io
"� cz sr
mo+ w• :.s
n
�F `\ PROPOSED 80 FT. -36'
0" n 9 `\
1 o Py
090
y Zo
WEST BOUND LANE I US HIGHWAY 70 EAST (WEST BOUND)
__ --------------------------------
-\
_________ _______ I 9
EAST BOUND LANE U.S HIGHWAY 70 EAST (EAST BOUND)
/o+
.s
yo
oy
oy
o
/
�a v le qzz'
FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NOT FOR RECORDING, CONVEYANCES OR SALES - -
I _i BlotffTND
T 1l`\ POND
0-1
111-ITFITI
ofl
SEE
'ff
Im m
0 1�i I 1;1 ..
O
ll�li!':I !!III !II -II.hI
I
1!I�1? �I I'llri lll 111 11 1!I�
,P] I
_d
` 1L .1 _'`- --------------
R'C'
�IIII;II
I I
I
\
(— i --.� I = \ \ \\
lill!III �
+H__j_L l ' I1 ';'� " ' 'Ili' ;I,
Pm rA !� i __
lt� '- it
1
y y�r 1
yy�rrll$
1
11�r4 1 17e
1 IN
® PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING LOT y E)OSnRG LA WETUNDL S '� / 1 %
VIII,! ® �_II_I-I_;;II!!I!_iI•IiI�II I� -��I Ij�i!!II�'ilylll;y;�y! r 111
.! I I, I I I 1 l I I
! , !i 0 ®II�I!!!IT! �I III III i�i!�� X1111111111! IL.yy ±41-1
PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING LOT
} X 20 HDPE - _I 11 I �, W '� y i
BIDRETENnDN 1, O O.S7C I ' BIORETENnON _ 1 I I _.✓L �, 1
1� _ _ BIORETENnON _�y 1
I I vono -Al l l l C� 1 POND J� �� �� POND
I•I- -\`e
� i I 1111
�_RIP��III!IIIIIIIIIIiII� 111IIIII11111111{,1111,1111 111, III IIII,III II yI,I�I;�Ilil
- 2 50 RIPMIAN BUFFER \ 1 1
PROPOSED 36' ZS \
i ZONE 2 \ _ _ \
_ J._ -- _ _ — _ _ -_
ZONE 1
- - - - _ _ - TOP OT BARk - 1 - - - .- a TOP OF BANK
_TOP OF BANK
- -- --- n— e— e- -d --
-- -- - ----- -- ----- - --- --- -
`��- 1758------------ - - - - -- 4 eo - --
(MCLAIN STREET) ----------------------------- ----- -------'-'---- ------------ +
--------------------- -------------------
--o — o— o— o— o-- o--- a--- o— o— o— o— o —c - -_
U S. HIGHWAY N0. 70
(— i --.� I = \ \ \\
lill!III �
+H__j_L l ' I1 ';'� " ' 'Ili' ;I,
Pm rA !� i __
lt� '- it
1
y y�r 1
yy�rrll$
1
11�r4 1 17e
1 IN
® PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING LOT y E)OSnRG LA WETUNDL S '� / 1 %
VIII,! ® �_II_I-I_;;II!!I!_iI•IiI�II I� -��I Ij�i!!II�'ilylll;y;�y! r 111
.! I I, I I I 1 l I I
! , !i 0 ®II�I!!!IT! �I III III i�i!�� X1111111111! IL.yy ±41-1
PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING LOT
} X 20 HDPE - _I 11 I �, W '� y i
BIDRETENnDN 1, O O.S7C I ' BIORETENnON _ 1 I I _.✓L �, 1
1� _ _ BIORETENnON _�y 1
I I vono -Al l l l C� 1 POND J� �� �� POND
I•I- -\`e
� i I 1111
�_RIP��III!IIIIIIIIIIiII� 111IIIII11111111{,1111,1111 111, III IIII,III II yI,I�I;�Ilil
- 2 50 RIPMIAN BUFFER \ 1 1
PROPOSED 36' ZS \
i ZONE 2 \ _ _ \
_ J._ -- _ _ — _ _ -_
ZONE 1
- - - - _ _ - TOP OT BARk - 1 - - - .- a TOP OF BANK
_TOP OF BANK
- -- --- n— e— e- -d --
-- -- - ----- -- ----- - --- --- -
`��- 1758------------ - - - - -- 4 eo - --
(MCLAIN STREET) ----------------------------- ----- -------'-'---- ------------ +
--------------------- -------------------
--o — o— o— o— o-- o--- a--- o— o— o— o— o —c - -_
U S. HIGHWAY N0. 70

—S - -S ---�
EX. 36" STORM
/ �oQ T
o.
HDPE
�wq OpOS
s 9
0
°moo �6
ti O 'L
O
'L EXIST.
` 19 36" FES
PROPOSED 80 FT. -36" RCP
qp�\
9
�i --------------------
U.S. HIGHWAY 70 EAST (WEST BOUND)
------------ - - - - --
U.S. HIGHWAY 70 EAST (EAST BOUND)
M. R. ll U O ll If U V E twl L/-�) LJ 9 [INC.
LAND SURVEYING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING
License Number. F -1054
300 East Walnut Street
Goldsboro, N.C. 27530
www.kornegaysep com (919) 735 -5886 Fax: [phone]
N
,`,11111 CgR���I
``O�,
E 55 0
�c- SEAL
T % 16813
'����1111111 \11
J�
G
o+
0
1,+
_ .-------- - - - - --
I
1 PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING LOT
■.�
���
ju: • • •
POND
lol V I I I I 1
�RIPARI
.SAN BUFFER
PROPOSED 36" FES �b
s • ...... ' �- ZONE 2
• ''�''•' • } � ZONE 1
.. q rr
\ \ s TOP BANK . �. / \ .. .. _ .. _ . _ .. _ B
S —s - -s
`.� "�-- s-- s-- s-- s-- s-- s - -s --
RIPRAP APRON - - - - -- - -- ---------------------
- ------------------------
` EXISTING GUARD RAIL N.C. SECONDARY ROAD
-- ----------- ` (McLAIN STREE
IIA dt o 0 0 0
IMPACT AREA #1
NEUSE DISTURBANCE
ZONE 1 DISTURBED AREA= 236 SQ. FT. OR 0.005 AC. (PIPE AND RIP RAP APRON)
- - - - -- - ]IBM 119ENIM DISTURBED AREA TO BE GRADEQ AND REVEGETATED= 816 SQ. FT. OR 0.019 AC.
ZONE 2 DISTURBED AREA= 60 SQ. FT. OR 0.001 AC. (PIPE)
MUMN DISTURBED AREA TO BE GRADED AND REVEGETATED= 886 S.F. OR 0.020 AC.
TOTAL NEUSE BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER D TURBANC4 2 1 SQ. FT. OR 0.05 AC.
STREAM IMPACT DUE TO PIPING= 73 L.F�Z�4G_� IC L - ��'
STREAM IMPACT DUE TO RIP RAP APRON= 20 FT.
WETLANDS IMPACT= 422 SQ. FT. OR 0.01 AC. `YvA t W I-1
---------------------------------------
- - -- - J
----------------------------------------- -
U. S. HIGHWAY N0. 70
''--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
DRAWN BY: SHEET: �I
DESIGNED BY,
LK
DEACON JLK JON E5 A v TOGROUP 3
DATE: NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP WORK ORDER:
7 -7 -15 150013
SCALE: WAYNE COUNTY, N.C. CADD DWG:
1" = 50' 130157
�Y
a
lol V I I I I 1
�RIPARI
.SAN BUFFER
PROPOSED 36" FES �b
s • ...... ' �- ZONE 2
• ''�''•' • } � ZONE 1
.. q rr
\ \ s TOP BANK . �. / \ .. .. _ .. _ . _ .. _ B
S —s - -s
`.� "�-- s-- s-- s-- s-- s-- s - -s --
RIPRAP APRON - - - - -- - -- ---------------------
- ------------------------
` EXISTING GUARD RAIL N.C. SECONDARY ROAD
-- ----------- ` (McLAIN STREE
IIA dt o 0 0 0
IMPACT AREA #1
NEUSE DISTURBANCE
ZONE 1 DISTURBED AREA= 236 SQ. FT. OR 0.005 AC. (PIPE AND RIP RAP APRON)
- - - - -- - ]IBM 119ENIM DISTURBED AREA TO BE GRADEQ AND REVEGETATED= 816 SQ. FT. OR 0.019 AC.
ZONE 2 DISTURBED AREA= 60 SQ. FT. OR 0.001 AC. (PIPE)
MUMN DISTURBED AREA TO BE GRADED AND REVEGETATED= 886 S.F. OR 0.020 AC.
TOTAL NEUSE BASIN RIPARIAN BUFFER D TURBANC4 2 1 SQ. FT. OR 0.05 AC.
STREAM IMPACT DUE TO PIPING= 73 L.F�Z�4G_� IC L - ��'
STREAM IMPACT DUE TO RIP RAP APRON= 20 FT.
WETLANDS IMPACT= 422 SQ. FT. OR 0.01 AC. `YvA t W I-1
---------------------------------------
- - -- - J
----------------------------------------- -
U. S. HIGHWAY N0. 70
''--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
DRAWN BY: SHEET: �I
DESIGNED BY,
LK
DEACON JLK JON E5 A v TOGROUP 3
DATE: NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP WORK ORDER:
7 -7 -15 150013
SCALE: WAYNE COUNTY, N.C. CADD DWG:
1" = 50' 130157

SEC77ON 'A -A'
DRIVEWAY NO. 1
40 20 0 20 40
108 PAVEt�NT 6'
F7 7 F FINISHED GRADE
106
EXIST. GRADE
104
102 I 1 PROPOSED 36'
100 1
EXIST. INV.= 100.95
L EXIST. 36'. FES
98
PROPOSED 36' FES INV. =99.6
1' = 20' HORIZ
I`= 4' VERT.
SEC770N 'B -B' FINISHED GRADE
40 20 0 20 1 40
108
106 - - -
104 EXIST. GRADE
\ /
102 w
100 I I
98
1' = 20' HORIZ.
1' = 4' VERT.
EXIST. GRADE
D o " FCA W ', DRAWN BY'
SHEET:
R. V M mM g M v o JLK
DESIGNED BY:
19 LAND SURVEYING •ENGINEERING PLANNING SEAL JLK DEACON J ON E S A U T OG R O M p
License Number- F OF: 3
—1054 16813 ��Q Q p DATE: NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP WORK ORDER:
300 East Walnut Street 7 -7 -15
150013
Goldsboro, N C. 27530 �,,��;•.;,N;;;• rj.� WAYNE COUNTY, N.C.
www.kornegaysep.com (919) 735 -5886 Fax: [phone] ��j Y L, KO� SCALE' CADD DWG:
��/ � I � I rt ►�� 130157

11TF-
L
�I
PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING LOT
l�
6 r0 4
FN BUFFER
ZONE 2 N I
TOP OF BANK S -t- <,e4f-
-P OF BANK ._.._..�__s —_s
— S-- S-- s-- S - -S - -s S s - -s
�— RIPRAP APRON
50 o 25 50 100
/ �•4 ict �� O ��VA4r,„V-V1 inch = 50 ft.
J
to
IMPACT AREA #2 It
WETLAND IMPACT AREA= 19,715 SQ. FT. OR 0.37 AC.
JURISDICTIONAL DITCH IMPACT= 4,904 SQ. FT. OR 0.07 AC. ®�-
IMPACT AREA] C�p�q �>
NEUSE DISTURBANCE
ZONE 1 DISTURBED AREA= 438 SQ. FT. OR 0.010 AC. (PIPE AND RIP RAP APRON)
FT. OR 0. 16 AC. AREA TO BE GRADED AND REVEGETATED= 712 SQ.
ZONE 2 DISTURBED AREA= 113 SQ. FT OR 0.003 AC. (PIPE)
HADED AND REVEGETATED= 409
SQ. FT. OR 0.009 AC.
PIPE AND RIP RAP APRON)
—s - -S - -S - -S - -S - -S - -S - -S - -S --j
- , ---------------------------
PROPOSED
DRIVEWAY NO. 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 0-----O-----C ---------------------- --------------------------------
Sqa DRAWN BY. SHEET:
;�,Q�o DESIGNED 9Y: DEACON JONES gMTO (m[�OMp �
LAND SURVEYING • ENGINEERING PLANNING ,�_ : SEAL s f� /�p� II'--��v��J JLK
License Number- F -1054 p Q (� [i �1 p OF: 3
300 East Walnut Street 18813 ��� °A� NEW HOPE TOWNSHIP WORK ORDER:
Goldsboro, N.0 27530 '.••.
ft NEC,. 7 -7 -15 WAYNE COUNTY, N.C. 150013
www.korne a e com 919 735 -5886 Fax: 919 • 580 -9053 �� SCALE: CADD DWG:
9 Ys P ) ) ,�1iiiN���, 1° = 50' 130157

r k �
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA FIRM PANEL LOCATOR DIAGRAM LEGEND
ILI! JONS PANFI YID
/ oac FErr rr 5e Jo �r rr r 5e oc ) >S oa0 FEET L -- SPECIAL FLOOD FIAZARO AREAS ISFMAN SUBJECT TO
1 vn sp. .___ • -••
r em 000 FEET ... RV11NLNTIdH BY THE 1% ANNUAL olAl9Q FLOOD
. ,- . -. - �•�, �. F rr• Ilrr 1% arwW dsrm bw Roow..Y° bw� � •a Oe bad. Y M Emd
of Goldsboro
law 'r Aa ,a a u r 6M � F Hed weme m wry EM., yv *k sPws.�
I�ay� I,y w. Fx r,wtlra noon Msr
' A v" i` • `e OYW IuritdiTuo rR: d sprF.l Flmd Fred eFdrde tors .� AE,.W. AO. M wry. v. vtl vE TIC s�
. : i ifp.d Ekrwm Y •w .•am -awlwe dmwl'ur d Yr 1x rrxwl drr,w •md.
ZONE 1 V ~ �7O2S Y` 11Trra • W •.r Famd ELrwaua dmwnrrrd.
t,
.�,, % `��, r y. g • -1 lDM Y Fre Hand De ub/a - .
T f mNF AN Ymd daDlF• d 1 m 3 Foes wWBr .rem d PwdIN: a.a clam
4 hy t i
r ^w, ury - 1 f" � FNMwre MnMrrd.
+r. ® ]s : 'e'.•
so
y w w
N -ko �, - * + • r' elf � rz+ =� � 'c w ,J{ y ss ]] JO FdmermYred. d.IM4r Yr,�Mdl,6.ebdlb.
r T
/-'- t„. �K AA.. - , �' R r �• 1 r a ;7 "]r ZONF u aYoFEad Flv✓d Ares b ^erF/ Promoed hwn IM 1% vnu.l
bisarma
+ trod . ama mraml N+t wr
6 .rf;: Y a +r I. E.Ya ,.mood
!•?
ZONE ' t ✓e r f Iererbad.
a r S: tfaboro. 1 saw Aa m M waa»d Ira^, 1 x�npaeam F.dea
-'� ". .'��x• � E: C
urisdiction
r { , ;! r r
X011 � f Q f 1 f i. r � +•F 4-'� � ilOpU4AY AREAS IN ZONE AT
TM Y Y,e dsvl d• Iawr^
wr,r Yur rn� M
r �^
r bod.wy M
zw.w Y O
S
_ O k d aacmdrnarl m M tlru )ll w.rrW d.ee bad en Ye tamed wUou
2 -) p i 1` f OTHFR FLOOD AREAS
rYilltp ,F 3� Q r :! ZONE 1 _ {t ZONE Y _'£lf t. y, e- rl r>D V saw 1 ..m. d o.]x mw drsry emd: d 1x Ir.0 w sw
DATUM INFORMATION
TM r •, •� A`_ .. (, 1- ' .,_.. EI ni n rlb • • °i M OTHER AREAS
prof•etlan aced n d,e pmpsmlron or Nis map w.s dN Mort. um5n. ...,I (i1fE of Ga1d66,dro
Sum F'sru (FIPSZONE 31001 TM Y•auutsl dataa rraa IM Honk AI ­n n L 'I �+ •0 j . 1 _ -s _ '�I E010 a /uaa dew.wrd m 6r nwde M n]x .Sur dwo Eo>p.in.
des d IM GRSBD dripanid D0.Nerarcee n Mum eeiadd D grxuon o, Q traicr a qr �E7 dICElOn a .,. •r w Ad ial� D Mw F wlYd, !nd NvrrY re u,d.mr,drrd. M podde.
U - all Trerov ma Mmaw Jorua uaad m IM PrOaAnn PI FIRM. I. wRCasrt s,,
j - w'pn:., rney ra,h in alight P ilarol dMtiencas nmap taturea acroae ,�' .,�y '• r.aaq, � t, f 4,b M " I •'J *., ZONE X, ® COASTAL BARRIER RF50lIR(15 SYSIEM --I AREAS
i daaplma boprmsde Tna• WMennm m nm ahect IM .<w,rrY of Nb City of Goldsboro + F• s4 , - zaNF Y err , w .+ � i` i/t Y g rw.'It .
FWM. NI coordinates on Nis map an in U S. Survey Fan. w.rr. ! \
1 u s sD,ver Fool . 1100/D93T Me1rs EsTrRterritorid r' -B�, ••' F - �!� Ym,eE .roll, .row.^, a sPme� na
Fbod erevetbns on V,m mw are rdere— Io tlM NAM Amariran Van—
JURBdICtlOn s `/ / j , >} ' `` • ;. m tared M.w
Debvr d 1988 INaw eel. Tnee Ilona absa0om 370255 _.. <•. ` =• t. r• �., }^
met M cenaemd to - ,.
�i!- �r A 43x rwW tl,u¢e imdpYi Eowtl✓1
and , tan al. NAl`D Its — 0 na same s•rtleal daft, n evtipe F
ZONE % 4� �.- yF•
oMw, Mfwwn NAw BB eno Ne N.bo,Ml ceoaafb vaNOe wwm d 1a1B e � �+. •. < rr � v .. ✓ - :1 •I — — — — H°°d`rn Y°'^de)
INGW Igloo bean pules Id seal NoM UraYr oouMy lies offam .w , _� "e+ �•4 '�
win —bN:1 b tM NGw M %IiRJ Wamm Nr rots m r..eea wnn9 tM ilV of S.I bma dw,
n 1 fhia aulsvdM romrl RRM. TM ohrla b onto cch n shown w �J j ^ y LIRS rM OvA
i , ...
ads FIRM W nd re alnwn In TM vrtma dsfMn °Nast arela babes. Wrrere • _ Jl o° �.,.� -.� -- EoudrY dMd^F Spam, Fbm HY i Mv. a dMl«ens
Ca,arrY boundary sw • 0paderg morn w.N pwswaw NGYD 1.9 •om aMrians aq - Y `, • - ��p.�d_ ear flood el.wdwa, bm d.al. b amd wham
w cninaw,e. an r nand dNr Ms lwn u Hid ew aPWiad donro tM ' 's'l. ).; r.. r ,t, i s,t
Fralbn d Ns sbtawida tonal FIRM Sea Shc m 61 d 1M h=cwVhh h9 yrlr• ,. 'iELS 1167) _ d�"irmr�i m Yes• `eM< rea.e w+Ywm wrN �me:
ood INRImNFa Sbdy sport m cibb, %ncha, Idemumn on Na mrvtifbn • �� ,/' ' . <''�
If eNvsnona belwaan NAw ®std NO 29. To obWn coon, hir mbn. ; •' , -
da lIkIii n. and /or IouMn imammm� ill b•asb Garbs ahcwh on this ,nap. , • ; Z m as rush A.rrmlmn vwa Il.oa d bas
wane corrlact U1e NoM UmYne Geoeetk Survey d IM adbap aMwn Oelow. _ . v R + .:• •...., `.t • r + ON[ �� � remmr s!
Yw may axo cronba w , .1—i1. Sam® Br.rbl a dr NalgrW G•oaelic �, •�i - �y
Su m (101)111 -S1E.3 or root b vvabaM n vrww.rm ror.mv. � H � ------
op Trran d
`f 1 J sr or FO' v]> ]o Cwgaa mordMmrr NnIid m De Nmh Arrrv:m�
W C. Geapmm survey I�.nn vwul D.wm aNm Tabb / :%ei. • d✓' ? o.•a d 1903 D4to pl
rn roast is 27 sYT•m gem/ veal o.e.^ aNm IN - -, f, .... lNA .z,ea<• 1Dpo-.r w�.r.l u.we. M.®r em ed.. ,a,,. 1e
"•phi - 801 wMw _ fd) : - t�:�e '�- ~ �` •t l ^1 Z ,+), rb FlF1� '��31IXI. Smk PW,e NV]I4r wee
wxw.rcaa.abta.nc.us
I sanaY: hwu IN fir.. BM5610 R FM, r�aErm 4edNY 5rM a•d, roll nm m¢I.u°m
m de Dram Ildorrralmr wane, d•Ar FlRM peso
r� t \.Y• bNE Y .�r2 BM6610® er dery Ybmltl ��alm anY FlsM ane0. w
All sba.ma Iiatw in Na Flood I1h2eN Data TBblo bNOU wa mudw by i �• N •M1.6 WrM9r
direst melho0a using Bad a— ONr how Marl dab a— w Isis _ I � V•ya+,•,
map mar hale been stilled using °lawn • —W arWyau or amdw dmeimd
op m.
-I,anelyen. Man the F d In tM R &. soups cooties by Ness _
sruheea b coniairrw in tlm Food Ineurerru 9ud1 ,.port
rwrwYw w u. —
FLOOD HAZARD DATA TABLE
A.a., s..w InI aN.eaar.�aear � •i� O ' - e
IYMIrw�
IBh L,' BUD REEF F
SOY
I DDB B30
02T IDD/115 I
I DI) t ]1e aY 88/11) I i
I
011
z.)Je NA
I a3a 3ses I.310 1ms J 111
NA 1wa 35/4 I dr iY H
I 05 1 s.ms 1,390 w.e 1e 1e9 - � -
I OaE
­21 1.310 I.E. Y 140 ssJ +N.��, i Y SnF�' n•JJ'p•
I Del e.a9J NA 10)s .1.
IRR.HLAND �REEt % *y, s Jv ,' •�- MaZj3' . �'•A .
pp6 616 NA iRI .1110 F' j• • ��
0]t ]Ae6 NA
oa• B.se NA w3 3s /aa I 6p 600 ra&r �'✓/�, F '=,�' �� I I��fr
I nee
$7. .)Be NA 1N..
t \ V \ GRID NORTH
0)3 105 NA 102] ee /a I : t vrF `�Ty1 ` WP SCALE Ol• 400 (1 S. 0oo )��TEPS
I 066 0.IB1 MA 191.6 w �� W- 1 -_
r•.. lee ODD
100 9A]) NA 101.8 106/95
11. 11 A., NA 100.0 19/16 ".•• r a Ie
sTONEYfEEY :c
•Fry.n.I1.23h 6ma1 ww r_w.I w ar ":1w'6c.�ww.r.,r.I .....W."nM.U.�r._.I ,r.rLsa. r e•Ba+eFCrrr ;,.
. � vy,y,i' , � ir . r ��c.� .:_ ,• t .r ' -' _y, s ' � . ,+ . �F+f•:J � . � - •� . . a• rw . 1 t
1
166 T 600 L
v
PANEL 0070.1 ) G716 zT `F ,
d ; FIRM
III
t e.
1011E FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
Fea f p" Q +w \� © NORTH CAROLINA
Is PANEL 3519
i►c, I ! '71 �� .. I
�.r v -_ ''r ' ♦ ,y ��� k(J
tw ®J i £3E1D T am R" ET • rr eI Fo 1 m m IRE IT—- PANEL 3W „ 5• m s Den � H Tm r RffT Ar, ` (1� w cn. ww utvc l rr . . cto ies N„ a vAz x [s
.T
'
�lMy/
NOTES TO USERS
a` hip
Thu map is Ioniser Nkni,l nna M hai n l Fbod Inwraww Propnm ftdoas rest Grtein m not In Spacul Pl Hard Area may M p.mcd 1 by fls•d astral TNa map mRacis mom a•mi and into -dma •tree sh•n al e°nri0 ,tla.•sun IdIEOFanF�
rl 01, tlanOf, d crass wI_, m hb iIng. pali-Ihd, I— bul dmNiq. sw2es atractama. Raley m Smion a4 -Fbod PmiM Man r ” d Ne Floyd Inwrr,u Omma ,moryn on Ne PWAM, FWM III No jurudicton. Tn. Ilowpnins era Iloodwali byes u area d M h RgsYalr a amp ersti m rb wwe am
It an ih sec TM Dashatilr w r•y„Ft• ,Mao W cwu6sa III pFHLhW upMSed Stud, r—. 1w rdormmion on lbod 1-1 abucluras in Ne judsSeOOna. tat wwe ImsNr. hom the pravlorn FIRM m•y Irw o•en W,..Dm m mnhInn .
.`� r ,•....,u,w c -.... K. w addrnonW Bond frMrd YdwrMdon I u Mae raw warn Fic,IcII oodpwsaons. N • , (which Fbil Prd -ibn and PhV0d 1Y CD
4 0aa by inlomin�on eM paopnid tau used m drdap me FIRM were aeTe:.nea Yes^ I N tZ. h eM Fbw Iawlig Spud, upon isub, mob d wf ies h a by cwhi, FEFFC1hE bETF OF Ham YIMS1Mla MTE auP PAIEI CD
r
TI obla , moo dNrad Ydormeoon n yes wore W 11-W 01•ntnws MFEm va p s orpr,vauaa. nc6dnp 010 parYCpstvp tits, mmwnMwaI. ebb arb L— dsul may A- warn darnel omarv:a dal drier horn whal .s arlaw., on an. —0. aBLnsaa i9i
a ,110, }lsaf asym Iran bean mr,nnw. uasa tis an —mgmd H, corod[ iM FYmd apeRa..rm /o: Dtl,m room TM women Imaa 1w Nu FIRM Y aerW nlagn, ean-+w e
R06Ne. Roadwh, Dme Md /w Summon d SOMvnr E4�ROna — DorrtN„ad wiNm pan d fM Nn D.,a Onhop'! Program TM lane pert° d cIa— Iw Yea Plesa i rslar m IM a•pam•n paw am ladaa Iw sn owwew map Dr Na oounn Of[pat sh?"Or MM�Ia 10 na tall,,
B., flood abr.v,u sway IFS) ram- Na: _'D•d•a ;hn FIRM Uara doutl M Inagan n 20DO Idomufion rb phmpnm: Mu aapp5w W Na mcsl cPnmeeA -) .fowl,; IM Inlaid d tip P ab, comrnnin map ya0ailon wnraa, mm • liabna 01 ,e •� , �.m ���.,
aware Mat BFE• alrOw, pre I, FIRM raprarN rou/tlad wNda-NW Naranwm. Then --FEW Des map .pe ifraMne wen DwuiOtied fM pmlernw swans Fa Coemnia — mrWMp Hirchi , Food Inewtirce pr°7am dNa b aacn
Tn., disco FloPd Iraumrrre Rate Map IFWM) wa produced enough • ur/0ue BFE. an Imrlaaa b hoot, nww•nu nano purpose w+n sod ah°uld wA M used davNwn•nt If da M.• map Se OaosWTW mmwne Iw dr '--- ' —' dIPW FIRM a —1 a • b" d Na p•rWa on vwvd •M1 n IP �.
Pormti.6ya cannamlip Mrwaan Ine Sbb DI Nwln C1101M ens N. FNkmI a tM sae Sono d mod of raY 4II.—ddn. Admdr^gn, fw,d ahl —cIn all Iw wd.i 1 nfo� n .M�f baaa map w.Pr.tio,1 EFFEMVE DATE NAP NUMBER
Ensg•NF,, Management Agency IFEMA) TM Sine of N.- Card,ru Ms Dmsaniw '" DIe FS mpun aboAU M _chid m <°rrRm n weh d1• FIRM for P.NO H you h•va'••tlash ahsat this asp . o, aueetbns m,cerrdrlg The Netbnal Fom '
:npwnwnt.e . brp nrm apyrwcn d Fbod°Inn -- imn1.n1 to chi of cpnabuction rm /r soedphwh ,narrgemat Baa map lawns snows on Mis map, fu<h n cerParete 1LIts. am Maw W d1a 1aum,ca prwram In ganaml, I— cell 1 -r .FBA W (1- 0)7.21S27) I, des DECEMBER 2, 1DD5 37203519001
dv <om. aasor]aIw won mdup Tn a x erlmnemfw by iM sbb a oam- most ut,f . deb a iahhN n sM j— of pubhu0on. Champ. L this a•ghlhls FEW w.b*. m www.larrb.DOV Fw mmmurly raP ,wen IrNitiy pbm aaaaFe.
Bmfem:Mivs of dm r �+9.*.m cm -, MINI
o tip boat.^ n drs iccN-1 Aa . an d ms •Mon. w laedr ." _ d w,i w arcs —I-, and — JIFlarw Derwsen llilta . peon waerraa Glee• .F4 , Has I.bilMw. Map rr.ai .load Hlmry bhY Iamad h dry M1ad haa�
SY:a d N OarI,_ ha i—Iihi 'n a Ceeparg Tall —Slam NINHI —I see - The moo~ wave oases on h,*.k ronsMmudre wM regem t° rnnwn iM aPwaphrste common n off eW or weosee to .arMr Lvrrra corldiYwa of M ew.omnnwrp Flood Inawmrce spay nOOrL lone d My Revmm� (LOMRI Or 1e11er liahakiiiiin
win FFMA m produce ono re main Rl. digar FIRM rpD.anMnb d Ne NabW F ,iI maw•nrw F w,— P--, — and don WMdr 1 bwrrarw .rid bam map latu,a d MW ArrwWrran: ILOMN I—M Poniene of Nis Penal old d0ial yraiona of IN' 1 de`wmare Y Ema Ysr Y.raWe Y diaaawa. Fvum p,r imrAwrm rpNL D,r
Dm0'�; Dona_ m M wo,rMC r• Na I— __ Slwy type^ b, Ne N'adNam FIRM ara, M a aa•N. YW ma aartb genus• Fl•aplels Raw" RrMrr waMila Ned' Careh i DMbn d Ab��f rte Nmbrd Ferri Imearrw rgrr^ +art
www.nefloodmaps.eom r r.p���a oaa as�aam `Prom da caiEiAAsn fPh'` vaee.ea
Iw �m(.6ea F< awes, dae.s.wy Aary..a Nasal Ham ae:vrm hrTs` Sutt of North Carolina
Charmay ah, M rrdW W Fu m1�0g350-asm aw du'v lveMea nwwwirnm"Amc 19191 ns J000 I- HOD- t]aien wwJ.rMPAdID ` Iii., Fcdttel ClatritOC7' ManaF�ml AKal7'